Skip to main content
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
. 2019 Dec 24;51(2):519–525. doi: 10.1007/s42770-019-00218-8

Molecular typing of Campylobacter jejuni strains: comparison among four different techniques

Miliane Rodrigues Frazão 1, Roberto Antonio de Souza 1, Marta Inês Cazentini Medeiros 2, Sheila da Silva Duque 3, Guojie Cao 4, Marc William Allard 4, Juliana Pfrimer Falcão 1,
PMCID: PMC7203312  PMID: 31872391

Abstract

This study compared the ability of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), flaA small variable region (SVR) sequencing, analysis of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats locus by high resolution melting analysis (CRISPR-HRMA), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) for typing 111 Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from diverse sources during 20 years in Brazil. For this, we used previous results obtained by PFGE and flaA-SVR sequencing from our research group and performed CRISPR-HRMA and MLST typing for the first time. Furthermore, the discrimination index (DI) of each method was accessed. The DI for PFGE, flaA-SVR sequencing, CRISPR-HRMA, and MLST was 0.980, 0.932, 0.868, and 0.931, respectively. By PFGE and flaA-SVR sequencing, some strains from clinical and non-clinical sources and from humans and animals presented ≥ 80% similarity. Similarly, some strains from different origins presented the same ST and CRISPR-HRMA types. In conclusion, despite the different DI values, all assays provided the same epidemiological information suggesting that a potential transmission may have occurred between C. jejuni from clinical and non-clinical sources and from animals and humans in Brazil. Furthermore it was demonstrated the suitability of PFGE that should be used preferably together with MLST and/or flaA-SVR sequencing for typing C. jejuni strains.

Keywords: Campylobacter jejuni, Pulsed field gel electrophoresis, flaA-SVR sequencing, CRISPR-HRMA, MLST, Molecular epidemiology

Introduction

Campylobacter jejuni has been the most common causative agent of food-borne gastroenteritis in some countries [14]. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in the USA [3], Campylobacter spp. have been the most common bacterial pathogens that cause diarrhoea in humans and affect over two million people annually. The same trend has been observed in some European countries, which reported more than 246,000 confirmed cases in 2016 of human campylobacteriosis [4]. Based on this high incidence of Campylobacter as an important cause of disease in humans, epidemiological studies using typing methods are required in order to trace the source and the route of transmission of this important pathogen [5].

Various molecular methodologies such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), sequencing of the short variable region (SVR) of the flaA gene, analysis of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats locus by high resolution melting analysis (CRISPR-HRMA), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST), among others have been used successfully worldwide for studying the genotypic diversity and the epidemiology of C. jejuni strains [615].

PFGE was developed by Ribot et al. [8] and since then has been commonly used to study the molecular epidemiology of C. jejuni, being generally accepted as one of the most discriminatory genotyping method available for typing Campylobacter spp. [5, 16, 17]. Meinersmann and colleagues [6] described for the first time the sequencing of the SVR of the flaA gene for genotyping Campylobacter spp. strains with good discriminatory power. This technique provided a SVR allele that allows the comparison among other strains isolated worldwide deposited in a database available online (http://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/).

The suitability of HRMA in discriminating CRISPR genotypes in C. jejuni strains was demonstrated by Price et al. [10]. HRMA has been used to characterize hypervariable regions, such as CRISPR locus, that are a class of short sequence repeats that have been found in some bacterial genomes and are composed of direct repeats interspersed with non-repetitive spacer sequences [18, 19]. HRMA consists of a one-step, closed-tube post-PCR assay that detects nucleotide sequence variation within a specific locus via melting curve analysis of amplicons [20].

The MLST method was developed for C. jejuni by Dingle and colleagues [7] based on the sequencing of seven housekeeping genes. The major advantage of this technique over the other genotyping methods is its high reproducibility and the database available online (http://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/) making it possible to access the sequence type (ST) of the strains and to monitor the global trends of C. jejuni strains isolated worldwide [5, 7, 17].

Despite the high incidence of Campylobacter as a cause of human gastroenteritis in many countries, this pathogen has been underdiagnosed and underreported in Brazil. There is a paucity of studies that molecularly characterized C. jejuni strains isolated in this country [14, 2124].

Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the suitability of PFGE, flaA-SVR sequencing, HRMA of the CRISPR locus, and MLST to type C. jejuni strains isolated from diverse sources in Brazil. For this, we used previous results of our research group [14] obtained by PFGE and flaA-SVR sequencing and performed CRISPR-HRMA and MLST typing for the first time.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains

A total of 111 C. jejuni strains isolated from human diarrheal faeces (41 strains), human blood (02 strains), monkey faeces (19 strains), chicken faeces (14 strains), chicken meat (33 strains), and sewage (02 strains) from some cities in the States of Minas Gerais, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and Rio Grande do Sul located in the Southeast and South regions of Brazil between 1996 and 2016 were typed. Specifically, the strains isolated from monkeys were isolated from ones of the species Saimiri, rhesus, and cynomolgus all from captive monkeys. These strains were selected from the collections of the Campylobacter Reference Laboratories of the Oswaldo Cruz Institute of Rio de Janeiro (Fiocruz-RJ) and of the Adolfo Lutz Institute of Ribeirao Preto (IAL-RP) in Brazil. They were systematically chosen to represent isolates from sporadic cases from different clinical and non-clinical samples of the two collections of the reference laboratories mentioned above.

Molecular typing methods

The ability of PFGE and flaA-SVR sequencing to type C. jejuni strains isolated in Brazil was done based on the results reported in a previous study of our research group [14]. Furthermore, the use of HRMA of the CRISPR locus and MLST for typing C. jejuni strains is described for the first time in the present study.

PFGE typing

Agarose blocks were prepared with each 111 C. jejuni strains studied using the CDC PulseNet protocol for C. jejuni [8]. The plugs were digested with 40 U of SmaI (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 25 °C for 2 h. Macrorestriction fragments were resolved by counter-clamped homogeneous electric field electrophoresis in a CHEF-DR III apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories) as described in details by Gomes et al. [25]. The pulse times were ramped from 6.8 to 35.4 s over 19 h, as described by Ribot et al. [8]. A Salmonella serotype Braenderup H9812 strain digested with 40 U of XbaI at 37 °C for 2 h was used as a reference for the molecular mass standard. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/mL) for 30 min and destained in distilled water for 80 min. The restriction fragments were viewed under UV light. The relatedness among the PFGE profiles was analysed using the software package BioNumerics 7.0 (Applied Maths, Keistraat, Belgium). Only bands that represented fragments between 20.5 and 1135 Kb in size were included in the analysis. A dendrogram of genotypic similarity was constructed by the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) method using the Dice similarity coefficient and a position tolerance of 1.5%.

flaA-SVR sequencing

All amplifications of the flaA gene were performed according Frazão et al. [14] using the primer pair described by Wassenaar and Newell [16]. Briefly, amplicons of 1713 bp were detected by electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/mL) and observed under UV light. Thereafter, the amplicons were purified for sequencing with a PureLink Quick PCR Purification kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. For performing the sequencing of the SVR of the flaA gene, the purified amplicons were resubmitted to amplification using the primer pair described by Meinersmann et al. [6]. Automated DNA sequencing was performed with an ABI 3500xL sequencer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The dendrogram was generated with the software package BioNumerics 7.0 (Applied Maths, Keistraat, Belgium), using the UPGMA method with Jukes and Cantor distance correction model. Bootstrap values (1000 samples) were used to estimate the robustness of the phylogenetic analysis. The flaA-SVR nucleotide allele was obtained on the database found at http://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/flaA.

HRMA of the CRISPR locus

This analysis was performed using the protocol described by Souza and Falcão [26]. Briefly, the reaction was performed in 20 μl reaction mixture that contained 10 μl of MeltDoctor HRM Master Mix (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1.2 μl of each primer, 4 μl of genomic DNA at 5 ng/μL, and 3.6 μl of DNase and RNase-free distilled water. The primers used were described by Price et al. [10]. The PCR conditions were 1 cycle of 95 °C for 10 min and 45 cycles consisting of 95 °C for 15 s and 58 °C for 1 min. Real-time PCR cycling was performed on a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and the HRMA step was performed immediately after PCR cycling. The amplicons were heated to 95 °C for 10 s and then cooled to 60 °C for 1 min. The melting curves were generated by increasing the temperature from 60 to 95 °C in 1.6 °C/s increments, and fluorescence was detected every 0.1 s. The normalized melting curve data was analysed with HRM 2.0.1 software program (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The software grouped together amplicons that had similar normalized melting curves so that the differences among sets of amplicons could be easily identified.

MLST typing

For MLST we used the whole genome sequencing of the 106 C. jejuni strains carried out on a NextSeq Illumina instrument (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The Illumina reads were assembled using CLC Genomics Workbench version 10.0.1 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark) [27]. Five strains (Cj 14, Cj 21, Cj 28, CCAMP 698, and CCAMP 1065) were excluded of the MLST typing because the draft genome sequences obtained for these strains were not of good quality. Sequence types (STs) were assigned using the Campylobacter database at http://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/. New alleles and STs were submitted to the database. All the C. jejuni strains studied were registered, and their data are available in the database cited above. The draft genome sequences of all 106 C. jejuni strains were submitted to GenBank, and the accession numbers are presented in Frazão et al [14].

Discrimination index (DI)

The discriminatory index of the four techniques used in this study was assessed by Simpson’s diversity index as described by Hunter and Gaston [28].

Results

PFGE typing and flaA-SVR sequencing

By PFGE, it was obtained 64 different PFGE types, and the 111 C. jejuni strains were grouped into three main clusters designated PFGE-A, PFGE-B, and PFGE-C. The similarity of the three clusters was above 47.7%. Specifically, the cluster PFGE-A comprised 48 (43.2%) strains exhibiting a similarity of more than 50.4% isolated from humans, monkey and chicken faeces, chicken meat, and sewage in São Paulo, Minas Gerais, and Rio de Janeiro States between 1996 and 2016. Cluster PFGE-B was composed of 25 (22.5%) strains that exhibited a similarity above 52.3% isolated from humans, chicken faeces, and chicken meat between 1996 and 2015 in São Paulo, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, and Rio Grande do Sul. Cluster PFGE-C comprised 38 (34.2%) strains with a similarity above 59.9% isolated from humans, monkey and chicken faeces, chicken meat, and sewage in Minas Gerais, São Paulo, and Rio de Janeiro States between 1996 and 2011. These three main clusters were subdivided into 20 subclusters composed of some strains with ≥ 80% of similarity [14].

The dendrogram of the flaA-SVR sequencing revealed 35 SVR-types and grouped the 111 C. jejuni strains studied into two clusters named as SVR-A and SVR-B, with a similarity of more than 83.4%. Cluster SVR-A comprised 13 (11.7%) strains with ≥ 89.2% of similarity isolated from humans, monkey and chicken faeces, and sewage between 2004 and 2016 in São Paulo, Minas Gerais, and Rio de Janeiro States. Cluster SVR-B was composed of 98 (82.3%) strains exhibiting a similarity of more than 91.2%, isolated from humans, monkey and chicken faeces, chicken meat, and sewage between 1996 and 2015 in São Paulo, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, and Rio Grande do Sul States. The most frequently flaA-SVR alleles detected were gt57, gt45, gt49, and gt21 with 19, 13, 13, and 09 strains, respectively, isolated from different sources, years, and states of Brazil [14].

HRMA of the CRISPR locus

The results of the HRMA of the CRISPR locus of the 111 C. jejuni strains studied are presented in the Table 1. Twenty two different melting profiles were obtained, and each one was named as variant. Variant 3 was the most prevalent and comprised 36 strains isolated from humans (2), monkey faeces (1), chicken faeces (3), chicken meat (29), and sewage (1). The second most prevalent was variant 5 with 16 strains isolated from humans (9), monkey faeces (1), and chicken faeces (6). Variant 4 was the third most prevalent and comprised eight strains isolated from humans (2), monkey faeces (5), and sewage (1). The following nine variants were represented by only one strain of this study: V13, V15, V16, V17, V18, V19, V20, V21, and V22 (Table 1).

Table 1.

Distribution of the 22 CRISPR-HRMA variants (V) among the 111 Campylobacter jejuni strains studied

V Strains State Source Period Total
V1 Cj14 e Cj30 SP Human 2003 to 2009 2
V2 CCAMP 488, Cj03, Cj16, SP, Human 1996 to 2010 6
Cj31, CCAMP 489, CCAMP 1478 RJ
V3 Cj02, Cj12, CCAMP 476,

Human,

Animal,

Food,

The

environment

1996 to 2015 36
CCAMP 478, CCAMP 479, CCAMP 685,
CCAMP 764, CCAMP 1013, CCAMP 1014,
CCAMP 1015, CCAMP 1016, CCAMP 1018,
CCAMP 1019, CCAMP 1020, CCAMP 1021, SP,
CCAMP 1023, CCAMP 1024, CCAMP 1025, MG,
CCAMP 1032, CCAMP 1047, CCAMP 1050, RJ,
CCAMP 1051, CCAMP 1052, CCAMP 1053, RS
CCAMP 1054, CCAMP 1055, CCAMP 1056,
CCAMP 1057, CCAMP 1058, CCAMP 1059,
CCAMP 1060, CCAMP 1491, CCAMP 1518,
CCAMP 1520, CCAMP 1521, CCAMP 1523
V4 CCAMP 497, CCAMP 687, CCAMP 689, Human, animal, the environment 1997 to 1999 8
CCAMP 696, CCAMP 828, CCAMP 830, RJ
CCAMP 845, CCAMP 980
V5 Cj01, Cj04, Cj11, Cj15, Human, animal 1996 to 2016 16
Cj17, Cj22, Cj28, Cj29, SP,
CCAMP 470, CCAMP 471, CCAMP 472, MG,
CCAMP 480, CCAMP 481, CCAMP 699, RJ
CCAMP 770, CCAMP 1574
V6 Cj06, Cj07, CCAMP 789 SP,RJ Human, animal 1997 to 2003 3
V7 Cj18, Cj23, Cj24, SP, RJ

Human,

animal

1996 to 2006 5
CCAMP 621, CCAMP 698
V8 Cj20, Cj25, Cj26, Cj27, SP, MG, Human, animal 1998 to 2011 6
CCAMP 473, CCAMP 493 RJ
V9 Cj33, CCAMP 588 SP, RJ Human 2001, 2012 2
V10 CCAMP 81, CCAMP 162, CCAMP 163, RJ Animal 2003 to 2006 6
CCAMP 672, CCAMP 674, CCAMP 675
V11 Cj13, CCAMP 487, CCAMP 506, SP, RJ Human, animal, food 1996 to 2015 5
CCAMP 1065, CCAMP 1493
V12 CCAMP 159, CCAMP 700, CCAMP 991 RJ Human, animal 1999 to 2004 3
V13 CCAMP 501 RJ Human 1999 1
V14 CCAMP 594, CCAMP 1039, MG, RJ Human, animal, food 2001 to 2009 4
CCAMP 1048, CCAMP 1266
V15 Cj21 SP, RJ Human, animal 2006, 2015 1
V16 CCAMP 1061 MG Food 2009 1
V17 CCAMP 1080 RJ Animal 2009 1
V18 CCAMP 1519 RS Food 2015 1
V19 CCAMP 1140 RJ Animal 2009 1
V20 CCAMP 1466 RJ Animal 2009 1
V21 CCAMP 1497 RJ Human 2014 1
V22 CCAMP 1538 RS Animal 2015 1

V Variant, MG Minas Gerais, SP São Paulo, RJ Rio de Janeiro, RS Rio Grande do Sul

MLST

By MLST 41 different STs were observed among the 106 C. jejuni strains typed by this methodology (Table 2). Fourteen STs (8741, 8743, 8744, 8745, 8746, 8747, 8748, 8749, 8751, 8752, 9081, 9082, 9083, and 9084) were described for the first time in the Campylobacter spp. MLST database. The ST353 was the most prevalent in this present study with 22 strains isolated from humans (8), monkey faeces (2), and chicken meat (12). The second most prevalent ST was the ST8741 with one strain isolated from human and 11strains isolated from chicken meat. Thirty-one STs do not belonged to any known clonal complex (CC), and CC ST-353 and CC ST-403 were the most prevalent ones, comprising 38 and 11 strains, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2.

Distribution of the clonal complexes (CC) and sequence types (ST) of the 106 C. jejuni strains typed by MLST

CC ST Human
n = 39
Animal n = 33 Food
n = 32
The environment n = 2 Total
n = 106
21 21 1 5
50 1
1359 2
9081 1
42 469 1 2
3997 1
45 45 1 1
48 332 1 11
475 6 1
8744 3
49 8749 1 1
52 52 2 4 6
206 2086 1 1
353 353 8 2 12 38
8741 1 11
8743 1
8752 1
9083 1
9084 1
354 354 1 1 6
1723 1
3852 1
6257 1
8747 1
403 403 2 4 11
1775 2 3
443 51 3 9
463 1 5
607 607 1 1
658 1398 1 2
8745 1
NA 791 1 1
NA 1962 1 1
NA 2042 1 1
NA 2289 1 1
NA 2304 2 2
NA 6091 1 1
NA 8746 1 1
NA 8748 1 1 2
NA 8751 1 1
NA 9082 1 1

NA not assigned to any CC; New STs are in bold

Discrimination index (DI)

The DI for PFGE, flaA-SVR sequencing, HRMA of the CRISPR locus, and MLST was 0.980, 0.932, 0.868, and 0.931, respectively.

Discussion

C. jejuni is the most common causative agent of food-borne gastroenteritis in many countries [14]. However, despite the high incidence of Campylobacter as a cause of human gastroenteritis in some countries, this pathogen has been underdiagnosed and underreported in Brazil, and there is a paucity of studies that molecularly characterized C. jejuni strains in this country [14, 2124].

This study compared four methodologies in order to access the capability of these techniques to type and to differentiate 111 C. jejuni strains isolated from different sources in Brazil. For this, we used previous results of PFGE and flaA-SVR sequencing obtained by our research group [14] and also presented here CRISPR-HRMA and MLST results for the first time.

PFGE technique grouped the 111 C. jejuni strains studied in three main clusters, with a genotypic diversity above 47.7% and revealed 64 PFGE types which indicates the high diversity among the majority of the strains studied. However, these three clusters were divided in 20 subclusters that contained 99 strains with a genetic similarity ≥ 80%. The analysis of these subclusters showed a high similarity of some C. jejuni strains studied suggesting potential for transmission between clinical and non-clinical sources and between animals and humans in Brazil [14].

By flaA-SVR sequencing, the 111 C. jejuni strains studied were grouped in two clusters designated SVR-A and SVR-B comprising strains from clinical and non-clinical sources exhibiting a similarity ≥ 83.4%. Additionally, this technique showed that the most frequently detected flaA-SVR alleles were allele gt57, gt45, and gt49 with 19, 13, and 13 strains, respectively. Some strains isolated from different sources, places of isolation, and years in Brazil were indistinguishable sharing the same flaA-SVR allele [14]. In some countries, the alleles most frequently observed were different from the alleles obtained in the present work. For instance, in the USA, the most prevalent alleles were the alleles gt3 and gt6 of the C. jejuni isolated from humans [9]. According to Wassenaar and colleagues [29] in Norway, Basque Country, and Iceland, the alleles gt36, gt32, and gt34 were the most prevalent in C. jejuni strains isolated from poultry and humans. A study performed in Portugal showed that gt34 was the most frequently detected among C. jejuni strains isolated from humans, food, and animals [30].

Taken together, the results obtained by PFGE and flaA-SVR sequencing showed that some strains isolated from different sources, years, and places of isolation presented a high genotypic similarity among each other, suggesting that a potential transmission may have occurred between C. jejuni from clinical and non-clinical sources and from humans and animals over the course of 20 years in different states of the Southeast and South regions in Brazil [14].

According to Price et al. [10], HRMA technique can be used as an alternative to DNA sequencing to analyse the CRISPR locus of the C. jejuni strains. Price and colleagues [10] studied 29 C. jejuni strains and obtained by CRISPR-HRMA eight different variants or profiles. These findings of Price et al. [10] provided a novel approach for genotyping C. jejuni strains with resolving power similar to PFGE. In the present work, the analyses of the CRISPR locus was done for the first time for C. jejuni strains isolated in Brazil. However, despite of the lowest DI value, this methodology provided the same epidemiological information as the other techniques performed in the present study and can be used for complementing the PFGE findings.

The typing of the 106 C. jejuni strains by MLST showed 41 different STs of which 14 STs were deposited in the database for the first time. Some strains isolated from different sources, years, and places of isolation belonged to the same ST. For instance, the ST353 comprised strains isolated from humans, animals, and food. Similarly, ST475, ST52, ST354, ST403, and ST1775 were represented by strains isolated from humans and animals, and ST8741 and ST463 comprised strains isolated from humans and food. It is interesting to mention that according to the Campylobacter spp. database, the ST8741 is comprised exclusively by C. jejuni strains of this present study. However, the ST353 showed to be a more diverse ST-containing strains isolated in some European countries, South America, USA, Canada, and Japan, between 1982 to 2017, from different sources, such as human faeces and blood, chicken meat, chicken faeces, environmental waters, and dog, among others.

In this way, the results of HRMA of the CRISPR locus and MLST described above and presented here for the first time reinforced our previous hypothesis suggesting that a potential transmission may have occurred between C. jejuni from clinical and non-clinical sources and from humans and animals isolated during 20 years in Brazil, once a same CRISPR-HRMA variant and a same ST comprised strains isolated from clinical and non-clinical sources and from humans and animals.

According to the DI, in this present study, PFGE was the most discriminatory method for typing the C. jejuni strains studied, and the same trend was observed in other works worldwide [9, 11, 31]. Furthermore, both MLST and flaA-SVR sequencing presented almost the same discriminatory index, high reproducibility even if performed in different laboratories, and possibility of comparison with strains of other countries deposited in the databases.

In conclusion, PFGE was more efficient than flaA-SVR sequencing, HRMA of the CRISPR locus, and MLST for differentiating the C. jejuni strains studied. However, all assays provided the same epidemiological information and suggested that a potential transmission may have occurred between C. jejuni from clinical and non-clinical sources and from animals and humans in Brazil, confirming the suitability of PFGE that should be used preferably together with MLST and/or flaA-SVR sequencing for typing C. jejuni strains.

Funding information

We thank São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) (2014/13029-0) for financial support, under the supervision of J.P. Falcão. During the course of this work, M.R. Frazão was supported by a scholarship from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (141495/2016-2), and J.P. Falcão received a scientific production from the same institution (CNPq 303475/2015-3 and CNPq 304399/2018-3).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Miliane Rodrigues Frazão, Email: milianerf@yahoo.com.br.

Roberto Antonio de Souza, Email: robert_antonypco@yahoo.com.br.

Marta Inês Cazentini Medeiros, Email: micmedeiros@ial.sp.gov.br.

Sheila da Silva Duque, Email: duque@ioc.fiocruz.br.

Guojie Cao, Email: guojie.cao@fda.hhs.gov.

Marc William Allard, Email: marc.allard@fda.hhs.gov.

Juliana Pfrimer Falcão, Email: jufalcao@fcfrp.usp.br.

References

  • 1.Moore JE, Corcoran D, Dooley JS, Fanning S, Lucey B, Matsuda M, McDowell DA, Mégraud F, Millar BC, O’Mahony R, O’Riordan L, O’Rourke M, Rao JR, Rooney PJ, Sails A, Whyte P. Campylobacter. Vet Res. 2005;36:351–382. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2005012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Silva J, Leite D, Fernandes M, Mena C, Gibbs PA, Teixeira P. Campylobacter spp. as a foodborne pathogen: a review. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Food Safety. http://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/diseases/campylobacter/index.html; 2015 (Accessed 06.12.2019)
  • 4.EFSA The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2016. EFSA J. 2017;15:1–228. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ahmed MU, Dunn L, Ivanova EP. Evaluation of current molecular approaches for genotyping of Campylobacter jejuni strains. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2012;9:375–385. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2011.0988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Meinersmann RJ, Helsel LO, Fields PI, Hiett KL. Discrimination of Campylobacter jejuni isolates by flaA gene sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:2810–2814. doi: 10.1128/JCM.35.11.2810-2814.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dingle KE, Colles FM, Wareing DR, Ure R, Fox AJ, Bolton FE, Bootsma HJ, Willems RJ, Urwin R, Maiden MC. Multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter jejuni. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:14–23. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.14-23.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ribot EM, Fitzgerald C, Kubota K, Swaminathan B, Barrett TJ. Rapid pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocol for subtyping of Campylobacter jejuni. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:1889–1894. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1889-1894.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sails AD, Swaminathan B, Fields PA. Utility of multilocus sequence typing as an epidemiological tool for investigation of outbreaks of gastroenteritis caused by Campylobacter jejuni. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:4733–4739. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4733-4739.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Price EP, Smith H, Huygens F, Giffard PM. High-resolution DNA melt curve analysis of the clustered, regularly interspaced short-palindromic-repeat locus of Campylobacter jejuni. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:3431–3436. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02702-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Oporto B, Juste RA, López-Portolés JA, Hurtado A. Genetic diversity among Campylobacter jejuni isolates from healthy livestock and their links to human isolates in Spain. Zoonoses Public Health. 2011;58:365–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01373.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Llarena AK, Huneau A, Hakkinen M, Hanninen ML. Predominant Campylobacter jejuni sequence types persist in Finnish chicken production. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Marotta F, Garofolo G, Di Donato G, Aprea G, Platone I, Cianciavicchia S, Alessiani A, Di Giannatale E. Population diversity of Campylobacter jejuni in poultry and its dynamic of contamination in chicken meat. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2015/859845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Frazão MR, Medeiros MIC, Duque SS, Falcão JP. Pathogenic potential and genotypic diversity of Campylobacter jejuni: a neglected food-borne pathogen in Brazil. J Med Microbiol. 2017;66:350–359. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ohishi T, Aoki K, Ishii Y, Usui M, Tamura Y, Kawanishi M, Ohnishi K, Tateda K. Epidemiological analysis of human and chicken derived isolates of Campylobacter jejuni in Japan using next-generation sequencing. J Infect Chemother. 2017;23:165–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2016.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wassenaar TM, Newell DG. Genotyping of Campylobacter spp. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:1–9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.1.1-9.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sabat AJ, Budimir A, Nashev D, Sá-Leão R, van Dijl JM, Laurent F, Grundmann H, Friedrich AW. Overview of molecular typing methods for outbreak detection and epidemiological surveillance. Euro Surveill. 2013;18:1–15. doi: 10.2807/ese.18.04.20380-en. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Horvath P, Barrangou R. CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science. 2010;327:167–170. doi: 10.1126/science.1179555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Smith BL, Lu CP, Alvarado Bremer JR. High resolution melting analysis (HRMA): a highly sensitive inexpensive genotyping alternative for population studies. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10:193–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02726.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lévesque S, Michaud S, Arbeit RD, Frost EH. High-resolution melting system to perform multilocus sequence typing of Campylobacter jejuni. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Scarcelli E, Piatti RM, Harakava R, Miyashiro S, Fernandes FMC, Campos FR, Francisco W, Genovez ME, Richtzenhain LJ. Molecular subtyping of Campylobacter jejuni subsp jejuni strains isolated from different animal species in the state of São Paulo. Braz J Microbiol. 2005;36:378–382. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822005000400014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Scarcelli E, Piatti RM, Harakava R, Miyashiro S, Campos FR, Souza MC, Cardoso MV, Teixeira SR, Genovez ME. Use of PCR-RFLP of the flaA gene for detection and subtyping of Campylobacter jejuni strains potentially related to Guillain-Barre syndrome, isolated from humans and animals. Braz J Microbiol. 2009;40:952–959. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822009000400029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Aquino MHC, Lauria-Filgueiras AL, Matos R, Santos KR, Ferreira T, Ferreira MC, Tibana A. Diversity of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli genotypes from human and animal sources from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Res Vet Sci. 2010;88:214–217. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Silva DT, Tejada TS, Blum-Menezes D, Dias PA, Timm CD. Campylobacter species isolated from poultry and humans, and their analysis using PFGE in southern Brazil. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;217:189–194. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gomes CN, Souza RA, Passaglia J, Duque SS, Medeiros MIC, Falcão JP. Genotyping of Campylobacter coli strains isolated in Brazil suggests possible contamination amongst environmental, human, animal and food sources. J Med Microbiol. 2016;65:80–90. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Souza RA, Falcão JP. A novel high-resolution melting analysis-based method for Yersinia pseudotuberculosis genotyping. J Microbiol Methods. 2012;91:329–335. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Frazão MR, Cao G, Medeiros MIC, Duque SS, Sanchez-Leon M, Allard MW, Falcão JP. Draft genome sequences of 116 Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from humans, animals, food and the environment in Brazil. Genome Announc. 2018;6:e00250–e00218. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00250-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hunter P, Gaston M. Numeral index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson’s index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:2465–2466. doi: 10.1128/JCM.26.11.2465-2466.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wassenaar TM, Fernández-Astorga A, Alonso R, Marteinsson VT, Magnússon SH, Kristoffersen AB, Hofshagen M. Comparison of Campylobacter fla-SVR genotypes isolated from humans and poultry in three European regions. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009;49:388–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02678.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Duarte A, Santos A, Manageiro V, Martins A, Fraqueza MJ, Caniça M, Domingues FC, Olestro M. Human, food and animal Campylobacter spp. isolated in Portugal: high genetic diversity and antibiotic resistance rates. Int J Antimicrob Ag. 2014;44:306–313. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Behringer M, Miller WG, Oyarzabal OA. Typing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from live broilers and retail broiler meat by flaA-RFLP, MLST, PFGE and REP-PCR. J Microbiol Met. 2011;84:194–201. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Brazilian Society of Microbiology

RESOURCES