Skip to main content
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice logoLink to Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
letter
. 2020 Apr 23;7(4):478–479. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12948

Gender Differences in Functional Movement Disorder: Sociocultural or Biological?

Anjali Chouksey 1, Sanjay Pandey 1,
PMCID: PMC7197311  PMID: 32373673

We read with great interest the study by Baizabal‐Carvallo and Jankovic1 addressing the sex differences in functional movement disorders (FMDs). Previous studies have demonstrated that FMDs, although seen in almost all age groups, have a relatively higher incidence in the middle‐age group with a predilection for the female sex. Baizabal‐Carvallo and Jankovic1 also found that women represented 70% of the FMD cases in their cohort as women tend to access health services more frequently, resulting in a higher rate of consultations of women. In two of our FMD case series, we found that among children, girls were more than boys, while in adults including elderly, males were more than females. Male preponderance in adult age group can be explained as adult females tend to have lower literacy rate, access to health services and health expenditures as compared to males because of patriarchal nature of Indian society.2, 3 Other factors such as stereotyped preconceptions about men and women may also lead to an exaggeration of observed sex differences. Researchers found that physicians tend to consider men's symptoms as organic and women's symptoms as psychosocial.4 This reflects the important roles that social and cultural backgrounds play in gender predominance in FMDs.

Baizabal‐Carvallo and Jankovic1 noticed that men and women were equally represented in patients aged 50 years or older, and thus sex differences gradually diminish after menopause in women, suggesting that the observed sex‐specific disease pattern may be partly attributed to the effect of sex hormones. Behavioral responses to psychosocial stress in humans are sexually dimorphic. Physiologically, the stress response is mediated by oxytocin and probably sex hormones and endogenous opioids via the modulation of sympathetic and hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal activity. However, to the best of our knowledge, the influence of biological factors including the effect of sex hormones has never been studied in FMDs. Thus, it would be premature to comment on their potential influence on FMDs. In their study, Baizabal‐Carvallo and Jankovic1 found that men had more frequent physical trauma, whereas women acknowledged psychological trauma more commonly than men. The inconsistencies between responses to physiological and psychological stress have been demonstrated in previous studies. Although the physiological responses did not differ across sexes, the psychological measures and neuroimaging data clearly showed asymmetric prefrontal activity in men and primarily limbic activation in women.5 The reporting bias may partly be attributed to the fact that women are more likely to report emotional stress than men.

In terms of phenomenology, women had more frequent functional dystonia than men. The female predominance in functional cranial dystonia resembling hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm is well known.

Given the complex biological, cultural, and social interplay underlying the pathogenesis of functional disorders, recognition of the exact mechanism behind sex predilection of FMDs remains inconclusive. Future research needs to explore the combination of neuroimaging, behavioral, and physiologic approaches for probing the neurobiological basis of sex‐specific differences in FMD.

Author Roles

(1) Research Project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; (3) Manuscript Preparation: A. Writing of the first draft, B. Review and Critique.

A.C.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 3A, 3B

S.P.: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2C, 3A, 3B

Disclosures

Ethical Compliance Statement

The authors confirm that the approval of an institutional review board and the patient consent was not required for this work. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines.

Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest

No specific funding was received for this work. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest relevant to this work.

Financial Disclosures for the Previous 12 Months

The authors declare that there are no additional disclosures to report.

Relevant disclosures and conflicts of interest are listed at the end of this article.

References

  • 1. Baizabal‐Carvallo JF, Jankovic J. Gender differences in functional movement disorders. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2019;7(2):182–187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Pandey S, Koul A. Psychogenic movement disorders in adults and children: a clinical and video profile of 58 Indian patients. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2017;4(5):763–767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chouksey A, Pandey S. Functional movement disorders in elderly. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2019;9 10.7916/tohm.v0.691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Colameco S, Becker LA, Simpson M. Sex bias in the assessment of patient complaints. J Fam Pract 1983;16:1117–1121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wang J, Korczykowski M, Rao H, et al. Gender difference in neural response to psychological stress. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2007;2(3):227–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Movement Disorders Clinical Practice are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES