Skip to main content
Infectious Diseases of Poverty logoLink to Infectious Diseases of Poverty
. 2020 Apr 28;9:45. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00662-x

Expression of the SARS-CoV-2 cell receptor gene ACE2 in a wide variety of human tissues

Meng-Yuan Li 1,2, Lin Li 1,2, Yue Zhang 3,4,5, Xiao-Sheng Wang 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7186534  PMID: 32345362

Abstract

Background

Since its discovery in December 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected more than 2 180 000 people worldwide and has caused more than 150 000 deaths as of April 16, 2020. SARS-CoV-2, which is the virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), uses the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a cell receptor to invade human cells. Thus, ACE2 is the key to understanding the mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study is to investigate the ACE2 expression in various human tissues in order to provide insights into the mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods

We compared ACE2 expression levels across 31 normal human tissues between males and females and between younger (ages ≤ 49 years) and older (ages > 49 years) persons using two-sided Student’s t test. We also investigated the correlations between ACE2 expression and immune signatures in various tissues using Pearson’s correlation test.

Results

ACE2 expression levels were the highest in the small intestine, testis, kidneys, heart, thyroid, and adipose tissue, and were the lowest in the blood, spleen, bone marrow, brain, blood vessels, and muscle. ACE2 showed medium expression levels in the lungs, colon, liver, bladder, and adrenal gland. ACE2 was not differentially expressed between males and females or between younger and older persons in any tissue. In the skin, digestive system, brain, and blood vessels, ACE2 expression levels were positively associated with immune signatures in both males and females. In the thyroid and lungs, ACE2 expression levels were positively and negatively associated with immune signatures in males and females, respectively, and in the lungs they had a positive and a negative correlation in the older and younger groups, respectively.

Conclusions

Our data indicate that SARS-CoV-2 may infect other tissues aside from the lungs and infect persons with different sexes, ages, and races equally. The different host immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection may partially explain why males and females, young and old persons infected with this virus have markedly distinct disease severity. This study provides new insights into the role of ACE2 in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 cell receptor, Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, Gene expression, SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, Immune signatures

Background

The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is rapidly spreading across the world and have caused a global health emergency [1]. Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 have mainly displayed pneumonia-associated symptoms, including fever, cough, shortness of breath, sputum production, and myalgia or fatigue [2, 3], indicating that SARS-CoV-2 primarily infects the respiratory tract and causes acute respiratory disease. However, SARS-CoV-2 infection may result in symptoms of diseases associated with other tissues, such as digestive (diarrhea, poor appetite, nausea, and vomiting), nervous (confusion and headache), and cardiovascular (palmus, chest distress, and cardiac injury) systems [2, 3]. In addition, some studies have indicated that person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 can occur by routes outside of the respiratory tract [4]. A study of 99 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 showed that females were less susceptible to infection than males, and older males with comorbidities were more likely to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 [3]. Like SARS-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV) [5], SARS-CoV-2 uses the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a host cell receptor [68]. A recent study uncovered that ACE2-expressing lung cells were more abundant in Asian males [9], potentially explaining the elevated susceptibility of males to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nevertheless, the findings from that study are not sufficiently convincing due to a small number of samples being analyzed.

In this study, we analyzed the expression of ACE2 in various normal human tissues using the datasets from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project [10] and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) program (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). We compared ACE2 expression levels across 31 human tissues, between males and females, and between younger and older persons in these individual tissues. Furthermore, we analyzed the correlations between ACE2 expression levels and immune signature enrichment levels in individual tissues.

Methods

Datasets

We downloaded the GTEx RNA-Seq gene expression profiling datasets (RSEM normalized) for 31 human normal tissues from the UCSC Xena project (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/). We downloaded the TCGA RNA-Seq gene expression profiling datasets (RSEM normalized) for 12 human normal tissues from the Genomic Data Commons Data Portal (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). All gene expression values were added to 0.001 and then log2-transformed before analysis.

Evaluation of the immune signature enrichment levels in tissue

We defined the enrichment level of an immune signature in tissue as the mean expression level of marker genes of the immune signature in the tissue. We analyzed four immune signatures, including CD8+ T cells, interferon response, B cells, and natural killer (NK) cells. The CD8+ T cell marker genes included CD2, CD247, CD28, CD3D, CD3E, CD3G, CD8A, ICAM1, ITGAL, ITGB2, PTPRC, and THY1 [11]. The interferon response marker genes included IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, IRF7, ISG20, MX1, MX2, RSAD2, TNFSF10, GPR146, SELP, and AHR [12]. The B cell marker genes included BACH2, BANK1, BLK, BTLA, CD79A, CD79B, FCRL1, FCRL3, HVCN1, and RALGPS2 [12]. The NK cell marker genes included KLRC1 and KLRF1 [12].

Statistical analysis

We used Pearson’s correlation test to calculate the correlations between ACE2 expression levels and immune signature enrichment levels in individual tissues. We used a Student’s t test (two-sided) to compare ACE2 expression levels between males and females, between younger (ages ≤ 49 years) and older (ages > 49 years) persons, and between Asian and non-Asian races in individual tissues. The adjusted P value estimated by the Benjamini and Hochberg method [13] was used to adjust for multiple tests.

Results

ACE2 expression in various human tissues

Among the 31 GTEx human tissues, the small intestine, testis, kidneys, heart, thyroid, and adipose tissue had the highest ACE2 expression levels, while blood, spleen, bone marrow, brain, blood vessels, and muscle had the lowest ACE2 expression levels (Fig. 1a). In the lungs, colon, liver, bladder, and adrenal gland, ACE2 showed medium expression levels (Fig. 1a). These results suggest that ACE2 is expressed in a wide variety of human tissues in addition to the lungs.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

ACE2 expression in various human tissues. a Comparison of ACE2 expression levels across 31 human tissues in GTEx [10]. Comparison of ACE2 expression levels between males and females and between younger (ages ≤ 49 years) and older (ages > 49 years) groups in individual human tissues in GTEx (b) and TCGA (c). In TCGA, a comparison of ACE2 expression levels between Asian and non-Asian races in five normal human tissues was also performed (c). Two-sided Student’s t test was used in (b, c). The adjusted P value was calculated by the Benjamini and Hochberg method [13]. ACE2: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; GTEx: Genotype-Tissue Expression; TCGA: The Cancer Genome Atlas

Furthermore, the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database (http://www.proteinatlas.org/) showed that the ACE2 protein had relatively high expression levels in the duodenum, small intestine, gallbladder, kidneys, testis, seminal vesicle, colon, rectum, and adrenal gland. The HPA database also showed that the gastrointestinal tract (duodenum, small intestine, colon, and rectum), kidney, gallbladder, and male tissues (testis and seminal vesicle) had high expression levels of both ACE2 gene and protein.

Taken together, these data indicate that: i) SARS-CoV-2 may infect other human tissues in addition to lungs, and ii) males may be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection than females.

We further compared ACE2 expression levels between males and females in 22 individual human tissues using the GTEx datasets and found no statistically significant difference between males and females in any tissue using a threshold of adjusted P value < 0.05 and fold change > 1.5 (Fig. 1b). We also compared ACE2 expression levels between younger (ages ≤ 49 years) and older (ages > 49 years) populations and did not observe a statistically significant difference between the groups in any tissue with a threshold of adjusted P value < 0.05 and fold change > 1.5 (Fig. 1b). Likewise, in TCGA datasets, ACE2 was not differentially expressed between males and females or between younger and older groups in any tissue (Fig. 1c), consistent with the results in GTEx. In TCGA, we also compared ACE2 expression levels between Asian and non-Asian races in five normal tissues (stomach, thyroid, breast, liver, and pancreas), and did not find a significant difference between them in any tissue (Fig. 1c).

Association of ACE2 expression with immune signatures

We analyzed the correlations between ACE2 expression levels and immune signature enrichment levels (CD8+ T cells, interferon response, B cells, and NK cells) in various male and female human tissues. In the skin, digestive system (esophagus, stomach, colon, and pancreas), brain, and blood vessels, we observed significant positive correlations between ACE2 expression levels and CD8+ T cell enrichment levels in both males and females (Pearson’s correlation test, adjusted P < 0.05, 0.27 ≤ r ≤ 0.78) (Fig. 2a). In addition, in the thyroid, lungs, adrenal gland, liver, and kidneys, ACE2 expression levels showed significant positive correlations with CD8+ T cell enrichment levels solely in males (0.20 < r < 0.68). However, in the thyroid and lungs, ACE2 expression levels were negatively correlated with CD8+ T cell enrichment levels in females (r = -0.36). In the heart, ACE2 expression levels had a negative and a positive correlation with CD8+ T cell enrichment levels in males (r = -0.23) and females (r = 0.32), respectively. Likewise, the interferon response signature had significant positive correlations with ACE2 expression levels in the skin, digestive system (esophagus, stomach, liver, and pancreas), brain, and blood vessels in both males and females (0.14 ≤ r ≤ 0.75) (Fig. 2a). In the thyroid, lungs, kidneys, adrenal gland, colon, and bladder, ACE2 expression levels had significant positive correlations with the interferon response signature solely in males (0.32 ≤ r ≤ 0.82). In contrast, in the thyroid, lungs, and colon, ACE2 expression levels were negatively correlated with the interferon response signature in females (-0.26 < r < -0.20). In the heart, ACE2 expression levels had a negative and a positive correlation with the interferon response signature in males (r = -0.18) and females (r = 0.54), respectively. Similar results were observed for B cells and NK cells (Fig. 2a). Collectively, these results demonstrate the commonality and distinction in the association of ACE2 expression with immune signatures between males and females.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Association of ACE2 expression with immune signatures in various human tissues. a Correlation between ACE2 expression levels and immune signature enrichment levels in various human tissues in males and females. b Correlation between ACE2 expression levels and immune signature enrichment levels in the lungs and thyroid of older (ages > 49 years) and younger (ages ≤49 years) populations. Pearson’s correlation test was used to calculate the correlation coefficient (r) and P value in (a, b). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001. ACE2: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; NK: Natural killer

We further analyzed the correlations between ACE2 expression and immune signatures in younger and older populations. In most individual tissues, the correlations between ACE2 expression levels and immune signature enrichment levels displayed consistent trends between younger and older populations. However, in the lungs they had a positive and a negative correlation in the older and younger groups, respectively (Fig. 2b). Again, these results suggest the potential difference in the host immune response to coronavirus infection between young and old persons.

Discussion

We analyzed the expression of ACE2, the gene encoding the human host cell receptor of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV, in 31 normal human tissues. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating ACE2 expression across a wide variety of human tissues. We found that although the inflammation of the lungs is the primary symptom of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the lungs had moderate expression of ACE2 among all tissues. This indicates that SARS-CoV-2 may affect other tissues in addition to the lungs, including male tissues (testis and seminal vesicle). This indication has been confirmed by recent publications [24]. For example, Holshue et al. uncovered that stool from a patient infected with SARS-CoV-2 was positive for SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that this virus may infect the gastrointestinal tract [5]. Huang et al. reported the virus-related cardiac injury in five patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection [2]. A study of 99 cases of SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia revealed the increased susceptibility of males to infection by this virus [3]. In fact, many cases of SARS-CoV-2 have reported symptoms outside of pneumonia, including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, confusion, headache, and cardiac injury [24]. In addition, the predominant symptoms of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 could be attributed to the fact that the respiratory tract is the readiest transmission approach for the virus.

We found that ACE2 expression levels showed no significant difference between males and females, between younger and older persons, or between Asian and non-Asian races. This indicates that the infection risk of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV may have no significant association with sex, age, or race. In fact, like SARS-CoV [14], SARS-CoV-2 can affect males and females equally and can infect young and old persons equally [15]. Nevertheless, the mortality risk for SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV infections appears to be associated significantly with sex and age, with a higher risk for males versus females and old versus young populations [3, 14, 16].

Adaptive and innate immune responses play an important role in fighting off invading coronavirus, even though they may induce a cytokine storm, which is responsible for the immunopathological damage in patients with coronavirus infections [17]. Interestingly, while inflammation of the lungs (pneumonia) is the most common disease caused by coronavirus, the correlations between expression of the ACE2 receptor and immune signatures in the lungs differed between males and females and between young and old persons. This indicates that the host immune response to coronavirus infection could differ between males and females and between young and old persons, partially explaining why males and females and young and old persons have markedly distinct clinical outcomes of coronavirus infections [3, 18]. In addition, it has been demonstrated that lung cells highly expressing ACE2 are more readily infected by SARS-CoV [19]. We found that the correlation between ACE2 expression and immune signatures was negative in the lung tissue of females and younger persons, but it was positive in the lung tissue of males and older persons. Collectively, this means that: i) if the lungs highly expressing ACE2 are infected by SARS-CoV-2 in females or young persons, they will have weaker immune signatures, and ii) if the lungs highly expressing ACE2 are infected by SARS-CoV-2 in males or older persons, they will have stronger immune signatures. This suggests that an excessive immune response (cytokine storm or immunopathological damage) could be more likely to occur in males and old persons with SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2 infection.

This work provides some basis for our next-step investigation of ACE2 expression at protein level. To understand the potential mechanism of interaction between SARS-CoV2 and ACE2, we will explore the possible enrichment and viability of SARS-CoV2 in different tissues alongside different expression level of ACE2. We will try to clarify the survival, death, transfer, and transformation of SARS-CoV-2 in different tissue niches, and explore the virus in vivo inactivation in human body during and after epidemic. In addition, our pilot data suggest that cigarette smoke or nicotine inhalation inhibits the expression of ACE2/AT2R in multiple tissues, including the brain, heart and lungs, thus disrupting the balance within the renin-angiotensin system.

Our study has several limitations. First, the findings from the bioinformatics analysis need to be further validated by experimental and clinical data. In particular, because mRNA expression pattern of ACE-2 is not necessarily the same as its protein expression pattern across tissues due to some factors probably affecting the mapping from mRNA level to protein level, such as post-translational modification, the validation of our mRNA-based findings at protein level is important and worth further investigation. Second, the tissue mRNA expression did not capture the mRNA expression in individual cell types that would be important for precisely understanding the virus-host interaction. An analysis of the single-cell RNA-Seq data may address this issue. However, because the single-cell RNA-Seq data across such a wide variety of human tissues are lacking, it is not realistic to perform such an analysis. Third, the comparison of ACE2 expression levels between Asian and non-Asian races in TCGA datasets was performed in a small number of samples, and thus the associated results need to be verified in larger populations. Finally, our data cannot explain the epidemic divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV in that SARS-CoV-2 is less virulent but more infectious than SARS-CoV. An in-depth analysis of the genomic and protein structures of both coronaviruses would warrant exploring the mechanism underlying the epidemic divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV.

Conclusions

ACE2 is expressed in various human tissues in addition to the lungs, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 may infect other tissues aside from the lungs. ACE2 expression levels have no significant differences between males and females, between young and old persons, and between Asian and non-Asian races in various human tissues, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 may infect persons with different sexes, ages, and races equally. The correlations between ACE2 expression and immune signatures differ between males and females and between young and old persons in the lungs, indicating that the different host immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection may partially explaining why males and females and young and old persons infected with this virus have markedly distinct disease severity. This study provides new insights into the role of ACE2 in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and insights into understanding the associations of symptoms, sex, age, and race with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Acknowledgements

We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

Abbreviations

SARS-CoV-2

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

ACE2

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2

GTEx

Genotype-tissue expression

TCGA

The cancer genome atlas

HPA

Human protein atlas

NK

Natural killer

Authors’ contributions

ML performed data analyses and edited the manuscript. LL performed data analyses. YZ performed data analyses and edited the manuscript. XW conceived of the research, designed the methods, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the China Pharmaceutical University (grant number 3150120001 to XW).

Availability of data and materials

The GTEx and TCGA gene expression profiling datasets for human normal tissues were downloaded from the UCSC Xena project (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/) and the Genomic Data Commons Data Portal (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/), respectively.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was waived since we used only publicly available data and materials in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Horton R. Offline: 2019-nCoV outbreak—early lessons. Lancet. 2020;395(10221):322. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30212-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan. China. Lancet. 2020; 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, Qiu Y, Wang J, Liu Y, Wei Y. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020; 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Holshue ML, DeBolt C, Lindquist S, Lofy KH, Wiesman J, Bruce H, Spitters C, Ericson K, Wilkerson S, Tural A. First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2020; 10.1056/NEJMoa2001191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Li W, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, Sui J, Wong SK, Berne MA, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature. 2003;426(6965):450–454. doi: 10.1038/nature02145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xu X, Chen P, Wang J, Feng J, Zhou H, Li X, et al. Evolution of the novel coronavirus from the ongoing Wuhan outbreak and modeling of its spike protein for risk of human transmission. Sci China Life Sci. 2020:1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020; 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020:1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Zhao Y, Zhao Z, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Ma Y, Zuo W. Single-cell RNA expression profiling of ACE2, the putative receptor of Wuhan 2019-nCov. BioRxiv. 2020; 10.1101/2020.01.26.919985.
  • 10.Lonsdale J, Thomas J, Salvatore M, Phillips R, Lo E, Shad S, et al. The genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) project. Nat Genet. 2013;45(6):580. doi: 10.1038/ng.2653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Greenough TC, Straubhaar JR, Kamga L, Weiss ER, Brody RM, McManus MM, et al. A gene expression signature that correlates with CD8+ T cell expansion in acute EBV infection. J Immunol. 2015;195(9):4185–4197. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rooney MS, Shukla SA, Wu CJ, Getz G, Hacohen N. Molecular and genetic properties of tumors associated with local immune cytolytic activity. Cell. 2015;160(1–2):48–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat Soc B. 1995;57:289–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pang X, Zhu Z, Xu F, Guo J, Gong X, Liu D, et al. Evaluation of control measures implemented in the severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak in Beijing, 2003. Jama. 2003;290(24):3215–3221. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.24.3215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Epidemiology Working Group for NCIP Epidemic Response The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China. Chin J Epidemiol. 2020;41(2):145–151. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jia N, Feng D, Fang LQ, Richardus JH, Han XN, Cao WC, et al. Case fatality of SARS in mainland China and associated risk factors. Tropical Med Int Health. 2009;14:21–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02147.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li G, Fan Y, Lai Y, Han T, Li Z, Zhou P, et al. Coronavirus infections and immune responses. J Med Virol. 2020; 10.1002/jmv.25685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Karlberg J, Chong D, Lai W. Do men have a higher case fatality rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome than women do? Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(3):229–231. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jia HP, Look DC, Shi L, Hickey M, Pewe L, Netland J, et al. ACE2 receptor expression and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection depend on differentiation of human airway epithelia. J Virol. 2005;79(23):14614–14621. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.23.14614-14621.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The GTEx and TCGA gene expression profiling datasets for human normal tissues were downloaded from the UCSC Xena project (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/) and the Genomic Data Commons Data Portal (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/), respectively.


Articles from Infectious Diseases of Poverty are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES