Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Apr 29;10:7492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64339-z

Author Correction: Probabilistic Assessment of Nerve Regeneration with Diffusion MRI in Rat Models of Peripheral Nerve Trauma

Isaac V Manzanera Esteve 1,2, Angel F Farinas 3, Alonda C Pollins 3, Marlieke E Nussenbaum 3, Nancy L Cardwell 3, Hakmook Kang 4, Mark D Does 1,2,5, Wesley P Thayer 3,5, Richard D Dortch 1,2,5,
PMCID: PMC7189241  PMID: 32346062

Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-019-56215-2, published online 23 December 2019

This Article contains errors in the Methods sections under subheading ‘MRI protocol’.

“Images were acquired with a three-dimensional diffusion-weighted spin-echo sequence and the following parameters: field-of-view = 60 × 60 × 160 mm3, resolution = 125 × 125 × 372 µm3, TE/TR = 22/425 ms, gradient pulse duration/diffusion time (δ/Δ) = 4/12 ms, b-values = 2000 and 4000 s/mm2, 20 diffusion directions, number of averaged excitations = 2, and scan time = 7 hours and 40 minutes for each b-value.”

should read:

“Images were acquired with a three-dimensional diffusion-weighted spin-echo sequence and the following parameters: field-of-view ≈ 6 × 6 × 16 mm3 (adjusted to fit sample), resolution = 125 × 125 × 372 µm3, TE/TR = 22/425 ms, gradient pulse duration/diffusion time (δ/Δ) = 4/12 ms, b-values = 2000 and 4000 s/mm2, 20 diffusion directions, number of averaged excitations = 2, and scan time ≈ 7-10 hours for each b-value (depending on the field-of-view).”


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES