Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 May 7;15(5):e0232695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232695

Effects of miR-103 by negatively regulating SATB2 on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

Hao Lv 1, Huashan Yang 1, Yuanrui Wang 1,*
Editor: Gianpaolo Papaccio2
PMCID: PMC7205233  PMID: 32379794

Abstract

Background

The proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (HBMScs) are modulated by a variety of microRNAs (miRNAs). SATB homeobox 2 (SATB2) is a critical transcription factor that contributes to maintain the balance of bone metabolism. However, it remains unclear how the regulatory relationship between miR-103 and SATB2 on HBMScs proliferation and osteogenic differentiation.

Methods

HBMScs were obtained from Cyagen Biosciences and successful induced osteogenic differentiation. The proliferation abilities of HBMScs after treatment with agomiR-103 and antagomiR-103 were assessed using a cell counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay, and osteogenic differentiation was determined using alizarin red S staining and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assay. The expression levels of miR-103, SATB2, and associated osteogenic differentiation biomarkers, including RUNX family transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), bone gamma-carboxyglutamate protein (BGLAP), and secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1), were evaluated using real-time qPCR and Western blot. The regulatory sites of miR-103 on SATB2 were predicted using bioinformatics software and validated using a dual luciferase reporter assay. The underlying mechanism of miR-103 on SATB2-medicated HBMScs proliferation and osteogenic differentiation were confirmed by co-transfection of antagomiR-103 and SATB2 siRNA.

Results

The expression of miR-103 in HBMScs after induction of osteogenic differentiation was reduced in a time-dependent way. Overexpression of miR-103 by transfection of agomiR-103 suppressed HBMScs proliferation and osteogenic differentiation, while silencing of miR-103 by antagomiR-103 abolished these inhibitory effects. Consistently, RUNX2, BGLAP and SPP1 mRNA and protein expression were decreased in agomiR-103 treated HBMScs compared with those in agomiR-NC group. Meanwhile, antagomiR-103 upregulated the mRNA and protein expression levels of RUNX2, BGLAP and SPP1 in HBMScs. Further studies revealed that SATB2 was a direct target gene of miR-103. BMSCs transfected with agomiR-103 exhibited significantly downregulated protein expression level of SATB2, whereas knockdown of miR-103 promoted it. Additionally, rescue assays confirmed that silencing of SATB2 partially reversed the effects of antagomiR-103 induced HBMScs proliferation and osteogenic differentiation.

Conclusions

The present results suggested that miR-103 negatively regulates SATB2 to serve an inhibitory role in the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of HBMScs, which sheds light upon a potential therapeutic target for treating bone-related diseases.

Introduction

microRNAs (miRNAs) are a family of highly conserved, endogenously expressed, single-stranded small non-coding RNAs of ~22 nucleotides in length [1]. miRNAs act as critical regulators of gene expression through binding with the 3'-untranslated regions (UTRs) of associated mRNAs [2]. Numerous previous studies demonstrated that miRNAs are involved in a variety of cellular biological behaviors, such as proliferation, migration, autophagy, and differentiation, and aberrant expression of miRNAs can lead to the development of multiple human diseases [3]. Notably, recent studies have indicated that miRNAs are related to the dysfunction of bone metabolism [4]. Osteoporosis is a progressive systemic skeletal disease in aged people characterized by low mineral density and microarchitecture deterioration of bone tissues [5]. According to previous epidemiological statistics, osteoporosis significantly increases the risk of fractures, and causes a serious social burden worldwide [6]. Osteogenic differentiation has been regarded as a critical issue in fracture therapy of osteoporosis; however, its mechanisms remain largely unclear.

Stem cells therapy provides a promising novel approach for repairing defective tissues or organs through the transplantation of cells. Dental mesenchymal stem cells have gained considerable attention as an attractive source for maxillofacial regenerative therapy [7,8]. Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (HBMScs) are pluripotent stem cells that possess multiple differentiation potential, including chondrocytes, osteoblasts, fibroblasts, and adipocytes. Increasing data suggested that the HBMScs osteogenic differentiation is modulated by hormones, medicines, as well as growth factors [9]. Of note, several recent studies have shown that abnormal expression of miRNAs is relevant to HBMScs osteogenic differentiation [10]. For instance, Li et al [11] found that miR-21 facilitates osteogenesis of mouse BMScs by rgulating Smad7-Smad1/5/8-Runx2 pathway. Zhang et al [12] showed that miR-664a-5p promotes osteogenic differentiation of HBMScs by directly downregulating high-mobility group A2 expression. Xiao et al [13] reported that miR-483-3p regulates osteogenic differentiation of mouse BMScs by regulation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1. Additionally, Li et al [14] demonstrated that miR-92b-5p modulates melatonin-mediated osteogenic differentiation of mouse BMScs by targeting intracellular adhesion molecule-1. Therefore, identification of the potential mechanisms underlying osteogenic differentiation of HBMScs is a meaningful process that developed novel therapeutic targets for osteoporosis treatment.

miR-103 is one of the members of the miR-15/107 family [15]. Several previous reports indicated that miR-103 is involved in various human diseases, including malignancies [16], nervous system disease [17], as well as fatty liver disease [18]. Chen et al [19] found that miR-103 expression was markedly downregulated in serum samples of osteoporotic patients. Valassi et al [20] reported that circulating miR-103 is associated with bone parameters in patients with controlled acromegaly. Additionally, evidence from microarray information showed that miR-103 is significantly disregulated in senescent BMScs [21]. SATB homeobox 2 (SATB2), as a member of AT-rich binding proteins family, is a special transcription factor that improved transcription by binding with nuclear matrix-attachment regions. SATB2 was found to be a critical factor of osteoblast differentiation in bone development [22]. Nonetheless, the regulatory relationship between miR-103 and SATB2 is still unclear. Thus, the present study aimed to explore the role of miR-103 on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of HBMScs using gain- and lose-of-function assays, and to investigate the underlying molecular mechanism of miR-103 on SATB2. The findings suggested that miR-103 inhibits HBMScs proliferation and osteogenic differentiation by directly targeting SATB2, indicating regulation of miR-103 as a potential molecular therapeutic strategy for osteoporosis treatment.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and osteogenic differentiation

HBMScs were obtained from Cyagen Biosciences (HUXMA-01001, Guangzhou, China). Cells were conventional cultured in OriCell® HBMScs Complete Medium (HUXMA-90011, Cyagen Biosciences) supplemented with 10% of fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere under 5% CO2. For osteogenic differentiation, cells were treated with OriCell® Osteogenic Induction Differentiation Medium (HUXMA-90021, Cyagen Biosciences) at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 21 d incubation, and the medium was replaced every 2 d.

Oligonucleotides synthesis and cell transfection

The agomiR-103, agomiR-NC, antagomiR-103, and antagomiR-NC were designed and synthesized by GenePharma (Shanghai, China). SATB2 siRNA and corresponding siRNA NC were acquired from Hanbio Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). All oligonucleotides were dissolved to suitable concentration in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water. HBMScs in logarithmic growth phase were trypsinized and seeded in 6-well plates. When HBMScs grew to 60% cell confluence, cell were transfected with these oligonucleotides at final concentration of 200 nM using Lipofectamine 2000 Transfection Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) along with Opti-MEM Reduced Serum Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer's protocols. The cells were harvested 48 h after transfection for further experiments.

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining

The calcium deposition by osteoblasts was assessed using ALP staining. HBMSCs were placed in 12-well plates and induced osteogenic differentiation for 21 d. Then HBMSCs were rinsed three times with PBS for three times and fixed with 75% alcohol (Sigma, St Louis, CA, USA) for 30 minutes at 37°C. The fixed cells were soaked in BCIP/NBT solution (Yeasen, Shanghai, China) and washed with PBS, and then were observed with an Olympus SP-500UZ Digital Camera (Nikon, Japan).

ALP activity assay

21 days after osteogenic induction, HBMSCs were lysed with 100 μl of cell lysate buffer (21101ES60, Yeasen, Shanghai, China) for 5 min at 4°C at 37°C. Thereafter, the supernatant was added into 40 μl of the ALP substrate reaction solution (Yeasen) for 30 min at 37°C in the dark according to the manufacturer's protocols, and 150 μl of the stop buffer (Yeasen) was added to stop the reaction. Finally, the optical density (OD) values were determined by measuring the absorbance at a wavelength of 405 nm using a microplate reader (Molecular Devices LLC, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The total protein content ratio demonstrates the amounts of ALP produced by differentiated HBMSCs.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

HBMSCs was collected after oligonucleotides treatment for 48 h. The SATB2 protein expression was calculated using a commercially available ELISA kit (abx383034, Abbexa, Cambridge, UK), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Alizarin red S staining

HBMSCs were placed in 12-well plates and induced osteogenic differentiation induced osteogenic differentiation for 21 d. Mineralization of cells was detected using alizarin red S Staining. Briefly, HBMSCs were trypsinized and collected, and fixed with 75% ethanol for 1 h at 37°C. Then the cells were incubated using 40 mM alizarin red S (HUXMA-90021, Cyagen Biosciences) for 20 min at 37°C. After washes with PBS twice to rinse needless unbound stains, the stained matrix was photographed with an Olympus SP-500UZ Digital Camera (Nikon). Five images were randomly selected and analyzed for quantification of staining with an Image Pro plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA).

Real-time qPCR

Total RNA was obtained from HBMScs using Trizol Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and reverse transcribed into first-stranded cDNA sequences using a miRNA cDNA Synthesis Kit (YB130911-25, Ybscience, Shanghai, China) or a PrimeScript RT reagent kit (DRR037A, TaKaRa, Japan). The amplification of miR-103, SATB2, RUNX family transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), bone gamma-carboxyglutamate protein (BGLAP), and secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) was performed by qPCR using the cDNA as a template on the ABI 7900HT Real-Time PCR System 7900 (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The primers of the genes were listed in Table 1. Thermocycling conditions of PCR amplifications were performed in duplicate at 98°C for 15 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s, finally 4°C for 30 min. The relative levels of target gene expression were quantified using the 2-ΔΔCq method [23]. small nuclear U6 RNA was used as an internal reference for miR-103 expression analysis, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) served as an internal control for other genes.

Table 1. Forward and reverse primers listed for real-time qPCR.

Name Sequence (5’-3’)
miR-103 forward AGCAGCATTGTACAGGGCTATGA
miR-103 reverse AAGGCGAGACGCACATTCTT
SATB2 forward CCTGGCCCTGGGGTATTCT
SATB2 reverse GTGCATCTGTCACATAACTGAGG
RUNX2 forward TCTTAGAACAAATTCTGCCCTTT
RUNX2 reverse GCTTTGGTCTTGAAATCACA
BGLAP forward GCAGCTTGGTGCACACCTAG
BGLAP reverse GGAGCTGCTGTGACATCCAT
SPP1 forward CTTTCACTCCAATCGTCCCTA
SPP1 reverse GCTCTCTTTGGAATGCTCAAGT
U6 forward CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA
U6 reverse AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT
GAPDH forward ATTTGGTCGTATTGGGCG
GAPDH reverse TGGAAGATGGTGATGGGATT

Western blot

HBMScs were lysed using mammalian protein extraction RIPA reagent (Yeasen). Equivalent amounts (50 μg) of cell protein lysates were electrophoresed on an 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to PVDF membranes (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies of RUNX (1:750, ab76956, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), BGLAP (1:1000, ab13421, Abcam), SSP1 (1:750, ab69498, Abcam), and GAPDH (1:1000, 60004-1-Ig, ProteinTech Group, Chicago, IL, USA). After incubating with HRP-associated second antibodies, protein blots were observed using ECL Select Western Blotting Detection System (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) and the results were quantified using Image Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics).

Cell counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay

To measure in vitro growth of HBMScs, a CCK-8 assay was performed. A total of 7 × 103 cells were seeded into each well of 96-well plates and transfected with agomiR-103, agomiR-NC, antagomiR-103, and antagomiR-NC. On the 0, 24, 48, and 72 h of the measurement, each well was replaced with 100 μl of fresh DMEM medium containing 10 μl of the CCK-8 reagent (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan). Plates were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere for 4 h, then the medium was shaken for 20 min. Absorbances were then measured with a microplate reader (Molecular Devices LLC) at a wavelength of 450 nm.

Bioinformatics analysis and reporter vector construction

Bioinformatics analysis was conducted to predict the putative targets of miR-103 using TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org) and miranda (http://www.microrna.org). The wild type (WT) 3'-UTR of SATB2 contained the predicted miR-103 binding sites and a mutant (MUT) 3'‑UTR of SATB2 were obtained from Hanbio Biotechnology Co., Ltd. The two sequences were inserted into the psiCHECK2 vector (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) to produce SATB2 WT and MUT reporter vectors, respectively.

Luciferase reporter assay

HBMScs cells at 60% confluence in 6-well plates were co-transfected with 50 nM agomiR-103, agomiR-NC, antagomiR-103, and antagomiR-NC, along with 0.75 μg SATB2 WT or MUT reporter vectors using Lipofectamine 2000 Transfection Reagent. The Firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured 48 h after transfection using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (E1910, Promega Corporation), according the manufacturer's protocols. Renilla luciferase acted as a reporter gene and Firefly luciferase as a normalized internal reference for each individual analysis.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analyses. Each experiment was conducted and repeated for three times. The quantitative data were listed as the mean ± standard deviation. Independent Student’s t-tests and one-way ANOVA analyses were used to compare differences between groups. Differences with p-values of less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The expression of miR-103, RUNX2, BGLAP and SPP1 in HBMScs after induction of osteogenic differentiation

To assess the association between miR-103 and osteogenic differentiation, HBMScs were induced osteogenic differentiation for 21 d incubation, and the expression levels of miR-103 in HBMScs after 0, 7, 14, and 21 d induction were observed. Our results showed that the associated osteogenic differentiation biomarkers (RUNX2, BGLAP, and SPP1) mRNA expression was significantly upregulated in HBMScs on days 7, 14, and 21 as compared with undifferentiated cells on 0 day (Fig 1A–1C, p<0.05 or p<0.001), indicating osteogenic differentiation of HBMScs is successful. Notably, the results of real-time qPCR revealed that the expression level of miR-103 was markedly reduced in HBMScs during osteogenic differentiation in a time-dependent way (Fig 1D, p<0.05 or p<0.001). Consistently, the protein expression of RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1 was increased in HBMScs during osteogenic differentiation (Fig 1E and 1F, p<0.05 or p<0.01 or p<0.001). The data suggested that decreased miR-103 expression correlates with HBMScs osteogenic differentiation.

Fig 1. The expression of miR-103, RUNX2, BGLAP and SPP1 in HBMScs after induction of osteogenic differentiation.

Fig 1

Real-time qPCR was performed to detect the mRNA expression levels of RUNX2 (A), BGLAP (B) and SPP1 (C) in HBMScs after 0, 7, 14, and 21 d induction. (D) The expression of miR-103 was markedly reduced in HBMScs during osteogenic differentiation in a time-dependent way. (E and F) Western blot analysis of the protein expression of RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1 in HBMScs during osteogenic differentiation. Columns mean of three independent experiments, and bars SD. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

The modulation of miR-103 on the proliferation of HBMScs

To determine the expression levels of miR-103 following oligonucleotides transfection, real-time qPCR was conducted. The results revealed that the expression of miR-103 was 102.55 times higher in HBMScs treated with agomiR-103 than in cells transfected with the agomiR-NC group (Fig 2A, p<0.001). Also, miR-103 expression was downregulated by 76.18% in HBMScs transfected with antagomiR-103 compared with the antagomiR-NC group (Fig 2B, p<0.001). Further, the effects of the miR-103 overexpression and knockdown on the proliferation of HBMScs were determined. The results indicated that the proliferation abilities of HBMScs decreased by 14.62%, 21.70% and 34.89% at 24, 48 and 72 h posttransfection of the agomiR-103, as compared with the agomiR-NC group (Fig 2C, p<0.05 or p<0.001). Meanwhile, in HBMScs treated with antagomiR-103 the results revealed that at 24, 48 and 72 h the cell proliferation was increased by 11.24%, 30.15% and 29.44%, compared with cells transfected with the antagomiR-NC group (Fig 2D, p<0.05 or p<0.001). These data validated that miR-103 suppresses the proliferation of HBMScs.

Fig 2. miR-103 suppresses the proliferation of HBMScs.

Fig 2

(A) Elevated expression of miR-103 was determined by real-time qPCR when HBMScs were transfected with agomiR-103. (B) The expression of miR-103 was significantly downregulated in BMMSCs after treated with antagomiR-103. (C) A CCK-8 assay demonstrated that overexpression of miR-103 retarded the growth of HBMScs in vitro. (D) Knockdown of miR-103 promoted HBMScs proliferation ability. Data are shown as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001.

The effects of miR-103 overexpression and knockdown on HBMScs osteogenic differentiation

Furthermore, to better identify the functional effects of miR-103 overexpression and knockdown on the osteogenic differentiation of HBMScs, the expressions of RUNX2, BGLAP, and SPP1 were detected. As presented in Fig 3A, the mRNA expression levels of RUNX2, BGLAP, and SPP1 were markedly reduced during osteogenic differentiation in the agomiR-103 group compared with the agomiR-NC group (p<0.05 or p<0.001). Compared with the antagomiR-NC group, these genes expression were significantly increased in the antagomiR-103 treated HBMScs (Fig 3B, p<0.001). Western blot showed that agomiR-103 treatment decreased RUNX2, BGLAP, and SPP1 protein expression, whereas antagomiR-103 induced these proteins expression (Fig 3C and 3D, p<0.05 or p<0.001). To corroborate the roles of miR-103 on the osteogenic process, ALP activity and alizarin red S staining were performed. As expected, overexpression of miR-103 decreased ALP activity and mineralized-bone matrix formation in HBMScs (Fig 3E and 3F, p<0.001). Consistently, silencing of miR-103 exhibited higher ALP activity and mineralized-bone matrix formation after osteogenic differentiation of 21 days (Fig 3G and 3H, p<0.001). Thus, the above data confirmed that miR-103 negatively regulates the osteogenic differentiation of HBMScs.

Fig 3. miR-103 represses the osteogenic differentiation of HBMScs.

Fig 3

(A) Real-time qPCR analysis detected mRNA expression of RUNX2, BGLAP and SPP1 in HBMScs after treatment with agomiR-103 or agomiR-NC. (B) The RUNX2, BGLAP and SPP1 mRNA expression were significantly increased in the antagomiR-103 treated HBMScs. (C and D) Western blot analysis of the protein expression of RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1 in HBMScs by miR-103 overexpression and knockdown. (E) The ALP activity of HBMScs was significantly suppressed when miR-103 was overexpressed. (F) The osteogenic differentiation of HBMScs transfected with agomiR-103 and agomiR-NC was observed by Alizarin red S staining. (G) Knockdown of miR-103 exhibited higher ALP activity after osteogenic differentiation of 21 days. (H) Alizarin red S staining investigated the ability of mineralized-bone matrix formation in HBMScs treated with antagomiR-103 or antagomiR-NC. Columns mean of three independent experiments. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001.

The negatively regulation of miR-103 on the potential target gene SATB2

SATB2 mRNA 3’-UTR has a potential complimentary binding sites to miR-203a (Fig 4A). Real-time qPCR and ELISA were applied to investigate the relationship between the expression levels of miR-103 and SATB2. As shown in Fig 4B and 4C, enforced miR-103 expression led to downregulate the mRNA and protein expression levels of SATB2 in HBMScs; by contrast, application of antagomiR-103 to the HBMScs markedly upregulated SATB2 mRNA and protein expression (p<0.01 or p<0.001). Additional, a dual luciferase reporter assay was performed to validated the miR-103 binding sites on the 3’-UTR of SATB2 mRNA, and WT and MUT SATB2 reporter plasmids were constructed according to this sites. Results showed that in WT SATB2 reporter plasmid the relative luciferase activity significantly decreased in agomiR-103-transfected HBMScs (Fig 4D, p<0.001). With MUT SATB2 reporter plasmid, there was no significant difference in relative luciferase activity between the agomiR-103 and agomiR-NC groups. Conversely, miR-103 knockdown substantially escalated the relative luciferase activity of the SATB2 reporter plasmid that carried the WT but not MUT 3’-UTR of SATB2 (Fig 4E, p<0.001). These findings meant that SATB2 is a direct target of miR-103 in HBMScs.

Fig 4. SATB2 is a direct target of miR-103 in HBMScs.

Fig 4

(A) miR-103 target sites in the 3’-UTR of SATB2 mRNA. (B) Real-time qPCR and ELISA were conducted to examine the effects of miR-103 overexpression on the mRNA and protein expression of SATB2. GAPDH was also detected as a loading control. (C) Knockdown of miR-103 markedly upregulated SATB2 mRNA and protein expression in HBMScs. (D) Relative luciferase activity of the WT or MUT SATB2 reporter plasmids along with agomiR-103 or agomiR-NC in HBMScs was shown. Renilla luciferase activity was normalized to Firefly luciferase activity and plotted as relative luciferase activity. (E) Luciferase activities were measured in HBMScs following cotransfection with the WT or MUT SATB2 reporter plasmids and antagomiR-103 or antagomiR-NC. Data are shown as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

The regulatory mechanism of miR-103 on HBMScs proliferation and osteogenic differentiation by directly downregulating SATB2

As SATB2 plays a critical role in osteoblast differentiation of bone development, and SATB2 is a direct target of miR-103, we speculated that miR-103 may perform its functions by regulating SATB2. To verify the participation of SATB2 in the effects of miR-103 on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation, HBMScs with miR-103 knockdown were transfected with either the SATB2 siRNA or corresponding siRNA NC, and SATB2 expression was detected by real-time qPCR and ELISA. The data of results confirmed that the protein and mRNA expression levels of SATB2 in HBMScs were significantly decreased following SATB2 siRNA transfection, and SATB2 siRNA partly reversed the upregulation of SATB2 expression by antagomiR-103(Fig 5A and 5B, p<0.01 or p<0.001). Interesting, HBMScs co-transfected with antagomiR-103 and SATB2 siRNA exhibited a lower cell proliferation ability than cells transfected with antagomiR-103 and siRNA NC (Fig 5C, p<0.001). Moreover, antagomiR-103 induced HBMScs osteogenic differentiation could be partly abolished by SATB2 knockdown, as evidenced by reduction in ALP activity and mineralized matrix formation (Fig 5D and 5E, p<0.05 or p<0.001), and reduced protein expression levels of RUNX2, BGLAP, and SPP1 (Fig 5F and 5G, p<0.01 or p<0.001). Altogether, these data demonstrated miR-103 participates in the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of HBMScs by directly targeting SATB2.

Fig 5. miR-103 participates in the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of HBMScs by directly targeting SATB2.

Fig 5

(A) Expression levels of SATB2 mRNA and protein were examined after transfection of SATB2 siRNA and siRNA NC. (B) Transfection of SATB2 siRNA partly reversed the upregulation of SATB2 expression by antagomiR-103. (C) HBMScs co-transfected with antagomiR-103 and SATB2 siRNA exhibited a lower cell proliferation ability than cells transfected with antagomiR-103 and siRNA NC. (D) SATB2 knockdown partly abolished antagomiR-103 induced ALP activity of HBMScs. (E) SATB2 knockdown partly abolished antagomiR-103 induced mineralized matrix formation of HBMScs. (F and G) HBMScs treatment with antagomiR-103 and SATB2 siRNA reduced the protein expression levels of RUNX2, BGLAP, and SPP1 compared cells treated with antagomiR-103 and siRNA NC. Columns mean of three independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Discussion

BMScs are a commonly used progenitor cell source to study osteogenic differentiation in progressive systemic skeletal diseases because of their capacity for self-renewal and differentiation potential. During the past years, a number of miRNAs have been determined as key regulators of osteogenic differentiation of BMScs by modulating a series of genes expression involved in bone development [24]. Recently, study by Wang and his colleagues [25] found that steroid-induced avascular necrosis of the femoral head exhibits reduced osteogenic differentiation and promotes fat differentiation, and elevates miR-103 expression. Shen and his team members [26] reported that miR-103 expression is consistently downregulated in the forkhead transcription factor C1-overexpressing MC3T3-E1 cells. Given these findings, we explored the potential function and mechanism of miR-103 in regulating proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. We selected HBMScs to perform our experiments, and our in vitro results supported that miR-103 negatively regulates SATB2 to serve an inhibitory role in the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of HBMScs. Our findings provides more insights into the function and mechanism of miRNAs in modulating the osteogenesis of HBMScs.

miR-103 is a notable miRNA that it is evolutionarily conserved and involved in regulating cell differentiation, metabolism and immune [27]. For example, Croizier et al [28] demonstrated that miR-103/107 signal controls developmental switch of proopiomelanocortin progenitors into neuropeptide Y neurons and impacts glucose homeostasis. In another study, Holik and his team [29] reported that n(ϵ)-carboxymethyllysine promotes the miR-103/143 expression and enhances lipid accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells. In addition, recent study reported that shenmai injection improves the postoperative immune function by inhibiting differentiation into Treg cells via miR-103/GPER1 axis [30]. However, researches concerning miR-103 on osteogenesis are still very limited. Here, we examined the effect and mechanism of miR-103 on HBMScs osteogenic differentiation because we detected decreased levels of miR-103 in a time-dependent way after induction of osteogenic differentiation. Similar to our findings, Yoo et al [21] recently reported expression profiles of miRNAs in senescent BMScs. It has previously been demonstrated that upregulation expression of some osteogenic markers, including RUNX2, BGLAP, and SPP1, and accumulated mineralization of the extracellular matrix can be observed during the osteogenic differentiation [31]. Similarly, our study revealed that overexpression of miR-103 led to the decrease of ALP activity and mineralized-bone matrix formation, and reduction of RUNX2, BGLAP, and SPP1 expression, and conversely, while silencing of miR-103 elevated these phenomenon. Additional, we found HBMScs proliferation was arrested by miR-103, which is in agreement with previous study in the cancer field, where miR-103 has been shown to functions as a tumor suppressor gene in non-small cell lung cancer by directly targeting programmed cell death 10 [32]. These data confirmed that miR-103 negatively regulates the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of HBMScs.

To further to decipher mechanism, computational bioinformatics analysis was taken to identify target mRNAs that that could explain the phenotypic effects inhibited by miR-103 on HBMScs proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. One target gene of interest was the SATB2 gene (Gene ID: 23314), which located at 2q33.1 and have 18 exons. SATB2 is a member of the highly conserved AT-rich binding proteins family, and its protein is involved in transcription regulation and chromatin remodeling [33]. The mutation or deficiency of SATB2 in humans is associated with several severe diseases, such as craniofacial deformity, craniosynostosis, and mental retardation [34]. Indeed, SATB2 is documented to be a sensitive biomarker for colorectal carcinoma [35], pancreatic cancer [36] and osteosarcoma [37]. Recently, accumulating evidences confirmed that SATB2 serves a key role in bone development and osteoblastic differentiation [22]. Notably, SATB2 has been found to be targeted by several miRNAs, including miR-31 [38], miR-34a/b/c [39,40], miR-383 [41], and miR-875-5p [42]. Here, by luciferase reporter and ELISA assay, we identified that miR-103 directly bound to the SATB2 mRNA 3’-UTR and suppressed SATB2 expression in HBMScs. Moreover, rescue assays confirmed that silencing of SATB2 partially rescued the effects of miR-103 knockdown induced HBMScs proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. Our study is not without limitations. We could not determine miR-103 expression and the correlation between miR-103 and SATB2 in osteoporosis patients. Further studies are warranted to identify the regulatory mechanism of miR-103 on SATB2 in inhibiting HBMScs proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in vivo.

Taken together, the present study demonstrated that miR-103 suppresses the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of HBMScs by directly targeting SATB2. Thus, targeting miR-103 may be a molecular therapeutic strategy for bone-related diseases treatment.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Western blot analysis of the protein expression of RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1 in HBMScs.

(TIF)

Abbreviations

HBMScs

human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

miRNAs

microRNAs

SATB2

SATB homeobox 2

CCK

8cell counting Kit-8

RUNX2

RUNX family transcription factor 2

ALP

alkaline phosphatase

BGLAP

bone gamma-carboxyglutamate protein

SPP1

secreted phosphoprotein 1

UTRs

untranslated regions

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116(2):281–297. 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136(2):215–233. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mendell JT, Olson EN. MicroRNAs in stress signaling and human disease. Cell. 2012;148(6):1172–1187. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yuan Y, Zhang L, Tong X, Zhang M, Zhao Y, Guo J, et al. Mechanical Stress Regulates Bone Metabolism Through MicroRNAs. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2017;232(6):1239–1245. 10.1002/jcp.25688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tella SH, Gallagher JC. Prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2014;142(155–170. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.09.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Black DM, Rosen CJ. Clinical Practice. Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;374(3):254–262. 10.1056/NEJMcp1513724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.La Noce M, Mele L, Laino L, Iolascon G, Pieretti G, Papaccio G, et al. Cytoplasmic Interactions between the Glucocorticoid Receptor and HDAC2 Regulate Osteocalcin Expression in VPA-Treated MSCs. Cells. 2019;8(3). 10.3390/cells8030217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Winning L, El Karim IA, Lundy FT. A Comparative Analysis of the Osteogenic Potential of Dental Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cells and Development. 2019;28(15):1050–1058. 10.1089/scd.2019.0023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Caplan AI. Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Time to Change the Name! Stem Cells Translational Medicine. 2017;6(6):1445–1451. 10.1002/sctm.17-0051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li M, Zhang YL, Huang H, Xiong Y. MicroRNA-10-5p regulates differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into cardiomyocytes by targeting TBX5. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2019;23(2):479–485. 10.26355/eurrev_201901_16859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li X, Guo L, Liu Y, Su Y, Xie Y, Du J, et al. MicroRNA-21 promotes osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells via the Smad7-Smad1/5/8-Runx2 pathway. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2017;493(2):928–933. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.09.119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wu M, Wang H, Wu L, Xu B, et al. MicroRNA-664a-5p promotes osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by directly downregulating HMGA2. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2020;521(1):9–14. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.09.122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xiao Y, Guo Q, Jiang TJ, Yuan Y, Yang L, Wang GW, et al. miR4833p regulates osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by targeting STAT1. Molecular Medicine Reports. 2019;20(5):4558–4566. 10.3892/mmr.2019.10700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li Y, Feng C, Gao M, Jin M, Liu T, Yuan Y, et al. MicroRNA-92b-5p modulates melatonin-mediated osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by targeting ICAM-1. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2019;23(9):6140–6153. 10.1111/jcmm.14490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Finnerty JR, Wang WX, Hebert SS, Wilfred BR, Mao G, Nelson PT. The miR-15/107 group of microRNA genes: evolutionary biology, cellular functions, and roles in human diseases. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2010;402(3):491–509. 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.07.051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Du J, Zhang F, Zhang L, Jia Y, Chen H. MicroRNA-103 regulates the progression in endometrial carcinoma through ZO-1. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology. 2019;33:2058738419872621 10.1177/2058738419872621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moncini S, Lunghi M, Valmadre A, Grasso M, Del Vescovo V, Riva P, et al. The miR-15/107 Family of microRNA Genes Regulates CDK5R1/p35 with Implications for Alzheimer's Disease Pathogenesis. Molecular Neurobiology. 2017;54(6):4329–4342. 10.1007/s12035-016-0002-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu Q, Li Y, Shang YF, Wang HL, Yao MX. miRNA-103: molecular link between insulin resistance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2015;21(2):511–516. 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen J, Li K, Pang Q, Yang C, Zhang H, Wu F, et al. Identification of suitable reference gene and biomarkers of serum miRNAs for osteoporosis. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:36347 10.1038/srep36347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Valassi E, Garcia-Giralt N, Malouf J, Crespo I, Llauger J, Diez-Perez A, et al. Circulating miR-103a-3p and miR-660-5p are associated with bone parameters in patients with controlled acromegaly. Endocrine Connections. 2019;8(1):39–49. 10.1530/EC-18-0482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yoo JK, Kim CH, Jung HY, Lee DR, Kim JK. Discovery and characterization of miRNA during cellular senescence in bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells. Experimental Gerontology. 2014;58:139–145. 10.1016/j.exger.2014.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Conner JR, Hornick JL. SATB2 is a novel marker of osteoblastic differentiation in bone and soft tissue tumours. Histopathology. 2013;63(1):36–49. 10.1111/his.12138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nature Protocols. 2008;3(6):1101–1108. 10.1038/nprot.2008.73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fan L, Fan J, Liu Y, Li T, Xu H, Yang Y, et al. miR-450b Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation In Vitro and Enhances Bone Formation In Vivo by Targeting BMP3. Stem Cells and Development. 2018;27(9):600–611. 10.1089/scd.2017.0276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang T, Teng S, Zhang Y, Wang F, Ding H, Guo L. Role of mesenchymal stem cells on differentiation in steroid-induced avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2017;13(2):669–675. 10.3892/etm.2016.3991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shen H, Lu C, Shi J, Li H, Si J, Shen G. Satb2 expression in Foxc1-promoted osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells is negatively regulated by microRNA-103-3p. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica (Shanghai). 2019;51(6):588–597. 10.1093/abbs/gmz037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li M, Liu Z, Zhang Z, Liu G, Sun S, Sun C. miR-103 promotes 3T3-L1 cell adipogenesis through AKT/mTOR signal pathway with its target being MEF2D. Biological Chemistry. 2015;396(3):235–244. 10.1515/hsz-2014-0241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Croizier S, Park S, Maillard J, Bouret SG. Central Dicer-miR-103/107 controls developmental switch of POMC progenitors into NPY neurons and impacts glucose homeostasis. Elife. 2018;7:e40429 10.7554/eLife.40429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Holik AK, Lieder B, Kretschy N, Somoza MM, Held S, Somoza V. N() -Carboxymethyllysine Increases the Expression of miR-103/143 and Enhances Lipid Accumulation in 3T3-L1 Cells. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2016;117(10):2413–2422. 10.1002/jcb.25576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fang T, Li J, Wu X. Shenmai injection improves the postoperative immune function of papillary thyroid carcinoma patients by inhibiting differentiation into Treg cells via miR-103/GPER1 axis. Drug Development Research. 2018;79(7):324–331. 10.1002/ddr.21459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yi J, Liu D, Xiao J. LncRNA MALAT1 sponges miR-30 to promote osteoblast differentiation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells by promotion of Runx2 expression. Cell and Tissue Research. 2019;376(1):113–121. 10.1007/s00441-018-2963-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yang D, Wang JJ, Li JS, Xu QY. miR-103 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor by Directly Targeting Programmed Cell Death 10 in NSCLC. Oncology Research. 2018;26(4):519–528. 10.3727/096504017X15000757094686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chung J, Grant RI, Kaplan DR, Irwin MS. Special AT-rich binding protein-2 (SATB2) differentially affects disease-causing p63 mutant proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2011;286(47):40671–40680. 10.1074/jbc.M111.271189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhao X, Qu Z, Tickner J, Xu J, Dai K, Zhang X. The role of SATB2 in skeletogenesis and human disease. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews. 2014;25(1):35–44. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2013.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Xu M, Xu X, Pan B, Chen X, Lin K, Zeng K, et al. LncRNA SATB2-AS1 inhibits tumor metastasis and affects the tumor immune cell microenvironment in colorectal cancer by regulating SATB2. Molecular Cancer. 2019;18(1):135 10.1186/s12943-019-1063-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yu W, Ma Y, Shankar S, Srivastava RK. Role of SATB2 in human pancreatic cancer: Implications in transformation and a promising biomarker. Oncotarget. 2016;7(36):57783–57797. 10.18632/oncotarget.10860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xu HY, Fang W, Huang ZW, Lu JC, Wang YQ, Tang QL, et al. Metformin reduces SATB2-mediated osteosarcoma stem cell-like phenotype and tumor growth via inhibition of N-cadherin/NF-kB signaling. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2017;21(20):4516–4528. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhen L, Jiang X, Chen Y, Fan D. MiR-31 is involved in the high glucose-suppressed osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells by targeting Satb2. American Journal of Translational Research. 2017;9(5):2384–2393. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hao J, Zhang L, Cong G, Ren L, Hao L. MicroRNA-34b/c inhibits aldosterone-induced vascular smooth muscle cell calcification via a SATB2/Runx2 pathway. Cell and Tissue Research. 2016;366(3):733–746. 10.1007/s00441-016-2469-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wu G, Li Z, Wang Y, Ju X, Huang R. miR-34a Inhibits Cell Proliferation by Targeting SATB2 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. BioMed Research International. 2018;2018:2863902 10.1155/2018/2863902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tang J, Zhang Z, Jin X, Shi H. miR-383 negatively regulates osteoblastic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in rats by targeting Satb2. Bone. 2018;114:137–143. 10.1016/j.bone.2018.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang J, Lu Y, Ding H, Gu T, Gong C, Sun J, et al. The miR-875-5p inhibits SATB2 to promote the invasion of lung cancer cells. Gene. 2018;644:13–19. 10.1016/j.gene.2017.11.066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Gianpaolo Papaccio

17 Jan 2020

PONE-D-19-35932

Effects of miR-103 by negatively regulating SATB2 on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

PLOS ONE

Dear Mr. Wang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

This manuscript is of interest but it presents some critical point that need to be addressed in full. The Authors therefor in their revision must highlight all the changes made without any exception and answer to each point raised.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Mar 02 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Gianpaolo Papaccio, M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include a copy of Table 1 which you refer to in your text on page 10.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this manuscript the Authors investigate about the role on miR-103 in the osteogenic differentiation. The Authors propose that miR-103 interact and promote the degradation of SATB2 mRNA. Blocking miR-103 with a specific antagomir promote bone differentiation by increasing RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1, ALP activity, and matrix formation. The work is interesting in principle, however there are few concerns that need to be addressed as follows:

Fig.1 show the inverse correlation between miR-103 and RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1 expression, this data should be validated at protein level by WB, IF etc. The axis report “mRMA relative expression” I believe the Authors meant mRNA, please correct.

Fig3 A,B shows that treatment with antagomiR-103 and agomiR-103 influence RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1 expression, this result should be validated at protein level by WB,IF etc. same mistake as above about “mRMA”

Fig.3 C,E report the effect of antagomiR-103 and agomiR-103 on ALP activity, image of the cells should be shown together with plots (e.g. colorimetric assay).

Fig 3 D,F report the effect of antagomiR-103 and agomiR-103 on matrix mineralization, image of alizarin red should be shown together with plots.

Fig 5 show the effect of siRNA and anatgomiR-103 on SATB2, all this result must be validated at protein level by WB,IF etc.

Without the proper validation al these results are not reliable.

Reviewer #2: In this paper authors examined the effect and mechanism of miR-103 on HBMScs osteogenic differentiation and demonstrated the relationship between miR103 and SATB2 in osteogenic differentiation.

The paper is interesting but some corrections are needed.

Authors should add information about the therapeutic potential resulting from the use of stem cells in osteogenic differentiation (Cells. 2019 Mar; 8(3): 217; Stem Cells Dev. 2019 Aug 1;28(15):1050-1058)

Authors should indicate how many days they evaluated the effects of miR-103 overexpression and knockdown on HBMScs osteogenic differentiation through q-RT PCR.

Authors should present not only quantification but also images of Alizarin red.

Authors should perform also protein expression of osteogenic genes, such as BGLAP, OPN, BSP, after overexpression and knockdown of miR-103, through WB or IHC/IF staining.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 May 7;15(5):e0232695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232695.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


1 Apr 2020

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript. Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. The entire review has undergone major changes. The main corrections in the paper highlighted in blue. The responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:

Sincerely Yours,

Yuanrui Wang, Department of Trauma Center, Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University

E-mail: wangyrjinan@sina.com.

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Reply: We have revised the manuscript style as required.

2. Please include a copy of Table 1 which you refer to in your text on page 10.

Reply: We have added Table 1 in the revised manuscript as required.

Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: In this manuscript the Authors investigate about the role on miR-103 in the osteogenic differentiation. The Authors propose that miR-103 interact and promote the degradation of SATB2 mRNA. Blocking miR-103 with a specific antagomir promote bone differentiation by increasing RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1, ALP activity, and matrix formation. The work is interesting in principle, however there are few concerns that need to be addressed as follows:

Fig.1 show the inverse correlation between miR-103 and RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1 expression, this data should be validated at protein level by WB, IF etc. The axis report “mRMA relative expression” I believe the Authors meant mRNA, please correct.

Reply: We have performed WB experiment to detect the protein expression of RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1 in HBMScs after induction of osteogenic differentiation. Consistently, the protein expression of RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1 was increased in HBMScs during osteogenic differentiation (Fig 1E and 1F, p<0.05 or p<0.01 or p<0.001). The “mRMA” has been corrected to “mRNA” in all Figures.

Fig3 A,B shows that treatment with antagomiR-103 and agomiR-103 influence RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1 expression, this result should be validated at protein level by WB,IF etc. same mistake as above about “mRMA”

Reply: We have performed WB experiments to detect the protein expression of RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1 in HBMScs after treatment with antagomiR-103 and agomiR-103. Consistent with mRNA expression characteristics, we found that overexpression of miR-103 decreased the protein expression of RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1, while miR-103 knockdown increased these proteins expression.

Fig.3 C,E report the effect of antagomiR-103 and agomiR-103 on ALP activity, image of the cells should be shown together with plots (e.g. colorimetric assay).

Reply: We have added the images of alkaline phosphatase staining in the revised Fig 3.

Fig 3 D,F report the effect of antagomiR-103 and agomiR-103 on matrix mineralization, image of alizarin red should be shown together with plots.

Reply: We have added the images of alizarin red staining in the revised Fig 3.

Fig 5 show the effect of siRNA and anatgomiR-103 on SATB2, all this result must be validated at protein level by WB,IF etc. Without the proper validation all these results are not reliable.

Reply: The mRNA and protein expression of SATB2 in HBMScs after transfection of SATB2 siRNA and anatgomiR-103 had been validated by real-time qPCR and ELISA assays. We have performed WB experiments to detect the protein expression of RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1 after transfection of SATB2 siRNA and anatgomiR-103. we found that SATB2 siRNA partly reversed the upregulation of RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1 protein expression by antagomiR-103.

Reviewer #2: In this paper authors examined the effect and mechanism of miR-103 on HBMScs osteogenic differentiation and demonstrated the relationship between miR103 and SATB2 in osteogenic differentiation.

The paper is interesting but some corrections are needed.

Authors should add information about the therapeutic potential resulting from the use of stem cells in osteogenic differentiation (Cells. 2019 Mar; 8(3): 217; Stem Cells Dev. 2019 Aug 1;28(15):1050-1058)

Reply: We have added these information and references in the revised manuscript (page 5-6, lines 110-113).

Authors should indicate how many days they evaluated the effects of miR-103 overexpression and knockdown on HBMScs osteogenic differentiation through q-RT PCR.

Reply: HBMSCs were induced osteogenic differentiation for 21 d.

Authors should present not only quantification but also images of Alizarin red.

Reply: We have added the images of alizarin red staining in the revised Fig 3.

Authors should perform also protein expression of osteogenic genes, such as BGLAP, OPN, BSP, after overexpression and knockdown of miR-103, through WB or IHC/IF staining.

Reply: We have performed WB experiments to detect the protein expression of RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1 in HBMScs after treatment with antagomiR-103 and agomiR-103. Consistent with mRNA expression characteristics, we found that overexpression of miR-103 decreased the protein expression of RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1, while miR-103 knockdown increased these proteins expression.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Gianpaolo Papaccio

21 Apr 2020

Effects of miR-103 by negatively regulating SATB2 on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

PONE-D-19-35932R1

Dear Dr. Wang,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Gianpaolo Papaccio, M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: the authors addressed all the concerns raised by this reviewer, now the manuscript is greatly improved.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Gianpaolo Papaccio

27 Apr 2020

PONE-D-19-35932R1

Effects of miR-103 by negatively regulating SATB2 on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

Dear Dr. Wang:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Gianpaolo Papaccio

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Western blot analysis of the protein expression of RUNX, BGLAP and SSP1 in HBMScs.

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES