Skip to main content
PMC home page
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2018 Feb 19;20(3):298–306. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.12.005

Evaluation of Two Commercial Real-Time PCR Kits for Aspergillus DNA Detection in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis

Julie Denis ∗,∗, Faezeh Forouzanfar ∗,†, Raoul Herbrecht ‡, Elise Toussaint ‡, Romain Kessler §, Marcela Sabou ∗, Ermanno Candolfi ∗, Valérie Letsher-Bru ∗
PMCID: PMC7185652  PMID: 29471112

Abstract

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is a common complication of immunosuppression. Rapid diagnosis using molecular techniques is essential to improve patient survival. PCR techniques are promising in enhancing Aspergillus detection in blood and respiratory samples. We evaluate for the first time the performances of two commercial real-time PCR kits, the A. fumigatus Bio-Evolution and the MycoGENIE A. fumigatus for the detection of A. fumigatus DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) from patients with and without IPA. Seventy-three BAL samples were included. Thirty-one of them corresponded to patients with probable IPA, 11 to patients with possible IPA, and 31 to patients without aspergillosis, according to the 2008 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group criteria. In the probable IPA group, A. fumigatus Bio-Evolution and the MycoGENIE A. fumigatus real-time PCR kits showed a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 81% and 71%, respectively. The A. fumigatus Bio-Evolution detected Aspergillus DNA in the 14 BAL samples with a positive Aspergillus culture result, whereas the MycoGENIE A. fumigatus PCR result was positive only for 12. In the possible IPA group, there were no positive real-time PCR or positive Aspergillus culture results. For the patients without aspergillosis, no positive result was observed for real-time PCR kit, despite the presence of various other non-Aspergillus pathogens in this group. Our study demonstrates an excellent specificity and a good sensitivity of A. fumigatus DNA detection in BAL samples with both kits.

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is a common complication of immunosuppression, particularly during deep and prolonged neutropenia. Hematologic malignant tumors, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and solid organ transplantation are major risk factors for IPA, followed by solid tumor and multiple other immunosuppressive conditions. Aspergillus fumigatus is the most frequent species isolated during aspergillosis (80%), but other species, such as Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, and Aspergillus terreus, can also be found.1 IPA mortality is substantial (>30%) and is the highest in hematologic patients (up to 90% for HSCT).2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Some studies have found survival improvement in patients receiving an early and appropriate antifungal therapy.7, 8 A rapid and accurate diagnosis of aspergillosis is essential to initiate early treatment. IPA is diagnosed according to clinical, radiologic, histologic, and microbiological criteria.9 Microbiological methods consist of direct examination and culture of respiratory or other relevant samples and of fungal antigen detection. Because of low culture sensitivity, microbiological evidence of Aspergillus presence is difficult to establish in respiratory samples.10 Antigen detection techniques have improved IPA diagnosis. Galactomannan is an accurate marker recommended for IPA diagnosis in serum11 and commonly used in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids with an index threshold of 0.5 recommended by the manufacturer. Some laboratories use higher thresholds on respiratory samples, from 0.8 to 1,12 to improve the test specificity, with variable results, which explains the lack of standardization among laboratories for galactomannan detection in respiratory samples. Serum (1→3)-β-d-glucan can also be used for this diagnosis, but it is not specific for Aspergillus.11, 13, 14, 15, 16 PCR techniques seem to be promising to enhance Aspergillus detection in blood and respiratory samples.11 Many in-house PCR tests have been developed in blood and respiratory samples but are still lacking standardization.17, 18, 19 Thus, there is a need for standardized PCR techniques for better IPA diagnosis. Commercial real-time PCR kits are now available to detect Aspergillus in blood and in respiratory specimens, but only a few of them have been evaluated.20, 21, 22, 23 Two of them, the A. fumigatus Bio-Evolution (Bio-Evolution, Bry-sur-Marne, France) and the MycoGENIE A. fumigatus (Ademtech, Pessac, France) kits, have never been compared in clinical respiratory samples. In this study, we evaluated and compared in our routine conditions the performances of these two commercially available PCR kits for the detection of A. fumigatus DNA in BAL samples from patients with and without IPA.

Materials and Methods

Specimens

The study was conducted retrospectively on 73 BAL samples addressed to the microbiology laboratory of the Strasbourg University Hospital between February 2014 and November 2015 for routine mycologic, bacteriologic, and virologic examination. Routine mycologic analysis on BAL samples consisted of direct examination (Musto staining), semiquantitative culture, determination of galactomannan index (Platelia Aspergillus antigen, Bio-Rad, Schiltigheim, France), and Pneumocystis jirovecii detection by PCR. The semiquantitative cultures were realized as follows: 2 to 6 mL of BAL, depending on initial BAL volume received, was centrifuged (15 minutes, 2500 × g), and 100 μL of the pellet was cultivated onto ChromID Candida medium (bioMérieux, Paris, France) and incubated for 9 days at 35°C followed by 7 more days at 27°C. Morphologic A. fumigatus identification was confirmed by β-tubulin sequencing and comparison to the Genbank, Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS), and European Molecular Biology Laboratory databases. The mean inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to amphotericin B, caspofungin, fluconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole were determined by Etest (bioMérieux). Determination of galactomannan index (Platelia Aspergillus antigen, Bio-Rad) was performed on the BAL supernatant and concomitant serum samples. DNA for P. jirovecii detection was obtained using a manual extraction kit QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France).

