Skip to main content
Annals of Gastroenterology logoLink to Annals of Gastroenterology
. 2020 Feb 12;33(3):322. doi: 10.20524/aog.2020.0456

Fish bone perforation of the duodenum

Daisuke Murakami a,, Hideaki Harada a, Yuji Amano b
PMCID: PMC7196621  PMID: 32382239

An 84-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain beginning immediately after the ingestion of mackerel. Her vital signs were normal. She had upper abdominal rebound tenderness and a white-cell count of 24,640 cells per cubic millimeter, with 90.7% neutrophils. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a linear, high-density body in the third portion of the duodenum near the ligament of Treitz, and a small volume of free air in the vicinity (Fig. 1A). Emergency laparotomy could not obtain a surgical field sufficient to reveal the object. Intraoperative endoscopy successfully demonstrated a duodenal perforation due to a 3-cm–long fish bone, which was carefully removed by endoscopic forceps (Fig. 1B). Neither any sealing method, such as a surgical patch nor endoscopic closure, was done. Abdominal irrigation and treatment with antibiotics were undertaken. The patient was discharged without complications.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Computed tomography of the abdomen showing the sharp foreign body penetrating the third portion of the duodenum near the ligament of Treitz. (B) Endoscopic view showing a yellow-colored fish bone, which was identified and carefully removed by endoscopic forceps

Less than 1% of gastrointestinal perforations are due to ingested bodies [1]. Several successful cases of conservative treatment with endoscopic retrieval for fish bone penetration have been reported [2,3]. Therefore, though only in patients whose condition is stable, minimally invasive treatments with early endoscopy are becoming more common as safe and alternative therapeutic methods to open surgery in the treatment of minor gastrointestinal perforation [1]. In addition, the third portion of the duodenum is fixed to the retroperitoneum; consequently, the surgical approach may be limited by an insufficient view field to treat mesocolon with the mesenteric vessels, as in this case. Under certain conditions, minor fish bone perforation might be adequately treated by combining endoscopic removal with conservative treatment.

Biography

New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: None

References

  • 1.Ansari D, Torén W, Lindberg S, Pyrhönen HS, Andersson R. Diagnosis and management of duodenal perforations:a narrative review. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019;54:939–944. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1647456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yuki T, Ishihara S, Okada M, et al. Double-balloon endoscopy for treatment of small bowel penetration by fish bone. Dig Endosc. 2012;24:281. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01195.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sasaki S, Nishikawa J, Saito M, et al. Endoscopic removal of a fish bone migrating and penetrating the stomach. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:1282. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0161-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Gastroenterology are provided here courtesy of The Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology

RESOURCES