Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2013 Oct 8:1185–1265. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-01219-8_47

Acute Neonatal Respiratory Failure

Desmond Bohn 2,✉, Peter A Dargaville 3,✉, Peter G Davis 4,✉, Alastair A Hutchison 5,6,✉, Louise S Owen 4,✉
Editor: Peter C Rimensberger*
PMCID: PMC7193706

Abstract

Acute respiratory failure requiring assisted ventilation is one of the most common reasons for admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. Respiratory failure is the inability to maintain either normal delivery of oxygen to the tissues or normal removal of carbon dioxide from the tissues. It occurs when there is an imbalance between the respiratory workload and ventilatory strength and endurance. Definitions are somewhat arbitrary but suggested laboratory criteria for respiratory failure include two or more of the following: PaCO2 > 60 mmHg, PaO2 < 50 mmHg or O2 saturation <80 % with an FiO2 of 1.0 and pH < 7.25 (Wen et al. 2004).

Respiratory Failure of Non-pulmonary Origin

Apnoea of Prematurity

Alastair A. Hutchison

Educational Aims

  • To describe the key features of the central control of breathing, the coordinated output to the motor effectors, the resultant mechanical events resulting in ventilation and the nature of the nervous and chemical feedbacks to the controller

  • To describe the importance of behavioural state in fetal ‘breathing’

  • To describe apnoea in terms of breathing homoeostasis and its limits

  • To describe apnoea of prematurity, its different categories and its association with oxygen desaturation and bradycardia and thus potentially with life-threatening tissue hypoxia

  • To describe the pathophysiology of apnoea of prematurity in terms of the central circuitry and its outputs, the responses to blood gases, the associated reflex bradycardia, the motor responses to afferent inputs and the upper airway protective and exaggerated responses

  • To describe the clinical presentation and differential diagnosis of apnoea of prematurity

  • To describe the avoidance of clinical factors that can aggravate apnoea of prematurity and its non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies

  • To describe the specifics of caffeine therapy including recommended dosages, efficacy, cessation of therapy and benefits on long-term outcome

  • To describe the natural history of apnoea of prematurity, the preparation for safe discharge home, the indications for home monitoring and the lack of a firm association with SIDS

  • To describe the concerns about long-term morbidity with recurrent preterm apnoea and the advisability of follow-up care

Introduction

When you can’t breathe, nothing else matters. – American Lung Association Motto.

Breathing, Central Control and Fetal Development

Breathing consists of motor acts that enable tidal ventilation for gas exchange. Immediately at birth the newborn employs intricate breathing patterns that establish and maintain airway volume and attain ventilation. Thereafter, throughout life the normal breathing pattern, eupnoea, can be gentle tidal breathing that is involuntary and hardly sensed, but many other breathing patterns are employed in normal conditions. Thus, an expanded view of normal breathing is that it consists of centrally controlled coordinated muscular activities which aim to ensure that the airway is protected and has optimal supra- and sub-glottic volumes to maintain homoeostasis and provide a stable platform to enable ventilation with ensuing efficient gas exchange and transport (Hutchison 2007). Normal breathing involves central coordination with other motor acts, e.g. swallowing, speech and walking.

Breathing control is primarily determined by the intrinsic nature of the central nervous system (CNS) controller and is modified by integration of all inputs (Fig. 47.5). Two features of central control deserve emphasis. There is a redundancy to the circuitry, with alternative drives and pathways, and there is a motor control hierarchy: rapid airway protection takes precedence over control of absolute airway volume, which in turn takes precedence over relative tidal volume changes. Control of breathing is exercised by the coordinated activities of the nasal, pharyngeal, laryngeal and pump muscles which, in concert with lower airway smooth muscle tone that adjusts airway wall stiffness, alter the transairway pressure gradients. The result is that tidal ventilation occurs simultaneously with the control of total airway volume, which adjusts airway pressure critical for patency, central feedback and likely drive threshold (Adrian 1933). Airway and chest wall neural feedback is rapid (milliseconds) and crucial for homoeostasis, enabling the controller to adjust flow within a breath and match motor outputs with the structural characteristics of the different parts of the respiratory system and their associated mechanics. Feedback from blood gaseous and chemical sensors occurs within seconds.

…thoracic gymnastics in preparation for the great extrauterine function of atmospheric respiration. – John W. Ballantyne, 1902.

Fig. 47.5.

Fig. 47.5

Open in a new tab

Breathing control. This diagram of the central control of breathing shows its functions both in enabling ventilation with gas exchange and the simultaneous maintenance of airway patency and respiratory system homoeostasis. The central generation and formation of motor breathing patterns involve integration of all sensory inputs in a hierarchical manner

Fetal ‘breathing’ develops when gas exchange is placental and blood oxygen tension is low. Central state is a dominant factor. In fetal sheep, in the high-voltage state, phasic diaphragmatic activity is absent and laryngeal narrowing occurs (Harding 1994). In the low-voltage state, the laryngeal and diaphragmatic activities pattern is similar to that seen postnatally. Both state-related fetal ‘breathing’ patterns are important for lung growth (Harding 1994). Fetal hypercapnia augments ‘breathing’ muscle activities mainly in the low-voltage state (Harding 1994). In contrast, hypoxia, acting at a pontine site, inhibits fetal diaphragmatic activity in the low-voltage state (Harding 1994).

Apnoea, Breathing and Apnoea: A Spectrum of Homoeostasis and Limits

Apnoea is a lack of tidal airflow. Transient lacks of airflow are seen in patterns with glottic closure, e.g. during swallowing, defecating, lifting, coughing, yawning, crying or vocalising. Apnoea occurs with a minimal fall in the carbon dioxide tension (PCO2) to below the apnoeic threshold (Khan et al. 2005). Brief apnoeas are typified by the brain’s subsequent ability to return quickly to muscle activities that ventilate the airway. Clinical apnoea is a persistent lack of airflow without a spontaneous return to breathing.

Breathing patterns and apnoea can be viewed as a spectrum/continuum (Fig. 47.6). Throughout life, rapid changes in pattern are dependent upon the status of the central circuitry, its response hierarchy and its different inputs. Central setting of optimal homoeostatic limits must vary constantly with inputs sensing changes in growth and in the individual’s internal and external environments. It is speculated that during sleep, ‘virtual’ central conditions allow the limits to be reset/tuned (Hutchison 2007).

Fig. 47.6.

Fig. 47.6

Open in a new tab

Spectrum of breathing and apnoea. This diagram shows the spectrum of breathing patterns used in daily life including coordination with complex acts such as swallowing and coughing. A centrally controlled pattern switch can rapidly alter the breathing patterns from ones typified in expiration by a more open glottis to ones characterised by a more closed glottis. This occurs transiently in airway volume maintenance, airway protection and speech and is determined by central drive/status and afferent inputs. Expiratory laryngeal closure increases as central drive decreases. It is postulated that in mixed apnoea a switch from central apnoea to obstructive apnoea accompanies a progressive decrease in central drive and that this may be enhanced by a decrease in airway volume during central apnoea with an open glottis

Apnoea of Prematurity

. . . They seem to do the most unreasonable things with their respiration . . . – Kenneth Cross, 1954

Definition and Types of Apnoea

Apnoea of prematurity is associated with physiological characteristics and pathological conditions found in the preterm infant born at <37 completed postmenstrual weeks. Its incidence is inversely related to gestational age (Henderson-Smart 1981). Brief cessations of airflow lasting a few seconds are common in sleep and may represent a transient return to fetal life. Apnoea demanding attention and meriting the clinical diagnosis of apnoea of prematurity is that lasting 15–20 s or that accompanied by bradycardia, cyanosis or pallor. Apnoea is categorised into different types. Central apnoea (incidence ~10–25 %) is a lack of tidal airflow accompanied by a lack of pump muscle activity (with or without an open glottis). Obstructive apnoea (~10–20 %) is an absence of tidal airflow accompanied by upper airway obstruction, which can commence in expiration and continue despite pump muscle activity and in the subsequent neural expiration. Mixed apnoea (~50–75 %) is both central and obstructive apnoeas occurring serially, usually in that order. Bradycardia (heart rate <100/min) usually follows the onset of apnoea of prematurity. Oxygen saturation values fall (<85 %) and can produce cyanosis. An associated pallor can indicate the occurrence of a dive reflex response with preferential blood flow to the heart, brain and adrenals but diminished blood flow to other important organs, e.g. the gut. The newborn brain is more tolerant than the adult to hypoxia, but if apnoea is ongoing, death results.

Pathophysiology
Central Circuitry and Output Determinants

Rostral and caudal CNS structures influence the control of breathing patterns (Feldman and Del Negro 2006; Rybak et al. 2008). Lesioning studies in animals have identified that, at a minimum, eupnoea requires a pontomedullary neuronal network (Rybak et al. 2008). When both upper pontine respiratory neuronal groups (PRG) and vagal afferents are removed, the lower pontine-medullary output is apneusis, a pattern typified by prolonged inspiratory drive. The generation of signals for coordination of laryngeal and diaphragmatic activities appears to be dependent upon an intact lower pons (Hutchison and Speck 2003). Inspiratory and pre-inspiratory neurons involved in rhythm generation have been identified in the ventral medullary pre-Bötzinger and parafacial regions, respectively. Neurons in the Bötzinger complex exert mainly expiratory control (Feldman and Del Negro 2006). Specific types of premotor medullary neurons have been classified by their signal shapes and timings. Their actions result in a central breathing cycle consisting of three phases: inspiration, post-inspiration and expiration (Feldman and Del Negro 2006). Mechanical changes following these outputs are seen well in grunting (see Sect. 10.1007/978-3-642-01219-8_4). Protective, mechanical and speech-related changes occur quickly within a breath; thus, phase-switching and pattern-switching neurons are important (Rybak et al. 2008) (Fig. 47.6).

Apnoea of prematurity is associated with incomplete brain development, including decreased cell synapses, dendrites, myelinisation and brainstem conduction (Darnall et al. 2006). Gene abnormalities are reported in the central hypoventilation syndrome (Abu-Shaweesh and Martin 2008). Neurotransmitters (γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), adenosine, prostaglandin E, serotonin, endorphins, catecholamines, glutamate) affect respiratory-related neuronal function (Darnall et al. 2006). The neurochemistry in preterm infants favours neuronal inhibition over excitation. In animals, prostaglandin E production can be triggered by the cytokine IL-1β, while adenosine stimulates GABA production (Abu-Shaweesh and Martin 2008). Metabolism is increased by hyperthermia and decreased by hypothermia. Both hypothermia and hyperthermia can decrease breathing, suggesting that hypothermia decreases excitation more than inhibition and that hyperthermia augments the dominant intrinsic inhibitory pathways and their inputs. Thus, the importance of temperature homoeostasis is emphasised.

Central apnoea may result from altered PRG input (Hutchison and Speck 2003). When the PRG is removed from decerebrate cats, the response to an expiratory airway load is a pattern similar to central apnoea with an open glottis. In this circumstance, expiratory flow will occur passively until the relaxation volume (Vr) is reached (see Chap. 10.1007/978-3-642-01219-8_4, Fig. 10.1007/978-3-642-01219-8_4_Fig6). Preterm infants actively maintain sub-glottic volume above their low Vr when awake, but during central sleep apnoeas the sub-glottic volume can decrease. This is especially seen in REM sleep when all types of apnoeas are more common and longer and can be associated with profound bradycardia. Central apnoea with glottic closure can also occur, e.g. in some human newborns who are depressed at birth, in preterm lambs (Praud and Reix 2005) and in gasping animals with exposure to acute cerebral hypoxia/ischaemia (Hutchison et al. 2002). Gasping is typified by short diaphragmatic bursts and long expirations with glottic closure. Initially, this incremental breathing pattern (see Sect. 10.1007/978-3-642-01219-8_4) maintains sub-glottic volume, which is probably critical in autoresuscitation (Hutchison et al. 2002). In lambs, when central depression results in prolonged expiratory apnoea, glottic adductor activity persists until all muscle activity ceases (Praud and Reix 2005). During mixed apnoea, obstructive upper airway closure commences before diaphragmatic activity and its associated fall in airway pressure (Idiong et al. 1998) and thus appears to be due to centrally altered laryngeal or pharyngeal muscle activities (Idiong et al. 1998; Upton et al. 1992). Obstructive apnoea is due to insufficient pharyngeal opening pressure, which reflects an imbalance between factors that decrease pharyngeal patency (see Sect. 10.1007/978-3-642-01219-8_4) and the central motor output that dictates a compensatory increase in muscle tone. In the preterm infant, pharyngeal collapse can occur passively with neck flexion or actively in sleep, when pharyngeal wall muscle tone can be low (Thach and Stark 1979). Expiratory laryngeal closure, triggered by a low lung volume, could play a role by reducing intrapharyngeal pressure below its critical value for patency.

Central Responses to Blood Gases and Apnoea of Prematurity

Throughout life, hypocarbia decreases the central drive to breathe (Khan et al. 2005), and during the associated hypopnoea/apnoea, laryngeal adductor activity (glottic closure) is found (Jounieaux et al. 1995; Kuna et al. 1993). The apnoeic threshold is higher in preterm infants with apnoea (Gerhardt and Bancalari 1984), making apnoea more likely with a fall in PCO2, e.g. with normal activity, sighing. Hypercapnia increases ventilation, but the response is depressed by accompanying hypoxia (Rigatto 1986) and can be accompanied by expiratory laryngeal closure (Eichenwald et al. 1993). At high PCO2 levels apnoea can occur (Alvaro et al. 1992). Marked hypercapnia may act via central inhibition of respiratory muscle output and/or by inducing chest wall distortion that can trigger apnoea with laryngeal closure. The preterm infant’s response to hypoxaemia may or may not start with a transient increase in ventilation, which, if present, is dependent upon carotid body integrity. A decrease in central output to the diaphragm follows; this decrease is attenuated in non-rapid eye movement sleep (Rigatto 1986). Hypoxia can result in periodic breathing and then apnoea (Rigatto 1986). The responsiveness of the carotid body is depressed after birth but recovers within 2 weeks (Abu-Shaweesh and Martin 2008). Repeated exposure to hypoxaemia postnatally may augment the carotid body sensitivity to hypoxaemia with a resultant hyperventilation, followed by hypocarbia and decreased ventilation (Al-Matary et al. 2004; Nock et al. 2004). These cycles may produce periodic breathing and apnoea. However, prenatal exposure to cigarette smoke may diminish the response to hypoxaemia (Gauda et al. 2004; Schneider et al. 2008), and exposure to hyperoxia at critical periods of development can inhibit carotid body development in animals (Gauda et al. 2004). Diminished stimulatory responses to hypoxaemia have been found in preterm infants (Gauda et al. 2004). Thus, central integration of both increased and decreased carotid body inputs may promote apnoea (Gauda et al. 2004).

Sinus Arrhythmia and Reflex Bradycardia

Vagal cardiac efferent output decreases in inspiration when airway vagal afferent input increases. Therefore, heart rate increases during inspiration, while it slows during expiration – sinus arrhythmia. The heart rate changes help maintain a constancy of cardiac output and blood pressure. Augmented ventilation in respiratory distress can produce cardiac output volume swings detected as pulsus paradoxus (Goldstein and Brazy 1990). During apnoea, vagal afferent input falls and vagal cardiac efferent output increases; thus, the onset of bradycardia can be immediate. Bradycardia in older preterm infants with apnoea follows the onset of a decrease in oxygen saturation, reflecting the importance of central integration of vagal afferent and chemoreceptor inputs (Poets 2003) (see Sects. 10.1007/978-3-642-01219-8_4 and 47.3.1.2.2.5). Vagal efferent activity occurs in swallowing, urinating and defecating and can be accompanied by bradycardia.

Motor Responses to Chest Wall and Airway Inputs

Active maintenance of sub-glottic volume is noted in the newborn, whose elastic chest wall is ideal for growth and atraumatic birth. Chest wall distortion, inward movement that threatens airway volume, occurs easily and stimulates chest wall afferents that inhibit phrenic activity (intercostal-phrenic reflex) and/or produce glottic closure. Newborn infant motor responses to vagal afferents are easily elicited (Thach 2001). Lower airway slowly adapting receptors (SARs) detect within-breath volume/stretch, while rapidly adapting irritant receptors (RARs) detect distortion/deflation. C-fibre receptors, associated with the pulmonary vasculature, detect chemical changes. In animals, the SAR inputs stimulate the chest wall and diaphragmatic pump muscles during inspiration until peak afferent activity is reached when inspiration is inhibited. Increased vagal afferent feedback accompanies a large inflation and triggers expiratory apnoea – the Hering-Breuer inflation reflex, a response modulated by airway CO2 in animals. After a large inflation, abdominal expiratory muscle activity is triggered – the Hering-Breuer expiration reflex. Prevention of inspiration by airway occlusion causes a fall in upper and lower airway vagal input, prolonging inspiration. During partial vagal blockade, inflation produces a second inspiratory effort – Head’s paradoxical reflex. Prevention of expiration by airway occlusion maintains vagal afferent input, thus prolonging expiratory time. In adult animals, when airway volume is considerably reduced, irritant receptor stimulation triggers an inspiration – the Hering-Breuer deflation reflex. However, irritant receptor input in preterm infants, with deflation or with tracheal stimulation, can result in apnoea (Fleming et al. 1978; Hannam et al. 1998). A cough response is only noted after 34 weeks postmenstrual age (Fleming et al. 1978).

The Hering-Breuer and Head reflexes may act to optimise lung inflation without tissue damage during inspiration and tailor expiratory time for a given expired volume. The stretch receptors may also act to increase central neuronal activity during expiration such that inspiration begins at a higher level of expiratory vagal input and thus peaks sooner, signalling an earlier cessation of tidal inspiration and promoting respiratory rate (Al-Matary et al. 2004). There is support for Head’s viewpoint. Infants use laryngeal and diaphragmatic means of maintaining higher absolute airway volumes and breathe faster (Sect. 10.1007/978-3-642-01219-8_4) (Thach 2001). In the preterm neonate, atelectasis/deflation post-extubation is associated with apnoea (Hannam et al. 1998). A lower end-expiratory volume (EEV) is noted in REM sleep and in apnoeic infants (Poets 2003). Furthermore, in lambs breathing through a tracheostomy, absence of laryngeal control of EEV is associated with apnoea (Johnson 1979). Airway pressure support after birth is the mainstay for reversal of apnoea and bradycardia, the latter being used in initial stabilisation as a sign to indicate the need for airway volume support. After birth, the intensivist employs the ‘open lung (airway) approach’ during artificial ventilation. Failure to maintain sub-glottic airway volume when the preterm infant is on a ventilator results in desaturation/bradycardia (Bolivar et al. 1995). This stresses that, when handling the endotracheal tube and/or moving the preterm infant’s thorax, the maintenance of sub-glottic airway volume is important.

Upper Airway Protective and Exaggerated Interactive Central Responses

Stimulation of protective receptors, e.g. laryngeal chemoreceptors with superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) afferents, can rapidly interrupt ventilation and close the larynx (Davies et al. 1988). In immature humans and animals, the SLN inputs can instigate apnoea and bradycardia, although a re-distribution of blood flow to the heart, brain and adrenals also occurs – the dive reflex response (Abu-Shaweesh and Martin 2008; Daly 1997). This response to SLN input decreases with advancing age but can be rekindled by a concurrent central depression or an upper airway infection (Daly 1997). The coexistence of central inhibition (e.g. with sedation or hypo-/hyperthermia), followed by SLN stimulation (e.g. at intubation) and then hypoxia, can produce an exaggerated and potentially lethal response, even in the adult (Daly 1997) (Sect. 10.1007/978-3-642-01219-8_4). This stresses the roles of central status and the motor response hierarchy in determining pattern (Fig. 47.7).

Fig. 47.7.

Fig. 47.7

Open in a new tab

Afferent interactions and the motor response hierarchy. This diagram illustrates how factors influencing motor pattern may interact. Sudden decreases in any excitatory input can alter the balance affecting the outputs to the heart, airway smooth muscle and laryngeal and diaphragmatic muscles producing a more protective pattern (right side of diagram). The motor response determining expiratory glottic closure is seen as being determined primarily by the central drive/status, amplified secondly by decreased or error signals in neural afferent inputs and amplified thirdly by input from carotid body stimulation. Thus, increased carotid body stimulation can amplify an existing pattern. By contrast, a sudden decrease in carotid body input can trigger a switch to a protective pattern. This provides a possible explanation for the proposed roles of both increased and decreased carotid body inputs in the genesis of apnoea with glottic closure. CNS central nervous system, CSN carotid sinus nerve, HR heart rate, Airway SM airway smooth muscle, PCA E expiratory posterior cricoarytenoid, TA E expiratory thyroarytenoid

Clinical Aspects
Presentation and Differential Diagnosis

Apnoea can present on the first day of life and is virtually universal in preterm infants born at <28 weeks gestational age (Fig. 47.8) (Henderson-Smart 1981). The severity of apnoea is defined by its duration, the degrees of associated oxygen desaturation and bradycardia, and the type of therapeutic intervention provided, from minimal stimulation to total respiratory support. The assessment of the apnoeic patient consists of the nose-to-diaphragm then the head-to-toe approach. Apnoea of prematurity is differentiated from periodic breathing, a repetitive series of pauses in breathing separated by a crescendo-decrescendo pattern of breaths. Periodic breathing in normal preterm infants is considered benign, but it can be associated with hypocarbia, hypoxia and CNS hypoxia/ischaemia and with a fall in sub-glottic airway volume (Khan et al. 2005; Rigatto 1986). Conditions resulting in apnoea, including structural lesions (Brazy et al. 1987), are considered before a diagnosis of idiopathic apnoea is made (Fig. 47.9). Upper airway contact with food or with gastric contents can result in apnoea, but episodes of gastroesophageal reflux do not appear to be temporally linked to apnoea. In animals, prior upper airway exposure to acid can alter the response to subsequent mechanical loads (Sant’Ambrogio et al. 1998). Thus, the clinical impression that the two are related may be indirect. Pre-existing anaemia exacerbates the apnoeic response to SLN stimulation in animals and is important in postoperative apnoea (Cote et al. 1995). However, blood transfusion therapy for apnoea of prematurity is debated.

Fig. 47.8.

Fig. 47.8

Open in a new tab

Incidence of apnoea of prematurity. The incidence of apnoea of prematurity increases inversely with the gestational age at birth, being virtually universal in the preterm infant <28 weeks (Modified and reproduced with permission from Henderson-Smart (1981))

Fig. 47.9.

Fig. 47.9

Open in a new tab

Aetiology of apnoea of prematurity. Multiple physiological and pathological conditions affect central nervous system (CNS) control and are associated with an increased propensity to apnoea of prematurity

Therapy

Specific therapy is given for the conditions listed in Fig. 47.9, e.g. a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) resulting in hypoxaemia and pulmonary oedema that can trigger lower airway receptors resulting in apnoea. Conditions that can enhance apnoea are avoided. Hyperoxia can diminish recovery from SLN stimulation in lambs and, with altered carotid chemosensitivity, will increase apnoea (Al-Matary et al. 2004). Careful attention is paid to nasal patency (secretions, proper prong size and attachment of nasal continuous airway positive pressure [NCPAP] device), environmental temperature, correct neck posture (neck flexion) and abdominal distention (air in the stomach, correct positioning of gastric tube, a tight diaper forcing abdominal contents into the chest). Apnoea and bradycardia or bradycardia alone during feeding is usually a benign condition that responds to cessation of the suck/swallow stimulus.

The importance of central ‘drive’ and airway stability/patency as causative factors in apnoea of prematurity is reflected in the main forms of therapy, namely, peripheral tactile stimulation, xanthine therapy and respiratory airway support (Table 47.2). Xanthine therapy primarily enhances central drive and treats central apnoea (Table 47.3), while NCPAP therapy maintains airway stability and thus prevents mixed apnoea (Miller and Martin 2004). However, caffeine therapy enhances breathing peripherally by improving diaphragmatic function, while NCPAP therapy enhances central drive by increasing airway vagal feedback and decreasing oxygen saturation variability that may stabilise carotid body feedback.

Table 47.2.

Therapies for apnoea of prematurity

Effective therapies for idiopathic apnoea Comments
Physiological stimulation
Tactile stimulation Used for minor apnoea
Air cushion Infrequently used
Inhaled low-concentration CO2 Experimental (Abu-Shaweesh and Martin 2008)
Pharmacologic stimulation

Xanthines

Caffeine used in recommendeddosing

Safe; serum concentration monitoring not needed; ↓ bronchopulmonary dysplasia and ↑ neurodevelopment

↓ Postoperative apnoea in former preterms up to ~60 postmenstrual weeks
Theophylline Bronchodilator properties may be useful
Doxapram In high dose ↑ seizures; rarely used
Respiratory support
Nasal cannulae: high flow Alternative to NCPAP but applied pressure not monitored; used in weaning from NCPAP
Nasal CPAP

Mainstay of therapy; modern device available with low work of breathing

Mixed apnoea > central apnoea
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation May be useful; more trials awaited
Invasive artificial ventilation Final resort: has risks of ‘endotrauma’
Open in a new tab
Table 47.3.

Caffeine effects and side effects

Effects Side effects
Competitive antagonism of adenosine receptors (A1 and A2a)

↑ Irritability (restlessness)

↑ Jitteriness
Inhibition of phosphodiesterase (minor) ↑ Seizure tendency
Mobilisation of cellular calcium (at high dose) ↑ Diuresis/dehydration

↑ Central ‘drive’: ↑ minute ventilation

↓ Threshold to hypercapnia

↑ Gastric aspirates

↑ GI intolerance (− gastric acid)
↑ Pulmonary blood flow; ↓ BPD ↑ Tachycardia,arrhythmias
↑ Skeletal muscle and myocardium activity ↑ Hyper-/hypoglycaemia
↑ Metabolism (− O2 consumption) ↑ Failure to gain weight
↑ Neurodevelopment (recommended doses) ↑ Sleeplessness
Open in a new tab

Despite appearing as a ‘simple’ therapy, NCPAP requires care in its application and excellent bedside monitoring and nursing (Hutchison and Bignall 2008). Laboratory and clinical studies strongly support the use of a modern NCPAP device (Hutchison and Bignall 2008; Pantalitschka et al. 2009). Weaning from NCPAP is little studied. In general, when an infant is receiving <30 % supplementary oxygen, a switch to high-flow nasal cannulae can be made. The advantage of nasal cannulae lies in their ease of use. The disadvantages are that the airway pressure they generate is not monitored and there may be increased infectious risks. Severe apnoea can warrant invasive mechanical ventilation but involves the complications of ‘endotrauma’ (Hutchison and Bignall 2008). There is interest in non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) for apnoea, and larger trials are awaited (Hutchison and Bignall 2008; Pantalitschka et al. 2009). Since coordination between the upper airway and pump muscles is critical, NIPPV is applied synchronously with the central outputs to the breathing muscles (Jounieaux et al. 1995); this may be difficult during sleep.

Caffeine therapy with a loading dose of 20 mg/kg followed by 5–6 mg/kg/day produces therapeutic serum concentrations (8–20 mcg/L) independent of the patients’ gestational age between 24 and 35 weeks and of their renal and liver functions over wide ranges (Leon et al. 2007). Thus, monitoring of serum caffeine concentrations is unnecessary if the recommended dosing is used. Tachycardia with caffeine can result from a pharmacodynamic effect. It resolves with cessation of therapy despite a normal serum concentration. Slightly higher and significantly higher caffeine dosing regimens have been used. The latter regimen increased successful weaning from a ventilator (Steer et al. 2003). Concerns about the extensive use of caffeine relate to its action as an antagonism of adenosine, a body-wide mediator of vasodilatation, which is involved in neurodevelopment. However, a controlled trial of early postnatal administration (<10 days) of caffeine versus placebo found that those receiving caffeine in recommended doses had less bronchopulmonary dysplasia (by 10 %) and improved cognitive outcome (by 5 %) (Schmidt et al. 2007; Schmidt et al. 2006b). Adenosine blockade may still be problematic. Caffeine therapy has been linked to necrotising enterocolitis, albeit weakly. Preterm infants are susceptible to white matter injury and thus at increased risk when cerebral blood flow is low (Darnall et al. 2006). If an infant on caffeine therapy develops hypocarbia during ventilatory support, any hypocarbia-associated decrease in cerebral perfusion may be aggravated.

Caffeine therapy is started regularly in infants born at <28 weeks gestational age, and in more mature infants, it is prescribed based upon an increased frequency of minor apnoea, the occurrence of severe apnoea or the presence of respiratory support. Cessation of caffeine therapy is attempted when the apnoea-free infant reaches 32 weeks postmenstrual age. This is successful ~80 % of the time (Spitzer 2002) ensuring a sufficient period for caffeine elimination prior to a hospital discharge decision. Recurrence of apnoea off caffeine may indicate that the apnoea is not idiopathic, e.g. infection related (Darnall et al. 1997).

Natural History/Discharge/Home Monitoring

The duration of apnoea is inversely related to the postmenstrual age at birth. In general, apnoea is absent by 37–40 weeks in those born at >28 weeks postmenstrual age (Darnall et al. 1997; Eichenwald et al. 1997). By contrast, for those born at <28 weeks, apnoea can persist up to 44 weeks postmenstrual age (Darnall et al. 1997; Eichenwald et al. 1997). Home monitoring is indicated under certain circumstances (Table 47.4). There is no evidence for an association between apnoea of prematurity and SIDS, nor has monitoring for apnoea of prematurity been shown to affect the incidence of SIDS (Darnall et al. 2006). If caffeine therapy has been discontinued and the infant has been free of apnoea and bradycardia for 5–7 days, then discharge is not delayed and home monitoring is not prescribed. Infants should adopt a ‘back to sleep’ posture prior to discharge and be tested in a car seat. Families should receive regular SIDS counselling advice, including the avoidance of sleeping in situations where the infant can be compressed or have their upper airway blocked.

Table 47.4.

Indications for home monitoring

Persistent apnoea and bradycardia (43 weeks)
Apnoea and bradycardia with gastroesophageal reflux
Apnoea and bradycardia with other pathology
Xanthine therapy
Home oxygen – bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Tracheostomy
Home ventilator
Open in a new tab
Prognosis/Follow-Up

Recurrent preterm apnoea may result in short-term and/or long-term morbidity (Abu-Shaweesh and Martin 2008; Darnall et al. 1997). However, no definitive proof exists that apnoea of prematurity per se causes neurodevelopmental delay, as it is almost impossible to control for the multiple confounding intrinsic and extrinsic factors that can influence brain development in the neonatal period and thereafter. Ongoing apnoea in infancy requires investigation and treatment. Follow-up of high-risk preterm infants and provision of required interventions and educational assistance are advised.

Essentials to Remember

  • Breathing consists of motor acts that enable ventilation and maintain airway stability.

  • Breathing muscle activities can alter rapidly to ensure airway protection or coordinate with other simultaneous motor functions. Afferent inputs monitor breathing rapidly.

  • Breathing patterns and apnoea can be viewed as a spectrum.

  • Apnoea, a lack of tidal airflow, can be physiological or pathological.

  • Apnoea of prematurity is categorised into central, mixed and obstructive types. It is often accompanied by bradycardia and oxygen desaturation. Thus, severe apnoea is life-threatening.

  • Apnoea results from changes in the central outputs to the muscles of breathing and changes induced by altered intrinsic/extrinsic, central/peripheral and neural/chemical inputs.

  • Apnoea is exaggerated when upper airway afferents are stimulated during central depression. This can be evident during intubation of the sedated patient.

  • Conditions associated with clinical apnoea are excluded before a diagnosis of idiopathic apnoea of prematurity is made.

  • Apnoea can recur postoperatively in former preterm infants up to ~60 postmenstrual weeks, and this is exaggerated with anaemia. Perioperative caffeine therapy may prevent this apnoea.

  • Management includes avoiding factors that trigger apnoea and non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies, the latter usually with caffeine which, using recommended dosing, has short-term and long-term respiratory and neurodevelopmental benefits.

  • Knowledge of the natural history of apnoea of prematurity and caffeine pharmacokinetics allows for the planning of safe home discharge and home monitoring, if required.

  • Follow-up for interim medical care and neurodevelopmental evaluation is advised.

Acknowledgements The author thanks L.S. Segers, PhD; B.G. Lindsey, PhD; B.M. Schnapf, DO; and F. Marchal, MD, for critical review and J.D. Carver, PhD, and M-F. Hutchison, MA, for editorial input.

Contributor Information

Peter C. Rimensberger, Phone: 22382 4323, FAX: 22382 4675, Email: peter.rimensberger@hcuge.ch

Desmond Bohn, Email: desmond.bohn@criticall.org.

Peter A. Dargaville, Email: peter.dargaville@dhhs.tas.gov.au

Peter G. Davis, Email: pgd@unimelb.edu.au

Alastair A. Hutchison, Email: ahutchi2@health.usf.edu, Email: aahutch@msn.com

Louise S. Owen, Email: owen@thewomens.org.au

References

  1. Abu-Osba YK. Treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: update. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:74–77. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.1_spec_no.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abu-Shaweesh JM, Martin RJ. Neonatal apnea: what’s new? Pediatr Pulmonol. 2008;43:937–944. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams FH, Fujiwara T, Emmanouilides GC, Raiha N. Lung phospholipids of human fetuses and infants with and without hyaline membrane disease. J Pediatr. 1970;77(5):833–841. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(70)80244-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adrian ED. Afferent impulses in the vagus and their effect on respiration. J Physiol. 1933;79:332–358. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1933.sp003053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aghai ZH, Saslow JG, Nakhla T, Milcarek B, Hart J, Lawrysh-Plunkett R, et al. Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) decreases work of breathing (WOB) in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006;41(9):875–881. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Aghajafari F, Murphy K, Matthews S, Ohlsson A, Amankwah K, Hannah M. Repeated doses of antenatal corticosteroids in animals: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(4):843–849. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.121624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ahluwalia JS, White DK, Morley CJ. Infant Flow Driver or single prong nasal continuous positive airway pressure: short-term physiological effects. Acta Paediatr. 1998;87(3):325–327. doi: 10.1080/08035259850157408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ali N, Claure N, Alegria X, D’Ugard C, Organero R, Bancalari E. Effects of non-invasive pressure support ventilation (NI-PSV) on ventilation and respiratory effort in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007;42(8):704–710. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Al-Matary A, Kutbi I, Qurashi M, Khalil M, Alvaro R, Kwiatkowski K, Cates D, Rigatto H. Increased peripheral chemoreceptor activity may be critical in destabilizing breathing in neonates. Semin Perinatol. 2004;28:264–272. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2004.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Al-Shanafey S, Giacomantonio M, Henteleff H. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: experience without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002;18(1):28–31. doi: 10.1007/s003830200006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Alvaro RE, Weintraub Z, Kwiatkowski K, Cates DB, Rigatto H. A respiratory sensory reflex in response to CO2 inhibits breathing in preterm infants. J Appl Physiol. 1992;73:1558–1563. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1992.73.4.1558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Aly H, Milner JD, Patel K, El-Mohandes AA. Does the experience with the use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure improve over time in extremely low birth weight infants? Pediatrics. 2004;114(3):697–702. doi: 10.1542/peds.2003-0572-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Aly H, Massaro AN, Hammad TA, Narang S, Essers J. Early nasal continuous positive airway pressure and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2009;124(1):205–210. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ambalavanan N, Carlo WA. Ventilatory strategies in the prevention and management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30(4):192–199. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ammari A, Suri M, Milisavljevic V, Sahni R, Bateman D, Sanocka U, et al. Variables associated with the early failure of nasal CPAP in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 2005;147(3):341–347. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.04.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Anderson PJ, Doyle LW. Neurodevelopmental outcome of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30(4):227–232. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Annibale DJ, Hulsey TC, Engstrom PC, Wallin LA, Ohning BL. Randomized, controlled trial of nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in the extubation of very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 1994;124(3):455–460. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(94)70375-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Annibale DJ, Hulsey TC, Wagner CL, Southgate WM. Comparative neonatal morbidity of abdominal and vaginal deliveries after uncomplicated pregnancies. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149(8):862–867. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170210036006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Apisarnthanarak A, Holzmann-Pazgal G, Hamvas A, Olsen MA, Fraser VJ. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in extremely preterm neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit: characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes. Pediatrics. 2003;112:1283–1289. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.6.1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Aranda JV, Carlo W, Hummel P, Thomas R, Lehr VT, Anand KJ. Analgesia and sedation during mechanical ventilation in neonates. Clin Ther. 2005;27:877–899. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Arena F, Romeo C, Baldari S, Arena S, Antonuccio P, Campenni A, et al. Gastrointestinal sequelae in survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Int. 2008;50(1):76–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2007.02527.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Arioni C, Bellini C, Scopesi F, Mazzella M, Serra G. Pulmonary interstitial emphysema in preterm twins on continuous positive airway pressure. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;19(10):671–673. doi: 10.1080/14767050600853344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Austin MT, Lovvorn HN, 3rd, Feurer ID, Pietsch J, Earl TM, Bartilson R, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair on extracorporeal life support: a decade of lessons learned. Am Surg. 2004;70(5):389–395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Auten RL, Notter RH, Kendig JW, Davis JM, Shapiro DL. Surfactant treatment of full-term newborns with respiratory failure. Pediatrics. 1991;87:101–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Avery ME, Fletcher BD, Williams RG (1981) The lung and its disorders in the newborn infant. Major Probl Clin Pediatr. 1 4th Edition:1–367 [PubMed]
  26. Avery ME, Tooley WH, Keller JB, Hurd SS, Bryan MH, Cotton RB, et al. Is chronic lung disease in low birth weight infants preventable? A survey of eight centers. Pediatrics. 1987;79(1):26–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Azarow K, Messineo A, Pearl R, Filler R, Barker G, Bohn D. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia – a tale of two cities: the Toronto experience. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32(3):395–400. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90589-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Bagolan P, Morini F. Long-term follow up of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2007;16(2):134–144. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2007.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Bagolan P, Casaccia G, Crescenzi F, Nahom A, Trucchi A, Giorlandino C. Impact of a current treatment protocol on outcome of high-risk congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(3):313–318. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Bahrami KR, Van Meurs KP. ECMO for neonatal respiratory failure. Semin Perinatol. 2005;29(1):15–23. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2005.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Bancalari E, del Moral T. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia and surfactant. Biol Neonate. 2001;80(Suppl 1):7–13. doi: 10.1159/000047170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Bang AT, Bang RA, Morankar VP, Sontakke PG, Solanki JM. Pneumonia in neonates: can it be managed in the community? Arch Dis Child. 1993;68:550–556. doi: 10.1136/adc.68.5_spec_no.550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Barrington KJ, Bull D, Finer NN. Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2001;107(4):638–641. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.4.638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Bartlett RH, Gazzaniga AB, Toomasian J, Coran AG, Roloff D, Rucker R. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in neonatal respiratory failure. 100 cases. Ann Surg. 1986;204(3):236–245. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198609000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Becerra JE, Rowley DL, Atrash HK. Case fatality rates associated with conditions originating in the perinatal period: United States, 1986 through 1987. Pediatrics. 1992;89(6 Pt 2):1256–1259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Beck J, Reilly M, Grasselli G, Mirabella L, Slutsky AS, Dunn MS, et al. Patient-ventilator interaction during neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in low birth weight infants. Pediatr Res. 2009;65(6):663–668. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31819e72ab. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Beeram MR, Dhanireddy R. Effects of saline instillation during tracheal suction on lung mechanics in newborn infants. J Perinatol. 1992;12:120–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Beligere N, Rao R. Neurodevelopmental outcome of infants with meconium aspiration syndrome: report of a study and literature review. J Perinatol. 2008;28(Suppl 3):S93–S101. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Bell EF, Warburton D, Stonestreet BS, Oh W. Effect of fluid administration on the development of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus and congestive heart failure in premature infants. N Engl J Med. 1980;302(11):598–604. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198003133021103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Bellu R, de Waal KA, Zanini R (2005) Opioids for neonates receiving mechanical ventilation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD004212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  41. Berger TM, Allred EN, Van Marter LJ. Antecedents of clinically significant pulmonary hemorrhage among newborn infants. J Perinatol. 2000;20:295–300. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Berggren E, Liljedahl M, Winbladh B, Andreasson B, Curstedt T, Robertson B, et al. Pilot study of nebulized surfactant therapy for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2000;89(4):460–464. doi: 10.1080/080352500750028195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Bernbaum J, Schwartz IP, Gerdes M, D’Agostino JA, Coburn CE, Polin RA. Survivors of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 1 year of age: the relationship of primary diagnosis with health and neurodevelopmental sequelae. Pediatrics. 1995;96(5 Pt 1):907–913. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Bernstein G, Knodel E, Heldt GP. Airway leak size in neonates and autocycling of three flow-triggered ventilators. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:1739–1744. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199510000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Bernstein G, Mannino FL, Heldt GP, et al. Randomized multicenter trial comparing synchronized and conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation in neonates. J Pediatr. 1996;128:453–463. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70354-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Bhandari V, Gavino RG, Nedrelow JH, Pallela P, Salvador A, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS. J Perinatol. 2007;27(11):697–703. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Bhandari V, Finer NN, Ehrenkranz RA, Saha S, Das A, Walsh MC, et al. Synchronized nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation and neonatal outcomes. Pediatrics. 2009;124(2):517–526. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Bhat RY, Rao A. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid and meconium aspiration syndrome: a prospective study. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2008;28:199–203. doi: 10.1179/146532808X335642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Bisceglia M, Belcastro A, Poerio V, Raimondi F, Mesuraca L, Crugliano C, et al. A comparison of nasal intermittent versus continuous positive pressure delivery for the treatment of moderate respiratory syndrome in preterm infants. Minerva Pediatr. 2007;59(2):91–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Bjorklund LJ, Ingimarsson J, Curstedt T, John J, Robertson B, Werner O, et al. Manual ventilation with a few large breaths at birth compromises the therapeutic effect of subsequent surfactant replacement in immature lambs. Pediatr Res. 1997;42(3):348–355. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199709000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Blennow M, Jonsson B, Dahlstrom A, Sarman I, Bohlin K, Robertson B. Lung function in premature infants can be improved. Surfactant therapy and CPAP reduce the need of respiratory support. Lakartidningen. 1999;96(13):1571–1576. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Bohlin K, Gudmundsdottir T, Katz-Salamon M, Jonsson B, Blennow M. Implementation of surfactant treatment during continuous positive airway pressure. J Perinatol. 2007;27(7):422–427. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Bohn D. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(7):911–915. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200204-304CC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Bohn D, Tamura M, Perrin D, Barker G, Rabinovitch M. Ventilatory predictors of pulmonary hypoplasia in congenital diaphragmatic hernia, confirmed by morphologic assessment. J Pediatr. 1987;111(3):423–431. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80474-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Bolivar JM, Gerhardt T, Gonzalez A, Hummler H, Claure N, Everett R, Bancalari E. Mechanisms for episodes of hypoxemia in preterm infants undergoing mechanical ventilation. J Pediatr. 1995;127:767–773. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70171-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Boloker J, Bateman DA, Wung JT, Stolar CJ. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in 120 infants treated consecutively with permissive hypercapnea/spontaneous respiration/elective repair. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37(3):357–366. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.30834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Bond DM, Froese AB. Volume recruitment maneuvers are less deleterious than persistent low lung volumes in the atelectasis-prone rabbit lung during high-frequency oscillation. Crit Care Med. 1993;21(3):402–412. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199303000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Bouchard S, Johnson MP, Flake AW, Howell LJ, Myers LB, Adzick NS, et al. The EXIT procedure: experience and outcome in 31 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37(3):418–426. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.30839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Bouchut JC, Dubois R, Moussa M, Godard J, Picaud JC, Di Maio M, et al. High frequency oscillatory ventilation during repair of neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2000;10(4):377–379. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2000.00503.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Boumecid H, Rakza T, Abazine A, Klosowski S, Matran R, Storme L. Influence of three nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices on breathing pattern in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92(4):F298–F300. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.103762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Brazy JE, Kinney HC, Oakes WJ. Central nervous system structural lesions causing apnea at birth. J Pediatr. 1987;111:163–1757. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80062-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Brion LP, Soll RF (2001) Diuretics for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD001454 [DOI] [PubMed]
  63. British Association of Perinatal Medicine T (2005) Early care of the newborn infant. Statement on current level of evidence
  64. Brudno DS, Boedy RF, Kanto WP., Jr Compliance, alveolar-arterial oxygen difference, and oxygenation index changes in patients managed with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1990;9:19–23. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950090105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Bryner BS, West BT, Hirschl RB, Drongowski RA, Lally KP, Lally P, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: does timing of repair matter? J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(6):1165–1171. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Buettiker V, Hug MI, Baenziger O, Meyer C, Frey B. Advantages and disadvantages of different nasal CPAP systems in newborns. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(5):926–930. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2267-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Buss M, Williams G, Dilley A, Jones O. Prevention of heart failure in the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia by maintaining ductal patency. A case report. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(4):e9–e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Cacciari A, Ruggeri G, Mordenti M, Ceccarelli PL, Baccarini E, Pigna A, et al. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2001;11(1):3–7. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-12204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Callen P, Goldsworthy S, Graves L, Harvey D, Mellows H, Parkinson C. Mode of delivery and the lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1979;86(12):965–968. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb11245.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Campbell DM, Shah PS, Shah V, Kelly EN. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus infant flow for preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2006;26(9):546–549. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Carlton DP, Cho SC, Davis P, Lont M, Bland RD. Surfactant treatment at birth reduces lung vascular injury and edema in preterm lambs. Pediatr Res. 1995;37:265–270. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199503000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Carter JM, Gerstmann DR, Clark RH, et al. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the treatment of acute neonatal respiratory failure. Pediatrics. 1990;85:159–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Castellheim A, Lindenskov PH, Pharo A, Aamodt G, Saugstad OD, Mollnes TE. Meconium aspiration syndrome induces complement-associated systemic inflammatory response in newborn piglets. Scand J Immunol. 2005;61:217–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2005.01532.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Castillo A, Sola A, Baquero H, Neira F, Alvis R, Deulofeut R, et al. Pulse oxygen saturation levels and arterial oxygen tension values in newborns receiving oxygen therapy in the neonatal intensive care unit: is 85% to 93% an acceptable range? Pediatrics. 2008;121(5):882–889. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Cayabyab RG, Kwong K, Jones C, Minoo P, Durand M. Lung inflammation and pulmonary function in infants with meconium aspiration syndrome. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007;42:898–905. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Chan V, Greenough A. Comparison of weaning by patient triggered ventilation or synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 1994;83(3):335–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb18108.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Chang GY, Cox CC, Shaffer TH (2005) Nasal cannula, CPAP and Vapotherm: effect of flow on temperature, humidity, pressure and resistance. Pediatric Academic Society, Washinton, DC, p 1248
  78. Cheema IU, Ahluwalia JS. Feasibility of tidal volume-guided ventilation in newborn infants: a randomized, crossover trial using the volume guarantee modality. Pediatrics. 2001;107(6):1323–1328. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.6.1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Chen JY, Ling UP, Chen JH. Comparison of synchronized and conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation in neonates. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1997;39:578–583. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.1997.tb03644.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Chen XK, Lougheed J, Lawson ML, Gibb W, Walker RC, Wen SW, et al. Effects of repeated courses of antenatal corticosteroids on somatic development in children 6 to 10 years of age. Am J Perinatol. 2008;25(1):21–28. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Chinese Collaborative Study Group for Neonatal Respiratory Diseases Treatment of severe meconium aspiration syndrome with porcine surfactant: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94:896–902. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb02008.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Chiu P, Hedrick HL. Postnatal management and long-term outcome for survivors with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28(7):592–603. doi: 10.1002/pd.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Chiu PP, Sauer C, Mihailovic A, Adatia I, Bohn D, Coates AL, et al. The price of success in the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: is improved survival accompanied by an increase in long-term morbidity? J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(5):888–892. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Cho SD, Krishnaswami S, McKee JC, Zallen G, Silen ML, Bliss DW. Analysis of 29 consecutive thoracoscopic repairs of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates compared to historical controls. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(1):80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Chou P, Blei ED, Shen-Schwarz S, Gonzalez-Crussi F, Reynolds M. Pulmonary changes following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: autopsy study of 23 cases. Hum Pathol. 1993;24:405–412. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(93)90089-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Claure N, Bancalari E. Mechanical ventilatory support in preterm infants. Minerva Pediatr. 2008;60(2):177–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Cleary GM, Wiswell TE. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid and the meconium aspiration syndrome. An update. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1998;45:511–529. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70025-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Cleary JP, Bernstein G, Mannino FL, Heldt GP. Improved oxygenation during synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, crossover study. J Pediatr. 1995;126(3):407–411. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70460-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Cochrane CG, Revak SD, Merritt TA, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage with KL4-surfactant in models of meconium aspiration syndrome. Pediatr Res. 1998;44:705–715. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199811000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Cohen M, Carson BS. Respiratory morbidity benefit of awaiting onset of labor after elective cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65(6):818–824. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Cohen MS, Rychik J, Bush DM, Tian ZY, Howell LJ, Adzick NS, et al. Influence of congenital heart disease on survival in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr. 2002;141(1):25–30. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.125004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Colaizy TT, Younis UM, Bell EF, Klein JM. Nasal high-frequency ventilation for premature infants. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(11):1518–1522. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00900.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Cole FS, Hamvas A, Rubinstein P, King E, Trusgnich M, Nogee LM, et al. Population-based estimates of surfactant protein B deficiency. Pediatrics. 2000;105(3 Pt 1):538–541. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.3.538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Cools F, Offringa M (2005) Neuromuscular paralysis for newborn infants receiving mechanical ventilation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD002773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  95. Cote CJ, Zaslavsky A, Downes JJ, Kurth CD, Welborn LG, Warner LO, Malviya SV. Postoperative apnea in former preterm infants after inguinal herniorrhaphy. A combined analysis. Anesthesiology. 1995;82:809–822. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199504000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Cotton RB, Olsson T, Law AB, Parker RA, Lindstrom DP, Silberberg AR, et al. The physiologic effects of surfactant treatment on gas exchange in newborn premature infants with hyaline membrane disease. Pediatr Res. 1993;34(4):495–501. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199310000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Courtney SE, Barrington KJ. Continuous positive airway pressure and noninvasive ventilation. Clin Perinatol. 2007;34(1):73–92. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2006.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Courtney SE, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Arnold GK, Pandit PB, Habib RH. Lung recruitment and breathing pattern during variable versus continuous flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: an evaluation of three devices. Pediatrics. 2001;107(2):304–308. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.2.304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Courtney SE, Durand DJ, Asselin JM, Hudak ML, Aschner JL, Shoemaker CT. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(9):643–652. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Crowley PA. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials, 1972 to 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(1):322–335. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90222-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Crowther CA, Harding JE (2007) Repeat doses of prenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth for preventing neonatal respiratory disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (3):CD003935 [DOI] [PubMed]
  102. Crowther CA, Doyle LW, Haslam RR, Hiller JE, Harding JE, Robinson JS. Outcomes at 2 years of age after repeat doses of antenatal corticosteroids. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(12):1179–1189. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Cuestas RA, Lindall A, Engel RR. Low thyroid hormones and respiratory-distress syndrome of the newborn. Studies on cord blood. N Engl J Med. 1976;295(6):297–302. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197608052950601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. D’Agostino JA, Bernbaum JC, Gerdes M, Schwartz IP, Coburn CE, Hirschl RB, et al. Outcome for infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the first year. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30(1):10–15. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(95)90598-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. D’Angio CT, Chess PR, Kovacs SJ, Sinkin RA, Phelps DL, Kendig JW, et al. Pressure-regulated volume control ventilation vs synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation for very low-birth-weight infants: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(9):868–875. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.9.868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Daly M d B. Peripheral arterial chemoreceptors and respiratory-cardiovascular integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997. Clinical implications of chemoreceptor reflexes; pp. 557–589. [Google Scholar]
  107. Dargaville PA, Copnell B. The epidemiology of meconium aspiration syndrome: incidence, risk factors, therapies, and outcome. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1712–1721. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Dargaville PA, Mills JF. Surfactant therapy for meconium aspiration syndrome: current status. Drugs. 2005;65:2569–2591. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565180-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Dargaville PA, South M, McDougall PN. Surfactant and surfactant inhibitors in meconium aspiration syndrome. J Pediatr. 2001;138:113–115. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.109602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Dargaville PA, Mills JF, Headley BM, et al. Therapeutic lung lavage in the piglet model of meconium aspiration syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168:456–463. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200301-121OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Dargaville PA, Mills JF, Copnell B, Loughnan PM, McDougall PN, Morley CJ. Therapeutic lung lavage in meconium aspiration syndrome: a preliminary report. J Paediatr Child Health. 2007;43:539–545. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01130.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Dargaville PA, Copnell B, Mills JF, Haron I, Lee JKF, Tingay DG et al (2011) Randomized controlled trial of lung lavage with dilute surfactant for meconium aspiration syndrome. J Pediatr 158:383–389 [DOI] [PubMed]
  113. Darnall RA, Kattwinkel J, Nattie C, Robinson M. Margin of safety for discharge after apnea in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 1997;100:795–801. doi: 10.1542/peds.100.5.795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Darnall RA, Ariagno RL, Kinney HC. The late preterm infant and the control of breathing, sleep, and brainstem development: a review. Clin Perinatol. 2006;33:883–914. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2006.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Davey AM, Becker JD, Davis JM. Meconium aspiration syndrome: physiological and inflammatory changes in a newborn piglet model. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1993;16:101–108. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950160205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Davies PA, Aherne W. Congenital pneumonia. Arch Dis Child. 1962;37:598–602. doi: 10.1136/adc.37.196.598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Davies AM, Koenig JS, Thach BT. Upper airway chemoreflex responses to saline and water in preterm infants. J Appl Physiol. 1988;64:1412–1420. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1988.64.4.1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Davis GM, Bureau MA. Pulmonary and chest wall mechanics in the control of respiration in the newborn. Clin Perinatol. 1987;14(3):551–579. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Davis PG, Henderson-Smart DJ (2000) Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD000143 [DOI] [PubMed]
  120. Davis PG, Henderson-Smart DJ (2001) Extubation from low-rate intermittent positive airways pressure versus extubation after a trial of endotracheal continuous positive airways pressure in intubated preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD001078 [DOI] [PubMed]
  121. Davis PG, Henderson-Smart DJ (2003) Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD000143 [DOI] [PubMed]
  122. Davis JM, Richter SE, Kendig JW, Notter RH. High-frequency jet ventilation and surfactant treatment of newborns with severe respiratory failure. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1992;13:108–112. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950130209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Davis PG, Lemyre B, de Paoli AG (2001) Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD003212 [DOI] [PubMed]
  124. Davis PG, Tan A, O’Donnell CP, Schulze A. Resuscitation of newborn infants with 100% oxygen or air: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2004;364(9442):1329–1333. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17189-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Davis PJ, Firmin RK, Manktelow B, Goldman AP, Davis CF, Smith JH, et al. Long-term outcome following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the UK experience. J Pediatr. 2004;144(3):309–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Davis PG, Morley CJ, Owen LS. Non-invasive respiratory support of preterm neonates with respiratory distress: continuous positive airway pressure and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;14(1):14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2008.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Dawson JA, Kamlin COF, Vento MT, Wong C, Donath S, Davis PG, Morley CJ (2009) Defining the ‘normal’ range for oxygen saturations in newly born infants. Pediatric Academic Society, Baltimore
  128. Dawson JA, Kamlin COF, Te Pas AB, Schmoelzer G, Donath SM, O’Donnell CPF, Davis PG, Morley CJ (2009) Neopuff compared with Laerdal self-inflating bag for the first five minutes of resuscitation in infants < 29 weeks gestation at birth: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatric Academic Society, Baltimore, 3212.7
  129. de Beaufort AJ, Pelikan DM, Elferink JG, Berger HM. Effect of interleukin 8 in meconium on in-vitro neutrophil chemotaxis. Lancet. 1998;352:102–105. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)85013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. De Klerk AM, De Klerk RK. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure and outcomes of preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health. 2001;37(2):161–167. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2001.00624.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. De Paoli AG, Morley CJ, Davis PG, Lau R, Hingeley E. In vitro comparison of nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices for neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002;87(1):F42–F45. doi: 10.1136/fn.87.1.F42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. De Paoli AG, Lau R, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Pharyngeal pressure in preterm infants receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90(1):F79–F81. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.052274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. De Paoli AG, Davis PG, Faber B, Morley CJ (2008) Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD002977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  134. Desfrere L, Jarreau PH, Dommergues M, Brunhes A, Hubert P, Nihoul-Fekete C, et al. Impact of delayed repair and elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on survival of antenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia: first application of these strategies in the more “severe” subgroup of antenatally diagnosed newborns. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26(7):934–941. doi: 10.1007/s001340051284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Dessens AB, Haas HS, Koppe JG. Twenty-year follow-up of antenatal corticosteroid treatment. Pediatrics. 2000;105(6):E77. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.6.e77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Dhanireddy R, Smith YF, Hamosh M, Mullon DK, Scanlon JW, Hamosh P. Respiratory distress syndrome in the newborn: relationship to serum prolactin, thyroxine, and sex. Biol Neonate. 1983;43(1–2):9–15. doi: 10.1159/000241631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Dillon PW, Cilley RE, Hudome SM, Ozkan EN, Krummel TM. Nitric oxide reversal of recurrent pulmonary hypertension and respiratory failure in an infant with CDH after successful ECMO therapy. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30(5):743–744. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(95)90706-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Dillon PW, Cilley RE, Mauger D, Zachary C, Meier A. The relationship of pulmonary artery pressure and survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(3):307–312. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Dimitriou G, Greenough A. Measurement of lung volume and optimal oxygenation during high frequency oscillation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995;72:F180–F183. doi: 10.1136/fn.72.3.f180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Dimitriou G, Greenough A, Griffin F, Chan V. Synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation modes compared with patient triggered ventilation during weaning. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995;72(3):F188–F190. doi: 10.1136/fn.72.3.f188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Dimitriou G, Greenough A, Laubscher B, Yamaguchi N. Comparison of airway pressure-triggered and airflow-triggered ventilation in very immature infants. Acta Paediatr. 1998;87(12):1256–1260. doi: 10.1080/080352598750030942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Dimitriou G, Greenough A, Cherian S. Comparison of airway pressure and airflow triggering systems using a single type of neonatal ventilator. Acta Paediatr. 2001;90(4):445–447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Dimmitt RA, Moss RL, Rhine WD, Benitz WE, Henry MC, Vanmeurs KP. Venoarterial versus venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry, 1990–1999. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(8):1199–1204. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.25762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Donn SM, Sinha SK. Invasive and noninvasive neonatal mechanical ventilation. Respir Care. 2003;48:426–439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Donn SM, Sinha SK. Minimising ventilator induced lung injury in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006;91(3):F226–F230. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.082271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Downard CD, Jaksic T, Garza JJ, Dzakovic A, Nemes L, Jennings RW, et al. Analysis of an improved survival rate for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38(5):729–732. doi: 10.1016/jpsu.2003.50194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Dreyfuss D, Saumon G. Barotrauma is volutrauma, but which volume is the one responsible? Intensive Care Med. 1992;18(3):139–141. doi: 10.1007/BF01709236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Dreyfuss D, Saumon G. Ventilator-induced lung injury: lessons from experimental studies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157(1):294–323. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.1.9604014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Drummond WH, Gregory GA, Heymann MA, Phibbs RA. The independent effects of hyperventilation, tolazoline, and dopamine on infants with persistent pulmonary hypertension. J Pediatr. 1981;98(4):603–611. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(81)80775-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Duenhoelter JH, Pritchard JA. Fetal respiration. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977;129:326–338. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90793-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Duke T. Neonatal pneumonia in developing countries. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F211–F219. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.048108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Dunser MW, Mayr AJ, Ulmer H, Ritsch N, Knotzer H, Pajk W, et al. The effects of vasopressin on systemic hemodynamics in catecholamine-resistant septic and postcardiotomy shock: a retrospective analysis. Anesth Analg. 2001;93(1):7–13. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200107000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Duran R, Ulfet V, Mustafa Y, Betul A. An unusual complication of nasopharyngeal CPAP in a premature infant. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15(10):903–905. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01670.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Durand M, McCann E, Brady JP. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on the ventilatory response to CO2 in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 1983;71(4):634–638. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Early versus delayed neonatal administration of a synthetic surfactant – the judgment of OSIRIS. The OSIRIS Collaborative Group (open study of infants at high risk of or with respiratory insufficiency – the role of surfactant (1992) Lancet 340(8832):1363–1369 [PubMed]
  156. Edberg KE, Ekstrom-Jodal B, Hallman M, Hjalmarson O, Sandberg K, Silberberg A. Immediate effects on lung function of instilled human surfactant in mechanically ventilated newborn infants with IRDS. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1990;79(8–9):750–755. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1990.tb11550.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Eden RD, Seifert LS, Winegar A, Spellacy WN. Perinatal characteristics of uncomplicated postdate pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:296–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Egan EA, Dillon WP, Zorn S. Fetal lung liquid absorption and alveolar epithelial solute permeability in surfactant deficient, breathing fetal lambs. Pediatr Res. 1984;18(6):566–570. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198406000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Ehrenkranz RA, Walsh MC, Vohr BR, Jobe AH, Wright LL, Fanaroff AA, et al. Validation of the National Institutes of Health consensus definition of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatrics. 2005;116(6):1353–1360. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Eichenwald EC, Ungarelli RA, Stark AR. Hypercapnia increases expiratory braking in preterm infants. J Appl Physiol. 1993;75:2665–2670. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1993.75.6.2665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Eichenwald EC, Aina A, Stark AR. Apnea frequently persists beyond term gestation in infants delivered at 24 to 28 weeks. Pediatrics. 1997;100:354–359. doi: 10.1542/peds.100.3.354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. El Shahed AI, Dargaville P, Ohlsson A, Soll RF (2007) Surfactant for meconium aspiration syndrome in full term/near term infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD002054 [DOI] [PubMed]
  163. Elbourne D, Field D, Mugford M (2002) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe respiratory failure in newborn infants (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD001340 [DOI] [PubMed]
  164. Elgellab A, Riou Y, Abbazine A, Truffert P, Matran R, Lequien P, et al. Effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) on breathing pattern in spontaneously breathing premature newborn infants. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(11):1782–1787. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1117-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Engle WD, Arant BS, Jr, Wiriyathian S, Rosenfeld CR. Diuresis and respiratory distress syndrome: physiologic mechanisms and therapeutic implications. J Pediatr. 1983;102(6):912–917. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(83)80024-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Engle WA, Yoder MC, Andreoli SP, Darragh RK, Langefeld CD, Hui SL. Controlled prospective randomized comparison of high-frequency jet ventilation and conventional ventilation in neonates with respiratory failure and persistent pulmonary hypertension. J Perinatol. 1997;17:3–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Evans NJ, Archer LN. Doppler assessment of pulmonary artery pressure during recovery from hyaline membrane disease. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66(7 Spec No):802–804. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.7_spec_no.802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Farrell PM, Avery ME. Hyaline membrane disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1975;111(5):657–688. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1975.111.5.657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Fauza DO, Wilson JM. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia and associated anomalies: their incidence, identification, and impact on prognosis. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29(8):1113–1117. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90290-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Feldman JL, Del Negro CA. Looking for inspiration: new perspectives on respiratory rhythm. Nat Rev. 2006;7:232–242. doi: 10.1038/nrn1871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Figueras-Aloy J, Quero J, Carbonell-Estrany X, Ginovart G, Perez-Rodriguez J, Raspall F, et al. Early administration of the second dose of surfactant (beractant) in the treatment of severe hyaline membrane disease. Acta Paediatr. 2001;90(3):296–301. doi: 10.1080/080352501300067631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Findlay RD, Taeusch HW, Walther FJ. Surfactant replacement therapy for meconium aspiration syndrome. Pediatrics. 1996;97:48–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Finer NN, Barrington KJ (2006) Nitric oxide for respiratory failure in infants born at or near term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD000399 [DOI] [PubMed]
  174. Finer NN, Moriartey RR, Boyd J, Phillips HJ, Stewart AR, Ulan O. Postextubation atelectasis: a retrospective review and a prospective controlled study. J Pediatr. 1979;94(1):110–113. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(79)80371-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Finer NN, Carlo WA, Duara S, Fanaroff AA, Donovan EF, Wright LL, et al. Delivery room continuous positive airway pressure/positive end-expiratory pressure in extremely low birth weight infants: a feasibility trial. Pediatrics. 2004;114(3):651–657. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Finer NN, Merritt TA, Bernstein G, et al. A multicenter, pilot study of Aerosurf delivered via nasal CPAP to prevent RDS in pre-term neonates. Eur Pediatr Acad Soc. 2006;59:4840. [Google Scholar]
  177. Fleming PJ, Bryan AC, Bryan MH. Functional immaturity of pulmonary irritant receptors and apnea in newborn preterm infants. Pediatrics. 1978;61:515–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Fliman PJ, deRegnier RA, Kinsella JP, Reynolds M, Rankin LL, Steinhorn RH. Neonatal extracorporeal life support: impact of new therapies on survival. J Pediatr. 2006;148:595–599. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Fowlie PW. Prophylactic indomethacin: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996;74(2):F81–F87. doi: 10.1136/fn.74.2.f81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Fowlie PW, Davis PG. Prophylactic indomethacin for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88(6):F464–F466. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.6.F464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Fox WW, Berman LS, Downes JJJ, Peckham GJ. The therapeutic application of end-expiratory pressure in the meconium aspiration syndrome. Pediatrics. 1975;56:214–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Fox WW, Schwartz JG, Shaffer TH. Successful extubation of neonates: clinical and physiological factors. Crit Care Med. 1981;9(12):823–826. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198112000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Frenckner B, Ehren H, Granholm T, Linden V, Palmer K. Improved results in patients who have congenital diaphragmatic hernia using preoperative stabilization, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and delayed surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32(8):1185–1189. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90679-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Frenckner B, Broome M, Lindstrom M, Radell P. Platelet-derived growth factor inhibition – a new treatment of pulmonary hypertension in congenital diaphragmatic hernia? J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(10):1928–1931. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Frerichs I, Dargaville PA, Dudykevych T, Rimensberger PC. Electrical impedance tomography: a method for monitoring regional lung aeration and tidal volume distribution? Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(12):2312–2316. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2029-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Frey P, Glanzmann R, Nars P, Herzog B. Familial congenital diaphragmatic defect: transmission from father to daughter. J Pediatr Surg. 1991;26(12):1396–1398. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(91)91044-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Friedlich P, Lecart C, Posen R, Ramicone E, Chan L, Ramanathan R. A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal-synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants after extubation. J Perinatol. 1999;19(6 Pt 1):413–418. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Froese AB, Kinsella JP. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation: lessons from the neonatal/pediatric experience. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(3 Suppl):S115–S121. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000155923.97849.6d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Froese AB, McCulloch PR, Sugiura M, Vaclavik S, Possmayer F, Moller F. Optimizing alveolar expansion prolongs the effectiveness of exogenous surfactant therapy in the adult rabbit. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;148(3):569–577. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.3.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Fuchimukai T, Fujiwara T, Takahashi A, Enhorning G. Artificial pulmonary surfactant inhibited by proteins. J Appl Physiol. 1987;62:429–437. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1987.62.2.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Fujikura T, Froehlich LA. Intrauterine pneumonia in relation to birth weight and race. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1967;97:81–84. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(67)90596-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Gaillard EA, Cooke RW, Shaw NJ. Improved survival and neurodevelopmental outcome after prolonged ventilation in preterm neonates who have received antenatal steroids and surfactant. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001;84(3):F194–F196. doi: 10.1136/fn.84.3.F194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Gaon P, Lee S, Hannan S, Ingram D, Milner AD. Assessment of effect of nasal continuous positive pressure on laryngeal opening using fibre optic laryngoscopy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999;80(3):F230–F232. doi: 10.1136/fn.80.3.f230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Garite TJ, Rumney PJ, Briggs GG, Harding JA, Nageotte MP, Towers CV, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of betamethasone for the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome at 24 to 28 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(2):646–651. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91691-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Garland JS, Nelson DB, Rice T, Neu J. Increased risk of gastrointestinal perforations in neonates mechanically ventilated with either face mask or nasal prongs. Pediatrics. 1985;76(3):406–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Garland JS, Buck RK, Allred EN, Leviton A. Hypocarbia before surfactant therapy appears to increase bronchopulmonary dysplasia risk in infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149(6):617–622. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170190027005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Gaston B, Drazen JM, Loscalzo J, Stamler JS. The biology of nitrogen oxides in the airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;149(2 Pt 1):538–551. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.149.2.7508323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Gauda EB, McLemore GL, Tolosa J, Marston-Nelson J, Kwak D. Maturation of peripheral arterial chemoreceptors in relation to neonatal apnoea. Semin Neonatol. 2004;9:181–194. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2003.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Gerhardt T, Bancalari E. Apnea of prematurity: I. Lung function and regulation of breathing. Pediatrics. 1984;74:58–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Gerstmann DR, Minton SD, Stoddard RA, Meredith KS, Monaco F, Bertrand JM, et al. The Provo multicenter early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation trial: improved pulmonary and clinical outcome in respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics. 1996;98(6 Pt 1):1044–1057. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Gibbs DL, Rice HE, Farrell JA, Adzick NS, Harrison MR. Familial diaphragmatic agenesis: an autosomal-recessive syndrome with a poor prognosis. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32(2):366–368. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90212-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Gibson RL, Nizet V, Rubens CE. Group B streptococcal beta-hemolysin promotes injury of lung microvascular endothelial cells. Pediatr Res. 1999;45:626–634. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199905010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Gluck L, Kulovich MV, Eidelman AI, Cordero L, Khazin AF. Biochemical development of surface activity in mammalian lung. IV. Pulmonary lecithin synthesis in the human fetus and newborn and etiology of the respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Res. 1972;6(2):81–99. doi: 10.1203/00006450-197202000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Goldsmith JP. Continuous positive airway pressure and conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of meconium aspiration syndrome. J Perinatol. 2008;28(Suppl 3):S49–S55. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Goldsmith LS, Greenspan JS, Rubenstein SD, Wolfson MR, Shaffer TH. Immediate improvement in lung volume after exogenous surfactant: alveolar recruitment versus increased distention. J Pediatr. 1991;119(3):424–428. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82057-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Goldstein RF, Brazy JE. Fluctuations of arterial blood pressure decrease with mechanical ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Perinatol. 1990;10:267–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Gomez R, Ghezzi F, Romero R, Munoz H, Tolosa JE, Rojas I. Premature labor and intra-amniotic infection. Clinical aspects and role of the cytokines in diagnosis and pathophysiology. Clin Perinatol. 1995;22(2):281–342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Gooding CA, Gregory GA, Taber P, Wright RR. An experimental model for the study of meconium aspiration of the newborn. Radiology. 1971;100:137–140. doi: 10.1148/100.1.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Gounaris A, Costalos C, Varchalama L, Kokori P, Kolovou E, Alexiou N. Gastric emptying in very-low-birth-weight infants treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Pediatr. 2004;145(4):508–510. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Gouyon JB, Ribakovsky C, Ferdynus C, Quantin C, Sagot P, Gouyon B. Severe respiratory disorders in term neonates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008;22:22–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00875.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Graham PL, 3rd, Begg MD, Larson E, Della-Latta P, Allen A, Saiman L. Risk factors for late onset gram-negative sepsis in low birth weight infants hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25(2):113–117. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000199310.52875.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Greenough A, Sharma A. Optimal strategies for newborn ventilation – a synthesis of the evidence. Early Hum Dev. 2005;81(12):957–964. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Greenough A, Morley C, Davis J. Interaction of spontaneous respiration with artificial ventilation in preterm babies. J Pediatr. 1983;103(5):769–773. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(83)80483-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Greenough A, Greenall F, Gamsu H. Synchronous respiration: which ventilator rate is best? Acta Paediatr Scand. 1987;76(5):713–718. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1987.tb10554.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Greenough A, Dimitriou G, Prendergast M, Milner AD (2008) Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD000456 [DOI] [PubMed]
  216. Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, Tooley WH, Hamilton WK. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med. 1971;284(24):1333–1340. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197106172842401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Greisen G, Munck H, Lou H. Severe hypocarbia in preterm infants and neurodevelopmental deficit. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1987;76(3):401–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1987.tb10489.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Gross RE. Congenital hernia of the diaphragm. Am J Dis Child. 1946;71(6):579–592. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1946.02020290002001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Gross I, Smith GJ, Wilson CM, Maniscalco WM, Ingleson LD, Brehier A, et al. The influence of hormones on the biochemical development of fetal rat lung in organ culture. II. Insulin. Pediatr Res. 1980;14(6):834–838. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198006000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Guner YS, Chokshi N, Aranda A, Ochoa C, Qureshi FG, Nguyen NX, et al. Thoracoscopic repair of neonatal diaphragmatic hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008;18(6):875–880. doi: 10.1089/lap.2007.0239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Gupta A, Rastogi S, Sahni R, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide and gentle ventilation in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension of the newborn – a single-center, 5-year experience. J Perinatol. 2002;22:435–441. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Gupta S, Sinha SK, Tin W, Donn SM. A randomized controlled trial of post-extubation bubble continuous positive airway pressure versus Infant Flow Driver continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr. 2009;154(5):645–650. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Guthrie SO, Walsh WF, Auten K, Clark RH. Initial dosing of inhaled nitric oxide in infants with hypoxic respiratory failure. J Perinatol. 2004;24:290–294. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Hachey WE, Eyal FG, Curtet-Eyal NL, Kellum FE. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation in a piglet model of early meconium aspiration. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:556–561. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199803000-00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Hajer GF, vd Staak FH, de Haan AF, Festen C. Recurrent congenital diaphragmatic hernia; which factors are involved? Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1998;8(6):329–333. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1071226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  226. Hall GL, Hantos Z, Wildhaber JH, Sly PD. Contribution of nasal pathways to low frequency respiratory impedance in infants. Thorax. 2002;57(5):396–399. doi: 10.1136/thorax.57.5.396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Halliday HL. History of surfactant from 1980. Biol Neonate. 2005;87(4):317–322. doi: 10.1159/000084879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  228. Halliday HL. Recent clinical trials of surfactant treatment for neonates. Biol Neonate. 2006;89(4):323–329. doi: 10.1159/000092869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  229. Halliday HL, McClure G, Reid MM, Lappin TR, Meban C, Thomas PS. Controlled trial of artificial surfactant to prevent respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet. 1984;1:476–478. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92849-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Halliday HL, Tarnow-Mordi WO, Corcoran JD, Patterson CC. Multicentre randomised trial comparing high and low dose surfactant regimens for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (the Curosurf 4 trial) Arch Dis Child. 1993;69(3 Spec No):276–280. doi: 10.1136/adc.69.3_spec_no.276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Halliday HL, Speer CP, Robertson B. Treatment of severe meconium aspiration syndrome with porcine surfactant. Collaborative Surfactant Study Group. Eur J Pediatr. 1996;155:1047–1051. doi: 10.1007/BF02532529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  232. Hamilton PP, Onayemi A, Smyth JA, Gillan JE, Cutz E, Froese AB, et al. Comparison of conventional and high-frequency ventilation: oxygenation and lung pathology. J Appl Physiol. 1983;55(1 Pt 1):131–138. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1983.55.1.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  233. Han VK, Beverley DW, Clarson C, Sumabat WO, Shaheed WA, Brabyn DG, et al. Randomized controlled trial of very early continuous distending pressure in the management of preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 1987;15(1):21–32. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(87)90097-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  234. Hand IL, Noble L, Geiss D. The effects of positioning on the Hering-Breuer reflex in the preterm infant. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007;42(1):37–40. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  235. Hannam S, Ingram DM, Milner AD. A possible role for the Hering-Breuer deflation reflex in apnea of prematurity. J Pediatr. 1998;132:35–39. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70481-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  236. Harbarth S, Sudre P, Dharan S, Cadenas M, Pittet D. Outbreak of Enterobacter cloacae related to understaffing, overcrowding, and poor hygiene practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:598–603. doi: 10.1086/501677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  237. Hardart GE, Fackler JC. Predictors of intracranial hemorrhage during neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr. 1999;134(2):156–159. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70408-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Harding R. Development of the respiratory system. In: Thorburn GD, Harding R, editors. Textbook of fetal physiology. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 1994. pp. 140–167. [Google Scholar]
  239. Harris H, Wilson S, Brans Y, Wirtschafter D, Cassady G. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Improvement in arterial oxygenation in hyaline membrane disease. Biol Neonate. 1976;29(3–4):231–237. doi: 10.1159/000240868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  240. Harrison VC, Heese Hde V, Klein M. The significance of grunting in hyaline membrane disease. Pediatrics. 1968;41(3):549–559. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  241. Hascoet JM, Espagne S, Hamon I. CPAP and the preterm infant: lessons from the COIN trial and other studies. Early Hum Dev. 2008;84(12):791–793. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  242. Heimler R, Hoffmann RG, Starshak RJ, Sasidharan P, Grausz JP. Chronic lung disease in premature infants: a retrospective evaluation of underlying factors. Crit Care Med. 1988;16(12):1213–1217. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198812000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  243. Heiss K, Manning P, Oldham KT, Coran AG, Polley TZ, Jr, Wesley JR, et al. Reversal of mortality for congenital diaphragmatic hernia with ECMO. Ann Surg. 1989;209(2):225–230. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198902000-00014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  244. Heiss KF, Clark RH, Cornish JD, Stovroff M, Ricketts R, Kesser K, et al. Preferential use of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30(3):416–419. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(95)90045-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  245. Hellstrom-Westas L, Bell AH, Skov L, Greisen G, Svenningsen NW. Cerebroelectrical depression following surfactant treatment in preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 1992;89(4 Pt 1):643–647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  246. Henderson-Smart D. The effect of gestational age on the incidence and duration of recurrent apnoea in newborn babies. Aust J Paediatr. 1981;17:273–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1981.tb01957.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  247. Henderson-Smart DJ, Wilkinson A, Raynes-Greenow CH (2002) Mechanical ventilation for newborn infants with respiratory failure due to pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD002770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  248. Henderson-Smart DJ, Cools F, Bhuta T, Offringa M (2007) Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD000104 [DOI] [PubMed]
  249. Henderson-Smart DJ, De Paoli AG, Clark RH, Bhuta T (2009) High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction born at or near term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD002974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  250. Hendricks-Munoz KD, Walton JP. Hearing loss in infants with persistent fetal circulation. Pediatrics. 1988;81:650–656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  251. Hernandez LA, Peevy KJ, Moise AA, Parker JC. Chest wall restriction limits high airway pressure-induced lung injury in young rabbits. J Appl Physiol. 1989;66(5):2364–2368. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1989.66.5.2364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  252. Hernandez C, Little BB, Dax JS, Gilstrap LC, Rosenfeld CR. Prediction of the severity of meconium aspiration syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:61–70. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90132-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  253. Herting E, Sun B, Jarstrand C, Curstedt T, Robertson B. Surfactant improves lung function and mitigates bacterial growth in immature ventilated rabbits with experimentally induced neonatal group B streptococcal pneumonia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997;76:F3–F8. doi: 10.1136/fn.76.1.f3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  254. Herting E, Rauprich P, Stichtenoth G, Walter G, Johansson J, Robertson B. Resistance of different surfactant preparations to inactivation by meconium. Pediatr Res. 2001;50:44–49. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200107000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  255. Hey Ee . Neonatal formulary. 4. London: BMJ Books; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  256. Higgins RD, Richter SE, Davis JM. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure facilitates extubation of very low birth weight neonates. Pediatrics. 1991;88(5):999–1003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  257. Higgins ST, Wu AM, Sen N, Spitzer AR, Chander A. Meconium increases surfactant secretion in isolated rat alveolar type II cells. Pediatr Res. 1996;39:443–447. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199603000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  258. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure in preterm infants. The HIFI Study Group (1989) N Engl J Med 320(2):88–93 [DOI] [PubMed]
  259. Hill HR. Biochemical, structural, and functional abnormalities of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in the neonate. Pediatr Res. 1987;22:375–382. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198710000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  260. Hintz SR, Suttner DM, Sheehan AM, Rhine WD, Van Meurs KP. Decreased use of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): how new treatment modalities have affected ECMO utilization. Pediatrics. 2000;106(6):1339–1343. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.6.1339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  261. Hintz SR, Poole WK, Wright LL, Fanaroff AA, Kendrick DE, Laptook AR, et al. Changes in mortality and morbidities among infants born at less than 25 weeks during the post-surfactant era. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90(2):F128–F133. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.046268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  262. Hirschl RB, Schumacher RE, Snedecor SN, Bui KC, Bartlett RH. The efficacy of extracorporeal life support in premature and low birth weight newborns. J Pediatr Surg. 1993;28(10):1336–1340. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(05)80324-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  263. Hislop AA, Wigglesworth JS, Desai R. Alveolar development in the human fetus and infant. Early Hum Dev. 1986;13(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(86)90092-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  264. Hjalmarson O. Epidemiology and classification of acute, neonatal respiratory disorders. A prospective study. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1981;70(6):773–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1981.tb06228.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  265. Hjalmarson O, Olsson T., IV Work of breathing. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl. 1974;247:49–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  266. Ho JJ, Subramaniam P, Henderson-Smart DJ, Davis PG (2002) Continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD002271 [DOI] [PubMed]
  267. Holcberg G, Huleihel M, Katz M, et al. Vasoconstrictive activity of meconium stained amniotic fluid in the human placental vasculature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999;87:147–150. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00099-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  268. Holleman-Duray D, Kaupie D, Weiss MG. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula: use and a neonatal early extubation protocol. J Perinatol. 2007;27(12):776–781. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  269. Holm BA, Notter RH. Effects of hemoglobin and cell membrane lipids on pulmonary surfactant activity. J Appl Physiol. 1987;63:1434–1442. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1987.63.4.1434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  270. Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Carpenter JH, Fanaroff AA, Kilpatrick S, LaCorte M, et al. Trends in mortality and morbidity for very low birth weight infants, 1991–1999. Pediatrics. 2002;110(1 Pt 1):143–151. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.1.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  271. Huckstadt T, Foitzik B, Wauer RR, Schmalisch G. Comparison of two different CPAP systems by tidal breathing parameters. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(7):1134–1140. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1785-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  272. Hulsey TC, Alexander GR, Robillard PY, Annibale DJ, Keenan A. Hyaline membrane disease: the role of ethnicity and maternal risk characteristics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168(2):572–576. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90496-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  273. Hummler H, Schulze A. New and alternative modes of mechanical ventilation in neonates. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;14(1):42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2008.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  274. Hunt RW, Kean MJ, Stewart MJ, Inder TE. Patterns of cerebral injury in a series of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia utilizing magnetic resonance imaging. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(1):31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  275. Hutchison AA (2007) Essentials of airway physiology. In: 5th world congress on Pediatric Critical Care, World Federation of Pediatric Intensive Critical Care Societies, Geneva, June 24–28; follow Research and Education at www.wfpiccs.org
  276. Hutchison AA, Bignall S. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in the preterm neonate: reducing endotrauma and the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93:F64–F68. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.103770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  277. Hutchison AA, Speck DF. Laryngeal and diaphragmatic muscle activities after central nervous system lesions in cats. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92:1297–1307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  278. Hutchison AA, Burchfield DJ, Wozniak JA, Mohrman SJ. Laryngeal muscle activities with cerebral hypoxia-ischemia in newborn lambs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:85–91. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2101024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  279. Huxtable KA, Tucker AS, Wedgwood RJ. Staphylococcal pneumonia in childhood; long-term follow-up. Am J Dis Child. 1964;108:262–269. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1964.02090010264007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  280. Idiong N, Lemke RP, Lin YJ, Kwiatkowski K, Cates DB, Rigatto H. Airway closure during mixed apneas in preterm infants: is respiratory effort necessary? J Pediatr. 1998;133:509–512. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70058-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  281. Ijsselstijn H, Tibboel D, Hop WJ, Molenaar JC, de Jongste JC. Long-term pulmonary sequelae in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155(1):174–180. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.1.9001308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  282. Ikegami M, Jacobs H, Jobe A. Surfactant function in respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr. 1983;102(3):443–447. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(83)80673-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  283. Ikegami M, Jobe AH, Yamada T, Seidner S. Relationship between alveolar saturated phosphatidylcholine pool sizes and compliance of preterm rabbit lungs. The effect of maternal corticosteroid treatment. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;139(2):367–369. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/139.2.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  284. Ikegami M, Jobe AH, Tabor BL, Rider ED, Lewis JF. Lung albumin recovery in surfactant-treated preterm ventilated lambs. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;145(5):1005–1008. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/145.5.1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  285. Inamura N, Kubota A, Nakajima T, Kayatani F, Okuyama H, Oue T, et al. A proposal of new therapeutic strategy for antenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(8):1315–1319. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  286. Inhaled nitric oxide and hypoxic respiratory failure in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. The Neonatal Inhaled Nitric Oxide Study Group (NINOS) (1997) Pediatrics 99(6):838–845 [DOI] [PubMed]
  287. Iocono JA, Cilley RE, Mauger DT, Krummel TM, Dillon PW. Postnatal pulmonary hypertension after repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: predicting risk and outcome. J Pediatr Surg. 1999;34(2):349–353. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(99)90207-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  288. Ioffe S, Chernick V. Maternal alcohol ingestion and the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156(5):1231–1235. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90152-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  289. Jackson JC, Palmer S, Truog WE, Standaert TA, Murphy JH, Hodson WA. Surfactant quantity and composition during recovery from hyaline membrane disease. Pediatr Res. 1986;20(12):1243–1247. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198612000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  290. Jackson JK, Vellucci J, Johnson P, Kilbride HW. Evidence-based approach to change in clinical practice: introduction of expanded nasal continuous positive airway pressure use in an intensive care nursery. Pediatrics. 2003;111(4 Pt 2):e542–e547. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  291. Jacobsen T, Gronvall J, Petersen S, Andersen GE. “Minitouch” treatment of very low-birth-weight infants. Acta Paediatr. 1993;82(11):934–938. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1993.tb12603.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  292. Jaillard SM, Pierrat V, Dubois A, Truffert P, Lequien P, Wurtz AJ, et al. Outcome at 2 years of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a population-based study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(1):250–256. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04278-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  293. Jakobson LS, Frisk V, Trachsel D, O’Brien K. Visual and fine-motor outcomes in adolescent survivors of high-risk congenital diaphragmatic hernia who did not receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Perinatol. 2009;29(9):630–636. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  294. Jasin LR, Kern S, Thompson S, Walter C, Rone JM, Yohannan MD. Subcutaneous scalp emphysema, pneumo-orbitis and pneumocephalus in a neonate on high humidity high flow nasal cannula. J Perinatol. 2008;28(11):779–781. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  295. Jasnosz KM, Hermansen MC, Snider C, Sang K. Congenital complete absence (bilateral agenesis) of the diaphragm: a rare variant of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Perinatol. 1994;11(5):340–343. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  296. Javid PJ, Jaksic T, Skarsgard ED, Lee S. Survival rate in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the experience of the Canadian Neonatal Network. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(5):657–660. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  297. Jefferies AL, Coates G, O’Brodovich H. Pulmonary epithelial permeability in hyaline-membrane disease. N Engl J Med. 1984;311(17):1075–1080. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198410253111703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  298. Jobe AH. Commentary on surfactant treatment of neonates with respiratory failure and group B streptococcal infection. Pediatrics. 2000;106:1135. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.5.1135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  299. Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163(7):1723–1729. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.2011060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  300. Jobe AH, Kramer BW, Moss TJ, Newnham JP, Ikegami M. Decreased indicators of lung injury with continuous positive expiratory pressure in preterm lambs. Pediatr Res. 2002;52(3):387–392. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200209000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  301. Johnson P. Comparative aspects of the control of breathing during development. In: von Euler C, Lagercrantz H, editors. Central nervous control mechanisms in breathing. Oxford: Permagon Press; 1979. pp. 337–352. [Google Scholar]
  302. Jones CA, Cayabyab RG, Kwong KY, et al. Undetectable interleukin (IL)-10 and persistent IL-8 expression early in hyaline membrane disease: a possible developmental basis for the predisposition to chronic lung inflammation in preterm newborns. Pediatr Res. 1996;39:966–975. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199606000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  303. Jorch G, Hartl H, Roth B, Kribs A, Gortner L, Schaible T, et al. Surfactant aerosol treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in spontaneously breathing premature infants. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1997;24(3):222–224. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199709)24:3<222::aid-ppul9>3.0.co;2-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  304. Jounieaux V, Aubert G, Dury M, Delguste P, Rodenstein D. Effects of nasal positive-pressure hyperventilation on the glottis in normal awake subjects. J Appl Physiol. 1995;79:176–185. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1995.79.1.176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  305. Kahn DJ, Courtney SE, Steele AM, Habib RH. Unpredictability of delivered bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure: role of bias flow magnitude and nares-prong air leaks. Pediatr Res. 2007;62(3):343–347. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e318123f702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  306. Kamata S, Usui N, Ishikawa S, Okuyama H, Kitayama Y, Sawai T, et al. Prolonged preoperative stabilization using high-frequency oscillatory ventilation does not improve the outcome in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Surg Int. 1998;13(8):542–546. doi: 10.1007/s003830050398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  307. Kamper J, Wulff K, Larsen C, Lindequist S. Early treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in very low-birth-weight infants. Acta Paediatr. 1993;82(2):193–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1993.tb12637.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  308. Kanto WP, Jr, Borer RC, Jr, Barr M, Jr, Roloff DW. Tracheal aspirate lecithin/sphingomyelin ratios as predictors of recovery from respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr. 1976;89(4):612–616. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(76)80402-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  309. Kanto WP, Jr, Kuhns LP, Borer RC, Jr, Roloff DW. Failure of serial chest radiographs to predict recovery from respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;131(7):757–760. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(78)90241-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  310. Kassim Z, Greenough A. Patient-triggered ventilation. Minerva Pediatr. 2006;58(4):327–332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  311. Kattwinkel J, Nearman HS, Fanaroff AA, Katona PG, Klaus MH. Apnea of prematurity. Comparative therapeutic effects of cutaneous stimulation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Pediatr. 1975;86(4):588–592. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(75)80158-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  312. Kattwinkel J, Robinson M, Bloom BT, Delmore P, Ferguson JE. Technique for intrapartum administration of surfactant without requirement for an endotracheal tube. J Perinatol. 2004;24(6):360–365. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  313. Kavvadia V, Greenough A, Dimitriou G, Hooper R. Influence of ethnic origin on respiratory distress syndrome in very premature infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998;78(1):F25–F28. doi: 10.1136/fn.78.1.f25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  314. Kays DW, Langham MR, Jr, Ledbetter DJ, Talbert JL. Detrimental effects of standard medical therapy in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ann Surg. 1999;230(3):340–348. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199909000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  315. Keller RL, Hamrick SE, Kitterman JA, Fineman JR, Hawgood S. Treatment of rebound and chronic pulmonary hypertension with oral sildenafil in an infant with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004;5(2):184–187. doi: 10.1097/01.pcc.0000113266.26638.ad. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  316. Kendig JW, Ryan RM, Sinkin RA, Maniscalco WM, Notter RH, Guillet R, et al. Comparison of two strategies for surfactant prophylaxis in very premature infants: a multicenter randomized trial. Pediatrics. 1998;101(6):1006–1012. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.6.1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  317. Keszler M. Volume-targeted ventilation. J Perinatol. 2005;25(Suppl 2):S19–S22. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  318. Keszler M, Molina B, Butterfield AB, Subramanian KN. Combined high-frequency jet ventilation in a meconium aspiration model. Crit Care Med. 1986;14:34–38. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198601000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  319. Keszler M, Modanlou HD, Brudno DS, Clark FI, Cohen RS, Ryan RM, et al. Multicenter controlled clinical trial of high-frequency jet ventilation in preterm infants with uncomplicated respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics. 1997;100(4):593–599. doi: 10.1542/peds.100.4.593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  320. Khalaf MN, Brodsky N, Hurley J, Bhandari V. A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):13–17. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  321. Khammash H, Perlman M, Wojtulewicz J, Dunn M. Surfactant therapy in full-term neonates with severe respiratory failure [see comments] Pediatrics. 1993;92:135–139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  322. Khan A, Qurashi M, Kwiatkowski K, Cates D, Rigatto H. Measurement of the CO2 apneic threshold in newborn infants: possible relevance for periodic breathing and apnea. J Appl Physiol. 2005;98:1171–1176. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00574.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  323. Khorana M, Paradeevisut H, Sangtawesin V, Kanjanapatanakul W, Chotigeat U, Ayutthaya JK. A randomized trial of non-synchronized Nasopharyngeal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (nsNIMV) vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) in the prevention of extubation failure in pre-term < 1,500 grams. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91(Suppl 3):S136–S142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  324. Kiciman NM, Andreasson B, Bernstein G, Mannino FL, Rich W, Henderson C, et al. Thoracoabdominal motion in newborns during ventilation delivered by endotracheal tube or nasal prongs. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998;25(3):175–181. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199803)25:3<175::aid-ppul7>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  325. Kim EH. Successful extubation of newborn infants without preextubation trial of continuous positive airway pressure. J Perinatol. 1989;9(1):72–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  326. Kinsella JP, Abman SH. Inhaled nitric oxide and high frequency oscillatory ventilation in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Eur J Pediatr. 1998;157(Suppl 1):S28–S30. doi: 10.1007/pl00014288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  327. Kinsella JP, Truog WE, Walsh WF, et al. Randomized, multicenter trial of inhaled nitric oxide and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in severe, persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. J Pediatr. 1997;131:55–62. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70124-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  328. Kinsella JP, Ivy DD, Abman SH. Pulmonary vasodilator therapy in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: acute, late, and chronic pulmonary hypertension. Semin Perinatol. 2005;29(2):123–128. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2005.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  329. Kirpalani H (2007) NIPPV in premature infants: Hamilton Health Sciences Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00433212
  330. Koivusalo AI, Pakarinen MP, Lindahl HG, Rintala RJ. The cumulative incidence of significant gastroesophageal reflux in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia-a systematic clinical, pH-metric, and endoscopic follow-up study. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(2):279–282. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  331. Konishi M, Fujiwara T, Naito T, Takeuchi Y, Ogawa Y, Inukai K, et al. Surfactant replacement therapy in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. A multi-centre, randomized clinical trial: comparison of high- versus low-dose of surfactant TA. Eur J Pediatr. 1988;147(1):20–25. doi: 10.1007/BF00442605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  332. Kopelman AE, Holbert D. Use of oxygen cannulas in extremely low birthweight infants is associated with mucosal trauma and bleeding, and possibly with coagulase-negative staphylococcal sepsis. J Perinatol. 2003;23(2):94–97. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  333. Kribs A, Vierzig A, Hunseler C, Eifinger F, Welzing L, Stutzer H, et al. Early surfactant in spontaneously breathing with nCPAP in ELBW infants – a single centre four year experience. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(3):293–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00617.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  334. Kubicka ZJ, Limauro J, Darnall RA. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula therapy: yet another way to deliver continuous positive airway pressure? Pediatrics. 2008;121(1):82–88. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  335. Kugelman A, Saiki K, Platzker AC, Garg M. Measurement of lung volumes and pulmonary mechanics during weaning of newborn infants with intractable respiratory failure from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1995;20:145–151. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950200304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  336. Kugelman A, Gangitano E, Pincros J, Tantivit P, Taschuk R, Durand M. Venovenous versus venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38(8):1131–1136. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(03)00256-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  337. Kugelman A, Feferkorn I, Riskin A, Chistyakov I, Kaufman B, Bader D. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Pediatr. 2007;150(5):521–526. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  338. Kuint J, Reichman B, Neumann L, Shinwell ES. Prognostic value of the immediate response to surfactant. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994;71(3):F170–F173. doi: 10.1136/fn.71.3.f170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  339. Kulkarni A, Ehrenkranz RA, Bhandari V. Effect of introduction of synchronized nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation in a neonatal intensive care unit on bronchopulmonary dysplasia and growth in preterm infants. Am J Perinatol. 2006;23(4):233–240. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-939536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  340. Kuna ST, McCarthy MP, Smickley JS. Laryngeal response to passively induced hypocapnia during NREM sleep in normal adult humans. J Appl Physiol. 1993;75:1088–1096. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1993.75.3.1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  341. Kunisaki SM, Barnewolt CE, Estroff JA, Myers LB, Fauza DO, Wilkins-Haug LE, et al. Ex utero intrapartum treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42(1):98–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  342. Kyzer S, Sirota L, Chaimoff C. Abdominal wall closure with a silastic patch after repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Arch Surg. 2004;139(3):296–298. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.3.296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  343. Lachmann RA, van Kaam AH, Haitsma JJ, Lachmann B. High positive end-expiratory pressure levels promote bacterial translocation in experimental pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:1800–1804. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0749-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  344. Lally KP, Engle W. Postdischarge follow-up of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatrics. 2008;121(3):627–632. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  345. Lally KP, Lally PA, Lasky RE, Tibboel D, Jaksic T, Wilson JM, et al. Defect size determines survival in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatrics. 2007;120(3):e651–e657. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  346. Lamont RF, Dunlop PD, Levene MI, Elder MG. Use of glucocorticoids in pregnancies complicated by severe hypertension and proteinuria. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983;90(3):199–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08608.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  347. Lampland AL, Plumm B, Meyers PA, Worwa CT, Mammel MC. Observational study of humidified high-flow nasal cannula compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Pediatr. 2009;154(2):177–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  348. Langham MR, Jr, Kays DW, Ledbetter DJ, Frentzen B, Sanford LL, Richards DS. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Epidemiology and outcome. Clin Perinatol. 1996;23(4):671–688. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  349. Lanteri CJ, Willet KE, Kano S, Jobe AH, Ikegami M, Polk DH, et al. Time course of changes in lung mechanics following fetal steroid treatment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150(3):759–765. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.3.8087349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  350. Leach CL, Greenspan JS, Rubenstein SD, Shaffer TH, Wolfson MR, Jackson JC, et al. Partial liquid ventilation with perflubron in premature infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome. The LiquiVent Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(11):761–767. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609123351101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  351. Lee KS, Dunn MS, Fenwick M, Shennan AT. A comparison of underwater bubble continuous positive airway pressure with ventilator-derived continuous positive airway pressure in premature neonates ready for extubation. Biol Neonate. 1998;73(2):69–75. doi: 10.1159/000013962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  352. Leipala JA, Bhat RY, Rafferty GF, Hannam S, Greenough A. Effect of posture on respiratory function and drive in preterm infants prior to discharge. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003;36(4):295–300. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  353. Lemons JA, Bauer CR, Oh W, Korones SB, Papile LA, Stoll BJ, et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child health and human development neonatal research network, January 1995 through December 1996. NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2001;107(1):E1. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.1.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  354. Leon AE, Michienzi K, Ma CX, Hutchison AA. Serum caffeine concentrations in preterm neonates. Am J Perinatol. 2007;24:39–47. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-958163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  355. Leone TA, Rich W, Finer NN. Neonatal intubation: success of pediatric trainees. J Pediatr. 2005;146(5):638–641. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  356. LeSouef PN, England SJ, Bryan AC. Total resistance of the respiratory system in preterm infants with and without an endotracheal tube. J Pediatr. 1984;104(1):108–111. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(84)80605-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  357. Lewis JF, Ikegami M, Jobe AH, Tabor B. Aerosolized surfactant treatment of preterm lambs. J Appl Physiol. 1991;70(2):869–876. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1991.70.2.869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  358. Lewis DF, Futayyeh S, Towers CV, Asrat T, Edwards MS, Brooks GG. Preterm delivery from 34 to 37 weeks of gestation: is respiratory distress syndrome a problem? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(2):525–528. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70421-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  359. Lieberman E, Torday J, Barbieri R, Cohen A, Van Vunakis H, Weiss ST. Association of intrauterine cigarette smoke exposure with indices of fetal lung maturation. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79(4):564–570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  360. Liechty EA, Donovan E, Purohit D, Gilhooly J, Feldman B, Noguchi A, et al. Reduction of neonatal mortality after multiple doses of bovine surfactant in low birth weight neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics. 1991;88(1):19–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  361. Liggins GC, Howie RN. A controlled trial of antepartum glucocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Pediatrics. 1972;50(4):515–525. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  362. Lin CH, Wang ST, Lin YJ, Yeh TF. Efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating apnea of prematurity. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998;26(5):349–353. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199811)26:5<349::aid-ppul8>3.0.co;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  363. Lin CY, Zhang H, Cheng KC, Slutsky AS. Mechanical ventilation may increase susceptibility to the development of bacteremia. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1429–1434. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000063449.58029.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  364. Lin HC, Su BH, Lin TW, Peng CT, Tsai CH. Risk factors of mortality in meconium aspiration syndrome: review of 314 cases. Acta Paediatr Taiwan. 2004;45:30–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  365. Lin AE, Pober BR, Adatia I. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia and associated cardiovascular malformations: type, frequency, and impact on management. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2007;145(2):201–216. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  366. Linderkamp O, Versmold HT, Fendel H, Riegel KP, Betke K. Association of neonatal respiratory distress with birth asphyxia and deficiency of red cell mass in premature infants. Eur J Pediatr. 1978;129(3):167–173. doi: 10.1007/BF00442160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  367. Lindner W, Vossbeck S, Hummler H, Pohlandt F. Delivery room management of extremely low birth weight infants: spontaneous breathing or intubation? Pediatrics. 1999;103(5 Pt 1):961–967. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.5.961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  368. Lindwall R, Blennow M, Svensson M, Jonsson B, Berggren-Bostrom E, Flanby M, et al. A pilot study of inhaled nitric oxide in preterm infants treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(7):959–964. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2593-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  369. Liptsen E, Aghai ZH, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Nakhla T, Long J, et al. Work of breathing during nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: a comparison of bubble vs variable-flow devices. J Perinatol. 2005;25(7):453–458. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  370. Lista G, Colnaghi M, Castoldi F, Condo V, Reali R, Compagnoni G, et al. Impact of targeted-volume ventilation on lung inflammatory response in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004;37(6):510–514. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  371. Locke R, Greenspan JS, Shaffer TH, Rubenstein SD, Wolfson MR. Effect of nasal CPAP on thoracoabdominal motion in neonates with respiratory insufficiency. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1991;11(3):259–264. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950110313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  372. Logan JW, Rice HE, Goldberg RN, Cotten CM. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and summary of best-evidence practice strategies. J Perinatol. 2007;27(9):535–549. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  373. Lotze A, Mitchell BR, Bulas DI, Zola EM, Shalwitz RA, Gunkel JH. Multicenter study of surfactant (beractant) use in the treatment of term infants with severe respiratory failure. Survanta in Term Infants Study Group. J Pediatr. 1998;132:40–47. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70482-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  374. Lund DP, Mitchell J, Kharasch V, Quigley S, Kuehn M, Wilson JM. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the hidden morbidity. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29(2):258–262. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90329-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  375. Lundstrom KE. Early nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm neonates: the need for randomized trials. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92(10):1124–1126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  376. Makri V, Hospes B, Stoll-Becker S, Borkhardt A, Gortner L. Polymorphisms of surfactant protein B encoding gene: modifiers of the course of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome? Eur J Pediatr. 2002;161(11):604–608. doi: 10.1007/s00431-002-1046-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  377. Masuda T, Kazama T, Ikeda K, Ohba S. Tension pneumomediastinum secondary to meconium aspiration syndrome. Crit Care Med. 1984;12:1009. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198411000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  378. Maturana A, Torres-Pereyra J, Salinas R, Astudillo P, Moya FR, The Chile Surf Group A randomized trial of natural surfactant for moderate to severe meconium aspiration syndrome. Pediatr Res. 2005;57:1545A. [Google Scholar]
  379. Mazela J, Merritt TA, Finer NN. Aerosolized surfactants. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2007;19(2):155–162. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32807fb013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  380. Mazzella M, Bellini C, Calevo MG, Campone F, Massocco D, Mezzano P, et al. A randomised control study comparing the Infant Flow Driver with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001;85(2):F86–F90. doi: 10.1136/fn.85.2.F86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  381. McCallion N, Davis PG, Morley CJ (2005) Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in the neonate. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD003666 [DOI] [PubMed]
  382. McCann EM, Goldman SL, Brady JP. Pulmonary function in the sick newborn infant. Pediatr Res. 1987;21(4):313–325. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198704000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  383. McCormick MC, Workman-Daniels K, Brooks-Gunn J, Peckham GJ. Hospitalization of very low birth weight children at school age. J Pediatr. 1993;122(3):360–365. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)83417-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  384. McGahren ED, Mallik K, Rodgers BM. Neurological outcome is diminished in survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32(8):1216–1220. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90685-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  385. Mendelson CR, Alcorn JL, Gao E. The pulmonary surfactant protein genes and their regulation in fetal lung. Semin Perinatol. 1993;17(4):223–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  386. Menon G, Boyle EM, Bergqvist LL, McIntosh N, Barton BA, Anand KJ. Morphine analgesia and gastrointestinal morbidity in preterm infants: secondary results from the NEOPAIN trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93(5):F362–F367. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.119297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  387. Mercier JC, Hummler H, Durrmeyer X, Sanchez-Luna M, Carnielli VP, Field D, Greenough A, Van Overmeire B, Jonsson B, Hallman M, Baldassarre J (2009) Inhaled nitric oxide for the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants. Pediatric Academic Society, Baltimore
  388. Metkus AP, Esserman L, Sola A, Harrison MR, Adzick NS. Cost per anomaly: what does a diaphragmatic hernia cost? J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30(2):226–230. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(95)90565-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  389. Mettauer NL, Pierce CM, Cassidy JV, Kiely EM, Petros AJ. One-year survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia, 1995–2006. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94(5):407. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.147827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  390. Michna J, Jobe AH, Ikegami M. Positive end-expiratory pressure preserves surfactant function in preterm lambs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160(2):634–639. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.2.9902016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  391. Migliazza L, Bellan C, Alberti D, Auriemma A, Burgio G, Locatelli G, et al. Retrospective study of 111 cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia treated with early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and presurgical stabilization. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42(9):1526–1532. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  392. Migliori C, Motta M, Angeli A, Chirico G. Nasal bilevel vs. continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005;40(5):426–430. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  393. Migliori C, Gancia P, Garzoli E, Spinoni V, Chirico G. The Effects of helium/oxygen mixture (heliox) before and after extubation in long-term mechanically ventilated very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2009;123(6):1524–1528. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  394. Miguet D, Claris O, Lapillonne A, Bakr A, Chappuis JP, Salle BL. Preoperative stabilization using high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Crit Care Med. 1994;22(9 Suppl):S77–S82. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199422091-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  395. Miller JD, Carlo WA. Safety and effectiveness of permissive hypercapnia in the preterm infant. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2007;19(2):142–144. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3280895e12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  396. Miller MJ, Martin RJ. Pathophysiology of apnea of prematurity. In: Polin RA, Fox WW, Abman SH, editors. Fetal and neonatal physiology. 3. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. p. 905. [Google Scholar]
  397. Miller MJ, Carlo WA, Martin RJ. Continuous positive airway pressure selectively reduces obstructive apnea in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 1985;106(1):91–94. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80475-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  398. Miller MJ, DiFiore JM, Strohl KP, Martin RJ. Effects of nasal CPAP on supraglottic and total pulmonary resistance in preterm infants. J Appl Physiol. 1990;68(1):141–146. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1990.68.1.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  399. Moa G, Nilsson K, Zetterstrom H, Jonsson LO. A new device for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the newborn: an experimental study. Crit Care Med. 1988;16(12):1238–1242. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198812000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  400. Moretti C, Gizzi C, Papoff P, Lampariello S, Capoferri M, Calcagnini G, et al. Comparing the effects of nasal synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) after extubation in very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev. 1999;56(2–3):167–177. doi: 10.1016/s0378-3782(99)00046-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  401. Morini F, Capolupo I, Masi R, Ronchetti MP, Locatelli M, Corchia C, et al. Hearing impairment in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the inaudible and noiseless foot of time. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(2):380–384. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  402. Morley CJ, Lau R, De Paoli A, Davis PG. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure: does bubbling improve gas exchange? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90(4):F343–F344. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.062588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  403. Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet JM, Carlin JB. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(7):700–708. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  404. Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102(2):101–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09060.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  405. Moses D, Holm BA, Spitale P, Liu MY, Enhorning G. Inhibition of pulmonary surfactant function by meconium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:477–481. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)80003-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  406. Moss RL, Chen CM, Harrison MR. Prosthetic patch durability in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a long-term follow-up study. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(1):152–154. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.20037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  407. Moya FR, Gadzinowski J, Bancalari E, Salinas V, Kopelman B, Bancalari A, et al. A multicenter, randomized, masked, comparison trial of lucinactant, colfosceril palmitate, and beractant for the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome among very preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2005;115(4):1018–1029. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  408. Moya F, Sinha S, Gadzinowski J, D’Agostino R, Segal R, Guardia C, et al. One-year follow-up of very preterm infants who received lucinactant for prevention of respiratory distress syndrome: results from 2 multicenter randomized, controlled trials. Pediatrics. 2007;119(6):e1361–e1370. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  409. Muratore CS, Wilson JM. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: where are we and where do we go from here? Semin Perinatol. 2000;24(6):418–428. doi: 10.1053/sper.2000.21111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  410. Muratore CS, Kharasch V, Lund DP, Sheils C, Friedman S, Brown C, et al. Pulmonary morbidity in 100 survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia monitored in a multidisciplinary clinic. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(1):133–140. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.20031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  411. Muratore CS, Utter S, Jaksic T, Lund DP, Wilson JM. Nutritional morbidity in survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(8):1171–1176. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.25746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  412. Musante G, Schulze A, Gerhardt T, Everett R, Claure N, Schaller P, et al. Proportional assist ventilation decreases thoracoabdominal asynchrony and chest wall distortion in preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 2001;49(2):175–180. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200102000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  413. Mutch L, Newdick M, Lodwick A, Chalmers I. Secular changes in rehospitalization of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 1986;78(1):164–171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  414. Myers TR. AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: selection of an oxygen delivery device for neonatal and pediatric patients – 2002 revision & update. Respir Care. 2002;47(6):707–716. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  415. Naeye RL, Dellinger WS, Blanc WA. Fetal and maternal features of antenatal bacterial infections. J Pediatr. 1971;79:733–739. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(71)80383-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  416. Nafday SM, Green RS, Lin J, Brion LP, Ochshorn I, Holzman IR. Is there an advantage of using pressure support ventilation with volume guarantee in the initial management of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome? A pilot study. J Perinatol. 2005;25(3):193–197. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  417. Neonatal acute respiratory failure outcome data. The Extracorporeal Life Support Organisation (2009)
  418. Neonatal ECMO Registry of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organisation (2004) Neonatal ECMO. Ann Arbor
  419. Newnham JP, Jobe AH. Should we be prescribing repeated courses of antenatal corticosteroids? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;14(3):157–163. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2008.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  420. Ng E, Taddio A, Ohlsson A (2003) Intravenous midazolam infusion for sedation of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD002052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  421. Ng GY, Derry C, Marston L, Choudhury M, Holmes K, Calvert SA. Reduction in ventilator-induced lung injury improves outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia? Pediatr Surg Int. 2008;24(2):145–150. doi: 10.1007/s00383-007-2051-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  422. Niblett DJ, Sandhar BK, Dunnill MS, Sykes MK. Comparison of the effects of high frequency oscillation and controlled mechanical ventilation on hyaline membrane formation in a rabbit model of the neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Br J Anaesth. 1989;62(6):628–636. doi: 10.1093/bja/62.6.628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  423. Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW, van der Cammen-van Zijp MH, Janssen AJ, Reuser JJ, Mazer P, van Heijst AF, et al. Motor performance in five-year-old extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survivors: a population-based study. Crit Care. 2009;13(2):R47. doi: 10.1186/cc7770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  424. Nilsson R, Grossmann G, Robertson B. Artificial ventilation of premature newborn rabbits: effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on lung mechanics and lung morphology. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1980;69(5):597–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1980.tb07328.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  425. Nissen MD. Congenital and neonatal pneumonia. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2007;8:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2007.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  426. Nobuhara KK, Lund DP, Mitchell J, Kharasch V, Wilson JM. Long-term outlook for survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Clin Perinatol. 1996;23(4):873–887. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  427. Nock ML, Difiore JM, Arko MK, Martin RJ. Relationship of the ventilatory response to hypoxia with neonatal apnea in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2004;144:291–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  428. Nolent P, Hallalel F, Chevalier JY, Flamant C, Renolleau S. Meconium aspiration syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation: incidence and respiratory management in France (2000–2001) Arch Pediatr. 2004;11:417–422. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2004.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  429. Noori S, Friedlich P, Wong P, Garingo A, Seri I. Cardiovascular effects of sildenafil in neonates and infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and pulmonary hypertension. Neonatology. 2007;91(2):92–100. doi: 10.1159/000097125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  430. Northway WH, Jr, Rosan RC, Porter DY. Pulmonary disease following respirator therapy of hyaline-membrane disease. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 1967;276(7):357–368. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196702162760701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  431. O’Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Endotracheal intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation: success rates, duration, and adverse effects. Pediatrics. 2006;117(1):e16–e21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  432. Oelberg DG, Downey SA, Flynn MM. Bile salt-induced intracellular Ca++ accumulation in type II pneumocytes. Lung. 1990;168:297–308. doi: 10.1007/BF02719707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  433. Ojomo EO, Coustan DR. Absence of evidence of pulmonary maturity at amniocentesis in term infants of diabetic mothers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163(3):954–957. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91103-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  434. Olsen SL, Thibeault DW, Truog WE. Crossover trial comparing pressure support with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. J Perinatol. 2002;22(6):461–466. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  435. Onrust SV, Dooley M, Goa KL. Calfactant: a review of its use in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Paediatr Drugs. 1999;1(3):219–243. doi: 10.2165/00128072-199901030-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  436. Ostrea EMJ, Naqvi M. The influence of gestational age on the ability of the fetus to pass meconium in utero. Clinical implications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982;61:275–277. doi: 10.3109/00016348209156571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  437. Owen LS, Morley CJ, Davis PG. Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: what do we know in 2007? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92(5):F414–F418. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.117614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  438. Owen LS, Morley CJ, Davis PG. Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: a survey of practice in England. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93(2):F148–F150. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.118109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  439. Pandit PB, Courtney SE, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Habib RH. Work of breathing during constant- and variable-flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 2001;108(3):682–685. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  440. Pandya HC, Kotecha S. Chronic lung disease of prematurity: clinical and pathophysiological correlates. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2001;56(3):270–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  441. Pantalitschka T, Sievers J, Urschitz MS, Herberts T, Reher C, Poets CF. Randomized crossover trial of four nasal respiratory support systems on apnoea of prematurity in very low birth weight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94:F245–F248. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.148981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  442. Pape KE, Armstrong DL, Fitzhardinge PM. Central nervous system pathology associated with mask ventilation in the very low birthweight infant: a new etiology for intracerebellar hemorrhages. Pediatrics. 1976;58(4):473–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  443. Papoff P, Caresta E, Versacci P, Grossi R, Midulla F, Moretti C. The role of terlipressin in the management of severe pulmonary hypertension in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19(8):805–806. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03078.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  444. Paranka MS, Clark RH, Yoder BA, Null DM., Jr Predictors of failure of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in term infants with severe respiratory failure. Pediatrics. 1995;95:400–404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  445. Patel D, Greenough A. Does nasal CPAP reduce bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)? Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(10):1314–1317. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00931.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  446. ATS-ERS Pediatrics Assembly Respiratory mechanics in infants: physiologic evaluation in health and disease. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;147:474–496. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.2.474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  447. Pellicano A, Tingay DG, Mills JF, Fasulakis S, Morley CJ, Dargaville PA. Comparison of four methods of lung volume recruitment during high frequency oscillatory ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:1990–1998. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1628-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  448. Phatak RS, Pairaudeau CF, Smith CJ, Pairaudeau PW, Klonin H. Heliox with inhaled nitric oxide: a novel strategy for severe localized interstitial pulmonary emphysema in preterm neonatal ventilation. Respir Care. 2008;53(12):1731–1738. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  449. Pillow JJ, Hillman N, Moss TJ, Polglase G, Bold G, Beaumont C, et al. Bubble continuous positive airway pressure enhances lung volume and gas exchange in preterm lambs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176(1):63–69. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200609-1368OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  450. Piotrowski A, Sobala W, Kawczynski P. Patient-initiated, pressure-regulated, volume-controlled ventilation compared with intermittent mandatory ventilation in neonates: a prospective, randomised study. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23(9):975–981. doi: 10.1007/s001340050441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  451. Piper JM, Xenakis EM, McFarland M, Elliott BD, Berkus MD, Langer O. Do growth-retarded premature infants have different rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality than appropriately grown premature infants? Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(2):169–174. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00400-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  452. Poets CF. Pathophysiology of apnea of prematurity: implications from observational studies. In: Mathew OP, editor. Respiratory control and disorders in the newborn. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2003. pp. 295–316. [Google Scholar]
  453. Possmayer F. Physicochemical aspects of pulmonary surfactant. In: Polin RA, Fox WW, Abman SH, editors. Fetal and neonatal physiology. 3. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2004. pp. 1014–1034. [Google Scholar]
  454. Praud JP, Reix P. Upper airways and neonatal respiration. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2005;149:131–141. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2005.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  455. Probyn ME, Hooper SB, Dargaville PA, McCallion N, Crossley K, Harding R, et al. Positive end expiratory pressure during resuscitation of premature lambs rapidly improves blood gases without adversely affecting arterial pressure. Pediatr Res. 2004;56(2):198–204. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000132752.94155.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  456. Quinteros A, Gonzalez AJ, Salinas JA, Luco M, Tapia JL (2009) Hypopharyngeal oxygen concentration and pressures delivered by nasal cannula in preterm infants. Relationship with flow, gas mixture and infant weight. Pediatric Academic Society, Baltimore [DOI] [PubMed]
  457. Ramanathan R. Optimal ventilatory strategies and surfactant to protect the preterm lungs. Neonatology. 2008;93(4):302–308. doi: 10.1159/000121456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  458. Ramanathan R, Sardesai S. Lung protective ventilatory strategies in very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol. 2008;28(Suppl 1):S41–S46. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  459. Ramanathan R, Rasmussen MR, Gerstmann DR, Finer N, Sekar K. A randomized, multicenter masked comparison trial of poractant alfa (Curosurf) versus beractant (Survanta) in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Am J Perinatol. 2004;21(3):109–119. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-823779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  460. Ramsden CA, Reynolds EO. Ventilator settings for newborn infants. Arch Dis Child. 1987;62:529–538. doi: 10.1136/adc.62.5.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  461. Rana AR, Khouri JS, Teitelbaum DH, Drongowski RA, Hirschl RB, Mychaliska GB. Salvaging the severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia patient: is a silo the solution? J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(5):788–791. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  462. Rasheed A, Tindall S, Cueny DL, Klein MD, Delaney-Black V. Neurodevelopmental outcome after congenital diaphragmatic hernia: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation before and after surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(4):539–544. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.22278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  463. Rennie JM. Roberton’s textbook of neonatology. 4. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  464. Revenis ME, Glass P, Short BL. Mortality and morbidity rates among lower birth weight infants (2000 to 2500 grams) treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr. 1992;121(3):452–458. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81804-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  465. Reyes C, Chang LK, Waffarn F, Mir H, Warden MJ, Sills J. Delayed repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia with early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation during preoperative stabilization. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33(7):1010–1016. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90523-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  466. Reynolds EO, Roberton NR, Wigglesworth JS. Hyaline membrane disease, respiratory distress, and surfactant deficiency. Pediatrics. 1968;42(5):758–768. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  467. Richardson CP, Jung AL. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on pulmonary function and blood gases of infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Res. 1978;12(7):771–774. doi: 10.1203/00006450-197807000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  468. Richardson DK, Torday JS. Racial differences in predictive value of the lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(5 Pt 1):1273–1278. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70141-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  469. Richardson P, Wyman ML, Jung AL. Functional residual capacity and severity of respiratory distress syndrome in infants. Crit Care Med. 1980;8(11):637–640. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198011000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  470. Rider ED, Ikegami M, Whitsett JA, Hull W, Absolom D, Jobe AH. Treatment responses to surfactants containing natural surfactant proteins in preterm rabbits. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;147(3):669–676. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.3.669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  471. Rigatto H. Apnea. In: Thibeault DW, Gregory GA, editors. Neonatal pulmonary care. 2. Norwalk: Appleton Century-Crofts; 1986. pp. 641–656. [Google Scholar]
  472. Rishi A, Hatzis D, McAlmon K, Floros J. An allelic variant of the 6A gene for human surfactant protein A. Am J Physiol. 1992;262(5 Pt 1):L566–L573. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1992.262.5.L566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  473. Robertson NJ, McCarthy LS, Hamilton PA, Moss AL. Nasal deformities resulting from flow driver continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996;75(3):F209–F212. doi: 10.1136/fn.75.3.f209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  474. Rocha GM, Bianchi RF, Severo M, Rodrigues MM, Baptista MJ, Correia-Pinto J, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia – the neonatal period (part I) Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2008;18(4):219–223. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  475. Rojas MA, Lozano JM, Rojas MX, Laughon M, Bose CL, Rondon MA, et al. Very early surfactant without mandatory ventilation in premature infants treated with early continuous positive airway pressure: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2009;123(1):137–142. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  476. Ronnestad A, Abrahamsen TG, Medbo S, Reigstad H, Lossius K, Kaaresen PI, et al. Septicemia in the first week of life in a Norwegian national cohort of extremely premature infants. Pediatrics. 2005;115(3):e262–e268. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  477. Roy BJ, Rycus P, Conrad SA, Clark RH. The changing demographics of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients reported to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry. Pediatrics. 2000;106(6):1334–1338. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.6.1334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  478. Roze JC, Chambille B, Fleury MA, Debillon T, Gaultier C. Oxygen cost of breathing in newborn infants with long-term ventilatory support. J Pediatr. 1995;127(6):984–987. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70044-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  479. Rubaltelli FF, Bonafe L, Tangucci M, Spagnolo A, Dani C. Epidemiology of neonatal acute respiratory disorders. A multicenter study on incidence and fatality rates of neonatal acute respiratory disorders according to gestational age, maternal age, pregnancy complications and type of delivery. Italian Group of Neonatal Pneumology. Biol Neonate. 1998;74(1):7–15. doi: 10.1159/000014005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  480. Rubin BK, Tomkiewicz RP, Patrinos ME, Easa D. The surface and transport properties of meconium and reconstituted meconium solutions. Pediatr Res. 1996;40:834–838. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199612000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  481. Ryan CA, Finer NN, Peters KL. Nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation offers no advantages over nasal continuous positive airway pressure in apnea of prematurity. Am J Dis Child. 1989;143(10):1196–1198. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1989.02150220094026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  482. Rybak IA, O’Connor R, Ross A, Shevtsova NA, Nuding SC, Segers LS, Shannon R, Dick TE, Dunin-Barkowski WL, Orem JM, Solomon IC, Morris KF, Lindsey BG. Reconfiguration of the pontomedullary respiratory network: a computational modeling study with coordinated in vivo experiments. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:1770–1799. doi: 10.1152/jn.90416.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  483. Sai Sunil Kinshore M, Dutta S, Kumar P (2009) Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr 98(9):1412–1415 [DOI] [PubMed]
  484. Sakai H, Tamura M, Hosokawa Y, Bryan AC, Barker GA, Bohn DJ. Effect of surgical repair on respiratory mechanics in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr. 1987;111(3):432–438. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80475-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  485. Sakai H, Bohn DJ, Bryan AC. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: does surgical repair really improve respiratory mechanics. Jpn J Pediatr Surg. 1987;19:881. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80475-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  486. Sakurai Y, Azarow K, Cutz E, Messineo A, Pearl R, Bohn D. Pulmonary barotrauma in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a clinicopathological correlation. J Pediatr Surg. 1999;34(12):1813–1817. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(99)90319-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  487. Sandri F, Ancora G, Lanzoni A, Tagliabue P, Colnaghi M, Ventura ML, et al. Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airways pressure in newborns of 28–31 weeks gestation: multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89(5):F394–F398. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.037010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  488. Sandri F, Plavka R, Simeoni U. The CURPAP study: an international randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of combining prophylactic surfactant and early nasal continuous positive airway pressure in very preterm infants. Neonatology. 2008;94(1):60–62. doi: 10.1159/000113060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  489. Sandri F, Plavka R, Simeoni U (2009) CURPAP study – an international randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of combining prophylactic surfactant and early nasal CPAP in very preterm infants. Pediatric Academic Society, Baltimore [DOI] [PubMed]
  490. Sant’Ambrogio FB, Sant’Ambrogio G, Chung K. Effect of HCl-Pepsin laryngeal instillations on upper airway patency-maintaining mechanisms. J Appl Physiol. 1998;84:1299–1304. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.4.1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  491. Santin R, Brodsky N, Bhandari V. A prospective observational pilot study of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) as a primary mode of ventilation in infants > or = 28 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) J Perinatol. 2004;24(8):487–493. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  492. Saslow JG, Aghai ZH, Nakhla TA, Hart JJ, Lawrysh R, Stahl GE, et al. Work of breathing using high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2006;26(8):476–480. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  493. Saugstad OD, Ramji S, Soll RF, Vento M. Resuscitation of newborn infants with 21% or 100% oxygen: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Neonatology. 2008;94(3):176–182. doi: 10.1159/000143397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  494. Scheurer MA, Bradley SM, Atz AM. Vasopressin to attenuate pulmonary hypertension and improve systemic blood pressure after correction of obstructed total anomalous pulmonary venous return. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129(2):464–466. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.06.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  495. Schlessel JS, Susskind H, Joel DD, Bossuyt A, Harrold WH, Zanzi I, et al. Effect of PEEP on regional ventilation and perfusion in the mechanically ventilated preterm lamb. J Nucl Med. 1989;30(8):1342–1350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  496. Schmidt B, Roberts RS, Davis P, Doyle LW, Barrington KJ, Ohlsson A, et al. Caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(20):2112–2121. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  497. Schmidt B, Roberts R, Davis P, Doyle L, Barrington K, Ohlsson A, Solimano A, Tin W, for the Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity Trial Group Caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2112–2121. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  498. Schmidt B, Roberts RS, Davis P, Doyle LW, Barrington KJ, Ohlsson A, et al. Long-term effects of caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(19):1893–1902. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  499. Schmolzer GM, Kamlin OF, Dawson JA, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Respiratory monitoring of neonatal resuscitation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95(4):F295–F303. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.165878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  500. Schneider J, Mitchell I, Singhal N, Kirk V, Hasan SU. Prenatal cigarette smoke exposure attenuates recovery from hypoxemic challenge in preterm infants. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178:520–526. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200803-432OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  501. Schreiber MD, Gin-Mestan K, Marks JD, Huo D, Lee G, Srisuparp P. Inhaled nitric oxide in premature infants with the respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(22):2099–2107. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  502. Schulze A, Jonzon A, Schaller P, Sedin G. Effects of ventilator resistance and compliance on phrenic nerve activity in spontaneously breathing cats. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153(2):671–676. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.153.2.8564116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  503. Schulze A, Gerhardt T, Musante G, Schaller P, Claure N, Everett R, et al. Proportional assist ventilation in low birth weight infants with acute respiratory disease: a comparison to assist/control and conventional mechanical ventilation. J Pediatr. 1999;135(3):339–344. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70131-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  504. Schulze A, Rieger-Fackeldey E, Gerhardt T, Claure N, Everett R, Bancalari E. Randomized crossover comparison of proportional assist ventilation and patient-triggered ventilation in extremely low birth weight infants with evolving chronic lung disease. Neonatology. 2007;92(1):1–7. doi: 10.1159/000098376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  505. Schwartz SM, Vermilion RP, Hirschl RB. Evaluation of left ventricular mass in children with left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr. 1994;125(3):447–451. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)83293-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  506. Schwartz IP, Bernbaum JC, Rychik J, Grunstein M, D’Agostino J, Polin RA. Pulmonary hypertension in children following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy and repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Perinatol. 1999;19(3):220–226. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  507. Seidner S, Pettenazzo A, Ikegami M, Jobe A. Corticosteroid potentiation of surfactant dose response in preterm rabbits. J Appl Physiol. 1988;64(6):2366–2371. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1988.64.6.2366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  508. Semakula N, Stewart DL, Goldsmith LJ, Cook LN, Bond SJ. Survival of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia during the ECMO era: an 11-year experience. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32(12):1683–1689. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90506-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  509. Sen S, Reghu A, Ferguson SD. Efficacy of a single dose of antenatal steroid in surfactant-treated babies under 31 weeks’ gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;12(5):298–303. doi: 10.1080/jmf.12.5.298.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  510. Seppanen MP, Kaapa PO, Kero PO, Saraste M. Doppler-derived systolic pulmonary artery pressure in acute neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics. 1994;93(5):769–773. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  511. Shaffer TH, Lowe CA, Bhutani VK, Douglas PR. Liquid ventilation: effects on pulmonary function in distressed meconium-stained lambs. Pediatr Res. 1984;18:47–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  512. Shanmugananda K, Rawal J. Nasal trauma due to nasal continuous positive airway pressure in newborns. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92(1):F18. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.095034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  513. Shennan AT, Dunn MS, Ohlsson A, Lennox K, Hoskins EM. Abnormal pulmonary outcomes in premature infants: prediction from oxygen requirement in the neonatal period. Pediatrics. 1988;82(4):527–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  514. Shoemaker MT, Pierce MR, Yoder BA, DiGeronimo RJ. High flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: a retrospective study. J Perinatol. 2007;27(2):85–91. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  515. Short BL. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: use in meconium aspiration syndrome. J Perinatol. 2008;28(Suppl 3):S79–S83. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  516. Siebert JR, Haas JE, Beckwith JB. Left ventricular hypoplasia in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 1984;19(5):567–571. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(84)80105-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  517. Siew ML, Te Pas AB, Wallace MJ, Kitchen MJ, Lewis RA, Fouras A, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure enhances development of a functional residual capacity in preterm rabbits ventilated from birth. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106(5):1487–1493. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91591.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  518. Sinderby C, Navalesi P, Beck J, Skrobik Y, Comtois N, Friberg S, et al. Neural control of mechanical ventilation in respiratory failure. Nat Med. 1999;5(12):1433–1436. doi: 10.1038/71012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  519. Singh SD, Bowe L, Smith J, Clarke P, Glover K, Pasquill A et al (2006) Nasal CPAP weaning of VLBW infants: is decreasing CPAP pressure or increasing time off the better strategy – results of a randomised controlled trial. Pediatric Academic Society annual meeting, San Francisco, Abstract No. 2635.4
  520. Singh J, Sinha SK, Alsop E, Gupta S, Mishra A, Donn SM. Long term follow-up of very low birthweight infants from a neonatal volume versus pressure mechanical ventilation trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94(5):F360–F362. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.150938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  521. Singh BS, Clark RH, Powers RJ, Spitzer AR. Meconium aspiration syndrome remains a significant problem in the NICU: outcomes and treatment patterns in term neonates admitted for intensive care during a ten-year period. J Perinatol. 2009;29:497–503. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  522. Sinha SK, Donn SM. Fetal-to-neonatal maladaptation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;11(3):166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2006.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  523. Sinha SK, Donn SM. Newer forms of conventional ventilation for preterm newborns. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(10):1338–1343. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00869.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  524. Sinha A, Yokoe D, Platt R. Epidemiology of neonatal infections: experience during and after hospitalization. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22:244–251. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000055060.32226.8a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  525. Sinha SK, Gupta S, Donn SM. Immediate respiratory management of the preterm infant. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;13(1):24–29. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2007.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  526. Skari H, Bjornland K, Frenckner B, Friberg LG, Heikkinen M, Hurme T, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a survey of practice in Scandinavia. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20(5):309–313. doi: 10.1007/s00383-004-1186-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  527. Skelton R, Jeffery HE. Factors affecting the neonatal response to artificial surfactant. J Paediatr Child Health. 1996;32(3):236–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1996.tb01561.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  528. So BH, Shibuya K, Tamura M, Watanabe H, Kamoshita S. Clinical experience in using a new type of nasal prong for administration of N-CPAP. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1992;34(3):328–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.1992.tb00967.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  529. Soe A, Hodgkinson J, Jani B, Ducker D. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure weaning in preterm infants [abstract] Eur J Pediatr. 2006;165(suppl 1):50. [Google Scholar]
  530. Soll RF, Blanco F (2001) Natural surfactant extract versus synthetic surfactant for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD000144 [DOI] [PubMed]
  531. Soll RF, Morley CJ (2001) Prophylactic versus selective use of surfactant in preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD000510 [DOI] [PubMed]
  532. Soll R, Ozek E (2009) Multiple versus single doses of exogenous surfactant for the prevention or treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD000141 [DOI] [PubMed]
  533. Somaschini M, Locatelli G, Salvoni L, Bellan C, Colombo A. Impact of new treatments for respiratory failure on outcome of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur J Pediatr. 1999;158(10):780–784. doi: 10.1007/s004310051203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  534. Sosenko IR. Antenatal cocaine exposure produces accelerated surfactant maturation without stimulation of antioxidant enzyme development in the late gestation rat. Pediatr Res. 1993;33(4 Pt 1):327–331. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199304000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  535. Speer CP, Gefeller O, Groneck P, Laufkotter E, Roll C, Hanssler L, et al. Randomised clinical trial of two treatment regimens of natural surfactant preparations in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995;72(1):F8–F13. doi: 10.1136/fn.72.1.f8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  536. Spitzer A. Apnea and home cardiorespiratory monitoring. In: McConnell MS, Imaizumi SO, editors. Guidelines for pediatric home health care. Elk Grove Village: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2002. pp. 357–387. [Google Scholar]
  537. Sreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson-Mason A, Osiovich H. High-flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: a comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics. 2001;107(5):1081–1083. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.5.1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  538. Sriram S, Wall SN, Khoshnood B, Singh JK, Hsieh HL, Lee KS. Racial disparity in meconium-stained amniotic fluid and meconium aspiration syndrome in the United States, 1989–2000. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:1262–1268. doi: 10.1016/j.obstetgynecol.2003.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  539. St Peter SD, Valusek PA, Tsao K, Holcomb GW, 3rd, Ostlie DJ, Snyder CL. Abdominal complications related to type of repair for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Surg Res. 2007;140(2):234–236. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  540. Steer PA, Flenady VJ, Shearman A, Lee TC, Tudehope DI, Charles BG. Periextubation caffeine in preterm neonates: a randomized dose response trial. J Paediatr Child Health. 2003;39:511–515. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2003.00207.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  541. Stefanescu BM, Murphy WP, Hansell BJ, Fuloria M, Morgan TM, Aschner JL. A randomized, controlled trial comparing two different continuous positive airway pressure systems for the successful extubation of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2003;112(5):1031–1038. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.5.1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  542. Steinhorn RH, Kinsella JP, Pierce C, Butrous G, Dilleen M, Oakes M, et al. Intravenous sildenafil in the treatment of neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension. J Pediatr. 2009;155(6):841–847. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  543. Stenson BJ, Glover RM, Parry GJ, Wilkie RA, Laing IA, Tarnow-Mordi WO. Static respiratory compliance in the newborn. III: early changes after exogenous surfactant treatment. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994;70(1):F19–F24. doi: 10.1136/fn.70.1.f19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  544. Stevens TP, Harrington EW, Blennow M, Soll RF (2007) Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs. selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD003063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  545. Stolar CJ. What do survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia look like when they grow up? Semin Pediatr Surg. 1996;5(4):275–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  546. Stolar C, Dillon P, Reyes C. Selective use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 1988;23(3):207–211. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(88)80723-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  547. Stolar CJ, Levy JP, Dillon PW, Reyes C, Belamarich P, Berdon WE. Anatomic and functional abnormalities of the esophagus in infants surviving congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Surg. 1990;159(2):204–207. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80261-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  548. Stolar CJ, Crisafi MA, Driscoll YT. Neurocognitive outcome for neonates treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: are infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia different? J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30(2):366–371. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(95)90591-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  549. Subhedar NV, Ryan SW, Shaw NJ. Open randomised controlled trial of inhaled nitric oxide and early dexamethasone in high risk preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997;77(3):F185–F190. doi: 10.1136/fn.77.3.f185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  550. Subramaniam P, Henderson-Smart DJ, Davis PG (2005) Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airways pressure for preventing morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD001243 [DOI] [PubMed]
  551. Sun B, Curstedt T, Robertson B. Surfactant inhibition in experimental meconium aspiration. Acta Paediatr. 1993;82:182–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1993.tb12635.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  552. Swaminathan S, Quinn J, Stabile MW, Bader D, Platzker AC, Keens TG. Long-term pulmonary sequelae of meconium aspiration syndrome. J Pediatr. 1989;114:356–361. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80551-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  553. Sweet D, Bevilacqua G, Carnielli V, Greisen G, Plavka R, Didrik Saugstad O, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. J Perinat Med. 2007;35(3):175–186. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2007.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  554. Szymankiewicz M, Gadzinowski J, Kowalska K. Pulmonary function after surfactant lung lavage followed by surfactant administration in infants with severe meconium aspiration syndrome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004;16:125–130. doi: 10.1080/14767050400003777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  555. te Pas AB, Walther FJ. A randomized, controlled trial of delivery-room respiratory management in very preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2007;120(2):322–329. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  556. te Pas AB, Siew M, Wallace MJ, Kitchen MJ, Fouras A, Lewis RA, et al. Effect of sustained inflation length on establishing functional residual capacity at birth in ventilated premature rabbits. Pediatr Res. 2009;66(3):295–300. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181b1bca4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  557. te Pas AB, Kamlin CO, Dawson JA, O’Donnell C, Sokol J, Stewart M, et al. Ventilation and spontaneous breathing at birth of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr. 2009;154(3):369–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  558. Thach B. Fast breaths, slow breaths, small breaths, big breaths: importance of vagal innervation in the newborn lung. J Appl Physiol. 2001;91:2298–2300. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.5.2298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  559. Thach BT, Stark AR. Spontaneous neck flexion and airway obstruction during apneic spells in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 1979;94:275–281. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(79)80843-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  560. Thomas M, Greenough A, Morton M. Prolonged ventilation and intact survival in very low birth weight infants. Eur J Pediatr. 2003;162(2):65–67. doi: 10.1007/s00431-002-0914-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  561. Thome UH, Ambalavanan N. Permissive hypercapnia to decrease lung injury in ventilated preterm neonates. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;14(1):21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2008.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  562. Thome U, Kossel H, Lipowsky G, Porz F, Furste HO, Genzel-Boroviczeny O, et al. Randomized comparison of high-frequency ventilation with high-rate intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory failure. J Pediatr. 1999;135(1):39–46. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70325-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  563. Thomson MA. Continuous positive airway pressure and surfactant; combined data from animal experiments and clinical trials. Biol Neonate. 2002;81(Suppl 1):16–19. doi: 10.1159/000056766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  564. Tibboel D, Gaag AV. Etiologic and genetic factors in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Clin Perinatol. 1996;23(4):689–699. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  565. Tingay DG, Mills JF, Morley CJ, Pellicano A, Dargaville PA. Trends in use and outcome of newborn infants treated with high frequency ventilation in Australia and New Zealand, 1996–2003. J Paediatr Child Health. 2007;43:160–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  566. Torday J. Cellular timing of fetal lung development. Semin Perinatol. 1992;16(2):130–139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  567. Torfs CP, Curry CJ, Bateson TF, Honore LH. A population-based study of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Teratology. 1992;46(6):555–565. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420460605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  568. Trachsel D, Selvadurai H, Bohn D, Langer JC, Coates AL. Long-term pulmonary morbidity in survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005;39(5):433–439. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  569. Trachsel D, Selvadurai H, Adatia I, Bohn D, Schneiderman-Walker J, Wilkes D, et al. Resting and exercise cardiorespiratory function in survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006;41(6):522–529. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  570. Tracy M, Downe L, Holberton J. How safe is intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm babies ventilated from delivery to newborn intensive care unit? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89(1):F84–F87. doi: 10.1136/fn.89.1.F84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  571. Tran N, Lowe C, Sivieri EM, Shaffer TH. Sequential effects of acute meconium obstruction on pulmonary function. Pediatr Res. 1980;14:34–38. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198001000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  572. Trevisanuto D, Grazzina N, Ferrarese P, Micaglio M, Verghese C, Zanardo V. Laryngeal mask airway used as a delivery conduit for the administration of surfactant to preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Biol Neonate. 2005;87(4):217–220. doi: 10.1159/000083370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  573. Tripathi S, Saili A, Dutta R. Inflammatory markers in meconium induced lung injury in neonates and effect of steroids on their levels: a randomized controlled trial. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2007;25:103–107. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.32714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  574. Truffert P, Storme L, Fily A (2008) Randomised trial comparing nasal CPAP versus conventional ventilation in extremely preterm infants. Progres en Neonatologie 28eme Journees Nationales de Neonatologie. Societe Francaise de Neonatologie, Paris
  575. Turkbay D, Dilmen U, Altug N. Pneumopericardium in a term infant on nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92(3):F168. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.107458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  576. Tyler DC, Murphy J, Cheney FW. Mechanical and chemical damage to lung tissue caused by meconium aspiration. Pediatrics. 1978;62:454–459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  577. Ueda T, Ikegami M, Polk D, Mizuno K, Jobe A. Effects of fetal corticosteroid treatments on postnatal surfactant function in preterm lambs. J Appl Physiol. 1995;79(3):846–851. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1995.79.3.846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  578. UK Collaborative ECMO Trial Group UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Lancet. 1996;348:75–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  579. UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. UK Collaborative ECMO Trail Group (1996) Lancet 348(9020):75–82 [PubMed]
  580. Upton CJ, Milner AD, Stokes GM. Upper airway patency during apnoea of prematurity. Arch Dis Child. 1992;67:419–424. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.4_spec_no.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  581. Urbaniak KJ, McCowan LM, Townend KM. Risk factors for meconium-aspiration syndrome. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;36:401–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1996.tb02180.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  582. Vain NE, Szyld EG, Prudent LM, Wiswell TE, Aguilar AM, Vivas NI. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suctioning of meconium-stained neonates before delivery of their shoulders: multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:597–602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16852-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  583. van de Berg E, Lemmers PM, Toet MC, Klaessens J, van Bel F. The effect of the “InSurE” procedure on cerebral oxygenation and electrical brain activity of the preterm infant. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95(1):F53–F58. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.156414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  584. van Kaam AH, Rimensberger PC. Lung-protective ventilation strategies in neonatology: what do we know – what do we need to know? Crit Care Med. 2007;35(3):925–931. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000256724.70601.3A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  585. van Kaam AH, Lachmann RA, Herting E, De Jaegere A, van Iwaarden F, Noorduyn LA, et al. Reducing atelectasis attenuates bacterial growth and translocation in experimental pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:1046–1053. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200312-1779OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  586. Van Marter LJ, Allred EN, Pagano M, Sanocka U, Parad R, Moore M, et al. Do clinical markers of barotrauma and oxygen toxicity explain interhospital variation in rates of chronic lung disease? The Neonatology Committee for the Developmental Network. Pediatrics. 2000;105(6):1194–1201. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.6.1194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  587. Van Marter LJ, Allred EN, Leviton A, Pagano M, Parad R, Moore M. Antenatal glucocorticoid treatment does not reduce chronic lung disease among surviving preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2001;138(2):198–204. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.110980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  588. Van Meurs K. Is surfactant therapy beneficial in the treatment of the term newborn infant with congenital diaphragmatic hernia? J Pediatr. 2004;145(3):312–316. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.04.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  589. Van Meurs KP, Robbins ST, Reed VL, Karr SS, Wagner AE, Glass P, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: long-term outcome in neonates treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr. 1993;122(6):893–899. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(09)90013-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  590. Van Meurs KP, Wright LL, Ehrenkranz RA, Lemons JA, Ball MB, Poole WK, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide for premature infants with severe respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(1):13–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  591. Vanamo K, Peltonen J, Rintala R, Lindahl H, Jaaskelainen J, Louhimo I. Chest wall and spinal deformities in adults with congenital diaphragmatic defects. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(6):851–854. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90152-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  592. Vanamo K, Rintala R, Sovijarvi A, Jaaskelainen J, Turpeinen M, Lindahl H, et al. Long-term pulmonary sequelae in survivors of congenital diaphragmatic defects. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(8):1096–1099. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90095-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  593. Vanamo K, Rintala RJ, Lindahl H, Louhimo I. Long-term gastrointestinal morbidity in patients with congenital diaphragmatic defects. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(4):551–554. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90494-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  594. vd Staak FH, de Haan AF, Geven WB, Doesburg WH, Festen C. Improving survival for patients with high-risk congenital diaphragmatic hernia by using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30(10):1463–1467. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(95)90408-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  595. Velaphi S, Van Kwawegen A. Meconium aspiration syndrome requiring assisted ventilation: perspective in a setting with limited resources. J Perinatol. 2008;28(Suppl 3):S36–S42. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  596. Veldhuizen R, Nag K, Orgeig S, Possmayer F. The role of lipids in pulmonary surfactant. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1408(2–3):90–108. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4439(98)00061-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  597. Verder H. Nasal CPAP has become an indispensable part of the primary treatment of newborns with respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96(4):482–484. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00263.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  598. Verder H, Robertson B, Greisen G, Ebbesen F, Albertsen P, Lundstrom K, et al. Surfactant therapy and nasal continuous positive airway pressure for newborns with respiratory distress syndrome. Danish-Swedish Multicenter Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(16):1051–1055. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199410203311603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  599. Verder H, Albertsen P, Ebbesen F, Greisen G, Robertson B, Bertelsen A, et al. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure and early surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome in newborns of less than 30 weeks’ gestation. Pediatrics. 1999;103(2):E24. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.2.e24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  600. Walsh MC, Morris BH, Wrage LA, Vohr BR, Poole WK, Tyson JE, et al. Extremely low birthweight neonates with protracted ventilation: mortality and 18-month neurodevelopmental outcomes. J Pediatr. 2005;146(6):798–804. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  601. Walsh-Sukys MC, Tyson JE, Wright LL, et al. Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn in the era before nitric oxide: practice variation and outcomes. Pediatrics. 2000;105:14–20. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.1.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  602. Walstab JE, Bell RJ, Reddihough DS, Brennecke SP, Bessell CK, Beischer NA. Factors identified during the neonatal period associated with risk of cerebral palsy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44:342–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00249.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  603. Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Mele L, Johnson F, Dudley DJ, Spong CY, et al. Long-term outcomes after repeat doses of antenatal corticosteroids. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(12):1190–1198. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  604. Ward RM. Pharmacologic enhancement of fetal lung maturation. Clin Perinatol. 1994;21(3):523–542. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  605. Webber S, Wilkinson AR, Lindsell D, Hope PL, Dobson SR, Isaacs D. Neonatal pneumonia. Arch Dis Child. 1990;65:207–211. doi: 10.1136/adc.65.2.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  606. Wells DA, Gillies D, Fitzgerald DA (2005) Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD003645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  607. Wen SW, Smith G, Yang Q, Walker M. Epidemiology of preterm birth and neonatal outcome. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004;9(6):429–435. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2004.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  608. Wessel DL, Adatia I, Van Marter LJ, et al. Improved oxygenation in a randomized trial of inhaled nitric oxide for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Pediatrics. 1997;100:E7. doi: 10.1542/peds.100.5.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  609. West KW, Bengston K, Rescorla FJ, Engle WA, Grosfeld JL. Delayed surgical repair and ECMO improves survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ann Surg. 1992;216(4):454–460. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199210000-00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  610. Wheeler KI, Davis PG, Kamlin CO, Morley CJ. Assist control volume guarantee ventilation during surfactant administration. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94(5):F336–F338. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.149583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  611. Wilkinson DJ, Andersen CC, Smith K, Holberton J. Pharyngeal pressure with high-flow nasal cannulae in premature infants. J Perinatol. 2008;28(1):42–47. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  612. Wilson JM, Lund DP, Lillehei CW, Vacanti JP. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia – a tale of two cities: the Boston experience. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32(3):401–405. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90590-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  613. Wirbelauer J, Speer CP. The role of surfactant treatment in preterm infants and term newborns with acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Perinatol. 2009;29(Suppl 2):S18–S22. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  614. Wiswell TE, Bent RC. Meconium staining and the meconium aspiration syndrome. Unresolved issues. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1993;40:955–981. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)38618-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  615. Wiswell TE, Henley MA. Intratracheal suctioning, systemic infection, and the meconium aspiration syndrome. Pediatrics. 1992;89:203–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  616. Wiswell TE, Tuggle JM, Turner BS. Meconium aspiration syndrome: have we made a difference? Pediatrics. 1990;85:715–721. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  617. Wiswell TE, Foster NH, Slayter MV, Hachey WE. Management of a piglet model of the meconium aspiration syndrome with high-frequency or conventional ventilation. Am J Dis Child. 1992;146:1287–1293. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1992.02160230045013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  618. Wiswell TE, Peabody SS, Davis JM, Slayter MV, Bent RC, Merritt TA. Surfactant therapy and high-frequency jet ventilation in the management of a piglet model of the meconium aspiration syndrome. Pediatr Res. 1994;36:494–500. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199410000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  619. Wiswell TE, Graziani LJ, Kornhauser MS, Cullen J, Merton DA, McKee L, et al. High-frequency jet ventilation in the early management of respiratory distress syndrome is associated with a greater risk for adverse outcomes. Pediatrics. 1996;98(6 Pt 1):1035–1043. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  620. Wiswell TE, Gannon CM, Jacob J, et al. Delivery room management of the apparently vigorous meconium-stained neonate: results of the multicenter, international collaborative trial. Pediatrics. 2000;105:1–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  621. Wiswell TE, Knight GR, Finer NN, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing Surfaxin (Lucinactant) lavage with standard care for treatment of meconium aspiration syndrome. Pediatrics. 2002;109:1081–1087. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.6.1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  622. Wiswell TE, Tin W, Ohler K. Evidence-based use of adjunctive therapies to ventilation. Clin Perinatol. 2007;34(1):191–204. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2006.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  623. Wood BR. Physiologic principles. In: Goldsmith JP, Karotkin EH, editors. Assisted ventilation of the neonate. 4. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003. pp. 15–40. [Google Scholar]
  624. Woodhead DD, Lambert DK, Clark JM, Christensen RD. Comparing two methods of delivering high-flow gas therapy by nasal cannula following endotracheal extubation: a prospective, randomized, masked, crossover trial. J Perinatol. 2006;26(8):481–485. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  625. Wung JT, James LS, Kilchevsky E, James E. Management of infants with severe respiratory failure and persistence of the fetal circulation, without hyperventilation. Pediatrics. 1985;76(4):488–494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  626. Wung JT, Sahni R, Moffitt ST, Lipsitz E, Stolar CJ. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: survival treated with very delayed surgery, spontaneous respiration, and no chest tube. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30(3):406–409. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(95)90042-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  627. Yang EY, Allmendinger N, Johnson SM, Chen C, Wilson JM, Fishman SJ. Neonatal thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: selection criteria for successful outcome. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(9):1369–1375. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.05.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  628. Yeh TF, Harris V, Srinivasan G, Lilien L, Pyati S, Pildes RS. Roentgenographic findings in infants with meconium aspiration syndrome. JAMA. 1979;242:60–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  629. Yeh TF, Lilien LD, Barathi A, Pildes RS. Lung volume, dynamic lung compliance, and blood gases during the first 3 days of postnatal life in infants with meconium aspiration syndrome. Crit Care Med. 1982;10:588–592. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198209000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  630. Yoder BA, Kirsch EA, Barth WH, Gordon MC. Changing obstetric practices associated with decreasing incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:731–739. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)01942-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  631. Yong SC, Chen SJ, Boo NY. Incidence of nasal trauma associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during continuous positive airway pressure treatment in very low birthweight infants: a randomised control study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90(6):F480–F483. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.069351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  632. Yost CC, Soll RF (2000). Early versus delayed selective surfactant treatment for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD001456 [DOI] [PubMed]
  633. Yu VY, Rolfe P. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure breathing on cardiorespiratory function in infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1977;66(1):59–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1977.tb07808.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  634. Yuksel B, Greenough A, Gamsu HR. Neonatal meconium aspiration syndrome and respiratory morbidity during infancy. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1993;16:358–361. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950160607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  635. Zola EM, Gunkel JH, Chan RK, Lim MO, Knox I, Feldman BH, et al. Comparison of three dosing procedures for administration of bovine surfactant to neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr. 1993;122(3):453–459. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)83440-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Pediatric and Neonatal Mechanical Ventilation. 2013 Oct 8:1185–1265.

Introduction and Definitions

Peter G Davis 7,✉

Acute respiratory failure requiring assisted ventilation is one of the most common reasons for admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. Respiratory failure is the inability to maintain either normal delivery of oxygen to the tissues or normal removal of carbon dioxide from the tissues. It occurs when there is an imbalance between the respiratory workload and ventilatory strength and endurance. Definitions are somewhat arbitrary but suggested laboratory criteria for respiratory failure include two or more of the following: PaCO2 > 60 mmHg, PaO2 < 50 mmHg or O2 saturation <80 % with an FiO2 of 1.0 and pH < 7.25 (Wen et al. 2004).

Many have observed that neonates are not merely small adults. Infants have less respiratory reserve than older individuals, and respiratory failure is more common, not only during pulmonary illnesses but also any serious illness. Infants have narrow, compliant airways which are prone to collapse. Their chest wall is not ossified and has low muscle mass. It is very compliant, which in combination with a low functional residual capacity puts the infant at risk of airway collapse and atelectasis. The low recoil of the chest wall means that little pressure is required to expand the chest wall. In contrast to older subjects, the major force contributing to elastic recoil is surface tension at the air-liquid interface in the distal airways and alveoli. Surfactant deficiency, both primary and secondary, leads to decreased stability of the small terminal airways and alveoli and ultimately to collapse.

Assisted ventilation aims to (1) maintain adequate oxygenation, supporting gas exchange by improving alveolar ventilation, (2) restore or maintain functional residual capacity to prevent atelectasis or reopen areas of collapsed lung and (3) reduce the work of breathing in the presence of high airway resistance and/or reduced compliance. For neonates, the aim is to gently support the patient in order to allow time for the resolution of the underlying disorder without causing further injury through ventilation.

Pediatric and Neonatal Mechanical Ventilation. 2013 Oct 8:1185–1265.

Pulmonary Pathologies in the Neonate Leading to Respiratory Failure

Louise S Owen 8,✉, Peter G Davis 8

Educational Aims

  • To describe the pathology and physiology of RDS

  • To outline the risk factors associated with RDS

  • To describe the impact of delivery room and early management of RDS on outcome

  • To delineate the range of non-invasive and invasive modes of respiratory support available to treat RDS

  • To outline the importance of instituting a lung protective ventilatory strategy to reduce the risk of developing BPD

  • To outline the role of additional therapies in the treatment of RDS

  • To describe the complications and outcomes of RDS

Infant Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) remains the most common reason for admission to neonatal intensive care and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality (Wen et al. 2004; Horbar et al. 2002). RDS develops due to immaturity of the surfactant synthesis systems, insufficiency of surfactant production and structural immaturity of the lungs.

Pathophysiology of RDS

Lung Development

Human lung development falls into distinct stages: the pseudoglandular stage from 5 to 17 weeks gestation, the canalicular stage from 16 to 26 weeks gestation, the saccular stage between 24 and 38 weeks and the alveolar stage from 36 weeks until 2 years. During the canalicular phase, there is ongoing branching of the respiratory bronchioles with thinning of the airway epithelium, so that by the end of this period there is some capability for gas exchange. During the saccular stage, the peripheral airways widen into saccules which then form the alveolar ducts, the precursor to alveoli. Infants born during this period do not have fully functioning terminal airways; there are fewer, thick-walled gas exchange units. The true alveolar stage does not start until 36 weeks gestation and continues postnatally until about 2 years of age. The development of fully functional alveoli is also dependent on development of the surrounding mesenchyme and the alveolar capillaries.

Transition

The transition from fetal life to newborn life involves multiple processes. The most important adaptation is the conversion of the lungs from a fluid-filled unit to air-filled spaces, capable of working as a gas exchange organ. In utero, the terminal airways are full of fluid secreted from the pulmonary epithelial cells. This fluid is an important determinant of lung growth. The volume of fluid is equivalent to functional residual capacity (FRC) post delivery. Following delivery, lung fluid is cleared. This process is slower and less efficient in preterm infants (Egan et al. 1984). The sequence of lung inflation, fluid clearance and rising pH controls the early fall in pulmonary vascular resistance and initial oxygenation. The action of the respiratory muscles overcomes the resistive properties of the airways to develop FRC and tidal volume (Sinha et al. 2008). Antenatal, perinatal and resuscitation events interact to affect the processes of lung fluid clearance, FRC development and maintenance of adequate tidal volume.

Physiology

RDS is characterised by stiff non-compliant lungs with low levels of surfactant. Premature lungs have insufficient alveolarisation, decreased functional surface area, increased distance from alveoli to adjacent capillaries and reduced surfactant synthesis and show less hysteresis than normal lungs. The terminal airways collapse at end of expiration due to high surface tension. Tidal volumes are small and the dead space is relatively large. Infants are able to increase their respiratory rate to compensate for the low tidal volume. This means they may be able to maintain their minute volume, but the work of breathing is doubled (Hjalmarson and Olsson 1974; McCann et al. 1987). Most infants have some surfactant at birth (Reynolds et al. 1968) but levels fall within a few hours as alveolar protein leak inhibits function (Ikegami et al. 1983). Without exogenous surfactant infants tire, minute volume falls and hypoxia and acidaemia follows. This further increases surfactant inhibition.

Histology

Hyaline membranes are the characteristic histological finding in RDS and have given the disease its alternative name of hyaline membrane disease. In immature, stiff, surfactant deficient lungs, alveolar epithelial cell death starts to occur in the first hour after birth. Dead cells detach from the basement membrane, denuded patches appear, and protein leak leads to interstitial oedema. Hyaline membranes form; they consist of plasma protein, fibrin, cellular debris, red blood cells, macrophages and proteinaceous exudate. The material lines or fills the air spaces inhibiting gas exchange. Most of the protein leak occurs over the first 24 h (Ikegami et al. 1992). During this time the hyaline membranes, which are initially patchy, become more confluent. Ischaemia exacerbates RDS with epithelial necrosis occurring in the terminal airways. Asphyxiated infants have more severe RDS (Linderkamp et al. 1978) and respond less well to surfactant treatment (Skelton and Jeffery 1996).

After 24 h, inflammatory cell numbers increase and macrophages start to ingest the membranous material. Epithelial regeneration commences after 48 h and surfactant production starts to increase. Microscopically, the surfactant deficient lung is characterised by collapsed air-spaces alternating with hyper-expanded areas, vascular congestion and hyaline membranes. The lungs remain non-compliant and atelectatic until surfactant reappears at 36–48 h (Kanto et al. 1976). Hyaline membranes are broken down by the seventh day but will persist for longer if the infant is receiving mechanical ventilation. Healing is hyperplastic with shedding of the bronchiolar epithelial cells. Proteinaceous material in the terminal airways induces scarring and fibrosis in the developing alveoli and ultimately can lead to bronchopulmonary dysplasia or chronic lung disease (CLD).

Clinical Picture

The diagnosis of RDS is made on the basis of the clinical picture and the chest x-ray which demonstrates decreased lung volumes and a bell-shaped chest. Uniform infiltrates described as a ‘ground glass’ appearance involve all lobes of the lungs. Air bronchograms are seen as the infiltrate outlines the larger airways that remain air filled. In severe cases, the infiltrates are such that the cardiac and diaphragmatic borders become indistinct giving a ‘white-out’ appearance. Infants increase their respiratory rate, take smaller volume breaths and use accessory muscles to assist with their increased work of breathing. This results in nasal flaring and rib, sternal and subcostal recession. Infants attempt to stop alveolar collapse at end expiration by closing the glottis, resulting in grunting. As the infant tires, cyanosis develops and the infant develops apnoeic episodes with desaturations. Infants with RDS have decreased urine output and commonly become oedematous. The differential diagnosis includes infection (particularly group B streptococcal infection), persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn, aspiration pneumonia, lung malformations and upper airway obstruction, transient tachypnoea of the newborn, meconium aspiration syndrome, air leak syndromes, pulmonary haemorrhage, asphyxia, congenital heart disease, primary neurological or neuromuscular disease and inborn errors of metabolism.

Lung Mechanics of RDS

FRC and Physiological Dead Space

The effects of RDS on lung function vary with gestational and postnatal age. Newborns with normal lungs quickly develop an FRC of about 30 mL/kg (McCann et al. 1987). FRC is the volume of gas remaining in the lungs at the end of normal expiration, preventing alveolar collapse and allowing the lung to operate at optimal efficiency. Less mature infants have lower lung volumes, including a lower FRC; however, tidal volume remains about the same at 4–6 mL/kg (Hislop et al. 1986). These effects proportionally increase the physiological dead space to 60–80 % of tidal volume, compared with 30–40 % of tidal volume in healthy lungs (Avery et al. 1981). To compensate for this increased dead space, infants with RDS increase their respiratory rates. For infants without RDS, a rise in respiratory rate can lead to gas trapping; however, in babies with RDS, an increased respiratory rate may be enough to help maintain necessary FRC and avoid end-expiratory alveolar collapse. Newborn FRC already approaches alveolar closing volume, so a reduction in FRC permits atelectasis to readily develop. Further loss of FRC occurs due to vascular congestion, interstitial oedema and proteinaceous exudates.

Infants with RDS try to preserve lung function by delaying contraction of the diaphragm to delay the loss of thoracic volume and keep the alveoli inflated (Davis and Bureau 1987). Infants also contract the laryngeal muscles to keep the upper airway closed until late expiration, and then when these muscles relax, the abdominal muscles contract. The explosive release of air sounds as a grunt. Grunting helps to delay air escape from the lung and maintains FRC. It has been demonstrated that when an endotracheal tube is inserted, the loss of these mechanisms result in a fall in arterial oxygenation (Harrison et al. 1968). Surfactant treatment helps to increase lung volumes, so that lower positive pressures are required for ventilation. Higher lung volumes are maintained even when positive pressure is reduced because FRC increases following surfactant treatment (Goldsmith et al. 1991). Most lung volume improvement is seen when exogenous surfactant containing surfactant proteins are used (Rider et al. 1993). As FRC improves oxygenation improves. This normally occurs as lung fluid clears (Engle et al. 1983) or following surfactant treatment (Edberg et al. 1990) or when using distending pressure, such as mechanical ventilation (Richardson and Jung 1978). In an infant with RDS, the FRC returns to normal by about day 7.

Time Constant, Compliance and Resistance

Infants with RDS have less compliant, more resistant lungs. This results in a short time constant, meaning that gas leaves the terminal airways more quickly than in normal lungs. Surfactant-deficient lungs, with high surface tension in the alveoli, exhibit collapse in expiration of the smaller alveoli. This leads to overdistension of the larger alveoli that have remained open. Compliance is reduced as fewer terminal air spaces are ventilated, and those that are open become overdistended. Alveolar instability affects compliance as the critical opening and closing pressures vary. This means that alveoli open and shut suddenly, smaller ones then stay closed and open alveoli overfill. There is increased resistance in the lungs due to reduced cross-sectional area of the patent airways to the distal lung units. During spontaneous breathing the activity of the respiratory muscles tries to overcome elastic resistance and inertia of the tissues by increasing the change in intrapleural pressure, resulting in distortion of the compliant chest wall. Pulmonary compliance improves more slowly, following surfactant administration, than the rapid improvement seen in FRC (Edberg et al. 1990). This is reflected by quick improvement in oxygenation, compared with the relatively slower fall in carbon dioxide. The reduced compliance slowly returns to normal around day 7.

Gas Exchange and Shunting

Arterial carbon dioxide levels rise in RDS due to alveolar underventilation from atelectasis and the proportional increase in dead space. Most hypoxia in RDS is due to right-to-left shunting. Small shunts exist across the foramen ovale (if right atrial pressure is higher than left atrial pressure) and the ductus arteriosus (which is often patent in infants with RDS for 48 h). These shunts only account for about 10 % of the shunt in RDS (Seppanen et al. 1994) and are more important in other lung pathologies such as persistent pulmonary hypertension. In RDS, the most important shunt is intrapulmonary, as capillary blood travels through unventilated, or hypoventilated, atelectatic areas of the lung. Pulmonary arterial pressure normally falls rapidly, to half of the in utero level, soon after birth, but in RDS it can remain high for the first week (Evans and Archer 1991). The pulmonary pressure is proportionately higher in infants with more severe RDS and can exacerbate the hypoxia seen in RDS.

Epidemiology of RDS

Risk of RDS varies with lung maturity, which is intrinsically related to gestational age. Lung maturity is altered by the use of antenatal steroids and by postnatal surfactant treatment. Premature infants have lower levels of surfactant, although in almost all infants, there is some surfactant present within a few hours of birth (Reynolds et al. 1968). If newborn infants are not given surfactant, then levels fall as protein leak and oedema increase and the infant tires. The resulting hypoxia and acidosis reduce surfactant synthesis, and the clinical condition deteriorates further.

Prevention of RDS

Ideally prevention of RDS would focus on avoiding preterm birth. Addressing social deprivation and reducing rates of genital tract infection and preterm rupture of the membranes, both of which increase preterm delivery, could reduce RDS rates. If preterm labour occurs, or maternal disease necessitates preterm delivery, pharmaceutical intervention such as tocolytics may prolong pregnancy for 48 h. This is sufficient time to administer steroid treatment and reduce the risk of RDS. Antibiotics for suspected infection, or for membrane rupture, reduces progression to preterm delivery (Gomez et al. 1995). Other factors which impact on RDS development include asphyxia and drug depression of the infant. Care in avoiding intra- and postpartum asphyxia and minimal use of maternally administered opiates, anaesthetics, benzodiazepines and magnesium sulphate may also reduce rates of RDS.

Antenatal Steroids

Synthetic steroids given antenatally as betamethasone or dexamethasone, to women at risk of preterm delivery, reduce rates of RDS (odds ratio (OR) 0.63, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.44, 0.82). Neonatal deaths are reduced (OR 0.6, 95 % CI 0.48, 0.75) (Crowley 1995) as are rates of germinal matrix/intraventricular haemorrhage and necrotising enterocolitis (Ward 1994). The widespread uptake of antenatal steroid use has had a dramatic impact on the epidemiology of RDS over the last 20 years. Steroids induce enzymes for surfactant synthesis, induce genes for synthesis of surfactant protein (Mendelson et al. 1993), improve the quality of the surfactant produced (Ueda et al. 1995; Lanteri et al. 1994), mature the lung tissue and increase the number of alveolar divisions (Lanteri et al. 1994). The optimal timing of steroid administration has been shown to be 24–168 h prior to delivery (Crowley 1995). Some benefit can be seen with doses given 4–24 h prior to delivery (Sen et al. 2002). There is limited evidence of benefit below 28 weeks gestation (Garite et al. 1992) or beyond 34 weeks gestation (Liggins and Howie 1972). Steroids appear to be safe in terms of effect on maternal pregnancy-induced hypertension (Lamont et al. 1983), prolonged rupture of the membranes (Crowley 1995) and maternal diabetes. No long-term adverse outcomes have been demonstrated in infants following a single course of antenatal steroids (Dessens et al. 2000).

Repeated courses of steroids continue to improve neonatal outcomes in terms of lung function but may be detrimental to fetal growth and brain function (Aghajafari et al. 2002). A randomised controlled trial (RCT) in Australia demonstrated that repeated doses of antenatal corticosteroids reduced neonatal morbidity, compared with a single course, without changing neurosensory disability or body size at age 2 (Crowther et al. 2007). Another RCT of repeated versus single-steroid courses found a non-statistically significant increased rate of cerebral palsy in the repeated course group (Wapner et al. 2007); this question warrants further study. A retrospective review of infants who received multiple courses of steroids, compared with infants who received no antenatal steroids, showed that repeated courses were associated with decreased head circumference, decreased body mass index and decreased salivary cortisol at age 6–10 years (Chen et al. 2008). A Cochrane review of multiple doses of antenatal steroids published in 2007 concluded that further long-term data were required (Crowther and Harding 2007), and a review of this topic published in mid-2009 concluded that concerns about brain growth following repeated courses of antenatal corticosteroid currently warranted restriction of use to a single course (Newnham and Jobe 2009).

Incidence of RDS

Prior to the use of antenatal steroids and surfactant, the incidence of RDS in newborns in Europe was 2–3 % (Hjalmarson 1981). In the mid-1980s in the USA, the incidence was reported as 1.72 % (Becerra et al. 1992). In the modern era with widespread use of antenatal steroids and surfactant, the figures quoted are less than 1 % (Rubaltelli et al. 1998). The incidence of RDS decreases with advancing gestational age, from more than 50 % in infants born at 28 weeks gestation to around 25 % in those born at 31 weeks gestation. This fall reflects the increase in endogenous surfactant production between these ages.

Risk Factors for RDS

Gestation

Risk factors for RDS have been well demonstrated, with prematurity being the most important. Incidence of RDS is inversely proportional to gestational age; the majority of infants born before 28 weeks gestation will have some degree of respiratory distress. RDS remains a significant problem until around 34 weeks of gestation (Lewis et al. 1996); by 35–36 weeks gestation, incidence falls to 2 % (Rubaltelli et al. 1998). Not only are preterm lungs less mature in terms of surfactant synthesis, but epithelial protein leak is worse in these infants, leading to increased surfactant inhibition. Preterm infants are more at risk of other factors that impact on the incidence of RDS such as asphyxia, hypoxia, cold and hypotension.

Maternal Factors

Infants of diabetic mothers are at higher risk of developing RDS as they have abnormal surfactant synthesis (Ojomo and Coustan 1990), and insulin delays the maturation of type 2 alveolar cells delaying surfactant production (Gross et al. 1980). Maternal hypertension and prolonged membrane rupture protect against RDS. Stress raises the fetal cortisol and induces lung maturation.

Maternal alcohol use (Ioffe and Chernick 1987), smoking (Lieberman et al. 1992) and opioid and cocaine abuse all reduce RDS in the infant. Heroin is known to mature surfactant systems, and animal models of antenatal cocaine use have shown that cocaine induces surfactant synthesis (Sosenko 1993).

Antenatal steroids protect against RDS (see section on Epidemiology of RDS).

Fetal Factors

Male infants are at higher risk of developing RDS and suffer a more severe course. Incidence in males is 1.7 times higher, and males are more likely to die from the condition (Farrell and Avery 1975). This gender difference appears to be related to the effects of androgens which delay the maturation of the lecithin-sphingomyelin ratio and delay production of phosphatidylcholine in surfactant (Torday 1992).

Race plays a part in risk of RDS with infants of black race relatively protected. Black infants have about a one-third lower incidence than Caucasians (Hulsey et al. 1993). This protection exists even in the most immature infants (Kavvadia et al. 1998). When looking at lecithin-sphingomyelin ratio to assess lung maturity, for the same ratio more Caucasian infants develop RDS than black infants (Richardson and Torday 1994). It is hypothesised that there may be allelic variation in surfactant proteins causing this disparity (Rishi et al. 1992).

Growth-restricted infants are more likely to develop RDS, and the disease is more severe, compared with normal weight infants of the same gestation. Growth restriction is not as strong a risk factor as gestation, so a preterm infant of similar weight to a growth-restricted older infant is more likely to develop RDS than a growth-restricted child (Piper et al. 1996).

In multiple pregnancies the second, or higher birth order infant, is at more risk of developing RDS, as are infants born following a rapid labour.

Genetic conditions resulting in surfactant protein deficiencies are a rare cause of RDS, e.g. autosomal recessive surfactant protein B deficiency. Partial protein deficiencies and polymorphisms of parts of the proteins have also been described (Cole et al. 2000; Makri et al. 2002). A family history of a sibling with RDS increases the risk for the subsequent infant.

Thyroid activity is involved in the development of surfactant systems; hypothyroid infants with RDS have lower surfactant levels than those with normal thyroid function, although the majority of hypothyroid infants do not develop RDS (Cuestas et al. 1976; Dhanireddy et al. 1983).

Delivery Factors

Infants born by caesarean section (CS) are at higher risk of developing RDS. Infants born by CS after a period of time in labour have more surfactant in their airway than those born without labour (Callen et al. 1979). CS without labour is associated with more RDS and transient tachypnoea of the newborn (Annibale et al. 1995; Cohen and Carson 1985; Morrison et al. 1995). Risk of RDS following elective CS without labour continues to fall between 37 and 40 weeks of gestation.

Asphyxia results in reduced lung perfusion, and ischaemia causes capillary damage. Recovery and reperfusion cause protein leak from damaged capillaries, worsening RDS (Jefferies et al. 1984). The function of surfactant decreases with acidosis and low temperature; below 34 °C surfactant cannot spread, and therefore cold or acidotic infants are more likely to develop RDS (Gluck et al. 1972).

Stepwise Approach to Respiratory Support for RDS

Management of newborn infants who either have or are likely to develop RDS is twofold: firstly, there is the need to provide initial support for the respiratory distress, and second is the instigation of the optimal lung protective strategy to prevent development of BPD. BPD will affect up to 40 % of infants born before 29 weeks, presenting a significant healthcare burden (Patel and Greenough 2008). Every effort should be made to deliver preterm infants at high risk of RDS in centres with the appropriate skills and resources available to provide the best possible care (Sweet et al. 2007).

Delivery Room Management

Most very premature infants will need some form of respiratory support in the first few minutes of life. Most resuscitation guidelines are drawn up with term infants in mind and may not translate accurately to preterm infants at high risk of RDS and BPD. Until recently premature infants were routinely stabilised using 100 % oxygen; many were intubated and given surfactant as a standard procedure, regardless of their respiratory effort. We now know that 100 % oxygen is not the best choice of gas to use (Saugstad et al. 2008) and several studies are underway to determine the most appropriate initial oxygen concentration to use, as well as the best oxygen saturations to target (Castillo et al. 2008). Centile charts for normal oxygen saturations for preterm infants are now being developed (Dawson et al. 2009a). There are good theoretical, clinical and animal data for using positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at delivery. Animal data have demonstrated that PEEP reduces alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (Probyn et al. 2004), protects from lung injury (Jobe et al. 2002), preserves the surfactant pool (Michna et al. 1999), improves oxygenation and improves ventilation-perfusion matching (Schlessel et al. 1989; Finer et al. 2004). PEEP also accelerates formation of FRC (Siew et al. 2009) and protects the lungs by keeping the alveoli open (Nilsson et al. 1980). Using a resuscitation device that is able to give PEEP would seem advantageous but so far has not shown improved outcomes in terms of saturations at 5 min or need for endotracheal intubation (Dawson et al. 2009b). Use of CPAP to treat preterm infants has been shown to reduce rates of endotracheal intubation (Lindner et al. 1999; Lundstrom 2003; Stevens et al. 2007), but the disadvantage is that any surfactant treatment is delayed. PEEP or CPAP from the delivery room onward has been shown to be as good as initial ventilation and surfactant treatment, but not any better (Morley et al. 2008), and is discussed further in the CPAP section of this chapter. CPAP and sustained inflations can be used to help the infant establish FRC (te Pas et al. 2009a; te Pas and Walther 2007). It is important to carefully control any positive pressure support given in the delivery room to avoid damaging the lungs. Animal studies have shown that even a few large volume inflations can damage newborn lungs (Bjorklund et al. 1997; Dreyfuss and Saumon 1992; Hernandez et al. 1989) and currently the majority of respiratory support systems used in the delivery room do not allow the clinician to measure the delivered volume (Schmolzer et al. 2010). In the absence of respiratory function, monitoring the initial stabilisation and transfer from the delivery room to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) should be guided by oxygen saturations and chest movement. However, Tracy et al. suggest that this clinically determined ventilation commonly results in hypocarbia, hyperoxia or both (Tracy et al. 2004).

General Management

Infants with RDS should be nursed in a thermo-neutral environment, with cardiovascular and respiratory monitoring. Once initial examination is complete, infants should be handled as little as possible and nursed prone to maximise oxygenation and respiratory muscle coordination (Hand et al. 2007; Leipala et al. 2003; Wells et al. 2005). As RDS is clinically indistinguishable from sepsis, infants with ongoing respiratory symptoms should have intravenous access, blood sent for full blood count, a chest x-ray, septic markers and blood culture and should receive antibiotics.

Infants with significant increased work of breathing should not initially receive enteral feeds, but be managed with intravenous fluid titrated against urine output and plasma sodium. Very low birth weight infants who are likely to need ongoing respiratory support require early parental nutrition for optimal lung growth and recovery. Anaemia and coagulation abnormalities need to be carefully controlled; blood pressure should be maintained with crystalloid and if necessary with inotropic support. Arterial oxygen levels should be kept between 50 and 75 mmHg (7–10 kPa); ongoing clinical trials, such as BOOST2, aim to determine the optimal oxygen saturations for this group of infants. The European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Neonatal RDS currently recommend that oxygen saturations, in infants receiving supplemental oxygen, should be kept below 95 % (Sweet et al. 2007). Hypocarbia must be avoided due to the effect on cerebral blood flow (Garland et al. 1995). A degree of permissive hypercarbia appears safe (Miller and Carlo 2007) and is associated with lower rates of BPD (Thome and Ambalavanan 2009).

Supplemental Oxygen

Infants with the mildest degree of RDS may need only supplemental oxygen and good general care. Supplemental oxygen may be delivered into the isolette, given directly as subnasal oxygen or delivered via a hood or head box. With increasing disease severity, oxygen requirements climb, work of breathing increases, the infant tires, carbon dioxide (PaCO2) levels rise and the pH falls. The infant may have desaturations or apnoeas at which point positive pressure support is required. The British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM) suggests instigation of CPAP support if the inspired oxygen requirement reaches 40 %, if the pH falls below 7.25 or if the PaCO2 rises above 50 mmHg (6.7 kPa) (British Association of Perinatal Medicine T 2005).

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

CPAP was first used in neonates in 1971 (Gregory et al. 1971) and has grown hugely in popularity, particularly over the last 15 years. It has been advocated as a gentler form of respiratory support (Jacobsen et al. 1993) and has been shown to have many physiological benefits. These include decreasing the likelihood of upper airway collapse and decreasing upper airway resistance by splinting and increasing the cross-sectional area of the pharynx (Miller et al. 1990). CPAP reduces obstructive apnoeas (Miller et al. 1985) and alters the shape of the diaphragm, improving lung compliance and decreasing lung resistance (Gaon et al. 1999). It allows larger tidal volumes for the same respiratory effort and conserves surfactant. CPAP has also been demonstrated to increase FRC (Richardson and Jung 1978; Richardson et al. 1980), stabilise the chest wall (Locke et al. 1991), improve lung volumes (Harris et al. 1976; Yu and Rolfe 1977) and improve oxygenation (Durand et al. 1983).

Generating CPAP Pressure

CPAP can be generated by a ventilator, by an underwater bubbling circuit and by variable flow drivers. There is little evidence to support one form of CPAP delivery over another, a conclusion reached by Cochrane review in 2008 (De Paoli et al. 2008). There are reports that CPAP from variable flow circuits may be superior to CPAP via a ventilator (Pandit et al. 2001; Huckstadt et al. 2003; Courtney et al. 2001) with increased tidal volume, improved thoraco-abdominal synchrony (Boumecid et al. 2007), more stable airway pressure and decreased work of breathing (Moa et al. 1988). However, other studies have not found any differences in respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure or comfort levels between the devices (Ahluwalia et al. 1998) nor any difference in rates of extubation failure (Stefanescu et al. 2003).

Studies that have compared ventilator generated CPAP with underwater bubbling CPAP have also seen mixed results. Animal studies showed improved airway patency, higher pH and improved oxygenation in bubble circuits compared with ventilator CPAP (Pillow et al. 2007), while another study described more stable pressure at the prong during ventilator CPAP (Kahn et al. 2007). There has been debate about whether bubble CPAP is superior to ventilator CPAP due to oscillations in the delivered pressure caused by the bubbling (Lee et al. 1998), but it appears that vigorous bubbling is no better than gentle bubbling (Morley et al. 2005) and the oscillations are dramatically attenuated on reaching the small airways (Kahn et al. 2007). One clinical study that attempted to compare ventilator with bubble CPAP found reduced minute volume, but also reduced respiratory rates in the bubble CPAP group with no difference in blood gases (Lee et al. 1998).

Studies have also compared variable flow CPAP with bubble CPAP. One group found that bubble CPAP was not as good as variable flow CPAP at improving work of breathing and thoraco-abdominal synchrony (Liptsen et al. 2005), and another group found infants treated with bubble CPAP had higher oxygen requirements and respiratory rates (Mazzella et al. 2001). A third, more recent study determined that bubble CPAP was equally as effective as variable flow in preventing extubation failure and was more effective in infants who had been ventilated for longer (Gupta et al. 2009). Clinically important outcomes of different CPAP devices require further evaluation in randomised trials.

Nasal Interface During CPAP

CPAP was originally described using either an endotracheal tube or various head chambers and masks. These were associated with severe side effects and are no longer used. Endotracheal CPAP has been shown to increase work of breathing (Kim 1989; Davis and Henderson-Smart 2001; LeSouef et al. 1984), and CPAP is now delivered via a variety of short and long, single and bi-nasal prongs, or by nasal mask.

Long nasopharyngeal tubes, passed through one nostril to sit above the epiglottis, are still used but have high intrinsic resistance, and therefore a significant amount of the distending pressure is lost along the tube, sometimes more than 4 cm H2O (De Paoli et al. 2002). Shorter single nasal prongs can be used but also have high resistance, and pressure is also lost via the contralateral nostril. Short bi-nasal prongs, of which there are several designs, provide a low resistance interface (De Paoli et al. 2002). Their use has been shown to prevent more re-intubations than single nasal or nasopharyngeal prongs (relative risk (RR) 0.59, 95 % CI 0.41, 0.85, number needed to treat (NNT) was 5) (De Paoli et al. 2008). Small nasal masks have also been developed, initially in the belief that they caused less trauma. There is minimal data regarding their use, efficacy or safety, and a recent study showed that mask CPAP caused as much nasal trauma as bi-nasal prongs (Yong et al. 2005), albeit at different sites. The use of nasal masks needs to be properly investigated.

Indications for CPAP: Delivery Room and Early CPAP

In much of the developed world, management of very preterm infants in the delivery room has included endotracheal intubation and early surfactant treatment. However, a series of observational studies suggested that preterm infants managed well with initial CPAP support, reducing intubation and BPD rates, without increasing mortality or morbidity (Jacobsen et al. 1993; De Klerk and De Klerk 2001; Kamper et al. 1993; Van Marter et al. 2000). Following these publications CPAP gained more credibility as a first-line treatment and was extensively used in very low birth weight infants (Finer et al. 2004; Ammari et al. 2005). Starting CPAP soon after birth not only avoids endotracheal intubation and its inherent risks (O’Donnell et al. 2006) but also delays any surfactant treatment (Stevens et al. 2007). RCTs and meta-analyses of premature infants managed with early CPAP compared with intubation and ventilation had failed to detect differences between groups (Han et al. 1987; Sandri et al. 2004; Subramaniam et al. 2005). One study did find lower rates of BPD in infants treated with early CPAP, but the group had also received a sustained inflation at stabilisation which may have affected the results (te Pas and Walther 2007).

The COIN trial randomised infants less than 28 weeks of gestation to either CPAP or intubation in the delivery room (Morley et al. 2008). This trial found that half of the infants in the CPAP group never required intubation. CPAP-treated infants had a significantly lower rate of death or BPD at 28 days, but not at 36 weeks corrected age. CPAP-treated infants also had a higher rate of pneumothorax, but no differences were found in any other adverse outcomes. From this large RCT, it would appear that CPAP is an acceptable alternative to intubation in the delivery room as many small babies who breathe spontaneously at birth were successfully treated without mechanical ventilation. It is possible that the higher pneumothorax rate in the CPAP group was due to surfactant deficiency. The challenge is not only to look at ways to support infants with CPAP but also to replace surfactant in a timely manner if necessary (Hascoet et al. 2008).

Indication for CPAP: Post-extubation

As lung protective strategies have evolved, premature infants are being extubated earlier. Premature infants will have ongoing lung disease (Fox et al. 1981), poor thoraco-abdominal wall co-ordination (Locke et al. 1991) and apnoea of prematurity (Kattwinkel et al. 1975). They can develop progressive atelectasis (Finer et al. 1979) and many do not manage without ventilation for long (Annibale et al. 1994; Davis and Henderson-Smart 2000; Higgins et al. 1991). Systematic review of nine trials randomising infants to CPAP or head box oxygen post-extubation showed reduced need for additional respiratory support in the CPAP group (RR 0.62 95 % CI 0.51, 0.76, with NNT 6) (Davis and Henderson-Smart 2003). No difference was seen in terms of BPD. In these studies many infants in the head box oxygen group were successfully ‘rescued’ with CPAP treatment, and as a result the review found no difference in re-intubation rates. Extubation to CPAP was only advantageous if CPAP pressures were at least 5 cm H2O. The review concluded that CPAP is beneficial post-extubation, but if resources are limited, there is no harm in restricting CPAP use after extubation to those infants who are unable to manage in head box oxygen alone. Current European guidelines recommend that preterm infants should be placed on CPAP following extubation (Sweet et al. 2007).

Optimal CPAP Pressure

Deciding optimal CPAP pressure with which to treat infants is difficult. Animal data suggests that alveolar-arterial gradient falls with increasing PEEP, up to 8 cm H2O (Probyn et al. 2004). Human data shows increasing FRC and tidal volume, with decreasing respiratory rate and thoraco-abdominal asynchrony, as PEEP increases from 0 to 8 cm H2O (Elgellab et al. 2001). Laboratory data demonstrated that different prong systems result in the loss of several centimetres of water pressure across the prongs (De Paoli et al. 2002), and other studies have shown that further pressure loss occurs between the prong and the pharynx (De Paoli et al. 2005). There is much to learn about optimal CPAP pressures, and it is unlikely that any single pressure will be appropriate for the duration of an infant’s illness. It would be more realistic to titrate CPAP pressure against severity of the lung disease at a given time (Davis et al. 2009).

CPAP Complications

Success of CPAP support is dependent on training and experience of both medical and nursing staff. Clinical skills in delivering CPAP support increase with time (Aly et al. 2004). The aim of CPAP is to pressurise the infants nasopharynx and lungs, but nasal prong fit is inexact and gas leak from the mouth and nose means that delivered pressure may be lower than intended (Kahn et al. 2007). Optimal prong size, position, angle and strapping all affect pressure delivery. Chin strapping may be used to reduce leak, but there is no evidence that this increases the delivered pressure. It can be difficult to achieve a therapeutic distending pressure in some infants, resulting in failure of CPAP treatment.

Gastric distension is a well-recognised side effect of CPAP although CPAP does not appear to increase the risk of necrotising enterocolitis (Aly et al. 2009) and may actually increase the speed of gastric emptying (Gounaris et al. 2004). Standard practice includes insertion of a gastric tube that is left open to air, with the aim of venting the stomach, although there is no evidence that this occurs. Nasal trauma has been reported in up to 20 % of infants receiving nasal CPAP (Robertson et al. 1996). Similar rates of injury between nasal prongs, masks and nasopharyngeal tubes have been reported (Yong et al. 2005; Buettiker et al. 2004). Duration of CPAP support has so far been shown to be the strongest risk factor for traumatic injury (Yong et al. 2005). Early RCTs of CPAP report increased rates of pneumothoraces (Ho et al. 2002) and recent trials have shown similar rates (Morley et al. 2008; Sandri et al. 2009). Several case reports exist of more unusual complications including pneumopericardium (Turkbay et al. 2007), pulmonary interstitial emphysema (Arioni et al. 2006) and ingested nasal tubes (Duran et al. 2005). There is some data to suggest that CPAP increases infection rates, possibly secondary to trauma to the nasal mucosa (Ronnestad et al. 2005).

INSURE Technique

Increasing numbers of preterm infants are managed with CPAP support from birth, but concerns remain about pneumothorax rates and the delay in any surfactant treatment required. Clinicians have become interested in a technique that incorporates a brief period of intubation, to administer surfactant, followed by rapid extubation to CPAP which may overcome these problems. The technique has become known as INSURE (intubation-surfactant-extubation), and several studies have tested this method against standard ventilation techniques (Blennow et al. 1999; Bohlin et al. 2007; Thomson 2002; Verder et al. 1999).

Systematic review has shown that in infants at high risk of early RDS, early prophylactic surfactant in the first 2 h of life is better than later selective surfactant use with respect to BPD, death and air leak (Soll and Morley 2001). It has also been reported that quick intubation for surfactant delivery was most efficacious when done early (Blennow et al. 1999; Bohlin et al. 2007) with improved oxygen, less mechanical ventilation and less BPD (Thomson 2002; Verder et al. 1999; Verder 2007).

Meta-analysis of six INSURE papers (Stevens et al. 2007) has shown reduction in BPD in the INSURE group, compared with traditional treatment of surfactant and ongoing ventilation (RR 0.51 95 % CI 0.26, 0.99). The review also found that INSURE-treated infants had less need for mechanical ventilation (RR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.57, 0.79) and fewer air leaks (RR 0.52, 95 % CI 0.28, 0.96) but had an increase in surfactant use. Stratified analysis, by oxygen requirement at study entry, found that a lower threshold of intervention, at an inspired oxygen below 45 %, resulted in lower rates of pneumothorax (RR 0.46, 95 % CI 0.23, 0.93) and less BPD (RR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.20, 0.92). Higher thresholds were associated with higher rates of patent ductus arteriosus (RR 2.15, 95 % CI 1.09, 4.13). Further studies comparing INSURE with ongoing ventilation, published since the meta-analysis, have added further weight to its findings (Rojas et al. 2009). The REVE trial also compared the INSURE technique with ongoing ventilation post-surfactant treatment, and the results suggest that the technique has most benefit for the youngest infants at 25–26 weeks gestation (Truffert et al. 2008).

The technique may not be risk-free; it still requires intubation which has inherent risks, and data suggest that INSURE results in a period of depressed brain activity (van de Berg et al. 2010). These studies have not answered the question of whether it is better to treat infants with the INSURE technique or to treat with CPAP alone and give rescue surfactant, via brief intubation, only if CPAP support is insufficient. One small Scandinavian study has addressed this question and found that the INSURE group had better oxygenation and reduced need for mechanical ventilation (Verder et al. 1994) compared with the CPAP and rescue surfactant group. The large multicentre CURPAP study also aimed to answer this question (Sandri et al. 2008), and the presented results show that there were no differences between groups in the need for mechanical ventilation, or for the combined outcome of death or BPD (Sandri et al. 2009). The implication for clinicians is that CPAP with rescue surfactant was no worse than prophylactic surfactant followed by CPAP support. There is a need to individualise initial CPAP support with early rescue surfactant based on clinical criteria. The Vermont-Oxford Network is now running a three-armed trial comparing traditional intubation, surfactant and ongoing ventilation with either INSURE or CPAP and rescue surfactant (Sinha et al. 2008).

High-Flow Humidified Nasal Cannula Oxygen Delivery

High-flow nasal cannulae deliver gas at 2–8 L/min into the nose, via small prongs which are loose fitting in the nostrils. The technique has evolved from subnasal oxygen treatment at low flows, less than 2 L/min, as clinicians have attempted to support more infants without using traditional CPAP. The use of humidified high-flow systems has increased rapidly over the last few years, particularly as it is felt that the system is easier to use (Shoemaker et al. 2007) and provides more patient comfort.

Traditional CPAP delivery has disadvantages using of tight-fitting head wraps, the need for careful positioning, compression of the nose and nasal trauma, and it is sometimes poorly tolerated by the infant. The use of small cannulae to generate positive pressure could reduce many of these issues; however, early equipment, developed from the original low-flow systems, were poorly heated and humidified. This limited their use due to risk of nasal mucosa injury, mucosal bleeding, thickened secretions and nosocomial infection (Kopelman and Holbert 2003; Woodhead et al. 2006). The development of heated humidified high-flow gas delivery via nasal cannulae (HHHFNC) may circumvent these issues. Such circuits are reported to decrease work of breathing and prevent re-intubation more effectively than high flow from a standard, non-heated, non-humidified nasal cannula (Woodhead et al. 2006).

Studies have shown that HHHFNC, at relatively low flows of 1–2 L/min, can generate a positive pressure in the airway of preterm infants (Sreenan et al. 2001); however, HHHFNC does not currently allow the measurement of delivered pressure, without a separate invasive process such as an oesophageal pressure probe. Some data exist suggesting that HHHFNC does not produce excessive distending pressures (Kubicka et al. 2008; Saslow et al. 2006) and that very high flows would be needed to generate significant positive pressure. Other data has demonstrated high and variable delivered pressures (Shoemaker et al. 2007; Campbell et al. 2006), and reports exist that demonstrate potentially hazardous pressures, especially in very small infants (Sreenan et al. 2001; Quinteros et al. 2009; Chang et al. 2005).

Specific gas flow to obtain a certain delivered pressure is unknown; the pressure generated in the pharynx will depend on leak at the nose (Lampland et al. 2009), which in turn depends on the size of the patients nostril, and the presence of any secretions sealing the nares. Some algorithms exist to guide flow selection, but they depend on a consistent level of leak being present, which is not necessarily the case in practice (Wilkinson et al. 2008). If the infant’s mouth is closed and the cannulae become functionally ‘sealed’ in the nares due to secretions or tight-fitting cannulae, then flow will continue to increase the nasopharyngeal pressure until an outlet is found. This could result in significant lung and gastrointestinal overdistention. A recent report describes development of subcutaneous scalp emphysema, pneumo-orbitis and pneumocephalus during HHHFNC use (Jasin et al. 2008). Not all HHHFNC systems contain a pressure-limiting safety valve to protect against inadvertent high pressure, but such a system should be incorporated into future designs (Lampland et al. 2009). One further concern with HHHFNC has been adequate humidification and heating of the circuit. Anecdotal reports exist of condensation in the tubing and cannulae during flows at the lower end of the range of ‘high flow’, resulting in water droplets coalescing to obstruct flow or enter the nares.

Initial studies with ‘high-flow’ systems showed disadvantages when compared with CPAP (Campbell et al. 2006); however, partial humidification and relatively low flows were used. More recent studies have found work of breathing and lung compliance were improved during HHHFNC compared with CPAP (Saslow et al. 2006); ventilator days were decreased without adverse effects such as air leak, intraventricular haemorrhage, nosocomial infection or BPD (Shoemaker et al. 2007); and frequency and severity of apnoea and bradycardia were reduced (Shoemaker et al. 2007; Woodhead et al. 2006; Sreenan et al. 2001; Holleman-Duray et al. 2007).

It is possible that the jet of gas delivered in HHHFNC may penetrate the nasal dead space very efficiently. As the nasal compartment contributes up to 50 % of the overall respiratory resistance (Hall et al. 2002), this effect could contribute to a reduced work of breathing compared with conventional CPAP prongs. The uptake of HHHFNC by numerous neonatal units has not been accompanied by obvious changes in neonatal outcome, but the technique has not been systematically studied. The American Association of Respiratory Care 2002 Clinical Practice Guideline (Myers 2002) states that flow for nasal cannula treatment in newborn infants should not exceed 2 L/min and acknowledges that even this flow may be excessive for the extremely low birth weight infant. There is a need for high-quality RCTs to delineate the range of delivered pressure for a given flow, for all sizes of preterm infants. Until the results of these trials are available, if an infant requires CPAP, then it can more safely be delivered with a standard device (Davis et al. 2009; So et al. 1992). A multicentre, prospective, randomised comparison of CPAP compared with HHHFNC in infants greater than 1,000 g and 28 weeks gestation, from birth or following extubation, is currently underway.

Non-invasive Ventilation: Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)

NIPPV includes modes of non-invasive ventilation, characterised by CPAP augmented with mechanical inflations to a set pressure. The peak (PIP) and end-expiratory pressures, inflation rate and time can all be manipulated during NIPPV. Terminology used to describe NIPPV is varied, reflecting the different inflation strategies applied through the nasal interface. Terms include synchronised nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) (Aghai et al. 2006; Bhandari et al. 2007; Kulkarni et al. 2006; Santin et al. 2004), nasopharyngeal-synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation (NP-SIMV) (Friedlich et al. 1999), nasal synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation (N-SIMV) (Kiciman et al. 1998), nasal synchronised intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) (Moretti et al. 1999), nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV) (Kugelman et al. 2007) and non-invasive pressure support ventilation (NI-PSV) (Ali et al. 2007). Nasal bi-level positive airway pressure (N-BiPAP) (Migliori et al. 2005) is also used but may be more indicative of a technique using a narrow PIP-PEEP pressure difference, long inspiratory times and low rates, during which the infant continues to breathe undisturbed.

Evolution of NIPPV

NIPPV has emerged concurrently with the drive toward minimal ventilation and lung protective strategies of respiratory support. As many as half of very low birth weight infants ‘fail’ initial CPAP support (Finer et al. 2004; Morley et al. 2008), requiring intubation and ventilation, and around a third ‘fail’ extubation to CPAP (Annibale et al. 1994; Higgins et al. 1991; Davis and Henderson-Smart 2003). Efforts to manage more small infants without invasive ventilation prompted the investigation and use of NIPPV. Neonatal NIPPV uses nasal prongs or masks, with variable leak via the mouth and nose, and usually no trigger for synchronisation. A survey of neonatal units in the UK in 2006 (Owen et al. 2008) showed that 48 % of regional nurseries were using NIPPV.

The mechanism of action of NIPPV remains unclear. Hypotheses include pharyngeal dilation and increased pharyngeal pressure (Aghai et al. 2006; Santin et al. 2004; Friedlich et al. 1999; Moretti et al. 1999; Khalaf et al. 2001) increased sighs and improved respiratory drive (Lin et al. 1998), induction of Head’s paradoxical reflex (Ryan et al. 1989), increased mean airway pressure (Davis et al. 2001) increased alveolar recruitment (Khalaf et al. 2001; Courtney and Barrington 2007), increased functional residual capacity (FRC) and increased tidal and minute volume (Moretti et al. 1999). It is unclear whether mechanical inflations during NIPPV are transmitted to the chest. There is some evidence that NIPPV, compared with CPAP, improves arterial oxygen, carbon dioxide, respiratory rates and oxygen saturations (Moretti et al. 1999; Migliori et al. 2005), reduces thoraco-abdominal asynchrony (Kiciman et al. 1998) and decreases work of breathing (Aghai et al. 2006; Ali et al. 2007). NIPPV may increase tidal volumes and minute ventilation (Moretti et al. 1999), although this finding is not consistent (Aghai et al. 2006; Ali et al. 2007).

NIPPV Delivery

NIPPV may be generated by a ventilator or specialised CPAP driver and may be delivered by nasal or nasopharyngeal prongs or by nasal mask. No studies have compared efficacy of nasal interface for NIPPV delivery. Most NIPPV delivery systems do not allow the mechanical inflations to be synchronised with spontaneous inspiration. Abdominal pneumatic capsules have been used to attempt to synchronise inflations, but their efficacy during NIPPV has not been investigated.

We do not know the optimal inflation settings in terms of PIP, PEEP, inflation rate or time for NIPPV, and these values have varied widely in published studies. The 2006 UK survey noted that the settings used by clinicians were very variable (Owen et al. 2008). No studies have investigated weaning strategies for NIPPV.

Indications for NIPPV Use

Meta-analysis of three studies (Friedlich et al. 1999; Khalaf et al. 2001; Barrington et al. 2001) comparing NIPPV with CPAP following extubation found a significant risk reduction for extubation failure (RR 0.21, 95 % CI 0.1, 0.45, NNT 3) in the NIPPV group (Davis et al. 2001). Recent studies of NIPPV post-extubation have confirmed this finding (Khorana et al. 2008; Sai Sunil Kishore et al. 2009). Meta-analysis of two studies (Lin et al. 1998; Ryan et al. 1989) comparing NIPPV with CPAP for the treatment of apnoea showed no advantage of NIPPV over CPAP (Davis et al. 2001). Some studies have now investigated the use of NIPPV for the initial treatment of respiratory disease and found reduced rates of endotracheal intubation in the NIPPV groups (Kugelman et al. 2007; Bisceglia et al. 2007). There is emerging evidence that NIPPV, when compared with ventilation (Bhandari et al. 2007) or with CPAP (Kulkarni et al. 2006; Kugelman et al. 2007), has reduced rates of BPD. Retrospective review of NIPPV-treated infants, compared with ventilated infants, shows that the smallest babies had better outcomes with respect to BPD, death and neurodevelopmental outcome at 18–22 months (Bhandari et al. 2009). A large multicentre trial of NIPPV as a first-line treatment is now taking place (Kirpalani 2007).

NIPPV Complications

Complications similar to those seen in CPAP-treated infants are the most likely to occur, including trauma, laceration (Yong et al. 2005; Shanmugananda and Rawal 2007) and sepsis (Graham et al. 2006). Historically gastrointestinal perforations (Garland et al. 1985) and head moulding (Pape et al. 1976) were reported following NIPPV, but these have not been described in recent studies. Abdominal distension has been reported in one NIPPV study (Jackson et al. 2003), but it has also been suggested that the reduced work of breathing seen during NIPPV may reduce gastrointestinal complications (Aghai et al. 2006).

Future Directions for NIPPV

There is no evidence regarding the best device, interface, settings or weaning, nor whether synchronised NIPPV is more advantageous compared with non-synchronised NIPPV. These areas warrant further investigation to delineate how NIPPV is most beneficial (Owen et al. 2007).

Ventilation

Neonatal endotracheal intubation and ventilation emerged in the 1960s, and although many infants survived due to this intervention (Henderson-Smart et al. 2002), it quickly became apparent that ventilation had inherent risks: ventilator-induced lung injury (Dreyfuss and Saumon 1998), infection, development of BPD (Avery et al. 1987; Heimler et al. 1988; Pandya and Kotecha 2001) and upper airway problems. While there is now considerable debate about which preterm infants need mechanical ventilation, there have also been dramatic changes in the way neonatologists are able to deliver mechanical ventilation. The British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM) suggests that infants have failed CPAP support and require ventilation if they have persistent or major apnoeas with bradycardia, become acidotic below pH 7.25 or require more than 60 % oxygen (British Association of Perinatal Medicine T 2005).

Conventional Ventilation

Early neonatal ventilation was time cycled, was pressure limited and was not synchronised with spontaneous respiratory effort (continuous mandatory ventilation (CMV), referred to as conventional ventilation). It was however demonstrated that CMV, at inflation rates similar to the infant’s own respiratory rate, could result in synchronous breathing (Greenough et al. 1983, 1987).

Triggered Ventilation

Technology now allows synchronisation of mechanical inflations with spontaneous inspiration. Success of this technique relies on the triggering device being highly sensitive, with minimal time delay. Several types of trigger have been devised, using changes in airway pressure, airway flow, transthoracic impedance and abdominal movement. Different triggers may work differently under varying respiratory conditions and movements (Kassim and Greenough 2006); flow triggers have been shown to be superior to pressure triggers (Dimitriou et al. 2001). Triggered ventilatory modes, when compared with conventional CMV, show reduced rates of air leak and shorter duration of ventilation, when started during the recovery phase of RDS (Greenough et al. 2008). They also achieve improved blood gases, more stable blood pressure and reduced work of breathing (Cleary et al. 1995). Triggered modes have not been shown to be advantageous over conventional CMV in terms of intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), BPD or mortality (Greenough et al. 2008). Some triggered ventilation modes support all spontaneous inspirations (e.g. assist control (AC), synchronised intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SIPPV) or patient-triggered ventilation (PTV)). Other modes support only a set number of inspirations (e.g. synchronised intermittent mechanical ventilation (SIMV)), determined by the clinician. Small RCTs have suggested that supporting all inflations is superior to supporting a limited number and that low numbers of supported breaths, less than 20/min, actually increase work of breathing (Roze et al. 1995).

Volume-Targeted Ventilation (VTV)

Until recently, it had not been possible to measure tidal and minute volumes in neonates, but as devices have been developed that can make these tiny measurements, volume-targeted neonatal ventilation has emerged. There is good animal and adult evidence to suggest that controlling tidal volume can reduce volutrauma, atelectotrauma and BPD in low birth weight infants (Van Marter et al. 2000). Volume-targeted ventilation allows gas exchange at lower peak inflation pressures in both the early and recovery phases of RDS (Cheema and Ahluwalia 2001). VTV shows more consistent tidal volume delivery, fewer very large breaths and less inflammatory cytokine response (Keszler 2005). Meta-analysis of volume-targeted ventilation, compared with pressure-limited ventilation, shows lower pneumothorax and IVH rates, but no definite effect on BPD or mortality rates (McCallion et al. 2005). Long-term follow-up of infants managed with VTV, compared with pressure-limited ventilation, showed no differences in mortality, respiratory illnesses or readmissions. The volume-targeted group had lower rates of inhaled steroid and bronchodilator use (Singh et al. 2009a).

Newer Modes of Conventional Ventilation

It is possible to synchronise the end of inspiration as well as the start, such that the infant is able to determine their own inspiratory time (sometimes called flow termination, e.g. pressure support ventilation, PSV, from the Dräger Babylog ventilator). Data evaluating this mode of support suggests that the technique is associated with lower rates of asynchrony (Dimitriou et al. 1998). Pressure support ventilation combined with volume-targeted ventilation has had mixed results; there appears to be reduced inflammation compared with pressure-limited ventilation (Lista et al. 2004), whereas another study found no benefit (Nafday et al. 2005). One study found infants on PSV with volume targeting required higher mean airway pressures than those managed with SIMV (Olsen et al. 2002).

Many other modes exist, such as pressure-regulated volume-controlled ventilation (PRVC from the Servo-i ventilator); this mode combines pressure and volume control. Tidal volume and maximum pressure are set, and the ventilator uses decelerating variable flow to achieve the target tidal volume. Two RCTs using PRVC in preterm infants have been published. One demonstrated reduced grade III and IV IVH in the PRVC group, compared with CMV. In a subgroup of infants less than 1,000 g, they demonstrated shorter duration of ventilation in the PRVC group (median of 11 vs. 19 days) (Piotrowski et al. 1997). The second trial found no differences when compared with SIMV (D’Angio et al. 2005).

Volume-assured pressure support ventilation (VAPS from the VIP Bird Gold ventilator) is another form of hybrid pressure and volume-controlled ventilation, where adjustment of pressure and inspiratory time occurs within each breath, to achieve the desired volume. No studies have evaluated this mode in infants with RDS.

Proportional-assist ventilation (PAV) allows even more patient control. The infant controls the timing, frequency and magnitude of inflations, and the waveform is tailored to compensate for changes in compliance and resistance. This method of support reduces work of breathing (Schulze et al. 1996) and may allow ventilation at lower mean airway pressures (Schulze et al. 1999) with less thoraco-abdominal asynchrony (Musante et al. 2001), but infants can have longer desaturations compared with PTV and require conventional back-up inflations for periods of apnoea (Schulze et al. 2007).

Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) uses the electrical activity of the diaphragm to control the ventilator (Sinderby et al. 1999), and electrodes are embedded onto a gastric tube positioned in the lower oesophagus. The electrical signal triggers ventilator inflation, drives inflation pressure proportional to the respiratory effort and ceases at end inspiration. One study examining seven low birth weight infants with this technique showed improved infant-ventilator interaction and lower respiratory rates during NAVA, when compared with conventional ventilation (Beck et al. 2009).

There have been many reviews of the evidence regarding respiratory management of infants with RDS published over the past decade (Sinha et al. 2008; Sweet et al. 2007; Hascoet et al. 2008; van Kaam and Rimensberger 2007; Ambalavanan and Carlo 2006; Bancalari and del Moral 2001; Claure and Bancalari 2008; Greenough and Sharma 2005; Hummler and Schulze 2009; Ramanathan 2008; Ramanathan and Sardesai 2008; Sinha and Donn 2008); however, scientific evidence does not necessarily translate into clinical practice. A survey carried out in 2006 in the UK showed that 73 % of neonatal units chose conventional non-synchronised ventilation (CMV) as the first line of support in preterm infants with RDS. Two per cent chose CPAP as first line, 2 % chose high-frequency ventilation and 5 % chose volume-targeted ventilation (Henderson-Smart et al. 2007), and only a quarter of NICUs were able to measure tidal volumes during ventilation.

High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (HFOV)

Early animal work investigating HFOV demonstrated that there was more lung damage with the high magnitude pressure changes used in conventional ventilation than with the high mean airway pressure (MAP) used in HFOV (Hamilton et al. 1983). Animal data has shown less protein leak in RDS when using HFOV, compared with conventional ventilation (Niblett et al. 1989). Initial trials of HFOV used low lung volume strategies. This technique may be ideal for infants with established air leak syndromes, but when infants with RDS were studied, no pulmonary benefits were found with HFOV, and higher rates of IVH were seen (The HIFI Study Group 1989). Many of the infants enrolled in the early studies would not have had continuous carbon dioxide monitoring and may have had undetected hypocarbia contributing to the poor outcomes seen (The HIFI Study Group 1989; Greisen et al. 1987; Froese and Kinsella 2005). Further animal data demonstrated that optimising lung volume prolonged the effect of exogenous surfactant (Froese et al. 1993) and that when starting HFOV it was important to fully recruit the lung using a short period of higher airway pressure. A brief period of overdistension is less damaging than the persistent atelectasis seen in the low-volume approach (Bond and Froese 1993), and the open lung technique results in more even distribution of tidal volume and less alveolar overdistention (Frerichs et al. 2003). Froese et al. suggested that how the HFOV technique is applied is more important than the choice of mechanical device generating the oscillations (Froese and Kinsella 2005).

The next wave of clinical trials used high lung volume strategies, where clinicians reduced inspired oxygen before reducing the MAP. Acute and chronic pulmonary advantages of HFOV were then seen compared with conventional ventilation (Gerstmann et al. 1996). However, the results were not reproduced in later trials where all the infants received steroids, exogenous surfactant and early CPAP after delivery (Thome et al. 1999), all of which result in a more open lung ventilation technique in both groups. Improvements in conventional ventilation, increasing PEEP, decreasing tidal volume and synchronising inflations, have meant that the advantages of HFOV have been greatly reduced (Courtney et al. 2002). Now the pulmonary benefits of lower BPD rates and shorter duration of ventilation are only seen in infants with the most severe disease, who require high oxygen requirements (>60 %) post surfactant (Courtney et al. 2002). Routine HFOV for all RDS has not been shown to be beneficial and is now often reserved for the subset of infants with severe disease. The BAPM guidelines suggest conversion to HFOV, from conventional ventilation, for infants who have failed to respond to surfactant therapy and optimisation of conventional ventilation and who still have an oxygen requirement above 60 % and peak pressures above 30 cm H2O (British Association of Perinatal Medicine T 2005).

A Cochrane review has concluded that there is no clear evidence that prophylactic HFOV offers important advantages over conventional ventilation, in treating premature infants with RDS. There may be a small reduction in the rate of BPD, but the evidence is weak; future HFOV trials should focus on infants who are at the highest risk of BPD (Henderson-Smart et al. 2007). It is still to be determined whether a conventional ventilation strategy that aims to minimise volutrauma and atelectotrauma by using open lung ventilation, low tidal volumes and high PEEP is any different from HFOV (van Kaam and Rimensberger 2007).

There has been one study examining the application of high-frequency oscillations via nasal prongs showing improved PaCO2 and pH, compared with standard CPAP (Colaizy et al. 2008); further investigation of this method may be warranted.

High-Frequency Jet Ventilation (HFJV)

This mode of ventilation is a modification of HFOV that delivers very short inflation times of 0.02 s via a small bore injector cannula, in the frequency range of about 4–8 Hz. HFJV is not routinely used for infants with RDS. One study demonstrated that HFJV reduced rates of BPD in preterm infants, compared with conventional ventilation (Keszler et al. 1997), but a second study was stopped early due to higher rates of IVH seen in the HFJV group (Wiswell et al. 1996).

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

ECMO describes the use of modified cardiopulmonary bypass for patients with reversible lung disease, in whom maximal standard therapy has failed. It has become accepted for the treatment of several neonatal conditions, allowing time for lung healing. Catheter size and the need for systemic anticoagulation means that the technique is usually limited to infants greater than 2 kg in weight and more than 34 weeks gestation (Revenis et al. 1992). This excludes the majority of infants likely to have severe RDS. Infants at lower gestations have reduced survival (Hirschl et al. 1993) and a significantly increased risk of IVH (Hardart and Fackler 1999). IVH is four times more likely at 34 weeks gestation than at term (Neonatal ECMO Registry of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organisation 2004). Mature infants with life-threatening RDS show benefit from ECMO treatment with survival rates of more than 80 % (Bahrami and Van Meurs 2005).

Partial Liquid Ventilation (PLV)

PLV involves instilling perfluorocarbon into the lungs; perfluorocarbon is capable of gas transport, and during PLV the volume of liquid instilled replaces FRC. Conventional gas ventilation is applied in addition. PLV has been shown to reduce lung injury in animal models, but there is limited data in preterm infants with RDS (Ambalavanan and Carlo 2006). One non-randomised study showed a higher than expected rate of survival in infants with severe RDS, in whom conventional treatment was failing (Leach et al. 1996).

Weaning from Respiratory Support

Stepping down from mechanical ventilation is a topic of as much interest as escalation of support; however, there is very little research into the best practice of weaning. There is some evidence to suggest that the AC mode of ventilation is superior to SIMV modes for weaning (Dimitriou et al. 1995; Chan and Greenough 1994), as low SIMV rates can increase oxygen consumption and increase work of breathing (Roze et al. 1995). However, a survey of UK practice in 2006, more than a decade after this evidence was published, found that 73 % of neonatal units used SIMV mode for weaning infants from ventilation (Henderson-Smart et al. 2007). There have been several methods investigated to test whether an infant is ready for extubation, the key factors being an infant’s respiratory drive and their lung compliance.

Use of CPAP following extubation has been shown to be superior to head box oxygen, if the CPAP pressure is at least 5 cm H2O (Davis and Henderson-Smart 2003). In addition, use of NIPPV has been shown to prevent more extubation failures than CPAP alone (Davis et al. 2001). Weaning from NIPPV has not been studied, and weaning from CPAP has been the subject of very few studies. One study suggests decreasing CPAP support to pressures of 4–5 cm H2O and then stopping (Singh et al. 2006); this is the alternative to ‘cycling’ the infant through increasing periods of time off CPAP. The ‘cycling’ method has not been shown to have any significant advantages and prolongs the time the infant spends on CPAP support (Soe et al. 2006).

Summary of Respiratory Support

Currently the data are not conclusive to support or refute either starting with ventilation and weaning quickly or starting with minimal support and only escalating care if the infant is not managing. Ideal ventilation delivers consistent tidal and minute volumes, responds quickly to changing demands and allows the infant to breathe at the lowest pressures with the least work of breathing. Further RCTs comparing different modalities, for specific clinical conditions, are required before any single mode can be justified as being superior to another.

Rationale for Using Adjunctive Therapies During CPAP or Mechanical Ventilation for RDS

Exogenous Surfactant

The introduction of surfactant replacement in the late 1980s reduced mortality due to RDS but left NICUs with the burden of survivors with BPD, as survival increased, so did the rate of BPD (Hintz et al. 2005). Debate continues today about the need for surfactant administration, which surfactant to use, the most appropriate timing for surfactant delivery, the best dose and optimal mode of surfactant delivery, to treat RDS and prevent BPD. Surfactant has been shown to decrease rates of pneumothorax by 30–65 % and decrease mortality by up to 40 % (Halliday 2005).

Structure and Function of Surfactant

Surfactant is a complex system of phospholipids – mainly dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine, neutral lipids, proteins and glycoproteins. Surfactant is produced and assembled in type 2 pneumocytes from 22 weeks of gestation onwards, and the number of type 2 pneumocytes increases throughout gestation. Surfactant is stored in the lamellar bodies of the pneumocytes and is later extruded into the air spaces. A healthy term infant has about ten times the pool of surfactant compared with a premature baby with RDS (Adams et al. 1970; Jackson et al. 1986).

The main effect of surfactant is reduction of surface tension; phosphatidylcholine produces a monolayer that reduces surface tension by about two-thirds. Other phospholipids, along with surfactant proteins, further reduce surface tension to almost zero (Veldhuizen et al. 1998). Surface tension is responsible for approximately two-thirds of the elastic recoil forces of the lung, so by reducing surface tension, the surfactant prevents the air spaces from collapsing at end expiration. The lowered surface tension also allows re-expansion of the terminal airways with less force. Maximum lung volumes are increased and lung expansion is more uniform. Exogenous surfactants can mimic the effects of natural surfactant, but it takes up to ten times the quantity of exogenous surfactant to generate the same effects as endogenous surfactant (Seidner et al. 1988; Ikegami et al. 1989).

Surfactant Preparations

Improved outcomes are seen with animal-derived surfactants (Soll and Blanco 2001) or surfactants containing additional proteins or peptides, rather than phospholipids alone (Moya et al. 2005). Studies have shown more improvements in FRC and compliance when using porcine-derived surfactant (poractant alfa – CurosurfTM) compared with synthetic surfactant (colfosceril – ExosurfTM) (Stenson et al. 1994) and when using bovine-derived surfactants beractant (SurvantaTM) (Cotton et al. 1993) or calfactant (InfasurfTM) (Onrust et al. 1999) compared with colfosceril. Although few studies have directly compared different animal-derived surfactants, there is some data to suggest a quicker improvement in oxygenation with poractant alfa (Speer et al. 1995; Ramanathan et al. 2004). Newer artificial surfactants are now emerging which contain an artificial peptide (sinapultide) similar to surfactant protein B (lucinactant – SurfaxinTM). Early data suggest that this product may be as good as animal-derived compounds (Moya et al. 2005, 2007).

Timing of First Surfactant Dose

Using surfactant prior to the onset RDS can reduce ventilator-induced lung injury (Halliday 2006; Donn and Sinha 2006). Prophylactic versus selective rescue surfactant has been shown to be superior in terms of mortality (OR 0.61 95 % CI 0.28, 0.77), BPD or death (OR 0.85 95 % CI 0.76, 0.95) and pneumothorax(OR 0.54, 95 % CI 0.42, 0.84) (Soll and Morley 2001). However, there has not been shown to be a difference in mortality depending on whether the dose is given prior to mechanical ventilation or following stabilisation (Kendig et al. 1998); there is no definite answer as to how early, early treatment should be (Soll and Morley 2001; Yost and Soll 2000). Currently data would suggest that there is not much difference between early CPAP with prophylactic surfactant via brief intubation, early CPAP and selective rescue surfactant, intubation with prophylactic surfactant or rescue endotracheal intubation and rescue surfactant (Thomson 2002).

Dose of Surfactant

The dose of surfactant recommended by most manufacturers is 100 mg/kg. Smaller doses have been shown to be less effective (Konishi et al. 1988; Halliday et al. 1993), and larger doses may have a quicker effect but confer no ongoing advantages (Halliday et al. 1993). Manufacturers recommend repeat doses at 12 h, but if there is severe disease with extensive protein leak, much of the second dose may be inactivated. Early delivery of the second dose in infants with high ventilatory or oxygen requirements may be more advantageous (Figueras-Aloy et al. 2001). A Cochrane review looking at single versus multiple doses of surfactant described two papers using animal-derived surfactants showing that multiple doses resulted in fewer pneumothoraces (RR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.30, 0.88) and a trend towards lower mortality (RR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.39, 1.02). They also described one study, using synthetic surfactant, that showed lower rates of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) following multiple doses (RR 0.20, 95 % CI 0.08, 0.51) and lower mortality (RR 0.56, 95 % CI 0.39, 0.81). The review concluded that if an infant has ongoing respiratory insufficiency, then repeated doses of surfactant are beneficial (Soll and Ozek 2009). Studies have found no benefit in delivery of more than two doses of surfactant (The OSIRIS Collaborative Group 1992).

Mode of Surfactant Delivery

Almost all surfactant is given directly into the endotracheal tube as a bolus. There has not been shown to be any benefit in performing physical manoeuvres aiming to direct surfactant into different areas of the lungs (Zola et al. 1993). In the modern era of minimal ventilation, there is considerable interest in a technique of surfactant delivery that does not require intubation. Endotracheal intubation has inherent risks; it frequently takes longer than the recommended time to perform (O’Donnell et al. 2006) and is often not successful at the first attempt (Leone et al. 2005). There are reports of success using alternative delivery techniques. One group has reported using surfactant delivered via a small endotracheal catheter, under direct vision, and showed that the process was well tolerated and first attempt at administration was successful in 80 % (Kribs et al. 2008). This method is now the subject of a randomised controlled trial. Two groups have published studies of aerosolised surfactant delivery, which appears feasible and safe (Berggren et al. 2000; Jorch et al. 1997) but requires further study (Mazela et al. 2007), as animal data have suggested that drug distribution in the lungs may be very variable (Lewis et al. 1991). A recent report of aerosolised lucinactant (AerosurfTM) also appears feasible and safe (Finer et al. 2006). Another group has delivered surfactant via laryngeal masks (Trevisanuto et al. 2005); this is also now the subject of an RCT. Kattwinkel et al. used surfactant instilled into the pharynx prior to delivery of the body and reported that the method was simple and safe and warrants a randomised trial (Kattwinkel et al. 2004).

Adverse Events During Surfactant Delivery

Surfactant delivery is not without adverse effects. Infants can have transient hypoxia and bradycardia (Liechty et al. 1991) along with flattening of the EEG (electroencephalogram) (Hellstrom-Westas et al. 1992). A recent report demonstrated that the endotracheal tube is frequently obstructed following surfactant administration and infants exhibit increased ventilatory requirements for up to an hour following surfactant delivery (Wheeler et al. 2009).

Nonresponders to Surfactant

Lack of response to surfactant treatment may indicate persistent pulmonary hypertension, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), air leak, shock, congenital infection or asphyxia (Wirbelauer and Speer 2009). In the absence of these confounding conditions, failure of response confers a worse prognosis (Skelton and Jeffery 1996; Kuint et al. 1994).

Surfactant Conclusion

Surfactant improves outcomes for small ventilated infants, but many of the trials investigating surfactant use were done in the pre-steroid era and general anaesthetic was routinely used for caesarean sections. The results, therefore, may not be so applicable to today’s population of preterm babies. In some infants who have received antenatal steroids, who are not affected by anaesthetic agents and who are supported with early CPAP, it is not clear whether exogenous surfactant is needed at all.

Inhaled Nitric Oxide

Nitric oxide is a potent pulmonary vasodilator and has been shown to have profound effects on gas exchange (Gaston et al. 1994). Its use improves ventilation-perfusion mismatching, allowing improved oxygenation and reduced ventilation. Inhaled nitric oxide has been shown to be beneficial in term infants with respiratory disease, but the results are less clear, and more variable, in infants below 34 weeks gestation (Van Meurs et al. 2005; Schreiber et al. 2003; Lindwall et al. 2005). There may be some short-term benefits, but no long-term advantages have been demonstrated in premature infants (Subhedar et al. 1997). Prophylactic low dose nitric oxide in preterm infants does not reduce the risk of developing BPD (Mercier et al. 2009). Concerns remain regarding the effects of the drug on the developing brain and possible risk of intracranial bleeding (Van Meurs et al. 2005).

Antibiotics

It is impossible to differentiate between RDS and severe postnatal, or congenital, infection. Blood cultures and antibiotic treatment, with a penicillin and an aminoglycoside, for 48 h until blood cultures are shown to be negative, are standard therapy for infants with presumed RDS.

Methylxanthines

Methylxanthines have proven benefit in treating apnoea of prematurity. A recent large RCT has shown improved survival without neurodevelopmental disability (Schmidt et al. 2007), reduced rates of BPD and shorter duration of respiratory support (Schmidt et al. 2006a) in infants treated with caffeine. These benefits would suggest that preterm infants with RDS, who may or may not develop apnoea of prematurity, could benefit from treatment with methylxanthines.

Heliox

Heliox is a gas mixture in which the nitrogen has been replaced with helium. This mixture decreases pulmonary resistance and resistive work of breathing. It is hypothesised that this might improve lung function and reduce energy expenditure in infants with severe lung disease. Early observational data show that mechanical ventilation with heliox mixture does reduce resistive work of breathing and ventilatory requirements, as well as improving gas exchange in ventilated preterm infants (Migliori et al. 2009). Other reports suggest it may be useful in the treatment of pulmonary interstitial emphysema (Phatak et al. 2008). Heliox treatment, combined with CPAP, for extremely low birth weight infants is currently being studied as part of a randomised trial.

Diuretics

Frusemide (furosemide) increases resorption of lung fluid and produces short-term improvements in lung function. However, the early use of diuretics in preterm infants can increase the risk of patent ductus arteriosus as frusemide stimulates production of prostaglandin E2. Repeated use of diuretics in premature infants increases the risk of ototoxicity and aminoglycoside ototoxicity (Hey Ee 2003), as well as the possibility of inducing hypovolaemia and low systemic blood pressure. Systematic review of diuretics for RDS shows no benefit on mortality, BPD, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of oxygen treatment or length of hospital stay (Brion and Soll 2001). The trials included in the Cochrane review were completed before generalised use of antenatal steroids or surfactant replacement, but to date there is no evidence in favour of routine use of diuretic treatment in RDS (Wiswell et al. 2007). The use of diuretics should be reserved for oliguric infants with fluid retention and deteriorating lung function.

Analgesia, Sedation and Neuromuscular Paralysis

Opioids have regularly been used to provide analgesia and sedation for ventilated infants with RDS. Recent systematic review found no significant benefits in terms of mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation or neurodevelopmental outcomes to warrant routine use of opioids in this population (Bellu et al. 2005). Adverse effects of morphine, such as delaying achievement of full enteral feeds, need to be considered when considering opioid treatment (Menon et al. 2008). Midazolam is also commonly used for sedation of ventilated newborns, but again systematic review found no advantages when compared with either placebo or morphine. Midazolam use increased rates of adverse events including hypotension, death, longer duration of hospital stay, and more IVH and periventricular leukomalacia. The authors concluded that routine use of midazolam for sedation should not be recommended (Ng et al. 2003). Neuromuscular paralysing agents are sometimes used to abolish spontaneous breathing patterns in infants with asynchronous respiratory effort. Cochrane review has shown that agents such as pancuronium have the potential to decrease air leak and IVH in such infants. Uncertainty regarding the long-term pulmonary and neurological effects of paralysing agents means that routine usage is not currently recommended (Cools and Offringa 2005).

Numerous pharmacologic agents have been used to treat infants with BPD; these are further discussed in Sect. 10.1007/978-3-642-01219-8_32, 10.1007/978-3-642-01219-8_32, and 10.1007/978-3-642-01219-8_48 of this book.

Classical Complications of RDS

The single most important complication of RDS, in terms of morbidity, treatment and cost, is bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). BPD can occur even in the presence of only mild respiratory disease (Bancalari and del Moral 2001) and will affect up to 40 % of infants born before 29 weeks gestation (Patel and Greenough 2008). The use of antenatal steroids, surfactant and newer ventilatory techniques has not significantly reduced the incidence of BPD (Van Marter et al. 2001; Lemons et al. 2001).

Air leak syndromes including pulmonary interstitial emphysema, pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum used to be high in infants with RDS, but following the introduction of exogenous surfactant, the use of triggered ventilation techniques and shorter inflation times, these complication rates have fallen to about 5 % in infants ventilated for RDS (Rennie 2005).

Other major complications include PDA, intraventricular haemorrhage and renal failure. The incidence of symptomatic PDA increases with the fluid overload seen in infants with RDS (Bell et al. 1980); this in turn increases the risk of significant pulmonary haemorrhage. There has been considerable debate in the literature regarding the use of prophylactic indomethacin for very low birth weight babies with RDS, as indomethacin has been shown to reduce PDA and possibly reduce severe IVH (Fowlie 1996; Fowlie and Davis 2003). Long-term follow-up of infants who received prophylactic indomethacin has not demonstrated any beneficial effect on mortality or neurodevelopment (Fowlie and Davis 2003). Infants with RDS require close control of PaCO2, blood pressure and coagulation, to minimise the risk of developing IVH and acute tubular necrosis.

Short- and Long-Term Outcome of RDS

Long-term complications following RDS may develop as a result of oxygen toxicity, ventilator-induced lung and airway injuries, or from periods of hypoxia. The major complication of RDS remains chronic lung disease, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).

Survival

Overall mortality from RDS is between 5 and 10 % and is rare in infants of birth weight greater than 1,500 g (Rennie 2005). Death from RDS occurs most frequently between days 2 and 7 of life. Infants who receive prolonged ventilation from birth have lower survival rates and higher rates of impairment (Gaillard et al. 2001; Walsh et al. 2005).

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Chronic Lung Disease

The definition of BPD has evolved over recent years from the original description of oxygen dependency at 28 days with corresponding x-ray changes (Northway et al. 1967). It has now been shown that oxygen dependence at 36 weeks corrected gestational age correlates better with long-term morbidity (Shennan et al. 1988). Infants born below 32 weeks gestation are assessed at 36 weeks corrected age, or at hospital discharge, whichever is sooner, and BPD is classified as mild, moderate or severe. Infants who need supplemental oxygen at 28 days of age, but who are in air at 36 weeks corrected age, have mild disease. Infants requiring up to 30 % oxygen at 36 weeks corrected age have moderate disease, and infants requiring more than 30 % oxygen, or positive pressure support, have severe disease. Infants born after 32 weeks gestational age are assessed by the same criteria at 56 days of age, or at hospital discharge, whichever is sooner (Jobe and Bancalari 2001).

It is difficult to predict infants who will go on to develop BPD from the appearance of the initial x-rays as the findings depend upon the amount of fetal lung fluid present and the phase of respiratory cycle in which the x-ray was taken. Positive pressure support and early surfactant use improve the x-ray appearance so early images are a poor guide to outcome (Kanto et al. 1978). The incidence of BPD in very low birth weight infants ranges from 15 to 50 %; quoted incidence varies as the proportion of extremely low birth weight babies in different studies varies (Sinha and Donn 2006). The oxygen saturation target, and ventilation strategy of individual neonatal units, influences the number of infants receiving supplemental oxygen and therefore the quoted rates of BPD. Numbers of infants with BPD have increased over recent years, and this may reflect the increased survival of very low birth weight infants. Many factors affect the risk of developing BPD: the degree of prematurity, the severity of the disease, oxygen toxicity, effects of ventilator-induced lung injury (barotrauma, volutrauma, atelectasis, shear trauma and biotrauma), PDA and the presence or absence of air leak. Infants who develop BPD commonly have exacerbations of their lung disease in childhood, requiring readmission to paediatric wards both in the first year (Mutch et al. 1986) and throughout childhood (McCormick et al. 1993). These infants are at risk of serious decompensation should they contract bronchiolitis, and regimens exist for respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis to specific groups of children with BPD.

Neurological Outcome

Although most infants with RDS have normal neurological outcomes, those who require prolonged ventilation and develop BPD have more neurological sequelae than those with mild disease not requiring ventilation (Anderson and Doyle 2006). One follow-up study showed that infants with RDS who required prolonged continuous ventilation, for at least 28 days, were more likely to die or have abnormal neurological outcome, than those requiring less ventilation. The study also showed that very low birth weight infants with major cranial ultrasound abnormalities who had prolonged ventilation, all either died or had abnormal neurodevelopmental outcome (Thomas et al. 2003).

Conclusions

RDS remains a major problem for extremely low birth weight infants. How these infants are managed in the first few minutes of life may determine their long-term outcome. BPD is a major cause of severe neonatal morbidity (Ehrenkranz et al. 2005) and mechanical ventilation is a prime risk factor (Jobe and Bancalari 2001). How to use CPAP and surfactant to the infant’s best advantage, while avoiding lung injury, still needs to be determined. Optimal devices and settings for CPAP and NIPPV delivery need to be researched. On the horizon are developments such as nebulised surfactant, non-invasive ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula treatment, interactive modes of mechanical ventilation and the use of heliox. These treatments have the potential for improved management and outcome in the population of preterm infants at highest risk of RDS and are all the subject of ongoing trials.

Essentials to Remember

  • Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is the most common reason for admission to a neonatal intensive care unit.

  • In RDS the lungs are non-compliant and atelectatic with high surface tension and small airways collapse.

  • On CXR diffuse infiltrates have the appearance of ground glass which outlines larger air-filled bronchioles.

  • Risk of developing RDS varies with lung maturity which is related to gestational age and the use of antenatal steroids.

  • Mortality from RDS is 5–10 %, and antenatal steroids and surfactant replacement reduce mortality rates.

  • Management of RDS involves supporting respiration using a minimally invasive lung protective strategy, to reduce the risk of developing BPD.

  • Use of PEEP at delivery, judicious use of supplemental oxygen, early CPAP with or without prophylactic surfactant and restriction of invasive mechanical ventilation all play a role in reducing the risk of developing BPD.

  • BPD will affect up to 40 % of infants born before 29 weeks. Newer ventilatory techniques have not significantly reduced the incidence of BPD.

  • Numbers of infants with BPD have increased over recent years, and this may reflect the increased survival of very low birth weight infants with RDS.

  • Further research is required to define the optimal modes of respiratory support in RDS, to avoid lung injury.

Neonatal Pneumonia

Peter G. Davis, Louise S. Owen

Educational Aims

  • To define neonatal pneumonia and its classification

  • To describe the histopathology and common causative organisms

  • To outline why neonates are susceptible to pneumonia and define subgroups at highest risk

  • To describe appropriate therapy including antibiotics and respiratory support

  • To describe outcomes following neonatal pneumonia

Pneumonia may be defined as inflammation of the lung with consolidation. The term is usually used to indicate infection of the lung parenchyma resulting in obliteration of alveolar air spaces by purulent exudate. The lungs are a common site of infection in the newborn. Infection may be viral or bacterial in origin and may be acquired before birth, during delivery or in the early postnatal period. The clinical manifestations are often subtle and non-specific. Systemic signs may precede signs of respiratory distress and x-rays and blood tests have limited predictive value. It is important, therefore, to consider the diagnosis and treat early, as pneumonia is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in this age group.

Pathophysiology

Host Defences of the Newborn

The host defences in the lung of the newborn infant are less well developed than those of older children and adults. Polymorphonuclear neutrophils have reduced phagocytic and microbicidal activities as well as diminished capacity for chemotaxis and adhesion (Hill 1987). Natural killer cells, while normal in number, have reduced cytolytic activity against target cells. Circulating complement levels are reduced to around 50 % of levels seen in older children. Transmission of maternal IgG antibodies across the placenta confers a degree of immune protection. However, the neonate is poorly protected against organisms that predominantly evoke IgA or IgM antibodies. Importantly, preterm infants miss out on the placental transfer of antibodies which mostly occurs late in the third trimester of pregnancy.

As a result of impaired host defences, infections are more common and cause greater disruption of normal lung structure and function in both term and preterm neonates.

Pathology

Bacterial infections commonly give rise to inflammation of the pleura, infiltration and destruction of the bronchopulmonary tissue and exudate containing leukocytes and fibrin within the alveoli and small airways (Davies and Aherne 1962). An interstitial pattern with infiltration of mononuclear cells and lymphocytes is more typically seen in viral pneumonia.

Damage to the lungs occurs due to direct injury by the invading microorganisms and indirectly as a result of inappropriate or excessive responses by the host defence system. Direct injury is mediated by microbial enzymes, proteins and toxins that disrupt host cell membranes and metabolism. For example, group B streptococcal (GBS) pneumonia is characterised by exudative pulmonary oedema and alveolar haemorrhage. The organism appears to injure lung microvascular endothelial cells via a pore-forming hemolysin (Gibson et al. 1999). Inflammation attracts phagocytes which release substances that may help defend the body against the invading organisms but may result in poorly regulated cascades which damage host tissues.

Injury leads to an increased airway smooth muscle tone, mucous secretion and debris within the airways. In turn, this causes increased airway resistance, partial or total airway obstruction and atelectasis or air trapping. Surfactant inactivation by proteinacious exudate exacerbates the impairment of lung function. Gas exchange is impaired by increased barriers to alveolar diffusion, intrapulmonary shunting and ventilation-perfusion mismatch. An increased metabolic demand of the lungs and other tissues to which the infection may have spread exacerbates these problems.

Some bacterial infections are associated with typical pathological features. Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae cause extensive tissue damage and may lead to abscess formation and empyema.

Lung Mechanics

Neonatal pneumonia causes impaired lung mechanics through a variety of pathways. Respiratory drive is frequently reduced, leading to retention of carbon dioxide and culminating in apnoeic episodes requiring respiratory support. Hypoxaemia from hypoventilation is relatively easily overcome by increasing the inspired oxygen concentration.

Inflammation and infection involving the distal air spaces decreases ventilation to the affected areas. If perfusion of these areas is maintained, ventilation-perfusion mismatch occurs. When alveoli are completely filled with exudate, there may be no ventilation and extreme ventilation-perfusion inequality results. Hypoxaemia is the consequence of such an intrapulmonary shunt, and the low PaO2 is not overcome by administering high oxygen concentrations.

Pneumonia causes leakage of proteins from the intravascular and interstitial spaces into the alveoli. Fibrin, fibrinogen and albumin inhibit surfactant function, leading to a further reduction in functional residual capacity, decreased pulmonary compliance and increased work of breathing.

Epidemiology

Early Onset Pneumonia

Early onset pneumonia presents within the first 3 days of life. Transplacentally acquired pneumonia is a relatively rare form of early onset pneumonia. It includes those pneumonias caused by rubella virus, cytomegalovirus, Treponema pallidum and Listeria monocytogenes. Many of these infants are stillborn or die in the first days of life.

More commonly it is due to aspiration of infected amniotic fluid before or at the time of delivery. In developed countries, group B streptococcus (GBS) is the most common bacterial pathogen, but gram-negative organisms such as E. coli are also prevalent. In contrast, E. coli is the main organism in developing countries. Blood cultures are frequently positive when these organisms are involved. Listeria species, herpes simplex virus, candida, enterovirus and adenovirus have also been reported.

Initial treatment with a penicillin (penicillin G or ampicillin) and an aminoglycoside (gentamicin) is appropriate pending blood cultures. Acyclovir should be started if herpes simplex virus pneumonia is suspected. As the clinical and radiological signs of pneumonia are not specific, treatment of all cases of respiratory distress with appropriate antibiotics is the safest option.

Late-Onset Pneumonia

Late-onset pneumonia, beyond the first 72 h of life, may be caused by the same organisms, but Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococci and gram-negative bacilli are most common. Blood cultures are frequently negative in late-onset pneumonia.

Choice of antibiotics is governed by the resistance profiles of the setting. Where drug-resistant staphylococci are prevalent, the combination of vancomycin and gentamicin provides suitable cover.

Factors Associated with Increased Risk

Race and economic factors are associated with risk of early neonatal pneumonia. A study conducted in the 1960s showed that black infants who died in the first 48 h of life had an incidence of pneumonia of 27.7 %, compared with 11.3 % of white infants. The difference was consistent across all weight groups (Fujikura and Froehlich 1967). Similar differences were found by Naeye et al. in a series of consecutive autopsies of newborn and stillborn infants. Black infants had significantly higher rates of pneumonia (37 %) than Puerto Rican (22 %) or white infants (20 %). They also found that babies from families with the lowest income had significantly higher rates of pneumonia than infants from higher income families (Naeye et al. 1971).

Late-onset bacterial pneumonia may occur in nursery epidemics as a result of an infected health care worker or contaminated equipment. Viral epidemics have also been reported. Respiratory syncytial virus and influenza virus are amongst the causative organisms, and direct contact and droplets are the most common modes of spread.

Incidence

The reported rates of neonatal pneumonia vary widely depending on site, definition and method of ascertainment. However, it is well established that pneumonia is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in developing countries (Duke 2005). Between 750,000 and 1.2 million neonatal deaths are thought to be due to pneumonia which equates to 10 % of global child mortality (Nissen 2007). A field study in rural India found a mortality rates for pneumonia in the first month of life of 29 per 1,000 live births (Bang et al. 1993). The incidence is much lower in developed countries. Webber et al. prospectively studied neonatal pneumonia in single tertiary unit in Oxford (Webber et al. 1990). Over a 41-month period, they diagnosed 35 cases of early onset pneumonia amongst 19,569 live-born infants (1.79 per 1,000). Group B streptococcus was the predominant organism (69 %). Late-onset pneumonia occurred in 39 infants, the overwhelming majority of whom were preterm (92 %) and ventilated (87 %). Sinha et al. conducted a retrospective cohort study of neonatal infections using data from a large health maintenance organisation. In this US setting although infection was common during the first 30 days of life, pneumonia was uncommon compared to other infections. They reported rates of pneumonia of 4 per 1,000 during a nursery stay, 0.3 per 1,000 at paediatric office visits and 0.1 per 1,000 at emergency department visits (Sinha et al. 2003).

Risk Factors

Early Onset Pneumonia

Ascending infection from the maternal genital tract is the most common mode of acquisition of early onset pneumonia. Therefore, prolonged rupture of the membranes, variously defined as beyond 18 or 24 h duration, is an important risk factor for neonatal pneumonia. Signs of maternal infection, e.g. maternal fever and uterine tenderness, may give early warning of an infant at risk. Frequent pelvic examinations during labour are also considered a risk factor. Persistent fetal tachycardia is a relatively specific sign of infection, and its presence on CTG during labour should be communicated to those responsible for postnatal care of the infant.

Vaginal and rectal carriage of GBS occurs in 10–20 % of pregnant women. Infants at highest risk for GBS are those whose mothers carry the organism but have little or no circulating anti-GBS immunoglobulin. Approximately 1 % of infants born to carrier mothers become infected. Early onset GBS disease affects 1.8 per 1,000 live births.

Infected dairy products are considered the most important reservoir for transmission of Listeria monocytogenes. Women with HIV are more susceptible to infection with this organism.

Late-Onset Pneumonia

Late-onset pneumonia is strongly associated with assisted ventilation, and the risk is substantially higher for preterm infants. Rates vary according to the stringency of definition. Colonisation of the endotracheal tube is common, but using strict criteria, including positive blood culture of a respiratory pathogen, the rate of late-onset pneumonia in infants ventilated for more than 24 h in the Oxford study was 10 % (Webber et al. 1990). In a single-centre cohort study of ventilated infants of birth weight <2,000 g in St. Louis, the overall rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia was 11 %. Diagnosis was based on focal infiltrates on chest x-ray in combination with antibiotic usage for 1 week. The rate was substantially higher (28 %) in infants <28 weeks gestation (Apisarnthanarak et al. 2003). Using a less strict definition, Halliday et al. reported a pneumonia rate of 35 % in preterm infants ventilated during a randomised trial of surfactant therapy (Halliday et al. 1984). Other risk factors for late-onset pneumonia include neurological impairments leading to aspiration and congenital abnormalities of the lung and airways, e.g. tracheo-oesophageal fistula and cystic adenomatoid malformations. Preventable factors such as poor hand washing (Harbarth et al. 1999) are important in both developed and developing countries.

Stepwise Approach to Respiratory Support

Basic Principles

Successful treatment of neonatal pneumonia depends on consideration of the diagnosis in the differential diagnosis of any unwell newborn infant and early commencement of appropriate antibiotic therapy. The goals of treatment are to eradicate the infection and provide adequate respiratory support to allow intact survival of the infant.

There is less evidence to guide clinicians regarding the ventilation of infants with pneumonia compared with RDS. However, the hierarchy of respiratory support is similar to that for RDS. Requirements should be titrated against an infant’s needs. Regular clinical assessment, in addition to continuous cardiorespiratory and oxygen saturation monitoring, allows the clinician to gauge the infant’s progress and intervene appropriately.

Non-invasive Support

Active infants with respiratory distress whose breathing is regular may only require supplemental oxygen to maintain normal oxygen saturations. Additional support may be required to manage an infant with inadequate respiratory drive or severe lung disease. Sepsis in general and pneumonia in particular are often associated with apnoeic pauses. These occur in term infants but are more common in preterm infants. If apnoeic infants require frequent stimulation, i.e. more often than once per hour, or bag and mask ventilation, then additional support is required. Nasal CPAP may be useful as it reduces the work of breathing and leads to more regular respirations.

Invasive Support

Infants with severe respiratory distress, particularly when associated with respiratory acidosis, require intubation and ventilation. Regular assessment of blood gases is essential to avoid the dangers of excessive ventilation, i.e. hypocarbia and volutrauma as well as underventilation and worsening respiratory acidosis.

PEEP and Tidal Volume

There are no randomised trials comparing different modes of ventilation for infants with pneumonia. Given the paucity of human data, some animal data may usefully inform clinical practice. Using an adult rat model of pseudomonas pneumonia, Lin et al. showed that the choice of ventilator parameters is potentially important in determining the outcome of pneumonia (Lin et al. 2003). They compared an injurious mode of ventilation, zero PEEP and high tidal volumes with a lung protective strategy, standard PEEP and moderate tidal volume. Rats undergoing the injurious strategy had increased rates of bacteraemia and higher serum levels of inflammatory cytokines. In a series of experiments using a newborn piglet model of group B streptococcal pneumonia, van Kaam and Lachmann demonstrated the importance of PEEP and atelectasis. The use of (1) surfactant prophylaxis and (2) a strategy of peak and end-expiratory pressures designed to avoid atelectasis each independently resulted in attenuated bacterial growth and translocation into the blood stream (van Kaam et al. 2004). In a similar study, this group compared three different PEEP levels after surfactant lavage and group B streptococcus inoculation. The lowest PEEP group had the worst lung function and the highest mortality. The highest PEEP group had higher rates of translocation of bacteria into the bloodstream than the optimum PEEP group (Lachmann et al. 2007). The implications for clinicians are that care should be exercised in choice of ventilator settings and overdistension and atelectasis should be avoided.

High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Nitric Oxide

There are no trials which definitively identify the role of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the management of neonatal pneumonia. Typically this form of support is reserved for the sickest infants, i.e. those with the most difficulties with oxygenation and carbon dioxide retention. Donn and Sinha appropriately caution clinicians using high-frequency ventilation for infants with sepsis as this modality may exacerbate an already compromised cardiac output (Donn and Sinha 2003). Judicious use of volume replacement and inotropes may be required when this form of ventilation is used in infants with severe respiratory failure and hemodynamic compromise. When pulmonary hypertension is a feature, typically in group B streptococcal pneumonia, the combination of high-frequency ventilation and nitric oxide may be appropriate. Kinsella and Abman suggest that for pulmonary hypertension where diffuse parenchymal disease and underinflation are features, e.g. neonatal pneumonia, recruitment of air spaces using high-frequency oscillatory ventilation enhances delivery and effectiveness of inhaled nitric oxide (Kinsella and Abman 1998).

Exogenous Surfactant Therapy

Natural surfactants contain host defence factors. Surfactant proteins A and D modulate the inflammatory response to infection and assist in phagocytosis and killing of invading organisms (Jobe 2000). Herting et al. showed that exogenous surfactant reduced bacterial growth and improved lung compliance in a rabbit model of GBS pneumonia (Herting et al. 1997). In a retrospective study of 118 infants with culture proven GBS pneumonia, Herting et al. showed that surfactant therapy improved gas exchange in about 75 % of infants. The response was slower and smaller in magnitude than that of infants with hyaline membrane disease. In the absence of randomised trials on the topic, surfactant therapy for neonatal pneumonia may be considered a potentially useful therapy for infants requiring endotracheal intubation and ventilation.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes

Duke reported case fatality rates for neonatal pneumonia of between 8 and 48 % in a variety of community- and hospital-based studies (Duke 2005). The highest rates were seen in early onset disease. The studies predominantly were from India, the exception being the Oxford study of Webber et al. which reported a mortality rate of 14 % (Webber et al. 1990). Duke noted the risk factors for death included the presence of hypoxaemia, low birth weight and absence of tachypnoea (Duke 2005).

In developed countries outcomes are generally good. However, increased mortality is associated with preterm birth, pre-existing chronic lung disease or immune deficiencies. Residual pulmonary anomalies including pneumatocoele are relatively common, particularly with staphylococcal pneumonia. These sequelae are also seen in association with Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes and Haemophilus influenzae and may persist for many months. However, long-term prognosis for complete recovery is excellent (Huxtable et al. 1964).

Conclusions

Worldwide, neonatal pneumonia is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The symptoms and signs are non-specific; therefore, the diagnosis should be suspected in any infant with respiratory distress. Infants treated early with appropriate antibiotics have a good prognosis. Respiratory support should be matched to the infant’s requirements, aiming to allow treatment and resolution of the infection without causing additional ventilator-induced damage.

Essentials to Remember

  • Neonates are susceptible to pneumonia because many of the components of the host defence system are not fully developed.

  • Infections can be of early onset (first 3 days of life) or late (beyond the first 3 days).

  • Early infections are most commonly due to group B streptococcus and gram-negative bacteria. Initial treatment with a penicillin and an aminoglycoside is appropriate.

  • Late infections are most commonly due to staphylococci and gram-negative bacilli. Antibiotic therapy should be guided by local resistance patterns; where resistant staphylococci are prevalent, vancomycin and an aminoglycoside provide suitable cover.

  • Prolonged rupture of membranes, signs of maternal infection and persistent fetal tachycardia may provide early warning of the risk of early onset pneumonia.

  • The combination of assisted ventilation and prematurity increases the risk of late-onset infection.

  • The level of respiratory support should be titrated against the infant’s requirements: supplemental oxygen, nasal CPAP and conventional and high-frequency ventilation via an endotracheal tube may be required.

  • Outcomes following neonatal pneumonia in developed countries are generally good. Risks of death increase with associated disorders and prematurity.

Meconium Aspiration Syndrome

Peter A. Dargaville

Educational Aims

This chapter aims to give an understanding of:

  • The pathophysiology of MAS, in particular the causes of hypoxaemia and poor lung compliance

  • The epidemiology of the condition

  • The conventional and alternative means of respiratory support for MAS, including a stepwise approach to respiratory support, and the rationale for use of adjunctive therapies

  • The complications and outcome of MAS

Introduction

Meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) is a complex respiratory disease of the term and near-term neonate that continues to place a considerable burden on neonatal intensive care resources worldwide. MAS is a disease in evolution, with both the incidence and severity directly linked to improvements in antenatal and peripartum care. In the developed world, largely as a result of a more aggressive management of post-maturity, fetal growth restriction, placental dysfunction and intrapartum fetal distress, MAS has become uncommon but will never be eradicated completely. The outcome for afflicted infants has also improved substantially. In newly industrialised and developing countries, MAS remains a prominent cause of neonatal respiratory failure in the term infant, with a high risk of mortality.

MAS has features that make it stand alone amongst neonatal respiratory diseases – the unique combination of atelectasis, airflow obstruction and lung inflammation, the high risk of coexistent pulmonary hypertension and the fact of these occurring in a term infant with a mature lung structurally and biochemically. For all these reasons, management of MAS, and in particular the ventilatory management of MAS, has been a difficult challenge for neonatologists down the years.

In this chapter, MAS is defined as respiratory distress occurring soon after delivery in a meconium-stained infant that is not otherwise explicable and is associated with a typical radiographic appearance (Wiswell and Henley 1992).

Pathophysiology

Lung dysfunction in MAS is a variable interplay of several pathophysiological disturbances, chief amongst which are airway obstruction, epithelial injury, alveolar oedema, surfactant inhibition and pulmonary hypertension. Figure 47.1 shows a schematic of the pathogenesis of MAS, indicating the antecedents to these events, the critical one being entry of meconium into the lung (Dargaville and Mills 2005).

Fig. 47.1.

Fig. 47.1

Open in a new tab

Pathogenesis of meconium aspiration syndrome. Shaded boxes denote usual elements, and no shading denotes occasional elements (From Dargaville and Mills (2005); with permission)

Meconium is the viscid pigmented secretion of the fetal intestinal tract, which accumulates in the colon and distal small intestine in a layered fashion from the 12th week of fetal gestation. It is a noxious substance when inhaled, producing one of the worst forms of aspiration pneumonitis encountered in humans. Meconium has many adverse biophysical properties, including high tenacity (stickiness) (Rubin et al. 1996), extremely high surface tension (215 mN/m) (Rubin et al. 1996) and potent inhibition of surfactant function (Moses et al. 1991; Sun et al. 1993; Herting et al. 2001). Meconium is also directly toxic to the pulmonary epithelium, causing haemorrhagic alveolitis, and is chemotactic to neutrophils, activates complement and is possibly vasoactive (Oelberg et al. 1990; Dargaville et al. 2001; de Beaufort et al. 1998; Castellheim et al. 2005; Holcberg et al. 1999). These adverse properties of meconium are reflected in the sequence of pathophysiological disturbances known to occur in MAS (Fig. 47.1).

The pathogenesis of MAS after aspiration of meconium has been studied in animals with naturally occurring MAS (Shaffer et al. 1984), animal models of MAS induced using human meconium (Castellheim et al. 2005; Tyler et al. 1978; Tran et al. 1980; Davey et al. 1993; Wiswell et al. 1994; Gooding et al. 1971; Jones et al. 1996; Cayabyab et al. 2007) and in human infants with the disease (Dargaville et al. 2001; Dimitriou and Greenough 1995; Yeh et al. 1982). Once inhaled, meconium migrates distally down the tracheobronchial tree, obstructing airways of progressively smaller diameter (Tyler et al. 1978; Tran et al. 1980; Davey et al. 1993). In some instances there appears to be a considerable component of ‘ball-valve’ obstruction, with high resistance to airflow in expiration, and thus resultant gas trapping distal to the obstruction (Tran et al. 1980). If global in distribution, high functional residual capacity may result, although only in a small proportion of infants with MAS is there measurably high FRC (Dimitriou and Greenough 1995; Yeh et al. 1982), and even then only transiently (Yeh et al. 1982). For most infants with MAS, obstruction of the airways with meconium leads to downstream atelectasis (Fig. 47.2) (Wiswell et al. 1994). The juxtaposition of atelectatic and normally aerated lung units is reflected in the patchy opacification typically noted on chest x-ray in MAS (Fig. 47.3) (Yeh et al. 1979).

Fig. 47.2.

Fig. 47.2

Open in a new tab

Histological appearance of MAS. Section of lung from a piglet with experimental MAS, showing an area of normal lung expansion on the left, side by side with an area of atelectasis on the right. Meconium plugs are identified in the bronchi within the atelectatic region (arrows) (From Wiswell et al. (1994); with permission)

Fig. 47.3.

Fig. 47.3

Open in a new tab

Chest x-ray appearances in ventilated infants with MAS. Panel (a): Typical appearance of MAS showing ‘fluffy’ opacification widespread throughout the lung fields. Panel (b): Marked atelectasis in an infant with profound hypoxaemia. Panel (c): Hyperinflation and gas trapping, with a narrow cardiac waist, flattened diaphragms and intercostal bulging of the lung (arrows)

Experimentally, meconium instilled into the trachea reaches the alveoli within a few hours (Davey et al. 1993; Gooding et al. 1971), and the combination of haemorrhagic alveolitis and surfactant inhibition that follows potentiates the regional atelectasis. Meconium is toxic to the alveolar epithelium (Oelberg et al. 1990; Higgins et al. 1996), causing disruption of the alveolocapillary barrier and an exudative oedema not unlike that seen in acute respiratory distress syndrome. The underlying lung interstitium shows inflammatory cell infiltrate (Tyler et al. 1978; Davey et al. 1993), and there is a cytokine release in part related to complement activation (Castellheim et al. 2005; Jones et al. 1996; Cayabyab et al. 2007). The alveolar oedema potentiates the local atelectasis, causing variable degrees of ventilation-perfusion mismatch, or, worse still, intrapulmonary shunt. Moreover, meconium causes a potent dose-dependent inhibition of surfactant function (Moses et al. 1991; Sun et al. 1993; Herting et al. 2001), and, along with fibrinogen and haemoglobin in the exudate (Fuchimukai et al. 1987; Holm and Notter 1987), impairs the capacity of endogenous surfactant to reduce surface tension. Stability of alveoli at end expiration is thus compromised (Possmayer 2004), as is the capacity to clear oedema fluid from the air spaces (Carlton et al. 1995). The global consequence of these alveolar disturbances is a reduction in lung compliance (see below).

MAS is frequently accompanied by PPHN (Abu-Osba 1991), with many factors contributing to its development, including low pO2 and pH, coexistent intrauterine asphyxia and possibly vasoactive substances in the meconium itself (Wiswell and Bent 1993).

The most prominent and consistent physiological disturbances of pulmonary function in MAS are hypoxaemia and decreased compliance. Some degree of hypoxaemia is universal in symptomatic MAS, contributed to by many of the above-mentioned noxious effects of meconium. Disturbances of oxygenation in MAS may relate to atelectasis, overdistension, pulmonary hypertension or a combination of these. A challenging aspect of the management of MAS is to discern which mechanism of hypoxaemia is the predominant one in any given infant at any given time.

Lung Mechanics and Functional Residual Capacity

In naturally occurring MAS in animals (Shaffer et al. 1984) and humans (Cayabyab et al. 2007; Yeh et al. 1982; Brudno et al. 1990; Beeram and Dhanireddy 1992; Kugelman et al. 1995; Szymankiewicz et al. 2004), as well as in animal models of MAS (Tran et al. 1980; Davey et al. 1993), lung or respiratory system compliance is significantly impaired. Some studies in experimental animals have indicated that decreased compliance may be related to hyperinflation secondary to ‘ball-valve’ airway obstruction (Tran et al. 1980). In human infants, poor compliance has been noted with low and high FRC, although the only study reporting measurement of both indices simultaneously has been in non-ventilated infants with MAS of mild to moderate severity (Yeh et al. 1982). This study also demonstrated that most infants with MAS have FRC values in the normal range, with a subgroup showing high lung volumes, in particular, on the second day of life. Undoubtedly, in infants with more severe MAS requiring ventilation, there is the potential for overdistension of relatively unaffected lung regions which, due to their relatively long time constant, may empty incompletely during the ventilator expiratory cycle, especially at fast ventilator rates (Ramsden and Reynolds 1987). Respiratory resistance has also been noted to be increased in some studies, but variations in the technique of measurement make interpretation of these results difficult (ATS-ERS Pediatrics Assembly 1993).

Epidemiology

In most cases, MAS has its origin in two prenatal events. The first of these is in utero passage of meconium, and the second is an exaggeration of the normal pattern of fetal respiration (Duenhoelter and Pritchard 1977), to the point where the normal net efflux of fluid from the fetal lung is reversed and meconium gains entry into the lung in an amniotic fluid vehicle. Inhalation of meconium or meconium-stained fluid may also occur as an immediate postnatal event with the first breaths of extrauterine life. The lack of impact of oropharyngeal suction performed prior to the first breath on the risk and severity of subsequent MAS (Vain et al. 2004) suggests that postnatal inhalation of meconium is considerably less important as a cause of MAS, and that most cases are of prenatal origin.

Passage of meconium in utero is frequent (~10–15 %) (Wiswell and Bent 1993), with the most important determinant under normal circumstances being gestational age. Meconium passage occurs in 4 % of infants <38 weeks, 13 % at 39–40 weeks and 25–50 % of infants beyond 42 weeks (Ostrea and Naqvi 1982; Eden et al. 1987) and appears in many post-mature infants to be a physiological event not preceded by in utero compromise. On the other hand, in some instances prenatal meconium passage is clearly linked to fetal distress, with meconium-stained amniotic fluid more likely to occur where there is low fetal pH and/or low Apgar scores (Wiswell and Bent 1993).

The likelihood of MAS developing in the presence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid is also affected by the presence of fetal compromise. Low Apgar score is a very strong predictor of MAS amongst meconium-stained infants, with the odds ratio for MAS in the presence of a 5 min Apgar score <7 being as much as 21 (Wiswell et al. 2000). Risk of MAS is also higher when the liquor is heavily meconium-stained (Wiswell and Bent 1993; Wiswell et al. 2000).

Incidence

In the past few decades, there appears to have been a reduction in the incidence of MAS in many centres, at least in the developed world (Wiswell et al. 1990; Sriram et al. 2003; Yoder et al. 2002; Dargaville and Copnell 2006). The incidence of MAS requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation is now 0.4–0.6 per 1,000 live births (Dargaville and Copnell 2006; Gouyon et al. 2008). Incidence of MAS remains high outside the developed world, with hospital-based studies suggesting an incidence of MAS requiring intubation of 1.4–7 per 1,000 live births (Bhat and Rao 2008; Velaphi and Van Kwawegen 2008).

Risk Factors

Amongst all live births, several risk factors for MAS have been identified, with the presence of fetal compromise overshadowing all others. Compared to infants with a 5 min Apgar score of 7 or above, those with a score below 7 had an odds ratio of 52 for the development of MAS requiring intubation (Dargaville and Copnell 2006). Other important risk factors for MAS include advanced gestation (Yoder et al. 2002; Dargaville and Copnell 2006), black or indigenous or Islander ethnicity (Sriram et al. 2003; Dargaville and Copnell 2006; Urbaniak et al. 1996), Caesarean delivery (Dargaville and Copnell 2006; Hernandez et al. 1993) and home birth (Dargaville and Copnell 2006).

Stepwise Approach to Respiratory Support

As noted in the sections above, MAS is a disease of many elements, which coalesce into a problematic respiratory syndrome that can be difficult to treat. An approach to respiratory support is set out below.

Oxygen Therapy

Supplemental oxygen administration is the foundation upon which treatment for MAS is built and, in many less severe cases, will be the only therapy required (Singh et al. 2009b). Some ventilated infants with MAS require high inspired oxygen concentration for long periods, with few apparent adverse effects. Infants persistently requiring an FiO2 >0.8 should, however, have measures taken to improve oxygenation (see Table 47.1).

Table 47.1.

Approach to hypoxaemia in MAS

If there is marked global or regional atelectasis, with extensive radiological opacification, consider:
 Increasing PEEP to improve end-expiratory lung volume
 Increasing PIP to recruit atelectatic lung units
 Increasing inspiratory time to facilitate the recruiting effect of PIP
 Use of HFOV with sufficient distending pressure to recruit atelectatic lung units
 Use of HFJV with sufficient PEEP to maintain FRC and conventional breath PIP to recruit atelectatic lung units
 Exogenous surfactant
 Lung lavage
If there is obvious gas trapping, with global or regional hyperlucency radiologically, along with distortion of normal anatomy (flattened diaphragms, narrow cardiac waist), consider:
 Decreasing PEEP (but may lose recruitment of areas prone to atelectasis)
 Decreasing inspiratory time and increasing expiratory time
 Use of HFJV with low PEEP, low frequency (240–360 bpm) and minimal CMV breaths
 Use of HFOV with relatively low P AW and low frequency (5–6 Hz)
If there is pulmonary hypertension, with a pre- and post-ductal SpO2 difference and/or evidence of increased right ventricular pressure, consider:
 Correction of potentiating factors – hypoglycaemia, hypocalcaemia, hypomagnesaemia, polycythaemia, hypothermia and pain
 Bolstering systemic blood pressure to reduce right-to-left ductal shunt – volume expansion and pressor agents
 Improving right ventricular function – inotrope infusion
 Selective pulmonary vasodilators – inhaled nitric oxide
Open in a new tab

Moment by moment titration of oxygen concentration (or flow) in infants with MAS should be according to SpO2 level, with a pre-ductal reading to be preferred and the SpO2 target range being higher (e.g. 94–98 %) than that used in preterm infants. In ventilated infants, oxygen therapy should also be monitored by regular blood gas sampling from an intra-arterial line, preferably in a pre-ductal position in the right radial artery. Suggested target pO2 range is 60–100 mmHg (pre-ductal). Where there is considerable PPHN, titration of FiO2 using post-ductal pO2 values is not advisable.

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)

Of all infants requiring mechanical respiratory support because of MAS, approximately 10–20 % are treated with CPAP only (Wiswell et al. 2000; Dargaville and Copnell 2006; Singh et al. 2009b). Additionally, around one-quarter of infants requiring intubation with MAS receive CPAP before and/or after their period of ventilation (Dargaville and Copnell 2006). CPAP for such infants can be effectively delivered by bi-nasal prongs or a single nasal prong, typically with a CPAP pressure of 5–8 cm H2O. Tolerance of the CPAP device may be limited given the relative maturity of infants with MAS, and on occasions the associated discomfort will exacerbate pulmonary hypertension to the point where intubation becomes necessary.

Intubation

Approximately one-third of all infants with a diagnosis of MAS require intubation and mechanical ventilation (Wiswell and Bent 1993; Cleary and Wiswell 1998). This proportion varies according to how assiduously non-ventilated cases are identified in published series and also depends on ventilation practices of individual units. Indications for intubation of infants with MAS include (a) high oxygen requirement (FiO2 > 0.8), (b) respiratory acidosis, with arterial pH persistently less than 7.25, (c) pulmonary hypertension and (d) circulatory compromise, with poor systemic blood pressure and perfusion (Goldsmith 2008). Except in emergency circumstances, intubation of infants with MAS should be performed with premedication. Significant endotracheal tube leak is a major barrier to effective ventilation in infants with MAS, and in most cases a size 3.5 mm internal diameter endotracheal tube will be required. Once intubated, tolerance of the endotracheal tube will require ongoing sedation with infusions of an opiate (e.g. morphine or fentanyl) (Aranda et al. 2005), possibly supplemented with a benzodiazepine. Additionally, continuation of muscle relaxant drugs is often helpful during the stabilisation period after intubation, particularly in infants with coexistent pulmonary hypertension.

Conventional Mechanical Ventilation

Despite more than four decades of mechanical ventilation for infants with MAS, the ventilatory management of the condition remains in the realm of ‘art’ rather than ‘science’, with very few clinical trials upon which to base definitive recommendations. Physiological principles and published experience of ventilation in MAS do, however, allow some guiding principles to be put forward for conventional ventilation strategy.

Choosing a Mode of Ventilation

Ventilation mode and the value of patient triggering have been incompletely studied in MAS. Two randomised trials of patient-triggered ventilation have included infants with MAS. One of these found no advantage of synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) over IMV in 15 infants with MAS (Chen et al. 1997). Another study found, in a group of 93 infants >2 kg birth weight (including an unspecified number with MAS), that use of SIMV was associated with a shorter duration of ventilation compared with IMV (Bernstein et al. 1996). Despite the relative paucity of evidence in favour, it seems logical to use a synchronised mode of ventilation in any spontaneously breathing ventilated infant with MAS. Trigger sensitivity should be set somewhat higher than for a preterm infant and should take into account the possibility of autocycling if there is a tube leak (Bernstein et al. 1995). There have been no clinical trials in patients with MAS comparing SIMV and synchronised intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SIPPV), also known as assist control. Given the propensity for gas trapping in MAS, there is some concern that using SIPPV may lead to high levels of inadvertent positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with resultant hyperinflation. For this reason SIMV may be the most appropriate mode of ventilation in MAS.

Selection of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure

For any newborn respiratory disease, but particularly MAS, application of PEEP must balance the competing interests of overcoming atelectasis while avoiding overdistension. Early observations of the effect of PEEP suggested the greatest benefit with PEEP settings between 4 and 7 cm H2O, with higher PEEP settings (8–14 cm H2O) giving minimal oxygenation benefit (Fox et al. 1975). No more recent clinical studies exist to guide PEEP selection in MAS; physiological principles dictate that if atelectasis predominates (Fig. 47.3b), PEEP should be increased up to 10 cm H2O, whereas for regional or global hyperinflation (Fig. 47.3c), a lower PEEP (3–4 cm H2O) may be necessary (Goldsmith 2008). For infants with severe atelectasis, PEEP settings above 10 cm H2O are likely to increase the risk of pneumothorax (Probyn et al. 2004), and modes of high-frequency ventilation are to be preferred if available.

Selection of Inspiratory Time

As with PEEP, setting inspiratory time in MAS must take into account the balance between atelectasis and overdistension. Term infants have generally longer time constants than their preterm counterparts (Wood 2003) and thus require a longer inspiratory time (around 0.5 s) to allow near-full equilibration of lung volume change in response to the applied peak pressure. Even longer inspiratory times may be useful for lung recruitment during inspiration if atelectasis is prominent.

Selection of Peak Inspiratory Pressure (or Tidal Volume)

Given the reduced compliance, the peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) required to generate sufficient tidal volume in MAS are often high (30 cm H2O or more). Such pressures may well contribute to a secondary ventilator-induced lung injury in ventilated infants with MAS. Suggested target tidal volume is 5–6 mL/kg. If using a ‘volume guarantee’ mode, the peak pressure limit should be set at or near 30 cm H2O to allow the ventilator to scale up the PIP when needed to reach the tidal volume target. If PIP is persistently higher than 30 cm H2O, high-frequency ventilation should be considered, if available.

Selection of Ventilator Rate

Especially if there is gas trapping and expiratory airflow limitation, optimal conventional ventilation in MAS requires the use of a relatively low ventilator rate (<50) and hence longer expiratory time. This will help to avoid inadvertent PEEP. The resultant minute ventilation must be sufficient to produce adequate CO2 clearance. An acceptable arterial pCO2 range is 40–60 mmHg and pH 7.3–7.4, which is achievable in most infants even when there is significant parenchymal disease combined with PPHN (Gupta et al. 2002). Hyperventilation-induced alkalosis, which anecdotally appeared to reduce the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in infants with PPHN (Walsh-Sukys et al. 2000), is no longer practised, in part due to the risk of sensorineural hearing loss (Hendricks-Munoz and Walton 1988).

High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation

Despite the dearth of clinical trial evidence suggesting a benefit (Henderson-Smart et al. 2009), high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) has become an important means of providing respiratory support for infants with severe MAS failing conventional ventilation. Published series from large neonatal databases suggest that 20–30 % of all infants requiring intubation and ventilation with MAS are treated with high-frequency ventilation (Dargaville and Copnell 2006; Singh et al. 2009b; Tingay et al. 2007), with most of these receiving HFOV rather than high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV). Indications for transitioning to HFOV include ongoing hypoxaemia and/or high FiO2 and, less commonly, respiratory acidosis. In infants with significant atelectasis, adequate lung recruitment may require the application of a mean airway pressure (P AW) considerably higher than on conventional ventilation (up to 25 cm H2O in some cases), with a stepwise recruitment manoeuvre likely to be the most effective (Pellicano et al. 2009). Once oxygenation has improved, P AW should then be reduced; most infants with MAS requiring HFOV can be stabilised using a P AW around 16–20 cm H2O, with gradual weaning in the days thereafter (Dargaville et al. 2007). Infants with prominent gas trapping may tolerate the recruitment process poorly, with reductions in oxygenation and systemic blood pressure and the potential for exacerbation of pulmonary hypertension. Recruitment manoeuvres of some form can still be advantageous in this group, with the benefit becoming apparent when the P AW is reduced.

Choice of oscillatory frequency is critically important in MAS, with experimental studies and clinical experience indicating that frequency should not be higher than 10 Hz and preferably should be set at 8 or even 6 Hz. In experimental models of MAS, high oscillatory frequency (15 Hz) is associated with worsening of gas trapping (Hachey et al. 1998). HFOV can also lend a clinical advantage in infants with significant coexisting PPHN, as the response to inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is better when delivered on HFOV compared to conventional ventilation (Kinsella et al. 1997). Early reports suggested that up to half of infants with MAS treated with HFOV did not respond adequately and went on to receive ECMO (Carter et al. 1990; Paranka et al. 1995). More recent experience would suggest that only around 5 % of infants treated with HFOV and iNO fail to respond and transition to ECMO (Wiswell et al. 1990).

High-Frequency Jet Ventilation

The combination of atelectasis and gas trapping that can occur in MAS may be better managed with HFJV than HFOV, with the former technique offering the possibility of ventilation at a lower P AW (Keszler et al. 1986). A number of laboratory investigations have shown HFJV either alone or in combination with surfactant therapy, to be beneficial in animal models of MAS (Keszler et al. 1986; Wiswell et al. 1992, 1994). Clinical studies including infants with MAS appear to confirm the benefit of HFJV compared with conventional ventilation, both in terms of improvement in oxygenation and in avoidance of ECMO (Davis et al. 1992; Engle et al. 1997). Additionally, some infants with MAS failing on HFOV with hypoxaemia and/or respiratory acidosis do show improvements after transition to HFJV using a low frequency (240–360 bpm) and a low conventional ventilator rate (Dargaville (2010), unpublished observations).

Rationale for Using Adjunctive Therapies

Bolus Surfactant Therapy

The pathophysiology of MAS includes inhibition of surfactant in the air spaces, both by meconium and by exuded plasma proteins (Moses et al. 1991; Sun et al. 1993; Herting et al. 2001; Fuchimukai et al. 1987). Preliminary reports of the use of exogenous surfactant given as bolus therapy to ventilated infants with MAS were promising (Auten et al. 1991; Khammash et al. 1993), although it was identified that around 40 % of cases did not respond (Halliday et al. 1996). Four randomised controlled trials of bolus surfactant therapy have been conducted (Findlay et al. 1996; Lotze et al. 1998; Chinese Collaborative Study Group for Neonatal Respiratory Diseases 2005; Maturana et al. 2005), which when analysed together show a benefit in terms of reduction in need for ECMO, but not duration of ventilation or other pulmonary outcomes (El Shahed et al. 2007). In the developed world, bolus surfactant therapy is currently used in 30–50 % of ventilated infants with MAS (Dargaville and Copnell 2006; Singh et al. 2009b). Bolus surfactant therapy should be used judiciously in MAS, choosing infants with severe disease, and treating early, and if necessary, repeatedly (Dargaville and Mills 2005).

Lavage Therapy

Lung lavage using dilute surfactant is an emerging treatment for MAS that offers the potential of interrupting the pathogenesis of the disease by removal of meconium from the air spaces (Dargaville and Mills 2005). Laboratory studies and preliminary clinical evaluations have indicated that lavage therapy may improve oxygenation and shorten duration of ventilation in MAS (Cochrane et al. 1998; Wiswell et al. 2002; Dargaville et al. 2003). A recent randomised controlled trial of large volume lavage using dilute surfactant in infants with severe MAS noted no effect on duration of respiratory support or other pulmonary outcomes, but did find a higher rate of ECMO-free survival in the treated group (Dargaville et al. 2011). A further clinical trial would be necessary to more precisely define the effect on survival.

Corticosteroid Therapy

Steroid therapy has been investigated in MAS for more than three decades, with a number of small clinical trials being conducted, none of which have given a definitive result. One recent trial suggested that dexamethasone therapy could dampen the inflammatory response in MAS, as indicated by levels of tumour necrosis factor-α (Tripathi et al. 2007). In the absence of further trials, steroid therapy cannot be recommended as routine therapy in MAS.

Inhaled Nitric Oxide

Large randomised controlled trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of iNO in term infants with pulmonary hypertension, with a reduction in need for ECMO, and in the composite outcome of death or requirement for ECMO (Finer and Barrington 2006). Each trial included a large subgroup with MAS; overall more than 640 infants with MAS have been enrolled in iNO trials, although few have reported the outcome for MAS separately. The potential value of delivering iNO during HFOV has been highlighted in one trial, in which the proportion of nonresponders was lowest when the two therapies were combined (Kinsella et al. 1997). Currently around 20–30 % of all ventilated infants with MAS receive iNO (Dargaville and Copnell 2006; Singh et al. 2009b), and around 40–60 % show a sustained response (Gupta et al. 2002; Kinsella et al. 1997).

The approach to an infant with MAS and coexistent PPHN should initially focus on optimising the ventilatory management and, in particular, overcoming atelectasis if this is prominent radiologically. The severity of PPHN should be assessed clinically and by echocardiogram if available. If moderate to severe PPHN persists after appropriate ventilatory manoeuvres and the pO2 remains at less than 80–100 mmHg in FiO2 1.0 (Kinsella et al. 1997; Wessel et al. 1997), iNO should commence at a dose of 10–20 ppm. Higher doses do not appear to result in better oxygenation (Guthrie et al. 2004).

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Infants with severe MAS have been treated with ECMO since 1976, and MAS has been the leading diagnosis amongst neonates referred for this therapy (Short 2008). With the advent of newer therapies, the number of infants with MAS treated with EMCO has decreased (Fliman et al. 2006), but survival with ECMO treatment for MAS has remained high (around 95 %) (Short 2008). The usual indication for commencing ECMO is intractable hypoxaemia despite optimisation of the patient’s condition with available therapies (including high-frequency ventilation and iNO and bolus surfactant therapy). Degree of hypoxaemia in this setting has generally been quantified using oxygenation index (OI), where OI = P AW × FiO2 × 100 / PaO2. An OI persistently above 40 despite aggressive standard management has been, and remains, an indication for treatment with ECMO where available (UK Collaborative ECMO Trial Group 1996).

Classical Complications

Air Leak

Pneumothorax is a feared complication of MAS which potentiates lung atelectasis and PPHN and compounds the difficulties with management. Around 10 % of all ventilated infants with MAS are reported to have this complication (Wiswell et al. 1990; Dargaville and Copnell 2006). Pneumothorax is associated with an increase in the risk of mortality (Dargaville and Copnell 2006; Lin et al. 2004), in part related to the severity of the associated lung disease, but also to the destabilising influence of the air leak itself. Clinicians should remain attuned to the possibility of pneumothorax in ventilated infants, particularly those prone to gas trapping, and should employ ventilatory strategies to avoid regional and global overdistension wherever possible. Effective treatment requires that air be evacuated from the pleural space immediately once the condition is diagnosed, and then in most instances, an intercostal drainage tube is required to control ongoing air leak.

Other air leak syndromes, including pneumomediastinum and pulmonary interstitial emphysema, are occasionally seen in MAS. Pneumopericardium and pneumoperitoneum are rare. Pneumomediastinum usually requires no treatment unless under significant tension (Masuda et al. 1984). Pulmonary interstitial emphysema in the setting of MAS at times results in the formation of multiple large cysts and can be extremely difficult to treat. The condition is best managed either with HFJV (see Table 47.1) or HFOV at low frequency (5–6 Hz).

Pulmonary Haemorrhage

Pulmonary haemorrhage (or, more correctly, haemorrhagic pulmonary oedema) occurs in a small proportion of infants with MAS and can occasionally cause severe destabilisation and hypoxaemia (Berger et al. 2000). Transient application of a high airway pressure is usually necessary to drive this oedema fluid back into the interstitium of the lung. This is best achieved using high-frequency ventilation, with P AW above 30 cm H2O sometimes required to re-recruit flooded alveoli.

Chronic Lung Disease

Cases of severe MAS succumbing after a long period of ventilation can have severe distortion of normal lung architecture on post-mortem examination (Chou et al. 1993). Refinements in ventilatory and adjunctive care now mean that fewer infants have long-standing severe chronic lung disease after MAS. Nevertheless, approximately 5–7 % of ventilated infants with MAS remain in oxygen for more than 4 weeks (Dargaville and Copnell 2006; Singh et al. 2009b), and 5 % go home in oxygen (Dargaville and Copnell 2006). A subset of infants who have had MAS in the newborn period will have wheezing and repeated hospitalisations in the first year of life and have demonstrable abnormalities on respiratory function testing (Yuksel et al. 1993). These abnormalities would be expected to largely resolve later in the first decade (see below).

Comorbidities

Seizures occur in around 10 % of all ventilated infants with MAS, most usually in the context of a coexistent hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (Singh et al. 2009b; Cleary and Wiswell 1998). Circulatory insufficiency is common, and the majority of infants who have severe MAS and coexistent PPHN are treated with inotrope infusions (Dargaville et al. 2011). Multi-organ failure develops in a small proportion of such infants.

Short- and Long-Term Outcome

Mortality

Mortality related to MAS has decreased significantly, with population-based studies suggesting a mortality of 1–2 per 100,000 live births (Sriram et al. 2003; Dargaville and Copnell 2006; Nolent et al. 2004). The case fatality rate in ventilated infants with MAS varies widely in published series (0–37 %) (Cleary and Wiswell 1998) and is influenced by availability of alternative means of ventilation, adjunctive therapies including nitric oxide and ECMO. Approximately one-quarter to one-third of all deaths in ventilated infants with a diagnosis of MAS are directly attributable to the pulmonary disease, with the remainder in large part caused by hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (Dargaville and Copnell 2006; Singh et al. 2009b; Nolent et al. 2004).

Duration of Ventilation, Oxygen and Hospitalisation

Considering all intubated infants with MAS, median duration of ventilation is 3 days (mean 4.8 days) (Dargaville and Copnell 2006). Infants with more severe disease, requiring at least one of HFV, iNO or bolus surfactant, are ventilated for a median of 5 days (Dargaville and Copnell 2006). Median duration of oxygen therapy and length of hospital stay currently stand at 7 and 17 days, respectively (Dargaville and Copnell 2006).

Long-Term Outcome

Respiratory compromise after hospital discharge is common in infants who were ventilated with MAS. Up to half of infants will be symptomatic with wheezing and coughing in the first year of life (Yuksel et al. 1993). Older children may exhibit evidence of airway obstruction, hyperinflation and airway hyperreactivity, but appear to have normal aerobic capacity (Swaminathan et al. 1989).

Neurological sequelae following MAS are well recognised (Cleary and Wiswell 1998), and a diagnosis of MAS in the neonatal period confers a considerable risk of cerebral palsy (5–10 %) (Beligere and Rao 2008; Walstab et al. 2004) and global developmental delay (15 %) (Beligere and Rao 2008).

Essentials to Remember

  • Atelectasis, overdistension or pulmonary hypertension may all contribute to hypoxaemia in MAS, and it is vital to consider which of these is predominating at any given point in time in an infant who remains hypoxic despite high FiO2.

  • Overdistension of relatively unaffected lung regions is a serious barrier to effective ventilation in MAS.

  • With judicious use of available modes of ventilation and adjunctive therapies, infants with even the most severe MAS can usually be supported without needing ECMO.

Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Desmond Bohn

Educational Aims

  • To describe the epidemiology of CDH

  • To outline the principles of resuscitation and stabilisation in the delivery suite

  • To describe the ventilation techniques with a focus on preventing ventilation-induced lung injury

  • To describe the options for surgical repair and the changes in physiology associated with it

  • To discuss the importance of increased pulmonary vascular reactivity in CDH

  • To discuss the place of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the management of CDH

  • To outline the main long-term morbidity associated with improved survival

Introduction

The management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in the newborn infant has changed radically since the first successful outcomes were reported 60 years ago (Gross 1946). Then it seemed a surgical problem with a surgical solution – do an operation, remove the intestines and solid viscera from the thoracic cavity, repair the defect and allow the lung to expand. CDH in that era was regarded as the quintessential neonatal surgical emergency. The expectation was that urgent surgery would result in improvement in lung function and oxygenation. That approach persisted up to the 1980s when it was realised that the problem was far more complex and involved both an abnormal pulmonary vascular bed and pulmonary hypoplasia. The use of systemically delivered pulmonary vasodilator therapy became a focus of interest in the 1980s with case reports and small case series suggesting improved survival. In the 1990s, based on studies that showed worsening thoracic compliance and gas exchange following surgical repair, deferred surgery and preoperative stabilisation became the standard of care. At the same time, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was increasingly used either as part of preoperative stabilisation or as a rescue therapy after repair. Other centres chose to use high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). Despite all these innovations, the survival rate in live-born infants with CDH did not improve to much more than 50 % in large series published from high-volume centres. However, in the past 10 years, there has been an appreciable improvement in survival to the extent that many centres are now reporting survival rates of greater than 80 %. Probably the biggest impact on this improvement has been the recognition of the role that ventilation-induced lung injury plays in mortality and the need for ECMO rescue. This has ushered in an era of a lung protective or ‘gentle ventilation’ strategy which has now been widely adopted as a standard approach and has largely been responsible for survival rates of 80 % or higher being reported by high-volume centres.

Epidemiology

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia is an anomaly that occurs in 1 in approximately 3,000 live births (Langham et al. 1996). Eighty-five per cent are left sided, and the most common form is the classic posterolateral or Bochdalek hernia. There is a reported incidence of 40–50 % of other malformations in association with CDH, the most common of which are those involving the central nervous system (Tibboel and Gaag 1996). The most important, in terms of prognosis, is congenital heart anomalies. Approximately 11–15 % of CDH infants will have heart defects based on a recent review of the literature, the most common being atrial and ventricular septal defects, conotruncal defects (tetralogy, transposition, pulmonary atresia, double outlet right ventricle) and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (Lin et al. 2007). Outcome data on this association are limited and confined to case reports or case series (Lin et al. 2007; Cohen et al. 2002; Torfs et al. 1992; Fauza and Wilson 1994). Based on the physiology, hemodynamically significant lesions associated with ventricular outflow tract obstruction (hypoplastic left heart syndrome, tetralogy, coarctation) or those with high pulmonary blood flow (atrioventricular septal defect, large perimembranous ventricular septal defects) will have more impact on mortality compared to atrial and small ventricular septal defects. CDH is also associated with chromosomal abnormalities both in number (Turner’s syndrome, trisomy 13 and18) and in specific chromosomal aberrations (Fryns syndrome). A rare familial association has also been reported (Frey et al. 1991). There is a rare variant of bilateral absence of the diaphragm which is associated with a fatal prognosis (Gibbs et al. 1997; Jasnosz et al. 1994).

In isolated CDH the spectrum of severity covers a wide range from infants with severe pulmonary hypoplasia and hypoxaemia refractory to conventional and innovative ventilation techniques to those with a much more benign course and minimal blood gas derangements. The degree of pulmonary hypoplasia and the severity of the pulmonary vascular abnormality are the important issues that determine survival (Bohn et al. 1987). Evidence suggests that the lesion includes failure of both alveolar and vascular development to the extent the cross-sectional area of the pulmonary vascular bed is reduced.

Delivery Room Resuscitation and Stabilisation

The key principles of successful delivery room resuscitation and stabilisation are based on early intubation and positive pressure ventilation. Bag mask ventilation should be avoided to prevent gut distention. A recent study that measured tidal volume and airway pressure during spontaneous and assisted breathing in newborn infants with CDH immediately after delivery showed that spontaneous breaths with assisted ventilation achieved a higher TV than manual inflations alone (te Pas et al. 2009b). There is increasing evidence that the use of 100 % oxygen has adverse long-term consequences and should be avoided (Davis et al. 2004a). The objective for ventilation should be the establishment of a satisfactory pre-ductal arterial saturation (>85 %) while at the same time avoiding the use of high inflation pressures based on the hypothesis that this may injure the lung. An experimental study in a preterm lamb model of lung disease of prematurity has shown that as few as 6 high-volume lung inflations at the time of delivery results in pulmonary barotrauma and a blunted response to surfactant (Bjorklund et al. 1997). Although this is clearly not the same model as CDH, the lungs are hypoplastic and the potential for secondary injury exists. The objective of positive pressure ventilation should be to limit peak inspiratory pressure to 25 cm H2O and to target a pre-ductal SaO2 of >85 % while tolerating hypercarbia (PaCO2 45–55 mmHg) if necessary as long as there is a compensated pH (>7.35). Correction, using bicarbonate, if the pH is below that level, may be appropriate. Neuromuscular-blocking drugs are useful during the initial resuscitation, but evidence for their continued or routine use is controversial. Surfactant replacement therapy has also been advocated for infants who present with severe hypoxaemia and low Apgar scores based on some encouraging results in animal models of CDH, but this is not supported by any human data (Logan et al. 2007; Van Meurs 2004). Standard additional procedures should include insertion of a nasogastric tube as well as arterial and central venous lines. Principles for the safe transport of these infants include a secure airway, gut decompression, adequate vascular access, a compensated pH and a pre-ductal saturation of >85 %.

Contemporary Intensive Care Management: CDH as a Cardiopulmonary Disease

The postnatal management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia has evolved from being a surgical problem with a surgical solution through different eras when focus was on the pulmonary vascular abnormalities and most recently on ventilation-induced lung injury. A more holistic approach is to consider CDH as a cardiopulmonary disease (Bohn 2002). The approach in the past has been to make assumptions about pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) based solely on gradients between pre- and post-ductal saturations and post-ductal PaO2 measurements. Much more detailed information is available by echocardiography which can inform decision making on the management of pulmonary artery pressure and right ventricular function. This together with skilful ventilator management can result in substantial improvements in survival.

Pre- and Postoperative Ventilation

The management of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN), including CDH, up to the mid-1990s included the use of hyperventilation to induce an alkalosis, based on a small case series published by Drummond in 1981 which demonstrated that this could reverse or eliminate ductal shunting (Drummond et al. 1981). This approach, which set the tone for the management of PPHN for the next 15 years, was based on observations in only six patients. No prospective trial ever demonstrated that this improved outcome, rather there is now persuasive evidence that it may indeed be harmful in terms of pulmonary barotrauma and cerebral vasoconstriction. As long ago as 1985, a ‘permissive hypercapnia’ strategy was advocated by Wung in ventilation of infants with PPHN, well before it was introduced into adult medicine (Wung et al. 1985). Several retrospective series of CDH have shown that airway pressure limitation and tolerance of hypercarbia while focusing on pre-ductal oxygen saturation to be the most important factors in favourably influencing outcome (Bohn 2002; Bagolan et al. 2004; Boloker et al. 2002; Downard et al. 2003; Kays et al. 1999; Wilson et al. 1997; Wung et al. 1995). These series report not only improved survival rates of up to 80 % but also a significant reduction in the need for ECMO support. In the original CDH series, proposing this approach published by Wung et al. (1995) advocated that the key objective of conventional mechanical ventilation should be to keep PIP ≤25 cm H2O while maintaining a pre-ductal SaO2 >85 %. Patients were managed without muscle relaxation and a chest drain. In this situation, ductal shunting can be tolerated as long as right heart function is adequate. This is based on lessons learned from newborn infants with cyanotic congenital heart disease that a normal lactate, a mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) of >70 % and the absence of a metabolic acidosis are compatible with adequate oxygen delivery.

Many centres are now opting to use HFOV as a way of avoiding barotrauma and report improved survival using this approach together with deferred surgery (Bohn 2002; Bagolan et al. 2004; Bouchut et al. 2000; Cacciari et al. 2001; Desfrere et al. 2000; Kamata et al. 1998; Migliazza et al. 2007; Miguet et al. 1994; Ng et al. 2008; Reyes et al. 1998; Skari et al. 2004; Somaschini et al. 1999). This had not been our experience when we were using hyperventilation as part of our strategy to reverse ductal shunting with HFOV as a rescue mode in the 1980s (Azarow et al. 1997). When we performed a detailed analysis of post-mortem findings in 1999, the most striking finding was not only the degree of pulmonary barotrauma and haemorrhage in the ipsilateral lung but also in the contralateral (Sakurai et al. 1999). We believed that our error was to use HFOV with the ventilation strategy that incorporated lung recruitment as was commonly used in other forms of neonatal lung disease. The post-mortem study of findings in 68 non-surviving infants with CDH from an era when we were using HFOV with a high mean airway pressure (>20 cm H2O) showed that the high mortality (50 %) could be partially attributed to pulmonary barotrauma causing damage to hypoplastic lungs (Sakurai et al. 1999). There was a high incidence of air leak as well as histology showing pulmonary haemorrhage and hyaline membrane formation. CDH does not represent a recruitable lung, and attempts to use a high mean airway pressure (MAP) are likely to cause secondary lung injury. More recent case series have recommended MAPs no higher than 14–16 cmH2O (Desfrere et al. 2000; Miguet et al. 1994; Somaschini et al. 1999). We have now changed our philosophy on the use of HFOV from a rescue mode to an early intervention strategy in order to limit lung injury when PIP exceeds 25 cm H2O on conventional ventilation. The peak-to-peak pressures (amplitude) are adjusted to achieve a PaCO2 in the range of 35–45 mmHg with a pH in the range of 7.35–7.45 as long as the pre-ductal SaO2 is >85 %. Mean airway pressure is limited to 14–16 cmH2O. The adoption of this strategy has been associated with a significant improvement in survival in our centre since 1995 (Bohn 2002).

Surgical Repair and Thoracic Compliance in CDH

For many years there was an assumption that surgical repair would improve gas exchange by relieving compression of the ipsilateral lung which formed the basis for surgical repair. Formal measurements of thoracic compliance and blood gases before and after repair not only showed that this was not so but also, on the contrary, demonstrated a deterioration which was associated with a rise in PaCO2 actually for the same ventilator settings (Fig. 47.4) (Sakai et al. 1987). There are several possible explanations for this finding. Firstly, the abdominal cavity may be somewhat small because the viscera have been in the chest during fetal life and surgical repair and closure restricts movement of both diaphragms. Secondly, the repair itself can stretch the diaphragm especially if the defect is large and a patch is not used. These findings resulted in resetting the priorities for the timing of surgical repair which have changed substantially in the past two decades and provided the rationale for delayed surgery and preoperative stabilisation which has now become widely accepted practice. The decision on timing of repair is based on evaluating the infant’s haemodynamic and pulmonary profile. Surgery should be delayed until such time as there has been a reduction in PVR, and satisfactory ventilation can be maintained with low PIP and inspired oxygen requirements. Infants with mild forms of CDH with a low PIP and minimal shunting can be repaired within the first 24–48 h of life, while infants who are labile with right-to-left shunting should have surgery deferred on a day-to-day basis until such time as they stabilise, even if this requires protracted periods of preoperative ventilation. Where HFOV is used, surgery should be delayed until such time as the infant can be switched back to conventional ventilation and managed with peak airway pressures of <25 cm H2O as this meets a definition of stability. We do not undertake surgical repair in infants with pre-ductal hypoxaemia and hypercarbia which cannot be reversed by therapies outlined in the previous sections.

Fig. 47.4.

Fig. 47.4

Open in a new tab

Correlation between compliance and PaCO2 levels. Survivors: (•) preoperative and (°) postoperative; nonsurvivors: (▪) preoperative and (▫) postoperative (From Sakai et al. (1987); with permission)

In terms of surgical repair, Gortex, Marlex or biosynthetic porcine patches are commonly used to close large defects that cannot be closed by primary repair without major distortion of the thorax, but these are associated with a significant recurrence rate (Hajer et al. 1998; Moss et al. 2001; St Peter et al. 2007). Data from the CDH Registry has shown that there is a relationship between defect size and outcome (Lally et al. 2007). Reduction of the hernia with replacement of the abdominal viscera is frequently associated with difficult abdominal wound closure and an adverse change in respiratory system compliance. The use of an abdominal silo to counter this problem has been suggested in some studies (Kyzer et al. 2004; Rana et al. 2008). There is no indication to insert pleural drains at the time of surgery, and they are only needed in the postoperative period in the event that there is an accumulation of pleural fluid that results in mediastinal shift or a contralateral pneumothorax (Wung et al. 1995). There has been an increasing trend to opt for non-invasive surgical repair techniques. Although this can be done successfully, there are a significant number of cases where the procedure has to be changed to an open reduction or there has been a recurrence of the hernia (Kyzer et al. 2004; Chiu and Hedrick 2008; Cho et al. 2009; Guner et al. 2008; Yang et al. 2005). Given this and the fact that the non-invasive technique is unlikely to shorten the ICU length of stay or the time on mechanical ventilation, this approach is difficult to rationalise except on the basis of the cosmetic effect.

Pulmonary Vascular Management

Increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is an almost universal finding in CDH even when not clinically manifest by right-to-left shunting at ductal level. The diagnosis of PPHN in CDH is usually made on the basis of a pre-/post-ductal saturation gradient. However, as this only occurs when pulmonary artery pressure exceeds systemic, in the absence of this finding, there is little clinical information on the level of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP). Therefore, the information obtained by echocardiography is becoming an increasingly important tool in the management of CDH, firstly to exclude an associated congenital heart defect but also to assess the degree of pulmonary hypertension. Important prognostic information may also be available in predicting outcome. In a single-centre retrospective review by Dillon, all infants with subsystemic PA pressures survived (Dillon et al. 2004). The cardinal echo features of systemic or near systemic PAP are flattening of the intraventricular septum, development of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and right-to-left or bidirectional shunting at ductal level. The presence of pre-ductal desaturation implies that there is a right-to-left shunt at atrial level, and the PA pressure is well above systemic throughout the entire cardiac cycle. The presence of a TR jet allows the operator to actually estimate right ventricular pressure. Identification of the ductus is also important because as long as this is widely patent, it allows the right ventricle to decompress and prevents right heart failure when the pressure becomes suprasystemic. A new finding of pre-ductal desaturation, in a previously stable infant, might indicate that the ductus has closed or become restrictive and, if confirmed by echo, would warrant a trial of prostaglandin (PGE1) in order to open the ductus and prevent right ventricular failure (Buss et al. 2006; Inamura et al. 2005; Kinsella et al. 2005). Furthermore, in light of studies that have shown that left ventricular (LV) mass is decreased in infants with CDH (Schwartz et al. 1994; Siebert et al. 1984) leading to compromise of LV function, there is an additional rationale to maintaining ductal patency (Kinsella et al. 2005).

Although undesirable, ductal shunting can be tolerated by the infant as long as pre-ductal saturations are maintained in the 80–85 % as this reflects very adequate cerebral oxygenation. Indeed, saturations in this range are a common scenario in many forms of cyanotic congenital heart disease. The use of hyperventilation to reverse this is likely to do more harm than good in that it exchanges ventilator-induced lung injury for better systemic oxygenation.

Infants who demonstrate significant ductal shunting or elevated right ventricular pressures can be tried on inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) although evidence for an outcome benefit, in terms of survival, is lacking. A randomised trial of the use of iNO in PPHN which included infants with CDH showed that they were the group that responded least well with no impact on survival or the use of ECMO (The Neonatal Inhaled Nitric Oxide Study Group (NINOS) 1997). However, a more accurate assessment of the response to iNO is by cardiac echo, and if a reduction of right ventricular pressure is documented, the therapy is worth continuing, accepting that it is unlikely that the dramatic reductions in PVR, seen in other forms of PPHN, will occur. Ductal shunting and low systemic pressures can also be improved by the use of inotropic support, particularly if there is right heart failure. There is also increasing interest in the use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in the treatment of PPHN, specifically the PDE5 inhibitor sildenafil. A recent open-label study of an IV infusion of the drug in hypoxic neonates showed an improvement in OI (Steinhorn et al. 2009). There are also some small case series of sildenafil being used successfully in the management of sustained pulmonary hypertension in CDH (Keller et al. 2004; Noori et al. 2007; Rocha et al. 2008).

There are other novel therapies that have been tried in treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Arginine vasopressin is now commonly used in the treatment of vasodilated shock, and it may have some interesting effects on the pulmonary circulation. Retrospective data suggests that in this situation it increases systemic pressure while causing a reduction in pulmonary artery pressure in adults (Dunser et al. 2001). It has also been used successfully in the management of two newborn infants with suprasystemic pulmonary artery pressures in the immediate postoperative period after repair of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (Scheurer et al. 2005). There is also a single case report of the use of the vasopressin analogue terlipressin in successfully reversing ductal shunting in an infant with CDH who was resistant to iNO, alkalosis and inotropic therapy (Papoff et al. 2009).

As well as pulmonary hypertension occurring in the immediate postnatal period, there are a certain number of infants who survive and are weaned from mechanical ventilation where PVR remains elevated necessitating further intervention (Dillon et al. 1995; Iocono et al. 1999; Schwartz et al. 1999). The use of inhaled nitric oxide delivered by nasal cannula has been reported in the treatment of sustained pulmonary hypertension (Kinsella et al. 2005). Finally, there is a single case report describing the use of imatinib, an anti-platelet-derived growth factor drug in the successful treatment of an infant with CDH and suprasystemic pulmonary artery pressures (Frenckner et al. 2008).

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Extensive experience of the use of ECMO in the management of CDH has been accumulated since the first case series were published in the 1980s (Bartlett et al. 1986). The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) database shows that it has been used to support 5,700 infants with an overall survival of 51 % (The Extracorporeal Life Support Organisation 2009). This is the least favourable outcome for ECMO support in all forms of acute respiratory failure in infants. Despite the better outcomes demonstrated in the UK randomised trial, the survival rate in the 35 CDH infants enrolled in the study was very poor with only 4 survivors out of 18 in those who were randomised to ECMO surviving to hospital discharge (UK Collaborative ECMO Trail Group 1996).

When it was first introduced, ECMO was originally used in the rescue of infants with severe hypoxaemia after surgical repair. Many centres now opt to use ECMO as part of a deferred repair strategy, together with other therapies such as iNO and HFOV, to stabilise the infant prior to repair and perform the surgery either just prior to weaning from support or after decannulation. Data from the CDH Registry suggests that repair post ECMO is associated with the best outcome (Bryner et al. 2009). The latest innovation in extracorporeal support has been the so-called EXIT to ECMO strategy where prenatally identified high-risk infants are cannulated immediately after delivery while still connected to the placenta (Bouchard et al. 2002; Kunisaki et al. 2007). The most commonly used cannulation technique is veno-arterial, although some centres have reported success with the veno-venous approach (Austin et al. 2004; Dimmitt et al. 2001; Heiss et al. 1995; Kugelman et al. 2003). Venous cannulation pre-repair may be problematic because of caval distortion when the liver is herniated. The duration of support is frequently prolonged, the average in the ELSO database being 10 days with a duration up to 50 days. Morbidity in terms of pulmonary and neurocognitive function post ECMO in survivors is significant (Van Meurs 2004; D’Agostino et al. 1995; Davis et al. 2004b; McGahren et al. 1997; Nijhuis-van der Sanden et al. 2009; Stolar et al. 1995). It is also a highly costly therapy which, in one series, was reported to be $365,000 per survivor in 1995 US dollars (Metkus et al. 1995). The indications for the use of ECMO in CDH are far from clear as indeed are the data which suggest that there is a clear benefit in terms of survival and long-term outcome associated with its use.

There is a wealth of case series and database material which puts ECMO in a favourable light. Many centres with a historically high mortality rate in the 1990s (>50 %) reported an improvement in survival with the introduction of delayed repair and the use of ECMO as a rescue therapy (D’Agostino et al. 1995; Frenckner et al. 1997; Heiss et al. 1989; Semakula et al. 1997; vd Staak et al. 1995; West et al. 1992). However, this must be now placed into the context of reports of survival rates of >80 % either from centres where ECMO is not available (Bagolan et al. 2004; Al-Shanafey et al. 2002) or where there has been the adoption of alternate management strategies which has led to a significant reduction in the need for ECMO (Bohn 2002; Boloker et al. 2002; Kays et al. 1999; Wilson et al. 1997; Miguet et al. 1994; Azarow et al. 1997; Mettauer et al. 2009). In terms of large case series from high volume (>10 cases/year), the evidence for improved outcome with ECMO is not persuasive. In a retrospective review of over 400 infants with CDH from The Children’s Hospital, Boston, and The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, outcome was compared between 1981 and 1994 during an era where the major changes were deferred surgery and the use of ECMO (Wilson et al. 1997; Azarow et al. 1997). In the Boston series, ECMO was used in 50 % of cases as the rescue mode, while in Toronto HFOV was used with only very occasional resort to ECMO (1 %). The survival rate in the two institutions was the same (53 % vs. 55 %). Since the introduction of a lung protective ventilation strategy, the survival rate has risen in both institutions to 80 % or higher. Most high-volume centres are experiencing a reduction in ECMO use in CDH (Kays et al. 1999; Wilson et al. 1997; Mettauer et al. 2009). which parallels the declining numbers in all forms of neonatal respiratory failure (Hintz et al. 2000). Although many reasons for this have been suggested, a major contributing factor has been the change in ventilation practice. This was confirmed when data from the ELSO Registry between 1988 and 1997 was analysed (Roy et al. 2000). This showed a reduction in the annual numbers of neonatal ECMO support from 1991 onwards which coincided with an increased use of HFOV and iNO. Perhaps of more significance, the mean level of PIP prior to the initiation of ECMO had fallen from 47 ± 10 cm H2O in 1988 to 39 ± 12 cmH2O in 1997.

Does the use of ECMO either as part of a preoperative stabilisation algorithm or as a rescue therapy improve the survival rate in CDH? A Cochrane review of published studies concluded that there is evidence for short-term efficacy, but it is unclear whether there is long-term benefit as defined as improved survival without increase morbidity (Elbourne et al. 2002). Perhaps the more relevant question now is: in an era of ‘gentle ventilation’, does the use of ECMO result in not only improved survival but without increase morbidity? The hypothesis could be tested in a prospective multicentre RCT, but it is unlikely to happen because of lack of equipoise. One of the major difficulties is selection criteria and what constitutes the need for ECMO. Traditionally an oxygenation index (OI) >40 has been used and was the entry criteria for the UK randomised trial (UK Collaborative ECMO Trail Group 1996), but as it is most frequently calculated from a post-ductal PaO2, it is largely influenced by a right-to-left shunt at ductal level. Previous studies that used the relationship between PaCO2 and ventilation parameters to define severity are no longer relevant in an era when permissive hypercapnia ventilation is widely practised. The most frequently cited criterion is now ‘failure of medical management’ which is obviously difficult to define. Does this mean that all patients should be considered eligible for ECMO, exclusive of those with other major congenital anomalies? There clearly is a subset of patients with pulmonary hypoplasia which is incompatible with life and will result in failure to separate from ECMO. Some studies have excluded patients based on failure to demonstrate a post-ductal PaO2 of >100 mmHg (Stolar et al. 1988) or a pre-ductal SaO2 > 85 % at some stage of their resuscitation or stabilisation (Boloker et al. 2002). In our centre we would only consider the use of ECMO in those infants who decompensate with severe pre-ductal hypoxaemia and right-to-left shunting due to high PVR, where we are unable to maintain a pre-ductal SaO2 >85 % and who fail to respond to a management strategy that includes HFOV, iNO, inotropic support or opening the ductus with PGE1 (Bohn 2002; Buss et al. 2006). We would not offer ECMO to infants with severe pulmonary hypoplasia, as defined by severe hypercarbia in the immediate postdelivery period and the inability to demonstrate a pre-ductal SaO2 of >85 % at some stage after initial resuscitation. Since 1995 we have used ECMO in only 18 infants with only 6 survivors but still have an overall 80 % survival.

Outcome and Long-Term Follow-Up

The outcome in newborn infants presenting within the first 24 h of life has changed significantly in the past 10 years from 50 % to now 80 % or higher in high-volume centres. There is a price tag for this improvement in survival which has been increase in morbidity in those infants who previously would have died. There has been a rise in the number of reports of survivors with chronic lung disease, recurrent or residual pulmonary hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux, oral feeding aversion, poor weight gain, hernia recurrence, pectus excavatum, scoliosis, pulmonary hypertension, neurosensory hearing loss and delayed neurodevelopment (Kinsella et al. 2005; Stolar et al. 1995; Bernbaum et al. 1995; Chiu et al. 2006; Hunt et al. 2004; Jaillard et al. 2003; Jakobson et al. 2009; Koivusalo et al. 2008; Morini et al. 2008; Muratore et al. 2001a, b; Rasheed et al. 2001; Stolar 1996; Stolar et al. 1990; Van Meurs et al. 1993; Vanamo et al. 1996a, b, c). The incidence of morbidity is higher in these infants treated with ECMO and those requiring patch closure (Jaillard et al. 2003; Lund et al. 1994). One of the major areas of concern is that of neurological morbidity. In a study published from Boston Children’s Hospital in 1994, 30 % of CDH infants where ECMO was used had abnormal CT scans (Lund et al. 1994). These abnormalities are independent of ECMO use. A report by Hunt using MRI showed a high incidence of ventriculomegaly, white matter and basal ganglia abnormalities in a series of CDH survivors where ECMO was not used (Hunt et al. 2004). A long-term follow-up study from this institution has shown an increased incidence of oral motor and visuomotor control in 10–16 year old CDH patients compared to controls (Jakobson et al. 2009). The underlying causes of which are probably multifactorial and include perinatal asphyxia and hypoxaemia, alkalosis to treat ductal shunting and ECMO support.

As might be predicted there is a high incidence of problems of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and feeding difficulties in severe CDH infants who are now surviving. The incidence depends on the era studied and the length of follow-up (Koivusalo et al. 2008; Muratore et al. 2001b; Stolar et al. 1990; Arena et al. 2008). Data from a multidisciplinary follow-up clinic has shown a 32 % incidence of GER with 19 % of patients undergoing fundoplication. Twenty-four per cent had aversion to oral feeding and 56 % were below the 25th percentile for weight despite the use of gastrostomy tubes (Muratore et al. 2001b). More extended and detailed follow-up studies have shown that between a third and a half of patients have oesophageal abnormalities by endoscopy (Koivusalo et al. 2008; Arena et al. 2008).

In terms of pulmonary function, one can anticipate a difference in morbidity in an era of improved survival of more severe forms of CDH. Studies of pulmonary function and cardiorespiratory exercise done on adolescents also from our centre who came from an era when the survival rate was 50 % showed some degree of airway obstruction but near normal exercise capacity compared with normal controls (Trachsel et al. 2005, 2006). However, follow-up studies from Boston Children’s Hospital where they report 90 % survival show prolonged ICU stays and duration of ventilation with 16 % of infants oxygen dependent at the time of discharge (Muratore et al. 2001a). Two studies have reported that 4 % of patients in their series have required tracheostomy (Jaillard et al. 2003; Bagolan and Morini 2007). Obstructive airways disease is seen in up to 25 % of survivors and chronic lung disease in up to 22 % (Jaillard et al. 2003; Ijsselstijn et al. 1997). Chest and musculoskeletal deformities are also being documented more frequently in multidisciplinary follow-up clinics, and these include pectus excavatum and scoliosis (Vanamo et al. 1996a; Lund et al. 1994; Nobuhara et al. 1996). Many of these complications are more frequently seen in infants where the defect is large and requires a patch repair and the use of ECMO, which again reflects the severity of the disease (Lally et al. 2007; Stolar 1996; Muratore and Wilson 2000). Infants with CDH in this new era require more than the traditional surgical follow-up clinic visits, and many centres, including our own, have now developed multidisciplinary clinics involving general surgeons, chest physicians, dieticians, neonatal follow-up specialists and cardiologists (Lally and Engle 2008). It is only with this coordinated approach that these medically challenging infants will receive the appropriate care for their ongoing problems.

Summary

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia is a complex disease with, until this decade, a 50 % mortality due to a pathophysiology which combines pulmonary hypoplasia and pulmonary vascular disease. The introduction of delayed surgical repair and ECMO in the 1990s was associated with an improved survival in centres with previous high mortality rates. Equivalent improvements were seen in centres where HFOV was used as a rescue therapy. There has been a marked improvement in survival with the widespread adoption of lung protective ventilation strategies but at the cost of significant morbidity in infants with hypoplastic lungs and large diaphragmatic defects. The challenge facing those involved in postnatal management of CDH, especially in centres that offer ECMO, is to decide which infants have the capacity to survive without major morbidity, in particular, neurodevelopmental outcomes. The challenge facing those who advocate prenatal intervention, in an era of 80–90 % survival, is to demonstrate that the predictors they use are robust, easily implemented across centres and are reproducible. If they are, then they need to show in a carefully designed RCT, which includes standardised postnatal management which incorporates current best practice, that tracheal occlusion reduces morbidity. Finally, there is a striking difference in survival in the CDH Registry (68 %) and the >80 survival reported in high-volume centres. Given the fact that CDH is a complex cardiorespiratory disease and that the Canadian Neonatal Network has shown that there is a relationship between volume and outcome (Javid et al. 2004), a strong argument can be made for care of these infants to be regionalised to high-volume centres where multidisciplinary, highly specialised management is available.

Essentials to Remember

  • CDH is a cardiorespiratory disease that requires information obtained by cardiac echo to help guide management.

  • The lungs in CDH are dysplastic and therefore liable to secondary injury with high pressure positive pressure ventilation.

  • High-frequency oscillation and ECMO are both effective rescue therapies, at least in the short term. HFOV with high mean airway pressure can cause lung damage. ECMO provides lung rest and allows time for reduction in PVR.

  • Due consideration needs to be given to the degree of pulmonary hypoplasia before choosing ECMO as an option.

  • Many infants with severe forms of CDH have major morbidity at long-term follow-up. The emphasis needs to be placed the quality of survival.

Outline of Principles of Management.
Resuscitation
ET tube placement with minimal bag mask/ventilation
Vascular access
Gut decompression by nasogastric tube
Ventilation objectives: pre-ductal SaO2 >85 % and pH >7.3 with PIP ≤25 cm H2O
Cardiopulmonary management
Ventilation
 Conventional ventilation
  Objective: pre-ductal SaO2 >85 % pH >7.3
  PIP ≤25 cm H2O
 High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV)
  Objective: pre-ductal SaO 2 >85 %
  MAP 14–16 cm H2O
Pulmonary vascular management
 Cardiac echo
  Exclude CHD
  Assess RV function
  Estimate PA pressure
  Identify the ductus and assess shunting
Trial of inhaled nitric oxide for patients with increased RV pressure
Open in a new tab

Articles from Pediatric and Neonatal Mechanical Ventilation are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES