Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2020 Feb 26;15(3):1732661. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2020.1732661

Diel patterns of stem CO2 efflux vary among cycads, arborescent monocots, and woody eudicots and gymnosperms

Thomas E Marler a,, Anders J Lindström b
PMCID: PMC7194385  PMID: 32100615

ABSTRACT

The diel patterns of stem carbon dioxide efflux (Es) were determined for cycads, monocots, and woody eudicot and gymnosperm tree species. Stem Es at a height of 30–40 cm was measured every 2 h throughout 31-h campaigns. Our range of Es was 1.5–4.0 µmol·m−2·s−1 for cycads, 1.0–3.5 µmol·m−2·s−1 for arborescent monocots, and 1.5–4.5 µmol·m−2·s−1 for woody eudicot and gymnosperm trees species. Time of day did not influence Es of cycads or monocots. In contrast, the woody stems of eudicots and gymnosperms exhibited diurnal Es that was 36% to 40% greater than nocturnal Es. The established literature based on Es of woody tree species cannot be used to estimate habitat carbon cycles in habitats which contain cycad or monocot trees. Time of day must be included for accuracy of research on Es of woody tree species. Failures to account for the spatiotemporal differences of Es may explain some of the disparity in outcomes of published stem respiration studies.

KEYWORDS: Conservation physiology, Guam, primary thickening meristem, stem respiration

Introduction

Habitat-level respiration is a critical component of ecosystem carbon cycling and is the sum of soil, stem, and leaf respiration. Considerable attention has been given to stem respiration as a source of atmosphere CO2.1,2 Determining the contribution of stem respiration to these processes typically involves the measurement of CO2 efflux from stem surfaces, extrapolating this to the entire stem surface area, then upscaling the flux to the stand level. The accuracy of this upscaling step is hindered by inadequate understanding of spatiotemporal variations in Es. Temporal variations of Es include seasonal changes as influenced by abiotic mediators such as temperature or drought.3-6 Temporal variations of Es also include diel changes, with the greatest Es reported during the diurnal4,7-9 or nocturnal10-15 period. Biotic factors such as stem growth increment, primary productivity, or carbohydrate supply have been invoked to explain cause and effect relationships in temporal changes of Es.3,4,6,11,12 Much of the diel variation in Es is also explained by the influence of sap flow on internal CO2 movement.16 The contribution of root-respired CO2 to stem CO2 efflux may be substantial as a result of sap flow.13,15,17 The differences of Es in space and time may explain some of the disparity in outcomes of published stem respiration studies.

The Es literature is dominated by studies on lignophyte eudicot and gymnosperm tree species that produce dense xylem from bifacial secondary vascular cambium. Cycads, palms, and other arborescent monocot species produce pachycaulous stems that do not possess secondary vascular cambium.18-24 The Es traits of these thick-stemmed species have been little studied to date. We are aware of only one publication that reported Es of palm species,25 and only two publications that reported Es of a cycad species.26,27 These reports did not consider the influence of time of day on Es. Therefore, the established literature on diel Es patterns has been restricted to lignophyte eudicot and gymnosperm trees.

An understanding of changes in Es throughout the day is required for upscaling stem Es data to stand level carbon cycle estimates. Unfortunately, the current knowledge of the diel variation of Es is not reliable for upscaling in habitats that contain cycad, palm, or other arborescent monocot tree species. We addressed these issues by comparing the diel cycle of Es for cycad, monocot, and lignophyte trees in three study sites. The monocot stem form included representatives from four families with dissimilar stem construction approaches.

We predicted that Es of cycads and most arborescent monocots would exceed that of woody tree species, primarily because most of the volume of a lignophyte stem is dead heartwood that does not respire, and most of the volume of cycad and monocot families is respiring ground tissue. We also predicted that the diel pattern of Es would be similar within each stem growth form category, but would vary among the growth forms.

Materials and methods

Our study sites and dates included Nong Nooch Tropical Botanical Garden, Chonburi, Thailand from 6 to 7 July 2019; Mangilao, Guam from 1 to 2 December 2019; and Angeles City, Philippines from 15 to 16 December 2019. For each of the dates, we conducted a 31-h campaign to determine the diel variation of stem CO2 efflux among six trees. The first measurement period was 15:00 HR on the first date, and measurements were repeated at approximately 2-h intervals through the entire nocturnal period and the photoperiod of the second date. We then continued the measurements until 22:00 HR of the second date. These methods encompassed the final 3.5 h of the first photoperiod, an entire nocturnal period, an entire photoperiod, then the first 4 h of the following nocturnal period. The six trees in each location were comprised of two representative species for each of three stem growth forms.

Our three stem growth forms were cycads, arborescent monocots, and lignophyte trees with secondary vascular cambium. The cycad species included Cycas semota K.D. Hill and Encephalartos senticosus Vorster in Thailand, Cycas angulata R.Br. and Zamia furfuracea L.f. in Guam, and Cycas micronesica K.D. Hill and Dioon spinulosum Dyer ex Eichler in Philippines. The arborescent monocot species included Phoenix sylvestris (L.) Roxb. and Washingtonia robusta H. Wendl in Thailand, Areca catechu L. and Pandanus tectorius Parkinson ex Zucc. in Guam, and Beaucarnea recurvata Lem. and Ravenala madagascariensis Sonn. in Philippines. The lignophyte trees included Albizia saman (Jacq.) F. Muell. and Ficus benjamina L. in Thailand, Elaeocarpus joga Merr. and Tabernaemontana rotensis (Kaneh.) P.T. Li. in Guam, and Acacia auriculiformis A.Cunn. ex Benth. and Araucaria heterophylla (Salisb.) Franco in Philippines.

We selected trees that appeared vigorously growing and healthy with no obvious signs of physical trauma on the stems. We restricted our choice to individuals with a minimal increase in stem diameter at the root collar and no buttress roots. For the P. tectorius individual on Guam, we selected a tree with no stilt roots.

A CIRAS EGM-4 analyzer fitted with an SRC-1 close system chamber (PP Systems, Amesbury, MA. U.S.A.) was used to quantify the efflux of CO2 from stem surfaces as previously described.25 We used a fixed stem height of 30–40 cm above the root collar. The EGM-4 recorded air temperature and the chamber’s increase in CO2 concentration above ambient for a 2-min period. The change in CO2 concentration was used to calculate the flux by dividing by area and time. We conducted three periods of efflux at different radial locations for each tree for each measurement period.

The stem surface temperature was measured with an infrared thermometer (Milwaukee Model 2267–20, Milwaukee Tool, Brookfield, WI, USA) for every tree at every measurement period. Relative humidity was determined with a sling psychrometer at the beginning and end of each measurement period. Stem diameter at the 30–40 cm height of measurements and total stem height were recorded one time for each tree. Each tree required 8–9 min to complete, and each round of measurements took ~60 min in the Thailand location and 70–75 min in the other two locations.

The influences of time of day and species on Es were assessed for each of the stem growth forms using repeated-measures analysis of variance with three replications. Time of day was designated as the repeated measure and the analysis used an autoregressive covariance structure (PROC MIXED; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Means separation for significant factors was conducted by Tukey’s HSD test.

Results

The environmental traits of our three study locations were similar (Table 1). The Thailand nocturnal maximum in relative humidity was less than that for the other two locations, but the diurnal minimum in relative humidity was similar among the locations. Stem temperature tracked air temperature during the nocturnal measurements and was 1.0–1.5°C less than air temperature for most of the measurements during the diurnal measurements. The minimum stem temperatures generally occurred prior to sunrise, and the maximum temperatures generally occurred mid-afternoon.

Table 1.

Environmental characteristics of three study locations used to characterize diel patterns of CO2 efflux from stem surfaces of three tree stem growth forms.

Study Location Sunrise Sunset Max/Min relative humidity (%) Max/Min temperature (°C)
Thailand 05:55 HR 18:47 HR 80/62 32/27
Guam 06:27 HR 17:51 HR 88/63 30/25
Philippines 06:15 HR 17:30 HR 86/59 32/22

Cycads

We included three Cycadaceae species and three Zamiaceae species in this case study (Table 2). The plants ranged in height from 1.7 to 2.4 m and stem diameter from 19 to 34 cm. Cycad Es was not influenced by time of day (P = .2595) or the interaction of time of day with species (P = .8884). In contrast, the species main effect was highly significant (P < .0001).

Table 2.

Characteristics of 18 tree species used to determine the diel pattern of carbon dioxide efflux from the base of stems.

Species  Family Study location Plant height (m) Stem diameter (cm)
  Cycads      
Cycas angulata Cycadaceae Guam 2.1 31
Cycas micronesica Cycadaceae Philippines 1.8 19
Cycas semota Cycadaceae Thailand 1.7 21
Dioon spinulosum Zamiaceae Philippines 2.3 25
Encephalartos senticosus Zamiaceae Thailand 2.4 34
Zamia furfuracea Zamiaceae Guam 1.9 23
  Monocots      
Areca catechu Arecaceae Guam 7.6 18
Beaucarnea recurvata Asparagaceae Philippines 4.4 24
Pandanus tectorius Pandanaceae Guam 8.6 19
Phoenix sylvestris Arecaceae Thailand 9.1 41
Ravenala madagascariensis Strelitziaceae Philippines 8.8 26
  Lignophytes      
Acacia auriculiformis Fabaceae Philippines 13.2 42
Albizia saman Fabaceae Thailand 20.5 92
Araucaria heterophylla Araucariaceae Philippines 14.6 31
Elaeocarpus joga Elaeocarpaceae Guam 6.2 36
Ficus benjamina Moraceae Thailand 16.6 48
Tabernaemontana rotensis Apocynaceae Guam 7.8 29

The Es of our six cycad species were separated into three overlapping groups within a range of 1.5–4.0 µmol·m−2·s−1 (Figure 1). The Cycadaceae species exhibited a range in Es that was similar to that of the Zamiaceae species.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Carbon dioxide efflux from the base of stems of six cycad species as influenced by time of day. Open triangle = Cycas micronesica, closed triangle = Dioon spinulosum, open square = Zamia furfuracea, closed square = Cycas angulata, open circle = Encephalartos senticosus, closed circle = Cycas semota. Dashed lines and triangles from Angeles City, Philippines. Dotted lines and squares from Mangilao, Guam. Solid lines and circles from Chonburi, Thailand. Bar on the x-axis depicts nocturnal hours. Species with the same letter on the right vertical axis are not different according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Arborescent monocots

The monocot species that we selected were representatives of four families including the palm family Arecaceae (Table 2). The plants ranged in height from 4.4 to 31.2 m and stem diameter ranged from 18 to 49 cm at the height of measurements. Monocot tree Es was not influenced by time of day (P = .9415) or the interaction of time of day with species (P = .9747). In contrast, the species main effect was highly significant (P < .0001).

The Es of our six monocot species were separated into two distinct groups (Figure 2). The pandanus and palm species exhibited Es (2.8–3.5 µmol·m−2·s−1) that was significantly greater than that of the Asparagaceae and Strelitziaceae species (1.1–1.3 µmol·m−2·s−1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Carbon dioxide efflux from the base of stems of six arborescent monocot species as influenced by time of day. Open triangle = Ravenala madagascariensis, closed triangle = Beaucarnea recurvata, open square = Pandanus tectorius, closed square = Areca catechu, open circle = Washingtonia robusta, closed circle = Phoenix sylvestris. Dashed lines and triangles from Angeles City, Philippines. Dotted lines and squares from Mangilao, Guam. Solid lines and circles from Chonburi, Thailand. Bar on x-axis depicts nocturnal hours. Species with the same letter on the right vertical axis are not different according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Lignophyte eudicot and gymnosperm trees

We included five families of lignophyte tree species, including the legume family Fabaceae (Table 2). The plants ranged in height from 6.2 to 20.5 m and stem diameter from 29 to 92 cm. The time of day exerted a significant influence on Es of these woody tree species (P = .0049). Similarly, the species main effect was highly significant (P < .0001). In contrast, the interaction of time of day with species was not significant (P = .9221), indicating the significant changes in Es throughout the day were similar among the species.

The six lignophyte species that we included exhibited a range in Es of about 1.5–4.5 µmol·m−2·s−1 (Figure 3). The Es of these lignophyte trees formed three distinct groups. The two Fabaceae species exhibited the greatest Es, and the two native tree species from Guam exhibited the least Es. The middle to end of the photoperiod exhibited maximum Es for all six species and most of the nocturnal period exhibited a relatively stable minimum Es.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Carbon dioxide efflux from the base of stems of six lignophyte tree species. Open triangle = Araucaria heterophylla, closed triangle = Acacia auriculiformis, open square = Elaeocarpus joga, closed square = Tabernaemontana rotensis, open circle = Ficus benjamina, closed circle = Albizia saman. Dashed lines and triangles from Angeles City, Philippines. Dotted lines and squares from Mangilao, Guam. Solid lines and circles from Chonburi, Thailand. Bar on x-axis depicts nocturnal hours. Species with the same letter on the right vertical axis are not different according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Discussion

The range in Es was similar among the cycad and monocot tree species, and the Es of these trees was on average below that of the lignophyte growth form. This outcome was not consistent with our first prediction. The results indicated that the absolute total volume of respiring tissue within a tree stem does not predict Es. One explanation may be that the metabolic activity of the peripheral tissues of a tree stem controls Es regardless of the respiratory activity of the tissues in the center of the stems. Therefore, the highly active secondary vascular cambium and growing cells of the young phloem and xylem of the lignophyte stems respire CO2 that easily conducts to the stem surface despite the fact that the center of the lignophyte stem is not metabolically active. In contrast, the less active peripheral ground tissue of cycad and monocot tree stems respires relatively less CO2 that can easily conduct toward the stem surface even though most of the center of the stem contains living tissue. A second explanation may be that the respiratory activity of the copious volume of respiring tissue of cycads and arborescent monocot stems may be less than that of the limited volume of respiring tissue within lignophyte stems because respiratory potential may be inversely correlated with the volume of parenchyma tissue.28-30 A third explanation may involve the radial position of the most active xylem, since much of the variation in Es can be explained by the influence of sap flow on the internal CO2 movement.16 The contribution of root-respired CO2 to stem CO2 efflux may be substantial as a result of sap flow.13,15,17 The active xylem for lignophyte stems is located close to the stem surface. In contrast, the active xylem for the cycad and monocot stems is located inside a wide peripheral layer of ground tissue. Therefore, the CO2 that is translocated from roots through xylem may readily conduct radially toward the stem surface for lignophyte trees, but the root-derived CO2 may not easily conduct toward the stem surface of cycad or monocot stems because of the copious peripheral ground tissue. Indeed, relative radial CO2 conductance may differ among tree species and has been proposed as one factor that explains differences in Es.31 More studies that include a greater number of species from each growth form are needed to confirm if our results are canonical or idiosyncratic for the six species we selected for each growth form.

The diel patterns of Es for our lignophyte eudicot and gymnosperm tree species revealed an increase in Es during the diurnal period in conformity with previous reports.4,7-9 The highest Es in our study occurred during the late afternoon at a time when the transfer of dissolved CO2 from root respiration would enter stems via sap flow. Moreover, the species with the greatest mean Es were legume trees, and this same result was reported for a range of tree growth forms in Costa Rica.25

Our results were consistent with our second prediction, in that all six species within each growth form exhibited similar patterns with respect to time of day, but the three growth forms did not exhibit similar diel patterns. In contrast to the lignophyte species, the cycad and arborescent monocot tree species did not reveal any observable pattern with respect to the diel cycle of Es. Most published studies were conducted in colder climates, and some of the diel patterns of Es may have been controlled by the influence of temperature on respiration.4,7 More research in colder climates is needed with cycad and monocot tree species to determine if a greater diel variation in temperature would cause a change in diel patterns of Es of these pachycaulous stems.

Radial stem growth of some arborescent monocot species does involve a secondary cambium.22,23 However, this monocot cambium is not a vascular cambium and most of the new tissue construction is ground tissue with bundles of vascular tissue interspersed. In all cycads and arborescent monocots, the presence of a relatively thick zone of ground tissue comprised of parenchyma or sclerenchyma is peripheral to the vascular tissue. For example, we have reported a cortex width of 5–6 cm for some Cycas species.32 Our results suggest that this peripheral ground tissue may buffer the radial conductance of xylem CO2 such that the temporal variations of sap flow do not overtly influence the temporal patterns of Es. Alternatively, this ground tissue may temporarily store or consume dissolved CO2 such that the ultimate diffusion to the open air occurs as a relatively stable flux throughout the diel cycle. Biological consumption of stem CO2 may occur through stem photosynthesis or other processes.33 Substantial CO2 storage has been reported in parenchyma cells, even for lignophyte stems.34 The temporal and spatial dynamics of carbohydrate movement and the location of storage pools are not well understood for pachycaulous growth forms, and this continues to limit our understanding of the relationship between carbohydrate relations and Es.

Several of our tree species are threatened with extinction. The cycad species Cycas micronesica, Dioon spinulosum, and Zamia furfuracea are Red-listed as Endangered.35-37 The Guam trees Cycas micronesica and Tabernaemontana rotensis are listed as Threatened on the United States Endangered Species Act.38 Moreover, cycad species comprise the most threatened plant group internationally.39 Conservation biologists include the stakeholder group with the role of determining the causal mechanisms behind the abiotic and biotic threats that generate declines in populations of threatened species. Conservation physiology is a critical sub-discipline of conservation biology because an understanding of the physiological responses of organisms to their ever-increasing threats is required for success.4042 We have studied various aspects of cycad stem behavior,26,27,32,43-48 and a continued focus on stem physiology and all other aspects of plant behavior would greatly improve conservation programs of cycads and other threatened tree species. The continued study of stem respiration is an ideal conservation physiology endeavor because the measurements are nondestructive and can be applied without damage to individuals of the most threatened plant taxa.

In summary, the considerable literature on Es remains biased toward lignophyte eudicot and gymnosperm tree species that produce dense xylem from bifacial secondary vascular cambium. We have shown that the use of this literature for predicting and modeling ecosystem-level CO2 relations will lead to equivocal results for habitats with cycad or arborescent monocot species. Based on our species, the range and greatest Es among cycad and monocot trees appear to be less than the range and greatest Es among lignophyte trees. Inaccuracies in upscaling the contributions of Es to the habitat or ecosystem-level carbon cycle are highly likely if only one time of day is used for Es studies on lignophyte tree species. However, our results indicate that similar inaccuracies are less likely when only one time of day is used for Es studies on cycad or arborescent monocot species.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the United States Forest Service Cooperative Agreement number 17-DG-11052021-217. Support and access to germplasm provide by Mr. Kampon Tansacha, Director of Nong Nooch Tropical Botanical Garden.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  • 1.Yang J, He Y, Aubrey DP, Zhuang Q, Teskey O.. Global patterns and predictors of stem CO2 efflux in forest ecosystems. Global Change Biol. 2016;22:1–7. doi: 10.1111/gcb.2016.22.issue-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vargas R, Barba J.. Greenhouse gas fluxes from tree stems. Trends Plant Sci. 2019;24:296–299. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maier CA. Stem growth and respiration in loblolly pine plantations differing in soil resource availability. Tree Physiol. 2001;21:1183–1193. doi: 10.1093/treephys/21.16.1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yang Q, Xu M, Chi Y, Zheng Y, Shen R, Li P, Dai H. Temporal and spatial variations of stem CO2 efflux of three species in subtropical China. J Plant Ecol. 2012;5:229–237. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtr023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tarvainen L, Räntfors M, Wallin G. Vertical gradients and seasonal variation in stem CO2 efflux within a Norway spruce stand. Tree Physiol. 2014;34:488–502. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpu036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rowland L, da Costa ACI, Oliveira AAR, Oliveira RS, Bittencourt PL, Costa PB, Giles, AL, Sosa, AI, Coughlin, I, Godlee, JL, et al. Drought stress and tree size determine stem CO2 efflux in a tropical forest. New Phytol. 2018;218:1393–1405. doi: 10.1111/nph.15024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bužková R, Acosta M, Dařenová E, Pokorný R, Pavelka M. Environmental factors influencing the relationship between stem CO2 efflux and sap flow. Trees. 2015;29:333–343. doi: 10.1007/s00468-014-1113-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kunert N, Edinger J. Xylem sap flux affects conventional stem CO2 efflux measurements in tropical trees. Biotropica. 2015;47:650–653. doi: 10.1111/btp.2015.47.issue-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhao K, Dong B, Jia Z, Ma L. Effect of climatic factors on the temporal variation of stem respiration in Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr. Agric For Meteor. 2018;248:441–448. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bowman WP, Barbour MM, Turnbull MH, Tissue DT, Whitehead D, Griffin KL. Sap flow rates and sapwood density are critical factors in within‐ and between‐tree variation in CO2 efflux from stems of mature Dacrydium cupressinum trees. New Phytol. 2005;167:815–828. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01478.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Maier CA, Clinton BD. Relationship between stem CO2 efflux, stem sap velocity and xylem CO2 concentration in young loblolly pine trees. Plant Cell Environ. 2006;29:1471–1483. doi: 10.1111/pce.2006.29.issue-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Saveyn A, Steppe K, Lemeur R. Daytime depression in tree stem CO2 efflux rates: is it caused by low stem turgor pressure? Ann Bot. 2007;99:477–485. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kunert N. A case study on the vertical and diurnal variation of stem CO2 effluxes in an Amazonian forest tree. Trees. 2018;32:913–917. doi: 10.1007/s00468-018-1680-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Salomón RL, De Schepper V, Valbuena‐Carabaña M, Gil L, Steppe K. Daytime depression in temperature‐normalised stem CO2 efflux in young poplar trees is dominated by low turgor pressure rather than by internal transport of respired CO2. New Phytol. 2018;217:586–598. doi: 10.1111/nph.14831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tarvainen L, Wallin G, Lim H, Linder S, Oren R, Löfvenius MO, Räntfors, M, Tor-ngern, P and Marshall, J, et al. Photosynthetic refixation varies along the stem and reduces CO2 efflux in mature boreal Pinus sylvestris trees. Tree Physiol. 2018;38:558–569. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hölttä T, Kolari P. Interpretation of stem CO2 efflux measurements. Tree Physiol. 2009;29:1447–1456. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpp073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bloemen J, McGuire MA, Aubrey DP, Teskey RO, Steppe K. Transport of root-respired CO2 via the transpiration stream affects aboveground carbon assimilation and CO2 efflux in trees. New Phytol. 2013;197:555–565. doi: 10.1111/nph.2012.197.issue-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Stevenson DW. Radial growth in Beaucarnea recurvata. Amer J Bot. 1980;67:476–489. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1980.tb07675.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stevenson DW. Radial growth in the Cycadales. Amer J Bot. 1980;67:465–475. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1980.tb07674.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stevenson DW, Fisher JB. The developmental relationship between primary and secondary thickening growth in Cordyline (Agavaceae). Bot Gaz. 1980;141:264–268. doi: 10.1086/337154. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tomlinson PB. The structural biology of palms. Oxford (UK): Clarendon Press; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rudall P. Lateral meristems and stem thickening growth in monocotyledons. Bot Rev. 1991;57:150–163. doi: 10.1007/BF02858768. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rudall P. New records of secondary thickening in monocotyledons. Iawa J. 1995;16:261–268. doi: 10.1163/22941932-90001409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tomlinson PB, Huggett BA. Cell longevity and sustained primary growth in palm stems. Amer J Bot. 2012;99:1891–1902. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1200089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cavaleri MA, Oberbauer SF, Ryan MG. Wood CO2 efflux in a primary tropical rain forest. Global Change Biol. 2006;12:2442–2458. doi: 10.1111/gcb.2006.12.issue-12. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Marler TE. Stem CO2 efflux of Cycas micronesica is reduced by chronic non-native insect herbivory. Plant Signal Behav. 2020;15:e1716160. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2020.1716160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marler TE, Krishnapillai MV. Vertical strata and stem carbon dioxide efflux in Cycas trees. Plants. 2020;9:230. doi: 10.3390/plants9020230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pruyn ML, Harmon ME, Gartner BL. Stem respiratory potential in six softwood and four hardwood tree species in the central cascades of Oregon. Oecologia. 2003;137:10–21. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1316-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pruyn ML, Gartner BL, Harmon ME. Storage versus substrate limitation to bole respiratory potential in two coniferous tree species of contrasting sapwood width. J Exp Bot. 2005;56:2637–2649. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Spicer R, Holbrook NM. Parenchyma cell respiration and survival in secondary xylem: does metabolic activity decline with cell age? Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30:934–943. doi: 10.1111/pce.2007.30.issue-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang X, Mao Z, McGuire MA, Teskey RO. Stem radial CO2 conductance affects stem respiratory CO2 fluxes in ash and birch trees. J For Res. 2019;30:22–29. doi: 10.1007/s11676-018-0737-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Marler TE, Lindström A, Fisher JB. Stem tissue dimensions correlate with ease of horticultural management for six Cycas species. HortScience. 2010;45:1293–1296. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.45.8.1293. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Angert A, Muhr J, Juarez RN, Muñoz WA, Kraemer G, Santillan JR, Barkan E, Mazeh S, Chambers JQ, Trumbore SE, et al. Internal respiration of Amazon tree stems greatly exceeds external CO2 efflux. Biogeosciences. 2012;9:4979–4991. doi: 10.5194/bg-9-4979-2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lev-Yadun S, Aloni R. Differentiation of the ray system in woody plants. Bot Rev. 1995;61:45–84. doi: 10.1007/BF02897151. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chemnick J, Gregory T. Zamia furfuracea. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2010: e.T42152A10668734. [Accessed 2020 January18]. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-3.RLTS.T42152A10668734.en. [DOI]
  • 36.Marler T, Haynes J, Lindstrom A. Cycas micronesica. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2010: e.T61316A12462113. [Accessed 2020 January18]. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-3.RLTS.T61316A12462113.en. [DOI]
  • 37.Vovides A, Chemnick J, Gregory T. Dioon spinulosum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2010: e.T42149A10667709. [Accessed 2020 January18]. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-3.RLTS.T42149A10667709.en. [DOI]
  • 38.United States Fish & Wildlife Service . Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; endangered status for 16 species and threatened status for 7 species in Micronesia. Fed Regist. 2015;80:59424–59497. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fragniere Y, Bétrisey S, Cardinaux L, Stoffel M, Kozlowski G. Fighting their last stand? A global analysis of the distribution and conservation status of gymnosperms. J Biogeogr. 2015;42:809–820. doi: 10.1111/jbi.12480. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wikelski M, Cooke SJ. Conservation physiology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006;21:38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cooke SJ, O-Connor CM. Making conservation physiology relevant to policy makers and conservation practitioners. Conserv Lett. 2010;3:159–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00109.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mahoney JL, Klug PE, Reed WL. An assessment of the US endangered species act recovery plans: using physiology to support conservation. Conserv Physiol. 2018;6:coy036. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coy036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fisher JB, Lindström A, Marler T. Tissue responses and solution movement after stem wounding in six Cycas species. HortScience. 2009;44:848–851. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.44.3.848. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Marler TE, Lindström AJ. Free sugar profile in cycads. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:526. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Marler TE. Axial and radial spatial patterns of non-structural carbohydrates in Cycas micronesica stems. Plants. 2018;7:49. doi: 10.3390/plants7030049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Marler TE. Elemental profiles in Cycas micronesica stems. Plants. 2018;7:94. doi: 10.3390/plants7040094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Marler TE. Stem carbohydrates and adventitious root formation of Cycas micronesica following Aulacaspis yasumatsui infestation. HortScience. 2018;53:1125–1128. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI13170-18. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Marler TE, Cascasan ANJ. Carbohydrate depletion during lethal infestation of Aulacaspis yasumatsui on Cycas revoluta. Int J Plant Sci. 2018;179:497–504. doi: 10.1086/697929. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES