Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2014 Mar 20;94(3):338–345. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2014.03.004

Mycobacterium tuberculosis pili (MTP), a putative biomarker for a tuberculosis diagnostic test

Natasha Naidoo 1, Saiyur Ramsugit 1, Manormoney Pillay 1,
PMCID: PMC7185575  PMID: 24721207

Abstract

Novel biomarkers are urgently needed for point of care TB diagnostics. In this study, we investigated the potential of the pilin subunit protein encoded by the mtp gene as a diagnostic biomarker. BLAST analysis of the mtp gene on published genome databases, and amplicon sequencing were performed in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex (MTBC) strains and other organisms. The protein secondary structure of the amino acid sequences of non-tuberculous Mycobacteria that partially aligned with the mtp sequence was analysed with PredictProtein software. The mtp gene and corresponding amino acid sequence of MTBC were 100% homologous with H37Rv, in contrast to the partial alignment of the non-tuberculous Mycobacteria. The mtp gene was present in all 91 clinical isolates of MTBC. Except for 2 strains with point mutations, the sequence was 100% conserved among the clinical strains. The mtp gene could not be amplified in all non-tuberculous Mycobacteria and respiratory organisms. The predicted MTP protein structure of Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium ulcerans and Mycobacterium abscessus differed significantly from that of the M. tuberculosis, which was similar to Mycobacterium marinum. The absence of the mtp gene in non-tuberculous Mycobacteria and other respiratory bacteria suggests that its encoded product, the pilin subunit protein of M. tuberculosis may be a suitable marker for a point of care TB test.

Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Diagnosis, Point of care test, Pili, Mycobacterial pili, Biomarker

1. Introduction

There is an urgent need to improve the laboratory turnaround time for the diagnosis of Mycobacteria [1] by the development of a point of care test that is also accessible to resource poor countries [2]. The lack of suitable biomarkers has hindered the development of diagnostic tests that meet all the criteria of a point of care test for the rapid detection of tuberculosis.

Biomarkers, such as epitopes, molecules or genetic materials have been incorporated into assays capable of rapidly and inexpensively identifying active tuberculosis, distinguishing appropriate responses to anti-tuberculous drugs, and those at risk for disease progression [3]. The identification of biomarkers to distinguish among members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) comprising M. tuberculosis, Mycobacterium africanum, Mycobacterium bovis, M. bovis BCG, Mycobacterium microti and Mycobacterium canettii and non-tuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) has been a challenge. This is due to the high similarity between the genomes of the MTBC members [4]. Examples include the >99.95% homology between M. bovis and M. tuberculosis genomes [5]. There have been conflicting reports on the ability to distinguish MTBC from NTM with the most widely studied potential biomarkers for MTB diagnosis, ESAT-6 and CFP-10 [6], [7], [8].

Numerous immunochromatographic tests have been evaluated for use as point of care tests, including few that are based on the MPB64 epitope [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], which include the Capilia TB and BIOLINE SD Ag MPT64 tests [12]. The MPB64 antigen is an immunogenic protein found in unheated cultures of M. tuberculosis [9], [15], [16], [17]. These tests are based on detection from culture with the detection limit of 10.5 cfu/ml [12]. Since the production of this antigen is slow, it is not always detectable in liquid culture compared to solid media [10]. The ICT TB test is based on 5 M. tuberculosis antigens, including Antigen 85 and LAM [18], [19]. However, the ability of the ICT test to distinguish between MTBC and NTM has not been evaluated [18], [20]. Recently, ESAT-6/CFP-10 has been used in a nanoELIwell assay that integrates on chip culturing of cells, immunoassay and fluorescent imaging [8]. The advantages of this assay are high throughput and rapid culture. However, the sensitivity of this test would be reduced since ESAT-6 is secreted by many NTM [6], [7], [8]. An immunochromatographic test developed using both ESAT-6/CFP-10 complex showed high specificity and sensitivity of 97% and 97.4% respectively for MTBC organisms [21]. Despite the apparent high specificity and sensitivity compared to sputum smear and tuberculin skin tests, the study showed a greater chance of false negative and false positive results using these epitopes [21].

Adhesins, including pili, are the first point of contact with the host cell, helping overcome the net repulsive forces on the surfaces of the host and the pathogen [22]. Therefore, pili represent targets for use in diagnostics, including potential point of care tests. Two types of pili were discovered in M. tuberculosis [23], namely Type IV pili, common to Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [22] and archeal bacteria [24], [25], [26], [27] and ‘curli’ pili, common to pathogens such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium [28], [29]. Type IV pili possess a hydrophobic amino terminus and a signal peptide [30], [31]. They are often observed under the electron microscope as long bundles of filaments, resembling rope-like structures or wicks [30], [31]. Curli pili are 2–5 nm wide, coiled and highly aggregative adhesive fibres. These structures are assembled using a nucleation pathway, requiring the major and minor pilin subunits [32].

The curli pili of M. tuberculosis (MTP), encoded by the mtp gene (Rv3312A), has many attributes in common with curli pili of other bacteria [23]. They are highly sticky, aggregative and insoluble fibres that bind laminin [23], [33], [34] and Congo red dye and contain large numbers of glycine and proline residues. However, there is no similarity between the primary sequence homology of the protein subunits of MTP and curli pili of other bacteria [23].

MTP first identified and characterised by Alteri et al. (2007), are produced during active human infection and facilitate binding to laminin on host cells [23]. Not all Mycobacteria produce pili, although this may be attributed to the response of Mycobacteria to different environmental indicators [30]. With access to complete Mycobacterial genomes, it is now possible to determine the occurrence of the mtp gene in various Mycobacterial species and study the levels of expression of the gene.

In this study, we sought to determine whether the MTP protein is a suitable biomarker for a potential diagnostic test for tuberculosis. Therefore, BLAST analysis on publically available genome databases and sequencing was performed to determine the presence and conservation of the mtp gene in MTBC strains, NTM and other respiratory organisms. In addition, we analysed the protein secondary structure and topology of the pilin subunits of these organisms. We showed that the mtp gene and its encoded protein product, MTP is unique to MTBC strains with only partial similarity to Mycobacterium marinum.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Bacterial strains

Mycobacteria and other respiratory organisms used in this study are listed in Table 1 . Mycobacterial isolates were cultured for 2–3 weeks at 37 °C, on Middlebrook 7H11 complete agar (BD Difco) containing 10% oleic acid, albumin, dextrose, catalase (OADC) (Becton Dickinson and Company), except for Mycobacterium chelonae that was incubated at 30 °C and Mycobacterium ulcerans at 32 °C. Respiratory organisms were cultured at 37 °C in the presence of 5% CO2 for 48 h on blood agar, with the exceptions of Haemophilus spp. and Legionella pneumophila that were grown on chocolate agar and Buffered Charcoal Yeast Extract (BCYE) agar in moist conditions respectively.

Table 1.

The MTBC, non-tuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) and other respiratory organisms selected for sequencing of the mtp gene.

Bacterial strain ATCC number n
M. tuberculosis complex strains 91
F15/LAM4/KZN 20
Beijing 20
F11 10
F28 10
Unique 8
Other clustering strains 18
M. africanum 1
M. canettii 1
M. microti 1
M. bovis 1
M. bovis BCG 1
Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria 34
M. scrofulaceum 1
M. intracellulare 3
M. gordonae 7
M. fortuitum 9
M. avium 6
M. chelonae 4
M. marinum 1
M. abscessus 23040 1
M. smegmatis 21293 1
M. ulcerans 1
Respiratory organisms 10
Gram positive bacteria
Streptococcus pyogenes 8668 1
Staphylococcus aureus 25923 1
Streptococcus pneumoniae 49619 1
Gram negative bacteria
Haemophilus influenzae type B 7901 1
Haemophilus parainfluenzae 33533 1
Moraxella catarrhalis 1
Legionella pneumophila 1
Klebsiella pneumoniae 700623 1
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 27853 1
Burkholderia cepacia

1
Total 135

The organisms that do not have ATCC numbers are clinical isolates.

2.2. Bioinformatics analysis of the mtp gene and corresponding coded amino acid sequence

The complete genome sequences of some Mycobacterial spp. and other respiratory organisms are available on the NCBI website [35] (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), the TB database [36] (www.tbdb.org), the Broad Institute website [37] (www.broad.mit.edu), the GenoList databases [38] (http://genolist.pasteur.fr) and the Sanger Institute website [39] (www.sanger.ac.uk). The degree of homology of the mtp gene and corresponding amino acid sequence to the MTBC was determined by BLAST analysis (blastn and blastp) and multi-sequence alignment (Bioedit). The mtp gene was presumed absent if no hits were obtained for organisms that have the complete genomes present on the database.

2.3. Bioinformatics analysis of proteins

Partial sequence alignment was found in M. marinum, Mycobacterim avium, M. ulcerans, and Mycobacterium abscessus. The function of the hypothetical proteins encoded by these gene sequences is unknown. The amino acid sequences of these partially-aligned sequences were, therefore, analysed for the secondary structure, topology and antigenic epitopes to determine if these proteins resemble pilin protein subunits. This was done using PredictProtein software [40] and the Abie Pro: Peptide Antibody Design version 3.0 program [41], and compared to that of M. tuberculosis.

2.4. Sequencing of the mtp gene in clinical strains of M. tuberculosis, NTM and other respiratory organisms

2.4.1. PCR amplification of the mtp gene

Purified DNA was prepared by the Sodium chloride–Cetyl trimethylammonium bromide method as previously described [42], with the exception of the M. ulcerans DNA, obtained using the boiling method. The ability of the latter DNA to be amplified was tested using the 16S rRNA housekeeping gene (results not shown). Following optimisation experiments, the DNA concentrations of all MTBC, NTMs and respiratory microbes were quantitated using a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies). DNA samples were standardized to 10 ng/μl, that is, the maximum concentration required to give a PCR product if the mtp gene is present in the organism.

The complete mtp gene was amplified using the following primers: forward: 5′-CTC ATG GGT CAC AGC GAG TA-3′, reverse: 5′-ATG ACA GGT TCC CTT CAA GC-3′, flanking the gene 90 bp upstream and 180 bp downstream of the gene. The amplicon size of the PCR product is 582 bp. The PCR master mix contained a final concentration of 1X Taq buffer (Roche Applied Science), 0.2 mM of each primer, 0.25 mM of dNTPs (Roche Applied Science), nuclease free water and 0.5 U Taq Polymerase (Roche Applied Science) in a reaction volume of 25 μl. Cycle conditions comprised of: initial denaturation of 1 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 20 s at 95 °C, 1 min at 57 °C and 30 s at 72 °C. This was followed by a final extension for 5 min at 72 °C. PCR products were electrophoresed in a 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized using the GelDoc system.

2.4.2. Automated DNA sequencing

The PCR products were purified and then sequenced using the primer set described above by Inqaba Biotec, Pretoria, South Africa. The chromatograms were analysed using Chromas Pro and multiple sequence alignment was performed with Bioedit software.

3. Results

3.1. The mtp gene and corresponding coded amino acid sequence are specific to the MTBC

To determine the value of the mtp gene as a diagnostic marker, it was imperative to determine specificity to M. tuberculosis as compared to other members of the MTBC and NTM as well as other respiratory pathogens and commensals. The mtp gene and corresponding amino acid sequence were aligned against all relevant complete genome sequences available on the publically available databases.

Nucleotide and protein BLAST analysis of the mtp gene and corresponding coded amino acid sequence showed 100% homology in M. tuberculosis C, M. tuberculosis H37Ra, M. tuberculosis Haarlem, M. tuberculosis CDC1551, M. tuberculosis F11, M. bovis, M. bovis BCG, M. canettii and M. microti with that of the laboratory strain H37Rv (Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1) in contrast to the partial alignment shown by the NTM. The similarity of the mtp gene sequence of the different organisms on the publically available genomic databases was further explored using e-values (Table 2 ). The lower the e-value, the stronger the homology with that of the mtp gene sequence of the organism. All the MTBC organisms displayed a lower e-value and thus showed 100% homology of the mtp gene. Higher e-values and therefore partial homologies were obtained for the NTM (Table 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A pictorial representation of the BLAST analysis of the mtp gene of MTBC and NTM from the public genome databases. This was modified in the NCBI output diagram to show the organisms adjacent to a colour bar that represents the degree of homology of each organism's sequence (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). The query bar represents the input sequence of 312 base pairs of M. tuberculosis H37Rv that was aligned to the complete genomes available on NCBI. The red bar represents the correct alignment of 200 base pairs or more to the query sequence, the pink bar 80–200 base pairs, the green bar 50–80 base pairs, the blue bar 40–50 base pairs and the black bar less than 40 base pairs. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Table 2.

Genomic BLAST analysis of MTBC, NTM, and respiratory organisms for the presence of the mtp gene. Publically available genomic databases were used to compare e-values and homology between mtp genes in various microbial species.

Mycobacterial species e-values
M. tuberculosis CDC1551 e−176
M. tuberculosis F11 e−176
M. tuberculosis H37Ra e−176
M. tuberculosis KZN 1435 e−176
M. bovis AF2122/97 e−176
M. bovis BCG str. Tokyo 172 e−176
M. bovis BCG str. Pasteur e−176
M. africanumGM041182 e−176
M. canettii e−176
M. microti e−176
M. marinum 6e−15
M. paratuberculosis paratuberculosis K-10 0.087
Mycobacterium sp. MCS 0.087
Mycobacterium sp. KMS 0.087
Mycobacterium sp. JLS 0.087
M. avium 104 0.087
M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis K-10 0.087
M. smegmatis str. MC2 155 0.34
M. vanbaalenii 0.34
M. ulcerans Agy99 0.34
M. leprae Br4923 1.4
M. gilvum 1.4
M. gilvum PYR-GCK 1.4
M. abscessus ATCC 19977 1.4
M. vaccae No hits
M. liflandii No hits
M. celatum No hits

e-values represent the number of hits one can “expect” to see by chance when searching a database. The lower the e-value, or the closer it is to “0”, the higher is the “significance” of the match.

BLAST analysis of the complete genomes of other respiratory organisms showed that no significant similarity was found for the following bacteria: Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Bordetella pertussis, Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Burkholderia cepacia, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

The complete genome sequence was not available for L. pneumophila but this isolate was cultured for amplicon sequencing (Table 1).

Viruses and fungi are not likely to possess pilin protein. Nevertheless, the mtp gene sequence was aligned to the complete genome sequences of the following organisms: Rhinovirus, Coronavirus, Enterovirus, Adenovirus, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, parainfluenza virus, Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus and Paracoccidiodes brasiliensis. However, no homology was observed.

3.2. Selective amplification of the mtp gene

The mtp gene (Rv3312A) was specifically and consistently amplified as a 582 bp size product from all the MTBC subspecies tested (Figure 2 (A)). These included the most prevalent strains in KwaZulu-Natal, a few other cluster strains, some unique strains, M. bovis, M. bovis BCG, M. africanum, M. microti and M. canettii. In contrast, none of the NTM strains showed a positive PCR result (Figure 2(B)), despite extensive optimization (results not shown). The PCR on the NTMs was conducted with a standardised DNA concentration and the negative result was interpreted as the absence of the gene in the organism.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Detection of the mtp gene by PCR amplification in the MTBC and NTM strains. (A) MTBC: lane 1: F15/LAM4/KZN strain, lane 2: Beijing strain, lane 3: F11 strain, lane 4: F28 strain, lane 5: cluster 5, lane 6: cluster 6, lane 7: cluster 7, lane 8: cluster 8, lane 9: unique strain, lane 10: M. bovis, lane 11: M. bovis BCG, lane 12: M. africanum, lane 13: M. canettii, lane 14: M. microti, lane 15: H37Rv, lane 16: negative control (nuclease free water) and lane 17: Molecular weight marker (Fermentas). The amplicon size was 582 bp. (B) NTMs: lane 1: M. fortuitum, lane 2: M. abscessus, lane 3: M. scrofulaceum, lane 4: M. intracellulare, lane 5: M. gordonae, lane 6: M. avium, lane 7: M. chelonae, lane 8: M. marinum, lane 9: M. smegmatis, lane 10: M. ulcerans, lane 11: H37Rv, lane 12: negative control (nuclease free water) and lane 13: Molecular weight marker (Fermentas).

3.3. Sequencing of M. tuberculosis isolates demonstrated a highly conserved gene sequence

No mutations were observed in the mtp gene in 84/86 (97.7%) of M. tuberculosis clinical strains (Figure 3 (A)). Two isolates of M. tuberculosis harboured point mutations, a G54C synonymous and a G17T non-synonymous mutation with a C6F amino acid change (Figure 3(B)).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Multiple sequence alignment of the mtp gene sequences of representative isolates in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN). The KZN, Beijing, F28, F11 and clusters 5–8 strains represent strain families dominant in KZN. The unique strain was isolated from a single patient in KZN. The alignment is shown as a dot plot, each dot representing the same nucleotide as the reference mtp gene sequence of H37Rv. A change in nucleotide would result in the nucleotide standing out from the rest of the dot plot. Thus, it is apparent that no mutations were found in the strains represented in the figure. (B) Point mutations in the mtp gene occurred within the first 60 bp. The mutants were sequenced three times for confirmation. The point mutations stand out from the dot plot. In mutant 1, at position 17, the nucleotide change of guanine to thymine brings about change in amino acid from cysteine to phenylalanine. In mutant 2, at position 54, the nucleotide change of guanine to cytosine brings about no amino acid change.

3.4. Pili protein structure and topology

Partial sequence alignment was found in M. marinum, M. avium, M. ulcerans and M. abscessus. The function of the hypothetical proteins encoded by these gene sequences is unknown. The amino acid sequences of these partial sequences were therefore analysed for secondary structure and topology using the PredictProtein software. The predicted protein structure of the encoded gene sequences of M. avium, M. ulcerans and M. abscessus differed from that of the M. tuberculosis, which was 67% similar to M. marinum (Figure 4 ).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Bioinformatics analysis using Protein Predict and Abie Pro software of the M. tuberculosis pili (MTP) protein and the proteins of the NTMs that showed a partial homology upon BLAST analysis. (A) M. tuberculosis pilin protein has a transmembrane region (t), contains one antigenic epitope (a) from amino acids 7–80, and comprises 19.42% α-helix (h) and 80.58% random coil (l). NTMs: (B) M. marinum protein has a transmembrane region (t), contains 2 antigenic epitopes (a) from amino acids 54–89 and 82–91, 27.66% α-helix (h) and 72.34% random coil (l). (C) M. abscessus protein does not contain a transmembrane region (t) and contains a large antigenic epitope at the N-terminal. (D) M. avium protein does not contain a transmembrane region (t), contains 4 smaller antigenic epitopes (a) and has 6.30% strand (s) structure, with no α-helix (h). (E) M. ulcerans protein contains no transmembrane region (t), 4 antigenic epitopes (a), and a highly looped (l) secondary structure.

3.4.1. Bioinformatics analysis of amino acid sequences of the MTP and NTMs

MTP protein coded for by the mtp gene contained a transmembrane region, one antigenic epitope, and comprised 19.42% α-helix, with 80.58% random coil. The amino acid sequence that had the highest sequence similarity (67%) and pairwise sequence identity (55%) to the MTP amino acid sequence was that of M. marinum. The protein of M. marinum contained a transmembrane region, but possessed 2 epitopes and a different secondary structure (27.66% α-helix and 72.34% random coil). M. abscessus amino acid sequence had a 44% pairwise sequence identity and 59% sequence similarity to the MTP amino acid sequence. Whilst the secondary structure was similar, the protein contained no transmembrane region. The M. avium amino acid sequence had a 43% pairwise sequence identity and 57% sequence similarity to the MTP amino acid sequence. However, the protein lacked a transmembrane region and contained 4 epitopes. The secondary structure comprised 6.3% strand structure and no α-helix. M. ulcerans amino acid sequence had the lowest similarity to the MTP amino acid sequence with 41% pairwise sequence identity and 53% sequence similarity. The protein contained no transmembrane region, 4 epitopes, and a highly looped secondary structure (Figure 4). It is therefore apparent that the proteins of M. abscessus, M. avium and M. ulcerans do not resemble the pilin subunit protein structure. The protein of M. marinum however, does resemble the pilin subunit protein of M. tuberculosis.

4. Discussion

The role of MTP in adhesion of M. tuberculosis to the host was first reported in 2007 [23]. MTP were proposed to be the first point of contact with the host and unique to pathogenic Mycobacteria. MTP were recently viewed by Atomic Force Microscopy in XDR-TB and TDR-TB strains [43]. It has been conclusively proven that the mtp gene is required for pili formation in M. tuberculosis [23], [44]. In this study, BLAST analysis of the complete genome sequences of various Mycobacteria and other respiratory pathogens and commensals [35], [36], [37], [39], as well as amplicon sequencing has proven conclusively that the mtp gene is unique to members of the MTBC. The very low frequency of mutations in the mtp gene indicated that it is highly conserved among the clinical strains of M. tuberculosis. Furthermore, the partial homology detected in NTM has not been linked to proteins similar to those encoding pilin subunits, with the exception of M. marinum. This is the first study providing evidence that the mtp gene is highly conserved, suggestive of the potential use of its encoded product, the MTP protein, as a biomarker for MTBC pathogens.

Further support for this is provided by the bioinformatics analysis, suggesting that the partial protein homologies in other NTMs occurred by chance, with high e-values and very low sequence similarity. The predicted protein structure encoded by the gene sequences of M. avium, M. ulcerans, and M. abscessus differed from that of M. tuberculosis. The low pairwise sequence identity and the fact that these are not transmembrane proteins and differ in secondary structure decreases the probability that these proteins code for pilin subunits or are involved in pilin assembly. Also, the probability of cross reactivity with MTP in an antigen based diagnostic assay for MTBC is unlikely.

In contrast to these NTMs, the transmembrane protein of M. marinum has greater sequence identity and secondary structural similarity to M. tuberculosis. Whilst this does not necessarily dictate a similar function, pili proteins from groups of Gram-positive organisms have been shown to be clearly related. Ancillary protein1 (AP1), encoded by pilus islands 1 and 2 of group B Streptococci share 42% sequence identity with each other and 50% identity with AP1 of S. pneumoniae [45]. It is likely that this partially-aligned protein of M. marinum may be a pilus-like protein, similar to that of MTP but the presence of these cell-surface structures in this organism still needs to be confirmed experimentally. However, the secondary structural similarity of M. marinum is unlikely to pose an obstacle to MTBC diagnostics as this organism does not cause NTM lung disease. M. marinum has been isolated from subcutaneous lesions on the skin of humans and can only grow at very low temperatures [46], [47].

MTP are similar to curli pili produced by E. coli and Salmonella enterica in their morphology as well as their ability to bind to Congo Red and laminin [23]. However, they differ in their secondary structure, in that the MTP amino acid sequence consists of an α-helix, whereas, that of E. coli pilin is a β-barrel structure [22]. Curli pili in general are non-branching, β-sheet rich fibres that are resistant to protease digestion and 1% SDS [22]. In E. coli, curli pili are assembled via the nucleation precipitation pathway [32]. Little is known about the structure and assembly of MTP [23]. The mtp gene does not belong to an operon like the pili biogenesis genes of bacteria such as E. coli, Salmonella spp. and Gram-positive bacteria [48], [49], [50], [51]. The mtp gene is located in between genes involved in intermediary metabolism (add, deoA and cdd) as well as Rv3312c, a gene of unknown function [23], [38], [44].

Novel TB biomarkers are urgently needed as targets for the development of rapid point of care diagnostics as well as therapeutic interventions and vaccines. Previous studies identified an arsenal of novel M. tuberculosis antigens including 38-kDa antigen, 19-kDa lipoprotein, 16-kDa antigen, MTB81, ESAT-6, antigen 85B, MPT51, MPT32, 14-kDa antigen, A60, HBHA, PE and PPE antigens and the glycolipid antigens for use in serodiagnostic assays as reviewed by Abebe et al., 2007 [52]. The low and variable sensitivity of these assays based on the inclusion of a single biomarker led to the proposal of various combinations of these immunodominant antigens for the detection of different stages of TB infection or disease [53]. However, serodiagnostic tests aimed at measuring antibody levels in biological samples have proved unsuccessful [54], [55], [56], [57], [58]. Commercial point of care diagnostic tests that measure the presence of M. tuberculosis antigens such as MPT64 [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], ESAT-6/CFP-10 [7], [8], [21], [59], [60] and Antigen 85 [61] are limited as they are based on culture. The MPT64 antibodies showed a limited sensitivity of 64.4% when tested on sputum specimens in a sandwich Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis [62]. LAM antigens, either alone or with other epitopes have shown limited accuracy on clinical specimens [18], [20], [63]. Other epitopes that have been evaluated for diagnostic purposes include the IP-10 [64], B cell antigens [65], malate synthase and MPT51 [66], [67], [68].

A limitation of most biomarker studies is the lack of extensive evaluation of an epitope prior to screening of biological samples. In addition to providing evidence of the conserved nature and specificity of the mtp gene to the MTBC in this study, we have detected the mtp gene transcript in broth and agar grown clinical MTBC strains in preliminary experiments using RT-PCR. Further studies are in progress to verify these results and to detect the presence of MTP in these strains. Furthermore, gene knockout and complementation studies have proved the essentiality of the mtp gene for MTP production [23], [44]. We therefore propose MTP as a relevant diagnostic marker for the MTBC. Studies are underway to screen for anti-pili antibodies in patients with various stages of tuberculosis and to generate monoclonal antibodies for the detection of MTP antigen in clinical specimens of patients with tuberculosis.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Miss Nafiisah Bibi Chotun and Miss Nonhlanhla Mhlongo for their contribution to the amplification of the mtp gene for sequencing of some of the clinical strains as part of their honours research projects. We are also grateful to the National Health Laboratory Services, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital for the donation of isolates of respiratory pathogens. We are thankful to Dr Deepak Almeida of the KwaZulu-Natal Research Institute for Tuberculosis and HIV-coinfection (K-RITH) for the M. ulcerans strain. We appreciate the donation of the DNA of M. africanum, M. microti and M. canettii from Dr. Philip Supply of the Institut Pasteur de Lille, France.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data related to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2014.03.004.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee, University of KwaZulu-Natal (BE 245-11).

Funding

N. Naidoo gratefully acknowledges scholarships received from the National Research Foundation (NRF); College of Health Sciences, UKZN and K-RITH, Howard Hughes Medical Research Institute. We thank the Medical Research Council, NRF (grant no. 77286), K-RITH and the College of Health Sciences, UKZN for project running costs.

Competing interests

None declared.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the supplementary data related to this article:

mmc1.docx (19.1KB, docx)
mmc2.docx (341.6KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Parsons L.M., Somoskövi A., Gutierrez C., Lee E., Paramasivan C.N., Abimiku A., Spector S., Roscigno G., Nkengasong J. Laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis in resource-poor countries: challenges and opportunities. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24:314–350. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00059-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization. TB diagnostics in the spotlight. http://www.who.int/tdr/news/2010/tb-diagnostics/en/index.html [accessed 13.06.13].
  • 3.Nyendak M.R., Lewinsohn D.A., Lewinsohn D.M. New diagnostic methods for tuberculosis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2009;22:174–182. doi: 10.1097/qco.0b013e3283262fe9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brosch R., Pym A.S., Gordon S.V., Cole S.T. The evolution of mycobacterial pathogenicity: clues from comparative genomics. Trends Microbiol. 2001;9:452–458. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(01)02131-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Garnier T., Eiglmeier K., Camus J.C., Medina N., Mansoor H., Pryor M., Duthoy S., Grondin S., Lacroix C., Monsempe C., Simon S., Harris B., Atkin R., Doggett J., Mayes R., Keating L., Wheeler P.R., Parkhill J., Barrell B.G., Cole S.T., Gordon S.V., Hewinson R.G. The complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:7877–7882. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1130426100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.van Pittius N.C.G., Warren R.M., van Helden P.D. ESAT-6 and CFP-10: what is the diagnosis? Infect Immun. 2002;70:6509–6511. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.11.6509-6511.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Arend S.M., van Meijgaarden K.E., de Boer K., de Palou E.C., van Soolingen D., Ottenhoff T.H., van Dissel J.T. Tuberculin skin testing and in vitro T cell responses to ESAT-6 and culture filtrate protein 10 after infection with Mycobacterium marinum or M. kansasii. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:1797–1807. doi: 10.1086/345760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nguyen Y.H., Ma X., Qin L. Rapid identification and drug susceptibility screening of ESAT-6 secreting Mycobacteria by a NanoELIwell assay. Sci Rep. 2012;2:635. doi: 10.1038/srep00635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Abe C., Hirano K., Tomiyama T. Simple and rapid identification of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by immunochromatographic assay using anti-MPB64 monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:3693–3697. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.11.3693-3697.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marzouk M., Kahla I.B., Hannachi N., Ferjeni A., Salma W.B., Ghezal S., Boukadida J. Evaluation of an immunochromatographic assay for rapid identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical isolates. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;69:396–399. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ngamlert K., Sinthuwattanawibool C., McCarthy K.D., Sohn H., Starks A., Kanjanamongkolsiri P., Anek-vorapong R., Tasaneeyapan T., Monkongdee P., Diem L., Varma J.K. Diagnostic performance and costs of Capilia TB for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex identification from broth-based culture in Bangkok, Thailand. Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14:748–753. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02284.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Park M.Y., Kim Y.J., Hwang S.H., Kim H.H., Lee E.Y., Jeong S.H., Chang C.L. Evaluation of an immunochromatographic assay kit for rapid identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:481–484. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01253-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Toihir A.H., Rasolofo V., Andrianarisoa S.H., Ranjalahy G.M., Ramarokoto H. Validation of an immunochromatographic assay kit for the identification of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011;106:777–780. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762011000600022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vadwai V., Sadani M., Sable R., Chavan A., Balan K., Naik A., Kambli P., Dhane V., Patankar M., Shetty A., Rodrigues C. Immunochromatographic assays for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: what is the perfect time to test? Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;74:282–287. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Harboe M., Nagai S., Patarroyo M.E., Torres M.L., Ramirez C., Cruz N. Properties of proteins MPB64, MPB70, and MPB80 of Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Infect Immun. 1986;52:293–302. doi: 10.1128/iai.52.1.293-302.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abou-Zeid C., Harboe M., Rook G.A. Characterization of the secreted antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis BCG: comparison of the 46-kilodalton dimeric protein with proteins MPB64 and MPB70. Infect Immun. 1987;55:3213–3214. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.12.3213-3214.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nagai S., Wiker H.G., Harboe M., Kinomoto M. Isolation and partial characterization of major protein antigens in the culture fluid of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 1991;59:372–382. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.1.372-382.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chang C.L., Lee E.Y., Son H.C., Park S.K. Evaluating the usefulness of the ICT tuberculosis test kit for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:715–717. doi: 10.1136/jcp.53.9.715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nanta S., Kantipong P., Pathipvanich P., Ruengorn C., Tawichasri C., Patumanond J. Diagnostic value of two rapid immunochromatographic tests for suspected tuberculosis diagnosis in clinical practice. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011;94:1198–1204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gounder C., De Queiroz Mello F.C., Conde M.B., Bishai W.R., Kritski A.L., Chaisson R.E., Dorman S.E. Field evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic test for tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:1989–1993. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.6.1989-1993.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shen G.H., Chiou C.S., Hu S.T., Wu K.M., Chen J.H. Rapid identification of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by combining the ESAT-6/CFP-10 immunochromatographic assay and smear morphology. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:902–907. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00592-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Proft T., Baker E.N. Pili in gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria – structure, assembly and their role in disease. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:613–635. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8477-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Alteri C.J., Xicohténcatl-Cortes J., Hess S., Caballero-Olín G., Girón J.A., Friedman R.L. Mycobacterium tuberculosis produces pili during human infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:5145–5150. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602304104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Albers S., Pohlschröder M. Diversity of archaeal type IV pilin-like structures. Extremophiles. 2009;13:403–410. doi: 10.1007/s00792-009-0241-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pohlschroder M., Ghosh A., Tripepi M., Albers S.V. Archaeal type IV pilus-like structures-evolutionarily conserved prokaryotic surface organelles. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011;14:357–363. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Szabó Z., Stahl A.O., Albers S.V., Kissinger J.C., Driessen A.J., Pohlschröder M. Identification of diverse archaeal proteins with class III signal peptides cleaved by distinct archaeal prepilin peptidases. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:772–778. doi: 10.1128/JB.01547-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Imam S., Chen Z., Roos D.S., Pohlschröder M. Identification of surprisingly diverse type IV pili, across a broad range of gram-positive bacteria. PLoS One. 2011;6:28919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hahn E., Wild P., Hermanns U., Sebbel P., Glockshuber R., Häner M., Taschner N., Burkhard P., Aebi U., Müller S.A. Exploring the 3D molecular architecture of Escherichia coli type 1 pili. J Mol Biol. 2002;323:845–857. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01005-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Römling U., Bian Z., Hammar M., Sierralta W.D., Normark S. Curli fibers are highly conserved between Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli with respect to operon structure and regulation. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:722–731. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.3.722-731.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Alteri C.J. The University of Arizona; 2005. Novel pili of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. [Ph.D. thesis] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Strom M.S., Lory S. Structure-function and biogenesis of the type IV pili. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1993;47:565–596. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.47.100193.003025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hammar M., Bian Z., Normark S. Nucleator-dependent intercellular assembly of adhesive curli organelles in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:6562–6566. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.13.6562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Olsén A., Jonsson A., Normark S. Fibronectin binding mediated by a novel class of surface organelles on Escherichia coli. Nature. 1989;338:652–655. doi: 10.1038/338652a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Olsén A., Herwald H., Wikström M., Persson K., Mattsson E., Björck L. Identification of two protein-binding and functional regions of curli, a surface organelle and virulence determinant of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:34568–34572. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206353200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Reddy T.B., Riley R., Wymore F., Montgomery P., DeCaprio D., Engels R., Gellesch M., Hubble J., Jen D., Jin H., Koehrsen M., Larson L., Mao M., Nitzberg M., Sisk P., Stolte C., Weiner B., White J., Zachariah Z.K., Sherlock G., Galagan J.E., Ball C.A., Schoolnik G.K. TB database: an integrated platform for tuberculosis research. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database issue):D499–D508. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kostic A.D., Ojesina A.I., Pedamallu C.S., Jung J., Verhaak R.G., Getz G., Meyerson M. PathSeq: software to identify or discover microbes by deep sequencing of human tissue. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:393–396. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lew J.M., Kapopoulou A., Jones L.M., Cole S.T. TubercuList – 10 years after. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2011;91:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rutherford K., Parkhill J., Crook J., Horsnell T., Rice P., Rajandream M.A., Barrell B. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics. 2000;16:944–945. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rost B., Yachdav G., Liu J. The PredictProtein server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(Web server issue):W321–W326. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chang Bioscience. Abie Pro 3.0: Peptide antibody design. http://www.changbioscience.com/abie/abie.html. [accessed 15.06.12].
  • 42.van Soolingen D., de Haas P.E., Hermans P.W., van Embden J.D. DNA fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Methods Enzymol. 1994;235:196–205. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(94)35141-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Velayati A.A., Farnia P., Masjedi M.R. Pili in totally drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TDR-TB) Int J Myco. 2012;1:57–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2012.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ramsugit S., Guma S., Pillay B., Jain P., Larsen M.H., Danaviah S., Pillay M. Pili contribute to biofilm formation in vitro in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2013;104:725–735. doi: 10.1007/s10482-013-9981-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Telford J.L., Barocchi M.A., Margarit I., Rappuoli R., Grandi G. Pili in gram-positive pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:509–519. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Stinear T.P., Seemann T., Harrison P.F., Jenkin G.A., Davies J.K., Johnson P.D.R., Abdellah Z., Arrowsmith C., Chillingworth T., Churcher C., Clarke K., Cronin A., Davis P., Goodhead I., Holroyd N., Jagels K., Lord A., Moule S., Mungall K., Norbertczak H., Quail M.A., Rabbinowitsch E., Walker D., White B., Whitehead S., Small P.L., Brosch R., Ramakrishnan L., Fischbach M.A., Parkhill J., Cole S.T. Insights from the complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium marinum on the evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Genome Res. 2008;18:729–741. doi: 10.1101/gr.075069.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Clark H.F., Shepard C.C. Effect of environmental temperatures on infection with Mycobacterium marinum (balnei) of mice and a number of poikilothermic species. J Bacteriol. 1963;86:1057–1069. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.5.1057-1069.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Barnhart M.M., Chapman M.R. Curli biogenesis and function. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006;60:131–147. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Collinson S.K., Parker J.M., Hodges R.S., Kay W.W. Structural predictions of AgfA, the insoluble fimbrial subunit of Salmonella thin aggregative fimbriae. J Mol Biol. 1999;290:741–756. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hammar M., Arnqvist A., Bian Z., Olsén A., Normark S. Expression of two csg operons is required for production of fibronectin- and congo red-binding curli polymers in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol. 1995;18:661–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_18040661.x.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mandlik A., Swierczynski A., Das A., Ton-That H. Pili in gram-positive bacteria: assembly, involvement in colonization and biofilm development. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16:33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2007.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Abebe F., Holm-Hansen C., Wiker H.G., Bjune G. Progress in serodiagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Scand J Immunol. 2007;66:176–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2007.01978.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kunnath-Velayudhan S., Salamon H., Wang H.Y., Davidow A.L., Molina D.M., Huynh V.T., Cirillo D.M., Michel G., Talbot E.A., Perkins M.D., Felgner P.L., Liang X., Gennaro M.L. Dynamic antibody responses to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:14703–14708. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009080107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Baumann R., Kaempfer S., Chegou N.N., Nene N.F., Veenstra H., Spallek R., Bolliger C.T., Lukey P.T., van Helden P.D., Singh M., Walzl G. Serodiagnostic markers for the prediction of the outcome of intensive phase tuberculosis therapy. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2013;93:239–245. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2012.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ireton G.C., Greenwald R., Liang H., Esfandiari J., Lyashchenko K.P., Reed S.G. Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens of high serodiagnostic value. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010;17:1539–1547. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00198-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Steingart K.R., Henry M., Laal S., Hopewell P.C., Ramsay A., Menzies D., Cunningham J., Weldingh K., Pai M. Commercial serological antibody detection tests for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2007;4:202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Steingart K.R., Dendukuri N., Henry M., Schiller I., Nahid P., Hopewell P.C., Ramsay A., Pai M., Laal S. Performance of purified antigens for serodiagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009;16:216–276. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00355-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhang L., Wang Q., Wang W., Liu Y., Wang J., Yue J., Xu Y., Xu W., Cui Z., Zhang X., Wang H. Identification of putative biomarkers for the serodiagnosis of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proteome Sci. 2012;10:12. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-10-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Arend S.M., Geluk A., van Meijgaarden K.E., van Dissel J.T., Theisen M., Andersen P., Ottenhoff T.H.M. Antigenic equivalence of human T-cell responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific RD1-encoded protein antigens ESAT-6 and culture filtrate protein 10 and to mixtures of synthetic peptides. Infect Immun. 2000;68:3314–3321. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.6.3314-3321.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Waters W.R., Nonnecke B.J., Palmer M.V., Robbe-Austermann S., Bannantine J.P., Stabel J.R., Whipple D.L., Payeur J.B., Estes D.M., Pitzer J.E., Minion F.C. Use of recombinant ESAT-6: CFP-10 fusion protein for differentiation of infections of cattle by Mycobacterium bovis and by M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004;11:729–735. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.11.4.729-735.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kashyap R.S., Shekhawat S.D., Nayak A.R., Purohit H.J., Taori G.M., Daginawala H.F. Diagnosis of tuberculosis infection based on synthetic peptides from Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen 85 complex. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115:678–683. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhu C., Liu J., Ling Y., Yang H., Liu Z., Zheng R., Qin L., Hu Z. Evaluation of the clinical value of ELISA based on MPT64 antibody aptamer for serological diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mutetwa R., Boehme C., Dimairo M., Bandason T., Munyati S.S., Mangwanya D., Mungofa S., Butterworth A.E., Mason P.R., Corbett E.L. Diagnostic accuracy of commercial urinary lipoarabinomannan detection in African tuberculosis suspects and patients. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;13:1253–1259. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Goletti D., Raja A., Kabeer B.S.A., Rodrigues C., Sodha A., Carrara S., Vernet G., Longuet C., Ippolito G., Thangaraj S., Leportier M., Girardi E., Lagrange P.H. Is IP-10 an accurate marker for detecting M. tuberculosis-specific response in HIV-infected persons? PLoS One. 2010;5:12577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sartain M.J., Slayden R.A., Singh K.K., Laal S., Belisle J.T. Disease state differentiation and identification of tuberculosis biomarkers via native antigen array profiling. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5:2102–2113. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M600089-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Achkar J.M., Dong Y., Holzman R.S., Belisle J., Kourbeti I.S., Sherpa T., Condos R., Rom W.N., Laal S. Mycobacterium tuberculosis malate synthase- and MPT51-based serodiagnostic assay as an adjunct to rapid identification of pulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006;13:1291–1293. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00158-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Achkar J.M., Jenny-Avital E., Yu X., Burger S., Leibert E., Bilder P.W., Almo S.C., Casadevall A., Laal S. Antibodies against immunodominant antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in subjects with suspected tuberculosis in the United States compared by HIV status. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010;17:384–392. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00503-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wanchu A., Dong Y., Sethi S., Myneedu V.P., Nadas A., Liu Z., Belisle J., Laal S. Biomarkers for clinical and incipient tuberculosis: performance in a TB-endemic country. PLoS One. 2008;3:2071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.docx (19.1KB, docx)
mmc2.docx (341.6KB, docx)

Articles from Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES