Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Open Select logoLink to Taylor & Francis Open Select
. 2020 Feb 14;59(2-3):127–193. doi: 10.1080/00173134.2019.1696400

Combined LM and SEM study of the middle Miocene (Sarmatian) palynoflora from the Lavanttal Basin, Austria: Part V. Magnoliophyta 3 – Myrtales to Ericales

Friđgeir Grímsson 1,, Johannes M Bouchal 2, Alexandros Xafis 3, Reinhard Zetter 3
PMCID: PMC7195176  PMID: 32406427

Abstract

The continued investigation of the middle Miocene palynoflora from the Lavanttal Basin reveals numerous additional angiosperm taxa. The Myrtales to Ericales pollen record documented here comprises 46 different taxa belonging to Onagraceae (Ludwigia), Ericaceae (Craigia, Reevesia, Tilia), Anacardiaceae (Pistacia), Rutaceae (Zanthoxylum), Sapindaceae (Acer), Santalaceae (Arceuthobium), Amaranthaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Polygonaceae (Persicaria, Rumex), Cornaceae (Alangium, Cornus, Nyssa), Ebenaceae (Diospyros), Ericaceae (Andromeda, Arbutus, Empetrum, Erica), Sapotaceae (Pouteria, Sideroxylon), Styracaceae (Rehderodendron) and Symplocaceae (Symplocos). Köppen signatures of potential modern analogues of the additional fossil woody elements confirm the hypothesis of a subtropical (Cfa, Cwa) climate at lower elevations and subsequent transition into a temperate climate with altitudinal succession (CfaCfb/DfaDfb; CwaCwbDwb-climate). The fossil plants represent different vegetation units, from wetland lowlands to well-drained montane forests. Many of the fossil taxa have potential modern analogues that can be classified as nemoral and/or meridio-nemoral and/or semihumid-meridional vegetation elements. New is the recognition of oreotropical elements, which are direct indicators for a substantial altitudinal gradient.

Keywords: angiosperms, Cainozoic, Carinthia, fossil pollen, eudicots, palaeoclimate, palaeovegetation


This contribution is the fifth in a series of articles on the middle Miocene (Sarmatian) palynoflora from the Lavanttal Basin, Austria. For a general introduction and non-angiosperm pollen record, see Grímsson et al. (2011; spores, gnetophytes, ginkgophytes); Grímsson and Zetter (2011) covers the remaining gymnosperms (conifers), and Grímsson et al. (2015a, 2016a) the Magnoliales to Rosales. First numerical palaeoclimate and palaeovegetation assessments are provided in Grímsson et al. (2016), with focus on the, therein described, angiosperm clades of Fagales and Rosales. Using ‘Köppen signatures’ of potential modern analogues and classifying them as ‘Schroeder categories’ (Denk et al. 2013), we inferred a subtropical, per- to winter-humid Cfa/Cwa climate (Köppen 1936; Kottek et al. 2006; Rubel et al. 2017) in the lowlands providing habitats for meridio-nemoral and accessory nemoral elements. The occurrence of boreal elements, not adapted to subtropical climates, hinted towards a significant altitudinal gradient. Here, we collect the fossil pollen of two further angiosperm clades, the malvids and asterids. The malvids are represented by five orders, the Myrtales, Malvales, Sapindales, Santalales and Caryophyllales, accounting for 21 of the here recorded taxa. The asterids are represented by two orders, the Cornales and Ericales, in total, 25 taxa. Based on the potential modern analogues of the fossils we can confirm and refine our preliminary hypotheses about palaeovegetation and palaeoecology.

Material and methods

For a detailed account on the geographical position, geology and age of the Lavanttal Basin and its surroundings, sedimentology and palaeoenvironment, preservation of organic matter, as well as detailed information on the sediment samples and preparation methods see Grímsson et al. (2011).

The fossil pollen grains were investigated both by light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using the single-grain method as described by Zetter (1989) and Halbritter et al. (2018). Pollen micrographs in compiled figures show the same single pollen grain photographed with LM (sometimes rotated and/or at different focus level) and with SEM (overview and close-up of sculpture).

We used ‘Köppen signatures’ (Denk et al. 2013) to summarise the climatic niche occupied by potential modern analogues (species groups, genera) of the determined pollen taxa. We also categorised the potential modern analogues as climate-dependent vegetation elements adapting the concepts of Schroeder (1998) to provide a more generalised account of the palaeovegetation in relation to modern-day vegetation zones (cf. Denk et al. 2013, figure 2; Grímsson et al. 2016, figure 2). Here, we recognise two additional climate–vegetation categories, the ‘oreotropic’ (Figure 1) and ‘austral’ elements (Schroeder 1998) to accommodate species with hygric and thermic preferences not covered by the data set used by Denk et al. (2013) and Grímsson et al. (2016). Oreotropic species (Schröder 1998) are found in fully humid temperate to winter-dry temperate climates ([A], Cfa, Cfb, Cwa, Cwb; sensu Köppen-Geiger in Kottek et al. 2006) along altitudinal thermic successions in low latitudes characterised by tropical climates. Climatically they are hence similar to meridio-nemoral elements, but are exclusively found in mountainous areas within the tropics and, in contrast to meridio-nemoral elements, show no physical latitudinal connection to the nemoral or boreal vegetation zones. Austral species are adapted to thermic and humidity conditions of the Southern Hemisphere similar to the meridional and nemoral zones of the Northern Hemisphere including temperate fully humid to summer- and winter-dry climates with hot to warm summers (Cfa, Cfb, Csa, Csb, Cwa, Cwb; sensu Köppen-Geiger in Kottek et al. 2006). The climate data for all potential modern analogues of the fossil taxa presented herein are listed in Supplementary File S1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Circumscription of vegetation elements by Köppen climate types (‘Köppen signatures’), introducing one new category (scheme modified after Denk et al. 2013; Grímsson et al. 2016).

Note that we use here two, semantically partly overlapping concepts that have caused much confusion in palaeoclimatic and palaeovegetational literature when not strictly applied. For the general climate/vegetation bands/zones, we make use of the latitudinal-based modification of Köppens climate classification by Trewartha (1954; Trewartha & Horn 1980), which recognises a subtropical zone (addressed also as ‘subtropics’) between the equatorial tropical zone (‘tropics’) and the (fully or ‘cool’) temperate zone at mid-latitudes (c. 30°–60°). The Köppen signatures refer strictly to Köppen’s system that has no explicit subtropical zone. Thus, when we speak of ‘warm temperate climates’ (Köppen’s C-climates), this includes climates typical for the (low- to mid-altitude) subtropics with hot and/or dry summers (Cfa, Cwa, Csa, Csb p.p.) but also climates typical for the warmer part of the temperate zone (Cfb, Cwb, rest of Csb) and climates that, according Trevartha’s system, transition into the boreal (also known as ‘cold temperate’) zone (Cfc, Cwc). Vegetation-wise, Köppen’s original system is more applicable since many dominant and common taxa of the subtropics extend into the warmer part or deep into the temperate zone. The transition from the subtropical into the temperate zone is vegetation-wise hardly visible in North America or East Asia due to the absence of major east–west physical barriers.

Systematic palaeontology

All descriptions of angiosperm pollen presented herein include the most diagnostic features observed both in LM and SEM. The pollen terminology follows mostly Punt et al. (2007, LM) and Halbritter et al. (2018, SEM). The classification of orders and families follow APG III (2009). Families and genera are arranged in alphabetical order.

Clade Malvids

Order Myrtales Juss. ex Bercht. et J.Presl

Family Onagraceae Juss.

Genus Ludwigia L.

Ludwigia sp. 1

(Figure 2A–E)

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Light microscopy (LM) (A) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B–J) micrographs of dispersed fossil Onagraceae pollen. A–E. Ludwigia sp. 1. C. Close-up showing part of a smooth viscin thread. D. Close-up of sculpture around aperture, elongated rugulae. E. Close-up of rugulae in area of mesocolpium. F–J. Ludwigia sp. 2. G. Close-up of rugulae in polar area. H. Close-up of viscin threads attachment points. I. Close-up of rugulae in area of mesocolpium. J. Close-up showing part of a smooth viscin thread. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, F), 1 µm (C–E, G–J).

Description

Pollen, monad, oblate, outline triangular in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; equatorial diameter 38–41 µm wide in LM, 37–38 µm wide in SEM; tricolporate; exine 0.9–1.2 µm thick (LM), nexine thinner than sexine; tectate; sculpture scabrate in LM, microrugulate to rugulate in SEM, rugulae elongated around pori, viscin threads originating on proximal face of pollen, viscin threads smooth, mostly 0.4–0.6 µm wide (SEM).

Remarks

The pollen morphology of Onagraceae has been studied in detail using LM, SEM and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) by Ting (1966), Brown (1967), Skvarla et al. (1976, 1978), Praglowski et al. (1983, 1987, 1988, 1994), Patel et al. (1984), Keri and Zetter (1992), Punt et al. (2003), and Makbul et al. (2008). These studies show that Onagraceae produce distinct pollen types that cannot be confused with pollen from any other angiosperm family (cf. Patel et al. 1984), making it also possible to identify fossil Onagraceae pollen/tetrads at generic level.

Fossil record

The macrofossil record of Ludwigia is mostly confined to Europe, including the Oligocene to Pliocene of Germany (Mai 1985, 1989, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2001; Mai & Walther 1988; Mai & Wähnert 2000), the Miocene to Pliocene of Poland, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia (Buzek et al. 1985; Knobloch 1988; Zastawniak 1992), the Miocene of Denmark (Friis 1985), and the Pliocene of Italy (Mai 1995a). Fossil pollen grains assigned to Ludwigia are frequent compared to other genera of Onagraceae. Fossil Ludwigia pollen has been identified in the Upper Cretaceous of India (Farooqui et al. 2019), the Paleocene, Eocene and Miocene of China (Song et al. 2004; Grímsson et al. 2012b), the Eocene to Oligocene of Canada (Rouse 1962, 1977; Piel 1971), the Eocene of Columbia (Gonzáles Guzmán 1967) and Russian Far East (Brattseva 1969), the Oligocene to Pliocene of the United States (Traverse 1955; Rachele 1976), the Miocene of Mexico (Graham 1976a, 1976b, 1987) and Turkey (Bouchal et al. 2016b), and the Miocene/Pliocene of Guatemala (Graham 1998). Several Paleocene to Pliocene fossil Onagraceae pollen that are thought to have botanical affinities to Ludwigia have also been assigned to the form-genera Jussitriporites Gonzáles-Guzmán and Corsinipollenites Nakoman (e.g. Gonzáles Guzmán 1967; Krutzsch 1968, 1970c; Frederiksen 1983; Quattrocchio & Volkheimer 1990; Quattrocchio et al. 1997; Zheng et al. 1999; Stuchlik et al. 2009).

Ecological implications

Ludwigia displays a cosmopolitan, but mainly pantropical, distribution with some of its 82 species occurring on every continent except Antarctica. These are mostly small herbaceous annual or perennial plants (Wagner et al. 2007). Most extant Ludwigia species are water plants. It is very likely that both Ludwigia sp. 1 and Ludwigia sp. 2 represent small herbaceous plants that grew in lakes or along their shorelines in the lowland wetlands of the Lavanttal Basin.

Ludwigia sp. 2

(Figure 2F–J)

Description

Pollen, monad, oblate, outline triangular in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; equatorial diameter 52–56 µm wide in LM, 50–52 µm wide in SEM; triporate, pori circular to elliptic; exine 1.0–1.3 µm thick (LM), nexine thinner than sexine; tectate; sculpture scabrate in LM, rugulate in SEM, rugulae elongated around pori, viscin threads originating on proximal face of pollen, attachment points are thickened and fused by three or more elongated (protruding) rugulae elements, viscin threads smooth, mostly 0.6–0.8 µm wide (SEM).

Remarks

The Ludwigia sp. 2 is much larger than the Ludwigia sp. 1, it is also triporate versus tricolporate in Ludwigia sp. 1. Attachment points of viscin threads are also markedly thickened and fused by rugulate elements in Ludwigia sp. 2, a feature not observed in Ludwigia sp.1.

Order Malvales Juss. ex Bercht. et J.Presl

Family Malvaceae Juss.

Genus Craigia W.W.Sm. et W.E.Evans

Craigia sp.

(Figure 3A–F)

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Malvaceae pollen. A–C. Craigia sp., close-up of central part of proximal polar area. D–F. Cragia sp., close-up of central part of proximal polar area. G–I. Reevesia sp., close-up of central part of distal polar area. J–L. Reveesia sp., close-up of central part of proximal polar area. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen, monad, oblate, convex triangular in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 16–19 µm long in LM, equatorial diameter 32–34 µm wide in SEM, 28–30 µm wide in SEM; brevitricolporate, planaperturate; exine 0.9–1.2 µm thick, nexine thinner than sexine, nexine thickened around endopori, thickening horseshoe-like in outline; sculpture reticulate in LM, microreticulate in SEM, muri narrow and crested on distal polar area, muri slightly microstriate, lumina circular to elliptic in outline, brochi funnel-shaped, proximal polar area microreticulate to perforate (SEM).

Remarks

Pollen morphology of Craigia yunnanensis W.W. Smith et W.E. Evans has been documented using LM and SEM by Long et al. (1985) and Kvaček et al. (2002). In LM the apertures of Craigia pollen is characterised by a circular horseshoe-like nexine thickening best observed in optical cross-section (Kvaček et al. 2002, plate V). In Tilia, this thickening is much broader/wider and less convex (Perveen et al. 2004, figure 4). Tilia pollen is also larger than the pollen of Craigia, and the sculpture of Tilia pollen observed with LM is more prominent.

Fossil record

The macrofossil record of Craigia, including leaves and fruits, is summarised in Kvaček et al. (2005). The record shows that this genus had a much wider distribution during the Cainozoic, with numerous fossils from the early Oligocene to late Pliocene of Western Eurasia, late Eocene/Oligocene of Spitsbergen, the Paleocene to Miocene of East and Central Asia, and the middle Eocene to middle Miocene of North America (e.g. Kvaček 2004; Kvaček et al. 2005; Jin et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2012). Fossil Craigia pollen is also well represented in the palynological record of the Cainozoic (e.g. Kvaček et al. 2002; Zetter et al. 2002), but the grains have mostly been lumped into various fossil species (along with Tilia type pollen) under the form-genus Intratriporopollenites Pflug et Thomson (cf. Stuchlik et al. 2014).

Ecological implications

Craigia is a small genus comprising only two modern species, C. yunnanensis and C. kwangsiensis H.H. Hsue. Nothing is known about the living plant of C. kwangsiensis and it might even be extinct. Craigia yunnanensis are small deciduous trees, up to 20 m tall, occurring mostly in open forests, at an elevation of 500 to 1600 m, in southern China and adjacent northernmost Vietnam (Ya et al. 2007b). Today’s Craigia prefer warm temperate climates with dry winters and hot summers (Cwa; semihumid-meridional vegetation element; File S1), with mean annual temperatures (MATs) ranging from 13 to 21 °C, annual precipitation of 1074 to 1688 mm, and coldest mean month temperature of 6.3 to 14.2 °C (Fang et al. 2009). According to Kvaček et al. (2005), C. yunnanensis is usually confined to mesic notophyllous evergreen broadleaved forests, with some populations occurring at higher elevations in mixed conifer and evergreen broadleaved forests or mixed mesophytic forests. Since macrofossils of Craigia (e.g. C. bronnii, Dombeyopsis lobata) are often associated with plants of moist habitats, Kvaček (2004) suggested that during the Miocene the Central European Craigia were part of wetland forest vegetation thriving in backswamp forests and along streams and in deltas. Based on the Lavanttal plant assemblage such a scenario is possible; taking into account its present habitat, however, it cannot be ruled out that Craigia was only/also part of more well-drained forests at higher elevation surrounding the Lavanttal Basin.

Genus Reevesia Lindl.

Reevesia sp.

(Figures 3G–L, 4A–F)

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Malvaceae pollen. A–C. Reveesia sp., close-up of central part of distal polar area. D–F. Reveesia sp., close-up of central part of proximal polar area. G–I. Tilia sp. 1, close-up of central part of proximal polar area. J–L. Tilia sp. 1, close-up of central part of distal polar area. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen, monad, oblate, circular to convex quadrangular in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 11–14 µm long in LM, equatorial diameter 19–23 µm wide in LM, 16–22 µm wide in SEM; brevitetracolporate; exine 0.8–1.2 µm thick, nexine thinner than sexine, nexine thickened around endopori, sexine slightly protruding in area of endopori; sculpture reticulate in LM, heterobrochate reticulate in SEM, duplicolumellate, columellae numerous and closely spaced, muri as high as columellae, muri rounded, lumina polygonal, lumina in distal polar area with numerous freestanding columellae, nexine in proximal polar area perforate (SEM).

Remarks

The pollen morphology of extant Reevesia, including R. lofouensis Chun et Hsue, R. longipetiolata Merr. et Chun, R. formosana Sprague, R. pupescens Mast. and R. thyrsoidea Lindl., is known from LM studies by Krutzsch (1970b), Huang (1972), Petrov and Drazheva-Stamatova (1972), Long et al. (1985) and Wang et al. (1995).

Fossil record

Reevesia pollen is morphologically unique and easy to identify. For this reason, even though it occurs only in low numbers in palynological samples, it has a well-established fossil record. The fossil pollen record of Reevesia and Reevesiapollis Krutzsch has been summarised in detail by Krutzsch (1970b), Petrov and Drazheva-Stamatova (1972), Raine et al. (2011), and Stuchlik et al. (2014). These accounts suggest that Reevesia had a wide continental European distribution, with records extending from the middle Paleocene until the Pliocene, but with a peak occurrence during the Miocene. Pollen of this genus is also known from the Eocene to Miocene of Russia and from the Miocene to Pleistocene of New Zealand.

Ecological implications

The genus Reevesia comprises about 20 species of evergreen and deciduous trees (8–18 m tall) with a South Asian distribution (excluding the two Central American species alternatively placed in Veeresia). Fifteen of the species occur in China, where 12 of them are endemic (Ya et al. 2007a). Most of the Chinese Reevesia occur in warm temperate climate with dry winter and hot summer (Cwa), a third of the taxa occur (also) in equatorial savannah climate with dry winter (Aw-climate), and one third (also) in fully humid warm temperate climate with hot summer (Cfa), in combination, the genus can be characterised as a tropical-meridional element (File S1). The majority of the taxa endure a MAT in the range of 14 to 25 °C, and an annual precipitation somewhere between 1268 and 2992 mm (Fang et al. 2009). All the Reevesia species in China have very restricted distributions except for R. pubescens (Aw, Cwa, Cfa); it grows under a MAT of 2 to 25 °C, and annual precipitation of 741 to 2435 mm (Fang et al. 2009). Reevesia pubescens Mast. is the only species extending into regions with winter frost, enduring coldest mean month temperatures down to −7 °C (Fang et al. 2009). According to Ya et al. (2007a) Reevesia occurs in both open valley forests as well as dense montane forests; it can also be found on forested slopes/hillsides and along riverbanks. Based on habitats of the potential modern analogues of the Lavanttal fossils, especially R. pubescens, the Miocene Reevesia was likely part of forest vegetation surrounding the basin, occurring in well-drained valley- and hillside forests, above the main wetlands.

Genus Tilia L.

Tilia sp. 1

(Figure 4G–L)

Description

Pollen, monad, oblate, convex triangular in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 23–28 µm long in LM, equatorial diameter 41–48 µm wide in LM, 35–45 µm in SEM; brevitricolporate, planaperturate; exine 1.7–2.2 µm thick, nexine slightly thinner than sexine, nexine remarkably thickened around endopori; sculpture reticulate in LM, reticulate to microreticulate in SEM, heterobrochate reticulate in distal polar area, heterobrochate microreticulate in proximal polar area, lumina elliptic to circular, muri rounded, single branched columellae filling lumina, space between branches appearing as perforations in the lumina (SEM).

Remarks

Pollen of recent Tilia has been studied in detail by various authors using both LM and SEM (e.g. Chambers & Godwin 1971; Zhang & Chen 1984; Huo et al. 1985; Christensen & Blackmore 1988; Perveen et al. 2004) and even TEM (e.g. Halbritter & Hesse 2016; Sam 2016).

Fossil record

The earliest macrofossils assigned to Tilia are bracts (‘type B’; Manchester 1994b) from the late Eocene of North America. In Europe, Tilia type B bracts are known from the Oligocene (Manchester 1994b), suggesting that the genus spread to Eurasia via the North Atlantic land bridge. Tilia bracts are also known from the Oligocene of Asia (‘type C’; Manchester 1994b). For a more complete summary on the macrofossil record of Tilia consult the monograph on the genus by Pigott (2012). Tilia and Tilia-like pollen from the Paleocene to Pliocene of Europe have been assigned to the form-genus Intratriporopollenites Pflug et Thomson using various species names (e.g. Mai 1961; Muller 1981; Stuchlik et al. 2014). Combined LM and SEM analyses have shown that the early Cainozoic records (Paleocene to late Oligocene) of Intratriporopollenites in central Europe do not represent Tilia but other extant genera (Mortoniodendron: Grímsson et al. 2017b) and unknown or extinct groups (Gastaldo et al. 1998). True Tilia pollen is not known from western Eurasian sediments prior to the Oligocene, but is frequent in Miocene sediments and has been documented, among others, from Iceland (Denk et al. 2011), Germany (Ferguson et al. 1998), Poland (Stuchlik et al. 2014), Austria (Kovar-Eder et al. 1998; Zetter 1998) and Turkey (Bouchal et al. 2016b, 2017; Bouchal 2019).

Ecological implications

The monograph on Tilia by Pigott (2012) accepts only 23 extant species with 14 subspecies. Tilia are deciduous trees (up to 45 m tall) occurring mostly throughout the temperate zone of the Northern Hemisphere. Two species occur in North and Central America, four species are growing in Europe and western Asia, and 17 species are distributed in eastern Asia (e.g. Jones 1968; Ya et al. 2007b; Pigott 2012; Hanes 2015). Tilia americana L. covers a wide geographical region in eastern North America, occurring in both fully humid warm temperate climates and snow climates, with either hot or warm summers (Cfa, Cfb, Dfa, Dfb; nemoral vegetation element; File S1). In China, most Tilia species occur in warm temperate climates with hot summers that are either fully humid (Cfa) or winter-dry (Cwa). Only some East Asian Tilia species (≤ 6 spp.) extend into cooler areas with warm summers (Cwb) or (≤ 4 spp.) extend into snow climates (Dwa, Dwb). None of the Tilia species in China are particularly prominent in lowland wetland vegetation, but are predominantly reported from altitudes above 600 m and even occurring in mountain forests up to c. 4000 m (Ya et al. 2007b). Only very few of the Tilia species (≤ 3 spp.) in China extend into areas where the MAT drops below 0 °C, most of the taxa (≥ 11 spp.) occur in areas where the MAT is above 5 °C, and the annual precipitation ranges between 250 and 1997 mm (Fang et al. 2009). According to Ya et al. (2007b) Tilia trees in China are components of evergreen or mixed evergreen and deciduous forests, occurring on well-drained steep valley slopes and mountainsides. A similar habitat is suggested for the middle Miocene Tilia from the Lavanttal Basin.

Tilia sp. 2

(Figure 5A–F)

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Malvaceae and Anacardiaceae pollen. A–C. Tilia sp. 2, close-up of central part of distal polar area. D–F. Tilia sp. 2, close-up of central part of proximal polar area. G–I. Pistacia sp., close-up showing sculpture in area of mesocolpium. J–L. Pistacia sp., close-up of sculpture around aperture. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen, monad, oblate, convex triangular in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 24–27 µm long in LM, equatorial diameter 44–48 µm wide in LM, 39–43 µm wide in SEM; brevitricolporate, planaperturate; exine 1.4–2.2 µm thick, nexine slightly thinner than sexine, nexine remarkably thickened around endopori; sculpture reticulate in LM, reticulate to microreticulate in SEM, heterobrochate reticulate in distal polar area, heterobrochate microreticulate in proximal polar area, lumina elliptic to circular, muri broadly rounded, muri with a striate suprasculpture, single branched columellae filling lumina, space between branches appearing as perforations in the lumina (SEM).

Remarks

This pollen type differs from Tilia sp. 1 in having striate suprasculpture. Identical striate suprasculpture observed in SEM has been documented by Perveen et al. (2004, figure 4G) for extant Tilia platyphyllos Scop. as well as fossil Miocene Tilia pollen (Bouchal 2019, SI3, figure 12A–C).

Order Sapindales Juss. ex Bercht. et J.Presl

Family Anacardiaceae R.Br.

Genus Pistacia L.

Pistacia sp.

(Figure 5G–L)

Description

Pollen, monad, spheroidal, outline ± circular in polar and equatorial view; polar axis 20–22 µm long in LM, 17–22 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 21–24 µm wide in LM, 18–22 µm wide in SEM; (brevi)tetracolpate, colpi short; exine 0.9–1.1 µm thick, nexine thinner than sexine; tectate to semitectate; sculpture psilate to scabrate in LM, perforate to microreticulate in SEM, area between perforations nanobaculate (nanoechinate) or muri with nanobaculate (nanoechinate) suprasculpture (SEM).

Remarks

Pistacia is characterised by unique pollen that has been described in detail using LM (e.g. Erdtman 1952; Beug 2004; Bahramabadi et al. 2017) and also SEM (Díez 1986; Belhadj et al. 2007; Perveen & Qaiser 2010; Halbritter & Weis 2016; Li et al. 2011). The apertures described from this genus have either been classified as pori, meridionally elongated pori, or as short colpi. The apertures of the fossil pollen from Lavanttal correspond to the colpi of P. terebinthus L. as figured by Halbritter and Weis (2016).

Fossil record

The European macrofossil record of Pistacia is meagre. According to Mai (1995b), leaf and fruit records are rare and confined to the middle Oligocene and Pliocene of Italy, and the Miocene of Germany, Hungary and Austria. Pistacia pollen is also very rare. So far, the only European records are from the Miocene of France and Spain (cf. Muller 1981).

Ecological implications

The recently revised classification of Pistacia by Al-Saghir and Porter (2012) recognised nine species (and five subspecies). Pistacia are deciduous or evergreen shrubs to small trees (up to 20 m tall). The genus has a disjunct northern hemispheric distribution, with a single species in south-western United States and Central America (P. mexicana Humb.), five species in Mediterranean Europe and Africa (P. atlantica Desf., P. chinensis Bunge, P. terebinthus L., P. vera L., P. lentiscus L.), six species in West to Central Asia (P. atlantica, P. chinensis, P. eurycarpa Yalt., P. khinjuk Stocks, P. vera, P. lentiscus), and two species in East Asia (P. chinensis, P. weinmannifolia J. Poiss. ex Franch.) (Al-Saghir & Porter 2012). The current diversification centre of Pistacia, the Mediterranean region (summer-dry warm temperate climates), is believed to have been established following the latest Miocene (Xie et al. 2014). Hence, the Mediterranean (and alike) Pistacia species cannot be used as informative modern-day analogues for the Lavanttal fossils. This leaves the East Asian species as potential modern analogues of the fossil taxon, P. chinensis and P. weinmannifolia. The former shows a disjunct distribution across Asia into Africa. In China, P. chinensis has a wide distribution, thriving in winter-dry equatorial savannah climates (Aw) to fully humid warm temperate climate with hot summers (Cfa), and enduring coldest mean month temperatures down to −13 °C (Fang et al. 2009). It occurs alongside P. weinmannifolia in warm temperate climates with hot or warm summer (Cwa, Cwb;), hence, the genus can be classified as a tropical-meridional vegetation element (File S1). Both taxa are found in hill and mountain forests, growing mostly on hard substrates (rocky soils and limestone). Pistacia chinensis occurs at an elevation between 100 and 3600 m, and P. weinmanniifolia at elevation between 500 and 2700 m (Tianlu & Barfod 2008). The Miocene Pistacia from Lavanttal was most likely growing outside the lowland wetland area, on well-drained hills and mountain slopes, especially on hard or rocky substrate.

Family Rutaceae Juss.

Genus Zanthoxylum L.

Zanthoxylum sp. 1

(Figure 6A–G)

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, I) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, G, H, J, K) micrographs of dispersed fossil Rutaceae pollen. A–C, G. Zanthoxylum sp. 1. C. Close-up of striae in area of central mesocolpium. G. Close-up of striae in polar area. D–F. Zanthoxylon sp. 1, close-up of striae along colpi. H–K. Zanthoxylon sp. 2. J. Close-up of striae in polar area. K. Close-up of striae in area of mesocolpium. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, I, J), 1 µm (C, F, G, H, K).

Description

Pollen, monad, prolate, outline lobate in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 23–25 µm long in LM, 23–25 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 16–18 µm wide in LM, 12–14 µm wide in SEM; tricolporate, colpi long and bow-like, endopori lalongate elliptic to rectangular, margins of endopori perpendicular to polar axis are thickened; exine 0.8–1.0 µm thick (LM), nexine thinner than sexine, sexine slightly thickened in polar areas; tectate; sculpture scabrate to striate in LM, striate in SEM, striae 0.6–0.7 µm wide, striae closely spaced in mesocolpium, striae wider apart in polar areas, partly striato-reticulate in polar areas (SEM).

Remarks

Pollen of extant Zanthoxylum has been studied in LM by Huang (1972), Barth (1980), Wang et al. (1995), and Mayer (1996), in SEM by Barth (1980), Mayer (1996), Li et al. (2011), and Cao et al. (2014), and in TEM by Barth (1980). The pollen morphology of Zanthoxylum is unique within Rutaceae (Mayer 1996). The suite of characters that permit identification of this genus include long and bow-like colpi and lalongate rectangular endopori observed with LM. Also, margins of endopori perpendicular to polar axis are thickened (LM), and the sculpture is striato-reticluate to striate. The only genus producing similar pollen is Toddalia, but their pollen is smaller, spheroidal (versus prolate in Zanthoxylum), and the colpi are shorter.

Fossil record

According to Gregor (1989) and Mai (1995b) Zanthoxylum has a reliable fossil seed record from the middle Eocene to Pliocene in Europe, the Oligocene to Pleistocene of Asia, and the Miocene of North America. The leaf record is scarce and doubtful (Mai 1995b). This pollen type has rarely been reported (e.g. Gastaldo et al. 1998; Ferguson et al. 1998) even though it is often occurring in Oligocene to Pliocene sediments of Central Europe (R. Zetter, pers. obs.).

Ecological implications

Zanthoxylum comprises about 225 species with a pantropical distribution but extending into temperate latitudes in eastern Asia and eastern North America. The plants are either deciduous or evergreen and occur as woody climbers, shrubs, or small trees that can be up to 20 m tall (Dianxiang et al. 2008; Kubitzki et al. 2011). Chinese Zanthoxylum plants occur in various habitats including lowland forests, hillside thickets, moist (river) valley forests, and open upland forests, and are often conspicuous at forest margins. The plants are found mostly in lowlands, at an elevation from sea-level up to 800 m, but also occur in various forest types reaching an elevation of 2000 to 3000 m (Dianxiang et al. 2008). The majority of the Zanthoxylum species in China occur in fully humid and/or winter-dry warm temperate climates with hot and/or warm summers (Cfa, Cwa, Cwb; meridio-nemoral vegetation element; File S1). Only a few species extend into areas with equatorial climates (Aw; tropical-meridional vegetation element; File S1). Only three species in China seem to extend into a winter-dry snow climate with hot summers (Dwa). Based on the modern life form and pollen morphology of the genus it is impossible to conclude if the Miocene Zanthoxylum from Lavanttal was deciduous or evergreen and if it was a climber, shrub or a small tree. Also, the habitat ranges of modern species suggest that Zanthoxylum could have been a component of lowland wetland forests and/or various hillside forests and/or mountain forests.

Zanthoxylum sp. 2

(Figure 6H–K)

Description

Pollen, monad, prolate, outline trilobate in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 21–23 µm long in LM, 20–22 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 15–17 µm wide in LM, 14–16 µm wide in SEM; tricolporate, colpi long and bow-like, endopori lalongate rectangular, margins of endopori perpendicular to polar axis are thickened; exine 0.8–0.9 µm thick (LM), nexine thinner than sexine; semitectate; sculpture reticulate in LM, striato-reticulate to striato-microreticulate in SEM, striae 0.2–0.3 µm wide; margo striate, perforate (SEM).

Remarks

Even though the two Zanthoxylum pollen types are very similar in size and outline they unambiguously belong to two different species because Zanthoxylum sp. 2 has much narrower striae (0.2–0.3 versus 0.6–0.7 µm wide) and is also striato-reticulate over most of the pollen surface versus striate in Zanthoxylum sp. 1.

Family Sapindaceae Juss.

Genus Acer L.

Acer sp. 1

(Figure 7A–I)

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Sapindaceae pollen. A–C. Acer sp. 1, close-up of striae in are of mesocolpium. D–F. Acer sp. 1, close-up of colpus membrane. G–I. Acer sp. 1, close-up striae in area of mesocolpium. J–L. Acer sp. 2, close-up of striae in area of mesocolpium. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen, monad, prolate, outline lobate in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 29–33 µm long in LM, 27–31 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 18–27 µm wide in LM, 15–22 µm wide in SEM; tricolpate, colpi long; exine 1.2–1.6 µm thick, nexine slightly thinner or as thick as sexine; tectate; sculpture striate in LM and SEM, striae long and straight, running mostly parallel to the polar axis, closely spaced, often dividing and/or fusing, 0.3–0.5 µm wide (SEM).

Remarks

Pollen morphology of both American and Eurasian Acer species has been studied in detail using LM and SEM by Biesboer (1975), Adams and Morton (1976), Clarke and Jones (1978), Philbrick and Bogle (1981), Pozhidaev (1993), Fürstl (2002), Li et al. (2011), Miyoshi et al. (2011) and Siahkolaee et al. (2017). Most authors agree that Acer pollen can be distinguished into four groups based on the sculpture observed in LM and/or SEM; a striate group (including most American and Eurasian taxa of various sections including sect. Acer and Platanoidea, the dominant groups in western Eurasia), a rugulate (or rugulose, cf. Biesboer 1975) group (including unrelated A. negundo L. and Acer sect. Rubra), a striato-reticulate (or microreticulate, cf. Biesboer 1975) group (including A. saccharum Marshall, the North American representative of sect. Acer), and a rugulate-echinate (or granulate, cf. Biesboer 1975) ‘group’ (including A. carpinifolium Siebold et Zucc., a systematically and genetically isolated species; Grimm et al. 2006; Renner et al. 2008).

Fossil record

The massive macrofossil record (leaves and samaras) of Acer has been summarised by numerous authors including Walther (1972), Tanai (1983), Wolfe and Tanai (1987), Oterdoom (1994), Mai (1995b), Boulter et al. (1996), Manchester (1999), McClain (2000), and Grimm et al. (2007). Based on these accounts, the current consensus is that the earliest accepted Acer fossils are from the Paleocene of North America. Acer is then believed to have dispersed across Beringia into Asia during the Eocene and finally reaching Europe during the Oligocene. Acer was one of the most species-rich and widely distributed woody genera in the Miocene of Europe (e.g. Walther 1972; Mai 1995b; Boulter et al. 1996). In western Eurasia, striate Acer pollen grains, similar to the fossils, have been documented among others from the Oligocene and Miocene of Germany (Schmid 2000; Kottik 2002), and the Miocene of Iceland (Denk et al. 2011), Poland (Stuchlik et al. 2014), and Turkey (Bouchal et al. 2016b, 2017; Bouchal 2019; Denk et al. 2019).

Ecological implications

Acer is one of the largest tree genera of the Northern Hemisphere comprising c. 126 species (e.g. de Jong 1994; Acevedo-Rodríguez et al. 2011) divided into 16 sections and 19 series (cf. de Jong 1994). Most of the species occur in Eurasia (c. 116) and especially China (including many microspecies); relatively few species are wide-spread including many of the western Eurasian species (sections Acer, Platanoidea) and most of the nine species found in North America (van Gelderen 1994); in East Asia, the most widespread species are A. pictum Thunb. (section Platanioidea) and A. palmatum Thunb. (section Palmata), the latter cultivated worldwide as a garden ornamental. The striate fossil Acer sp. 1 and Acer sp. 2 pollen types correspond to pollen from numerous modern North American and Eurasian taxa and it is, therefore, difficult to affiliate them to any of the modern, genetically supported sections. These pollen grains could have originated from lowland wetland trees or from individuals that were part of well-drained highland or even mountain forests surrounding the basin.

Acer sp. 2

(Figure 7J–L)

Description

Pollen, monad, prolate, outline lobate in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 32–34 µm long in LM, 28–30 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 29–31 µm wide in LM, 24–26 µm wide in SEM; tricolpate, colpi long; exine 1.3–1.5 µm thick, nexine thinner than sexine; tectate; sculpture striate in LM and SEM, striae short and sinuous, often dividing, 0.4–0.6 µm wide, sometimes short parts of striae protruding, striae separated by wide grooves (SEM).

Remarks

Acer sp. 2 differs from the previous taxon mainly in the length and orientation of the striae. The striae in Acer sp. 2 are shorter, more sinuous, often dividing and they are generally wider than those in Acer sp. 1.

Acer sp. 3

(Figure 8A–I)

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Sapindaceae pollen. A–C. Acer sp. 3, tetrad, close-up of striae in area of mesocolpium. D–F. Acer sp. 3, close-up of striae in area of mesocolpium. G–I. Acer sp. 3, close-up striae in area of mesocolpium. J–L. Acer sp. 4, close-up of striae in area of mesocolpium. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen, monad (rarely tetrads), prolate, outline lobate in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 27–34 µm long in LM, 28–34 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 21–25 µm wide in LM, 16–19 µm wide in SEM; tricolpate, colpi long; exine 1.1–1.4 µm thick, nexine thinner than sexine; tectate; sculpture scabrate to striate in LM, rugulate-striate in SEM, striae short and sinuous, 0.5–0.8 µm wide, striae branching radially or in series, striae separated by irregularly outlined grooves and perforations (SEM).

Remarks

Acer sp. 3 clearly differs from the two previously described Acer sp. 1 and Acer sp. 2 by its rugulate-striate sculpture. This pollen type falls within the rugulate (rugulose) group of Biesboer (1975). Modern taxa known to produce similar pollen are A. negundo (sect. Negundo) but also A. saccharinum and A. rubrum L. of the distantly related sect. Rubra (Adams & Morton 1976; Philbrick & Bogle 1981); according to Renner et al. (2008), both lineages originated during the first radiation phase that took place at least ~55–35 ma ago). On a side note, the fossil species A. tricuspidatum Bronn (leaves) is associated with Acer sect. Rubra based on its cuticular analysis (Walther 1972). Leaves of this species have not been reported from St. Stefan but have been identified and collected from a Badenian Lavanttal locality (Schaßbach, J. M. Bouchal, pers. obs.).

Fossil record

In western Eurasia, rugulate Acer pollen grains, similar to the Acer sp. 3 fossils, have been documented from the Miocene of Iceland (Denk et al. 2011), Germany (Kmenta 2011), and Turkey (Bouchal et al. 2017; Bouchal 2019).

Ecological implications

Acer negundo are deciduous trees or shrubs. The species has a vast range throughout North America (Canada, United States, Mexico, and Guatemala), occurring mostly in forested valleys, along riverbanks, and in mixed riparian forests (van Gelderen 1994). Concerning its vast distribution A. negundo has a wide climate range, occurring under various warm temperate and snow climates (Cfa, Cfb, Dfa, Dfb, Cwa, Dwa, Csb; predominantly a nemoral vegetation element; File S1). Acer saccharinum are deciduous trees (up to 40 m tall) native to eastern and central North America (eastern United States, Canada) (van Gelderen 1994). They occur mostly in lowland wetlands and are found in river floodplains, along streams and lakes, and even in swamps (Gabriel 1990b). They grow under fully humid warm temperate to snow climates with hot or warm summers (Cfa, Cfb, Dfa, Dfb; nemoral vegetation element; File S1). It is possible that the plants producing the Acer sp. 3 pollen grains were European counterparts of the North American A. negundo or A. rubrum-saccharinum lineages and part of the lowland wetland vegetation during the Miocene of Lavanttal, occurring in mixed forest along lakes and streams, and floodplains and backswamps.

Acer sp. 4 (aff. A. saccharum)

(Figure 8J–L)

Description

Pollen, monad, prolate, outline lobate in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 43–45 µm long in LM, 42–44 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 32–34 µm wide in LM, 25–28 µm wide in SEM; tricolpate, colpi long; exine 1.4–1.6 µm thick, nexine thinner than sexine; tectate; sculpture striate in LM and SEM, striae 0.5–0.7 µm wide, often branching and interwoven, striae separated by wide grooves, striae fused along margin of colpi (SEM).

Remarks

This pollen type is much larger than the Acer sp. 1–3. Its sculpture type is different to the long striae of Acer sp. 1 and the radially branching striae observed in Acer sp. 3. This pollen type falls within the striato-reticulate (or microreticulate) group of Biesboer (1975). Modern taxon known to produce similar pollen is A. saccharum, a widespread, morphologically variable species that now includes all North American members of sect. Acer (Adams & Morton 1976; van Gelderen 1994).

Ecological implications

Acer saccharum are deciduous trees, up to 40 m tall, occurring in eastern Canada and central and eastern United States to Mexico and Guatemala (van Gelderen 1994). Acer saccharum is not a wetland taxon and does not occur in swamps but prefers well-drained slopes at intermediate elevation. It is found in rich forests, on slopes, in ravines and valleys, and near streams. In the Mixed Mesophytic Climax Forest of the eastern United States, A. saccharum appears as a dominant member of the forest canopy in association with Aesculus, Fagus, Liriodendron, Quercus, Tilia and Tsuga (Godman et al. 1990; Gabriel 1990a). Acer saccharum is growing under fully humid warm temperate to snow climates with hot or warm summers (Cfa, Cfb, Dfa, Dfb; nemoral vegetation element; File S1). It is possible that the trees producing this type of Acer pollen, during the Miocene of Lavanttal, were found at moderate elevation above the main wetland as part of ravine vegetation and well-drained species-rich hillside and slope forests.

Order Santalales R.Br. ex Bercht. et J.Presl

Family Santalaceae R.Br.

Genus Arceuthobium M.Bieb.

Arceuthobium sp.

(Figure 9A–F)

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Santalaceae and Amaranthaceae pollen. A–C. Arceuthobium sp., close-up of granulate and echinate sculpture. D–F. Arceuthobium sp., close-up of echinate sculpture in area of mesocolpium. G–I. Amaranthaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1, close-up showing opercula and microechinate sculpture of the surrounding tectum. J–L. Amaranthaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1, close-up showing opercula and microechinate sculpture of the surrounding tectum. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen, monad, spheroidal to oblate, outline hexagonal to lobate in polar view, circular to elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 20–22 µm long in LM, 17–19 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 20–24 µm wide in LM, 16–20 µm wide in SEM; tricolpate with three alternating pseudocolpi (heteroaperturate), colpi much longer than pseudocolpi; exine (excl. echini) 1.0–1.1 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture echinate in LM, microrugulate to granulate and echinate in SEM, echini 1.1–1.8 µm long, widely spaced, conical in form, loosely attached to tectum, colpus membrane granulate (SEM).

Remarks

Pollen morphology of the genus was investigated using LM and SEM by Hawksworth and Wiens (1972), also listing all previous studies on the pollen morphology of Arceuthobium. Fossil pollen affiliated to modern Arceuthobium has been assigned to the pollen form-genus Spinulaepollis Krutzsch (e.g. Krutzsch 1962; Stuchlik et al. 2014).

Fossil record

The pre-Quaternary fossil record of Arceuthobium is scarce and mostly based on dispersed pollen. The earliest pollen records are from the middle Eocene of Europe, but pollen of this genus is known from the middle Eocene to Pliocene of Germany (Krutzsch 1962, 1970a; Sontag 1966; Krutzsch & Lenk 1973; Menke 1975; 1976; Thiele-Pfeiffer 1980; Gastaldo et al. 1998), the late Eocene of UK (unpublished data, F. Grímsson), the late Oligocene to Miocene of Poland and Austria (Stuchlik 1964; Ziembińska-Tworzydło 1974; Oszast & Stuchlik 1977; Hochuli 1978; Ziembińska-Tworzydło & Ważyńska 1981; Rębas 1985; Stuchlik et al. 1990; 2014; Kohlman-Adamska 1993; Ziembińska-Tworzydło et al. 1994b; Piwocki & Ziembińska-Tworzydło 1997; Meller et al. 1999; Słodowska & Paruch-Kulczycka 2008; Worobiec 2009; Worobiec & Szulc 2010; Stuchlik et al. 2014), and the Miocene of Hungary (Nagy 1969, 1985), Turkey (Bouchal 2019) and north-eastern China (unpublished data, F. Grímsson). The mostly LM-based European pollen record documents two different morphotypes, the smaller Spinulaepollis arcethobioides Krutzsch and the larger Spinulaepollis major (Stuchlik) Stuchlik, suggesting the coexistence of at least two different Arceuthobium lineages during the Eocene to Miocene of Europe. Previous studies on the pollen morphology of Arceuthobium (e.g. Hawksworth & Wiens 1972) suggest Arceuthobium being stenopalynous in LM (term sensu Halbritter et al. 2018), and the pollen from different extant species are hard to distinguish except in some few taxa. If this was the case in fossil species each morphotype could easily represent more than a single biological taxon. There are not many reports on Arceuthobium macrofossils worldwide. The few Palaeogene records are fragments of shoots and fruiting inflorescences originating from the late Eocene Baltic amber (Sadowski et al. 2017b). The only Neogene macrofossil records are shoots, flowers and fruits, from the late Miocene of Poland (Łańcucka-Środoniowa 1980). Interestingly, the Baltic amber seems to encompass six different co-occurring Arceuthobium species (see Sadowski et al. 2017b). Such a diversity hot spot is only known from current-day Mexico, established following the Miocene (Hawksworth & Wiens 1996). The high number of fossil species in the Baltic amber raises the question whether sexual dimorphism, that is apparent in extant taxa (Hawksworth & Wiens 1996), played a role and lead to an overestimation of the actual palaeo-diversity. Extant Arceuthobium are very host selective and exclusive, raising the additional question whether this was also the case during the Eocene and whether the Baltic amber forests had sufficient host numbers to satisfy at least six different parasites. Sadowski et al. (2017a) note a considerable variety of conifers (at least 12 different taxa) thriving in the Baltic amber forests, including Calocedrus, Quasisequoia, Taxodium (Cupressaceae), Cupressospermum (Geinitziaceae), Abies, Cathaya, Nothotsuga, Pseudolarix, Pinus (Pinaceae), and Sciadopitys (Sciadopityaceae). Finding an appropriate host was apparently not a problem and the high number of different conifers could easily have sustained a diverse Arceuthobium flora. The same can be said about the Miocene Lavanttal flora: Grímsson and Zetter (2011) reported at least 20 different conifers, including various Cupressaceae (5 spp.), Pinaceae (14 spp.) and Sciadopitys.

Comparing primitive versus advanced characteristics of extant Arceuthobium, Hawksworth and Wiens (1972) hypothesised that this genus originated in north-eastern Asia during the early Cainozoic. Arceuthobium apparently then dispersed westwards to the Mediterranean area, south into Africa, and north-eastwards across the Bering land bridge into the Americas. Following first molecular evidence, Hawksworth and Wiens (1996) adjusted their theory by adding a possible migration event across the North Atlantic land bridge during the early Cainozoic and constraining the migration across the Bering land bridge as a second event during the Miocene. This would imply that American Arceuthobium originated from two different stocks, an Eocene western Eurasian stock and a Miocene East Asian stock. This contradicts the current molecular phylogenetic framework of the genus by Nickrent et al. (2004) supporting a monophyletic origin of all American taxa with A. azoricum resolved as sister to the American clade, i.e. a single colonisation event via the North Atlantic. The current fossil record suggests a middle Eocene European origin for Arceuthobium (see earlier). Likely, Arceuthobium dispersed southwards into Africa already during the Eocene, similar migration routes have recently been proposed for other plant groups, e.g. the Loranthaceae (from Asia; Grímsson et al. 2017a, 2018b) and the Picrodendraceae (from Europe; Grímsson et al. 2019). The restricted present-day distribution of Arceuthobium in Africa is most likely the result of post-Miocene climate and vegetation changes. How, if and when Arceuthobium migrated across the North Atlantic land bridge is uncertain. Palynological data place the genus at the gate of the corridor during the late Eocene (UK record, unpublished data, F. Grímsson), but studies on Palaeogene floras of Greenland hold no such records (Grímsson et al. 2014, 2015b; 2016b, 2016c, 2018a). Also, the Miocene floras of Iceland, both macrofloras and microfloras, have been studied in detail and yield no records of Arceuthobium, but Viscum is present (e.g. Grímsson et al. 2005, 2007a, 2007b; Denk et al. 2005, 2010, 2011; Grímsson & Símonarson 2008). The earliest American fossil records of Arceuthobium are from the Miocene (summarised by Hawksworth & Wiens 1996). The fossil pollen from China noted herein represent the only known record of this genus from East Asia. If the hypothesis holds that Arceuthobium originated in Europe during the Eocene, it would be unlikely that it migrated into Asia before the closure of the Turgai Seaway that took place during the early Oligocene (Akhmetiev & Reshetov 1996). It is more likely that Arceuthobium only reached Asia following its closure in the Oligocene and/or Miocene, at the same time as numerous other plant groups dispersed between these continental areas (e.g. Akhmetiev & Reshetov 1996; Manchester 1999; Manchester et al. 2009a; Denk et al. 2012; Grímsson et al. 2012a).

Ecological implications

Arceuthobium is a small genus with a mostly northern hemispheric distribution. Hawksworth and Wiens (1996) recognised 42 spp., but on the background of molecular phylogenetic data Nickrent et al. (2004) reduced their number to 26. Of these, a single species occurs in Europe, A. oxycedri (DC) Bieb., extending from Spain eastwards through Mediterranean Europe and Africa (Morocco, Algeria) to the Middle East and the Himalayas of India and China (Hawksworth & Wiens 1996; Polhill & Wiens 1998). This species along with A. juniperi-procerae Chiovenda and A. tibetense H.S Kiu et W. Ren are considered the most basal/primitive within the genus (Nickrent et al. 2004). Arceuthobium juniperi-procerae is confined to the highlands of Eritrea, Ethiopia and central Kenya (Polhill & Wiens 1998). Arceuthobium tibetense is only known from the Mainling area in eastern Xizang, Tibet (Hawksworth & Wiens 1996). These three species are placed in Subgenus Arceuthobium Section Arceuthobium and were placed as sister lineages to the clade composing the remaining Asian taxa, A. chinense Lecomte, A. minutissimus JD Hooker, A. pini Hawksws. et Wiens and A. sichuanense (H.S. Kiu) Hawksw. et Wiens of Section Chinense (Nickrent et al 2004). Arceuthobium minutissimum is known from the Himalayas in Pakistan, India, Nepal, and Bhutan, but the other three Asian taxa (A. chinense, A, pini and A. sichuanense) are restricted to south-western China (Hawksworth & Wiens 1996). In addition to these Old World taxa, A. azoricum Hawksw. et Wiens, an endemic to the Azores, occurs on the islands of Terceira, San Jorge, Pico, and Faial in the North Atlantic Ocean (Hawksworth & Wiens 1996). All remaining Arceuthobium (18 spp.) are found in the Americas, occurring in Canada (3 spp.), United States (8 spp.), Mexico (12 spp., greatest diversity), Hispaniola (1 sp.) and continental Central America (3 spp.) (Hawksworth & Wiens 1996; Nickrent et al. 2004).

Arceuthobium are stem hemiparasites that exclusively parasitise conifers and have been found on Abies, Cupressus, Juniperus, Keteleeria, Larix, Picea, Pinus, Pseudotsuga and Tsuga (Hawksworth & Wiens 1972, 1996; Polhill & Wiens 1998; Kuijt 2015). Individual taxa can be very selective and parasitising only a single host species, some are found on several different conifers but usually do not cross genera. Dual parasitism (two Arceuthobium species infecting a single host tree) is extremely rare and they rarely parasitise trees that are already occupied by other parasitic plants. It is also believed that climate is a limiting factor in the distribution of Arceuthobium, especially when they do not occur throughout the whole range of their host (Hawksworth & Wiens 1996). At present, Arceuthobium is mostly absent from all equatorial and polar climates (A- and E-climates) and thrives well in the drier variants (summer or winter-dry) of the warm temperate climates (Cs, Cw), arid climates (B-climates) and snow climates (D-climates). Being a parasite, Arceuthobium is depended on its host. Based on the rich conifer flora previously documented from Lavanttal by Grímsson and Zetter (2011), Arceuthobium could have been infecting trees both in the lowland wetlands as well as in the surrounding hills and mountains.

Order Caryophyllales Juss. ex Bercht. et J.Presl

Family Amaranthaceae Juss.

Amaranthaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1

(Figure 9G–L)

Description

Pollen, monad, spheroidal, circular in outline; diameter 17–19 µm wide in LM, 15–17 µm wide in SEM; pantoporate, 48–51 pori, pori circular with opercula, diameter of pori 1.3–1.5 µm wide (SEM); exine 0.9–1.2 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture scabrate in LM, nanoechinate, perforate in SEM, nanoechini closely packed, opercula nanoechinate (SEM).

Remarks

Pollen of Amaranthaceae is invariable (relatively thick exine, pantoporate, nanoechinate, perforate) and has been extensively studied using both LM and SEM (e.g. Nowicke 1975; Skvarla & Nowicke 1976; Müller & Borsch 2005; Olvera et al. 2006; Dehghani & Akhani 2009; Hamdi et al. 2009; Toderich et al. 2010; Borsch et al. 2018). Except for the subfamily Celosioideae (e.g. Borsch 1998), characterised by reticulate pollen, dispersed pollen of this family cannot be assigned to taxa below the family level owing to the substantial overlap in pollen morphology.

Fossil record

The macrofossil record of this family is sparse (e.g. Friis et al. 2011). Seeds of Chenopodium have been reported from the early Miocene of the Randecker Maar, southern Germany (Gregor 1982). The few additional Eurasian Neogene macrofossil records representing the family are summarised in Mai (1995b). The earliest pollen records are from the Maastrichtian of Canada (Srivastava 1969) and the United States (Nichols 2002). From the Palaeogene, pollen of this family is more often reported and is known from the Paleocene to Eocene of the United States (Zetter et al. 2011; Bouchal et al. 2016a), the Eocene of Central and East Asia (Wang & Zhao 1980; Hoorn et al. 2012), and the Eocene of western Eurasia (Akkiraz et al. 2006; Worobiec & Gedl 2018). From the Neogene onward Amaranthaceae pollen is very common in Eurasia (summarised by Muller 1981; Stuchlik et al. 2009). Fossil Amaranthaceae pollen is commonly assigned to the form-genus Chenopodipollis Krutzsch (e.g. Stuchlik et al. 2009).

Ecological implications

The Amaranthaceae (including Chenopodiaceae) comprise about 170 genera and over 2400 species. The family has a cosmopolitan distribution, but Amaranthaceae s. str. (excluding the Chenopodiaceae) are mainly tropical and the former Chenopodiaceae are subtropical to temperate. The plants are mostly annual or perennial herbs, subherbs or shrubs, rarely lianas or trees (e.g. Townsend 1993; Kühn 1993). Most Amaranthaceae s. str. occur in regions with low humidity and rainfall, some taxa are aquatic, others occur in inundated or damp depressions, and some are found near water in montane forests (Townsend 1993). The Chenopodiaceae can be dominant components in both marshes and (semi-)deserts. Chenopodiaceae prefer coastal or xeric habitats, they are light demanding plants, and many of them have a dominant position within certain vegetation units. Chenopodium and Atriplex, with non-pronounced xeromorphic attributes, are typical members of vegetation occurring on sandy or stony soil at riverbanks or rocky habitats (Kühn 1993). Based on the cosmopolitan distribution of the family and the overlapping pollen morphology between taxa, potential modern analogues for the fossil Amaranthaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1 and 2 cannot be established. Nonetheless, the fossil pollen grains likely originated from herbaceous plants growing in open and sunny areas, maybe on sandy/stony banks of streams running into the lowland wetlands, or on rocky outcrops in the surrounding highlands.

Amaranthaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2

(Figure 10A–C)

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Amaranthaceae and Caryophyllaceae pollen. A–C. Amaranthaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2, close-up showing opercula and microechinate sculpture of the surrounding tectum. D–F. Caryophyllaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1, close-up showing opercula and microechinate and perforate sculpture of the surrounding tectum. G–I. Caryophyllaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2, close-up showing opercula and microechinate sculpture of the surrounding tectum. J–L. Caryophyllaceae gen. et spec. indet. 3, close-up showing opercula and microechinate sculpture of the surrounding tectum. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen, monad, spheroidal, circular in outline; diameter 33–35 µm wide in LM, 31–33 µm wide in SEM; pantoporate, 57–63 pori, pori circular with opercula, diameter of pori 2.4–2.6 µm wide (SEM); exine 1.2–1.5 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture scabrate in LM, nanoechinate, perforate in SEM, nanoechini widely spaced, opercula microechinate (SEM).

Remarks

The Amaranthaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2 is much larger than the indet.1 type pollen, the pori are also much wider (1.3–1.5 vs 2.4–2.6), and the density of nanoechini is much higher in the previous taxon than the latter.

Family Caryophyllaceae Juss.

Caryophyllaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1

(Figure 10D–F)

Description

Pollen, monad, spheroidal, circular in outline; diameter 26–28 µm wide in LM, 22–24 µm wide in SEM; pantoporate, 9–12 pori, pori circular with opercula; exine 1.5–1.6 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture scabrate in LM, microechinate, perforate in SEM, perforations at regular interval, radially arranged around pori, perforations more frequent around pori, opercula microechinate, microechini of opercula clustered and fused (SEM).

Remarks

The morphology (LM, SEM) and ultrastructure (TEM) of Caryophyllaceae pollen has been studied extensively, e.g. Chanda (1962), Vishnu-Mittre and Gupta (1964), McNeill and Bassett (1974), Iwarsson (1977), McNeill and Crompton (1978), Ghazanfar (1984), Straka and Friedrich (1988), Al-Eisawi (1989), Punt and Hoen (1995), Kaplan (2008), Ataşlar et al. (2009), Al-Taie and Almousawi (2018), Doğan and Erdem (2018), and Ullah et al. (2018, 2019). Caryophyllaceae pollen are commonly pantoporate (all Caryophylloideae); in the other two subfamilies, Alsinoideae and Paronychioideae, one can also find, colpate or colporate pollen. The general morphology and SEM sculpture of spherical pantoporate Caryophyllaceae pollen is very alike and the different genera are hard to distinguish based on dispersed pollen (within and across subfamilies). This makes affiliation of the fossil Caryophyllaceae pollen from Lavanttal to any extant infrafamily taxon impossible. Concerning pore number and pore membrane, Caryophyllaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1 displays morphological similarities to the ‘Areanaria serpyllifolia type’ of Punt and Hoen (1995).

Fossil record

The macrofossil record of Caryophyllaceae is sparse. A fossil inflorescence, Caryophylloflora paleogenica G.J.Jord. et Macphail, with in situ pollen, is known from the Eocene of Tasmania, Australia (Jordan & Macphail 2003). Fossil seeds, assigned to Hantsia, are described from the Eocene of England, UK (Chandler 1960; 1961, 1963, 1964). All other macrofossils are post-Miocene seed records, assigned to Arenaria, Cerastium, Cucubalus, Minuartia, Silene, and Stellaria (e.g. Zazula et al. 2005; Thompson et al. 2011; Huang et al. 2013). The palynological record of Caryophyllaceae is summarised in Muller (1981), Jordan and Macphail (2003), and Stuchlik et al. (2009). Even though Caryophyllaceae-type pollen (Periporopollenites Pflug et Thompson) seems to occur in Upper Cretaceous to Palaeogene sediments of Australia (cf. Jordan & Macphail 2003), their earliest European records (mostly assigned to Caryophyllidites Couper and Vaclavipollis Krutzsch) are of Miocene age (cf. Muller 1981; Stuchlik et al. 2009).

Ecological implications

The Caryophyllaceae is a large family that includes about 86 genera and c. 2200 species of annual or perennial herbs, or subshrubs, rarely shrubs or small trees. Three genera compose large shrubs or small trees such as Sanctambrosia (San Ambrosia Island, Chile), Alsinidendron (Hawaii) and Schiedea (Hawaii). The family is cosmopolitan, including Antarctica, with a primarily Holarctic distribution, and a centre of diversity (54 of the 86 genera occur) in the Mediterranean and Irano-Turanean region. Caryophyllaceae are found in various habitats, especially in dry open areas and mountainous regions (up to 7000 m above sea level [a.s.l.]). They also occur in moist temperate forests or meadows, moist areas in tropical Afromontane regions, but are absent from tropical lowland rain forests (Bittrich 1993). Based on the cosmopolitan distribution of Caryophyllaceae, and the fact that the fossil Lavanttal pollen cannot be assigned to a particular genus (due to overlapping in pollen morphology), further speculations regarding climate preferences of potential modern analogues are impractical. It is likely that the fossil pollen originates from herbaceous plants that were part of open habitats, maybe meadows or shrublands at forest margins, or formed part of the understory in the rich highland forests surrounding the lowland wetlands.

Caryophyllaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2

(Figure 10G–I)

Description

Pollen, monad, spheroidal, circular in outline; diameter 17–19 µm wide in LM, 14–16 µm wide in SEM; pantoporate, 15–18 pori, pori circular with opercula; exine 0.8–1.0 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture scabrate in LM, microechinate, perforate in SEM, perforations irregularly distributed, opercula microechinate, microrugulate (SEM).

Remarks

This pollen type differs from the previously described not only in size of the pollen, but also in the size and shape of echini and the number and conspicuousness of perforations. Also, the echini on the opercula of the Caryophyllaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2 are often fused to elongated, a feature not observed in pollen of the indet. 1 type. This pollen type is morphologically similar (pore membrane configuration) to the ‘Silene vulgaris type’ of Punt and Hoen (1995).

Caryophyllaceae gen. et spec. indet. 3

(Figure 10J–L)

Description

Pollen, monad, spheroidal, circular in outline; diameter 19–21 µm wide in LM, 18–20 µm wide in SEM; pantoporate, 15–18 pori, pori circular with opercula; exine 1.6–1.8 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture scabrate in LM, microechinate, perforate in SEM, opercula microechinate, microechini on opercula specially arranged, with a single centrally placed microechinus surrounded by a circle of six or more echini (SEM).

Remarks

This pollen type differs from Caryophyllaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1 in both size and number of apertures. It is considerably smaller and equipped with more apertures. The pollen wall in Caryophyllaceae gen. et spec. indet. 3 is much thicker than that of Caryophyllaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2. The indet. 3 pollen type shows morphological similarities (pore membrane configuration) to the ‘Dianthus superbus type’ of Punt and Hoen (1995).

Family Polygonaceae Juss.

Subfamily Polygonoideae Eaton

Tribe Persicarieae Dumort

Genus Persicaria (L.) Mill.

Persicaria sp.

(Figure 11A–F)

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Polygonaceae and Cornaceae pollen. A–C. Persicaria sp., close-up showing heterobrochate reticulate sculpture. D–F. Persicaria sp., close-up showing crested muri and short freestanding columellae. G–I. Rumex, close-up of microechinate and perforate sculpture in area of mesocolpium. J–L. Alangium sp., close-up of polar area. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen, monad, spheroidal, outline circular; diameter 40–46 µm wide in LM, 33–45 µm wide in SEM; pantoporate; exine 2.4–2.8 µm thick (LM), nexine thinner then sexine; semitectate; sculpture reticulate in LM, heterobrochate reticulate in SEM, duplicolumellate, columellae high and closely spaced, muri crested, lumen with short densely spaced freestanding columellae (SEM).

Remarks

Pollen morphology (LM, SEM) and ultrastructure (TEM) of Persicaria, generic circumscription following Haraldson (1978), Ronse Decraene and Akeroyd (1988), Sanchez et al. (2011), and Schuster et al. (2015), has been studied by various authors, but referred to both Persicaria and/or Polygonum (e.g. Wodehouse 1931; Hedberg 1946; Nowicke & Skvarla 1977; van Leeuwen et al. 1988; Hong & Hedberg 1990; Hong 1994; Zhou et al. 1999; Ayodele 2005; Yasmin et al. 2010b). Based on pollen morphology observed in some of the 131 Persicaria species accepted by POWO (2017), two main pollen types are occurring in this genus, a pantocolpate/pantoporate type and a 3-colpate type. The fossil pantoporate pollen from Lavanttal falls within the framework of the pantoporate ‘Persicaria’/‘Polygonum persicaria’ pollen types of Wodehouse (1931), Hedberg (1946), van Leeuwen et al. (1988) and Yasmin (2010b, ‘Persicaria type’). Pantoporate pollen has been documented for P. acuminata (Kunth) M.Gómez, P. amphibia (L.) Delarbre, P. arifolia (L.) Haraldson, P. barbata (L.) H.Hara, P. bungeana (Turcz.) Nakani, P. cespitosa (Blume) Nakai, P. careyi (Olney) Greene, P. criopolitana (Hance) Migo, P. dichotoma (Blume) Masam., P. foliosa (H.Lindb.) Kitag, P. glabra (Willd.) M.Gómez, P. hydropiper (L.) Delarbre, P. hydropiperoides (Michx.) Small, P. jucunda (Meisn.) Migo, P. lanigera (R.Br.) Soják, P. lapathifolia (L.) Delarbre, P. longiseta (Bruyn) Kitag., P. maculosa Gray, P. minor (Huds.) Opiz, P. meisneriana (Cham. et Schltdl.) M.Gómez, P. mitis (Schrank) Assenov, P. orientalis (L.) Spach, P. pensylvanica (L.) M. Gómez, P. perfoliata (L.) H.Gross, P. sagittata (L.) H.Gross, P. senticosa (Meisn.) H.Gross, P. sinuata (Royle ex Bab.) H.Gross, P. stagnina (Buch.-Ham. ex Meisn.) M.A. Hassan, P. tinctoria (Aiton) Spach, and P. thunbergii (Siebold et Zucc.) H.Gross.

Fossil record

The macrofossil record of the genus was recently summarised/revised by Doweld (2017): Fossil Persicaria leaves are known from the Miocene of Romania, P. asymmetrica (Givulescu et Ţicleanu) Doweld, and Poland, P. lapathiformis (Kownas) Iljinskaja and P. zablockii Doweld. Also, Doweld reports fossil fruits from the Miocene of Ukraine and Siberia, Russia, P. vladichenica (Negru) Doweld and P. omoloica Doweld, and the Pliocene of Germany and western Russia, P. wolfii (Kinkelin) Doweld and P. dorofeevii Arbuzova. The LM-based palynological record of Persicaria, recorded as the form-genus Persicarioipollis Krutzsch, is summarised in Muller (1981), Song et al. (2004), Stuchlik et al. (2009), Schuster et al. (2013), and Doweld (2017). According to these summaries, Persicaria-type pollen has its earliest appearance in the Paleocene of western/central Europe (France, Germany), the Eocene of China, and the Oligocene of Russia. It became very common during the Neogene and had a worldwide distribution after the Miocene.

Ecological implications

Persicaria comprises about 150 species of annual or perennial herbs. It is a cosmopolitan genus, occurring mostly in the Northern Hemisphere with some taxa extending into subtropical and tropical regions, from sea-level to high elevation (Brandbyge 1993; Heywood et al. 2007). Persicaria plants usually occur near or in the water and are found along the coastline, at riversides, along streams and river banks, along the shoreline of lakes, in swamps, fens, ponds, bogs, tidal marshes, wet ravines, marshlands, moist prairies, on floodplains, and other types of wetlands. The plants can be part of various different forest types (including deciduous forests, mixed deciduous and evergreen forests, and evergreen forests), but are typically concentrated in openings and/or at the forest margins (e.g. Li et al. 2003; Freeman & Reveal 2005; Kantachot et al. 2010; Li 2014; Liang & Li 2014). For a detailed account on the ecology and habitat of P. amphibia consult Partridge (2001). The cosmopolitan distribution of Persicaria and the similarities in pollen morphology of its species, render fossil Persicaria useless for climate inferences using potential modern analogues. The fossil Persicaria pollen from Lavanttal probably originates from herbaceous plants, growing in or close to moving or stagnant water as part of lowland wetlands or in open areas of the forests surrounding the basin, at forest margins and/or along streams.

Tribe Rumiceae Dumort

Genus Rumex L.

Rumex sp.

(Figure 11G–I)

Description

Pollen, monad, spheroidal, outline circular to trilobate in polar view, circular in equatorial view; polar axis 24–25 µm long in LM, 22–23 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 24–25 µm wide in LM, 23–24 µm wide in SEM; tricolporate, colpi long and narrow, endopori lolongate, not wider than colpi; exine 0.9–1.0 µm thick (LM), nexine thinner than sexine, nexine slightly thickened around endopori; tectate; sculpture scabrate in LM, microechinate, perforate in SEM, perforations in pits (SEM).

Remarks

Pollen of Rumex has been studied using LM (e.g. Wodehouse 1931; den Nijs et al. 1980; van Leeuwen et al. 1988; Cheng & Feng 1996; Ayodele 2005; Yasmin et al. 2010a), SEM (e.g. Nowicke & Skvarla 1977; den Nijs et al. 1980; van Leeuwen et al. 1988; Cheng & Feng 1996; Yasmin et al. 2010a; Soleimani et al. 2014) and TEM (e.g. Nowicke & Skvarla 1977; Cheng & Feng 1996). The sculpture of Rumex pollen observed in SEM seems to be very similar between taxa, although there is a considerable variation in aperture configuration both within and between species. Rumex pollen grains are predominantly tricolporate, but grains with 4–9 apertures also occur (van Leeuwen et al. 1988, table II; Cheng & Feng 1996, table II). The fossil Rumex pollen from Lavanttal is of the typical tricolporate type and resembles pollen from many of the extant species.

Fossil record

There are currently no convincing pre-Miocene macrofossil records of Rumex. The fossil record is composed solely of fruits from the Neogene and Quaternary of Eurasia (e.g. Reid 1920; Szafer 1954; Nikitin 1957; Łańcucka-Środoniowa 1979; Friis 1985; Mai 1995b). The palynological record is also scarce and confined to Miocene and younger sediments (e.g. Muller 1981).

Ecological implications

Rumex comprises about 195 species of perennial or annual herbs (POWO 2017). Like the other found Polygonaceae, it is a cosmopolitan genus but with a preference of the temperate regions of the world (Brandbyge 1993). Rumex occurs from sea-level to an elevation of about 4300 m. The plants are found in various environments (e.g. coastal, alluvial and montane habitats), including, swamps, marshes, bogs, shores of lakes, banks of streams and rivers, grasslands, (wet) meadows, (moist) valleys, (dry) mountain slopes, forest margins, sandy and gravelly shores, sandy planes, sand dunes, rocky outcrops, rocky fissures, and even saline deserts and sands (Li et al. 2003; Freeman & Reveal 2005). As in the case of other Polygonaceae, it is useless for climate reconstruction. Based on the variable habitats of extant Rumex it is uncertain if the pollen originates from plants that were growing in the lowland wetlands or suitable patches in the highland and/or mountain forests surrounding the basin.

Clade Asterids

Order Cornales Link.

Family Cornaceae Bercht. et J.Presl

Genus Alangium Lam.

Alangium sp.(aff. A. kurzii)

(Figure 11J–L)

Description

Pollen, monad, oblate to spheroidal, outline elliptic in equatorial view, trilobate in polar view; polar axis 56–58 µm long in LM, equatorial diameter 69–72 µm wide in LM, 73–76 µm wide in SEM; tricolporate, colpi broad, endopori elliptic with two short opposite equatorially placed crevasses (LM); exine 4.5–4.6 µm thick, nexine thinner than sexine (LM); semitectate; sculpture reticulate in LM, heterobrochate reticulate in SEM, becoming striatoreticulate towards apertures, margo striate, colpus membrane irregularly granulate, muri narrow and high, partly interwoven (SEM).

Remarks

The pollen morphology of Alangium has been studied quite thoroughly by Reitsma (1970), but see also Chao (1954), Straka et al. (1967), Eyde et al. (1969), Eyde (1972), Cerceau-Larrival et al. (1984) and Martin et al. (1996). These palynological studies were based on the c. 20 taxa known at that time. Recent revision on three of the four currently accepted sections within Alangium (sections Alangium, Conostigma, Rhytidandra) by de Wilde and Duyfjes (2016, 2017a, 2017b) shows that they comprise 43 species. Section Marlea has not been revised so far but is believed to hold less than 10 taxa (de Wilde & Duyfjes 2016, 2017a, 2017b). The pollen morphology of Alangium is therefore in need of revision to clarify the characteristics of each section and to assess whether important and/or diagnostic features are overlapping between sections. The fossil Alangium pollen from Lavanttal is heterobrochate-reticulate to striatoreticulate and with narrow muri. Until now, Alangium kurzii Craib (section Marlea) is the only extant taxon known to produce comparable pollen (Reitsma 1970, plates 7–10).

Fossil record

The fossil record of Alangium goes back to the Eocene of the Americas, Europe, India, southeast Asia and Australia and has been summarised by Eyde et al. (1969), Morley (1982), Phadtare and Thakur (1990), Martin et al. (1996) and Shatilova and Kokolashvili (2014). Fossil pollen grains attributed to extant Alangium kurzii (sect. Marlea) are known from the middle Oligocene to late Miocene of Germany (Krutzsch 1962), the Miocene of Hungary (Nagy 1962, 1969, 1973), Poland (Słodkowska 1998; Ziembińska-Tworzydło et al. 1994b; Stuchlik et al. 2014), Austria (Kovar-Eder et al. 1998) and Bulgaria (Ivanov 1997), the Miocene to Pliocene of Georgia (Stuchlik & Shatilova 1987; Shatilova & Kokolashvili 2014), and the Pliocene of southeast Asia (Morley 1982). Fossil Alangium pollen grains of this type are mostly assigned to Alangipollis barghoornianum (Traverse) Krutzsch that was originally described from the Miocene of Vermont, USA, by Traverse (1955); later emended by Krutzsch (1962) adding fossils from the middle Oligocene of Germany.

Ecological implications

Alangium kurzii is a deciduous shrub or tree that can be up to 28 m tall. It occurs from 50–1600 m a.s.l. and has a vast distribution across southeast Asia (including Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines) and East Asia (including southern and eastern China, Korea and Japan) (Bloembergen 1935, 1939; Qin & Phengklai 2007). In China, Alangium kurzii is a woodland tree occurring at 600–1600 m a.s.l. in mixed deciduous-evergreen broadleaved and conifer forests (Qin & Phengklai 2007) in fully humid to winter-dry temperate climates with hot summers (Cfa, Cwa; meridio-nemoral vegetation element; File S1) with mean annual temperatures ranging from 11.7 to 24.8 °C, an annual precipitation of 711 to 2435 mm, and coldest month mean temperatures of 1.1 to 20.1 °C (Fang et al. 2009). Based on the preferred habitat of extant Alangium kurzii, and the rareness of this fossil pollen type, it is likely that the Lavanttal Alangium was not growing in the lowland wetlands, but was part of the forest community surrounding the basin, and probably growing along streams or in sparse forest units on well-drained substrates.

Genus Cornus L.

Cornus sp.

(Figure 12A–C)

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Cornaceae and Ebenaceae pollen. A–C. Cornus sp., close-up of sculpture in area of mesocolpium. D–F. Nyssa sp., close-up of sculpture in area of central mesocolpium. G–I. Nyssa sp., close-up of sculpture in area of central mesocolpium. J–L. Diospyros sp., close-up of microrugulate sculpture in area of central mesocolpium. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen, monad, prolate, outline elliptic in equatorial view, convex triangular in polar view; polar axis 44–45 µm long in LM, 38–39 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 29–30 µm wide in LM, 25–26 µm wide in SEM; tricolporate, endopori lalongate; exine 1.1–1.2 µm thick (LM), nexine thinner than sexine, sexine thickened along colpi; tectate; sculpture psilate to scabrate in LM, microechinate, perforate in SEM, perforations closely spaced, polar areas and margins around colpi psilate with irregularly and widely distributed perforations (SEM).

Remarks

The pollen morphology and ultrastructure of Cornus has been studied by Ferguson (1977). For additional LM- and SEM-based work on Cornus pollen see e.g. Adams and Morton (1976), Stafford and Heath (1991), Chester and Raine (2001), Perveen and Qaiser (2002), Mert (2009), Li et al. (2011), Miyoshi et al. (2011), and Kilie and Tuttu (2017). In his study on c. 44 different Cornus species, Ferguson (1977) concluded that all taxa produce similar pollen (stenopalynous genus sensu Halbritter et al. 2018) but divided them into two groups: (a) ‘Cornus mas-subtype’, and (b) ‘Cornus sanguinea-subtype’. The main difference between these two subtypes is the polar/equatorial (P/E) ratio. Pollen assigned to the Cornus mas-subtype are ± isodiametric, and those grouped in the C. sanguinea-subtype are ± prolate.

Fossil record

The earliest fossil attributed to Cornus is a permineralised fruit, Cornus cf. piggae Manchester, Wing et Xiang, from the late Campanian (c. 73 Ma) of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada (Atkinson et al. 2016). Fossil Cornus fruits are also known from the early Cainozoic, including C. piggae from the Paleocene of North Dakota, USA (Manchester et al. 2010), C. ettingshausenii (Gardner) Eyde and C. multilocularis (Gardner) Eyde from the early Eocene of southern England (Eyde 1988). Other early Cainozoic records are based on leaves and include C. swingii Manchester, Xiang, Kodrul et Akhmetiev from the Paleocene of the United States (Manchester et al. 2009b), Cornus hyperborean Heer from the Paleocene of Atanikerluk, Nuussuaq Peninsula, West Greenland (Heer 1869), Cornophyllum hebridicum (Johnson) Boulter et Kvaček from the Paleocene of Mull, Scotland (Boulter & Kvaček 1989), C. platyphylla Saporta from the Paleocene of Sézanne, France (Saporta 1868), and C. krassilovii Manchester, Xiang, Kodrul et Akhmetiev from the Paleocene of Amur, Russian Far East (Manchester et al. 2009b). The complete post-Paleocene fossil record of Cornus was summarised in detail by Eyde (1988), including the alleged pollen record. Both Eyde (1988) and Muller (1981) were sceptic about all the fossil Cornus pollen that had been published/described (using LM only) at that time, stating they lack diagnostic features to differentiate them from pollen grains of other Cornaceae and related groups. The earliest fossil Cornus pollen studied using SEM is reported from the late Paleocene of Almont, North Dakota, USA (Zetter et al. 2011).

Ecological implications

The fossil Cornus pollen from Lavanttal definitely falls into the C. sanguinea-subtype. Extant taxa producing such pollen are distributed across most of the Northern Hemisphere. These include the American C. alternifolia L.f. (central and eastern Canada to north central and eastern United States), C. amomum Mill. (east central and eastern United States), C. asperifolia Michx. (southeast United States), C. drummondii C.A.Mey. (south-eastern Canada to central and east central United States), C. excelsa Kunth (Mexico to Honduras), C. foemina Mill. (east central and south-eastern United States), C. glabrata Benth. (southern Oregon to California, USA), C. peruviana J.F.Macbr. (Costa Rica to north-western Venezuela and Bolivia), C. rugose Lam. (central and eastern Canada to north central and eastern United States) and, C. sericea L. (widespread), the Eurasian C. sanguinea L. (Europe to Lebanon) and C. alba L. (north-eastern Europe to northern Korea), and the East Asian C. controversa Hemsl. (central Himalaya to southern Kuril Island), C. hemsleyi C.K.Schneid. et Wangerin (China), C. quinquenervis Franch. (central and southern China), C. ulotricha C.K.Schneid (Tibet to central China), C. walteri Wangerin (China to Korea), C. wilsoniana Wangerin (central and southern China) (distribution data from WCSP 2019). Plants producing the C. sanquinea-subtype pollen are mostly deciduous shrubs to small trees (up to 20 m tall). Depending on their geographic distribution, taxa occuring from sea-level to c. 3600 m a.s.l. (Xiang & Boufford 2005; Murell & Poindexter 2016). The Chinese Cornus are part of various, different vegetation units and forests. These include mixed broad-leaved and conifer forests, mixed thickets/woods, dense forests, the margin of woods, and scrub vegetation. Cornus is frequently growing along streams in both lowlands and at higher elevations, on hillsides and in real mountainous regions (Xiang & Boufford 2005). In China, most Cornus species occur in fully humid warm temperate climates with hot summers or winter-dry warm temperate climates with hot to warm summers (Cfa, Cwa, Cwb; meridio-nemoral vegetation element; File S1). Some Cornus extent into winter-dry snow climates with hot to warm summers or cool summers and cold winters (Dwa, Dwb, Dwc; nemoral vegetation element; File S1). In North America, Cornus grow from sea-level to c. 3400 m a.s.l. Cornus plants are found in both open vegetation as well as in dense forest, in mesic or dry-mesic deciduous hardwood forests, alluvial woods, or dry woodlands. As in China, Cornus in America often occurs along river and stream banks, as well as near wet meadows, swamp margins and marshes (Murell & Poindexter 2016). North American Cornus species occur in fully humid warm temperate or snow climates with hot or warm summers (Cfa, Cfb, Dfa, Dfb; nemoral vegetation element; File S1). Based on present-day Cornus, the Lavanttal Cornus pollen represents a nemoral or meridio-nemoral vegetation element originating from plants growing in the lowlands, at the boundary of swamps or on levees, or from plants growing along streams in highland areas surrounding the basin.

Genus Nyssa L.

Nyssa sp.

(Figure 12D–I)

Description

Pollen, monad, spheroidal, outline triangular in polar view, circular in equatorial view; polar axis 41–42 µm long in LM, 34–37 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 39–45 µm wide in LM, 34–36 µm wide in SEM; tricolporate, endopori thickened in corners where crossing colpi (LM); exine 1.1–1.5 µm thick, nexine thinner or as thick as sexine (LM); tectate, sculpture scabrate in LM, rugulate, fossulate, perforate, microechinate in SEM, microechini widely and irregularly spaced, rugulae partly fused along colpi (SEM).

Remarks

Pollen of Nyssa has been studied in detail by various authors using both LM (Sohma 1963, 1967) and SEM (Saito et al. 1992; Göschl 2008; Li et al. 2011). Nyssa aquatica L., N. ogeche W.Bartram ex Marshall, N. sylvatica Marshall and N. sinensis Oliv. produce pollen with less sculptured or psilate areas surrounding the colpi. In N. javanica (Blume) Wangerin and N. bifida Craib a distinct nanorugulate sculpture is present in areas adjacent to the colpi (Göschl 2008). Information concerning this character state in N. talamancana Hammel et N.Zamora is currently unavailable. All investigated Nyssa pollen from Lavanttal displayed no nanorugulation in the colpus area.

Fossil record

The fossil record of Nyssa has been summarised by Eyde (1997) and Manchester et al. (2015). Early macrofossil records of Nyssoideae (fruits) date back to the Upper Cretaceous (early Coniacian) of Japan (Takahashi et al.  2002). The three sculpture types known from endocarps of extant species (ridged with sunken bundles, ridge raised bundles, and smooth) have been reported from the early Eocene of North America and Europe, indicating radiation prior to the Eocene. The form-genera Nyssapollenites Thiergart ex R.Potonié and Nyssoidites R.Potonié, Thomson et Thiergart ex R.Potonié have commonly been used for fossil Nyssa-like pollen. The Cainozoic palynological record of Nyssa is summarised by Muller (1981) and Eyde (1991), and most recently by Stuchlik et al. (2014), accepting earliest records from the Paleocene of the Northern Hemisphere.

Ecological implications

The nine extant species of Nyssa show a disjunct distribution, with five species occurring in eastern North America (N. aquatica, N. biflora Walter, N. ogeche, N. sylvatica, N. ursina Small), one in Central America (N. talamancana), and three in east to southeast Asia (N. bifida, N. javanica, N. sinensis) (Wen & Stuessy 1993; Tucker 2016; POWO 2017). All extant species of Nyssa are deciduous trees. The North American species are commonly found in habitats with water-logged soils (swamps, floodplain forests, riparian forests) at low elevations in fully humid warm temperate climate (Cfa). Nyssa sylvatica shows the widest ecological range, thriving in wet, well-drained, and even dry environments/habitats, from subtropical to snow climates (Aw, Cfa, Cfb, Dfa, Dfb; meridio-nemoral vegetation element; File S1), at an elevation from sea level up to 1100 (1600) m, and frost resistance in mature trees to −30 °C (Sakai & Weiser 1973; Tucker 2016). Nyssa talamancana thrives at middle elevations in Costa Rica and Panama under fully humid equatorial climate or fully humid warm temperate climate with warm summers (Af, Cfb; tropical-oreotropical vegetation element; File S1) together with other relict genera, e.g. Ticodendron, Alfaroa, Oremunnea and Gordonia (Hammel & Zamora 1990). Nyssa sinensis is found in wet mixed forests along streams at elevations from 300 to 2700 m (Haining & Chamlong 2007), under fully humid to winter-dry warm temperate climate with hot to warm summers (Cfa, Cfb, Cwa, Cwb; meridio-nemoral vegetation element: File S1). The habitats of extant Nyssa species producing pollen similar to the fossil from Lavanttal point to a nemoral to meridio-nemoral vegetation element. Its pollen probably originated from plants growing in the lowlands, in swamps, on waterlogged soils, or as riparian elements.

Order Ericales Bercht. et J.Presl

Family Ebenaceae Gürke

Genus Diospyros L.

Diospyros sp.

(Figure 12J–L)

Description

Pollen, monad, prolate, outline elliptic in equatorial view, trilobate in polar view; polar axis 41–43 µm long in LM, 40–42 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 34–36 µm wide in LM, 21–26 µm wide in SEM; tricolporate, pori lalongate, colpi long and bowlike (LM); exine 1.0–1.3 µm thick, nexine thinner than sexine (LM); tectate; sculpture psilate in LM, microrugulate, perforate, fossulate in SEM, rugulae in small groups, rugulae parallel and oriented within groups (SEM).

Remarks

The pollen morphology (LM, SEM) and ultrastructure (TEM) of Diospyros has been studied thoroughly by, among others, Erdtman (1952), Ng (1971), Cerceau-Larrival et al. (1984), de Franceschi (1993), Morton (1994), Tissot et al. (1994), Kodela (2006), Geeraerts et al. (2009), Sánchez-Dzib et al. (2009), Grygorieva et al. (2010, 2013), Li et al. (2011), Miyoshi et al. (2011), and Gosling et al. (2013). The recent most comprehensive SEM work by Geeraerts et al. (2009) defines four main sculpture types within Ebenoideae (including Diospyros, Euclea, Royena). The sculpture of the fossil pollen type from Lavanttal falls within ‘Type 1b’ of Geeraerts et al. (2009) that occurs in various extant Diospyros, but also Euclea and Royena species. According to Geeraerts et al. (2009) pollen of the three genera can be distinguished based on pollen and orbicule size, equatorial outline, and sculpture. Pollen of extant Diospyros species display a wide range in size and outline, but all have a (micro)rugulate sculpture (Geeraerts et al. 2009). The relatively long colpi and perforations observed in interapertural areas (SEM) of the fossil pollen is shared with pollen of many extant Diospyros taxa (Geeraerts et al. 2009, tables I and II).

Fossil record

The macrofossil record of Diospyros has been summarised by Hiern (1873), Berry (1912), and Basinger and Christophel (1985). Both Basinger and Christophel (1985) and Wallnöfer (2001, 2004) agree that most of the Cretaceous to late Cainozoic leaf records are questionable and need to be re-evaluated. The most convincing records are fossil flowers, Austrodiospyros cryptostoma Basinger et Christophel, with in situ pollen and leaves from the middle Eocene of southern Australia. Both leaves and pollen of this fossil taxon are identical to those found in extant Diospyros (Christophel & Basinger 1982; Basinger & Christophel 1985). As in the case of leaves, the dispersed fossil pollen of Diospyros is hard to identify and distinguish from pollen of many Sapotaceae and Styracaceae when studied using LM only (cf. Erdtman 1952). The only reliable pollen records of Diospyros are those verified using SEM. Fossil Diospyros pollen identified using SEM have been described from the middle Eocene of Hainan, China (Hofmann 2018), and the late Eocene of Colorado, USA (Bouchal et al. 2016a).

Ecological implications

Diospyros is pantropical and comprises between 500 and 600 species, growing mostly in lowland tropical to subtropical regions. Only a few species are known to extend into mountains and temperate regions. There are about 100 different species in the Americas, c. 95 in Africa, c. 95 in Madagascar and the Comoro Islands, 200–300 in Asia and the Pacific area, and about 15 in Australia (Wallnöfer 2001, 2004). Diospyros are mostly small to medium-sized evergreen, less frequently deciduous, trees in the forest understorey. The trees often thrive along rivers but can also be found in swamps and periodically flooded environments. Some species are part of well-drained forests and occur in deciduous forests (e.g. D. lotus L., D. kaki L.f., D. virginiana L.); some are even growing in fire-prone savannahs (Wallnöfer 2001, 2004). In North America, D. virginiana, is a widely distributed tree (up to 40 m tall) in the eastern United States. It occurs from 0 to 1100 m a.s.l. and is found in various forest types, from seasonally flooded bottomlands to dry ridgetops (Eckenwalder 2009), predominantly thriving in fully humid warm temperate climates with hot to warm summers (Cfa; meridio-nemoral vegetation element; File S1) and extending into Dfa climates with coldest month minima of −4.9° (Thompson et al. 1999). The other North American taxon, D. texana Scheele, distributed in Texas and Mexico, occurs from 0 to 1800 m a.s.l., and is part of open lowland bottomlands, prairie margins, and is found on rocky hillsides. In Texas, it thrives under fully humid warm temperate climate with hot summers (Cfa), but in the southern part of its distribution area, Mexico, it is found in hot arid steppe climate (BSh; File S1). China, mostly its south-eastern and south-western parts, is home to about 60 species of Diospyros (Lee et al. 1996). Small shrubs to large trees (up to c. 25 m tall), which can be either deciduous or evergreen, which occur from sea level to an elevation of 2700 m. The plants are part of both deciduous and broad-leaved evergreen forests, as well as mixed broad-leaved evergreen-deciduous forests. They often occur in forested ravines or on slopes, and in forests beside streams or moist lowland valley forests (Lee et al. 1996). The Chinese Diospyros fall into two major groups regarding climate preferences. About one-third of the taxa grow under fully humid to winter-dry warm temperate climate with hot to warm summers (Cfa, Cfb, Cwa, Cwb; nemoral to meridio-nemoral vegetation element; File S1). About two-thirds of the species either extend into (tropical-meridional vegetation element) or are confined to various equatorial climates (tropical vegetation element), like fully humid rainforest (Af), monsoon (Am), or savannah climates with dry winter (Aw; File S1). Based on the extant habitats of warm temperate Diospyros species, the fossil pollen from Lavanttal most likely represent shrubs or small trees, characteristic for the understory. The pollen could originate from plants growing in the lowland wetlands or along streams at the periphery of the basin. It could also derive from plants growing further away from the accumulation zone, representing ravine vegetation or a highland element.

Family Ericaceae Juss.

Genus Andromeda L.

Andromeda sp.

(Figure 13A–C)

Figure 13.

Figure 13.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Ericaceae pollen tetrads. A–C. Andromeda sp., close-up of microrugulate and fossulate sculpture in polar area. D–F. Arbutus sp., close-up of granulate and fossulate sculpture in area of mesocolpium. G–I. Arbutus sp., close-up of sculpture in polar area. J–L. Empetrum sp., close-up showing microverrucate sculpture with nanoechinate suprasculpture. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Permanent tetrads, subspheroidal, outline convex triangular in polar view, rounded quadrangular in equatorial view; diameter of tetrad 27–31 µm wide in LM, 26–28 µm wide in SEM; pollen tricolporate; exine 1.3–1.5 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture psilate in LM, microrugulate, granulate, fossulate, perforate in SEM, fossulae more pronounced in area of pollen intersection (SEM).

Remarks

The tetrad morphology, size, and the delicate sculpture overserved with SEM suggests that this type belongs to Andromeda. Extant pollen tetrads of A. polifolia L. have been figured using both LM and SEM by several authors (e.g. Oldfield 1959; Adams & Morton 1979; Hebda 1979; Warner & Chinappa 1986; Sarwar & Takahashi 2006; Halbritter & Svojtka 2016).

Fossil record

It is not easy to affiliate fossil Ericaceae tetrads to extant lineages and/or genera. Most fossil records are documented using LM only and assigned to different species of the form-genus Ericipites Wodehouse (e.g. Stuchlik et al. 2014). We are unaware of any convincing pre-Quaternary Andromeda macrofossil or pollen record.

Ecological implications

Andromeda polifolia is the single modern species of genus Andromeda (POWO 2017). It is a low growing evergreen shrub that is usually 10 to 25 cm tall but can grow up to 40 cm. This species is present in all circumboreal regions of the Northern Hemisphere. It inhabits wet sites, (peat) bogs, fens, swamps, margins of pools, and boggy shores, from sea level up to 1500 m, throughout boreal forests and the Arctic (Jacquemart 1998; Fabijan 2009). For a detailed summary of the distribution and the ecology of A. polifolia see Jacquemart (1998). Andromeda polifolia does not extend into tropical (A) or arid (B) climates but is found in fully humid warm temperate and snow climates with hot to cold summers (Cfa, Cfb, Cfc, Dfb, Dfc; File S1), summer- and winter-dry snow climates (Dwb, Dwc, Dsb, Dsc) and Tundra climates (ET) (boreal to nemoral vegetation element; File S1). During the Miocene of Lavanttal Andromeda probably was part of the lignite forming swamp community or growing at the margins of conifer forests belts at higher elevation.

Genus Arbutus L.

Arbutus sp.

(Figure 13D–I)

Description

Permanent tetrads, subspheroidal, outline convex triangular in polar view, rounded quadrangular in equatorial view; diameter of tetrad 37–44 µm wide in LM, 34–39 µm wide in SEM; pollen tricolporate; exine 1.1–1.5 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture scabrate in LM, granulate, fossulate, perforate in SEM, fossulae deeper and more pronounced in area of mesocolpium, fossulae in polar areas and around colpi fewer and more shallow, colpus membrane microverrucate to microechinate (SEM).

Remarks

Arbutus has large tetrads compared to most Ericaceae. The colpi are distinct, but the boundaries between individual pollen grains (in mesocolpium area) are extremely vague (linear perforations) and untypical for this family. Individual pollen grains are ± triangular in polar view (LM) versus lobate to circular in most Ericaceae. This, in combination with the granulate and perforate sculpture observed with SEM, clearly place these fossil tetrads from Lavanttal in Arbutus. The pollen morphology of most Arbutus species have been documented in detail using both LM and SEM by e.g. Adams and Morton (1979), Lewis et al. (1983), Warner and Chinappa (1986), Barento et al. (1987), Luteyn et al. (1995), Sarwar (2007), Sarwar et al. (2008), and Halbritter (2016a).

Fossil record

The fossil record of Arbutus is meagre. In the United States, fossil Arbutus leaves have been reported from the early and late Oligocene of Colorado (Axelrod 1987; Gregory & McIntosh 1996), the Miocene of Nevada and Oregon (e.g. Axelrod 1991; Graham 1999), and the Miocene/Pliocene of California (Axelrod 1950). In Europe, fossil Arbutus leaves are known from the Eocene to Pliocene (summarised in Mai 1995b). Noteworthy is that genetic investigations of Arbutoideae have shown that European Arbutus species are sister to all American genera (including Arbutus) of this subfamily (Hileman et al. 2001). As mentioned previously, it is not easy to affiliate fossil Ericaceae pollen tetrads to extant lineages and/or genera, therefore, most fossil Ericaceae pollen tetrads are assigned to the form genus Ericipites (e.g. Stuchlik et al. 2014). There seems to be no previous convincing pre-Quaternary Arbutus pollen record.

Ecological implications

Arbutus is a small genus, comprising c. 14 species of shrubs and trees, occurring in western Europe to the Mediterranean, Macaronesia, and western Canada to Central America (Hileman et al. 2001; Sørensen 2009; POWO 2017). Four species, A. andrachne L., A. unedo L., A. × andrachnoides Link, and A. pavarii Pamp., occur in the Mediterranean region from North Africa to the Middle East, here they thrive under summer-dry or fully humid temperate conditions with hot to warm summers (Csa, Csb, Cfa, Cfb; File S1). Arbutus canariensis Veill. ex Duhamel and Arbutus × androsterilis Salas, Acebes et del Arco are endemic to the Canary Islands. The remaining eight taxa (A. arizonica [A.Gray] Sarg, A. bicolor S.González, MGonzález et P.D.Sørensen, A. occidentalis McVaugh et Rosatti, A. madrensis S.González, A. menziesii Pursh, A. mollis Kunth, A. tessellata P.D.Sørensen, A. xalapensis Kunth) all occur in the Americas (Hileman et al. 2001; Sørensen 2009; POWO 2017). Arbutus arizonica thrives in riverine forest and along seasonally moist waterways, at an elevation of 1500 to 2400 m, in Arizona and northern Mexico. Arbutus menziesii occurs in open forests, on rocky slopes, foothills, in ravines, and along shores, at an elevation of 0 to 1800 m, from British Columbia to northwest Mexico. In tropical Central America Arbutus is found primarily in forested montane areas dominated by Pinus and Quercus (Sørensen 2009). The American Arbutus species grow under a wide range of climates, from fully humid temperate conditions with warm to cool summers (Cfb, Cfc) to summer- or winter-dry climates (Csb, Cwa, Cwb), and even extend into equatorial and arid climates (Aw, BSh, BSk). The Arbutus pollen from the Miocene of Lavanttal could have originated from trees growing along streams or in ravines at the periphery of the basin, or from drier hill sites or mountain areas surrounding the lowlands.

Genus Empetrum L.

Empetrum sp.

(Figure 13J–L)

Description

Permanent tetrads, subspheroidal, outline convex triangular in polar view, rounded quadrangular in equatorial view; diameter of tetrad 29–31 µm wide in LM, 25–27 µm wide in SEM; pollen tricolporate; exine 0.8–1.0 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture psilate in LM, microverrucate in SEM, microverrucae with a nanoechinate suprasculpture, apices of microechini often blunt (SEM).

Remarks

The pollen morphology of Empetrum has been studied with both LM and SEM and figured, among others, by Warner and Chinappa (1986), Foss and Doyle (1988), Beug (2004), Sarwar (2007), Miyoshi et al. (2011), and Halbritter (2016b). The fossil pollen from Lavanttal corresponds in size and morphology to extant Empetrum pollen, and the sculpture observed in SEM is comparable to that of E. nigrum L. as depicted by Halbritter (2016b).

Fossil record

The few North American and European macrofossil records of Empetrum are mostly confined to the Quaternary (e.g. Mai 1995b; Graham 1999). Still, a single endocarp assigned to this genus is reported from the middle Miocene of Denmark (Friis 1979). According to Mai (1995b), Empetrum pollen is first recovered from the Miocene of Europe, but then became a prominent component in Pliocene and younger peat deposits of that region. As noted earlier, Ericaceae pollen tetrads are very similar in morphology and it is not easy to affiliate fossil tetrads to extant taxa unless observed with SEM. Most fossil Ericaceae tetrads studied using LM are assigned to the form-genus Ericipites (e.g. Stuchlik et al. 2014). There are currently no previous pre-Miocene Empetrum pollen records verified using SEM.

Ecological implications

Empetrum composes about four extant species of prostrate shrubs (Murray et al. 2009; POWO 2017). Three of the species are restricted in distribution. Empetrum rubrum Vahl ex Willd. is native to southern South America and the Falkland Islands, where it thrives under fully humid warm temperate climates, with warm to cool summers and cold winters, and extends into summer-dry as well as tundra climates (Csb, Cfb, Cfc, ET; File S1). Empetrum atropurpureum Fernald et Wiegand and E. eamesii Fernald et Wiegand are native to eastern Canada and north-eastern United States, where they occur at an elevation from sea level to c. 1500 m, on dunes, sandy terraces, coastal rock barrens, alpine heath, and exposed mountain slopes near treeline (Murray et al. 2009). Both species grow under fully humid snow climates with warm to cool summers (Dfa, Dfb, Dfc; File S1) with E. atropurpureum extending into fully humid temperate climates (Cfb) touching Cfa at the coast of Maine, USA. The most common species, E. nigrum, has a circumpolar (temperate to Arctic) northern hemispheric distribution (POWO 2017). According to Murray et al. (2009), E. nigrum occurs in North America, Greenland and Europe at elevations from sea level to c. 1900 m, in windswept southern arctic and alpine tundra and open subalpine and boreal forests and mountain summits, as well as on exposed, coastal bluffs and in sphagnum bogs. In China (East Asia), E. nigrum can be found in forests, on stony hills, at elevations of 700 to 1500 m (Fang et al. 2005). Empetrum nigrum does not extend into tropical (A) or arid (B) climates but is found in fully humid warm temperate and snow climates with hot to cold summers (Cfa, Cfb, Cfc, Dfb, Dfc; File S1), summer-dry warm temperate climate with warm summers (Csb; File S1), summer- to winter-dry snow climates (Dsc, Dwb, Dwc), and Tundra climates (ET) (boreal to nemoral vegetation element; File S1). It is possible that during the Miocene of Lavanttal, Empetrum was growing on shady slopes or in shadows at the edge of woodlands in the hillsides and/or mountains surrounding the Lavanttal Basin.

Genus Erica L.

Erica sp. 1

(Figure 14A–C)

Figure 14.

Figure 14.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Ericaceae pollen tetrads. A–C. Erica sp. 1, close-up of polar area showing (micro)verrucae with nanoechinate suprasculpture. D–F. Erica sp. 2, close-up of polar area showing (micro)verrucae and rugulae with nanoechinate suprasculpture. G–I. Erica sp. 2, close-up of sculpture in area of mesocolpium. J–L. Erica sp. 3, close-up of polar area showing rugulae with a minute-nanoechinate suprasculpture. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Permanent tetrads, subspheroidal, outline lobate in polar view, rounded quadrangular in equatorial view; diameter of tetrad 23–25 µm wide in LM, 22–24 µm wide in SEM; pollen tricolporate; exine 0.9–1.2 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture scabrate in LM, verrucate to microverrucate in SEM, verrucae with a nanoechinate suprasculpture (SEM).

Remarks

Pollen in permanent tetrads showing verrucate to microverrucate sculpture and nanoechinate suprasculpture (SEM) are typical for Erica. Despite the number of publications including Erica pollen, only a small portion, less than 100 species, are palynologically studied so far (e.g. Oldfield 1959; Foss & Doyle 1988; Díez & Fernandes 1989; Mateus 1989; Oliver 2000; Sarwar 2007; Sarwar & Takahashi 2014; Wrońska-Pilarek et al. 2018; and references cited therein). Based on the taxa studied so far, Erica pollen can be divided into two major groups: (1) pollen dispersing in permanent tetrahedral tetrads (majority), and (2) pollen dispersing as monads (minority). All the Erica type pollen from Lavanttal belong to the former. Because of the numerous unstudied extant taxa and the overlapping pollen morphology of the studied ones, we refrain from affiliating the Lavanttal pollen tetrads to any particular species group or intrageneric lineage.

Fossil record

According to Mai (1995b, p. 182), the few pre-Quaternary leaf records of Ericoideae/Erica are doubtful and not based on reliable leaf anatomy nor cuticle analyses. Rare fruits/capsules of Erica are documented from the late Miocene of Europe (van der Burgh 1987). As with other fossil Ericaceae pollen tetrads, they are hard to affiliate to extant lineages and/or genera unless studied with SEM. Therefore, most fossil Erica tetrads are lumped into the form-genus Ericipites (e.g. Stuchlik et al. 2014). The earliest pollen records of Erica, verified using combined LM and SEM, are from the early Miocene of Europe, but they become common elements in late Miocene and younger sediments of that region (e.g. Zetter 1991; Ferguson et al. 1998; van der Burg & Zetter 1998; Hofmann et al. 2002).

Ecological implications

Erica is one of the largest plant genera, comprising c. 858 species (POWO 2017) of perennial woody prostrate shrubs and trees, up to 10 m tall (Oliver 2000; Stevens et al. 2004). Erica species show a narrow north–south geographic distribution, spanning north-western Europe and the Mediterranean region (c. 23 spp.), the Middle East (the genus extends eastwards into Turkey and Lebanon and the south-western part of the Arabian Peninsula), eastern and soutern Africa (c. 780 spp.), and Madagascar and the Mascarene Islands (c. 50 spp.). Erica arborea L. is the only species that is widespread in both Europe and Africa. Erica arborea is present in fully humid to summer-dry temperate (Cfa, Cfb, Csa, Csb; File S1) climates in Europe. In Africa, this species is found in winter-dry to fully humid temperate climates in mountainous regions (Cfb, Cwa, Cwb; File S1). In Europe, Erica are part of different shrub communities, and in Africa they are part of montane scrub or grasslands (Quezel 1978; Oliver 2000; McGuire & Kron 2005). In general, Erica thrives under winter-dry, summer-dry, and fully humid temperate climates with hot or warm summers (Cfa, Cfb, Csa, Csb, Cwa, Cwb; File S1), as well as fully humid snow climates with warm to cool summers (Dfb, Dfc), but rarely extends into equatorial (A) or arid (B) climates. The fossil Erica pollen tetrads from Lavanttal either originate from small shrubs that occurred in open habitats (dry to wet substrate, lowland to highland) or as understory growth (ground vegetation) in woodlands.

Erica sp. 2

(Figure 14D–I)

Description

Pollen, tetrad, subspheroidal, outline lobate in polar view, rounded quadrangular in equatorial view; diameter of tetrad 22–26 µm wide in LM, 19–23 µm in SEM; pollen tricolporate; exine 0.8–1.0 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture psilate in LM, verrucate to microverrucate in SEM, (micro)verrucae fused around colpi forming rugulae, (micro)verrucae and rugulae with a nanoechinate suprasculpture, nanoechini numerous and densely packed (SEM).

Remarks

The Erica sp. 2 pollen tetrads are easily distinguished from the Erica sp. 1 type. In Erica sp. 2 the verrucae around the colpi are fused and forming ‘large’ rugulae, a feature not observed in Erica sp. 1. Also, the nanoechini in Erica sp. 2 are much smaller and more numerous than in Erica sp. 1. A similar ornamented Erica pollen tetrad is reported from the middle Miocene of Turkey (Bouchal et al. 2016b, figure 20G–I).

Erica sp. 3

(Figure 14J–L)

Description

Pollen, tetrad, subspheroidal, outline lobate in polar view, rounded quadrangular in equatorial view; diameter of tetrad 25–28 µm wide in LM, 23–25 µm wide in SEM; pollen tricolporate; exine 0.9–1.1 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture psilate in LM, rugulate in SEM, rugulae larger and more elongated in polar areas and around colpi, rugulae with a minute-nanoechinate suprasculpture (SEM).

Remarks

The Erica sp. 3 pollen tetrads are similar to those of Erica sp. 2, but are slightly larger, the rugulae are more homogeneous in size and relief, and the nanoechini are also much shorter and blunt.

Erica sp. 4

(Figure 15A–C)

Figure 15.

Figure 15.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Ericaceae pollen tetrads. A–C. Erica sp. 4, close-up showing nanoverrucae with nanoechinate suprasculpture. D–F. Erica sp. 5, close-up of polar area showing nanoverrucae with a minute-nanoechinate suprasculpture. G–I. Erica sp. 5, close-up of sculpture in area of mesocolpium. J–L. Erica sp. 5, close-up of polar area. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen, tetrad, subspheroidal, outline convex triangular to lobate in polar view, rounded quadrangular in equatorial view; diameter of tetrad 25–28 µm wide in LM, 23–25 µm wide in SEM; pollen tricolporate; exine 0.8–0.9 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture psilate in LM, nanoverrucate in SEM, nanoverrucae with nanoechinate suprasculpture, nanoverrucae slightly larger around colpi (SEM).

Remarks

The Erica sp. 4 pollen tetrads are the only fossil Erica tetrads with clearly uniform nanoverrucate sculpture in SEM.

Erica sp. 5

(Figure 15D–L)

Description

Pollen, tetrad, subspheroidal, outline lobate in polar view, rounded quadrangular in equatorial view; diameter of tetrad 25–29 µm wide in LM, 23–26 µm wide in SEM; pollen tricolporate; exine 0.8–1.1 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture psilate to scabrate in LM, nanoverrucate in SEM, nanoverrucae with a minute-nanoechinate suprasculpture, nanoverrucae slightly larger around colpi (SEM).

Remarks

Pollen tetrads assigned to Erica sp. 5 differ from the remaining Erica sp. 1–4 in the sculpture observed with SEM. The tetrads are nanoverrucate in Erica sp. 5, but verrucate to microverrucate or rugulate in Erica sp. 1 and sp. 2. The sculpture elements around the apertures and is areas of mesocolpium in Erica sp. 5 are of similar size and outline but vary substantially in Erica sp. 2. The Erica sp. 5 pollen tetrads are most similar to Erica sp. 4 but the nanoverrucae are larger in Erica sp. 5, taller, and more globular in outline, and with a higher number of nanoechini per nanoverruca.

Ericaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1

(Figure 16A–I)

Figure 16.

Figure 16.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Ericaceae pollen tetrads. A–C. Ericaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1, close-up of polar area showing microverrucae composed of rod-like elements. D–F. Ericaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1, close-up of polar area. G–I. Ericaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1, close-up of sculpture in area of mesocolpium. J–L. Ericaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2, close-up showing microrugulate sculpture in polar area. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen, tetrad, subspheroidal, outline lobate in polar view, rounded quadrangular in equatorial view, diameter of tetrad 24–29 µm wide in LM, 24–28 µm wide in SEM; pollen tricolporate; exine 0.9–1.2 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture psilate to scabrate in LM, microverrucate in SEM, microverrucae composed of rod-like elements, rod-like elements sometimes divided into shorter units (SEM).

Remarks

Pollen tetrads of this and the following type definitely belong to the Ericaceae, but we are currently unable to affiliate them with certainty to a particular genus. They could also represent extinct lineages (e.g Kowalski & Fagúndez 2017).

Ericaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2

(Figure 16J–L)

Description

Pollen, tetrad, subspheroidal, outline lobate in polar view, rounded quadrangular in equatorial view, diameter of tetrad 33–38 µm wide in LM, 31–33 µm wide in SEM; pollen tricolporate; exine 0.9–1.1 µm thick (LM); tectate; sculpture scabrate in LM, microrugulate in SEM, microrugulae often forming clusters (SEM).

Family Sapotaceae Juss.

Genus Pouteria Aubl.

Pouteria sp. 1

(Figure 17A–F)

Figure 17.

Figure 17.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Sapotaceae pollen. A–C. Pouteria sp. 1, close-up of granulate sculpture in area of mesocolpium. D–F. Pouteria sp. 1, close-up showing colpus membrane and widening at the end of colpi. G–I. Pouteria sp. 2, close-up of microrugulate to rugulate sculpture in area of mesocolpium. J–L. Pouteria sp. 2, close-up of mesocolpium. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen, monad, prolate, outline quadrangular to lobate in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 20–27 µm long in LM, 17–24 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 19–21 µm wide in LM, 15–19 µm wide in SEM; stephano(4–5)colporate, colpi narrow, varying in length, often wider and rounded at ends, endopori small and slightly lalongate, margins of endopori thickened in corners where crossing colpi; exine 0.6–0.8 µm thick, nexine thinner than sexine (LM); tectate; sculpture psilate in LM, granulate with few perforations in SEM, colpus membrane microverrucate (SEM).

Remarks

The fossil Pouteria sp. 1 pollen falls within the range of ‘Pollen Type 8ʹ (Harley 1991a, figure 13) and ‘Subtype 8A’ (Harley 1991b, figure 35) as defined by Harley, and is similar to pollen from Pouteria sect. Rivicoa observed in P. alnifolia (Baker) Roberty (cf. Harley 1991b, figure 35A).

Fossil record

Fossil Pouteria pollen, identified using SEM, has been described from the middle Eocene of Eckfeld (as Pouteria sp., Wappler et al. 2015; Grímsson et al. 2017b) and Profen (as Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet 6, Haring 2014), Germany.

Ecological implications

Pouteria comprises c. 320 species of trees and shrubs occurring in the Americas (c. 200 spp.), in Africa (c. 5 spp.), and in continental Asia, Malesia, Australia and the Pacific (c. 120 spp.) (Pennington 1991, 2004). Pouteria is a pantropical genus occurring in wet lowland (rain)forests, lowland swampy forest, (semi-)evergreen lowland forests, periodically flooded forests, upland (rain)forests, (evergreen)montane (rain)forests, riverside gallery forests, along savannah edges, and in dry thickets on limestone hills (Pennington 1990). Since Pouteria are pollinated by insects, the fossil pollen grains likely originated from plants growing close to the depositional site. We hence consider that the Pouteria pollen from Lavanttal originated from sheltered understorey shrubs (or small trees) that were part of the lowland wetland forests.

Pouteria sp. 2

(Figure 17G–L)

Description

Pollen, monad, prolate, outline pentangular in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 24–25 µm long in LM, 22–23 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 15–18 µm wide in LM, 12–14 µm wide in SEM; stephano(5)colporate, colpi narrow, varying in length, often wider and rounded at ends, endopori lalongate, margins of endopori thickened in corners where crossing colpi; exine 0.7–1.0 µm thick, nexine thinner than sexine (LM); tectate; sculpture psilate in LM, microrugulate to rugulate, perforate in SEM, rugulae often interwoven, colpus membrane microverrucate (SEM).

Remarks

The fossil Pouteria sp. 2 pollen falls within the range of ‘Pollen Type 9ʹ of Harley (1991a, figure 14, 1991b, figure 38) that is restricted to Pouteria sect. Oxythece, observed in P. cuspidate (A.DC.) Baehni, P. gabrielensis (Gilly ec Aubrév.) T.D. Penn., P. pallida (Gaertn. F.) Baehni, and P. scrobiculata Monachino (Harley 1991b).

Genus Sideroxylon L.

Sideroxylon sp.

(Figure 18A–F)

Figure 18.

Figure 18.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Sapotaceae pollen. A–C. Sideroxylon sp., close-up of area around colpi. D–F. Sideroxylon sp., close-up showing rugulae with granulate suprasculpture in area of mesocolpium. G–I. Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2, close-up of sculpture in area of mesocolpium. J–L. Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2, close-up showing microverrucate colpus membrane. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen, monad, prolate, outline quadrangular in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 18–20 µm long in LM, 13–17 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 11–15 µm wide in LM, 8–11 µm wide in SEM; tetracolporate, colpi long and narrow, endopori slightly rectangular, lalongate, margins of endopori perpendicular to polar axis thickened (LM); exine 0.8–0.9 µm thick, nexine thinner than sexine (LM); tectate; sculpture psilate in LM, rugulate in SEM, rugulae of varying width, rugulae with a granulate suprasculpture (SEM).

Remarks

The fossil Sideroxylon pollen falls within the range of ‘Pollen Type 6ʹ (Harley 1991a, figure 11) and ‘Subtype 6A to C’ (Harley 1991b, figure 24) as defined by Harley, and is similar to pollen from various extant Sideroxylon species (compare Harley 1991b, figures 24, 25).

Fossil record

Fossil Sideroxylon pollen has been described form the middle Eocene of Kassel, Hesse, Germany (as Sideroxylon-type, Hofmann 2018). Twigs with attached leaves and fruits (S. salicites [Weber] Weyland) are knownearly Miocene of Rott, Germany (Weyland 1937; Winterscheid 2006).

Ecological implications

Sideroxylon comprises c. 75 species of trees and shrubs occurring in the Americas (c. 49 spp.), Africa (c. 7 spp.), on Madagascar (6 spp.), the Mascarene Islands (8 spp.), and in Asia (c. 5 spp.) (Pennington 1991, 2004). Sideroxylon is a tropical to subtropical genus, and depending on the species, occurring among others in coastal vegetation, mangroves, wet lowland forests, (lowland) tropical rainforests, montane rain forests, cloud forests, moist seasonal evergreen forests, humid forests, lower montane forests, mixed oak-semievergreen forests, tropical (dwarf) deciduous forests, seasonal (semi)deciduous forests, dry forests, and arid thorn forests (Pennington 1990). Noteworthy is, recent genetic studies indicate that the North American clade of Sideroxylon, including the most frost hardy taxa, already split during the upper Eocene (Stride et al. 2014). Extant Sideroxylon are entomophilous (insect-pollinated) and, therefore, the fossil pollen grains from Lavanttal probably originate from plants growing close to the depositional site, from shrubs or small trees occurring in the lowland wetland forest or along streams at moderate elevation.

Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1

(Figure 19A–L)

Figure 19.

Figure 19.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Sapotaceae pollen. A–C. Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1, close-up showing microverrucate and perforate sculpture and widening at the end of colpi. D–F. Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1, close-up of colpus membrane. G–I. Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1, close-up of sculpture in area of mesocolpium. J–L. Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1, close-up of polar area. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen, monad, prolate, outline convex-quadrangular to pentagonal in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 21–26 µm long in LM, 17–24 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 16–20 µm wide in LM, 13–16 µm wide in SEM; stephano(4–5)colporate, colpi narrow, varying in length, often wider and rounded or truncated at ends, endopori lalongate, margins of endopori perpendicular to polar axis thickened; exine 0.8–1.4 mm thick (LM), nexine as thick as sexine; tectate; sculpture psilate in LM, microverrucate, perforate, fossulate in SEM, microverrucae closely spaced, perforations and fossulae more frequent in polar areas, colpus membrane microverrucate (SEM).

Remarks

The pollen morphology (LM and SEM) and ultrastructure (TEM) from 48 of the 53 genera of Sapotaceae has been documented in a series of publications by Harley (1986a, 1986b, 1990, 1991a, 1991b, 2004). In the two main publications, Harley identified 12 pollen types (Harley 1991a), subdivided into a total of 49 subtypes (Harley 1991b). The Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1 and 2 pollen both fall within the range of ‘Pollen Type 1ʹ (Harley 1991a, figure 6) and ‘Subtype 1A’ (Harley 1991b, figures 5, 6) that occur in subfamilies Sapotoideae (Madhuca, Manilkara, Mimusops, Palaquium) and Chrysophylloideae (Xantolis). Since only a fraction of the taxa assigned to ‘Subtype 1A’ by Harley (1991b) are illustrated in both LM and SEM, a more detailed comparison and assignment of both fossil pollen types to particular extant genera is impractical.

Fossil record

The Sapotaceae pollen record has been summarised by Muller (1981), Harley (1991a, 1991b), Song et al. (2004), and Stuchlik et al. (2014). Few of the records date back to the late Cretaceous, but most are confined to the Cainozoic, suggesting a cosmopolitan distribution during the late Eocene. These fossil Sapotaceae pollen grains have been assigned to various species divided into two main form-genera, Sapotaceoidaepollenites R.Potonié, Thomson et Thiergart ex R.Potonié, and Tetracolporopollenites Pflug et Thomson. Most of these records are based on LM observations only but see Harley et al. (1991), and any affiliation to extant lineages and/or genera are uncertain (cf. Harley 1991b). Relying on the monumental work by Harley (1986a, 1986b, 1990, 1991a, 1991b, 2004) on the pollen morphology of extant Sapotaceae, it is clear that fossil pollen grains of this family can only be affiliated to extant lineages or genera using combined LM and SEM. Fossil pollen grains, documented via SEM, that are similar to the Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1 pollen type from Lavanttal, have been reported from the middle Eocene of Germany by Manchester et al. (2015, Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet.) and Hofmann (2018, Mimusopeae/Isonandreae-type sp. 1 and sp. 2).

Ecological implications

All extant genera producing pollen similar to that of the Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1 and 2 pollen types are characterised by woody evergreen shrubs or trees. Madhuca comprises c. 100 species that occur from India through Malesia and south China and New Guinea (Pennington 1991, 2004). Manilkara is a pantropical genus composing c. 65 species occurring in the Americas (c. 30 spp.), Africa and Madagascar (c. 20 spp.), and in Asia and across the Pacific (c. 15 spp.) (Pennington 1991, 2004). Mimusops comprises c. 41 species that are distributed in Africa (c. 20 spp.), Madagascar (c. 15 spp.), the Mascarene Islands (4 spp.), the Seychelles, and in Asia and the Pacific (one species). The c. 110 spp. of Palaquium range from India through southeast Asia to the Pacific Islands. Xantolis is a small genus comprising c. 14 species ranging from southern India to Vietnam and southern China, with one species in the Philippines (Pennington 1991, 2004). All these genera are insect-pollinated and occur in tropical or/to subtropical regions, where they are part of various vegetation units. We speculate that the Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1 and 2. originate from shrubs or small trees that were part of the lowland wetlands or growing along streams in the surrounding hillside forests of the Lavanttal Basin.

Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2

(Figure 18G–L, 20A–C)

Figure 20.

Figure 20.

Light microscpy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Sapotaceae and Styracaceae pollen. A–C. Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2, close-up of sculpture in area of mesocolpium. D–F. Rehderodendron sp., close-up of rugulae composed of rod-like elements in area of mesocolpium. G–I. Rehderodendron sp., close-up of sculpture in area of mesocolpium. J–L. Rehderodendron sp., close-up of sculpture in area of mesocolpium. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen monad, prolate, outline quadrangular to pentangular in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 37–40 µm long in LM, 34–36 µm long in SEM equatorial diameter 27–32 µm wide in LM, 22–26 µm wide in SEM; stephano(4–5)colporate, colpi narrow, endopori lalongate elliptic, margins of endopori thickened; exine 1.9–2.5 µm thick, nexine thinner than sexine, sexine thickened along colpi (LM); tectate; sculpture scabrate in LM, slightly rugulate, microverrucate, perforate, fossulate in SEM, colpus membrane microverrucate (SEM).

Remarks

The Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2 pollen differs from the sp. 1 pollen type in both size and outline in polar view (square versus circular or lobed). The sp. 2 pollen type is also consistently tetra-aperturate, but the sp. 1 pollen is usually equipped with five apertures.

Fossil record

Comparable pollen, studied using SEM, has been describedearly Miocene/early Miocene of Altmittweida, Germany (as Sapotaceae gen. et sp. indet. 2 and 3, Kmenta & Zetter 2013), and the early and middle Miocene of Turkey (Bouchal et al. 2017; Bouchal 2019; Denk et al. 2019).

Family Styracaceae DC. et Spreng.

Genus Rehderodendron Hu

Rehderodendron sp.

(Figure 20D–L, 21A–F)

Figure 21.

Figure 21.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G, J) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I, K, L) micrographs of dispersed fossil Styracaceae and Symplocaceae pollen. A–C. Rehderodendron sp., close-up of sculpture in area of mesocolpium. D–F. Rehderodendron sp., close-up of sculpture in area of mesocolpium. G–I. Symplocos sp. 1, close-up of sculpture in polar area. J–L. Symplocos sp. 2, close-up of sculpturing in polar area. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H, J, K), 1 µm (C, F, I, L).

Description

Pollen, monad, prolate, outline lobate in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 35–38 µm long in LM, 30–35 µm long in SEM, equatorial diameter 24–29 µm wide in LM, 22–25 µm wide in SEM; tricolporate, colpi long, endopori large, lalongate, H-like in outline; exine 1.0–1.2 µm thick (LM), nexine thinner than sexine, nexine thickened along colpi, sexine protruding in area of endopori; sculpture scabrate in LM, rugulate to microrugulate, perforate in SEM, rugulae and microrugulae composed of rod-like elements, rod-like units often radiating from perforations, curved and/or interwoven, varying considerably in length, sometimes indistinct (SEM).

Remarks

Pollen from three out of five Rehderodendron species has been studied using LM and SEM by Liang and Yu (1985) and Morton and Dickison (1992). The sculpture range, in the area of the mesocolpium, of the Lavanttal pollen is comparable to that documented by Liang and Yu (1985) for both R. kweichowense Hu and R. macrocarpum Hu (Liang & Yu 1985, plate 3, figures 22, 23).

Fossil record

The scarce macrofossil record of Rehderodendron is summarised by Mai (1970) and Manchester et al. (2009a). Fruits of this genus are documented from the early Eocene of UK (Mai 1970), the Miocene of Germany, Poland and Czech Republic (Mai 1970), the Pliocene of France (Geisser & Gregor 1981), Italy (Martinetto 1998) and Romania (Mai & Petrescu 1983). The fossil leaf records of Styracaceae are considered unreliable by Fritsch (2004) because they lack detailed anatomical features such as stellate or scale-like trichomes. Fossil pollen of Rehderodendron, identified using combined LM and SEM, has been reported from the Miocene of Germany (Ferguson et al. 1998) and Austria (Kovar-Eder et al. 1998).

Ecological implications

Rehderodendron is a small genus comprising five species of deciduous trees (up to 15 m tall) distributed in south-western China, Myanmar and Vietnam (Hwang & Grimes 1996; Fritsch 2004). The plants occur in dense forests, mixed broad-leaved evergreen and deciduous forests, at elevations from 100–1500 m (Hwang & Grimes 1996). All extant Rehderodendron species are currently growing under fully humid to winter-dry warm temperate climates with hot to warm summers (Cfa, Cfb, Cwa, Cwb; nemoral to meridio-nemoral vegetation element; File S1). Based on the current habitat of Rehderodendron the Lavanttal pollen may represent medium-sized trees that were part of the well-drained dense forests surrounding the basin.

Family Symplocaceae Desf.

Genus Symplocos Jacq.

Symplocos sp. 1

(Figure 21G–I)

Description

Pollen, monad, oblate, outline triangular in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 22–24 µm long in LM, equatorial diameter 31–33 µm wide in LM, 29–31 µm wide in SEM; brevitricolporate, colpi short, endopori lalongate; exine 1.2–1.4 µm thick (excl. echini), nexine slightly thinner or as thick as sexine (LM); tectate; sculpture baculate in LM, rugulate, verrucate, perforate, baculate in SEM, baculae irregularly distributed, varying in length and form (SEM).

Remarks

The pollen morphology (LM, SEM) and ultrastructure (TEM) of Symplocos has been studied by Erdtman (1952), van der Meijden (1970), Huang (1972), Barth (1979, 1982), Lieux (1982), Mai (1986), Nagamasu (1989a, 1989b), Premathilake et al. (1999), Aranha Filho et al. (2009), Li et al. (2011), Miyoshi et al. (2011), and Liu and Qin (2013). These studies show a considerable variation in pollen morphology, especially in sculpture observed with SEM. Some of these authors have pointed out characteristic pollen morphologies that are allegedly lineage-dependent and of systematic value (e.g. van der Meijden 1970; Barth 1979; Nagamasu 1989b). When pollen morphology of extant taxa is correlated to the newly established systematic framework by Fritsch et al. (2008), it is not obvious that pollen types are of diagnostic value below the genus level. The basal taxon, S. paniculata (subg. Palura), has a sort of reticulate to perforate sculpture in SEM (Nagamasu 1989b; Li et al. 2011); such sculpture is also found in pollen of many species of subg. Symplocos (sections Lodhra and Hopea: e.g. Nagamasu 1989b; Aranha Filho et al. 2009; Li et al. 2011; Miyoshi et al. 2011). Verrucate pollen occurs in other species of sect. Lodhra and Hopea, and baculate to echinate pollen in species of sect. Lodhra, Hopea and Symplocos (e.g. van der Meijden 1970; Barth 1979, 1983; Lieux 1982; Nagamasu 1989b; Aranha Filho et al. 2009; Li et al. 2011; Miyoshi et al. 2011; Liu & Qin 2013). Only the unique pollen types appear to be lineage-diagnostic, like that of S. tinctoria (see Lieux 1982; Nagamasu 1989a) or the latest diverged species of tropical America (see Bart 1982).

Fossil record

The fossil record of Symplocos was summarised among others by Krutzsch (1989), Mai and Martinetto (2006) and Tiffney et al. (2018). All authors agree that the leaf record is hard to judge because of their similarity to related genera. The fruit/seed fossil record is fairly rich. It includes finds from the middle Eocene of Oregon (Manchester 1994a) and the early Miocene of Vermont, USA (Tiffney et al. 2018), the Eocene to Pliocene of Germany (Mai & Martinetto 2006; Manchester & Fritsch 2014), the Oligocene to Miocene of Poland, Switzerland and Austria (e.g. Mai & Martinetto 2006), the Miocene of Czech Republic, France and Denmark, (e.g. Mai & Martinetto 2006; Manchester & Fritsch 2014), the Pliocene of the Netherlands, Italy (e.g. Mai & Martinetto 2006) and Japan (Miki 1937). The form-genera Symplocoipollenites R.Potonié and Symplocospollenites R.Potonié, Thomson et Thiergart are widely used for Symplocaceae pollen. The LM-based fossil pollen record of Symplocos is summarised by Muller (1981), Krutzsch (1989), Ivanov (1995, 2004) and Stuchlik et al. (2014). These include doubtful pollen from the Cretaceous of the Americas. The pollen record suggests that Symplocos already had a European-North American distribution during in Eocene. Based on the compiled fossil record, Manchester and Fritsch (2014) and Fritzsch et al. (2015) hypothesised an early Cainozoic European origin of the genus followed by an Eocene dispersal across the North Atlantic land bridge into the Americas. Dispersal from Europe into Asia is believed to have taken place following the closure of the Turgai Strait. There are only a few fossil Symplocos pollen grains that have been studied using combined LM and SEM. These include two pollen types from the Eocene of Profen, Germany (Haring 2014), three pollen types from the late Oligocene/early Miocene of Altmittweida, Germany (Kmenta 2011; Kmenta & Zetter 2013), five pollen types from the Miocene of Kreuzau, Germany (Ferguson et al. 1998, figured only one of the types), and numerous pollen types from the Miocene of Austria (Kovar-Eder et al. 1998, figured one out of three pollen types; Zetter 1998, figured none out of three pollen types; Meller et al. 1999, figured one out of five pollen types). Ashraf and Moosbrugger (1996) figured three types of Symplocoipollenites using SEM from the Lower Rhine Embament of Germany. Therefore, micrographs documenting the SEM-based sculpture variation in fossil Symplocos is lacking. Fossil pollen most similar to the Lavanttal fossils can be found in the Miocene (Ferguson et al. 1998, plate 6, figures 8–11), and, Eocene of Germany (Haring 2014, plates 8, 9).

Ecological implications

Symplocos comprises about 319 species distributed in tropical to subtropical regions of the Americas, eastern Asia and Australasia. These are mostly shrubs to small trees (< 20 m tall), but some become large trees that are up to 50 m tall. The plants are generally evergreen, but semi-deciduous (S. tinctoria [L.] L’Hér.) or deciduous (S. paniculata [Thung.] Miq.) species also exist (e.g. Fritsch et al. 2008; Kelly et al. 2016). The genus is divided into Symplocos subg. Palura (one species, S. paniculata, eastern Asia) and Symplocos subg. Symplocos (all other species, Americas, East Asia, Australasia). The latter subgenus is further divided into three sections, each showing a clear geographic pattern. Subgenus Symplocos sect. Lodhra comprises 142 species in eastern Asia and Australasia, Symplocos sect. Hopea (or Barberina) comprises 24 species in the Americas and one in eastern Asia, and Symplocos sect. Symplocos comprises 150 species in tropical America (Fritsch et al. 2008; Aranha Filho et al. 2009). Extant taxa producing pollen similar to the fossil Symplocos sp. 1 to sp. 4 occur in all three sections of Symplocos subgenus Symplocos, and show a subtropical to tropical distribution. The plants of Symplocos subg. Symplocos sect. Lodhra, growing in east to southeast Asia, are evergreen shrubs to small understory trees (mostly less than 10 m tall; rarely up to 30 m tall) occurring in mixed forests, especially on forested slopes, and depending on their geographic occurrence are found at elevations between 100 and 3000 m (Wu & Nooteboom 1996). They grow under equatorial monsoon and winter-dry savannah climates, as well as in fully humid to winter-dry warm temperate climates with hot or warm summers (Am, Aw, Cfa, Cfb, Cwa, Cwb; tropical-meridional to meridio-nemoral vegetation element; File S1). The Mexican to Central American Symplocos of subg. Symplocos sections Symplocos and Hopea (S. culminicola Standl. et Steyerm. and S. longipes Lundell) are also evergreen shrubs to small or medium-sized trees that are usually less than 20 m tall, and rarely up to 50 m in S. hartwegii A.DC. (Kelly et al. 2016). The plants occur mostly in tropical rainforests, from sea level up to 1600 m elevation, and in cloud forests, at elevations between 600 and 3350 m. They are also found in cool mountain forests, mountain rain forests, broad-leaved evergreen forests and mixed forests (Kelly et al. 2016). In this part of the world, Symplocos thrives under fully humid equatorial rainforest climate, equatorial monsoon climate, and summer-dry equatorial savannah climates (Af, Am, Aw; tropical vegetation element; File S1), but extends into fully humid or winter-dry warm temperate climates with warm summer (Cfb, Cwb). Based on the above, the various Symplocos pollen (sp. 1 to sp. 4) could represent evergreen shrubs or small trees that were part of the understory in the mixed deciduous-evergreen broad-leaved and conifer forests surrounding the basin.

Symplocos sp. 2

(Figure 21JL)

Description

Pollen, monad, oblate, outline triangular in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 25–27 µm long in LM, equatorial diameter 32–34 µm wide in LM, 29–31 µm wide in SEM; brevitricolporate, colpi short, endopori lalongate, colpori annulate; exine (excl. echini) 1.2–1.3 µm thick (LM), nexine as thick as sexine, sexine protruding in area of endopori (LM); tectate; sculpture baculate in LM, foveolate, perforate, baculate in SEM, baculae irregularly distributed, varying in length, foveolae irregular in outline (SEM).

Symplocos sp. 3

(Figure 22AC)

Figure 22.

Figure 22.

Light microscopy (LM) (A, D, G) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (B, C, E, F, H, I) micrographs of dispersed fossil Symplocaceae pollen. A–C. Symplocos sp. 3, close-up of sculpture in polar area. D–F. Symplocos sp. 4, close-up of sculpture in polar area. G–I. Symplocos sp. 5, close-up of sculpture in polar area. Scale bars 10 µm (A, B, D, E, G, H), 1 µm (C, F, I).

Description

Pollen, monad, oblate, outline triangular in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 20–22 µm long in LM, equatorial diameter 42–44 µm wide in LM, 37–39 µm wide in SEM; brevitricolporate, colpi short, endopori, elliptic lalongate, margin of endopori thickened; exine 1.4–1.6 µm thick, nexine as thick as sexine (LM); tectate; sculpture reticulate in LM, foveolate to reticulate, perforate in SEM, colpus membrane granulate (SEM).

Remarks

Fossil pollen similar to the Symplocos sp. 3 from Lavanttal has been figured by Haring (2014, plates 5–7) from the Eocene and by Kmenta and Zetter (2013, plate 6, figures 7–9) from the late Oligocene/early Miocene of Germany.

Symplocos sp. 4

(Figure 22DF)

Description

Pollen, monad, oblate, outline triangular in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; equatorial diameter 42–44 µm wide in LM, 34–36 µm wide in SEM; brevitricolporate, colpi short, endopori lalongate, margin of endopori thickened; exine 1.8–2.1 µm thick, nexine as thick as sexine (LM); tectate, sculpture scabrate in LM, verrucate to rugulate, perforate, fossulate in SEM, low relief sculpture around colpi (SEM).

Remarks

Fossil pollen similar to the Symplocos sp. 4 from Lavanttal has been figured by Kmenta and Zetter (2013, plate 7, figures 1–3) from the late Oligocene to early Miocene of Altmittweida, Germany.

Symplocos sp. 5 (aff. S. tinctoria)

(Figure 22GI)

Description

Pollen, monad, oblate, outline triangular in polar view, elliptic in equatorial view; polar axis 18–21 µm long in LM, equatorial diameter 29–31 µm wide in LM, 27–29 µm wide in SEM; brevitricolporate, colpi short, endopori lalongate, margin of endopori thickened; exine 1.2–1.4 µm thick (LM), nexine as thick as sexine, sexine protruding in area of aperture; tectate, sculpture scabrate in LM, verrucate to microverrucate in SEM, verrucae and microverrucae with a nanoverrucate suprasculpture (SEM).

Remarks

This fossil Symplocos pollen type, with its nanoverrucate suprasculpture, is very similar to pollen of extant S. tinctoria, the only semi-deciduous taxon in the Symplocos subg. Symplocos sect. Hopea (or Barberina), figured by Nagamasu (1989a) and Lieux (1982). Fritsch et al. (2015) concluded that Symplocos originated in Eurasia and dispersed into the Americas during the early Cainozoic. They also postulated that dispersal from North America back to Eurasia occurred within Symplocos sect. Hopea in the middle to late Miocene, pinpointing S. tinctoria as one of two species involved in the Miocene disjunction. This fossil pollen type from the late middle Miocene of Lavanttal seems to collaborate that theory.

Ecological implications

Symplocos tinctoria is distributed in south-eastern United States, from sea level to an elevation of c. 1400 m. It is a deciduous shrub to small tree and part of several different vegetation units ranging from lowland wetlands to well-drained or dry upland forests (moist mixed-deciduous hardwoods to dry pine-oak woods). It occurs in maritime forests, swamps, hammocks, bottomlands, flatwoods, streamheads, baygalls, on rocky summits and in ravines (Almeda & Fritsch 2009). Symplocos tinctoria is growing under fully humid warm temperate climate with hot to warm summers (Cfa, Cfb; meridio-nemoral vegetation element; File S1). The fossil pollen could have originated from small understory trees growing either in the lowland wetlands or in forests on dryer substrates surrounding the Lavanttal Basin.

Discussion

Occurrence and identification of angiosperm pollen

In total, 46 angiosperm pollen types are described herein. Of these, we suspect that 16 types (35%) were previously identified from the Lavanttal Basin by Klaus (1984). Since Klaus studied most of the palynoflora using LM only, it is sometimes uncertain if the pollen types described/figured here represent the same taxon as depicted by Klaus (Table I; for example, Tilia caroliniana, Chenopodiaceae Form A, Ericaceoipoll. cf. acastus). Pollen of the genera Craigia (Malvaceae), Pistacia (Anacardiaceae), Zanthoxylum (Rutaceae), Persicaria, Rumex (Polygonaceae), Alangium, Cornus (Cornaceae), Diospyros (Ebenaceae), Andromeda, Empetrum, Erica (Ericaceae), Pouteria, Sideroxylon (Sapotaceae), and Rehderodendron (Styracaceae) are first-time reports. We further document a higher diversity within previously identified genera like Ludwigia (Onagraceae), Tilia (Malvaceae), Acer (Sapindaceae), and Symplocos (Symplocaceae). Quantitatively, the pollen types described here rarely make up for more than 0.5% of the entire palynomorph spectrum (F. Grímsson, pers. comm., based on six years of studying this sample). The Malvaceae (Craigia, Reevesia, Tilia) and the Sapindaceae (Acer sp. 1 and sp. 3) are by far the most common types. Followed by Nyssa (Cornaceae), Arceuthobium (Santalaceae), Arbutus, Erica sp. 2 and sp. 5, Ericaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1 (Ericaceae), and Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1 and 2 (Sapotaceae). All other pollen types presented herein are extremely rare and would most likely not be encountered in a conventional LM observation that includes counting up to 600 grains.

Table I.

Angiosperm pollen described in this study in comparison to Klaus (1984).

This study Klaus (1984)
Ludwigia sp. 1 x
Ludwigia sp. 2 Ludwigia
Craigia sp. x
Reevesia sp. Reevesia
Tilia sp. 1 ?Tilia caroliniana
Tilia sp. 2 ?Tilia caroliniana
Pistacia sp. x
Zanthoxylum sp. 1 x
Zanthoxylum sp. 2 Toddalia
Acer sp. 1 Acer franchetti
Acer sp. 2 x
Acer sp. 3 Acer saccharinum
Acer sp. 4 x
Archeuthobium sp. Archeuthobium
Amaranthaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1 ?Chenopodiaceae Form A
Amaranthaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2 Chenopodiaceae Form B
Caryophyllaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1 x
Caryophyllaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2 x
Caryophyllaceae gen. et spec. indet. 3 x
Persicaria sp. x
Rumex sp. x
Alangium sp. x
Cornus sp. x
Nyssa sp. Nyssa
Diospyros sp. x
Andromeda sp. x
Arbutus sp. Arbutus
Empetrum sp. x
Erica sp. 1 x
Erica sp. 2 x
Erica sp. 3 x
Erica sp. 4 x
Erica sp. 5 ?Ericaceoipoll. cf. acastus
Ericaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1 ?Ericaceoipoll. cf. ericius
Ericaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2 x
Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1 x
Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet. 2 x
Pouteria sp. 1 x
Pouteria sp. 2 x
Sideroxylon sp. x
Rehderodendron sp. Rhoipites pseudocingulum
Symplocos sp. 1 x
Symplocos sp. 2 x
Symplocos sp. 3 x
Symplocos sp. 4 Symplocos
Symplocos sp. 5 x

Note: Question marks indicate when we are uncertain if the light microscopy (LM)-based description and/or micrographs by Klaus correspond to our pollen types, the x indicates that this pollen type was not reported by Klaus.

Palaeoecological interpretations and palaeoenvironmental reconstructions preliminary results

Previous contributions on the middle Miocene (Sarmatian) palynoflora from the Lavanttal Basin suggest that pollen and spores, preserved in freshwater lake sediments, originate from both lowland wetland plants, as well as plants that occurred in various vegetation units of the surrounding hills/mountains (Grímsson et al. 2011, 2015a, 2016a; Grímsson & Zetter 2011). Based on the ecological preferences of potential modern analogues of the fossil pollen/spores from the Lavanttal Basin, we suggest that the pollen described in this part dispersed from plants occurring in different habitats/vegetation units in lowland wetlands, in dryer lowlands at the periphery of the basin, and in the surrounding highlands and mountains (Table II).

Table II.

Preferred general forest types of extant species of genera/families represented among the Lavanttal Myrtales, Sapindales, Santalales, Caryophyllales, Cornales and Ericales.

  RF MF DF
Ludwigia x    
Craigia x   x
Reevesia   x x
Tilia   x x
Pistacia   x x
Zanthoxylum x x x
Acer x x x
Archeuthobium x x x
Amaranthaceae x x x
Caryophyllaceae   x x
Persicaria x x x
Rumex x x x
Alangium   x x
Cornus x x x
Nyssa x x  
Diospyros x x x
Andromeda x    
Arbutus x x x
Empetrum     x
Erica x x x
Ericaceae x x x
Madhuca x x  
Manilkara x x  
Mimusops x x  
Palaquim x x  
Xantolis x x  
Pouteria x x  
Sideroxylon x x  
Rehderodendron   x x
Symplocos x x x

Note: RF, riparian forest; MF, mesic forest; DF, dry forest.

Taxa typical of lowland wetland forests (mixed evergreen/deciduous broad-leaved/conifer forests), occupying lake margins, banks of rivers, swamps, levees, hammocks, floodplains, etc. found at the Lavanttal site include: Acer, Alnus, Amaranthaceae, Andromeda, Arceuthobium (host-dependent, parasite on conifers), Betula, Carex, Carpinus, Carya, Cedrelospermum, Celtis, Cercidiphyllum, Cornus, Craigia, Diospyros, Dryopteris, Elaeagnus, Ephedra, Erica, Ericaceae, Ginkgo, Glyptostrobus, Juglans, Larix, Liquidambar, Ludwigia, Lycopodium, Magnolia, Myrica/Morella, Nyssa, Osmunda, Ostrya, Parthenocissus, Persicaria, Picea, Pinus, Platanus, Pouteria, Prunus, Pterocarya, Quercus subg. Quercus (mainly sects Lobatae, Virentes), Ranunculaceae, Rumex, Salix, Sapotaceae, Sciadopitys, Selaginella, Sequoia, Sideroxylon, Sparganium, Sphagnum, Symplocos, Trigonobalanopsis, Typha, Ulmus, Vitis, and Zanthoxylum.

Many taxa like Acer, Alangium, Amaranthaceae, Arbutus, Betula, Caryophyllaceae, Cornus, Corylus, Diospyros, Elaeagnus, Engelhardioideae, Erica, Ericaceae, Myrica/Morella, Nyssa, Quercus sect. Cyclobalanopsis, Persicaria, Pistacia, Pouteria, Prunus, Pterocarya, Reevesia, Rehderodendron, Rhamnaceae, Rumex, Sapotaceae, Sideroxylon, Symplocos, Tilia, Zanthoxylum, and Zelkova were most likely (also) growing in lowland/hinterland forests along or outside the periphery of the wetland basin and reaching into hillside forests surrounding the basin. Some were probably also growing along streams reaching well into the surrounding highland and/or mountains.

At some distance from the main accumulating area, occurring in the mixed hillside and mountain forest, were Abies, Buxus, Carya, Castanea, Cathaya, Cedrus, Celtis, Cercidiphyllum, Cryptomeria, Daphnyphyllum, Distylium, Elaeagnus, Engelhardioidea, Fortunearia, Ginkgo, Juglans, Keteleeria, Larix, Lycopodium, Myrica/Morella, Ostrya, Parrotia, Parthenocissus, Picea, Pinus, Prunus, Pteris, Quercus (sects Cerris, Ilex, Lobatae, Quercus), Sequoia, Trochodendron, Tsuga, Ulmus, Vitis, and Zelkova.

Based on the dominant climatic preferences of potential modern analogues of the fossil Myrtales to Ericales from the Sarmatian of Lavanttal, as expressed by their ‘Köppen signatures’ (Figure 23, Table III), equatorial (A [lowlands]), arid (B), and polar (E [at highest altitudes]) climates seem unlikely for this region at that time. Even though some of the taxa, including Reevesia, Pistacia, Zanthoxylum, Nyssa, Dyospyros, Arbutus, Erica, and Symplocus, extend into equatorial climates, they also thrive in various warm temperate (C) climates, while by far the most elements are extra-tropical. The majority of the woody plants, Craigia, Reevesia, Tilia, Pistacia, Zanthoxylum, Acer, Alangium, Cornus, Nyssa, Diospyros, Arbutus, Erica, Rehderodendron, and Symplocos, are mostly nemoral and/or meridio-nemoral vegetation elements and typical of warm temperate (C) climates (Figure 23, Table III). Nyssa talamancana thrives at middle elevations in Costa Rica and Panama under fully humid equatorial climate or fully humid warm temperate climate with warm summers (Af, Cfb; tropical-oreotropical vegetation element; File S1) together with other relict genera, e.g. Ticodendron, Alfaroa, Oremunnea and Gordonia (Hammel & Zamora 1990). Sapotaceae, which are warmth-loving and predominantly occur under equatorial (A) climates, also extend into warm temperate (e.g. Cwa, Cwb, Cfa, Cfb) climates. The co-occurrence of insect-pollinated tropical-meridional (frost- and snow-cover intolerant) and meridional-nemoral (extra-tropical) elements and the scarcity of steppe-climate (BS) tolerating taxa points towards a subtropical, humid warm temperate climate with hot summers (Cfa, Cwa) for the lowland deposition area. The taxa extending into snow (D) and polar (E) climates (Amaranthaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Andromeda, Empetrum, Ericaceae, Ludwigia) are water plants and/or herbaceous plants or small shrubs with a cosmopolitan distribution, and therefore more or less climate independent.

Figure 23.

Figure 23.

Köppen signatures of potential modern analogues of Myrtales, Malvales, Santanales and Ericales lineages found at the Lavanttal site. The bar chart shows the proportion of extant species part of the modern genus/lineage categorised for generalised climate–vegetation types (see Denk et al. 2013; Grímsson et al. 2016; see also Material and methods section). Boreal-nemoral elements preference for D-climates and C-climates, occurring in snow and temperate climates with hot to cool summers; nemoral elements preference for warm temperate and/or snow climates with warm summers (Cfb, Cwb, Csb, Dfb, Dwb, Dsb); meridio-nemoral elements preference for warm temperate climates with hot, but not warm, summers (Cfa- and Cwa-climates); semihumid-meridional elements preference for semihumid warm temperate climates with hot (and warm) summers; tropical-meridional elements preference for tropical (A-climates) and warm temperate climates with hot but not warm summers; tropical elements species restricted to tropical (A-climates); eurytropical elements preference for non-tropical climates with summer draught and generally dry climates (B- and Cs-climates); oreotropical elements species restricted to temperate climates along altitudinal successions within the tropical zone (Cfa, Cfb, Cwa, Cwb).

Table III.

Summarised ‘Köppen signatures’ for Myrtales, Sapindales, Santalales, Caryophyllales, Cornales and Ericales of Lavanttal.

  Pollen taxon/taxa Köppen signature Indicative of
O Ludwigia sp. 1/2 Cosmopolitan Cosmopolitan
M Craigia sp. Cwa Winter dry warm temperate climate with hot summer
M Reevesia sp. Aw, Cfa, Cwa Winter dry warm temperate climate with hot summer
M Tilia sp. 1/2 Cfa, Cfb, Cwa, Cwb, Dwa, Dwb, Dfa, Dfb Fully humid to winter dry warm temperate climate with hot summer
AN Pistacia sp. Aw, Cfa, Cwa, Cwb Fully humid to winter dry warm temperate climate with hot summer
R Zanthoxylum sp. 1/2 Aw, Cfa, Cwa, Cwb, Dwa Fully humid to winter dry warm temperate climate with hot to warm summer
SA Acer sp. 1/4 Cfa, Cfb, Dfa, Dfb, Cwa, Dwa, Csb Fully humid warm temperate to snow climate with hot to warm summer
SN Archeuthobium sp. B, Cs, Cw, Ds, Dw, Df Summer to winter dry warm temperate to snow climate, fully humid snow climate, or arid climates
AM Amaranthaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1/2 Cosmopolitan Cosmopolitan
CA Caryophyllaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1/2/3 Cosmopolitan Cosmopolitan
P Persicaria sp. Cosmopolitan Cosmopolitan
P Rumex sp. Cosmopolitan Cosmopolitan
CO Alangium sp. Cfa, Cwa Fully humid to winter dry warm temperate climate with hot summers
CO Cornus sp. Cfa, Cfb, Dfa, Dfb, Dfc, Cwa, Cwb, Dwa, Dwb, Dwc, Csa, Csb, Fully humid to winter dry warm temperate to snow climate with hot to warm summer
CO Nyssa sp. Af, As, Aw, Cfa, Cfb, Dfa, Dfb, Cwa, Cwb, Fully humid to winter dry warm temperate climate with hot to warm summer and various equatorial climates
EB Diospyros sp. Af, Am, Aw, Cfa, Cfb, Cwa, Cwb Fully humid to winter dry warm temperate climate with hot to warm summer and various equatorial climates
ER Andromeda sp. Cfa, Cfb, Cfc, Dfb, Dfc, Dwb, Dwc, Dsb, Dsc, ET Fully humid warm temperate to snow climate with hot to warm summer and summer to winter dry snow climates
ER Arbutus sp. Aw, BSh, BSk, Csa, Cwa, Cwb, Csb, Cfa, Cfb, Cfc Warm temperate climates
ER Empetrum sp. Csb, Cfa, Cfb, Cfc, Dsc, Dwb, Dwc, Dfa, Dfb, Dfc, ET Fully humid warm temperate to snow climates with hot to cool summer and cold winter
ER Erica sp. 1/2/3/4/5 A, B, Csa, Csb, Cwa, Cwb, Cfa, Cfb, Dfb, Dfc Warm temperate climates and fully humid snow climates with warm to cool summer and cold winter
ER Ericaceae gen. et spec. indet. 1/2 Cosmopolitan Cosmopolitan
SP Sapotaceae gen. et spec. indet.1/2 A, B, Cfa, Cfb, Cwa, Csa, Equatorial to warm temperate climate
SP Pouteria sp. 1/2 A, B, Cfa, Cfb, Cwa, Csa, Equatorial to warm temperate climate
SP Sideroxylon sp. A, B, Cfa, Cfb, Cwa, Csa, Csb Equatorial to warm temperate climate
ST Rehderodendron sp. Cfa, Cfb, Cwa, Cwb, Fully humid to winter dry warm temperate climate with hot to warm summer
SY Symplocos sp. 1/2/3/4 Af, Am, Aw, Cfa, Cfb, Cwa, Cwb Equatorial to warm temperate climate
SY Symplocos sp. 5 (aff. S. tinctoria) Cfa, Cfb Fully humid warm temperate climate with hot to warm summer

Note: O, Onagraceae; M, Malvaceae; AN, Anacardiaceae; R, Rutaceae; SA, Sapindaceae; SN, Santalaceae; AM, Amaranthaceae; CA, Caryophyllaceae; P, Polygonaceae; CO, Cornaceae; EB, Ebenaceae; ER, Ericaceae; SP, Sapotaceae; ST, Styracaceae; SY, Symplocaceae. Most prominent climate types appear in bold. See Kottek et al. (2006) for the three letter code used in the Köppen-Geiger climate classification and quantitative definition of categories.

The climatic preferences of the taxa presented herein support our previously interpreted climate signal based on the fossil Fagales to Rosales from the Sarmatian of the Lavanttal Basin (Grímsson et al. 2016, figure 23, table III). The lowlands in the Lavanttal region probably thrived in fully humid warm temperate (Cfa) climate, with possible dryer winters than summers (→ Cw climate), subtropical conditions as found today in south-eastern part of the United States and southern China (see also Grímsson et al. 2016, figure 1). From the lowlands up into the mountains, subsequent altitudinal succession would have occurred, and the climate gradually shifted from warm temperate into snow (D) climates (CfaCfb/DfaDfb) providing niches for species intolerant to summer heat.

The angiosperm pollen described herein as well as palynomorphs previously presented by Grímsson et al. (2011, 2015a, 2016a) and Grímsson and Zetter (2011) represent the major part of the palynoflora from the Sarmatian of the Lavanttal Basin. The remaining angiosperm (and unknown) pollen types will be described in a following contribution. A detailed interpretation and comprehensive discussion of the palaeovegetation, ecology and paleoclimate is envisaged to be presented after the remaining pollen types have been described.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) with a grant to FG, project number P29501-B25.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Guido W. Grimm for drafting the figure on climate and vegetation elements and pre-reviewing the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary material

Supplementary data for this article can be accessed here.

Supplemental Material
SGRA_A_1696400_SM9233.xlsx (156.7KB, xlsx)

References

  1. Acevedo-Rodríguez P, van Welzen PC, Adema F, van der Ham RWJM.. 2011. Sapindaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Volume 10. Flowering plants. Eudicots. Sapindales, Cucurbitales, Myrtales, 357–407. Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams RJ, Morton JK. 1976. An atlas of pollen of the trees and shrubs of eastern Canada and the adjacent United States, Part III. University of Waterloo Biology Series 10: 1–37. [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams RJ, Morton JK. 1979. An atlas of pollen of the trees and shrubs of eastern Canada and the adjacent United States, Part 4. University of Waterloo Biology Series Number 11: 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  4. Akhmetiev MA, Reshetov YV. 1996. The Eocene to early Miocene evolution of plant assemblages and large mammals in the extratropical Asia. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 4: 371–377. [Google Scholar]
  5. Akkiraz MS, Akgün F, Örçen S, Bruch AA, Mosbrugger V. 2006. Stratigraphic and palaeoenvironmental significance of Bartonian-Priabonian (middle-late Eocene) microfossils from the Basçesme Formation, Denizli Province, Western Anatolia. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 15: 155–180. [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Eisawi D. 1989. Pollen morphology of Caryophyllaceae in Jordan. Mitteilungen Der Botanischen Staatssammlung München 28: 599–614. [Google Scholar]
  7. Almeda F, Fritsch PW. 2009. Symplocaceae Desfontaines. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee , ed. Flora of North America north of Mexico, volume 8, Magnoliophyta: Paeoniaceae to Ericaceae, 329–331. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Al-Saghir MG, Porter DW. 2012. Taxonomic revision of the genus Pistacia L. (Anacardiaceae). American Journal of Plant Sciences 3: 12–32. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2012.31002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Al-Taie SSK, Almousawi UMN. 2018. Pollen morphology of Caryophyllaceae species from Iraq. Misan Journal for Academic Studies 33: 271–285. [Google Scholar]
  10. APG III . 2009. An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 105–121. [Google Scholar]
  11. Aranha Filho JLM, Fritsch PW, Almeda F, Martins AB. 2009. Cryptic dioecy is widespread in South American species of Symplocos section Barberina (Symplocaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 277: 99–104. doi: 10.1007/s00606-008-0109-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ashraf AR, Moosbrugger V. 1996. Palynologie und Palynostratigraphie des Neogens der Niederrheinischen Bucht Teil 2: Pollen. Palaeontographica Abteilung B 241: 1–98. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ataşlar E, Potoğlu Erkara İ, Tokur S. 2009. Pollen morphology of some Gypsophila L. (Caryophyllaceae) species and its taxonomic value. Turkish Journal of Botany 33: 335–351. [Google Scholar]
  14. Atkinson BA, Stockey RA, Rothwell GW. 2016. Cretaceous origin of dogwoods: An anatomically preserved Cornus (Cornaceae) fruit from the campanian of Vancouver Island. PeerJ 4: e2808. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Axelrod DI. 1950. Further studies on the Mount Eden flora, southern California. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Contributions to Palaeontology 590: 73–117. [Google Scholar]
  16. Axelrod DI. 1987. The late Oligocene Creede flora, Colorado. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences 130: 1–235. [Google Scholar]
  17. Axelrod DI. 1991. The early Miocene Buffalo Canyon flora of western Nevada. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences 135: 1–76. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ayodele AM. 2005. The morphology and taxonomic significance of pollen in the West-African Polygonaceae. Thaiszia Journal of Botany 15: 143–153. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bahramabadi EZ, Jonoubi P, Rezanejad F. 2017. Ultrastructural changes of pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) mature seeds and pollen in relation to desiccation. Trees 32: 29–39. doi: 10.1007/s00468-017-1606-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Barento C, Candau P, Díez MJ, Fernández I, Fernández Paniagua I, Godoy C, López C, Luque T, Martín Cacao M, Ortiz P, Pastor JL, Polo JM, Romanos LG, Torres P, Suárez R. 1987. Atlas polinico de Andalucia occidental. Seville: Instituto de Desarollo Regional de la Universidad de Sevilla. [Google Scholar]
  21. Barth OM. 1979. Pollen morphology of Brazilian Symplocos species (Symplocaceae). Grana 18: 99–107. doi: 10.1080/00173137909430723. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Barth OM. 1980. Pollen morphology of a Brazilian Rutaceae: Zanthoxylum (Fagara). Pollen et Spores 22: 425–436. [Google Scholar]
  23. Barth OM. 1982. The sporoderm of Brazilian Symplocos pollen types (Symplocaceae). Grana 21: 65–69. doi: 10.1080/00173138209427682. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Basinger JF, Christophel DC. 1985. Fossil flowers and leaves of the Ebenaceae from the Eocene of southern Australia. Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 1825–1843. doi: 10.1139/b85-258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Belhadj S, Derridj A, Civeyrel L, Gers C, Aigouy T, Otto T, Gauquelin T. 2007. Pollen morphology and fertility of wild Atlas pistachio (Pistacia atlantica Desf., Anacardiaceae). Grana 46: 148–156. doi: 10.1080/00173130701520310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Berry EW. 1912. Some ancestors of the persimmon. The Plant World 15: 15–21. [Google Scholar]
  27. Beug H-J. 2004. Leitfaden der Pollenbestimmung für Mitteleuropa und angrenzende Gebiete. München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil. [Google Scholar]
  28. Biesboer DD. 1975. Pollen morphology of the Aceraceae. Grana 15: 19–27. doi: 10.1080/00173134.1975.11864620. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Bittrich V. 1993. Caryophyllaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Volume 2. Flowering plants. Dicotyledons. Magnoliid, Hamamelid and Caryophyllid families, 206––236.. Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bloembergen S. 1935. The genus Alangium in the Netherlands Indies. Blumea 1: 241–294. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bloembergen S. 1939. A revision of the genus Alangium. Bulletin Du Jardin Botanique Buitenzorg, Série 3 16: 139–235. [Google Scholar]
  32. Borsch T. 1998. Pollen types in the Amaranthaceae. Morphology and evolutionary significance. Grana 37: 129–142. doi: 10.1080/00173139809362658. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Borsch T, Flores-Olvera H, Zumaya S, Müller K. 2018. Pollen characters and DNA sequence data converge on a monophyletic genus Iresine (Amaranthaceae, Caryophyllales) and help elucidate its species diversity. Taxon 67: 944–976. doi: 10.12705/675.7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Bouchal JM. 2019. The middle Miocene palynoflora of the Salihpaşalar lignite mine (Yatağan Basin, southwest Anatolia): Environmental characterisation and comparison with palynofloras from adjacent basins. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments. 99: 591–636. 10.1007/s12549-018-0345-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Bouchal JM, Mayda S, Grímsson F, Akgün F, Zetter R, Denk T. 2017. Miocene palynofloras of the Tınaz lignite mine, Muğla, southwest Anatolia: Taxonomy, palaeoecology and local vegetation change. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 243: 1–36. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2017.02.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Bouchal JM, Zetter R, Denk T. 2016a. Pollen and spores of the uppermost Eocene florissant formation, Colorado: A combined light and scanning electron microscopy study. Grana 55: 179–245. doi: 10.1080/00173134.2015.1108362. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Bouchal JM, Zetter R, Grímsson F, Denk T. 2016b. The middle Miocene palynoflora and palaeoenvironments of Eskihisar (Yatağan Basin, southwestern Anatolia): A combined LM and SEM investigation. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 182: 14–79. doi: 10.1111/boj.2016.182.issue-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Boulter MC, Benfield JN, Fisher HC, Gee DA, Lhotak M. 1996. The evolution and the global migration of the Aceraceae. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 351: 589–603. [Google Scholar]
  39. Boulter MC, Kvaček Z. 1989. The Palaeocene flora of the Isle of Mull. Special Papers in Palaeontology 42: 1–149. [Google Scholar]
  40. Brandbyge J. 1993. Polygonaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Volume 2. Flowering plants. Dicotyledons. Magnoliid, Hamamelid and Caryophyllid families, 531–544. Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  41. Brattseva GM. 1969. Palinologicheskie issledovaniya verkhnego mela i paleogena Dal’nego Vostoka. Akademii Nauk SSSR Geologii Instituta Trudy 207: 5–56. [Google Scholar]
  42. Brown CA. 1967. Pollen morphology of the Onagraceae. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 3: 163–180. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(67)90050-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Buzek C, Kvaček Z, Holy F. 1985. Late Pliocene palaeoenvironment and correlation of the Vildstejn floristic complex within Central Europe. Rozpravy Ceskoslovenské Akademie Ved, Rada Matematickych A Prírodnich Ved 95: 1–72. [Google Scholar]
  44. Cao M, Zhang DX, Shah A, Dong LN. 2014. Pollen morphology and its systematic significance in Zanthoxylum (Rutaceae) from China. Pakistan Journal of Botany 46: 1325–1330. [Google Scholar]
  45. Cerceau-Larrival M-T, Straka H, Friedrich B. 1984. Palynologia Madagassica et Mascarenica. FAM. 155-166. Tropische Und Subtropische Pflanzenwelt 51: 73–116. [Google Scholar]
  46. Chambers TC, Godwin H. 1971. Scanning electron microscopy of Tilia pollen. New Phytologist 70: 687–692. doi: 10.1111/nph.1971.70.issue-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Chanda S. 1962. On the pollen morphology of some Scandinavian Caryophyllaceae. Grana 3: 67–89. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chandler EM. 1960. Plant remains of the Hengistbury and Barton Beds. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History, Geology 4: 119–238. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chandler EM. 1961. Flora of the lower headon beds of Hampshire and the Isle of Wight. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History, Geology 5: 91–158. [Google Scholar]
  50. Chandler EM. 1963. The lower tertiary floras of South England. Volume 3. Flora of the Bournemouth Beds; the Boscombe, and the Highcliff Sands. London: British Museum of Natural History. [Google Scholar]
  51. Chandler EM. 1964. The lower Tertiary floras of southern England. Volume 4. A summary and survey of findings in light of recent botanical observations. London: British Museum of Natural History. [Google Scholar]
  52. Chao C. 1954. Comparative pollen morphology of the Cornaceae and allies. Taiwania 5: 93–106. [Google Scholar]
  53. Cheng C, Feng Z. 1996. Study on the pollen morphology of the genus Rumex in China. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research 14: 16–24. [Google Scholar]
  54. Chester PI, Raine JI. 2001. Pollen and spore keys for Quaternary deposits in the northern Pindos Mountains, Greece. Grana 40: 299–387. doi: 10.1080/00173130152987535. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Christensen PB, Blackmore S. 1988. The Northwest European Pollen Flora, 40. Tiliaceae. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 57: 33–43. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(88)90045-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Christophel DC, Basinger JF. 1982. Earliest floral evidence for the Ebenaceae in Australia. Nature 296: 439–441. doi: 10.1038/296439a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Clarke GCS, Jones MR. 1978. The Northwest European Pollen Flora, 17 Aceraceae. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 26: 181–193. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(78)90043-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. de Franceschi D. 1993. Phylogénie des Ebénales - Analyse de lʹordre et origine biogéographique des espèces indiennes. Publication Du Département D’écologie, Institut Français De Pondichéry 33: 1–153. [Google Scholar]
  59. de Jong PC. 1994. Taxonomy and reproductive biology of maples. In: van Gelderen DM, de Jong PC, Oterdoom HJ, eds. Maples of the world, 69–103. Portland, OR: Timber Press. [Google Scholar]
  60. de Wilde WJJO, Duyfjes BEE. 2016. A conspectus of Alangium Lam. sect. Alangium (Alangiaceae). Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany) 44: 74–87. doi: 10.20531/tfb.2016.44.1.12. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. de Wilde WJJO, Duyfjes BEE. 2017a. Taxonomy of Alangium section Conostigma (Alangiaceae). Blumea 62: 29–46. doi: 10.3767/000651917X695164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. de Wilde WJJO, Duyfjes BEE. 2017b. The species of Alangium section Rhytidandra (Alangiaceae). Blumea 62: 75–83. doi: 10.3767/000651917X695443. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Dehghani M, Akhani H. 2009. Pollen morphological studies in subfamily Suaedoideae (Chenopodiaceae). Grana 48: 79–101. doi: 10.1080/00173130902842968. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. den Nijs JC, Hooghiemstra H, Schalk PH. 1980. Biosystematic studies of the Rumex acetosella complex (Polygonaceae). IV. Pollen morphology and the possibilities of identification of cytotypes in pollen analysis. Phyton 20: 307–323. [Google Scholar]
  65. Denk T, Grimm GW, Grímsson F, Zetter R. 2013. Evidence from “Köppen signatures” of fossil plant assemblages for effective heat transport of Gulf Stream to subarctic North Atlantic during Miocene cooling. Biogeosciences 10: 7927–7942. doi: 10.5194/bg-10-7927-2013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Denk T, Grímsson F, Kvaček Z. 2005. The Miocene floras of Iceland and their significance for late Cainozoic North Atlantic biogeography. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 149: 369–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2005.00441.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Denk T, Grímsson F, Zetter R. 2010. Episodic migration of oaks to Iceland: Evidence for a North Atlantic “land bridge” in the latest Miocene. American Journal of Botany 97: 276–287. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0900195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Denk T, Grímsson F, Zetter R. 2012. Fagaceae from the early Oligocene of Central Europe: Persisting new world and emerging old world biogeographic links. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 169: 7–20. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2011.09.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Denk T, Grímsson F, Zetter R, Símonarson LA. 2011. Late Cainozoic floras of Iceland - 15 million years of vegetation and climate history in the northern North Atlantic. Dordrecht: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  70. Denk T, Güner HT, Bouchal JM. 2019. Early Miocene climate and biomes of Turkey: Evidence from leaf fossils, dispersed pollen, and petrified wood. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 530: 236–248. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.05.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Dianxiang Z, Hartley TG, Mabberley DJ. 2008. Rutaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY, eds. Flora of China Volume 11, Oxalidaceae through Aceraceae, 51–97. Beijing: Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  72. Díez MJ. 1986. Anacardiaceae. In: Valdés B, Díez MJ, Fernández I, eds. Atlas Polinico de Andalucia Occidental, 230–231. Utrera (Seville): Grafitres S.L. [Google Scholar]
  73. Díez MJ, Fernandes I. 1989. Identification of Spanish Ericaceae by pollen morphology. Pollen et Spores 31: 215–227. [Google Scholar]
  74. Doğan C, Erdem SÖ. 2018. Pollen morphology of some Arenaria taxa (Caryophyllaceae). Phytotaxa 351: 28–40. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.351.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Doweld AB. 2017. New names in Fallopia, Persicarioipollis, Polygonum and Reynoutria (Polygonaceae), living and fossil. Phytotaxa 308: 66–79. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.308.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Eckenwalder JE. 2009. Ebenaceae Gürke. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee , ed. Flora of North America north of Mexico, volume 8, Magnoliophyta: Paeoniaceae to Ericaceae, 247–250. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  77. Erdtman G. 1952. Pollen morphology and taxonomy Angiosperms (An introduction to palynology. I). Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell. [Google Scholar]
  78. Eyde RH. 1972. Pollen of Alangium: Towards a more satisfactory synthesis. Taxon 21: 471–477. doi: 10.2307/1219108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Eyde RH. 1988. Comprehending Cornus: Puzzles and progress in the systematics of the dogwoods. The Botanical Review 54: 233–351. [Google Scholar]
  80. Eyde RH. 1991. Nyssa‐like fossil pollen: a case for stabilizing nomenclature. Taxon 40: 75––88.. doi: 10.2307/1222924. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Eyde RH. 1997. Fossil record and ecology of Nyssa (Cornaceae). The Botanical Review 63: 97–123. doi: 10.1007/BF02935928. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Eyde RH, Bartlett A, Barghoorn ES. 1969. Fossil record of Alangium. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 96: 288–314. doi: 10.2307/2483735. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Fabijan DM. 2009. Andromeda Linnaeus. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee , ed. Flora of North America north of Mexico, volume 8, Magnoliophyta: Paeoniaceae to Ericaceae, 503–505. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  84. Fang J, Wang Z, Tang Z. 2009. Atlas of woody plants in China. Distribution and climate. Index and Volumes 1–3. Beijing: Higher Education Press. [Google Scholar]
  85. Fang MY, Fang RC, He MY, Hu LZ, Yang HB, Qin HN, Min TL, Chamberlain DF, Stevens PF, Wallace GD, Anderberg A. 2005. Ericaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY, eds. Flora of China. Volume 14. (Apiaceae through Ericaceae), 242–517. Beijing: Science Press/St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. [Google Scholar]
  86. Farooqui A, Tripathi S, Garg A, Shukla AN, Marthy S, Prasad V, Sinah GP. 2019. Palaeotropical lineage of Indian water primrose (Ludwigia L, Onagraceae) using pollen morphologic analysis. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 269: 64–77. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2019.06.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Ferguson DK, Pingen M, Zetter R, Hofmann -C-C. 1998. Advances in our knowledge of the Miocene plant assemblage from Kreuzau, Germany. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 101: 147–177. doi: 10.1016/S0034-6667(97)00074-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Ferguson IK. 1977. Cornaceae Dum. World Pollen and Spore Flora 6: 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  89. Foss PJ, Doyle GJ. 1988. A palynological study of the Irish Ericaceae and Empetrum. Pollen et Spores 30: 151–178. [Google Scholar]
  90. Frederiksen NO. 1983. Middle Eocene palynomorphs from San Diego, California. Part II. Angiosperm pollen and miscellanea. AASP Contribution Series 12: 1–155. [Google Scholar]
  91. Freeman CC, Reveal JL. 2005. Polygonaceae Jussieu. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee , ed. Flora of North America north of Mexico, volume 5. Magnoliophyta: Caryophyllidae, part 2, 405–456. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  92. Friis EM. 1979. The damgaard flora: A new middle Miocene flora from Denmark. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 27: 117–142. [Google Scholar]
  93. Friis EM. 1985. Angiosperm fruits and seeds from the middle Miocene of Jutland (Denmark). Det Kongelige Danske Videnskaberne Selskab Biologiske Skrifter 24: 1–165. [Google Scholar]
  94. Friis EM, Crane PR, Pedersen KR.. 2011. Early flowers and angiosperm evolution. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511980206 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  95. Fritsch PW. 2004. Styracaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. volume 6. Flowering plants. Dicotyledons. Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales, 434–442. Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  96. Fritsch PW, Kelly LM, Wang Y, Almeda F, Kriebel R. 2008. Revised intrafamilial classification of Symplocaceae based on phylogenetic data from DNA sequences and morphology. Taxon 57: 823–852. doi: 10.1002/tax.573013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  97. Fritsch PW, Manchester SR, Stone RD, Cruz BC, Almeda F. 2015. Northern hemisphere origins of the amphi-pacific tropical plant family symplocaceae. Journal of Biogeography 42: 891––901.. doi: 10.1111/jbi.12442 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  98. Fürstl T 2002. Zur Pollenmorphologie rezenter und fossiler Aceraceae. MS thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  99. Gabriel WJ. 1990a. Acer nigrum Michx.f. Black maple. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH, eds. Silvics of North America: Volume 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654, 46–52. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. [Google Scholar]
  100. Gabriel WJ. 1990b. Acer saccharinum L. Silver maple. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH, eds. Silvics of North America: Volume 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654, 70–77. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. [Google Scholar]
  101. Gastaldo RA, Riegel W, Püttmann W, Linnemann UG, Zetter R. 1998. A multidisciplinary approach to reconstruct the late Oligocene vegetation in central Europe. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 101: 71–94. doi: 10.1016/S0034-6667(97)00070-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  102. Geeraerts A, Raeymaekers JAM, Vinckier S, Pletsers A, Smets E, Huysmans S. 2009. Systematic palynology in Ebenaceae with focus on Ebenoideae: Morphological diversity and character evolution. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 153: 336–353. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2008.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  103. Geisser F, Gregor H-J. 1981. Einige interessante und neue sommergrüne Pflanzenelemente (Fruktifikationen) aus dem Elsäßer Pliozän (Genera Sabia Colebr., Wikstroemia Endl., Alangium Lam., Nyssa L., Halesia Ellis, Rehderodendron Hu.). Mitteilung des Badischen Landesvereins für Naturkunde und Naturschutz e.V. Freiburg I. Br 12: 233–239. [Google Scholar]
  104. Ghazanfar SA. 1984. Pollen morphology of the genus Silene L. (Caryophyllaceae), sections Siphonomorpha Otth and Auriculatae (Boiss.) Schischk. New Phytologist 98: 683–690. doi: 10.1111/nph.1984.98.issue-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  105. Godman RM, Yawney HW, Tubbs CH. 1990. Acer saccharum Marsh. Sugar maple. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH, eds. Silvics of North America: Volume 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654, 78–91. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. [Google Scholar]
  106. Gonzáles Guzmán AE. 1967. A palynological study on the Upper Los Cuervos and Mirador Formations (lower and middle Eocene; Tibú area, Columbia). Leiden: EJ Brill. [Google Scholar]
  107. Göschl W 2008. Beiträge zur Pollenmorphologie ausgewählter rezenter und fossiler Vertreter der Davidiaceae und Nyssaceae. MS thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  108. Gosling WD, Miller CS, Livingstone DA. 2013. Atlas of tropical West African pollen flora. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 199: 1–135. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2013.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  109. Graham A. 1976a. Late Cenozoic evolution of tropical lowland vegetation in Veracruz, Mexico. Evolution 29: 723–735. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00867.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Graham A. 1976b. Studies in neotropical paleobotany. II. The Miocene communities of Veracruz, Mexico. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 63: 787–842. doi: 10.2307/2395250. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  111. Graham A. 1987. Tropical American Tertiary floras and paleoenvironments: Mexico, Costa Rica, and Panama. American Journal of Botany 74: 1519–1531. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1987.tb12143.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Graham A. 1998. Studies in Neotropical Paleobotany XI. Late Tertiary vegetation and environments of southeastern Guatemala: Palynofloras from the Mio-Pliocene Padre Miguel Group and the Pliocene Herreria Formation. American Journal of Botany 85: 1409–1425. doi: 10.2307/2446399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Graham A. 1999. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic hostory of North American Vegetaion north of Mexico. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  114. Gregor HJ. 1982. Die “Parvangulae” und “Guttulae” Hiltermann & Schmitz 1968 aus dem Randecker Maar: Samenreste von Centrospermae. Palaeontologische Zeitschrift 56: 11–18. doi: 10.1007/BF02988782. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  115. Gregor HJ. 1989. Aspects of the fossil record and phylogeny of the family Rutaceae (Zanthoxyleae, Toddalioideae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 162: 251–265. doi: 10.1007/BF00936920. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  116. Gregory MK, McIntosh WC. 1996. Paleoclimate and paleoelevation of the Oligocene Pitch-Pinnacle flora, Sawatch Range, Colorado. Geological Society of America Bulletin 108: 545–561. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1996)108<0545:PAPOTO>2.3.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  117. Grimm GW, Denk T, Hemleben V. 2007. Evolutionary history and systematics of Acer section Acer A case study of low-level phylogenetics. Plant Systematics and Evolution 267: 215–253. doi: 10.1007/s00606-007-0572-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  118. Grimm GW, Renner SS, Stamatakis A, Hemleben V. 2006. A nuclear ribosomal DNA phylogeny of Acer inferred with maximum likelihood, splits graphs, and motif analyses of 606 sequences. Evolutionary Bioinformatics 2: 279–294. doi: 10.1177/117693430600200014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Grímsson F, Denk T, Símonarson LA. 2007a. Middle Miocene floras of Iceland The early colonization of an island? Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 144: 181–219. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2006.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  120. Grímsson F, Ferguson DK, Zetter R. 2012a. Morphological trends in the fossil pollen of Decodon and the paleobiogeographic history of the genus. International Journal of Plant Sciences 173: 297–317. doi: 10.1086/663968. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  121. Grímsson F, Graham SA, Coiro M, Jacobs BF, Xafis A, Neumann FH, Scott L, Sakala J, Currano ED, Zetter R. 2019. Origin and divergence of Afro-Indian Picrodendraceae: Linking pollen morphology, dispersal modes, fossil records, molecular dating and paleogeography. Grana 58: 227–275. doi: 10.1080/00173134.2019.1594357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Grímsson F, Grimm GW, Meller B, Bouchal JM, Zetter R. 2016a. Combined LM and SEM study of the middle Miocene (Sarmatian) palynoflora from the Lavanttal Basin, Austria: Part IV. Magnoliophyta 2 Fagales to Rosales. Grana 55: 101–163. doi: 10.1080/00173134.2015.1096566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Grímsson F, Grimm GW, Potts AJ, Zetter R, Renner SS. 2018a. A Winteraceae pollen tetrad from the early Paleocene of western Greenland, and the fossil record of Winteraceae in Lauraceae and Gondwana. Journal of Biogeography 45: 567–581. doi: 10.1111/jbi.13154. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  124. Grímsson F, Grimm GW, Zetter R, Denk T . 2016b. Cretaceous and Paleogene Fagaceae from North America and Greenland: Evidence for a Late Cretaceous split between Fagus and the remaining Fagaceae. Acta Palaeobotanica 56: 247–305. doi: 10.1515/acpa-2016-0016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  125. Grímsson F, Kapli P, Hofmann CC, Zetter R, Grimm GW. 2017a. Eocene Loranthaceae pollen pushes back divergence ages for major splits in the family. PeerJ 5: e3373. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Grímsson F, Meller B, Bouchal JM, Zetter R. 2015a. Combined LM and SEM study of the middle Miocene (Sarmatian) palynoflora from the Lavanttal Basin, Austria: Part III. Magnoliophyta 1 Magnoliales to Fabales. Grana 54: 85–128. doi: 10.1080/00173134.2015.1007081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Grímsson F, Pedersen GK, Grimm W, Zetter R. 2016. c. A revised stratigraphy for the Palaeocene Agatdalen flora (Nuussuaq Peninsula, western Greenland): Correlating fossiliferous outcrops, macrofossils, and palynological samples from phosphoritic nodules. Acta Palaeobotanica 56: 307–327. doi: 10.1515/acpa-2016-0009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  128. Grímsson F, Símonarson LA. 2008. Iceland’s ancient forests. Skógræktarritið 2008/2: 14–30. (in Icelandic). [Google Scholar]
  129. Grímsson F, Símonarson LA, Denk T. 2007b. Late Langhian to early Serravallian floras of Iceland. Náttúrufræðingurinn 75: 85–106 (in Icelandic). [Google Scholar]
  130. Grímsson F, Símonarson LA, Friedrich WL. 2005. Unusually large samaras from Late Miocene sediments in Iceland. Náttúrufræðingurinn 73: 15–29 (in Icelandic). [Google Scholar]
  131. Grímsson F, Xafis A, Neumann FN, Scott L, Bamford MK, Zetter R. 2018b. The first Loranthaceae fossils from Africa. Grana 57: 249–259. doi: 10.1080/00173134.2018.1430167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Grímsson F, Zetter R. 2011. Combined LM and SEM study of the middle Miocene (Sarmatian) palynoflora from the Lavanttal Basin, Austria: Part II. Pinophyta (Cupressaceae, Pinaceae and Sciadopityaceae). Grana 50: 262–310. doi: 10.1080/00173134.2011.641450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Grímsson F, Zetter R, Ball C. 2011. Combined LM and SEM study of the middle Miocene (Sarmatian) palynoflora from the Lavanttal Basin, Austria: Part I. Bryophyta, Lycopodiophyta, Pteridophyta, Ginkgophyta, and Gnetophyta. Grana 50: 102–128. doi: 10.1080/00173134.2011.585804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Grímsson F, Zetter R, Grimm GW, Pedersen GK, Pedersen AK, Denk T. 2015b. Fagaceae pollen from the early Cenozoic of West Greenland: Revisiting Engler’s and Chaney’s Arcto-Tertiary hypotheses. Plant Systematics and Evolution 301: 809–832. doi: 10.1007/s00606-014-1118-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Grímsson F, Zetter R, Halbritter H, Grimm GW. 2014. Aponogeton pollen from the Cretaceous and Paleogene of North America and West Greenland: Implications for the origin and palaeobiogeography of the genus. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 200: 161–187. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2013.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Grímsson F, Zetter R, Labandeira CC, Engel MS, Wappler T. 2017b. Taxonomic description of in situ bee pollen from the middle Eocene of Germany. Grana 56: 37–70. doi: 10.1080/00173134.2015.1108997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Grímsson F, Zetter R, Leng Q. 2012b. Diverse fossil Onagraceae pollen from a Miocene palynoflora of north-east China: Early steps in resolving the phytogeographic history of the family. Plant Systematics and Evolution 298: 671–687. doi: 10.1007/s00606-011-0578-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  138. Grygorieva O, Brindza J, Ostrolucká MG, Ostrovský R, Klymenko S, Nôžková J, Tóth D. 2010. Pollen characteristics in some persimmon species (Diospyros spp.). Agriculture 56: 121–130. [Google Scholar]
  139. Grygorieva O, Brindza J, Ostrovský R, Klymenko S, Grabovetska O. 2013. Pollen characteristics in some Diospyros species. Modern Phytomorphology 3: 45–50. [Google Scholar]
  140. Haining Q, Chamlong P. 2007. Nyssaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, eds. Flora of China. Volume 13. (Clusiaceae through Araliaceae), 300–303. Beijing: Science Press; /St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. [Google Scholar]
  141. Halbritter H 2016a. Arbutus unedo. In: PalDat Palynological Database. https://www.paldat.org/pub/Arbutus_unedo/302416; accessed 05 March 2019.
  142. Halbritter H 2016b. Empetrum nigrum. In: PalDat Palynological Database. https://www.paldat.org/pub/Empetrum_nigrum/302156; accessed 19 August 2019 .
  143. Halbritter H, Hesse M. 2016. Tilia platyphyllos. In: PalDatPalynological Database. https://www.paldat.org/pub/Tilia_platyphyllos/302531; accessed 29 November 2017 .
  144. Halbritter H, Svojtka M. 2016. Andromeda polifolia. In: PalDat - Palynological Database. https://www.paldat.org/pub/Andromeda_polifolia/302154; accessed 21 January 2019 .
  145. Halbritter H, Ulrich S, Grímsson F, Weber M, Zetter R, Hesse M, Buchner R, Svojtka M, Frosch-Radivo A. 2018. Illustrated pollen terminology. Second edition. Vienna: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  146. Halbritter H, Weis B. 2016. Pistacia terebinthus. In: PalDatPalynological Database. https://www.paldat.org/pub/Pistacia_terebinthus/300552; accessed 5 December 2017 .
  147. Hamdi SMM, Malekloo M, Assadi M, Nejadsatari T. 2009. Pollen micromorphological studies of the genus Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae) in Iran. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 8: 129–137. doi: 10.3923/ajps.2009.129.137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  148. Hammel BE, Zamora NA. 1990. Nyssa talamancana (Cornaceae), an addition to the remnant Tertiary flora of southern Central America. Brittonia 42: 165–170. doi: 10.2307/2807205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  149. Hanes MM. 2015. Malvaceae Jussieu. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee , ed. Flora of North America north of Mexico, Volume 6, Cucurbitaceae to Droseraceae, 187–375. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  150. Haraldson K. 1978. Anatomy and taxonomy in Polygonaceae, subfam. Polygonoideae Meisn. Emend. Jaretzky. Symbolae Botnicae Upsalienses 22: 1–95. [Google Scholar]
  151. Haring C 2014. Pollenmorphologische Untersuchungen (LM, REM) an Ericaceae, Symplocaceae, Sapotaceae, Cornaceae. MS Thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  152. Harley MM. 1986a. Distinguishing pollen characters for the Sapotaceae. Canadian Journal of Botany 64: 3091–3100. doi: 10.1139/b86-408. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  153. Harley MM. 1986b. The nature of the endoaperture in the pollen of Sapotaceae. In: Blacmore S, Ferguson IK, eds. Pollen and spores: Form and function, 417–419. London: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  154. Harley MM. 1990. Pollen. In: Pennington TD, ed. Sapotaceae. Flora Neotropica 52, 11–29. New York: New York Botanical Garden. [Google Scholar]
  155. Harley MM. 1991a. Pollen morphology of the Sapotaceae. In: Pennington TD, ed. The genera of Sapotaceae, 23–50. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. New York: New York Botanical Garden. [Google Scholar]
  156. Harley MM. 1991b. The pollen morphology of the Sapotaceae. Kew Bulletin 46: 379–491. doi: 10.2307/4110538. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  157. Harley MM. 2004. Pollen morphology. In: Pennington TD, Kubitzki K,, eds. The families and genera of vascular plants. Volume VI. Flowering plants. Dicotyledons. Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales., 394–395. Berlin: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  158. Harley MM, Kurmann MH, Ferguson IK. 1991. Systematic implications of comparative morphology in selected Tertiary and extant pollen from Palmae and the Sapotaceae. In: Blackmore S, Barnes SH, eds. Pollen and spores: Patterns of diversification, 225–238. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Google Scholar]
  159. Hawksworth FG, Wiens D. 1972. Biology and classification of dwarf mistletoes (Arceuthobium). Agriculture Handbook 401. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service. [Google Scholar]
  160. Hawksworth FG, Wiens D. 1996. Dwarf mistletoes: Biology, pathology, and systematics. Agriculture Handbook 709. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service. [Google Scholar]
  161. Hebda RJ. 1979. Size, productivity, and paleoecological implications of ericaceous pollen from Burns Bog, southern Fraser River Delta, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Botany 57: 1712–1717. doi: 10.1139/b79-210. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  162. Hedberg O. 1946. Pollen morphology in the genus Polygonum L. S. Lat. And Its Taxonomical Significance. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 40: 371–404. [Google Scholar]
  163. Heer O. 1869. Flora fossilis artica. Vol 2, part 4. Contributions to the fossil flora of North Greenland, being a description of the plants collected by Mr. Edward Whymper during the summer of 1867. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 159: 445–488. [Google Scholar]
  164. Heywood VH, Brummitt RK, Culham A, Seberg O. 2007. Flowering plant families of the world. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. [Google Scholar]
  165. Hiern WP. 1873. A monograph of Ebenaceae. Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 12: 27–300. [Google Scholar]
  166. Hileman LC, Vasey MC, Parker VT. 2001. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Arbutoideae (Ericaceae): Implications for the Madrean-Tethyan hypothesis. Systematic Botany 26: 131–143. [Google Scholar]
  167. Hochuli PA. 1978. Palynologische Untersuchungen im Oligozän und Untermiozän der zentralen und westlichen Parathetys. Beiträge Zur Paläontologie Von Österreich 4: 1–132. [Google Scholar]
  168. Hofmann -C-C. 2018. Light and scanning electron microscopic investigations of pollen of Ericales (Ericaceae, Sapotaceae, Ebenaceae, Styricaceae and Theaceae) from five lower and mid-Eocene localities. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 187: 550–578. doi: 10.1093/botlinnean/boy035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  169. Hofmann -C-C, Zetter R, Draxler I. 2002. Pollen- und Sporenvergesellschaftungen aus dem Karpatium des Korneuburger Beckens (Niederösterreich). Beiträge Zur Paläontologie 27: 17–43. [Google Scholar]
  170. Hong S-P. 1994. Reconsideration of the generic status of Rubrivena (Polygonaceae, Persicarieae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 186: 95–122. doi: 10.1007/BF00937715. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  171. Hong S-P, Hedberg O. 1990. Parallel evolution of aperture numbers and arrangements in the genera Koenigia, Persicaria and Aconogonon (Polygonaceae). Grana 29: 177–184. doi: 10.1080/00173139009427750. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  172. Hoorn C, Straathof J, Abels HA, Xu Y, Utescher T, Dupont-Nivet G. 2012. A late Eocene palynological record of climate change and Tibetan Plateau uplift (Xin Basin, China). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 344–345: 16–38. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.05.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  173. Huang T-C. 1972. Pollen flora of Taiwan. Taipei: National Taiwan University Botany Department Press. [Google Scholar]
  174. Huang Y-J, Liu Y-S, Jacques FMB, Su T, Xing Y, Zhou Z. 2013. First discovery of Cucubalus (Caryophyllaceae) fossil, and its biogeographical and ecological implications. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 190: 41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2012.11.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  175. Huo L, Liking He, Hsianghao H. 1985. Pollen morphology of craigia with reference to its systematic position. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 23: 179-184. [Google Scholar]
  176. Hwang S, Grimes J. 1996. Styracaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, eds. Flora of China. Volume 15. (Mirsinaceae through Loganiaceae), 253–271. Beijing: Science Press; /St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. [Google Scholar]
  177. Ivanov D. 1995. Palynological data about the presence of the family Symplocaceae in the Miocene of northwestern Bulgaria. Geologica Carpathica 46: 37–40. [Google Scholar]
  178. Ivanov D. 1997. Miocene palynomorphs from the southern part of the Forecarpathian Basin (Northwest Bulgaria). Flora Tertiaria Mediterranea 6: 1–81. [Google Scholar]
  179. Ivanov D. 2004. Pollen of some exotic plants in the Neogene of Bulgaria. Acta Palaeobotanica 44: 69–77. [Google Scholar]
  180. Iwarsson M. 1977. Pollen morphology of East African Caryophyllaceae. Grana 16: 15–22. doi: 10.1080/00173134.1977.11864635. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  181. Jacquemart A-L. 1998. Andromeda polifolia L. Journal of Ecology 86: 527–541. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00274.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  182. Jin J, Kodrul TM, Liao W, Wang X. 2009. A new species of Craigia from the Eocene Changchang formation of Hainan Island, China. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 155: 80–82. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  183. Jones GN. 1968. Taxonomy of American species of linden (Tilia). Illinois Biological Monographs 39: 1––156.. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.50274. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  184. Jordan GJ, Macphail MK. 2003. A middle-late Eocene inflorescence of Caryophyllaceae from Tasmania, Australia. American Journal of Botany 90: 761–768. doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.5.761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Kantachot C, Chantaranothai P, Simpson DA. 2010. A synopsis of the genus Persicaria (Polygonaceae) in Thailand. Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany) 38: 128–149. [Google Scholar]
  186. Kaplan A. 2008. Pollen morphology of some Paronychia species (Caryophyllaceae) from Turkey. Biologia 63: 53–60. doi: 10.2478/s11756-008-0016-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  187. Kelly LM, Almeda F, Fritsch PW. 2016. A taxonomic revision of Mexican and Central American Symplocos (Symplocaceae). Phytotaxa 264: 1–115. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.264.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  188. Keri C, Zetter R. 1992. Notes on the exine ultrastructure of Onagraceae and Rhododendroideae (Ericaceae). Grana 31: 119–123. doi: 10.1080/00173139209430731. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  189. Kilic N, Tuttu G. 2017. Pollen morphology of Cornus mas L. and Cornus sanguinea L. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 67: 65–71. [Google Scholar]
  190. Klaus W. 1984. Zur Mikroflora des Unter-Sarmat am Alpen-Südostrand. Beiträge Zur Paläontologie Von Österreich 11: 289–419. [Google Scholar]
  191. Kmenta M 2011. Die Mikroflora der untermiozänen Fundstelle Altmittweida Deutschland. MS thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  192. Łańcucka-Środoniowa M. 1979. Macroscopic plant remains from the freshwater Miocene of the Nowy Sącz Basin (West Carpathians, Poland). Acta Palaeobotanica 20: 3–117. [Google Scholar]
  193. Łańcucka-Środoniowa M. 1980. Macroscopic remains of the dwarf mistletoe Arceuthobium Bieb. (Loranthaceae) in the Neogene of Poland. Acta Palaeobotanica 21: 61–64. [Google Scholar]
  194. Kmenta M, Zetter R. 2013. Combined LM and SEM study of the upper Oligocene/lower Miocene palynoflora from Altmittweida (Saxony): Providing new insights into Cenozoic vegetation evolution of Central Europe. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 195: 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2013.03.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  195. Knobloch E. 1988. New records of fruits and seeds from the Upper Miocene and Lower Pliocene of Moravia and Slovakia. Tertiary Research 9: 107–116. [Google Scholar]
  196. Kodela PG. 2006. Pollen morphology of some rainforest taxa occurring in the Illawarra region of New South Wales, Australia. Telopea 11: 346–389. doi: 10.7751/telopea20065734. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  197. Kohlman-Adamska A. 1993. Pollen analysis of the Neogene deposits from the Wyrzysk region, north-western Poland. Acta Palaeobotanica 33: 91–292. [Google Scholar]
  198. Köppen W. 1936. Das geographische System der Klimate. In: Köppen W, Geiger R, eds. Handbuch der klimatologie, band 1, teil c, 1-44. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger. [Google Scholar]
  199. Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck D, Rudolf B, Rubel F. 2006. World map of Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 15: 259–263. doi: 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  200. Kottik S 2002. Die Palynologie des Randecker Maars (Miozän, Baden-Württemberg). MS thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  201. Kovar-Eder J, Meller B, Zetter R. 1998. Comparative investigations on the basal fossiliferous layers at the opencast mine Oberdorf (Köflach-Voitsberg lignite deposit, Styria, Austria; early Miocene). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 101: 125–145. doi: 10.1016/S0034-6667(97)00073-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  202. Kowalski R, Fagúndez J . 2017. Maiella miocaenica gen. et sp. nov., a new heather genus (Ericeae, Ericaceae) from the central European Miocene. International Journal of Plant Sciences 178: 411–420. [Google Scholar]
  203. Krutzsch W. 1962. Stratigraphisch bzw. botanisch wichtige neue Sporen- und Pollenformen aus dem deutschen Tertiär. Geologie 11: 265–307. [Google Scholar]
  204. Krutzsch W. 1968. Zur Kenntnis des dispersen Oenotheraceen- (Onagraceen-) Pollens, inbesondere aus dem mitteleuropäischen Tertiär. Paläontologische Abhandlungen Abteilung B, Paläobotanik 2: 765–788. [Google Scholar]
  205. Krutzsch W. 1970a. Die stratigraphisch verwertbaren Sporen- und Pollenformen des mitteleuropäischen Alttertiärs. Jahrbuch Für Geologie (Für 1967) 3: 309–379. [Google Scholar]
  206. Krutzsch W. 1970b. Reevesiapollis, ein neues Pollengenus der Sterculiaceen aus dem mittlereuropäischen Tertiär. Feddes Repertorium 81: 371–384. doi: 10.1002/fedr.19700810603. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  207. Krutzsch W. 1970c. Zur Kenntnis fossiler disperser Tetradenpollen. Paläontologische Abhandlungen Abteilung B, Paläobotanik 3: 399–433. [Google Scholar]
  208. Krutzsch W. 1989. Paleogeography and historical phytogeography (paleochorology) in the Neophyticum. Plant Systematics and Evolution 162: 5–61. doi: 10.1007/BF00936909. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  209. Krutzsch W, Lenk G. 1973. Sporenpaläontologische Untersuchungen im Alttertiär des Weißelster-Beckens. I. Die stratigraphisch wichtigen Pollen- und Sporenformen aus dem Profil des Tagebaus Profen. Abhandlungen Zentralen Geologischen Institut 18: 59–76. [Google Scholar]
  210. Kubitzki K, Kallunki JA, Duretto M, Wilson PG. 2011. Rutaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants, volume 10, 276–356. Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  211. Kühn U. 1993. Chenopodiaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Volume 2. Flowering plants. Dicotyledons. Magnoliid, Hamamelid and Caryophyllid Families, 253–281. Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  212. Kuijt J. 2015. Santalales. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants, Volume 12. Flowering plants. Eudicots. Santalales, Balanaphorales, 3–189. Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  213. Kvaček Z. 2004. Early Miocene records of Craigia (Malvaceae s.l.) in the most basin, North Bohemia Whole plant approach. Journal of the Czech Geological Society 49: 161–171. [Google Scholar]
  214. Kvaček Z, Manchester SR, Akhmetiev MA. 2005. Review of the fossil history of Craigia (Malvaceae s.l.) in the Northern Hemisphere based on fruits and co-occurring foliage. In: Akhmetiev MA, Herman AB, eds. Modern problems of Palaeofloristics, Palaeophytogeography and Phytostratigraphy. Transaction of the international Palaeobotanical conference, Volume 1, 114–140. Moscow: GEOS. [Google Scholar]
  215. Kvaček Z, Manchester SR, Zetter R, Pingen M. 2002. Fruits and seeds of Craigia bronnii (Malvaceae Tilioideae) and associated flower buds from the late Miocene Inden Formation, lower Rhine Basin, Germany. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 119: 311–324. doi: 10.1016/S0034-6667(01)00135-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  216. Lee S, Gilbert MG, White F. 1996. Ebenaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, eds. Flora of China. Volume 15. (Mirsinaceae through Loganiaceae), 215–234. Beijing: Science Press; /St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. [Google Scholar]
  217. Lewis WH, Vinay P, Zenger VE. 1983. Airborne and allergenic Pollen of North America. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  218. Li AJ, Bao BJ, Grabovskaya-Borodina AE, Hong SP, McNeil J, Mosyakin SL, Ohba H, Park CW. 2003. Polygonaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY, eds. Flora of China Volume 5, Ulmaceae through Basellaceae, 277–350. Beijing: Science Press; /St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. [Google Scholar]
  219. Li B. 2014. Persicaria wugongshanensis (Polygonaceae: Persicarieae), and odoriferous and distylous new species from Jiangxi, eastern China. Phytotaxa 153: 133–144. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.156.3.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  220. Li J, Stukel M, Bussies P, Skinner K, Lemmon AR, Lemmon EM, Brown K, Bekmetjev A, Swenson NG. 2019. Maple phylogeny and biogeography inferred from phylogenomic data. Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 57: 594–606. doi: 10.1111/jse.12535 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  221. Li T-Q, Cao H-J, Kang M-S, Zhang Z-X, Zhao N, Zhang H. 2011. Pollen flora of China woody plants by SEM. Beijing: Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  222. Liang T-J, Li B. 2014. Persicaria lankeshanensis (Polygonaceae: Persicarieae), a new species from Guangdong, China. Bangladesh Journal of Plant Taxonomy 21: 147–152. doi: 10.3329/bjpt.v21i2.21353. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  223. Liang Y, Yu C. 1985. Pollen morphology of Styracaceae and its taxonomic significance. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 23: 81–90. [Google Scholar]
  224. Lieux MH. 1982. An atlas of pollen of trees, shrubs, and woody vines of Louisiana and other southeastern states, part IV. Sapotaceae to Fabaceae. Pollen et Spores 24: 331–368. [Google Scholar]
  225. Liu B, Qin H-N. 2013. Taxonomic revision of the Symplocos nakaharae complex (Symplocaceae) with special reference to fruit morphology. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 51: 94–114. doi: 10.1111/jobm.v51.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  226. Liu WQ, Liu XY, Cui DF, Jin JH. 2012. An additional record of Craigia-fruits (Malvaceae s.l.) from the Eocene of Hainan Island, South China. Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences 105: 141–144. [Google Scholar]
  227. Long H, He LK, Hsue HH. 1985. Pollen morphology of Craigia with reference to its systematic position. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 23: 179–184. [Google Scholar]
  228. Luteyn JL, Clemants SE, Diggs GM, Dorr LJ, Judd WS, Sørensen PD, Stevens PF, Wallace GD. 1995. Ericaceae, Part II. The superior-ovaried genera (Monotropoideae, Pyroloideae, Rhododendroideae, and Vaccinioideae p.p.). Flora Neotropica Monograph 66: 1–560. [Google Scholar]
  229. Mai DH. 1961. Über eine fossile Tiliaceen-Blüte und tilioiden Pollen aus dem deutschen Tertiär. Geologie 19, Beiheft 32: 34––94.. [Google Scholar]
  230. Mai DH. 1970. Subtropische Elemente im europäischen Tertiär I. Die Gattungen Gironniera, Sarcococca, Illicium, Evodia, Ilex, Mastixia, Alangium, Symplocos und Rehderodendron. Paläontologische Abhandlungen Abteilung B 3: 441–503. [Google Scholar]
  231. Mai DH. 1985. Entwicklung der Wasser- und Sumpfpflanzen-Gesellschaften Europas von der Kreide bis ins Quartär. Flora 176: 449–511. doi: 10.1016/S0367-2530(17)30141-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  232. Mai DH. 1986. Über die Antillanische Symplocaceae. Feddes Repertorium 97: 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  233. Mai DH. 1989. Die fossile Flora des Blättertons von Wischgrund und anderer gleichaltriger Fundstellen der Klettwitzer Hochfläche, Teil 2. Natur Und Landschaft Im Bezirk Cottbus 11: 3–44. [Google Scholar]
  234. Mai DH. 1995a. Palaeocarpological investigations in the Villafranchian (Pliocene) of Italy. Bollettino Museo Regionale Di Scienze Naturali Torino 13: 407–437. [Google Scholar]
  235. Mai DH. 1995b. Tertiäre Vegetationsgeschichte Europas. Jena: Gustav Fischer. [Google Scholar]
  236. Mai DH. 1997. Die oberoligozänen Floren am Nordrand der Sächsischen Lausitz. Palaeontographica B 244: 1–124. [Google Scholar]
  237. Mai DH. 1998. Contribution to the flora of the middle Oligocene Calau Beds in Brandenburg, Germany. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 101: 43–70. doi: 10.1016/S0034-6667(97)00069-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  238. Mai DH. 2000. Die untermiozänen Floren aus der Spremberger Folge und dem II. Flözhorizont in der Lausitz, Teil 3: Dialypetalae und Sympetalae. Palaeontographica B 253: 1–106. [Google Scholar]
  239. Mai DH. 2001. Die mittelmiozänen und obermiozänen Floren aus der Meuroer und Raunoer Folge in der Lausitz, Teil 2: Dicotyledonen. Palaeontographica B 257: 35–174. [Google Scholar]
  240. Mai DH, Martinetto E. 2006. A reconsideration of the diversity of Symplocos in the European Neogene on the basis of fruit morphology. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 140: 1–26. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2006.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  241. Mai DH, Petrescu I. 1983. Eine neue Rehderodendron-Art (Styracaceae) aus dem oberen Pliozän des Baraolt-Beckens (Sozialistische Republik Rumänien). Zeitschrift Für Geologische Wissenschaften, Berlin 11: 915–925. [Google Scholar]
  242. Mai DH, Wähnert V. 2000. On the problems of the Pliocene floras in Lusatia and Lower Silesia. Acta Palaeobotanica 40: 165–205. [Google Scholar]
  243. Mai DH, Walther H. 1988. Die pliozänen Floren von Thüringen, Deutsche Demokratische Republik. Quartärpaläontologie 7: 55–297. [Google Scholar]
  244. Makbul S, Türkmen Z, Coskunçelebi K, Beyazoglu O. 2008. Anatomical and pollen characters in the genus Epilobium L. (Onagraceae) from Northeast Anatolia. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 50: 51–62. [Google Scholar]
  245. Manchester SR. 1994a. Fruits and seeds of the middle Eocene Nut Beds Flora, Clarno Formation, Oregon. Palaeontographica Americana 59: 1–205. [Google Scholar]
  246. Manchester SR. 1994b. Inflorescence bracts of fossil and extant Tilia in North America, Europe, and Asia: Patterns of morphologic divergence and biogeographic history. American Journal of Botany 81: 1176–1185. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1994.tb15612.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  247. Manchester SR. 1999. Biogeographic relationships of North American tertiary floras. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 472–522. doi: 10.2307/2666183. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  248. Manchester SR, Chen Z-D, Lu A-M, Uemura K. 2009a. East Asian endemic plant genera and their paleogeographic history throughout the Northern Hemisphere. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 47: 1–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00001.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  249. Manchester SR, Fritsch PW. 2014. European fossil fruits of Sphenotheca related to extant Asian species of Symplocos. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 52: 68–74. doi: 10.1111/jse.v52.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  250. Manchester SR, Grímsson F, Zetter R. 2015. Assessing the fossil record of asterids in the context of our current phylogenetic framework. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 100: 329–363. doi: 10.3417/2014033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  251. Manchester SR, Xiang Q-Y, Kodrul TM, Akhmetiev MA. 2009b. Leaves of Cornus (Cornaceae) from the Paleocene of North America and Asia confirmed by trichome characters. International Journal of Plant Sciences 170: 132–142. doi: 10.1086/593040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  252. Manchester SR, Xiang X-P, Xiang Q-Y. 2010. Fruits of Cornelian cherries (Cornaceae: Cornus subg. Cornus) in the Paleocene and Eocene of the Northern Hemisphere. International Journal of Plant Sciences 171: 882–891. doi: 10.1086/655771. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  253. Martin HA, Macphail MK, Partridge AD. 1996. Tertiary (Alangiaceae) in eastern Australia: Evidence from pollen. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 94: 111–122. doi: 10.1016/S0034-6667(96)00011-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  254. Martinetto E. 1998. East Asian elements in the Plio-Pleistocene floras of Italy. In: Zhang A, Wu S, eds. Floristic characteristics and diversity of East Asian Plants: Proceedings of the first international symposium on floristic characteristics and diversity of East Asian plants, 71–87. Beijing: China Higher Education Press. [Google Scholar]
  255. Mateus JE. 1989. Pollen morphology of Portuguese Ericales. Revista De Biologia 14: 135–208. [Google Scholar]
  256. Mayer C 1996. Zur Pollenmorphologie rezenter und fossiler Rutaceae. MS thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  257. McClain AM 2000. Systematics and biogeography of selected modern and fossil Dipteronia and Acer (Sapindaceae). MS thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. [Google Scholar]
  258. McGuire AF, Kron KA. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships of European and African Ericas. International Journal of Plant Sciences 166: 311–318. doi: 10.1086/427478. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  259. McNeill J, Bassett IJ. 1974. Pollen morphology and the infrageneric classification of Minuartia (Caryophyllaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 1974: 1225–1231. doi: 10.1139/b74-158. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  260. McNeill J, Crompton CW. 1978. Pollen dimorphism in Silene alba (Caryophyllaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 56: 1280–1286. doi: 10.1139/b78-143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  261. Meller B, Kovar-Eder J, Zetter R. 1999. Lower Miocene leaf, palynomorph, and diaspore assemblages from the base of the lignite-bearing sequence in the opencast mine Oberdorf, N Voitsberg (Styria, Austria) as an indication of “Younger Mastixioid” vegetation. Palaeontographica B 252: 123–179. doi: 10.1127/palb/252/1999/123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  262. Menke B. 1975. Vegetationsgeschichte und Florenstratigraphie nordwest Deutschlands in Pliozan und Frühguant, mit einen Beitrag zur Biostratigraphie des Weichselfruhglazials. Geologisches Jahrbuch, Reihe A 26: 3–151. [Google Scholar]
  263. Menke B. 1976. Pliozane und altestquartare Sporen und Pollenflora von Schleswig-Holstein. Geologisches Jahrbuch, Reihe A 32: 3–197. [Google Scholar]
  264. Mert C. 2009. Pollen morphology and anatomy of Cornelian Cherry (Cornus mas L.) cultivars. HortScience 44: 519–522. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.44.2.519. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  265. Miki S. 1937. Plant fossils from the Stegodon Beds and the Elephas Beds near Akashi. Japanese Journal of Botany 8: 303–341. [Google Scholar]
  266. Miyoshi N, Fujiki T, Kimura H. 2011. Pollen flora of Japan. Sapporo: Hokkaido University Press. [Google Scholar]
  267. Morley RJ. 1982. Fossil pollen attributable to Alangium Lamarck (Alangiaceae) from the Tertiary of Malesia. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 36: 65–94. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(82)90014-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  268. Morton CM 1994. The use of pollen morphology and wood anatomy in the study of the phylogeny of Ebenaceae and Rutaceae subtribe Cuspariinae. PhD thesis, The City University of New York, New York, NY. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77044-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  269. Morton CM, Dickison WC. 1992. Comparative pollen morphology of the Styracaceae. Grana 31: 1–15. doi: 10.1080/00173139209427822. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  270. Muller J. 1981. Fossil pollen records of extant Angiosperms. Botanical Review 47: 1–142. [Google Scholar]
  271. Müller K, Borsch T. 2005. Multiple origins of a unique pollen feature: Stellate pore ornamentation in Amaranthaceae. Grana 44: 266–282. doi: 10.1080/00173130500477787. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  272. Murell ZE, Poindexter DB. 2016. Cornaceae Bechtold & J. Presl. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee , ed. Flora of North America north of Mexico, Volume 12, Magnoliophyta: Vitaceae to Garryaceae, 443–457. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  273. Murray DF, Mirré V, Elven R. 2009. Empetrum Linnaeus. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee , ed. Flora of North America north of Mexico, Volume 8, Magnoliophyta: Paeoniaceae to Ericaceae, 486–489. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  274. Nagamasu H. 1989a. Pollen morphology and relationship of Symplocos tinctoria (L.F.) L’Her. (Symplocaceae). Botanical Gazette 150: 314–318. doi: 10.1086/337776. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  275. Nagamasu H. 1989b. Pollen morphology of Japanese Symplocos (Symplocaceae). The Botanical Magazine Tokyo 102: 149–164. doi: 10.1007/BF02488560. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  276. Nagy E. 1962. New pollen species from the lower Miocene of the Bakony Mountain (Várpalota) of Hungary. Acta Botanica Hungarica 8: 153–163. [Google Scholar]
  277. Nagy E. 1969. Palynological elaborations the Miocene layers of the Mecsek Mountains. Annales Instituti Geologici Publici Hungarici 52: 233–649. [Google Scholar]
  278. Nagy E. 1973. Palynological data for the Neogene of Cserehát. Acta Botanica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 19: 453–460. [Google Scholar]
  279. Nagy E. 1985. Sporomorphs of the Neogene in Hungary. Geologica Hungarica, Seria Palaeontologica 47: 1–470. [Google Scholar]
  280. Ng FSP 1971. A taxonomic study of the Ebenaceae with special reference to Malesia. PhD thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. [Google Scholar]
  281. Nichols DJ. 2002. Palynology and palynostratigraphy of the Hell Creek Formation in North Dakota: A microfossil record of plants at the end of Cretaceous time. Geological Society of America Special Paper 361: 393–456. [Google Scholar]
  282. Nickrent DL, Garcia MA, Martín MO, Mathiasen RL. 2004. A phylogeny of all species of Arceuthobium (Viscaceae) using nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 91: 125–138. doi: 10.3732/ajb.91.1.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  283. Nikitin PA. 1957. Pliocenovye i cetverticnye flory Voronezskoj Oblasti. Moscow: Izvestija Akademii Nauk SSSR. [Google Scholar]
  284. Nowicke JW. 1975. Pollen morphplogy in the order Centrospermae. Grana 15: 51–77. doi: 10.1080/00173134.1975.11864622. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  285. Nowicke JW, Skvarla JJ. 1977. Pollen morphology and the relationship of the Plumbaginaceae, Polygonaceae, and Primulaceae to the order Centrospermae. Smithsonian Contribution to Botany 37: 1–64. [Google Scholar]
  286. Oldfield F. 1959. The pollen morphology of some of the West Eurasian Ericales. Pollen et Spores 1: 19–49. [Google Scholar]
  287. Oliver EGH. 2000. Systematics of Ericeae (Ericaceae, Ericoideae): Species with indehiscent and partially dehiscent fruits. Contributions from the Bolus Herbarium 19: 1–483. [Google Scholar]
  288. Olvera HF, Fuentes-Soriano S, Hernández EM. 2006. Pollen morphology and systematics of Atripliceae (Chenopodiaceae). Grana 45: 175–194. doi: 10.1080/00173130600873935. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  289. Oszast J, Stuchlik L. 1977. The Neogene vegetation of the Podhale West Carpathians, Poland). Acta Palaeobotanica 18: 45–86. [Google Scholar]
  290. Oterdoom HJ. 1994. Paleobotany and evolution of maples. In: van Gelderen DM, de Jong PC, Oterdoom HJ, eds. Maples of the world, 63–68. Portland, OR: Timber Press. [Google Scholar]
  291. Partridge JW. 2001. Persicaria amphibia (L.) Gray (Polygonum amphibium L.). Journal of Ecology 89: 487–501. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00571.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  292. Patel VC, Skvarla JJ, Raven PH. 1984. Pollen characters in relation to the delimitation of Myrtales. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71: 858–969. doi: 10.2307/2399170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  293. Pennington TD. 1990. Sapotaceae. Flora Neotropica 52: 1–770. [Google Scholar]
  294. Pennington TD. 1991. The genera of Sapotaceae. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; /New York: New York Botanical Garden. [Google Scholar]
  295. Pennington TD. 2004. Sapotaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Volume VI. Flowering plants. Dicotyledons. Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales, 390–420. Berlin: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  296. Perveen A, Grafström E, El-Ghazaly G. 2004. World pollen and spore flora 23. Malvaceae Adams. P.p. Subfamilies: Grewioideae, Tilioideae, Brownlowioideae. Grana 43: 129–155. doi: 10.1080/00173130410000730. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  297. Perveen A, Qaiser M. 2002. Pollen flora of Pakistan XXXV. Cornaceae. Pakistan Journal of Botany 34: 157–160. [Google Scholar]
  298. Perveen A, Qaiser M. 2010. Pollen flora of Pakistan-LXVI: Anacardiaceae. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42: 1401–1406. [Google Scholar]
  299. Petrov S, Drazheva-Stamatova T. 1972. Reevesia Lindl. fossil pollen in the Tertiary sediments of Europe and Asia. Pollen et Spores 14: 79–95. [Google Scholar]
  300. Phadtare NR, Thakur B. 1990. Fossil pollen of Alangium from the Eocene lignite of Gujarat, India, with comments on its stratigraphic antiquity. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 63: 281–297. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(90)90105-R. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  301. Philbrick CT, Bogle AL. 1981. The pollen morphology of the native New England species of the genus Acer (Aceraceae). Rhodora 83: 237–258. [Google Scholar]
  302. Piel KM. 1971. Palynology of Oligocene sediments from central British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Botany 49: 1885–1920. doi: 10.1139/b71-266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  303. Pigott D. 2012. Lime-trees and basswoods. A biological monograph of the genus Tilia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  304. Piwocki M, Ziembińska-Tworzydło M. 1997. Neogene of Polish lowlands - litostratigraphy and pollen-spore zones. Geological Quarterly 41: 21–40. [Google Scholar]
  305. Polhill R, Wiens D. 1998. Mistletoes of Africa. London: The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. [Google Scholar]
  306. POWO . 2017. Plants of the world online. http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org; accessed 5 August 2019.
  307. Pozhidaev AE. 1993. Polymorphism of pollen in the genus Acer (Aceraceae). Isomorphism of deviate forms of angiosperm pollen. Grana 32: 79–85. doi: 10.1080/00173139309429457. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  308. Praglowski J, Nowicke JW, Raven PH, Skvarla JJ, Hoch PC. 1988. Onagraceae Juss. Onagreae R. Raimann pro parte., Lopezieae Spach. World Pollen and Spore Flora 16: 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  309. Praglowski J, Nowicke JW, Raven PH, Skvarla JJ, Wagner WL. 1987. Onagraceae Juss. Onagreae R. Raimann pro parte. World Pollen and Spore Flora 15: 1–55. [Google Scholar]
  310. Praglowski J, Nowicke JW, Skvarla JJ, Hoch PC, Raven PH, Takahashi M. 1994. Onagraceae Juss. Circaeae DC., Hauyeae Raimann, Epilobieae Spach. World Pollen and Spore Flora 19: 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  311. Praglowski J, Skvarla JJ, Raven PH, Nowicke JW. 1983. Onagraceae Juss. Fuchsieae L./Jussiaceae L. World Pollen and Spores Flora 12: 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  312. Premathilake R, Epitawatta S, Nilsson S. 1999. Pollen morphology of some selected plant species from Horton plains, Sri Lanka. Grana 38: 289–295. doi: 10.1080/001731300750044500. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  313. Punt W, Hoen PP. 1995. The northwest European pollen flora, 56. Caryophyllaceae. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 88: 83–272. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(95)00020-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  314. Punt W, Hoen PP, Blackmore S, Nilsson S, Le Thomas A. 2007. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 143: 1–81. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2006.06.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  315. Punt W, Rovers J, Hoen PP. 2003. The northwest European pollen flora, 67. Onagraceae. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 123: 107–161. doi: 10.1016/S0034-6667(02)00158-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  316. Qin H, Phengklai C. 2007. Alangiaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY, eds. Flora of China. Volume 13. (Clusiaceae through Araliaceae), 304–308. Beijing: Science Press; /St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. [Google Scholar]
  317. Quattrocchio M, Volkheimer W. 1990. Paleogene paleoenvironmental trends as reflected by palynological assemblage types, Salta Basin, NW Argentina. Neues Jahrbuch Für Geologie Und Paläontologie Abhandlungen 181: 377–396. doi: 10.1127/njgpa/181/1990/377. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  318. Quattrocchio M, Volkheimer W, Del Papa C. 1997. Palynology and palaeoenvironment of the “Faja Gris” Mealla Formation (Salta Group) at Garabatal Creek (NW Argentina). Palynology 21: 231–247. doi: 10.1080/01916122.1997.9989498. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  319. Quezel P. 1978. Analysis of the flora of Mediterranean and Saharan Africa. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 65: 479–534. doi: 10.2307/2398860. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  320. Rachele LD. 1976. Palynology of the Legler Lignite: A deposit in the Tertiary Cohansey formation of New Jersey. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 22: 225–252. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(76)90004-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  321. Raine JI, Mildenhall DC, Kennedy EM. 2011. New Zealand fossil spores and pollen: An illustrated catalogue. 4th Edition. GNS Science miscellaneous series no. 4. Lower Hutt: GNS Science. http://data.gns.cri.nz/sporepollen/index.htm [Google Scholar]
  322. Rębas E. 1985. Palynological premised for stratigraphy of strata from lower part of the borehole column Kurów Mały S-553, Głogów region). Przegląd Geologiczny 33: 460–463. (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  323. Reid EM. 1920. On two preglacial floras from Castle Eden. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society 76: 104–144. doi: 10.1144/GSL.JGS.1920.076.01-04.04. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  324. Reitsma T. 1970. Pollen morphology of the Alangiaceae. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 10: 249–332. [Google Scholar]
  325. Renner SS, Grimm GW, Schneeweiss GM, Stuessy TF, Ricklefs RE. 2008. Rooting and dating maples (Acer) with an uncorrelated-rates molecular clock: Implications for North American/Asian disjunctions. Systematic Biology 57: 795–808. doi: 10.1080/10635150802422282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  326. Ronse Decraene L-P, Akeroyd JR. 1988. Generic limits in Polygonum and related genera (Polygonaceae) on the basis of floral characters. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 98: 321–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1988.tb01706.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  327. Rouse GE. 1962. Plant microfossils from the Burrard formation of western British Columbia. Micropaleontology 8: 187–218. doi: 10.2307/1484744. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  328. Rouse GE. 1977. Paleogene palynomorph ranges in western and northern Canada. AASP Contribution Series 5A: 48–65. [Google Scholar]
  329. Rubel F, Brugger K, Haslinger K, Auer I. 2017. The climate of the European Alps: shift of very high resolution Köppen-Geiger climate zones 1800–2100. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 26: 115––125.. doi: 10.1127/metz/2016/0816. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  330. Sadowski E-M, Schmidt AR, Seyfullah LJ, Kunzmann L. 2017a. Conifers of the ‘Baltic amber forest’ and their palaeoecological significance. Stapfia 106: 1–73. [Google Scholar]
  331. Sadowski E-M, Seyfullah LJ, Wilson CA, Calvin CL, Schmidt AR. 2017b. Diverse early dwarf mistletoes (Arceuthobium), ecological keystones of the Eocene Baltic amber biota. American Journal of Botany 104: 694–718. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1600390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  332. Saito T, Yamanoi T, Jinbo I. 1992. Pollen morphology of fossil Nyssa (Nyssaceae) by means of a scanning electron microscope. Japanese Journal of Palynology 38: 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  333. Sakai A, Weiser CJ. 1973. Freezing resistance in North America with reference to tree regions. Ecology 54: 118–126. doi: 10.2307/1934380. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  334. Sam S. 2016. Tilia tomentosa. In: PalDat A palynological database. https://www.paldat.org/pub/Tilia_tomentosa/301294; accessed 29 November 2017 .
  335. Sanchez A, Schuster TM, Burke JM, Kron KA. 2011. Taxonomy of Polygonoideae (Polygonaceae): A new tribal classification. Taxon 60: 151–160. doi: 10.1002/tax.601013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  336. Sánchez-Dzib DLA, Sosa-Nájera S, Lozano-García MDS. 2009. Morfología Polínica de Escpecies de la Selva Mediana Subperennifolia en la Cuenca del Río Candelaria, Campeche. Boletín De La Sociedad Botánica De Mexico 84: 83–104. [Google Scholar]
  337. Saporta G. 1868. Prodrome d’une flore fossile des travertins anciens de Sézanne. Mémoires De La Société Géologique De France, 2 Série 8/3: 289–436. [Google Scholar]
  338. Sarwar AKMG. 2007. Pollen morphology and its systematic significance in Ericaceae. PhD Thesis, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0467B [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  339. Sarwar AKMG, Takahashi H. 2006. The taxonomic significance of pollen morphology in Andromedeae s.s., Gaultherieae, Lyonieae and Oxydendreae (Ericaceae: Vaccinioideae). Japanese Journal of Palynology 52: 77–96. [Google Scholar]
  340. Sarwar AKMG, Takahashi H. 2014. Pollen morphology of Erica L. and related genera and its taxonomic significance. Grana 53: 221–231. [Google Scholar]
  341. Sarwar AKMG, Toshiaki ITO, Takahashi H. 2008. An overview of pollen morphology in subfamily Arbutoideae (Ericaceae), and ist systematic significance. Japanese Journal of Palynology 54: 79–92. [Google Scholar]
  342. Schmid E 2000. Palynologische Untersuchungen an Phosphoritknollen (Mitteloligozän) aus dem Tagebau Cospuden (Leipziger Bucht). MS thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  343. Schroeder G-F. 1998. Lehrbuch der pflanzengeographie. Wiesbaden: Quelle & Meyer. [Google Scholar]
  344. Schuster TM, Reveal JL, Bayly MJ, Kron KA. 2015. An updated molecular phylogeny of Polygonoideae (Polygonaceae): Relationship of Oxygonum, Pteroxygonum, and Rumex, and a new circumscription of Koenigia. Taxon 64: 1188–1208. doi: 10.12705/646.5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  345. Schuster TM, Setaro SD, Kron KA. 2013. Age estimates for the buckwheat family Polygonaceae based on sequence data calibrated by fossils and with a focus on the Amphi-Pacific Muehlenbeckia. PLoS ONE 8: e61261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  346. Shatilova I, Kokolashvili I. 2014. The pollen of genus Alangium in Cenozoic deposits of Georgia. Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences 8: 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  347. Siahkolaee SN, Sheidai M, Assadi M, Noormohammadi Z. 2017. Pollen morphological diversity in the genus Acer L. (Sapindaceae) in Iran. Acta Biologica Szegediensis 61: 95–104. [Google Scholar]
  348. Skvarla JJ, Nowicke JW. 1976. Ultrastructure of pollen exine in centrospermous families. Plant Systematics and Evolution 126: 55––78.. doi: 10.1007/BF00986074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  349. Skvarla JJ, Raven PH, Chissoe WF, Sharp M. 1978. An ultrastructural study of viscin threads in Onagraceae pollen. Pollen et Spores 20: 5–143. [Google Scholar]
  350. Skvarla JJ, Raven PH, Praglowski J. 1976. Ultrastructural survey of Onagraceae pollen. Linnean Society Symposium Series 1: 447–479. [Google Scholar]
  351. Słodkowska B. 1998. Palynological characteristics of the Neogene brown coal seams. Prace Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego 160: 28–33. [Google Scholar]
  352. Słodowska B, Paruch-Kulczycka J. 2008. Micropalaeontological taphocoenoses of the Miocene Poznań formation (Konin area, Central Poland). Acta Musei Nationalis Pragae B, Historia Naturalis 64: 193–211. [Google Scholar]
  353. Sohma K. 1963. Pollen morphology of the Nyssaceae, I. Nyssa and Camptotheca. Scientific Reports of the Tohoku University. Ser. IV 29: 389–392. [Google Scholar]
  354. Sohma K. 1967. Pollen morphology of the Nyssaceae, II. Nyssa and Davidia. Reports of the Tohoku University. Ser. IV 33: 527–532. [Google Scholar]
  355. Soleimani M, Jafari A, Shahrokhabady KN, Moghadam DA. 2014. Comparative anatomical and palynological studies on Rumex L. Species (Polygonaceae) in NE Iran. Greener Journal of Biological Sciences 4: 111–115. doi: 10.15580/GJBS.2014.4.041714190. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  356. Song Z-C, Wang W-M, Huang F. 2004. Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms in China. Botanical Review 70: 425–458. doi: 10.1663/0006-8101(2004)070[0425:FPROEA]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  357. Sontag E. 1966. Mikrobotanische (palynologische) Untersuchungen am 2. Niederlausitzer Flözhorizont. Geologie 15, Beihefte 54: 1–141. [Google Scholar]
  358. Sørensen PD. 2009. Arbutus Linnaeus. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee , ed. Flora of North America north of Mexico, volume 8, Magnoliophyta: Paeoniaceae to Ericaceae, 398–400. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  359. Srivastava SK. 1969. Assorted pollen from the Edmonton formation (Maestrichtian), Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 975–989. doi: 10.1139/b69-138 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  360. Stafford PJ, Heath GLA. 1991. The northwest European pollen flora, 48. Cornaceae. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 69: 97–108. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(91)90068-E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  361. Stevens PF, Luteyn J, Oliver EGH, Bell TL, Brown EA, Crowden RK, George AS, Jordan GJ, Ladd P, Lemons K, McLean CB, Menadue Y, Pate JS, Stace H´M, Weiller CM. 2004. Ericaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Volume VI. Flowering plants. Dicotyledons. Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales, 145–194. Berlin: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  362. Straka H, Friedrich B. 1988. Palynologia Madagassica et Mascarenica Fam. 65–97. Tropische Und Subtropische Pflanzenwelt 61: 5–117. [Google Scholar]
  363. Straka H, Simon A, Cerceau-Larrival M-T. 1967. Palynologia Madagassica et Mascarenica. Fam. 155–166. Pollen et Spores 9: 427–466. [Google Scholar]
  364. Stride G, Nylinder S, Swenson U. 2014. Revisiting the biogeography of Sideroxylon (Sapotaceae) and an evaluation of the taxonomic status of Argania and Spiniluma. Australian Systematic Botany 27: 104–118. doi: 10.1071/SB14010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  365. Stuchlik L. 1964. Pollen analysis of the Miocene deposits at Rypin. Acta Palaeobotanica 5: 1–113. [Google Scholar]
  366. Stuchlik L, Shatilova II. 1987. Palynological study of Neogene deposits of southern Poland and western Georgia. Acta Palaeobotanica 27: 21–52. [Google Scholar]
  367. Stuchlik L, Szynkiewicz A, Łańcucka-Środoniowa M, Zastawniak E. 1990. Results of the hitherto palaeobotanical investigations of the Tertiary brown coal bed „Bełchatówˮ (Central Poland). Acta Palaeobotanica 30: 259–305. [Google Scholar]
  368. Stuchlik L, Ziembińska-Tworzydło M, Kohlman-Adamska A, Grabowska I, Słodkowska B, Ważyńska H, Sadowska A. 2009. Atlas of pollen and spores of the polish Neogene. Volume 3. Angiosperms (1). Kraków: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  369. Stuchlik L, Ziembińska-Tworzydło M, Kohlman-Adamska A, Grabowska I, Słodkowska B, Worobiec E, Durska E. 2014. Atlas of pollen and spores of the polish Neogene. Volume 4. Angiosperms (2). Kraków: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  370. Szafer W. 1954. Pliocene flora from the vicinity of Czorsztyn and its relation to the Pleistocene. Prace Instytutu Geologicznego 11: 1–238. [Google Scholar]
  371. Takahashi M, Crane PR, Manchester SR. 2002. Hironoia fusiformis gen. et sp. nov.; a cornalean fruit from the Kamikitaba locality (upper Cretaceous, lower Coniacian) in northeastern Japan. Journal of Plant Research 115: 463––473.. doi: 10.1007/s10265-002-0062-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  372. Tanai T. 1983. Revision of tertiary Acer from East Asia. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University. Series 4, Geology and Mineralogy 20: 291–390. [Google Scholar]
  373. Thiele-Pfeiffer H. 1980. Die miozäne Mikroflora aus dem Braunkohlentagebau Oder bei Wackersdorf/Oberpfalz. Palaeontographica B 174: 95–224. [Google Scholar]
  374. Thompson RS, Anderson KH, Bartlein PJ. 1999. Atlas of relations between climatic parameters and distribution of important trees and shrubs in North America — Hardwoods. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1650–B: 1–423. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey. [Google Scholar]
  375. Thompson WB, Griggs CB, Miller NG, Nelson RE, Weddle TK, Kilian TM. 2011. Associated terrestrial and marine fossils in the late-glacial Presumpscot formation, southern Maine, USA, and the marine reservoir effect on radiocarbon ages. Quaternary Research 75: 552–565. [Google Scholar]
  376. Tianlu M, Barfod A. 2008. Anacardiaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY, eds. Flora of China volume 11, Oxalidaceae through Aceraceae, 335–357. Beijing: Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  377. Tiffney BH, Manchester SR, Fritsch PW. 2018. Two new species of Symplocos based on endocarps from the early Miocene brandon lignite of vermont, USA. Acta Palaeobotanica 58: 185–198. doi: 10.2478/acpa-2018-0008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  378. Ting WS. 1966. Pollen morphology of Onagraceae. Pollen et Spores 8: 9–36. [Google Scholar]
  379. Tissot C, Chikhi H, Nayar TS. 1994. Pollen of wet evergreen forests of the Western Ghats India. Publication Du Département D’écologie, Institut Français De Pondichéry 35: 1–133. [Google Scholar]
  380. Toderich KN, Shuyskaya EV, Ozturk M, Juylova A, Gismatulina L. 2010. Pollen morphology of some Asiatic species of genus Salsola (Chenopodiaceae) and its taxonomic relationships. Pakistanian Journal of Botany (Special Issue, Ali Festschrift) 42: 155–174. [Google Scholar]
  381. Townsend CC. 1993. Amaranthaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Volume 2. Flowering plants. Dicotyledons. Magnoliid, Hamamelid and Caryophyllid families, 70–91. Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  382. Traverse A. 1955. Pollen analysis of the brandon lignite of vermont. United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations 5151: 1–107. [Google Scholar]
  383. Trewartha GT. 1954. An introduction into climate. 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  384. Trewartha GT, Horn LH. 1980. An introduction to climate. 5th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  385. Tucker GC. 2016. Nyssaceae Jussieu ex Dumontier. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee , ed. Flora of North America north of Mexico, volume 12, Magnoliophyta: Vitaceae to Garryaceae, 458–461. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  386. Ullah F, Shah SN, Zaman W, Zafar M, Ahmad M, Ayaz A, Sohail A, Saqib S. 2019. Using palynomorphological characteristics for the identification of species of Alsinoideae (Caryophyllaceae): A systematic approach. Grana 58: 174–184. doi: 10.1080/00173134.2019.1569719. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  387. Ullah F, Zafar M, Ahmad M, Dilbar S, Shah SN, Sohail A, Zaman W, Iqbal M, Bahadur S, Tariq A. 2018. Pollen morphology of subfamily Caryophylloideae (Caryophyllaceae) and its taxonomic significance. Microscopy Research & Technique 2018: 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  388. van der Burgh J. 1987. Miocene floras in the lower Rhenish Basin and their ecological interpretation. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 52: 299–366. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(87)90064-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  389. van der Burgh J, Zetter R. 1998. Plant mega- and microfossil assemblages from the Brunssumian of ‘Hambach’ near Düren, BRD. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 101: 209–256. doi: 10.1016/S0034-6667(97)00076-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  390. van der Meijden R. 1970. A survey of the pollen morphology of the indo-pacific species of Symplocos (Symplocaceae). Pollen et Spores 12: 513–551. [Google Scholar]
  391. van Gelderen DM. 1994. Maple species and intraspecific taxa. In: van Gelderen DM, de Jong PC, Oterdoom HJ, eds. Maples of the world, 105–239. Portland, OR: Timber Press. [Google Scholar]
  392. van Leeuwen P, Punt W, Hoen PP. 1988. The Northwest European Pollen Flora, 43. Polygonaceae. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 57: 81–151. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(88)90048-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  393. Vishnu-Mittre S, Gupta HP. 1964. Studies of Indian pollen grains III. Caryophyllaceae. Pollen et Spores 6: 99–111. [Google Scholar]
  394. Wagner WL, Hoch PC, Raven PH. 2007. Revised classification of the Onagraceae. Systematic Botany Monographs 83: 1–240. [Google Scholar]
  395. Wallnöfer B. 2001. The Biology and systematics of Ebenaceae: A review. Annalen Des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 103B: 485–512. [Google Scholar]
  396. Wallnöfer B. 2004. Ebenaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Volume 6. Flowering plants. Dicotyledons. Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales, 125–130. Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  397. Walther H. 1972. Studien über tertiäre Acer Mitteleuropas. Abhandlungen Des Staatlichen Museums Für Mineralogie Und Geologie Dresden 19: 1–309. [Google Scholar]
  398. Wang DN, Zhao YN. 1980. Late Cretaceous–Early Paleogene sporopollen assemblages of the Jianghan Basin and their stratigraphical significance. Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Professional Papers of Stratigraphy and Palaeontology 9: 1–174. [Google Scholar]
  399. Wang F, Chien N, Zhang Y, Yang H. 1995. Pollen flora of China. 2nd edition. Beijing: Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  400. Wappler T, Labandeira CC, Engel MS, Zetter R, Grímsson F. 2015. Specialized and generalized pollen-collection strategies in an ancient bee lineage. Current Biology 25: 3092–3098. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  401. Warner BG, Chinappa CC. 1986. Taxonomic implications and evolutionary trends in pollen of Canadian Ericales. Canadian Journal of Botany 64: 3113–3126. doi: 10.1139/b86-410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  402. WCSP . 2019. World checklist of selected plant families. London: Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://wcsp.science.kew.org/; accessed February 2019. [Google Scholar]
  403. Wen J, Stuessy TF. 1993. The phylogeny and Biogeography of Nyssa (Cornaceae). Systematic Botany 18: 68–79. doi: 10.2307/2419789. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  404. Weyland H. 1937. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der rheinischen Tertiärflora. II. Erste Ergänzungen und Berichtigungen zur Flora der Blätterkohle und des Polierschiefers von Rott im Siebengebirge. Palaeontographica Abteilung B 83: 67–122. [Google Scholar]
  405. Winterscheid H. 2006. Oligozäne und untermiozäne Floren in der Umgebung des Siebengebirges. Documenta Naturae 158: 1–485. [Google Scholar]
  406. Wodehouse RP. 1931. Pollen grains in the identification and classification of plants VI. Polygonaceae. American Journal of Botany 18: 749–764. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1931.18.issue-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  407. Wolfe JA, Tanai T. 1987. Systematics, phylogeny, and distribution of Acer (maples) in the Cenozoic of western North America. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University. Series 4, Geology and Mineralogy 22: 1–246. [Google Scholar]
  408. Worobiec E. 2009. Middle Miocene palynoflora of the Legnica lignite deposit complex, Lower Silesia, Poland. Acta Palaeobotanica 49: 5–133. [Google Scholar]
  409. Worobiec E, Gedl P. 2018. Upper Eocene palynoflora from Łukowa (SE Poland) and its palaeoenvironmental context. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 492: 134–146. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.12.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  410. Worobiec E, Szulc J. 2010. A middle Miocene Palynoflora from sinkhole deposits from Upper Silesia, Poland and its palaeoenvironmental context. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 163: 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2010.06.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  411. Wrońska-Pilarek D, Szkudlarz P, Bocianowski J. 2018. Systematic importance of morphological features of pollen grains of species from Erica (Ericaceae) genus. PLoS ONE 13: e0204557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  412. Wu R, Nooteboom HP. 1996. Symplocaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, eds.. Flora of China. Volume 15. (Mirsinaceae through Loganiaceae), 235–252. Beijing: Science Press; /St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. [Google Scholar]
  413. Xiang Q, Boufford DE. 2005. Cornaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY, eds. Flora of China. Volume 14. (Apiaceae through Ericaceae), 206–221. Beijing: Science Press; /St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. [Google Scholar]
  414. Xie L, Yang Z-Y, Wen J, Li D-Z, Yi T-S. 2014. Biogeographic history of Pistacia (Anacardiaceae), emphasizing the evolution of the Madrean-Tethyan and the eastern Asian-Tethyan disjunctions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 77: 136–146. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  415. Ya T, Gilbert MG, Dorr LJ. 2007a. Sterculiaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY, eds. Flora of China volume 12, Hippocastanaceae through Theaceae, 302–330. Beijing: Science Press; /St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. [Google Scholar]
  416. Ya T, Gilbert MG, Dorr LJ. 2007b. Tiliaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY, eds. Flora of China volume 12, Hippocastanaceae through Theaceae, 240–263. Beijing: Science Press; /St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. [Google Scholar]
  417. Yasmin G, Khan MA, Shaheen N, Hayat MQ, Ali S, Abbas S. 2010a. Taxonomic implications of pollen morphology of seven species of Rumex L., from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42: 1435–1442. [Google Scholar]
  418. Yasmin G, Khan MA, Shaheen N, Hayat MQ, Zafar M, Ahmad M. 2010b. Pollen morphological diversity in selected species of Persicaria Mill. (family; Polygonaceae). Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 4: 862–870. [Google Scholar]
  419. Zastawniak E, ed. 1992. The younger Tertiary deposits in the Gozdnica region (SW Poland) in the light of recent palaeobotanical research. Polish Botanical Studies 3: 1–129. [Google Scholar]
  420. Zazula GD, Froese DG, Westgate JA, Farge CL, Mathewes RW. 2005. Paleoecology of Beringia “packrat” middens from central Yukon Territory. Canadian Quaternary Research 63: 189–198. [Google Scholar]
  421. Zetter R. 1989. Methodik und Bedeutung einer routinemäßig kombinierten lichtmikroskopischen und rasterelektonenmikroskopischen Untersuchung fossiler Mikrofloren. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 109: 41–50. [Google Scholar]
  422. Zetter R 1991. Untersuchungen an Pollenkorntetraden der Gattung Erica aus miozänen Fundstellen Österreichs. Proceedings of the Pan-European Palaeobotanical Conference, Vienna, Austria, 19–23 September 1991, 245–249. [Google Scholar]
  423. Zetter R. 1998. Palynological investigations from the early Miocene lignite opencast mine Oberdorf (N Voitsberg, Styria, Austria). Jahrbuch Der Geologischen Bundesanstalt 140: 461–468. [Google Scholar]
  424. Zetter R, Farabee MJ, Pigg KB, Manchester SR, DeVore M, Nowak MD. 2011. Palynoflora of the late Paleocene silicified shale at Almont, North Dakota, USA. Palynology 35: 179–211. doi: 10.1080/01916122.2010.501164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  425. Zetter R, Weber M, Hesse M, Pingen M. 2002. Pollen, pollenkitt, and orbicules in Craigia bronnii flower buds (Tilioideae, Malvaceae) from the Miocene of Hambach, Germany. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 1067–1071. doi: 10.1086/342520. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  426. Zhang YL, Chen YS. 1984. Studies on pollen morphology in Tiliaceae of China. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 22: 367–377. [Google Scholar]
  427. Zheng Y, Li M, Zhang Y, Wang W, Wang D, Zhao C, Zhou S, Zhu Z, Zhao Y. 1999Fossil spores and pollen of China. Vol. 1. Late Cretaceous and Tertiary spores and pollen. Beijing: Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  428. Zhou -Z-Z, Lu R-L, Ge L, Bao S-L, Zheng -Y-Y. 1999. A study on the pollen morphology of the Polygonaceae in Anhui Province. Bulletin of Botanical Research 19: 17–33. [Google Scholar]
  429. Ziembińska-Tworzydło M. 1974. Palynological characteristics of the Neogene of Western Poland. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 19: 309–432. [Google Scholar]
  430. Ziembińska-Tworzydło M, Grabowska I, Kohlman-Adamska A, Sadowska A, Słodkowska B, Stuchlik L, Ważyńska H. 1994a. Checklist of selected genera and species of spores and pollen grains ordered in morphological system. Acta Palaeobotanica, Supplement 1: 31–56. [Google Scholar]
  431. Ziembińska-Tworzydło M, Grabowska I, Kohlman-Adamska A, Skawińska K, Słodowska B, Stuchlik L, Sadowska A, Ważyńska H. 1994b. Taxonomic revision of selected pollen and spores taxa from Neogene deposits. Acta Palaeobotanica, Supplementum 1: 5–30. [Google Scholar]
  432. Ziembińska-Tworzydło M, Ważyńska H. 1981. A palynological subdivision of the Neogene in Western Poland. Bulletin De lʼAcadémie Polonaise Des Sciences Série Des Sciences De La Terre 29: 29–43. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Halbritter H 2016a. Arbutus unedo. In: PalDat Palynological Database. https://www.paldat.org/pub/Arbutus_unedo/302416; accessed 05 March 2019.
  2. Halbritter H 2016b. Empetrum nigrum. In: PalDat Palynological Database. https://www.paldat.org/pub/Empetrum_nigrum/302156; accessed 19 August 2019 .

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material
SGRA_A_1696400_SM9233.xlsx (156.7KB, xlsx)

Articles from Grana are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES