Abstract
In light of the limited treatment options of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) available, suitable animal models are essential to investigate pathophysiological mechanisms and to identify potential therapeutic targets. In vivo evaluation with current techniques, however, often provides only restricted information about disease evolution. In the study of patients with DPN, magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) has been introduced as an innovative diagnostic tool detecting characteristic lesions within peripheral nerves. We developed a novel multicontrast ultra high field MRN strategy to examine major peripheral nerve segments in diabetic mice non-invasively. It was first validated in a cross-platform approach on human nerve tissue and then applied to the popular streptozotocin(STZ)-induced mouse model of DPN. In the absence of gross morphologic alterations, a distinct MR-signature within the sciatic nerve was observed mirroring subtle changes of the nerves’ fibre composition and ultrastructure, potentially indicating early re-arrangements of DPN. Interestingly, these signal alterations differed from previously reported typical nerve lesions of patients with DPN. The capacity of our approach to non-invasively assess sciatic nerve tissue structure and function within a given mouse model provides a powerful tool for direct translational comparison to human disease hallmarks not only in diabetes but also in other peripheral neuropathic conditions.
Subject terms: Magnetic resonance imaging, Experimental models of disease
Introduction
In vivo magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) has recently identified distinct focal lesions within the sciatic nerve as a major hallmark of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) in both type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients1–3. Such focal lesions have been reported to have a proximal predominance at thigh level and correlate closely to the degree of clinical severity.
In addition, these lesions have been shown to exhibit well-defined signal features in MRN: Quantification of either the signal in T2-weighted (T2-w) imaging or proton spin density (PD) indicated an increase within such lesions, suggestive of an increase of free-water molecules, as it would occur in endoneurial oedema, and a change in the organization of the extracellular compartment1,2,4. Recently, it was also found that in T2D hypointense nerve alterations can occur on T2-w imaging with fat saturation, suggesting an intraneurial deposition of lipids3. Furthermore, the measurement of fractional anisotropy (FA), which reflects the spatial anisotropy in the extent of water molecule self-diffusion, was reduced within DPN nerve lesions, whereas apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), which reflects the average extent of water molecule self-diffusion, was increased. The changes observed with respect to FA and ADC5,6 would again be suggestive of a change within the macromolecular compartment consistent with a loss of axons and myelin.
A direct correlation between peripheral nerve imaging and the pathological nature of the lesions from patients with DPN has been difficult to achieve, as the fascicle biopsies from such proximal sites are not possible. However, this is not a limiting factor in experimental models of DPN. One of the most widely used animal models is the use of streptozotocin (STZ) to induce a phenotype which mimics T1D in mice. The presence of hyper- and hypoalgesic phenotypes as well as electrophysiological alterations have traditionally been interpreted as consequence of murine DPN7. Intraepidermal nerve fibre densities (IENFD) in skin-punch biopsies have shown that nerve fiber loss is a characteristic feature in experimental DPN8–10. However, evidence remains limited as to the degree to which changes in the proximal nerve, as have been reported in the analysis of patients with DPN11,12, play a role in such models13,14.
The objective of this study is therefore to implement a novel multicontrast, ultra high field MRN approach to assess pathomorphological nerve changes at a very high resolution which can be applied to mice in vivo. Such a non-invasive imaging toolbox may allow for detection of potential nerve lesions and distinct MR-signatures as correlate of experimental DPN and other neuropathic conditions. These findings can then be compared to clinical, behavioural and histological parameters to eventually provide a better understanding of DPN-related nerve lesions.
Material and Methods
Human nerve tissue for cross-platform validation
The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg (No. S-279/2018 & S-281/2018), and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki 2013. All participants involved in this study gave written informed consent.
To compare MRN findings of diabetic nerve tissue between different platforms in vivo and ex vivo, we identified a 39-yo male patient who presented to our hospital for emergency amputation of his left leg due to an advanced diabetic foot syndrome with necrosis and non-healing wounds in the setting of severe diabetic neuropathy. The patient had a history of more than 20 years of T1D with end stage diabetic nephropathy that had been treated by a kidney transplant one year prior to admission. He showed a HbA1C of 9.0% and an eGFR of 105.8 ml/min*1.73 m². His BMI was 24.8. Cardiovascular risk factors included hypertension and smoking. His freshly dissected sciatic nerve was directly taken from the operating room to the 9.4 T MR facility and immediately scanned. Five days post amputation, his opposite, non-amputated distal thigh was scanned under clinical conditions at 3 T.
For ex vivo comparison we identified a non-diabetic 74-yo male patient who presented to our hospital for emergency amputation of his left leg due to acute ischemia in the setting of stage IV peripheral artery disease and mild chronic kidney disease (G2A1) due to granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). His history was further remarkable for pulmonary and ocular involvement of GPA, glaucoma and corneal ulcer. The patient showed a HbA1C of 5.2% and an eGFR of 88.5 ml/min*1.73 m². No polyneuropathic symptoms were reported. For in vivo comparison, an age-matched healthy control subject (36-yo male, HbA1C 5.0%, no polyneuropathic symptoms) underwent standard clinical MRN at 3 T.
Animal model
All procedures were approved by the local Animal Care and Use Committee (Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe, Germany; G295/15), and performed according to the guidelines of German animal welfare law. Diabetes was induced by administration of STZ via intraperitoneal injection (50 mg/kg body weight in 50 mM Sodium citrate; pH 4.5) on five consecutive days in ten-week old male and female C57BL/6 mice (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA, USA), whilst matched controls received sodium citrate (Table 1). Mice were maintained in the diabetic conditions (blood glucose >300 mg/dl) for 24 weeks by regular monitoring of blood glucose, sampled from the tail vain, and corrected by treatment with insulin15. This long period was selected to avoid artefacts introduced by the STZ treatment itself16. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was determined by cation-exchange chromatography on a PolyCAT A column17. Albumin-creatinine ratio was determined from 24 h urine collection and measured using a combined fluorometric and colorimetric microplate assay (Biovision, Milpitas, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Table 1.
Phenotype | STZ | Control | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Gender (m:f) | 7:6 | 5:5 | |
Body weight (g) | 21.9 ± 3.5 | 32.8 ± 5.3 | <0.0001 |
Blood glucose (mg/dl) | 418.2 ± 123.7 | 133 ± 18.6 | <0.0001 |
HbA1C (%) | 9.5 ± 2.2 | 3.7 ± 0.4 | <0.0001 |
Albumin-Creatinine Ratio (mg/g) | 18.3 ± 9.4 | 6.9 ± 2.1 | <0.001 |
Quantitative sensory testing
Sensitivity to heat-induced pain was measured using an electronically controlled hot-plate analgesia meter (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, Ohio, USA) at 50 °C, as described previously18 and the nociceptive threshold was determined by the tail flick assay15,19. Additionally, the foot withdrawal latency was measured using the Hargreaves apparatus (Ugo Basile, Comerio, Italy), as described previously16,20.
MR imaging & data acquisition
Human nerve tissue
Clinical in vivo MRN imaging was performed on a 3 T MR scanner (Magnetom Trio, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The MR protocol included the following sequences using a 15-channel transmit-receive knee coil (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) positioned at distal thigh level, matching the position of the amputation site of the contralateral leg. Images were acquired in axial orientation to the long axis of the thigh:
High-resolution T2-w turbo-spin-echo (TSE) sequence: 2D sequence, TE: 55 ms, TR: 7000 ms, echo train length: 13, spectral fat saturation, Field-of-View (FoV): 160 ×160 mm², acquisition matrix: 512 ×333, number of slices: 41, slice thickness: 3.5 mm, number of averages: 2, acquisition time: 03 min 46 s.
DTI-EPI sequence: 2D sequence, number of diffusion gradients: 20, TE: 92.8 ms, TR: 4000 ms, spectral adiabatic inversion recovery (SPAIR) fat saturation, FoV: 160 ×160 mm², acquisition matrix: 128 ×128, number of slices: 18, slice thickness: 4 mm, b-values: 0/1000 s/mm², flip angle: 180°, number of averages: 1, acquisition time: 03 min 58 s.
Multi-Slice-Multi-Echo (MSME) sequence: 2D sequence, shortest TE and TE spacing: 10 ms, number of echoes: 12, spectral fat saturation, TR: 2400 ms, FoV: 160 ×160 mm², acquisition matrix: 192 ×169, number of slices: 11, slice thickness: 3.5 mm, number of averages: 1, acquisition time: 06 min 50 s.
For ex vivo imaging, freshly dissected sciatic nerves were immediately stored in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 (Thermo Fisher Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), put on ice and directly taken to the experimental MR unit. MR imaging was performed at room temperature on the same experimental 9.4 T system following the parameter settings as detailed below in section 2.3.2, except of sequence 2).
Mouse model
For MR imaging, animals were anesthetized with 3% isoflurane. Anesthesia was maintained with 1–2% isoflurane. Mice were placed on a heating pad in a supine position to keep the body temperature constant. Respiration was monitored externally using a breathing surface pad controlled by a custom-written LabView program (National Instruments Corporation, Austin, TX, USA).
MR imaging was performed on a 9.4 Tesla horizontal bore small animal NMR scanner (BioSpec 94/20 USR, Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) with a four-channel phased-array surface receiver coil, as described previously21. The MR protocol included the following sequence settings:
High-resolution T2-w Rapid Acquisition with Refocused Echoes (RARE) sequence with flip-back technique of the pelvis: 2D sequence, echo time (TE): 40 ms, repetition time (TR): 2500 ms, rare factor 4, spectral fat saturation, 47 µm x 47 µm in plane resolution, acquisition matrix: 512 ×212, number of slices: 15, slice thickness: 1 mm, number of averages: 2, acquisition time: 4 min 35 s.
High-resolution T2-w RARE sequence with flip-back technique of each proximal thigh: same parameters as in 1) except for TR: 4000 ms, acquisition matrix: 200 ×200, number of slices: 10, number of averages: 3, acquisition time: 10 min 17 s.
DTI-stimulated echo sequence of the pelvis: 2D sequence, number of diffusion gradient directions: 18 + 5 A0 images, b-values: 0/650 s/mm², gradient duration: 2.5 ms, gradient separation: 15.5 ms, TE: 18.1 ms, TR: 1200 ms, excitation pulse: 130°, spectral fat saturation, 100 µm x 128 µm in plane resolution, acquisition matrix: 120 ×50, number of slices: 17, slice thickness: 1.5 mm, number of averages: 1, acquisition time: 23 min 05 s.
MSME sequence of the pelvis: 2D sequence, shortest TE and TE spacing: 9.7 ms, number of echoes: 20, TR: 3200 ms, spectral fat saturation, 80 µm x 80 µm in plane resolution, acquisition matrix: 300 ×127, number of slices: 15, slice thickness: 1 mm, number of averages: 1, acquisition time: 7 min 12 s.
ADC and FA maps were calculated using Paravision 6.0 (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany). T2 and PD maps were calculated using a custom-written Matlab routine based on monoexponential fitting (R2015a, MathWorks Inc., Natwick, MA, USA)22. To enable a quantitative comparison of the signal intensity (SI) between different T2-w measurements, the human nerve SI was normalized to the SI of either the synovial fluid of the knee (in vivo) or the surrounding medium (ex vivo) according to T2wnorm = SInerve/SIfluid. In the animal model, nerve SI was normalized to the SI of adjacent normal-appearing muscle according to T2wnorm = SInerve/SImuscle.
Histological examination
Following MRI, mice were killed using carbon dioxide and both sciatic nerves from three randomly picked STZ-diabetic and control mice were dissected and processed for analysis.
For light and electron microscopy, sciatic nerve specimens were cut to cubes of 3-5 mm length and fixed for at least 2 h at room temperature in 3% glutaraldehyde solution in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer pH 7.4, cut into pieces of ca. 1mm3, washed in buffer, postfixed for 1 h at 4° in 1% aqueous osmium tetroxide, rinsed in water, dehydrated through graded ethanol solutions, transferred into propylene oxide, and embedded in araldite resin23. Semithin and ultrathin sections were cut with an ultramicrotome (Reichert Ultracut E, Wien, Austria). Semithin sections of 0.9 µm were stained with toluidine blue for light microscopical examination (Hamamatsu NanoZoomer Digital Pathology, Hamamatsu Photonics, K.K., Japan) and digitized using NIS-Elements BR 3.00 Imaging Software (Nikon, Chiyoda, Japan). Selected areas of blocks were cut into 60-80 nm ultrathin sections, treated with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined with an electron microscope JEM 1400 equipped with a 2 K TVIPS CCD Camera TemCam F216.
Image evaluation and statistical analysis
MRN and histological images were exported and evaluation was performed in ImageJ Fiji24 using standard annotation and segmentation tools.
Human fascicular diabetic nerve lesions were identified on in vivo and ex vivo T2-w sequences and correspondingly segmented on images of the other MR contrasts. Likewise, inconspicuous nerve fascicles were identified and marked in the control cases.
For the quantitative morphometric analysis of myelinated fibres of the whole-mount, toluidine blue stained sciatic mouse nerves, axon density was defined as the absolute number of axons divided by the entire nerve cross sectional area; myelin density was defined as the absolute myelin area divided by the entire nerve cross sectional area and the average myelination was defined by absolute myelin area divided by the absolute number of myelinated axons within an entire nerve cross section.
For morphometric analysis of unmyelinated fibres, axon area, axon number and density and distribution of axon size were measured within randomly selected frames obtained from ultrathin-sections, each covering an area of 31 µm x 31 µm (n = 16 in control animals vs. n = 17 in STZ-animals). Ultrastructure of myelination was assessed visually in these image frames.
For further statistical analysis Prism Version 7.02 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA), Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft Inc., Redmond, WA, USA) and custom-written routines in MatLab (R2015a, MathWorks Inc., Natwick, MA, USA) were employed. Data are expressed as mean ± s.d. Group statistics were calculated using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction: *=p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, n.s.=nonsignificant. Correlation tables were calculated using non-parametric Spearman’s r at a significance level of p < 0.05. Histogram comparison was carried out using two-tailed nonparametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test at a significance level of p < 0.05.
Results
Long-term STZ-diabetic phenotype
STZ-diabetic mice showed a greatly reduced body weight, increased blood glucose level, increased HbA1c and an increased Albumin-Creatinine ratio as compared to the control cohort (Table 1). STZ-diabetic mice exhibited a significant delay of the behavioural response in the hotplate and Hargreaves tests (Fig. 1a, c). Beside body weight, HbA1c was found to be the only clinical parameter which significantly correlated to all three behavioural tests (Fig. 1d-f). These findings support the assumption of a robust hypoalgesic phenotype in mice with long-term STZ-induced diabetes.
Ultra high field MRN of human diabetic nerve tissue
To allow for detailed visualization as well as morphological and quantitative evaluation of nerve tissue at a very high resolution, we developed an adapted multicontrast ultra high field MRN approach. We first intended to establish that tissue contrasts obtained at 9.4 T magnetic field strength would indeed reflect the same findings as acquisition under clinical conditions in vivo. We therefore performed a cross-platform validation experiment in which we compared in vivo and ex vivo nerve tissue from a T1D patient with the findings of non-diabetic nerves (Fig. 2). At 3 T, T2wnorm was 0.77 ± 0.06 vs. 0.32 ± 0.05 (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2a), T2-time was 193.6 ± 39.7 vs. 41.9 ± 4.4 ms (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2b), PD was 40.18 ± 9.04 vs 20.21 ± 1.29 (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2c), FA was 0.14 ± 0.03 vs. 0.62 ± 0.05 (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2d) and ADC was 2.25 ± 0.07 vs. 1.26 ± 0.14 *10-³mm²/s (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2e). At 9.4 T, T2wnorm was 0.75 ± 0.08 vs. 0.20 ± 0.02 (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2a); T2-time was 52.3 ± 5.01 vs. 19.2 ± 1.05 ms (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2b), PD was 19.51 ± 5.21 vs 14.05 ± 2.54 (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2c), FA was 0.15 ± 0.02 vs. 0.38 ± 0.04 (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2d) and ADC was 1.88 ± 0.07 vs. 1.18 ± 0.09 *10-³mm²/s (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2e).
These findings show that for each individual MR parameter considered, the same expected tissue contrast changes can be visualized using the experimental MRN protocol at 9.4 T as in the clinical in vivo setting at 3 T. We therefore conclude that our multicontrast approach at ultra high field strength can readily be used to detect type 1 DPN nerve lesions.
Ultra high field MRN in the STZ-diabetic mouse model
Applying this technique to the mouse model, our strategy consisted of a proximal multicontrast MRN protocol which was complemented by morphological T2-w MRN of both sciatic nerves at thigh level (Fig. 3, sciatic nerve indicated by white arrows).
Other than expected, there was a significant shortening of the T2-time in the sciatic nerve and a significant decrease in T2wnorm at the thigh level in STZ-diabetic mice. No significant difference was noted in the T2wnorm of the proximal position at the pelvic exit between STZ-diabetic and control mice (Fig. 4a-c). However, neither focal nerve signal nor morphological alterations were identified in the STZ-diabetic mice that would correspond to the pathognomonic lesions earlier reported in patients with DPN and also observed in our validation experiment on human T1D nerve tissue. Quantitative analysis of PD and the water diffusion parameters FA and ADC did not yield any significant differences (Fig. 4d-f).
Correlation analysis of MRN parameters with clinical and behavioral parameters showed that HbA1c, as the most robust clinical marker, significantly correlated to T2-time (r = -0.62, p = 0.002) and to T2wnorm at distal level (r = −0.51, p = 0.02) (Fig. 5a, b), whilst all other MRN parameters failed to do so. It was subsequently found that T2-time was the only MRN parameter which correlated significantly with either the hotplate (r = -0.49, p = 0.02) or Hargreaves assay (r = -0.49, p = 0.02) (Fig. 5c, d), but not the tail-flick.
Histological and ultrastructural nerve analysis
Quantitative evaluation of whole-mount, toluidine blue stained semithin-sections of sciatic nerves (Fig. 6a) from control and STZ-diabetic mice showed no significant differences in either overall myelinated axon density (18087 ± 2725 vs. 21069 ± 369.5 per mm²; p = 0.20; Fig. 6b) or myelin density (0.42 ± 0.021 vs. 0.416 ± 0.055 µm²; p = 0.91; Fig. 6c). With respect to average myelination, there was a 17% reduction in the sciatic nerves from the STZ-diabetic mice; however, this difference was nonsignificant (23.9 ± 6.08 vs. 19.8 ± 2.75 µm²; p = 0.37; Fig. 6d). Exact frequency distribution analysis of all myelinated axons, however, showed a left shift towards smaller fibers in STZ-diabetic mice (Fig. 6e) with a significant increase of small radius axons between 1-2 µm when compared to the control cohort. This shift could also be confirmed by pairwise comparison of the mean axon size distribution (p < 0.01, Wilcoxon-signed-rank test). In the overall group data, this leads to a 22% decrease of the mean equivalent axon radius (2.36 ± 0.56 vs. 1.84 ± 0.76 µm; p = 0.49).
Despite the presence of a number of artifacts in the respective images, electron microscopy (EM) showed an increase in myelin fiber abnormalities such as infoldings (4147 ± 1489 vs. 1990 ± 1315 per mm²; p < 0.01; Fig. 7a) in sciatic nerves from STZ-diabetic mice, which may be consistent with pathological changes previously reported for peripheral neuropathy. In contrast, alterations in myelin compaction were not found to occur more often in STZ-diabetic mice (2483 ± 1136 vs. 1842 ± 1334 per mm²; p = 0.15).
Furthermore, quantitative EM morphometry showed a significant decrease of unmyelinated axon density (0.053 ± 0.046 vs. 0.111 ± 0.08; p = 0.02) and unmyelinated fiber area (0.034 ± 0.027 vs. 0.063 ± 0.042; p = 0.03) in sciatic nerves of STZ-diabetic mice compared to the control cohort (Fig. 7b, c). While there was a nonsignificant trend towards an increased proportion of small-sized unmyelinated axons <0.2 µm² (0.32 ± 0.15 vs. 0.24 ± 0.07; p = 0.08), there was a significant smaller proportion of medium-sized unmyelinated axons between 0.2 µm² and 0.8 µm² (0.59 ± 0.12 vs. 0.66 ± 0.08; p = 0.04) in the sciatic nerves of STZ-diabetic mice. The overall size distribution of all unmyelinated axons, however, appeared to be very similar as evidenced by the violin plot (Fig. 7d, median 0.33 vs 0.33, 25th percentile 0.198 vs. 0.209, 75th percentile 0.503 vs. 0.504, n = 878 vs. 1646; p = 0.54).
Discussion
MRN has proven to be a powerful and innovative tool readily depicting peripheral nerve lesions in human DPN with proximal predominance1–3. In addition, the lesion load has been found to correspond closely to the clinical severity of DPN1–3 and seems to mirror earlier pathological findings of multifocal fiber loss along the nerve12,25. The description of such nerve signal alterations has been broadened by the use of DTI5,6 and T2-relaxometry2,6 assigning a well-defined “multicontrast MR-signature” to these characteristic DPN lesions.
Rodents are frequently used as model organisms in the study of DPN to identify possible therapeutic targets. While in vivo assessment of clinical phenotype or physiological functions is often difficult, objective tools to monitor morphological and functional changes over time appear highly desirable.
Here, we have introduced a novel multicontrast MRN approach at ultra high field strength for the high-resolution in vivo study of the PNS in mice, based upon human clinical MRN strategies.
To validate this experimental approach and confirm that results acquired at 9.4 T in an experimental setting are comparable to human clinical findings in vivo, we have first come up with an elaborate cross-platform strategy involving the parallel comparison of ex vivo and in vivo sciatic nerve tissue from a patient with long standing T1D and severe dPNP to non-diabetic controls. This could show that our experimental ultra high field MRN approach was indeed able to pick up the same typical signal features of type 1 DPN as conventional in vivo MRN in patients. One important limitation to this approach, however, is the validation in only a single case-control comparison with serious co-morbidities and accompanying medication which could have introduced a considerable bias. On the other hand, the observed extensive MRN phenotype in T1D with stereotypical signal alterations matched closely previously reported cases of the same condition1–3,6 so there is no reason for us to believe these findings to be artifacts of other etiology. Furthermore, it seems very difficult to identify patients, especially T1D, with such a severe dPNP warranting a major leg amputation without any other substantial diabetic late complications or co-morbidities to completely exclude potential contributions from other physiological systems. To gain ex vivo access to major peripheral nerves, it seems nearly impossible, unfortunately, to get around this shortcoming.
We applied our experimental MRN strategy to the STZ diabetic mouse, one of the most frequently studied DPN animal models. Surprisingly, MRN findings in these mice were strikingly different from the characteristic MR-signature observed in patients with type 1 DPN at 3 and 9.4 T. Although exhibiting typical clinical and behavioural phenotype featuring thermal hypoalgesia, there were no classic MR-morphological focal lesions or nerve enlargement1,4 nor the expected quantitative changes, such as an increase in T2-w SI1, proton density2, a decrease in FA or an increase in ADC5,6. Instead, a marked drop of T2-time and a corresponding reduction in general T2-w signal of the nerve were identified which is contrary to prior reports on T2-time in patients with DPN2,5. In fact, T2-w hyperintensity was the first reported major hallmark of human DPN nerve lesions1,4.
As the exact nature of such lesions in humans still remains unclear, it would be unwise to speculate as to the reasons for their absence from the mouse but the difference could be due to subtler nerve pathology and the lack of gross changes in axonal number – which is a known observation from earlier studies in STZ-diabetic rodents14,26. Indeed, the alterations observed on the light-microscopic and ultrastructural level in our study could reproduce earlier findings in STZ-diabetic rodents which are thought to be linked to experimental DPN: Among those, an overall left-shift of myelinated fibres, in particular, appears to be a most consistent finding26–28. Although to a lesser extent, this does also seem to be the case for unmyelinated axons with a significant reduction in overall unmyelinated fibre area26. A reduction in unmyelinated axon density as we found has been reported less frequently29 but may – at our relatively late observational time point – reflect a later finding of well-known dying back degeneration of C-fiber terminals8,30–33. Moreover, myelin irregularities could also be found which is consistent with earlier reports14,34.
As proposed in previous studies26, the observed phenotype and structural morphotype of the STZ-diabetic animals may reflect early diabetic neuropathy in humans given the absence of gross nerve pathology compared to human DPN12. Therefore, the shortened T2-time observed in STZ-diabetic mice in our study could be explained by the altered axonal composition of the nerve due to the left-shift of the size distribution: An increase of fiber numbers with smaller fiber radii and decreased average myelination would lead to a greater surface area of cellular membranes within the nerve, which is believed to result in a T2 decrease35. Also, such changes are likely to have an impact on tissue susceptibility additionally contributing to a shortening of the T2-time36.
Our findings could therefore represent an early indicator of structural re-arrangement within the nerve, potentially preceding the MR-signature of late-stage diabetic neuropathy. Translational and confirmatory studies are therefore required to determine if these structural changes are indeed responsible for the MR-parameter changes observed and how they may be related to the neuropathic phenotype.
It has previously been reported that injured peripheral nerves within an experimental context have an increased T2-w SI and prolonged T2 values, followed by gradual recovery and normalization of T2 signal over time37–39. In a study with STZ-diabetic rats, similar findings have also been reported40. This, however, contrasts with the findings of our study, which observed an unexpected decrease of T2-time in the STZ mice. This might be due to differences between rat and mouse, particularly, with regard to STZ treatment. In the rat study by Wang et al., a single 50 mg/g dose of STZ was used to induce persistent hyperglycemia and an increase in tactile allodynia as assessed by von Frey filament seven weeks post-induction; but this duration may be too short for the development of a true DPN morphotype within the peripheral nervous system and STZ-related artifacts are still expected to be present16, potentially leading to an endoneurial oedema that can be picked up by an increase in T2-w SI. In contrast, the mice in our study received five consecutive injections of STZ at the same dose and significant differences in thermal hyperalgesia were observed after 24 weeks, a widely accepted paradigm of experimental DPN. Under these conditions, we did not find any sign of endoneurial oedema. Such differences highlight the need for standardized models in the future to achieve an effective comparison even across species. In addition to the MR measurements, complementary parameters, such as IENFD, should be performed to assess the relationship between dermal fiber loss and the integrate of the sciatic nerve.
In conclusion, we have implemented a novel multicontrast ultra high field MRN approach for the in vivo study of major peripheral nerve segments in mice. Within the context of the standard STZ model, there was no evidence for the presence of characteristic lesions within the proximal sciatic nerve as has previously been reported in patients with DPN. However, an unexpected, distinct MR-signature was observed that may represent an indicator of early structural re-arrangement within the nerve in the context of DPN. The capacity of our MRN approach for non-invasive assessment of proximal nerve structure and function within a given mouse model provides a powerful tool for direct translational comparison to human disease hallmarks not only in diabetes but also in other peripheral neuropathic conditions.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Axel Erhard for daily care of the mice and performing the behavioural testing of the mice. The expert technical assistance of Ulrike Ganserer, Zlata Antoni and Andrea Döbler (EM Lab IPH) is thankfully acknowledged. EM analysis was generously supported by Nadine Volk and the biobank of the SFB1118 (Project S02) and the tissue bank of the NCT. Behavioural analyses were supported by the Interdisciplinary Behavioral Core (INBC) of Heidelberg University. We thank J. Weis (RWTH Aachen) for fruitful discussions and help with the EM analysis. This study was supported via funding from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) via SFB1118 to T.F. and P.P.N (Project A04, S01), to D.S., M.B. and S.H. (Project B05) and to N.A. and R.K. (Project B06) and via SFB1158 to M.B. and P.P.N. (Project A03). D.S. and M.O.B. were supported by a physician-scientist fellowship of the Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg.
Author contributions
D.S., A.S.H., M.B., P.P.N., S.H. and T.F. conceived and designed the study; D.S., I.H., S.H. and T.F. wrote the manuscript; A.S.H. and T.F. performed animal care, phenotyping and sample collection; D.S., I.H., F.S., R.K., S.H. and T.F interpreted the results; D.S., M.F., V.S., D.M., M.O.B. and S.H. implemented and performed MRN; V.S., D.M., S.H. developed MR sequences and parameter extraction routines; I.H. performed LM and EM experiments. D.S. performed all data analysis with contributions from A.S.H., I.H., F.S., M.O.B., N.A., R.K., M.B., P.P.N., S.H. and T.F. All authors discussed the results, critically revised and contributed to the final version of the manuscript. M.B. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Data availability
Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Pham M, et al. Proximal neuropathic lesions in distal symmetric diabetic polyneuropathy: findings of high-resolution magnetic resonance neurography. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:721–723. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pham M, et al. Magnetic resonance neurography detects diabetic neuropathy early and with Proximal Predominance. Ann Neurol. 2015;78:939–948. doi: 10.1002/ana.24524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jende JME, et al. Diabetic neuropathy differs between type 1 and type 2 diabetes: Insights from magnetic resonance neurography. Ann Neurol. 2018;83:588–598. doi: 10.1002/ana.25182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Thakkar RS, et al. Spectrum of high-resolution MRI findings in diabetic neuropathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:407–412. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vaeggemose M, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging MR neurography for the detection of polyneuropathy in type 1 diabetes. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45:1125–1134. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vaeggemose M, et al. Magnetic Resonance Neurography Visualizes Abnormalities in Sciatic and Tibial Nerves in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes and Neuropathy. Diabetes. 2017;66:1779–1788. doi: 10.2337/db16-1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wattiez, A.-S., Barrière, D. A., Dupuis, A. & Courteix, C. Rodent models of painful diabetic neuropathy: what can we learn from them. Diabetes Metab S5 (2012).
- 8.Christianson JA, Riekhof JT, Wright DE. Restorative effects of neurotrophin treatment on diabetes-induced cutaneous axon loss in mice. Exp Neurol. 2003;179:188–199. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4886(02)00017-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen YS, Chung SS, Chung SK. Noninvasive monitoring of diabetes-induced cutaneous nerve fiber loss and hypoalgesia in thy1-YFP transgenic mice. Diabetes. 2005;54:3112–3118. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.11.3112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Beiswenger, K., Calcutt, N. & Mizisin, A. In Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System. 8-9 (Blackwell Publishing 9600 Garsington RD, Oxford OX4 2DQ, Oxon, England).
- 11.Yasuda H, et al. Diabetic neuropathy and nerve regeneration. Prog Neurobiol. 2003;69:229–285. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0082(03)00034-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sugimura K, Dyck PJ. Multifocal fiber loss in proximal sciatic nerve in symmetric distal diabetic neuropathy. J Neurol Sci. 1982;53:501–509. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(82)90246-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Walker D, et al. Structural abnormalities do not explain the early functional abnormalities in the peripheral nerves of the streptozotocin diabetic rat. J Anat. 1999;195(Pt 3):419–427. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1999.19530419.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lennertz RC, Medler KA, Bain JL, Wright DE, Stucky CL. Impaired sensory nerve function and axon morphology in mice with diabetic neuropathy. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:905–914. doi: 10.1152/jn.01123.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bierhaus A, et al. Methylglyoxal modification of Nav1.8 facilitates nociceptive neuron firing and causes hyperalgesia in diabetic neuropathy. Nat Med. 2012;18:926–933. doi: 10.1038/nm.2750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hidmark AS, Nawroth PP, Fleming T. STZ causes depletion of immune cells in sciatic nerve and dorsal root ganglion in experimental diabetes. J Neuroimmunol. 2017;306:76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2017.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wajcman, H. In Hemoglobin Disorders 21-29 (Springer, 2003).
- 18.Menendez L, Lastra A, Hidalgo A, Baamonde A. Unilateral hot plate test: a simple and sensitive method for detecting central and peripheral hyperalgesia in mice. J Neurosci Methods. 2002;113:91–97. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0270(01)00483-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.D’Amour FE, Erickson BR, Smith DL. Effect of environmental temperature in traumatic shock. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1957;94:1–4. doi: 10.3181/00379727-94-22840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hargreaves K, Dubner R, Brown F, Flores C, Joris J. A new and sensitive method for measuring thermal nociception in cutaneous hyperalgesia. Pain. 1988;32:77–88. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90026-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Breckwoldt MO, et al. Correlated magnetic resonance imaging and ultramicroscopy (MR-UM) is a tool kit to assess the dynamics of glioma angiogenesis. Elife. 2016;5:e11712. doi: 10.7554/eLife.11712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Milford D, Rosbach N, Bendszus M, Heiland S. Mono-Exponential Fitting in T2-Relaxometry: Relevance of Offset and First Echo. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brandt T, et al. Pathogenesis of cervical artery dissections: association with connective tissue abnormalities. Neurology. 2001;57:24–30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.57.1.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dyck PJ, et al. The spatial distribution of fiber loss in diabetic polyneuropathy suggests ischemia. Ann Neurol. 1986;19:440–449. doi: 10.1002/ana.410190504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Murakami T, et al. Development of sensory neuropathy in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Brain Behav. 2013;3:35–41. doi: 10.1002/brb3.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yagihashi S, Kamijo M, Watanabe K. Reduced myelinated fiber size correlates with loss of axonal neurofilaments in peripheral nerve of chronically streptozotocin diabetic rats. Am J Pathol. 1990;136:1365–1373. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Weis J, Dimpfel W, Schroder JM. Nerve conduction changes and fine structural alterations of extra- and intrafusal muscle and nerve fibers in streptozotocin diabetic rats. Muscle Nerve. 1995;18:175–184. doi: 10.1002/mus.880180205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liao C, Yang M, Zhong W, Liu P, Zhang W. Association of myelinated primary afferents impairment with mechanical allodynia in diabetic peripheral neuropathy: an experimental study in rats. Oncotarget. 2017;8:64157–64169. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lauria G, et al. Intraepidermal nerve fiber density in rat foot pad: neuropathologic-neurophysiologic correlation. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2005;10:202–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1085-9489.2005.0010210.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Murakami T, et al. Placental growth factor-2 gene transfer by electroporation restores diabetic sensory neuropathy in mice. Exp Neurol. 2011;227:195–202. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yorek MS, et al. Effect of diet-induced obesity or type 1 or type 2 diabetes on corneal nerves and peripheral neuropathy in C57Bl/6J mice. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2015;20:24–31. doi: 10.1111/jns.12111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Coppey LJ, Shevalye H, Obrosov A, Davidson EP, Yorek MA. Determination of peripheral neuropathy in high-fat diet fed low-dose streptozotocin-treated female C57Bl/6J mice and Sprague-Dawley rats. J Diabetes Investig. 2018;9:1033–1040. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Veiga S, Leonelli E, Beelke M, Garcia-Segura LM, Melcangi RC. Neuroactive steroids prevent peripheral myelin alterations induced by diabetes. Neurosci Lett. 2006;402:150–153. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.03.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cameron IL, Ord VA, Fullerton GD. Characterization of proton NMR relaxation times in normal and pathological tissues by correlation with other tissue parameters. Magn Reson Imaging. 1984;2:97–106. doi: 10.1016/0730-725X(84)90063-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Stanisz GJ, et al. T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:507–512. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Aagaard, B. D. et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging is a noninvasive method of observing injury and recovery in the peripheral nervous system. Neurosurgery53, 199-203; discussion 203-194 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 38.Zhang X, et al. MR imaging and T2 measurements in peripheral nerve repair with activation of Toll-like receptor 4 of neurotmesis. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1145–1152. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3134-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bendszus M, Wessig C, Solymosi L, Reiners K, Koltzenburg M. MRI of peripheral nerve degeneration and regeneration: correlation with electrophysiology and histology. Exp Neurol. 2004;188:171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang D, et al. Assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:463–471. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3423-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.