Skip to main content
Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock logoLink to Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
letter
. 2020 Mar 19;13(1):98–99. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_132_19

A Case of Triphasic Anaphylaxis

Ikuto Takeuchi 1, Ken-Ichi Muramatsu 1, Hiroki Nagasawa 1, Youichi Yanagawa 1
PMCID: PMC7204960  PMID: 32395061

Dear Editor,

We encountered a unique patient with triphasic anaphylaxis. A 24-year-old woman with a 2-time history of anaphylaxis due to unknown cause felt a mild fever and pharyngeal pain while working a night shift as a nurse. After her shift (in the morning), she ate some bread and then took cold medicine, which included salicylamide, acetaminophen, caffeine, and promethazine. Later that afternoon, she consumed a hydration drink due to feeling under the weather. Early the next morning, before 6 a.m., she noticed she had urticaria and vomiting when she awoke and called an ambulance.

When emergency medical technicians checked her, her systolic blood pressure was 70 mmHg, so she was transported to our acute critical care center. On arrival, her vital signs were as follows: the Glasgow Coma Scale, E4V5M6; blood pressure, 96/58 mmHg; heart rate, 100 bpm; percutaneous saturation, 99% under 6 L/min of oxygen; and body temperature, 36.5°C. She had diffuse urticaria and vomiting once. She was diagnosed with anaphylactic shock due to unknown cause and therefore underwent an intramuscular injection of 0.3 mg of adrenaline and drip infusion of 125 mg of methylpredon in, 10 mg of chlorpheniramine, and 20 mg of famotidine. After these treatments, her symptoms subsided, and she was admitted for observation. After admission at 3 p.m., she experienced diffuse urticaria and vomiting again. She, therefore, underwent 125 mg of methylpredon in every 6 h and 10 mg of chlorpheniramine and 20 mg of famotidine at every 12 h for 3 days. Her symptoms subsided again. However, she relapsed with diffuse urticaria and vomiting at 6 p.m. on the same day, which subsequently subsided. At 11 p.m. on the same day, she felt itching and had erythema, and these symptoms also subsided. This was the final event during her admission. On the 4th hospital day, she was discharged.

This is the second case of triphasic anaphylaxis. We did not consider the fourth skin change to be anaphylaxis because this event did not meet the definition of anaphylaxis.[1] Lee et al. reported factors that might predict biphasic reactions.[2] They identified 872 anaphylaxis-related visits. Among them, 36 (4.1%) visits resulted in biphasic reactions. A multivariable analysis showed that prior anaphylaxis, unknown inciting trigger, and a first adrenaline administration more than 60 min after the symptom onset were statistically significantly associated with biphasic reactions. In the present case, delayed injection of adrenaline from symptoms, prior anaphylaxis, and an unknown trigger was risk factors of repeated anaphylactic reactions. Concerning triphasic anaphylaxis, Gönül et al. reported a case of Omalizumab-induced triphasic anaphylaxis.[3] However, they did not discuss the mechanism underlying the triphasic nature. In the present case, the onset of flu may cause a deterioration in the healing process of anaphylaxis by increasing the cytokine levels. In addition, ingested drugs or foods might induce delayed allergen absorption from the bowel. Furthermore, these allergens may also take a long time to metabolize and/or be excreted until they are completely eliminated from the body. These might explain the repeated anaphylactic reaction.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

This manuscript received financial support from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)-Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities, 2015-2019 concerning (The constitution of total researching system for comprehensive disaster, medical management, corresponding to wide-scale disaster).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sampson HA, Muñoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL, Adkinson NF, Jr, Bock SA, Branum A, et al. Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: Summary report – Second national institute of allergy and infectious disease/Food allergy and anaphylaxis network symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:391–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.12.1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee S, Peterson A, Lohse CM, Hess EP, Campbell RL. Further evaluation of factors that may predict biphasic reactions in emergency department anaphylaxis patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5:1295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gönül M, Özenergün Bittacı A, Ergin C. Omalizumab-induced triphasic anaphylaxis in a patient with chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30:e135–6. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES