Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2020 Apr;104(4):456–468. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.01.005

Risk factors for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) gene acquisition and clinical outcomes across multiple bacterial species

AJ Mathers a,b,∗, K Vegesana c, I German-Mesner c, J Ainsworth c, A Pannone d, DW Crook e,f, CD Sifri a,g, A Sheppard e, N Stoesser e,f, T Peto e, AS Walker e,f, DW Eyre e,h
PMCID: PMC7193892  PMID: 31931046

Summary

Introduction

Risk factors for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) acquisition/infection and associated clinical outcomes have been evaluated in the context of clonal, species-specific outbreaks. Equivalent analyses for complex, multi-species outbreaks, which are increasingly common, are lacking.

Methods

Between December 2010 and January 2017, a case–control study of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing organism (KPCO) acquisition was undertaken using electronic health records from inpatients in a US academic medical centre and long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) with ongoing multi-species KPCO transmission despite a robust CPE screening programme. Cases had a first KPCO-positive culture >48 h after admission, and included colonizations and infections (defined by clinical records). Controls had at least two negative perirectal screens and no positive cultures. Risk factors for KPCO acquisition, first infection following acquisition, and 14-day mortality following each episode of infection were identified using multi-variable logistic regression.

Results

In 303 cases (89 with at least one infection) and 5929 controls, risk factors for KPCO acquisition included: longer inpatient stay, transfusion, complex thoracic pathology, mechanical ventilation, dialysis, and exposure to carbapenems and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors. Exposure to other KPCO-colonized patients was only a risk factor for acquisition in a single unit, suggesting that direct patient-to-patient transmission did not play a major role. There were 15 species of KPCO; 61 (20%) cases were colonized/infected with more than one species. Fourteen-day mortality following non-urinary KPCO infection was 20% (20/97 episodes) and was associated with failure to achieve source control.

Conclusions

Healthcare exposures, antimicrobials and invasive procedures increased the risk of KPCO colonization/infection, suggesting potential targets for infection control interventions in multi-species outbreaks. Evidence for patient-to-patient transmission was limited.

Keywords: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), Carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), Multi-species clinical risk, Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE)

Introduction

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) remain one of the most urgent healthcare threats. Several Enterobacterales spp., such as Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, are common human pathogens and asymptomatic colonizers of the human gastrointestinal tract and environmental niches. Others species such as Kluyvera intermedia are more adapted to environmental reservoirs, but may play an important role in resistance gene exchange and dissemination in both healthcare and non-healthcare settings [1]. Clinically significant carbapenem resistance occurs across Enterobacterales spp., particularly Klebsiella spp., E. coli and Enterobacter spp. [[2], [3], [4]], and is most often mediated by carbapenemase genes which can be shared across species. K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC, encoded by blaKPC) is one of the most common carbapenemase genes globally [5].

Existing guidelines for CPE management [6] have largely been based on evidence from clonal, single-species outbreaks, with a view that patient-to-patient spread has played a key role and colonized patients represent a major risk [7,8]. Multiple co-morbidities, antimicrobial exposure, critical illness and exposure to other colonized patients are risk factors for acquisition and infection [[7], [8], [9], [10]]. There is increasing recognition, however, that CPE outbreaks are evolving into complex, multi-species, polyclonal phenomena, facilitated by the rapid horizontal transmission of carbapenem resistance genes on mobile genetic elements such as plasmids [2,11]. In these contexts, the healthcare environment, and wastewater reservoirs in particular, may play a major role in transmission [12,13]. Particular clinical risk factors for acquisition in these contexts remain poorly defined, partly because robust screening programmes for asymptomatic colonization with all species of CPE are not widely implemented [14].

In the study setting, endemic transmission of multi-species KPC-producing organisms (KPCO) has occurred since 2007 despite robust patient surveillance. The wastewater environment likely played a role in transmission [15]. This provides a unique opportunity to systematically examine risk factors associated with: (i) multi-species KPCO acquisition; (ii) KPCO infection vs colonization; and (iii) 14-day mortality in those with KPCO infection. This approach allowed the authors to investigate which patients were at risk of acquisition of KPCO colonization, and then, from the subset of patients who became colonized, to identify which patients were at risk of invasive infection, as, whilst acquisition is generally considered to precede invasion (even if this is short-lived), the drivers for these two processes (acquisition without invasion vs invasion) may be distinct.

Methods

Setting and samples

The University of Virginia Health System (UVaHS) consists of a 619-bed academic tertiary acute care hospital and a 44-bed long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) (opened in 2012). During the study (1st December 2010–1st January 2017), admission and weekly perirectal KPCO screening was performed on all patients admitted to the LTACH, the surgical trauma burn (STBICU) and medical (MICU) intensive care units, and anywhere another inpatient on any ward had been identified as colonized or infected with KPCO (until 7 days after the last KPCO case), using methods described previously (detailed laboratory and screening methods in online supplementary material) [11].

KPCO acquisition

Risk factors for KPCO acquisition were identified using a case–control study, including patients who spent >48 h within the acute care hospital or LTACH during the study period. Cases were defined as any patient whose first KPCO-positive culture (either from screening or clinical samples, deemed an ‘acquisition’) was taken >48 h after their first admission to the institution, to minimize inclusion of imported KPCO cases whose risk of acquisition would be difficult to ascertain (Figure 1). Controls had no positive cultures and two consecutive negative perirectal cultures within the same hospital stay (mostly ≥7 days apart due to the screening policy) to minimize the impact of false-negative rectal screens.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Study flow chart. KPCO, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenase-producing organisms.

Potential risk factors were obtained from an infection control data warehouse of electronic medical records, including patient location, length of acute care hospital stay and any LTACH stays, procedure and diagnostic codes, medication exposures, and microbiology results (see online supplementary material for details). Exposures were determined for inpatient events during the 90 days preceding the first KPCO-positive culture for cases and prior to the last negative screen for controls. Total event counts during the 90 days were considered for recurring exposures in inpatients [e.g. days of enteral feeding or patient-days of KPCO colonization pressure arising from sharing a unit with at least one KPCO-positive patient and indicating potential for direct patient-to-patient transmission (see online supplementary material for calculation)]. KPCO colonization pressure was considered as a separate predictor for each ICU, other units in the acute care hospital and the LTACH as the screening strategies differed in each location, and in the case of other units, screening was triggered by identification of a colonized patient, thus increasing the chance of a control being exposed to a case in this setting. Available risk factors for acquisition identified in previous studies were considered, together with novel risk factors for acquisition at the study institution (details in online supplementary material).

Independent predictors of KPCO acquisition were determined using multi-variate logistic regression with backwards selection (exit P>0.1), accounting for non-linear effects and interactions. For factors based on counts of events, the authors tested if the presence of any event, the total number of events or both were independently predictive. All analyses were conducted using Stata 14.1 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA). Final model stability was assessed using bootstrapping (see online supplementary material for detailed statistical methods). As some cases may have been colonized or infected with KPCO at the time of transfer to the study institution but this was not detected within 48 h of admission (i.e. not true ‘acquisitions’), a sensitivity analysis was performed restricted to cases with a prior negative screen at the study institution.

KPCO infection vs colonization

Risk factors for KPCO infection vs colonization among KPCO-positive cases were identified using a nested case–control study (Figure 1). Species were considered separately such that cases could contribute episodes of infection or colonization or both. KPCO infection episodes were defined by a KPCO clinical culture (non-perirectal surveillance) that met the National Healthcare Safety Network definition of clinical infection by chart review for pneumonia, bloodstream infection, urinary tract infection, intra-abdominal infection, and skin and soft tissue infection [16], and/or received antimicrobials targeting the site of infection by clinical culture. All other patients were considered to be colonized. The same potential predictors were considered as for acquisition, but excluding factors likely relevant to acquisition alone (patient location and KPCO colonization pressure), and also considering KPCO species. Exposures were calculated for the 90 days preceding the start of empiric treatment for infections, or to their last KPCO-positive culture for colonizations. Predictors of KPCO infection vs acquisition were determined using multi-variate logistic regression as above, allowing for within-patient correlation using robust standard errors.

Fourteen-day mortality following KPCO infection

Information on vital status at 14 days post infection was available for all patients, including those with a first positive KPCO culture within 48 h of admission (i.e. likely imported cases) [17]. Predictors of 14-day all-cause mortality following each index infection (excluding repeat isolations within 14 days) were determined using Cox proportional hazards regression, allowing for within-patient correlation using robust standard errors. Given small numbers, no model selection was undertaken, and predictors were restricted a priori based on a review of the literature [[18], [19], [20]] (see online supplementary material for details).

Ethics

This study was approved by the University of Virginia Health System with waiver of consent (IRB #18393, #18776 and #13558).

Results

During the study, 43,748 perirectal screens for KPCO were undertaken at UVaHS in a total of 20,817 patients. Overall, 556 (1.3%) screens in 181 patients and 349 clinical samples in 151 additional patients were KPCO culture-positive. Twenty-nine patients were KPCO culture-positive at another institution or within 48 h of admission (i.e. likely acquired KPCO outside of UVaHS) and were excluded from acquisition analyses (Figure 1). In total, 303 patients acquired one or more KPCO species with a carbapenemase-positive phenotype >48 h post admission [274 confirmed by blaKPC polymerase chain reaction (PCR); 29 discarded in error before performing PCR]. Sixty-one of the 303 (20%) cases had more than one species, with 368 distinct patient–KPCO species colonization/infections in total during the study period (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Incidence of unique patient and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenase-producing organisms over the study period. New colonizations/infections over time (unique species per patient). Note includes multiple infections/colonizations per patient when these are different species.

Predictors of KPCO acquisition

The median age of cases was 59 [interquartile range (IQR) 49–69] years, and the median length of stay in the study institution was 19 (IQR 10–33) days in the 90 days prior to first KPCO isolation. The median age of controls was 62 (IQR 50–72) years, with a median of 12 (IQR 6–22) days of acute care hospital exposure at their last negative screen (P=0.06 and <0.001, respectively) (Table I).

Table I.

Predictors of acquisition of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing organisms (KPCO)

Variable Controls (N=5929)
 Cases (N=303)
 Univariate
 Multi-variate (all variables)
 Final multi-variate model
N/median %/IQR N/median %/IQR Odds ratio 95% CI P-value Odds ratio 95% CI P-value Odds ratio 95% CI P-value
Congestive heart failure 923 15.6% 49 16.2% 1.05 (0.76–1.43) 0.78 1.12 (0.74–1.68) 0.60
Chronic lung disease 1140 19.2% 50 16.5% 0.83 (0.61–1.13) 0.24 0.88 (0.61–1.28) 0.50
Liver disease 340 5.7% 25 8.3% 1.48 (0.97–2.26) 0.07 0.95 (0.47–1.93) 0.89
Chronic kidney disease 1087 18.3% 70 23.1% 1.34 (1.02–1.76) 0.04 1.32 (0.87–2.00) 0.20
Metastatic malignancy 306 5.2% 11 3.6% 0.69 (0.38–1.28) 0.24 0.93 (0.38–2.27) 0.88
Human immunodeficiency virus 18 0.3% 1 0.3% 1.09 (0.14–8.17) 0.94 2.20 (0.27–17.99) 0.46
Diabetes with complication 502 8.5% 32 10.6% 1.28 (0.88–1.86) 0.21 1.27 (0.75–2.14) 0.37
Solid organ transplant 295 5.0% 24 7.9% 1.64 (1.07–2.53) 0.02 0.63 (0.26–1.48) 0.29
Female 2636 44.5% 139 45.9% 1.06 (0.84–1.33) 0.63 1.21 (0.94–1.56) 0.14
Department, vs other (reference)
 Other 3941 66.5% 163 53.8% 1.00 1.00
 STBICU 595 10.0% 60 19.8% 2.44 (1.79–3.32) <0.001 1.26 (0.79–2.00) 0.34 1.19 (0.76–1.87) 0.45
 MICU 405 6.8% 22 7.3% 1.31 (0.83–2.07) 0.24 0.64 (0.33–1.23) 0.18 0.61 (0.32–1.18) 0.14
 LTACH 988 16.7% 58 19.1% 1.42 (1.04–1.93) 0.03 1.56 (0.62–3.95) 0.35 1.70 (0.69–4.21) 0.25
KPCO colonization pressure (STBICU) 0 0–0 0 0–0 1.04 (1.03–1.05) <0.001 1.01 (0.99–1.03) 0.20 1.02 (1.00–1.03) 0.04
KPCO colonization pressure (MICU) 0 0–0 0 0–0 1.02 (1.00–1.04) 0.03 1.00 (0.97–1.02) 0.93 1.00 (0.98–1.03) 0.94
KPCO colonization pressure (LTACH) 0 0–0 0 0–0 1.00 (0.99–1.00) 0.22 1.00 (0.99–1.00) 0.32 1.00 (0.99–1.00) 0.26
KPCO colonization pressure (other unit) 2 0–10 0 0–6 0.99 (0.98–1.00) 0.06 0.99 (0.97–1.00) 0.06 0.99 (0.98–1.00) 0.06
Charlson score 1 0–4 1 0–4 1.01 (0.97–1.05) 0.73 0.96 (0.87–1.06) 0.40
Age 62 50–72 59 49–69 0.99 (0.99–1.00) 0.06 1.00 (0.99–1.00) 0.31
Acute hospital inpatient days 12 6–22 19 10–33 1.03 (1.03–1.04) <0.001 1.00 (0.99–1.02) 0.71
LTACH inpatient days 0 0–0 0 0–0
(LTACH inpatient days)−2 0.86 (0.84–0.88) <0.001 0.86 (0.84–0.89) <0.001 0.87 (0.84–0.89) <0.001
(LTACH inpatient days)−1 5.05 (3.78–6.75) <0.001 5.20 (3.70–7.30) <0.001 5.16 (3.71–7.18) <0.001
Mechanical ventilation days 1 0–5 3 0–15 1.04 (1.03–1.05) <0.001 1.03 (1.00–1.05) 0.02 1.02 (1.01–1.04) 0.005
Any aminoglycoside 242 4.1% 19 6.3% 1.57 (0.97–2.55) 0.07 0.95 (0.54–1.66) 0.86
Any antifungal 1168 19.7% 115 38.0% 2.49 (1.96–3.17) <0.001 1.01 (0.66–1.56) 0.95
Antifungal days 0 0–0 0 0–6 1.09 (1.07–1.11) <0.001 1.03 (0.99–1.08) 0.13
Any beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor 1987 33.5% 152 50.2% 2.00 (1.58–2.52) <0.001 1.68 (1.19–2.37) 0.003 1.69 (1.28–2.24) <0.001
Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor days 0 0–3 1 0–6 1.07 (1.04–1.09) <0.001 0.96 (0.92–1.01) 0.10
Any carbapenem 512 8.6% 63 20.8% 2.78 (2.07–3.72) <0.001 1.47 (0.72–2.99) 0.29 2.56 (1.59–4.11) <0.001
Carbapenem days 0 0–0 0 0–0 1.22 (1.15–1.29) <0.001 0.99 (0.83–1.17) 0.91
Any complex wound care 1854 31.3% 136 44.9% 1.79 (1.42–2.26) <0.001 1.09 (0.78–1.52) 0.62
Complex wound care days 0 0–1 0 0–2 1.27 (1.17–1.38) <0.001 1.03 (0.87–1.23) 0.73
Any complex abdominal pathology 409 6.9% 43 14.2% 2.23 (1.59–3.13) <0.001 1.13 (0.74–1.72) 0.57
Any complex thoracic pathology 455 7.7% 51 16.8% 2.43 (1.78–3.34) <0.001 1.48 (1.01–2.15) 0.04 1.52 (1.06–2.19) 0.02
Any dialysis 740 12.5% 104 34.3% 3.66 (2.86–4.70) <0.001 2.79 (1.81–4.29) <0.001 2.96 (2.00–4.39) <0.001
Dialysis days 0 0–0 0 0–2 1.11 (1.08–1.14) <0.001 0.93 (0.87–0.99) 0.02 0.94 (0.89–1.00) 0.05
Any endoscopy 963 16.2% 82 27.1% 1.91 (1.47–2.49) <0.001 1.24 (0.91–1.69) 0.18
Any extended-spectrum cephalosporin 2633 44.4% 173 57.1% 1.67 (1.32–2.10) <0.001 1.29 (0.93–1.78) 0.13
Extended-spectrum cephalosporin days 0 0–5 2 0–7 1.04 (1.02–1.06) <0.001 0.97 (0.94–1.01) 0.11
Any fluroquinolone 1212 20.4% 79 26.1% 1.37 (1.05–1.79) 0.02 1.11 (0.73–1.69) 0.63
Fluoroquinolone days 0 0–0 0 0–1 1.05 (1.00–1.10) 0.08 0.96 (0.88–1.06) 0.47
Liver transplant 131 2.2% 17 5.6% 2.63 (1.57–4.42) <0.001 2.13 (0.76–5.99) 0.15
Kidney transplant 45 0.8% 2 0.7% 0.87 (0.21–3.60) 0.85 0.77 (0.16–3.80) 0.75
Any transfusion 2859 48.2% 207 68.3% 2.32 (1.81–2.97) <0.001 1.12 (0.81–1.57) 0.49
Transfusion events 0 0–2 2 0–6 1.25 (1.20–1.30) <0.001 1.07 (0.99–1.15) 0.11 1.09 (1.03–1.15) 0.002
Any enteral feeding 2792 47.1% 188 62.0% 1.84 (1.45–2.33) <0.001 0.99 (0.71–1.37) 0.93
Enteral feeding days 0 0–6 3 0–12 1.03 (1.02–1.04) <0.001 0.99 (0.96–1.01) 0.23
Any urinary catheter 948 16.0% 63 20.8% 1.38 (1.04–1.84) 0.03 1.16 (0.80–1.69) 0.43
Urinary catheter days 0 0–0 0 0–0 1.22 (1.00–1.49) 0.04 1.36 (0.72–2.56) 0.34
Any central vascular access 2708 45.7% 194 64.0% 2.12 (1.67–2.69) <0.001 0.81 (0.58–1.14) 0.22
Central vascular access events 0 0–1 1 0–3 1.57 (1.45–1.70) <0.001 1.16 (0.97–1.38) 0.10
Any beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor + any carbapenem (interaction P=0.006) 1.78 (1.09–2.89) 0.02
Open in a new tab

STBICU, surgical-trauma-burn intensive care unit; MICU, medical intensive care unit; LTACH, long-term acute care hospital; CI, confidence interval.

Note: see Supplementary Table 4 for bootstrap percentages and full multi-variate model. Location and cumulative days of KPCO colonization pressure by location forced into the model. (LTACH inpatient days)−2 and (LTACH inpatient days)−1 represent transformations of days of admission to the LTACH to allow a non-linear relationship (see Supplementary Figure S1).

Independent risk factors for KPCO acquisition (Table I) included mechanical ventilation [odds ratio (OR) per day=1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.04; P=0.005], use of carbapenems (OR=2.56, 95% CI 1.59–4.11; P<0.001) or β-lactamase/β-lactamase inhibitors (OR=1.69, 95% CI 1.28–2.24; P<0.001) or both (OR=1.78, 95% CI 1.09–2.89; P=0.02, Pinteraction=0.006), complex thoracic pathology (OR=1.52, 95% CI 1.06–2.19; P=0.02) and blood transfusions (OR per product received=1.09, 95% CI 1.03–1.15; P=0.002). Patients with any episode of dialysis had increased risk of acquisition (OR=2.96, 95% CI 2.00–4.39; P<0.001); however, risk decreased per additional dialysis episode received (OR per additional episode=0.94, 95% CI 0.89–1.00; P=0.05).

There was no independent effect of the unit where patients were tested (P=0.21). Risk of acquisition/infection increased per patient-day of KPCO colonization pressure on the STBICU (OR per patient-day=1.02, 95% CI 1.00–1.03; P=0.04) but not on the MICU (P=0.94) or LTACH (P=0.26) (Pinteraction=0.04). There was a trend towards KPCO colonization pressure being protective on other units, possibly reflecting the fact that controls in these locations were likely exposed to KPCO-positive patients by definition of the screening strategy around cases.

There was a non-linear relationship between time spent in the LTACH and risk of acquisition. Risk of acquisition was high immediately following LTACH admission, which frequently originated from the acute care hospital (i.e. acquisition was detected on LTACH admission screening), but then declined during the LTACH admission (Table I, Figure S1, see online supplementary material). After adjusting for all other predictors, there was no additional effect of the number of days spent in the acute care hospital (OR per day=1.00, 95% CI 0.99–1.02; P=0.67).

In addition to the variables included in the final model, extended-spectrum cephalosporin exposure, endoscopy, enteric feeding and vascular access events were included in ≥40% of bootstrap models used to assess model stability (Supplementary Table 4, see online supplementary material).

In the sensitivity analysis restricted to 208 cases with at least one prior negative screen (Supplementary Table 5, see online supplementary material), results were similar, with mechanical ventilation, β-lactamase/β-lactamase inhibitor, complicated thoracic pathology, dialysis, transfusions and LTACH-days included in the final model. As in the primary analysis, risk of acquisition increased per patient-day of exposure on the STBICU alone. Carbapenem exposure was not selected in the final model, but use of extended-spectrum cephalosporins and antifungals were selected instead.

Predictors of KPCO infection vs colonization

Amongst the 303 cases, 368 distinct patient–KPCO species colonization/infections occurred (Table II). One hundred and twenty-two patients had a clinical culture, only 40 of whom had a KPCO-positive perirectal screen before their positive clinical culture, despite 87 (71%) having been screened in the prior 90 days. No typically environmental KPCO caused an infection, and therefore these species could not be included in the multi-variate analysis (N=21). Similarly, one patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection and one patient with a kidney transplant in the last 90 days predicted colonization and infection perfectly, respectively, and were therefore not included. Two patients had a novel Enterobacterales spp. identified and were also excluded from multi-variate analysis. Predictors of KPCO infection were assessed in the remaining 347 patient–KPCO episodes: 94 (27%) infections and 253 (73%) colonizations (Table III).

Table II.

Species causing Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing organism (KPCO) infection vs colonization

Total Colonized
 Infected
N row % N row %
Included in analysis of risk factors for infection vs colonization
Klebsiella pneumoniae 93 68 73% 25 27%
Aeromonas spp. 18 11 61% 7 39%
Citrobacter freundii 53 43 81% 10 19%
Klebsiella aerogenes 7 3 43% 4 57%
Enterobacter cloacae complex 76 53 70% 23 30%
Escherichia coli 14 11 79% 3 21%
Klebsiella oxytoca 19 14 74% 5 26%
Serratia marcescens 67 50 75% 17 25%
Colonization alonea
Citrobacter spp. (non-freundii) 7 7 100% 0 0%
Pantoea spp. 5 5 100% 0 0%
Raoultella spp. 4 4 100% 0 0%
Other speciesb 5 5 100% 0 0%
Total 368 274 94
Open in a new tab
a

The breakdown of isolates which did not cause an infection and therefore excluded from the model as they predicted colonization perfectly.

b

Other species were Kluyvera intermedia (N=1), Morganella morganii (N=1), Proteus mirabilis (N=1) and unknown species of Enterobacterales (N=2) which could not be speciated further in a clinical laboratory.

Table III.

Predictors of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing organism (KPCO) infection vs colonization including multiple species

Variable Colonized (N=253)
 Infected (N=94)
 Univariate
 Multi-variate (all variables)
 Final multi-variate model
N/median %/IQR N/median %/IQR Odds ratio 95% CI P-value Odds ratio 95% CI P-value Odds ratio 95% CI P-value
Congestive heart failure 49 19% 11 12% 0.55 (0.29–1.07) 0.08 0.74 (0.30–1.84) 0.52
Chronic lung disease 53 21% 11 12% 0.50 (0.25–0.99) 0.05 0.69 (0.28–1.72) 0.42
Chronic kidney disease 64 25% 31 33% 1.45 (0.89–2.38) 0.14 2.06 (0.79–5.34) 0.14
Metastatic malignancy 6 2% 7 7% 3.31 (1.29–8.48) 0.01 5.75 (0.85–38.95) 0.07 4.26 (1.27–14.25) 0.02
Diabetes with complication 35 14% 10 11% 0.74 (0.37–1.48) 0.39 0.98 (0.27–3.54) 0.98
Solid organ transplant 19 8% 15 16% 2.34 (1.15–4.74) 0.02 3.23 (0.94–11.12) 0.06
Female 119 47% 46 49% 1.08 (0.68–1.72) 0.75 1.47 (0.76–2.83) 0.25 1.60 (0.96–2.69) 0.07
Species, vs Klebsiella pneumoniae (reference)a
 Klebsiella pneumoniae 68 27% 25 27% 1.00 1.00
 Aeromonas spp. 11 4% 7 7% 1.73 (0.61–4.90) 0.30 1.37 (0.46–4.03) 0.57
 Citrobacter freundii 43 17% 10 11% 0.63 (0.28–1.44) 0.28 0.58 (0.20–1.70) 0.32
 Klebsiella aerogenes 3 1% 4 4% 3.63 (0.74–17.72) 0.11 3.78 (0.58–24.52) 0.16
 Enterobacter cloacae complex 53 21% 23 24% 1.18 (0.61–2.30) 0.63 1.62 (0.73–3.58) 0.23
 Escherichia coli 11 4% 3 3% 0.74 (0.19–2.87) 0.67 0.63 (0.12–3.30) 0.59
 Klebsiella oxytoca 14 6% 5 5% 0.97 (0.31–3.03) 0.96 1.13 (0.23–5.65) 0.88
 Serratia marcescens 50 20% 17 18% 0.92 (0.45–1.90) 0.83 0.45 (0.17–1.18) 0.10
Charlson score 2 0–4 2 0–4 1.03 (0.96–1.12) 0.40 0.97 (0.78–1.20) 0.76
Age 58 49–68 58.5 45–68 0.99 (0.98–1.01) 0.40 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.40
Acute inpatient days 20 11–33 28 14–46 1.02 (1.01–1.03) <0.001 1.02 (0.99–1.05) 0.20 1.02 (1.00–1.04) 0.04
LTACH inpatient days 0 0–0 0 0–0 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.34 1.00 (0.97–1.04) 0.82
Any aminoglycoside 21 8% 13 14% 1.77 (0.94–3.35) 0.08 2.13 (0.52–8.69) 0.29
Aminoglycoside days 0 0–0 0 0–0 1.24 (0.97–1.59) 0.08 0.65 (0.24–1.74) 0.39
Any antifungal 103 41% 49 52% 1.59 (1.00–2.53) 0.05 0.82 (0.29–2.34) 0.71
Antifungal days 0 0–7 2 0–17 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 0.003 1.00 (0.94–1.06) 0.97
Any beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor 131 52% 50 53% 1.06 (0.66–1.69) 0.81 0.92 (0.43–1.97) 0.83
Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor days 1 0–7 1 0–6 0.99 (0.95–1.02) 0.46 0.94 (0.88–1.01) 0.08 0.94 (0.90–0.98) 0.004
Any carbapenem 56 22% 32 34% 1.82 (1.09–3.01) 0.02 1.10 (0.33–3.64) 0.87
Carbapenem days 0 0–0 0 0–7 1.09 (1.04–1.14) <0.001 1.03 (0.90–1.17) 0.69
Any complex wound care 120 47% 55 59% 1.56 (0.98–2.50) 0.06 1.11 (0.52–2.38) 0.78
Complex wound care days 0 0–2 1 0–3 1.15 (1.03–1.29) 0.02 1.16 (0.90–1.48) 0.25
Any complex abdominal pathology 29 11% 26 28% 2.95 (1.68–5.18) <0.001 2.19 (0.91–5.24) 0.08 2.51 (1.26–4.99) 0.009
Any complex thoracic pathology 41 16% 19 20% 1.31 (0.72–2.38) 0.38 0.52 (0.16–1.66) 0.27
Complex thoracic pathology days 0 0–0 0 0–0 1.24 (0.84–1.85) 0.28 1.53 (0.30–7.73) 0.60
Any dialysis 83 33% 52 55% 2.54 (1.59–4.05) <0.001 2.97 (1.16–7.58) 0.02 2.77 (1.37–5.60) 0.004
Dialysis days 0 0–3 1 0–4 1.02 (0.99–1.06) 0.14 0.91 (0.85–0.98) 0.007 0.94 (0.90–0.98) 0.003
Any endoscopy 68 27% 31 33% 1.34 (0.82–2.19) 0.24 0.53 (0.23–1.22) 0.14
Endoscopy events 0 0–1 0 0–1 1.26 (0.99–1.60) 0.06 1.50 (0.78–2.86) 0.22
Any extended-spectrum cephalosporin 141 56% 63 67% 1.61 (0.99–2.63) 0.05 1.02 (0.48–2.18) 0.95
Extended-spectrum cephalosporin days 1 0–7 3 0–17 1.04 (1.01–1.07) 0.003 1.00 (0.94–1.07) 0.98
Any fluroquinolone 64 25% 39 41% 2.09 (1.29–3.41) 0.003 1.13 (0.53–2.42) 0.76
Fluoroquinolone days 0 0–1 0 0–3 1.10 (1.03–1.17) 0.002 1.02 (0.90–1.14) 0.77
Any enteral feeding 156 62% 64 68% 1.33 (0.82–2.15) 0.25 1.02 (0.43–2.46) 0.96
Enteral feeding days 3 0–15 5 0–22 1.01 (1.00–1.03) 0.19 0.97 (0.94–1.01) 0.12
Any urinary catheter 58 23% 24 26% 1.15 (0.67–1.98) 0.61 1.85 (0.90–3.83) 0.10
Urinary catheter days 0 0–0 0 0–1 0.99 (0.75–1.32) 0.96 0.67 (0.27–1.68) 0.39
Any central vascular access 174 69% 76 81% 1.92 (1.09–3.38) 0.02 1.17 (0.49–2.81) 0.73
Central vascular access events 1 0–3 2 1–4 1.19 (1.09–1.30) <0.001 0.99 (0.80–1.22) 0.92
Any mechanical ventilation 160 63% 69 73% 1.60 (0.96–2.67) 0.07 1.44 (0.59–3.56) 0.42
Mechanical ventilation days 3 0–13 10 0–24 1.03 (1.01–1.04) 0.001 1.02 (0.98–1.06) 0.42
Any transfusion 184 73% 71 76% 1.16 (0.68–1.98) 0.59 0.29 (0.13–0.64) 0.002 0.41 (0.20–0.80) 0.004
Transfusion events 2 0–5 4.5 1–13 1.09 (1.05–1.13) <0.001 1.09 (0.99–1.21) 0.07 1.09 (1.02–1.16) 0.003
Open in a new tab

LTACH, long-term acute care hospital; CI, confidence interval.

Note: excluding isolates from other species, patients with human immunodeficiency virus and renal transplant patients as these predicted infection/colonization perfectly.

a

Some patients may have more than one isolate across species. The breakdown of isolates which caused an infection. Species which did not cause an infection were excluded as they perfectly predicted colonization alone.

Independent predictors of KPCO infection (Table III) were metastatic malignancy (OR=4.26, 95% CI 1.27–14.25; P=0.02), longer acute care hospital inpatient stay (OR per day=1.02, 95% CI 1.001–1.04; P=0.04), and complex intra-abdominal pathology (OR=2.51, 95% CI 1.26–4.99; P=0.009). Ever having dialysis was associated with increased risk of infection (OR=2.77, 95% CI 1.37–5.60; P=0.004), but this declined per additional day of dialysis received (OR per additional day=0.94, 95% CI 0.90–0.98; P=0.003). Risk of infection was higher among those who had never received blood product transfusion (OR=2.47, 95% CI 1.25–4.89; P=0.01), but increased per transfusion event (OR per event=1.09, 95% CI 1.02–1.16; P=0.01). β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor exposure decreased the risk of infection vs colonization (OR=0.94 per additional day, 95% CI 0.90–0.98; P=0.004).

After adjusting for these predictors, there was no evidence of an additional effect of the most common bacterial species [overall P=0.21, compared with K. pneumoniae, OR (95% CI, P-value), Aeromonas spp. 1.22 (0.37–4.02; P=0.74), Citrobacter freundii 0.53 (0.21–1.32; P=0.17), E. aerogenes 2.69 (0.50–14.6; P=0.25), E. cloacae complex 1.37 (0.65–2.89; P=0.41), E. coli 0.66 (0.15–2.90; P=0.59), K. oxytoca 1.27 (0.36–4.47; P=0.71) and S. marcescens 0.49 (0.21–1.14; P=0.10)]. Raoutella spp., Pantoea spp. and Citrobacter non-freundii complex perfectly predicted colonization alone (Table II). There was no evidence of additional effects of days of carbapenem, extended-spectrum cephalosporin or fluoroquinolone exposure (P=0.56, 0.21 and 0.19, respectively).

Predictors of 14-day mortality following KPCO infection

Including patients admitted with KPCO acquisition that plausibly occurred elsewhere (i.e. identified during the first 48 h of their first hospital stay or before admission), 143 KPCO infections were identified in 100 patients. Of these, 46 (32%) were urinary tract infections (all surviving 14 days post infection), 50 (35%) were intra-abdominal infections, 25 (17%) were pneumonia, 20 (14%) were bacteraemia, one (<1%) was tracheobronchitis and one (<1%) following a skin and soft tissue infection. In 97 non-urinary infections, 20 (21%) patients died within 14 days (10 following intra-abdominal infection, seven following pneumonia, two following bacteraemia, and one with a skin and soft tissue infection). On multi-variate analysis, excluding patients with a urinary tract infection (none of whom died) (Table IV), source control was associated with reduced 14-day mortality risk [hazard ratio (HR)=0.07, 95% CI 0.01–0.44; P=0.005] and there was a trend towards lower mortality with active therapy (HR=0.32, 95% CI 0.09–1.10; P=0.07). There was also a very weak association between infection with an intrinsically colistin-resistant KPCO (i.e. S. marcescens) and mortality independent of active therapy (HR=1.97, 95% CI 0.83–4.68; P=0.12).

Table IV.

Predictors of 14-day mortality following infection with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing organisms (KPCO)

Variable Alive at 14 days (N=77)
 Died by 14 days (N=20)
 Univariate
 Multi-variate
N/median %/IQR N/median %/IQR Hazard ratio 95% CI P-value Hazard ratio 95% CI P-value
Age, per year 57 46–65 57 43–66 0.99 (0.96–1.03) 0.64 1.00 (0.97–1.03) 0.84
Female 29 38% 4 20% 0.44 (0.16–1.21) 0.11 0.47 (0.15–1.42) 0.18
Active therapy 67 87% 11 55% 0.23 (0.08–0.62) 0.004 0.32 (0.09–1.10) 0.07
Source control 43 56% 1 5% 0.05 (0.01–0.39) 0.004 0.07 (0.01–0.44) 0.005
Number of previous KPCO infections, per infection 0 0–1 0 0–1 0.99 (0.64–1.53) 0.96 0.76 (0.47–1.24) 0.27
Infection with intrinsically colistin-resistant KPCO 13 17% 9 45% 3.05 (1.39–6.69) 0.005 1.97 (0.83–4.68) 0.12
Charlson score, per point increase 2 0–5 4 0.5–6 1.10 (0.98–1.24) 0.10 0.98 (0.84–1.15) 0.81
Infection focus, intra-abdominal (baseline) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 1.00 1.00
 Bacteraemia 18 23% 2 10% 0.48 (0.10–2.22) 0.35 1.12 (0.30–4.21) 0.86
 Pneumonia 18 23% 7 35% 2.37 (0.49–11.47) 0.29 0.74 (0.23–2.43) 0.62
 Other 1 1% 1 5% 1.54 (0.55–4.34) 0.41 2.12 (0.54–8.30) 0.28
Open in a new tab

CI, confidence interval.

Note: not including 46 patients with KPCO urinary tract infections, none of whom died within 14 days.

Discussion

To the authors' knowledge, this is the largest study to date to examine clinical risk factors for acquisition of, infection with and mortality following multi-species KPCO in a single institution over several years under endemic conditions with a robust perirectal screening programme. This allowed the quantification of risks in the context of multi-species KPCO transmission (i.e. focusing on resistance genes as opposed to resistant strains), which is becoming increasingly common [21,22]. The findings are therefore relevant to CPE outbreak management guidelines and stratifying patients for screening and treatment, especially when hospital environment may play a role [15,23,24].

One important finding is the variable risk for acquisition associated with exposure to other colonized/infected patients (i.e. a proxy marker for transmission between patients). Exposure to other KPCO-colonized/-infected patients increased the risk of acquisition in the STBICU but not elsewhere in the hospital, supporting a role of other sources. Five studies have found that exposure to another CPE-colonized patient increases the risk of acquisition; however, all were in KPC-producing K. pneumoniae outbreaks [7,8,[25], [26], [27], [28]]. In the multi-species KPCO setting of the present study, additional multi-factorial modes of acquisition and other unsampled reservoir(s) could include: missed, silently colonized patients [either the wrong patients were screened and/or laboratory methods lack sensitivity (the method used has reported microbiological sensitivity of 85.7%)] [29]; colonized staff; or other environmental reservoirs varying by unit. Environmental wastewater reservoirs have almost certainly played a role in endemic transmission in the study institution [15], as elsewhere [12,13,23,24]. Similar findings have been noted in transmission studies of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales, where interventions to prevent patient-to-patient transmission have been ineffective in preventing acquisition [30]. The present findings indicate that polyclonal/multi-species CPE outbreaks may require novel screening and isolation approaches paired with environmental interventions [6]. Furthermore, the results call into question the potential efficacy of some interventions, such as patient and staff cohorting, advocated in clonal, single-species outbreaks where patient-to-patient transmission likely plays a predominant role [6]. The present study also found that KPCO acquisition was limited within the LTACH; most detected acquisition occurred shortly after admission, suggesting importation from the acute care hospital. This highlights that acquisitions from other KPCO-positive patients can be minimized. This may be due to the aggressive infection control measures in place at the LTACH with all patients on contact precautions and weekly CPE surveillance, as described above [31].

Given the role of horizontal gene transfer in CPE dissemination, no attempt was made to perform species or genomic linkage between patients in this study, but a previous, large genomic analysis of the outbreak suggested that patient-to-patient transmission of genetically-related strains accounted for only a minority (48/167; 29%) of transmission events [11].

Apart from KPCO colonization pressure, this study confirms that risk factors for multi-species KPCO acquisition generally mirror those identified from clonal carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae outbreaks. Acquisition in both contexts occurs in vulnerable patients who are critically ill and exposed to broad-spectrum antibiotics [7,8,25,32]. Several novel risk factors associated with KPCO acquisition were also identified in the study setting, namely transfusion, dialysis and complex thoracic pathology. Short-term dialysis was associated with greatest risk, reflecting these patients may be critically ill and dialyse through temporary vascular access. Additionally, temporary dialysis was performed in the room of a critically ill patient with effluent draining continually into wastewater, possibly increasing nutrient exposure and bacterial loads in the wastewater. Transfusion and complex thoracic pathology may also be markers for complications in surgical patients with multiple interventions. The thoracic procedures were related to empyema, need for chest tube and decortication procedures, and procedures to control haemorrhage or infection from an initial surgery which often occurred in patients with complications.

Despite the extensive perirectal screening programme conducting over 6500 screens per year [29], only a minority of patients (33%) with a KPCO-positive clinical culture had previously been identified as KPCO-colonized. However, the majority (71%) had had an antecedent perirectal screen, suggesting that the screening strategy is targeting the correct population. Screening may not be sufficiently frequent, or culture may be insufficiently sensitive. The analyses of KPCO infection risk focused on comparing those who were colonized without experiencing invasion with those who developed invasive infection. Findings are therefore most generalizable to KPCO-colonized patients who may develop invasive infection rather than a priori general hospital populations developing invasive infection with KPCO vs other pathogens. However, as colonization (even if short-lived) is generally assumed to precede invasion, and, as above, prior colonization may have been missed due to relatively infrequent screening, the study approach is more efficient for identifying factors genuinely associated with KPCO invasion. As in previous studies, infection rather than colonization was more likely in patients with multiple co-morbidities, including prolonged hospitalization, metastatic malignancy, and complicated intra-abdominal pathology, often with multiple surgical revisions [[33], [34], [35]]. Unlike other studies, however, increasing antibiotic exposure was not a risk factor for infection, which may represent high antimicrobial exposure in the high-risk control group [36]. Infection was unsurprisingly associated with pathogenic species; however, colonization with less pathogenic organisms such as Raoutella spp. or Kluyvera spp. may have an important role to play in resistance gene transfer to more pathogenic organisms, environmental persistence and transmission, and is not typically detected under current screening guidelines [6]. These data may help guide clinicians to determine, in colonized or very-high-risk patients, which patients are most likely to develop invasive infection, and thus those who might benefit from including KPCO active agents in an empiric treatment regimen.

Source control was the only significant predictor of 14-day mortality and is an important, potentially modifiable risk [18]. None of 46 episodes of urinary tract infection led to death within 14 days, suggesting that this represents a lower risk clinical category, supported by other comparisons of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae [37]. With relatively small numbers of deaths, power was low to detect effects of other factors, but active therapy tended to be associated with lower mortality risk, and S. marcescens infection, which carries intrinsic colistin resistance, tended to be associated with greater risk, as in other studies [38].

This study has several limitations. Firstly, it is a retrospective study of a single medical system, and may not be generalizable in all respects to other centres. Small numbers, particularly for the mortality analysis, likely limited power to detect relevant risk factors. Genetic analyses of strains might refine the assessment of relevant KPCO colonization pressures (although the complexities posed by horizontal gene transfer would need to be addressed), as would detailed contemporaneous sampling of other reservoirs (e.g. environment, staff). Finally, given the complex nature of medical records and the patient group being surveyed, classification of procedures into distinct subcategories that could be assessed in regression models was not straightforward.

In conclusion, to the authors' knowledge, this is the largest study to date of acquisition, infection and mortality risks associated with multi-species CPE in a single centre. The study demonstrated overlapping and unique risk factors associated with acquisition of multiple species of KPCO compared with prior evaluations which focused on single clones/species (often K. pneumoniae). A particularly important finding was that risk of acquisition was not universally associated with exposure to other KPCO-colonized patients [7,27,28], and that CPE management guidelines may need to be more nuanced for multi-species CPE transmission linked by the same resistance gene. Future work to investigate the role of non-patient reservoirs in the hospital environment which can act as a source of these organisms is essential [12].

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding sources

This work was funded, in part, by a contract from the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention Broad Agency Announcement BAA 2016-N-17812. ASW, DWC, TEAP and ASW are affiliated to the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at the University of Oxford in partnership with Public Health England (Grant HPRU-2012-10041) and are supported by the Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. ASW and TEAP are NIHR Senior Investigators. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR, the Department of Health or PHE. DWE is a Robertson Foundation Big Data Fellow.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.01.005.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

mmc1.docx (310.3KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Wailan A.M., Sartor A.L., Zowawi H.M., Perry J.D., Paterson D.L., Sidjabat H.E. Genetic contexts of blaNDM-1 in patients carrying multiple NDM-producing strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:7405–7410. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01319-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cerqueira G.C., Earl A.M., Ernst C.M., Grad Y.H., Dekker J.P., Feldgarden M. Multi-institute analysis of carbapenem resistance reveals remarkable diversity, unexplained mechanisms, and limited clonal outbreaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:1135–1140. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616248114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chavda K.D., Chen L., Fouts D.E., Sutton G., Brinkac L., Jenkins S.G. Comprehensive genome analysis of carbapenemase producing Enterobacter spp.: new insights into phylogeny, population structure, and resistance mechanisms. MBio. 2016;7 doi: 10.1128/mBio.02093-16. pii:e02093-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stoesser N., Sheppard A.E., Peirano G., Anson L.W., Pankhurst L., Sebra R. Genomic epidemiology of global Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Escherichia coli. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5917. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06256-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Munoz-Price L.S., Poirel L., Bonomo R.A., Schwaber M.J., Daikos G.L., Cormican M. Clinical epidemiology of the global expansion of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:785–796. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70190-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Centers for Disease Control Guidance for control of infections with carbapenem-resistant or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in acute care facilities. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:256–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Swaminathan M., Sharma S., Poliansky Blash S., Patel G., Banach D.B., Phillips M. Prevalence and risk factors for acquisition of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the setting of endemicity. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34:809–817. doi: 10.1086/671270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ben-David D., Masarwa S., Navon-Venezia S., Mishali H., Fridental I., Rubinovitch B. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in post-acute-care facilities in Israel. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32:845–853. doi: 10.1086/661279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang Q., Zhang Y., Yao X., Xian H., Liu Y., Li H. Risk factors and clinical outcomes for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae nosocomial infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35:1679–1689. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2710-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nicolas-Chanoine M.H., Vigan M., Laouénan C., Robert J., E-carb Study Group Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a French case–control–control study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38:383–393. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3438-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sheppard A.E., Stoesser N., Wilson D.J., Sebra R., Kasarskis A., Anson L.W. Nested Russian doll-like genetic mobility drives rapid dissemination of the carbapenem resistance gene blaKPC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:3767–3778. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00464-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kizny Gordon A.E., Mathers A.J., Cheong E.Y., Gottlieb T., Kotay S., Walker A.S. Is the hospital water environment a reservoir for carbapenem-resistant organisms causing hospital-acquired infections? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:1435–1444. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Decraene V., Phan H.T.T., George R., Wyllie D.H., Akinremi O., Aiken Z. A Large, refractory nosocomial outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli demonstrates carbapenemase gene outbreaks involving sink sites require novel approaches to infection control. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62 doi: 10.1128/AAC.01689-18. pii:e01689-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Richter S.S., Marchaim D. Screening for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: who, when, and how? Virulence. 2017;8:417–426. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1255381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mathers A.J., Vegesana K., German Mesner I., Barry K.E., Pannone A., Baumann J. Intensive care unit wastewater interventions to prevent transmission of multi-species Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) producing organisms. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:171–178. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Neuner E.A., Sekeres J., Hall G.S., van Duin D. Experience with fosfomycin for treatment of urinary tract infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:5744–5748. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00402-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tumbarello M., Trecarichi E.M., De Rosa F.G., Giannella M., Giacobbe D.R., Bassetti M. Infections caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: differences in therapy and mortality in a multicentre study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:2133–2143. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Patel G., Huprikar S., Factor S.H., Jenkins S.G., Calfee D.P. Outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection and the impact of antimicrobial and adjunctive therapies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:1099–1106. doi: 10.1086/592412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Satlin M.J., Chen L., Patel G., Gomez-Simmonds A., Weston G., Kim A.C. Bacteremia due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE): a multicenter clinical and molecular epidemiologic analysis in the nation's epicenter for CRE. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61 doi: 10.1128/AAC.02349-16. pii:e02349-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zarkotou O., Pournaras S., Tselioti P., Dragoumanos V., Pitiriga V., Ranellou K. Predictors of mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and impact of appropriate antimicrobial treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:1798–1803. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.de Maio Carrilho C.M., de Oliveira L.M., Gaudereto J., Perozin J.S., Urbano M.R., Camargo C.H. A prospective study of treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections and risk factors associated with outcome. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:629. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1979-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Conlan S., Thomas P.J., Deming C., Park M., Lau A.F., Dekker J.P. Single-molecule sequencing to track plasmid diversity of hospital-associated carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:254ra126. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vergara-López S., Domínguez M.C., Conejo M.C., Pascual Á., Rodríguez-Baño J. Wastewater drainage system as an occult reservoir in a protracted clonal outbreak due to metallo-β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella oxytoca. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:E490–E498. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wendel A.F., Kolbe-Busch S., Ressina S., Schulze-Röbbecke R., Kindgen-Milles D., Lorenz C. Detection and termination of an extended low-frequency hospital outbreak of GIM-1-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST111 in Germany. Am J Infect Control. 2015;43:635–639. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Papadimitriou-Olivgeris M., Marangos M., Fligou F., Christofidou M., Bartzavali C., Anastassiou E.D. Risk factors for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae enteric colonization upon ICU admission. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:2976–2981. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Papadimitriou-Olivgeris M., Marangos M., Fligou F., Christofidou M., Sklavou C., Vamvakopoulou S. KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae enteric colonization acquired during intensive care unit stay: the significance of risk factors for its development and its impact on mortality. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;77:169–173. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schwartz-Neiderman A., Braun T., Fallach N., Schwartz D., Carmeli Y., Schechner V. Risk factors for carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CP-CRE) acquisition among contacts of newly diagnosed CP-CRE patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37:1219–1225. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wiener-Well Y., Rudensky B., Yinnon A.M., Kopuit P., Schlesinger Y., Broide E. Carriage rate of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in hospitalised patients during a national outbreak. J Hosp Infect. 2010;74:344–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mathers A.J., Poulter M., Dirks D., Carroll J., Sifri C.D., Hazen K.C. Clinical microbiology costs for methods of active surveillance for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35:350–355. doi: 10.1086/675603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tschudin-Sutter S., Frei R., Dangel M., Stranden A., Widmer A.F. Rate of transmission of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae without contact isolation. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:1505–1511. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lewis J.D., Bishop M., Heon B., Mathers A.J., Enfield K.B., Sifri C.D. Admission surveillance for carbapenamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae at a long-term acute care hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34:832–834. doi: 10.1086/671263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mariappan S., Sekar U., Kamalanathan A. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: risk factors for infection and impact of resistance on outcomes. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2017;7:32–39. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.198520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sbrana F., Malacarne P., Bassetti M., Tascini C., Vegnuti L., Della Siega P. Risk factors for ventilator associated pneumonia due to carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in mechanically ventilated patients with tracheal and rectal colonization. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016;82:635–640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kalpoe J.S., Sonnenberg E., Factor S.H., del Rio Martin J., Schiano T., Patel G. Mortality associated with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2012;18:468–474. doi: 10.1002/lt.23374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bar-Yoseph H., Cohen N., Korytny A., Andrawus E.R., Even Dar R., Geffen Y. Risk factors for mortality among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae carriers with focus on immunosuppression. J Infect. 2019;78:101–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schechner V., Kotlovsky T., Kazma M., Mishali H., Schwartz D., Navon-Venezia S. Asymptomatic rectal carriage of blaKPC producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: who is prone to become clinically infected? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:451–456. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03888.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Qureshi Z.A., Syed A., Clarke L.G., Doi Y., Shields R.K. Epidemiology and clinical outcomes of patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteriuria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:3100–3104. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02445-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Papadimitriou-Olivgeris M., Marangos M., Christofidou M., Fligou F., Bartzavali C., Panteli E.S. Risk factors for infection and predictors of mortality among patients with KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Scand J Infect Dis. 2014;46:642–648. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2014.923106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.docx (310.3KB, docx)

RESOURCES