ABSTRACT
A relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) is a very important clinical finding in neuro-ophthalmology, and is almost always accompanied by other signs of afferent visual pathway dysfunction including visual field defect, decreased acuity and abnormal colour vision. We present a case of isolated RAPD and describe the anatomic localisation of the lesion with a review of the literature for similar cases.
KEYWORDS: RAPD, midbrain, MRI
An 18-year-old healthy woman presented with worsening headaches and diplopia. She was found to have a large epidermoid cystic tumour in the posterior fossa and obstructive hydrocephalus for which she underwent subtotal surgical resection and ventriculo-peritoneal shunt insertion. She was initially seen in Neuro-ophthalmology clinic several months post-operatively. At this time, her diplopia had completely resolved. Her examination showed 20/20 visual acuity bilaterally. There was physiologic anisocoria (equal in light and dark), with the left pupil 1 mm larger than the right. There was no relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD). Oculomotor exam revealed full ductions and versions with 2 prism dioptres left hyperphoria in primary gaze and downgaze. Funduscopy was normal with no pallor or oedema of the optic nerves.
As post-operatively she was noted to have residual tumour, she was under continuous radiologic surveillance. Several years later, it was noted that the residual tumour had slightly increased in size and we were asked to reassess her for a concern of possible papilloedema. At this time, her visual acuity remained 20/20 bilaterally with physiologic anisocoria as previously noted. However, there was now an obvious left RAPD. There was no optic disc oedema or pallor on funduscopy. Oculomotor exam revealed full extraocular motility with a relatively comitant 3 prism dioptre left hyperphoria. 24–2 automated perimetry was normal bilaterally. Magnetic resonance imaging showed residual cystic tumour exerting mass effect on the brachium of the right superior colliculus (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Axial T2-weighted image (left), post-contrast axial 3D-T1 fat-saturated (upper right) and axial diffusion-weighted (bottom right) images demonstrating a residual epidermoid inclusion cyst (white arrows) within the right quadrigeminal plate cistern. It is non-enhancing, T2 hyperintense and shows restricted diffusion. Mass effect is exerted on the brachium of the superior colliculus (dashed black arrow denotes normal brachium on the left side). Afferent pupillomotor fibres within this tract have left the optic tract (solid black arrow), bypassing the lateral geniculate ganglion, on their way to the pretectum.
Discussion
Classical teaching is that an RAPD localises to the ipsilateral anterior visual pathway in conditions such as ischaemic optic neuropathy or optic neuritis. A contralateral RAPD is also seen with optic tract lesions due to the slightly unequal partitioning of fibres decussating in the optic chiasm, with approximately 53% of input coming from the nasal retina of the contralateral eye.1 This also corresponds to the larger size of the temporal visual field. Prechiasmal lesions are accompanied by ipsilateral visual field defects, most often with other signs of afferent dysfunction such as decreased colour vision and visual acuity. Optic tract lesions result in bilateral visual field defects; the optic tract syndrome consists of a triad of contralateral, incongruous homonymous hemianopia, contralateral RAPD and optic atrophy, often in a bowtie pattern in the contralateral eye due to retrograde axonal degeneration of nasal axons.2
Lesions producing an RAPD in the absence of any afferent visual dysfunction have a very specific localisation to the contralateral midbrain. In the midbrain, the small subset of retinal ganglion cells that make up the retinotectal tract separate from the remainder of the optic tract bound for the lateral geniculate nucleus. Retinotectal fibres traverse the brachium of the superior colliculus to synapse in the pretectal nucleus, which then sends bilateral projections to the Edinger-Westphal nucleus. From there, the ciliary ganglion is innervated and excitatory inputs to the pupillary constrictor as well as the ciliary muscle are activated via the oculomotor nerve.
We describe a rare case of RAPD in the absence of any other abnormality of the afferent visual pathway. There exist a small number of reported cases in the literature, summarised in the Table 1. All cases localised to the lesions in the contralateral midbrain, and often presented with other signs of midbrain pathology, most commonly superior oblique palsies and dorsal midbrain syndrome.
Table 1.
Reported cases of RAPD with otherwise normal afferent visual function.
| Reference | Age | Aetiology | Presenting Symptoms | Examination | Afferent visual function |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellis, 19843 | 19M | ?Glioma, R thalamus and pineal | L paresthesia, numbness, diplopia | L mydriasis, L sensory defect, L limb ataxia | Vision and VF stated normal |
| Johnson & Bell, 19874 | 23M | Mixed germ cell tumour of the pineal gland | Headache, diplopia | Dorsal midbrain syndrome, BSO palsy. Both resolved after resection and VP shunt leaving only RAPD | Vision 20/15, normal colour vision, VF stated normal. Normal VEP |
| Forman et al, 19905 | 33M | AVM/haemorrhage R dorsomedial thalamus, brachium of SC, central tegmental tract, red nucleus | Severe headache, diplopia, brief loss of consciousness | Full EOMs, slow upgaze, convergence-retraction nystagmus | Vision 20/20, normal colour vision, VF normal by static and kinetic perimetry |
| King et al, 19916 | 30F | Grade 2/3 glioma R thalamus, midbrain, anterior medullary velum. Hydrocephalus-resolved with VP shunt | Difficulty concentrating, headache, gait disturbance then vertical diplopia | RSO palsy, impaired upgaze, convergence-retraction nystagmus. Papilloedema initially present but resolved after shunt. L hemisensory defect | Vision 20/20, normal colour vision, VF normal by tangent screen and Goldmann |
| Eliott et al, 19917 | 27F | Astrocytoma R dorsal midbrain | Vertical diplopia | LSO palsy | Vision 20/20, normal colour vision, VF normal by static and kinetic perimetry |
| Girkin et al, 19988 | 54F | Traumatic SAH, infarction L brachium SC | Coma, later L facial weakness, diplopia | LSO, L CN 6 and 7 palsies | Vision 20/20, normal colour vision, VF normal by static and kinetic perimetry |
| Taguchi et al, 20009 | 33F | Grade 2 astrocytoma, brachium of R SC and anterior medullary velum | Fever, back pain, post-operative vertical binocular diplopia | RSO palsy | Vision 20/15, normal colour vision, VF normal by Goldmann |
| Chen et al, 200410 | 27M | Pineal tumour with compression R dorsal midbrain | Headache | EOM full, normal alignment, no nystagmus | Vision 20/20, VF full to confrontation with no formal perimetry |
| Staubach et al, 200711 | 12F | Pilocytic astrocytoma with L > R dorsal midbrain compression | Diplopia, headache | RSO palsy | Vision, colour vision and VF stated normal. Normal VEP. |
| Papageorgiou et al, 200912 | 65F | R dorsal midbrain, R basal ganglia and posterior thalamus haemorrhage | Headache, dysphagia, heaviness of L arm/leg, and numbness L side of body | Mild L arm/leg hemiparesis, L hemisensory deficit, R gaze palsy | Visual acuity 20/20, normal colour vision, VF full by static automated perimetry |
AVM: arteriovenous malformation; CN: cranial nerve; EOM: extraocular movement; L: left; R: right; RAPD: relative afferent pupillary defect; SAH: subarachnoid haemorrhage; SC: superior colliculus; SO: superior oblique; VEP: visual evoked potentials; VF: visual fields; VP: ventriculoperitoneal.
References
- 1.Kupfer C, Chumbley L, Downer J.. Quantitative histology of optic nerve, optic tract and lateral geniculate nucleus in man. J Anat. 1967;101:393–401. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rodriguez AR, Pearls RK. Oy-sters: optic tract syndrome. Neurology. 2010;75(21):e86–e87. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181feb454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ellis C. Afferent pupillary defect in pineal region tumour. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984;47:739–741. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.47.7.739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Johnson R, Bell R. Relative afferent pupillary defect in a lesion of the pretectal afferent pupillary pathway. Can J Ophthalmol. 1987;22:282–284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Forman S, Behrens M, Odel J, Spector R, Hilal S. Relative afferent pupillary defect with normal visual function. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:1074–1075. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1990.01070100030017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.King J, Galetta S, Flamm E. Relative afferent pupillary defect with normal vision in a glial brainstem tumour. Neurology. 1991;41:945–946. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.6.945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Eliott D, Cunningham ET Jr, Miller NR. Fourth nerve paresis and ipsilateral relative afferent pupillary defect without visual sensory disturbance: a sign of contralateral dorsal midbrain disease. J Clin Neuroophthalmol. 1991;11:169–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Girkin C, Perry J, Miller N. A relative afferent pupillary defect without any visual sensory defect. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1544–1545. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.11.1544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Taguchi H, Kashii S, Kikuchi M, Yasuyoshi H, Honda Y. Superior oblique paresis with contralateral relative afferent pupillary defect. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:927–929. doi: 10.1007/s004170000206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen CJ, Scheufele M, Sheth M, Torabi A, Hogan N, Frohman EM. Isolated relative afferent pupillary defect secondary to contralateral midbrain compression. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:1451–1453. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.9.1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Staubach F, Pieh C, Maier P, Lagreze WA. Relative afferent pupillary defect with normal vision and vertical strabismus-implications for pupillary pathway anatomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:321–323. doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0500-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Papageorgiou E, Wermund T, Wilhelm H. Pupil perimetry demonstrates hemifield pupillary hypokinesia in a patient with a pretectal lesion causing a relative afferent pupil defect but no visual field loss. J Neuroophthalmol. 2009;29:33–36. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e318198cb8c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
