Skip to main content
. 1999 Aug 1;20(8):1615–1620. doi: 10.1093/carcin/20.8.1615

Table III.

Evaluation of tumor size and multiplicity (mean ± SD)

Diagnosis DMBA plus magnetic field exposure group
Control 1 G, 50 Hz 5 G, 50 Hz 1 G, 60 Hz
a P < 0.05 compared with controls (Dunnett's test).
bND, not done.
Palpation data
Study 1
Tumors/tumor-bearing rat 6.6 ± 3.7 5.0a ± 3.3 5.2a ± 3.6 5.6 ± 3.3
Mean tumor size (cm2) 1.5 ± 0.8 1.5 ± 1.0 1.4 ± 0.9 1.5 ± 0.9
Study 2
Tumors/tumor-bearing rat 2.0 ± 1.4 1.7 ± 1.0 1.8 ± 1.0 NDb
Mean tumor size (cm2) 1.2 ± 0.9 1.4 ± 0.8 1.4 ± 1.1 ND
Histology data
Study 1
Carcinoma/rat 6.9 ± 4.8 5.3a ± 4.4 6.5 ± 4.9 6.9 ± 4.8
Carcinoma area/rat (cm2) 15.0 ± 13.9 12.9 ± 12.5 12.9 ± 12.5 14.4 ± 10.7
Ratio of area per carcinoma (cm2) 2.2 2.4 2.0 2.1
Study 2
Carcinoma/rat 1.0 ± 1.9 0.9 ± 1.3 0.8 ± 1.3 ND
Carcinoma area/rat (cm2) 1.9 ± 4.7 1.8 ± 4.6 1.7 ± 4.8 ND
Ratio of area per carcinoma (cm2) 1.9 2.0 2.2 ND