To the Editor
The question of whether or not severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has the potential for airborne transmission is an extremely contentious issue right now. Emerging evidence suggests that airborne transmission is possible. Inconsistent recommendations from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have caused confusion among health care providers regarding the appropriate level of precaution. CDC recommends airborne precautions when caring for any patient with known or suspected COVID-19,1 whereas WHO recommends standard (contact) and droplet precautions for the care of COVID-19 suspected or confirmed patients, and airborne precautions only for aerosol-generating procedures.2
We are profoundly worried about restricting airborne precautions only to suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients due to the potential for onward transmission to health care providers. In the absence of widespread testing for SARS-CoV-2, it is reasonable to suspect a large proportion of individuals with cases are undiagnosed. Furthermore, false-negative tests resulting from limitations of sample collection and kit performance3,4 may misspecify a patient as negative when they are truly at risk of transmitting virus. Pre- or asymptomatic infection could be an important source of transmission to others, with symptoms of COVID-19 appearing a median of 5days after exposure with likely transmission during the prodromal phase.5 In fact, asymptomatic infection may account for over half of onward transmission.6,7 Moreover, nonspecific symptoms means that patients may present for management of nonrespiratory symptoms (such as diarrhea8 or nausea8) and thus would not necessarily be a suspected COVID-19 case.
We will outline the evidence to date that suggests airborne precautions should be implemented in the hospital setting. First, short-range aerosol transmission is an important mode of transmission for other respiratory viruses that share similar characteristics with SARS-CoV-2. These viruses include severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS),9 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS),10 and influenza A virus.11 Seasonal human coronaviruses (NL63, OC43, HKU1) also have the potential for aerosol transmission. In a recent study, viral RNA for seasonal human coronaviruses, influenza viruses, and rhinoviruses was found in exhaled breath and coughs of children and adults with acute respiratory illness.12 It is thus reasonable to suspect aerosol transmission is also possible for SARS-CoV-2.
Second, a growing number of epidemiologic investigations point to airborne transmission during the presymptomatic period. In Skagit County, WA, at least 45 cases of COVID-19 have been linked to a 2.5-hour choir practice at which there were 60 attendees.13 At the time of the gathering, no person was symptomatic, and the group observed infection control practices such as distancing and the use of hand sanitizer. It is suspected that forceful exhalation, especially in this instance in which people were also inhaling forcefully during singing, may have aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 and led to high levels of disease transmission.
Third, several observational studies of patients with COVID-19 provide evidence of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Santarpia et al14 collected air and surface samples from individuals who were confirmed positive with COVID-19 infection. Many commonly used items, toilet facilities, and air samples had evidence of viral contamination. More than 60% of air samples collected from rooms and hallways in hospitals treating patients with COVID-19 were positive for SARS-CoV-2. A similar study performed in China also suggests aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2.15
Fourth, experiments conducted under controlled laboratory conditions provide further evidence of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. One study used a 3-jet Collison nebulizer and fed into a Goldberg drum under controlled laboratory conditions to generate aerosols. Although not necessarily reflective of human cough conditions, experimentally induced aerosols were viable for up to 3hours.16
These factors in combination build a strong case for airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Universal airborne precautions are an appropriate recommendation17 for a provider caring for any patient during this pandemic. However, the demand for N95 respirators has already outpaced their availability.18 As such, anesthesiologists and other health care providers may find themselves without appropriate airborne protection during emergent surgery or contact with a patient. To ensure the safety of anesthesia providers, an N95 (or equivalent such as FFP2) respirator should be the minimum requirement for direct contact patient care. To conserve respirators, the CDC has recommended approaches for extended use and limited reuse of respirators.19 CDC has also recommended broader hospital-based practices to conserve respirators for those at highest risk of coming into contact with COVID-19–positive patients.19 It is imperative that international, national, and local authorities make every possible effort to greatly increase the supply of respirator masks and develop efficient workflows to maximize the respirators currently available.
Given the growing evidence that airborne transmission of SAR-CoV-2 and the known high risk of exposure to health care providers, hospitals must employ universal airborne precautions and enact policies for extended and reuse of respirators to protect the health and safety of the professionals working to save lives during the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank the support by the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota Fairview Medical Center.
Ratan K. Banik, MD, PhD
Department of Anesthesiology
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota
rkbanik@umn.edu
Angela K. Ulrich, MPH, PhD
Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Division of Epidemiology & Community Health
School of Public Health
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Footnotes
Funding: This study was supported by the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota. A.K.U. is supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI055433).
REFERENCES
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Healthcare Settings. 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control-recommendations.html. Accessed xxx, xxx, xxx.
- 2.World Health Organization. Infection prevention and control during health care when novel coronavirus (nCoV) infection is suspected. 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications-detail/infection-prevention-and-control-during-health-care-when-novel-coronavirus-(ncov)-infection-is-suspected-20200125. Accessed xxx, xxx, xxx.
- 3.Greenland JR, Michelow MD, Wang L, London MJ. COVID-19 infection: implications for perioperative and critical care physicians. Anesthesiology. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, et al. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a report of 1014 cases. Radiology. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lauer SA, Grantz KH, Bi Q, et al. The incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: estimation and application. Ann Intern Med. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li R, Pei S, Chen B, et al. Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV2). Science. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Day M. Covid-19: four fifths of cases are asymptomatic, China figures indicate. BMJ. 2020;369:m1375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yu ITS, Li Y, Wong TW, et al. Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1731–1739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kim SH, Chang SY, Sung M, et al. Extensive viable Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) coronavirus contamination in air and surrounding environment in MERS isolation wards. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:363–369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tellier R. Review of aerosol transmission of influenza A virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1657–1662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Leung NHL, Chu DKW, Shiu EYC, et al. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nat Med. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Choir practice turns fatal. Corona virus is to blame. Los Angeles Times. 2020. Available at: https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2020-03-29/coronavirus-choir-outbreak. Accessed xxx, xxx, xxx. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Santarpia JL, Rivera DN, Herrera V, et al. Transmission potential of SARS-CoV-2 in viral shedding observed at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. medRxiv. 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu Y, Ning Z, Chen Y, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics and RNA concentration of SARS-CoV-2 aerosol in Wuhan hospitals during COVID-19 outbreak. bioRxiv. 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 16.van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1564–1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.American Society of Anesthesiologists. The use of personal protective equipment by anesthesia professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2020March20 Available at: https://www.asahq.org/about-asa/newsroom/news-releases/2020/03/the-use-of-personal-protective-equipment-by-anesthesia-professionals-during-the-covid-19-pandemic Accessed xxx, xxx, xxx.
- 18.World Health Organization. Shortage of personal protective equipment endangering health. 2020March3 Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/03-03-2020-shortage-of-personal-protective-equipment-endangering-health-workers-worldwide. Accessed xxx, xxx, xxx.
- 19.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommended guidance for extended use and limited reuse of N95 filtering facepiece respirators in healthcare settings. 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/hcwcontrols/recommendedguidanceextuse.html. Accessed xxx, xxx, xxx.