Real-Time PCR

For the retrospective study, the DNA previously extracted from the BAL for the routine P. jirovecii PCR was used. DNA was extracted using an extraction kit (QIAamp DNA mini kit, Qiagen) available for DNA/RNA extraction. A variable BAL sample volume (2 to 6 mL), depending on initial sample volume received, was centrifuged and 200 μL of the pellet was extracted according to the manufacturer's recommendations with 200 μL of elution volume. Positive and negative extraction controls were used for each extraction run and checked during the P. jirovecii PCR. DNA was stored at −20°C with one freezing/thawing cycle. Aspergillus DNA was detected by using two commercialized real-time PCR kits, the A. fumigatus Bio-Evolution kit and the MycoGENIE A. fumigatus kit.

The A. fumigatus Bio-Evolution PCR kit targets the ITS1 region and allows the specific detection of A. fumigatus DNA with a limit of detection (LOD) of 5 copies/μL, validated on serum and sinus biopsy specimens. This real-time PCR was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions with 5 μL of DNA extract and the kit inhibition control amplified on LightCycler 480 (Roche, Meylan, France). A quantitation cycle <38 was considered to be positive. The positive control, which can be used to quantify DNA, is provided in the kit.

The MycoGENIE A. fumigatus multiplex kit detects the 28S rRNA of A. fumigatus with a LOD of 1 copy/μL and the major azole resistance mutation TR34/L98H with a LOD of 6 copies/μL. It is validated on respiratory tract, biopsy, and serum samples. Real-time PCR was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions using 10 μL of DNA extract and the kit inhibition control amplified on LightCycler 480 (Roche, Meylan, France). A positive control from an A. fumigatus sensu stricto culture was used. A quantitation cycle <40 was considered to be positive for A. fumigatus detection and mutation detection.

Statistical Analysis

For each BAL sample, the following data were recorded: age and sex of the patient, underlying condition, presence and duration of antifungal therapy before the BAL test, mycologic results (direct examination and BAL culture, isolation of Aspergillus from other respiratory specimens during the episode), BAL galactomannan index (threshold of 0.5 according to manufacturer's recommendations), sera galactomannan index, and all other pathogens recovered in BAL during the episode. The episodes were classified as probable IPA, possible IPA, and non-IPA episodes according to the 2008 and 2016 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) criteria (excluding PCR) for patients with cancer, severe neutropenia, HSCT or solid organ transplantation, or T-cell immunosuppressive or steroid treatment.9 For patients who lacked these underlying conditions, the specific algorithm developed for intensive care unit patients was applied.24

For both kits, the clinical sensitivity and specificity were calculated according to this final diagnosis (proven/probable IPA for the clinical sensitivity). Nonparametric binomial and McNemar tests were used for the statistical analysis.

Results

Seventy-three BAL samples were included in the study. Thirty-one of them corresponded to probable IPA, 11 to possible IPA, and 31 to nonaspergillosis pulmonary episodes according to the 2008 EORTC/MSG criteria without considering Aspergillus PCR results. No proven IPAs were diagnosed during the study.

Probable IPA

The demographic and underlying condition data are presented in Table 1 and the detailed microbiological and galactomannan results in Table 2 . The underlying conditions were hematologic malignant tumors [n = 15 (49%)], solid organ transplant [n = 5 (16%)], allogenic bone marrow transplant [n = 4 (13%)], solid tumor [n = 1 (3%)], and other conditions [n = 6 (19%)]. Neutropenia was reported for 14 patients (45%). All patients presented clinical criteria for IPA with dense, well-circumscribed nodules with or without halo sign or pulmonary condensation. Fifteen patients (48%) received anti-Aspergillus antifungal treatment at the time of the BAL sampling, with a mean duration of 13 days (range, 1 to 37 days) before the BAL. Fourteen BALs (45%) tested positive for A. fumigatus sensu stricto in culture with a semiquantitative count varying from 1 to >40 colonies, and 27 BALs (87%) tested positive for Aspergillus galactomannan.

Table 1.

Epidemiologic, Clinical Characteristics, and Treatment of Patients with Probable Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis

BAL specimen no. Age, years/sex Underlyling conditions Pulmonary nodule(s) Neutropenia Antifungal treatment before BAL (duration)
1 56/M Kidney and pancreas transplant (2001) Yes (halo) No Voriconazole (1 day)
2 65/F NHL, hypogammaglobulinemia, CMV disease, ICU Yes Yes Voriconazole (26 days)
3 55/M Lung transplant (30 days before) Yes No Micafungin and liposomal amphotericin B nebulization (30 days)
4 71/F NHL, end-stage postviral liver disease, ICU Yes Yes Liposomal amphotericin B (37 days)
5 66/M AML Yes (halo) Yes Liposomal amphotericin B (1 day)
6 56/F AML, AlloHSCT (10 days before) Yes Yes None
7 64/M COPD, Influenza A (H1N1) pneumonia, steroids, ICU Yes No None
8 34/M AML Yes (halo) Yes Voriconazole (1 day)
9 84/M NHL, steroids Yes (halo) Yes None
10 86/M AML Yes (halo) Yes None
11 54/M Myasthenia, steroids, azathioprine Yes No Caspofungin (2 days)
12 60/F Ovarian cancer, bronchial stenosis Yes No None
13 57/F AML Yes (halo) Yes None
14 50/F Kidney transplant (2013) Yes No Voriconazole (2 days)
15 75/F AML Yes No None
16 50/M ALL, steroids Yes
halo		 Yes None
17 86/M NHL, cryoglobulinemia, steroids Yes No None
181 86/M NHL, cryoglobulinemia, steroids Yes No Voriconazole (9 days)
19 62/M Allogenic HSCT (2012), influenza A (H1N1) pneumonia, ICU Yes No Voriconazole (10 days)
20 32/M Kidney transplant (2013) Yes Yes None
21 47/M End-stage postviral liver disease, ICU Yes No None
222 47/M End-stage postviral liver disease, ICU Yes No Liposomal amphotericin B (14 days)
23 62/F AML, allogenic HSCT (2013) Yes Yes Voriconazole (12 days)
24 58/M Lung transplant (2012) Yes No Voriconazole (4 days)
25 67/M AML Yes (halo) Yes None
26 60/M AML Yes Yes Voriconazole (1 day)
27 69/M MDS, COPD, steroids, ICU Yes No None
28 72/M COPD, inhaled steroids, ICU Yes No None
29 55/M HIV positive, NHL, allogenic HSCT (2014), GVHD Yes Yes Voriconazole (32 days) then caspofungin (2 days)
30 67/M AML Yes Yes None
31 76/M Congestive heart failure, ECMO, ICU Yes No None
Open in a new tab

F, female; M, male; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CMV, cytomegalovirus; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; ICU, intensive care unit; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Table 2.

Aspergillus fumigatus Bioevolution and MycoGENIE A. fumigatus Ademtech (CT) RT-PCR Assay, Culture, and Serologic Characteristics for 31 BAL Samples of Patients with Probable Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis

BAL
 Serum galactomannan result Other Aspergillus-positive culture Other pathogens in the BAL sample
Sample no. Real-time A. fumigatus PCR kit (Ct) MycoGENIE (Ct) Culture Direct examination. Galactomannan index
1 Positive (28) Positive (26) A. fumigatus >40 colonies Hyphae >5 Positive Tracheal aspiration None
2 Positive (35) Positive (33) Negative Negative 0.99 Negative Tracheal aspiration CMV, Coronavirus
3 Positive (35) Positive (34) A. fumigatus 10–20 colonies Negative 3.47 Positive Bronchial lavage None
4 Positive (22) Positive (21) A. fumigatus >40 colonies Hyphae >5 Positive Tracheal aspiration None
5 Negative Negative Candida albicans 1 colony Negative >5 Negative None None
6 Negative Negative Negative Negative 1.59 Negative None Enterovirus
7 Positive (35) Positive (34) A. fumigatus 5 colonies Hyphae 0.07 Negative None Influenza A (H1N1)
8 Positive (34) Positive (31) Negative Negative >5 Positive None None
9 Negative Negative Negative Negative 0.79 Negative None Pseudomonas aeruginosa
10 Positive (35) Negative C. albicans >40 colonies Negative 1.12 Negative None Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pneumocystis
11 Positive (35) Positive (31) C. albicans 10–20 colonies Negative 0.24 Negative Tracheal aspiration CMV, Pneumocystis
12 Positive (35) Positive (39) C. albicans >40 colonies Negative 0.74 Negative None Pneumocystis
13 Negative Negative Penicillium species 1 colony Negative 0.61 Negative None Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
14 Negative Negative Negative Negative 1.40 Positive None None
15 Positive (35) Negative A. fumigatus 1 colony Negative 0.76 Negative None Enterococcus faecium, Pneumocystis
16 Positive (35) Positive (34) Negative Negative >5 Positive None CMV
17 Positive (33) Positive (31) A. fumigatus 1 col., A. niger 3 col. Negative >5 Positive Subsequent BAL Pneumocystis
18 Positive (28) Positive (26) A. fumigatus 6 colonies, A. niger 1 colony, Trichosporon asahii >40 colonies Hyphae >5 Positive None Pneumocystis, Influenza
19 Positive (30) Positive (28) A. fumigatus 20–40 colonies Hyphae >5 Negative None Influenza A (H1N1), Pseudomonas aeruginosa
20 Positive (35) Negative A. fumigatus 6 colonies Negative >5 Negative Tracheal aspiration Staphylococcus aureus
21 Positive (25) Positive (23) A. fumigatus 20–40 colonies Hyphae >5 Negative Tracheal aspiration None
22 Positive (35) Positive (33) Negative Hyphae 0.18 Negative None Enterococcus faecium
23 Negative Negative Negative Hyphae 0.59 Negative None Enterococcus faecium, Coronavirus, Pneumocystis
24 Positive (34) Positive (31) A. fumigatus 1 colony Hyphae 0.48 Negative Bronchial aspiration None
25 Positive (35) Positive (33) Negative Negative >5 Positive None Enterococcus faecium
26 Positive (35) Positive (32) Negative Negative >5 Positive Stool None
27 Positive (32) Positive (30) A. fumigatus 1 colony Negative 2.75 Negative Prior BAL Parainfluenza virus
28 Positive (28) Positive (26) A. fumigatus >40 colonies Negative >5 Positive None Pseudomonas aeruginosa
29 Positive (35) Positive (33) Negative Negative 2.11 Positive Sputum Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Parainfluenza virus
30 Positive (35) Positive (32) Negative Negative >5 Positive None None
31 Positive (31) Positive (28) A. fumigatus 5 colonies Negative 0.61 Negative Tracheal aspiration None
Open in a new tab

BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CMV, cytomegalovirus.

With the A. fumigatus Bio-Evolution kit, clinical sensitivity and specificity were 81% (25 of 31 positive BAL results) and 100%, respectively (Table 3 ). PCR results were positive for all 14 BAL samples with positive A. fumigatus culture and for 21 of 27 (78%) with positive galactomannan index. All six BAL samples with a negative PCR result had a negative culture result and a positive galactomannan index. Median galactomannan index was >5 (range, 0 to > 5) in the positive PCR group and 0.79 (range, 0.59 to > 5) in the negative PCR group. For patients with a negative PCR, no Aspergillus was found in other concomitant respiratory samples, such as sputum or tracheal aspiration. No inhibitory effects were detected.

Table 3.

RT-PCRs, Culture, and Galactomannan Assay Results in Patients Diagnosed with Probable Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis

Test result A. fumigatus real-time PCR kit, n (%)
 MycoGENIE, n (%)
Positive Negative Positive Negative
Culture (A. fumigatus)
 Positive (n = 14) 14 (100) 0 12 (86) 2 (14)
 Negative (n = 17) 11 (65) 6 (35) 10 (59) 7 (41)
Galactomannan
 Positive (n = 27) 21 (78) 6 (22) 18 (67) 9 (33)
 Negative (n = 4) 4 (100) 0 4 (100) 0
Total (n = 31) 25 (81) 6 (19) 22 (71) 9 (29)
Open in a new tab

For the MycoGENIE A. fumigatus, the PCR result was positive for 22 of 31 BAL specimens in the IPA probable group, giving a sensitivity of 71% (Table 3). All 22 BAL specimens were also PCR positive with the A. fumigatus Bio-Evolution kit. Specificity was 100%. The PCR result was positive for 12 of 14 (86%) of the BAL samples, with positive A. fumigatus culture results, with the two samples with negative PCR results corresponding to BALs with low fungal load (1 and 6 colonies). The PCR result was positive for 18 of 27 (67%) of the BALs with a positive galactomannan index. Six samples with negative PCR results had a negative culture result and a positive galactomannan index. Median galactomannan index was >5 (range, 0 to > 5) in the positive PCR group and 1.12 (range, 0.59 to > 5) in the negative PCR group. No inhibitory effects were detected. No azole resistances were identified consistently with the results of the MICs previously determined by Etest. These two reagents showed comparable performance (P = 0.24, McNemar test) for A. fumigatus DNA detection.

Previous antifungal treatment did not appear to be a cause of false-negative result because the percentage of positive PCRs was comparable between patients with and without antifungal treatment (A. fumigatus Bio-Evolution 80% and 81% in treated and nontreated patients, respectively; P > 0.99; MycoGENIE A. fumigatus 80% and 63% in treated and nontreated patients, respectively; P = 0.44, nonparametric binomial test).

Possible IPA

Underlying conditions were hematologic malignant tumors [8/11 (73%)], allogenic bone marrow transplant [1/11 (9%)], and other conditions [2/11 (18%)]. Neutropenia was noted for eight patients (73%). Six patients (55%) were undergoing anti-Aspergillus antifungal treatment before BAL sampling, with a mean duration of 8 days (range, 1 to 16 days) before the BAL. According to the EORTC/MSG 2008 criteria for possible IPA, every patient of this group presented one of the following clinical criteria: a dense, well-circumscribed nodule with or without halo sign or an air-crescent sign, a negative galactomannan index, and negative respiratory samples cultures. No positive PCR result was observed on BAL samples from this group.

Non-Aspergillus Pulmonary Episodes

Underlying conditions were solid organ transplant [2/31 (71%)], hematologic malignant tumors [6/31 (19%)], allogenic bone marrow transplant [2/31 (6%)], and solid tumor [1/31 (3%)]. Neutropenia was noted only for 3 patients (10%). Eight patients (26%) were receiving antifungal treatment at the moment of the BAL, with a mean duration of 17 days (range, 2 to 38 days) before BAL, mainly for posttransplant prophylaxis or curative treatment of another fungal infection.

The final diagnosis was a documented pulmonary infection attributable to another pathogen for 14 patients (three bacterial infections, two viral infections, five P. jirovecii pneumonias, one mucormycosis, one cryptococcosis, one pulmonary and disseminated toxoplasmosis, and one P. jirovecii and cytomegalovirus coinfection), noninfectious pulmonary diseases for two patients, and routine control BALs in 15 lung transplant patients.

No positive result was observed with either of the two PCR kits, despite the presence of various other pathogens in this group. The specificity was 100% for both kits.

Discussion

Our study evaluated two commercially available real-time PCR kits for A. fumigatus DNA detection in retrospective BAL samples from patients with probable IPA, patients with possible IPA, and patients without aspergillosis. Our study population displayed the risk factors usually found in individuals with probable or possible IPA, such as hematologic malignant tumors, neutropenia, solid organ transplant or allogenic bone marrow transplant, immunosuppressive therapy, or terminal organ failure.25, 26, 27

The two evaluated kits showed excellent specificities (100% for both kits), with no cross-reactivity with the other pathogens tested, and a good clinical sensitivity for probable IPA, with no significant differences between the two kits (81% for A. fumigatus Bio-Evolution versus 71% for MycoGENIE, P = 0.24). Three BAL results were discordant between the two PCR kits. All three BAL samples had a positive galactomannan index (1.12, 0.76, and >5); two of them had positive A. fumigatus culture results (one and six colonies). None of the patients with discordant BAL results had received previous antifungal therapy. The two samples with a positive culture were not detected by the MycoGENIE kit despite using a larger extraction volume and displaying a lower LOD. This LOD was determined by the manufacturer with the MycoGENIE A. fumigatus DNA extraction reagent. Use of a manual Qiagen extraction could explain the decreased analytical sensitivity and require a reevaluation of the LOD.

Several studies have tested in-house PCR and other commercial PCR kits on respiratory samples. The clinical sensitivity of in-house PCRs varies among studies (67% to 100%) according to the patient population.17, 18, 19, 28, 29 Many PCR kits are commercialized for the detection of Aspergillus (AsperGenius, MycAssay, A. fumigatus Genesig, Fungiplex Renishaw, etc.), but only a few of them have been tested on respiratory samples (BAL, bronchial lavage, or sputum) of patients at risk for aspergillosis. The studies using the AsperGenius kit showed 65.5% to 84.2% sensitivity and 80% to 91.4% specificity with cross-reactivity with Rhizopus oryzae and Penicillium chrysogenum.23, 30, 31 The MycAssay Aspergillus kit had various sensitivities (80% to 100%) and specificities (92.9% to 98.6%, cross-reactivity with A. flavus).21, 32, 33 The MycoGENIE A. fumigatus study showed 92.9% sensitivity (versus culture) and 90.1% specificity.34 Variation in sensitivity may be explained by various PCR targets, including 28S rRNA (AsperGenius, MycoGENIE), 18S rRNA (MycAssay), and ITS1 (A. fumigatus Bio-Evolution), as well as by different methods of DNA extraction. Although Wheat et al2 described equivalent performances for manual and automated DNA extraction processes, a better sensitivity was observed by others with automated extraction.31, 32, 33, 35, 36 In a multicenter analysis, White et al37 demonstrated a better PCR sensitivity using larger sample volumes and small elution volumes (≤100 μL). In our study, DNA was previously manually extracted for P. jirovecii routine PCR, and the kits were evaluated in our routine conditions. BAL-extracted volume depended on the volume of the initial sample received and varied from 2 to 6 mL. A study showed an equivalent efficiency for pellet and supernatant extraction for A. fumigatus detection,38 whereas others revealed better efficiency extraction using pellet.31 Here, BALs were concentrated by centrifugation and 200 μL of the pellet were extracted, as recommended by the extraction kit's manufacturer. Elution volume used during the extraction process was 200 μL, according to our routine extraction protocol. An optimized elution volume (50 or 100 μL) may improve detection capacities of the tested PCR.

Previous antifungal therapy may affect PCR sensitivity results, but study results are controversial. Some authors showed no effect of a prior antifungal treatment,28 whereas others observed a decreased PCR sensitivity.29 Here, previous antifungal treatment did not significantly alter PCR results and could not explain the negative PCRs in the probable IPA group.

The A. fumigatus Bio-Evolution and MycoGENIE A. fumigatus kits increase A. fumigatus detection in BAL and showed a higher clinical sensitivity than culture, with 13 (42%) and 8 (26%) BALs having a positive PCR and a negative culture result, respectively. A higher sensitivity detection of Aspergillus in respiratory samples allowed upgrading from possible IPA to probable IPA in some studies.18, 39 Here, no PCR was positive in the possible IPA group. A very low fungal load could explain the poor detectability of A. fumigatus in possible IPA, despite the low limit of detection. A way to enhance detection sensitivity in this group would be to analyze multiple respiratory (other than BAL) or serum samples in these patients.

These two kits only allow identification of A. fumigatus sensu lato, unlike other commercial kits that detect Aspergillus species or several species from the genus Aspergillus (AsperGenius, MycAssay). A. fumigatus sensu lato represents 80% of IPA, and its detection is essential for IPA diagnosis; thus, the lack of detection of other Aspergillus species could be problematic.1 No A. fumigatus cryptic species were isolated in this study; thus, the detection of A. fumigatus cryptic species could not be studied. However, an extensive study to evaluate the detection of cryptic A. fumigatus species would be valuable. Nevertheless, identification of Aspergillus species at species level in the case of a negative BAL culture results has improved the diagnosis accuracy and could allow the quick adjustment of antifungal therapy, especially when a non-Aspergillus infection was suspected.

The MycoGENIE A. fumigatus kit also allows detection of the major azole resistance mutation TR34/L98H. An increase of azole A. fumigatus resistance in Europe has been recently reported.40, 41 Detection of this azole resistance mutation by PCR is interesting for appropriate treatment, particularly when no strain can be isolated. In our study, no mutations were detected, confirming the MICs previously determined by Etest and consistent with the first MycoGENIE A. fumigatus study.34 Until now, only rare cases of azole-resistant strains have been isolated in Eastern France, allowing us to use the MIC determination to test sensitivity to many azoles or other drugs, such as amphotericin B.

Aspergillus DNA detection in BAL fluids is a promising tool in IPA diagnosis. In our study, the two PCR kits confirmed A. fumigatus DNA presence in nine BAL samples with negative culture results and positive galactomannan indexes. Among them, two had BAL galactomannan indexes between 1 and 5, and two had an index between 0.5 and 1. The galactomannan positivity threshold is still controversial in BAL. In our study, the positive galactomannan index threshold used was 0.5, according to the manufacturer's recommendations, but some authors use 0.8 or 1.0.12, 42, 43, 44 For galactomannan indexex between 0.5 and 1.0, PCR would be particularly helpful to confirm Aspergillus presence. Moreover, PCR would be interesting in patients with both negative culture results and galactomannan indexes in BAL but with a serum galactomannan index ≥0.5 to confirm the presence of pulmonary Aspergillus.

For Aspergillus DNA detection in IPA diagnosis, several types of samples can be used. A meta-analysis about in-house PCR and commercial kits using blood samples (plasma or sera) showed a mean sensitivity of 80.5% and a specificity of 78.5% for IPA diagnosis.45 Another meta-analysis compared Aspergillus PCR on BAL and serum samples and obtained a lower sensitivity for BAL compared with serum (76.9% to 79.9% versus 84% to 88%, respectively) but a higher specificity in BAL (93.7% to 94.5% versus 75% to 76% in serum) in patients with IPA.44 These two types of samples seem to be complementary for IPA diagnosis. Several studies propose serum DNA detection as a noninvasive screening technique for the population at risk of IPA because of its feasibility and specificity. BAL fluids are more difficult to obtain and thus could be used to confirm Aspergillus presence and to enhance the sensitivity of Aspergillus detection in respiratory samples.44 However, Aspergillus DNA detection in BAL does not differentiate colonization from an invasive pulmonary infection or from an allergic aspergillosis and, as culture or galactomannan, remains just a detection method of Aspergillus presence.

Conclusions

To improve IPA diagnosis, standardized and validated molecular techniques are required. Our study demonstrates excellent specificity and good sensitivity in A. fumigatus DNA detection on BAL samples with the A. fumigatus Bio-Evolution and MycoGENIE A. fumigatus kits. Further study with an increased number of IPA and a greater range of species would be valuable.

Acknowledgment

We thank Dr. Francois Severac for help with statistical questions.

Footnotes

Disclosures: None declared.

Supplementary data related to this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.12.005.

Supplemental Data

Data Profile
mmc1.xml (193B, xml)

References

  • 1.Paulussen C., Hallsworth J.E., Alvarez-Perez S., Nierman W.C., Hamill P.G., Blain D., Rediers H., Lievens B. Ecology of aspergillosis: insights into the pathogenic potency of Aspergillus fumigatus and some other Aspergillus species. Microb Biotechnol. 2017;10:296–322. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wheat L.J., Walsh T.J. Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis by galactomannan antigenemia detection using an enzyme immunoassay. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;27:245–251. doi: 10.1007/s10096-007-0437-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lortholary O., Gangneux J.P., Sitbon K., Lebeau B., de Monbrison F., Le Strat Y., Coignard B., Dromer F., Bretagne S., French Mycosis Study Group Epidemiological trends in invasive aspergillosis in France: the SAIF network (2005-2007) Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:1882–1889. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kurosawa M., Yonezumi M., Hashino S., Tanaka J., Nishio M., Kaneda M., Ota S., Koda K., Suzuki N., Yoshida M., Hirayama Y., Takimoto R., Torimoto Y., Mori A., Takahashi T., Iizuka S., Ishida T., Kobayashi R., Oda T., Sakai H., Yamamoto S., Takahashi F., Fukuhara T. Epidemiology and treatment outcome of invasive fungal infections in patients with hematological malignancies. Int J Hematol. 2012;96:748–757. doi: 10.1007/s12185-012-1210-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Porpon R., Chen Y.C., Chakrabarti A., Li R.Y., Shivaprakash R.M., Yu J., Kung H.C., Watcharananan S., Tan A.L., Saffari S.E., Tan B.H. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of invasive mould infections: a multicenter, retrospective analysis in five Asian countries. Med Mycol. 2018;56:186–196. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myx029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Taccone F.S., Van den Abeele A.M., Bulpa P., Misset B., Meersseman W., Cardoso T., Paiva J.A., Blasco-Navalpotro M., De Laere E., Dimopoulos G., Rello J., Vogelaers D., Blot S.I., Asp ICU Study Investigators Epidemiology of invasive aspergillosis in critically ill patients: clinical presentation, underlying conditions, and outcomes. Crit Care. 2015;19:7. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0722-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Herbrecht R., Caillot D., Cordonnier C., Auvrignon A., Thiebaut A., Brethon B., Michallet M., Mahlaoui N., Bertrand Y., Preziosi P., Ruiz F., Gorin N.C., Gangneux J.P. Indications and outcomes of antifungal therapy in French patients with haematological conditions or recipients of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:2731–2738. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ledoux M.P., Toussaint E., Denis J., Herbrecht R. New pharmacological opportunities for the treatment of invasive mould diseases. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:i48–i58. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Pauw B., Walsh T.J., Donnelly J.P., Stevens D.A., Edwards J.E., Calandra T., Pappas P.G., Maertens J., Lortholary O., Kauffman C.A., Denning D.W., Patterson T.F., Maschmeyer G., Bille J., Dismukes W.E., Herbrecht R., Hope W.W., Kibbler C.C., Kullberg B.J., Marr K.A., Munoz P., Odds F.C., Perfect J.R., Restrepo A., Ruhnke M., Segal B.H., Sobel J.D., Sorrell T.C., Viscoli C., Wingard J.R., Zaoutis T., Bennett J.E., European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group. National Institute of Allergy Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group Consensus Group Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1813–1821. doi: 10.1086/588660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bergeron A., Porcher R., Sulahian A., de Bazelaire C., Chagnon K., Raffoux E., Vekhoff A., Cornet M., Isnard F., Brethon B., Lacroix C., Poirot J.L., Bouges C., Derouin F., Tazi A., Ribaud P. The strategy for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis should depend on both the underlying condition and the leukocyte count of patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2012;119:1831–1837. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-351601. quiz 1956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Patterson T.F., Thompson G.R., 3rd, Denning D.W., Fishman J.A., Hadley S., Herbrecht R., Kontoyiannis D.P., Marr K.A., Morrison V.A., Nguyen M.H., Segal B.H., Steinbach W.J., Stevens D.A., Walsh T.J., Wingard J.R., Young J.A., Bennett J.E. Executive summary: practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:433–442. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zou M., Tang L., Zhao S., Zhao Z., Chen L., Chen P., Huang Z., Li J., Chen L., Fan X. Systematic review and meta-analysis of detecting galactomannan in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosing invasive aspergillosis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Maertens J., Maertens V., Theunissen K., Meersseman W., Meersseman P., Meers S., Verbeken E., Verhoef G., Van Eldere J., Lagrou K. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid galactomannan for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with hematologic diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1688–1693. doi: 10.1086/647935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Imbert S., Gauthier L., Joly I., Brossas J.Y., Uzunov M., Touafek F., Brun S., Mazier D., Datry A., Gay F., Fekkar A. Aspergillus PCR in serum for the diagnosis, follow-up and prognosis of invasive aspergillosis in neutropenic and nonneutropenic patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:562.e1–562.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.01.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Arvanitis M., Ziakas P.D., Zacharioudakis I.M., Zervou F.N., Caliendo A.M., Mylonakis E. PCR in diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:3731–3742. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01365-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Boch T., Reinwald M., Postina P., Cornely O.A., Vehreschild J.J., Heussel C.P., Heinz W.J., Hoenigl M., Eigl S., Lehrnbecher T., Hahn J., Claus B., Lauten M., Egerer G., Muller M.C., Will S., Merker N., Hofmann W.K., Buchheidt D., Spiess B. Identification of invasive fungal diseases in immunocompromised patients by combining an Aspergillus specific PCR with a multifungal DNA-microarray from primary clinical samples. Mycoses. 2015;58:735–745. doi: 10.1111/myc.12424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gu Z., Buelow D.R., Petraitiene R., Petraitis V., Walsh T.J., Hayden R.T. Quantitative multiplexed detection of common pulmonary fungal pathogens by labeled primer polymerase chain reaction. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138:1474–1480. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0592-OA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Heng S.C., Chen S.C., Morrissey C.O., Thursky K., Manser R.L., De Silva H.D., Halliday C.L., Seymour J.F., Nation R.L., Kong D.C., Slavin M.A. Clinical utility of Aspergillus galactomannan and PCR in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with haematological malignancies. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;79:322–327. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Johnson G.L., Sarker S.J., Nannini F., Ferrini A., Taylor E., Lass-Florl C., Mutschlechner W., Bustin S.A., Agrawal S.G. Aspergillus-specific lateral-flow device and real-time PCR testing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: a combination biomarker approach for clinical diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:2103–2108. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00110-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pini P., Bettua C., Orsi C.F., Venturelli C., Faglioni L., Forghieri F., Bigliardi S., Luppi F., Girardis M., Blasi E. Clinical performance of a commercial real-time PCR assay for Aspergillus DNA detection in serum samples from high-risk patients: comparison with a galactomannan enzyme immunoassay. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34:131–136. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2211-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Orsi C.F., Bettua C., Pini P., Venturelli C., La Regina A., Morace G., Luppi M., Forghieri F., Bigliardi S., Luppi F., Codeluppi M., Girardis M., Blasi E. Detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii and Aspergillus spp. DNa in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids by commercial real-time PCr assays: comparison with conventional diagnostic tests. New Microbiol. 2015;38:75–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Danylo A., Courtemanche C., Pelletier R., Boudreault A.A. Performance of MycAssay Aspergillus DNA real-time PCR assay compared with the galactomannan detection assay for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis from serum samples. Med Mycol. 2014;52:577–583. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myu025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chong G.M., van der Beek M.T., von dem Borne P.A., Boelens J., Steel E., Kampinga G.A., Span L.F., Lagrou K., Maertens J.A., Dingemans G.J., Gaajetaan G.R., van Tegelen D.W., Cornelissen J.J., Vonk A.G., Rijnders B.J. PCR-based detection of Aspergillus fumigatus Cyp51A mutations on bronchoalveolar lavage: a multicentre validation of the AsperGenius assay(R) in 201 patients with haematological disease suspected for invasive aspergillosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71:3528–3535. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Blot S.I., Taccone F.S., Van den Abeele A.M., Bulpa P., Meersseman W., Brusselaers N., Dimopoulos G., Paiva J.A., Misset B., Rello J., Vandewoude K., Vogelaers D., Asp ICU Study Investigators A clinical algorithm to diagnose invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186:56–64. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201111-1978OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen J., Yang Q., Huang J., Li L. Risk factors for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis and hospital mortality in acute-on-chronic liver failure patients: a retrospective-cohort study. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10:1625–1631. doi: 10.7150/ijms.6824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Herbrecht R., Bories P., Moulin J.C., Ledoux M.P., Letscher-Bru V. Risk stratification for invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1272:23–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06829.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Perkhofer S., Lass-Florl C., Hell M., Russ G., Krause R., Honigl M., Geltner C., Auberger J., Gastl G., Mitterbauer M., Willinger B., Knobl P., Resch G., Waldner R., Makrai A., Hartmann G., Girschikofsky M., Greil R. The Nationwide Austrian Aspergillus Registry: a prospective data collection on epidemiology, therapy and outcome of invasive mould infections in immunocompromised and/or immunosuppressed patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;36:531–536. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Musher B., Fredricks D., Leisenring W., Balajee S.A., Smith C., Marr K.A. Aspergillus galactomannan enzyme immunoassay and quantitative PCR for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:5517–5522. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5517-5522.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Eigl S., Prattes J., Reinwald M., Thornton C.R., Reischies F., Spiess B., Neumeister P., Zollner-Schwetz I., Raggam R.B., Flick H., Buchheidt D., Krause R., Hoenigl M. Influence of mould-active antifungal treatment on the performance of the Aspergillus-specific bronchoalveolar lavage fluid lateral-flow device test. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;46:401–405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Montesinos I., Argudin M.A., Hites M., Ahajjam F., Dodemont M., Dagyaran C., Bakkali M., Etienne I., Jacobs F., Knoop C., Patteet S., Lagrou K. Culture-based methods and molecular tools for azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus detection in a Belgian University Hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:2391–2399. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00520-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chong G.L., van de Sande W.W., Dingemans G.J., Gaajetaan G.R., Vonk A.G., Hayette M.P., van Tegelen D.W., Simons G.F., Rijnders B.J. Validation of a new Aspergillus real-time PCR assay for direct detection of Aspergillus and azole resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:868–874. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03216-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Orsi C.F., Gennari W., Venturelli C., La Regina A., Pecorari M., Righi E., Machetti M., Blasi E. Performance of 2 commercial real-time polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Aspergillus and Pneumocystis DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from critical care patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;73:138–143. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Torelli R., Sanguinetti M., Moody A., Pagano L., Caira M., De Carolis E., Fuso L., De Pascale G., Bello G., Antonelli M., Fadda G., Posteraro B. Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis by a commercial real-time PCR assay for Aspergillus DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from high-risk patients compared to a galactomannan enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:4273–4278. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05026-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dannaoui E., Gabriel F., Gaboyard M., Lagardere G., Audebert L., Quesne G., Godichaud S., Verweij P.E., Accoceberry I., Bougnoux M.E. Molecular diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis and detection of azole resistance by a newly commercialized PCR kit. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:3210–3218. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01032-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Francesconi A., Kasai M., Harrington S.M., Beveridge M.G., Petraitiene R., Petraitis V., Schaufele R.L., Walsh T.J. Automated and manual methods of DNA extraction for Aspergillus fumigatus and Rhizopus oryzae analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1978–1984. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02246-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Perry M.D., White P.L., Barnes R.A. Comparison of four automated nucleic acid extraction platforms for the recovery of DNA from Aspergillus fumigatus. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63:1160–1166. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.076315-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.White P.L., Mengoli C., Bretagne S., Cuenca-Estrella M., Finnstrom N., Klingspor L., Melchers W.J., McCulloch E., Barnes R.A., Donnelly J.P., Loeffler J., European Aspergillus PCR Initiative Evaluation of Aspergillus PCR protocols for testing serum specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:3842–3848. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05316-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Khot P.D., Ko D.L., Hackman R.C., Fredricks D.N. Development and optimization of quantitative PCR for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tuon F.F. A systematic literature review on the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from bronchoalveolar lavage clinical samples. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2007;24:89–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Choukri F., Botterel F., Sitterle E., Bassinet L., Foulet F., Guillot J., Costa J.M., Fauchet N., Dannaoui E. Prospective evaluation of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus clinical isolates in France. Med Mycol. 2015;53:593–596. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myv029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.van der Linden J.W., Arendrup M.C., Warris A., Lagrou K., Pelloux H., Hauser P.M., Chryssanthou E., Mellado E., Kidd S.E., Tortorano A.M., Dannaoui E., Gaustad P., Baddley J.W., Uekotter A., Lass-Florl C., Klimko N., Moore C.B., Denning D.W., Pasqualotto A.C., Kibbler C., Arikan-Akdagli S., Andes D., Meletiadis J., Naumiuk L., Nucci M., Melchers W.J., Verweij P.E. Prospective multicenter international surveillance of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:1041–1044. doi: 10.3201/eid2106.140717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hoenigl M., Prattes J., Spiess B., Wagner J., Prueller F., Raggam R.B., Posch V., Duettmann W., Hoenigl K., Wolfler A., Koidl C., Buzina W., Reinwald M., Thornton C.R., Krause R., Buchheidt D. Performance of galactomannan, beta-d-glucan, Aspergillus lateral-flow device, conventional culture, and PCR tests with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:2039–2045. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00467-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Eigl S., Hoenigl M., Spiess B., Heldt S., Prattes J., Neumeister P., Wolfler A., Rabensteiner J., Prueller F., Krause R., Reinwald M., Flick H., Buchheidt D., Boch T. Galactomannan testing and Aspergillus PCR in same-day bronchoalveolar lavage and blood samples for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. Med Mycol. 2017;55:528–534. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myw102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.White P.L., Wingard J.R., Bretagne S., Loffler J., Patterson T.F., Slavin M.A., Barnes R.A., Pappas P.G., Donnelly J.P. Aspergillus polymerase chain reaction: systematic review of evidence for clinical use in comparison with antigen testing. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:1293–1303. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mengoli C., Cruciani M., Barnes R.A., Loeffler J., Donnelly J.P. Use of PCR for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:89–96. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70019-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Profile
mmc1.xml (193B, xml)

Articles from The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics : JMD are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES