Abstract
AST-120 (Kremezin) is used to treat progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) by adsorbing uremic toxin precursors produced by gut microbiota, such as indole and phenols. In this study, we propose that AST-120 reduces indole level, consequently suppresses indole effects on induction of drug tolerance and virulence in Escherichia coli including enterohaemorrhagic strains. In experiments, AST-120 adsorbed both indole and tryptophan, a precursor of indole production, and led to decreased expression of acrD and mdtEF which encode drug efflux pumps, and elevated glpT, which encodes a transporter for fosfomycin uptake and increases susceptibility to aztreonam, rhodamine 6G, and fosfomycin. AST-120 also decreased the production of EspB, which contributes to pathogenicity of enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC). Aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, minocycline, trimethoprim, and sulfamethoxazole were also adsorbed by AST-120. However, fosfomycin, in addition to rifampicin, colistin and amikacin were not adsorbed, thus AST-120 can be used together with these drugs for therapy to treat infections. These results suggest another benefit of AST-120, i.e., that it assists antibacterial chemotherapy.
Introduction
The spread of pathogens that have developed antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and the shortage of new antibiotics are critical issues in health care. Alternatives to traditional bacteriostatic and bactericidal agents have been proposed, such as reagents targeting bacterial proteins responsible for pathogenicity and/or drug resistance, including antitoxin agents and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) inhibitors, respectively [1–2]. Such reagents, which assist therapies by using traditional drugs to treat infections, are associated with low rates of resistance, presumably because they do not affect bacterial growth.
Drug resistance is characterized as the inherited ability of bacteria to grow in a concentration of a drug that would otherwise prevent growth, and it is typically acquired by genetic modifications. In addition to drug resistance, drug tolerance of bacteria is recently re-considered as a potential critical issue. Drug tolerance is defined as a transient ability of bacteria to survive under bactericidal antibiotic treatments without having acquired a resistance phenotype, therefore, it is associated with the failure of antimicrobial chemotherapy [3–4].
Bacteria use particular signaling molecules, such as autoinducers, when they contact other bacteria, then alter the expression profile of subsets of genes [5]. In most of bacterial species, the communication mediated by these signaling compounds is closely associated with drug resistance, drug tolerance and pathogenicity, making them candidate targets for the treatment of refractory infectious diseases caused by pathogens resistant to commonly used antibiotics [6].
Bacterial signaling molecules have been the subject of extensive studies, particularly in pathogens. Many species of gram-negative bacteria use acyl-homoserine lactones and a derivative of 4,5-dihydroxy-2,3-pentanedione (DPD) termed autoinducer-2 [7–8]. As an exception, Escherichia coli strains do not produce acyl-homoserine lactones, but they produce autoinducer-2. In addition to autoinducer-2, E. coli also utilizes indole [9]. Tryptophanase (TnaA) is an enzyme that catalyzes a reaction from tryptophan into pyruvate, then indole is generated as a by-product.
Indole controls diverse cellular functions of bacteria including drug resistance, drug tolerance, biofilm formation and virulence as a signal molecule [10–12]. Previously, we found that indole increases expression of genes that encode proteins for drug efflux pumps and the type III secretion system, which contribute to drug tolerance and pathogenicity in host epithelial cells, respectively, in species, such as the food-borne pathogen enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) [13–14]. On the other hand, indole decreases expression of glpT, which encodes the uptake transporter of fosfomycin with glycerol-3-phospate, leading to increased tolerance to fosfomycin [15].
In human host, indole is produced by some of enteric bacteria including E. coli. That is absorbed into the intestine, and transported by the blood to the liver, where it is converted into indoxyl sulfate, and reenters the bloodstream [16]. Indoxyl sulfate is known to be a uremic toxin [17]. When kidney function is normal, indoxyl sulfate enters the renal tubular cells and is eventually excreted from the urine [18]. However, indoxyl sulfate remains highly in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), leading to an accelerated decline of kidney function [19].
AST-120 (Kremezin) is an oral carbonaceous adsorbent, used to treat progressive CKD by delaying the progression of the disease, followed by the initiation of dialysis [17, 20]. In enteric sites, AST-120 adsorbs uremic toxin precursors, including indole, produced by enteric bacteria, and reduces the production of uremic toxins, such as indoxyl sulfate [21].
We hypothesized that AST-120 adsorbs indole produced by E. coli and then attenuates indole signaling of E. coli species, including EHEC, which in turn decreases drug tolerance and type III secretion system-associated virulence elevated by indole. In this study, we assessed the in vitro role of AST-120 as a potential inhibitor of indole signaling. We show evidence that AST-120 can attenuate drug tolerance and virulence induced by indole signaling.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains, plasmids and culture conditions
The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table 1. Bacteria were grown in LB (Luria-Bertani) medium or DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium), and cell growth was monitored by absorbance at 600 nm. The pNNacrD-P [13], pNNgadE-P [13], and pNNglpT-P [22] are lacZ fusion reporter plasmids that monitor promoter activities of acrD, gadE and glpT, respectively. Each DNA fragment containing its promoter sequence was ligated to promoter-less lacZ on a pNN387 plasmid [23], allowing the promoter activity to be assessed according to β-galactosidase levels from LacZ expression on the plasmid. For the maintenance of plasmids, chloramphenicol was added to the growth media at a concentration of 30 μg/ml.
Table 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study.
Strain or plasmid | Relevant genotype/phenotype | Reference |
---|---|---|
Strains | ||
MG1655 | E. coli K-12; wild type; reporter strain | [24] |
MC4100 | E. coli K12, lacking the endogenous lacZ gene | [25] |
MC4100ΔacrB | acrB mutant from MC4100 | [13] |
O157:H7 Sakai | Wild-type parent EHEC O157:H7 (RIMD 0509952) | [26] |
O157ΔtnaA | tnaA mutant from O157:H7 Sakai | [14] |
Plasmids | ||
pNNacrD-Pa | acrD promoter reporter; CmR | [13] |
pNNgadE-Pa | gadE promoter reporter; CmR | [13] |
pNNglpT-P | glpT promoter reporter; CmR | [22] |
CmR: Chloramphenicol resistance
a Formally named pNNacrD and pNNyhiE, respectively
EspB antiserum
EspB antiserum was produced in rabbits by Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC (St. Louis, MO). A peptide synthesized from positions 294 to 312 of EspB was used as an antigen.
Measurement of indole in bacterial culture
To determine indole levels in E. coli culture, we measured the indole concentration of the culture supernatant because most of indole produced by E. coli was secreted into culture media [27]. Bacteria were grown in the LB medium for 24 hours, and the cell cultures were centrifuged to remove the cell pellets. Indole in the culture supernatants was extracted with ethyl acetate, then 0.7 ml of Kovac’s reagent (10 g of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde, 50 ml of HCl and 150 ml of amylalcohol) was added to 0.02 mL of the ethyl acetate fraction containing indole. The indole concentration was calculated by absorbance at 540 nm according to the standard curve using commercial indole (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Industries Corp., Osaka, Japan).
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays
MIC assays were performed by a serial agar dilution method. Bacteria were grown with or without indole in LB medium to the early-stationary phase. Five microliters of 100-fold-diluted cultures (~5,000 cells) was inoculated onto a LB agar plate containing drugs with or without indole and incubated for 16 h at 37°C. The MICs were determined as the lowest concentration at which growth was inhibited.
Survival assays
Bacteria were grown with or without indole and/or AST-120 in LB medium to the mid-logarithmic phase, then 5.0 x 107 cells were transferred into the fresh LB medium containing either drug; 25 μg/ml aztreonam, 1.56 μg/ml fosfomycin or 75 μg/ml rhodamine 6G, and incubated with shaking. At indicated time points, aliquots of the cultures were sampled, and the number of viable cells was determined as the colony forming unit (CFU) by plating serial dilutions on LB agar. Percentage survival was calculated as the value of CFU for cells after incubated with drug relative to the value of CFU for cells prior to incubation with drug as time 0.
Promoter assays
Promoter activities were evaluated as β-galactosidase activities from LacZ expression on the reporter plasmids. The E. coli MC4100 strains carrying pNN-glpT-P, pNN-acrD-P or pNN-gadE-P, the LacZ reporter plasmids, were grown at 37°C in LB medium. β-Galactosidase levels from LacZ expression were determined using a Tropix Galacto-Light Plus according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) as previously indicated [28].
Measurement of tryptophan, aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, rhodamine 6G, rifampicin, minocycline, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, fosfomycin and colistin in bacteria-free aqueous solution after treatment of AST-120
Each compound in aqueous solution was incubated for 2 hours in the presence and absence of 30 mg AST-120. Drug concentrations except fosfomycin, colistin and amikacin were calculated by measuring absorbance at 280 nm. Concentrations of fosfomycin and colistin and amikacin were measured by a diffusion disc assay using the E. coli MG1655 reporter strain as previously indicated [15] because these compounds have no aromatic ring structure, therefore do not absorb the light of 280 nm wavelength.
EspB detection
EHEC strains were grown at 37°C with shaking to the early stationary phase in DMEM, and separated by centrifugation and filtration. Secreted proteins were precipitated from the supernatants with 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and dissolved in Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The solution was boiled, and the proteins were separated on a 12.5% acrylamide Tris-glycine SDS/PAGE gel. The gel was electroblotted onto a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). EspB was detected with EspB antiserum with secondary anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC., St. Louis, MO) and SuperSignal West Pico Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Protein bands of EspB were visualized on a LAS-4010 Luminescent image analyzer (GE Healthcare Japan, Tokyo).
Results
AST-120 adsorbs not only indole produced by E. coli, but also tryptophan, a substrate of indole production, which decreases the level of indole in media
To confirm the ability of AST-120 to adsorb indole, we incubated indole with AST-120 in a bacterial-free solution and then measured the level of indole in the supernatant after the removal of AST-120. E. coli strains, including EHEC produce indole in the range of 0.3–0.7 mM when grown in LB medium [27]. Indole is produced from tryptophan, then its production can be increased by exogenous addition of the tryptophan substrate. We found that E. coli strains, including the K-12 laboratory and EHEC strains MG1655 and O157:H7 Sakai, respectively, produced 2 mM indole when grown to the stationary phase in LB medium containing tryptophan, therefore we tested 2 mM indole to examine the effect of AST-120 in this study. More than 98% of the indole was adsorbed when incubated with at least 30 mg AST-120 (Fig 1A). Indole has a bicyclic structure consisting of a benzene ring fused to a pyrrole ring. Because tryptophan has the same bicyclic structure, we tested whether AST-120 also adsorbs tryptophan. Our results showed that almost all 2.5 mM tryptophan in solution was adsorbed when incubated with 30 mg AST-120 (Fig 1B). These findings indicate that AST-120 adsorbs both indole and tryptophan, which leads to a reduction in indole levels in E. coli culture.
AST-120 decreases tolerance to aztreonam, fosfomycin, and rhodamine 6G induced by indole
Indole induces expression of several genes that encode drug efflux pumps including acrD and mdtEF, and suppresses expression of glpT, which encodes a glycerol-3-phosphate/fosfomycin symporter responsible for fosfomycin uptake [13, 15, 27]. AST-120 may minimize the effects of indole on expression of these genes, leading to an increase of drug susceptibility. To test this hypothesis, we measured promoter activities of acrD, mdtEF, and glpT in MC4100, an E. coli host that lacks a chromosomal lacZ gene when grown in the presence or absence of indole and AST-120. Because the mdtEF genes are transcribed with gadE, which is located upstream of mdtEF, we used the gadE promoter–lacZ reporter plasmid to assess expression of mdtEF. Consistent with our previous results, indole increased LacZ expression from acrD and gadE promoters while decreasing expression from the glpT promoter (Fig 2A). However, when grown in the presence of AST-120, no effect of indole on LacZ expression was observed (Fig 2A). acrD and mdtEF overexpression decrease susceptibility to aztreonam and rhodamine 6G, respectively while reduction of glpT expression decreases susceptibility to fosfomycin [15, 29–30]. We tested the susceptibilities of the MC4100 strain to aztreonam and fosfomycin when grown with or without indole and AST-120. To test the susceptibility to rhodamine 6G, we used MC4100ΔacrB as a host strain because E. coli is not susceptible to rhodamine 6G due to the AcrAB drug efflux pump, which is constitutively produced [30]. Consistent with previous studies, bacteria grown with indole were lower susceptible to these drugs than those grown without indole. In addition, we here showed that indole increases tolerance to these drugs. Drug tolerance is characterized by a slower killing even at high concentrations of the drug while MIC of the drug is not changed in contrast to drug resistance [3]. Indole addition did not increase MICs of aztreonam, fosfomycin and rodamine 6G in cultures of the MC4100 and MC41000ΔacrB strains (data not shown). On the other hand, compared to the strains grown without indole, the strains grown with indole were slowly killed during exposure of these drugs, suggesting that indole increases tolerance, but not resistance, (Fig 3A–3C). When AST-120 was present, the strains grown with indole were similarly killed to those grown without indole (Fig 3A–3C). We also note that AST-120 addition does not affect innate tolerance to aztreonam and fosfomycin because these killing curves for cells grown without indole in the presence of AST-120 were similar to those in the absence of AST-120. On the other hand, AST-120 addition moderately prolonged bacterial survival for cells grown without indole during exposure of rhodamine 6G although we do not know the reason. As a consequence, AST-120 suppresses the effect of indole on induction of AcrD, MdtEF, and GlpT-associated drug tolerance.
We also tested whether AST-120 terminates the effect of indole on induction of gene expression. Two sets of bacteria were grown with indole to the mid-logarithmic phase, at which point AST-120 was added to the first set of bacterial cultures, and its culture was continued to the stationary phase whereas the other set of bacterial cultures was similarly continued but without added AST-120. For this experiment, we chose the acrD promoter. We found that the level of LacZ expression in bacteria when AST-120 was added was lower than that of bacteria to which AST-120 was not added (Fig 2B).
AST-120 decreases EspB level elevated by indole
EspB, which is secreted via the type III secretion system by EHEC, and this protein contributes to pathogenicity in host epithelial cells [31]. Previously, we found that indole increases secretion of this protein [14]. In this study, we tested the effect of AST-120 addition on EspB secretion. We grew wild-type parent EHEC and the tnaA mutant in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing tryptophan or indole. In the preliminary experiment, we found that the wild-type parent produces 0.3 mM of indole in DMEM when tryptophan is added. We therefore used this concentration of indole for the EspB experiment (Fig 4A). We found that the addition of AST-120 reduced EspB levels in the wild-type parent (Fig 4B). As in our previous study, EspB levels of the tnaA mutant when grown with tryptophan were lower than those of the wild-type parent because the tnaA mutant does not produce indole, and it was elevated when grown with exogenous indole. AST-120 addition decreased EspB levels in culture. Thus, AST-120 reduces indole level, then the wild-type parent grown in the presence of AST-120 behaves as the tnaA mutant.
AST-120 does not adsorb fosfomycin, rifampicin, colistin, or aminoglycosides, such as amikacin
AST-120 may adsorb not only indole and tryptophan but also some classes of antimicrobial agents. This property may limit the effectiveness of a combination therapy that uses AST-120 and a common antimicrobial agent. We tested the capability of AST-120 to adsorb antimicrobial agents that are generally active in E. coli species, including aztreonam and fosfomycin, to which tolerance is induced by indole. AST-120 adsorbed aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, minocycline, trimethoprim, and sulfamethoxazole, but not fosfomycin, rifampicin, colistin, or amikacin. Fosfomycin, rifampicin, colistin, and aminoglycosides, such as amikacin, are therefore still useful, even when AST-120 is present (Fig 5). In addition, AST-120 did not adsorb rhodamine 6G although it is not generally used for the treatment of bacterial infectious diseases.
Discussion
AST-120 is used to treat progressive CKD by inhibiting the production of indoxyl sulfate, a uremic toxin derived from indole that is produced by some kinds of enteric bacteria, such as E. coli [21]. When kidneys function normally, the renal tubular cells remove indoxyl sulfate from the blood and eventually drain it with the urine [17]. However, in CKD patients, indoxyl-sulfate accumulates in the kidney and blood, where it generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), and induces oxidative cell damage [32]. Therefore, indoxyl sulfate not only accelerates kidney function decline but also damages vascular endothelial cells. Animal studies have shown that indoxyl sulfate disturbs the cardiovascular system, whereas administration of AST-120 alleviates it [33–34]. In this study, we propose that AST-120 plays another beneficial role against enteric infectious diseases caused by pathogenic E. coli, including EHEC, although this role may be limited because AST-120 adsorbs some antimicrobial agents. We provided evidence that AST-120 suppresses indole signaling of E. coli by adsorbing both indole and tryptophan (a substrate for indole production) and decreasing tolerance to particular antimicrobial agents, including aztreonam, fosfomycin, rhodamine 6G, and type III secretion proteins.
When bacteria communicate with other bacteria, they produce diffusible signaling molecules, such as autoinducers, and alter expression profiles in subsets of genes [5]. This activity is termed “bacterial cell-to-cell communication.” There is increasing evidence that this activity is closely associated with drug resistance and pathogenicity and is therefore a possible efficient target for the treatment of refractory infectious diseases caused by pathogens resistant to traditional antibiotics. Gram-negative bacteria commonly use acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs) as signaling molecules [8]. In addition to AHLs, some species also use autoinducer-2 [7]. E. coli uses indole instead of AHLs. It is produced not only by E. coli but also by other enteric bacteria, such as Proteus spp. [35]. Indole is synthesized from tryptophan, an essential amino acid contained in food, and some share of it is eventually converted into indoxyl sulfate [16]. However, a high level of indole can still accumulate at enteric sites [36]. Therefore, indole may increase resistance to some drugs and E. coli at enteric sites. AST-120 is expected to be able to remove indole. Indole also increases drug resistance of Salmonella enterica via induction of AcrAB, a drug efflux pump, and biofilm formation of Vibrio cholera [37–38]. AST-120 administration may therefore contribute to therapies for these enteric infections. On the other hand, indole suppresses virulence of P. aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, increases drug susceptibility in Lysobacter species and inhibits P. aeruginosa persister cell resuscitation [11–12, 39–40]. Therefore, we have to note that AST-120 may exhibit detrimental aspects in some of cases. However, we believe that AST-120 still has a merit for treatment of E. coli infections including EHEC.
Many studies report on the inhibition of bacterial signaling, and studies on AHL inhibitors are well known [6]. Although many cases involving antagonists target the receptors, some molecules inactivate signaling at the extracellular space without being incorporated into the bacterial cells. Cyclodextrins, for example, can capture AHLs in a matrix [41]. AST-120 inhibits indole signaling, and it works in extracellular spaces in a manner similar to that of cyclodextrins. These compounds may not be affected by membrane permeability and the presence of efflux pump. Some species of soil bacteria oxidize or degrade indole [42–43]. The enzymes catalyzing these reactions are also considered potential indole-signaling inhibitors. Compared with these degradation and modification enzymes, AST-120 is relatively small and stable.
However, tryptophan metabolites, including indole, also have beneficial aspects for host cells, therefore AST-120 may interfere with their beneficial actions. Studies in mice showed that low levels of indole alleviate liver and colonic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [44–45]. Several Clostridium species, such as C. sporogenes, produce indole propionic acid (IPA) from tryptophan [46]. IPA promotes intestinal barrier function via activation of pregnane X receptor (PXR) while helping protect host cells from oxidative damage by scavenging hydroxyl radicals [47–48]. Tryptamine produced by C. sporogenes and Ruminococcus gnavus acts on enterochromaffin cells, inducing the release of 5-hydroxytryptamin, (5-HT) which stimulates gastrointestinal motility [49–50]. Treatment with indole-3-carboxaldehyde (ICA) limits gut epithelial damage, reduces transepithelial bacterial translocation, and decreases inflammatory cytokine production [51]. Therefore, to enhance the potential efficacy of AST-120 therapy, establishing a method that minimizes interference of the beneficial effects caused by tryptophan metabolites may be important.
We note that AST-120 adsorbs some kinds of antimicrobial agents, such as aztreonam and ciprofloxacin which are commonly used to treat of E. coli infections. However, fosfomycin, colistin, rifampicin, and aminoglycosides are still not adsorbed by AST-120. Although fosfomycin is an old-generated antibiotic, it recently has attracted attention as a “last resort drug” to treat multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens [52]. Increasingly, pathogenic E. coli clones that are resistant to quinolones and β-lactams, including carbapenem, have becomes a critical issue in clinical settings. Therefore, AST-120 may offer a potential benefit by helping fosfomycin therapy treat E. coli infections.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript.
Funding Statement
The authors, Dr. Uchida and Dr. Nishijima belong to a commercial company, Kureha corp. They contributed to the study design, data interpretation and providing the AST-120 material in addition to financial support (20,000 dollars) to perform experiments and publish the results, but not salaries for authors as the funder. We believe that the financial support should be reasonable value, and I suggest that they did not directly participate in data collection. HH was supported by JSPS KAKENHI “Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) Grant Number 19K07533 (https://www.jsps.go.jp/) and HT was supported by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED Grant Number 19fk0108061h0502 (https://www.amed.go.jp/en/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Bush K, Bradford PA. Interplay between beta-lactamases and new beta-lactamase inhibitors. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019; 17:295–306. 10.1038/s41579-019-0159-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kufel WD, Devanathan AS, Marx AH, Weber DJ, Daniels LM. Bezlotoxumab: A Novel Agent for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection. Pharmacotherapy. 2017; 37:1298–1308. 10.1002/phar.1990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brauner A, Fridman O, Gefen O, Balaban NQ. Distinguishing between resistance, tolerance and persistence to antibiotic treatment. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016; 14:320–330. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Windels EM, Michiels JE, Van den Bergh B, Fauvart M, Michiels J. Antibiotics: Combatting Tolerance To Stop Resistance. mBio. 2019; 10: e02095–19. 10.1128/mBio.02095-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Parsek MR, Greenberg EP. Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 2005; 13:27–33. 10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hirakawa H, Tomita H. Interference of bacterial cell-to-cell communication: a new concept of antimicrobial chemotherapy breaks antibiotic resistance. Front Microbiol. 2013; 4:114 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bassler BL. Small talk. Cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Cell. 2002; 109: 421–424. 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00749-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fuqua WC, Winans SC, Greenberg EP. Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. J Bacteriol. 1994; 176:269–275. 10.1128/jb.176.2.269-275.1994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang D, Ding X, Rather PN. Indole can act as an extracellular signal in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2001; 183:4210–4216. 10.1128/JB.183.14.4210-4216.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lee JH, Wood TK, Lee J. Roles of indole as an interspecies and interkingdom signaling molecule. Trends Microbiol. 2015; 23:707–718. 10.1016/j.tim.2015.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang W, Yamasaki R, Song S, Wood TK. Interkingdom signal indole inhibits Pseudomonas aeruginosa persister cell waking. J Appl Microbiol. 2019; 127:1768–1775. 10.1111/jam.14434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang Y, Tian T, Zhang J, Jin X, Yue H, Zhang XH, et al. Indole Reverses Intrinsic Antibiotic Resistance by Activating a Novel Dual-Function Importer. mBio. 2019; 10:e00676–19 10.1128/mBio.00676-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hirakawa H, Inazumi Y, Masaki T, Hirata T, Yamaguchi A. Indole induces the expression of multidrug exporter genes in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2005; 55:1113–1126. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04449.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hirakawa H, Kodama T, Takumi-Kobayashi A, Honda T, Yamaguchi A. Secreted indole serves as a signal for expression of type III secretion system translocators in enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Microbiology. 2009; 155:541–550. 10.1099/mic.0.020420-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kurabayashi K, Hirakawa Y, Tanimoto K, Tomita H, Hirakawa H. Role of the CpxAR two-component signal transduction system in control of fosfomycin resistance and carbon substrate uptake. J Bacteriol. 2014; 196:248–256. 10.1128/JB.01151-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Leong SC, Sirich TL. Indoxyl Sulfate-Review of Toxicity and Therapeutic Strategies. Toxins (Basel). 2016; 8(12):358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Niwa T. Role of indoxyl sulfate in the progression of chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease: experimental and clinical effects of oral sorbent AST-120. Ther Apher Dial. 2011; 15:120–124. 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2010.00882.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Deguchi T, Ohtsuki S, Otagiri M, Takanaga H, Asaba H, Mori S, et al. Major role of organic anion transporter 3 in the transport of indoxyl sulfate in the kidney. Kidney Int. 2002; 61:1760–1768. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00318.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sun CY, Hsu HH, Wu MS. p-Cresol sulfate and indoxyl sulfate induce similar cellular inflammatory gene expressions in cultured proximal renal tubular cells. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013; 28:70–78. 10.1093/ndt/gfs133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ueda H, Shibahara N, Takagi S, Inoue T, Katsuoka Y. AST-120, an oral adsorbent, delays the initiation of dialysis in patients with chronic kidney diseases. Ther Apher Dial. 2007; 11:189–195. 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2007.00430.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Niwa T, Yazawa T, Ise M, Sugano M, Kodama T, Uehara Y, et al. Inhibitory effect of oral sorbent on accumulation of albumin-bound indoxyl sulfate in serum of experimental uremic rats. Nephron. 1991; 57:84–88. 10.1159/000186222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kurabayashi K, Hirakawa Y, Tanimoto K, Tomita H, Hirakawa H. Identification of a second two-component signal transduction system that controls fosfomycin tolerance and glycerol-3-phosphate uptake. J Bacteriol. 2015; 197:861–871. 10.1128/JB.02491-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Elledge SJ, Davis RW. Position and density effects on repression by stationary and mobile DNA-binding proteins. Genes Dev. 1989; 3:185–197. 10.1101/gad.3.2.185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Blattner FR, Plunkett G 3rd, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M, et al. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science. 1997; 277:1453–1462. 10.1126/science.277.5331.1453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Casadaban MJ. Transposition and fusion of the lac genes to selected promoters in Escherichia coli using bacteriophage lambda and Mu. J Mol Biol. 1976; 104: 541–555. 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90119-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hayashi T, Makino K, Ohnishi M, Kurokawa K, Ishii K, Yokoyama K, et al. Complete genome sequence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 and genomic comparison with a laboratory strain K-12. DNA Res. 2001; 8:11–22. 10.1093/dnares/8.1.11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kobayashi A, Hirakawa H, Hirata T, Nishino K, Yamaguchi A. Growth phase-dependent expression of drug exporters in Escherichia coli and its contribution to drug tolerance. J Bacteriol. 2006; 188:5693–5703. 10.1128/JB.00217-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hirakawa H, Kurabayashi K, Tanimoto K, Tomita H. Oxygen Limitation Enhances the Antimicrobial Activity of Fosfomycin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Following Overexpression of glpT Which Encodes Glycerol-3-Phosphate/Fosfomycin Symporter. Front Microbiol. 2018; 9:1950 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nishino K, Yamada J, Hirakawa H, Hirata T, Yamaguchi A. Roles of TolC-dependent multidrug transporters of Escherichia coli in resistance to beta-lactams. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003; 47:3030–3033. 10.1128/AAC.47.9.3030-3033.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nishino K, Yamaguchi A. Analysis of a complete library of putative drug transporter genes in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2001; 183:5803–5812. 10.1128/JB.183.20.5803-5812.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kodama T, Akeda Y, Kono G, Takahashi A, Imura K, Iida T, et al. The EspB protein of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli interacts directly with alpha-catenin. Cell Microbiol. 2002; 4:213–222. 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2002.00176.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gelasco AK, Raymond JR. Indoxyl sulfate induces complex redox alterations in mesangial cells. Am. J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006; 290:F1551–1558. 10.1152/ajprenal.00281.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lekawanvijit S, Kompa AR, Manabe M, Wang BH, Langham RG, Nishijima F, et al. Chronic Kidney Disease-Induced Cardiac Fibrosis Is Ameliorated by Reducing Circulating Levels of a Non-Dialysable Uremic Toxin, Indoxyl Sulfate. PLoS One. 2012; 7(7):e41281 10.1371/journal.pone.0041281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yamamoto S, Zuo YQ, Ma J, Yancey PG, Hunley TE, Motojima M, et al. Oral activated charcoal adsorbent (AST-120) ameliorates extent and instability of atherosclerosis accelerated by kidney disease in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2011; 26:2491–2497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lee JH, Lee J. Indole as an intercellular signal in microbial communities. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2010; 34:426–444. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00204.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Darkoh C, Chappell C, Gonzales C, Okhuysen P. A Rapid and Specific Method for the Detection of Indole in Complex Biological Samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015; 81:8093–8097. 10.1128/AEM.02787-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mueller RS, Beyhan S, Saini SG, Yildiz FH, Bartlett DH. Indole Acts as an Extracellular Cue Regulating Gene Expression in Vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol. 2009; 191:3504–3516. 10.1128/JB.01240-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nikaido E, Yamaguchi A, Nishino K. AcrAB multidrug efflux pump regulation in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium by RamA in response to environmental signals. J Biol Chem. 2008; 283:24245–24253. 10.1074/jbc.M804544200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lee JH, Cho HS, Kim Y, Kim JA, Banskota S, Cho MH, et al. Indole and 7-benzyloxyindole attenuate the virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013; 97:4543–4552. 10.1007/s00253-012-4674-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chu W, Zere TR, Weber MM, Wood TK, Whiteley M, Hidalgo-Romano B, et al. Indole production promotes Escherichia coli mixed-culture growth with Pseudomonas aeruginosa by inhibiting quorum signaling. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012; 78:411–419. 10.1128/AEM.06396-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kato N, Morohoshi T, Nozawa T, Matsumoto H, Ikeda T. Control of gram-negative bacterial quorum sensing with cyclodextrin immobilized cellulose ether gel. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem. 2006; 56:55–59. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fishman A, Tao Y, Rui L, Wood TK. Controlling the regiospecific oxidation of aromatics via active site engineering of toluene para-monooxygenase of Ralstonia pickettii PKO1. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280:506–514. 10.1074/jbc.M410320200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yin B, Gu JD, Wan NS. Degradation of indole by enrichment culture and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Gs isolated from mangrove sediment. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2005; 56:243–248. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Beaumont M, Neyrinck AM, Olivares M, Rodriguez J, de Rocca Serra A, Roumain M, et al. The gut microbiota metabolite indole alleviates liver inflammation in mice. FASEB J. 2018; 32(12):6681–6693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Whitfield-Cargile CM, Cohen ND, Chapkin RS, Weeks BR, Davidson LA, Goldsby JS, et al. The microbiota-derived metabolite indole decreases mucosal inflammation and injury in a murine model of NSAID enteropathy. Gut Microbes. 2016; 7:246–261. 10.1080/19490976.2016.1156827 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dodd D, Spitzer MH, Van Treuren W, Merrill BD, Hryckowian AJ, Higginbottom SK, et al. A gut bacterial pathway metabolizes aromatic amino acids into nine circulating metabolites. Nature. 2017; 551(7682):648–652. 10.1038/nature24661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chyan YJ, Poeggeler B, Omar RA, Chain DG, Frangione B, Ghiso J, et al. Potent neuroprotective properties against the Alzheimer beta-amyloid by an endogenous melatonin-related indole structure, indole-3-propionic acid. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274:21937–21942. 10.1074/jbc.274.31.21937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Venkatesh M, Mukherjee S, Wang H, Li H, Sun K, Benechet AP, et al. Symbiotic bacterial metabolites regulate gastrointestinal barrier function via the xenobiotic sensor PXR and Toll-like receptor 4. Immunity. 2014; 41:296–310. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mawe GM, Hoffman JM. Serotonin signalling in the gut-functions, dysfunctions and therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 10:473–486. 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Takaki M, Mawe GM, Barasch JM, Gershon MD, Gershon MD. Physiological-Responses of Guinea-Pig Myenteric Neurons Secondary to the Release of Endogenous Serotonin by Tryptamine. Neuroscience. 1985; 16(1):223–240. 10.1016/0306-4522(85)90059-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Swimm A, Giver CR, DeFilipp Z, Rangaraju S, Sharma A, Ulezko Antonova A, et al. Indoles derived from intestinal microbiota act via type I interferon signaling to limit graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2018; 132:2506–2519. 10.1182/blood-2018-03-838193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Michalopoulos AS, Livaditis IG, Gougoutas V. The revival of fosfomycin. Int J Infect Dis. 2011; 15:E732–E739. 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]