Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2020 Apr 19;30:105490. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105490

Experimental data on activity catalyst TiO2/Fe3O4 under natural solar radiation conditions

A Castro-Sánchez 1, R Camargo-Amado 1, F Machuca-Martínez 1,
PMCID: PMC7182709  PMID: 32346563

Abstract

In this document, the photocatalytic activity of TiO2/Fe3O4, prepared by the mixing of the pure oxides, was studied. The photocatalytic degradation of aqueous Methylene Blue (MB) solutions (10 and 30 ppm) was performed, the TiO2/Fe3O4 catalysts in 80/20, 50/50 and 20/80 mass ratios were used during the test, artificial sunlight and natural solar radiation were tested at laboratory and pilot plant scale respectively. Besides, the kinetic reactions were evaluated according to the Langmuir-Hinshelwood model, the apparent velocity constants (kapp) were obtained for the TiO2/Fe3O4 catalysts.

In the laboratory test, the TiO2/Fe3O4 catalyst (80/20) had a performance for 93.04% of discoloration, kapp = 0.0238 min−1, while for TiO2/Fe3O4 (50/50, 20/80) had an 83.46%, 65.00% for discoloration of MB and the kapp values were 0.0154 min−1 and 0.0098 min−1, respectively.

In the solar test at pilot scale, the percentages of discoloration of 24.32%, and 57.78%, with kapp values of 0.00037 min−1, 0.00121 min−1 respectively were obtained for TiO2/Fe3O4 (80/20), a MB solution of 30 ppm, a load of 0.1 g/L and 0.3 g/L of the catalyst respectively.

Keywords: Dye, Catalyst support, Compound parabolic collector, Pilot plant, Magnetite, TiO2


Specifications table

Subject Chemical Engineering
Specific subject area Advanced Oxidation Processes
Type of data Tables and Figures
How data were acquired The TiO2/Fe3O4 materials were analysed by FT-IR, the raw data of degradation and accumulated energy was obtained by UV–vis spectrophotometry, and radiometry UV respectively.
Data format Raw and analysed
Parameters for data collection All experimental tests were carried out to laboratory and pilot scale. A batch type photoreactor was used under the irradiation provided by a xenon lamp in a solar simulator, with a light intensity of 150 klx (kilolux), radiation intensity of 500 W/m2 and with a cooling system. Pilot-scale, CPC reactor was used exposed under sunlight, following the reaction up to 100 kJ/m2
Description of data collection TiO2/Fe3O4 was prepared by a process of mixing the pure oxides in mass ratios of 80%, 50% and 20% of TiO2, the photocatalytic activity was evaluated by the discoloration of MB. Laboratory scale teste were made with catalysts at 10 and 30 ppm MB in batch reactors under a SUNTEST system for 2 h. After 30 min of adsorption-desorption equilibrium, the first sample was taken, then the lamp was turned on and a sample of the first half hour was taken every 10 min; then at 60 min and finally at 120 min. The absorbances of the samples were taken and the MB color concentration was known.
The best performing catalyst in the first stage were selected for sunlight testing. These tests were carried out on a pilot under natural solar radiation with 10 and 30 ppm MB solutions in a compound parabolic collector (CPC) reactor, and showing every 10 kJ/m2 up to 100 kJ/m2 of accumulated energy.
Data source location Universidad del Valle, A.A. 25,360, Calle 13 No. 100–00 Cali, Colombia.
Data accessibility The data is found only in this article.

Value of the data

  • The TiO2/Fe3O4 is a useful catalyst because its photocatalytic and magnetic properties allow the degradation of dye and then it can later be removed easily

  • The data can be used to model reactors under real conditions.

  • The information recorded here is important in the work of innovating in profitable and sustainable catalysts in its industrial application for wastewater treatment.

1. Data

The data describes the obtaining of the TiO2/Fe3O4 catalyst and its use in the degradation of Methylene Blue (MB) solutions by photocatalysis. The mixing catalyst was prepared easily with promising functionality due to the excellent data obtained from the degradation of the model pollutant and its ease to remove it from the remaining medium [1], [2], [3], [4].

Fig. 1 shows the photocatalysts of TiO2/Fe3O4 with different proportions of the oxides. Fig. 2 illustrates the infrared spectra of the synthesized catalysts and Fe3O4, as well as in Fig. 3 with the FT-IR spectra of TiO2/Fe3O4 (80/20) and pure TiO2.

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

Synthesized TiO2/Fe3O4 catalysts (a) 80/20; (b) 50/50; (c) 20/80.

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

FT-IR spectrum (a) TiO2/Fe3O4 (80/20) (b) TiO2/Fe3O4 (50/50), (c) TiO2/Fe3O4 (20/80), (d) Fe3O4.

Fig. 3.

Fig 3

FT-IR spectrum (a) TiO2/Fe3 (80/20), (b) pure TiO2.

Fig. 4 compares the discoloration achieved in laboratory tests with the photocatalysts that were prepared. Fig. 5, Fig. 6 illustrate the variation in the degradation of MB according to the initial dye concentration 10 ppm and 30 ppm, respectively.

Fig. 4.

Fig 4

MB discoloration under simulated solar reactor by catalysts of TiO2, TiO2/Fe3O4 and Fe3O4. [catalyst] = 0.3 g/L.

Fig. 5.

Fig 5

Discoloration of MB under solar simulator at lab test [MB] = 10 ppm, [catalyst]=0.3 g/L.

(■) TiO2, (●) TiO2/Fe3O4 (80/20), (♦) TiO2/Fe3O4 (50/50), (∆) TiO2/Fe3O4 (20/80), (×) Fe3O4.

Fig. 6.

Fig 6

Discoloration of MB under solar simulator at lab test [MB] = 30 ppm, [catalyst]=0.3 g/L.

(●) TiO2/Fe3O4 (80/20), (♦) TiO2/Fe3O4 (50/50), (∆) TiO2/Fe3O4 (20/80), (×) Fe3O4.

The discoloration levels of MB solutions in a CPC solar reactor with accumulated energy of 100 kJ/m2 for different concentrations of TiO2/Fe3O4 (80/20), TiO2 and Fe3O4 respectively, are compared in Fig. 7, Fig. 8.

Fig. 7.

Fig 7

Comparison of MB discoloration by of TiO2/Fe3O4 (80/20) under natural solar test at pilot scale. [TiO2/Fe3O4] = 0.1 g/L and 0.3 g/L.

Fig. 8.

Fig 8

Comparison of MB discoloration under natural solar test at pilot scale, by of TiO2 and Fe3O4 [catalysts] = 0.1 g/L and 0.3 g/L.

Table 1 shows the adsorption values of the catalysts for a 30 ppm methylene blue solutions. Table 2 and Table 3 shows the percentages of discoloration and the rate constant for reactions at laboratory scale and pilot scale. Finally, Fig. 9, Fig. 10 present the monitoring of the reaction (C/Co) as a function of the accumulated solar energy for two concentrations of MB with the TiO2/Fe3O4 (80/20), 0.1 g/L and 0.3 g/L loads, in your order.

Table 1.

Adsorption percentage of catalysts on dark stage, [MB]= 30 ppm, [catalyst]= 0.3 g/L.

Catalyst % Adsorption
TiO2 10.19
TiO2/Fe3O4 (80/20) 17.15
TiO2/Fe3O4 (50/50) 16.07
TiO2/Fe3O4 (20/80) 10.97
Fe3O4 0.70

Table 2.

Percent discoloration of MB under simulated solar radiation (120 min), and the apparent constant of the first order (kapp), [catalysts] = 0.3 g/L.

10 ppm
30 ppm
Catalysts % discoloration kapp (min−1) % discoloration kapp (min−1)
TiO2 99.93 0.0828 99.32 0.0389
TiO2/Fe3O4 (80/20) 99.93 0.0768 93.04 0.0238
TiO2/Fe3O4 (50/50) 99.94 0.0767 83.46 0.0154
TiO2/Fe3O4 (20/80) 99.88 0.0585 65.00 0.0098
Fe3O4 20.38 0.0019 12.02 0.0011

Table 3.

Percent discoloration of MB under natural solar radiation and the average apparent first order rate constant (kapp) with 100 kJ/m2 accumulated energy.

[catalysts] = 0.1 g/L
10 ppm
30 ppm
% discoloration kapp (m3/kJ) % discoloration kapp (m3/kJ)
TiO2 99.05 0.00854 71.57 0.00132
TiO2/Fe3O4 (80/20) 92.86 0.00318 24.32 0.00037

[catalysts] = 0.3 g/L
TiO2 99.02 0.00693 89.93 0.00261
TiO2/Fe3O4 (80/20) 99.11 0.00626 57.78 0.00121

Fig. 9.

Fig 9

Degradation of AM vs UV energy accumulated. 0.1 g/L of TiO2/Fe3O4 (80/20).

Fig. 10.

Fig 10

Degradation of AM vs UV energy accumulated. 0.3 g/L of TiO2/Fe3O4(80/20).

2. Experimental design, materials, and methods

2.1. Material

Percentages of 20, 50 and 80% by weight of TiO2 (AEROXIDE® TiO2 P-25, Evonik) and Fe3O4 (iron oxide NP (II, III), Sigma-Aldrich) were used for the synthesis of TiO2/Fe3O4 catalysts; solutions of NaOOCCH3•3H2O (sodium acetate trihydrate, ACS Fisher Scientific) and CH3COOH (commercial acetic acid) were also used to adjust the pH; Methylene Blue solutions, analytical grade (Mol Labs), were prepared as a model contaminant.

2.2. Photocatalytic reactors

For the development of the present investigation, a batch type photoreactor was used, this is a Pyrex type beaker, covered with a Petri dish to avoid evaporation of the MB solutions due to the radiation of the xenon lamp in a solar simulator, ORIGINAL HANAU SUNTEST. In this system, the lamp is located approximately 10 cm from the reactor, the light intensity is 150 klx (kilolux), radiation intensity of 500 W/m2. Additionally, the system is provided with recirculation of water around and ventilation (60m3/h), to avoid heating the solutions above 45 °C.

The Compound Parabolic Collector (CPC) type solar reactor was used for pilot and solar scale tests. This reactor consists of 6 borosilicate glass tubes, connected in series mounted on the reflective aluminum collector surface that distributes direct and diffuse solar radiation; each tube has a length of 1.5 m, a diameter of 0.025 m and 1.4 mm thick, which comprises a total irradiated area of 0.225m2. The hydraulic system of this reactor operates with a centrifugal pump that recirculates the fluid through the irradiated section of the tubes to the recirculation and mixing tank. The flow rate provided was approximately 24 Lmin-1, which ensures a turbulent flow (Re > 10000), with a volume of 28 L.

2.3. Experimental

3.5 g of the TiO2/Fe3O4 catalysts were prepared in percentages of 20, 50 and 80% by weight of TiO2. Thus, for the TiO2/Fe3O4 catalyst 20% by weight of TiO2, 0.7 g of TiO2 and 2.8 g of Fe3O4 were taken for the 20% by weight catalyst of TiO2 and dispersed separately in 200 ml of filtered water. Each suspension was adjusted to pH 6 with NaOOCCH3•3H2O and CH3COOH solutions, taken to an ultrasound bath (Elma-Transsonic TS 540) for 2 min to achieve a good dispersion of each oxide and mixed in equal volumetric proportions. This mixture was also taken to the ultrasound bath for 6 min, then filtered with a Millipore microfiltration membrane (0.45 μm) in a polysulfone vacuum filtration funnel. The solid obtained was removed and allowed to dry in the convection drying oven at 60 °C, to finally macerate to obtain a powder of very fine particles for testing [5]. This procedure was followed to obtain TiO2 catalysts at 50% and 80% by weight.

For laboratory experiments with artificial sunlight [6], solutions of 10 and 30 ppm of analytical grade MB (Mol Labs) in filtered water were prepared to perform 300 mL discoloration tests of these MB solutions in the photoreactor. The experiments were performed for each concentration of MB with 0.3 g of each of the three catalysts prepared (TiO2/Fe3O4 20/80, 50/50 and 80/20) and with 0.3 g for the targets, corresponding to TiO2 and Fe3O4; they were suspended by stirring (mechanical) at natural pH of the solutions (7.3 - 7.5). Stirring was done in the dark for 30 min before irradiation to reach the adsorption-desorption equilibrium of the dye on the catalyst [7]. After 30 min of equilibrium, the first 3 mL sample was taken with a syringe, then the lamp was turned on and the first half hour was sampled every 10 min; then at 60 min and finally at 120 min of having started lighting. At all times 3 mL of sample was taken, and at the end of the process the volume in the reactor was 285 mL.

The experiments on a solar scale began with the preparation of the 10 ppm and 30 ppm MB solutions in the mixing tank, according to the volume of work and then the pump was put into operation to facilitate mixing and achieve a flow with an initial concentration in steady state; After 3 min a sample was taken, the catalyst was added and the tank was closed. During this preparation and for a time of 30 min, from the addition of the catalyst (in concentrations of 0.1 g/L and 0.3 g/L), the photo-reactor is protected with a black cover to prevent the reaction from starting earlier that the substrate adsorption equilibrium is reached on the catalyst surface [8]. After 30 min in which the adsorption-desorption equilibrium is guaranteed, a sample of the circulating solution was taken and the reactor was discovered, and from that moment the process of solar discoloration was followed by measuring the accumulated energy until reaching a value of 100 kJ/m2 as the standard solar irradiance, by means of the radiometer and the UV-A probe located near and in the same position of the reactor [9], every 10 kJ/m2 up to 100 kJ/m2 samples were taken of the fluid that exits the tubes from the reactor and returned to the mixing tank.

2.4. Analytical techniques

Infrared Spectroscopy (Jasco/4100–Jasco Corporation FT-IR spectrometer, transmittance with KBr tablet) was used to observe some of the structural characteristics of the synthesized catalysts. To obtain the spectrum of the MB dye, a UV–VIS spectrophotometer (SpectroQuant Merck Pharo 300) was used and through the same technique the absorbency was measured in relation to the color of the samples taken in the experiments. The energy accumulated in the solar-scale experiments was monitored using a photo-radiometer (Delta Ohm-HD2102.2, with LP 471 UVA probe) to track the system in the time of solar exposure that affects the surface of the system. In addition, a portable DO dissolved oxygen meter (5-Star Plus Thermo Scientific Orion, with DO probe) was used.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Universidad del Valle for the support. The authors thank to M.N. Machuca-Jerez for review the English Language.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105490.

Contributor Information

R. Camargo-Amado, Email: ruben.camargo@correounivalle.edu.co.

F. Machuca-Martínez, Email: fiderman.machuca@correounivalle.edu.co.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.xml (395B, xml)
mmc2.xlsx (188.4KB, xlsx)

References

  • 1.Ciccotti L., do Vale L.A.S., Hewer T.L.R., Freire R.S. Fe3O4@TiO2 preparation and catalytic activity in heterogeneous photocatalytic and ozonation processes. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015;5:1143–1152. doi: 10.1039/c4cy01242a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jiang Y., Zheng R., Shen Z., Zhang Y. Preparation of TiO2/c/Fe3O4 magnetic composite catalyst and research of its photocatalytic performance. IOP Conf. Ser. 2018;382:1–7. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/382/2/022010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gebrezgiabher M., Gebreslassie G., Gebretsadik T., Yeabyo G., Elemo F., Bayeh Y., Thomas M., Linert W. A C-doped TiO2Fe3O4 nanocomposite for photocatalytic dye degradation under natural sunlight irradiation. J. Compos. Sci. 3. 2019;75:1–11. doi: 10.3390/jcs3030075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Li Y., Zhang M., Guo M., Wang X. Preparation and properties of a nano TiO2Fe3O4 composite superparamagnetic photocatalyst. Rare Metals. 2009;28:423–427. doi: 10.1007/s12598-009-0082-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Choi J., Youn H., Kwak B., Wang Q. Preparation and characterization of TiO2-masked Fe3O4 nano- particles for enhancing catalytic combustion of 1,2-dichlorobenzene and incineration of polymer wastes. Appl. Catalysis B. 2009;91:210–216. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.05.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Herrmann J., photocatalysis Heterogeneous. fundamentals and applications to the removal of various types of aqueous pollutants. Catal Today. 1999;53:115–129. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00107-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dagher S., Soliman A., Ziout A., Tit N., Hilal-Alnaqbi A., Khashan S., Alnaimat F., Qudeiri J.A. Photocatalytic removal of methylene blue using titania- and silicacoated magnetic nanoparticles. Mater. Res. Express. 2018;5:1–13. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/aacad4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Benhabiles O., Mahmoudi H., Lounici H., Goosen M.F.A. Effectiveness of a photocatalytic organic membrane for solar degradation of methylene blue pollutant. Desalination Water Treat. 2015:1–10. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1061954. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Molano M., Mueses M.A., Machuca F.M. Modeling and experimental evaluation of a non-isothermal photocatalytic solar reactor: temperature effect on the reaction rate kinetics. Ingeniería y Competitividad. 2017;2(19):143–154. doi: 10.25100/iyc.v19i2.5301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.xml (395B, xml)
mmc2.xlsx (188.4KB, xlsx)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES