Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Apr 28;10:7100. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63517-3

The voltage-gated proton channel hHv1 is functionally expressed in human chorion-derived mesenchymal stem cells

Beáta Mészáros 1,3, Ferenc Papp 1, Gábor Mocsár 1, Endre Kókai 2, Katalin Kovács 2,3, Gabor Tajti 1, Gyorgy Panyi 1,3,
PMCID: PMC7188850  PMID: 32346069

Abstract

The voltage-gated proton channel Hv1 is widely expressed, among others, in immune and cancer cells, it provides an efficient cytosolic H+extrusion mechanism and regulates vital functions such as oxidative burst, migration and proliferation. Here we demonstrate the presence of human Hv1 (hHv1) in the placenta/chorion-derived mesenchymal stem cells (cMSCs) using RT-PCR. The voltage- and pH-dependent gating of the current is similar to that of hHv1 expressed in cell lines and that the current is blocked by 5-chloro-2-guanidinobenzimidazole (ClGBI) and activated by arachidonic acid (AA). Inhibition of hHv1 by ClGBI significantly decreases mineral matrix production of cMSCs induced by conditions mimicking physiological or pathological (inorganic phosphate, Pi) induction of osteogenesis. Wound healing assay and single cell motility analysis show that ClGBI significantly inhibits the migration of cMSCs. Thus, seminal functions of cMSCs are modulated by hHv1 which makes this channel as an attractive target for controlling advantages/disadvantages of MSCs therapy.

Subject terms: Ion transport, Mesenchymal stem cells

Introduction

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells with intensive proliferative capacity and ability to differentiate into various cell types (osteoblasts, chondroblasts, myocytes, adipocytes etc.)1,2. MSCs were originally isolated from bone marrow, and were found later in numerous organs and tissues, including adipose tissue, periosteum, synovial membrane, articular cartilage, umbilical cord and placenta, among others1,3. The use of MSCs is a novel therapeutic strategy for regenerative medicine4,5, however, their application is not limited to repairing and replacing the impaired organs, rather, the immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties59 of MSCs are also important10,11. Placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells (cMSCs) possess excellent immunoregulatory properties, therefore, the chorionic plate of the placenta may be an attractive source for stem cells to be used in cell therapy and tissue engineering3,12. In most cases, systemic delivery is preferred for the clinical applications which requires the homing and migration of MSCs to the target tissue. In line with these MSCs have a capacity to migrate into the injured and inflamed environment13,14.

Bioelectric signaling and pH regulation via ion channels and pumps are known to play a role in a wide range of cell functions, including cell proliferation, migration, differentiation, apoptosis but this aspect of stem cell biology seems to be poorly understood10,15. Multiple ion channels were reported earlier to be present in human MSCs, for example K+channels, Na+and Cl channels16,17, but data are missing in the literature for the existence of the human voltage-gated proton channels (hHv1) in mesenchymal stem cells. At the same time hHv1 channels are widespread; they can be found in various mammalian cells1824, such as macrophages25, B-lymphocytes26,27, oocytes28, osteoclasts29,30, skeletal muscle cells31, as well as cancer cells32,33, for example in malignant B-cells22, Jurkat cells18, and glioblastoma multiforme21.

Voltage-gated proton channels have characteristic biophysical properties, e.g., they are highly selective for protons and the channels have extremely low single-channel conductance19. Their gating is voltage-and pH dependent: changing of the intra- or extracellular (pHi or pHo, respectively) pH by one unit shifts the voltage-dependence of gating by 40 mV34. In most species they conduct non-inactivating outward current only. The function of hHv1 strongly depends on the temperature as well35,36. As for pharmacology, Hv1 can be inhibited by Zn2+37,38, ClGBI39 and a peptide inhibitor (Corza6)40, and the channels can be activated by arachidonic acid, however, this latter effect requires PKC activation4143. The function of Hv1 is associated with many cellular processes19, such as migration20, proliferation44 and apoptosis18,21, which are highly relevant to the physiology and pathophysiology of MSCs1821.

Based on the widespread expression of Hv1 and its versatile physiological functions we hypothesized that this channel may be present in MSCs as well. To confirm this hypothesis, we demonstrated the expression of Hv1 mRNA transcripts in cMSCs using RT-PCR. We also measured the native proton current in cMSCs using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique and found that its biophysical and pharmacological characteristics (including pH- and voltage-dependence, ClGBI sensitivity, activation by AA) were consistent with the properties of the Hv1 channel. As for the physiological function of the channel, we found that the activity of Hv1 influences cell viability and mineral matrix formation during physiological and pathological mineralization. Moreover, blocking of hHv1 inhibited the motility of these cells. We propose that hHv1 might be a new target or control point in the regulation of therapeutic application of MSCs.

Results

Expression of human voltage-gated proton channel transcripts in cMSCs

RT-PCR was used to characterize the expression of the mRNA encoding the hHv1 channel. Based on the GenBank database the hHv1 channel is encoded by the HVCN1 gene with three distinct transcript variants. Accordingly, we have designed intron-spanning primers to identify and confine the three transcript variants. Figure 1 shows that transcript variants 1 and 2 were detected in the chorion derived MSCs from two different placentas. We carried out this analysis with cMSCs isolated from two other placenta donors as well (Supplementary Fig. S1), our results were the same in all placentas examined. The expression of transcript variants 1 and 2 was maintained during the 21-day exposure of cMSCs to the cocktail inducing osteogenic differentiation (Supplementary Fig. S1, see later for osteogenic induction). Transcript variants 1 (NM_00104017.1) and 2 (NM_032369.3) encode the same, longer hHv1 protein isoform, whereas transcript variant 3 (NM_001256413) results in the shorter isoform. Our results demonstrated the expression of transcript variants 1 and 2 in mesenchymal stem cells, which predicts the presence of the longer, common isoform of the hHv1 protein in these cells. The presence of transcript variants 1 and 2 in differentiated cells as well suggest that the expression pattern of hHv1 isoforms does not depend on the differentiation status of the cells.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

hHv1 transcript variants 1 and 2 are detected in cMSCs from placenta donor 10 and 18. Identification of hHv1 mRNA was carried out by means of RT-PCR, using intron spanning primers to confine the distinct transcript variants. Red circles on the gel electrophoresis photos highlight the presence of the transcripts of hHv1 variant 1 (PCR product is 190 bp, left set) and hHv1 variant 2 (PCR product is 183 bp, middle-left set) in cMSCs isolated from placenta donors 10 (shown as cMSC10 in the figure) and 18 (shown as cMSC18 in the figure), as indicated. We did not detect the transcript variant 3 (missing 568 bp long PCR product, middle-right set). The PCR was validated using GAPDH and NTC (non-template control) controls (right set). The NAC bands (no amplification control) were obtained in the absence of the reverse transcriptase enzyme. NAC controls showed that genomic hHv1 DNA was not amplified in the positive samples. Full-length gels are presented in Supplementary Fig. S9.

Modulation of the voltage-dependent gating of the current by extracellular pH

Figure 2A shows whole-cell currents of a cMSCs recorded at pHi = 6.18 in the pipette filling solution and pHo = 6.4 in the extracellular solution at increasing depolarizations (inset). The recording solutions lacked conventional permeating cations and contained reduced Cl concentration to eliminate outward currents other than the proton current (see Materials and Methods and Discussion). Upon depolarization exceeding +50 mV robust voltage- and time-dependent whole-cell currents were recorded (Fig. 2A). Larger depolarizations evoked larger currents with faster activation kinetics, albeit, the current activates slowly even at large depolarizations, it does not saturate during the 2000-ms-long pulse, and inactivation of the current was not observed. The extracellular solution was then switched to pHo = 7.4 (Fig. 2B), which increased the currents at identical test potentials and sped up the activation kinetics. The magnitudes of the currents at the end of the depolarizing pulses were determined at pHo = 6.4 and pHo = 7.4 and plotted as function of the test potential in Fig. 2C. Comparison of the two datasets shows that the data points obtained in the pHo = 7.4 solution are shifted to hyperpolarized potentials as compared to pHo = 6.4; one-unit shift in pHo shifted the current-voltage relationship by ~40 mV in this cell. The Vthr (threshold potential at which Hv1 starts to open, see Methods, Supplementary Fig. S2) was +46 ± 4 mV at pHo=6.4, and Vthr = +6 ± 4 mV at pHo = 7.4 in cMSCs, which corresponds to a 40.0 ± 4 mV (n = 5) voltage shift (Fig. 2E). The pHo-induced shift in the current-voltage relationship is also demonstrated using voltage-ramps. Figure 2D shows voltage ramp-induced (from −60 to +150 mV) currents at pHo = 7.4 and at pHo = 6.4 in a cMSC, the shift in the I-V curve obtained in this way is also ~40 mV. Statistical analysis of the voltage-ramp evoked currents shows a 37.6 ± 1.7 mV shift in the activation threshold (n = 10) upon changing the extracellular pH (∆pHo = 1). Similar experiments were conducted in HEK cells expressing the hHv1 channel (Supplementary Fig. S3). The shifts in the threshold potentials induced by ∆pHo = 1 were 40.0 ± 3.0 mV and 42.8 ± 3.6 mV for voltage-step and voltage-ramp protocols, respectively. Vthr values were +32 ± 5 mV and −8 ± 2 mV (n = 5),using pHo = 6.4 and pHo = 7.4 solutions, respectively, for the hHv1 currents measured in outside-out configuration of the patch-clamp in HEK.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Voltage- and pH-dependent gating of the hHv1 in mesenchymal stem cells. Increasing extracellular pH by one unit shifts the voltage-dependence of activation of Hv1 channels by about 40 mV toward more negative voltages. A, Whole-cell currents in a cMSC (donor 10) using pHo = 6.4 bath and pHi = 6.18 pipette filling solutions. The cell was held at −80 mV holding potential, test pulses were delivered ranging from −80 mV to +100 mV with 10 mV increment every 20 s followed by a short hyperpolarization to −120 mV(inset) before returning to the holding potential. The duration of the test pulses was 2000 ms. B, Whole-cell currents of the same cell as in panel A but using pHo = 7.4 bath and pHi = 6.18 pipette filling solutions. For the composition of the recording solutions see Materials and Methods. C, Current- voltage relationships constructed from the records shown in A and B after leak subtraction. Data points were determined as the average of the last 20 points at the end of the depolarizing pulses at the indicated test potentials. Red and black circles indicate the magnitude of the currents in pHo = 6.4 and pHo = 7.4, respectively. D, Whole-cell currents evoked by voltage ramps at different pHo. The same cMSC as in panels A and B, red and black traces correspond to records at pHo = 7.4 and pHo = 6.4, respectively, as indicated also by the arrows. The holding potential was −60 mV, the membrane potential was changed at a constant rate from −60 mV to +150 mV in 1000 ms, every 20 s. E, Summary of the modulation of the voltage-dependent gating by pH in cMSCs and transfected cells. Config. whole-cell and O/O corresponds to whole-cell and outside-out configuration of patch-clamp, respectively, protocol IV stands for voltage step protocol as shown in panels A and B, n indicates the number of experiments. ∆V (mV) is the change in the threshold potential (Vthr).

Arachidonic acid enhances and ClGBI inhibits the hHv1 conductance in cMSCs

One of the pharmacological hallmarks of the Hv1 channel is its sensitivity to the guanidine-derivate blocker ClGBI (5-chloro-2- guanidinobenzimidazole). Figure 3A shows the whole cell currents evoked by voltage-ramps in a cMSC at pHo = 6.4 and in the absence and presence of 200 µM ClGBI. This concentration of CIGBI inhibited 83–91% of the current measured at the end on the ramp at +150 mV (pHo = 7.4: 83 ± 1.4%, n = 7; pHo = 6.4: 91 ± 1.1%, n = 7), the block of the current was significantly different at the two pHovalues (t-test, p = 0.002, n = 7). The block was reversible, the current returned to the control by perfusing the recording chamber with drug-free solution. These properties of the block agree well with the literature ((Kdwas 26.3 ± 2.2 µM39) and with our data in HEK cells transfected with hHv1(Supplementary Fig. S4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Sensitivity of hHv1 to ClGBI and Arachidonic Acid (AA) in cMSCs. The Hv1 current is activated by micromolar concentrations of arachidonic acid (AA) in the extracellular solution41,43. This feature is shown in Fig. 3B, where currents evoked by voltage steps to +100 mV are shown in control solution at pHo = 7.4 and after the perfusion of the recording chamber with the same solution but containing 10 µM AA. The traces obtained at three different time points during the experiment clearly indicate the time-dependent enhancement of the current by AA. The current amplitude at +100  mV increased 1.43 ± 0.16-fold (n = 3) at t1 = 3 min, 1.77 ± 0.14-fold (n = 3) at t2 = 3.3 min and 2.14 ± 0.18-fold (n = 3) at t3 = 3.5 min, as compared to the control current. The enhancement of the current was reversible upon perfusing the recording chamber with AA-free extracellular solution (Supplementary Fig. S5).

A, Inhibition of the hHv1 current by ClGBI. Whole-cell currents evoked by voltage-ramps in the presence and absence of ClGBI at different pHo. The holding potential was −60 mV, the membrane potential was changed at a constant rate from −60 mV to +150 mV in 2000 ms, every 20 s. Control records were obtained at pHo = 6.4 (black) and pHo = 7.4 (blue) and in the presence of 200 µM ClGBI at pHo = 6.4 (cyan) and pHo = 7.4 (red). 92% and 86% of the current at +150 mV was blocked at pHo = 6.4 and pHo = 7.4, respectively. Wash-out traces are shown for pHo = 6.4 (gray) and for pHo = 7.4 (dark gray). B, Enhancement of the hHv1 current by AA. The currents were measured in whole-cell configuration. Depolarizing voltage pulses (+100 mV, 1 s in duration) were applied every 30 s from holding potential −80 mV. Control record was obtained at pHo = 7.4 (black) then the perfusion of the recording chamber was changed to the same solution containing 10 µM AA and the currents were recorded at t1 = 3 min (green), t2 = 3.3 min (blue) and t3 = 3.5 min (red). The current was enhanced 1.4-fold, 1.7-fold and 2-fold at t1, t2 and t3, respectively in this record.

The hHv1 blocker ClGBI reduces the viability of cMSCs

A recent publication reported that inhibition of hHv1 induced apoptosis in Jurkat cells18, therefore, we tested if block of hHv1 in cMSC influences cell viability measured by the MTT reduction assay. The measurement is based on the conversion of MTT (Thiazoly Blue Tetrazolium Bromide) to formazan by NAD(P)H-dependent oxidoreductase enzymes of viable cells only. Therefore, the amount of formazan dye formed directly correlates to the number of metabolically active cells in the culture45. Figure 4A,B show that ClGBI (100 µM) reduced the viability of cMSCs on day 2 (A) and day 3 (B) of the treatment. The control solution contained DMSO (ctrl + DMSO) as the ClGBI stock solution was prepared in DMSO. The reduction in the cell viability was estimated by the decrease in the normalized OD (see Materials and Methods). A similar set of experiments was conducted in COS-7 cells (Fig. 4C,D) which do not express Hv1 proton channels46. We found that the cell viability was not affected by 100 µM ClGBI in COS-7 regardless of the day of the determination, i.e., cells lacking the Hv1 proton channel were insensitive to the inhibitor of the voltage-gated proton current.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effect of ClGBI on the viability of Hv1 expressing (cMSCs) and non-expressing (COS-7) cells. A, B Reduction in the cell viability of cMSCs in the presence of the Hv1 blocker ClGBI. Normalized OD was calculated as A/Actrl where A and Actrl are the absorbances of a given sample and that of cMSCs cells in the presence of DMSO control, respectively. ClGBI was added to the cell culture medium in the indicated concentrations. OD determinations were done on samples harvested on day 2 (A) and day 3 (B). Significant differences (p < 0.05) are indicated by asterisks, bars and error bars indicate mean ± SEM for the indicated number of experiments. C, D ClGBI does not affect the viability of COS-7 cells. The same set of experiments as in A and B were repeated in COS-7 cells, variables are the same as above. Similarly, DMSO treatment was used as vehicle control, results were normalized to COS-7 cells treated with DMSO.

Mineral matrix production of cMSCs is inhibited by blocking of hHv1

Osteogenic induction (including mineral matrix production) of cMSCs was performed using dexamethasone, ascorbic acid, β-glycerophosphate and vitamin D3 treatment, referred to as “classical” pathway of osteogenic induction47,48. Osteogenic differentiation of cMSCs was followed and quantitatively analyzed using Alizarin Red staining (Fig. 5). To test the hypothesis that inhibition of hHv1 modulates osteogenic differentiation of MSCs the inhibitor of hHv1, ClGBI was added to the differentiation medium in various concentrations. Figure 5A shows the Alizarin Red staining of the cultures on day 27. The darkest red wells on the right indicate strong mineral matrix formation in vehicle controls (diff + DMSO). The progressively lighter colors with increasing ClGBI concentrations correspond to a dose-dependent inhibition of mineralization by ClGBI. The lightest red colors on the left show the differentiation control where the differentiation cocktail was omitted from the medium only DMSO was added as vehicle control for ClGBI. The hydroxyapatite-Alizarin Red complexes were dissolved in CPC (Fig. 5B) and the optical density was determined. The inhibition of the mineral matrix production is clearly reflected in the normalized optical densities of the different samples shown in Fig. 5C,D. The inhibition of mineral matrix formation increases with increasing ClGBI concentration, the normalized optical densities are significantly smaller at higher ClGBI concentrations (*p < 0.05, One Way Analysis of Variance on Rank statistics). The extent of inhibition was statistically the same on day 27 as on day 21 at identical ClGBI concentrations (*p > 0.05, t-test or Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test). We also examined the effect of Hv1 blockers on the inorganic phosphate (Pi)-induced mineralization of MSCs, which process may be similar to the pathological mineralization therefore referred to as such below. The same set of experiments were conducted as above, except the duration of the experiments, which were 14, 21 and 24 days following pathological induction of mineral matrix formation. Figure 6 shows the time and concentration dependence of the effect of ClGBI on this process. Regardless of the duration of the experiment (i.e. the time point of the readout) ClGBI induced a 10–20% inhibition in the mineral matrix production. Furthermore, the inhibition lacks clear dose-dependence: 100 µM ClGBI had smaller (day 14) or equivalent (day 21) effect as 60 µM ClGBI.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Sensitivity of the classical pathway-induced mineral matrix production to inhibition of hHv1proton channels. A-B, Mineralization of the ClGBI-treated and non-treated cMSCs using Alizarin Red staining (A) and upon dissolving the Alizarin Red S-calcium complexes in CPC (B). Labels indicate cMSC cultures treated with ctrl + DMSO: no differentiation cocktail, DMSO added as vehicle control for ClGBI; diff + ClGBI: induced by the cocktail for the classical pathway and treated with indicated concentrations of ClGBI; diff + DMSO: induced by the cocktail for the classical pathway and added DMSO as vehicle control for ClGBI. Staining was done on day 27. C-D: Quantification of the mineral matrix production on the Day 21 (C) and Day 27 (D). Normalized mineralization was calculated as A/ADMSO where A and ADMSO are the absorbances for a given sample and that for differentiation-induced cells in the presence of DMSO (vehicle control), respectively. Data were analyzed using One Way Analysis of Variance on Ranks statistical test, *p < 0.05.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Sensitivity of the pathological pathway-induced mineral matrix production to inhibition of hHv1proton channels. Mineralization of cMSCs was induced in via the pathological pathway using inorganic phosphate (Pi) and mineralization was assayed on Day 14 (A), Day 21 (B) and Day24 (C) using Alizarin Red. ClGBI was added to differentiation-induced cultures (diff + ClGBI) in the indicated concentrations and DMSO was used as vehicle control for ClGBI (diff + DMSO). ctrl + DMSO sample was treated with DMSO only in the absence of inorganic phosphate. Normalized mineralization was calculated as A/ADMSO where A and ADMSO are the absorbances for a given sample and that for differentiation-induced cells in the presence of DMSO (vehicle control), respectively. Data were analyzed using ANOVA statistical test, *p < 0.05.

Migration of MSCs is inhibited by blocking of hHv1

It has been reported that voltage-gated H+channels are involved in the regulation of migration of cancer and immune cells21,24,32,33. Based on this we hypothesized a similar effect in mesenchymal stem cells, therefore, we tested the effect of 100 µM ClGBI on the migration of cMSCs. We used the Oris Pro Biocompatible Gel to form a cell-free zone on a cell culture plate to result in a standardized wound-healing assay. The pre-labelled cells were seeded into the plate and monitored continuously over 41.3 hours using high content screening microscopy, and we quantified the closure of the initially acellular zone in each well. The initial cell free area is the cell free exclusion zone at the beginning of experiment (Fig. 7A,B), this area practically vanished by the end of the experiment (t = 41.3 h) in control condition (Fig. 7C). The initial cell free area reduced slightly in 41.3 h when 100 µM ClGBI was present (Fig. 7D). Cell fee areas are quantitatively displayed for control and 100 µM ClGBI-treated samples in Fig. 7E,F, respectively. Closure% of the cell free zone was used to assess wound-healing and calculated as follows: closure % = [(initial cell free area − cell free are at a given time point)/initial cell free area] * 100. A higher closure % indicates a smaller cell free zone in the wound. Figure 7G shows the comparison of the average closure% (±SEM) for control and 100 µM ClGBI-treated samples at 41.3 h. Measurements were carried out in duplicates using cMSCs from three different placenta donors, however, Fig. 7A–G demonstrates the data obtained in one experiment for one donor. Figure 7H presents the time-dependence of the reduction in the closure % obtained from pooled data (all experiments on all samples of the 3 donors). Figure 7H shows that control and ClGBI-treated samples display similar closure % values during the first 8 hours of the assay. Thereafter, the closure% in the presence of 100 µM ClGBI is significantly reduced as compared to control: the open area continuously decreases in the control samples whereas it remains constant in the ClGBI-treated samples. Time-dependence of the closure % responses, calculated individually for each sample, showed similar characteristics to the pooled ones (data not shown).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Representative images of the wound healing assay and the high content screening of closure responses using Oris Pro assay. Representative CM-Dil-20 stained images of cMSCs are shown at t = 0 for non-treated (A) and ClGBI-treated (100 µM) wells (B). Images were taken immediately following cell seeding. The final images of the closure areas (t = 41.3 h) are in panel C (control) and D (treated) respectively. Intensities were rescaled, scale bar represent 1 mm. Diagrams present open area (cell free zone) of ClGBI-treated (100 µM, F) and non-treated (control; E) cMSCs at t = 0 and t = 41.3 hours. Each bar represents the average and SEM of 7 wells (n = 7). G, Comparison of closure responses of MSCs following treatment with ClGBI (100 µM) over 41.3 hours versus control non-treated MSCs. Closure% = [(initial cell free are − cell free are at a given time pont)/initial cell free area] * 100). ***p < 0.0001 where indicated versus non-treated control. H, Time-dependence of the closure responses of MSCs in the absence (Control, black) and presence of 100 µM ClGBI (Treated, red). Each time point represents the average percent closure and SEM of samples from 3 different placenta donors.

ClGBI treatment inhibits the closure of the cell free zone during the time course of the experiment. The wound healing assay, however, does not discriminate among anti-migratory from anti-proliferative or apoptotic effects of the drug. To address directly the effect of ClGBI on migration we carried out single cell analysis of the cell motility (Fig. 8). The assays were performed in 2% serum-containing media, which inhibits cell proliferation and the consequent reduction of the cell-free zone due to increase in the cell number. We analysed the trajectories (Fig. 8A,B) of cMSCs in the center region (initially cell-free zone) of the Oris Pro Assay plate. The visual comparison of the rose-plots obtained in the absence (Fig. 8C) and presence of 100 µM ClGBI (Fig. 8D) qualitatively shows that ClGBI-treatment reduces the motility of cMSCs. Quantitative analysis of the trajectories was obtained by determining the average speed of migration, which was significantly reduced in the presence of ClGBI (Fig. 8E). The frequency histogram (Fig. 8F) shows the reduction in the average speed of trajectories at the population level in the presence of ClGBI. The shift of the histogram to lower average speed values in the presence of ClGBI suggests the involvement of hHv1 in the regulation of the migration ofcMSCs.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Single cell motility analysis demonstrates anti-migratory activity of ClGBI. Representative cell migration tracks over a period of 41.3 hours are shown for non-treated (A) and ClGBI-treated (100 µM) wells (B). The initial, cell free circular region of the center of the wells was used as a spatial filter for constructing the cell trajectories. Each colored track represents a different cell. Rose plots illustrate the motility patterns of individual cells in ClGBI-treated (D, 100 µM) and non-treated (C) samples. Twenty representative trajectories within the initial cell free region with 20 steps were used to construct the rose plots, each track represents the trajectory of a single cell over a period of 6.6 hours. Migration ability of cells was quantified by calculating the average speed of the cells along each trajectory. Means of cellular speeds of treated (filled bar) and non-treated (empty bar) tracks are summarized in panel E (n = 35–40), error bars are SEM values, data were compared with two tailed Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, ***p < 0.0001. (F) The distributions of the average speeds for all treated (grey bars) and not-treated (empty bars) tracks (N > 20,000). The probability density histograms were estimated (continuous black lines) by calculating the kernel smoothing functions of speed data.

Discussion

A TTX sensitive voltage-gated sodium current, Clcn3 chloride channels, KCa1.1, Kv10.1, Kir2.1, Kir6.1, Kir6.2, KCa3.1 potassium channels and L-type Ca channel were identified in MSCs from different sources including bone marrow and human umbilical cord vein16,4951. These channels participate in the regulation of proliferation52, migration53, osteogenic51,52 and adipogenic differentiation5153. Furthermore, membrane potential (Vm) can be a tractable control point for modulation of stem cell differentiation in a bi-directional fashion10,15. In this study, we detected transcript variants 1 and 2 of the HVCN1 gene using RT-PCR, which predicts the presence of the common, longer isoform of the human voltage-gated proton channels in cMSCs. The longer isoform is more widespread than the shorter, the latter was identified in malignant B-cells20 only.

The main properties of the voltage-gated proton channels are the followings17,24,34: modulation of the voltage-dependent gating by pH; the absence of inactivation; inhibition of the current by Zn2+ and 5-chloro-2- gunidinobenzimidazole (ClGBI), whereas arachidonic acid (AA) enhances the Hv1 current. To confirm the functional expression of the hHv1 in these cells we carried out electrophysiological measurements. Changing of pHo by one unit shifts the conductance-voltage relationship by ~40 mV, which is a hallmark of the Hv1 ion channels19. For the objective determination of the threshold potential of activation we have applied mathematical criteria for both voltage-ramp and voltage-step-based records (Supplementary Fig. S2). Data presented in the manuscript reflect Vthr values obtained using that approach. We obtained the same magnitude of shift in Vthr of the current in cMSCs and HEK293 cells transfected with hHv1, although the threshold potential was different for the two cell types. Previous publications have also reported that threshold potential for current activation may vary from cell to cell17,41. The resting membrane potential of MSCs is more depolarized than in mature cells3,10, and there are differences between ‘phagocyte’ and ‘epithelial’ type of native proton conductances19,23,38. A higher threshold potential could serve the special electrophysiological needs of mesenchymal stem cells.

There are two pharmacological inhibitors of hHv1 most commonly used for the identification of hHv1. Of these 200 µM ClGBI resulted in 83–91% block of the whole-cell current in agreement with the literature (Kd = 26.3 ± 2.2 µM)34. The other well-known inhibitor is Zn2+ that fully inhibits hHv1 at 100 μM concentration37,38. However, we were unable to use Zn2+ for positive identification of the current. Our pilot experiments showed the expression of robust Clcurrents in cMSC (Meszaros et al., in preparation) which were eliminated using low Clconcentration extra- and intracellular solutions in the current study. The substitute for Cl was aspartate, which complexes Zn2+54 and thus, reduces the potency of Zn2+ in inhibiting hHv1 (Supplementary Fig. S6). The two critical residues, His140 and His 19319,37,38, that are required for high-affinity Zn2+ binding to hHv1, are present in the hHv1 transcripts from cMSCs (Supplementary Fig. S7). The presence of the His residues predicts Zn2+ sensitivity of the hHv1 current in cMSCs as well.

Voltage-gated proton channels are activated by arachidonic acid (AA)41, an ω-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid. Accordingly, we tested the sensitivity of the whole-cell current of cMSCs to AA. 10 µM AA significantly enhanced the current in a time-dependent, reversible manner (Fig. 3B). AA also activates potassium current trough KCa1.1, however, there was no potassium ion neither in the intracellular or the extracellular solution thereby excluding the contamination of the whole-cell current by KCa1.1. The co-existence of AA-induced activation of both KCa1.1 and the hHv1 current was also tested using K+-containing solutions (Supplementary Fig. S8). KCa1.1 was first activated by 30 µM AA then inhibited fully by paxillin (the subunit composition-independent inhibitor of the KCa1.1 channels). In the continuous presence of paxillin and AA a whole cell outward current resembling hHv1 current reappeared in ~5 min. Arachidonic acid can be generated endogenously in the human cells (e.g. released from cell membranes of phagocytes by phospholipase A2 during inflammatory reactions). The liberated AA could regulate various biological processes including reactive oxygen species production by NADPH oxidase. The potentiation of the whole-cell current by AA suggests that perhaps, endogenous AA regulates the Hv1 channel activity in cMSCs and the relationship between the immune cells and MSCs may be strong, as many publications described it earlier1,3,5557. It is also unclear if the expression of hHv1 is a property exclusive to cMSCs, or, perhaps, hHv1 can also be expressed in MSCs isolated from other sources, e.g. bone marrow.

Based on the molecular biology, biophysics and pharmacology analysis above we propose that hHv1 channels are expressed in cMSCs isolated from human placenta. In order to demonstrate the physiological role of hHv1 in cMSC we applied the pharmacological inhibitor of the current, ClGBI. The interpretation of the physiological assays, such as mineralization, wound healing and migration requires the knowledge of the cytotoxic effects of these compounds. Based on the MTT assay we report here reduced viability of cMSCs in the presence 100 μM ClGBI. On the contrary, the results of the MTT assay were oblivious to the presence of 100 μM ClGBI in COS-7, a cell type known to lack hHv1 expression46. Thus, the effect of ClGBI on cell viability seems to be restricted to cells expressing Hv1. Inhibition of hHv1 may lead to increased cytotoxicity through a variety of mechanisms that include primarily the regulation of pHi and consequently, that of pHi-dependent cytosolic processes, enzymes, and mitochondrial oxidative metabolism58,59. The exact molecular mechanisms of these effects of ClGBI are unclear, but may involve cell death as well, and this can be used to target cancer cells abundantly expressing hHv118.

MSCs can differentiate into osteoblast9,60, chondroblast9,60, cardiomyocytes2,60,61, smooth muscle cells62,63, endothelial cells64 among the others9,13,60,61. Differentiation of MSC strongly depend on the tissue microenvironment60,65,66. Blair at al. developed a mesenchymal stem cell preparation using various matrices in bioreactors, and their results suggest that the secretion of matrix strongly depends on the active and passive transport of protons and the control pHi and pHo67. In addition, there is evidence about the role of MSCs in pathological mineralization68. This motivated us to study the effect of pharmacological inhibition of hHv1 on mineralization and osteogenic differentiation. We found that mineral matrix production was significantly inhibited by the hHv1 inhibitor ClGBI in the concentration range of 60–100 μM. This latter concentration of ClGBI is ~5x the Kd for the inhibition of the hHv1 current which blocks ~85% of the current39. As 100 μM ClGBI also induces a significant reduction on the MTT production (Fig. 4), the interpretation of the results more complex. This must include the inhibition of the proton current, which may interfere with the optimal pHi for various cytosolic processes including mRNA expression and enzyme activity of alkaline phosphatase and/or the regulation of osterix transcription58,69. Other issues to consider are the reduction of the cell number which may limit matrix formation. However, dying cells serve as the nucleus of bone formation70, and thus promote mineral matrix formation. The combination of these opposing effects, in our interpretation, may result in the very shallow dose-response of ClGBI on mineral matrix formation reported in this paper. The importance of these counterbalancing effects is also manifested in the reduced sensitivity of mineral matrix formation to the inhibition of hHv1 by ClGBI in the pathological mineralization model. Pathological mineralization was induced by Pi, which is known to activate voltage-gated proton channels29. The role of hHv1 in pathological mineralization is consistent with the presence of hHv1 transcripts in vascular smooth muscle cells (data not shown, Varga and Meszaros, manuscript in preparation).

Inhibition of hHv1 may also influence mineral matrix production by regulating pHo in the transcellular H+ transport model of osteogenesis67. According to that model transporters in the osteoblasts mediate acid uptake from bone matrix at the osteoblast “apical” membranes and acid extrusion at the “basolateral” membranes. hHv1 may also participate in the proton extrusion among other transporters (Na+/H+ exchanger, Cl/H+ exchanger etc7173.). When hHv1 is inhibited cells may not secrete sufficient H+ on the “basolateral” side and thus resorb H+ on the “apical” side thereby leading to reduced matrix formation and eventually cell death due to H+ accumulation in the cytosol. This hypothesis implies a basolateral localization of Hv1 in these cells, which is different from the proposed apical localization in other polarized cells (e.g., airways epithelial cells74,75). Thus, hHv1-dependent intra- and extracellular pH regulation may have important effects on bone metabolism and these data can be used to develop new therapeutic strategies to prevent pathological or ectopic mineralization via the modulation of hHv1.

Migration capacity MSCs is crucial for the execution of their biological functions. For example, MSCs must be recruited to the site of tissue damage, a key factor of their application in regenerative medicine13,14. On the other hand, migration of MSCs into tumors promotes tumor growth and metastasis formation by the secretion of cytokines, growth factors, chemokines and many other soluble molecules7686. Moreover, MSCs migrated into the tumor negatively modulate anti-cancer immunity via their interaction with immune cells8789. Ion transporters and channels in the plasma membrane participate in the regulation of cell motility9094. There is also evidence for the contribution of hHv1 to cell migration, e.g. in immune cells20,24 and in glioblastoma21, breast cancer33, colorectal cancer32. Our results show that wound healing is reduced when hHv1 is inhibited by ClGBI. As the result of the wound healing assay is also sensitive to cell number and density, we have extended the data analysis to individual cell trajectories. The rose plots on Fig. 8C,D clearly show that ClGBI treatment reduced the displacement of cMSCs from origin, which was associated with a reduction of the average speed of the migration. The combination of these may, at least partially, explain the reduced wound-healing observed upon ClGBI treatment. Similar to our findings Ribeiro-Silva L. et al. has shown that migration of glioblastoma is inhibited by the hHv1 blocker ZnCl221. The cellular mechanism for the reduced migration upon hHv1 block is unclear at this moment, but it may be secondary to the acidification of the cytosol21,32,33. This latter idea is consistent with our data: the effect of ClGBI on cell migration was not immediate, an ~8 h incubation was required for the manifestation of the reduced wound healing.

In summary, we have described that the hHv1 proton channel is functionally expressed chorion derived mesenchymal stem cells. hHv1 inhibition resulted in reduced cMSC migration capacity, which in turn, might be a useful tool to influence therapeutic use of cMSCs by restricting their mobility. Whether hHv1 block inhibits the “beneficial” cellular responses of cMSCs, e.g. differentiation into myocytes, or immunomodulation in autoimmune diseases, should be further investigated.

Methods

Ethical approval

The Regional and Institutional Ethics Committee of University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary approved the study (license number DEOEC-RKEB-2946-2009). All experimental techniques were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations listed in the ethical approval. Informed consent of the participants has been obtained according to the ethical approval.

Isolation of chorion-derived mesenchymal stem cells (cMSCs),cell culture condition and induction of the mineralization

Isolation of the mesenchymal stem cells from the chorionic plate of placenta (cMSC) was carried out as previously described47. Conventional surface markers (CD73, CD90 positive and CD34, CD45 negative) were used to identify cMSCs. Cells were cultured in DMEM containing standard supplements (10% FBS, 50 U/mL penicillin, 50 µg/mL streptomycin, and 1% L-glutamine) at 37 °C in humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.

For the induction of mineralization we used two different methods: the “classic inducing medium” was supplemented with dexamethasone (0.1 µM), ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (50 µg/mL), β-glycerophosphate (10 mM), and vitamin D3 (50 nM)47, the pathological mineralization was induced by inorganic phosphate (3 mmol/L; pathological inducing medium)95. Cells density (580 cells/mm2) was the same in all experiments. Cells were seeded in growth medium and allowed to attach/settle for 24 hours, then differentiation was initiated by adding osteogenic medium (Day 0).

hHv1 transfection

HEK-293 cells were used to express hHv1 (a kind gift from Kenton Swartz, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). HEK-293 cells were transiently co-transfected with a plasmid encoding hHv1 and another plasmid encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP) at molar ratios of 1:5, by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, then they were cultured under standard conditions. Transfected cells were replated onto 35-mm polystyrene cell culture dishes (Cellstar, Greiner Bio-One Hungary Kft, Mosonmagyaróvár, Hungary). Channels were transiently expressed in HEK-293 cells 12–48 h after transfection. GFP-positive transfectants were identified by a Nikon TS-100 fluorescence microscope (AuroscienceKft, Budapest, Hungary) using bandpass filters of 455–495 nm and 515–555 nm for excitation and emission, respectively. More than 60% of the GFP-positive cells expressed the co-transfected ion channels. Currents were recorded 24-48 h after transfection.

Total RNA extraction, reverse transcription, and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) analysis

The total RNA was extracted from cMSCs using TRIzolate Reagent (UD-GenoMedKft., Debrecen, Hungary; URN0101) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. RevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)) were used to synthesis cDNA. NAC (no amplification control) was produced without reverse transcriptase using all RNA sample by setting up the RT reaction as usual. PCR reaction contained the following reagents: 5 µL cDNA, 0.3 µL DreamTaq DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, EP0703), 3 µL 10X DreamTaq Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.5 µL (10 mM) dNTP Mix, 10–10 pM forward (FW) and reverse (RV) primer, 10.2 µL Nuclease-free water. To control the effectiveness of RNA isolation, GAPDH RT-PCR was carried out using primers from cDNA Synthesis Kit. NTC (no template control) was generated using water as template. The primers for detection of hHv1 are collected into the Supplementary Table ST1.

Electrophysiology and pharmacology

Electrophysiology measurements were carried out using patch-clamp technique in voltage-clamp mode. Whole-cell currents were recorded form cMSCs using an Axopatch 200B amplifier connected to a DigiData 1440 digitizer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Micropipettes were pulled from GC 150 F-15 borosilicatecapillaries (Harvard Apparatus Kent, UK) resulting in 3- to 5-MΩ resistance in the bath solution. The standard extracellular solution at pHo = 7.4 contained 135 mM L-aspartic acid (Na+ salt), 6 mM MgCl2, 5.5 mM glucose, 20 mM HEPES. The extracellular solution at pHo = 6.4 contained 60 mM L-aspartic acid (Na+ salt), 6 mM MgCl2and 80 mM MES (titrated with NaOH). The measured osmolality of the extracellular solutions was about 300 mOsm/L. The pipette solution contained 90 mM L-aspartic acid (Na+ salt), 80 mM MES, 6 mM MgCl2, 3.3 mM glucose at pH = 6.18 (titrated with NaOH). The solutions did not contain potassium to exclude the contamination of the records by potassium currents. Zn2+ was also used in NMDG (N-Methyl-D- Glucamine)-based extracellular solution at pHo = 7.4. It contained 75 mM NMDG (N-Methyl-D- Glucamine), 3 mM MgCl2, 15 mM glucose, 180 mM HEPES (titrated with HCl).

Guanidine derivate 5-chloro-2-guanidinobenzimidazole (CIGBI; Sigma-Aldrich Kft. Budapest, Hungary, S517038) and Arachidonic acid (AA; Sigma-Aldrich, A3611-100MG) stock solutions (concentration of the stocks was 30 mM) were prepared in DMSO.

Examination of the mineralization

Calcium deposition was assayed with Alizarin Red S staining. The staining was carried out as previously described47. After staining cell monolayers were photographed, and for the quantification Alizarin Red S-calcium complexes were extracted from the stained cultures with 10% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.7). The optical density of the color was determined at 540 nm using spectrophotometer in each well. DMSO treatment was used as control. Data obtained with DMSO control was statistically identical. Normalized mineralization was calculated as A/ADMSO where A and ADMSO are the absorbance’s a given sample and for differentiated cells in the presence of DMSO control, respectively.

MTT Assay

The most common method for the determination of cell viability is the MTT reduction assay. The measurement based on the conversion of MTT (Thiazoly Blue Tetrazolium Bromide, Sigma-Aldrich, M2128-1G) to formazan in the cell culture, which was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell viability was presented as a percentage of control (Normalized OD). DMSO treatment were used as vehicle controls, results were normalized to non-differentiated cells in the presence of DMSO.

Monitoring of cell migration using fluorescence labeling and wound healing assay

cMSC cells were cultured in the presence or absence of CIGBI for 41.3 hours in 96-well Oris Pro Cell Migration Assay plate (Platypus Technologies LLC, Madison, WI, USA). Each well in the assay plate contained dissolving bio-compatible gel droplet which formed cell free zone in the center of the wells. Immunofluorescence staining of MSCs was made using Cell Tracker CM-Dil (vital membrane dye C7000, Invitrogen, Carlsbad CA, USA). Images acquired by Opera Phenix High Content Confocal System (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Images of the Alexa-561 channel was collected at 8 μm of Z image plane using a 5× air objective (NA: 0.16) to monitor multigenerational tracking of cellular movements. 9 fields were acquired with 5% overlap that were covered the entire well and laser-based autofocus was performed at each imaging position. Time series measurements were created for 41.3 hours using 20 minutes interval between each individual measurement. The primary data were analyzed by Harmony 4.8 software (PerkinElmer) according to the analysis workflow of Migration - Confluency and Cell Tracking Ready to Made Solutions (http://www.perkinelmer.com/product/harmony-4-2-office-hh17000001). Open areas were determined and separated from cell layer by machine learning user defined training methods on the basis of Alexa-561 staining intensity.

The raw tracking data of cells were set up into a database, included induvial cell identifiers, coordinates and time points in all wells and frames of all cells, the database was exported to csv text file. The analyses of exported data were implemented in custom-written MATLAB scripts (The MathWorks, Natick, MA). The initial cell free circular region of the center of the wells was used as a spatial filter for constructing the cell trajectories. All cell trajectories within the initial cell free region longer than 10 steps were collected and analyzed for calculating the step sizes and visualizing the cellular migration. Step size data were presented as probability density histograms, for statistical comparisons, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used. For visualizing the effect of cell migration upon treatment, wind-rose plots depicting migratory tracks of ten randomly chosen individual migrating cells with step length of twenty were shown from control and treated samples.

Data analysis

For multiple comparisons One Way Analysis of Variance on Rank test were used, the difference between samples collected on two different day were tested by t-test or Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test. Statistical significance was concluded at *p < 0.05 (*indicates statistical difference). Determination of the threshold potential was the following: For the current recorded by ramp protocol, first off line leak correction was performed (i.e. a straight line was fitted to the points recorded in the first 200 ms of the 1 sec long ramp protocol (protocol ran from −60mV up to +150 mV). The parameters of this line were used to calculate the leak.). Then the mean and the SD values were determined in the first 100 ms. When 20 consecutive data points were above 2xSD value than that time in millisecond was associated to the threshold value. Finally, this threshold time value was converted to the appropriate voltage, i.e. membrane potential which is the threshold potential itself.

For current recorded using the I-V protocol, (voltage ran from −80 mV up to +100 mV with 10 mV increments) the process was very similar. Namely, the mean and the SD values were determined using the first 6 data points (i.e. between −80 mV and −30 mV). The threshold potential was associated to the current value, which was above 5xSD.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

The technical assistance of Cecilia Nagy and Adrienn Bagosi is highly appreciated. This work was supported by the National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary (Grant K119417 to G.P., FK134344 to FP and K132906 to ZV) and by EFOP-3.6.2-16-2017-00006 to B.M. F.P., G.T. and G.P.) and GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00015 (F.P., G.T. and G.P.). The project is co-financed by the European Union and the European Social Fund.

Author contributions

B.M.: designed the experiments, performed part of the electrophysiology experiments and the functional assays (migration and mineral matrix production), wrote the manuscript draft. F.P.: performed part of the electrophysiology experiments and contributed to the data analysis of the patch-clamp records. G.M.: conducted image analysis and data processing for the migration assay. E.K.: did the migration assay. K.K.: handling of cMSCs, participated in the functional assay (migration and mineral matrix production). G.T.: performed part of the electrophysiology experiments and the corresponding data analysis. G.P.: designed the project and the experiments, contributed to the writing of the manuscript and the construction of the figures. Supervised the project.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-63517-3.

References

  • 1.Si YL, Zhao YL, Hao HJ, Fu XB, Han WD. MSCs: Biological characteristics, clinical applications and their outstanding concerns. Ageing Res. Rev. 2011;10:93–103. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2010.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tokcaer-Keskin Z, et al. Timing of induction of cardiomyocyte differentiation for in vitro cultured mesenchymal stem cells: a perspective for emergencies. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2009;87:143–150. doi: 10.1139/Y08-111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Talwadekar MD, Kale VP, Limaye LS. Placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells possess better immunoregulatory properties compared to their cord-derived counterparts-a paired sample study. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:15784. doi: 10.1038/srep15784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Han, Y. et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Regenerative Medicine. Cells8, 10.3390/cells8080886 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Li H, et al. Immunomodulatory Functions of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Tissue Engineering. Stem Cell Int. 2019;2019:9671206. doi: 10.1155/2019/9671206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang R, et al. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in experimental traumatic brain injury. J. Neuroinflammation. 2013;10:106. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-10-106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weiss ARR, Dahlke MH. Immunomodulation by Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs): Mechanisms of Action of Living, Apoptotic, and Dead MSCs. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:1191. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shi Y, et al. Immunoregulatory mechanisms of mesenchymal stem and stromal cells in inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2018;14:493–507. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0023-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang M, Yuan Q, Xie L. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Immunomodulation: Properties and Clinical Application. Stem Cell Int. 2018;2018:3057624. doi: 10.1155/2018/3057624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sundelacruz S, Levin M, Kaplan DL. Comparison of the depolarization response of human mesenchymal stem cells from different donors. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:18279. doi: 10.1038/srep18279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kaveh K, Ibrahim R, Abu Bakar MZ, Ibrahim TA. Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Osteogenic Lineage and Bone Tissue Engineering: A Review. J. Anim. Veterinary Adv. 2011;10:2317–2330. doi: 10.3923/javaa.2011.2317.2330. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Luan X, Li G, Wang G, Wang F, Lin Y. Human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells suppress T cell proliferation and support the culture expansion of cord blood CD34(+) cells: a comparison with human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Cell. 2013;45:32–38. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2012.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang W, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells recruited by active TGFbeta contribute to osteogenic vascular calcification. Stem Cell Dev. 2014;23:1392–1404. doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rustad KC, Gurtner GC. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Home to Sites of Injury and Inflammation. Adv. Wound Care. 2012;1:147–152. doi: 10.1089/wound.2011.0314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sundelacruz S, Levin M, Kaplan DL. Membrane potential controls adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Heubach JF, et al. Electrophysiological properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. J. Physiol. 2004;554:659–672. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.055806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pillozzi, S. & Becchetti, A. Ion Channels in Hematopoietic and Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cells International, 10.1155/2012/217910 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Asuaje A, et al. The inhibition of voltage-gated H+ channel (HVCN1) induces acidification of leukemic Jurkat T cells promoting cell death by apoptosis. Pflug. Arch. 2017;469:251–261. doi: 10.1007/s00424-016-1928-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.DeCoursey TE. Voltage-gated proton channels: molecular biology, physiology, and pathophysiology of the H(V) family. Physiol. Rev. 2013;93:599–652. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00011.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.El Chemaly A, et al. VSOP/Hv1 proton channels sustain calcium entry, neutrophil migration, and superoxide production by limiting cell depolarization and acidification. J. Exp. Med. 2010;207:129–139. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ribeiro-Silva L, Queiroz FO, da Silva AM, Hirata AE, Arcisio-Miranda M. Voltage-Gated Proton Channel in Human Glioblastoma Multiforme Cells. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2016;7:864–869. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.6b00083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hondares E, et al. Enhanced activation of an amino-terminally truncated isoform of the voltage-gated proton channel HVCN1 enriched in malignant B cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:18078–18083. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1411390111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Eder C. A mysterious channel: new insights into proton channel functioning raise new questions. J. Physiol. 2008;586:2419–2420. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.154625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wu LJ. Voltage-gated proton channel HV1 in microglia. Neuroscientist. 2014;20:599–609. doi: 10.1177/1073858413519864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.El Chemaly A, Nunes P, Jimaja W, Castelbou C, Demaurex N. Hv1 proton channels differentially regulate the pH of neutrophil and macrophage phagosomes by sustaining the production of phagosomal ROS that inhibit the delivery of vacuolar ATPases. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2014;95:827–839. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0513251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Capasso M, et al. HVCN1 modulates BCR signal strength via regulation of BCR-dependent generation of reactive oxygen species. Nat. Immunol. 2010;11:265–272. doi: 10.1038/ni.1843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schilling T, Gratopp A, DeCoursey TE, Eder C. Voltage-activated proton currents in human lymphocytes. J. Physiol. 2002;545:93–105. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.028878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Smith RY, et al. Voltage-gated proton channels exist in the plasma membrane of human oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 2019;34:1974–1983. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Li G, Miura K, Kuno M. Extracellular phosphates enhance activities of voltage-gated proton channels and production of reactive oxygen species in murine osteoclast-like cells. Pflug. Arch. 2017;469:279–292. doi: 10.1007/s00424-016-1931-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kuno M, et al. Acid-inducible proton influx currents in the plasma membrane of murine osteoclast-like cells. Pflug. Arch. 2016;468:837–847. doi: 10.1007/s00424-016-1796-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bernheim L, et al. A voltage-dependent proton current in cultured human skeletal muscle myotubes. J. Physiol. 1993;470:313–333. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang Y, Wu X, Li Q, Zhang S, Li SJ. Human voltage-gated proton channel hv1: a new potential biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8:e70550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang Y, et al. Specific expression of the human voltage-gated proton channel Hv1 in highly metastatic breast cancer cells, promotes tumor progression and metastasis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011;412:353–359. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.07.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cherny VV, Markin VS, Decoursey TE. The Voltage-Activated Hydrogen-Ion Conductance in Rat Alveolar Epithelial-Cells Is Determined by the Ph Gradient. J. Gen. Physiol. 1995;105:861–896. doi: 10.1085/jgp.105.6.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.DeCoursey TE, Cherny VV. Temperature dependence of voltage-gated H+ currents in human neutrophils, rat alveolar epithelial cells, and mammalian phagocytes. J. Gen. Physiol. 1998;112:503–522. doi: 10.1085/jgp.112.4.503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kuno M, et al. Temperature dependence of proton permeation through a voltage-gated proton channel. J. Gen. Physiol. 2009;134:191–205. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200910213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Musset B, et al. Zinc inhibition of monomeric and dimeric proton channels suggests cooperative gating. J. Physiol. 2010;588:1435–1449. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.188318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ramsey IS, Moran MM, Chong JA, Clapham DE. A voltage-gated proton-selective channel lacking the pore domain. Nature. 2006;440:1213–1216. doi: 10.1038/nature04700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hong L, Kim IH, Tombola F. Molecular determinants of Hv1 proton channel inhibition by guanidine derivatives. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:9971–9976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324012111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhao RM, et al. Role of human Hv1 channels in sperm capacitation and white blood cell respiratory burst established by a designed peptide inhibitor. P Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E11847–E11856. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816189115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kawanabe A, Okamura Y. Effects of unsaturated fatty acids on the kinetics of voltage-gated proton channels heterologously expressed in cultured cells. J. Physiol. 2016;594:595–610. doi: 10.1113/JP271274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Morgan D, et al. Sustained activation of proton channels and NADPH oxidase in human eosinophils and murine granulocytes requires PKC but not cPLA2 alpha activity. J. Physiol. 2007;579:327–344. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.124248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.DeCoursey TE, Cherny VV. Potential, pH, and arachidonate gate hydrogen ion currents in human neutrophils. Biophys. J. 1993;65:1590–1598. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81198-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang Y, Li SJ, Wu X, Che Y, Li Q. Clinicopathological and biological significance of human voltage-gated proton channel Hv1 protein overexpression in breast cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:13877–13888. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.345280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kumar, P., Nagarajan, A. & Uchil, P. D. Analysis of Cell Viability by the MTT Assay. Cold Spring Harb Protoc2018, 10.1101/pdb.prot095505 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 46.Morgan D, Cherny VV, Price MO, Dinauer MC, DeCoursey TE. Absence of proton channels in COS-7 cells expressing functional NADPH oxidase components. J. Gen. Physiol. 2002;119:571–580. doi: 10.1085/jgp.20018544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Robaszkiewicz A, et al. Hydrogen peroxide-induced poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation regulates osteogenic differentiation-associated cell death. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2012;53:1552–1564. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.08.567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Langenbach F, Handschel J. Effects of dexamethasone, ascorbic acid and beta-glycerophosphate on the osteogenic differentiation of stem cells in vitro. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2013;4:117. doi: 10.1186/scrt328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Balana B, et al. 5-Azacytidine induces changes in electrophysiological properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Res. 2006;16:949–960. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7310116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pillozzi S, Becchetti A. Ion channels in hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Int. 2012;2012:217910. doi: 10.1155/2012/217910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Diehlmann A, et al. KATP channels in mesenchymal stromal stem cells: strong up-regulation of Kir6.2 subunits upon osteogenic differentiation. Tissue Cell. 2011;43:331–336. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2011.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang YY, et al. BKCa and hEag1 channels regulate cell proliferation and differentiation in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2014;229:202–212. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ding F, et al. Involvement of cationic channels in proliferation and migration of human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Cell. 2012;44:358–364. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2012.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tamas Kiss EFaHK. Complexes of Aminophosphonates. II. Transition Metal Complexes of Aminophosphonic Acid Analogues of Aspartic Acid and Glutamic Acid. Inorganica Chim. Acts. 1989;I55:281–287. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)90425-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cao W, Cao K, Cao J, Wang Y, Shi Y. Mesenchymal stem cells and adaptive immune responses. Immunol. Lett. 2015;168:147–153. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2015.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Najar M, et al. The Immunomodulatory Potential of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: A Story of a Regulatory Network. J. Immunother. 2016;39:45–59. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.de Castro LL, Lopes-Pacheco M, Weiss DJ, Cruz FF, Rocco PRM. Current understanding of the immunosuppressive properties of mesenchymal stromal cells. J. Mol. Med. 2019;97:605–618. doi: 10.1007/s00109-019-01776-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Disthabanchong S, Radinahamed P, Stitchantrakul W, Hongeng S, Rajatanavin R. Chronic metabolic acidosis alters osteoblast differentiation from human mesenchymal stem cells. Kidney Int. 2007;71:201–209. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Morgan D, Cherny VV, Murphy R, Katz BZ, DeCoursey TE. The pH dependence of NADPH oxidase in human eosinophils. J. Physiol. 2005;569:419–431. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.094748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.D’Souza N, et al. MSC and Tumors: Homing, Differentiation, and Secretion Influence Therapeutic Potential. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2013;130:209–266. doi: 10.1007/10_2012_150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Karantalis V, Hare JM. Use of mesenchymal stem cells for therapy of cardiac disease. Circ. Res. 2015;116:1413–1430. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gong Z, Niklason LE. Small-diameter human vessel wall engineered from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) FASEB J. 2008;22:1635–1648. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-087924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Shudo Y, et al. Isolation and trans-differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells into smooth muscle cells: Utility and applicability for cell-sheet engineering. Cytotherapy. 2016;18:510–517. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2016.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Oswald J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells can be differentiated into endothelial cells in vitro. Stem Cell. 2004;22:377–384. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.22-3-377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Leach JK, Whitehead J. Materials-Directed Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Tissue Engineering and Regeneration. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018;4:1115–1127. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Murphy MB, Moncivais K, Caplan AI. Mesenchymal stem cells: environmentally responsive therapeutics for regenerative medicine. Exp. Mol. Med. 2013;45:e54. doi: 10.1038/emm.2013.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Blair HC, et al. Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Matrix Formation In Vivo and In Vitro. Tissue Eng. Part. B Rev. 2017;23:268–280. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2016.0454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Xie C, et al. The Emerging Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Vascular Calcification. Stem Cell Int. 2019;2019:2875189. doi: 10.1155/2019/2875189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wu CY, Lu GL, Ji M, Wang XC. Effects of acidosis on the osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2016;9:23182–23189. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Fujita H, et al. Necrotic and apoptotic cells serve as nuclei for calcification on osteoblastic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2014;32:77–86. doi: 10.1002/cbf.2974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Green J, Yamaguchi DT, Kleeman CR, Muallem S. Cytosolic pH regulation in osteoblasts. Interaction of Na+ and H+ with the extracellular and intracellular faces of the Na+/H+ exchanger. J. Gen. Physiol. 1988;92:239–261. doi: 10.1085/jgp.92.2.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Redhead CR, Baker PF. Control of intracellular pH in rat calvarial osteoblasts: coexistence of both chloride-bicarbonate and sodium-hydrogen exchange. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1988;42:237–242. doi: 10.1007/bf02553749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Green J, Yamaguchi DT, Kleeman CR, Muallem S. Cytosolic pH regulation in osteoblasts. Regulation of anion exchange by intracellular pH and Ca2+ ions. J. Gen. Physiol. 1990;95:121–145. doi: 10.1085/jgp.95.1.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.DeCoursey TE, Cherny VV. Voltage-activated proton currents in membrane patches of rat alveolar epithelial cells. J. Physiol. 1995;489(Pt 2):299–307. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp021051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Fischer H, Widdicombe JH, Illek B. Acid secretion and proton conductance in human airway epithelium. Am. J. Physiol-CellPh. 2002;282:C736–C743. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00369.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Parekkadan B, Milwid JM. Mesenchymal stem cells as therapeutics. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2010;12:87–117. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-070909-105309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bonuccelli G, et al. Role of mesenchymal stem cells in osteosarcoma and metabolic reprogramming of tumor cells. Oncotarget. 2014;5:7575–7588. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Huang WH, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells promote growth and angiogenesis of tumors in mice. Oncogene. 2013;32:4343–4354. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Melzer C, Yang Y, Hass R. Interaction of MSC with tumor cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 2016;14:20. doi: 10.1186/s12964-016-0143-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kansy BA, et al. The bidirectional tumor–mesenchymal stromal cell interaction promotes the progression of head and neck cancer. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2014;5:95. doi: 10.1186/scrt484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yang Y, Otte A, Hass R. Human mesenchymal stroma/stem cells exchange membrane proteins and alter functionality during interaction with different tumor cell lines. Stem Cell Dev. 2015;24:1205–1222. doi: 10.1089/scd.2014.0413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Poggi A, Musso A, Dapino I, Zocchi MR. Mechanisms of tumor escape from immune system: role of mesenchymal stromal cells. Immunol. Lett. 2014;159:55–72. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2014.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Sun Z, Wang S, Zhao RC. The roles of mesenchymal stem cells in tumor inflammatory microenvironment. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2014;7:14. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-7-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Norozi F, Ahmadzadeh A, Shahrabi S, Vosoughi T, Saki N. Mesenchymal stem cells as a double-edged sword in suppression or progression of solid tumor cells. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:11679–11689. doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-5187-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Hong IS, Lee HY, Kang KS. Mesenchymal stem cells and cancer: friends or enemies? Mutat. Res. 2014;768:98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2014.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Su, P.et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Migration during Bone Formation and Bone Diseases Therapy. Int J Mol Sci19, 10.3390/ijms19082343 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 87.O’Malley G, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and colorectal cancer: a troublesome twosome for the anti-tumour immune response? Oncotarget. 2016;7:60752–60774. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Poggi, A. & Giuliani, M. Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Can Regulate the Immune Response in the Tumor Microenvironment. Vaccines (Basel)4, 10.3390/vaccines4040041 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 89.Liotta F, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells are enriched in head neck squamous cell carcinoma, correlates with tumour size and inhibit T-cell proliferation. Br. J. Cancer. 2015;112:745–754. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Catacuzzeno, L. & Franciolini, F. Role of KCa3.1 Channels in Modulating Ca(2+) Oscillations during Glioblastoma Cell Migration and Invasion. Int J Mol Sci19, 10.3390/ijms19102970 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 91.Ruggieri P, et al. The inhibition of KCa3.1 channels activity reduces cell motility in glioblastoma derived cancer stem cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e47825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Chimote AA, et al. Selective inhibition of KCa3.1 channels mediates adenosine regulation of the motility of human T cells. J. Immunol. 2013;191:6273–6280. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Crottes D, et al. Immature human dendritic cells enhance their migration through KCa3.1 channel activation. Cell Calcium. 2016;59:198–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2016.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Storck H, et al. Ion channels in control of pancreatic stellate cell migration. Oncotarget. 2017;8:769–784. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Zavaczki E, et al. Hydrogen sulfide inhibits the calcification and osteoblastic differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Kidney Int. 2011;80:731–739. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES