Brucellaphage EF4 was isolated from elk feces. The 38,321-bp double-stranded DNA genome is predicted to contain 72 coding regions, 38 of which have been assigned predicted functions. This phage displays nucleotide similarity to other brucellaphages of the genus Perisivirus.
ABSTRACT
Brucellaphage EF4 was isolated from elk feces. The 38,321-bp double-stranded DNA genome is predicted to contain 72 coding regions, 38 of which have been assigned predicted functions. This phage displays nucleotide similarity to other brucellaphages of the genus Perisivirus.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Brucella species are Gram-negative bacteria and the causative agents of brucellosis, which leads to premature abortions in cattle (1, 2). Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease that can be transmitted from cattle to humans (2). Currently, there is no human vaccine for brucellosis, and Brucella species can be cleared only with an extended antibiotic treatment regimen (3). With the need for improved treatment of brucellosis in humans and cattle, phage therapy has been proposed as an alternative treatment (4). Here, we describe the isolation and sequencing of a brucellaphage from the family Podoviridae that infects Brucella abortus strain S19.
We isolated and sequenced a bacteriophage infecting Brucella abortus strain S19 from elk fecal samples collected near the Gravelly Mountains in Montana. Elk fecal samples were homogenized in sterile phosphate-buffered saline and filtered through a 0.2-μm filter. Fecal filtrates were combined with the S19 vaccine strain of Brucella abortus and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Cultures were suspended in 0.75% potato infusion agar (PIA) and poured onto PIA plates. Plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C. Eleven fecal samples were screened. One plaque (elk fecal 4 [EF4]) was selected for clonal amplification using the plate lysate protocol (5).
EF4 phage DNA was isolated and purified via phenol-chloroform extraction (6). DNA was prepared for long-read sequencing using the SQK-LSK109 kit provided by Oxford Nanopore Technologies. DNA was sequenced using the MinION platform with an R9.4.1 FLO-MINSP6 flow cell. Sequencing resulted in a total of 417,284 reads, with an average read length of 1 kb. Quality control and base calling were performed with MinKNOW v19.06.8 and Guppy v3.2.4+d9ed22f, respectively (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). Sequences were assembled using Flye v2.5-g0c3de5b (7). This approach resulted in a single viral contig with 995× coverage. Prokka v1.14.5 was used to identify protein-coding regions within the viral genome (8). Coding regions were queried against the NCBI nonredundant protein database using BLASTp to assign putative functions (Fig. 1) (9). All tools were run with default parameters for long-read analysis.
Brucellaphages have a core genome of 38 kb, with a subset of phages containing two insertions totaling ∼3 kb (10–12). Assembly of the EF4 phage genome produced a single 38,321-bp circular genome (GC content, 48.2%) with neither of the previously described insertions. Since Perisivirus genomes are packaged as linear double-stranded DNA but replicate as covalently closed circles, we hypothesize that the circular assembly is a consequence of sequencing both forms of the genome (13). Genome termini were determined via alignment with existing brucellaphages (13). The finding of a single contig with the expected termini and length supports the idea that the whole EF4 phage genome was sequenced. Comparison of the EF4 genome with existing Perisivirus genomes using BLASTn revealed a high level of similarity with the genome of brucellaphage R/C (GenBank accession number HF569090), with 99.71% nucleotide identity and similar synteny (10–12).
The EF4 genome has a coding density of 87.8%, with 72 coding sequences (CDSs) identified using the Prokka software package (Fig. 1). Of the 72 predicted CDSs, 38 have sequence similarity to proteins of known function, while the other 34 are similar to hypothetical proteins with no known functions. The 38 CDSs with putative functional assignments include major head, portal, and tail collar proteins, as well as major and minor terminases. This genome also contains expected DNA replication machinery, such as a bifunctional DNA polymerase/primase, helicase, exonuclease, and DNA endonuclease. The genes cluster according to predicted function, with structural and lysis proteins being encoded on the positive strand and DNA replication proteins on the negative strand. This orientation may be involved in regulating gene expression.
Data availability.
Sequence and related data for the EF4 genome have been deposited under BioProject accession number PRJNA603786, GenBank accession number MT002975, and SRA accession number SRR10985492.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant R21AI130670 to M.J. and grant 1R35GM134867 to B.W.), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (grant MONB00021 to M.J.), and the Montana State University Agricultural Experimental Station (USDA NIFA).
REFERENCES
- 1.Halling SM, Peterson-Burch BD, Bricker BJ, Zuerner RL, Qing Z, Li LL, Kapur V, Alt DP, Olsen SC. 2005. Completion of the genome sequence of Brucella abortus and comparison to the highly similar genomes of Brucella melitensis and Brucella suis. J Bacteriol 187:2715–2726. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.8.2715-2726.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Corbel MJF. 2006. Brucellosis in humans and animals. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Al-Sibai MB, Halim MA, el-Shaker MM, Khan BA, Qadri SM. 1992. Efficacy of ciprofloxacin for treatment of Brucella-melitensis infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 36:150–152. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.1.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Corbel MJ, Morris JA. 1980. Investigation of the effect of Brucella-phage on the course of experimental infection with Brucella abortus. Br Vet J 136:278–289. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1935(17)32293-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pickard DJ. 2009. Preparation of bacteriophage lysates and pure DNA. Methods Mol Biol 502:3–9. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-565-1_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kramvis A, Bukofzer S, Kew MC. 1996. Comparison of hepatitis B virus DNA extractions from serum by the QIAamp blood kit, GeneReleaser, and the phenol-chloroform method. J Clin Microbiol 34:2731–2733. doi: 10.1128/JCM.34.11.2731-2733.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tevdoradze E, Farlow J, Kotorashvili A, Skhirtladze N, Antadze I, Gunia S, Balarjishvili N, Kvachadze L, Kutateladze M. 2015. Whole genome sequence comparison of ten diagnostic brucellaphages propagated on two Brucella abortus hosts. Virol J 12:66. doi: 10.1186/s12985-015-0287-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hammerl JA, Gollner C, Jackel C, Scholz HC, Nockler K, Reetz J, Al Dahouk S, Hertwig S. 2017. Genetic diversity of Brucella reference and non-reference phages and its impact on Brucella-typing. Front Microbiol 8:408. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Farlow J, Filippov AA, Sergueev KV, Hang J, Kotorashvili A, Nikolich MP. 2014. Comparative whole genome analysis of six diagnostic brucellaphages. Gene 541:115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Flores V, Lopez-Merino A, Mendoza-Hernandez G, Guarneros G. 2012. Comparative genomic analysis of two brucellaphages of distant origins. Genomics 99:233–240. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2012.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Sequence and related data for the EF4 genome have been deposited under BioProject accession number PRJNA603786, GenBank accession number MT002975, and SRA accession number SRR10985492.