Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Apr 27;729:139022. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139022

Air quality status during 2020 Malaysia Movement Control Order (MCO) due to 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pandemic

Samsuri Abdullah a,, Amalina Abu Mansor b, Nur Nazmi Liyana Mohd Napi a, Wan Nurdiyana Wan Mansor a, Ali Najah Ahmed c,d, Marzuki Ismail b,e, Zamzam Tuah Ahmad Ramly f,g
PMCID: PMC7184995  PMID: 32353722

Abstract

An outbreak of respiratory illness which is proven to be infected by a 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) officially named as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first detected in Wuhan, China and has spread rapidly in other parts of China as well as other countries around the world, including Malaysia. The first case in Malaysia was identified on 25 January 2020 and the number of cases continue to rise since March 2020. Therefore, 2020 Malaysia Movement Control Order (MCO) was implemented with the aim to isolate the source of the COVID-19 outbreak. As a result, there were fewer number of motor vehicles on the road and the operation of industries was suspended, ergo reducing emissions of hazardous air pollutants in the atmosphere. We had acquired the Air Pollutant Index (API) data from the Department of Environment Malaysia on hourly basis before and during the MCO with the aim to track the changes of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) at 68 air quality monitoring stations. It was found that the PM2.5 concentrations showed a high reduction of up to 58.4% during the MCO. Several red zone areas (>41 confirmed COVID-19 cases) had also reduced of up to 28.3% in the PM2.5 concentrations variation. The reduction did not solely depend on MCO, thus the researchers suggest a further study considering the influencing factors that need to be adhered to in the future.

Keywords: Coronavirus disease, Movement control order, Malaysia, Air pollutant index, Fine particulate matter

Graphical abstract

Unlabelled Image

Highlights

  • The PM2.5 concentrations dominated the Air Pollutant Index (API) in Malaysia.

  • There were several reductions on PM2.5 concentrations during Malaysia Movement Control Order (MCO).

  • Several red zone areas showed approximately 28.3% reduction of PM2.5 concentrations.

  • The Northern Region of Peninsular Malaysia showed the highest average reduction of PM2.5 concentrations, with 23.7%.

1. Introduction

Coronavirus is one of the significant pathogens that affects human respiratory system. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by a novel CoV, namely severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) which is formerly known as 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) (H. Li et al., 2020). The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 began at Wuhan, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China in late December 2019 (Q. Li et al., 2020). Considering the global threat, the World Health Organization (WHO) has declared COVID-19 as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) (Sohrabi et al., 2020). It is a pandemic that is spreading in other parts of Asia, such as Japan, Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, and Australia as well as Europe and North America (Rothan and Byrareddy, 2020). Older people with the age of >80 years old has a high mortality susceptibility, with the case-fatality rate of 21.9% once infected with COVID-19 (Koh and Hoeing, 2020). In Malaysia, the earliest COVID-19 cases were detected on 25 January 2020 (Ministry of Health Malaysia, 2020). The number of cases have since then kept on increasing, especially in March 2020. This escalating COVID-19 outbreak in Malaysia has urged several measures to be taken, including putting surveillance system in place to detect cases immediately; carrying out rapid diagnosis; performing immediate case isolation and rigorous tracking; and quarantining close contacts of those who have been tested positive in COVID-19. Malaysian government has announced the implementation of Movement Control Order (MCO) with the aim to isolate the source of the COVID-19 outbreak. Statistically, the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases at the end of Phase I MCO is 2766 cases (31 March 2020) and for Phase II is 4987 cases (14 April 2020) (Ministry of Health Malaysia, 2020). During MCO, several activities, including operating business is not allowed, except for essential services (Malaysian National Security Council (NSC), 2020). Since people are working from home and several industries are suspended, the traffic density and industrial emissions have reduced. In Malaysia, the sources of air pollution are derived from motor vehicles, industrial emissions, and open burning (Latif et al., 2014; Abdullah et al., 2019). The air quality status is defined based on the Air Pollutant Index (API) of 6 criteria pollutants whereby the dominant pollutant in Malaysia is fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Therefore, in this study, the researchers will evaluate the variation of PM2.5 changes during and before MCO in Malaysia.

2. Methods

In Malaysia, the air quality is managed by the Department of Environment under the Ministry of Environment and Water. The researchers acquired the Air Pollutant Index (API) data from the website of Air Pollutant Index of Malaysia (available at http://apims.doe.gov.my/public_v2/home.html) on hourly basis from 14 March 2020 to 14 April 2020 to determine the relative changes (%) of air quality. These data covered the air quality status before MCO (14–17 March 2020) (n = 6445), during Phase I MCO (18–31 March 2020) (n = 22,848) and Phase II MCO (1–14 April 2020) (n = 22,835). Overall, there are 0.19% of missing data and the total data used in this study is 55,128. The missing data were omitted in this study. The API for each hour was then converted to PM2.5 concentrations (μg/m3) (available at http://apims.doe.gov.my/public_v2/aboutapi.html). The computation of API and PM2.5 concentrations is shown in Table 1 .

Table 1.

Computation of API and PM2.5 concentration.

API Breakpoint of concentration Equation for API
X = PM2.5 (24 h average, unit: μg/m3)
0–50 0 ≤ X ≤ 12.0 API = 4.1667 ∗ X
51–100 12.1 ≤ X ≤ 75.5 API = 0.7741 ∗ (X − 12.1) + 51
101–200 75.5 ≤ X ≤ 150.4 API = 1.3218 ∗ (X − 75.5) + 101
201–300 150.5 ≤ X ≤ 250.4 API = 0.9909 ∗ (X − 150.5) + 201
301–400 250.4 ≤ X ≤ 350.4 API = 0.9909 ∗ (X − 250.5) + 301
401–500 350.5 ≤ X ≤ 500.4 API = 0.6604 ∗ (X − 350.5) + 401

∗ is multiply.

All 68 air quality monitoring stations in Malaysia were selected in this study, as shown in Table 2 . The stations are responsible of monitoring the air quality status in Malaysia comprehensively (available at http://apims.doe.gov.my/public_v2/aboutapi.html) to detect any significant changes in the environment quality that may be harmful to human health and the environment (Department of Environment Malaysia, 2020).

Table 2.

Air quality monitoring stations in Malaysia.

Station Region State Location
S1 North Perlis Kangar
S2 Kedah Langkawi
S3 Kedah Alor Setar
S4 Kedah Sungai Petani
S5 Kedah Kulim Hi-Tech
S6 Pulau Pinang Seberang Jaya
S7 Pulau Pinang Seberang Perai
S8 Pulau Pinang Minden
S9 Pulau Pinang Balik Pulau
S10 Perak Taiping
S11 Perak Tasek Ipoh
S12 Perak Pegoh Ipoh
S13 Perak Seri Manjung
S14 Perak Tanjung Malim
S15 Central Kuala Lumpur Batu Muda
S16 Kuala Lumpur Cheras
S17 Putrajaya Putrajaya
S18 Selangor Kuala Selangor
S19 Selangor Petaling Jaya
S20 Selangor Shah Alam
S21 Selangor Klang
S22 Selangor Banting
S23 Selangor Johan Setia Klang
S24 South Negeri Sembilan Nilai
S25 Negeri Sembilan Seremban
S26 Negeri Sembilan Port Dickson
S27 Melaka Alor Gajah
S28 Melaka Bukit Rambai
S29 Melaka Bandaraya Melaka
S30 Johor Segamat
S31 Johor Batu Pahat
S32 Johor Kluang
S33 Johor Larkin
S34 Johor Pasir Gudang
S35 Johor Pengerang
S36 Johor Kota Tinggi
S37 Johor Tangkak
S38 East Pahang Rompin
S39 Pahang Temerloh
S40 Pahang Jerantut
S41 Pahang Indera Mahkota Kuantan
S42 Pahang Balok Baru Kuantan
S43 Terengganu Kemaman
S44 Terengganu Paka
S45 Terengganu Kuala Terengganu
S46 Terengganu Besut
S47 Kelantan Tanah Merah
S48 Kelantan Kota Bharu
S49 Sabah Sabah Tawau
S50 Sabah Sandakan
S51 Sabah Kota Kinabalu
S52 Sabah Kimanis
S53 Sabah Keningau
S54 Labuan Labuan
S55 Sabah Politeknik Kota Kinabalu
S56 Sarawak Sarawak Limbang
S57 Sarawak ILP Miri
S58 Sarawak Miri
S59 Sarawak Samalaju
S60 Sarawak Bintulu
S61 Sarawak Mukah
S62 Sarawak Kapit
S63 Sarawak Sibu
S64 Sarawak Sarikei
S65 Sarawak Sri Aman
S66 Sarawak Samarahan
S67 Sarawak Kuching
S68 Sarawak IPD Serian

3. Results and discussion

The MCO has been found to reduce PM2.5 concentrations. Before the implementation of MCO and during the MCO (18 March–14 April 2020), the daily PM2.5 concentrations were in the range of 5.3–42.5 μg/m3 and 3.9–69.2 μg/m3, respectively. The New Malaysia Ambient Air Quality Standard (NMAAQS) has set the standard limit of PM2.5 to 35 μg/m3 for a 24-hour average (Department of Environment Malaysia, 2020) and the World Health Organization (WHO) (2017) has set a more stringent limit of PM2.5 to 25 μg/m3. Before MCO, one of the air quality monitoring stations that exceeded the limit was Politeknik Kota Kinabalu (S55) (42.5 μg/m3), while during MCO, the PM2.5 concentrations at Rompin (S38) exceeded the limit of NMAAQS with 69.2 μg/m3. Table 3 shows the variation of daily PM2.5 concentrations before and during MCO. The reduction of PM2.5 concentrations occurred at 34 stations, which attributed for 50% of overall stations. The highest reduction was at Politeknik Kota Kinabalu (S55), with 58.5% (Before = 41.2 μg/m3; During MOC = 17.1 μg/m3), while the lowest reduction was at Miri (S58), with 0.6% (reduce at 0.1 μg/m3). Table 4 shows the variation of daily PM2.5 concentrations before and during MCO I. The reduction of PM2.5 concentrations occurred at 29 stations, which attributed for 42.6% of overall stations. The highest reduction was at Politeknik Kota Kinabalu (S55), with 53.6% (Before = 41.2 μg/m3; MCO I = 19.1 μg/m3), while the lowest reduction was at Mindin (S8), with 0.8% (Before = 19.6 μg/m3; During MCO I = 19.7 μg/m3). Table 5 shows the variation of daily PM2.5 concentrations during MCO I and MCO II. Interestingly, the reduction of PM2.5 concentrations occurred at 52 stations, which attributed for 76.5% of overall stations. The highest reduction was at Seberang Perai (S7), with 35.1% (MCO I = 21.1 μg/m3; MCO II = 13.7 μg/m3), while the lowest reduction was at Mindin (S8), with 0.3% (reduce at 0.1 μg/m3). Fig. 1 shows the reduction average of PM2.5 based on different regions in Peninsular Malaysia (North, Central, South, East) and the East Malaysia of Sabah and Sarawak. High reductions were found in Peninsular Malaysia at the North (23.7%), Central (16.2%), South (15%), and East (11.3%) regions as well as the East Malaysia of Sabah (23.1%) and Sarawak (13.6%) at a different timeline before MCO, during MCO I and MCO II. The ranges of reduction were 6.5–23.7%, 8.8–16.2%, 11.0–13.3%, 7.7–11.3%, 15.8–23.1%, 9.5–13.6% for North, Central, South, and East of Peninsular Malaysia, followed by the East Malaysia of Sabah and Sarawak, respectively.

Table 3.

Variation of daily PM2.5 concentrations before MCO and during MCO.

Location Before MCO During MCO Variation
μg/m3 %
Kangar 11.3 12.6 1.3 +11.8
Langkawi 11.7 12.4 0.7 +6.3
Alor Setar 15.4 16.8 1.3 +8.7
Sungai Petani 20.8 18.2 −2.6 −12.5
Kulim Hi-Tech 20.0 15.7 −4.3 −21.5
Seberang Jaya 21.6 21.0 −0.6 −2.9
Seberang Perai 19.2 17.4 −1.8 −9.4
Minden 19.7 16.2 −3.5 −17.7
Balik Pulau 19.3 20.3 1.0 +5.2
Taiping 20.3 16.4 −3.9 −19.2
Tasek Ipoh 20.9 17.7 −3.2 −15.2
Pegoh Ipoh 18.3 18.7 0.5 +2.5
Seri Manjung 21.2 17.7 −3.5 −16.3
Tanjung Malim 11.5 9.3 −2.3 −19.7
Batu Muda 16.9 18.8 1.9 +11.4
Cheras 14.4 15.7 1.4 +9.4
Putrajaya 15.0 17.6 2.5 +16.9
Kuala Selangor 18.8 15.5 −3.3 −17.5
Petaling Jaya 22.1 16.7 −5.4 −24.3
Shah Alam 18.5 17.3 −1.3 −6.8
Klang 19.5 22.0 2.5 +13.0
Banting 12.6 15.0 2.4 +18.7
Nilai 14.1 15.8 1.7 +11.8
Seremban 10.1 12.0 1.9 +18.9
Port Dickson 11.2 13.8 2.6 +23.0
Alor Gajah 8.9 10.9 2.0 +22.8
Bukit Rambai 12.4 13.0 0.6 +4.8
Bandaraya Melaka 11.0 13.3 2.3 +20.6
Segamat 14.0 18.9 4.9 +34.8
Batu Pahat 9.4 11.7 2.2 +23.9
Kluang 9.1 9.6 0.5 +5.0
Larkin 13.6 13.9 0.3 +2.0
Pasir Gudang 9.3 10.9 1.6 +17.1
Pengerang 8.0 14.5 6.5 +82.1
Kota Tinggi 8.1 7.2 −0.9 −11.0
Tangkak 12.6 13.7 1.1 +8.8
Rompin 8.6 19.2 10.5 +122.4
Temerloh 12.4 14.1 1.7 +13.6
Jerantut 12.5 12.9 0.3 +2.7
Indera Mahkota Kuantan 8.5 8.8 0.2 +2.9
Balok Baru Kuantan 10.3 9.6 −0.7 −7.0
Kemaman 14.8 12.6 −2.3 −15.2
Paka 8.7 9.2 0.5 +5.8
Kuala Terengganu 13.3 17.0 3.8 +28.3
Besut 11.0 13.3 2.3 +21.0
Tanah Merah 23.8 22.9 −0.9 −3.9
Kota Bharu 12.0 18.8 6.8 +57.0
Tawau 8.7 7.2 −1.6 −17.8
Sandakan 12.2 10.0 −2.2 −18.3
Kota Kinabalu 13.7 11.7 −2.0 −14.3
Kimanis 22.5 13.7 −8.8 −39.0
Keningau 12.5 11.9 −0.6 −4.7
Labuan 14.9 14.8 −0.1 −0.8
Limbang 11.3 9.4 −1.9 −16.6
ILP Miri 20.5 18.5 −2.0 −9.9
Miri 12.0 12.0 −0.1 −0.6
Samalaju 13.0 12.0 −1.0 −8.1
Bintulu 13.9 13.5 −0.3 −2.4
Mukah 7.7 7.3 −0.3 −4.2
Kapit 7.4 6.8 −0.6 −8.4
Sibu 11.3 9.5 −1.8 −15.9
Sarikei 9.0 7.1 −1.9 −21.3
Sri Aman 8.1 7.8 −0.3 −3.8
Samarahan 8.1 8.6 0.5 +6.5
Kuching 8.9 9.8 0.9 +10.4
Johan Setia Klang 41.9 29.1 −12.8 −30.6
IPD Serian 5.4 7.0 1.6 +29.4
Politeknik Kota Kinabalu 41.2 17.1 −24.1 −58.5

Table 4.

Variation of daily PM2.5 concentrations before MCO and MCO I.

Location Before MCO MCO I Variation
μg/m3 %
Kangar 11.3 13.2 1.9 +17.2
Langkawi 11.7 12.9 1.3 +10.9
Alor Setar 15.4 20.2 4.7 +30.7
Sungai Petani 20.8 21.1 0.3 +1.4
Kulim Hi-Tech 20.0 18.6 −1.3 −6.7
Seberang Jaya 21.6 25.4 3.8 +17.6
Seberang Perai 19.2 21.1 1.9 +9.9
Minden 19.7 19.6 −0.1 −0.8
Balik Pulau 19.3 23.6 4.2 +22.0
Taiping 20.3 19.1 −1.2 −6.0
Tasek Ipoh 20.9 20.1 −0.8 −3.9
Pegoh Ipoh 18.3 19.2 1.0 +5.3
Seri Manjung 21.2 18.8 −2.4 −11.3
Tanjung Malim 11.5 10.3 −1.2 −10.2
Batu Muda 16.9 19.1 2.2 +13.1
Cheras 14.4 16.1 1.7 +12.1
Putrajaya 15.0 18.0 2.9 +19.4
Kuala Selangor 18.8 17.6 −1.2 −6.2
Petaling Jaya 22.1 17.2 −4.9 −22.0
Shah Alam 18.5 17.7 −0.8 −4.3
Klang 19.5 23.4 3.9 +19.9
Banting 12.6 15.9 3.3 +25.9
Nilai 14.1 16.3 2.1 +15.2
Seremban 10.1 12.8 2.7 +26.2
Port Dickson 11.2 15.0 3.8 +33.4
Alor Gajah 8.9 11.3 2.4 +27.4
Bukit Rambai 12.4 13.1 0.7 +5.5
Bandaraya Melaka 11.0 13.9 2.9 +26.7
Segamat 14.0 17.3 3.3 +23.2
Batu Pahat 9.4 11.5 2.1 +22.2
Kluang 9.1 11.1 2.0 +22.3
Larkin 13.6 14.4 0.8 +5.8
Pasir Gudang 9.3 10.8 1.5 +16.3
Pengerang 8.0 17.1 9.1 +115.0
Kota Tinggi 8.1 6.9 −1.2 −15.0
Tangkak 12.6 14.9 2.3 +18.2
Rompin 8.6 17.3 8.7 +100.6
Temerloh 12.4 14.6 2.2 +17.6
Jerantut 12.5 13.9 1.3 +10.7
Indera Mahkota Kuantan 8.5 8.9 0.3 +4.0
Balok Baru Kuantan 10.3 9.9 −0.4 −4.0
Kemaman 14.8 12.8 −2.0 −13.8
Paka 8.7 8.4 −0.3 −3.7
Kuala Terengganu 13.3 18.8 5.5 +41.7
Besut 11.0 12.5 1.5 +13.6
Tanah Merah 23.8 24.0 0.2 +0.8
Kota Bharu 12.0 18.8 6.9 +57.3
Tawau 8.7 6.5 −2.2 −25.1
Sandakan 12.2 9.0 −3.3 −26.6
Kota Kinabalu 13.7 13.1 −0.6 −4.6
Kimanis 22.5 16.1 −6.4 −28.4
Keningau 12.5 12.6 0.1 +0.4
Labuan 14.9 16.6 1.7 +11.4
Limbang 11.3 9.2 −2.1 −18.5
ILP Miri 20.5 21.2 0.6 +3.1
Miri 12.0 12.7 0.7 +5.5
Samalaju 13.0 12.1 −0.9 −7.3
Bintulu 13.9 13.7 −0.2 −1.1
Mukah 7.7 7.4 −0.3 −3.4
Kapit 7.4 6.3 −1.1 −14.5
Sibu 11.3 10.6 −0.7 −6.0
Sarikei 9.0 7.0 −2.0 −22.1
Sri Aman 8.1 7.3 −0.8 −9.5
Samarahan 8.1 7.2 −0.9 −11.2
Kuching 8.9 8.8 −0.1 −0.9
Johan Setia Klang 41.9 32.0 −9.9 −23.6
IPD Serian 5.4 6.9 1.5 27.2
Politeknik Kota Kinabalu 41.2 19.1 −22.1 −53.6

Table 5.

Variation of daily PM2.5 concentrations during MCO I and MCO II.

Location MCO I MCO II Variation
μg/m3 %
Kangar 13.2 12.0 −1.2 −9.3
Langkawi 12.9 11.9 −1.1 −8.3
Alor Setar 20.2 13.4 −6.8 −33.6
Sungai Petani 21.1 15.3 −5.8 −27.5
Kulim Hi-Tech 18.6 12.7 −5.9 −31.8
Seberang Jaya 25.4 16.6 −8.8 −34.8
Seberang Perai 21.1 13.7 −7.4 −35.1
Minden 19.6 12.9 −6.7 −34.1
Balik Pulau 23.6 17.1 −6.5 −27.5
Taiping 19.1 13.7 −5.4 −28.1
Tasek Ipoh 20.1 15.4 −4.7 −23.6
Pegoh Ipoh 19.2 18.2 −1.0 −5.2
Seri Manjung 18.8 16.7 −2.1 −11.2
Tanjung Malim 10.3 8.2 −2.2 −21.1
Batu Muda 19.1 18.5 −0.6 −3.0
Cheras 16.1 15.4 −0.8 −4.9
Putrajaya 18.0 17.2 −0.7 −4.2
Kuala Selangor 17.6 13.3 −4.3 −24.3
Petaling Jaya 17.2 16.2 −1.0 −5.8
Shah Alam 17.7 16.8 −0.9 −5.2
Klang 23.4 20.7 −2.7 −11.5
Banting 15.9 14.0 −1.8 −11.5
Nilai 16.3 15.3 −1.0 −5.9
Seremban 12.8 11.3 −1.5 −11.6
Port Dickson 15.0 12.6 −2.3 −15.7
Alor Gajah 11.3 10.5 −0.8 −7.1
Bukit Rambai 13.1 12.9 −0.2 −1.5
Bandaraya Melaka 13.9 12.6 −1.3 −9.6
Segamat 17.3 20.5 3.2 +18.8
Batu Pahat 11.5 11.8 0.3 +2.9
Kluang 11.1 8.0 −3.2 −28.3
Larkin 14.4 13.4 −1.0 −7.2
Pasir Gudang 10.8 11.0 0.2 +1.5
Pengerang 17.1 11.9 −5.2 −30.6
Kota Tinggi 6.9 7.5 0.6 +9.3
Tangkak 14.9 12.5 −2.4 −15.9
Rompin 17.3 21.0 3.8 +21.7
Temerloh 14.6 13.6 −1.0 −6.8
Jerantut 13.9 11.9 −2.0 −14.5
Indera Mahkota Kuantan 8.9 8.7 −0.2 −2.1
Balok Baru Kuantan 9.9 9.3 −0.6 −6.1
Kemaman 12.8 12.4 −0.4 −3.2
Paka 8.4 10.0 1.7 +19.8
Kuala Terengganu 18.8 15.3 −3.6 −19.0
Besut 12.5 14.1 1.6 +12.9
Tanah Merah 24.0 21.8 −2.3 −9.4
Kota Bharu 18.8 18.8 −0.1 −0.3
Tawau 6.5 7.8 1.3 +19.7
Sandakan 9.0 11.0 2.0 +22.7
Kota Kinabalu 13.1 10.4 −2.7 −20.4
Kimanis 16.1 11.3 −4.8 −29.6
Keningau 12.6 11.3 −1.3 −10.2
Labuan 16.6 13.0 −3.6 −21.9
Limbang 9.2 9.7 0.4 +4.7
ILP Miri 21.2 15.8 −5.3 −25.2
Miri 12.7 11.2 −1.5 −11.5
Samalaju 12.1 11.9 −0.2 −1.7
Bintulu 13.7 13.4 −0.4 −2.6
Mukah 7.4 7.3 −0.1 −1.7
Kapit 6.3 7.2 0.9 +14.2
Sibu 10.6 8.4 −2.2 −21.0
Sarikei 7.0 7.1 0.1 +2.0
Sri Aman 7.3 8.2 0.9 +12.6
Samarahan 7.2 10.0 2.9 +39.9
Kuching 8.8 10.8 2.0 +22.9
Johan Setia Klang (MCAQM) 32.0 26.2 −5.8 −18.2
IPD Serian (MCAQM) 6.9 7.1 0.2 +3.5
Politeknik Kota Kinabalu (MCAQM) 19.1 15.0 −4.1 −21.3

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Reduction average based on different regions.

The MCO in Malaysia included several prohibitions of mass movement and gathering; Malaysians travelling abroad; tourists and visitors' entry; and educational institutions, government and private agencies (except for essential services) closure (Malaysian National Security Council (NSC), 2020). These restrictions indirectly reduce the air pollution in Malaysia, although a detailed study needs to be conducted by considering other influencing factors, including local meteorology and anthropogenic emissions. Based on the results, the MCO had successfully reduced pollutants emission, particularly PM2.5 concentrations, as there were less motor vehicles and industry activities during the MCO. There were several red zone areas with >41 cases of confirmed COVID-19 (Crisis Preparedness and Response Centre, 2020). Some red zone areas were then enforced under the Enhanced Movement Control Order (EMCO). The red zone areas included Kluang (S32) (28.3% reduction of PM2.5 concentrations, MCO I and MCO II), Jerantut (S40) (14.5%, MCO I and MCO II), Kota Bharu (S48) (0.3%, MCO I and MCO II), Petaling Jaya (S19) (24.3%, before and during MCO), Klang (S21) (11.5%, MCO I and MCO II), Cheras (S16) (4.9%, MCO I and MCO II), Seremban (S25) (11.6%, MCO I and MCO II), Bandaraya Melaka (S29) (9.6%, MCO I and MCO II), Tawau (S49) (25.1%, before and during MCO I), Kuching (S67) (0.9%, before and during MCO I), and Samarahan (S66) (11.2%, before and during MCO I). The researchers observed that the decreasing of PM2.5 concentrations mostly occurred after the MCO I. The movements and activities of residents living in the red zone area may have been restricted; however, pollutant emissions, especially from mobile sources had indirectly reduced in such areas.

In Malaysia, Jerantut (S40) is considered as the background station (rural). Unfortunately, it did not show the lowest PM2.5 concentrations as expected whereby the PM2.5 concentrations before MCO was 12.5 μg/m3 and during MCO was 12.9 μg/m3 with an additional of 2.7%. The variation of PM2.5 concentrations was further increased with the increment of 10.7% when the researchers compared the PM2.5 concentrations before MCO (12.5 μg/m3) and during MCO I (13.9 μg/m3). It showed a decreasing variation (14.5%) between MCO I and MCO II, with 13.9 μg/m3 and 11.9 μg/m3, respectively. The researchers observed that this station did not show the lowest PM2.5 concentrations as a representative background station, thus a further study needs to be conducted by considering the other factors, including meteorological and the anthropogenic sources to justify the variation of PM2.5 at this station as compared with other stations. Previously, Latif et al., (2014) clarified that there is an emergence of development around 10 km radius from the station. This could affect the condition of the station as a background. A background station must be located at a remote area which has minimal influence of anthropogenic sources.

4. Conclusion

In this study, the researchers concluded that the MCO has significant effects in reducing the PM2.5 concentrations in Malaysia. It should be noted that other factors, such as weather conditions, traffic density, industrial activities, and biomass burning should be considered for further investigations. The MCO has been continued in Phase III, which started on 15 April 2020, and the PM2.5 concentrations are expected to continue to stay low, as several areas have been placed under enhanced MCO.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Samsuri Abdullah: Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Amalina Abu Mansor: Investigation, Formal analysis. Nur Nazmi Liyana Mohd Napi: Investigation, Formal analysis. Wan Nurdiyana Wan Mansor: Methodology. Ali Najah Ahmed: Methodology. Marzuki Ismail: Methodology. Zamzam Tuah Ahmad Ramly: Investigation, Formal analysis.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme for Research Acculturation of Early Career Researchers by the Malaysian Ministry of Education (FRGS-RACER) and Research and Management Centre, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu. We greatly appreciate the front line doctors, nurses, police, soldiers, etc. especially the Director-General of Health Malaysia, Dato Dr. Noor Hisham Abdullah, for their hard work during this critical time. Those who are directly impacted with COVID-19, we wish you brighter days ahead.

Editor: Jianmin Chen

References

  1. Abdullah S., Ismail M., Ahmed A.N., Abdullah A.M. Forecasting particulate matter concentration using linear and non-linear approaches for air quality decision support. Atmosphere. 2019;10:667. doi: 10.3390/atmos10110667. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Crisis Preparedness and Response Centre From the Desk of the Director-General of Health Malaysia. 2020. https://kpkesihatan.com/
  3. Department of Environment Malaysia Air Quality. 2020. https://www.doe.gov.my/portalv1/en/info-umum/kuality-udara/114
  4. Koh G.C.H., Hoeing H. How should the rehabilitation community prepare for 2019-nCoV? Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Latif M.T., Dominick D., Ahamad F., Khan M.F., Juneng L., Hamzah F.M., Nadzir M.S.M. Long term assessment of air quality from a background station on the Malaysian peninsula. Sci. Total Environ. 2014;482:336–348. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Li Q., Guan X., Wu P., Wang X., Zhou L., Tong Y., Ren R., Leung K.S.M., Lau E.H.Y., Wong J.Y., Xing X., Xiang N., Wu Y., Li C., Chen Q., Li D., Liu T., Zhao J., Liu M., Tu W., Chen C., Jin L., Yang R., Wang Q., Zhou S., Wang R., Liu H., Luo Y., Liu Y., Shao G., Li H., Tao Z., Yang Y., Deng Z., Liu B., Ma Z., Zhang Y., Shi G., Lam T.T.Y., Wu J.T., Gao G.F., Cowling B.J., Yang B., Leung G.B., Feng Z. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:1199–1207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Li H., Liu S.M., Yu X.H., Tang S.L., Tang C.K. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): current status and future perspectives. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Malaysian National Security Council (NSC) Movement Control Order (MCO) 2020. https://www.mkn.gov.my/web/ms/covid-19/
  9. Ministry of Health Malaysia Latest COVID-19 statistic in Malaysia. 2020. http://www.moh.gov.my/index.php/pages/view/2019-ncov-wuhan
  10. Rothan H.A., Byrareddy S.N. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J. Autoimmun. 2020;109 doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sohrabi C., Alsafi Z., O’Neill M., Khan M., Kerwan A., Al-Jabir A., Iosifidis C., Agha R. World Health Organization declares global emergency: a review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) Int. J. Surg. 2020;76:71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. World Health Organisation (WHO), 2017. Evolution of WHO Air Quality Guidelines: Past, Present and Future. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/air-quality/publications/2017/evolution-of-who-air-quality-guidelines-past,-present-and-future-2017 (accessed 14 April 2020).

Articles from The Science of the Total Environment are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES