Abstract
Patellar instability is common in the second decade, and genu valgum is a risk factor for patellar instability. In skeletally immature patients, genu valgum can be gradually corrected using less-invasive, well-established, growth-modulation techniques. For skeletally immature patients with patellar instability and genu valgum, it would be desirable to address both instability and deformity. We describe our technique of physeal-respecting medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients using hamstring autograft and simultaneous transphyseal screw hemiepiphysiodesis to gradually correct genu valgum. The medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction technique features posteromedial hamstring graft harvest, single patellar tunnel fixation without implant, and femoral attachment just below the distal femoral physis. The technique of growth modulation features percutaneous insertion of a single transphyseal screw through the distal medial femoral physis without interference with medial patellofemoral ligament graft placement. Our preliminary results have been encouraging with successful correction of genu valgum and satisfactory patellar stabilization without growth disturbances.
Introduction (With Video Illustration)
The risk of patellar instability is greatest in the 10- the 17-year age group, with an incidence of approximately 43 per 100,000 children per year. Several techniques have been described to address patellar instability in skeletally immature patients.1 Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has shown promising results, but there is a 10% to 20% complication rate and an added risk for physeal injury in skeletally immature patients.2,3 Thus, MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients would require technical modifications to avoid these complications.
There are several risk factors that contribute to patellar instability; increased genu valgum is one such risk factor that increases the laterally directed force and vector acting on the patella.4 Correction of increased genu valgum could be achieved by growth modulation in skeletally immature patients with at least a year of remaining growth.5,6 Our indications for distal femoral growth modulation are genu valgum >10°, mechanical axis in or outside the lateral knee compartment, and a mechanical lateral distal femoral angle <84° in a skeletally immature patient. The aim of the current report is to describe our technique of MPFL reconstruction (Video 1) and simultaneous growth modulation for correction of genu valgum in skeletally immature patients with recurrent patellar instability.
Surgical Technique
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.
Preoperative Planning
Knee radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging scans are evaluated for anatomic risk factors, MPFL tear pattern, and chondral injuries (Figs 1 and 2). A full-length, hip-to-ankle, standing radiograph is obtained with the patella facing forward. Deformity assessment is done to identify the source of genu valgum (Fig 3). A left-hand radiograph is obtained to assess skeletal age (Fig 4).
Patient Positioning
The patient is positioned supine on a radiolucent table with a tourniquet over the proximal thigh. A leg elevator (Bone Foam Inc., Corcoran, MN) under the involved leg can facilitate lateral knee radiographs (Fig 5). General anesthesia and a preoperative femoral and sciatic nerve block are performed by the anesthesiologist. An examination of the knee is performed to evaluate the medial–lateral translation of the patella in extension and 30° flexion.
Medial Hemiepiphysiodesis
Under anteroposterior fluoroscopy, a 2.8-mm guide pin is inserted percutaneously in a retrograde direction from medial aspect of medial femoral condyle, avoiding the articular surface to intersect the distal femoral physis at its medial third–middle third junction (Figs 6 and 7, Table 1). On the lateral view, the guide pin should intersect the physis at its center and should be placed along the mid-coronal plane of the distal femur. The pin is passed to exit the lateral aspect of thigh and withdrawn from the lateral aspect of thigh until its tip is just inside the medial femoral condyle. A 1-cm longitudinal skin incision is placed around the pin and screw length is measured. The pin is overdrilled with a 4.5-mm drill bit, and a 7.0-mm fully-threaded, self-tapping, cannulated cancellous screw is inserted with at least 5 screw threads crossing the physis. Alternatively, a 6.5-mm cancellous screw can be used.
Table 1.
Pearls |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pitfalls |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MPFL, medial patellofemoral ligament.
Gracilis Tendon Harvest
With the hip in flexion and abduction and the knee in about 30° of flexion, a 2.5-cm transverse incision is placed in the medial aspect of popliteal crease over the palpable gracilis tendon. Dissection is performed toward the tendon and the fascia is opened along the tendon. A right-angle clamp is used to deliver the tendon out of the incision and it is freed of its attachments (Fig 8). An open-tendon harvester is used to detach the tendon from its tibial insertion distally and a closed-tendon harvester is used to detach the tendon proximally at its musclotendinous junction. The gracilis tendon is wrapped in a saline-soaked sponge for later use.
Knee Arthroscopy
Diagnostic knee arthroscopy is performed using standard portals (Fig 9). Patellofemoral tracking is assessed. Any intra-articular lesions are addressed at this time. Arthroscopy from superolateral portal can provide better assessment of patellofemoral tracking.
Patellar Tunnel
A 3- to 4-cm para-patellar incision is made along the medial border of patella and dissection is performed down to the patella (Fig 10). The vastus medialis muscle fibers are identified (first layer). A subperiosteal dissection is performed using an electrocautery over the medial 5 mm of patella just above the widest part of patella. The plane between the medial retinaculum (second layer) and the capsule (third layer) is developed by cutting the transverse fibers of medial retinaculum.
The patellar tunnel is made just above the widest part of patella (center of superior two-thirds of patella). Two 1-cm drill holes are made using a 3.5-mm drill bit; first from medial to lateral and then from anterior to posterior to create a single 3.5-mm tunnel under a bone bridge (Fig 11). A curved curette is used to chamfer the tunnel and remove bone debris. A suture needle (0 VICRYL on OS-6 needle; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) is passed through the tunnel and its suture end is looped to help graft passage. The thinner musclotendinous end of the gracilis tendon is passed and pulled through the patellar tunnel. Both tendon ends are whip stitched with a #2 FiberWire suture (Arthrex, Naples, FL) (Fig 12). The doubled graft is sized using a graft sizer.
Femoral Tunnel
On a perfect lateral fluoroscopic view with overlap of the femoral condyles, a 2-mm Beath pin is placed percutaneously at the femoral attachment point at the level of the distal femoral physis, just anterior to the posterior femoral cortex, and inserted about 1 cm using a mallet7 (Fig 13). The position of the pin should be confirmed to be below the level of distal femoral physis on an anteroposterior view. The Beath pin is then advanced through the medial femoral epiphysis, under fluoroscopic guidance, from medial to lateral, posterior to anterior (to avoid the intercondylar notch) and inferior to the physis to exit from the lateral aspect of the knee. On the lateral view, the pin should be placed between the Blumensaat line and the transphyseal screw (Fig 14).
A 1-cm longitudinal incision is placed around the pin. Using a Kelly clamp and suture loop, the graft is shuttled between the second and third layer and out of the medial incision. An isometric assessment should be confirmed by wrapping the graft around the pin and putting the knee through flexion and extension to check for graft length changes (Fig 15). The Beath pin is overdrilled with an appropriate size reamer (5-6 mm) up to the opposite cortex. A nitinol guide wire for interference screw is inserted into the drilled tunnel alongside the Beath pin (Fig 16).
Graft Passage and Fixation
The suture ends of the graft are placed through the eyelet of the Beath pin, which is pulled out from the lateral side pulling the graft into the femoral tunnel. With the knee in about 45° flexion and the patella engaged in the trochlea, the suture ends of the graft are clamped on the lateral side of the knee against the skin (Fig 17). Patellar mobility and tracking with knee flexion and extension is confirmed. Knee arthroscopy is performed to verify the extra-articular position and functioning of the graft (Fig 18). A biocomposite interference screw (Matryx; ConMed, Utica, NY) is inserted over the nitinol wire. The size of the screw is the same as femoral tunnel size and is 25 to 30 mm in length. The complete insertion of the screw is confirmed by fluoroscopic visualization of the screwdriver tip (Fig 19).
Closure
The closure of medial retinaculum is performed with the knee flexed to prevent overtightening of medial structures. The medial retinaculum is imbricated in a pants-over-vest fashion using 2 to 3 absorbable sutures. All 3 incisions and portals are closed in a standard fashion. A well-padded dressing is applied, along with CryoCuff (DJO, Vista, CA) and a knee immobilizer.
Postoperative Course
Physical therapy is started within 3 to 4 days once the pain is under control. The patient is allowed weight bearing as tolerated in a knee immobilizer with crutches for 3 to 4 weeks, until quadriceps function is regained. Range of motion goals are 0 to 90° at 3 weeks and 0 to 120° at 6 weeks. Strengthening is initiated after 3 months. Functional strength tests including hop tests and isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY) tests are performed between 4 and 6 months. Patients are released to full activities, including sports, typically at around 6 months, once all functional goals are achieved in physical therapy.
Discussion
Pediatric cadaveric studies have demonstrated that the MPFL femoral attachment is predominantly below the level of the distal femoral physis.8 The trajectory of the femoral tunnel is distal and inferior to the distal femoral physis and anterior to the intercondylar notch. This would allow a pull-out technique for the femoral guide pin and graft sutures.9 Careful fluoroscopic guidance is critical during creation of femoral tunnel. We have not encountered any growth disturbances using this MPFL reconstruction technique in 79 skeletally immature patients. The alternate technique described in the literature has been to create a short and angled socket in the medial femoral epiphysis to avoid the physis and intercondylar notch penetration.9
The advantage of implant-mediated guided growth is that it does not require accurate growth prediction, as removal of the screw after deformity correction should restore normal growth (Table 2). The advantage of transphyseal screw, as compared with a tension-band plate for growth modulation, is that the screw would not interfere with the MPFL graft placement on the medial aspect of the knee. It would also avoid knee joint irritation, stiffness, and capsular penetration that could be seen with a plate. The disadvantage of transphyseal screw is its potential to damage the physis and cause growth disturbances. The transphyseal screw is inserted first, to ensure safety of the MPFL graft and sutures. We recommend full-length radiographs every 3 to 4 months until expected correction is achieved.
Table 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MPFL, medial patellofemoral ligament.
The current technique of MPFL reconstruction and simultaneous growth modulation is relatively simple to use and can correct an anatomic risk factor for patellar instability. Our experience has been reported with good results and minimal complications.6 The technique can be added to the surgical armamentarium when treating recurrent patellar instability in skeletally immature patients with genu valgum.
Footnotes
The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this article. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Supplementary Data
References
- 1.Vavken P., Wimmer M.D., Camathias C., Quidde J., Valderrabano V., Pagenstert G. Treating patella instability in skeletally immature patients. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:1410–1422. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.03.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Seitlinger G., Moroder P., Fink C., Wierer G. Acquired femoral flexion deformity due to physeal injury during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2017;24:680–685. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Parikh S.N., Nathan S.T., Wall E.J., Eismann E.A. Complications of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in young patients. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:1030–1038. doi: 10.1177/0363546513482085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mizuno Y., Kumagai M., Mattessich S.M. Q-angle influences tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:834–840. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Métaizeau J.P., Wong-Chung J., Bertrand H., Pasquier P. Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws (PETS) J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:363–369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Parikh S.N., Redman C., Gopinathan N.R. Simultaneous treatment for patellar instability and genu valgum in skeletally immature patients: A preliminary study. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2019;28:132–138. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Huston K.L., Okoroafor U.C., Kaar S.G., Wentt C.L., Saluan P., Farrow L.D. Evaluation of the Schöttle technique in the pediatric knee. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5 doi: 10.1177/2325967117740078. 2325967117740078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shea K.G., Polousky J.D., Jacobs J.C., Jr. The relationship of the femoral physis and the medial patellofemoral ligament in children: A cadaveric study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34:808–813. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nelitz M., Reichel H., Dornacher D., Lippacher S. Anatomical reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament in children with open growth-plates. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132:1647–1651. doi: 10.1007/s00402-012-1593-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.