Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 May 4;10:7482. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64412-7

First report of AChE1 (G119S) mutation and multiple resistance mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae s.s. in Nigeria

Ifeoluwa Kayode Fagbohun 1,, Emmanuel Taiwo Idowu 1, Olubunmi Adetoro Otubanjo 1, Taiwo Samson Awolola 2
PMCID: PMC7198501  PMID: 32366848

Abstract

Susceptibility and PBO synergist bioassays were done using 3–5 days old female Anopheles mosquito collected from Lagos State, Nigeria with WHO test papers DDT (4%), permethrin (0.75%), Bendiocarb (1%) and PBO (4%) according to standard procedures. The activities of cytochrome P450s, glutathione S-transferase and carboxylesterases were determined using biochemical assays. The presence of kdr-w, kdr-e and Ace-1R mutations were examined using molecular assays. Resistance to DDT and permethrin in An gambiae s.s from the four Local Government Areas (LGAs) was recorded while suspected resistance to bendiocarb was recorded in mosquitoes from Alimosho and Kosofe LGAs. PBO synergist reduced the knockdown time and also recorded significantly (P < 0.05) higher 24 hrs percentage mortality compared to non-synergized bioassays. Increased activities of detoxifying enzymes was recorded in wild mosquito compared to the insecticides susceptible laboratory strain and this was significant (P < 0.05) in P450s, esterase α and β. Kdr-w was detected in An. gambiae s.s from all the LGAs, kdr-e (L1014S) was detected in Alimosho, Kosofe and Ibeju-Lekki, while the Ace-1R gene was detected in Alimosho and Kosofe. Results from this study provide evidence for resistance of An. gambiae from Lagos State to multiple classes of neurotoxic insecticides with multiple resistance mechanisms to these insecticides.

Subject terms: Entomology, Mutation

Introduction

Malaria remains a major public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated 219 million cases and 430,000 mortality attributed to malaria globally in 2017 with Nigeria carrying the highest (19%) burden of the estimated death cases1. The global fight against malaria highlighted in the United Nations sustainable development goals (SDGs) goal 3.3 aligns with the WHO global technical strategy for malaria, the roll back malaria partnership (RBM) action and investment to defeat malaria (AIM). Specifically, the goal is to reduce the global malaria mortality and incidence rates by 90% in the year 2030 using 2015 as the baseline24.

The use of insecticide based vector control measures is vital for the reduction of malaria incidence globally. Scaling up the use of long lasting insecticides treated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) has been significantly crucial in the protection of several individuals in endemic areas especially infants and pregnant women1,5,6.

The effectiveness and efficacy of the few insecticides approved for the control of malaria vectors by WHO has been greatly hampered by the advent of insecticide resistance. In Nigeria, Pyrethriods and DDT resistance has been reported in several parts of the country712. Insecticides resistance in malaria vectors can result from one or combination of behavioral changes, morphological modifications, target site mutation and metabolism by detoxifying enzymes. Knockdown resistance (L1014F and L1014S) has first been described in Pyrethriods resistance malaria vector13,14. Subsequently, these mutations have been identified in Pyrethriods and DDT resistance Anopheles in different parts of Africa10,1519. The increase in the detoxifying and/or sequestering activities of cytochrome P450s, GSTs and Esterase have been associated with mosquitoes resistance to insecticides2022. Piperonyl butoxide is a non-toxic synergist but has been proven to suppress DDT and Pyrethriods resistance in malaria vectors under laboratory conditions2325. Likewise, in several endemic areas in sub-Saharan Africa, PBO incorporated into LLINs has also shown to be more efficacious and effective in controlling malaria vectors, thereby, reducing malaria incidence2629.

The need for regular monitoring susceptibility status and resistance mechanisms of malaria vectors in endemic areas becomes more important given the changing susceptibility status of Anopheles mosquitoes. Therefore, this study provides information on, the efficacy of PBO synergist based insecticides control measures in the management of DDT and permethrin resistant malaria vectors, and the presence of molecular resistance mechanism (L1014F, L1014S and G119S) in Lagos State, Nigeria.

Results

Insecticide susceptibility status of An. gambiae s.l. in lagos state, nigeria

Resistance to DDT and permethrin was recorded in An. gambiae s.l. in all the LGAs with 24hrs percentage mortality ranging from 9 to 55 and 22 to 70 for DDT and permethrin respectively. The estimated knockdown time for 50% (KDT50) of the mosquito assayed with DDT varied from 55 minutes in Badagry to 996.9 minutes in Alimosho LGA. While the estimated knockdown time for 95% (KDT95) of the mosquitoes from Lagos State exposed to permethrin was 3864.9 minutes for Alimosho LGA, 9361 minutes for Ibeju-Lekki LGA, 136.6 minutes for Badagry and 3127.1 minutes for Kosofe LGA (Table 1). Suspected resistance to bendiocarb was record in mosquitoes form Kosofe and Alimosho LGAs with KDT50 of 33.1 and 23.3 minutes respectively, while full susceptibility was observed in Ibeju-Lekki and Badagry LGAs (Table 2).

Table 1.

KDT50, KDT95 values and percentage mortality of An. gambiae s.l. from LGAs of Lagos State exposed to DDT, permethrin and PBO synergist.

Location Number exposed KDT50 (95% cl) KDT95 (95% cl) Mortality (%) Resistance status P value
Alimosho DDT 100 996.9(261.1–413030.8) 28091 (2024.1–4.4 × 109) 9 R 0.000
PBO + DDT 100 47(42.6–53) 204.6(142–273.4) 79
PER 100 180.5 (108.5–533.1) 3864.9 (1026.7–79822.7) 42 R 0.000
PBO + PER 100 37.2(34.2–40.8) 136.5(110.5–181.3) 88
Ibeju-Lekki DDT 100 226.3(131.4–785.2) 1901.8(607.1–27507.7) 18 R 0.000
PBO + DDT 100 38.4(35.3–42,2) 140.4(113.2–187.7) 88
PER 100 464(132–7.4 × 109) 9361.7(679.6–2.7 × 1019) 22 R 0.000
PBO + PER 100 25.5(23.6–27.4) 79.6(69–95.7) 96
Badagry DDT 100 55 (49.6–62.8) 193.8(148–284.5) 55 R 0.004
PBO + DDT 100 48.1(44.4–52.8) 137(112.6–179.3) 90
PER 100 45.6 (42.2–50.1) 136.6 (112.3–177.8) 70 R 0.031
PBO + PER 100 37.7(32.8–44) 83.7(65.7–140) 98
Kosofe PER 100 382.4(164.1–8117.5) 3127.1(631.3–1108705) 17 R 0.000
PBO + PER 100 68.2(52.8–109.5) 381.4(194.2–1578.2) 87
Kisumu DDT 50 48.5(42.1–58.6) 195.2(145.2–353.2) 97
Permethrin 50 12(9.6–13.9) 20(17.4–31.4) 100

Note: Mortality of >98% indicates Susceptibility, 97–90 Suspected resistance and <90% resistant60; S: susceptible, SR: suspected resistance, R: resistant, KDT: log probit estimates knockdown time, Kisumu: Laboratory susceptible strain, bioassay consist of 25 female Anopheles mosquitoes in four replicates. P is significant at P < 0.05.

Table 2.

KDT50, KDT95 values and percentage mortality of An. gambiae s.l. from LGAs of Lagos State exposed to bendiocarb (0.1%).

Kosofe Alimosho Ibeju-Lekki Badagry Kisumu
No. exposed 100 100 100 100 50
Knockdown at 10 min (%) 0 2 2 2 14
Knockdown at 30 min (%) 42 66 78 72 88
Knockdown at 60 min (%) 95 93 99 99 100
KDT50 (Min) 33.1(29.6–36.8) 23.3(19–27.7) 19.3(17.1–21.4) 20.5(18.1–22.9) 18.5(16.8–20.1)
KDT95 (Min) 60(52.3–77.8) 64.7(49.5–104.4) 45(38.6–55.7) 44.7(38–56.7) 39.2(34.6–46.5)
24 hr % mortality 96 96 100 100 100
Resistance Status Suspected resistance Suspected resistance Susceptible Susceptible Susceptible

Note: KDT: log probit estimates knockdown time, Kisumu: Laboratory susceptible strain, bioassay consist of 25 female Anopheles mosquitoes in four replicates.

Efficacy of PBO synergist on DDT and permethrin resistant An. gambiae s.s

Pre-exposure to PBO synergist significantly (P < 0.05) increases the 24hrs percentage mortality of An. gambiae s.l. in all the LGAs to DDT and permethrin. In addition, the estimated knockdown time for 50% and 95% of mosquitoes was also reduced when compared to that of the non-synergized bioassay, although only PBO + permethrin from Badagry was able to attain full susceptibility (Table 1). The percentage knockdown at various time intervals also shows that PBO synergized assay had faster knockdown rate in comparison to the non-synergized bioassays from the four LGAs (Fig. 2A–D).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(AD) Percentage knockdown of An. gambiae s.s. exposed to insecticides and PBO + insecticide from (A) Kosofe LGA (B) Ibeju lekki LGA (C) Alimosho LGA (D) Badagry LGA.

Activities of detoxifying enzymes in malaria vectors from lagos state, nigeria

The mean activities of detoxifying enzymes in field strains of An. gambiae s.l. in comparison with that of susceptible laboratory strain (Kisumu) is displayed in Fig. 3A–D. All enzymes including P450s, GSTs, esterase α and esterase β show higher level of activities in field strains compared to Kisumu strain. The difference in the enzymes activities of both the field and laboratory strains shows a statistical significance (P < 0.05) in the mean values for P450s, esterase α and esterase β especially from Kosofe and Alimosho LGAs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(AD) Mean level of (A) cytochrome P450 (B) glutathione S-transferase (C) esterase α (D) esterase β activity of Anopheles gambiae s.l. collected in four LGAs of Lagos State, compared with the susceptible Kisumu strain (letters a,b and c used to indicate statistical differences at (P < 0.05)).

Detection of point mutation associated neurotoxic insecticides resistance in An. gambiae s.s. population from lagos state

Table 3 shows the allele frequency at the kdr (L1014S and L104F) and Ace-1R (G119S) loci of An. gambiae in Lagos State. Homozygotes and heterozygotes resistance kdr west (L1014F) genotype were detected in all the sampled LGAs, with allele frequency ranging from 0.37 to 0.5. The distribution of L1014F mutation within the surveyed location did not significantly depart from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P > 0.05). Kdr east (L1014S) was also detected in Alimosho, Kosofe and Ibeju-Lekki LGAs with allele frequencies of 37%, 29% and 17% respectively and only heterozygotes resistance genotype identified. AChE1 mutation was detected in An. gambiae from Alimosho (32%) and Kosofe (36%) LGAs, meanwhile no Ace-1R mutation was detected in Badagry and Ibeju-Lekki LGAs. The observed genotypic frequencies from Ace-1R mutation in Kosofe and Alimosho LGAs were significantly different from Hardy-Weinberg expectations (P < 0.05).

Table 3.

Frequency of kdr and Ache1 allele in Anopheles gambiae s.l. from Lagos State, Nigeria.

Mutation type Location Number (N) Genotype (N) Allele frequency H-W P value
RR RS SS
Kdr west (L1014F) Alimosho 72 18 7 0 0.5 0.32
Kosofe 72 16 5 0 0.47 0.257
Badagry 72 10 2 0 0.37 0.22
Ibeju-Lekki 72 11 3 0 0.39 0.35
Total 288 55 19 0 0.16
Kdr east (L1014S) Alimosho 36 5 0 0 0.37
Kosofe 36 3 0 0 0.29
Badagry 36 0 0 0 0
Ibeju-Lekki 36 1 0 0 0.17
Total 144 18 0 0
AChE1 (G119S) Alimosho 36 0 23 05 0.32 0.00
Kosofe 36 0 26 07 0.36 0.00
Badagry 36 0 0 0 0
Ibeju-Lekki 36 0 0 0 0
Total

NB: H–W is the probability of the exact test for goodness of fit to Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; P significant at <0.05. RR: homozygote resistance RS: heterozygote resistance and SS: homozygote susceptible.

Discussion

The WHO and SDGs aim to reduce the global malaria prevalence by 90% in the year 2030, therefore, the regular monitoring of the limited available malaria control options including the use of insecticides needs to be harnessed strategically. IRS and ITNs are the two main insecticides-based strategies in malaria vector control2. The efficacy of the few Pyrethriods, DDT and carbamates insecticides currently approved for use in public health is critical to the sustainability of these strategies.

In this study, high level of resistance to DDT and permethrin was recorded in An. gambiae s.l. from the evaluated LGAs of Lagos State. Several previous studies in different parts of Nigeria have recorded similar resistant level to different Pyrethriods and DDT7,9,11,12. Pyrethriods resistance recorded in these study areas could be detrimental to the effectiveness of LLINs as they are the only class of insecticide currently approved for use in LLINs. Though, the level of Pyrethriods resistance in this study area should not be allowed to affect the utilization of LLINs in these areas because it also offers partial protections to users by serving as barrier from mosquito bites thereby reducing the risk of infection30. Suspected resistance to bendiocarb was recorded in Alimosho and Kosofe LGAs in this study. Another previous study has also reported resistance to propoxur in several parts of Lagos State31. Resistance to carbamates could have a detrimental effect on malaria vector being one of the few alternative available to widely used Pyrethriods especially with the widespread resistance to DDT and Pyrethriods.

Result from this study also highlights the relevance of PBO based control measures in DDT and Pyrethriods resistance management in malaria vector in Lagos State, Nigeria. PBO synergized bioassays did not only achieve faster knockdown rate and time in DDT and permethrin resistant An. gambiae s.s, it also recorded significantly higher 24hrs percentage mortality. Similarly, studies in several parts of Africa have also proven the efficacy of PBO synergist plus insecticides in resistant malaria vector management24,28,29,3133.

Elevated level of detoxifying enzymes (cytochrome P450, glutathione S-transferase, esterase α and esterase β) activities was observed in field population of An. gambiae s.s. when compared to that of the laboratory susceptible Kisumu strain in this study. Also, studies have linked the increased activities of detoxifying enzymes (P450s and GSTs) and/or mutation in some P450s and GSTs gene to Pyrethriods and other classes of neurotoxic insecticides resistance in malaria vector7,16,3438. Likewise increased activities of esterase α and esterase β have been implicated in resistance to different classes of insecticides39,40.

The kdr-w (L1014F) mutation was detected in all the study LGAs in this study. Previous studies in Nigeria8,9,15,31 and several parts of West and Central Africa16,4143 have described similar mutation to Pyrethriods and DDT which confers resistance to the vectors. Finding from this study also showed the presence of kdr-e (L1014S) mutation in DDT and Pyrethriods resistant An. gambiae s.s. for first time Nigeria. L1014S mutation had been previously characterized as the East African type of kdr14 but later study discovered that both knockdown mutation co-occur in Gabon and Uganda18,19. Recently however, L1014S mutation had been detected in malaria vectors from some parts of West Africa4447. L1014F and L1014S mutations have been associated with DDT and Pyrethriods cross resistance in An. gambiae13,14 though it has been argued that this mutation alone may not solely be responsible for this phenotypic response48. Highlighting the importance of multiple resistance mechanisms in the high level of resistance reported in An. gambiae s.s. to DDT and Pyrethriods in this study, the allele frequencies of L1014F recorded in this study is higher than what was previously reported in Senegal49 but lower than that of Burkina Faso42. The observed genotypic frequencies of L1014F mutations from all the locations in this study did not depart significantly from the Hardy-Weinberg proportions. Previous studies from Cameroon and Burkina Faso reported varies departure from Hardy-Weinberg proportions with locations42,50.

The Ace-1R (G119S) mutation was detected in An. gambiae s.s. from Alimosho and Kosofe LGAs of Lagos State, though the genotype frequency significantly departs from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium which maybe result from the excess heterozygotes resistant genotype in the An. gambiae s.s. population. Previous studies on malaria vectors in southern Nigeria have reported resistance to carbamates10,31 but did not detect the Ace-1R mutation that has been linked to carbamates and organophosphate cross resistance in malaria vectors. The detection of Ace-1R mutation in An. gambiae s.s. in Lagos State could be detrimental to the utilization and efficacy of IRS, a major strategy in the control of malaria vector in Sub Saharan Africa. Previous studies have associated the extensive use of agricultural pesticides42,51,52 and spread of resistance gene from neighbouring countries53 with development of carbamates and organophosphates cross resistance, but this may not be applicable in this study. The two LGAs where Ace-1R mutation was detected are densely populated with little or no agricultural activities. The development of Ace-1R mutation in locations can be attributed to widespread use of dichlorvos (DDVP) an organophosphate pesticide for the control of mosquitoes and other household pests54.

Findings from this study shows that An. gambiae s.s. from Lagos State exhibits multiple resistance mechanism to the different classes of insecticides available for control. It is important that regular insecticides monitoring be carried out if the WHO and SDGs goals of 2030 is to be achieved. The use PBO and other synergists incorporated into LLINs and other malaria vector control strategies should be encouraged in this areas as metabolic resistance mechanism are also proven to contribute to high level of insecticides resistance reported in the study areas.

Materials and Methods

Study area and sample collection

The study was carried out in four Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Lagos State, two densely populated LGAs: Alimosho and Kosofe and two less densely populated LGAs: Ibeju-Lekki and Badagry. According to the National Population Commission (NPC) in 2006, Badagry has an estimated population of 237,731 spanning a 443 km² area. It is the second largest town in Lagos State and surrounded by lakes, creeks and island. The major occupations known include fishing farming and salt making which is due to the abundance of trees and ocean water. Alimosho has an estimated 1,319,571 inhabitants occupying a 138 km² area of and it is the largest LGA in Lagos State. Ibeju-Lekki located in the north eastern part in the Epe Division of Lagos State, Nigeria has a total area of 455 km2 and a population of 117481 and Kosofe LGA with population of 66393 and an area of 81 km2 (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Map of Lagos State showing study LGAs where mosquito immature stages were collected. NB:Map was generated using GIS software ArcMap, version 10.1.

Collection of anopheles mosquito

Immature stages was collected from selected sites using “dipping” technique55, Anopheles mosquito eggs, larvae and pupa were retrieved from automobile tyre tracks, small pools and puddles. Immediately after scooping, the larvae were kept in well-labeled containers and subsequently transferred to the insectary at the Nigerian Institute of Medical Research where they were allowed to emerge into adults under standard insectary conditions.

Susceptibility and synergistic assay

The tests were performed using WHO test filter papers impregnated with the selected insecticides and piperonyl butoxide (PBO) from the Vector Control Research Unit (VCRU), University Sains Malaysia (http:/www. inreskit.usm.my). Non-blood fed, two to three days old female Anopheles were exposed to DDT (4%), Permethrin (0.75%) and Bendiocarb (0.1%) using the WHO standard procedure. A total of 25 female mosquitoes were pre-exposed to 4% piperonyl butoxide (PBO) and this was replicated in four places. PBO treated mosquitoes were exposed to either DDT (4%) or Permethrin (0.75%) for another one hour, each experiment consisted of four replicates. Knockdown rates of mosquitoes were recorded at intervals for one hour. Mosquitoes were later transferred into holding tubes with untreated papers; allowed a 24-hour recovery period and supplied with a 10% sugar meal during this period after which mortality was recorded. All the bioassays were accompanied by negative control.

Mosquito identification

The genomic DNA of Anopheles gambiae that has been identified using morphological keys56 was extracted according using protocols as earlier described57. Further, molecular identification of mosquito samples was carried out57. Four primers including; ME, AR, QD, UN, GA (Table 4) were used for Anopheles gambiae. This was done to identify sibling species of the An. gambiae complex. Digestion was achieved by utilizing 0.5 μl HhaI restriction enzyme and 10 μl of the PCR product from the reaction above. It was incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours and the PCR fragments were resolved on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light58.

Table 4.

Primers used for the molecular identification and target-site modifications screening in An. gambiae in Lagos State, Nigeria.

Primer name Primer sequence 5′−3′ References
An. gambiae s.l. identification ME TGACCAACCCACTCCCTTGA 61
AR AAGTGTCCTTCTCCATCCTA
QD CAGACCAAGATGGTTAGTAT
UN GTGTGCCCCTTCCTCGATGT
GA GTGTGCCCCTTCCTCGATGT
L1014F -kdr mutation Agd1 CTGGTTTGGTCGGCACGTTT 13
Agd2 GCAAGGCTAAGAAAAGGTTAAG
Agd3 CCACCGTAGTGATAGGAAATTTA
Agd4 CCACCGTAGTGATAGGAAATTTT
L1014S -kdr mutation Agd1 GTGGAACTTCACCGACTTC 14
Agd2 GCAAGGCTAAGAAAAGGTTAAG
Agd4 CCACCGTAGTGATAGGAAATTTT
Agd5 TTTGCATTACTTACGACTG
G119S -ace-1 mutation Moustdir1 CGGGNGCSACYATGTGGAA 62
Moustrev1 ACGATMACGTTCTCYTCCGA

Knockdown resistance (L1014F and L1014S) characterization

L1014F mutations assay (kdr west) was carried out as described by13 using the following primer pairs: Agd1, Agd2, Agd3 and Agd4 (Table 4). L1014S mutation assay (kdr east) was carried out as described by14. The primers Agd1, Agd2, Agd4 and Agd5 (Table 4) were used for the assay. The PCR condition for all assay includes an initial denaturation of 95 °C for 5 minutes, then 40 cycles at 95 °C for one minute, 48 °C for 2 minutes, 72 °C for 2 minutes and final extension at 72 °C for 10 minutes.

The PCR reactions were carried out in a total volume of 20 ul containing 12.5 µl of PCR master mix containing 1 × PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.4 µM of each primer, one unit of Taq polymerase (Solis BioDyne) and 1 µl of genomic DNA. 10ul of PCR product and 1ul of loading buffer was loaded into each sample well on a 1.5% agarose gel visualised by ethidium bromide stains under Ultra Violet light (UV light).

Insensitivity acetylcholine (AChE1) assay

PCR-RFLP analysis was used for Ace-1R mutation detection as described by59. The Ace-1R SNP region was amplified using two primers MOUSTDIR1 and MOUSTREV1 (Table 4). PCR was carried out in a 25-μl reaction volume using Taq polymerase (Solis BioDyne). PCR reaction contains 1 μl of genomic DNA under the following amplification condition: 94 °C/2 minutes, (98 °C/10 s, 68 °C/30 s) × 35cycles, 68 °C/2 minutes. The PCR product (15 μl) was digested by adding 1 μl Alu I restriction enzyme, 2 μl of H20, and 2 μl of buffer and incubated at 37 °C for 15 minutes. Digested fragments were resolved in 1.5% agarose gel and visualized under Ultra Violet light (UV light).

Metabolic enzyme activity assay

Eight adult female mosquito that were pre-exposed to WHO standard insecticide test paper were homogenized singly in 200 μl of cold distilled water in a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube. The homogenate was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 20 seconds and the supernatant stored at −20 °C (Hemingway 1998). Three metabolic enzymes, Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (P450s), Glutathione S-transferase (GSTs), and non-specific esterase (carboxylesterase) assay (COEs) (hydrolyzing α- and β- napthyl acetate) were analyzed on single individuals of field collected Insecticide resistant females mosquitoes, and on the laboratory susceptible strain according to WHO protocols (Hemingway 1998). Mean absorbance values for each tested mosquito and enzyme were converted into enzyme activity and standardized based on the total protein amount.

Glutathione S-transferase assay

This test was carried out in two replicates. 10 µl of mosquito homogenate were placed in separate well in microtitre plate and 200 µl of the GSH (reduced glutathione)/CDNB (1-chloro-2,4′-dinitrobenzene) working solution was then added. Three plate blanks containing 10 µl distill water and 200 µl of the GSH/CDNB working solution were used per microtitre plate as negative control. The test was then left at room temperature for 20 minutes and the absorbance value was read at 340 nm at end.

Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase assay

Mosquito homogenate (2 µl) of were placed in separate wells of the microplate, 80 µl of 0.625 M potassium phosphate (pH 7.2) was added to each replicate. Then 200 µl of the mixture of 5 ml methanol solution of tetramethyl benzidine with 15 ml of 0.25 M sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) was added to each well, 25 µl of 3% hydrogen peroxide was also added to each replicate, the preparation was left for 2 hours at room temperature before reading of absorbance at 650 nm. Control was run at 20 µl of buffer instead of mosquito homogenate and the assay was carried out in duplicate.

Esterase α and β assay

20 µl of mosquito homogenate were placed in separate wells of microtitre plates in two replicates, 200 µl of 1-NA (naphthyl acetate) working solution was added to one replicate and 200 µl of 2-NA was added to the second replicate and left at room temperature for 15 minutes, after which 50 µl of fast blue stain solution was added. Three plate blank solutions were prepared per plate and blank wells contain 20 µl of distill water, 200 µl of 1-NA or 2-NA solution and 50 µl of stain. The plates were rear at 570 nm wavelength.

Protein assay

Total protein was measured for each mosquito using Biuret test. All measurements were done in duplicate. Protein concentration in sample was calculated as absorbance of sample/absorbance of standard multiply by concentration of standard (60 g/dl). Enzyme activities were calculated as sample absorbance/g/dl of protein.

Statistical analysis

Susceptibility/resistance to test insecticides was categorized based on the 98–100% mortality criteria of mosquito which implies susceptibility, 80–97% mortality indicates suspected resistance that needs further confirmation through biochemical or molecular assays and <80% mortality implies resistance60. Regression probit was used to compute the KDT50 and KDT95. Chi-square was used to compare percentage mortality between insecticide only, and PBO plus insecticide. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the difference in the activities of detoxifying enzymes in wild and laboratory susceptible strain of Anopheles mosquito and Duncan multiple range test was check for statistical similarities/differences between the locations. The frequency of kdr-w. kdr-e and Ace-1R mutations in An. gambiae s.s. population were compared to Hardy-Weinberg expectations using Pearson’s chi-square test. All data analyses were computed using Microsoft Excel version 2016 and IBM SPSS Statistics 23. P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the central research grant of the University of Lagos, Nigeria CRC 2017/08 to OAO. The authors will also like acknowledge the support gotten from the staffs of the Vector Research Laboratory o the Nigeria Institute of Medical Research (NIMR) especially Mr Tolu Oyeniyi and Dr Adedapo Adeogun.

Author contributions

I.F.K.; Carried out the field and laboratory studies, data analysis and write the manuscript. I.E.T.; Conceptualized the study, supervised field studies and edited the manuscript. E.T.I.; Conceptualized the study and supervised the whole work. T.S.A.; Conceptualized the study and supervised the laboratory studies.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-64412-7.

References

  • 1.WHO, W. H. O. World Malaria Report. (2018).
  • 2.WHO. Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030. World Health Organization doi:ISBN: 978 92 4 156499 1 (2015).
  • 3.WHO, W. H. O. Health in 2015: from MDGs, millennium development goals to SDGs, sustainable development goals. (2015).
  • 4.WHO. Action and Investment to defeat Malaria 2016–2030. (2016).
  • 5.WHO. World malaria report. Global Malaria Programme World Health Organization (2014).
  • 6.WHO. World Malaria Report 2017. WHO, World Health Organisaation38 (2017).
  • 7.Awolola, T. S. et al. Pyrethroids resistance intensity and resistance mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae from malaria vector surveillance sites in Nigeria. PLoS One 1–13 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Awolola TS, et al. Evidence of multiple pyrethroid resistance mechanisms in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto from Nigeria. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2009;103:1139–1145. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ibrahim SS, Manu YA, Tukur Z, Irving H, Wondji CS. High frequency of kdr L1014F is associated with pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles coluzzii in Sudan savannah of northern Nigeria. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014;14:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Djouaka RJ, et al. Evidence of a multiple insecticide resistance in the malaria vector Anopheles funestus in South West Nigeria. Malar. J. 2016;15:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1615-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Oduola AO, et al. High level of DDT resistance in the malaria mosquito: Anopheles gambiae s.l. from rural, semi urban and urban communities in Nigeria. J. Rural Trop. Public Heal. 2010;9:114–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Umar A, et al. Susceptibility test of female anopheles mosquitoes to ten insecticides for indoor residual spraying (IRS) baseline data collection in Northeastern Nigeria. J. Entomol. Nematol. 2014;6:98–103. doi: 10.5897/JEN2014.0100. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Martinez-Torres D, et al. Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol. Biol. 1998;7:179–184. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1998.72062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ranson H, et al. Identification of a point mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of {Kenyan} {Anopheles} gambiae associated with resistance to {DDT} and pyrethroids. Insect Mol. Biol. 2000;9:491–497. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00209.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Awolola TS, Brooke BD, Koekemoer LL, Coetzee M. Absence of the kdr mutation in the molecular ‘M’ form suggests different pyrethroid resistance mechanisms in the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae s.s. Trop. Med. Int. Heal. 2003;8:420–422. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01034.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Corbel V, et al. Multiple insecticide resistance mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus from Benin, West Africa. Acta Trop. 2007;101:207–216. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Etang J, et al. Short report: first report of knockdown mutations in the malaria vector anopheles gambiae from cameroon. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2006;74:795–797. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2006.74.795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pinto J, et al. Co-occurrence of East and West African kdr mutations suggests high levels of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in Anopheles gambiae from Libreville, Gabon. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2006;20:27–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2006.00611.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Verhaeghen K, Van Bortel W, Roelants P, Backeljau T, Coosemans M. Detection of the East and West African kdr mutation in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis from Uganda using a new assay based on FRET/Melt Curve analysis. Malar. J. 2006;5:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-5-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Scott JG. Cytochromes P450 and insecticide resistance. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1999;29:757–777. doi: 10.1016/S0965-1748(99)00038-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ranson H, et al. Pyrethroid resistance in African anopheline mosquitoes: What are the implications for malaria control? Trends Parasitol. 2011;27:91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2010.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hemingway J, Ranson H. Insecticide Resistance in Insect Vectors of Human Disease. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2000;45:371–391. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rakotoson JD, et al. Insecticide resistance status of three malaria vectors, Anopheles gambiae (s.l.), An. funestus and An. mascarensis, from the south, central and east coasts of Madagascar. Parasites and Vectors. 2017;10:1–17. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2336-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chouaïbou M, Zivanovic GB, Knox TB, Jamet HP, Bonfoh B. Synergist bioassays: A simple method for initial metabolic resistance investigation of field Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations. Acta Trop. 2014;130:108–111. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gleave K, Lissenden N, Richardson M, Ranson H. Piperonyl butoxide (PBO) combined with pyrethroids in long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) to prevent malaria in Africa. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017;2017:1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Awolola ST, et al. Impact of PermaNet 3.0 on entomological indices in an area of pyrethroid resistant Anopheles gambiae in south-western Nigeria. Parasites and Vectors. 2014;7:1–10. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Koffi, A. A. et al. Efficacy of Olyset® Duo, a permethrin and pyriproxyfen mixture net against wild pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae s.s. from Côte d’Ivoire: An experimental hut trial. Parasite22, (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 28.Ketoh GK, et al. Efficacy of two PBO long lasting insecticidal nets against natural populations of Anopheles gambiae s. l. in experimental huts, Kolokope Togo. PLoS One. 2018;13:1–12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Protopopoff N, et al. Effectiveness of a long-lasting piperonyl butoxide-treated insecticidal net and indoor residual spray interventions, separately and together, against malaria transmitted by pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes: a cluster, randomised controlled, two-by-two fact. Lancet. 2018;391:1577–1588. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30427-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kleinschmidt I, et al. Implications of insecticide resistance for malaria vector control with long-lasting insecticidal nets: a WHO-coordinated, prospective, international, observational cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018;18:640–649. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30172-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Oduola AO, et al. Evidence of carbamate resistance in urban populations of Anopheles gambiae s.s. Mosquitoes resistant to DDT and deltamethrin insecticides in Lagos. Parasit. Vectors. 2012;5:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Aïzoun N, et al. Dynamics of insecticide resistance and effect of synergists piperonyl butoxide (PBO), S. S. S- tributylphosphorotrithioate (DEF) and ethacrynic acid (ETAA or EA) on permethrin, deltamethrin and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) resistance i. J. Parasitol. Vector Biol. 2014;6:1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fagbohun IK, Oyeniyi TA, Idowu TE, Otubanjo OA, Awolola ST. Cytochrome P450 Mono-Oxygenase and Resistance Phenotype in DDT and Deltamethrin-Resistant Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) and Culex quinquefasciatus in Kosofe, Lagos, Nigeria. J. Med. Entomol. 2019;56:817–821. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjz006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ibrahim SS, Riveron JM, Stott R, Irving H, Wondji CS. The cytochrome P450 CYP6P4 is responsible for the high pyrethroid resistance in knockdown resistance -free Anopheles arabiensis. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016;68:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2015.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Weedall GD, et al. A cytochrome P450 allele confers pyrethroid resistance on a major African malaria vector, reducing insecticide-treated bednet efficacy. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019;11:1–14. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat7386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Antonio-Nkondjio C, et al. Investigation of mechanisms of bendiocarb resistance in Anopheles gambiae populations from the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon. Malar. J. 2016;15:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1483-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nardini, L. et al. Malaria vectors in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: the mechanisms that confer insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus. Malar. J. 1–15, 10.1186/s12936-017-2099-y (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 38.Riveron JM, et al. Genome-Wide Transcription and Functional Analyses Reveal Heterogeneous Molecular Mechanisms Driving Pyrethroids Resistance in the Major Malaria Vector Anopheles funestus Across Africa. Gene Genomes Genet. 2017;7:1819–1832. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.040147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Matowo J, et al. Biochemical basis of permethrin resistance in Anopheles arabiensis from Lower Moshi, north-eastern Tanzania. Malar. J. 2010;9:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Witzig C, et al. Genetic mapping identifies a major locus spanning P450 clusters associated with pyrethroid resistance in kdr -free Anopheles arabiensis from Chad. Heredity (Edinb). 2013;110:389–397. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2012.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Boussougou-Sambe ST, et al. Insecticide susceptibility status of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) in South-West Cameroon four years after long-lasting insecticidal net mass distribution. Parasites and Vectors. 2018;11:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2979-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dabiré RK, et al. Distribution and frequency of kdr mutations within Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations and first report of the Ace.1G119S mutation in Anopheles arabiensis from Burkina Faso (West Africa) PLoS One. 2014;9:1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lidwine, M. et al. Evidence of multiple insecticide resistance mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae populations in Bangui, Central African Republic. Parasit. Vectors 1–10, 10.1186/s13071-016-1965-8 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 44.Chouaïbou M, Kouadio FB, Tia E, Djogbenou L. First report of the East African kdr mutation in an Anopheles gambiae mosquito in Côte d’Ivoire. Wellcome Open Res. 2017;2:8. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.10662.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ndiath, M. O. et al. Emerging knock - down resistance in Anopheles arabiensis populations of Dakar, Senegal: first evidence of a high prevalence of kdr - e mutation in West African urban area. Malar. J. 1–9, 10.1186/s12936-015-0898-6 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 46.Awono-ambene HP, et al. Spatial and temporal development of deltamethrin resistance in malaria vectors of the Anopheles gambiae complex from North Cameroon. PLoS One. 2019;14:1–22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Soma D, et al. Evidence that agricultural use of pesticides selects pyrethroid resistance within Anopheles gambiae s. l. populations from cotton growing areas in Burkina Faso, West Africa. PLoS One. 2017;12:1–15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Brooke B. D. kdr: can a single mutation produce an entire insecticide resistance phenotype? Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2008;102:524–525. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Thiaw O, et al. Investigating insecticide resistance and knock-down resistance (kdr) mutation in Dielmo, Senegal, an area under long lasting insecticidal-treated nets universal coverage for 10 years. Malar. J. 2018;17:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2276-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nwane P, et al. Kdr-based insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.s in Cameroon:spread of the L1014F and L1014S mutations. Malar. J. 2011;4:0–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liebman KA, et al. Novel mutations on the ace-1 gene of the malaria vector Anopheles albimanus provide evidence for balancing selection in an area of high insecticide resistance in Peru. Malar. J. 2015;14:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0599-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Aïkpon R, et al. Bendiocarb resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations from Atacora department in Benin, West Africa: A threat for malaria vector control. Parasites and Vectors. 2013;6:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ndille EE, et al. The G119S Acetylcholinesterase (Ace-1) Target Site Mutation Confers Carbamate Resistance in the Major Malaria Vector Anopheles gambiae from Cameroon: A Challenge for the Coming IRS… The G119S Acetylcholinesterase (Ace-1) Target Site Mutation Confe. Genes (Basel). 2019;10:790. doi: 10.3390/genes10100790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fagbohun KI, Idowu TE, Olubunmi OA, Awolola ST. Susceptibility status of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) to malathion in Lagos, Nigeria. Anim. Res. Int. 2020;17:3541–3549. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Service, M. W. Field Sampling Methods. In Mosquito Ecology. 988 (Elsevier Science Publishers, 1993).
  • 56.Gillies, M. T. & Coetzee, M. A supplement to the Anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Afro- An annotated checklist and bibliography of the mostropical Region). Publications of the South African Institute for Medical Research Res No. 55, (South African Institute for Medical Research, 1987).
  • 57.Collins FH, et al. A ribosomal RNA gene probe differentiates member species of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1987;37:37–41. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1987.37.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fanello C, Santolamazza F, Torre A. Della. Simultaneous identification of species and molecular forms of the Anopheles gambiae complex by PCR-RFLP. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2002;16:461–464. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2002.00393.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Weill M, et al. The unique mutation in ace-1 giving high insecticide resistance is easily detectable in mosquito vectors. Insect Mol. Biol. 2004;13:1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2004.00452.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.WHO. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes. World Health Organisation Technical Report Series, 10.1007/978-3-642-10565-4 (2016).
  • 61.Scott JA, Brogdon WG, Collins FH. Identification of single specimens of the Anopheles gambiae complex by the polymerase chain reaction. Am. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1993;49:520–529. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1993.49.520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Weill M, et al. The unique mutation in ace-1 giving high insecticide. Insect Mol. Biol. 2004;13:1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2004.00452.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES