Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 May 6;15(5):e0232213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232213

An integrated model of the younger generation’s online shopping behavior based on empirical evidence gathered from an emerging economy

Van Thac Dang 1, Jianming Wang 2,*, Thinh Truong Vu 3
Editor: Baogui Xin4
PMCID: PMC7202652  PMID: 32374783

Abstract

The younger generation is the largest Internet user group in China. They are the first generation to grow up with computers, the Internet, smartphones, online social media, and online shopping. The individuals that belong to this generational cohort have one thing in common—their online shopping behavior. To understand the shopping behavior of the younger Chinese generation, this study draws on the theoretical foundation of generational cohort theory. This study proposes an integrated model that examines the effects of information adoption, personalized service, perceived switching risk, and habitual behavior on purchase intention in the online shopping environment. Survey data have been collected from 407 Chinese people that belong to the post-90s generation. Structural equation modeling is used to analyze the data. Empirical findings show that information adoption, personalized service, and perceived switching risk are the most important predictors of online purchase intention. However, habitual behavior is negatively related to online purchase intention.

1. Introduction

Recent Internet technologies have provided an important vehicle for commercial transaction around the world. Internet commerce refers to the transaction of products and services via the Internet [1]. Internet commerce enables simple, easy, and cheap methods for consumers and business firms to interact and conduct business electronically [2]. The Internet is altering the nature of customer shopping behavior and our society [3]. Furthermore, China has become the world’s second largest economy and the biggest Internet market [4]. According to the China E-commerce Research Center, Internet users in China have increased from 731 million in 2016 to 772 million in 2017, thereby accounting for over 59.4% of its population. Chinese online shopping users have reached 533 million in 2017 and 560 million in 2018. In addition, online retail sales have increased to nearly 1.1 trillion US dollars in 2017, accounting for 19.6% of its total retail sales. These retail sales are expected to reach nearly 1.5 trillion US dollars in 2018. E-commerce B2C is expected to be the fastest growing segment of the retail industry in China. Therefore, e-commerce B2C holds its high promises for both academic researchers and business managers to explore the high-potential e-commerce market in China.

A growing number of research has started to examine China’s e-commerce market [513]. However, prior studies on China’s e-commerce market tend to treat China consumers as an ethnically homogenous group [14]. Bilgihan [15] has stated that generational cohorts have different values, attitudes, preferences, and shopping behaviors. Business managers must understand such differences and provide suitable products and services for different consumer groups. According to the China Internet Network Information Center, Chinese internet users, aged 20 to 29 years old, account for 30% of China’s population. These are the largest Internet users group in China. As reported in mass media, the younger Chinese generation takes smartphones, tablets, wireless Internet, and digital media for granted, blending the online worlds seamlessly as they socialize and shop [16]. The gap between China’s new and older generations is arguably wider than that in Western societies due to the dramatic transformation in China’s economic, politics, and culture in the last decades [17]. Despite the difference between Chinese generations, a lack of social scientific research on the younger Chinese generation remains. Therefore, a comprehensive model describing the factors that influence the online shopping behavior of the younger Chinese generation will offer insights to academics and practitioners.

Generational difference has become an important gap since social value changed through generation replacement in China [18]. Transitional economy like China has witnessed a wider gap between generations after its social reform [19]. Although generational cohort theory is universally applicable in Western societies [15], an investigation of generational value differences in China would shed a new light on the generalization of the theory. Furthermore, prior researchers tend to apply generational cohort theory in the fields of organizational behavior and human resource management [17, 20]. The absence of its application in marketing management limits the generalizability of the theory. Investigating online shopping behavior of Chinese younger generation would extend generational cohort theory in the field of marketing and consumer behavior (i.e. e-commerce). In addition, a lack of empirical evidence on consumer behavior of Chinese younger generation has provided very limited knowledge to business managers’ decision making in China market. Findings of this study will contribute to enhance quality of business policy for Internet commerce in China. Therefore, this study draws on the theoretical foundation of generational cohort theory to investigate important factors that affect the online shopping behavior of the post-90s Chinese generation.

In the context of e-commerce, consumers often collect numerous information to reduce product and purchase uncertainty in their decision-making process. Information adoption can be viewed as an important factor to consumer purchase behavior because information helps consumers evaluate and understand products, services, and everything related to their purchase decisions [11]. Moreover, the absence of face-to-face interaction with consumers leads to the recognition of the inadequacy of traditional methods of service. Personalized service becomes particularly important for online stores [21]. Online retailers, such as Amazon and Jingdong.com (China), have been successful because they provide excellent, efficient, responsive, flexible, guaranteed, interactive, supportive, and informative customized service [22]. Personalized service is identified as a key factor that influences consumer behavior in the online shopping environment [21, 23]. Furthermore, in an era of rapidly changing technology and highly complex markets, consumers often have too many choices for their purchase. A diversified market with highly homogeneous products makes it easier and cheaper for customers to switch between retailers [24]. Switching risk becomes an important factor that determines consumers’ attachment and loyalty to a particular online retailer [25]. Compared with physical stores, online retailers offer an extensive selection of products, timely information, and added personalized information about the products. Online shopping also offers convenience, time saving, and low transaction costs for consumers and business firms [3]. Such tremendous benefits make consumers become accustomed to online shopping. The role of habitual behavior may also play an important role in the consumer decision-making process [26]. To advance our knowledge on the post-90s Chinese generation’s online purchase behavior, this study proposes an integrated model. This study also investigates the influence of information adoption, personalized service, perceived switching risk, and habitual behavior on purchase intention of the generational cohort born after 1990 in the online environment of China.

Following this introduction, Section 2 presents the theoretical background and research hypotheses. Section 3 covers the study methodology. Section 4 presents the results and findings. Section 5 discusses the conclusions and limitations and proposes directions for future research.

2. Theoretical background and hypotheses

2.1. Generational cohort theory and Chinese generational cohort

Generational cohort theory posits that people can be classified into different groups or generations based on the era they were born [18]. People who were born at the same time and space tend to share similar values, beliefs, and life experiences. These similarities influence people’s attitudes, preferences, and behaviors [27]. Different generations have different characteristics, expectations, and views due to their exposure to various social contexts [15]. Thus, a generational cohort is defined as a group of people who were born at approximately the same time and experienced similar social and life events that shaped their unique values, attitudes, and behaviors [28].

Studies on Chinese generational cohort have divided generations based on key historical events. Egri and Ralston [29] and Wang ([30], in Chinese) have used a sample data of employees and the general public to divide people into the Republican Era (born between 1930 and 1950), the Consolidation Era (born between 1951 and 1960), the Cultural Revolution Era (born between 1961 and 1970), and the Social Reform Era (born between 1971 and 1975). Most scholars have classified Chinese generations by decade. Liu ([20], in Chinese) and Tang et al. [17] have used employees as sample data and classified them into pre-reform generation (born before 1978), reform generation (born between 1979 and 1989), and post-reform generation (born after 1990). The most recent accepted categorization of Chinese generations is the cohorts known as the post-70s generation (born between 1970 and 1979), post-80s generation (born between 1980 and 1989), post-90s generation (born between 1990 and 1999), and post-00’s generation (born after 2000) [19].

The Chinese post-90s generation was born in an era of the Internet and digital technology. They were the first generation to grow up with computers, internet, mobile phones, online social media, and online shopping. After Jack Ma launched Alibaba.com in 1998 [31], the Chinese post-90s generation has been accompanied with the development and growth of e-commerce market in China. The members of this generational cohort have one thing in common—their comfort with online shopping. They view online shopping as an indispensable activity in their daily lives. They also have a unique attitude and value toward their shopping behaviors [17]. Therefore, e-commerce marketers should understand this generational cohort and use suitable strategies to provide products and services for them. The next section discusses the influential factors that affect the online purchasing behavior of the post-90s Chinese generation.

2.2. Information adoption theory and technology acceptance model

Information adoption theory aims to explain the important factors that drive people to adopt information or technology in an organizational context [32]. Information adoption theory is rooted in the theory of reasoned action [33] and the technology acceptance model (TAM) [34]. These models suggest that beliefs are important determinants of individuals’ intention to adopt particular information or technology. These beliefs may include perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. The former refers to “the degree to which an individual believes that using a particular technology would be free of physical and mental effort.” The latter refers to “the degree to which an individual believes that using a particular technology would enhance his or her job performance” [33]. Information adoption theory has been applied by several researchers to explain the adoption of new technology, such as software products [35, 36], spreadsheets [37], voice mail [38], and information systems [11,36]. In this study, information adoption theory and TAM are applied to explain information factors (e.g. source credibility, information quality, information usefulness, and information adoption) that affect Chinese younger generation’s shopping behavior in online environment.

2.3. Information adoption in online shopping

According to information adoption theory and TAM, the usefulness of information plays a critical role in the consumer decision-making process [39]. Sussman and Siegal [32] have argued that source credibility and information quality are two major factors that influence information usefulness. Source credibility refers to the reliability of information sources rather than the content of the information. Information quality refers to the completion, consistency, and accuracy of the information [40]. In the context of online shopping, source credibility explains that the people who provide information or comments on shopping websites are knowledgeable, reliable, and trustworthy [11]. Consumers tend to trust information from credible sources, and they often feel that source credibility is useful because it is beneficial for their purchase decisions [41]. Consequently, consumers will perceive information provided by credible people as useful information. Thus, the following hypothesis is developed.

H1. Source credibility is positively related to information usefulness

Consumers often perceive a high risk in online shopping because of the lack of face-to-face communication [42]. For example, consumers may worry that the product is counterfeit, of low-quality, or that the quality of the product is different from that of the product they viewed on the screen [25, 43]. Consequently, information quality is useful for consumers to evaluate and assess products and services online [32]. Consumers are more likely to perceive that high information quality is useful because it enhances the quality of consumer purchase decision [11]. Thus, the following hypothesis is developed.

H2. Information quality is positively related to information usefulness

In the Internet age, consumers often search numerous information from different sources before purchasing a product. When consumers lack information or obtain low-quality information, they often face higher uncertainty in their decision-making process [25]. By contrast, if consumers obtain useful information, they will better understand products, services, and other policies related to their purchase decisions [43, 44]. The influence of information usefulness on information adoption has been confirmed in prior studies [11, 39]. Based on the above argument and prior research, the following hypothesis is developed.

H3. Information usefulness is positively related to information adoption

Kotler and Armstrong [45] have argued that information search is an important step in the consumer purchase decision-making process. Seeking information helps consumers find out useful information about products. Obtaining useful information reduces information asymmetry and costs related to their decisions [46]. Furthermore, consumers adopt useful information to enhance their understanding about competing brands and their features and to advance consumer knowledge and insight about a particular product or service [41]. As a result, information adoption helps consumers reach a better purchase decision. Thus, the following hypothesis is developed.

H4. Information adoption is positively related to online purchase intention

2.4. Personalized service in online shopping

Personalized service is a process whereby products and services are tailored to match individual consumer needs and demands [47]. This service refers to the interaction between an online retailer and a customer on a one-to-one basis [48]. In the context of online shopping, personalized service is often provided in the form of personalized information, suggestions, recommendations, and multiple versions of interaction touchpoints [49]. Online retailers, such as Amazon, eBay, Taobao, and Apple, use personalized services to interact with their consumers. They allow consumers to use the embedded toolbars in their website’s portal and filter information related to the consumers’ personalized demand [50]. Furthermore, online retailers often use personalization as an effective strategy to persuade consumers to select and purchase a product or service [48]. Examples of personalization services include voice interaction or live chat between service employees and online shoppers, rapid responses to consumers’ demands, prompt delivery of products, ease of payment, ease of product return, specific services for individual consumer’s demands, and website design personalization [47, 51]. In a rapidly changing and intensely competitive environment, online retailers depend heavily on personalized services to fulfill consumer needs. One-to-one marketing helps online retailers improve their understanding of their consumers. Online retailers can also learn consumer preferences and synthesize the gathered knowledge from the personalization process into their products and services [48]. Consequently, personalized services have become an important source of competitive advantage for online retailers [3].

Levy and Weitz [3] have stated that online retailers create great benefits for consumers because they personalize merchandize offerings and information for each consumer. Consumers can obtain tremendous information to make a purchase decision or they can format the information to compare the product with other alternatives. Given the interactive nature of the personalization process, personalization raises emotional and rational assurance of consumer choices, increases consumer trust in online retailers, and enhances consumer satisfaction [52]. Personalization gives online shoppers pleasant shopping experiences that are previously available only in the physical shopping environment [53]. Personalized services make online shopping more interesting, more hedonic, and more economical for consumers [54]. As personalized service enhances the consumers’ emotional and economic benefits when shopping online [3, 53], consumer intention to purchase in online increases. Thus, the following hypothesis is developed.

H5. Personalized service is positively related to online purchase intention

According to behavioral learning theory, people often learn to perform behaviors that produce positive outcomes and avoid those that yield negative results [55,56]. A high level of personalization implies that consumers can enjoy more values and positive rewards from online retailers. For example, when consumers purchase personalized products that fit their specific demands, they can obtain high-quality services [57]. Consumers can also gain benefits from a customized combination of information, product, promotion, price, delivery, and service [58]. When consumers enjoy high-value personalized service, they tend to hold positive attitudes and trust the retailer; in addition, emotional and behavioral dependence are likely to emerge from the personalization process [54]. In other words, personalized service acts as an instrumental mechanism that induces consumer attitudes and behaviors. When consumers gain positive outcomes from the personalization process, they hold positive attitudes toward the online retailer. Over a long period and repeated process, consumers become familiar and emotionally attached to the online retailer. Consequently, personalization process leads to consumer habitual behavior because consumers depend on the personalized service of online retailers to achieve positive outcomes. Thus, the following hypothesis is developed.

H6. Personalized service is positively related to habitual behavior

In addition, a high level of personalized service makes it harder for consumers to switch to alternative retailers because personalization raises consumer perceptions of switching risk [59]. Online retailers, such as Amazon and Jingdong.com, often create personalized webpages that allow each user to generate and maintain his or her own profile page. This personalization service contributes to the creation of personal assets and reduces transaction costs for consumers [60, 61]. Furthermore, the decision-making process requires a certain amount of time, energy, and effort for consumers to be familiar with a specific online retailer. A high-level of familiarity implies that consumers obtain additional knowledge and experience from that online store. Thus, personalization makes consumers stay with familiar online stores because doing so costs less time, energy, effort, and money [59]. By contrast, if consumers switch to a new retailer, they may face higher levels of risk and uncertainty. For example, consumers may not enjoy the personalized services as much as those provided by the current online retailer; they are also unsure of the reliability and security of the new retailer; in addition, they may have to spend much more time and effort to understand the new retailer [53]. Therefore, personalization raises consumer perceptions of risk when they intend to switch to other retailers. The following hypothesis is developed.

H7. Personalized service is positively related to perceived switching risk

2.5. Perceived switching risk in online shopping

Protection motivation theory posits that threat appraisal and coping appraisal are cognitive processes aroused when an individual faces a threat, which motivates protective behavior to reduce or avoid the threat [62, 63]. Threat appraisal is determined by perceived severity and perceived susceptibility to risks. Coping appraisal is associated with self-efficacy and response efficacy [64]. Self-efficacy is the belief that individuals can successfully perform protective behavior. Response efficacy believes in the effectiveness of the protection [65]. Protection motivation theory has been used to explain and understand protection behaviors online [64, 65]; [66].

Internet shoppers often feel a high risk in online activities [65]. Several risks and threats are associated with online shoppers, such as identity theft, malware or viruses, security of financial information, and information privacy [67]. When switching to new retailers, consumers often face high risks and threats because they are uncertain about the new retailer. Consequently, they may have to spend much more time and energy to become familiar with the new retailers. According to protection motivation theory, consumers tend to perform protective behaviors to reduce risks and threats when they perceive and evaluate that switching risks are high and severe, [62, 63]. Choosing to purchase from a specific store will be effective if the current online retailer provides reliability and high-quality products and services and if consumers are familiar with that retailer [43, 68]. By contrast, when switching costs are low, consumers may try to purchase from new retailers because they can have a novel shopping experience at lower costs. Such switching behavior enhances consumers’ hedonic experience and satisfaction [3]. Thus, consumer perceptions of switching risk are expected to enhance consumers’ intention to purchase from current online stores. The following hypothesis is developed.

H8. Perceived switching risk is positively related to online purchase intention

2.6. Habitual behavior in online shopping

Habits are defined as “routine behaviors that repeat regularly and tend to occur subconsciously” [69]. Habits form as people repeatedly and consistently perform a particular behavior to meet a goal [70]. Prior studies have claimed that approximately 45% of people’s behavior is repeated almost daily and eventually turns into habitual behavior [26]. Habits have received much attention in prior studies, probably because numerous purchase and consumption activities are associated with habits [71]. For example, Seetharaman [72] has found that consumers tend to repeatedly buy the same brands of products at different shopping outlets. Khare and Inman [73] have indicated that people eat similar types of foods for days. Khalifa and Liu [74] have demonstrated that online shopping habits can positively predict online shopping satisfaction. Hsiao, Chang, and Tang [75] have suggested that habit is an important antecedent of continuous intention. Similarly, habitual purchase behavior is also an important phenomenon in the online shopping environment [71].

Habitual behavior in the online environment can be viewed as an instrumental learning process [70]. According to instrumental learning theory, consumers learn to associate positive rewards with purchase behavior when shopping online [76]. Stimuli, such as customized information and recommendations, high-quality products, low prices, and a personalized webpage, often act as rewards that induce consumer purchase behavior. If this process repeats over time, consumers will learn to link these stimuli with benefits and values when purchasing online [71]. Consequently, online purchasing behavior is strengthened and becomes habitual behavior because consumers achieve positive outcomes each time they shop online. Accordingly, this study proposes the following hypothesis (Fig 1 shows the research framework of this study).

Fig 1. Research framework.

Fig 1

H9. Habitual behavior is positively related to online purchase intention

3. Research methodology

3.1. Sample and data collection

The data were collected from four large different universities in China. We obtained approval from the Business School’s Ethical Committee of Shantou University to conduct the survey. The researchers randomly invited college students to shop on Taobao.com and accomplish the survey. The students were born after 1990, thus representing the post-90s Chinese generation. These students voluntarily participated in the survey. Our research team explained the purpose and content of the survey before the respondents completed the questionnaire. The questionnaire was anonymous. Therefore, respondents could provide their measures without privacy concerns. The volunteer sampling technique was used because of the absence of a proper sampling frame in this study. After 4 months, this study finally obtained 407 completed surveys for the data analysis.

Table 1 shows the demographic profile of the sample. The respondents comprised 116 males (28.5%) and 291 females (71.5%). Approximately 84.8% of the respondents were freshmen, 9.6% respondents were sophomores, 3.7% respondents were juniors, and the remaining 2.0% respondents were seniors. Approximately 71.0% of the respondents were 20 years old or below, 26.5% were between 21 and 24 years old, and only 2.5% were between 24 and 28 years old. About 96.6% of the respondents purchased online more than three times a month, and only 3.4% of the respondents purchased online less than three times a month.

Table 1. Demographic profile.

Variable Sample Percentage (%)
Gender
    Male 116 28.5%
    Female 291 71.5%
Education
    Freshman 345 84.8%
    Sophomore 39 9.6%
    Junior 15 3.7%
    Senior 8 2.0%
Age
    Under 20 289 71.0%
    21–24 108 26.5%
    25–28 10 2.5%
    28 or above 0 0.0%
Online shopping frequency (times/per month)
    Not at all 0 0.0%
    1 0 0.0%
    2 14 3.4%
    3 or above 393 96.6%

n = 407

3.2. Instrumentation

A preliminary version of the questionnaire was formulated using forward and backward translation from English to Chinese, and vice versa. Two professional translators who are proficient in both English and Chinese were recruited to perform the forward and backward translation. A pilot test was conducted with 26 students in the author’s university to check the appropriateness of the wording and meaning of items in the questionnaire. The survey questionnaire was divided into two parts. The first part included several questions on the demographics of the respondents. The second part comprised the measures of all constructs of our research model. All scales were adapted from prior research [32, 7783]. Table 2 lists the questionnaire items used to measure each construct. A seven-point Likert scale anchored from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree) was used to measure the model’s variables.

Table 2. Constructs and items.

Constructs Items Sources
Information Quality (IQ) The reviews on Taobao are complete. Park, Lee, and Han [81]
The reviews on Taobao are accurate.
The reviews on Taobao are objective.
Source Credibility (SC) People who left comments on Taobao are knowledgeable on their comment topics. Sussman and Siegal [32]
People who left comments on Taobao are experts on their comment topics.
People who left comments on Taobao are trustworthy.
People who left comments on Taobao are reliable.
Information Usefulness (IU) The reviews on Taobao are valuable. Sussman and Siegal [32]
The reviews on Taobao are informative.
The reviews on Taobao are helpful.
Information Adoption (IA) I will ask other consumers on Taobao to provide me with their suggestions before I go shopping. Liang, Ho, Li, and Turban [80]
I will consider the shopping experiences of other consumers on Taobao when I want to shop.
I am willing to buy the products recommended buy other consumers on Taobao.
Personalized service (CS) The products and services on Taobao are personalized to my needs. Bock, Mangus, and Folse [77]; Srinivasan, Anderson, and Ponnavolu [82]
Taobao makes purchase recommendations that match my needs.
Taobao enables me to order products that are tailor-made for me.
The advertisements and promotions that Taobao sends to me are tailored to my situation.
Taobao makes me feel that I am a unique customer.
Taobao provides many functions of online service (e.g., live chat).
I believe that Taobao is personalized to my needs.
Habitual Behavior (HB) Shopping at Taobao is something I do frequently. Gupta, Su, and Walter [79]
Shopping at Taobao is nature to me.
Shopping at Taobao is something I do without thinking.
I usually shop at Taobao because it is what I have always done.
Perceived Switching Risk (PSR) Switching to another online retailer would involve much hassle. Gefen [78]
Switching to another online retailer would take much time and effort.
Switching to another online retailer would cause many problems.
Switching to another online retailer would require much learning.
Purchase Intention (PI) If I need a product, I intend to purchase it on Taobao. Venkatesh et al., [83]
I intend to continue purchasing from Taobao in the future.
I am decided to shop on Taobao next time.
I will regularly use Taobao in the future.

3.3. Control variables

This study has contained four control variables: gender, education, age, and online shopping frequency. The participants of this study are all undergraduate students who have purchased from Taobao.com before.

4. Empirical results

4.1. Descriptive statistics

Table 3 shows the means, standard deviations, and Pearson correlations for all variables in this study. The table indicates that information quality is significantly and positively associated with information usefulness (r = 0.35, P<0.01). Source credibility is also significantly and positively associated with information usefulness (r = 0.41, P<0.01). Information usefulness is significantly and positively associated with information adoption (r = 0.48, P<0.01). Information adoption is significantly and positively associated with purchase intention (r = 0.52, P<0.01). Furthermore, personalized service is significantly and positively associated with purchase intention (r = 0.10, P<0.01). Personalized service is also significantly and positively associated with habitual behavior (r = 0.47, P<0.01) and perceived switching risk (r = 0.38, P<0.01). However, perceived switching risk (r = −0.04, n.s.) and habitual behavior (r = 0.04, n.s.) are not significantly associated with purchase intention.

Table 3. Means, standard deviations, and Pearson correlations.

Constructs Mean S.D. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. Information quality 4.31 0.86 .83
2. Source credibility 4.00 0.96 .38** .87
3. Information usefulness 4.39 0.97 .35** .41** .86
4. Information adoption 4.46 0.97 .53** .50** .48** .72
5. Personalized service 4.99 0.62 −.02 −.05 .06 .06 .74
6. Habitual behavior 5.86 0.92 .01 .03 .04 .06 .47** .79
7. Perceived switching risk 5.31 0.87 .01 −.04 .04 −.01 .38** .52** .81
8. Purchase intention 5.35 1.03 .34** .35** .49** .52** .10** .04 −.04 .87

n = 407

square roots of AVE calculated for each of the constructs are along the diagonal.

** Correlation is significant at the .01 level (two-tailed).

4.2. Measurement model

We perform a confirmatory factor analysis to test whether the data fit the hypothesized measurement model. Table 4 shows the results of the goodness-of-fit indices for the proposed research model. The hypothesized model shows satisfactory goodness-of-fit indices: χ2/d.f. ratio is approximately 2.67, GFI = 0.91, CFI = 0.92, NFI = 0.91, TLI = 0.91, and RMSEA = 0.06. These results show that the goodness-of-fit measures for the hypothesized model meet the requirements of the benchmark fit indices (χ2/d.f.<3, GFI>0.90, CFI>0.90, NFI>0.90, TLI>0.90, and RMSEA<0.08) [84, 85], thereby indicating that the conceptual model fits the data reasonably well.

Table 4. Goodness of fit.

Constructs / model χ2/d.f. P-value GFI CFI NFI TLI RMSEA
Thresholds < 3 > .05 > .90 > .90 > .90 > .90 < .08
Hypothesized Model 1260.03/472 0.000 0.91 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.06

n = 407

To test the convergent and discriminant validity of the measures, composite reliability (CR), average variance extracted (AVE), and square root of average, and variance extracted (√AVE) are examined in this study. Convergent validity is acceptable if the value of CR exceeds 0.70 and the value of AVE is above 0.50 [84, 85]. Table 5 shows that the CR and AVE values of all constructs meet these requirements. Thus, the convergent validity of the measures is sufficient in this study. Furthermore, discriminant validity is satisfactory if the square root of AVE is greater than the off-diagonal elements in the corresponding rows and columns of the Pearson correlation matrix [82]. Table 3 shows that the square roots of AVE on the main diagonal are greater than those of the off-diagonal elements in the corresponding rows and columns of the matrix. Thus, the results evidently indicate good discriminant validity of the measure in this study.

Table 5. Confirmatory factor analysis results.

Construct Item Standardized estimates CR AVE √AVE Cronbach’s α
IQ IQ1 0.75 0.87 0.69 0.83 0.87
IQ2 0.88
IQ3 0.86
SC SC1 0.82 0.93 0.76 0.87 0.93
SC2 0.84
SC3 0.91
SC4 0.91
IU IU1 0.91 0.90 0.74 0.86 0.89
IU2 0.73
IU3 0.93
IA IA1 0.80 0.76 0.52 0.72 0.76
IA2 0.65
IA3 0.71
PS PS1 0.79 0.89 0.54 0.74 0.80
PS2 0.82
PS3 0.74
PS4 0.54
PS5 0.79
PS6 0.73
PS7 0.70
HB HB1 0.86 0.87 0.63 0.79 0.88
HB2 0.86
HB3 0.77
HB4 0.67
PSR PSR1 0.91 0.88 0.65 0.81 0.89
PSR2 0.85
PSR3 0.71
PSR4 0.74
PI PI1 0.73 0.92 0.75 0.87 0.87
PI2 0.87
PI3 0.96
PI4 0.89

n = 407, IQ = information quality, SC = source credibility, IU = information usefulness, IA = information adoption, PS = personalized service, HB = habitual behavior, PSR = perceived switching risk, PI = purchase intention.

Internal consistency reliability is also tested for each construct of the proposed model. Cronbach’s alpha for information quality, source credibility, information usefulness, information adoption, personalized service, habitual behavior, perceived switching risk, and purchase intention are 0.87, 0.93, 0.89, 0.76, 0.80, 0.88, 0.89, and 0.87, respectively. These values are the suggested criteria of 0.60 [84, 85]. Thus, the results indicate good reliability of the measurement scales.

Based on the self-reported survey, common method bias is examined in this study. According to Podsakoff, MacKenzie, and Lee [86], common method variance will appear if the results of principle component analysis show a single factor from unrotated factor solution or if a first factor explains the majority of the variance. We enter all items into principle component analysis and examine the unrotated factor solution. Eight factors emerge with an eigenvalue greater than 1.0, which accounts for 70.36% of variance. The first factor accounts for 9.12% of variance. The results indicate that neither a single factor nor the first factor explains the majority of the variance. Furthermore, we perform a CFA of the one-factor model. The results of this one-factor model show a poor model fit (χ2/df = 13.13, GFI = 0.37, CFI = 0.41, NFI = 0.39, TLI = 0.37, and RMSEA = 0.17) (see Table 6). Thus, common method variance does not seem to be a serious problem in our sample data.

Table 6. Harmar’s one-factor test.

Constructs / model χ2/d.f. P-value GFI CFI NFI TLI RMSEA
Thresholds < 3 > .05 > .90 > .90 > .90 > .90 < .08
One factor model 6501.17/495 0.000 0.37 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.17

n = 407

4.3. Structural model

Structural equation model is used to test the hypotheses of our research model. The results in Fig 2 show that source credibility is significantly and positively related to information usefulness (β = 0.621, P<0.001), providing support for Hypothesis H1. Information quality is also significantly and positively related to information usefulness (β = 0.216, P<0.001), providing support for Hypothesis H2. Information usefulness is significantly and positively related to information adoption (β = 0.618, P<0.001), providing support for Hypothesis H3. Information adoption is significantly and positively related to online purchase intention (β = 0.481, P<0.001), providing support for Hypothesis H4. Furthermore, personalized service is significantly and positively related to online purchase intention (β = 0.100, P<0.05), providing support for Hypothesis H5. Personalized service is also significantly and positively related to habitual behavior (β = 0.509, P<0.001) and perceived switching risk (β = 0.508, P<0.001), providing support for Hypotheses H6 and H7. Moreover, perceived switching risk is significantly and positively related to online purchase intention (β = 0.125, P<0.05), providing support for Hypothesis H8. Finally, habitual behavior is significantly and negatively related to online purchase intention (β = −0.212, P<0.001). Thus, Hypothesis H9 is not supported.

Fig 2. The path coefficient of full model.

Fig 2

***P<0.001, **P<0.01, *P<0.05.

5. Discussion

The findings of this research offer novel and important implications for academic researchers and business managers of e-commerce. First, prior studies have ignored the online consumer behavior of the post-90s Chinese generation. Most research has investigated Chinese generational cohorts in psychology and organizational management literature [17]. This study extends generational cohort theory by examining the online shopping behavior of the post-90s Chinese generation. As far as we know, this study is one of the first to investigate this generational cohort in the marketing literature.

Second, this study enriches our understanding of the influence of online information adoption. The findings explain the impact of informational factors on the consumer decision-making process. Source credibility and information quality are two key factors that determine the usefulness of information [11]. Consumers often perceive that information and comments on shopping websites from credible people are beneficial for their purchase decisions [41]. Consumers also believe that obtaining complete and accurate information is useful to evaluate products and services [32]. Furthermore, consumers tend to adopt useful information to purchase products online [39]. Adoption of useful information reduces information asymmetry and costs related to consumer decisions [46]. Our findings provide evidence to expand our knowledge on information adoption theory and TAM in the online shopping context.

Third, this study examines the influence of personalized service in the online shopping environment. Research shows that consumers are more likely to purchase online when online retailers provide personalized services [53]. Such likelihood exists because personalized services make online shopping more interesting, more hedonic, and more economical for consumers [54]. In this study, we extend prior research in two specific areas. On the one hand, we show that personalization may lead to consumer habitual behavior because consumers repeatedly obtain high values from the personalization process, creating consumer dependence and attachment to online retailers [54]. On the other hand, we demonstrate that personalized services make switching to new retailers harder for consumers because personalization raises consumer perceptions of switching risk [59] and ensures lower level of uncertainty [53].

In addition, this study provides new perspective on the impact of perceived switching risk on online purchase intention. According to protection motivation theory [62, 63], consumers often face higher risks when switching to new retailers because they are uncertain about the new retailers [68]. One effective strategy for consumers is to purchase at current online retailers because they already know them [43]. This study extends our understanding of protection motivation theory in the online shopping environment.

Finally, this study sheds new light on the role of habitual behavior in the consumer decision-making process in the online context. Instrumental learning theory explains that consumers may obtain great benefits and values when they repeatedly purchase online [76]. If this process repeats over time, consumer’s purchasing behavior will be strengthened and will become habitual [71]. However, our findings do not support instrumental learning theory. By contrast, habitual behavior is negatively related to online purchase intention. One possible reason is that the post-90s Chinese generation tends to engage in novel-seeking behavior. They seek information, compare different websites, and do not rely on a specific online store to purchase products. Furthermore, according to two-factor theory, two separate psychological processes operate when consumers repeatedly shop at a specific online store [56]. On the one hand, repeated purchase increases consumer familiarity with the retailers. On the other hand, repeated purchase may lead to boredom when consumers shop at the same retailer over time [56]. Thus, habitual behavior probably negatively affects online purchase intention due to consumers’ boredom when they repeatedly shop online.

Findings of this study also provide implications for business practitioners. The post-90s Chinese generation is the largest user group on the Internet. Growing up with the Internet and digital technology, this generation comprise the majority of online shoppers. Given this generation’s unique values, attitudes, behaviors, and their great purchasing potential, business managers should understand and provide marketing strategies that fit their preferences. Furthermore, the findings of this study suggest the important role of informational factors. Business managers should encourage credible sources of information to post their comments and recommendations about products and services. Business managers should also collect and disseminate high-quality information on their websites.

In addition, personalized service has become an important attribute for online businesses. Online retailers that provide interactive, customized, and more responsive services can easily satisfy consumer needs. Moreover, personalized service raises consumers’ perceptions of risk when they intend to switch to other retailers. Personalization also enhances consumer dependence and attachment to current retailers. Thus, business managers should design and offer personalized strategies (e.g., personalized webpage, live chat, customized information, personal recommendations, and suggestions) to enhance their service quality for consumers.

In addition, perceived switching risk increases consumer purchase intention on current online stores. Business managers should use marketing strategies to raise consumer perceptions of risk when they switch to new retailers. Business managers should also persuade consumers through additional benefits, improved safety, and fewer costs. However, business managers should pay attention to consumer habitual behavior. Consumers may not repeatedly purchase at current stores due to their feelings of boredom. Thus, online retailers should use strategies to create novel experiences for consumers. For example, online retailers may change their website interface, provide new ads, launch different promotion activities, or create hedonic activities to attract and retain consumers.

6. Conclusions

This study aims to propose an integrated model that determines the effects of information adoption, personalized service, perceived switching risk, and habitual behavior of the online purchase intention of the post-90s Chinese generation. Findings of this study contribute to the knowledge of current literature in which it extends the generalizability of generational cohort theory in emerging economy (i.e. China) and in the fields of marketing and consumer behavior. Furthermore, findings of this study also provide implications for business managers making better decisions that provide products and services for younger consumers in China market.

Although this study has been conducted rigorously, we acknowledge a few limitations that should be addressed in future research. Data collected for the independent and dependent variables are based on self-reports, which may have biased our results due to the social desirability problem [86]. To overcome this common method bias, future research should obtain more objective and potentially less biased measures and use more advanced methods to deal with common method bias. Furthermore, our sample data are collected from college students. This may affect the generalization of this study because not all members of the post-90s generation are college students. Because population of this study was difficult to identify and sample frame was not available, selection of college students may be the most suitable sample for this study. However, this convenient sampling technique may affect the representatives and results of the analysis. Future research should use random sampling techniques to collect data from different generational cohorts and from different cultural environments (e.g., Southeast Asia, Europe, and so on). In addition, many psychological factors may affect consumers’ attitudes and behavior in online shopping environment. Future research should deal with other variables such as emotion, persuasion, perceptions, etc.

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly because they contain potentially sensitive information and will provide analysis for third-party company, DaXue Marketing Research and Management Consultant Company. Data were collected upon the approval of Shantou University Business School Ethics Committee. Data are a part of the project between Shantou Business school and the DaXue Marketing Research and Management Consultant Company (contact via Manager Dr. Vi Thanh, greenstardeng84@yahoo.com). The authors of the present study had no special access privileges in accessing data from this third-party that other interested researchers would not have. The data set (entitled "Chinese Younger Generation Online Shopping Behavior") is available from the Shantou University Business School Ethics Committee (contact via Administrator Dr. Wilson Dang, wilsondang1005@gmail.com).

Funding Statement

This study is funded by the Guangdong Higher Education Major Research Project (grand number: 2018WQNCX036) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.71673238).

References

  • 1.Kearney A. T. (2015). The 2015 global e-commerce index: global retail e-commerce keeps on clicking. Chicago: A.T. Kearney. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clemons E.K., Wilson J., Matt C., Hess T., Ren F., Jin F., et al. (2016). Global differences in online shopping behavior: understanding factors leading to trust. Journal of Management Information System, 33(4), 1117–1148. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Levy M. and Weitz B.A. (2016), Retailing Management, McGraw-Hill; Irwin. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lin J.Y. (2012). Demystifying the Chinese Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Presss. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Clemes M.D., Gan C., and Zhang J. (2014). An empirical analysis of online shopping in Beijing, China. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21, 364–375. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cui X., Zhang N., and Lowry P.B. (2017). The agent bidding habit and use model (ABHUM) and its validation in the Taobao online auction context. Information & Management, 54, 281–291. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cui X., Lai V.S., and Lowry P.B. (2016). How do bidder’s organism reactions mediate auction stimuli and bidder loyalty in online auctions? the case of Taobao in China. Information & Management, 53, 609–624. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cui G. and Liu Q. (2001). Emerging market segments in a transitional economy: a study of urban consumers in China. Journal of International Marketing, 9(1), 84–106. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hung K., Gu F., and Yim C.K. (2007). A social institutional approach to identifying generation cohorts in China with a comparison with American consumers. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5), 836–853. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lu Y. and Rucker M. (2006). Apparel acquisition via single vs. multiple channels: college students perspectives in the US and China. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13 (1), 35–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shen X-L., Zhang K.Z.K., and Zhao S.J (2016). Herd behavior in consumers’ adoption of online reviews. Journal of The Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(11), 2754–2765. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xu X., Li Q., Peng L., Hsia T-L., Huang C-J., and Wu J-H. (2017). The impact of informational incentives and social influence on consumer behavior during Alibaba’s online shopping carnival. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 245–254. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang D. (2004). Hong Konger's cross-border consumption and shopping in Shenzhen: patterns and motivations. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11(3), 149–159. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang S., Ding S., and D’Alessandro S. (2018). Are all Chinese shoppers the same? Evidence of differences in values, decision making and shopping motivations between the Han majority and other minorities in China. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 24–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bilgihan A. (2016). Gen Y customer loyalty in online shopping: an integrated model of trust, user experience and branding. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 103–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li Y. P. and Hou X. F. (2012). Structure of work values of millennial generation and mechanism of its impact on work behavior. Economic Management, 34(5), 77–86 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tang N., Wang Y., and Zhang K. (2017). Values of Chinese generation cohorts: Do they matter in the workplace? Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 143, 8–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Howe N. and Strauss W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Books. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liao X. P. and Zhang C. M. (2007). The basic law and characteristic of the vicissitude of intergenerational values in view of the context of the Chinese society since the reform and opening-up. Journal of Northwest University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 37(5), 10–15 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu F. X. (2011). Research on generational differences of employees’ work values. Doctoral dissertation. Tianjin: Nankai University; (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Eng T. (2008). E-customer service capability and value creation. Service Industries Journal, 28(9), 1293–1306. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yang Z. and Fang X. (2004). Online service quality dimensions and their relationships with satisfaction. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15(3), 302–326. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jin Y. and Oriaku N. (2013). E-service flexibility: meeting new customer demands online. Management Research Review, 36, 1123–1136. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mittal D. and Agrawal S.R. (2016). Price transparency reflects assurance and reliability. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 31, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Demangeot C. and Broderick A.J. (2010). Consumer perceptions of online shopping environments: a Gestalt approach. Psychology and Marketing, 27(2), 117–140. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wood W. and Neal D.T. (2009). The habitual consumer. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 579–592. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Parment A. (2013). Generation Y vs. Baby Boomers: shopping behavior, buyer involvement and implications for retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(2), 189–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dries N., Pepermans R., and De Kerpel E. (2008). Exploring four generations’ beliefs about career: is “satisfied” the new “successful”? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 907–928. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Egri C. P. and Ralston D. A. (2004). Generation cohorts and personal values: A comparison of China and the United States. Organization Science, 15(2), 210–220. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang L. (2002). Consumer ethnocentrism: An empirical study in China and its marketing management implications. Beijing: Economic Management Press; (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Backaler,J. (2010). Chinese E-commerce Tops $38.5 Billion; What Comes Next. Retrieved April 28, 2010, from (http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/Chinesee-commerce tops385billionwhatcomesnext.Php).
  • 32.Sussman S.W. and Siegal W.S. (2003). Informational influence in organizations: an integrated approach to knowledge adoption, Information Systems Research, 14, 47–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fishbein M. and Ajzen I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addition-Wesley. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Davis F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chau P. (1996). An empirical investigation on factors affecting the acceptance of CASE by systems developers. Information & Management, 30, 269–280. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wallace L.G. and Sheetz S.D. (2014). The adoption of software measures: a technology acceptance model (TAM) perspective. Information & Management, 51, 249–259. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mathiassen, L. (1991). Management of risk in software development, Data Processing. 19-Congress, Jyvaskyla, Finland.
  • 38.Straub D.W., Limayem M., and Karahanna-Evaristo E. (1995). Measuring system usage: implications for IS theory testing. Management Science, 41, 1328–1341. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang W. and Watts S. (2008). Capitalizing on content: information adoption in two online communities. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(2), 73–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bailey J.E. and Pearson S.W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530–545. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Petty R.E. and Cacioppo J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bilgihan A. and Bujisic M. (2015). The effect of website features in online relationship marketing: a case of online hotel booking. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(4), 222–232. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pappas I.O., Kourouthanassis P.E., Giannakos M.N., and Chrissikopoulos V. (2016). Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: the role of cognitive and affective perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 69, 794–803. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pappas I. O. (2018). User experience in personalized online shopping: a fuzzy-set analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 52(7/8), 1679–1703. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kotler P. and Armstrong G. (2016). Principles of Marketing, 16th global edition, Pearson: New York. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cheung C.M.K., Lee M.K.O., and Rabjohn N. (2008). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: the adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18(3), 229–247. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Salonen V. and Karjaluoto H. (2016). Web personalization: the state of the art and future avenues for research and practice. Telematics Inform, 33(4), 1088–1104. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pappas I.O., Kourouthanassis P.E., Giannakos M.N., and Chrissikopoulos V. (2017). Sense and sensibility in personalized e-commerce: How emotions rebalance the purchase intentions of persuaded customers. Psychology & Marketing, 34(10), 972–986. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vesanen J., Raulas M., 2006. Building bridges for personalization: a process model for marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 20(1), 5–20.49. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lv H., Wan Y., and Wu F. (2017). Effect of online personalization services on complementary firms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 24, 12–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liao Z. and Cheung M.T. (2001). Internet-based e-shopping and consumer attitudes: an empirical study. Information & Management, 38, 299–306. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ball D., Coelho P. S., and Vilares M. J. (2006). Service personalization and loyalty. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(6/7), 391–403. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lee E-J. and Park J.K. (2009). Online service personalization for apparel shopping. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16, 83–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pappas I.O., Kourouthanassis P.E., Giannakos M.N., Lekakos G. (2017). The interplay of online shopping motivations and experiential factors on personalized e-commerce: a complexity theory approach. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 730–742. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bouton M. E. (2007). Learning and behavior: A contemporary synthesis. Sunderland, MA, US: Sinauer Associates. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Solomon M.R. (2018). Consumer behavior: buying, having, and being. New York: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wolf A. and Zhang L. (2016). The effect of customization and gender on customers’ attitude. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 56, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Montgomery A.L. and Smith M.D. (2009). Prospects for personalization on the internet. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23, 130–137. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Park J-H. (2014). The effects of personalization on user continuance in social networking sites. Information Processing and Management, 50, 462–475. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Burnham T.A., Frels J.K., and Mahajan V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: a typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 109–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Huang J. and Zhou L. (2019). The dual roles of web personalization on consumer decision quality in online shopping. Internet Research, 29(6), 1280–1300. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rogers RW. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology, 91(1):93–114. 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Rogers RW. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation In: Cacioppo J, Petty R, editors. Social psychophysiology: a sourcebook. NewYork: Guilford Press, 153–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Doane A.N., Boothe L.G., Pearson M.R., and Kelley M.L. (2016). Risky electronic communication behaviors and cyberbullying victimization: an application of protection motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 508–513. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Tsai H.S., Jiang M., Alhabash S., LaRose R., Rifon N.J., and Cotton S.R. (2016). Understanding online safety behaviors: a protection motivation theory perspective. Computers & Security, 59, 138–150. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Verkijika S.F. (2018). Understanding smartphone security behaviors: an extension of the protection motivation theory with anticipated regret. Computers & Security, 000, 1–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ng B.Y, Kankanhalli A, and Xu Y.C. (2009). Studying users’ computer security behavior: a health belief perspective. Decision Support Systems, 46(4), 815–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Cao Y., Ajjan H., and Hong P. (2018). Post-purchase shipping and customer service experiences in online shopping and their impact on customer satisfaction: an empirical study with comparison. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(2), 400–416. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Shiau W.-L. and Luo M. M. (2013). Continuance intention of blog users: The impact of perceived enjoyment, habit, user involvement and blogging time. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(6), 570–583. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Carden L. and Wood W. (2018). Habit formation and change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 20, 117–122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hsu M.-H., Chang C.-M., and Chuang L.-W. (2015). Understanding the determinants of online repeat purchase intention and moderating role of habit: The case of online group-buying in Taiwan. International Journal of Information Management, 35(1), 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Seetharaman P. B. (2004). Modeling multiple sources of state dependence in random utility models: A distributed lag approach. Marketing Science, 23, 263−271. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Khare A. and Inman J.J. (2006). Habitual behavior in American eating patterns: The role of meal occasions. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 567−575. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Khalifa M. and Liu V. (2007). Online consumer retention: contingent effects of online shopping habit and online shopping experience. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(6), 780–792. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hsiao C.-H., Chang J.-J., and Tang K.-Y. (2016). Exploring the influential factors in continuance usage of mobile social Apps: Satisfaction, habit, and customer value perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 342–355. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Luque D., Beesley T., Morris R.W., Jack B.N., Griffiths O., Whitford T.J, et al. (2017). Goal-directed and habit-like modulations of stimulus processing during reinforcement learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 3009–3017. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3205-16.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bock D.E., Mangus S.M., and Folse J.A.G. (2016). The road to customer loyalty paved with service customization. Journal of Business Research, 69, 3923–3932. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gefen D. (2002). Customer loyalty in e-commerce. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 3(1), 27–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Gupta A., Su B., and Walter Z. (2004). An empirical study of consumer switching from traditional to electronic channels: a purchase-decision process perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(3), 131–161. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Liang T-P., Ho Y-T., Li Y-W., and Turban E. (2011). What drives social commerce: the role of social support and relationship quality. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 69–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Park D.H., Lee J., and Han I. (2007). The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: the moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 125–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Srinivasan S.S., Anderson R., and Ponnavolu K. (2002). Customer loyalty in e-commerce: an exploration of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Retailing, 78, 41–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., and Davis F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., and Anderson R.E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kline R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press: New York. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., and Lee J.Y. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Baogui Xin

17 Jan 2020

PONE-D-19-28617

An integrated model of younger generation's online shopping behavior based on empirical evidence gathered from an emerging economy

PLOS ONE

Dear Professor Wang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Mar 02 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Baogui Xin, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed:

https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/APJML-01-2018-0038/full/html

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

3. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: "No"

  1. Please provide an amended Funding Statement that declares *all* the funding or sources of support received during this specific study (whether external or internal to your organization) as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now.  

  1. Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funder. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section: "No"

Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.", as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now

 This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

6. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Overview and general recommendation:

Drawing upon literature of Generational cohort theory and Information adoption in online shopping, the authors claim to investigate younger generation's online shopping behavior. The authors construct a research model to investigate the effects of information adoption, personalized service, perceived switching risk, and habitual behavior on purchase intention in online shopping environment. Using the empirical data, the study suggests that information adoption, personalized service, and perceived switching risk are the most important predictors of online purchase intention. Overall, the topic seems interesting. However, the motivation, research gap, and theoretical foundations should be clearly clarified based on a thorough literature review. In addition, the representative of sample data should be revised or justified. Following are specific comments for further improving this work.

Major comments:

Introduction

Firstly, this study indicated that the gap between China’s new and older generations is arguably wider. Whereas, the research motivation is still not clearly identified. Firstly, the authors should explain why the “research gap” is important from a more theoretical perspective. Only relying on the practical and managerial importance is not a strong motivation. Secondly, how the prior studies investigate this “gap”? To conclude, the authors should clearly identify the research gap and the research motivation based on solid literature review.

Literature

The literature review should be extended and integrated to include significant missing research domains. For example, the study seems lack a theoretical foundation. The authors briefly discuss the “information adoption in online shopping”. Whereas, “information adoption in online shopping” is a very broad field, many theories are applied in this field, for example the theories from social psychology, such as the TRA as the authors mentioned, and numerous research models from the school of TAM, such as TAM1,2,3 UTAUT1.2. Consequently, the author may lose its focus by only using the very broad “beliefs � behavioral intention” linkage as its “theoretical foundation”. The authors should provide a clearer arguments and a solid literature review regarding this issue.

In addition, the authors developed a rather complicated mode having 8 constructs. But it seems difficult to find a theoretical support of why these constructs can be included in a research model. As a result, the study also fails to explain why other constructs are not included. Hence, we cannot clearly identify what theoretical contributions (not a specific construct) are made on what theory. I strongly suggest the authors to provide a missing literature review in this section

Method

1. Regarding the data sample, how do you determine the reasonable percentages of the respondents to ensure the representativeness of the lager population? For example, 1). 71.5% females are females. 2). About 96.6% of the respondents purchased online more than three times a month, and only 3.4% of the respondents purchased online less than three times a month.

2. In the research process:

2.1 Did the authors conducted pretest to ensure the content validity of the questionnaire?

2.2 How did the author deal with the Chinese-English translation of the questionnaire to ensure the quality of it?

Discussion and Conclusion

In the section of “theoretical implication” section: Instead of writing “theoretical implication”, the authors actually seem write the “Discussion” or “Conclusion” section, by explaining the new findings, how the results are in accordance with prior studies. Hence, I suggest the authors to revise the secondary heading to “discussion”.

And importantly, the authors should add one more section to present their “theoretical implication”, and discuss how this study can contribute to which theory, or which area in which way?

Reviewer #2: This study draws from generational cohort theory and examines examines online shopping behavior of the post-90s Chinese generation. The introduction gives a good presentation of the topic and problem. To improve the introduction, and highlight the contribution and novelty, some changes and revisions are needed. After introducing the problem, then discuss what some best studies in the area have done and what they have missed (research gap). Then, explain why we need to address this gap, which should be beyond the fact that no studies have examined post-90s Chinese generation. Here you need to explain why this is important to be examined (see comment below about section 2). The describe how you will address this gap and present your major findings which would make for your contribution. Also, try to keep the paragraphs at an equal size as it makes it easier to follow. For example the first is very short while the fourth is rather long.

More details are needed what needs, motivations, characteristics etc, the post-90s Chinese generation has and how Generational cohort theory affects that. It is mentioned in the end of section 2.1 that 2.2 “discusses the influential factors that affect the online purchasing behavior of the post-90s Chinese generation.” however, the arguments in 2.2 are not focused on the post-90s Chinese generation. A new section here could help to address the issue.

The method has been performed properly.

For the common method bias, Podsakoff et al (2003) actually suggest to avoid Harman’s one-factor test and propose other ones. However, there have been recent papers that deal with this issue and argue that Harman’s one factor test is appropriate. Please update this.

The findings from SEM do not mention the r-square values. This is critical information to assess the model.

As the authors have a large number of participants, you may try looking for moderating effects from the control variables (e.g., age?), or you have more details on the online shopping frequency. See some related work in the end.

Since the study highlights as its main contribution the fact that the sample is born in the 90s, more details are needed about it. Almost all of the sample (except 2.5%) is under 24, with the vast majority being under 20. Also, all participants are students. What about participants that are older than 24 but still born in the 90s? (This is very briefly mentioned in the limitations; how can you overcome this?) What is the distribution for those under 20? Maybe using year of birth instead of age would clarify such issues.

In 5.1 it is mentioned that one of the theoretical contributions is the extension of generational cohort theory because the sample was born in the 90s. It is not explained at all what the findings imply for the theory and how the study contributes to it. This is directly related with the discussion on generational cohort theory in 2.1 and around the post-90s Chinese generation that is rather limited in the background section.

Future research can be expanded as it is very limited now. The related work below can also help towards that direction.

Pappas, I. O. (2018). User experience in personalized online shopping: a fuzzy-set analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 52(7/8), 1679-1703.

Pappas, I. O., Kourouthanassis, P. E., Giannakos, M. N., & Chrissikopoulos, V. (2017). Sense and sensibility in personalized e‐commerce: How emotions rebalance the purchase intentions of persuaded customers. Psychology & Marketing, 34(10), 972-986.

Huang, J., & Zhou, L. (2019). The dual roles of web personalization on consumer decision quality in online shopping. Internet Research.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 May 6;15(5):e0232213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232213.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


3 Apr 2020

Dear Editor:

Thank you for giving us a chance to revise our manuscript entitled "An integrated model of the younger generation’s online shopping behavior based on empirical evidence gathered from an emerging economy") for PLOS ONE.

The comments from you and reviewers are very helpful. We have considered carefully the comments and revised our paper. Our point-to-point responses are shown in the following pages. We wish you would agree with us that we have addressed all the concerns in this revision.

Best regards,

Authors of the Manuscript

Reviewer #1:

Dear professor: Many thanks for your insightful and detailed comments. We have endeavored to address all of your comments in a very systematic and comprehensive manner. This has greatly improved the academic rigor and readability of our manuscript, and for this we are extremely grateful to you. Please kindly see our responses as follows

Introduction

Comment 1: Firstly, this study indicated that the gap between China’s new and older generations is arguably wider. Whereas, the research motivation is still not clearly identified. Firstly, the authors should explain why the “research gap” is important from a more theoretical perspective. Only relying on the practical and managerial importance is not a strong motivation. Secondly, how the prior studies investigate this “gap”? To conclude, the authors should clearly identify the research gap and the research motivation based on solid literature review.

Our reply: We have revised the introduction section. We added a paragraph to explain the motivation and contribution of our research to theory and practice.

“…Generational difference has become an important gap since social value changed through generation replacement in China (Howe and Strauss, 2000). Transitional economy like China has witnessed a wider gap between generations after its social reform (Liao and Zhang, 2007). Although generational cohort theory is universally applicable in Western societies (Bilgihan, 2016), an investigation of generational value differences in China would shed a new light on the generalization of the theory. Furthermore, prior researchers tend to apply generational cohort theory in the fields of organizational behavior and human resource management (Liu, 2011; Tang et al., 2017). The absence of its application in marketing management limits the generalizability of the theory. Investigating online shopping behavior of Chinese younger generation would extend generational cohort theory in the field of marketing and consumer behavior (i.e. e-commerce). In addition, a lack of empirical evidence on consumer behavior of Chinese younger generation has provided very limited knowledge to business managers’ decision making in China market. Findings of this study will contribute to enhance quality of business policy for Internet commerce in China. Therefore, this study draws on the theoretical foundation of generational cohort theory to investigate important factors that affect the online shopping behavior of the post-90s Chinese generation….” (Page. 3-4).

Literature

Comment 2: The literature review should be extended and integrated to include significant missing research domains. For example, the study seems lack a theoretical foundation. The authors briefly discuss the “information adoption in online shopping”. Whereas, “information adoption in online shopping” is a very broad field, many theories are applied in this field, for example the theories from social psychology, such as the TRA as the authors mentioned, and numerous research models from the school of TAM, such as TAM1,2,3 UTAUT1.2. Consequently, the author may lose its focus by only using the very broad “beliefs � behavioral intention” linkage as its “theoretical foundation”. The authors should provide a clearer argument and a solid literature review regarding this issue.

Our reply: Thank you for your suggestion. We have revised the literature review section. We added section 2.1. to explain the generation cohort theory and Chinese generational cohort. We also added section 2.2. to discuss information adoption theory and technology acceptance model. These theories are used as theoretical basis for the hypothesis development in our research.

Comment 3: In addition, the authors developed a rather complicated mode having 8 constructs. But it seems difficult to find a theoretical support of why these constructs can be included in a research model. As a result, the study also fails to explain why other constructs are not included. Hence, we cannot clearly identify what theoretical contributions (not a specific construct) are made on what theory. I strongly suggest the authors to provide a missing literature review in this section.

Our reply: We have proposed a complicated research model which includes several constructs. In fact, it’s very difficult to find a single theory to support the whole model and develop relationships between variables based on a single theory. Thus, we used different theories including generational cohort theory, theory of information adoption and technology acceptance model, behavioral learning theory, and protection motivation theory, etc., to infer relationships between variables. A failure of using a single theory to support the whole model is a major limitation in our research. We will try to overcome this problem in future research. Thank you!

Method

Comment 4: Regarding the data sample, how do you determine the reasonable percentages of the respondents to ensure the representativeness of the lager population? For example, 1). 71.5% females are females. 2). About 96.6% of the respondents purchased online more than three times a month, and only 3.4% of the respondents purchased online less than three times a month.

Our reply: We acknowledge that this is another limitation of our study. We could not overcome this limitation because it was very difficult to identify the population and obtain a sample frame for our study. Therefore, we selected college students as our target sample. We have revised and discussed more details about this limitation in the conclusions section.

“…Furthermore, our sample data are collected from college students. This may affect the generalization of this study because not all members of the post-90s generation are college students. Because population of this study was difficult to identify and sample frame was not available, selection of college students may be the most suitable sample for this study. However, this convenient sampling technique may affect the representatives and results of the analysis. Future research should use random sampling techniques to collect data from different generational cohorts and from different cultural environments (e.g., Southeast Asia, Europe, and so on)….” (Page. 20).

Comment 5: Did the authors conducted pretest to ensure the content validity of the questionnaire? How did the author deal with the Chinese-English translation of the questionnaire to ensure the quality of it?

Our reply: We have revised this section and discussed in more details.

“A preliminary version of the questionnaire was formulated using forward and backward translation from English to Chinese, and vice versa. Two professional translators who are proficient in both English and Chinese were recruited to perform and ensure the forward and backward translation. A pilot test was conducted with 26 students in the author’s university to check the appropriateness of the wording and meaning of items in the questionnaire….” (Page. 12).

Discussion and Conclusion

Comment 6: In the section of “theoretical implication” section: Instead of writing “theoretical implication”, the authors actually seem write the “Discussion” or “Conclusion” section, by explaining the new findings, how the results are in accordance with prior studies. Hence, I suggest the authors to revise the secondary heading to “discussion”. And importantly, the authors should add one more section to present their “theoretical implication”, and discuss how this study can contribute to which theory, or which area in which way?

Our reply: Thank you for your suggestion. We have revised the “conclusion and discussions” section. We discussed theoretical and practical implications and limitations in more details.

Reviewer #2:

Dear professor: Many thanks for your insightful and detailed comments. We have endeavored to address all of your comments in a very systematic and comprehensive manner. This has greatly improved the academic rigor and readability of our manuscript, and for this we are extremely grateful to you. Please kindly see our responses as follows

Comment 1: This study draws from generational cohort theory and examines online shopping behavior of the post-90s Chinese generation. The introduction gives a good presentation of the topic and problem. To improve the introduction, and highlight the contribution and novelty, some changes and revisions are needed. After introducing the problem, then discuss what some best studies in the area have done and what they have missed (research gap). Then, explain why we need to address this gap, which should be beyond the fact that no studies have examined post-90s Chinese generation. Here you need to explain why this is important to be examined (see comment below about section 2). The describe how you will address this gap and present your major findings which would make for your contribution. Also, try to keep the paragraphs at an equal size as it makes it easier to follow. For example, the first is very short while the fourth is rather long.

Our reply: Many thanks for your suggestions! We have revised our paper and added many paragraphs to make the paper better. In the introduction section, we added one paragraph to explain the motivation and contribution of our research. In the literature review section, we added section 2.1. to explain generational cohort theory and Chinese generational cohort. We also added section 2.2. to discuss theory of information adoption and technology acceptance model. These will help to provide theoretical basis for the hypothesis development in our research. Furthermore, we have also revised the paper so that paragraphs appear in a more balanced manner. (Page. 5-6).

Comment 2: More details are needed what needs, motivations, characteristics etc, the post-90s Chinese generation has and how Generational cohort theory affects that. It is mentioned in the end of section 2.1 that 2.2 “discusses the influential factors that affect the online purchasing behavior of the post-90s Chinese generation.” however, the arguments in 2.2 are not focused on the post-90s Chinese generation. A new section here could help to address the issue.

Our reply: Thank you. We have added section 2.2. to discuss more details about the characteristics of the post-90s Chinese generation which is the main research sample of our study. (Page. 6).

Comment 3: The method has been performed properly.

Our reply: Thank you!

Comment 4: For the common method bias, Podsakoff et al (2003) actually suggest to avoid Harman’s one-factor test and propose other ones. However, there have been recent papers that deal with this issue and argue that Harman’s one factor test is appropriate. Please update this.

Our reply: Thank you for your suggestion. We acknowledge that Harman’s one-factor model is not the most suitable method to deal with common method bias. However, with our current knowledge, we used principle factor analysis with unrotated solution and CFA with one-factor model to test the common method bias. An instrumental variable method should be more suitable, but we have not used this when we designed and selected data. We will be careful and use different methods in future research.

Comment 5: The findings from SEM do not mention the r-square values. This is critical information to assess the model.

Our reply. We have added the R-square values in the model.

Comment 6: As the authors have a large number of participants, you may try looking for moderating effects from the control variables (e.g., age?), or you have more details on the online shopping frequency. See some related work in the end.

Our reply: Thank you for your suggestions. I would be more interesting to determine some moderating variables in this study. However, considering the focus of this study and avoiding too much variables that may make confusion in this study, we only focused on relevant variables as presented in our current research model. We will deal with more variables and the moderating effect in future research. Thank you!

Comment 7: Since the study highlights as its main contribution the fact that the sample is born in the 90s, more details are needed about it. Almost all of the sample (except 2.5%) is under 24, with the vast majority being under 20. Also, all participants are students. What about participants that are older than 24 but still born in the 90s? (This is very briefly mentioned in the limitations; how can you overcome this?) What is the distribution for those under 20? Maybe using year of birth instead of age would clarify such issues.

Our reply: We acknowledge that this is a major limitation of our study. We could not overcome this limitation because it was very difficult to identify the population and obtain a sample frame for our study. Therefore, we selected college students as our target sample. We have revised and discussed more details about this limitation in the conclusions section.

“…Furthermore, our sample data are collected from college students. This may affect the generalization of this study because not all members of the post-90s generation are college students. Because population of this study was difficult to identify and sample frame was not available, selection of college students may be the most suitable sample for this study. However, this convenient sampling technique may affect the representatives and results of the analysis. Future research should use random sampling techniques to collect data from different generational cohorts and from different cultural environments (e.g., Southeast Asia, Europe, and so on)….” (Page. 20).

Comment 8: In 5.1 it is mentioned that one of the theoretical contributions is the extension of generational cohort theory because the sample was born in the 90s. It is not explained at all what the findings imply for the theory and how the study contributes to it. This is directly related with the discussion on generational cohort theory in 2.1 and around the post-90s Chinese generation that is rather limited in the background section.

Our reply: We have revised the introduction and discussion and conclusions sections. We discussed in more details the contribution to both theory and practice. (Page. 3-4 and 17-19).

Comment 9: Future research can be expanded as it is very limited now. The related work below can also help towards that direction.

Our reply. Thank you for your suggestions. We have revised the limitation and discussed in more details.

“Although this study has been conducted rigorously, we acknowledge a few limitations that should be addressed in future research. Data collected for the independent and dependent variables are based on self-reports, which may have biased our results due to the social desirability problem (Podsakoff et al., 2003). To overcome this common method bias, future research should obtain more objective and potentially less biased measures and use more advanced methods to deal with common method bias. Furthermore, our sample data are collected from college students. This may affect the generalization of this study because not all members of the post-90s generation are college students. Because population of this study was difficult to identify and sample frame was not available, selection of college students may be the most suitable sample for this study. However, this convenient sampling technique may affect the representatives and results of the analysis. Future research should use random sampling techniques to collect data from different generational cohorts and from different cultural environments (e.g., Southeast Asia, Europe, and so on). In addition, many psychological factors may affect consumers’ attitudes and behavior in online shopping environment. Future research should deal with other variables such as emotion, persuasion, perceptions, etc.” (Page. 19-20).

Decision Letter 1

Baogui Xin

10 Apr 2020

An integrated model of younger generation's online shopping behavior based on empirical evidence gathered from an emerging economy

PONE-D-19-28617R1

Dear Dr. Wang,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Baogui Xin, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Baogui Xin

23 Apr 2020

PONE-D-19-28617R1

An integrated model of the younger generation’s online shopping behavior based on empirical evidence gathered from an emerging economy

Dear Dr. Wang:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Baogui Xin

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    Data cannot be shared publicly because they contain potentially sensitive information and will provide analysis for third-party company, DaXue Marketing Research and Management Consultant Company. Data were collected upon the approval of Shantou University Business School Ethics Committee. Data are a part of the project between Shantou Business school and the DaXue Marketing Research and Management Consultant Company (contact via Manager Dr. Vi Thanh, greenstardeng84@yahoo.com). The authors of the present study had no special access privileges in accessing data from this third-party that other interested researchers would not have. The data set (entitled "Chinese Younger Generation Online Shopping Behavior") is available from the Shantou University Business School Ethics Committee (contact via Administrator Dr. Wilson Dang, wilsondang1005@gmail.com).


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES