Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: Rev Environ Health. 2018 Sep 25;33(3):247–264. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2017-0033

Air pollution exposure during pregnancy and spontaneous abortion and stillbirth

Alexandra Grippo 1, Jun Zhang 2, Li Chu 2, Yanjun Guo 3, Lihua Qiao 4, Jun Zhang 4, Ajay A Myneni 5, Lina Mu 5,*
PMCID: PMC7183911  NIHMSID: NIHMS1581217  PMID: 29975668

Abstract

The developing fetus is particularly susceptible to environmental pollutants, and evidence has shown adverse effects of air pollutants on pregnancy and birth outcomes. Pregnancy loss, including spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) and stillbirth, is the most severe adverse pregnancy outcome. This review focuses on air pollution exposure during pregnancy in relation to spontaneous abortion and stillbirth. A total of 43 studies are included in this review, including 35 human studies and eight animal studies. Overall, these studies suggest that exposure to air pollutants such as particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO) and cooking smoke may be associated with higher risk for stillbirth and spontaneous abortion. PM10 exposure during an entire pregnancy was associated with increased risk of spontaneous abortion, and exposure to PM2.5 and PM10 in the third trimester might increase the risk of stillbirth. CO exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion and exposure during the third trimester was associated with an increased risk of stillbirth. Cooking smoke was found to increase the risk of stillbirths, and the evidence was consistent. Insufficient and conflicting evidence was found for various other pollutants, such as NO2 and SO2. Studies did not show clear evidence for associations between pregnancy loss and others pollutants such as heavy metals, organochlorine compounds, PAH and total dust count. Further research is warranted to better understand the relationship between air pollution exposure and pregnancy loss.

Keywords: cooking smoke, fetal death, intrauterine mortality, miscarriage, particulate matter

Introduction

In 2012, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that ambient (outdoor) air pollution was the cause of 3.7 million premature deaths, and household (indoor) air pollution was the cause of 3.8 million premature deaths worldwide. Air pollution has been associated with the increased risk of respiratory disease (1), cardiovascular disease (2), cerebrovascular disease (3) and lung cancer (4) in adults. In particular, PM2.5 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 μm), a heterogeneous mixture of solid and liquid particles, is a harmful risk factor in ambient air pollution and can elicit a wide range of biological responses (5). Due to its small size and large surface area, PM2.5 can enter the human respiratory tract and participate in blood circulation. Inflammation and oxidative stress could also be pathways by which exposure to air pollution may result in adverse pregnancy outcomes, as well as particles capable of passing through the blood-brain barrier and placental barrier (6). Research on air pollution exposure and the developing fetus are emerging but still undetermined.

The developing fetus is thought to be particularly susceptible to environmental pollutants, including air pollution. Evidence has shown adverse effects of air pollutants on maternal health and pregnancy outcomes including preterm birth, low birth weight, intrauterine growth restriction and congenital anomalies (7, 8). Pregnancy loss includes spontaneous abortion (miscarriage), usually defined as the loss of the fetus before 20 weeks of pregnancy, and stillbirth, usually defined as the loss of the fetus after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Pregnancy loss is the most severe adverse pregnancy outcome, but understanding around the cause of fetal death is limited. Detrimental effects of environmental pollution on spontaneous abortion and stillbirth have been previously suggested with exposure to magnetic fields (9, 10), parental smoking and environmental tobacco smoke (11, 12). However, the relationship between air pollution and pregnancy loss has not been well studied.

Spontaneous abortion, or miscarriage, is considered the most common and severe complication of early pregnancy, with an incidence of 17–22% of all recognized pregnancies (13). The true rate of pregnancy loss is difficult to determine, and some authors have suggested 20–40% of all losses may occur before clinical detection (14, 15). In 2009, the WHO reported that 2.6 million stillbirths occurred worldwide, and more than 7200 stillbirths occur every day (16). Several potential causes of stillbirth have been reported as umbilical cord accidents, congenital anomalies, placental abruption and smoking during pregnancy (17). In the last 10 years, literature has been emerging on the topic of air pollution and pregnancy loss, however, the evidence has not been reviewed systematically. Two recent reviews evaluated the effect of exposure to ambient air pollution and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Zhu et al. evaluated the effect of exposure to PM2.5 on pregnancy outcomes, but included only one study on stillbirth and none on spontaneous abortion (5). Siddika et al. evaluated the effect of exposure to ambient air pollution and stillbirth, but included no studies on spontaneous abortion (18). The purpose of this review was to collect and analyze the growing literature to better understand the effects of air pollution on spontaneous abortion and stillbirth.

Methods

A literature search was performed until March 2018 in PUBMED. The search combined terms related to air pollution exposure and spontaneous abortion or stillbirth outcomes. All study types were included in this review, including: ecological, time-series, case-control, cohort and experimental. Animal studies were included to focus on possible biological mechanisms relevant to human studies. Occupational studies were included to focus on highly exposed populations. This review excluded any study with the major environmental exposure of environmental tobacco smoke.

Our primary outcome of interest was spontaneous abortion and stillbirth. Synonyms for these keywords (i.e. miscarriage, intrauterine death, etc.) were also used in the search. Specific definitions of the outcomes were not used when determining which articles to include as each study may define abortion or stillbirth differently. The following keywords were used to search for outcomes related to spontaneous abortion or stillbirth: spontaneous abortion, miscarriage, stillbirth, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine mortality and missed abortion.

Air pollutants are a mixture of many contaminants, therefore we searched for various air pollutants in this review. These exposures included air pollution, particulate matter (PM), particles, sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), total dust count (TDC), respirable dust concentration (RDC), suspended dust concentration (SDC), total suspended particles (TSP), household air pollution (HAP), indoor air pollution (IAP), cooking smoke, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), diesel exhaust particles, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), smoke, biomass, carbon disulfide (CS2), solid fuel, benzene, volatile organic compounds (VOC), lead dust and lead fumes. All articles searched were carefully reviewed for inclusion. Those articles were excluded if they did not pertain to the air pollution exposure or the outcome being investigated. Reference lists of all relevant articles were screened for any articles that may have been overlooked.

A total of 43 studies that met the inclusion criteria are included in this review. Eight of the articles were animal studies (Table 1). Seventeen studies focused on spontaneous abortion (Table 2), four of which focused on occupational exposures and spontaneous abortion (Table 3), and 22 studies focused on stillbirth (Table 4). Four studies investigated both spontaneous abortion and stillbirth as the outcome (27, 29, 30, 32).

Table 1:

Summary of the animal studies literature.

Reference Subjects (n) Pollutants analyzed Results
Dominickand Carson (19) 18 Sows CO Ambient CO level, ppm Live births Stillbirths Stillbirths, %
Control 22 1 4.3
150 13 0 0
200 14 1 6.7
250 15 8 34.8
300 15 11 42.3
350 5 20 80
Mohallem et al. (20) 40 Female mice PM10, NO2 Chamber Live-born pups Live-born pups per mouse (median) Reabsorptions/fetal deaths per mouse (median)
Clean 106 6 1
Polluted 75 4 2
Pejsak et al. (21) 1100 Sows CO Farrowing unit Number of sows that aborted
D (January 2006) 28/28
D (March 2006) 25/28
H 26/28
Rigdon and Rennels (22) 14 Female rats Benzo[a]pyrene Untreated Treated
Successful births 3 1
Unsuccessful births 3 8
Tsukue et al.(23) 60 Female mice DEP Diesel exhaust particle concentration, mg/m3
Control (0.0) 0.3 1.0 3.0
Number of abortions, % 0 (0%) 1 (9.1%) 1(10.0%) 2(16.7%)
Waldner et al. (24) 23 Herds of cattle H2S Health measure Investigational herds (n = 18) Control herds (n = 5)
Abortion risk 0.0 (0.0–3.0) 0.0 (0.0–3.9)
Stillbirth risk 1.6(0.0–6.0) 1.9(1.3–3.3)
*Data expressed as median % (range %)
Waldner (25) 28,144 Cows for abortion assessment, 28,402 Calves for stillbirth assessment SO2, H2S, VOC Summary risk for study population
Productivity outcome % n
Risk of abortion 2.6 739
Risk of stillbirth 2.6 739
Wood (26) 16 Sows CO Incident Total piglets born Piglets dead at birth (% of total)
Incident 1 1198 335(28%)
Incident 2 68 36 (52.9%)

Table 2:

Summary of the literature investigating the relationship between air pollutants and spontaneous abortion.

Reference Location Study design Study population (SAB/confirmed pregnancies) Outcome definition Exposure Exposure assessment Major findings Notes
Dastoorpoor et al. (27) Iran Time series 1334/49,173 Births Fetal loss ≤20 weeks’ gestation PM10, CO, NO, NO2, SO2, O3 Khuzestan Province EPA daily measurements Rate ratio (95% Cl) per 10 μg/m3
increase:
Cumulative Lag (Lag 0 to 14)
PM10:1.01 (1.00,1.02)
CO: 0.28 (0.07, 1.08)
NO: 1.00(0.84,1.20)
NO2: 1.10(0.99,1.23)
SO2: 1.01 (0.96, 1.07)
O3: 1.00(0.98,1.10)
Lag 0:
SO2: 1.01 (1.00, 1.02)
Adjustments for trend, seasonality, temperature, relative humidity, weekdays, holidays
Di Caula and Bilancia (28) Italy Time series 984 Cases Fetal loss within 180 days of gestation PM10, NO2) O3 Regional environmental agency average monthly levels ARR (95% Cl) per 10 μg/m3
increase:
PM10:1.20 (1.08,1.34)
NO2: 0.96 (0.87, 1.05)
03:1.34 (1.26,1.42)
Adjustments for temperature and humidity
Guimarães et al. (29) São Paulo, Brazil Cross-sectional 199/4296 Fetal loss <20 weeks’ gestation Heavy metals, organochlorine compounds Questionnaire and interview AOR (95% Cl):
Area la: 1.04 (0.66,1.65)
Area 2b: 1.06 (0.64, 1.74)
Area 3c: 1.55 (0.98, 2.46)
Area 4d: 1.12 (0.69, 1.81)
Area 5: Control
Adjustments for time of residence in region, age group, education, marital status, family income, current and past occupational exposure, alcohol and tobacco use, prenatal care;
a: Industrial and petrochemical landfill
b: Industrial center
c: Chemical and pesticides landfills
d: Chemical industry and port
Hafez etal. (30) Egypt Cross-sectional 565/1934 Did not report definition TDC, SDC, RDC Questionnaire AOR:
TDC (Mppcf): 33.04
SDC (μig/m3): 0.03
RDC (μg/m3): 0.72 (p<0.05)
Adjustments for education, lead concentration, occupation, SES, smoking, RDC, SDC; No Cl reported
Hou etal. (31) Tianjin, China Case-control 959 Cases 959 Controls Evidence of fetal pole ≥6 mm within intra-uterine gestationalsac, but absence of heartbeat SO2, TSP, PM10, NO2 Tianjin air monitoring stations daily and monthly concentrations AOR fetal loss within 14 weeks
(95% Cl):
SO2:19.76 (2.34,166.71)
TSP: 2.04 (1.01, 4.13)
Only SO2 and TSP selected for logistic regression model Adjustments for maternal age, gravidity, parity, gestational age
Mohorovic eta 1.(32) Croatia Case-control 3/138 vs. 6/122 Did not report definition SO2 Maternal methemoglobin Frequencies of SAB lower in clean period compared to dirty period (p<0.05) Frequencies lower in the control compared to the “exposure”
Moridi et al. (33) Tehran, Iran Case-control 148 Cases 148 Controls Fetal loss <14 weeks’ gestation PM10, CO, NO2, O3,SO2 Tehran air quality control company annual average concentration AOR (95% Cl) cases vs. controls:
PM10: 1.01 (1.00, 1.02)
CO: 1.95 (1.50, 2.55)
NO2:1.04 (1.02,1.05)
O3:1.10 (1.06,1.13)
S02p value > 0.05; Adjustments for maternal and paternal age, cigarette smoke exposure, occupation, pre-pregnancy BMI, other demographic parameters
Samaraweera and Abeysena (34) Sri Lanka Case-control 230/731 Confirmed diagnosis of partial or full expulsion of fetus ≤28 weeks Cooking smoke Self-report AOR (95% Cl) exposure to smoke generated by cooking in a kitchen without a chimney: Second trimester: 3.83 (1.50, 9.90) Adjustments for maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, parity, previous abortions, education, employment, walking/standing/sitting/sleeping per day, stressful life events, medication, passive smoke, cooking smoke
Wuetal. (35) Tianjin, China Case-control 81 Cases 81 Controls Confirmed dead in-utero fetus <14 weeks’ gestation PAH Interview, aborted tissue, maternal blood draw (102 subjects) AOR of missed abortion (95% Cl): 1.35(1.11,1.64)
Maternal blood BaP-DNA level per adduct/108 nucleotides
Adjustments for maternal education and household income
Perin et al. (36) São Paulo, Brazil Retrospective cohort 34/177 IVF/ET patients, 18/354 Control patients First trimester loss: loss in first 12 weeks PM10 São Paulo EPA (CETESB) daily levels AOR Women exposed to >56.72 μg/m3 vs. ≤56.72 ng/m3: 2.585 (p = 0.00) OR for women exposed to the Q4 period (>56.72 μg/m3) during the follicular phase of conception compared to women exposed to Q1–Q3 periods (0, 56.72 μg/m3).
Perin etal. (37) São Paulo, Brazil Retrospective cohort 45/348 IVF/ET patients Pregnancy diagnosed with pos. serum p”hCG that failed to reach the 12 weeks gestation PM10 São Paulo EPA (CETESB) daily levels AOR (95% Cl) Women exposed to >56.72 μg/m3 vs. ≤56.72 (μg/m3: 5.05(1.04,25.51) Adjustments for level of PM10
Green etal. (38) CA, USA Prospective cohort 499/4979 Pregnancy ending ≤20 weeks NO2, AADT California Air Resources Board and Spatial Variation AOR (95% Cl):
1.18 (0.87,1.60) for top 90th
Percentile of AADT vs. bottom
75th percentile AADT
Adjustments for maternal age, race/ethnicity, SES, cigarette smoke exposure, employment status, stressful life events
Haetal. (39) United States Prospective cohort 97/246 Neg. pregnancy test after pos. test, clinically confirmed loss, or onset of menstruation PM2.5, PM10, CO, NO2, O3,SO2 Community multiscale air quality models HR for IQR increase:
Entire pregnancy:
PM2.5:1.13 (1.03,1.24)
PM10: 1.02 (0.99, 1.06)
CO: 1.00 (1.00, 1.00)
NO2: 1.03(0.98,1.08)
O3: 1.12(1.07,1.17)
SO2: 1.01 (0.77, 1.34)
Adjustments for season study site, maternal age, race, education, income, parity condition on gravidity, early pregnancy caffeine intake, BMI, early pregnancy adherence to multivitamin intake, maternal blood cotinine level, paternal blood cotinine level

SAB, Spontaneous abortion; PM2.5, particulate matter ≤ 2.5 μm; PM10, particulate matter ≤ 10 μm; CO, carbon monoxide; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; SO2, sulfur dioxide; O3, ozone; TDC, total dust count; SDC, suspended dust concentration; RDC, respirable dust concentration; TSP, total suspended particles; H2S, hydrogen sulfide; AADT, annual average daily traffic; IVF, in vitro fertilization; ET, embryo transfer; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; COR, crude odds ratio; ARR, adjusted risk ratio; HR, hazard ratio; IQR, interquartile range; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence intervals. Values in bold indicate significant confidence intervals.

Table 3:

Summary of the literature investigating the relationship between occupational exposure and spontaneous abortion.

Reference Location Study design Study population (SAB/confirmed pregnancies) Exposure Outcome definition Exposure assessment Major findings Notes
Hemminki and Niemi (40) Finland Cross-sectional 116/1792 SO2, H2S, CS2 Fetal loss <20 weeks’ gestation Institute of Meteorological Sciences data regional mean concentrations Increased rate of SAB (p< 0.10) for women employed in rayon textile and paper products jobs Increased rate for women employed in rayon textile jobs and paper products jobs
Lindbohm etal. (41) Finland Cross-sectional 4896/68,327 Solvents, automobile exhaust fumes, PAH, chemical exposures, metals, textile dust Fetal loss <20 weeks’ gestation 1975 National Population and Housing Census ARR (95% Cl): exposed vs. unexposed
Solvents: 0.79 (0.58, 1.07)
Automobile exhaust fumes: 1.16 (0.73, 1.85)
PAH: 0.89 (0.60, 1.30)
Other chemicals: 0.93 (0.78,1.29)
Metals: 0.78 (0.54,1.13)
Textile dust: 1.07 (0.93, 1.23)
Adjustments for age, place of residence, parity, marital status, age + parity interaction
Wong et al. (42) Shanghai, China Retrospective cohort 84/1429 Cotton dust, wool dust, silk dust, synthetic fibers, mixed fibers, solvents, acids and bases, resins, lubricants, metals Miscarriage <20 weeks’ gestation Self-report AOR (95% Cl): exposed vs. unexposed
Cotton dust: 0.98 (0.62, 1.56)
Wool dust: 0.87 (0.40,1.87)
Silk dust: 1.66(0.67,4.08)
Synthetic fibers: 1.89 (1.20, 3.00)
Mixed fibers: 3.31 (1.30,8.42)
Solvents: 0.54 (0.24,1.21)
Acids and bases: 0.60 (0.21,1.71)
Resins: 1.91 (0.64, 5.68)
Lubricants: 0.78 (0.49,1.24)
Metals: 0.44 (0.13,1.45)
Adjustments for age at pregnancy, education level, smoking status of women and spouse, alcohol use, women’s year of birth, first pregnancy, all pregnancies
Xuetal. (43) Beijing, China Retrospective cohort 175/2853 Petrochemicals Self-report Interview AOR (95% Cl) exposed vs. unexposed: 2.9 (2.0,4.0) Adjustments for age, education, plant, shift work, standing/kneeling hours at work, noise level, dust concentration, passive smoke, diet

SAB, Spontaneous abortion; SO2, sulfur dioxide; H2S, hydrogen sulfide; CS2, carbon disulfide; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; ARR, adjusted relative risk. Values in bold indicate significant confidence intervals.

Table 4:

Summary of the literature investigating the relationship between air pollutants and stillbirth.

Reference Location Study design Study population (stillbirths/confirmed pregnancies) Outcome definition Exposure Exposure assessment Major findings Notes
Bobakand Leon (44) Czech Republic Ecological 971/223,929 Delivery of dead infant >28 weeks’ gestation or weighing >1000g SO2, NO2,TSP Czech National Public Health Service daily average AOR (95% Cl) per 50 ng/m3 increase:
SO2: 0.90 (0.70,1.16)
NO2: 1.21 (0.89,1.64)
TSP: 0.92 (0.74, 1.15)
Adjustments for mean income, mean savings, mean number of people per car, proportion of births outside marriage, proportion of divorces to new marriages, legally induced abortions, proportion of gypsies in the population
Dastoorpoor etal. (27) Iran Time series 907/49,173 Fetal death >20 weeks’ gestation PM10, CO, NO, NO2,SO2,O3 Khuzestan Province EPA daily measurements Rate ratio (95% Cl) per 10 ug/m3 increase:
PM10: 0.99 (0.98,1.00)
CO: 0.54 (0.11, 2.70)
NO: 0.93 (0.76, 1.13)
NO2: 1.00(0.89,1.12)
SO2: 0.91 (0.85, 0.97)
O3: 0.96 (0.94, 0.99)
Cumulative lag (Lag 0–14) Adjustments for trend, seasonality, temperature, relative humidity, weekdays, holidays
Mishra etal. (45) India Time series 18,567 Cases Delivery of dead infant >28 weeks’ gestation Cooking smoke Questionnaire (A)OR:
Model 1a: 2.11 (95% Cl: 1.74, 2.57)
Model 2b: 1.52 (95% Cl: 1.23,1.89)
Model 6C: 1.44 (95% Cl: 1.05,1.97)
a: Biomass fuel vs. cleaner fuel
b: Has smoked vs. never smoked
c: Full model adjusted for nutritional status, BMI, education, religion, SES, household conditions, residence, region
Pereira etal. (46) São Paulo, Brazil Time series Daily counts intrauterine mortality Age of pregnancy >28 weeks’, weight >1000g, or fetal length >35 cm PM10, CO, NO2, SO2,O3 Sao Paulo Air pollution controlling agency (CETESB) daily concentrations ARR of daily intrauterine deaths (per 10 μg/m3 increase in PM10 on the concurrent day): 1.01 (95% Cl: 1.00,1.02) No significant associations observed for CO, NO2,SO2,O3
Adjustments for limited confounders at area-based level
Faiz et al. (47) NJ, USA Cross-sectional 1446/343,077 Between 20 and 42 weeks’ gestation (140–294 days of pregnancy) birth weight of >500g PM2.5, NO2, SO2, CO EPA hourly measurements, every third day measurements for PM2.5 AOR(95%CI):
PM2.5 (per 4 μg/m3):
Third trimester: 1.08 (0.79,1.48)
Entire pregnancy: 1.07 (0.86,1.33)
NO2(perlO-ppb):
Third trimester: 1.05 (0.90,1.23)
Entire pregnancy: 1.27 (1.04,1.55)
CO(per0.4-ppm):
Third trimester: 1.14 (1.06,1.24)
Entire pregnancy: 1.13 (0.99,1.29)
SO2(per3-ppb):
Third trimester: 1.26 (1.03,1.37)
Entire pregnancy: 1.13 (0.99,1.29)
Adjustments for maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, prenatal care, smoking status, neighborhood, calendar month, year of conception, mean temperature during first trimester
Guimarães et al. (29) São Paulo, Brazil Cross-sectional 22/4296 Fetal death ≥20 weeks’ gestation Heavy metals, organochlorine compounds, PAH Questionnaire and interview AOR(95%CI):
Area 1a: 2.66 (0.51,13.81)
Area 2b: 1.44 (0.20,10.32)
Area 31: 4.17 (0.83, 20.88)
Area 4d: 4.76 (0.98, 23.15)
Area 5: Control area
Adjustments for time of residence in region, age group, education, marital status, family income, current and past occupational exposure, alcohol and tobacco use, prenatal care;
a: Industrial and petrochemical landfill
b: Industrial center
c: Chemical and pesticides landfills
d: Chemical industry and port
Hafez et al. (30) Egypt Cross-sectional 651/1934 TDC, SDC, RDC Questionnaire AOR (All p> 0.05):
TDC (mppcf) 92.35
SDC (μg/m3) 0.01
RDC (μg/m3) 0.86
Adjustments for education, lead concentration, occupation, SES, smoking, RDC, SDC
Lakshmi et al. (48) India Cross-sectional 3112 stillbirths/188,917 total births Fetal death ≥28 weeks’ gestation Cooking fuel: wood, kerosene, other Questionnaire Prevalence ratio (compared to electricity):
Wood: 1.24 (95% Cl: 1.08,1.41)
Kerosene: 1.36 (95% Cl: 1.10, 1.67)
Other: 1.23 (95% Cl: 1.05,1.44)
Adjustments for literacy status, age at last pregnancy, gravid status, fetal complications, previous history of abortion, place of delivery, standard of living, house type, religion, and caste
Sehgaletal. (49) India Cross-sectional 26,103,870/26,519,041 ≥1000g birthweight or ≥28 weeks’ gestation Biomass fuels/HAP NSSO/SRS Report AOR (95% Cl) biomass fuel users: 1.26(1.12,1.43) Adjustments for rural or urban areas
Wylie etal. (50) East India Cross-sectional 55/1744 Delivery of dead infant in hospital Biomass fuels Interview AOR (95% Cl) wood users vs. gas users: 2.71 (0.99, ∞) Adjustments for maternal habits, prenatal care, sociodemographic characteristics
Ebisu et al. (51) CA, United States Case-control 5377/26,885 Fetal death >20 weeks’ gestation PM2.5 constit-uents EPA monitoring stations, every third or sixth day concentrations AOR (95% Cl) per IQR increase:
All stillbirth:
PM2.5 total mass: 1.06 (1.01,1.11)
Gestational age <28 weeks:
PM2.5 total mass: 1.05 (0.99,1.12)
Gestational age ≥28 weeks:
PM2.5 total mass: 1.09 (1.01,1.17)
Adjustments for food stamp rate, matched exposure to apparent temperature, natural cubic spline of LMP with 2 df per year
Hwang et al. (52) Taiwan Case-control 9325/102,575 Fetal death >20 weeks’ gestation PM10,SO2NO2, CO, O3 Taiwan EPA hourly concentrations AOR(95%CI):
PMI0 (per 10 μg/m3) 0.98 (0.94,1.01)
SO2 (per 1-ppb) 1.01 (0.99,1.03)
NO2 (per 10-ppb) 0.98 (0.92,1.04)
CO (100-ppb) 1.00 (0.98,1.02)
0 (per 10-ppb) 0.97 (0.91,1.04)
Adjustments for maternal age, sex of the infant, season of conception
Mavalankar etal. (53) India Case-control 451 Stillbirths 1465 Controls Delivery of dead infant in hospital Cooking smoke Interview AOR(95%CI): 1.5(1.0,2.1) Adjustments for maternal education, previous stillbirth, >1 previous child death, last birth premature, maternal weight, anemia, antenatal factors, intrapartum factors, maternal education, caste, place of residence, toilet facilities, parity
Mohorovic etal. (32) Croatia Case-control 1/138 vs. 4/122 Did not report definition SO2 Maternal methemoglobin Frequencies of stillbirth lower in clean period compared to dirty period (p < 0.05) Frequencies lower in the control compared to the”exposure”
DeFranco etal. (54) OH, USA Cohort 1848/351,036 Fetal death ≥20 weeks’ gestation PM2.5 EPA daily measures AOR(95%CI) > 12μg/m3vs. ≤12μg/m3:
First trimester: 0.77 (0.58,1.02)
Second trimester: 0.80 (0.62,1.04)
Third trimester: 1.42 (1.06,1.91)
Average over pregnancy: 1.21 (0.96,1.53)
Adjustments for maternal age, smoking status, race, education, prenatal care
Tielsch etal. (55) India Cohort 358/13,173 Deliveries Delivery of dead infant >28 weeks’ gestation Cooking fuel Interview ARR(95%CI): 1.34(0.76,2.36) Head of household occupation, number of children in household, place of delivery, roof material, religion, maternal age, education, night blindness, parity, tv/radio ownership, electricity in house, SHTS
Green etal. (38) CA, USA Retrospective cohort 13,999 Stillbirths/3,012,270 Live births Fetal death >20 weeks’ gestation PM2.5,SO2, NO2, CO, O3 California Resource Board average daily levels AOR(95%CI):
PM2.5(per10μg/m3):
Third trimester: 1.01 (0.96,1.06)
Entire pregnancy: 1.06 (0.99,1.13)
NO2(per 10-ppb):
Third trimester: 1.03 (0.99,1.08)
Entire pregnancy: 1.08 (1.03,1.13)
O3, (per 10-ppb):
Third trimester: 1.03 (1.01, 1.05)
Entire pregnancy: 1.01 (0.99,1.04)
CO (per 1-ppm):
Third trimester: 1.01 (0.95,1.07)
Entire pregnancy: 1.04 (0.97,1.12)
SO2 (per 10-ppb):
Third trimester: 0.95 (0.85,1.07)
Entire pregnancy: 1.02 (0.91,1.14)
Adjustments for maternal education, maternal race/ethnicity, maternal age, sex of infant/fetus, mean daily temperature, year of conception, season of last menstrual period, and residence; only significant results were included
Mendola et al. (56) United States Retrospective cohort 992/223,375 Fetal death ≥23 weeks’ gestation PM2.5, PM1O, SO2 NOx, CO, O3 Modified community multiscaleair quality (CMAQ) models ARR (95% Cl), IQR increase in average
daily exposure:
First trimester: O3:1.18 (1.00,1.39)
Whole pregnancy: O3:1.39 (1.05,1.84)
No significant associations observed for PM2.5, PM10, SO2 NO2 CO Adjustments for maternal age, race, parity, smoking and alcohol use during pregnancy, insurance status, marital status, pre-existing hypertension, pre-existing diabetes, season of conception, birth year, site, average temperature
Pearce et al. (57) Northern England Retrospective cohort 812/90,537 Delivery of dead infant ≥28 weeks’ gestation PM4 Air pollution monitoring stations/weekly black smoke levels AOR (95% Cl) per 10 μg/m3:
First trimester: 1.00 (0.99,1.02)
Second trimester: 1.00 (0.99,1.02)
Third trimester: 1.01 (0.99,1.02)
Whole pregnancy: 1.01 (0.99,1.03)
Adjustments for trimester, year of birth, parity, maternal age, sex of the infant
Kim etal.(58) Seoul, Korea Prospective cohort 67/1514 Intrauterine fetal death National Institute of Environmental Research hourly exposure AOR (per 10 μg/m3 increase in PM10):
First trimester: 0.95 (95% Cl: 0.85,1.02)
Second trimester: 1.07 (95% Cl: 0.98,
1.17)
Third trimester: 1.08 (95% Cl: 1.02,1.14)
Adjustments for infant sex, infant order, maternal age, maternal education, paternal education, season of birth, alcohol intake, BMI, maternal weight before delivery
Patel et al. (59) India, Pakistan, Kenya, Zambia, Guatemala Prospective cohort 1740/65,912 Fetal death >20 weeks’ gestation HAP, cooking smoke Questionnaire AOR (polluting fuel vs. clean fuel):
Macerated: 1.66 (95% Cl: 1.23, 2.25)
Non-macerated: 1.43 (95% Cl: 1.15,1.85)
Adjustments for maternal age, education, parity, delivery location, birth weight, infant gender, and tobacco use
Yang et al. (60) Wuhan, China Prospective cohort 95,354 Fetus born between 20 and 42 weeks’ with no sign of life PM2.5, PM10, SO2 NO2, CO, O3 Air pollution monitoring stations, daily mean concentration AOR (per 10 μg/m3 increase):
Third trimester:
PM2.5:1.12 (1.07,1.19)
PM10:1.08 (1.04,1.11)
SO2:1.26 (1.16,1.35)
NO2:1.13 (1.07,1.21)
CO: 1.01 (1.00,1.01)
Entire pregnancy:
PM2.5:1.60 (1.34,1.91)
CO: 1.18 (1.04,1.34)
No significant associations observed for O3 Adjustments for maternal age, occupation, high risk pregnancy, season of conception, prenatal care, infant sex, pregnancy induced hypertension, history of abortion

PM2.5, Particulate matter ≤ 2.5 μm; PM4, particulate matter ≤ 4 μm; PM10, particulate matter ≤ 10 μm; CO, carbon monoxide; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; SO2, sulfur dioxide; O3, ozone; TDC, total dust count; SDC, suspended dust concentration; RDC, respirable dust concentration; TSP, total suspended particles; PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; EPA, Environmental Protection Agency; HAP, household air pollution; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; IQR, interquartile range; SHTS, secondhand tobacco smoke. Values in bold indicate significant confidence intervals.

Results and discussion

The studies included in this review varied by population, geographic location, study design and exposure assessment. Study designs included were ecological, time series, cross-sectional, case-control and cohort study. For exposure measurements, 13 studies used self-reporting measures, such as a questionnaire or interview, 21 studies used routine monitoring stations and two studies used biological measurements (32, 35). The exposure period was not consistent across all studies. Most studies focused on exposure throughout the entire pregnancy, however, some were able to look at specific time periods during pregnancy. The outcome definition was also different across the studies.

Particulate matter

Particulate matter and spontaneous abortion

Out of the seven studies that focus on PM exposure throughout the entire pregnancy and spontaneous abortion, four provide strong evidence that there is an association between exposure to PM throughout the entire pregnancy and increased risk of spontaneous abortion (28, 36, 37, 39). A prospective cohort found a significant increased hazard ratio of 1.13 per interquartile range increase for PM2.5 and spontaneous abortion throughout the entire pregnancy (39). Two retrospective cohorts found significant increased AORs of 5.05 and 2.59 with spontaneous abortion for w >56.72 μg/m3 PM10 vs. ≤56.72 μg/m3 PM10 (36, 37). Both studies had recruited around 400 participants from fertility clinics. One time series study reported a 20% increased risk of spontaneous abortion per 10 μg/m3 increase in PM10 exposure [adjusted risk ratio (ARR) = 1.20, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.08–1.34] (28). A case-control study failed to confirm the association with PM10, but suggested that TSP exposure in the first 14 weeks of pregnancy during the heating period (December to May) has a doubled risk of spontaneous abortion [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.01–4.13] (31). Although evidence on PM10 and spontaneous abortion is strong, the limited data on PM2.5 exposure warrants more research in this area.

Particulate matter and stillbirth

Overall, the results between particulate matter and stillbirth are controversial. Six cohort studies were conducted, with three large studies finding significant associations between PM exposure in the third trimester and stillbirths (54, 58, 60). The cohort study from the United States found a 42% increased stillbirth risk with exposure to high levels of PM2.5 (>12 μg/m3) in the third trimester (AOR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.06–1.91) (54), and the cohort study from Korea found an 8% increased stillbirth risk per 10 μg/m3 increase in PM10 exposure in the third trimester (AOR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02–1.14) (58). No association was found between exposure in the first and second trimester and stillbirths in both studies (54, 58). A prospective cohort from China found an 8% increased stillbirth risk per 10 μg/m3 increase in PM10 exposure in the third trimester (AOR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04–1.11) and a 12% increased stillbirth risk per 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 exposure in the third trimester (AOR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.07–1.19) (60). The study also found a 60% increased stillbirth risk per 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 exposure throughout the entire pregnancy (AOR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.34, 1.91). The other two cohort studies, a case-control, and two time-series study showed null results (27, 38, 46, 52, 57). Two other studies, a cross-sectional and a cohort, found insignificantly increased risk for stillbirth from increased PM10 and PM2.5 exposure throughout the pregnancy (38, 47), while a case-control study from California found a 6% increased stillbirth risk per interquartile range increased in PM2.5 exposure among all stillbirths (AOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.11) (51). Many of the previous studies found a strong association between high particulate matter exposure and stillbirths. As stillbirths were often described as fetal deaths occurring ≥20 weeks of gestation and the third trimester is assumed to start from 27th week of gestation, it is difficult to determine whether these findings can be attributed to an acute exposure to pollutants in the third trimester or rather relatively chronic exposure during the first and second trimester. Regardless of this issue, the results from the previous studies are not consistent and further studies are necessary to elucidate the association between particulate matter exposure and stillbirths.

Cooking smoke

Cooking smoke and spontaneous abortion

The only available epidemiological evidence on the association between exposure to cooking smoke and spontaneous abortion is from a case-control study conducted in Sri Lanka (34). This study reported that compared to women who carried a viable fetus, those who had miscarriages (defined as partial or full expulsion of fetus ≤28 weeks of pregnancy) during the second trimester were 283% more likely to be exposed to cooking smoke (from burning firewood) during their pregnancy. While this study provides suggestive evidence on the association between cooking smoke and spontaneous abortions, these results should be interpreted with caution as they are based on a low case-yield. Smoke from burning biomass fuels contains many pollutants including particulate matter, carbon monoxide and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Additional evidence from future studies is necessary to determine how this mixture of pollutants can influence the risk of spontaneous abortions.

Cooking smoke and stillbirth

Overall, one time-series, three cross-sectionals, a case-control and two cohort studies measured the association between cooking smoke and stillbirth, with all but one providing strong evidence for the positive association between cooking smoke and stillbirth (45, 4850, 53, 55, 59). A prospective cohort that took place in India, Pakistan, Kenya, Zambia and Guatemala found a 66% increase in macerated stillbirths, death occurring pre-partum, and 43% increase in non-macerated stillbirths, death occurring intrapartum, among women who use polluted fuel compared to those who use clean fuel (AOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.23–2.25; AOR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.15–1.85) (59). Among three cross-sectional studies conducted in India, two studies found a 26%, and 171% increase in stillbirths among women exposed to biomass fuels (AOR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.12–1.43; AOR = 2.71, 95% CI: 0.99–∞, respectively) (49, 50). The third cross-sectional study reported that stillbirth rate increased by 24%, 36%, and 23% among women who used wood fuel, kerosene and other fuels respectively compared to the use of electricity (48). A case-control study found a 50% increase in stillbirths among women exposed to cooking smoke (AOR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0–2.1), and a time series study found a 111% increase in stillbirth rates among women who use biomass fuel compared to women who use cleaner fuel (AOR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.74–2.57) (45, 53). There was only one study that did not find an association between exposure to cooking smoke and increased risk of stillbirth (55). These results suggest a strong association between cooking smoke exposure and stillbirth.

Nitrogen dioxide

Nitrogen dioxide and spontaneous abortion

Six studies were conducted, of which one reported a positive relationship between NO2 exposure and spontaneous abortion, with estimated small magnitude (33). The case-control study from Iran found a 4% increase in spontaneous abortion among those exposed to higher concentrations of NO2, compared to those exposed to lower concentrations of NO2 (AOR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02–1.05). A prospective cohort in the United States reported an 18% increase on spontaneous abortion for those individuals in the top 90th percentile of annual average daily traffic exposure compared to the bottom 75th percentile, in which the main pollutant analyzed was NO2 (AOR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.87–1.60) (61). However, the other four studies failed to support the above findings (27, 28, 31, 39). These results are inconclusive, suggesting more studies need to analyze this association.

Nitrogen dioxide and stillbirth

Three studies, two cohort studies and a cross-sectional study, found increased stillbirths with exposure to NO2 (38, 47, 60). The retrospective cohort from the United States found an 8% increase in stillbirth rates per 10-ppb increase in NO2 throughout the entire pregnancy, and a 3% increase in stillbirth rates per 10-ppb increase in NO2 during the third trimester (AOR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03–1.13; AOR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.99–1.08) (38). The prospective cohort from China found a 13% increase in stillbirth rates per 10 μg/m3 increase in NO2 in the third trimester (AOR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.07–1.21) (60). The cross-sectional study from the United States found a 27% increase in stillbirth rates per 10-ppb increase in NO2 concentration (AOR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.04–1.55) (47). Five additional studies measured the association between NO2 and stillbirth but produced insignificant results (27, 44, 46, 52, 56). These studies suggest inconclusive results.

Sulfur dioxide

Sulfur dioxide and spontaneous abortion

Two case-control studies found significant associations between sulfur dioxide exposure and spontaneous abortion (27, 31, 32). A study from Croatia found frequencies of spontaneous abortion were lower when the local coal power plant was closed compared to when the power plant was open (p < 0.05) (32), and a study from China found fetal loss within 14 weeks was associated with exposure to SO2 (AOR = 19.76, 95% CI: 2.34–166.71) (31). These results suggest a strong relationship between sulfur dioxide exposure and spontaneous abortion.

Sulfur dioxide and stillbirth

Three studies found significant associations between SO2 and stillbirth (32, 47, 60). The case-control study from Croatia found that frequencies of stillbirth were lower in the control group compared to the exposed group (p < 0.05) (32). A cross-sectional study from the United States found a 26% increase in stillbirths per 3-ppb increase in SO2 in the third trimester (AOR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.03–1.37), and a prospective cohort from China found a 26% increase in stillbirths per 10 μg/m3 increase in SO2 in the third trimester (AOR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.16–1.35) (47, 60). However, there are also six studies that found no association between SO2 and stillbirth (27, 38, 44, 46, 52, 56).

Carbon monoxide

Carbon monoxide and spontaneous abortion

Only three studies analyzed carbon monoxide exposure and spontaneous abortion, and the results are conflicting (27, 33, 39). A case-control study from Iran found a 95% increase in spontaneous abortions in cases compared to controls (AOR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.50–2.55) (33), but a time series study found no association between spontaneous abortion and exposure to carbon monoxide, and a prospective cohort found null results (27, 39). These studies produced inconclusive results, suggesting more studies need to be done in this area.

Carbon monoxide and stillbirth

So far, three published studies found significant associations between carbon monoxide and stillbirth (38, 47, 60). The retrospective cohort from the United States found a 1% increase in stillbirth per 1-ppm increase in CO in the third trimester and a 4% increase in stillbirth per 1-ppm increase in CO throughout the entire pregnancy (AOR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.95–1.07; AOR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.97–1.12) (38). A cross-sectional study from the United States found a 14% increase in stillbirth per 0.4-ppm increase in CO in the third trimester and a 13% increase in stillbirth per 0.4-ppm increase in CO throughout the entire pregnancy (AOR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06–1.24, AOR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.99–1.29) (47). A prospective cohort found a 1% increase in stillbirth per 10 μg/m3 increase in CO in the third trimester (AOR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00–1.01) and an 18% increase in stillbirth per 10 μg/m3 increase in CO throughout the entire pregnancy (AOR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.04–1.34) (60). However, a case-control study from Taiwan found null results (52) and three other studies found no association (27, 46, 56).

Ozone

Ozone and spontaneous abortion

Four studies examined the effect of ozone on spontaneous abortion, with three producing strong results (27, 28, 33, 39). A time-series study from Italy found a 34% increased risk of spontaneous abortion per 10 μg/m3 increase in ozone (AOR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.26–1.42) (28). A case-control study from Iran found a 10% increased risk of spontaneous abortion in cases exposed to ozone compared to controls (AOR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.06–1.13) (33). A prospective cohort found a 12% increased risk of spontaneous abortion per interquartile range increase in ozone throughout the entire pregnancy (HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 10.7–1.17) (39). Another time series study produced null results (27). These results suggest an association between ozone and spontaneous abortion, but more studies are needed to investigate this association.

Ozone and stillbirth

Six studies examined the effect of ozone on stillbirth (27, 38, 46, 52, 56, 60). A retrospective cohort from the United States found an 18% increased risk in stillbirth per interquartile range increase in average daily exposure in the first trimester, and a 39% increased risk in stillbirth per interquartile range increase in average daily exposure throughout the whole pregnancy (ARR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00–1.39; ARR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.05–1.84) (56). Another retrospective cohort from the United States found a 3% increase in stillbirth per 10-ppb increase in ozone in the third trimester and a 1% increase in stillbirth per 10-ppb increase in ozone throughout the entire pregnancy (AOR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01–1.05; AOR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99–1.04) (38). However, the other four studies failed to observe an association between ozone and stillbirth (27, 46, 52, 60).

Other pollutants

Other pollutants and spontaneous abortion

Overall, three studies examined the effects of other pollutants not mentioned above on spontaneous abortion risk (29, 30, 35). One cross-sectional study from Brazil examined the association between different levels of heavy metals and organochlorine compounds and risk of spontaneous abortion, but no significant results were found (29). A second cross-sectional study was conducted in Egypt which examined the association between total dust count, suspended dust concentration, and respirable dust concentration, with a significant correlation for respirable dust count (r = 0.72, p < 0.05) (30). A case-control study from China observed a 35% increased risk of missed abortion among women whose maternal blood BaP-DNA level showed evidence of PAH exposure (AOR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.11–1.64) (35). A missed abortion is where the embryo has died but a miscarriage has not yet occurred.

Other pollutants and stillbirth

Overall, two studies examined the effects of other pollutants not mentioned above on stillbirth risk (29, 30). One cross-sectional study from Brazil examined the association between different levels of heavy metals and organochlorine compounds and risk of stillbirth (29), and a cross-sectional study from Egypt examined the association between total dust count, suspended dust concentration, and respirable dust concentration with risk of stillbirth (30). Both studies showed null results.

Occupational pollutants

Overall, two cross-sectional studies from Finland and two cohort studies from China examined the association between occupational pollutants and risk of spontaneous abortion (4043). One cross-sectional study examined spontaneous abortion risk in an industrial community (40). Pollutants that were examined included sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide and carbon disulfide. An increased rate of spontaneous abortion was found for women employed in rayon textile and paper products jobs (10.3 and 16.7, respectively, p < 0.10). Another occupational cross-sectional study from Finland examined the association between solvents, automobile exhaust fumes, PAH, chemical exposures, metals, textile dust and spontaneous abortion risk, however, no association was found (41). A retrospective cohort study from Shanghai, China examined the miscarriage risk among women textile workers (42). Pollutants that were measured included cotton dust, wool dust, silk dust, synthetic fibers, mixed fibers, solvents, acids and bases, resins, lubricants and metals. Women exposed to synthetic fibers had an 89% increased miscarriage risk (AOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.20–3.00) and women exposed to mixed fibers had a 231% increased miscarriage risk (AOR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.30–8.42) compared to those women who were unexposed. A retrospective cohort study from Beijing, China showed a 190% increased risk of spontaneous abortion among those exposed to petrochemicals compared to those unexposed to petrochemicals (AOR = 2.9, 95% CI: 2.0–4.0) (43).

Animal studies

Overall, we found eight animal studies for this review, from which seven studies provide strong evidence that air pollution causes both spontaneous abortion and stillbirth. Animals that were analyzed in these studies included sows, mice and cattle. Pollutants analyzed included CO, PM10, NO2, benzo(a)pyrene, diesel exhaust particles, H2S, SO2, and volatile organic compounds. Both short- and long-term exposures were included due to a shorter life span.

Two studies in particular observed a dose-response relationship with exposure to air pollutants and spontaneous abortion. A study found that as the ambient level of CO increased from 150 ppm, 200 ppm, 250 ppm, 300 ppm, to 350 ppm for 48–96 h, overall stillbirths rates were 0.0%, 6.7%, 34.8%, 42.3%, and 80.0%, respectively (19). Although 48–96 h is a much shorter exposure window than compared to the human exposure window, we decided to include it in this review due to the limited number of animal studies, and the study can at least provide certain useful evidence. Another study observed pregnant mice exposed to levels of diesel exhaust particles ranging from 0.3, 1.0, to 3.0 mg/m3, with abortion rates of 9.1%, 10.0%, and 16.7%, respectively (23).

Mice exposed to PM10 and NO2 showed a decreased fertility as higher numbers of live-born mice were born in the clean chamber compared to the polluted chamber (median = 6.0 and 4.0, respectively, p-value = 0.037) (20). A study examining the effects of benzo(a)pyrene on rats found that out of eight females fed benzo(a)pyrene, there was one successful birth and eight unsuccessful births (22). Of the eight females fed benzo(a)pyrene, five became pregnant and only one gave birth. The female that gave birth had four pups, of which two were stillborn. The remaining pregnant females did not give birth, indicating spontaneous abortion or fetal absorption, while three out of the six female controls became pregnant and all three females delivered healthy litters. Another study observed pregnant sows in Poland that were exposed to high levels of CO (21). In the first group of sows that experienced carbon monoxide poisoning, 28/28 aborted. In the second group 26/28 aborted, in the third group 25/28 aborted, and in the group of unexposed sows none aborted. Another study that focused on carbon monoxide poisoning in sows found 28% of piglets were stillborn in the first CO poisoning incident, and 52.9% were stillborn in the second CO poisoning incident (26). Waldner et al. conducted two animal studies focusing on exposure in cows from the oil and gas industry and birth outcomes (24, 25). The first study with 23 herds of cattle investigated a natural gas leak from a pipeline and calf mortality found null results (24). The other study showed that the risk of spontaneous abortion and stillbirth was 2.6% for cows with higher exposure to oil- and gas-production facilities compared to those who were less exposed (25). Overall, the animal studies included in this review provide supporting evidence that pollutants such as CO, diesel exhaust particles, benzo(a) pyrene and pollutants from oil and gas production lead to an increased risk for spontaneous abortion and stillbirth.

Biological mechanisms

The biological mechanisms behind particulate matter and spontaneous abortion and stillbirth are not well understood. It has been hypothesized that particulate matter may impair reproductive health in women by: [1] affecting the placental interface between the mother and the fetus by compromising delivery of maternal blood and nutrients to the placenta, impairing embryo development (62); [2] contributing to oxidative stress through oxidative activities of combustion-derived particles adversely affecting the embryo in its earliest stage of growth, which can lead to DNA damage and inflammation (63, 64); [3] escaping phagocytosis by alveolar macrophages and translocating to extrapulmonary organs due to the high respiratory deposition of ultrafine particles (65); or [4] increasing concentration of DNA adducts, which may lower the efficiency of the transplacental function, resulting in decreased fetal health ultimately leading to stillbirth (66). The exposure to the fetus at different periods of development may have differing effects because of differences in physiologic maturity of the fetus (63, 64). While many pathways between PM and spontaneous abortion and stillbirth have been proposed, none have been proven.

The overall mechanisms through which air pollution exposure potentiates stillbirth and spontaneous abortion remains unclear, with the toxic effects of CO on the fetus the only pathway that is well established. First, CO reduces the oxygen-carrying capacity of maternal hemoglobin, which could affect oxygen delivery to the fetal circulation (67); second, CO crosses the placental barrier due to fetal hemoglobin having a greater affinity for binding CO than adult hemoglobin, therefore further compromising oxygen delivery to the fetus.

Pathways involving NO2, SO2, and O3 are still under investigation. These pollutants can cross the placenta and damage the embryo during critical stages of development by causing irreversible damage to dividing cells (66, 68), or by triggering hypoxic damage or immune-mediated injury (63, 68). Cooking smoke, or smoke from solid fuel combustion, is comprised of many different pollutants, including particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and other organic compounds.

Methodological issues

One reason for the limited number of data on air pollution and spontaneous abortions is partially due to data collection. Women can have a spontaneous abortion before they even realize they are pregnant, resulting in a large portion of unrecognized spontaneous abortions. In developing countries, spontaneous abortion and stillbirth are still a major health problem, with much of the data underre-ported or unreliable (69). Another issue is the definition of the outcomes. Every country, or state in the United States, has their own definition of what constitutes a spontaneous abortion and stillbirth. The various definitions make it difficult to compare the results across the studies. Some studies included in this review presented associations between pollutant exposure during individual trimesters and stillbirths. Considering that women could be exposed to pollutants for only a short period during third trimester; at least some stillbirths occurring during this period could be attributed to an acute exposure to these pollutants. For example, Mendola et al. showed that acute (1 week before delivery) exposures to ozone could increase risk of stillbirths (56). On the other hand, findings from studies on the associations between third trimester exposure to pollutants and stillbirths should be interpreted with caution because of the lack of specificity in quantifying the exposure period before the occurrence of stillbirth outcome.

Many of the studies used air monitoring station data to represent individual air pollution exposure, without taking into account indoor air pollution and mobility of human activity. This limitation could result in misclassification bias. Many papers in this review reported results relating to various combinations of pollutants. Multiple pollutant models were used, and caution should be used when interpreting this data.

Summary

Our findings are inconsistent with what was found by Siddika et al. (18) and Zhu et al. (5). For PM2.5, Zhu et al. (5) indicated there was no evidence of a statistically significant effect on stillbirth with an increase of 10 μg/m3. These findings were consistent with those found by Siddika et al. (18). However, Siddika et al. (18) found an increase per 4 μg/m3 in the first and second trimesters, though not significant. They also found a small, non-significant increased risk of stillbirth with SO2 and CO exposure throughout the entire pregnancy. It is hard to compare these results with ours, as we did not do a meta-analysis. However, the evidence presented in this review suggests various air pollutants as a risk factor for spontaneous abortion and stillbirth. Consistent results were observed for PM10 exposure and spontaneous abortion, and for PM10 and PM2.5 exposure in the third trimester and increased risk of stillbirth. Exposure to cooking smoke also produced consistent and strong results with increased risk of stillbirth. Exposure to SO2 and CO showed inconsistent results. Pollutants such as heavy metals, organochlorine compounds, PAH, and total dust count produced no evidence. More evidence is needed.

Research funding:

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences R21ES026429.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

Informed consent: Informed consent is not applicable.

Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

Contributor Information

Alexandra Grippo, Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, The State University of New York (SUNY), Buffalo, NY, USA.

Yanjun Guo, Hang Tian General Hospital, Beijing, China.

References

  • 1.Sava F, Carlsten C. Respiratory health effects of ambient air pollution: an update. Clin Chest Med 2012;33(4):759–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beelen R, Stafoggia M, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Andersen ZJ, Xun WW, Katsouyanni K, et al. Long-term exposure to air pollution and cardiovascular mortality: an analysis of 22 European cohorts. Epidemiology 2014;25(3):368–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shah AS, Lee KK, McAllister DA, Hunter A, Nair H, Whiteley W, et al. Short term exposure to air pollution and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J 2015;350:h1295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Demetriou CA, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Loft S, Møller P, Vermeulen R, Palli D, et al. Biomarkers of ambient air pollution and lung cancer: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 2012;69(9):619–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhu X, Liu Y, Chen Y, Yao C, Che Z, Cao J. Maternal exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and pregnancy outcomes: a meta-analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2015;22(5):3383–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Slama R, Darrow L, Parker J, Woodruff TJ, Strickland M, Nieuwenhuijsen M, et al. Meeting report: atmospheric pollution and human reproduction. Environ Health Perspect 2008;116(6):791–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Dadvand P, Grellier J, Martinez D, Vrijheid M. Environmental risk factors of pregnancy outcomes: a summary of recent meta-analyses of epidemiological studies. Environ Health 2013;12:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stillerman KP, Mattison DR, Giudice LC, Woodruff TJ. Environmental exposures and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a review of the science. Reprod Sci 2008;15(7):631–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lindbohm ML, Hietanen M. Magnetic fields of video display terminals and pregnancy outcome. J Occup Environ Med 1995;37(8):952–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Juutilainen J, Matilainen P, Saarikoski S, Läärä E, Suonio S. Early pregnancy loss and exposure to 50-Hz magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 1993;14(3):229–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hyland A, Piazza KM, Hovey KM, Ockene JK, Andrews CA, Rivard C, et al. Associations of lifetime active and passive smoking with spontaneous abortion, stillbirth and tubal ectopic pregnancy: a cross-sectional analysis of historical data from the Women’s Health Initiative. Tob Control 2015;24(4):328–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pineles BL, Park E, Samet JM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of miscarriage and maternal exposure to tobacco smoke during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 2014;179(7): 807–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Garcıa-Enguıdanos A, Calle ME, Valero J, Luna S, Domınguez-Rojas V. Risk factors in miscarriage: a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002;102(2):111–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O’connor JF, Baird DD, Schlatterer JP, Canfield RE, et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1988;319(4):189–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Eskenazi B, Gold EB, Lasley BL, Samuels SJ, Hammond SK, Wight S, et al. Prospective monitoring of early fetal loss and clinical spontaneous abortion among female semiconductor workers. Am J Ind Med 1995;28(6):833–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet 2012;379(9832):2162–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aminu M, Unkels R, Mdegela M, Utz B, Adaji S, den Broek N. Causes of and factors associated with stillbirth in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;121(Suppl 4):141–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Siddika N, Balogun HA, Amegah AK, Jaakkola JJ. Prenatal ambient air pollution exposure and the risk of stillbirth: systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Occup Environ Med 2016;73(9):573–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dominick MA, Carson TL. Effects of carbon monoxide exposure on pregnant sows and their fetuses. Am J Vet Res 1983;44(1):35–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mohallem SV, de Araujo Lobo DJ, Pesquero CR, Assunção JV, de Andre PA, Saldiva PH, et al. Decreased fertility in mice exposed to environmental air pollution in the city of Sao Paulo. Environ Res 2005;98(2):196–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pejsak Z, Zmudzki J, Wojnicki P. Abortion in sows associated with carbon monoxide intoxication. Vet Rec 2008;162(13):417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rigdon RH, Rennels EG. Effect of feeding benzpyrene on reproduction in the rat. Experientia 1964;20(4):224–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tsukue N, Tsubone H, Suzuki AK. Diesel exhaust affects the abnormal delivery in pregnant mice and the growth of their young. Inhal Toxicol 2002;14(6):635–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Waldner CL, Ribble CS, Janzen ED. Evaluation of the impact of a natural gas leak from a pipeline on productivity of beef cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998;212(1):41–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Waldner CL. Risk of abortion and stillbirth in cow-calf herds exposed to the oil and gas industry in Western Canada. Arch Environ Occup Health 2009;64(1):29–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wood EN. Increased incidence of still birth in piglets associated with levels of atmospheric carbon monoxide. Vet Rec 1979;104(13):283–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dastoorpoor M, Idani E, Goudarzi G, Khanjani N. Acute effects of air pollution on spontaneous abortion, premature delivery, and stillbirth in Ahvaz, Iran: a time-series study. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2018;25(6):5447–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Di Caula A, Bilancia M. Relationships between mild PM10 and ozone urban air levels and spontaneous abortion: clues for primary prevention. Int J Environ Health Res 2015;25(6):640–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guimarães MT, Cunha MG, Carvalho DP, Ribeiro TS, Mar-tins LC, Braga AL, et al. Influence of environmental contamination on pregnancy outcomes. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2015;22(19):14950–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hafez AS, Fahim HI, Badawy HA. Socioenvironmental predictors of abortion and stillbirths in an industrial community in Egypt. J Egypt Public Health Assoc 2001;76(1–2):1–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hou HY, Wang D, Zou XP, Yang ZH, Li TC, Chen YQ. Does ambient air pollutants increase the risk of fetal loss? A case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;289(2):285–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mohorovic L, Petrovic O, Haller H, Micovic V. Pregnancy loss and maternal methemoglobin levels: an indirect explanation of the association of environmental toxics and their adverse effects on the mother and the fetus. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010;7(12):4203–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moridi M, Ziaei S, Kazemnejad A. Exposure to ambient air pollutants and spontaneous abortion. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014;40(3):743–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Samaraweera Y, Abeysena C. Maternal sleep deprivation, sedentary lifestyle and cooking smoke: risk factors for miscarriage: a case control study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;50(4):352–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wu J, Hou H, Ritz B, Chen Y. Exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and missed abortion in early pregnancy in a Chinese population. Sci Total Environ 2010;408(11):2312–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Perin PM, Maluf M, Czeresnia CE, Januário DA, Saldiva PH. Effects of exposure to high levels of particulate air pollution during the follicular phase of the conception cycle on pregnancy outcome in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2010;93(1):301–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Perin PM, Maluf M, Czeresnia CE, Januário DA, Saldiva PH. Impact of short-term preconceptional exposure to particulate air pollution on treatment outcome in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET). J Assist Reprod Genet 2010;27(7):371–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Green R, Sarovar V, Malig B, Basu R. Association of stillbirth with ambient air pollution in a California cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 2015;181(11):874–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ha S, Sundaram R, Louis GM, Nobles C, Seeni I, Sherman S, et al. Ambient air pollution and the risk of pregnancy loss: a prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 2018;109(1):148–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hemminki K, Niemi ML. Community study of spontaneous abortions: relation to occupation and air pollution by sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, and carbon disulfide. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1982;51(1):55–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lindbohm ML, Hemminki K, Kyyronen P. Parental occupational exposure and spontaneous abortions in Finland. Am J Epidemiol 1984;120(3):370–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wong EY, Ray RM, Gao DL, Wernli KJ, Li W, Fitzgibbons ED, et al. Dust and chemical exposures, and miscarriage risk among women textile workers in Shanghai, China. Occup Environ Med 2009;66(3):161–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Xu X, Cho SI, Sammel M, You L, Cui S, Huang Y, et al. Association of petrochemical exposure with spontaneous abortion. Occup Environ Med 1998;55(1):31–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bobak M, Leon DA. Pregnancy outcomes and outdoor air pollution: an ecological study in districts of the Czech Republic 1986–8. Occup Environ Med 1999;56(8):539–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mishra V, Retherford RD, Smith KR. Cooking smoke and tobacco smoke as risk factors for stillbirth. Int J Environ Health Res 2005;15(6):397–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pereira LA, Loomis D, Conceicao GM, Braga AL, Arcas RM, Kishi HS, et al. Association between air pollution and intrauterine mortality in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Environ Health Perspect 1998;106(6):325–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Faiz AS, Rhoads GG, Demissie K, Kruse L, Lin Y, Rich DQ. Ambient air pollution and the risk of stillbirth. Am J Epidemiol 2012;176(4):308–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lakshmi PV, Virdi NK, Sharma A, Tripathy JP, Smith KR, Bates MN, et al. Household air pollution and stillbirths in India: analysis of the DLHS-II National Survey. Environ Res 2013;121:17–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sehgal M, Rizwan SA, Krishnan A. Disease burden due to biomass cooking-fuel-related household air pollution among women in India. Glob Health Action 2014;7:25326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wylie BJ, Coull BA, Hamer DH, Singh MP, Jack D, Yeboah-Antwi K, et al. Impact of biomass fuels on pregnancy outcomes in central East India. Environ Health 2014;13(1):1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ebisu K, Malig B, Hasheminassab S, Sioutas C, Basu R. Cause-specific stillbirth and exposure to chemical constituents and sources of fine particulate matter. Environ Res 2018;160:358–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hwang BF, Lee YL, Jaakkola JJ. Air pollution and stillbirth: a population-based case-control study in Taiwan. Environ Health Perspect 2011;119(9):1345–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mavalankar DV, Trivedi CR, Gray RH. Levels and risk factors for perinatal mortality in Ahmedabad, India. Bull World Health Organ 1991;69(4):435–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.DeFranco E, Hall E, Hossain M, Chen A, Haynes EN, Jones D, et al. Air pollution and stillbirth risk: exposure to airborne particulate matter during pregnancy is associated with fetal death. PLoS One 2015;10(3):e0120594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tielsch JM, Katz J, Thulasiraj RD, Coles CL, Sheeladevi S, Yanik EL, et al. Exposure to indoor biomass fuel and tobacco smoke and risk of adverse reproductive outcomes, mortality, respiratory morbidity and growth among newborn infants in south India. Int J Epidemiol 2009;38(5):1351–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mendola P, Ha S, Pollack AZ, Zhu Y, Seeni I, Kim SS, et al. Chronic and acute ozone exposure in the week prior to delivery is associated with the risk of stillbirth. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14(7):731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pearce MS, Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, Rushton S, Charlton M, Parker L, et al. No association between ambient particulate matter exposure during pregnancy and stillbirth risk in the north of England, 1962–1992. Environ Res 2010;110(1):118–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kim OJ, Ha EH, Kim BM, Seo JH, Park HS, Jung WJ, et al. PM10 and pregnancy outcomes: a hospital-based cohort study of pregnant women in Seoul. J Occup Environ Med 2007;49(12):1394–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Patel AB, Meleth S, Pasha O, Goudar SS, Esamai F, Garces AL, et al. Impact of exposure to cooking fuels on stillbirths, perinatal, very early and late neonatal mortality – a multicenter prospective cohort study in rural communities in India, Pakistan, Kenya, Zambia and Guatemala. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol 2015;1:18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yang S, Tan Y, Mei H, Wang F, Li N, Zhao J, et al. Ambient air pollution the risk of stillbirth: a prospective birth cohort study in Wuhan, China. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2018;221(3):502–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Green RS, Malig B, Windham GC, Fenster L, Ostro B, Swan S. Residential exposure to traffic and spontaneous abortion. Environ Health Perspect 2009;117(12):1939–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Veras MM, Damaceno-Rodrigues NR, Caldini EG, Ribeiro AA, Mayhew TM, Saldiva PH, et al. Particulate urban air pollution affects the functional morphology of mouse placenta. Biol Reprod 2008;79(3):578–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jauniaux E, Watson AL, Hempstock J, Bao YP, Skepper JN, Burton GJ. Onset of maternal arterial blood flow and placental oxidative stress. A possible factor in human early pregnancy failure. Am J Pathol 2000;157(6):2111–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Risom L, Moller P, Loft S. Oxidative stress-induced DNA damage by particulate air pollution. Mutat Res 2005;592(1–2):119–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Oberdörster G, Sharp Z, Atudorei V, Elder A, Gelein R, Lunts A, et al. Extrapulmonary translocation of ultrafine carbon particles following whole-body inhalation exposure of rats. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2002;65(20):1531–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Perera FP, Jedrychowski W, Rauh V, Whyatt RM. Molecular epidemiologic research on the effects of environmental pollutants on the fetus. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107(Suppl 3):451–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Salam MT, Millstein J, Li YF, Lurmann FW, Margolis HG, Gilliland FD. Birth outcomes and prenatal exposure to ozone, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter: results from the Children’s Health Study. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113(11):1638–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sram R Impact of air pollution on reproductive health. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107(11):A542–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa P, Amouzou A, Mathers C, Hogan D, et al. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet 2016;387(10018):587–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES