Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2020 Apr 18;30:105560. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105560

Data on identification of desertified regions in Anantapur district, Southern India by NDVI approach using remote sensing and GIS

B Pradeep Kumar a,, K Raghu Babu a, M Ramachandra a, C Krupavathi a, B Narayana Swamy b, Y Sreenivasulu c, M Rajasekhar a
PMCID: PMC7186516  PMID: 32368593

Abstract

Present dataset aims at the inventory data on preparation of Desertification Status Maps (DSM) for the first time in semi-arid region of Anantapur district in the state of Andhra Pradesh, South India by applying Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) with acquired Remote Sensing (RS) satellite imageries and processed in ERDAS Imagine and ArcGIS software's. The NDVI has been classified into five such as water body, vegetation, fallow land, degradation land, and desertified land. Further, degradation land has been decreased to 4.87% which lead to desertification in the study region. The current research data will be resourceful to the environmental scientists and planning agencies who can utilize optimum for sustainable development and good governance in land degradation, desertification, and conserve land resources.

Keywords: Desertification, NDVI, DSM, Remote Sensing, ERDAS Imagine, Arc GIS


Specifications Table

Subject Environmental Geology
Specific subject area Remote Sensing and GIS
Type of data Tables and Figures
How data were acquired Topographical sheets from SOI, ASTER DEM, Land sat 4–7 and Land sat 8 data from USGS website, Soil data from Irrigation department, Anantapur and GPS (Germinetrix 10) field surveys processed and analyzed
Data format Raw and analyzed
Parameters for data collection SOI maps are georeferenced, Geometric corrections were made in ArcGIS. NDVI and SAVI were carried out in ERDAS Imagine software and Geometric data procured by using ArcGIS 10.4 software
Description of data collection DSM have been prepared for knowing the rate of migration of desertification for the past 29 years
Data source location Bommanahal Mandal, Anantapur district, Southern India (Fig. 1)
Data accessibility Data is available in the article

Value of the data

  • Data showed the first catalog on the DSM (Desertification Status Mapping) occurrences in the semi-arid region of Anantapur District, Southern India, during 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2019.

  • The analyzed data is useful to the stakeholders and decision makers for governance to implement the sustainable development for eco-friendly ecosystem in the desertified regions.

  • Can be utilized for future research in monitoring various studies and preparations of natural hazard zone maps to assess the desertification in future.

  • Taking the data into account, it can be realized that the majority of land degradation and desertification is happening on the eastern side of the Hagari/Vedavathi River.

1. Data

1.1. Study area

The study area, Bommanahal, is the southern-most point of Anantapur District in the Rayalaseema region of Southern India and lies in the SOI topographical maps 57A/16, 57B/13, 57 E/4, and 57 F/1 between 13° 40′ and 15° 15′ Northern latitude and 76° 50′ and 78° 30′ Eastern longitude (Fig. 1). It is geologically formed by older groups of metamorphic rocks that belong to the Archean and younger groups of Sedimentary rocks of Proterozoic age (Fig. 2) [7,8,11]. Geomorphologically, the study area has geomorphic changes due to wing action where alluvium is seen along the course of the Hagari/Vedavathi River [8,10]. A pattern of sand dunes sand sheets are also spread over the course of the Hagari River that are migrated by the action of wind in the study area (Fig. 3).

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

Location map: Bommanahal.

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Geology.

Fig. 3.

Fig 3

Geomorphology.

A range of soils present in the study area are shown in Fig. 4. At the same time, Lithology, Geomorphology, and soil data has shown in Table 1. On the other hand, NDVI of the study area of four different years has been provided respectively in Fig. 5(A) (year 1990), (B) (year 2000), (C) (year 2010), and (D) (year 2019), that are the primary Desertification Status Maps (DSM) of the study region [1,2,4]. Statistical data of NDVI for the past 29 years i.e., from 1990 to 2019 has been given in the Table 2.

Fig. 4.

Fig 4

Soils.

Table 1.

Lithology, geomorphology, and soils data.

Thematic layers Parameters Area (km2) Area (%)
Geology Gray granite/pink granite 6.72 2.19
Hornblende – biotite gneiss, Biotite gneiss, Migmatites 275.96 90.23
Quartzite; BIF/BMQ/Ferruginous Quartzite 3.57 1.16
River/Water body 19.61 6.42
Geomorphology Denudational Origin-Pediment-Pedi Plain Complex 268.71 87.85
Structural Origin-Moderately Dissected Hills and Valleys 5.47 1.78
River/Water body 20.41 6.67
Aeolian Origin/Sand/Sand dunes 11.28 3.68
Soils Gravelly clayey moderately deep desert soils 239.88 78.42
Loamy to clayey skeletal deep reddish brown soils 18.4 6.01
Gravelly clayey moderately deep red soils 23.19 7.58
Fine loamy gravelly clayey shallow reddish brown soils 11.82 3.86
Water bodies 12.57 4.11

Fig. 5.

Fig 5

A, 5B, 5C and 5D: primary DSM's.

Table 2.

NDVI for past 29 years.

Year Features Area (Km2) Area (%)
1990 Water body 19.37 6.33
Vegetation 81.96 26.79
Fallow land 59.78 19.54
Degraded land 97.86 31.99
Desertified land 46.89 15.33
2000 Water body 16.65 5.44
Vegetation 75.09 24.55
Fallow land 50.04 16.36
Degraded land 92.96 30.39
Desertified land 71.12 23.25
2010 Water body 12.96 4.23
Vegetation 60.26 19.7
Fallow land 35.72 11.67
Degraded land 96.47 31.54
Desertified land 100.45 32.84
2019 Water body 6.83 2.23
Vegetation 53.49 17.48
Fallow land 27.04 8.84
Degraded land 82.94 27.11
Desertified land 135.56 44.32

2. Experimental design, materials, and methods

As a part of the dataset design, four different Landsat data for the past 29 years i.e., 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2018 has been collected from USGS earth explorer (Landsat 4–5(1990), Landsat 7(2000 and 2010) with 30 m’ resolution, and Landsat 8 (2019) with 30 m’ resolution). SOI toposheets have been collected and georeferenced by using ArcGIS and extracted the boundary of the study area [3]. Further, attribute tables are prepared for geology, geomorphology, soil maps, and geometric calculations procured for these base maps in ArcGIS software.

Simultaneously, normalized Differential Vegetation Index (NDVI) enumerates vegetation by quantifying the variance between near-infrared (vegetation strongly reflects) and red light (which vegetation absorbs) where NDVI has calculated with the formula given below

NDVI=(NIRRed)/(NIR+Red)

For the Landsat 4 – 7 the bands combination is, NDVI = (Band4 – Band3) / (Band4 + Band3),

For the Landsat 8 the bands combination is, NDVI = (Band5 – Band4) / (Band5 + Band4).

NDVI always ranges from −1 to +1. But there isn't distinct boundary for each type of land cover. Negative NDVI values are likely water, the NDVI value is close to +1, it will be green leaves or vegetation, and the value is close to zero will have degraded land or desertified land [5,6,9]. It is carried out for the study area through ArcGIS software where four signatures are collected such as water body, Vegetation land, degraded land (severely affected) and desertified land (very severely affected) (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig 6

Final DSM.

Acknowledgments

The first author B. Pradeep Kumar, greatly thankful to Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, for financial support through Inspire program (Sanction order No. DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2017/IF170114). Also thankful to USGS for remote sensing data utilization, Department of Geology, Yogi Vemana University, for necessary facilities for carrying out my research work.

Conflict of Interest

All authors have participated in conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of the data. This manuscript has not been submitted to, nor is under review at, another journal or other publishing venue. The authors have no affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript. The following authors have affiliations with organizations with direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105560.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.xml (354B, xml)

References

  • 1.Arya A.S., Dhinwa P.S., Pathan S.K., Raj K.G. Desertification/land degradation status mapping of India. Curr. Sci. 2009:1478–1483. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Amal K. Desertification. In: Dwivedi R.S., Roy P.S., editors. Central Arid Zone Research Institute (CAZRI) Yes Dee Publishing; Chennai: 2016. pp. 295–320. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Anonymous. Forest, Land use and Photogrammetry group, RESIPA, Space Application Venter; Ahmadabad: 2003. Desertification Status Mapping – Technical Guidelines; p. 34. and. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anonymous. Directorate of Economics and STATISTICS. Govt. of Karnataka; Bangalore: 2005. Bellary district at a glance: 2003–2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Arya V.S., Singh H., Hooda R.S., Arya A.S. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences; 2014. Desertification change analysis in Siwalik Hills of Haryana using geo-informatics; p. 8. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hau L., Yaping S. Towards quantitative prediction of dust storms: an integrated wind erosion modeling system and its applications. Environ. Model. Softw. 2001;16:233–244. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pradeep Kumar B., Raghu Babu K., Rajasekhar M., Ramachandra M. Assessment of land degradation and desertification due to migration of sand and sand dunes in Beluguppa Mandal of Anantapur district (AP, India), using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J. Indian Geophys. Union. 2019;23(2):173–180. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pradeep kumar B., Raghu Babu K., Rajasekhar M., Ramachandra M., Kumar Reddy Siva. Assessment of land degradation and desertification due to migration of sand dunes- a case study in Bommanahal Mandal, Anantapur district, Andhra Pradesh, India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. IJRAT. 2018;6(6) E-ISSN-2321-9637. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dhinwa P.S., Dasgupta A. Ajai: monitoring and assessment of desertification using satellite remote sensing. J. Geom. 2016;10(2) [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rajasekhar M., Sudarsana R.G., Siddi Raju R., Ramachandra M., Pradeep Kumar B. Data in brief data on comparative studies of lineaments extraction from aster DEM, SRTM, and cartosat for Jilledubanderu river basin, Anantapur district, AP, India by using remote sensing and GIS. Data Brief. 2018;20(2018):1676–1682. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rajasekhar M., Raju G.S., Raju R.S., Basha U.I. Data on artificial recharge sites identified by geospatial tools in semi-arid region of Anantapur district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Data Brief. 2018;19:462–474. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.xml (354B, xml)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES