Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2020 May 1;11:2177. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15770-3

Midkine activation of CD8+ T cells establishes a neuron–immune–cancer axis responsible for low-grade glioma growth

Xiaofan Guo 1, Yuan Pan 1, Min Xiong 1, Shilpa Sanapala 1, Corina Anastasaki 1, Olivia Cobb 1, Sonika Dahiya 2, David H Gutmann 1,
PMCID: PMC7195398  PMID: 32358581

Abstract

Brain tumors (gliomas) are heterogeneous cellular ecosystems, where non-neoplastic monocytic cells have emerged as key regulators of tumor maintenance and progression. However, relative to macrophages/microglia, comparatively less is known about the roles of neurons and T cells in glioma pathobiology. Herein, we leverage genetically engineered mouse models and human biospecimens to define the axis in which neurons, T cells, and microglia interact to govern Neurofibromatosis-1 (NF1) low-grade glioma (LGG) growth. NF1-mutant human and mouse brain neurons elaborate midkine to activate naïve CD8T cells to produce Ccl4, which induces microglia to produce a key LGG growth factor (Ccl5) critical for LGG stem cell survival. Importantly, increased CCL5 expression is associated with reduced survival in patients with LGG. The elucidation of the critical intercellular dependencies that constitute the LGG neuroimmune axis provides insights into the role of neurons and immune cells in controlling glioma growth, relevant to future therapeutic targeting.

Subject terms: CNS cancer, Tumour immunology, CNS cancer


The role of neurons and T cells in glioma progression remains poorly understood. Here the authors show that midkine-dependent activation of a neuron-T cell-microglia axis promotes the growth of optic pathway gliomas.

Introduction

Numerous studies in malignant solid tumors have highlighted the importance of non-neoplastic stromal cells, particularly cancer-associated fibroblasts, in tumor formation, growth, and progression1,2. However, in nervous system cancers, fibroblasts are not part of the tumor microenvironment, suggesting that other non-neoplastic cells, including neurons and immune cells (T cells, microglia, and macrophages), could serve this critical function. In this respect, both brain and nerve sheath tumors are characterized by the presence of neurons and infiltrating immune cells3,4, which could each provide cancer cell support.

These cellular interactions have been more extensively studied in malignant brain tumors (e.g. glioblastoma and diffuse midline glioma), where cancer cells attract resident microglia and peripheral macrophages through the elaboration of chemokines, which in turn produce growth factors that promote tumor growth and progression5. Similarly, neurons can also regulate malignant brain tumor growth involving several mechanisms, ranging from activity-dependent release of growth factors to tonic release of neurotrophins and neurotransmitters6,7.

In contrast, these stromal dependencies are likely to be greater in benign tumors with fewer genetic mutations, such as those arising in the setting of cancer predisposition syndromes, like neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), in which affected patients develop low-grade peripheral nerve sheath tumors and brain tumors (optic pathway gliomas; OPGs). Whereas peripheral nerve sheath tumors require growth factors from mast cells and macrophages3,8, NF1-OPGs depend on resident brain monocytes (microglia) for their formation and progression9,10. In Nf1 murine optic gliomas, microglial production of a key growth factor (Ccl5) is both necessary and sufficient for tumor formation and growth11,12. Importantly, microglial Ccl5 expression requires T lymphocytes, such that glioma formation does not occur in mice lacking functional T cells12. However, it is currently not known how T cells are recruited to the developing tumor, how they are activated, and how their activation results in microglia Ccl5 production.

In light of the intimate association of these tumors with nerves and the increasing recognition that neurons can provide instructive signals to cancer cells, we sought to dissect the critical tumor-promoting axis involving neurons, immune cells, and low-grade gliomas (LGG) cancer cells using numerous converging cellular and molecular methodologies. Herein, we describe the complex cellular and molecular interactions between neurons, T cells, microglia, and glioma cells that comprise the LGG ecosystem, revealing critical roles for neurons and T cells in glioma formation and maintenance. We demonstrate that human and mouse NF1-mutant neurons produce midkine to activate T cells, which in turn leads to increased T cell Ccl4 secretion and the priming of microglia to elaborate Ccl5 to maintain LGG cell growth. Moreover, we identify each of the responsible intracellular signaling pathways and show that inhibiting integrin-mediated T cell brain entry or function is sufficient to attenuate glioma growth in vivo. The discovery of this co-dependent neuron/T cell/microglia/cancer cell axis provides opportunities for future pediatric LGG therapeutic targeting.

Results

T cell Ccl4 induces microglial Ccl5 production

Previous studies from our laboratory demonstrated that only activated, but not naïve, T cells produce paracrine factors that induce microglia to produce Ccl5 (Fig. 1a)10. To identify the paracrine factors induced by T cell activation, we employed a commercially available cytokine array to query the conditioned medium (CM) from activated (anti-CD3/CD28-mediated activation) versus naïve (non-activated) T cells in triplicate. In total, nine cytokines/chemokines (i.e., TNFα, GM-CSF, Ccl2, Ccl1, Ccl3, Ccl4, Ccl5, IL-1ra, and IL-2) were increased in activated, relative to non-activated, T cell-CM (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1a). We tested the ability of these cytokines to induce microglial Ccl5 production. After validating the increased expression of these nine cytokines, and the unaltered expression of two additional cytokines (Il10 and Ifnγ) (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1b) as negative controls, we treated WT microglia with each cytokine at the same concentrations measured in the activated T cell CM, and determined the microglia Ccl5 expression levels by ELISA. Only Ccl4 increased microglial Ccl5 protein expression to the levels seen following activated T cell CM treatment in both adult and neonatal microglia (Fig. 1a, d and Supplementary Fig. 1c, d). Similar results were obtained using different concentrations of these candidate cytokines (Supplementary Fig. 2a–h). While microglia were the major cell type expressing Ccl5 in the murine Nf1 optic gliomas (Supplementary Fig. 1e), activated T cells produced some Ccl5 (Fig. 1a), which could contribute to the Ccl5 induction observed in our experimental paradigm. To exclude T cell Ccl5 from the observed microglial response, activated Ccl5−/− T cells were analyzed. Ccl5-deficient T cell CM elicited a similar increase in microglial Ccl5 secretion, demonstrating that the Ccl5 produced by T cells did not contribute in this setting (Supplementary Fig. 2i).

Fig. 1. Activated T cells secrete Ccl4 and prime microglia to produce Ccl5.

Fig. 1

a Activated T cell conditioned medium (act-Tm CM) treatment stimulated WT microglia (MG) to produce a higher level of Ccl5 (ELISA) compared to non-activated T cell-conditioned medium (non-act-Tm CM). Non-activated and activated T cell CM, and CM collected from microglia alone served as controls for these experiments. b WT T cells isolated from the mouse spleen were seeded at the concentration of 2.5 × 106 cells ml−1 in complete PRIM1640 medium followed by 2 days of CD3/CD28 stimulation (activated; act-Tm) or vehicle (PBS) treatment (non-activated; non-act-Tm). CM was collected for chemokine array triplicates. Increased levels of TNF-α, GM-CSF, Ccl2, Ccl1, Ccl3, Ccl4, Ccl5, Il-1ra, and Il-2 expression were observed in activated T cell CM relative to non-activated T cell CM. The fold increases and P values relative to control groups for all three replicates (Supplementary Fig. 1a) are collated in the table. c ELISA assays reveal increased levels of TNFα, GM-CSF, Ccl2, Ccl1, Ccl3, Ccl4, Ccl5, Il-1ra, and Il-2 in the CM of activated, relative to non-activated, T cells. d WT microglia were stimulated with these differentially expressed cytokines [TNF-α (400 pg ml−1), GM-CSF (1000 pg ml−1), Ccl2 (80 pg ml−1), Ccl1 (500 pg ml−1), Ccl3 (8000 pg ml−1), Ccl4 (6000 pg ml−1), Il-1ra (80 pg ml−1), and Il-2 (6000 pg ml−1)] for 24 h at the concentrations detected in the activated T cell CM. Ccl5 production by microglia was increased following Ccl4 (6000 pg ml−1) treatment. Veh: vehicle. e Ccl5 ELISA revealed that activated T cell CM induction of microglial Ccl5 production was reduced following treatment with increasing concentrations of Ccl4 neutralizing antibody. f Microglial Ccr5 and Ccr8 expression was validated using spleen as a positive control. g Increasing concentrations of maraviroc (MCV, Ccr5 receptor inhibitor) and AZ084 (Ccr8 receptor inhibitor) reduced T cell induction of microglial Ccl5 expression. The combination of MCV and AZ084 exhibited the greatest inhibition of microglial Ccl5 expression. All data are presented as the mean ± SEM. a This representative experiment was conducted with n = 3 independent biological samples, and was replicated two additional times with similar results. b n = 3 independent biological samples were examined over three independent experiments, as illustrated in Fig. S1a. c and d Bar graphs represent the means ± SEM of n = 3 independent biological samples. e This representative experiment was conducted with 0 mg ml−1 anti-Ccl4, n = 6; 1, 2, 2.5 mg ml−1 anti-Ccl4, n = 3, independent biological samples, and was replicated two additional times with similar results. f Bar graphs represent the means ± SEM of n = 4 independent biological samples. g This representative experiment was conducted with (from left to right) n = 7, n = 6, n = 6, n = 4, n = 5, n = 4, and n = 5 independent biological samples, and was replicated two additional times with similar results. a, d, e, g One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test correction; b, c, f Two-tailed Student’s t-test. Exact P values are indicated within each panel; N.S.; not significant. From left to right in each panel: a all P < 0.001, c all P < 0.001, d N.S., N.S., N.S., N.S., P = 0.035, P < 0.001, N.S., N.S.; e P = 0.025, P < 0.001, P < 0.001; f N.S.; g P = 0.012, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001.

Using the Immgen database, Ccl4 expression is enriched in several T cell populations, including regulatory T cells (Tregs) and CD8+ T cells (Supplementary Fig. 2j). To determine whether Ccl4 is necessary for T cell CM-induced microglial Ccl5 production, a combination of Ccl4-neutralizing antibodies and Ccl4 receptor (Ccr5 and Ccr8) inhibitors were employed: Ccl4-neutralizing antibodies reduced activated T cell-induced microglia Ccl5 production by >60% (Fig. 1e). While both Ccr5 and Ccr8 were expressed by microglia (Fig. 1f), neither inhibiting Ccr5 (MCV treatment) or Ccr8 (AZ058 treatment) alone reduced Ccl5 to the same level as Ccl4-neutralizing antibodies (Fig. 1g). However, the combination of Ccr5 and Ccr8 inhibition (MCV + AZ058) reduced activated T cell-induced microglia Ccl5 production by ~60%, comparable to the effect observed with Ccl4-neutralizing antibodies (Fig. 1e, g). As controls, microglia were exposed to non-activated T cell CM in the presence or absence of Ccl4 receptor inhibition, with no effect on microglia Ccl5 production (Supplementary Fig. 2k). Since Ccl5 inhibits the apoptosis of Nf1-deficient high-grade glioma cells13, we analyzed the biological consequence of each of these reductions in Ccl5 expression on optic glioma stem cell (o-GSC) survival. Decreasing Ccl5 concentrations from 700 pg ml−1 to 400 or 200 pg ml−1, representing the Ccl5-inhibitory effect from anti-Ccl4 and Ccr5/Ccr8 blockers, increased o-GSC apoptosis by 50% or to untreated baseline levels, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2l), thus establishing a clear biological effect of this Ccl4 axis inhibition on microglial support of LGG stem cell survival.

Ccl3 also increased microglia Ccl5 production, albeit to a far lesser extent (2.5-fold increase vs.18.5-fold increase in response to Ccl4; Fig. 1d). However, the combination of Ccl3 and Ccl4 together did not further increase microglial Ccl5 expression beyond what was seen with Ccl4 alone (Supplementary Fig. 2m). Taken together, these results establish Ccl4 as the cytokine responsible for inducing microglia Ccl5 production relevant to glioma growth regulation.

MDK from NF1-mutant neurons induces T cell Ccl4 production

Since our experimental paradigm involved a non-physiologic method of T cell activation, we next sought to identify the factor(s) responsible for NF1-mediated T cell activation in the setting of Nf1 OPG. For these studies, we leveraged both human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) harboring actual NF1 patient germline NF1 gene mutations, as well as Nf1-mutant mice. Human neurons were generated from isogenic hiPSCs either heterozygous (NF1-het) or homozygous (NF1-null) for two NF1 patient germline NF1 gene mutations [c.2041C>T and c.6576C>T] using established protocols13. In light of previous work demonstrating elevated midkine (MDK) levels in NF1 patient samples, including low-grade peripheral nerve sheath tumors (neurofibromas14) and skin15, we employed a commercial array containing MDK and other cytokines. Using this assay, NF1-null neurons secreted higher levels of MDK and CSF-2 relative to control neurons (Supplementary Fig. 3a). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) validation revealed increased MDK, but not CSF2, mRNA expression in NF1-null, relative to control, neurons (Supplementary Fig. 3b, c). In contrast, increased CSF-2 protein levels were detected by ELISA in the CM of both NF1-null neurons relative to control neurons, but at much lower levels relative to MDK [CSF-2: 100–300 pg ml−1 (Supplementary Fig. 3d), MDK: 40,000–50,000 pg ml−1 (Fig. 2a)].

Fig. 2. NF1-mutant neurons express MDK, which activates T cells to produce Ccl4.

Fig. 2

a Isogenic hiPSC-induced neurons with heterozygous NF1 patient NF1 gene mutations (2041C>T and 6576C>T) produced higher levels of midkine in the neuron conditioned medium (N-CM) compared to WT (CTL) hiPSC-induced neurons. b Mdk gene expression was higher in the optic nerves of Nf1+/− relative to WT mice. c Increased Mdk expression was observed in optic glioma (OPG)-containing relative to control (CTL) optic nerves. d No change in T cell migration was observed in response to various MDK concentrations. e MDK (50 ng ml−1) stimulation for 48 h increased T cell Ccl4 production. f CM from isogenic hiPSC-induced neurons with NF1 patient NF1 gene mutations (c.2041C>T-N-CM and c.6576C>T-N-CM) exhibited a stronger T cell Ccl4 induction compared to CM from control hiPSC-induced neurons (CTL-N-CM). Anti-MDK neutralizing antibodies reduced T cell Ccl4 production in response to hiPSC-induced neuron CM stimulation. g MDK-activated (50 ng ml−1) T cell CM (mid-treated Tm) increased microglial Ccl5 production relative to non-activated T cell CM (non-act-Tm). h Immunohistochemistry revealed an increased percentage of MDK-immunoreactive cells in the retinal ganglion cell layer of OPG-bearing and Nf1+/− mice relative to control (CTL) or WT mice, respectively. Scale bars, 40 µm. Arrows denote representative immunopositive cells. i MDK gene expression was examined in NF1 pilocytic astrocytomas (NF1-PAs, n = 9), non-NF1-PAs (n = 9), and non-neoplastic brain tissues (n = 4). Increased MDK expression was detected in NF1-PAs compared to normal brain tissue and non-NF1-PAs. Arrows denote representative immunopositive cells. All data are presented as the mean ± SEM. a–c These representative experiments were conducted with a CTL, n = 3, 2041C>T n = 4, 6576C>T, n = 3; b WT, n = 7, Nf1±, n = 6; c CTL, n = 5, OPG, n = 4, independent biological samples, and were replicated two additional times with similar results. d and e Bar graphs represent the means ± SEM of d n = 5, e n = 3, independent biological samples. f This representative experiment was conducted with (from left to right) n = 3, n = 3, n = 3, n = 4, n = 3, n = 5, and n = 3 independent biological samples, and were replicated two additional times with similar results. g Bar graphs represent the means ± SEM of non-activated Tm, n = 3; MDK-treated Tm, n = 4 independent biological samples. h Bar graphs represent the means ± SEM of WT n = 9, Nf1+/−, n = 7, CTL, n = 5, OPG, n = 7, independent biological samples. i Bar graphs represent the means ± SEM of CTL, n = 4, non-NF1, PA, n = 9, NF1, PA, n = 9, independent biological samples. a, d, f, i One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test correction, b, c, h Two-tailed Student’s t-test. Exact P values are indicated within each panel; N.S.; not significant. From left to right in each panel: a all P < 0.00, 1 b P = 0.008, c P = 0.021, d all N.S.; f top P = 0.012, middle P = 0.023, P = 0.030, bottom P = 0.045, P = 0.039; i CTL:NF1 PA P = 0.024, non-NF1 PA:NF1-PA P = 0.007; h all P < 0.001.

Neuron-derived MDK or CSF-2 could influence T cell biology in two ways. First, it could function as a chemoattractant for T cells. However, CD3+ T cell migration measured using a transwell assay was not increased in response either to MDK or CSF-2 (Fig. 2d; Supplementary Fig. 3e). Second, it is possible that MDK or CSF-2 activates T cells to produce Ccl4. For these experiments, we stimulated CD3+ T cells with either MDK or CSF-2 at the concentrations measured in the CM of heterozygous NF1-mutant hiPSC-derived neurons (~50 ng ml−1 MDK, 200 pg ml−1, CSF-2), as seen in patients with NF1. While T cells exhibited increased Ccl4 production in response to MDK stimulation (Fig. 2e), there was no Ccl4 induction following CSF-2 treatment (Supplementary Fig. 3f), thus excluding CSF-2 as a potent neuronal T cell activator.

To determine whether MDK mediates hiPSC-derived neuron CM to increase T cell Ccl4 release, T cells were incubated with CM collected from control and heterozygous NF1-mutant (c.2041C>T and c.6576C>T) hiPSC-derived neurons. Treatment with the CM of c.2041C>T and c.6576C>T NF1-mutant hiPSC-neurons increased T cell Ccl4 production (Fig. 2f). MDK mediated this induction, since MDK-neutralizing antibodies attenuated the neuron CM-induced Ccl4 increase (Fig. 2f). It should be noted that NF1-mutant neuron CM contains a similar concentration of MDK (50 ng ml−1) to the commercially purified MDK used for T cell treatment (Fig. 2e). The fact that hiPSC NF1-mutant neuron CM was diluted in T cell CM (30% v/v) in order to maintain healthy T cell cultures, reduced the overall concentration of MDK by three-fold compared to the purified MDK treatments, thus resulting in relatively attenuated Ccl4 induction. Consistent with MDK as the primary activation signal for T cell priming of microglia, CM from MDK-treated T cells induced microglial Ccl5 production to an equivalent extent after normalizing to cell number and medium volume (Fig. 2g). Finally, we sought to define the mechanism underlying NF1 protein (neurofibromin) control of neuronal MDK expression. As the main function of the NF1 protein is to negatively regulate RAS activity, we treated control and NF1-mutant hiPSC-induced neurons with lovastatin (a crude RAS inhibitor) at different concentrations16. Following lovastatin treatment, MDK expression in these NF1-mutant hiPSC-induced neurons was reduced (Supplementary Fig. 3g), without alterations in neuronal survival (Supplementary Fig. 3h).

Relevant to human and mouse NF1-LGG, we also examined MDK expression in the Nf1 OPG mice and human NF1-LGG (pilocytic astrocytoma; PA) samples. Consistent with the hiPSC NF1-mutant neuron findings (Fig. 2a), optic nerves from Nf1+/− and Nf1 OPG mice exhibited higher levels of Mdk transcript expression (Fig. 2b, c), and a greater percentage of MDK-expressing cells in the retinal ganglion cell layer of the retina relative to control mice (Fig. 2h). In addition, MDK transcript expression was elevated in NF1-PA samples relative to non-NF1-PA and normal brain tissue (Fig. 2i). Taken together, these results establish increased MDK expression as a common feature unique to mouse and human NF1-LGGs, not shared with non-NF1-PAs, which functions as an activator of T cells to produce Ccl4.

MDK induces T cell Ccl4 via Lrp1/calcineurin/NFAT1 signaling

To determine how MDK activates T cells, we examined the expression of its known receptors, including Ptprz117, Cspg518, Lrp1, Lrp619, and Alk20. By qRT-PCR, T cells express abundant Lrp1 (Fig. 3a). To determine whether Lrp1 was necessary for MDK-mediated Ccl4 secretion from T cells, we incubated T cells with MDK or hiPSC NF1-mutant neuron CM in the presence of Lrp1-neutralizing antibodies. Lrp1-neutralizing antibodies inhibited the ability of both MDK and hiPSC NF1-mutant neuron CM to increase T cell Ccl4 expression (Fig. 3b,c). MDK has been reported to signal through multiple different intracellular pathways involving Akt, Atf21, Stat4, NFAT1, NFAT222, and Src23. While no differences in Akt, Atf, Stat4, NFAT2 activation were observed (Supplementary Fig. 4), increased nuclear NFAT1 levels were detected following MDK exposure (Fig. 3d). This nuclear translocation results from dephosphorylation of the serine-rich region (Serine-54) within the amino termini of NFAT1 proteins, and the following conformational change that exposes a nuclear localization signal24. As such, MDK treatment also dephosphorylated NFAT1 (Fig. 3e). Importantly, Lrp1 inhibition increased phosphorylated NFAT1S54 levels and blocked the nuclear translocation of NFAT1 in the setting of MDK exposure (Fig. 3e). Lrp1 can activate NFAT1 through ERK and calcineurin25. While we observed no change in ERK activity after MDK exposure (Supplementary Fig. 4), NFAT1 nuclear transport was reduced following calcineurin inhibition26 (FK506; Fig. 3f). Moreover, MDK-induced T cell Ccl4 production was reduced following treatment with the FK506 and cyclosporin (calcineurin inhibitors24; Fig. 3g). FK506 treatment also inhibited hiPSC-derived neuron CM induction of T cell Ccl4 production (Fig. 3h). Collectively, our findings demonstrate that MDK binds to Lrp1 on T cells and induces Ccl4 expression through calcineurin-mediated NFAT1 nuclear translocation.

Fig. 3. MDK activates T cells to produce Ccl4 through Lrp1/calcineurin/NFAT1 signaling.

Fig. 3

a T cells expressed only two (Lrp1 and Lrp6) of the putative MDK receptors [protein-tyrosine phosphatase ζ (Ptprz1), neuroglycan-C (Cspg5), low density-lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 (Lrp1), low density-lipoprotein receptor-related protein-6 (Lrp6) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (Alk)] by quantitative RT-PCR. Normal mouse cortex was used as an internal positive control. b Lrp1 blocking antibodies (30 µg ml−1) reduced MDK-induced Ccl4 production in T cells. c The 2041C>T neuron conditioned media (N-CM)-mediated Ccl4 production in T cells was attenuated following exposure to Lrp1 receptor blocking antibodies. d Immunoblotting revealed increased NFAT1 nuclear  localization in T cells following MDK treatment. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and TATA-binding protein (TBP) served as loading controls for the cytoplasm and nuclear fractions, respectively. e Decreased levels of phosphorylated-NFAT1 (p-NFAT) were observed after MDK stimulation of T cells. Lrp1 blocking antibodies (anti-Lrp1, 30 µg ml−1) increased NFAT1 phosphorylation and impaired NFAT1 nuclear localization in MDK-stimulated T cells. f The calcineurin inhibitor FK506 (10 μM) inhibited MDK-induced NFAT1 nuclear localization. g Calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporin (100 nM) and FK506 (10 μM), inhibited MDK-induced Ccl4 production in T cells. h FK506 (10 μM) reduced 2041C>T neuron conditioned media (N-CM)-induced Ccl4 production in T cells. All data are presented as the mean ± SEM. a Bar graphs represent the means ± SEM of n = 3 independent biological samples. b, c; g, h These representative experiments were conducted with n = 3 independent biological samples,and were replicated two additional times with similar results. b, c, g One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test correction, h Two-tailed Student’s t-test. Exact P values are indicated within each panel; N.S.; not significant. From left to right in each panel: b P = 0.005, P = 0.007; c N.S., P = 0.007; g P < 0.001, N.S., N.S.; h P < 0.001. df These are representative images of n = 3 independent biological samples examined over three independent experiments with similar results. Molecular weight markers are denoted at the left side of each blot.

CD8+ T cell brain entry is required for optic glioma growth

While the above studies revealed important roles for neurons and T cells in LGG stroma-tumor circuitry, they do not establish whether T cells are necessary for optic glioma growth. To demonstrate a requirement for T cells and directed T cell infiltration in murine Nf1 optic glioma growth, we performed two preclinical proof-of-principle experiments using neutralizing antibodies. First, Nf1 OPG mice were treated with anti-CD3 antibodies to deplete T cells from 6 weeks of age until 3 months of age, verified by flow cytometry of splenic cells (IgG group, 55% CD3+ cells; anti-CD3 group, 7.61%; Fig. 4a). Relative to isotype antibody (IgG) treatments, the OPGs in these mice had reduced numbers of CD3+ T cells and attenuated tumor proliferation (Fig. 4b). Second, since T cells are rarely found in the normal brain parenchyma, but are detected in NF1-associated mouse and human LGGs12,27, we examined the meningeal space in control (CTL, Nf1flox/flox) and Nf1 optic glioma (OPG, Nf1flox/mut; GFAP-Cre) mice as a potential point of entry28. Similar to the optic nerves27, more CD3+ T cells were observed in the meningeal space of OPG mice relative to controls (Fig. 4c), suggesting that T cells in the setting of optic gliomas are most likely recruited from this location into the evolving tumor. Because T cell migration from the meningeal space is mediated by integrins, such as the very late antigen 4 (VLA4)29, Nf1 OPG mice were treated with anti-VLA4 antibodies in a parallel experiment. Consistent with a dependency on integrin for T cell parenchymal invasion, anti-VLA4 treatment inhibited CD3+ T cell tumor infiltration, and reduced tumor proliferation (Fig. 4b). Interestingly, neither treatment affected microglia content (Iba1+ cells, Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4. Nf1 optic glioma mice exhibit increased meningeal and parenchymal T cells.

Fig. 4

a CD3+ T cells (circled with dash line) were depleted in splenocytes from anti-CD3 antibody-treated mice (7.6%) relative to IgG-treated mice (55%), as measured by flow cytometry. b Immunohistochemistry revealed that anti-VLA4 and anti-CD3, but not control IgG, antibody treatments reduced CD3+ T cell infiltration and the percentage of Ki67+ cells in murine Nf1 optic gliomas. No differences in microglia content (%Iba1+ cells) were observed in the anti-VLA4 and anti-CD3 groups compared to the IgG controls. Arrows denote representative immunopositive cells. Black arrows indicate representative immunopositive cells. c Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed increased meningeal CD3+ lymphocyte infiltration in optic glioma (OPG)-bearing mice, relative to the control (CTL) mice. Yellow arrow denotes representative immunopositive cells. DAPI (blue) is used as a nuclear counter stain. a, c Scale bars, 40 µm. b Bar graphs represent the means ± SEM of (top panel) IgG, n = 9; anti-VLA4, n = 10; anti-CD3, n = 9; (middle and bottom panels), all groups had n = 10 independent biological samples. c Bar graphs represent the means ± SEM of CTL, n = 6; OPG, n = 9; independent biological samples. b One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test correction; c Two-tailed Student’s t-test. Exact P values are indicated within each panel; N.S.; not significant. From left to right in each panel: b top panel: all P < 0.001, middle panel: all P < 0.001, bottom panel: all N.S.; c P = 0.005.

Next, we sought to determine which T cell population predominated in these tumors using CD4, CD8, and Foxp3 antibodies. Whereas no Foxp3+ cells were detected in the OPGs (Supplementary Fig. 5a), the majority of the T cells in the tumors were CD8+ cells, rather than CD4+ cells (Fig. 5a). The cellular identity of these CD8+ cells in the mouse Nf1 OPGs were verified as CD3+ T cells by double labeling immunohistochemistry (Fig. 5b). A similar pattern was also observed in the meninges of these mice, where the vast majority of the T cells were CD8+, with a smaller infiltration of CD4+ cells (Fig. 5c). Consistent with these findings in murine OPGs, CD8+ T cells were also detected in human NF1-PAs (N = 4; Supplementary Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5. Nf1 optic glioma mice exhibit increased numbers of CD8+ T cells in the meninges and optic nerve.

Fig. 5

a Increased CD3+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration was observed in Nf1 optic glioma (OPG)-containing nerves relative to control (CTL) optic nerves. Few CD4+ T cells were detected in murine Nf1 OPG or control optic nerves. Black arrows denote representative immunopositive cells. Scale bars, 20 µm. b CD3+ (red); CD8+ (green) double-positive cells were found (yellow arrow) in murine Nf1 optic gliomas. c Increased numbers of meningeal CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (green) were present in Nf1 OPG mice relative to controls, where the number of CD8+ T cells was three-fold higher than CD4+ T cells. DAPI (blue) is used as a nuclear counter stain. Yellow arrows denote representative immunopositive cells. b, c Scale bars, 40 µm. a, c Bar graphs represent the means ± SEM of a (left panel) n = 6, (middle panel) CTL, n = 5; OPG, n = 6, (right panel) n = 5 or c n = 6 independent biological samples. a Two-tailed Student’s t-test, c One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test correction. Exact P values are indicated within each panel; N.S.; not significant. From left to right in each panel: a left panel P = 0.006, middle panel N.S., right panel P = 0.007; c P = 0.004, P < 0.001.

To establish a requirement for CD8+ cells in Nf1 OPG growth, we employed anti-CD8 antibody treatment to deplete CD8+ T cells using a protocol similar to that described for the anti-CD3 treatments. CD8+ T cell depletion was validated in splenocytes by FACS analysis (IgG group, 50.3% CD8+ cells; anti-CD3 group, 0.18%; Supplementary Fig. 5c). As observed following CD3 antibody exposure, the OPGs in treated mice had reduced numbers of CD3+ T cells and attenuated tumor proliferation, but no change in microglia content (Fig. 6a). Consistent with a key role for this population of T lymphocytes in LGG pathobiology and similar to CD3+ T cells, CD8+ T cells produced Ccl4 in response to MDK (Supplementary Fig. 5d), which was inhibited by MDK-neutralizing antibodies (Supplementary Fig. 5d). Additionally, microglia exposed to MDK-treated CD8+ T cell CM exhibited similar levels of microglial Ccl5 (Supplementary Fig. 5e) as observed following MDK-treated CD3+ T cell CM exposure (Fig. 2g). Consistent with the T cell Ccl4 regulation of microglial Ccl5 expression, anti-CD8 antibody treatment of Nf1 OPG mice reduced the percent of Ccl4+and Ccl5+cells in the murine LGGs (Fig. 6a).

Fig. 6. CD8+ T cells control Nf1 optic glioma growth.

Fig. 6

a Immunohistochemistry revealed that anti-CD8 antibody treatment reduced the number of CD3+ T cells, as well as the percentage of Ki67+ cells, Ccl4+ cells, and Ccl5+ cells, in Nf1 optic glioma specimens. Black arrows denote representative immunopositive cells. Scale bar, 40 µm. No differences in microglia (%Iba1+ cells) content were observed in anti-CD8 treated mice compared to the IgG control group. Bar graphs represent the means ± SEM of %Ki67+ cells, IgG, n = 8; anti-CD8, n = 5; CD3+ cells, IgG, n = 8; anti-CD8, n = 5; %Iba1+ cells, IgG, n = 8; anti-CD8, n = 5; %Ccl4+ cells, IgG, n = 6; anti-CD8, n = 5; %Ccl5+ cells, IgG, n = 4; anti-CD8, n = 4, independent biological samples. Two-tailed Student’s t-test. Exact P values are indicated within each panel; N.S.; not significant. From left to right in each panel: a % Ki67+ cells, P = 0.001; CD3+ cells, P = 0.002; %Iba1+ cells, N.S.; %Ccl4+ cells, P = 0.026; % Ccl5+ cells, P = 0.015. b Kaplan–Meier survival analysis (Brain Lower Grade Glioma TCGA Provisional [left panel; P = 6.72e–13] and TCGA PanCancer Atlas [right panel; P = 7.11e−14] datasets) demonstrates that non-overlapping patients with LGG and high tumor CD8 expression have shorter survival time, while c high CD4 expression was not associated with reduced survival time (Brain Lower Grade Glioma TCGA Provisional [left panel; P = 0.371] and TCGA PanCancer Atlas [right panel; P = 0.598] datasets).

Lastly, to explore the possible clinical relevance of CD8+ T cell infiltration, we analyzed CD8 and CD4 RNA expression in datasets with LGG [Brain Lower Grade Glioma (TCGA, Provisional, overlapping patients excluded) and Brain Lower Grade Glioma (TCGA, PanCancer Atlas) samples]30. In both LGG datasets, shorter overall survival correlated with increased CD8, but not CD4, expression (Fig. 6b, c). Similarly, increased CD8 expression also correlated with reduced progression-free survival in the one dataset (TCGA, Provisional) with sufficient numbers of samples for analysis (Supplementary Fig. 5f). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that CD8+ T cell entry into the brain is required for Nf1 OPG growth, which is also associated with poor clinical outcome in patients with LGG.

T cell-induced microglial Ccl5 production inhibits apoptosis

Additionally, we sought to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for microglia Ccl5 production and LGG cancer cell growth. Initial experiments focused on defining the monocyte population (macrophages versus microglia) and the effect of a germline Nf1 gene mutation on the involved monocyte population. First, while the monocytes that populate the murine Nf1 OPGs are CD11b+/CD45low/Cx3cr1+ cells (microglia)9, rather than peripheral CD11b+/CD45high/Cx3cr1- macrophages, we nevertheless examined the responses of WT splenic monocytes (macrophages) to activated T cell CM (Supplementary Fig. 6a). In striking contrast to the results obtained with microglia, no significant induction of Ccl5 in splenic monocytes was observed, supporting a T cell-microglia, rather than T cell-macrophage, circuit in the maintenance of Nf1 OPGs. Second, because the stromal (T cells and microglia) cells in both murine and human NF1-OPG are heterozygous for a germline NF1 gene mutation, we also examined the ability of Nf1+/ T cells and microglia to interact and produce Ccl5. Similar induction of microglial Ccl5 was observed using activated Nf1+/− T cell CM or Nf1+/ microglia (Supplementary Fig. 6b, c). For these reasons, we explored the regulation of Ccl5 using WT T cells and microglia.

Since NFκB has been previously implicated in Ccl5 transcriptional regulation31, we examined NFkB inhibitor (Iκbα) phosphorylation in microglia following exposure to activated T cell CM. Increased Ikbα phosphorylation, indicating higher levels of NFκb activity, was observed following activated T cell CM treatment, which was abrogated using an NFκB inhibitor (Caffeic acid phenethyl ester, CAPE) (Fig. 7a). Importantly, increased microglial Ccl5 production in response to activated T cell CM exposure was blocked by NFκB inhibition (CAPE; Fig. 7b).

Fig. 7. T cell-mediated microglial Ccl5 production inhibits LGG apoptosis through CD44.

Fig. 7

a Activated T cell CM (act-Tm) increased Iκbα phosphorylation in microglia, which was reduced following Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE; 100 µM) treatment. b CAPE treatment attenuated activated T cell CM (act-Tm)-mediated Ccl5 production in microglia. OPG o-GSCs were stimulated with Ccl5 at 300 pg ml−1 for 3 days. Whereas no increased optic glioma stem cell (o-GSC) proliferation (%Ki67+ cells) was observed c, o-GSC apoptosis (%TUNEL+ cells) was reduced in the Ccl5-treated group compared to vehicle (Veh, 0.1% BSA) treated controls d. e Immunoblotting reveals activation of the Akt-GSK3β-CREB anti-apoptosis pathway following Ccl5 treatment, which was inhibited by AKT inhibitor (20 μM MK2206) treatment. f 20 μM MK2206 treatment inhibited the anti-apoptosis effect of Ccl5 on o-GSCs (%TUNEL+ cells). g Cd44 expression in o-GSCs was detected by qRT-PCR using splenocytes as a positive control. Cd44 expression differences were not statistically analyzed. h CD44 knockdown (CD44KD) in o-GSCs reduces CD44 expression relative to the control shRNA-treated (Ctrl) cells. i Apoptosis (%TUNEL+ cells) of CD44KD o-GSCs was not inhibited by Ccl5 treatment. j Immunoblotting reveals that Ccl5 activation of the Akt/GSK3β/CREB anti-apoptosis pathway was inhibited by CD44 knockdown. All data are presented as the mean ± SEM. bd, f, i These representative experiments were conducted with b n = 3, c n = 6, d n = 5; f, i n = 4 independent biological samples and were replicated two additional times with similar results. g Bar graphs represent the means ± SEM of n = 3 independent biological samples. bd, i Two-tailed Student’s t-test; f One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test correction. Exact P values are indicated within each panel; N.S.; not significant. From left to right in each panel: b P = 0.001; c N.S.; d P = 0.003; f P = 0.003, N.S.; i P = 0.119. a, e, h, j These are representative images of n = 3 independent biological samples examined over three independent experiments with similar results. Molecular weight markers are denoted at the right side of each blot.

Based on prior studies demonstrating that Ccl5 is necessary for murine Nf1 OPG growth in vivo11,12 and operates to control glioblastoma cell growth by inhibiting apoptosis, we next sought to determine whether Ccl5 increases the survival of cancer stem cells from murine Nf1 optic gliomas (optic glioma stem cells; o-GSCs). We focused on these cells, since they are capable of generating glioma-like lesions in mice following transplantation, and no suitable primary human NF1-LGG cell lines are currently available for analysis. Whereas Ccl5 treatment in the growth phase (non-confluent) did not change the percentage of proliferating (Ki67+) o-GSCs (Fig. 7c), Ccl5 reduced the apoptosis of confluent o-GSC cultures (TUNEL staining; Fig. 7d).

To identify the signaling pathway underlying Ccl5 control of o-GSC apoptosis, we performed a survey of known NF1 protein (neurofibromin) downstream effectors. While no change in ERK activity was observed following Ccl5 treatment (Supplementary Fig. 6d), Akt and CREB phosphorylation was increased (Fig. 7e). Since Akt activates the CREB pathway through GSK3β in hepatocytes32, we measured GSK3β activity. Consistent with Akt/GSK3β/CREB hyperactivation as the responsible pathway underlying Ccl5-mediated o-GSC survival, Akt inhibition (MK2206) following Ccl5 treatment attenuated Akt, GSK3β, and CREB activation (using phospho-specific antibodies), as well as increased o-GSC apoptosis (TUNEL) (Fig. 7e, f).

We have previously shown that CD44 is the CCL5 receptor on Nf1-deficient high-grade glioma cells33. To determine whether Ccl5 functions through this receptor, we first analyzed o-GSC CD44 mRNA and protein expression (Fig. 7g,h). Second, following Cd44 knockdown in o-GSCs, Ccl5 no longer inhibited o-GSC death (Fig. 7h–j). As such, Ccl5 operates to increase low-grade and high-grade glioma survival through CD44 binding and downstream signaling.

Since Ccl5 mediates o-GSC survival via the AKT/GSK3β/CREB pathway, we examined the percentage of p-AKTSer473-immunopositive cells and p-CREBSer133-immunopositive cells following anti-CD8 treatment in Nf1 optic glioma mice. Consistent with T cell Ccl4 induction of microglial Ccl5-mediated optic glioma growth, we observed a reduction in the percentage of p-AKTSer473-immunopositive cells and p-CREBSer133-immunopositive cells in the optic gliomas of anti-CD8 antibody-treated mice (Fig. 8a, b).

Fig. 8. T cell-induced Ccl5/CD44-mediated cell survival underlies Nf1 optic glioma growth.

Fig. 8

a, b Immunohistochemistry revealed that anti-CD8 antibody treatment reduced the percentage of p-AKTSer473-expressing and p-CREBSer133-expressing cells in mouse Nf1 optic glioma specimens. Black arrows denote representative immunopositive cells. Scale bars, 20 µm. Bar graphs represent the means ± SEM of n = 4 independent biological samples. Two-tailed Students-t test. Exact P values are indicated within each panel; a P < 0.001; b P = 0.002. c, d Kaplan–Meier survival curves (Brain Lower Grade Glioma TCGA Provisional [2 left panels; c P = 1.29e−6, d P = 2.06e−3] and TCGA PanCancer Atlas [2 right panels; c P = 4.69e−13, d P = 9.86e−3] datasets) demonstrate that non-overlapping patients with LGG who harbor high CCL5 expression or CD44 expression have reduced survival time. e Schematic representation of the neuron–immune–cancer axis in NF1-LGG. Meningeal T cells infiltrate into the optic glioma in an integrin (VLA-4)-dependent manner, and are activated by MDK produced by Nf1-mutant retinal ganglion cells (neurons) through a RAS-dependent mechanism. This neuron-mediated T cell activation increases CD8+ T cell Ccl4 production through increased Lrp1/calcineurin signaling, and results in increased NFκB-dependent microglial Ccl5 expression, culminating in increased glioma growth through Akt/GSK3β/CREB pathway-mediated suppression of cancer (glioma) stem cell apoptosis and increased tumor growth.

Finally, in keeping with a key role for Ccl5 and CD44 in LGG, high CCL5 or CD44 expression also correlated with reduced overall survival in the two available TCGA datasets with LGGs (overlapping patients excluded; Fig. 8c, d). A similar correlation between high tumor CCL5 expression and reduced progression-free survival was observed in the one dataset with sufficient numbers of samples for analysis; Supplementary Fig. 6e).

Discussion

Using NF1 as a genetic model system to study low-grade brain tumor pathobiology, we found that the glioma microenvironment is composed of immune (T cells and microglia) and non-immune (neurons) stromal cells, which together establish fertile soil supportive of the development and progression of these tumors. In this regard, we show that CD8+ T cells are required for glioma growth, such that inhibiting their entry into the brain attenuates tumor proliferation (VLA4, CD3, and CD8 antibody treatments). Moreover, we demonstrate that NF1-mutant neurons support glioma growth by producing MDK, which activates T cells to produce Ccl4, a cytokine that induces microglia to express a critical glioma growth factor (Ccl5) (Fig. 8e). These findings raise several important points relevant to solid tumor pathobiology.

While traditionally viewed as bystander cells in the pathogenesis of cancer, recent studies argue that neurons provide instructive cues for tumor formation and growth. First, neurons secrete neurotransmitters and neuropeptides, which can bind to their cognate receptors on tumor cells to directly increase brain tumor cell growth34. Second, using optogenetic approaches, increased neuronal activity has been shown to drive high-grade glioma growth through the shedding of neuroligin-3, a protein normally involved in neuron–neuron communication6. Third, nerve innervation is a poor prognostic marker in many cancers outside of the nervous system (pancreas and prostate cancer)35,36 such that neuron-secreted factors promote tumor initiation, growth, and metastasis37,38. For example, autonomic nerve fibers positively mediate prostate cancer initiation and progression through adrenergic and cholinergic signaling pathways37. In addition, neural progenitor cells (NPCs) can migrate from the brain to prostate tumors, and drive tumor proliferation and metastasis39.

In addition to directly mediate tumor growth, neurons can also contribute to tumorigenesis by modulating immune cell function. In the brain, neurons produce membrane-bound and soluble factors (e.g., CD2240, CD20041, ICAM-542, semaphorin-3A43, and CX3CL144) that each can modulate microglia properties. These tightly regulated interactions are not only essential for normal brain development, during which neuronal complement (C1q) expression triggers microglia-mediated synaptic pruning, but can be subverted to drive nervous system disease progression in the setting of peripheral nerve injury45 and neurodegenerative disorders46. Similarly, neurons produce TGFβ to increase CD4+ T cell proliferation47, as well as Fas ligand to promote T cell apoptosis48.

Our finding that NF1-mutant mouse and human neurons increase their expression of MDK, which operates to activate T cells through NFAT-1 signaling, also expands the role of neurons as immune system regulators. In this regard, neuronal shedding of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-5 inhibits the activation of naïve T cells49. While further studies will be required to understand how neuronal MDK is regulated relative to glioma growth, MDK has been previously implicated in the suppression of regulatory T cell (Treg) expansion50, as well as in the growth of experimental neurofibromas arising in the context of NF114,51. While MDK activation of T cells is the operative mechanism underlying NF1-LGG pathogenesis, other etiologies are likely responsible for non-NF1 (sporadic) LGG initiation and growth. As such, elevated MDK expression was not observed in non-NF1 PA samples relative to normal brain tissue (Fig. 2i), and MDK expression is not correlated with LGG patient survival using available TCGA data (Supplementary Fig. 6f).

T cells normally provide a level of immune surveillance by trafficking from the cerebrospinal fluid through the brain, and draining back into the periphery via lymphatic vessels in the meningeal spaces52. Although not present in large numbers in the healthy brain, the amount of infiltrating T cells is increased in numerous different histologic brain tumor subtypes, each of which displays a unique pattern of immune cell infiltration and transcriptional signatures53,54. However, the contribution of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to these tumors remains unclear. For example, pediatric LGG exhibit higher levels of T cell infiltration relative to their malignant counterparts55, while CD4+ and Foxp3+ T cell glioma content correlated with increased tumor progression56. Similarly, infiltrating T cells correlated with poor patient survival in one study57, whereas another demonstrated that CD8+ T cell content is associated with improved patient survival58.

Herein, we found that the majority of T cells in these low-grade murine gliomas are CD8+ lymphocytes, such that their depletion attenuated OPG growth in vivo. While these T cells are typically considered cytotoxic in nature, it is possible that they represent a population of exhausted T cells, which could be converted to tumoricidal59. Future experiments will be necessary to define their unique functional properties in this particular neoplastic setting. Similarly, whereas VLA-4 is required for CD8+ T cell infiltration into Nf1 optic gliomas, as revealed by the anti-VLA4 antibody experiments, differential VLA-4 expression in CD4+ versus CD8+ T cells does not account for the preferential CD8+ T cell infiltration in Nf1 murine optic gliomas28 and human NF154 gliomas (Supplementary Fig. 6g, h). However, since T cells are recruited into murine Nf1 optic gliomas by chemokines (Ccl2 and Ccl12) released by o-GSCs27, it is possible that differences in T cell population recruitment may result from differential responses to these chemokines. Future studies are focused on mechanistically defining how CD8T cells are selectively recruited into these LGGs27,60.

As systemic immune regulators, T cells have the capability to educate macrophages/microglia in both health and disease28,61. In other brain diseases, infiltrating T cells are in close vicinity to influence microglia/macrophages62. In addition, T cells suppress microglia activation in the phase of inflammatory insults, as well as produce cytokines (e.g., IL-4) that can alter microglia function63. Similarly, in many types of cancer, T cells interact with tumor-associated microglia/macrophages (TAMs) through the secretion of factors, like IL-4 and IL-1364 and alter tumor growth or invasion. This connection is underscored by previous work from our laboratory in which microglia from athymic (nu/nu) mice exhibit reduced phagocytosis and reduced Ccl5 expression12. Consistent with T cell-mediated microglia education, incubating nu/nu mouse brain microglia with activated wild-type (WT) T cells or their CM resulted in restoration of normal Ccl5 levels. The ability of T cells to communicate with microglia to change their physiologic state and functional capabilities provides another mechanism to control brain homeostasis and influence CNS pathobiology. In light of the patient survival curves stratified by CD8 and CCL5 tumor expression (Figs. 6b, 8c, d), these T cell–microglia interactions may be particularly relevant to LGGs, where MDK/CCL4-independent mechanisms involving CD8+ T cells and microglia result in CCL5 support of tumor growth. Additional experiments using other LGG models will be required to extend these findings beyond NF1.

In summary, the neuron–immune–cancer axis elucidated in this study highlights the tightly choreographed interactions between neoplastic cells and their non-neoplastic neighbors (neurons, T cells, and microglia; Fig. 6h). Similar to other contexts in which numerous cell types (microglia, reactive astrocytes, and oligodendrocyte precursor cells) interact to impact on brain function (methotrexate-induced cognitive impairment65), the findings in this report expand the concept of the tumor microenvironment and the complex relationships between participating cell types, including neurons, but also offer opportunities to target the tumor ecosystem.

Methods

Mice

All mice, including Nf1+/ mice (neomycin sequence insertion within exon 31 of the murine Nf1 gene), Nf1flox/mut; GFAP-Cre (OPG) mice (Nf1+/− mice with somatic Nf1 gene inactivation in neuroglial progenitors at E15.5) and Nf1flox/flox mice (controls)66,67, were maintained on a strict C57BL/6 background and used in accordance with an approved Animal Studies Committee protocol at Washington University. Ccl5−/− mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (JAX; 005090). Mice were housed in barrier facilities with controlled light–dark cycles (12:12 h) and ad libitum access to food and water.

Anti-VLA4, anti-CD3, and anti-CD8 treatments

Six-week-old OPG mice (n = 10/cohort) were injected with 150 µg of anti-VLA4 (IgG2b), anti-CD3 (IgG2b), anti-CD8 (IgG2b), or rat IgG (isotype control, Bio X Cell) intraperitoneally every other day for 6 weeks. The brains and optic nerves were harvested when the mice reached 3 months of age, and the Iba1, Ki67, and CD3-positive cells analyzed by counting the number of cells showing a positive signal after immunohistochemistry27.

Culture of mouse optic glioma stem cells, human iPSCs, and neurons

Optic nerves/chiasms were dissected from 3-month-old Nf1 OPG mice and used to generate o-GSCs68. Single cell suspensions were obtained by digesting the optic nerve/chiasm in Trypsin Digest Medium, followed by maintenance in neural stem cell (NSC) medium (61% DMEM low glucose medium, 35% neurobasal medium, 2 mM l-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin; P/S) supplemented with Glutamax (200 mM), EGF (20 ng ml−1), FGF (20 ng ml−1), 1% N2, and 2% B27.

Isogenic human iPSCs homozygous or heterozygous for the c.2041C>T or c.6513T>A NF1 patient-specific NF1 germline mutations were engineered using CRISPR/Cas9 technology by the Washington University Genome Engineering and iPSC Core Facility (GEiC). NPCs were differentiated by passaging iPSCs onto PLO/Laminin (Millipore Sigma)-coated plates using ReleSR (STEMCELL Technologies), followed by seeding at 200,000 cells cm−2 in NPC induction medium [50% DMEM F12 (Gibco), 50% Neurobasal medium (Gibco), supplemented with N2, B27 (Fisher), 2 mM GlutaMax (Gibco), 10 ng ml−1 hLIF, 4 µM CHIR99021, 3 µM SB431541, and 0.1 µM Compound E (all from STEMCELL Technologies)]. NPCs were maintained in this medium supplemented with 2 µM Dorsomorphin for 3 days, and without Dorsomorphin (STEMCELL technologies) for an additional 5 days. NPCs were subsequently incubated in NPC maturation medium (50% DMEM/F12, 50% Neurobasal medium supplemented with N2, B27, 2 mM GlutaMax, 10 ng ml−1 hLIF, 3 µM CHIR99021, and 2 µM SB431541), and were passaged weekly following Accutase (STEMCELL Technologies) dissociation according to manufacturer’s instructions. For differentiation into a mixed population of CNS neurons, NPCs were plated on PLO/Laminin-coated plates in Neuron Maturation Media (STEMCELL technologies) for 6 weeks prior to CM collection. CM was then used for T cell stimulation, MDK ELISA (LifeSpan Biosciences), CSF-2 (R&D Systems), and analysis using the Proteome Profiler Human Cytokine Array (R&D Systems ARY017).The collected neurons were used for mRNA isolation.

Human PA samples

The PA specimens used for qRT-PCR analyses were obtained under an approved Human Studies Protocol as frozen tumor pellets from the St. Louis Children’s Hospital Pediatric Tumor Bank, and included nine NF1 patient PAs (3 males, 6 females; 10.11 ± 1.91 years), nine non-NF1 PAs (3 males, 6 females; 10.11 ± 1.76 years) and four non-neoplastic brain samples (2 males, 7 females; 10.25 ± 2.81 years). These de-identified specimens were used under an approved protocol from the Washington University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board. Human NF1-associated PA specimens used for immunohistochemistry were obtained from Dr. Sonika Dahiya under an approved protocol at the Washington University School of Medicine IRB. Immunohistochemistry was performed on adjacent paraffin sections using the antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 1. Detection was performed using the Vectastain Elite ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame).

Microglia/monocyte analyses

Each mouse brains were homogenized in the gentle MACS™ Dissociator (Miltenyi) with 5 ml of digestion solution (116 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 26 mM NaHCO3, 1 mM NaH2PO4, 1.5 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.5 mM EDTA, 25 mM glucose, 1 mM cysteine, and 20 units ml−1 papain) for 30 min. 20 ml of PBS with 10% FBS was subsequently added to inactivate the digestion solution. Next, the cells were centrifuged (200×g, 20 min) in 20% Percoll overlaid with HBSS to remove the meninges. The cells were then treated with DNase, centrifuged and passed through a 70 µm strainer. The resulting cells maintained in minimal essential medium Earle’s medium supplemented with 1 mM l-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.6% d-(+)-glucose,1 ng ml−1 GM-CSF, 100 μg ml−1 P/S, 4% FBS, and 6% horse serum.

After 2 weeks, microglia were separated from the astrocytes by shaking (cultured in medium without GM-CSF 3 days before shaking, 200×g, 5 h, 37 °C). 5 × 105 microglia/monocytes were grown in T cell CM for 24 h12, and Ccl5 measured by an ELISA kit (R&D Systems). Maraviroc (MCV) (Fisher Scientific, S2003), AZ0084 (MedChem Express, HY-119217) and Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) (Fisher Scientific, 274310) were purchased from Fisher Scientific. The mouse recombinant cytokines [TNFα (Abcam, ab9740), GM-CSF (R&D Systems, 415ML101), Ccl2 (R&D Systems, 279-MC-010), Ccl1 (Fisher Scientific, EMCCL1),Ccl3 (Novus Biologicals, NBP2-35193), Ccl4 (R&D Systems, 451-MB-010), Ccl5 (Fisher Scientific, 478MR025), IL-1ra (Novus Biologicals, NBP2-35105), and Il-2 (R&D Systems, 402-ML-020)] were added to microglia and the Ccl5 levels quantified.

Optic glioma stem cell proliferation and apoptosis assays

To measure proliferation, 104 o-GSCs were seeded, and the total cell number counted 3 days later. To measure apoptosis, 105 o-GSCs were plated into 24-well plates coated with poly-d-lysine (50 μg ml−1) and fibronectin (10 μg ml−1) in complete NSC medium. After 3 days, cells were grown in NSC medium without N2, B27, FGF, and EGF for 48 h, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), and apoptosis quantitated using a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) kit (Sigma-Aldrich). MK2206 (Fisher Scientific, S1078) was purchased from Fisher Scientific.

T cell analyses

WT or Nf1+/− mouse spleens were homogenized into single cell suspensions by digesting in PBS containing 0.1% BSA and 0.6% Na-citrate, washed, and incubated with 120 Kunitz units of DNase I and red blood cell lysis buffer (eBioscience, 00433357). CD3+ or CD8+ T cells were isolated by negative selection using the pan-T-cell isolation kit II (Miltenyi Biotec, 130-095-130) or CD8a T Cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, 130-104-075), respectively. T cells were maintained at 2.5 × 106 cells ml−1 in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% P/S. CM from activated (1.25 µg ml−1 anti-mouse CD3 [Fisher Scientific, 16-0031-85] and 2 µg ml−1 anti-mouse CD28 [Fisher Scientific, 16-0281-82] antibody treatment for 2 days) and non-activated T cells (no antibody exposure) were collected, and the cytokines in the CM detected using the Proteome Profiler Mouse Cytokine Array Kit (R&D Systems, ARY006). Anti-MDK neutralizing antibody (Abcam, 170820) was used at a 1:50 dilution, while anti-Lrp1 blocking antibody (Fisher, MA1-27198) was used at 30 µg ml−1. Cyclosporin (C3662) and FK-506 (F4679) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Mouse splenic T cells were plated at a density of 5 × 105 cells in 96-well plates and incubated with 200 µl medium containing 30% iPSC-induced neuron CM and 70% complete RPMI-1640 (supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% P/S).

To assay migration, 5 × 105 T cells were placed in the upper chamber of a transwell chamber (Corning, 6.5 mm insert, 3.0 µm polycarbonate membrane, CLS3398-2EA) with 200 µl serum-free PRIM 1640 media. 500 µl of chemoattractant media (MDK or CSF-2, concentrations indicated in figures) was added to the lower chamber, and the number of T cells in the lower chambers were counted 4 h later.

Flow cytometry

Spleens from anti-CD3-treated mice were harvested when the mice reached 3 months of age, and single-cell suspensions without red blood cells were prepared from mouse spleens. Cells were incubated with anti­-CD3­PB antibodies (BioLegend, 100431) at 4 °C for 30 min. Spleens from anti-CD8-treated mice were harvested when the mice reached 3 months of age, and single-cell suspensions without red blood cells were prepared from mouse spleens. Anti­-CD4­-PerCP antibodies (BioLegend, 100431) and anti-CD8-APC antibodies (BioLegend, 100713) were added, and incubated with cells at 4 °C for 30 min. Flow cytometry was performed using an Attune NxT Flow Cytometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and analyzed using FlowJo v10.6.1 software.

Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence

Mice were euthanized and perfused transcardially with Ringer’s solution, followed by 4% PFA, and the brains and optic nerves/chiasms were processed for paraffin embedding and sectioning. Immunohistochemistry was performed on adjacent paraffin sections with antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 1. Detection was performed using the Vectastain Elite ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame). All sections were photographed with a digital camera (Optronics) attached to an inverted microscope (Nikon). For leptomeningeal analyses, 6-week old OPG and control mice were perfused with Ringer’s solution, followed by PFA, and storage in 30% sucrose. Floating sections of brains (20 µm-thick sections) were stained with anti-CD3/CD4/CD8 antibodies for 1 h at 4 °C after 0.1% PBS-T (Triton X-100) treatment (5 min) and corresponding secondary antibodies (Alexa-fluor 488 for CD3 and 568 for CD4/CD8). DAPI was used for counterstaining during mounting.

Western blotting

Nuclear protein extracts were obtained using RIPA and protein concentration was determined using the Pierce BCA protein assay kit. Up to 50 µg of protein per extract were separated in SDS–polyacrylamide gels by electrophoresis. After protein transfer onto PVDF membrane, the membranes were incubated with the indicated antibodies. Antibody binding was detected after incubation with a secondary antibody coupled to IRDye. The blots were analyzed using Image Studio Lite Ver 5.2 software. Images of the original immunoblots can be found in Supplementary Figs. 8 and 9.

RNA extraction and real-time qRT–PCR

RNA was isolated from cells using the RNeasy kit (QIAGEN), while RNA was isolated from mouse optic nerves using the Trizol reagent (Life Technologies). Real-time qRT–PCR was performed using the specific primers listed in Supplementary Table 2. ΔΔCT values were calculated using H3f3a as an internal control.

Survival curves

Kaplan–Meier survival curves were obtained from the MSKCC computational biology cancer genomics portal (http://www.cbioportal.org)30,69, which contains two annotated TCGA datasets (Brain Lower Grade Glioma (TCGA, Provisional) and Brain Lower Grade Glioma (TCGA, PanCancer Atlas). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Lovastatin treatment

100,000 human iPSC-derived NPCs were plated on PLO/laminin-coated six-well plates, allowed to differentiate into neurons in neuron maturation media for 6 weeks, and were then treated with varying concentrations of lovastatin for 24 h. After an additional 12 h, the conditioned media was collected for midkine ELISA measurements.

Primary neonatal microglia isolation and culture

Mouse pups (postnatal day 0–4; PN0–4) were euthanized, and their brains (without the cerebellum and olfactory bulb) were collected and stripped of the overlying meninges. The brains were then washed twice with ice-cold wash buffer and incubated with 3 ml of trypsin (2.5%) at 37 °C for 20 min, followed by inactivating trypsin in 4 mls of complete DMEM culture media (with 10% FBS). The cells were then treated with DNase, resuspended in 10 mls of DMEM complete media, passed through a 70 µm strainer, and seeded in flasks. The culture media was changed on day 3, and cells were fed with an additional 3 mls of fresh complete DMEM on day 7. Between days 8 and 14, microglia were isolated by shaking the flasks for 20–25 min at room temperature on a shaker at 250 rpm.

Splenic monocyte isolation

For monocyte isolation, spleen single cell suspensions were incubated with CD11b-specific magnetic beads, and captured using a magnetic separator. 5 × 105 microglia/monocytes were grown in T cell CM for 24 h1, and Ccl5 measured by an ELISA kit (R&D Systems).

Statistical analyses

Data analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. Unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests were used to determine differences between two groups. Multiple comparisons were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. All data are presented as mean values ± SEM. All experiments have been replicated at least three independent times with similar results.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by a grant from National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1-R35-NS07211-01) to D.H.G., while Y.P. was supported by a McDonnell Center for Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience fellowship and C.A. was supported by an R50 Research Specialist Award (1-R50-CA233164-01). The GeiC Center at WUSM engineered the hiPSCs and is subsidized by NCI Cancer Center Support Grant #P30-CA091842.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, D.H.G., X.G., and Y.P.; Methodology, D.H.G. S.S., and X.G.; Writing, original draft, X.G. and Y.P.; Writing—review & editing, D.H.G.; Investigation, X.G. performed most of the experiments in this report; S.S. performed the antibody treatments and meninges analyses, M.X. performed some of the T cell–microglia interaction experiments; C.A. performed the hiPSC neuronal assays, midkine ELISA, and qRT-PCR experiments and assembled the figures; O.C. performed the statistical analysis; Resources, D.H.G. and S.D.; Supervision, D.H.G.; Funding acquisition, D.H.G.

Data availability

The data are available within the Article, Supplementary Information and available from the authors upon request. The source data for Figs. 18 and Supplementary Figs. 1–9 are provided as a Source Data file. Additional data were extracted from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics (https://www.cbioportal.org) and the Immunological Genome Project (www.immgen.org).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Atique Ahmed, Michael Platten, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41467-020-15770-3.

References

  • 1.Su S, et al. CD10(+)GPR77(+) cancer-associated fibroblasts promote cancer formation and chemoresistance by sustaining cancer stemness. Cell. 2018;172:841–856e816. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Erez N, Truitt M, Olson P, Arron ST, Hanahan D. Cancer-associated fibroblasts are activated in incipient neoplasia to orchestrate tumor-promoting inflammation in an NF-kappaB-dependent manner. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:135–147. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yang FC, et al. Nf1-dependent tumors require a microenvironment containing Nf1+/− and c-kit-dependent bone marrow. Cell. 2008;135:437–448. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.El Andaloussi A, Lesniak MS. An increase in CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes of human glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro Oncol. 2006;8:234–243. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2006-006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gutmann DH, Kettenmann DH. Microglia/brain macrophages as central drivers of brain tumor pathobiology. Neuron. 2019;104:442–449. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.08.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Venkatesh HS, et al. Neuronal activity promotes glioma growth through neuroligin-3 secretion. Cell. 2015;161:803–816. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Venkatesh HS, et al. Targeting neuronal activity-regulated neuroligin-3 dependency in high-grade glioma. Nature. 2017;549:533–537. doi: 10.1038/nature24014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Prada CE, et al. Neurofibroma-associated macrophages play roles in tumor growth and response to pharmacological inhibition. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125:159–168. doi: 10.1007/s00401-012-1056-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pong WW, Higer SB, Gianino SM, Emnett RJ, Gutmann DH. Reduced microglial CX3CR1 expression delays neurofibromatosis-1 glioma formation. Ann. Neurol. 2013;73:303–308. doi: 10.1002/ana.23813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Daginakatte GC, Gutmann DH. Neurofibromatosis-1 (Nf1) heterozygous brain microglia elaborate paracrine factors that promote Nf1-deficient astrocyte and glioma growth. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007;16:1098–1112. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Solga AC, et al. RNA sequencing of tumor-associated microglia reveals Ccl5 as a stromal chemokine critical for neurofibromatosis-1 glioma growth. Neoplasia. 2015;17:776–788. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2015.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pan Y, et al. Athymic mice reveal a requirement for T-cell-microglia interactions in establishing a microenvironment supportive of Nf1 low-grade glioma growth. Genes Dev. 2018;32:491–496. doi: 10.1101/gad.310797.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Anastasaki C, Woo AS, Messiaen LM, Gutmann DH. Elucidating the impact of neurofibromatosis-1 germline mutations on neurofibromin function and dopamine-based learning. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015;24:3518–3528. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mashour GA, Ratner N, Khan GA, Wang HL, Martuza RL, Kurtz A. The angiogenic factor midkine is aberrantly expressed in NF1-deficient Schwann cells and is a mitogen for neurofibroma-derived cells. Oncogene. 2001;20:97–105. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mashour GA, Wang HL, Cabal-Manzano R, Wellstein A, Martuza RL, Kurtz A. Aberrant cutaneous expression of the angiogenic factor midkine is associated with neurofibromatosis type-1. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1999;113:398–402. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00699.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li W, et al. The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor lovastatin reverses the learning and attention deficits in a mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 1. Curr. Biol. 2005;15:1961–1967. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Maeda N, Ichihara-Tanaka K, Kimura T, Kadomatsu K, Muramatsu T, Noda M. A receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatase PTPzeta/RPTPbeta binds a heparin-binding growth factor midkine. Involvement of arginine 78 of midkine in the high affinity binding to PTPzeta. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:12474–12479. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.18.12474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ichihara-Tanaka K, Oohira A, Rumsby M, Muramatsu T. Neuroglycan C is a novel midkine receptor involved in process elongation of oligodendroglial precursor-like cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:30857–30864. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M602228200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Muramatsu H, Zou K, Sakaguchi N, Ikematsu S, Sakuma S, Muramatsu T. LDL receptor-related protein as a component of the midkine receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000;270:936–941. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stoica GE, et al. Midkine binds to anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and acts as a growth factor for different cell types. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:35990–35998. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M205749200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Khan N, Binder L, Pantakani DVK, Asif AR. MPA modulates tight junctions’ permeability via midkine/PI3K pathway in Caco-2 cells: a possible mechanism of leak-flux diarrhea in organ transplanted patients. Front. Physiol. 2017;8:438. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Masuda T, et al. Growth factor midkine promotes T-cell activation through nuclear factor of activated T cells signaling and Th1 cell differentiation in lupus nephritis. Am. J. Pathol. 2017;187:740–751. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jin Z, et al. Midkine enhances soft-tissue sarcoma growth: a possible novel therapeutic target. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008;14:5033–5042. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Beals CR, Clipstone NA, Ho SN, Crabtree GR. Nuclear localization of NF-ATc by a calcineurin-dependent, cyclosporin-sensitive intramolecular interaction. Genes Dev. 1997;11:824–834. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.7.824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Langlois B, et al. LRP-1 promotes cancer cell invasion by supporting ERK and inhibiting JNK signaling pathways. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e11584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Powell JD, Zheng Y. Dissecting the mechanism of T-cell anergy with immunophilin ligands. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs. 2006;7:1002–1007. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Guo X, Pan Y, Gutmann DH. Genetic and genomic alterations differentially dictate low-grade glioma growth through cancer stem cell-specific chemokine recruitment of T cells and microglia. Neuro Oncol. 2019;21:1250–1262. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noz080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Derecki NC, et al. Regulation of learning and memory by meningeal immunity: a key role for IL-4. J. Exp. Med. 2010;207:1067–1080. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yednock TA, Cannon C, Fritz LC, Sanchez-Madrid F, Steinman L, Karin N. Prevention of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by antibodies against alpha 4 beta 1 integrin. Nature. 1992;356:63–66. doi: 10.1038/356063a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gao J, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal. 2013;6:l1. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wickremasinghe MI, Thomas LH, O’Kane CM, Uddin J, Friedland JS. Transcriptional mechanisms regulating alveolar epithelial cell-specific CCL5 secretion in pulmonary tuberculosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:27199–27210. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403107200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Horike N, et al. AMP-activated protein kinase activation increases phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase 3beta and thereby reduces cAMP-responsive element transcriptional activity and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase C gene expression in the liver. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:33902–33910. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802537200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pan Y, Smithson LJ, Ma Y, Hambardzumyan D, Gutmann DH. Ccl5 establishes an autocrine high-grade glioma growth regulatory circuit critical for mesenchymal glioblastoma survival. Oncotarget. 2017;8:32977–32989. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Labrakakis C, Patt S, Hartmann J, Kettenmann H. Functional GABAA receptors on human glioma cells. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1998;10:231–238. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ayala GE, et al. Cancer-related axonogenesis and neurogenesis in prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008;14:7593–7603. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mitsunaga S, et al. Detail histologic analysis of nerve plexus invasion in invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas and its prognostic impact. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2007;31:1636–1644. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318065bfe6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Magnon C, et al. Autonomic nerve development contributes to prostate cancer progression. Science. 2013;341:1236361. doi: 10.1126/science.1236361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhao CM, et al. Denervation suppresses gastric tumorigenesis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014;6:250ra115. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mauffrey P, et al. Progenitors from the central nervous system drive neurogenesis in cancer. Nature. 2019;569:672–678. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1219-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mott RT, et al. Neuronal expression of CD22: novel mechanism for inhibiting microglial proinflammatory cytokine production. Glia. 2004;46:369–379. doi: 10.1002/glia.20009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hoek RM, et al. Down-regulation of the macrophage lineage through interaction with OX2 (CD200) Science. 2000;290:1768–1771. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mizuno T, et al. Neuronal adhesion molecule telencephalin induces rapid cell spreading of microglia. Brain Res. 1999;849:58–66. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(99)01984-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Majed HH, et al. A novel role for Sema3A in neuroprotection from injury mediated by activated microglia. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:1730–1738. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0702-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Harrison JK, et al. Role for neuronally derived fractalkine in mediating interactions between neurons and CX3CR1-expressing microglia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:10896–10901. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Biber K, et al. Neuronal CCL21 up-regulates microglia P2X4 expression and initiates neuropathic pain development. EMBO J. 2011;30:1864–1873. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hong S, et al. Complement and microglia mediate early synapse loss in Alzheimer mouse models. Science. 2016;352:712–716. doi: 10.1126/science.aad8373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu Y, Teige I, Birnir B, Issazadeh-Navikas S. Neuron-mediated generation of regulatory T cells from encephalitogenic T cells suppresses EAE. Nat. Med. 2006;12:518–525. doi: 10.1038/nm1402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Flugel A, et al. Neuronal FasL induces cell death of encephalitogenic T lymphocytes. Brain Pathol. 2000;10:353–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2000.tb00267.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tian L, Lappalainen J, Autero M, Hanninen S, Rauvala H, Gahmberg CG. Shedded neuronal ICAM-5 suppresses T-cell activation. Blood. 2008;111:3615–3625. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-09-111179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang J, et al. Inhibition of midkine alleviates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis through the expansion of regulatory T cell population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:3915–3920. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709592105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mashour GA, et al. Circulating growth factor levels are associated with tumorigenesis in neurofibromatosis type 1. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:5677–5683. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Louveau A, et al. Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature. 2015;523:337–341. doi: 10.1038/nature14432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lin GL, Nagaraja S, Filbin MG, Suva ML, Vogel H, Monje M. Non-inflammatory tumor microenvironment of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2018;6:51. doi: 10.1186/s40478-018-0553-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.D’Angelo F, et al. The molecular landscape of glioma in patients with Neurofibromatosis 1. Nat. Med. 2019;25:176–187. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0263-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Griesinger AM, et al. Characterization of distinct immunophenotypes across pediatric brain tumor types. J. Immunol. 2013;191:4880–4888. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mu L, et al. CD4+ and perivascular Foxp3+ T cells in glioma correlate with angiogenesis and tumor progression. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:1451. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhai L, et al. Infiltrating T cells increase IDO1 expression in glioblastoma and contribute to decreased patient survival. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:6650–6660. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhang J, et al. The combination of neoantigen quality and T lymphocyte infiltrates identifies glioblastomas with the longest survival. Commun. Biol. 2019;2:135. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0369-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nakashima H, et al. Modeling tumor immunity of mouse glioblastoma by exhausted CD8(+) T cells. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:208. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18540-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wainwright DA, et al. IDO expression in brain tumors increases the recruitment of regulatory T cells and negatively impacts survival. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012;18:6110–6121. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Liu G, et al. Phenotypic and functional switch of macrophages induced by regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells in mice. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2011;89:130–142. doi: 10.1038/icb.2010.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Brochard V, et al. Infiltration of CD4+ lymphocytes into the brain contributes to neurodegeneration in a mouse model of Parkinson disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2009;119:182–192. doi: 10.1172/JCI36470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fenn AM, Hall JC, Gensel JC, Popovich PG, Godbout JP. IL-4 signaling drives a unique arginase+/IL-1beta+ microglia phenotype and recruits macrophages to the inflammatory CNS: consequences of age-related deficits in IL-4Ralpha after traumatic spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:8904–8917. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1146-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.DeNardo DG, et al. CD4(+) T cells regulate pulmonary metastasis of mammary carcinomas by enhancing protumor properties of macrophages. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:91–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gibson EM, et al. Methotrexate chemotherapy induces persistent tri-glial dysregulation that underlies chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment. Cell. 2019;176:43–55e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Brannan CI, et al. Targeted disruption of the neurofibromatosis type-1 gene leads to developmental abnormalities in heart and various neural crest-derived tissues. Genes Dev. 1994;8:1019–1029. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.9.1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bajenaru ML, et al. Optic nerve glioma in mice requires astrocyte Nf1 gene inactivation and Nf1 brain heterozygosity. Cancer Res. 2003;63:8573–8577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Chen YH, Gianino SM, Gutmann DH. Neurofibromatosis-1 regulation of neural stem cell proliferation and multilineage differentiation operates through distinct RAS effector pathways. Genes Dev. 2015;29:1677–1682. doi: 10.1101/gad.261677.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Cerami E, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:401–404. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data are available within the Article, Supplementary Information and available from the authors upon request. The source data for Figs. 18 and Supplementary Figs. 1–9 are provided as a Source Data file. Additional data were extracted from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics (https://www.cbioportal.org) and the Immunological Genome Project (www.immgen.org).


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES