Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-018-26623-x, published online 31 May 2018
This Article contains typographical errors.
In the Discussion section,
“The sequencing data were considered of high quality (i.e. the average probability of a wrong base call is less than one in 16,000).”
should read:
“The sequencing data were considered of high quality (i.e. the average probability of a wrong base call is less than one in 6,250).”
In the Acknowledgements section,
“Vicent Wen, PhD”
should read:
“Vicent Wen, MSc”