Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 11.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020 Mar 6;59(20):7842–7847. doi: 10.1002/anie.201915654

Total Synthesis of Pyrolaside B: Phenol Trimerization via Sequenced Oxidative C-C and C-O Coupling

William C Neuhaus, Marisa C Kozlowski 1,*
PMCID: PMC7200290  NIHMSID: NIHMS1558169  PMID: 32026544

Abstract

A facile method to oxidatively trimerize phenols using a low loading catalytic aerobic copper system is described. The mechanism of this transformation is probed, an understanding of which enabled cross coupling trimerizations. With this method, the natural product pyrolaside B has been synthesized for the first time. The key strategy used for this novel synthesis is the facile one-step construction of a spiroketal trimer intermediate which can be selectively reduced to give the natural product framework without recourse to stepwise Ullmann- and Suzuki-type couplings. As a result, pyrolaside B can be obtained expeditiously in five steps and 16% overall yield. Two other analogues were synthesized highlighting the utility of the method and new accessibility to this range of chemical space. A novel xanthene was also synthesized through controlled Lewis acid promoted rearrangement of a spiroketal trimer.

Keywords: Oxidative coupling, Phenol, Copper, Total Synthesis, Xanthene

Graphical Abstract

A facile method to oxidatively trimerize phenols using a low loading catalytic aerobic copper system is described. The natural product pyrolaside B has been synthesized for the first time using this method, which allows an expeditious entry in five steps and 16% overall yield. Two analogues were also synthesized.

graphic file with name nihms-1558169-f0012.jpg


Phenol trimers (Figure 1) encompass a diverse range of compounds found in nature which have been shown to have unique biological activities. Pyrolaside B (1) was isolated from Pyrola rotundifoliai in 2005 and from Pyrola calliantha in 2010, and was found to inhibit Micrococcus luteus and Staphylococcus aureus.[1] Fucophlorethol C (2)[2] from brown alga Colpomenia bullosa acts as a lipoxygenase inhibitor. Pyrocallianthaside B (3)[3] and isotrityrosin (4)[4] have been isolated from Pyrola calliantha and haemonchus contortus infective larvae, respectively.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Phenol trimer natural products.

We envisaged that pyrolaside B could be constructed by reduction of the corresponding ortho-quinone/bisphenol dimer spiroketal (5) illustrated in Scheme 1. In particular, utilization of a version of 5 with each of the phenols already appended a glucose equivalent would circumvent the considerable challenges entailed in selectively glucosylating three of the five phenols of the pyrasolide B aglycone. In turn, 5 can be dissected to monomer 6. However, oxidative trimerization to 6 would involve the challenging selective formation of one C-C bond as well as two C-O bonds. Finally, stereoselective glycosylation of phenol precursor 7 would be needed to set the stage for the oxidative trimerization.

Scheme 1:

Scheme 1:

Retrosynthetic analysis of pyrolaside B.

Beginning in 1965, limited reports of stoichiometric oxidative trimerizations of phenols to form spiroketals of structure 9 have appeared (Scheme 2).[5,6] In 2012, the Lei Group gave one example of cyclic trimer formation via stoichiometric silver oxidation (Scheme 2a).[7] In the same year, the Beifuss group generated a similar cyclic trimer from sesamol via laccase oxidation in 3% yields (Scheme 2b).[8] Likewise, in 2018, it was found that methylcarbazoles were able to form spiroketal trimers, albeit in low yield (Scheme 2c).[9] The low yields in such processes likely arise from the selectivity challenges associated with phenol C-C dimerization in addition to two C-O bond forming reactions.

Scheme 2:

Scheme 2:

Precedents for oxidative trimer cyclization.

In the course of examining catalytic C-C[10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17] vs C-O[18] phenol dimerization using our oxidative catalyst library,[14] copper complexes were identified as potential candidates for C-O coupling. However, mixed selectivity was observed including spiroketal trimer 9, which had not been observed previously. Generally speaking there is wide precedent for C-C oxidative dimerizations of phenols with copper systems.[19,20] There are, however few examples of oxidative couplings which give controlled selectivity for both C-C and C-O coupled products.[19,20,21,22,23] In polymerization of 1-naphthol, the relative amount of C-O vs C-C coupling with a Cu (I) pyridine system heavily depends on the number of pyridine ligand equivalents.[24] In 2014 and 2016, the Lumb group elegantly showed that the formation of ortho-quinones from para-substituted phenols proceeds well with an aerobic copper (I) system with nitrogen ligands.[18, 25 ] In 2015, the Lumb and Ottenwaelder group elaborated on this finding by describing the mechanism of Cu (I) promoted selective oxygenation of 4-tert-butylphenol.[26] In 2014, this group also presented that copper salt choice, as well as ligand can alter the ratios of C-C oxidative coupling versus ortho-quinone oxygenation products.[19a]

Reasoning that an ortho-quinone might be an intermediate en route to ortho-quinone/bisphenol dimer spiroketal 9, further copper catalyst conditions were screened with the goal of identifying conditions that would allow catalytic oxidative C-C coupling as well as oxygenation to the ortho-quinone. It was further postulated that the copper(II) species formed under oxygen could also act as a Lewis acid catalyst to permit the spiroketalization. A brief screen (Table 1, entires 1-11) showed that toluene was the optimum solvent with high pyridine concentrations relative to copper being necessary (entry 6). A series of control experiments (entries 12-14) verified that the copper ligand system was indeed acting catalytically, and both the ligand and the copper were necessary for any conversion to occur.

Table 1.

Optimization of reaction conditions and control reactions

graphic file with name nihms-1558169-t0014.jpg

# Solvent (M) Ligand (mol%) CuCl (mol%) Yield[a]
1 toluene (0.05M) t-BuNH2 (20) 2 0%
2 toluene (0.05M) pyridine (200) 20 (57%)
3 THF (0.05 M) pyridine (20) 2 0%
4 EtOAc (0.05 M) pyridine (20) 2 (40%)
5 CH2Cl2 (0.05 M) pyridine (20) 2 (26%)
6 toluene (0.5M) pyridine (20) 2 (63%)
7 toluene (0.05 M) pyridine (20) 2 (39%)[b]
8 toluene (0.05M) pyridine (4) 2 (42%)
9 toluene (0.05M) pyridine (20) 2 (26%)[c]
10 toluene (0.05M) pyridine (20) 2 (57%)[d]
11 toluene (0.05M) pyridine (20) 2 64%
12 toluene (0.05M) None 2 0
13 toluene (0.05M) pyridine (20) 0 0
14 toluene (0.05M) None 0 0
[a]

Yields in parentheses determined by NMR spectroscopy using CH2Br2 as internal standard.

[b]

Air used as oxidant.

[c]

Reaction conducted at 0 °C.

[d]

Reaction conducted at 60 °C.

A variety of analogous phenols also afford the cyclic trimer under these conditions (Figure 2). Substrates 16-19 with the same ortho-alkyl, para-alkoxy motif all proceeded well. Even, allyl groups are tolerated under these oxidizing conditions in the case of 19 with a yield of 76%. A para tert-butyl group likewise appears sufficient to promote the desired reactivity with 20 giving 22% yield. A sterically unencumbered ortho-alkyl group was proposed as necessary for the selectivity, but 21 shows that even a phenyl group is well-tolerated. Having a para-aryl substituent is also well-tolerated as in the case of 22 which forms in 84% yield at slightly elevated temperatures (40 °C). Other bulky para-alkyl groups are tolerated but give low yields (c.f. 20, 2225). On the other hand, 2,4-dimethylphenol, 2-methyl-4-isopropylphenol, 2-methyl-4-chlorophenol, and 2-methyl-4-dimethylaminophenol resulted in decomposition.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Scope of phenol trimerization (Ad = adamantyl).

To implement this method in a synthesis of pyraloside B, commercially available phenol 26 was glycosylated in good yield (Scheme 3). The glycosylated monomer was then hydrogenated to 28 using Pd/C in 98% yield without the need for purification. With monomeric phenol 28 in hand, an oxidation using our aerobic copper (I) pyridine system was explored. To our delight, cyclic trimer 29 was generated in 65% with some starting material remaining.

Scheme 3:

Scheme 3:

Route to synthetic pyrolaside B.

Deconvolution of quinone-like intermediate 29 to the acyclic trimer precursor to pyrolaside B 30 occurred in near quantitative yield via hydrogenation with Pd/C. Notably, the spiroketal underwent scission under these conditions while the anomeric ketal linkage remained intact. Removal of the acetate protecting groups was performed with NaOMe resulting in an efficient reaction (93% yield, ~95% purity; see 1H NMR in SI). Preparatory HPLC was needed to remove trace aromatic impurities, but led to poor mass recovery (38% isolated yield). All spectra matched the spectra for the reported natural product (see SI). Thus, pyrolaside B was synthesized in 16% yield over 5 steps.

In order to afford the α-anomer of a pyrolaside B analogue monomer, longer glycosylation conditions, a greater amount of Lewis acid, and a less electrophilic glucose donor were used to drive the reaction to the thermodynamic product (Scheme 4). Reduction of the ortho-aldehyde 31 via hydrogenation using Pd/C gave the alkane in 98% yield without purification. The oxidative trimerization of the cis-glycosylated substrate 32 similarly formed 33.

Scheme 4:

Scheme 4:

Synthesis of tris-α-glucosyl epimer of pyrolaside B.

With this success, we interrogated the initially proposed mechanism involving formation of ortho-quinone and C-C coupled dimer intermediates that subsequently spiroketalize. Monitoring of reactions revealed that the C-C dimer did form initially and was then converted to product. To probe the mechanism, the reaction in eq 1 was attempted. However, no condensation product was observed and the majority of the ortho-quinone was recovered, while the C-C homodimer decomposed. Previous work on ortho-quinones also shows that typically the 4-position is more reactive to nucleophiles.[18] Altogether, these results point away from an ortho-quinone intermediate.

graphic file with name nihms-1558169-f0013.jpg (eq 1)

It was then hypothesized that cross C-O coupling of the phenol and C-C coupled dimer lead to product (Scheme 5). The monomeric phenol is first oxidized to C-C dimer 38 via a copper (II) pyridine complex formed in situ.[19a] Previous work in phenol oxidation would suggest that this homodimerization most likely goes through a one electron pathway in which two identical radicals recombine to allow for maximum SOMO orbital overlap.[16d] Once the dimer is formed it is more oxidizable giving rise to 39 which has no open positions for C-C coupling; instead, coupling occurs from the oxygen of the bisphenol with a carbon of the phenol monomer. The measured oxidation potentials (vs ferrocene in MeCN) of the monomer (0.97 V) and dimer (0.85 V) (see SI for details) support this sequence. A final oxidation then could occur at the more electron rich A-ring of 40 to form the cyclic trimer. Support for this last step comes from precedent with the acyclic trimer of 2,4-diphenylphenol being converted to the corresponding cyclized trimer with MnO2 in 92% yield.[6]

Scheme 5:

Scheme 5:

Proposed mechanism for trimerization.

From this mechanism, cross-couplings of dimer intermediate 38 with different phenols should be possible. Reaction pairs were selected where the corresponding phenol constituents had similar oxidation potentials such that dimer 35 would remain more oxidizable than monomer 42 (Scheme 6). In doing so, products 43 and 44 were afforded with similar efficiency as homotrimerization. In line with the reasoning above, no homotrimers were observed in the reaction mixture.

Scheme 6:

Scheme 6:

Formation of mixed trimers.

With these new products in hand, formation of the linear trimers was examined (Figure 3). With the same reductive conditions, linear trimers 47, 48 and 49 were obtained in good yields. Importantly, selective installation of a glucose group is feasible providing an entry to a large number of selectively substituted trisphenol C-O/C-C linked compounds.

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Scope of phenol trimer reduction. aReaction time was 16 h.

It was postulated that the inherit instability of a 7-membered ring containing four sp2 carbons facilitated the reductive openings in Figure 3. In a similar vein, these same driving forces were harnessed in a redox neutral rearrangement. With a mild Lewis acid (BF3·Et2O) under mild conditions (−78 °C), a bright yellow compound, tetracyclic xanthene 50,27] was formed in 69% yield (Figure 4a). With the limited number of hydrogens to probe structure by 1H NMR spectroscopy, the structure of 50 was secured by single crystal X-ray analysis (Figure 4b). At higher temperatures, this process was not nearly as selective leading to the possibility of a variety of other rearrangements that could be performed using cyclic phenol trimers.

Figure 4:

Figure 4:

Figure 4:

a) Rearrangement to xanthene. b) X-ray structure of 50.

In summary, a process for a catalytic coupling of phenols to afford trimeric spiroketal adducts has been described using a base metal catalyst and environmentally benign oxygen as the terminal oxidant. Mechanism studies reveal that the dioxepine adducts arise from a controlled sequence of three two electron oxidations involving C-C, C-O, and C-O coupling. The relative reactivity of dimerization vs trimerization is controlled by the slightly higher susceptibility of the intermediate dimer toward oxidation. Undoubtedly, such oxidation events occur in a number of other reported dimerizations. [1017] In most cases, the oxidation would be readily reversible allowing the dimer to accumulated. In other cases, such oxidation gives rise to decomposition. A hallmark of this case is the ability of the oxidized dimer to engage in selective C-O bond formation with an additional monomer. This method allowed the expeditious assembly of the natural product pyrolaside B over 5 steps. This first total synthesis of pyrolaside B overcomes the challenges associated with conventional approaches that involve multiple functionalizations to allow Ullmann- and Suzuki-type couplings and selective O-glycosylation of some phenols in the presence of others.[28] The oxidative coupling protocol tolerates incorporation of the glucose linkage into the monomer allowing construction of the overall architecture in a single assembly step that unites three monomers. The resultant spiroketal trimers can be reduced to the linear C-C/C-O linked timers or rearranged to a xanthene scaffold.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the NSF (CHE1764298) and the NIH (R35 GM131902, RO1 GM112684) for financial support of this research. Partial instrumentation support was provided by the NIH and NSF (1S10RR023444, 1S10RR022442, CHE-0840438, CHE-0848460, 1S10OD011980, CHE-1827457). Dr. Charles W. Ross III is acknowledged for obtaining accurate mass data. This work was supported by the Vagelos Institute for Energy Science Technology at the University of Pennsylvania. We thank Michael R. Gau for X-ray analysis. We thank Prof. J.P. Lumb (McGill University) for helpful discussions.

Footnotes

Supporting information for this article is given via a link at the end of the document.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest

References

  • [1].Chang J, Inui T, Chem. Pharm. Bul 2005, 53, 1051–1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Kurihara H, Konno R, Takahashi K, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem 2015, 79, 1954–1956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Chen Y-L, Tan C-H, Tan J-J, Qu S-J, Wang H-B, Zhang Q, Jiang S-H, Zhu D-Y, Helv. Chim. Acta 2007, 90, 2421–2426. [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Fetterer RH, Rhoads ML, J. Parasitol 1990, 76, 619–624. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].a) Hewgill FR, Hewitt DG, J. Chem. Soc 1965, 3660–3666; [Google Scholar]; b) Bowman DF, Hewgill FR, Kennedy BR, J. Chem. Soc. C 1966, 2274–2279. [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Becker HD, J. Org. Chem 1969, 34, 2027–2029. [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Liao D, Li H, Lei X, Org. Lett 2012, 14, 18–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Constantin M-A, Conrad J, Beifuss U, Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 3254–3258. [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Brütting C, Fritsche RF, Kutz SK, Börger C, Schmidt AW, Kataeva O, Knölker H-J, Chem. Eur. J 2018, 24, 458–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Catalytic V in phenol C-C coupling:; a) Hwang D-R, Chen C-P, Uang B-J, Chem. Commun 1999, 1207–1208; [Google Scholar]; b) Kang H, Lee YE, Vasu Govardhana Reddy P, Dey S, Allen SE, Niederer KA, Sung P, Torruellas C, Herling MR, Kozlowski MC, Org. Lett 2017, 19, 5505–5508; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Kang H, Torruellas C, Liu J, Kozlowski MC, Org. Lett 2018, 20, 5554–5558; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Kang H, Herling MR, Niederer KA, Lee YE, Vasu Govardhana Reddy P, Dey S, Allen SE, Sung P, Hewitt K, Torruellas C, Kim GJ, Kozlowski MC, J. Org. Chem 2018, 83, 14362–14384; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Sako M, Aoki T, Zumbrägel N, Schober L, Gröger H, Takizawa S, Sasai H, J. Org. Chem 2019, 84, 1580–1587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Electrochemical phenol C-C coupling:; a) Kirste A, Schnakenburg G, Stecker F, Fischer A, Waldvogel SR, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2010, 49, 971–975; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Elsler B, Schollmeyer D, Dyballa KM, Franke R, Waldvogel SR, , Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2014, 53, 5210–5213; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Dahms B, Kohlpaintner PJ, Wiebe A, Breinbauer R, Schollmeyer D, Waldvogel SR, Chem. Eur. J 2019, 25, 2713–2716; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Waldvogel SR, Röckl J, Schollmeyer D, Franke R, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2019, 59, 315–319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Catalytic Cu in phenol C-C coupling: Liao BS, Liu YH, Peng SM, Liu ST, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans 2012, 41, 1158–1164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Catalytic Co in phenol C-C coupling:; a) Jiang Q, Sheng W, Tian M, Tang J, Guo C, Eur. J. Org. Chem 2013, 2013, 1861–1866; [Google Scholar]; b) Reiss H, Shalit H, Vershinin V, More NY, Forckosh H, Pappo D, J. Org. Chem 2019, 84, 7950–7960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Catalyic phenol C-C coupling with several metals:; Lee YE, Cao T, Torruellas C, Kozlowski MC, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 6782–6785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Catalytic Cr in phenol C-C coupling:; a) Solinski AE, Ochoa C, Lee YE, Paniak T, Kozlowski MC, Wuest WM, ACS Inf. Dis, 2018, 4, 118–122; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Nieves-Quinones Y, Paniak TJ, Lee YE, Kim SM, Tcyrulnikov S, Kozlowski MC, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 10016–10032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Catalytic Fe in phenol C-C coupling:; a) Libman A, Shalit H, Vainer Y, Narute S, Kozuch S, Pappo D, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 11453–11460; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Shalit H, Libman A, Pappo D, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 13404–13413; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Vershinin V, Dyadyuk A, Pappo D, Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 3660–3668; [Google Scholar]; d) Shalit H, Dyadyuk A, Pappo D, J. Org. Chem 2019, 84, 1677–1686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Catalytic NOBF4 in phenol C-C coupling: Bering L, Vogt M, Paulussen FM, Antonchick AP, Org. Lett 2018, 20, 4077–4080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Catalytic Cu in phenol C-O coupling:; a) Huang Z, Lumb J-P, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 11543–11547; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Esguerra KVN, Lumb J-P ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 3477–3482; [Google Scholar]; c) Xu W, Huang Z, Ji X, Lumb J-P ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 3800–3810. [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Catalytic Cu in phenol C-C and C-O coupling:; a) Esguerra KVN, Fall Y, Petitjean L, Lumb J-P, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 7662–7668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Li W, Song F, You J, Chem. Eur. J 2015, 21, 13913–13918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].For reviews of catalytic Cu in phenol C-C and C-O coupling:; a) Allen SE, Walvoord RR, Padilla-Salinas R, Kozlowski MC, Chem. Rev 2013, 113, 6234–6458; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Huang Z, Lumb J-P, ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 521–555. [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Gold catalyzed phenol C-C and C-O coupling:; a) Cheneviere Y, Caps V, Tuel A, Appl. Catal. A 2010, 387, 129–134; [Google Scholar]; b) Jawale DV, Gravel E, Geertsen V, Li H, Shah N, Namboothiri INN, Doris E ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 719–723 [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Electrochemical phenol C-C and C-O coupling:; Elsler B, Schollmeyer D and Waldvogel SR Faraday Discuss. 2014, 172, 413–420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Photocatalytic phenol/arene C-C and C-O coupling:; Eisenhofer A, Hioe J, Gschwind RM, König B, Eur. J. Org. Chem 2017, 2017, 2194–2204. [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Mukherjea RN, Bandyopadhyay AK, Polymer 1977, 18, 1081–1082. [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Esguerra KVN, Fall Y, Lumb J-P, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2014, 53, 5877–5881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Askari MS, Esguerra KVN, Lumb J-P, Ottenwaelder X, Inorg. Chem 2015, 54, 8665–8672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].For formation of tetraphenol derived xanthene of similar structure through a different oxidative process, see:; Byrne LT, Hewgill FR, Legge F, Skelton BW, White AH, J. Chem. Soc. Perk. Trans. 1 1982, 2855–2862. [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Lin J-H, Ishimatsu M, Tanaka T, Nonaka G.-i., Nishioka I, Chem. Pharm. Bull 1990, 38, 1844–1851. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES