Abstract
Long non‐coding RNAs have been implicated in the regulation of a plethora of biological processes, yet it has been challenging to verify that they are truly not coding for proteins. Terminal differentiation‐induced non‐coding RNA (TINCR) is a 3.7‐kilobase mRNA that is highly abundant in epidermal keratinocytes prior to cornification. Here, we report the presence of an evolutionarily conserved open reading frame in TINCR and the identification of peptides derived from this open reading frame in the proteome of human stratum corneum. Our results demonstrate that TINCR is a protein‐coding RNA and suggest that the TINCR‐encoded protein is involved in keratinocyte cornification.
Keywords: cornification, differentiation, epidermis, evolution, ubiquitin
1. BACKGROUND
Long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are RNAs of at least 200 nucleotides length that are not translated into proteins. They represent a heterogeneous group of RNAs including mRNA‐like intergenic transcripts (lincRNAs), antisense transcripts of protein‐coding genes and others.1 The functions of many lncRNAs are not known but some lncRNAs were shown to control nuclear architecture and transcription in the nucleus and to modulate mRNA stability and translation in the cytoplasm.1 lncRNAs as potential regulators of many cellular processes have sparked great interest among researchers in dermatology, and several important roles of lncRNAs in skin cells have been demonstrated.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Terminal differentiation‐induced non‐coding RNA (TINCR) was identified in differentiating epidermal keratinocytes.8 TINCR RNA contains so‐called “TINCR box” motifs, which are 25 nucleotides long and were reported to mediate the interaction with “TINCR box” motifs in multiple cellular mRNAs. Furthermore, TINCR RNA reportedly binds to the staufen1 protein and subsequently stabilizes keratinocyte differentiation‐associated mRNAs.8 Depletion of TINCR and staufen1 impaired differentiation of keratinocytes, suggesting that TINCR is essential for this process. Subsequent studies revealed transcription factor signalling through MAF:MAFB as downstream targets of TINCR.9 Additional mechanisms of action and various mechanism of regulation of TINCR in skin and other organs have been reported in recent years.4, 10, 11
TINCR was first cloned from human hippocampus in the course of the National Institutes of Health, Mammalian Gene Collection project and was originally designated “Homo sapiens placenta‐specific 2 (non‐protein coding), mRNA” (GenBank accession number BC036545).12 Alternative names such as LINC00036, NCRNA00036 and onco‐lncRNA‐16 supported the non‐coding nature of this RNA. Automated analysis of the DNA sequence of human chromosome 1913 led to the identification of an open reading frame in TINCR that was deposited in the Uniprot database under the accession number A0A1B0GVN0. The Uniprot database was used as a reference for the proteomic analysis of human stratum corneum, and peptides corresponding to TINCR were identified in cornified envelopes.14
2. QUESTIONS ADDRESSED
Here, we address the question as to whether TINCR is a non‐coding or a protein‐coding RNA.
3. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
We obtained amino acid sequences of peptides from a mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of human stratum corneum proteins that was reported in detail previously.14 In brief, cornified envelopes were collected with adhesive discs from healthy forearm skin, eluted, incubated with SDS‐dithioerythritol and separated into a solubilized and an insoluble (envelope) fraction which were analysed by liquid chromatography‐MS/MS.14, 15 RNA was prepared from the skin of chickens and subjected to reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) with the intron‐spanning primers GgTINCRs 5′‐GGATGCTCCTCTCTGCCACA‐3′ and GgTINCRa 5′‐CACGCTGCGTTCCATGGTCA‐3′. The PCR product was sequenced (GenBank accession number MN857541). The open reading frames of human TINCR and TINCR of other species were translated, and the resulting amino acid sequences were aligned with the Multalin algorithm.16 Amino acid sequences were subjected to Conserved Domain search at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi.17
4. RESULTS
Human TINCR RNA is produced by transcription of the TINCR gene which is located at chromosome 19p13.3 and comprises 3 exons (Figure 1A). Peptides identified in stratum corneum14 correspond to a protein encoded by an open reading frame (ORF) that spans two exons of TINCR (Figure 1A, Figure S1). The corresponding translated protein has a length of 87 amino acid residues and is predicted to fold into a ubiquitin‐like 3‐dimensional structure (Figure S2).
Semi‐quantitative analysis of stratum corneum proteins suggests that the abundance of TINCR is in a similar range as that of established keratinocyte differentiation proteins such as Rnase7, histidase (HAL) and involucrin (IVL) (Figure 1B). Like two cysteine‐rich cornification proteins (CRIP1 and CRCT1) and two substrates of cornification (SPRR5 and IVL), TINCR was detected in the cross‐linked fraction of the cornified envelope protein but not in the solubilized protein fraction (Figure 1B),14 suggesting that TINCR is efficiently integrated into cornified envelopes.
Amino acid sequence analysis showed that TINCR does not contain cysteine residues, whereas glutamine and lysine residues are present as potential sites of transglutamination (Figure 1C). Comparison of amino acid sequences of TINCR orthologs showed high degrees of sequence conservation among mammals and more than 50% sequence identity to a predicted TINCR protein of the chicken (Figure 1C; Figure S1), suggesting that the open reading frame of TINCR has been conserved since the evolutionary divergence of the lineages leading to mammals and birds more than 300 million years ago.18
5. CONCLUSIONS
The presence of TINCR peptides in human stratum corneum and the conservation of the TINCR open reading frame through evolution indicate that TINCR encodes a protein. It is intriguing that TINCR is predicted to fold into a ubiquitin‐like domain which may facilitate specific interactions with other proteins. TINCR RNA is expressed in the skin where it is confined to differentiating keratinocytes of epidermis8 and at lower levels in the oesophagus and placenta. Proteins of these tissues should be investigated for binding partners of TINCR protein. Importantly, as deduced from the mass spectroscopic analysis TINCR protein persists throughout cornification of keratinocytes so that it is detectable in the stratum corneum.14 Whether TINCR acts primarily as component of cornified envelopes or whether it has other functions during cornficiation remains to be determined in future studies.
Previously, TINCR was classified as a long non‐coding RNA and interactions of TINCR RNA with protein‐coding mRNAs, miRNAs and proteins were suggested to mediate effects of TINCR on keratinocyte differentiation. These interactions were not investigated in the present study, and therefore, binding of TINCR RNA to other molecules is not excluded. However, the fact that TINCR encodes a protein is definitely not compatible with its current designation as non‐coding RNA. Thus, we propose that TINCR should stand for Terminal differentiation‐INduced Cornification Regulator.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Author contributions: LE, ET and RHR designed the research study. LE, JL and RHR performed the research and analysed the data. LE wrote the manuscript. All authors revised the paper. This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): P28004, P32777.
Eckhart L, Lachner J, Tschachler E, Rice RH. TINCR is not a non‐coding RNA but encodes a protein component of cornified epidermal keratinocytes. Exp Dermatol. 2020;29:376–379. 10.1111/exd.14083
REFERENCES
- 1. Yao R. W., Wang Y., Chen L. L., Nat. Cell. Biol. 2019, 21, 542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sonkoly E., Bata‐Csorgo Z., Pivarcsi A., Polyanka H., Kenderessy‐Szabo A., Molnar G., Szentpali K., Bari L., Megyeri K., Mandi Y., Dobozy A., Kemeny L., Szell M., PRINS. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 24159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Antonini D., Mollo M. R., Missero C., J. Invest. Dermatol. 2017, 137, e21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Szlavicz E., Olah P., Szabo K., Pagani F., Bata‐Csorgo Z., Kemeny L., Szell M., Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 27, 656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ji K., Zhang J., Fan R., Yang S., Dong C., Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 27, 1230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Cai P., Otten A. B., Cheng B., Ishii M. A., Zhang W., Huang B., Qu K., Sun B. K., Genome Res. 2019, 30, 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Li D., Kular L., Vij M., Herter E. K., Li X., Wang A., Chu T., Toma M. A., Zhang L., Liapi E., Mota A., Blomqvist L., Gallais Sérézal I., Rollman O., Wikstrom J. D., Bienko M., Berglund D., Ståhle M., Sommar P., Jagodic M., Landén N. X., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 9443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kretz M., Siprashvili Z., Chu C., Webster D. E., Zehnder A., Qu K., Lee C. S., Flockhart R. J., Groff A. F., Chow J., Johnston D., Kim G. E., Spitale R. C., Flynn R. A., Zheng G. X., Aiyer S., Raj A., Rinn J. L., Chang H. Y., Khavari P. A., Nature 2013, 493, 231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lopez‐Pajares V., Qu K., Zhang J., Webster D. E., Barajas B. C., Siprashvili Z., Zarnegar B. J., Boxer L. D., Rios E. J., Tao S., Kretz M., Khavari P. A., Dev. Cell. 2015, 32, 693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Li B., Tsoi L. C., Swindell W. R., Gudjonsson J. E., Tejasvi T., Johnston A., Ding J., Stuart P. E., Xing X., Kochkodan J. J., Voorhees J. J., Kang H. M., Nair R. P., Abecasis G. R., Elder J. T., J. Invest. Dermatol. 1828, 2014, 134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Yu S., Wang D., Shao Y., Zhang T., Xie H., Jiang X., Deng Q., Jiao Y., Yang J., Cai C., Sun L., Aging 2019, 11, 1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Strausberg R. L., Feingold E. A., Grouse L. H., Derge J. G., Klausner R. D., Collins F. S., Wagner L., Shenmen C. M., Schuler G. D., Altschul S. F., Zeeberg B., Buetow K. H., Schaefer C. F., Bhat N. K., Hopkins R. F., Jordan H., Moore T., Max S. I., Wang J., Hsieh F., Diatchenko L., Marusina K., Farmer A. A., Rubin G. M., Hong L., Stapleton M., Soares M. B., Bonaldo M. F., Casavant T. L., Scheetz T. E., Brownstein M. J., Usdin T. B., Toshiyuki S., Carninci P., Prange C., Raha S. S., Loquellano N. A., Peters G. J., Abramson R. D., Mullahy S. J., Bosak S. A., McEwan P. J., McKernan K. J., Malek J. A., Gunaratne P. H., Richards S., Worley K. C., Hale S., Garcia A. M., Gay L. J., Hulyk S. W., Villalon D. K., Muzny D. M., Sodergren E. J., Lu X., Gibbs R. A., Fahey J., Helton E., Ketteman M., Madan A., Rodrigues S., Sanchez A., Whiting M., Madan A., Young A. C., Shevchenko Y., Bouffard G. G., Blakesley R. W., Touchman J. W., Green E. D., Dickson M. C., Rodriguez A. C., Grimwood J., Schmutz J., Myers R. M., Butterfield Y. S., Krzywinski M. I., Skalska U., Smailus D. E., Schnerch A., Schein J. E., Jones S. J., Marra M. A., Mammalian Gene Collection Program Team , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 2002, 99, 16899.12477932 [Google Scholar]
- 13. Grimwood J., Gordon L. A., Olsen A., Terry A., Schmutz J., Lamerdin J., Hellsten U., Goodstein D., Couronne O., Tran‐Gyamfi M., Aerts A., Altherr M., Ashworth L., Bajorek E., Black S., Branscomb E., Caenepeel S., Carrano A., Caoile C., Chan Y. M., Christensen M., Cleland C. A., Copeland A., Dalin E., Dehal P., Denys M., Detter J. C., Escobar J., Flowers D., Fotopulos D., Garcia C., Georgescu A. M., Glavina T., Gomez M., Gonzales E., Groza M., Hammon N., Hawkins T., Haydu L., Ho I., Huang W., Israni S., Jett J., Kadner K., Kimball H., Kobayashi A., Larionov V., Leem S. H., Lopez F., Lou Y., Lowry S., Malfatti S., Martinez D., McCready P., Medina C., Morgan J., Nelson K., Nolan M., Ovcharenko I., Pitluck S., Pollard M., Popkie A. P., Predki P., Quan G., Ramirez L., Rash S., Retterer J., Rodriguez A., Rogers S., Salamov A., Salazar A., She X., Smith D., Slezak T., Solovyev V., Thayer N., Tice H., Tsai M., Ustaszewska A., Vo N., Wagner M., Wheeler J., Wu K., Xie G., Yang J., Dubchak I., Furey T. S., DeJong P., Dickson M., Gordon D., Eichler E. E., Pennacchio L. A., Richardson P., Stubbs L., Rokhsar D. S., Myers R. M., Rubin E. M., Lucas S. M., Nature 2004, 428, 529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Karim N., Phinney B. S., Salemi M., Wu P. W., Naeem M., Rice R. H., Exp. Dermatol. 2019, 28, 618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Rice R. H., Durbin‐Johnson B. P., Mann S. M., Salemi M., Urayama S., Rocke D. M., Phinney B. S., Sundberg J. P., Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 27, 931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Corpet F., Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16, 10881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Marchler‐Bauer A., Bryant S., Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hedges S. B., Marin J., Suleski M., Paymer M., Kumar S., Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.