Skip to main content
PLOS Biology logoLink to PLOS Biology
. 2020 May 5;18(5):e3000623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000623

Haplotype of the astrocytic water channel AQP4 is associated with slow wave energy regulation in human NREM sleep

Sara Marie Ulv Larsen 1, Hans-Peter Landolt 2,3,4,5, Wolfgang Berger 3,4,6, Maiken Nedergaard 7, Gitte Moos Knudsen 1,8, Sebastian Camillo Holst 1,5,*
Editor: Paul Shaw9
PMCID: PMC7199924  PMID: 32369477

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow through the brain parenchyma is facilitated by the astrocytic water channel aquaporin 4 (AQP4). Homeostatically regulated electroencephalographic (EEG) slow waves are a hallmark of deep non–rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and have been implicated in the regulation of parenchymal CSF flow and brain clearance. The human AQP4 gene harbors several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with AQP4 expression, brain-water homeostasis, and neurodegenerative diseases. To date, their role in sleep-wake regulation is unknown. To investigate whether functional variants in AQP4 modulate human sleep, nocturnal EEG recordings and cognitive performance were investigated in 123 healthy participants genotyped for a common eight-SNP AQP4-haplotype. We show that this AQP4-haplotype is associated with distinct modulations of NREM slow wave energy, strongest in early sleep and mirrored by changes in sleepiness and reaction times during extended wakefulness. The study provides the first human evidence for a link between AQP4, deep NREM sleep, and cognitive consequences of prolonged wakefulness.


Aquaporin 4 (AQP4) in astrocytes facilitates a flow of cerebrospinal fluid between perivascular spaces and the brain parenchyma. This study shows that a common genetic haplotype linked to lower levels of AQP4 is associated with more intense NREM sleep and an improved response to extended wakefulness.

Introduction

Glial-dependent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow through the brain parenchyma, by some termed the glymphatic system, facilitates the removal of waste by generating a convective flow of CSF and interstitial fluid [1,2]. Evidence suggests that the pathway relies on 3 main processes: Firstly, bulk flow of CSF through perivascular spaces is generated by arterial pulsations from the heartbeat and potentially to a lesser extent by pulsations from the respiration [3]. Secondly, movements of CSF from the perivascular space into the brain parenchyma relies on the water channel aquaporin 4 (AQP4), which is highly expressed on astrocytic vascular endfeet [1,4]. Mice lacking AQP4 show a strong reduction in parenchymal CSF influx [4,5] and increased interstitial beta-amyloid depositions [6], which is ameliorated by sleep deprivation [7]. Thirdly, the inward flow of CSF through AQP4 channels mainly occurs during non–rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep [8], and in preclinical studies, glymphatic flow is positively correlated with slow wave intensity during different types of anesthesia [9].

Emerging data support the existence of sleep driven CSF movements and clearance in the human brain. Increased levels of intracerebral tau and ß-amyloid have been observed in healthy adults after sleep loss [10,11], and recently sleep dependent pulsations in the fourth ventricle were demonstrated in the human brain [12]. To date, however, no studies have described the link between AQP4 and human sleep-wake regulation or investigated whether genetic modulation of AQP4 may have restorative effects on cognitive functions after sleep loss.

The gene encoding AQP4 is located on chromosome 18 (18q11.2–q12.1) [13] (Fig 1). Several thousand single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the noncoding regions of AQP4 have so far been identified, and their function(s) in the normal and diseased human brain is an active area of research. Human AQP4 SNPs have been shown to impair cellular water permeability and water homeostasis in vitro [14]. Moreover, an array of studies have associated human AQP4 SNPs with neurological disorders including Alzheimer’s disease progression [15], vascular depression phenotype [16], leukariosis [17], outcome after traumatic head injury [18], edema formation [19,20], and the risk of stroke [21]. These findings suggest a link between AQP4 and the development of brain diseases associated with waste deposition and fluid movements. Recently, a single variant within AQP4 was associated with a 15% to 20% change in AQP4 expression [22].

Fig 1. Hypothesized role of the human AQP4-haplotype investigated in a controlled sleep deprivation study.

Fig 1

(A) Based on the genetic modulation of AQP4 protein expression [22], we hypothesized that the high AQP4 expressing variant of the AQP4-haplotype (HtMa; black) presents with improved glymphatic flow compared to the low AQP4 expressing HtMi variant (red). Assuming that NREM slow waves are the endogenous regulator of glymphatic flow, the HtMa variant require less SWE to initiate glymphatic flow than the HtMi variant, establishing an innate glymphatic-sleep feedback loop. (B) Physical map of the AQP4 gene and the location of the 8 haplotype SNPs. The 3 SNPs genotyped in this sample are marked with full red arrows. Dark green blocks: coding exons; light blue blocks: 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions. (C) LD block among the AQP4 SNPs in the investigated haplotype. The pairwise LD coefficients (r2) of SNPs in the LD block are color-scaled in red tones with dark red indicating perfect LD (r2 = 1). (D) Table shows bases at the 8 different SNP locations in the AQP4 gene for the 2 haplotypes HtMa (76.7%) and HtMi (19.7%) and their respective frequencies in the CEU and TSI populations, representative of the investigated Swiss cohort. A total of 3.7% of CEU and TSI are predicted to be carriers of rare haplotype variants [23]. Frequencies in investigated study population were close to the prediction (HtMa: 75.7%; HtMi: 23.5; others: 0.7%; S1 Data). (E) Visualization of study design common for all subjects included from 6 separate studies. After a minimum 3-day inclusion period with monitored bedtimes and no caffeine intake, all study participants underwent an adaptation night in the laboratory before baseline sleep, 40 hours prolonged wakefulness and a recovery night, adding up to more than 1,950 hours (123 × 2 × 8 hours) of included sleep EEG recordings. Subjective sleepiness ratings and the approximately 10 min PVT were performed at 3-hour intervals. AQP4, aquaporin 4; CEU, Utah Residents from North and West Europe; EEG, electroencephalographic; HtMa, Major allele of haplotype; HtMi, Minor allele of haplotype; LD, linkage disequilibrium; NREM, non–rapid eye movement; PVT, psychomotor vigilance test; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; SWE, slow wave energy; TSI, Toscani in Italy;

Here, we aimed to investigate the role of AQP4 in human sleep-wake regulation. We hypothesized that if NREM slow waves are the endogenous regulator of CSF brain pulsations, then a reduced expression of AQP4 should be associated with a compensatory increase in deep NREM sleep (Fig 1A). To investigate this association, a haplotype spanning AQP4 was genotyped a priori in a previously collected sample of 123 healthy participants from controlled sleep deprivation studies. Data from all-night electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings in baseline and recovery sleep as well as measurements of subjective sleepiness and global alertness throughout 40 hours of prolonged wakefulness were analyzed (Fig 1E).

Results and discussion

The AQP4-gene harbors an 8-SNP haplotype associated with AQP4 expression

Initial examination of SNPs in the AQP4-gene revealed a conserved haplotype spanning the entire gene with 2 common variants (Fig 1B). This haplotype consists of 8 SNPs, including rs335929 implicated in cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s patients [15] and rs162008 demonstrated to reduce AQP4 expression [22]. Based on overall variance in EEG slow wave energy (SWE; 0.75–4.5 Hz) and the a priori aim to detect an effect size of at least 5%, power analysis suggests a required sample size of 78 (39 per group) as sufficient (see Methods). The AQP4-haplotypes were compared by means of dominant analysis, whereby 45 heterozygous subjects and 7 homozygotes were denoted as carriers of the minor allele (HtMi) and compared to 71 individuals homozygous for the major allele (HtMa) variant (S1 Data). The 2 groups did not differ in demographic characteristics (S1 and S2 Tables), presented with similar sleep architecture, and had a normal response to sleep deprivation (S3 Table).

AQP4-haplotype is associated with a distinct modulation of slow waves in NREM sleep

The sleep EEG is genetically determined, with NREM sleep exhibiting up to 90% heritability [24], making it one of the most hereditary human traits described. To investigate whether the AQP4-haplotype modulates homeostatic sleep-wake regulation, EEG energy in predefined frequency bands in NREM sleep in baseline and recovery nights and the evolution of subjective sleepiness as well as cognitive performance measures were compared between the AQP4-haplotypes by a fixed sequence procedure [25] (see Methods). EEG SWE, which is a combined measure of sleep intensity and duration and is one of the best validated markers of sleep propensity in humans [26], was defined as the primary outcome variable. EEG quantification revealed that the HtMi carriers produced more SWE than the HtMa homozygotes (“genotype”: P < 0.03; Fig 2A), an effect paralleled by post hoc slow wave power analysis (S2 Fig). These effects were not observed in the spindle range (P > 0.77) or any other frequency band (P > 0.33), nor in REM sleep (S1 Fig). The demonstrated AQP4-haplotype modulation of SWE documents an association between the intensity of deep NREM sleep and the expression of the AQP4-water channel, a relationship that may be central for CSF-driven brain pulsations. Given how recent preclinical evidence show that the intensity of slow waves is directly linked to glymphatic influx [9] and that the complete removal of AQP4 in mice results in brain impairments after sleep deprivation [7], this suggests an important role of AQP4-mediated clearance during sleep. The results appear in line with our initial hypothesis, suggesting that to compensate for a genetic reduction in AQP4 expression [22], AQP4 HtMi carriers increase SWE during NREM sleep, perhaps by an up-regulation of parenchymal CSF flow (Fig 1A). Interestingly, the AQP4-haplotype modulation was similar in baseline—and recovery nights (“genotype x night”: F1,120 = 0.37; P > 0.55; ηp2 = 0.31%), proposing that the AQP4 modulation is present both under normal sleep conditions and following the sleep homeostatic challenge.

Fig 2. AQP4-haplotype is associated with EEG energy regulation in the slow wave range.

Fig 2

Comparison of EEG energy (EEG power × time) across baseline and recovery nights in the slow wave range (0.75–4.5 Hz) within the AQP4 haplotype variants HtMa homozygotes (black) and HtMi carriers (red). To minimize false positive results, EEG data was analyzed by a hypothesis-driven fixed sequence procedure that only revealed significant effects of AQP4 in the whole-night slow wave band, which was significantly increased in the AQP4 HtMi-carrier group when compared to HtMa homozygotes (A; “genotype”: F1,121 = 5.0; P < 0.03; ηp2 = 3.95%). The effect was similar in baseline (B) and recovery (C) conditions and confined to the 0.75–2 Hz band. Inserts (B and C) represent full NREM sleep spectra for 0–20 Hz on log10 scale with gray shading indicating the slow wave band (S2 Data). Data represent mean ± SEM. By-bin unpaired two-tailed t tests: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. AQP4, aquaporin 4; EEG, electroencephalographic; HtMa, Major allele of haplotype; HtMi, Minor allele of haplotype; NREM, non–rapid eye movement.

To localize the AQP4-dependent effect in the slow wave range, bin-wise frequency analysis was performed and revealed significantly higher energy in the 0.75 to 2 Hz range for the HtMi carriers than the HtMa homozygotes (Fig 2B and 2C and S2 and S5 Datas).

EEG markers of sleep homeostasis in NREM sleep are associated with the AQP4-haplotype

To investigate whether the AQP4 haplotype modulates the well-known homeostatic decline of slow waves across sleep, EEG SWE was quantified across the first 4 NREM sleep episodes in baseline and recovery nights. Consistent with the all-night sleep EEG analysis, a main effect of the AQP4 haplotype was observed (“haplotype”: P < 0.03; Fig 3A–3B), confirming the overall increased SWE levels in the HtMi-carrier group. Importantly, however, the haplotype effect was not constant across the night. Rather, AQP4 HtMi carriers showed increased EEG energy mainly in the early part of the night (“haplotype x NREM episode”: P < 0.05; Fig 3A–3B) when sleep pressure is highest (S3 Data). This finding may suggest an AQP4-dependent homeostatic modulation of NREM sleep. The effect in the first NREM episode was masked by a small delay in REM onset (8.9 ± 4.3 min) in the HtMa homozygotes compared to the HtMi-carrier group (“haplotype”: F1,121 = 4.3; P < 0.05; ηp2 = 3.41%; S3 Table), making the AQP4-haplotype modulation clearer when the first 2 NREM episodes were combined (Fig 3 inserts). The increased SWE in the low AQP4 protein expressing HtMi carriers indicates regulatory feedback between sleep intensity and AQP4 dependent water exchange (Fig 1A). Future studies are warranted to better understand whether the increase in SWE is also associated with increased CSF clearance or perhaps indicates that sleep intensity is related to an exchange of fluids across the blood brain barrier.

Fig 3. Time course of EEG slow wave production is associated with the AQP4 haplotype.

Fig 3

To probe the role of AQP4 on sleep-wake regulation, SWE across the first 4 NREM episodes (A and B) was investigated. The data confirmed the previously detected overall increase in SWE in the AQP4 HtMi carriers (red) compared to the HtMa homozygote (black) group (“haplotype”: F1,121 = 5.39; P < 0.03, ηp2 = 4.26%). Moreover, a significant AQP4-haplotype modulation across the first 4 NREM episodes was observed (“haplotype x NREM episode”: F3,843 = 2.65; P < 0.05; ηp2 = 0.93%), an effect that was strongest in the second NREM episode. AQP4 HtMi carriers were found to have increased SWE mainly in the early part of the night (figure inserts). Spectral energy values of the slow wave band (0.75–4.5 Hz) in NREM sleep episodes 1 through 4 and the second part of the night (early: 1 and 2, late: 3 and 4) are plotted for the 2 haplotype groups for both baseline and recovery sleep (S3 Data). Data represent mean ± SEM. Unpaired two-tailed t tests: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. AQP4, aquaporin 4; EEG, electroencephalographic; HtMa, Major allele of haplotype; HtMi, Minor allele of haplotype; NREM, non–rapid eye movement; SWE, slow wave energy.

The AQP4-haplotype is associated with a modulation of subjective and objective responses to prolonged wakefulness

To probe whether the AQP4-haplotype modulation of SWE has cognitive consequences, we investigated psychomotor vigilance performance (psychomotor vigilance test, PVT) and subjective sleepiness (Stanford sleepiness scale, SSS) across prolonged wakefulness in the 2 genetic groups (see Fig 1E). Subjective sleepiness ratings revealed that HtMi carriers coped slightly better with sleep deprivation than HtMa homozygotes and showed a smaller increase in sleepiness ratings from day 1 to day 2 (“haplotype x day”: P < 0.04; Fig 4A). Importantly, median response speed on the PVT mirrored the effects on subjective sleepiness with the HtMi carriers reducing their speed slightly less than HtMa homozygotes (“haplotype x day”: P < 0.04; Fig 4B), despite comparable speeds on day 1. Effects for lapses of attention were visually similar yet did not reach significance (Fig 4C and S4 Data). These data suggest that alterations in AQP4-expression have cognitive consequences, unveiled during sleep deprivation. Our data extend the recently described connection between slow waves, neuronal activation, and CSF flow in the fourth ventricle [12], by showing that the AQP4 haplotype is associated with a modulation of NREM SWE and the restorative effect of sleep on cognitive functions. The low number of included HtMi homozygotes did not allow us to test whether the observed effects on sleep follow a dose response relationship, a question that should be addressed in future studies. Although we cannot rule out possible confounding associations between the AQP4 haplotype and other sleep regulating genes, our observations may indirectly suggest that AQP4-dependent fluid flow within the neuropil is regulated by EEG slow waves during NREM sleep.

Fig 4. Objective and subjective measures of sleep deprivation is affected by the AQP4 haplotype.

Fig 4

Subjective sleepiness ratings on the SSS and objective alertness measures by the PVT. SSS scores (A), median speed (B), and attention lapses (C) on the PVT were quantified at 3-hour intervals across the 40 hours of prolonged wakefulness. Three-way linear mixed-model analysis revealed strong differences between day 1 and day 2 (“day”: Fall > 442, p < 0.0001) and moderate modulations of clock time (Fall > 4.6, p < 0.0005) and by the “day x clock time” interaction (Fall > 3.5, p < 0.004) in all 3 measures. Comparison of subjective sleepiness between the 71 HtMa homozygotes (black) and the 52 HtMi carriers (red) of the AQP4 haplotype revealed that the HtMi group coped slightly better with prolonged wakefulness than the HtMa homozygotes (“haplotype x day”: F1,364 = 4.5; P < 0.04; ηp2 = 1.22%; Panel A right). Intriguingly, the AQP4-haplotype dependent modulation of sleepiness was mirrored by a similar effect on PVT median speed performance among the 60 HtMa homozygotes and 44 HtMi carriers that were tested (“haplotype x day”: F1,1041 = 4.7; P < 0.04; ηp2 = 0.45%; Panel B right), an effect similar yet not significant for lapses of attention (“haplotype x day”: F1,1041 = 0.1, p > 0.78, Panel C right; S4 Data). Data represent estimated mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 from the corresponding “haplotype x day” interaction. AQP4, aquaporin 4; hom: Homozygote; HtMa, Major allele of haplotype; HtMi, Minor allele of haplotype; PVT, psychomotor vigilance test; SSS, Stanford sleepiness scale.

Conclusion

Our data highlights that subjects carrying the low AQP4-expressing HtMi variant of the AQP4-haplotype have enhanced SWE mainly in early NREM episodes and cope slightly better with prolonged wakefulness. Given that SNPs associated with the HtMi variant affect the cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s patients [15], the here described modulation of sleep intensity by the AQP4 haplotype provides a tantalizing link between Alzheimer’s disease, sleep intensity, and AQP4 in humans. Although future studies are warranted to better understand the underlying molecular mechanisms governing this effect, the data are consistent with the hypothesized impact from the glymphatic pathway. It also supports the hypothesis that sleep slow waves are part of the regulatory machinery of parenchymal CSF flow. Further studies investigating the AQP4 haplotype and its association to sleep-associated brain functions are warranted.

Methods

Ethics statement

The study protocols were approved by the ethics committee of the Canton of Zurich for research on human subjects (Cantonal Ethics Committee reference numbers: E-39/2006 [29]; 2012–0398 [30]; E-24/2007 [31]; EK-Nr. 786 [32]; 2015–0424 [33]). As previously required, the oldest data set [28] was approved by local institutional review board. Subjects were recruited by public advertisements seeking participants for scientific studies or via billboard advertisements at the university buildings in Zurich. All subjects received a monetary compensation for their participation. Written and informed consent was obtained from all participants before the experiments as required according to the principles in the Declaration of Helsinki.

SNPs of the AQP4 gene and haplotype analysis

To investigate genetic modulations of AQP4, common variants in the AQP4 gene were explored using the dbSNP database build 152 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/). The initial search in the 1000 genome project database within dbSNP revealed 32 SNPs with a global minor allele frequency (MAF) above 5%. Only 16 of these were common (MAF above 20%) in the European population data representative of the investigated Swiss cohort (CEU and TSI populations). Linkage disequlibrium (LD) analysis showed that 8 of the 16 SNPs (rs162007, rs162008, rs63514, rs455671, rs335931, rs335930, rs335929, and rs16942851) form a distinct haplotype with SNPs in high LD (r2 > 0.8; Fig 1C). Further LD analysis of the haploblock revealed that these 8 SNPs form 2 common variants of the haplotype: a major haplotype (HtMa) with a 76,7% incidence and a minor haplotype (HtMi) with a 19.7% incidence (for further details, see Fig 1). Based on the 1000 genome database, this haplotype is widely detected across the European, American, and east Asian and south Asian populations.

Genotyping of APQ4 SNPs

Genomic DNA extracted from 3 mL fresh EDTA-blood (wizardR Genomic DNA purification Kit, Promega, Madison, WI) was used for genotyping. The rs335931, rs335929, and rs16942851 polymorphisms of AQP4 were chosen as tag SNPs to represent the haplotype and were determined using Taqman® SNP genotyping Assay (Life Technologies Europe B.V.; see also S2 Table). Allelic discrimination analysis was performed with SDS version 2.2.2 software (applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). All genotypes were replicated at least once for independent confirmation.

The MAFs of the genotyped variants were in accordance with MAFs predicted by the dbSNP database (S2 Table). All 3 SNPs were in Hardy-Weinberger equilibrium. Pairwise LD coefficients (r2) were calculated between rs335929, rs16942851, and rs335931 confirming high LD (r2 > 0,95). The 2 haplotypes and allele frequencies are shown in Fig 1.

Because of the well-established association between Alzheimer disease risk and Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype [27], we checked the distribution of APOE genotypes (rs429358 and rs7412) among the AQP4-haplotype groups using the same Taqman® SNP genotyping approach. The analysis revealed that the distribution was similar in HtMa homozygotes and HtMi carriers (p > 0.47; S1 Table).

Study population

To examine the impact of the genetic haplotype of AQP4 on the sleep EEG, we investigated data from 134 healthy participants of 6 previously published sleep deprivation studies [2833]. All studies were conducted under strictly controlled conditions in the sleep lab of the Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology at the University of Zürich, Switzerland, using similar protocols and methodology (Fig 1E). Two carriers of rare haplotypes as well as 9 older participants with an age above 60 years were excluded from the analysis. The total sample thereby included 71 individuals homozygous for the major allele (HtMa/HtMa), 45 heterozygous (HtMa/HtMi), and 7 homozygous for the minor allele (HtMi/HtMi). Given the low number of minor allele homozygotes, a HtMi-carrier group (HtMi/HtMi and HtMa/HtMi alleles) was created (n = 52). Dominant analysis was performed with the aim of investigating the consequence of harboring the minor AQP4 haplotype. No difference in the distribution of the AQP4 haplotype between the 6 studies was observed (p > 0.21). In studies that included the administration of one or more treatments [2830], only data from the placebo arm were analyzed.

Study participants were right-handed healthy volunteers with a medical history free of neurological and psychiatric disorders. They were drug and medication abstinent and reported being good sleepers with regular bedtimes and no shift or night work. No participants passed through time zones or consumed excessive amounts of alcohol or caffeine in the 2 months prior to study enrollment. Before inclusion, participants underwent a screening night in the sleep laboratory to check for undiagnosed sleep disorders or low sleep efficiency (<85%; see S1 and S3 Tables).

Sleep study protocol

The 6 study protocols were very similar and were performed as follows: In the final 3 days leading up to the sleep studies, participants were required to keep a strict 8-hour/16-hour sleep schedule and to refrain from caffeine (coffee, tea, cola drinks, chocolate, and energy drinks) and alcohol intake. Compliance with these requirements was verified by actigraphy from a wrist activity monitor, sleep-wake diaries, and determination of saliva caffeine as well as breath alcohol levels upon arrival in the sleep lab.

The sleep studies consisted of a block of 4 consecutive nights (see Fig 1E): First and second nights served as adaptation and baseline nights, respectively. The subjects were then kept awake for 40 hours (i.e., for 2 days, skipping one night of sleep) until bedtime on the fourth night, when they were given a 10-hour sleep opportunity for recovery. During the period of prolonged wakefulness, the participants were constantly supervised by members of the research team and engaged in studying, playing games, watching films, and occasionally taking a walk outside the laboratory.

Polysomnographic recordings

Continuous all-night polysomnographic recordings were performed on all baseline and recovery nights. The EEG, electrooculogram (EOG), submental electromyogram, (EMG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) were recorded using the polysomnographic amplifiers PSA24 (Braintronics Inc., Almere, the Netherlands; n = 16) [28] and Artisan® from Micromed (Mogliano Veneto, Italy; n = 107) [2933]. In the recordings obtained with the PSA24 recording system, the analogue EEG signals were conditioned by a high-pass filter (3 dB at 0.16 Hz) and a low-pass filter (3 dB at 102 Hz), sampled at 512 Hz, digitally low-pass filtered (3 dB at 49 Hz), and stored with a resolution of 128 Hz. In the recordings obtained with the Artisan® recording system, analogue EEG data were conditioned with a high-pass filter (3 dB at 0.15 Hz), a low-pass filter (3 dB at 67.2 Hz), and sampled with a frequency 256 Hz. Sleep stages were visually scored in 20-second epochs according to standard criteria [34], and arousal- and movement-related artifacts were visually identified and removed. The data from the C3M2 derivation are reported. In both conditions, the analyses were restricted to the first 8 hours (480 min) after lights-off.

EEG analyses

Four second EEG spectra (fast Fourier transform routine, Hanning Window, frequency resolution 0.25 Hz) were calculated with MATLAB (MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA), and EEG power spectra of 5 consecutive 4-second epochs were averaged and matched with the scored sleep stages.

The first 4 NREM episodes were defined according to current standards [35]. The all-night power spectra represent the average of all artifact-free 20-second values in NREM sleep (stages 1–4) between 0 and 20 Hz. The energy spectra contain all values of spectral power multiplied by time (minutes) spent in NREM sleep per night (480 minutes) or in the respective NREM sleep episodes. The energy calculations factors in a more relevant quantitative interpretation of the spectra [25].

Cognitive testing and sleepiness ratings

The PVT is a simple reaction time task implemented in e-Prime software (Psychology Software Tools Inc., Pittsburgh, PA), in which subjects are instructed to press a button as quickly as possible with their right index finger when they see a digital millisecond counter that starts to scroll in the center of the computer screen [36]. Nineteen individuals were excluded from analysis because they performed a different, noncomputerized version of the task, resulting in a sample size of 104 subjects for the PVT task analyses. Moreover, because a subset of participants underwent neuroimaging on the second day of sleep deprivation, some performance measures are missing on day 2. Subjects received oral instructions and performed a training session prior to study start. For each PVT trial; 100 stimuli were presented (random interstimulus intervals: 2–10 s). Two extensively validated PVT variables were quantified [37,38]: “lapses of attention” (defined as the percentage of trials with reaction times longer than 500 ms) and median response speed (based on inverse reaction times). Immediately prior to all PVT assessments, a validated German version of the SSS was administered [39]. The sleepiness ratings of all 123 subjects were included in the analyses.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.4 x64 software (SAS institute, Cary, North Carolina) and performed across nocturnal EEG data, subjective sleepiness and PVT performance measures. To approximate a normal distribution, EEG energy was log-transformed prior to statistical tests. Two- and three-way mixed-model analysis of variance were performed with the between-subjects factor “genotype” (HtMa homozygotes versus HtMi carriers) and the relevant within-subject factors: “condition” (baseline versus recovery), “NREM sleep episode” (1–4), “frequency bin” (bin 1–81), clock time (8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23 o’clock), and the duration of prolonged wakefulness (day 1 versus day 2). For the nocturnal EEG data, 2 overall four-way mixed-model analysis were performed (for EEG power and EEG energy), which included all frequency bins, genotype, condition, and study (“bin x genotype x night”: P < 0.0001). Further analysis was only performed because a significant effect of genotypes was established. Moreover, to control for type I error caused by multiple comparison, the significance levels for these primary 2 overall mixed models were set to α < 0.025 (Bonferroni correction α = 0.05/2). Type I errors were further controlled by only considering significant effects relevant when the following 2 criteria were met: (A) more than 2 bins in the by-bin (mixed model) analysis of variance were below α = 0.05 and (B) the corresponding frequency band (slow wave/delta, theta, alpha, spindle, beta) was also significant at α level = 0.05. The final step implemented to control for type I errors was to investigate the sleep EEG bands using a hypothesis driven, fixed sequence procedure [25], in which EEG bands were listed based on their relevance for sleep-wake regulation as follows: (1) Delta/slow wave activity (0.75–4.5 Hz), (2) Spindles (12–15 Hz), (3) Theta (5–8 Hz), (4) Alpha (8–12 Hz), and (5) Beta (15–20 Hz) and tested in that order. Only if the previously tested band revealed a significant genotype modulation, statistical testing of the subsequent band was performed.

Based on the log-transformed EEG SWE data, a priori power analysis revealed that to determine a 5% difference between haplotypes with a simple two-tailed t test (α = 0.05), a total sample size of 78 subjects (Cohen’s d: 0.833; SWE mean: 5 log[μV2min] ± 2.5%; standard deviation: 0.3 log[μV2min]) are required (G*Power 3.1.9.2; Die Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf).

When a significant main effect or interaction was discovered, appropriate paired or unpaired two-tailed t tests were used to localize differences within and between groups. If not stated otherwise, only significant effects or results are reported. Effect sizes (partial eta squared: ηp2) were calculated from corresponding mixed-model F-values and degrees of freedom. Effect sizes of 0.0099, 0.0588, and 0.1379 are considered small, moderate, and large, respectively [40,41].

Supporting information

S1 Fig. REM energy analysis.

REM energy analysis for AQP4 HtMa homozygous (black lines) and HtMi carriers (red lines) across baseline (A) nor recovery (B) nights. No significant modulation by the AQP4 haplotype was observed (“haplotype”: F1,21 = 0.07; P > 0.79), confirming that the sleep EEG modulations are selective to the NREM slow wave range (S5 Data). Plots represent means; error bars represent SEM. (Insert) Full NREM sleep spectra for 0 to 20 Hz on log10 scale. AQP4, aquaporin 4; EEG, electroencephalographic; HtMa, Major allele of haplotype; HtMi, Minor allele of haplotype; NREM, non–rapid eye movement; REM, rapid eye movement.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. AQP4-haplotype is associated with a modulation of EEG power in the slow wave range.

Comparison of EEG spectral power across baseline and recovery nights in the slow wave band (0.75–4.5 Hz) within the AQP4-haplotype variants HtMa homozygotes (black) and HtMi carriers (red). The AQP4 HtMi carriers had higher spectral power than the HtMa homozygotes (A; “genotype”: F1,121 = 4.2; P < 0.05). The effect was similar in baseline (B) and recovery sleep (C) conditions and confined to the 0.75 to 1.25 Hz band. Inserts in panels B and C represent full NREM sleep spectra for 0 to 20 Hz on log10 scale. Gray shading indicating the slow wave band (S2 Data). Data represents means ± SEM. By-bin unpaired two-tailed t tests; *P < 0.05 (only performed in the slow wave range). AQP4, aquaporin 4; EEG, electroencephalographic; HtMa, Major allele of haplotype; HtMi, Minor allele of haplotype; NREM, non–rapid eye movement.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Demographics.

Demographic characteristics of the 123 healthy adult volunteers, who participated in one of six 40-hour sleep deprivation studies from the Zürich sleep lab where AQP4 HtMa homozygotes and HtMi allele carriers were genotyped. No demographic differences between the 2 AQP4-haplotype groups was observed, nor was there a difference in haplotype distribution among the 6 studies (Fishers exact t test, p > 0.21). Given the low number of females in the 6 included studies, a potential interaction between AQP4 haplotype and gender could not be addressed in the current paper. German versions and validated German translations of questionnaires were used to assess lifestyle and personality traits. Questionnaires included ESS [42] and STAI [43]. Caffeine consumption was estimated based on average caffeine contents per serving (coffee: 100 mg, tea: 30 mg, cola drink: 40 mg [2 dL], energy drink: 80 mg [2 dL], chocolate: 50 mg [100 g]). The APOE genotype, known to modulate Alzheimer disease progression, was evenly distributed among the AQP4 haplotype groups. P values are calculated from students two-tailed t tests or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate. APOE, Apolipoprotein E; AQP4, aquaporin 4; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale; HtMa, Major allele of haplotype; HtMi, Minor allele of haplotype; STAI, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Investigated SNPs.

Alleles: presented as [major allele/minor allele]. Position: Position of SNP in gene. Location: Location of single nucleotid polymorphism on chromosome 18 in the genome. Assay ID: Thermofisher Taqman® SNP genotype assay ID nr. MAFpredicted: MAF predicted by dbSNP analysis tool in a CEU and TSI population (to approximate the Swiss population). MAFstudy: MAF in the entire genotyped study population (n = 134), including 2 rare genotypes and 9 elderly subjects excluded from analysis. dbSNP, The Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Database; CEU, Utah Residents from North and West Europe; MAF, minor allele frequency; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; TSI, Toscani in Italy;

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Visually scored sleep variables.

Data on the visually scored sleep variables and their modulation by sleep deprivation and the AQP4 haplotype. Values represent mean ± SEM in baseline and recovery nights for the 2 haplotype groups. Analysis of the recovery nights were restricted to 480 minutes. Sleep efficiency: percentage of total sleep time per 480 min. Stages N1–N3: NREM sleep stages (N3 refers to slow wave sleep). Sleep latency: time from lights-out to the first occurrence of N2 sleep. REM sleep latency: time from sleep onset to the first occurrence of REM sleep. F- and P values: two-way mixed-model ANOVA with factors “genotype” (HtMa homozygotes, HtMi carriers), “condition” (baseline, recovery), and their interaction. AQP4, aquaporin 4; HtMa, Major allele of haplotype; HtMi, Minor allele of haplotype; MT, movement time; NREM, non–rapid eye movement; REM, rapid eye movement; TIB, time in bed; TST, total sleep time; WASO, wakefulness after sleep onset.

(DOCX)

S1 Data. Individual genotyping and haplotyping.

(XLSX)

S2 Data. Individual whole-night NREM spectral power and spectral energy data.

NREM, non–rapid eye movement.

(XLS)

S3 Data. Individual NREM spectral power and spectral energy data for the first 4 NREM episodes.

NREM, non–rapid eye movement.

(XLSX)

S4 Data. Individual data for PVT median speed, PVT lapses, and SSS ratings.

PVT, psychomotor vigilance test; SSS, Stanford sleepiness scale.

(XLSX)

S5 Data. Individual whole-night REM spectral power and spectral energy data.

REM, rapid eye movement.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Marianna Di Chiara, Laura van Bommel, Silke Feil, and Dr. Samuel Koller for their assistance with AQP4 genotyping, and Dr. Brice Ozenne for his assistance with statistical analysis.

Abbreviations

APOE

Apolipoprotein E

AQP4

aquaporin 4

CSF

cerebrospinal fluid

ECG

electrocardiogram

EEG

electroencephalographic

EMG

electromyogram

EOG

electrooculogram

HtMa

HtMi

LD

linkage disequlibrium

MAF

minor allele frequency

NREM

non–rapid eye movement

PVT

psychomotor vigilance test

SNP

single nucleotide polymorphism

SSS

Stanford sleepiness scale

SWE

slow wave energy

Data Availability

Individual anonymized observations that underlie the data summarized in the figures are included in S1S5 Data files. For further information or details please contact the Neurobiology Research Unit in Copenhagen (Dr. Holst: holst@nru.dk, or MD Ulv Larsen: sara.larsen@nru.dk) or the Psychopharmacology Laboratory at the University of Zurich (Prof. Landolt: landolt@pharma.uzh.ch).

Funding Statement

This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 798131 (to SCH), by a fellowship from the Copenhagen University hospital, Rigshospitalet R151-A6534 (to SMUL) and by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation 31-67060.01; 310000-120377; 3100A0-107874; 320030_135414; 320030_163439 (to HPL). 'The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Plog BA, Nedergaard M. The glymphatic system in CNS health and disease: past, present and future. Annu Rev Pathol. 2018. January 24;13:379–94. 10.1146/annurev-pathol-051217-111018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Benveniste H, Lee H, Volkow ND. The Glymphatic Pathway. Neuroscientist. 2017. January 1;doi: 1073858417691030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mestre H, Tithof J, Du T, Song W, Peng W, Sweeney AM, et al. Flow of cerebrospinal fluid is driven by arterial pulsations and is reduced in hypertension. Nat Commun. 2018. 19;9(1):4878 10.1038/s41467-018-07318-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mestre H, Hablitz LM, Xavier AL, Feng W, Zou W, Pu T, et al. Aquaporin-4-dependent glymphatic solute transport in the rodent brain. Elife. 2018. 18;7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Haj-Yasein NN, Vindedal GF, Eilert-Olsen M, Gundersen GA, Skare Ø, Laake P, et al. Glial-conditional deletion of aquaporin-4 (Aqp4) reduces blood-brain water uptake and confers barrier function on perivascular astrocyte endfeet. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011. October 25;108(43):17815–20. 10.1073/pnas.1110655108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Iliff JJ, Wang M, Liao Y, Plogg BA, Peng W, Gundersen GA, et al. A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid β. Sci Transl Med. 2012. August 15;4(147):147ra111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang R, Liu Y, Chen Y, Li Q, Marshall C, Wu T, et al. Aquaporin 4 deletion exacerbates brain impairments in a mouse model of chronic sleep disruption. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2019. July 31; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xie L, Kang H, Xu Q, Chen MJ, Liao Y, Thiyagarajan M, et al. Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain. Science. 2013. October 18;342(6156):373–7. 10.1126/science.1241224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hablitz LM, Vinitsky HS, Sun Q, Stæger FF, Sigurdsson B, Mortensen KN, et al. Increased glymphatic influx is correlated with high EEG delta power and low heart rate in mice under anesthesia. Sci Adv. 2019. February;5(2):eaav5447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Holth JK, Fritschi SK, Wang C, Pedersen NP, Cirrito JR, Mahan TE, et al. The sleep-wake cycle regulates brain interstitial fluid tau in mice and CSF tau in humans. Science. 2019. 22;363(6429):880–4. 10.1126/science.aav2546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shokri-Kojori E, Wang G-J, Wiers CE, Demiral SB, Guo M, Kim SW, et al. β-Amyloid accumulation in the human brain after one night of sleep deprivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018. 24;115(17):4483–8. 10.1073/pnas.1721694115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fultz NE, Bonmassar G, Setsompop K, Stickgold RA, Rosen BR, Polimeni JR, et al. Coupled electrophysiological, hemodynamic, and cerebrospinal fluid oscillations in human sleep. Science. 2019. 01;366(6465):628–31. 10.1126/science.aax5440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nagelhus EA, Ottersen OP. Physiological Roles of Aquaporin-4 in Brain. Physiol Rev. 2013. October;93(4):1543–62. 10.1152/physrev.00011.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sorani MD, Zador Z, Hurowitz E, Yan D, Giacomini KM, Manley GT. Novel variants in human Aquaporin-4 reduce cellular water permeability. Hum Mol Genet. 2008. August 1;17(15):2379–89. 10.1093/hmg/ddn138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Burfeind KG, Murchison CF, Westaway SK, Simon MJ, Erten-Lyons D, Kaye JA, et al. The effects of noncoding aquaporin-4 single-nucleotide polymorphisms on cognition and functional progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2017. September;3(3):348–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Westermair AL, Munz M, Schaich A, Nitsche S, Willenborg B, Muñoz Venegas LM, et al. Association of Genetic Variation at AQP4 Locus with Vascular Depression. Biomolecules. 2018. December 5;8(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yadav BK, Oh S-Y, Kim N-K, Shin B-S. Association of rs2075575 and rs9951307 polymorphisms of AQP-4 gene with leukoaraiosis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014. June;23(5):1199–206. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.10.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dardiotis E, Paterakis K, Tsivgoulis G, Tsintou M, Hadjigeorgiou GF, Dardioti M, et al. AQP4 tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014. December 1;31(23):1920–6. 10.1089/neu.2014.3347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Henker C, Kriesen T, Fürst K, Goody D, Glass Ä, Pützer BM, et al. Effect of 10 different polymorphisms on preoperative volumetric characteristics of glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol. 2016. February;126(3):585–92. 10.1007/s11060-015-2005-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kleffner I, Bungeroth M, Schiffbauer H, Schäbitz W-R, Ringelstein EB, Kuhlenbäumer G. The role of aquaporin-4 polymorphisms in the development of brain edema after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. 2008. April;39(4):1333–5. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.500785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dardiotis E, Siokas V, Marogianni C, Aloizou A-M, Sokratous M, Paterakis K, et al. AQP4 tag SNPs in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage in Greek and Polish population. Neuroscience Letters. 2019. March 23;696:156–61. 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.12.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Woo J, Kim JE, Im JJ, Lee J, Jeong HS, Park S, et al. Astrocytic water channel aquaporin-4 modulates brain plasticity in both mice and humans: a potential gliogenetic mechanism underlying language-associated learning. Mol Psychiatry. 2018. April;23(4):1021–30. 10.1038/mp.2017.113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.National cancer institute [internet]. Tool for calculation of population specific haplotype frequencies [cited 2020 April 15]. Available from: https://ldlink.nci.nih.gov/?tab=ldhap
  • 24.Buckelmüller J, Landolt H-P, Stassen HH, Achermann P. Trait-like individual differences in the human sleep electroencephalogram. Neuroscience. 2006;138(1):351–6. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dmitrienko A, D’Agostino R. Traditional multiplicity adjustment methods in clinical trials. Stat Med. 2013. December 20;32(29):5172–218. 10.1002/sim.5990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Skorucak J, Arbon EL, Dijk D-J, Achermann P. Response to chronic sleep restriction, extension, and subsequent total sleep deprivation in humans: adaptation or preserved sleep homeostasis? Sleep. 2018. July 1;41(7). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yu J-T, Tan L, Hardy J. Apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer’s disease: an update. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014;37:79–100. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rétey JV, Adam M, Gottselig JM, Khatami R, Dürr R, Achermann P, et al. Adenosinergic mechanisms contribute to individual differences in sleep deprivation-induced changes in neurobehavioral function and brain rhythmic activity. J Neurosci. 2006. October 11;26(41):10472–9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1538-06.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bodenmann S, Xu S, Luhmann UFO, Arand M, Berger W, Jung HH, et al. Pharmacogenetics of modafinil after sleep loss: catechol-O-methyltransferase genotype modulates waking functions but not recovery sleep. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009. March;85(3):296–304. 10.1038/clpt.2008.222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Valomon A, Holst SC, Borrello A, Weigend S, Müller T, Berger W, et al. Effects of COMT genotype and tolcapone on lapses of sustained attention after sleep deprivation in healthy young men. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018. June;43(7):1599–607. 10.1038/s41386-018-0018-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bachmann V, Klaus F, Bodenmann S, Schäfer N, Brugger P, Huber S, et al. Functional ADA polymorphism increases sleep depth and reduces vigilant attention in humans. Cereb Cortex. 2012. April;22(4):962–70. 10.1093/cercor/bhr173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hefti K, Holst SC, Sovago J, Bachmann V, Buck A, Ametamey SM, et al. Increased metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 availability in human brain after one night without sleep. Biol Psychiatry. 2013. January 15;73(2):161–8. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.07.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Weigend S, Holst SC, Meier J, Brock M, Kohler M, Landolt H-P. Prolonged Waking and Recovery Sleep Affect the Serum MicroRNA Expression Profile in Humans. Clocks & Sleep. 2019. March;1(1):75–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kales A, Rechtschaffen A, University of California LA, Brain Information Service, National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness (U.S.). A manual of standardized terminology, techniques and scoring system for sleep stages of human subjects. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office; 1968.
  • 35.Feinberg I, Floyd TC. Systematic trends across the night in human sleep cycles. Psychophysiology. 1979. May;16(3):283–91. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb02991.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Durmer JS, Dinges DF. Neurocognitive consequences of sleep deprivation. Semin Neurol. 2005. March;25(1):117–29. 10.1055/s-2005-867080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Doran SM, Van Dongen HP, Dinges DF. Sustained attention performance during sleep deprivation: evidence of state instability. Arch Ital Biol. 2001. April;139(3):253–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lim J, Dinges DF. Sleep deprivation and vigilant attention. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1129:305–22. 10.1196/annals.1417.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sturm A., Clarenbach P., Largiadèr F. & Wicki O. Checkliste Schlafstörungen. Checklisten der aktuellen Medizin. Thieme; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cohen Jacob. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed New York: Academic Press; 2013. 567 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Richardson JTE. Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review. 2011;6:135–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bloch KE, Schoch OD, Zhang JNN, Russi EW. German version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Respiration. 1999;66:440–447. 10.1159/000029408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970; [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Gabriel Gasque

17 Dec 2019

Dear Dr Holst,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript entitled "Haplotype of the astrocytic water channel AQP4 modulates slow wave energy in human NREM sleep" for consideration as a Short Report by PLOS Biology.

Your manuscript has now been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editorial staff, as well as by an Academic Editor with relevant expertise, and I am writing to let you know that we would like to send your submission out for external peer review.

However, before we can send your manuscript to reviewers, we would like you to consider including and discussing the following reference: DOI: 10.1111/cns.13194

In addition, we need you to complete your submission by providing the metadata that is required for full assessment. To this end, please login to Editorial Manager where you will find the paper in the 'Submissions Needing Revisions' folder on your homepage. Please click 'Revise Submission' from the Action Links and complete all additional questions in the submission questionnaire.

Please re-submit your manuscript within two working days, i.e. by Dec 19 2019 11:59PM.

Login to Editorial Manager here: https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology

During resubmission, you will be invited to opt-in to posting your pre-review manuscript as a bioRxiv preprint. Visit http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/preprints for full details. If you consent to posting your current manuscript as a preprint, please upload a single Preprint PDF when you re-submit.

Once your full submission is complete, your paper will undergo a series of checks in preparation for peer review. Once your manuscript has passed all checks it will be sent out for review.

***Please be aware that, due to the voluntary nature of our reviewers and academic editors, manuscripts may be subject to delays due to their limited availability during the holiday season. Please also note that the journal office will be closed entirely 21st- 29th December inclusive, and 1st January 2020. Thank you for your patience.***

Feel free to email us at plosbiology@plos.org if you have any queries relating to your submission.

Kind regards,

Gabriel Gasque, Ph.D.,

Senior Editor

PLOS Biology

Decision Letter 1

Gabriel Gasque

30 Jan 2020

Dear Dr Holst,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Haplotype of the astrocytic water channel AQP4 modulates slow wave energy in human NREM sleep" for consideration as a Short Report by PLOS Biology. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, yours was evaluated by the PLOS Biology editors as well as by an Academic Editor with relevant expertise and by three independent reviewers. You will note that reviewer 3, Jack A Wells, has signed his comments.

Based on the reviews, we will probably accept this manuscript for publication, assuming that you will modify the manuscript to address the points raised by the reviewers. Please also make sure to address the data and other policy-related requests noted at the end of this email.

We expect to receive your revised manuscript within two weeks.

Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. Please note that PLOS does not accept references to data not shown. Thus, as pointed out by reviewers 1, please include those data either in the main body of the manuscript or in the supporting information.

Please submit the following files along with your revised manuscript:

1. A 'Response to Reviewers' file - this should detail your responses to the editorial requests, present a point-by-point response to all of the reviewers' comments, and indicate the changes made to the manuscript.

*NOTE: In your point by point response to the reviewers, please provide the full context of each review. Do not selectively quote paragraphs or sentences to reply to. The entire set of reviewer comments should be present in full and each specific point should be responded to individually, point by point.

2. In addition to a clean copy of the manuscript, please also upload a 'track-changes' version of your manuscript that specifies the edits made. This should be uploaded as a "Related" file type.

In addition to the remaining revisions and before we will be able to formally accept your manuscript and consider it "in press", we also need to ensure that your article conforms to our guidelines. A member of our team will be in touch shortly with a set of requests. As we can't proceed until these requirements are met, your swift response will help prevent delays to publication.

*Copyediting*

Upon acceptance of your article, your final files will be copyedited and typeset into the final PDF. While you will have an opportunity to review these files as proofs, PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling or significant scientific errors. Therefore, please take this final revision time to assess and make any remaining major changes to your manuscript.

NOTE: If Supporting Information files are included with your article, note that these are not copyedited and will be published as they are submitted. Please ensure that these files are legible and of high quality (at least 300 dpi) in an easily accessible file format. For this reason, please be aware that any references listed in an SI file will not be indexed. For more information, see our Supporting Information guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/supporting-information

*Published Peer Review History*

Please note that you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/

*Early Version*

Please note that an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you opted out when submitting your manuscript. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online, uncheck the box. Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us as soon as possible if you or your institution is planning to press release the article.

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

*Submitting Your Revision*

To submit your revision, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' to find your submission record. Your revised submission must include a cover letter, a Response to Reviewers file that provides a detailed response to the reviewers' comments (if applicable), and a track-changes file indicating any changes that you have made to the manuscript.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Gabriel Gasque, Ph.D.,

Senior Editor

PLOS Biology

------------------------------------------------------------------------

ETHICS STATEMENT:

-- Please include the ID number of your protocols approved by the ethics committee of the Canton of Zurich for research on human subjects.

-- Please indicate whether the written consent given by participants was informed.

--Please indicate if you conducted your experiments in accordance to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki or any other national or international ethical guidelines.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATA POLICY:

We note that in your Data Availability Statement you wrote: “Data are from the Human Sleep Psychopharmacology Laboratory and are available from the authors at request. Please contact: Prof. Landolt at landolt@pharma.uzh.ch.”

PLOS recognizes that, in some instances, authors may not be able to make their underlying data set publicly available for legal or ethical reasons. Our data policy (https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability) does not overrule local regulations, legislation or ethical frameworks. Where these frameworks prevent or limit data release, authors must make these limitations clear in the Data Availability Statement.

For more details, please refer to this page: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability#loc-acceptable-data-access-restrictions

Please note, however, it is not acceptable for an author to be the sole named individual responsible for ensuring data access.

Also note that we actually do not require all raw data. Rather, we ask for the individual quantitative observations that underlie the data summarized in the figures and results of your paper. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5

If you agree it is possible to share these data, they can be made available in one of the following forms:

1) Supplementary files (e.g., excel). Please ensure that all data files are uploaded as 'Supporting Information' and are invariably referred to (in the manuscript, figure legends, and the Description field when uploading your files) using the following format verbatim: S1 Data, S2 Data, etc. Multiple panels of a single or even several figures can be included as multiple sheets in one excel file that is saved using exactly the following convention: S1_Data.xlsx (using an underscore).

2) Deposition in a publicly available repository. Please also provide the accession code or a reviewer link so that we may view your data before publication.

Regardless of the method selected, please ensure that you provide the individual numerical values that underlie the summary data displayed in the following figure panels: Figures 2A-C, 3AB (including insets), 4A-C, and S1AB.

NOTE: the numerical data provided should include all replicates AND the way in which the plotted mean and errors were derived (it should not present only the mean/average values).

Please also ensure that the figure legends in your manuscript include information on where the underlying data can be found, and ensure your supplemental data file/s has a legend.

Please ensure that your Data Statement in the submission system accurately describes where your data can be found.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

BLOT AND GEL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS:

For manuscripts submitted on or after 1st July 2019, we require the original, uncropped and minimally adjusted images supporting all blot and gel results reported in an article's figures or Supporting Information files. We will require these files before a manuscript can be accepted so please prepare and upload them now. Please carefully read our guidelines for how to prepare and upload this data: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reviewer remarks:

Reviewer #1: This is an interesting and well-written paper that shows that AQP4 haplotype predicts NREM slow wave energy and response to sleep deprivation. The paper is clear and the analyses are well conducted. I have some comments on the analysis and interpretation.

- The authors state that there was no difference in other frequency bands, with "data not shown". Since the full spectrum is in the fig. 2 panel inset, could this be replaced with a statement of (p>0.05) instead, or of some other metric of how they determined lack of a difference? This seems like an important point to back up with data, and it appears to me that the data are present.

- The methods describe performing the analyses on both EEG power and EEG energy, but the results only describe the effects for energy, and power is not discussed. Could the authors clarify what the results of their other analysis were or provide rationale for not discussing power? Power is the more commonly used metric, and it's not clear whether this is because it showed no differences, or because there was another reason to focus on the energy metric.

- The authors interpret this phenomenon as a feedback loop from glymphatics to CSF energy. That is certainly possible but it seems possible there are other explanations as well - for example, might this haplotype covary with other genetic determinants of sleep architecture?

- Is it correct and not a typo that sleep was scored in 20 second epochs, rather than typical 30 second epochs described in the cited reference? (this is fine for the reported analysis, but note that the reference states 30 s).

minor:

- the analysis relies on the implication that the power analysis and hypothesis were designed a priori to performing genetic analyses, rather than selected post hoc. The methods section confirms that this was a priori but I'd recommend briefly adding that to the main text as well.

- add units to x-axis of fig 2.b, c

Reviewer #2: This is an interesting study investigating the AQP4 haplotypes and NREM sleep slow wave relationship. I was pleased to have the opportunity to review this work. Hypothesis is clearly stated and backed by earlier research. Study is based on analysis of data pooled from former studies and genotyping for AQP4. The topic is appropriate for this journal and manuscript is well written.

I have some comments on the methods that may impact the clarity of the findings:

1. How were the subjects recruited? Readers would benefit from a general description of who the subjects were and the basic procedure of recruitment.

2. Both groups have relatively low percentage of females. Why is that? Did the authors consider making an analysis comparing the sexes?

3. Although small in numbers, seven individuals homozygous for the minor allele were identified, but excluded from the analysis. I think it would be interesting for the reader to have the information about the kinds of results this small group had and a short discussion about a possible dose response effect.

Reviewer #3, Jack A Wells: This study uncovers some interesting new evidence that links various measures of sleep quality (EEG during sleep/awake and participant survey) to genes related to AQP4 in the human brain.

Given emerging evidence for the interplay between AQP4, sleep, the glymphatic system and measures of neuronal activity from EEG, and the possible role of this interplay in the aetiology of neurodegenerative disease, these data are an interesting development towards better understanding these mechanisms in the human brain. As such, I believe that the data presented in this manuscript would be of interest to the readers of Plos Biology and beyond. The data analysis and statistical approach appears appropriate to support the conclusions made, however, I do not have first hand experience of the analysis of EEG or genetic halotype data and therefore I cannot give detailed and informed feedback on the analytical methods employed here.

There are some issues in the way the data is contextualized to the current literature that I believe should be addressed prior to possible publication:

The author should avoid unnecessary speculation of possible mechanisms (specifically glymphatic activity) that may mediate or link the correlations that they have observed in their measurements:

e.g:

'AQP4 HtMi-carriers have a stronger parenchymal CSF flow' - the authors have no evidence for this as CSF flow was not measured - the caveats to this statement should be more clearly stated.

'our findings support the presence of an innate glymphatic-sleep feedback loop' - again no measurements of glymphatics are made in this study. Although there is evidence in the rodent brain that links glymphatic function to AQP4 expression, changes to AQP4 may also modulate several other physiological changes in the brain such as exchange at the blood brain barrier. The wording should be toned down to acknowledge such uncertainty at the current time..

'and suggests deep NREM sleep, not AQP4, as the main regulator of glymphatic flow' - In my opinion this is overly speculative given the lack of glymphatic measurements in this study and the current uncertainty of the relationship of glymphatic flow with sleep in the human brain. Again the wording should be adjusted to reflect the current experimental evidence.

'These data suggest that alterations in AQP4-dependent parenchymal CSF flow' - again there are no measures of parenchymal CSF flow made here. I think the authors should be careful to assume that physiologically relevant differences in AQP4 expression closely relate to differences in glymphatic function in the human brain given that the existing evidence that describes this relationship comes from comparing glymphatic flow in a WT and AQP4 knockout mouse (ie. all or nothing) and from correlations in mouse models of ageing or brain pathology (e.g. TBI) where other changes to brain physiology other then AQP4 are present that could also contribute to the correlations observed.

'our data provides novel 146 evidence for the existence of sleep dependent AQP4-driven CSF pulsations' - the author should more carefully word this statement given they have no measures of CSF pulsations.. firstly it is not known how the differences in AQP4 between the genetic variants explored here may effect glymphatic function in the human brain (the changes may be so subtle as to have minimal effect compared to, vascular pulseation for example and secondly changes in AQP4 expression may affect other physiological process that related to sleep in addition to the glymphatic system (for example classical bulk CSF flow).

In addition, the authors should avoid claiming evidence for causality when they have evidence for correlation. For example, other genetic changes that are not investigated in this work could be important for the differences in sleep behaviour that is observed.

e.g. AQP4-haplotype modulates slow waves in NREM sleep

The title and and similar text should be appropriately toned down in acknowledgement of this.

Introduction: 'facilitates a circulation of nutrients' - to my understanding there have been no studies to demonstrate that the glymphatic system is a physiologically-important carrier of 'nutrients' to the brain. Could the authors clarify what 'nutrients' they are referring to and reference accordingly.

'is generated by arterial pulsations from the heartbeat and respiration (3,4).': I can see that reference 3 (Maestre) provides evidence that arterial pulsation drives perivascular CSF movement but what is the evidence that respiration is an important mechanism? Reference 4 does not provide this as there is no measurements of glymphatic function in this work. Can the authors clarify where the evidence for respiration being a driver for glymphatic function derives from?

'glymphatic flow is known to be positively correlated with slow wave production (10)' - an important caveat of this important study is the use of difference anaesthesia protocols to investigate correlations between EEG measures and glymphatic inflow. I think it is important to mention this caveat to readers who may not be aware of this..

'and recently sleep driven parenchymal CSF pulsations in the fourth ventricle were demonstrated in 56 the human brain (13), providing the first evidence for human glymphatic mechanisms'

- Can the authors clarify what a parenchymal CSF pulsation is (and how it is measured)? -I found this hard to understand..

- Can the author clarify exactly how the measurements presented in ref 13 provide evidence for glymphatic mechanisms in the human brain?

Decision Letter 2

Gabriel Gasque

2 Apr 2020

Dear Dr Holst,

On behalf of my colleagues and the Academic Editor, Paul Shaw, I am pleased to inform you that we will be delighted to publish your Short Reports in PLOS Biology.

The files will now enter our production system. You will receive a copyedited version of the manuscript, along with your figures for a final review. You will be given two business days to review and approve the copyedit. Then, within a week, you will receive a PDF proof of your typeset article. You will have two days to review the PDF and make any final corrections. If there is a chance that you'll be unavailable during the copy editing/proof review period, please provide us with contact details of one of the other authors whom you nominate to handle these stages on your behalf. This will ensure that any requested corrections reach the production department in time for publication.

Early Version

The version of your manuscript submitted at the copyedit stage will be posted online ahead of the final proof version, unless you have already opted out of the process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

PRESS

We frequently collaborate with press offices. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. If the press office is planning to promote your findings, we would be grateful if they could coordinate with biologypress@plos.org. If you have not yet opted out of the early version process, we ask that you notify us immediately of any press plans so that we may do so on your behalf.

We also ask that you take this opportunity to read our Embargo Policy regarding the discussion, promotion and media coverage of work that is yet to be published by PLOS. As your manuscript is not yet published, it is bound by the conditions of our Embargo Policy. Please be aware that this policy is in place both to ensure that any press coverage of your article is fully substantiated and to provide a direct link between such coverage and the published work. For full details of our Embargo Policy, please visit http://www.plos.org/about/media-inquiries/embargo-policy/.

Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Biology and for your support of Open Access publishing. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can provide any assistance during the production process.

Kind regards,

Alice Musson

Publishing Editor

PLOS Biology

on behalf of

Gabriel Gasque,

Senior Editor

PLOS Biology

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. REM energy analysis.

    REM energy analysis for AQP4 HtMa homozygous (black lines) and HtMi carriers (red lines) across baseline (A) nor recovery (B) nights. No significant modulation by the AQP4 haplotype was observed (“haplotype”: F1,21 = 0.07; P > 0.79), confirming that the sleep EEG modulations are selective to the NREM slow wave range (S5 Data). Plots represent means; error bars represent SEM. (Insert) Full NREM sleep spectra for 0 to 20 Hz on log10 scale. AQP4, aquaporin 4; EEG, electroencephalographic; HtMa, Major allele of haplotype; HtMi, Minor allele of haplotype; NREM, non–rapid eye movement; REM, rapid eye movement.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. AQP4-haplotype is associated with a modulation of EEG power in the slow wave range.

    Comparison of EEG spectral power across baseline and recovery nights in the slow wave band (0.75–4.5 Hz) within the AQP4-haplotype variants HtMa homozygotes (black) and HtMi carriers (red). The AQP4 HtMi carriers had higher spectral power than the HtMa homozygotes (A; “genotype”: F1,121 = 4.2; P < 0.05). The effect was similar in baseline (B) and recovery sleep (C) conditions and confined to the 0.75 to 1.25 Hz band. Inserts in panels B and C represent full NREM sleep spectra for 0 to 20 Hz on log10 scale. Gray shading indicating the slow wave band (S2 Data). Data represents means ± SEM. By-bin unpaired two-tailed t tests; *P < 0.05 (only performed in the slow wave range). AQP4, aquaporin 4; EEG, electroencephalographic; HtMa, Major allele of haplotype; HtMi, Minor allele of haplotype; NREM, non–rapid eye movement.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Demographics.

    Demographic characteristics of the 123 healthy adult volunteers, who participated in one of six 40-hour sleep deprivation studies from the Zürich sleep lab where AQP4 HtMa homozygotes and HtMi allele carriers were genotyped. No demographic differences between the 2 AQP4-haplotype groups was observed, nor was there a difference in haplotype distribution among the 6 studies (Fishers exact t test, p > 0.21). Given the low number of females in the 6 included studies, a potential interaction between AQP4 haplotype and gender could not be addressed in the current paper. German versions and validated German translations of questionnaires were used to assess lifestyle and personality traits. Questionnaires included ESS [42] and STAI [43]. Caffeine consumption was estimated based on average caffeine contents per serving (coffee: 100 mg, tea: 30 mg, cola drink: 40 mg [2 dL], energy drink: 80 mg [2 dL], chocolate: 50 mg [100 g]). The APOE genotype, known to modulate Alzheimer disease progression, was evenly distributed among the AQP4 haplotype groups. P values are calculated from students two-tailed t tests or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate. APOE, Apolipoprotein E; AQP4, aquaporin 4; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale; HtMa, Major allele of haplotype; HtMi, Minor allele of haplotype; STAI, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Investigated SNPs.

    Alleles: presented as [major allele/minor allele]. Position: Position of SNP in gene. Location: Location of single nucleotid polymorphism on chromosome 18 in the genome. Assay ID: Thermofisher Taqman® SNP genotype assay ID nr. MAFpredicted: MAF predicted by dbSNP analysis tool in a CEU and TSI population (to approximate the Swiss population). MAFstudy: MAF in the entire genotyped study population (n = 134), including 2 rare genotypes and 9 elderly subjects excluded from analysis. dbSNP, The Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Database; CEU, Utah Residents from North and West Europe; MAF, minor allele frequency; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; TSI, Toscani in Italy;

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Visually scored sleep variables.

    Data on the visually scored sleep variables and their modulation by sleep deprivation and the AQP4 haplotype. Values represent mean ± SEM in baseline and recovery nights for the 2 haplotype groups. Analysis of the recovery nights were restricted to 480 minutes. Sleep efficiency: percentage of total sleep time per 480 min. Stages N1–N3: NREM sleep stages (N3 refers to slow wave sleep). Sleep latency: time from lights-out to the first occurrence of N2 sleep. REM sleep latency: time from sleep onset to the first occurrence of REM sleep. F- and P values: two-way mixed-model ANOVA with factors “genotype” (HtMa homozygotes, HtMi carriers), “condition” (baseline, recovery), and their interaction. AQP4, aquaporin 4; HtMa, Major allele of haplotype; HtMi, Minor allele of haplotype; MT, movement time; NREM, non–rapid eye movement; REM, rapid eye movement; TIB, time in bed; TST, total sleep time; WASO, wakefulness after sleep onset.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Data. Individual genotyping and haplotyping.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Data. Individual whole-night NREM spectral power and spectral energy data.

    NREM, non–rapid eye movement.

    (XLS)

    S3 Data. Individual NREM spectral power and spectral energy data for the first 4 NREM episodes.

    NREM, non–rapid eye movement.

    (XLSX)

    S4 Data. Individual data for PVT median speed, PVT lapses, and SSS ratings.

    PVT, psychomotor vigilance test; SSS, Stanford sleepiness scale.

    (XLSX)

    S5 Data. Individual whole-night REM spectral power and spectral energy data.

    REM, rapid eye movement.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: ResponsetoReviewers_AQP4_sleep_19032020.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Individual anonymized observations that underlie the data summarized in the figures are included in S1S5 Data files. For further information or details please contact the Neurobiology Research Unit in Copenhagen (Dr. Holst: holst@nru.dk, or MD Ulv Larsen: sara.larsen@nru.dk) or the Psychopharmacology Laboratory at the University of Zurich (Prof. Landolt: landolt@pharma.uzh.ch).


    Articles from PLoS Biology are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES