Abstract
Background
Although mortality and morbidity of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) have improved significantly over the past years, the impact of age for patients undergoing PD is still debated. This study is aimed at analyzing short- and long-term outcomes of PD in elderly patients.
Methods
124 consecutive patients who have undergone PD for pancreas neoplasms in our center between 2012 and 2017 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: group I (<75 years) and group II (≥75 years). Demographic features and intraoperative and clinical-pathological data were collected. Primary endpoints were perioperative morbidity and mortality; complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo Score. Secondary endpoints included feasibility of adjuvant treatment and overall survival rates.
Results
A total of 106 patients were included in this study. There were 73 (68.9%) patients in group I and 33 (31.1%) in group II. Perioperative deceases were 4 (3.6%), and postoperative pancreatic fistulas were 34 (32.1%). Significant difference between two groups was demonstrated for the ASA Score (p = 0.004), Karnofsky Score (p = 0.025), preoperative jaundice (p = 0.004), and pulmonary complications (p = 0.034). No significance was shown for diabetes, radicality of resection, stage of disease, operative time, length of stay, postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo Score, postoperative mortality, pancreatic fistula, and reoperation rates. 69.9% of the patients in group I underwent adjuvant treatment vs. 39.4% of the older ones (p = 0.012). Mean overall survival was 28.5 months in group I vs. 22 months in group II (p = 0.909).
Conclusion
PD can be performed safely in elderly patients. Advanced age should not be an absolute contraindication for PD, even if greater frailty should be considered. The outcome of elderly patients who have undergone PD is similar to that of younger patients, even though adjuvant treatment administration is significantly lower, demonstrating that surgery remains the main therapeutic option.
1. Introduction
Aging is a natural process, and the number of elderly is rapidly growing in western countries. It has been estimated that American elderly are the fastest growing age group and that they will become more than a fifth of the whole population by 2030 [1]. In the United States, pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death [2–4]. Age-specific incidence rates increase from around the age of 50 years, with the highest incidence in the over 85-year-old age group [5]. The same is true for other periampullary neoplasms, including distal bile duct cancer and ampullary and duodenal cancers [5].
Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is still burdened by high rates of morbidity and mortality, ranging from 35% to 51% and from 1% to 6%, respectively [6–8], and the role of age in surgical outcome is still debated [9, 10]. Furthermore, elderly are less likely to receive proper adjuvant chemotherapy, and this could make surgery less effective [11].
The aim of this study was to analyze short- and long-term outcomes of PD on a population of elderly (≥75 years of age) compared with a cohort of younger patients, to determine potential differences on postoperative and oncological outcomes.
2. Patients and Methods
124 consecutive patients who have undergone PD for periampullary neoplasms in our center between 2012 and 2017 were analyzed. 18 subjects were excluded because of lack of data or other concomitant procedures. No associated vascular resections were performed. A Whipple resection with pancreatojejunostomy and modified Child's reconstruction was performed in all 106 remaining cases. Pancreas texture was defined as soft or hard depending on manual palpation. At the end of the procedure, 3 tubular drainages were placed close to pancreatic and biliary anastomoses and 1 tubular drainage was placed in the jejunal loop anastomosed to pancreatic remnant and bile duct in order to drain pancreatic juice, bile, and jejunal fluid, according to the institutional reconstruction technique [12]. Patients were divided into two groups: group I (<75 years) and group II (≥75 years). Demographic features and intraoperative and clinical-pathological data were collected; data about octogenarians were analyzed both within the elderly group and separately. TNM staging was reported according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition [13]. Primary endpoints were perioperative morbidity and 90-day mortality; complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo Score, risk of pancreatic fistula was calculated according to Callery et al.'s validated Fistula Risk Score (FRS) [14], postoperative pancreatic fistula was defined according to International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definitions, and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula CR-POPF (grade B or C) has been considered as a complication [15]. Secondary endpoints included feasibility of adjuvant treatment and overall survival (OS) rates.
3. Statistical Analysis
Continuous data were expressed as median and range, or mean ± standard deviation when appropriate. Rates were expressed as numbers and percentage. In univariate analysis, continuous variables have been compared with a nonpaired t-test. Categorical variables have been compared with a χ2 test. Overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics 24 (IBM, Chicago, IL, United States).
4. Results
There were 73 (68.9%) patients in group I and 33 (31.1%) in group II; there were 9 octogenarians (12.3%). 44 PD were performed for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and 62 patients underwent PD for other periampullary neoplasms (12 duodenal adenocarcinomas, 18 ampullary adenocarcinomas, 9 biliary carcinomas, 8 pancreatic metastases from renal cell cancer, 5 G2-G3 pNETs, 8 IPMN-carcinomas, and 2 solid pseudopapillary neoplasms). Perioperative deceases were 4 (3.6%), including 1 (11.1%) from among the octogenarians, and postoperative pancreatic fistulas were 34 (32.1%) of which 3 (33.3%) were in patients ≥80 years old. Mean overall follow-up was 18.1 months (range 5-56 months); mean follow-up in group I was 19.1 months (range 5-56) and 15.6 months (range 5-36) in group II (p = 0.106). Demographic and preoperative clinical data are reported in Table 1; older patients were more prone to be ASA 3 (66.7% vs. 31.5% of younger patients; p = 0.004), presented a poorer performace status (mean Karnofsky Score 90% vs. 94.7% in group II; p = 0.025), and had higher bilirubin levels (117.66 μmol/L vs. 75.26; p = 0.004). Data about octogenarians were comparable to other group II cases.
Table 1.
Demographic and preoperative clinical data of 106 patients.
| Parameter | Group I (<75 yrs) (73 pts) |
Group II (≥75 yrs) (33 pts) |
p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, median (range) | 61 (27-72) | 78 (75-86) | |
| Sex, n (%) | |||
| Male | 39 (53.4) | 18 (54.5) | 0.915 |
| Female | 34 (46.6) | 15 (45.5) | |
| Diabetes, n (%) | |||
| Yes | 22 (30.1) | 9 (27.3) | 0.842 |
| No | 51 (69.9) | 24 (72.7) | |
| ASA Score, n (%) | |||
| 1-2 | 50 (68.5) | 11 (33.3) | 0.004 |
| 3 | 23 (31.5) | 22 (66.7) | |
| Karnofsky Score, mean (%) | 94.7 | 90 | 0.025 |
| BMI, mean | 22.08 ± 3.77 | 23.27 ± 4.11 | 0.225 |
| Preoperative total bilirubin, mean (μmol/L) | 75.26 ± 98.11 | 117.66 ± 147.94 | 0.004 |
| Preoperative Ca 19-9, mean (kU/L) | 7908 ± 46941 | 11868 ± 53783 | 0.567 |
| Preoperative serum albumin, mean (g/L) | 37.93 ± 6.70 | 34.73 ± 6.89 | 0.582 |
ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI: body mass index.
Intraoperative and pathological data are reported in Table 2: no significant differences were reported for operative time, estimated blood loss, radicality of resection, pancreas consistency, Wirsung dilation, TNM staging, and Fistula Risk Score. Data about octogenarians were comparable to other group II cases.
Table 2.
Intraoperative and pathological data of 106 patients.
| Parameter | Group I (73 pts < 75 yrs) |
Group II (33 pts ≥ 75 yrs) |
p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pathology, n (%) | |||
| Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma | 27 (37) | 17 (51.5) | 0.160 |
| Others | 46 (63) | 16 (48.5) | |
| Pancreatic tissue, n (%) | |||
| Hard | 24 (32.9) | 16 (48.5) | 0.125 |
| Soft | 49 (67.1) | 17 (51.5) | |
| Wirsung dilation, n (%) | |||
| Yes | 33 (43.7) | 11 (33.3) | 0.282 |
| No | 40 (56.3) | 22 (66.7) | |
| Radicality, n (%) | |||
| R0 | 57 (78.1) | 23 (69.7) | 0.325 |
| R1 | 16 (21.9) | 10 (30.3) | |
| T stage, n (%) | |||
| T1-2 | 59 (80.8) | 28 (84.8) | 0.238 |
| T3 | 14 (19.2) | 5 (15.2) | |
| Lymph-nodal status, n (%) | |||
| N0 | 35 (47.9) | 14 (42.4) | 0.899 |
| N+ | 38 (52.1) | 19 (57.6) | |
| Operative time (min) | 309 ± 9 | 301 ± 76 | 0.694 |
| Fistula Risk Score, mean (range) | 4.2 (0-8) | 3.9 (0-8) | 0.439 |
Postoperative outcome is reported in Table 3; a significant difference was reported only for pulmonary complications (0 in group I vs. 6.1% in older patients, p = 0.034; no pulmonary complications occurred in octogenarians). No differences were reported for length of hospital stay, 90-day mortality, and other postoperative complications (cardiovascular diseases, hemorrhages, abdominal collections, surgical site infections, bile leaks, and sepsis). Rates of complications with grade ≥ 3b, according to the Clavien-Dindo Score, were comparable between the groups (8.2% vs. 12.1%; p = 0.525), as well as incidence of CR-POPF (30.1% in group I vs. 36.3% in group II; p = 0.525). Among octogenarians, complications with the Clavien − Dindo Score ≥ 3b occurred in 1 patient (11.1%), while CR-POPF was detected in 3 cases (33.3%).
Table 3.
Postoperative outcome of 106 patients who have undergone pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms.
| Parameter | Group I (73 pts < 75 yrs) |
Group II (33 pts ≥ 75 yrs) |
p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital stay (days) | 21 ± 10 | 23 ± 13 | 0.452 |
| Reoperation, n (%) | 5 (6.8) | 1 (3.1) | 0.659 |
| 90-d deaths, n (%) | 1 (1.4) | 3 (9.1) | 0.088 |
| Pulmonary complications, n (%) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.1) | 0.034 |
| Cardiovascular complications, n (%) | 4 (5.5) | 4 (12.1) | 0.252 |
| Other complications, n (%) | 22 (30.1) | 9 (27,3) | 0.764 |
| Clavien − Dindo Score ≥ 3B, n (%) | 6 (8.2) | 4 (12.1) | 0.525 |
| Pancreatic fistula (grades B-C), n (%) | |||
| No | 51 (69.9) | 21 (63.7) | 0.525 |
| Yes | 22 (30.1) | 12 (36.3) |
POD: postoperative day.
Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 69.9% of patients in group I vs. 39.4% of older ones (p = 0.012); 22.2% of octogenarians underwent adjuvant treatment.
Overall survival (OS), considering all patients, is reported in Figure 1 and demonstrated no significant differences between the groups with comparable 2-year survival (45.4% in group I vs. 41.2% in group II) and an estimated mean survival of 28.5 months in group I vs. 22.1 in group II; regarding pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), estimated mean OS in group 1 was 16.8 months (2-year survival 28.3%) vs. 19.1 months (2-year survival 30.6%) in group II (p = 0.537).
Figure 1.
Overall survival of 106 patients who have undergone pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms, according to age stratification.
5. Discussion
The elderly population is increasing worldwide. In parallel, the rate of chronic and neoplastic diseases is rising steeply. In developed countries, the accepted definition of elderly population is of subjects ≥ 65 years of age with stratification in three categories: young older (65-74 yrs), older (75-84 yrs), and big older (≥85 yrs). Even more elderly patients suffer from neoplastic diseases and need to undergo major surgical operations. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), actually, represents the best curative treatment for periampullary neoplasms, but it is commonly burdened by high rates of morbidity and mortality that make some authors consider this kind of surgery as high risk in elderly people and patients should be carefully selected, even in high-volume centers [10, 16–18]. Furthermore, data on chemotherapy administration in elderly people are lacking [11], and sometimes, the best treatment choice is not easy.
In this study, the “frailty” of elderly patients is confirmed by a significantly higher rate of ASA Score 3 and a poorer performance status compared to younger patients (Table 1); however, intraoperative data did not show significant differences in terms of operative time, blood loss, lymph node retrieval, and radicality of resection, demonstrating that surgical technique and extent of resection is not affected by age of patients [9].
Considering postoperative mortality (90-day mortality), our data suggest a trend towards a worse outcome in the elderly group even though this is without statistical significance; a lack of significance could be related to sample size, but it is important to consider that in-hospital deceases, directly related to surgical operation, were similar (1 in group I and 1 in group II), while the other 2 deaths among older patients occurred from heart failure after discharge.
In the same way, overall postoperative complications were similar between the groups; in particular, no differences were reported for CR-POPF, surgical site infection, postoperative hemorrhage (PPH), abdominal collections, bile leaks, and reoperation rates. A trend towards a higher rate of cardiovascular complications (5.5% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.252) and a significantly higher rate of pulmonary complications was reported in the elderly groups (p = 0.034); however, these findings do not seem to affect postoperative outcome, as no differences were detected either for length of stay or rates of Clavien − Dindo Score ≥ 3b complications. Our data do not confirm previous reported data of worse outcomes in the elderly population [6, 7, 10, 18–22].
This evidence let us speculate that, probably, reduced functional reserves represent a potential risk factor for cardiovascular and pulmonary complications and, consequently, for mortality [23, 24]. However, a dedicated perioperative management and a perioperative fluid intervention with an individualized “goal-directed” fluid balance could prevent the onset of such disorders in this subset of patients, demonstrating that major surgery, such as pancreatic resections, need good expertise and high-volume series both on the “surgical side” and on anesthesiologic management [23, 25–27].
Data regarding oncological outcomes after pancreatic surgery for malignancies in the elderly are controversial so far. Some authors report that the elderly population shows a worse outcome [5, 17]; however, other groups did not find any significant survival difference [4, 9, 28]. This heterogeneity of results is probably due to selection biases, but our sample also shows a comparable overall survival between older and younger groups. In our opinion, these data are more interesting if related to chemotherapy administration, demonstrating that intention-to-treat surgery still remains the best therapeutic option, even if it is important to consider that adjuvant chemotherapy administration in our sample was gemcitabine-based monotherapy and does not take into account new regimens such as FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine-Nabpaclitaxel that could affect outcome significantly [29]. Data regarding access of elderly people to adjuvant chemotherapy are still lacking, but it is commonly accepted that admission to adjuvant treatments is not frequent for elderly patients due to clinical and social aspects, even if they obtain the same surgical oncological benefits [30]. Elderly patients commonly present preexistent comorbidities that reduce functional reserves, worse postdischarge home care and rehabilitation services, and, often, live alone, so the adherence to medical management could be insufficient; all these factors could significantly affect outcome and opportunity to access surgical and medical treatments.
6. Conclusions
This study has biases that must be considered, such as the retrospective nature, the size of sample, and the lack of data about patients who did not receive surgery due to comorbidities that probably led us to select the most fit elderly patients for surgery. On the contrary, the strength of this research is a good case matching that can give weight to advanced age as an independent variable. According to our data, advanced age is not an absolute contraindication to PD. Elderly patients fit for surgery can be submitted to PD safely with similar outcome to younger patients in terms of perioperative complications and overall survival, demonstrating that a good case volume, both for surgery and anesthesiology, is determinant for a good perioperative management and outcome. Furthermore, patient selection and recruitment still remain crucial for the therapeutic pathway, above all in order to access and adhere to postoperative medical treatments, claiming the need for more evidence in chemotherapy administration in elderly patients.
Data Availability
The clinical, demographic and pathological data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.
Disclosure
Preliminary data of this study have been presented as a conference abstract at the 50th European Pancreatic Club (EPC) Meeting in Berlin, Germany, 13th-16th June 2018, and at the 60th Society for Surgery of Alimentary Tract (SSAT) Meeting in San Diego, CA, 18th-21st May 2019.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
References
- 1.Etzioni D. A., Liu J. H., Maggard M. A., Ko C. Y. The aging population and its impact on the surgery workforce. Annals of Surgery. 2003;238(2):170–177. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000081085.98792.3d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ferlay J., Steliarova-Foucher E., Lortet-Tieulent J., et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. European Journal of Cancer. 2013;49(6):1374–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yancik R., Ries L. A. Cancer in older persons: an international issue in an aging world. Seminars in Oncology. 2004;31(2):128–136. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2003.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hatzaras I., George N., Muscarella P., Melvin W. S., Ellison E. C., Bloomston M. Predictors of survival in periampullary cancers following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2010;17(4):991–997. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0883-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Riall T. S. What is the effect of age on pancreatic resection? Advances in Surgery. 2009;43:233–249. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2009.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pratt W. B., Gangavati A., Agarwal K., et al. Establishing standards of quality for elderly patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Archives of Surgery. 2009;144(10):950–956. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Balcom J. H., IV, Rattner D. W., Warshaw A. L., Chang Y., Castillo C. F.-d. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic Resections. Archives of Surgery. 2001;136(4):391–398. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.4.391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bentrem D. J., Yeh J. J., Brennan M. F., et al. Predictors of intensive care unit admission and related outcome for patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2005;9(9):1307–1312. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Paiella S., De Pastena M., Pollini T., et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients ≥ 75 years of age: are there any differences with other age ranges in oncological and surgical outcomes? Results from a tertiary referral center. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017;23(17):3077–3083. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i17.3077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sukharamwala P., Thoens J., Szuchmacher M., Smith J., DeVito P. Advanced age is a risk factor for post-operative complications and mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. HPB: The Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association. 2012;14(10):649–657. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00506.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nagrial A. M., Chang D. K., Nguyen N. Q., et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 2014;110(2):313–319. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gruppo M., Angriman I., Martella B., Spolverato Y. C., Zingales F., Bardini R. Perioperative albumin ratio is associated with post-operative pancreatic fistula. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2018;88(7-8):E602–E605. doi: 10.1111/ans.14262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Edge S. B., Byrd D. R., Compton C. C., Fritz A. G., Greene F. L., Trotti A. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th. New York: Springer; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Callery M. P., Pratt W. B., Kent T. S., Chaikof E. L., Vollmer C. M., Jr. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2013;216(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bassi C., Dervenis C., Butturini G., et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138(1):8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Casadei R., Zanini N., Morselli-Labate A. M., et al. Prognostic factors in periampullary and pancreatic tumor resection in elderly patients. World Journal of Surgery. 2006;30(11):1992–2001. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0122-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Makary M. A., Winter J. M., Cameron J. L., et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2006;10(3):347–356. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Khan S., Sclabas G., Lombardo K. R., et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in the very elderly; is it safe and justified? Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2010;14(11):1826–1831. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1294-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kow A. W. C., Sadayan N. A., Ernest A., et al. Is pancreaticoduodenectomy justified in elderly patients? The Surgeon. 2012;10(3):128–136. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2011.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.De la Fuente S. G., Bennett K. M., Pappas T. N., Scarborough J. E. Pre- and intraoperative variables affecting early outcomes in elderly patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB: The Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association. 2011;13(12):887–892. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00390.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Melis M., Marcon F., Masi A., et al. The safety of a pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients older than 80 years: risk vs. benefits. HPB: The Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association. 2012;14(9):583–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00484.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lee D. Y., Schwartz J. A., Wexelman B., Kirchoff D., Yang K. C., Attiyeh F. Outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic malignancy in octogenarians: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. American Journal of Surgery. 2014;207(4):540–548. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sanaiha Y., Juo Y. Y., Aguayo E., et al. Incidence and trends of cardiac complications in major abdominal surgery. Surgery. 2018;164(3):539–545. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.04.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yang C. K., Teng A., Lee D. Y., Rose K. Pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. The Journal of Surgical Research. 2015;198(2):441–449. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Salzwedel C., Puig J., Carstens A., et al. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy based on radial arterial pulse pressure variation and continuous cardiac index trending reduces postoperative complications after major abdominal surgery: a multi-center, prospective, randomized study. Critical Care. 2013;17(5):p. R191. doi: 10.1186/cc12885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Holte K., Foss N. B., Andersen J., et al. Liberal or restrictive fluid administration in fast-track colonic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2007;99(4):500–508. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Grant F., Brennan M. F., Allen P. J., et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of liberal vs restricted perioperative fluid management in patients undergoing pancreatectomy. Annals of Surgery. 2016;264(4):591–598. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Oguro S., Shimada K., Kishi Y., Nara S., Esaki M., Kosuge T. Perioperative and long-term outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients 80 years of age and older. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery. 2013;398(4):531–538. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1072-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Conroy T., Hammel P., Hebbar M., et al. FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018;379(25):2395–2406. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sehgal R., Alsharedi M., Larck C., Edwards P., Gress T. Pancreatic cancer survival in elderly patients treated with chemotherapy. Pancreas. 2014;43(2):306–310. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The clinical, demographic and pathological data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.