Abstract
At the beginning of a COVID-19 infection, there is a period of time known as the exposed or latency period, before an infected person is capable of transmitting the infection to another person. We develop two differential equations models to account for this period. The first is a model that incorporates infected persons in the exposed class, before transmission is possible. The second is a model that incorporates a time delay in infected persons, before transmission is possible. We apply both models to the COVID-19 epidemic in China. We estimate the epidemiological parameters in the models, such as the transmission rate and the basic reproductive number, using data of reported cases. We thus evaluate the role of the exposed or latency period in the dynamics of a COVID-19 epidemic.
Keywords: Corona virus, Reported and unreported cases, Isolation, Quarantine, Public closings, Epidemic mathematical model
1. Introduction
In (New England Journal of Me, 2020) it is reported that transmission of COVID-19 infection may occur from an infectious individual, who is not yet symptomatic. In (Report of theO-China J, 2019) it is reported that COVID-19 infected individuals generally develop symptoms, including mild respiratory symptoms and fever, on an average of 5–6 days after infection (mean 5–6 days, range 1–14 days). In (Yanget al., 2020) it is reported that the median time prior to symptom onset is 3 days, the shortest 1 day, and the longest 24 days. It is evident that these time periods play an important role in understanding COVID-19 transmission dynamics. (see Table 1, Table 2, Table 3)
Table 1.
Symbol | Interpretation | Method |
---|---|---|
Time at which the epidemic started | fitted | |
Number of susceptible at time | fixed | |
Number of asymptomatic and noninfectious at time | fitted | |
Number of asymptomatic but infectious at time | fitted | |
Number of unreported symptomatic infectious at time | fitted | |
. | Transmission rate | fitted |
N | First day of the public interventions | fitted |
μ | Intensity of the public interventions | fitted |
average duration of the exposed noninfectious period | fitted | |
Average time during which asymptomatic infectious are asymptomatic | fixed | |
f | Fraction of asymptomatic infectious that become reported symptomatic infectious | fixed |
Rate at which asymptomatic infectious become reported symptomatic | fitted | |
Rate at which asymptomatic infectious become unreported symptomatic | fitted | |
Average time symptomatic infectious have symptoms | fixed |
Table 2.
January | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
198 | 291 | 440 | 571 | 830 | 1287 | 1975 |
26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
2744 | 4515 | 5974 | 7711 | 9692 | 11791 | |
February | ||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
14380 | 17205 | 20438 | 24324 | 28018 | 31161 | 34546 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
37198 | 40171 | 42638 | 44653 | 46472 | 48467 | 49970 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
51091 | ||||||
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | ||||||
March | ||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | |||
Table 3.
In this work, we will examine the latency period of COVID-19 infection, that is, the period of time in which newly infected individuals are asymptomatic and noninfectious. We illustrate the latency period in Fig. 1 below:
In the present article we develop two mathematical models to study the impact of the latency period. One is a ODE (ordinary differential equations) model, with an exposed class of infected individuals, who are not yet infectious. The other is a DDE (delay differential equations) model, with a time delay in newly infected individuals, before they become infectious. The DDE model can be derived from a continuous age of infection model, which can be reduced to a system of DDE. The derivation of such models is described in (Magal & McCluskey, 2013). We refer to (Tang et al., 2020; Yanget al., 2020) for early models with exposure applied to COVID-19.
As mentioned in (Liu, Magal, Seydi, & Webb, 2020), asymptomatic infectious cases are not usually reported to medical authorities, and reported infectious cases are typically only a fraction of the total number of the symptomatic infectious individuals. In this work, we examine the number of asymptomatic infectious cases and unreported infectious cases, as well as the number of reported infectious cases, for the COVID epidemic in mainland China. We note that public measures in China, beginning January 26, strongly attenuated the epidemic. One of our objectives is to understand how these measures, such as isolation, quarantine, and public closings, reduce the final size of the epidemic. We examine how the latency period, tied contact tracing and to a 14-day medical observation or quarantine period for exposed persons, mitigates the final size of the epidemic.
2. Models
2.1. Model with a compartment E of exposed infected individuals not yet infectious
This model has a compartment in the system of ODE that corresponds to exposed or latent infected individuals. We will designate this model as the SEIRU model:
(2.1) |
Here is time in days, is the beginning date of the epidemic, is the number of individuals susceptible to infection at time t, is the number of asymptomatic noninfectious individuals at time t, is the number of asymptomatic but infectious individuals at time t, is the number of reported symptomatic infectious individuals at time t, and is the number of unreported symptomatic infectious individuals at time t. This system is supplemented by initial data
(2.2) |
The exit flux of the exposed class E is describe by the term . The means that the time of exposure follows an exponential law, and the average value of the exposure time is , which can be, for example, 6 h, 12 h, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, etc …. The model contains an asymptomatic infectious class corresponding to the -equation. The dynamics of the symptomatic infectious individuals are decomposed into the -equation, which corresponds to the reported symptomatic infectious individuals (symptomatic infectious with severe symptoms), and the -equation, which corresponds to the unreported symptomatic infectious individuals (symptomatic infectious with mild symptoms). The flux of individuals leaving the class I is . We assume that a fraction f are reported and a fraction are unreported. Thus,
The time-dependent parameter is the transmission rate. During the early phase of the epidemic, when the cumulative number of reported cases grows approximately exponential, . is a constant value . After January 23, strong government measures in all of China, such as isolation, quarantine, and public closings, strongly impacted the transmission of new cases. The actual effects of these measures were complex, and we use a time-dependent exponentially decreasing transmission rate to incorporate these effects after the early exponentially increasing phase. The formula for during the exponential decreasing phase is derived by a fitting procedure to the data:
(2.3) |
Day N corresponds to the day when the public measures take effect, and μ is the rate at which they take effect. A schematic diagram of the model is given in Fig. 2, and the parameters of the model are listed in Table 2.1 below (see Fig. 3).
2.2. Model with a constant time delay δ in the I class equation
This model has a time delay δ in the equation in the system of DDE that contains the latency period. We will designate this model as the SEIRUδ model:
(2.4) |
This system is supplemented by initial data
(2.5) |
In the model SEIRUδ, the duration of exposure is constant and equal to δ. The exposed class is given by the integral formula
(2.6) |
or alternatively, by using the differential equation
(2.7) |
can be decoupled from the equations in the DDE system SEIRUδ, since it can be obtained from , , and . The parameters and initial conditions of the SEIRUδ model are given in Table 2.1, and a schematic diagram of the model is given in Fig. 2.2.
2.3. Data for the COVID-19 epidemic in China
In our simulations of models SEIRU and SEIRUδ for COVID-19 in mainland China, we will use the following data:
3. Estimation of the parameters and initial conditions
The parameters τ, ν, , , η, α, δ, as well as the starting time and the initial conditions , , , , are uncertain. Our objective is to identify them from specific time data of reported symptomatic infectious cases. To identify the unreported asymptomatic infectious cases, we assume that the cumulative reported symptomatic infectious cases at time t consist of a constant fraction f of the total number of symptomatic infectious cases at time t. In other words, we assume that the removal rate ν of infectious asymptomatic cases takes the following form: , where is the removal rate of reported symptomatic infectious individuals, and is the removal rate of unreported symptomatic infectious individuals due to all causes. The cumulative number of reported symptomatic infectious cases at time t, denoted by , is
(3.1) |
Our method is the following: We assume that has the following form when the epidemic is in the early exponentially growing phase:
(3.2) |
We evaluate . using the reported cases data. By using the method in Section 6.1 (Supplementary material), we estimate the starting time for the models from
We fix , which corresponds to the total population of mainland China. We assume that the variation in is small during this exponentially growing phase. We fix . We assume that the transmission rate is constant during this exponentially growing phase. We identify from for each of the models SEIRU and SEIRUδ.
3.1. Parameters and initial conditions for model SEIRU
We fix the fraction of symptomatic infectious cases that are reported. Thus, of infectious cases are reported. We assume , the average time during which the patients are asymptomatic infectious is 5 days or 7 days. We assume that , the average time during which a patient is symptomatic infectious, is 7 days. Since f is known, we obtain
(3.3) |
From Section 6.1 (Supplementary material), we obtain
(3.4) |
From Section 6.2 (Supplementary material), we obtain basic reproductive number for model SEIRU
3.2. Parameters and initial conditions for model SEIRUδ
The values of f, ν, and η are the same as for model SEIRU. From Section 6.3 (Supplementary material), we obtain
(3.5) |
(3.6) |
(3.7) |
and
(3.8) |
From Section 6.4 (Supplementary material), we obtain the basic reproductive number for model SEIRUδ
4. Comparisons of the models with the data
We use the data from Table 2.3 to numerically simulate models SEIRU and SEIRUδ.
4.1. Comparison of model SEIRU with data
In Fig. 4.1 and , we plot the graphs of , , , and from the numerical simulation of model SEIRU. We use , , , , and in both Fig. 4.1 and . We take in Fig. 4.1 and in Fig. 4.1. We take four different values for α: in both Fig. 4.1 and Fig. 4. The value of μ is chosen so that the simulations align with the cumulative reported case data. In this way, we are able to predict the future values of the epidemic from early cumulative reported case data. We see from the simulations the following: for Fig. 4.1, with , the simulations are almost the same; for Fig. 4.1, with , the simulations are almost the same.
4.2. Comparison of model SEIRUδ with data
In Fig. 4.2 and , we plot the graphs of , , , and from the numerical simulation of model SEIRUδ. We use , , , , and in both Fig. 4.2 and . We take in Fig. 4.2 and in Fig. 4.2. We take four different values for δ: in both Fig. 4.2 and Fig. 4. The value of μ is chosen so that the simulations align with the cumulative reported case data. In this way, we are able to predict the future values of the epidemic from early cumulative reported case data. We see from the simulations the following: for Fig. 4.2, with , the simulation for is almost the same as , the simulations for and do not agree with the data, and thus, δ cannot be greater than 5 days; for Fig. 4.2, with , the simulations for , , and are almost the same and for , the simulation does not agree with the data, and thus, δ cannot be greater than 7 days.
5. Discussion
We have developed two models SEIRU and SEIRUδ of the COVID-19 epidemic in China that incorporate key features of this epidemic: (1) the importance of implementation of major government public restrictions designed to mitigate the severity of the epidemic; (2) the importance of both reported and unreported cases in interpreting the number of reported cases; and (3) the importance of asymptomatic infectious cases in the disease transmission. The main difference from our previous papers (Liu et al., 2020) and (Liu, Magal, Seydi, & Webb, Webb) is that we consider a latency period in the two models. In model SEIRU, an exposed class E is used to model latency. Newly infected individuals enter the class E, where they are neither symptomatic nor infectious. From this exposed class, noninfectious asymptomatic individuals enter an infectious asymptomatic class I. From I, asymptomatic infectious individuals enter a class R or U where they are symptomatic infectious, and later are reported R or unreported U. In model SEIRUδ a time delay is used to model latency. Newly infected individuals enter the class I after a fixed time delay δ, and then proceed through classes R and U.
In order to compare the models SEIRU and SEIRUδ, we use the Median of Absolute Deviation (MAD) as an indicator:
(5.1) |
where is the vector of the cumulative number of reported cases from Table 2.3, while is the vector of predicted cumulative number of reported cases of the model. The following table summaries the MAD of models SEIRU and SEIRUδ.
From Table 5, it is evident that Fig. 4.1(b) is the best fit for model SEIRU (which corresponds to hours) and Fig. 4.2(a) is the best fit for model SEIRUδ (which corresponds to hours) (see Table 4). This mean that for both models, is better than . Furthermore, Table 5 also indicates that model SEIRUδ gives a better prediction than model SEIRU. We also deduce that the best exposure period varies between 6 h for model SEIRUδ and 12 h for model SEIRU. Our finding is consistent with Zou (Zouet al., 2020) where the high viral load observed for COVID-19 was used to explain that the transmission can occur at the early stage of the infection. This gives an explanation for the very short exposure period which give the best fit with data here. This also justifies the fact that in our previous articles (Liu et al., 2020; Liu et al., Webb; Magal & Webb, 2020) we neglected the exposure period.
Table 5.
Figure |
Final |
Final size |
Final size |
Turning point |
Turning point |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
size | Reported | Unreported | of | of | |
Fig. 6 (a) | 78633 | 62907 | 15728 | day 39.4 | day 33.9 |
Fig. 6 (b) | 78562 | 62850 | 15712 | day 39.1 | day 33.7 |
Fig. 6 (c) | 78590 | 62872 | 15718 | day 38.6 | day 33.4 |
Fig. 6 (d) | 79011 | 63209 | 15802 | day 37.1 | day 32.3 |
Fig. 7 (a) | 80043 | 64035 | 16008 | day 39.6 | day 33.8 |
Fig. 7 (b) | 79139 | 63312 | 15827 | day 39.3 | day 33.5 |
Fig. 7 (c) | 78934 | 63147 | 15787 | day 38.7 | day 33.1 |
Fig. 7 (d) | 78839 | 63071 | 15768 | day 37.0 | day 33.8 |
Table 4.
Figure |
Final |
Final size |
Final size |
Turning point |
Turning point |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
size | Reported | Unreported | of | of | |
Fig. 4 (a) | 79346 | 63477 | 15869 | day 39.4 | day 33.9 |
Fig. 4 (b) | 78241 | 62593 | 15648 | day 39.0 | day 33.7 |
Fig. 4 (c) | 79036 | 63229 | 15807 | day 38.9 | day 33.6 |
Fig. 4 (d) | 78363 | 62691 | 15672 | day 38.8 | day 33.4 |
Fig. 5 (a) | 78688 | 62950 | 15738 | day 39.4 | day 33.6 |
Fig. 5 (b) | 79097 | 63278 | 15819 | day 39.2 | day 33.5 |
Fig. 5 (c) | 78754 | 63003 | 15751 | day 38.9 | day 33.3 |
Fig. 5 (d) | 78805 | 63044 | 15761 | day 38.9 | day 33.1 |
We summarize in the following tables the predicted turning point and final size, respectively, for models SEIRU and SEIRUδ.
For our model without latency in (Liu et al., Webb), the turning point of the asymptomatic infectious cases is approximately day 35 = February 4. The turning point of the reported cases and the unreported cases is approximately day 41 = February 10, and the final size of cumulative cases is approximately 79,400 with approximately 63,500 reported, 15,900 unreported. For the ODE model SEIRU, Fig. 4.1 (b) (the best one according to MAD) predicts a turning point of the asymptomatic infectious cases at approximately day 34 = February 3. The turning point of the reported cases and the unreported cases is approximately day 39 = February 8, and the final size of cumulative cases is approximately 63,278 reported, 15,819 unreported. For the DDE model SEIRUδ, Fig. 4.2 (a) (the best one according to MAD) predicts a turning point of the asymptomatic infectious cases at approximately day 34 = February 3. The turning point of the reported cases and the unreported cases is approximately day 40 = February 9, and the final size of cumulative cases is approximately 64,035 reported 16,008 unreported.
Our analysis of the latency period for the COVID-19 epidemic in mainland China is applicable to COVID-19 epidemics in other regions.
6. Supplementary material
The part is devoted to the parameters estimation's of the models by assuming the reported cases data are exponentially growing. We assume that this exponential phase occurs before any public intervention. Therefore we assume that
for both SEIRU and SEIRUδ models.
6.1. Method to estimate the parameters and initial conditions of SEIRU from the number of reported cases
In the following we fix .
-
Step 1
Since f, α, η and ν are fixed, we know that
-
Step 2
By using equation (3.1) and (3.2) we obtain
(6.1) |
and
and therefore
(6.2) |
Moreover by using (6.2) at
(6.3) |
-
Step 3
In order to evaluated the parameters of the model we replace by in the right-hand side of (2.1) (which is equivalent to neglecting the variation of susceptibles due to the epidemic, which is consistent with the fact that grows exponentially). Therefore, it remains to estimate , and in the following system:
(6.4) |
By using the second equation we obtain
and therefore by using (6.2) we must have
Then, by using the first equation we obtain
and then
By substituting these expressions into (6.4), we obtain
(6.5) |
Remark 6.1
Here we fix in such a way that the value becomes the dominant eigenvalue of the linearized equation (6.5), and is the positve eigenvector associated to this dominant eigenvalue . Thus, we apply implicitly the Perron-Frobenius theorem. Moreover the exponentially growing solution that we consider (which is starting very close to ) follows the direction of the positive eigenvector associated with the dominant eigenvalue .
From the second and third equations of (6.5) we obtain
and by substituting these expressions into the first equation of (6.5) we obtain
(6.6)
6.2. Computation of the basic reproductive number of model SEIRU
In this section we apply results in Diekmann, Heesterbeek and Metz (Diekmann, Heesterbeek, & Metz, 1990) and Van den Driessche and Watmough (Van den Driessche & Watmough, 2002). The linearized equation of the infectious part of the system is given by
(6.7) |
The corresponding matrix is
and the matrix A can be rewritten as
where
Therefore, the next generation matrix is
and we obtain that
(6.8) |
By using (6.6) we obtain
and by using we obtain
(6.9) |
6.3. Method to estimate the parameters of model SEIRUδ from the number of reported cases
-
Step 1
We have
-
Step 2
By using equation (3.2) we obtain
(6.10) |
and
and therefore
(6.11) |
Moreover, by using (6.10) at ,
(6.12) |
-
Step 3
In order to evaluate the parameters of the model SEIRUδ, we replace by in the right-hand side of (2.4) (which is equivalent to neglecting the variation of susceptibles due to the epidemic, and is consistent with the fact that grows exponentially). Therefore, it remains to estimate and η in the following system:
(6.13) |
By using the first equation we obtain
and therefore by using (6.11) we must have
so by substituting these expressions into (6.13) we obtain
(6.14) |
Remark 6.2
Here we fix in such a way that the value becomes the dominant eigenvalue of the linearized equation (6.14) and is the positve eigenvector associated to this dominant eigenvalue . Thus, we apply implicitly the Perron-Frobenius theorem. Moreover the exponentially growing solution that we consider (which is starting very close to ) follows the direction of the positive eigenvector associated with the dominant eigenvalue .
By dividing the first equation of (6.14) by we obtain
and hence
(6.15) By using the second equation of (6.14) we obtain
(6.16) By using (6.15) and (6.16) we obtain
(6.17) By using (6.12) we compute
(6.18)
6.4. Computation of the basic reproductive number of model SEIRUδ
The linearized equation of the infectious part of the system is given by
(6.19) |
We apply the results in Thieme (Thieme, 2009) to the linear operator where
with
We split A into
By using Theorem 3.5 in (Liu, Magal, & Ruan, 2008) we obtain that is invertible and
where
Thus we can compute
and since the range of C is contained into it is sufficient to compute
Therefore, the next generation matrix is
which is a Leslie matrix, and the basic reproductive number is
(6.20) |
By using (6.17) and , we obtain
(6.21) |
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Handling editor. Dr. J Wu
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
References
- Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention http://www.chinacdc.cn/jkzt/crb/zl/szkb_11803/jszl_11809/ accessed on 17 March 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Diekmann O., Heesterbeek J.A.P., Metz J.A.J. On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Mathematical Biology. 1990;28(4):365–382. doi: 10.1007/BF00178324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Z., Magal P., Ruan S. Projectors on the generalized eigenspaces for functional differential equations using integrated semigroups. Journal of Differential Equations. 2008;244:1784–1809. [Google Scholar]
- Z. Liu, P. Magal, O. Seydi, and G. Webb, Predicting the cumulative number of cases for the COVID-19 epidemic in China from early data, Submitted. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Liu Z., Magal P., Seydi O., Webb G. Understanding unreported cases in the 2019-nCov epidemic outbreak in Wuhan, China, and the importance of major public health interventions. MPDI biology. 2020;9(3):50. doi: 10.3390/biology9030050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magal P., McCluskey C.C. Two group infection age model: An application to nosocomial infection. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. 2013;73(2):1058–1095. [Google Scholar]
- Magal P., Webb G. SSRN; Italy, France and Germany: 2020. Predicting the number of reported and unreported cases for the COVID-19 epidemic in South Korea. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- New England journal of medicine. Letter to the editor. January 30 2020 doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2001468. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2019. Report of the WHO-China joint mission on coronavirus disease. COVID-19 https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Tang B., Bragazzi N.L., Li Q., Tang S., Xiao Y., Wu J. An updated estimation of the risk of transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCov) Infectious Disease Modelling. 2020;5:248–255. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thieme H.R. Spectral bound and reproduction number for infinite-dimensional population structure and time heterogeneity. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. 2009;70(1):188–211. [Google Scholar]
- Van den Driessche P., Watmough J. Reproduction numbers and subthreshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission. Mathematical Biosciences. 2002;180:29–48. doi: 10.1016/s0025-5564(02)00108-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Z. Modified SEIR and AI prediction of the epidemics trend of COVID-19 in China under public health interventions. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2020 doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zou L. SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;382:1177–1179. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2001737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]