Skip to main content
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences logoLink to Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
. 2020 Jan 31;27(5):1265–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.01.028

New mutations of locus control region in Saudi sickle patients

Faris Q Alenzi 1,
PMCID: PMC7182994  PMID: 32346334

Abstract

Sickle cell anemia (SCA) is a common hematological disease affecting humans. Detection of a single base pair mutation in β-globin gene is an important diagnostic tool for SCA. The aim was to study the molecular survey of locus control regions (LCR) in Saudi patients with sickle cell anemia, and to identify the genetic variables and their clinical manifestations.

Methodology

Blood samples from 69 unrelated sickle cell disease patients were obtained from the KKUH, Riyadh between 2017–2019. In this study, the DNA was extracted and PCR was performed. Additional PCR amplifications reactions covering the LCR were performed by using another different set of primers. Seven specific primer pairs were used to amplify seven regions in the locus control region (LCR) of β globin family. The generated fragments were sequenced to identify the possible alterations in this region.

Results

The results gained from sequencing experiments revealed a wide range of genomic alterations.

 A total of 69 gene alterations have been recognized in the locus control region;-

 The first fragment LCR-HS1 shows 20 alterations;

 The second fragment LCR-HS2 revealed six changes;

 The third fragment LCR-HS3 shows many changes;

 The fifth LCR-HS5 region revealed four changes;

 The sixth fragment LCR-HS6 revealed eight changes;

 The seventh LCR-HS7 fragment demonstrates ten changes.

Conclusion

It clear that this study has successfully identified LCR mutations for random Saudi patients with SCD. The above results should be taken further to set up management strategies to improve outcomes.

1. Introduction

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a chronic hereditary disease not only in the developing countries but also in the developed world. There are more than 500,000 newly diagnosed infants, and about 200,000 people with sickle cell anaemia per year, according to the World Health Organization (Weatherall and Clegg, 2001, Williams and Weatherall, 2012, WHO report, 2006),

Genetic blood diseases including SCD and thalessemia are caused by molecular changes in specific blood proteins called globins. Haemoglobin (Hb) is made up of four chains of globin, each of which carries the heme group, which is associated with oxygen (Schechter, 2008). SCD is one of the most common and aggressive red blood cell (RBC) disorders, and is caused by abnormal haemoglobin known as HbS (Ashley-Koch et al., 2000). SCD results from a substitution of adenine (A) to thymine (T) in 6th codon of β-globin. SCD is featured by many signs such as: inflammation, stroke, chronic haemolysis, and acute chest pain. Abnormal RBC shape causing them to lose their flexibility and turn into the form of solid sickles (Lionnetet al., 2012).

In Saudi Arabia, SCD was first identified in the eastern region in 1960 by Lehman (1963), which leads to many subsequent studies at the regional and national level to determine the clinical and genetic background of SCD. In Saudi Arabia, SCD is a relatively common hereditary disorder, ranging from 0.4 to 8% while SCD carriers ranged from 2% to 27%. These estimates do not include neonatal screening, which may increase the real frequency of the disease (Jastaniah, 2011).

There are more than three million people had these genetic blood diseases in the Saudi Arabia, of which 30% in the Eastern Region (Al-Naseri, 2009). El-Hazmi and others demonsated two different types of sickle cell anaemia, the average type dominated in the eastern region, while the severe type observed in most patients in the south western region (El-Hazmi, 1979, El-Hazmi, 1983, El-Hazmi, 1985, El-Hazmi et al., 1990, El-Hazmi et al., 1991, El-Hazmi, 1992, El-Hazmi and Warsy, 1996, El-Hazmi and Warsy, 1999, Al-Qurashi et al., 2008).

The aim was to study the molecular survey of locus control regions (LCR) in Saudi patients with sickle cell anemia, and to identify the genetic variables and their clinical manifestations.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Patients

The study was conducted on 69 of sickle cell anemia patients selected randomly from the attending the blood diseases clinic at King Khalid University Hospital (KKUH, Riyadh, KSA) from different regions of Saudi Arabia between June2017–June2019. Hematological and biochemical measurements and history of each patient were investigated. The study protocol respected the most recent Declaration of Helsinki, written informed consent and Research Ethics Committee approval were obtained from all cases.

2.2. Sample

10 ml of venous blood was withdrawn from each patient and distributed to two tubes (each containing 5 ml) of ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA).

2.3. Extraction of DNA

DNA was extracted using Qiagen DNA extraction kit, according to the approved protocol by GentraPuregene Handbook 09/2007.

2.4. Primers & PCR

Primers were designed, requested and obtained through the Oligo ordering online. PCR primers were used (see Table 1).). Thirty-five cycles of PCR, with denaturation at 94o C for 30 s, annealing at 60o C for 1 min, and extension at 72o C for 1 min, were performed on a programmed-temperature system (Hybaid OmniGene; Midwest Scientific, Missouri, United States). After PCR amplification, 10 µl of the PCR products were mixed with 2 µl DNA loading buffer and electrophoresed on a 2 percent agarose gel containing 0.2 µg/ml ethidium bromide in 0.5X TBE buffer. A DNA ladder was also run in parallel. The amplified gel was visualized and photographed under UV light (Bio-Rad Gel Doc 2000 Imaging System).

Table 1.

The primers that were designed and used in this study to multiply the LCR.

Primer Primer seq 5′ – 3′ Product size (b.p)
LCR-1F CCTGCAAGTTATCTGGTCAC 445
LCR-1R CTTAGGGGCTTATTTTATTTTGT
LCR-2F CAGGGCAGATGGCAAAAA 460
LCR-2R CTGACCCCGTATGTGAGCA
LCR-3F ATGGGGCAATGAAGCAAAGGAA 595
LCR-3R ACCCATACATAGGAAGCCCATAGC
LCR-5F GCAAACACAGCAAACACAACGAC 442
LCR-5R ATGGCAGAGGCAGAGGACAGGTTG
LCR-6F TTCCCAAAACCTAATAAGTAAC 520
LCR-6R CCTCAGCCCTCCCTCTAA
LCR-7F TGCCCTGGCCCACAAGTATC 539
LCR-7R TCAGGGGAAAGGTGGTATCTCTAA

2.5. Statistical analysis

The data obtained was subjected to a statistical analysis using Window Excel and SPSS v17 statistical tools. ANOVAs tests for multiple comparisons and significant analysis (p < 0.05) were carried out.

3. Results

The study was conducted on 69 patients with sickle cell anemia from the outpatient clinic of blood diseases at the KKUH from different regions of Saudi Arabia.

In this study, locus control region of HBB was identified and propagated using the primers designed in Table 1. The analysis of the nucleotide sequencing for the entire LCR segment except the LCR4 was determined for study samples. These changes were widely varied between substitution at different nitrogen bases. Changes were found either homo or asymmetric. The number of changes also was identified in the control zones, was 69. The first zone of the control areas of the LCR-HBB / F1 gene begins at the number 668 of chromosome 11 and ends at 1110 and is called the LCR-HS1 region. Twenty changes have been detected in this area. The highest percentage in this region, are shown by all sample at 100%, while the lowest rate was 1.3% in twelve changes in the region in one patient only. The changes are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Hematological and biochemical measurements from SCA patients.

WBC Hgb Plt Bilirubin LDH
Mean 92 11 368 48 446
SD 23 5 166 39 206

3.1. Clinical and blood data in the research sample

Table 3 presents a summary of hematological and biochemical measurements from SCD patients who have been followed for more than 4 years.

Table 3.

Distrubution of LCR changes per base per sample.

LCR-HBB/F1
start at 668
end at 1110
LCR–HS1
Region/Fragment Base change N.Samples Percent %
1 749–750 -/t homo ins. 1 1.3%
2 751–752 -/c homo ins. 7 9.1%
3 752–753 -/c homo ins. 1 1.3%
4 752–753 -/t homo ins. 1 1.3%
5 753–756 - -/ct homo ins. 1 1.3%
6 754–657 - -/tt homo ins. 2 2.6%
7 757–759 -/c homo ins. 1 1.3%
8 765–767 -/t homo ins. 2 2.6%
9 765–767 -/c homo ins. 1 1.3%
10 805–807 -/c homo ins. 7 9.1%
11 805–807 -/t homo ins. 1 1.3%
12 704 ->T homo ins. 1 1.3%
13 710 A>- homo del. 13 16.9%
14 718–720 ->T homo ins. 1 1.3%
15 789 G > A het. 2 2.6%
16 797 G > A het. 1 1.3%
17 817–819 ->t homo ins. 1 1.3%
18 907 G > A het. 1 1.3%
19 963 A > G homo. 49 63.6%
20 1032 G > A het. 77 100.0%
LCR-HBB/F2
start at 4397
end at 4991
LCR–HS2
1 4575 G > A het. 77 100.0%
2 4631 G > A het. 77 100.0%
3 4673 G > A het. 77 100.0%
4 4950–4951 ->C homo ins. 2 2.6%
5 4455–4456 -->TC homo ins. 1 1.3%
6 4562 G > A het. 4 5.2%
LCR-HBB/F3
start at 8757
end at 9219
LCR–HS3
1 8874 G > A het. 7 9.1%
2 8899to 8902 TATA>---- homo del. 1 1.3%
3 8900to 8902 TA>---- homo del. 1 1.3%
4 8906–8910 -- > CA homo ins. 1 1.3%
5 8912 G > A het. 5 6.5%
6 8914 A > G homo. 42 54.5%
7 8915to 8920 TATA>---- homo del. 42 54.5%
8 8921to 8922 --> AT homo ins. 10 13.0%
9 8947 A > T het. 22 28.6%
10 8948 A > T het. 77 100.0%
11 8957 G > A het. 77 100.0%



Region/Fragment Base change N.Samples Percent %
LCR-HBB/F4
start at 8757
end at 9219
LCR–HS3
12 8960 T > A het. 18 23.4%
13 8966G > T homo. 76 98.7%
14 8969 A > T het. 7 9.1%
15 8977 T > A het. 18 23.4%
16 8994 A > G homo. 77 100.0%
17 8997 T > G homo. 69 89.6%
18 8997 T > G het. 8 10.4%
19 9009C > A het. 25 32.5%
20 9012 G > A het. 77 100.0%
21 9021 G > A het. 77 100.0%
LCR-HBB/F5
start at 34,273
end at 34,816
G–promoter
region
1 34,502 G > A het. 1 1.3%
2 34,662C > A het. 45 58.4%
3 34,663C > A het. 45 58.4%
4 34,687C > T het. 15 19.5%



Region/Fragment Base change N.Samples Percent %
LCR-HBB/F6
start at 61,441
end at 61,961
(AT)x(T)y region
1 61,495 to 61,496 ->C homo ins. 1 1.3%
2 61,522 to 6523 ->A homo ins. 1 1.3%
3 61,558 to 6559 ->A homo ins. 2 2.6%
4 61586 T > C homo. 2 2.6%
5 61,586 - - > CA homo ins. 3 3.9%
6 61590 T > C homo. 2 2.6%
7 61,593C > T homo. 8 10.4%
8 61,594 - - >AT homo ins. 9 11.7%



Region/Fragment Base change N.Samples Percent %
LCR-HBB/F7
start at 63,586
end at 64,134
3_ flanking
sequences
(enhancer
1 64,081 A > T homo. 6 7.8%
2 64,081 A > t het. 4 5.2%
3 63,925C > A homo. 1 1.3%
4 63,925C > A het. 3 3.9%
5 63918–63919 ->C homo ins 77 100.0%
6 63,923 G > A het. 1 1.3%
7 63,843 G > C hom 1 1.3%
8 63,843 G > C het. 3 3.9%
9 63,818 G > A het. 1 1.3%
10 63,826 G > A het. 1 1.3%

3.2. Relationship between genetic changes identified in beta globin and clinical symptoms in patients

The clinical symptoms of SCD patients vary from mild symptoms to severe complications that completely change their lifestyle and may even lead to disability from normal life. The changes identified above were correlated with the most frequent biochemical indicators among the surveyed patients to determine the relationship between these changes and the severity of those symptoms.

  • WBC count:

As shown in the Table 4, there was a significant difference between those individuals with LCR # F1_LCR # F1_10 mutation and who don’t (i.e., those 2 mutations can cause increase of the white blood cell count.

  • Hemoglobin level:

Table 4.

Relationship between WBC count and mutation.

Part/Variable WBC
Mean Median Standard Deviation
LCR#F1_2 Normal 10.89 11.05 4.21
Mutated 15.65 15.20 3.44
LCR#F1_10 Normal 10.66 11.05 3.54
Mutated 18.01 16.50 6.12
LCR#F1_13 Normal 11.58 11.33 4.41
Mutated 10.06 11.33 3.90
LCR#F3_9 Normal 11.52 11.19 4.64
Mutated 10.84 11.33 3.55

As shown in Table 5, there was no statistical difference between those with mutations, compared to the normal control group.

  • Platelets Count:

Table 5.

Relationship between Hb level and mutation.

Part/Variable HB or Hgb
Mean Median Standard Deviation
LCR#F1_2 Normal 91.1 91.7 20.9
Mutated 97.5 102.0 15.7
LCR#F1_10 Normal 91.0 91.7 20.8
Mutated 98.1 106.0 15.9
LCR#F1_13 Normal 92.4 91.7 19.0
Mutated 88.0 91.7 27.2
LCR#F3_9 Normal 92.2 91.7 22.3
Mutated 90.2 91.7 15.4

As shown in Table 6, there was a significant difference between those with mutations in LCR # F3_9, compared to the normal control group (i.e., this mutation may cause a decrease in platelets counts).

Table 6.

Relationship between Platelets count and mutation.

Part/Variable Plt
Mean Median Standard Deviation
LCR#F1_2 Normal 368 362 172
Mutated 368 333 103
LCR#F1_10 Normal 378 366 174
Mutated 318 323 104
LCR#F1_13 Normal 377 364 169
Mutated 301 315 131
LCR#F3_9 Normal 389 379 174
Mutated 299 298 115

Level of Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH):

As shown in Table 7, there was no statistical difference between those with mutations, compared to the normal control group.

  • Bilirubin level:

Table 7.

Relationship between LDH level and mutation.

Part/Variable LDH
Mean Median Standard Deviation
LCR#F1_2 Normal 550.6 539.3 502.5
Mutated 426.2 453.0 121.9
LCR#F1_10 Normal 547.6 539.3 503.2
Mutated 455.8 453.0 119.0
LCR#F1_13 Normal 560.6 539.3 516.5
Mutated 434.1 497.0 228.7
LCR#F3_9 Normal 558.7 539.3 564.8
Mutated 490.8 539.3 120.9

As shown in Table 8, there was a significant difference between those with mutation in LCR # F1_13, compared to normal individuals (i.e, this mutation can increase bilirubin level).

Table 8.

Relationship between Bilirubin level and mutation.

Part/ Variable Bilirubin
Mean Median Standard Deviation
LCR#F1_2 Normal 48.1 48.1 35.2
Mutated 48.9 47.0 21.5
LCR#F1_10 Normal 47.5 48.1 34.2
Mutated 55.1 47.0 34.9
LCR#F1_13 Normal 50.8 48.2 36.0
Mutated 35.2 42.0 18.0
LCR#F3_9 Normal 49.2 48.0 37.2
Mutated 45.6 47.6 25.1

Using Mann-Whitney test to determine whether there is a relationship between the parameters including: WBC, HB, PLT, LDH, Bilirubin and those individuals with mutations, Table 9 showed significant effect of some mutations on those individuals examined Hb, Platelets, and Bilirubin.

Table 9.

Relationship between Lab parameters and presence of mutation(s).

Part/Variable Significance Level (P- Value) one tail
WBC HB PLT LDH Bilirubin
LCR#F1_2 0.001 * 0.100 0.437 0.065 0.337
LCR#F1_10 0.001 * 0.122 0.101 0.15 0.257
LCR#F1_13 0.194 0.5 0.093 0.06 0.048 *
LCR#F3_9 0.495 0.328 0.034 * 0.448 0.343

4. Discussion

Analysis of the local control regions (LCR) showed many differences and changes on SCD patients. These changes widely varied among the substitutions within different nitrogen bases. Changes found were either homo or asymmetric. The number of changes identified from SCD patients in local control areas was 69.

El-Tayeb et al (2008) reported interesting results that the prevalence of sickle cell anaemia and thalassemia in Al-Qassim region, to be 0.165% and 0.252% respectively. Also showed that the clinical manifestations of sickle cell disease vary widely among patients, where some patients with sickle cell anaemia have mild disease, while others suffer from a severe form and relatively high mortality at early age.

Our current results were obtained from 69 SCD patients at the KKUH from various regions of Saudi Arabia, exhibiting a wide spectrum of the disease from mild to severe stages. This was evidenced by the follow-up of several indicators in patients' records throughout the study period. The differences in SCD patients were related to the need for medical emergency assistance, as well as the need to stay at the hospital for several days to receive the necessary treatment.

A comprehensive molecular analysis of the nucleotide sequence for six LCR outside the region was performed here, results as shown below: (LCR–HS1: (HBB-LCR1), LCR–HS2: (HBB-LCR2), LCR–HS3:(HBB-LCR3), G-promoter region: (HBB-LCR5), (AT)x(T)y region: (HBB-LCR6); and 3_ flanking; sequences (enhancer): (HBB-LCR7).

The relationship between clinical symptoms and LCR mutations, showed a close relationship between an increase of WBCs and those changes: (751–752 & change: 805–807 -/c homo ins), in the LCR-HS1 region: (HBB-LCR1). Another relationship between a decrease of platelets and those changes: (8947 A > T het, in the LCR-HS3) segment: (HBB-LCR3). A third relationship was found between elevated Bilirubin level and (a deletion of 710 A - homo del in LCR-HS1) (HBB-LCR1).

Ngo et al. (2013) studied forty four Saudi HbS homozygous patients with A haplotype. They found that A11 cases were homozygous for A1 haplotype. Moreover, SPNs in BCL11A and HBS1L-Myb were associated with high HbF (Ngo et al., 2013). Tunisian group found four independent regions in LCR Hb beta globin namely: (the 5‘ region of LCR-HS2 site, the intervening sequence region of two fetal G gamma and A gamma genes and 5‘ of beta-globin gene. There was a close relationship between high Hb F level and the 5‘ region of LCR-HS2, which could improve our standing on disease severity (Moumni et al., 2016). Two additional studies agreed with the Tunisian’s results (Zago et al., 2001, Ben Mustapha et al., 2012).

We published a very recent paper studying the nucleotide sequences and the molecular survey of β-globin gene in Saudi patients from 77 SCD patients. A total of 47 alterations have been recognized. SCD had a negative effect on many organs and outcomes (Alenzi and AlShaya, 2019).

In conclusion, it has been clear that this study has successfully identified LCR mutations for random Saudi patients with SCD. The above results should be taken further to set up management strategies to improve outcomes.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Dr. Dalal AlShaya (PNU) , Prof. AbdulKareem AL-Momen (KSU) and Dr. Mai AL-Mohanna (KFSHRC) for advice and providing the samples. This project has been funded by a grant from the PSAU (grant no: 2019/03/10211).

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

References

  1. Weatherall D.J., Clegg J.B. Inherited haemoglobin disorders: an increasing global health problem. Bull. World Health Organ. 2001;79(8):704–712. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. WHO report. (2005- 2006-2011). Sickle-cell disease and other haemoglobin disorders. Fact sheet N°308.
  3. Ashley-Koch A., Yang Q., Olney R.S. Sickle hemoglobin (Hb S) allele and sickle cell disease: a huge review. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2000;151(9):839–845. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Schechter A.N. Hemoglobin research and the origins of molecular medicine. Blood. 2008;112(10):3927–3938. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-078188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lionnet F., Hammoudi N., Stojanovic K.S., Avellino V., Grateau G., Girot R., Haymann J.P. Hemoglobin sickle cell disease complications: a clinical study of 179 cases. Haematologica. 2012;97(8):1136–1141. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.055202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jastaniah W. Epidemiology of sickle cell disease in Saudi Arabia. Ann. Saudi Med. 2011;31(3):289–293. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.81540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. El-Hazmi M.A.F. Aspect of humen hemoglobin and hemoglobin haemoglobinobathies in the arbian benansulla- studies at genetics and molecular level. KACST. 1979:1982–1992. [Google Scholar]
  8. El-Hazmi M.A.F. Distribution and evolution of hemoglobin and globin loci. Bowman JE, ed. 1983. 1983. Abnormal hemoglobins and allied disorders in the Middle East - Saudi Arabia; pp. 239–249. [Google Scholar]
  9. El-Hazmi M.A.F. Haemoglobinopathies, thalassaemias and enzymopathies in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med. J. 1992;13(6):488–499. doi: 10.1159/000205861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. El-Hazmi M.A.F. Incidence and Frequency of Haemoglobinopathies and Thalassaemia in the North West Sector of Arabia. Saudi Med. J. 1985;6(2), 149:162. [Google Scholar]
  11. El-Hazmi M.A.F., Warsy A.S. Appraisal of sickle cell and thalassaemia genes in Saudi Arabia. Eastern Mediterranean Health J. 1999;5(6):1147–1153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. El-Hazmi M.A.F., Jabbar F.A., Al-Faleh F.Z., Al-Swailem A.R., Warsy A.S. Pattern for sickle cell, thalassaemia and glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency genes in north western Saudi Arabia. Hum Hered. 1991;41(1):26–34. doi: 10.1159/000153970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Williams T.N., Weatherall D.J. World distribution, population genetics, and health burden of the hemoglobinopathies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(9) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Al-Qurashi M.M., El-Mouzan M.I., Al-Herbish A.S., Al-Salloum A.A., Al-Omar A.A. The prevalence of sickle cell disease in Saudi children and adolescents.A community-based survey. Saudi Med J. 2008;29:1480–1483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Al-Naseri, E. Awareness of mothers in nutrition their children affected with sickle-cell anemia and beta-thalassemia in Jeddah. (Master Thesis). King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2009.
  16. El-Tayeb E.N., Yaqoob M., Abdur-Rahim K., Gustavson K.H. Prevalence of beta-thalassaemia and sickle cell traits in premarital screening in Al-Qassim Saudi Arabia. Genet Couns. 2008;19(2):211–218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. El-Hazmi M.A.F., Bahakim H.M., Al-Swailem A.M., Warsy A.S. The features of sickle cell disease in Saudi children. J. Trop. Paedr. 1990;36:148–155. doi: 10.1093/tropej/36.4.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. El-Hazmi M.A.F., Warsy A.S. Genetic Disorders among Arab Populations. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. Hemoglobinopathies in Arab Countries. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ngo D., Bae H., Steinberg M.H., Sebastiani P., Solovieff N., Baldwin C.T., Melista E., Safaya S., Farrer L.A., Al-Suliman A.M., Albuali W.H., Al Bagshi M.H., Naserullah Z., Akinsheye I., Gallagher P., Luo H.Y., Chui D.H., Farrell J.J., Al-Ali A.K., Alsultan A. Fetal hemoglobin in sickle cell anemia: genetic studies of the Arab-Indian haplotype. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2013 Jun;51(1):22–26. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2012.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Moumni I., Ben Mustapha M., Ben Mansour I., Zoraï A., Douzi K., Sassi S., Chaouachi D., Mellouli F., Bejaoui M., Abbes S. Fetal hemoglobin in tunisian sickle cell disease patient: relationship with polymorphic sequences CIS to the β-globin gene. Indian J. Hematol. Blood Transfus. 2016 Mar;32(1):114–119. doi: 10.1007/s12288-015-0504-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zago M.A., Silva W.A., Jr, Gualandro S., Yokomizu I.K., Araujo A.G., Tavela M.H., Gerard N., Krishnamoorthy R., Elion J. Rearrangements of the beta-globin gene cluster in apparently typical betaS haplotypes. Haematologica. 2001 Feb;86(2):142–145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ben Mustapha M., Moumni I., Zorai A., Douzi K., Ghanem A., Abbes S. Microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphisms in the β-globin locus control region-hypersensitive Site 2: SPECIFICITY of Tunisian βs chromosomes. Hemoglobin. 2012;36(6):533–544. doi: 10.3109/03630269.2012.721432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Alenzi F.Q., AlShaya D.S. Biochemical and Molecular analysis of the beta-globin gene on Saudi sickle cell anemia. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019 Nov;26(7):1377–1384. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES