Abstract
We describe a new approach to optical sensing of glucose based on the competitive interactions between a ruthenium metal ligand complex, a boronic acid derivative and glucose. The metal-ligand complex [Ru(2,2′-bipyridme)2(5,6-dihydroxy-1,10-phenanthrolme)](PF6)2 at pH 8 forms a reversible complex with 2-toluylboronic acid or 2-methoxyphenyl boronic acid. Complexation is accompanied by a several-fold increase in the luminescent intensity of the ruthenium complex. Addition of glucose results in decreased luminescent intensity, which appears to be the result of decreased binding between the metal-ligand complex and the boronic acid. Ruthenium metal-ligand complexes are convenient for optical sensing because their long luminescent decay times allow lifetime-based sensing with simple instrumentation.
Keywords: Glucose sensing, boronic acid, metal-ligand complex
INTRODUCTION
Diabetes is a chronic disease affecting 100 million people worldwide. Convenient methods to measure glucose are needed for control of blood sugar in diabetics. It is now clear that tight control of blood glucose is needed to prevent the long-term health consequences of diabetics [1]. These complications include nerve damage, heart disease, and blindness. At present the only method to measure blood glucose is using a finger stick. The pain and inconvenience of this method results in infrequent measurements and poor control of blood glucose.
Considerable research effort has been directed toward finding a method for non-invasive measurements of blood glucose [2]. These methods include mid-infrared and near-infrared spectroscopy, optical rotation, and fluorescence methods. The fluorescence methods can be divided into two classes, those based on proteins that bind to sugars [3–11] and those based on the interaction of boronic acid with sugars and glycols [12–18]. These glucose-sensitive probes display changes in fluorescence intensity in the presence of glucose, which is typically the result of a change in the extent of photoinduced electron transfer (PET). Sensing methods based on fluorescence probes are desirable because of their stability compared to protein-based sensors.
While methods are available to measure glucose in isolated samples, the goal of non-invasive measurement of blood glucose remains elusive. Hence, there has been increasing interest in minimally invasive methods. One promising approach is based on the use of interstitial fluid extracted from beneath the skin. It appears that this fluid tracks blood glucose [19]. Interstitial fluid can be extracted by several methods, sometimes combined with laser ablation of the stratus corneum [20–21]. Such methods are painless and can be performed at frequent intervals. Hence, there remains interest in developing convenient, non-consumptive and reversible glucose sensors to be used with these emerging methods.
In the present paper we extend the earlier studies of boronic acid–based glucose sensors [17–18] to include a metal-ligand complex (MLC). In recent years, MLCs have been developed as luminescent probes [22–27]. MLCs display long luminescent lifetimes, high photostability, and convenient visible absorption bands. Thus, a glucose-sensitive MLC may find use in portable devices for glucose measurements.
Our approach to measuring glucose is outlined in Scheme I. The MLC contains 5,6-dihydroxy-1,10-phenanthroline, which is ionized at pH 8 (Step 1). The ionized diol can interact with boronic acid derivatives, which can alter the spectral properties of the MLC [Ru(bpy)2(dhph)]2+ (Step 2). Glucose is also known to interact with boronic acid and can remove boronic acid from the MLC (Step 3). We show that suitable spectral change occur according to Steps 1–3. Although the changes in Step 3 are minimal at this time for a practical glucose sensor, this paper provides proof that this approach can be utilized for the development of a working sensor.
Scheme 1.
Analytical scheme for sensing glucose based on competitive binding with [Ru(bpy)2dhph]2+ and boronic acid.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ruthenium trichloride 2,2′-bipyridine, 2-toluyl boronic acid, and 2-methoxyphenyl boronic acid, solvents, and chemicals were purchased from Aldrich and used without further purification. Distilled water was used for all aqueous solutions. The starting material Ru(bpy)2Cl2 and dhph ligand were prepared as described previously [28] with slight modifications.
Synthesis of [Ru(bpy)2(5,6-dihydroxy-1,10-phenanthroline)](PF6)2
[Ru(bpy)2(5,6-dihydroxy-1,10-phenanthroline)]-(PF6)2 was prepared by refluxing Ru(bpy)2Cl2 with 5, 6-dihydroxy-1,10-phenanthroline in 1:1.2 ratio for 4 h in dimethylformamide (DMF). Upon completion of the reaction, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and then vacuum dried leaving a brown solid. This solid was dissolved in water and filtered. The aqueous supernatant was saturated with ammonium hexafluorophosphate to precipitate the complex, which was seperated by filtration. The product was washed successively with cold water and ether and dried in vacuum. The compound was dissolved again in a minimum amount of acetone and seperated from solution by the addition of ammonium hexafluorophosphate. The solid was filtered, washed with cold water and ether, and dried. The resulting orangebrown powder was further purified by elution with acetone through an LH-20 column. The compound was characterized by elemental and mass spectroscopy.
Instrumentation
A commercial cross-correlation phase fluorometer (ISS, Urbana, IL) was modified to use a blue LED (Nichia NSPB500, Nichia Chemical Industries, Lancaster, PA) for the excitation source [29–31]. The LED was biased at 6.0 mA with a ILX Lightwave (Bozemann, MT) DX-3412 Precision Current Source through a picosecond pulse labs (Boulder, CO) 5580 bias tee. A Marconi Instruments (Allendale, NJ) 2022D signal generator supplied a modulation current + 6 dBm. Fluorescence emission was filtered to remove scattered excitation light by a single Andover (Salem, NH) 600FH90–50S 600-nm-long wave pass filter and detected by Hamamatsu (Bridgwater, NJ) R928 photomultiplier tube. Cross-correlation was achieved by modulating the photomultiplier tube bias with a second Marconi 2022D, also at + 6 dBm, amplified by a Mini-Circuits (Brooklyn, NY) ZHL-32A amplifier, for a total output of about + 30 dBm. A scattering solution of 1% Ludox (DuPont, Willmington, DE) colloidal silica was used as a reference. This scattered light was filtered by neutral density filters so that the amount of light detected was comparable to the emission of the sample.
Phase angles (φ) and modulations (m) were measured at eight frequencies spaced logarithmically ranging from 50 kHz–5MHz. These values were used by the least squares fitting program provided by ISS to find the best fit for one, two, or three discrete exponential decay lifetimes.
The frequency-domain intensity decay were fit to a single and multiexponential models. The analyses were performed with non-linear least square procedures [31]. The intensity decays were described by
(1) |
where αi are the preexponential factors, τi are the decay times, and n is the number of exponential components. The mean decay time is given by
(2) |
RESULTS
The emission intensity of [Ru(bpy)2(dhph)]2+ decreases as the pH is increased from 4.3 to 8.0. This decrease is thought to be due to the ionization of the two hydroxyl groups (Step 1). The intensity decay is dominantly a single exponential with a mean decay time near 300 ns (Table I). The mean decay time decreases from 320 to 285 ns as the pH is raised from 4 to 8. The decay time near 300 ns is assigned to the metal-to-ligand charge transfer state (MCLT). At present we are unsure of the origin of the shorter decay time near 50 ns.
Table I.
Effect of pH on the Fluorescence Lifetime of [Ru(bpy)2dhph]2+
Sample | τ1(ns) | f1 | τ2(ns) | f2 | τave(ns) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH 4 | 325 | 0.98 | 51 | 0.02 | 2.8 | 319.5 |
pH 6 | 290 | 0.97 | 51 | 0.03 | 3.6 | 282.8 |
pH 8 | 285 | 0.96 | 41 | 0.04 | 2.7 | 275.2 |
The emission intensity of [Ru(bpy)2(dhph)]2+ is strongly dependent on the presence of a boronic acid derivative. Addition of 2-toluylboronic acid (TBA) to the complex results in a 3-fold increase in intensity (Fig. 1). This increase in intensity could be partially reversed by addition of glucose (Fig. 2). The decrease in luminescence intensity occurs in the physiological range of blood glucose concentrations near 5mM. These results are marginal (~8%) but suggest that an MLCT probe such as [Ru(bpy)2(dhph)]2+ and a boronic acid can be used for optical sensing of glucose.
Fig. 1.
Emission spectra of 45μM [Ru(bpy)2dhph]2+ in the presence of increasing concentrations of TBA at pH 8.0.
Fig. 2.
Effect of increasing concentrations of glucose on the total intensity of 45 μM [Ru(bpy)2dhph]2+ in the presence of 45 μM TBA at pH 8.0.
Addition of a different boronic acid, 2-methoxyphenyl boronic acid (MBA), results in a 5-fold increase in luminescence intensity of [Ru(bpy)2(dhph)]2+ (Fig. 3). Although this increase appears to be larger than that found for TBA (see Fig. 1), the normalized intensities show that the TBA has a larger effect than MBA (Fig. 4). TBA does not dissolve in water as well as MBA, which prevents us from doing additional measurements at comparable concentrations. This suggests weaker binding of MBA to the MLC. We initially thought that weaker binding may be desirable in that the MLC-boronic acid interaction may be more readily reversed by glucose. However, it became clear that the strength of glucose binding to the boronic acid should also be considered.
Fig. 3.
Emission spectra of 45 μM [Ru(bpy)2dhph]2+ in the presence of increasing concentrations of MBA at pH 8.0.
Fig. 4.
Normalized total intensities of 45 μM [Ru(bpy)2dhph]2+ calculated from the spectra in Figs. 1 and 3, showing the relative reversibilities of the reaction of the TBA and MBA to [Ru(bpy)2dhph]2+.
For an MBA concentration of 180 μM, addition of glucose results in an 11% decrease in intensity of the MLC at 40 mM glucose. The plot (inset) suggests that saturation has not been reached and an even larger decrease can be expected at glucose concentrations higher than 40 mM. However, at the physiological glucose level, the change is only 4%. Although not favorable for our purposes, these results suggests that small changes in the boronic acid structure allows for selecting the range of measurable glucose concentration. In the future, we also foresee larger changes in intensity by optimizing the boronic acid structure, as well as the MLC-boronic acid ratio. The larger changes should allow more accurate measurement of the glucose concentration.
In previous reports we showed that phase-modulation lifetime measurements can be insensitive to the total intensity from the sample, which is a valuable property for medical uses of luminescence sensing [32]. Hence, we questioned whether our MLC could be used as a lifetime-based sensor for glucose. Frequency-domain intensity decay of [Ru(bpy)2(dhph)]2+ are shown in Fig. 6. Addition of MBA results in a substantial shift of the frequency responses to lower frequencies. This shift is the result of an increase in the mean decay time of [Ru(bpy)2(dhph)]2+ from 285–408 ns (Table II).
Fig. 6.
Frequency-domain intensity decays 45 μM [Ru(bpy)2dhph]2+ in the presence of increasing concentrations of MBA at pH 8.0.
Table II.
Fluorescence Lifetimes of [Ru(bpy)2dhph]2+ with Increasing Concentrations of Methoxyphenyl Boronic Acid at pH 8.0
MBA, (mM) | τ1(ns) | f1 | τ2(ns) | f2 | τave(ns) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 285 | 0.96 | 41 | 0.04 | 2.7 | 275.2 |
0.132 | 352 | 0.97 | 50 | 0.03 | 2.8 | 343.0 |
0.263 | 372 | 0.98 | 46 | 0.02 | 2.7 | 365.5 |
0.526 | 391 | 0.99 | 37 | 0.01 | 1.9 | 387.5 |
1.052 | 402 | 0.99 | 37 | 0.01 | 2.2 | 398.4 |
1.578 | 408 | 0.99 | 31 | 0.01 | 2.4 | 404.2 |
The changes in lifetime upon complexation between the MLC probe and MBA suggests the use of lifetime-based sensing. Unfortunately, we were unable to observe useful changes in the phase and modulation upon addition of glucose to the MLC-MBA complex. This is another aspect that needs to be addressed in order to make this method practical for glucose sensing. MLC probes with greater sensitivity to boronic acids will be designed and synthesized.
FUTURE PLANS
We have shown here that a glucose sensor based on a metal-ligand complex and boronic acid is feasible. One advantage of MLC is that the probe can be excited with a blue light–emitting diode (LED). The output of these LEDs is well matched to the MLCT transition near 450 nm. The optical output of LED can be easily modulated near 1 MHz [29–31], so that this solid-state light source could be used with steady-state or lifetime-based sensing.
We have not been able to observe lifetime changes in this system as yet. Nevertheless, the glucose-dependent intensity change of [Ru(bpy)2(dhph)]2+ can also be useful with recently developed methods for optical sensing. In several recent reports we described sensors that contained internal reference fluorophores. A change in intensity results in a change in modulation, which in turn can be used to measure the analyte concentration [33–35]. We also showed that one could use the polarization of the combined emission from a stretched-oriented reference film and the sensing fluorophore [36–37]. This method can be applied with any sensing fluorophore that displays a change in intensity. Polarization sensing can also be accomplished with visual detection [38]. One can readily imagine point-of-care devices based on such simple schemes for sensing. Thus, the glucose-dependent intensity change of our metal-ligand complex can be used with several methods for optical sensing of glucose.
Lastly, our results serve as proof of principle that glucose sensing can be achieved with a boronic acid and a luminescent MLC. There is a need to optimize the boronic acid structure in order to make the competitive assay of glucose more sensitive. A quencher or acceptor group may also be attached to the boronic acid for a FRET-based sensor This is also true for the MLC. An MLC that is more sensitive to the binding of boronic acid needs to be synthesized. We also foresee the MLC covalently linked to the boronic acid.
Fig. 5.
Emission spectra of 45 μM [Ru(bpy)2dhph]2+ + 180 μM MBA with increasing glucose concentrations at pH 8.0. Insert: Intensities as a function of glucose concentration.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by the National Institute of Health, National Center for Research Resources, RR-08119.
ABBREVIATIONS
- bpy
2,2′-bipyridine
- BDA
2-bromophenylboronic acid
- dhph
5,6-dihydroxy-1,10-phenanthroline
- LED
light emitting diode
- MBA
2-methyoxyphenyl boronic acid
- MLC
metal-ligand complex
- MLCT
metal-to-ligand charge transfer
- PET
photoinduced electron transfer
- TBA
2-toluylboronic acid
REFERENCES
- 1.National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disorders (June 1993). The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, NIH Publication. [Google Scholar]
- 2.McNichols RJ and Cote GL (1999) J. Biomed. Optics (in press.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schultz JS and Sims G (1979)Biotech. Bioeng. Symp 9, 65–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schultz J, Mansouri S, and Goldstein IJ (1982) Diabetes Care Bioeng. 5(3), 245–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Meadows D and Schultz JS, (1988) Talanta 35(2), 145–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lacowicz andB JR. Maliwal P (1993)Anal. Chim.Acta 271,155–164. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tolosa L, Szmacinski H, Rao G, and Lacowicz JR (1997) Anal. Biochem 250, 102–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tolosa L, Malak H, Rao G, and Lacowicz JR (1997) Sensors and Actuators 45, 93–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marvin JS, Hellinga HW (1998) J. Am. Chem. Soc 120, 120 7–11. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Careaga CL, Sutherland J, Sabeti J, and Falke JJ (1995) Biochemistry 34, 3048–3055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gilardi G, Zhou LQ, Hibbert L, and Cass AEG (1994) Anal. Chem. 66, 3840–3847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.James TD, Sandanayake KRAS, and Shinkai S (1994) J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun pp. 477–478. [Google Scholar]
- 13.James TD, Sandanayake KRAS, and Shinkai S (1995) Nature 74, 345–347. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kataoka K, Hisamitsu I, Sayama N, Okano T, and Sakurai Y (1995) J. Biochem 117, 1145–1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Takeshita M, Uchida K, and Irie M (1996) Chem. Commun pp. 1807–1808. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yamamoto M, Takeuchi M, and Shinkai S (1998) Tetrahedron 54, 3125–3140. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sandanayake KRAS, James TD, and Shinkai S (1996) Pure Appl. Chem 68, 1207–1212. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cooper CR and James TD (1999) SPIE Proceedings in Thompson RB and Lakowicz JR (Eds.) Advances in Fluorescence Sensing Technology. (In press.) [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tamada JA, Bohannon NJV, and Pots RO (1995) Nature Med. 1, 1198–1201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Glikfeld P, Hinz RS, and Guy RH (1989) Pharm. Res 6(11), 989–990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nelson JS, McCullough JL, Glenn TC, Wright WH, Liaw LH, and Jacques SL (1991) J. Invest. Dermatol 97, 874–879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jacques SL, McAuliffe DJ, Blank IH, and Parrish JA, (1987) J. Invest. Dermatol 88, 88–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Malak H, Gryczynski I, Lakowicz JR, Meyer GJ, and Castellano FN (1997) J. Fluoresc 7(2), 107–112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Guo X-Q, Castellano FN, Li L, and Lakowicz JR (1998) Anal. Chem 70(3), 632–637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Szmacinski H, Castellano FN, Terpetschnig E, Dattelbaum JD, Lakowicz JR, and Meyer GJ, (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1383, 151–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Castellano FN, Dattelbaum JD, and Lakowicz JR (1998) Anal. Biochem 255, 165–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li L, Castellano FN, Gryczynski I, and Lakowicz JR (1999) Chem. Phys. Lipids (In press.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Paw W and Eisenberg (1997) Inorg. Chem. 36, 2287–2293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sipior J, Carter GM, Lakowicz JR, and Rao G (1996) Rev. Sci. Instrum 67(11), 3795–3798. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sipior J, Carter G, and Lakowicz JR (1997) Rev. Sci. Instrum 68, 2670–2666. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fantini S, Franceschini MA, Fishkin JB, Barbieri B, and Gratton E, (1994) Appl. Optics 33(22), 5204–5213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Szmacinski H and Lakowicz JR (1994) In Lakowicz JR (Ed) Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Vol. 4, Probe Design and Chemical Sensing, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 295–334. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tolosa L, Gryczynski I, Eichhorn LR, Dattelbaum JD, Castellano JD, Rao G, and Lakowicz JR (1999) Anal. Biochem 267, 114–120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lakowicz JR, Castellano FN, Dattelbaum JD, Tolosa L, Rao G, and Lakowicz JR (1998) Anal. Chem 70(24), 5115–5121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lakowicz JR, Dattelbaum JD, and Gryczynski I (1999) Sensors and Actuators. (Submitted for publication.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Lakowicz JR, Gryczynski I, Gryczynski Z, Tolosa L, Dattelbaum JD, and Rao G (1998) Appl. Spectroscopy 9, 1149–1157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lakowicz JR, Gryczynski I, Gryczynski Z, and Dattelbaum JD (1999) Anal. Biochem. 267, 397–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gryczynski I, Gryczynski Z, and Lakowicz JR (1999) Anal. Chem, 71, 1241–1251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]