Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232783

Low prevalence of human pegivirus 1 (HPgV-1) in HTLV-1 carriers from Belém, Pará, North Region of Brazil

Ana Beatriz Figueiredo de Lima 1, Keyla Santos Guedes de Sá 1, Maria Karoliny da Silva Torres 1, Luana da Silva Soares 2, Hugo Reis Resques 2, Vânia Nakauth Azevedo 3, Rosimar Neris Martins Feitosa 3, Jacqueline Cortinhas Monteiro 3, Andrea Nazaré Monteiro Rangel da Silva 3, Andre Luis Ribeiro Ribeiro 3, Aldemir Branco de Oliveira-Filho 4, Antonio Carlos Rosario Vallinoto 3, Luiz Fernando Almeida Machado 1,3,¤,*
Editor: Jason Blackard5
PMCID: PMC7199934  PMID: 32369533

Abstract

Introduction

Human pegivirus 1 (HPgV-1) is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus belonging to the Flaviviridae family with limited cause-effect evidence of the causation of human diseases. However, studies have shown a potential beneficial impact of HPgV-1 coinfection in HIV disease progression. Human T lymphotropic virus-1 (HTLV-1) is a retrovirus known for causing diseases, especially in muscle and white blood cells, in approximately 5% of patients. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the potential effects of an HPgV-1 infection in patients carrying HTLV-1 in the state of Pará in the North Region of Brazil.

Methods

A group of HTLV-1 carriers was compared to healthy controls. Blood samples were collected, data from medical regards were collected, and a questionnaire was administered. HPgV-1 and HTLV-1 positivity was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The data were analyzed to correlate the effects of HPgV-1 coinfection in HTLV-1 carriers.

Results

A total of 158 samples were included in the study: 74 HTLV-1-positive patients (46,8%) and 84 healthy controls (53,2%). The overall HPgV-1 positivity rate was 7.6% (12/158), resulting in a prevalence of 5.4% (4/74) and 9.5% (8/84) in HTLV-1 carriers and healthy controls, respectively. No significant differences were found when comparing any clinical or demographic data between groups.

Conclusion

This study indicated that the prevalence of HPgV-1 infection is low in HTLV-1 carriers in Belém, Pará, and probably does not alter the clinical course of HTLV-1 infection, however, further studies are still needed.

Introduction

Human pegivirus 1 (HPgV-1) was discovered in 1995 and is thought to be an etiological agent for non-A to E hepatitis. However, well-controlled, prospective studies failed to identify an association between an infection and acute or chronic hepatitis [1]. HPgV-1 was formerly known as hepatitis G virus/GB virus C (GBV-C) and is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus belonging to the Flaviviridae family and the Pegivirus genus [2]. Although it has a high prevalence (studies suggest that there are ~ 750 million people with HPgV-1 infection worldwide), there is limited evidence for HPgV-1 as a primary etiological factor in human diseases [3]. On the other hand, HPgV-1 infection has been linked to modulating the course of other viral diseases, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), with a supposed beneficial effect; however, little is known about HPgV-1 coinfection in other viral diseases [4,5].

HPgV-1 is transmitted by exposure to infected blood, mainly through sexual exposure or by maternal–fetal transmission; cross-sectional serum surveys indicate between 1–5% of HPgV-1 viremia cases occur in developed countries, while up to 20% of blood donors in developing countries have an active infection [6,7]. Studies suggest a positive effect of chronic HPgV-1 infection in HIV-infected patients, in which data show a higher CD4+ T-cell count, lower HIV viral load and inflammatory markers, and delayed progression to AIDS [8,9]. HIV infection results in chronic activation of T cells, promoting activation-induced CD4+ T-cell death, resulting in lower CD4+ T-cell counts and progression to AIDS [10]. Conversely, HPgV-1 infection is associated with the reduced activation of T-cells in HIV-infected individuals compared to those without HPgV-1, which can help in the long life of those infected with HIV-1 [7,11,12]. Still intriguing, a study also indicated that HPgV-1 can interact with the host's immune system and modulate the super-exuberant immune response of the pathogenesis related to Ebola virus (EBOV) infection [13]. Thus, considerable attention has been given to investigating the association between the HPgV-1/HIV coinfection and how it can potentially improve the outcomes in HIV-infected individuals; however, limited data are found between the association and effects of HPgV-1 coinfection with the rare human T lymphotropic virus-1 (HTLV-1) infection [14].

HTLV-1 was the first human retrovirus and was discovered in 1980; HTLV-1 is found in diverse regions of the world, where its prevalence is estimated to infect approximately 10 to 20 million people worldwide [15]. Although most HTLV-1 carriers remain asymptomatic, approximately 5% of infected individuals can develop clinical manifestations, including adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) and tropical spastic paraparesis/HTLV-1-associated myelopathy (TSP/HAM) [16]. Furthermore, other inflammatory manifestations, including uveitis, dermatitis and rheumatological disorders, have also been associated with HTLV-1 infection [17,18].

In Brazil, the seroprevalence of viral infections is quite diverse. HTLV-1 seroprevalence in all 27 state capital cities varied from 0.04% to 1% in healthy blood donors. Other studies have also investigated the prevalence of HPgV-1 in healthy blood donors in the South Region, and the results indicated a seroprevalence between 5.9% [6] and 21.7% [19]. In people living with HIV, the prevalence of HPgV-1 infection was 34% [20], and vertical transmission of HPgV-1 in pregnant women with HIV was 31% [21].

The epidemiology of HPgV-1 infection in northern Brazil is still unknown, as there are no data about HPgV-1 and HTLV-1 coinfection. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence of HPgV-1 infection in HTLV-1 carriers with different clinical manifestations and compare them to a control group of HTLV-negative health volunteers in the city of Belém, Pará, North region of Brazil.

Materials and methods

Type of study and ethical aspects

This is a descriptive, cross-sectional and observational study. The study was divided into two groups based on the HTLV-1 status (positive or negative). HTLV-1 and HPgV-1 infections were determined by blood sampling. The participants were informed about the objectives of this investigation, and those who agreed to participate in this research signed a consent form. Demographic data on age, sex, and clinical symptoms were obtained from medical records. This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Institute of Health Sciences of the Federal University of Pará under protocol number 2.305.226.

Study population

The study group included 74 HTLV-1 carriers (18 TSP/HAM symptomatic patients, 3 with rheumatologic symptoms, 1 with uveitis, 53 asymptomatic and 4 with no clinical information) attending the outpatient clinic of the Nucleus of Tropical Medicine of the Federal University of Pará and 84 seronegative healthy volunteers blood donors from the Fundação Centro de Hemoterapia e Hematologia do Pará (HEMOPA) that were stored at the Virology Laboratory of the Federal University of Pará. All individuals in the control group were recruited between June 2012 and September 2012, and individuals from the HTLV-1 carrier group were recruited between 2013 and 2016. The HTLV-1 carriers with other known viral infectious diseases (selected in the medical record) were excluded from this study. All plasma samples from HTLV-1 carriers were confirmed using an immunenzymatic assay for the presence of antibodies anti-HTLV (HTLV-1/2 Ab-Capture ELISA Test System, Ortho Diagnostic Systems Inc., USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and HTLV infection was confirmed by RFLP [22].

Sampling

Blood samples (5 mL) were collected from each participant and placed in a tube containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as an anticoagulant. Samples were transferred and stored in the Virology Laboratory of the Federal University of Pará. Plasma and red blood cells were separated by centrifugation at 2,500 rpm for 10 minutes, transferred to Eppendorf tubes and stored at -20°C prior to molecular biology analyses.

RNA extraction

Total RNA was extracted from 500 μL of plasma with the Abbott mSample Preparation System (Promega Corporations) following the manufacturer’s specifications. RNA was eluted at a final volume of 25 μL of elution buffer and stored at -70°C.

HPgV-1 detection

HPgV-1 RNA was detected by nested RT-PCR amplification of the 5’ untranslated region (UTR) as described previously [23] with small modifications. In summary, 5 μL of RNA was added to 17 μL of a master mix composed of 5.6 μL of RNase-free H2O, 10 μL of (2x) TaqMan RT PCR Mix, 0.5 μL of (40x) TaqMan RT Enzyme Mix, 0.3 μL of Primer RTG1F (20 nM) 5’-GTGGTGGATGGGTGATGACA-3’, 0.3 μL of Primer RTG2R (20 nM) 5’-GACCCACCTATAGTGGCTACCA-3’, and 0.3 μL of Probe NFQ (10 nm) 5’-FAM-CCGGGATTTACGACCTACC-3’.

All samples were tested in duplicate and placed in 96-well microplates, sealed with adhesives and read on an ABI Prism 7500 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Reaction cycles were established as follows: 30 minutes at 50°C (reverse transcription), 10 minutes at 95°C (denaturation) and 40 cycles of 15 seconds at 95°C and 60 seconds at 60°C (annealing and extension). The maximum threshold cycle (Ct) established for positivity was 37, and those above the proposed value were submitted to a new amplification to confirm the results.

Statistical analysis

For descriptive analyses, the means and standard deviations are reported. A chi-squared test was performed to analyze data in contingency tables. Statistical analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). Differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 158 individuals were enrolled in this study, with 74 (46.8%) belonging to the HTLV-1 group and 84 (53.2%) belonging to the control (healthy) group (HTLV-1-negative). The general average age was 44 years (SD = ±13). The mean age of HTLV-1 carriers was 50 years (SD = ±16); most were female (55/74; 74.3%), over 50 years old (37/74; 50%) and asymptomatic (48/74; 64.9%). The control group showed an average age of 39 years (SD = ±7.8); most were female (44/84; 52.4%) and between the ages of 31 and 50 years (69/84; 82.1%).

The overall prevalence of HPgV-1 was 7.6% (12/158). The prevalence of HPgV-1 in HTLV-1 carriers and the control group was 5.4% (4/74) and 9.5% (8/84), respectively. No significant differences were found when comparing the prevalence of HPgV-1-positive individuals between the HTLV-1 and control groups (p = 0.4974) (Table 1). Likewise, no statistically significant differences were observed among the epidemiological and clinical variables and the prevalence of HPgV-1 between the evaluated groups (Table 2).

Table 1. HPgV-1 prevalence in individuals with or without HTLV-1 infection.

HPgV-1 HTLV-1 + Health controls Total p-value
n % n % n %
Positive 4 2.5 8 5.1 12 7.6 0.38a
Negative 70 44.3 76 48.1 146 92.4

HPgV-1, Human Pegivirus 1; HTLV-1, Human T Lymphotropic Virus-1

a chi-squared test

Table 2. Demographic and disease characteristics between HTLV-1 infection only and HTLV-1 and HPgV-1 coinfection.

Demographic and clinical data HTLV-1 + HPgV-1 HTLV-1 only Total p-valuea
n % n % N %
Age (years)
1–17 0 0 3 4.3 3 4 NP
18–30 0 0 4 5.7 4 5.4
31–50 3 75 20 25.6 23 31.1
>50 1 25 36 51.4 37 50
Not available 0 0 7 10 7 9.5
Sex
Male 2 50 17 24.3 19 25.7 0.27
Female 2 50 53 75.7 55 74.3
Presence of HTLV-1 symptoms
Asymptomatic 2 50 46 65.7 48 64.9 0.58
Symptomatic 2 50 20 28.6 22 29.7
Not available - - 4 5.7 4 5.4

HTLV-1, Human T Lymphotropic Virus-1; HPgV-1, Human Pegivirus 1; NP, not performed

a chi-squared test, comparing HTLV-1 + HPgV-1 and HTLV-1 only groups

In HLTV-1-infected individuals, HPgV-1 coinfection was detected only in those above 31 years old. As a result, it was not possible to assess the relationship between age and the two groups of HLTV-1-infected individuals. On the other hand, no differences were found in HPgV-1 infection with regard to sex or symptomatic status of HTLV-1 disease status (Table 2).

Discussion

This was the first study about the prevalence of HPgV-1 in HTLV-1 carriers in the North Region of Brazil. The prevalence of HPgV-1 infection in HTLV-1 carriers from Pará was 7.6%. This prevalence was much lower than that observed in individuals with HIV in the same region (North Region, 17.0%) [24] and in the South Region of Brazil (21.7%) [20] as well as in HIV carriers from China (23.4%) [7] and Indonesia (88.8%) [11]. We observed a prevalence of HPgV-1 similar to that observed in blood donors from several other Brazilian regions, where rates range from 7.1% to 10.0% [25,26].

On the other hand, the prevalence of HPgV-1 in HTLV-1 carriers in this study was higher than that reported in Nagasaki, Japan (2.8%) [14]. Although HPgV-1 infected some individuals with HTLV-1 in our sample, no differences were observed between the HTLV-1-positive and control groups. This suggests that HTLV-1 does not interfere with the susceptibility to HPgV-1 infection.

This reduced prevalence of HPgV-1 infection compared to most reported papers in the literature may be explained by the method used (only viral RNA was used for diagnosis) [7,14,21,26] and a more advanced age. Individuals between 18 to 30 and 31 to 50 years are approximately eight and six times, respectively more prone to show HPgV infection than those older than 50 years [19].

The prevalence of HPgV-1 is known to be higher in individuals with other viral diseases, especially HIV [19,27]. However, our results showed that it might not occur in patients with HTLV-1 infection. No differences were found between the prevalence of HTLV-1 carriers and healthy controls. Studies suggest that in immunocompetent individuals, the clearance of HPgV-1 occurs during the first years of infection, and HPgV-1 clearance is delayed in individuals with HIV due to their immunocompromised defenses. Thus, a delayed viral clearance associated with a similar method of transmission was indicated by some authors as a contributing factor for a higher prevalence of HPgV-1 in people living with HIV/AIDS [2830].

We observed a limited-to-no effect in HTLV-1 carriers when coinfected with HPgV-1, while HPgV-1 coinfection is suggested to delay disease progression in HIV-positive patients. HPgV-1 seems to antagonize some mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of HIV, including HIV-mediated activation of T-cells and T-cell death [10]. On the other hand, the two most common diseases associated with HTLV-1, ATL and TSP/HAM, have little to benefit from any similar effects. Indeed, ATL is linked to a suppression of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte function, and TSP/HAM is linked to an elevated cellular acquired immune response and high production of proinflammatory cytokines. Although other common mechanisms could be involved, it is unlikely that HPgV infection would interfere with HTLV-1-related diseases [31].

This study has limitations and should be considered. The small sample size makes it difficult to assess and, consequently, the indication or safe exclusion of possible associations. Another fact to be considered is the instability of the RNA molecule that can be degraded more easily over time, so the time between the collection and the evaluation of the presence of RNA in the samples of participants with low viral load may have caused a false result negative. However, this study presented relevant information on HPgV-1 infection and is also the first investigation of its kind in this remote region of Brazil. Further investigations are necessary to strengthen the data gathered herein, and it seems especially important to prospectively investigate these individuals to establish the effects of HPgV-1 and HTLV-1 coinfection.

In conclusion, the prevalence of HPgV-1 infection in patients with HTLV-1 in the city of Belém is relatively similar to the prevalence found in healthy individuals (seronegative HTLV-1), however this may be influenced by the small sample size. Thus, further studies are needed to confirm that HTLV-1 and HPgV-1 coinfection does not affect the course or development of symptoms related to HTLV-1 infection in affected individuals, since the pathological mechanisms of these viruses are quite different.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the individuals who took part in the study, CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior), and the Federal University of Pará.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Polgreen P, Xiang J, Stapleton JT. GB Virus C–HIV Co-Infection. Microbes and Infection. 2003;5:1255–1261. 10.1016/j.micinf.2003.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adams MJ, Lefkowitz EJ, King AM, Harrach B, Harrison RL, Knowles NJ, et al. Ratification vote on taxonomic proposals to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2016). Arch Virol. 2016;161:2921–49. 10.1007/s00705-016-2977-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stapleton JT, Xiang J, McLinden JH, Bhattarai N, Chivero ET, Klinzman D, et al. A novel T cell evasion mechanism in persistent RNA virus infection. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2014;125:14–24 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Balcom EF, Doan MAL, Branton WG, Jovel J, Blevins G, Edguer B, et al. Human pegivirus-1 associated leukoencephalitis: Clinical and molecular features. Ann Neurol. 2018;84:781–787. 10.1002/ana.25343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bukowska-Ośko I, Perlejewski K, Pawełczyk A, Rydzanicz M, Pollak A, Popiel M, et al. Human Pegivirus in Patients with Encephalitis of Unclear Etiology, Poland. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:1785–1794. 10.3201/eid2410.180161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Slavov SN, Silveira RM, Rodrigues ES, Diefenbach CF, Zimmermann AM, Covas DT, et al. Human pegivirus-1 (HPgV-1, GBV-C) RNA prevalence and genotype diversity among volunteer blood donors from an intra-hospital hemotherapy service in Southern Brazil. Transfus Apher Sci. 2019;58:174–178. 10.1016/j.transci.2019.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Miao Z, Gao L, Song Y, Yang M, Zhang M, Lou J, et al. Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Human Pegivirus-1 Infection in HIV-1-Infected Individuals in Yunnan, China. Viruses. 2017;9: pii: E28 10.3390/v9020028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bhattarai N, Stapleton JT. GB virus C: the good boy virus? Trends Microbiol. 2012;20:124–130. 10.1016/j.tim.2012.01.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chivero ET, Stapleton JT. Tropism of human pegivirus (formerly known as GB virus C/hepatitis G virus) and host immunomodulation: insights into a highly successful viral infection. J Gen Virol. 2015;96:1521–32. 10.1099/vir.0.000086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hunt PW, Martin JN, Sinclair E, Bredt B, Hagos E, Lampiris H, et al. T cell activation is associated with lower CD4+ T cell gains in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with sustained viral suppression during antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2003;187:1534–43. 10.1086/374786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Anggorowati N, Yano Y, Subronto YW, Utsumi T, Heriyanto DS, Mulya DP, et al. GB virus C infection in Indonesian HIV-positive patients. Microbiol Immunol. 2013; 57:298–308. 10.1111/1348-0421.12033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vahidnia F, Petersen M, Rutherford G, Busch M, Assmann S, Stapleton JT, et al. Transmission of GB virus type C via transfusion in a cohort of HIV-infected patients. J Infect Dis. 2012;205(9):1436–42. 10.1093/infdis/jis209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lauck M, Bailey AL, Andersen KG, Goldberg TL, Sabeti PC, O'Connor DH. GB virus C coinfections in west African Ebola patients. J Virol. 2015;89(4):2425–9. 10.1128/JVI.02752-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chiyoda S, Inoue J, Okamoto H. Co-infection with GB virus C in an area of high endemicity for human T-lymphotropic virus type I in Japan. Infection. 1997;25:129–130. 10.1007/bf02113595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Willems L, Hasegawa H, Accolla R, Bangham C, Bazarbachi A, Bertazzoni U, et al. Reducing the global burden of HTLV-1 infection: An agenda for research and action. Antiviral Res. 2017;137:41–48. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.10.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carpentier A, Barez PY, Hamaidia M, Gazon H, de Brogniez A, Perike S, et al. Modes of Human T Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Transmission, Replication and Persistence. Viruses. 2015;7:3603–3624. 10.3390/v7072793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Miyanaga M, Shimizu K, Kawaguchi T, Miyata K, Mochizuki M. A clinical survey of uveitis in HTLV-1 endemic region. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2009;17:335–41. 10.3109/09273940903137667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kamoi K, Mochizuki M. HTLV-1 uveitis. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:270 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mota LDD, Finger-Jardim F, Silva CM, Germano FN, Nader MM, Gonçalves CV, et al. Molecular and Clinical Profiles of Human Pegivirus Type 1 Infection in Individuals Living with HIV-1 in the Extreme South of Brazil. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:8048670 10.1155/2019/8048670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Da Mota LD, Nishiya AS, Finger-Jardim F, Barral MF, Silva CM, Nader MM, et al. Prevalence of human pegivirus (HPgV) infection in patients carrying HIV-1C or non-C in southern Brazil. J Med Virol. 2016;88:2106–2114. 10.1002/jmv.24574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Santos LM, Lobato RC, Barral MFM, Gonçalves CV, da Hora VP, Martinez AMB. Prevalence and vertical transmission of human pegivirus among pregnant women infected with HIV. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;138:113–118. 10.1002/ijgo.12175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Laurentino RV, Lopes IG, Azevedo VN, Machado LF, Moreira MR, et al. Molecular characterization of human T-cell lymphotropic virus coinfecting human immunodeficiency virus 1 infected patients in the Amazon region of Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2005;100(4):371–6. 10.1590/s0074-02762005000400006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Campos AF, Tengan FM, Silva SA, Levi JE. Influence of hepatitis G virus (GB virus C) on the prognosis of HIV-infected women. Int J STD AIDS. 2011;22:209–13. 10.1258/ijsa.2011.010283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.de Miranda BKB, de Sá KSG, da Silva ANR, Feitosa RNM, Cayres-Vallinoto IMV, Ishak R, et al. GBV-C/HIV-1 coinfection is associated with low HIV-1 viral load and high CD4+ T lymphocyte count. Arch Virol. 2017;162:3431–3438. 10.1007/s00705-017-3514-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lampe E, Saback FL, Viazov S, Roggendorf M, Niel C. Age-specific prevalence and genetic diversity of GBV-C/hepatitis G virus in Brazil. J Med Virol. 1998;56:39–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Oliveira LA, Martins RM, Carneiro MA, Teles SA, Silva SA, Cardoso DD, Lampe E, Yoshida CF. Prevalence and genotypes of GB virus C/hepatitis G virus among blood donors in Central Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2002;97:953–7. 10.1590/s0074-02762002000700005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bhanich Supapol W, Remis RS, Raboud J, Millson M, Tappero J, Kaul R, et al. Mother-to-child transmission of GB virus C in a cohort of women coinfected with GB virus C and HIV in Bangkok, Thailand. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:227–35. 10.1086/599793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Singh S, Blackard JT. Human pegivirus (HPgV) infection in sub-Saharan Africa-A call for a renewed research agenda. Rev Med Virol. 2017;27: Epub 2017 Nov 17. 10.1002/rmv.1951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Thomas DL, Vlahov D, Alter HJ, Hunt JC, Marshall R, Astemborski J, et al. Association of antibody to GB virus C (hepatitis G virus) with viral clearance and protection from reinfection. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:539–42. 10.1086/514245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jõgeda EL, Huik K, Pauskar M, Kallas E, Karki T, Des Jarlais D, et al. Prevalence and genotypes of GBV-C and its associations with HIV infection among persons who inject drugs in Eastern Europe. J Med Virol. 2017;89:632–638. 10.1002/jmv.24683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yamano Y, Sato T. Clinical pathophysiology of human T-lymphotropic virus-type 1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:389 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jason Blackard

3 Mar 2020

PONE-D-20-02565

Low prevalence of human pegivirus (HPgV) in HTLV-1 carriers from Belém, Pará, Amazon Region of Brazil

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Machado,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Apr 17 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jason Blackard, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

This is a cross-sectional study of human pegivirus in HTLV-1 carriers in Brazil.  Given the beneficial effects of HPgV on HIV disease, evaluating the presence/absence of a similar association with HTLV-1 is important.

The overall sample size is moderate (n = 158), and the prevalence of HPgV was 7.6% (a bit lower than for HIV/HPgV co-infection rates in most settings).

Sample storage at -20C may have contributed to degradation of viral RNA.

How big is the HPgV PCR amplicon that was generated?

Were HPgV viral loads or HPgV genotypes evaluated?

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please amend either the title on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the title in the manuscript so that they are identical.

 

3. Please amend either the abstract on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the abstract in the manuscript so that they are identical.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This paper evaluates the prevalence of HPgV viremia in HTLV+ patients and healthy controls in a region in Brazil. Several issues need to be clarified and the conclusions are not fully supported by the data presented.

1. Please define what is meant by HTLV +. I assume this means seropositive but this isnt clear. Also, what assay was used to determine seropositivity?

2. The data do not support conclusions about susceptibiltity. Susceptibility to viral infections is mediated by many factors and this small study with low numbers of HPgV+ cases measured at one time point retrospectively cannot provide any data about susceptibility.

3. The age difference between the HTLV+ group and the control group is an issue, as younger subjects may be more likely to harbor HPgV as they have had less time to clear it. An age matched control group may show different results.

4. While the study shows no difference in clinical outcomes of HTLV based on HPgV status, the numbers are too small to make any conclusions about this. However no obvious safety signal is seen.

5. Grammatical issues with sentence on lines 63-65 under Introduction.

Reviewer #2: This paper describes HPgV-1 prevalence in people with (n=74) and without (n=84) HTLV-I infection living in Northern Brazil. The prevalence was 5.4% in those with HTLV-I (n= 4), and higher (9.5%) in those without HTLV-I (n=8). Due to the small number of HPgV-1 infections, these differences were not statistically significant. The following represent a number of suggestions that would strengthen the paper.

Abstract:

1. A second human pegivirus (HPgV-2) has been identified, so the HPgV described here is best called HPgV-1.

2. The conclusion that HTLV-1 “does not change the susceptibility of patients to acquiring an HPgV infection” should be qualified, as the statistical power to suggest an increase or decrease in infection given the numbers is very low.

Introduction

3. In addition to surrogate markers of HIV-1 disease progression mentioned in lines 75 – 79, the association between HPgV-1 and survival in HIV-1 infected people is not mentioned. The data are extensive showing reduced mortality in HIV-1 patients, even in incident infection (Vahidnia et al, JID, 2012). Also, survival in Ebola-infected people was higher in those with HPgV-1 infecton (Lauck et al., J Virol, 2014). This information should be noted.

Methods: No comments

Results:

4. The question of HPgV-1 prevalence and age differentiation is not possible to address due to the small number of individuals studied in age groups < 30. It appears there were 7 in the HTLV-1-positive group, and it is not clear how many individuals were in this age group in the HPgV-1+HTLV-1 coinfection group (only data for the 4 HPgV-1 cases were provided, no denominator).

In conclusion, this is the second study to examine HPgV-1 infection in HTLV-I infected adults, and the first from this geographical location. Although the data do not identify significant differences in HPgV-1 prevalence by HTLV-1 status, age, sex, etc., the power to detect differences is limited due to the small number of HPgV-1 infections (n=12/158). There are many places throughout the manuscript where attention to English usage should be provided.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232783.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


14 Apr 2020

Reviewer #1: This paper evaluates the prevalence of HPgV viremia in HTLV+ patients and healthy controls in a region in Brazil. Several issues need to be clarified and the conclusions are not fully supported by the data presented.

1. Please define what is meant by HTLV+. I assume this means seropositive but this isnt clear. Also, what assay was used to determine seropositivity?

RESPONSE: We are grateful for the observation, HTLV+ individuals are those who were positive on the serological test (ELISA) and were later confirmed by PCR-RFLP. This information was added to the "Study population" as shown below (lines 132-136):

“All plasma samples dos indivíduos com HTLV were confirmados using an immunenzymatic assay for the presence of antibodies anti-HTLV (HTLV-1/2 Ab-Capture ELISA Test System, Ortho Diagnostic Systems Inc., USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and HTLV infection was confirmed by RFLP (22).”

2. The data do not support conclusions about susceptibiltity. Susceptibility to viral infections is mediated by many factors and this small study with low numbers of HPgV+ cases measured at one time point retrospectively cannot provide any data about susceptibility.

RESPONSE: The authors agree with the referee's observation and the conclusion has been changed, leaving only what refers to the prevalence of HPgV-1. The text was corrected and was modified as bellow:

Abstract (lines 52-54): “Conclusion: This study indicated that the prevalence of HPgV-1 infection is low in HTLV-1 carriers in Belém, Pará, and probably does not alter the clinical course of HTLV-1 infection, however, further studies are still needed.”

Lines 250-256: “In conclusion, the prevalence of HPgV-1 infection in patients with HTLV-1 in the city of Belém is relatively similar to the prevalence found in healthy individuals (seronegative HTLV-1), however this may be influenced by the small sample size. Thus, further studies are needed to confirm that HTLV-1 and HPgV-1 coinfection does not affect the course or development of symptoms related to HTLV-1 infection in affected individuals, since the pathological mechanisms of these viruses are quite different.”

3. The age difference between the HTLV+ group and the control group is an issue, as younger subjects may be more likely to harbor HPgV as they have had less time to clear it. An age matched control group may show different results.

RESPONSE: We appreciate the observation. As the control group used in the study were blood donors who were also used in other studies of the Virology Laboratory, it was not possible to match the case and control by the age of the participant, considering the main objective of the study in verifying the prevalence of HPgV-1, especially in the population with HTLV. However, this pairing strategy will be used in the continuation of this study.

4. While the study shows no difference in clinical outcomes of HTLV based on HPgV status, the numbers are too small to make any conclusions about this. However no obvious safety signal is seen.

RESPONSE: We appreciate and agree with the observation. Therefore, we added in the study's discussion that the sample size was an important limitation of the study. In addition, we emphasize that the study, even with this limitation, is the first to describe the prevalence of HPgV-1 in HTLV-1 carriers in the north of Brazil, which will serve as a basis for future work in this area.

Lines 239-246: “This study has limitations and should be considered. The small sample size makes it difficult to assess and, consequently, the indication or safe exclusion of possible associations. Another fact to be considered is the instability of the RNA molecule that can be degraded more easily over time, so the time between the collection and the evaluation of the presence of RNA in the samples of participants with low viral load may have caused a false result negative. However, this study presented relevant information on HPgV-1 infection and is also the first investigation of its kind in this remote region of Brazil.”

Lines 249-255: “In conclusion, the prevalence of HPgV-1 infection in patients with HTLV-1 in the city of Belém is relatively similar to the prevalence found in healthy individuals (seronegative HTLV-1), however this may be influenced by the small sample size. Thus, further studies are needed to confirm that HTLV-1 and HPgV-1 coinfection does not affect the course or development of symptoms related to HTLV-1 infection in affected individuals, since the pathological mechanisms of these viruses are quite different.”

5. Grammatical issues with sentence on lines 63-65 under Introduction.

RESPONSE: Review and correction performed. The text was modified as bellow:

Lines 63-65: “Although it has a high prevalence (studies suggest that there are ~ 750 million people with HPgV-1 infection worldwide), there is limited evidence for HPgV-1 as a primary etiological factor in human diseases [3].”

Reviewer #2: This paper describes HPgV-1 prevalence in people with (n=74) and without (n=84) HTLV-I infection living in Northern Brazil. The prevalence was 5.4% in those with HTLV-I (n= 4), and higher (9.5%) in those without HTLV-I (n=8). Due to the small number of HPgV-1 infections, these differences were not statistically significant. The following represent a number of suggestions that would strengthen the paper.

Abstract:

1. A second human pegivirus (HPgV-2) has been identified, so the HPgV described here is best called HPgV-1.

RESPONSE: We appreciate the observation and added the number 1 in all the acronyms of the HPgV.

2. The conclusion that HTLV-1 “does not change the susceptibility of patients to acquiring an HPgV infection” should be qualified, as the statistical power to suggest an increase or decrease in infection given the numbers is very low.

RESPONSE: We appreciate and agree with the observation. The authors removed from the manuscript, especially from the conclusions, the questions regarding the relationship of HTLV-1 and the susceptibility to infection by HPgV-1 due to the sample size. In addition, we added in the study limitations that the small sample size does not allow us to safely conclude anything about susceptibility.

Lines 239-246: “This study has limitations and should be considered. The small sample size makes it difficult to assess and, consequently, the indication or safe exclusion of possible associations. Another fact to be considered is the instability of the RNA molecule that can be degraded more easily over time, so the time between the collection and the evaluation of the presence of RNA in the samples of participants with low viral load may have caused a false result negative. However, this study presented relevant information on HPgV-1 infection and is also the first investigation of its kind in this remote region of Brazil.”

Introduction

3. In addition to surrogate markers of HIV-1 disease progression mentioned in lines 75 – 79, the association between HPgV-1 and survival in HIV-1 infected people is not mentioned. The data are extensive showing reduced mortality in HIV-1 patients, even in incident infection (Vahidnia et al, JID, 2012). Also, survival in Ebola-infected people was higher in those with HPgV-1 infecton (Lauck et al., J Virol, 2014). This information should be noted.

RESPONSE: We appreciate the observation and add excerpts in the introduction of the manuscript that highlights the results of the scientific studies suggested by the referee. The paragraph was modified as below:

Lines 80-84: “HPgV-1, which can help in the long life of those infected with HIV-1 [7,11,12]. Still intriguing, a study also indicated that HPgV-1 can interact with the host's immune system and modulate the super-exuberant immune response of the pathogenesis related to Ebola virus (EBOV) infection [13].”

Methods: No comments

Results:

4. The question of HPgV-1 prevalence and age differentiation is not possible to address due to the small number of individuals studied in age groups < 30. It appears there were 7 in the HTLV-1-positive group, and it is not clear how many individuals were in this age group in the HPgV-1+HTLV-1 coinfection group (only data for the 4 HPgV-1 cases were provided, no denominator).

RESPONSE: We appreciate the observation and agree that this information was not clear. In the group of HTLV-1 carriers, only 7 individuals were under 30 years of age, as shown in table 2, and none of them had co-infection with HPgV-1. We modified table 2, putting the number 0 (zero) in place of the hyphen for better understanding.

In conclusion, this is the second study to examine HPgV-1 infection in HTLV-I infected adults, and the first from this geographical location. Although the data do not identify significant differences in HPgV-1 prevalence by HTLV-1 status, age, sex, etc., the power to detect differences is limited due to the small number of HPgV-1 infections (n=12/158). There are many places throughout the manuscript where attention to English usage should be provided.

RESPONSE: We appreciate the comments of the reviewer and the English language was changed accordingly.

We thank very much the referees for their time going through the manuscript. The changes proposed were important to improve the presentation of the data.

Best regards

Luiz Fernando Almeida Machado

Virology Laboratory

Federal University of Pará

Decision Letter 1

Jason Blackard

22 Apr 2020

Low prevalence of human pegivirus 1 (HPgV-1) in HTLV-1 carriers from Belém, Pará, North Region of Brazil

PONE-D-20-02565R1

Dear Dr. Machado,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Jason Blackard, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

None

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: The revised manuscript addresses my concerns in all cases when possible, and noted the limitations when not possible.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Jason Blackard

24 Apr 2020

PONE-D-20-02565R1

Low prevalence of human pegivirus 1 (HPgV-1) in HTLV-1 carriers from Belém, Pará, North Region of Brazil

Dear Dr. Machado:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Jason Blackard

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES