Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2020 May 5;86(10):e02969-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02969-19

Different Effects of Soil Fertilization on Bacterial Community Composition in the Penicillium canescens Hyphosphere and in Bulk Soil

Yuan Zhang a,#, Xiuli Hao a,b,#, Adriana M Garcia-Lemos a, Inês Nunes c, Mette H Nicolaisen a, Ole Nybroe a,
Editor: Irina S Druzhininad
PMCID: PMC7205497  PMID: 32144110

P-solubilizing Penicillium strains are introduced as biofertilizers to agricultural soils to improve plant P nutrition. Currently, little is known about the ecology of these biofertilizers, including their interactions with other soil microorganisms. This study shows that communities dominated by Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria colonize P. canescens hyphae in soil and that the compositions of these communities depend on the soil conditions. The potential of these communities for N and organic P cycling is generally higher than that of soil communities. The high potential for organic P metabolism might complement the ability of the fungus to solubilize inorganic P, and it points to the hyphosphere as a hot spot for P metabolism. Furthermore, the high potential for N fixation could indicate that P. canescens recruits bacteria that are able to improve its N nutrition. Hence, this community study identifies functional groups relevant for the future optimization of next-generation biofertilizer consortia for applications in soil.

KEYWORDS: soil fungi, baiting microcosm, phosphorus and nitrogen cycling genes, long-term soil fertilization, bacterial communities, filamentous fungi, soil microbiology

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the effects of long-term soil fertilization on the composition and potential for phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) cycling of bacterial communities associated with hyphae of the P-solubilizing fungus Penicillium canescens. Using a baiting approach, hyphosphere bacterial communities were recovered from three soils that had received long-term amendment in the field with mineral or mineral plus organic fertilizers. P. canescens hyphae recruited bacterial communities with a decreased diversity and an increased abundance of Proteobacteria relative to what was observed in soil communities. As core bacterial taxa, Delftia and Pseudomonas spp. were present in all hyphosphere samples irrespective of soil fertilization. However, the type of fertilization showed significant impacts on the diversity, composition, and distinctive taxa/operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of hyphosphere communities. The soil factors P (Olsen method), exchangeable Mg, exchangeable K, and pH were important for shaping soil and hyphosphere bacterial community compositions. An increased relative abundance of organic P metabolism genes was found in hyphosphere communities from soil that had not received P fertilizers, which could indicate P limitation near the fungal hyphae. Additionally, P. canescens hyphae recruited bacterial communities with a higher abundance of N fixation genes than found in soil communities, which might imply a role of hyphosphere communities for fungal N nutrition. Furthermore, the relative abundances of denitrification genes were greater in several hyphosphere communities, indicating an at least partly anoxic microenvironment with a high carbon-to-N ratio around the hyphae. In conclusion, soil fertilization legacy shapes P. canescens hyphosphere microbiomes and their functional potential related to P and N cycling.

IMPORTANCE P-solubilizing Penicillium strains are introduced as biofertilizers to agricultural soils to improve plant P nutrition. Currently, little is known about the ecology of these biofertilizers, including their interactions with other soil microorganisms. This study shows that communities dominated by Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria colonize P. canescens hyphae in soil and that the compositions of these communities depend on the soil conditions. The potential of these communities for N and organic P cycling is generally higher than that of soil communities. The high potential for organic P metabolism might complement the ability of the fungus to solubilize inorganic P, and it points to the hyphosphere as a hot spot for P metabolism. Furthermore, the high potential for N fixation could indicate that P. canescens recruits bacteria that are able to improve its N nutrition. Hence, this community study identifies functional groups relevant for the future optimization of next-generation biofertilizer consortia for applications in soil.

INTRODUCTION

Fungal hyphae provide a unique niche for bacterial colonization in which bacteria benefit from their fungal partner by obtaining suitable carbon (C) or energy sources from fungal exudates (1, 2). In return, the specific bacterial communities recruited by fungal hyphae may help the host fungi by accessing recalcitrant forms of soil nutrients and hence meet the host’s nutrient requirements (3). Fungi are key components in soil environments that drive important ecosystem functions (4), and fungal hyphae may serve as hot spots for nutrient cycling. For example, Zhang et al. (2) observed that the bacterial communities attached to surfaces of hyphae from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can produce alkaline phosphatase, a function absent from fungal hyphae. Another study revealed that association with nitrogen-fixing bacteria enabled wood-decaying fungi to overcome nitrogen (N) depletion (5). However, high competition has also been observed between fungi and their associated bacteria for soil nutrients such as phosphorus (P) (6).

Penicillium spp. are common soil fungi considered to be “key organisms” involved in soil P cycling due to their ability to solubilize inorganic P by producing organic acids (7, 8). Some Penicillium elite strains are used as biofertilizer inoculants in agriculture to improve crop P nutrition and increase crop yield, although with varied efficacy (9, 10). Currently, the interactions between Penicillium spp. and the bacteria colonizing their hyphae in soil are understudied, although these bacteria might develop important interactions with the inoculants in the soil. For comparison, hyphosphere bacteria (the term “hyphosphere bacteria” is used below for bacteria living on, or in association with, hyphae) can exert positive effects on AMF mycelial growth and mycorrhiza formation (1), while studies for Rhizoctonia spp. have revealed several bacterial isolates that inhibit fungal growth (11).

Several baiting systems have been constructed in order to study the hyphosphere bacteria of different fungi (1214). These systems are most often based on extracted soil or rhizosphere bacteria, which are added to hyphae growing on an artificial medium. Therefore, bias may arise due to the different physiological statuses of hyphae when grown in artificial medium versus in natural soil, which might lead to the release of different exudates that can attract bacteria. Recently, a baiting soil microcosm approach was developed in which Penicillium hyphae are incubated in natural soil, enabling the recovery and analysis of bacterial communities associated with the hyphae under realistic soil conditions (15). The results obtained using this baiting system show that Penicillium bilaiae hyphae recruited a specific bacterial community from one investigated soil (15), and that very similar bacterial communities develop in association with hyphae of P. canescens and Penicillium janthinellum grown in the same soil. However, different hyphosphere communities develop when different top soils and subsoils with various characteristics are used in the baiting system (16). Nevertheless, insight into the factors that influence the composition of hyphosphere communities is still very limited.

Mineral and organic fertilizers are routinely applied to improve nutrient availability to crops and, ultimately, crop yields in agricultural systems. The impacts of fertilizer regime on the diversity and structure of microbial communities in the soil have been well studied (1720). Mineral fertilizers have been reported to affect soil microbial community composition directly by supplying nutrients to the microorganisms or indirectly by changing the soil pH (18). For organic fertilizers, increased bacterial biomass and community diversity have been found in long-term trials fertilized with manure/organic amendments (17, 19, 20). However, it is still unknown how the fertilizer regime affects the composition of the Penicillium hyphosphere bacterial communities and their functional potential for cycling major nutrients such as N and P.

Hence, the objective of the current study was to determine the impacts of soil fertilization on the composition, as well as the potential for N and P cycling, of bacterial communities in the hyphosphere of the P-solubilizing P. canescens under close-to-natural soil conditions. It was hypothesized that both the composition and the nutrient cycling potential of hyphosphere bacterial communities are influenced by the hyphosphere and the type of soil fertilization to which they are exposed. Baiting soil microcosms were set up in which hyphae of P. canescens were introduced to soils that had received long-term amendment with mineral or mineral plus organic fertilizers in the field. The bacterial communities were characterized by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and their functional potential was determined using quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting genes involved in N and P cycling.

RESULTS

Hyphal viability and bacterial colonization.

Baiting microcosms were established in three soils that differed in the type of fertilizer amendments, N1K1-F, N1P2K2-F, and M1P1-F (Table 1). Glass coverslips colonized by P. canescens hyphae were recovered from N1K1-F soil microcosms and analyzed for hyphal morphology and viability at different time points (see Fig. S1A in the supplemental material). Intact hyphae were observed using calcofluor white staining (images a to d in Fig. S1A), and a mixture of hyphae with and without metabolic activity was observed by FUN1 staining, yielding green fluorescence from inactive hyphae and spores versus red-orange fluorescence from active hyphae and spores (images e to h and i to p in Fig. S1A). At day 0, a large number of active spores and a small number of active hyphae were observed, while at days 1, 4, and 8, old and active hyphae were not observed, whereas germinating spores and young active hyphae were abundant. After 8 days of incubation, the P. canescens hyphae from microcosms established in all three soils were colonized by a large number of individual bacteria and/or bacterial aggregates, as shown by SYBR green staining (Fig. 1). In contrast, the negative-control glass coverslips (slides without P. canescens hyphae) from the three microcosms showed very few bacteria attached onto the glass (Fig. S1B).

TABLE 1.

General properties of soils used for establishing baiting microcosms and specifications of long-term nutrient amendments in the field

Soil sample Soil origina Fertilizer amendment(s) pH Olsen P (mg kg−1) Content (mg kg−1) of exchangeable:
Total content:
K Mg C (g kg−1) N (g kg−1) P (mg kg−1) K (mg kg−1)
N1K1-F LTNDT N1K1 field Mineral 5.2 7.5 134.3 66.0 12.3 1.65 355 15,211
N1P2K2-F LTNDT N1P2K2 field Mineral 5.1 16.3 219.8 57.3 12.8 1.65 452 15,452
M1P1-F LTNDT M1P1 field Organic and mineral 5.8 17.0 119.8 89.5 13.9 1.70 423 14,982
a

LTNDT, long-term nutrient depletion trial.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Colonization of bacteria on P. canescens hyphae in soil microcosms after 8 days of incubation. The Penicillium hyphae came from microcosms with soils that had been amended in the field over a long time with N and K (PeN1K1-F), N, P, and K (PeN1P2K2-F), or manure plus P (PeM1P1-F). Hyphae and bacteria were stained by SYBR green. Images were obtained by fluorescence microscopy at ×630 magnification.

Diversity and structure of soil and hyphosphere bacterial communities.

Across treatments, soil bacterial communities had significantly higher diversity indices (richness and Shannon) than did the hyphosphere communities (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2A). The community from the soil receiving long-term manure plus P amendment (M1P1-F) had significantly higher diversity indices than did other soil communities (P < 0.05). Comparisons of hyphosphere communities exhibited comparable results because the diversity indices were significantly higher for the hyphosphere bacterial community recruited from the M1P1-F soil (referred to as PeM1P1-F) than for the hyphosphere community recruited from N1P2K2-F soil (P < 0.05). However, the hyphosphere community recruited from the N1K1-F soil had diversity indices similar to those recruited from the M1P1-F soil.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Diversity, structure, and composition of soil and hyphosphere bacterial communities. The soil communities came from soils that had been amended in the field over a long period with N and K (N1K1-F), with N, P, and K (N1P2K2-F), or with manure plus P (M1P1-F). Hyphosphere communities recruited from these soils are referred to as PeN1K1-F, PeN1P2K2-F, and PeM1P1-F, respectively. (A) Alpha-diversity indices (richness and Shannon index) calculated from 16S rRNA gene sequence data at the OTU level (blue, soil samples; red, hyphosphere samples). Error bars represent the standard error of the results from three replicates. The statistical significance of differences was analyzed for all samples using one-way ANOVA, followed by the Duncan test (P < 0.05), and is indicated by lowercase letters; different letters indicate significant differences. (B) NMDS plots for soil and hyphosphere bacterial community structures based on weighted UniFrac distance. Circles indicate soil communities, while triangles indicate hyphosphere communities. (C) NMDS plots for hyphosphere bacterial community structure based on weighted UniFrac distance. (D and E) Community composition of soil and hyphosphere samples at the phylum (D) and class (E) levels. The stacked bar charts depict the mean relative abundance of the taxa present in each sample. “Others” represents bacterial taxa with mean relative abundances below 2% and unassigned bacterial taxa. All samples were clustered based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity of bacterial relative abundance data.

Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis of operational taxonomic unit (OTU) matrices, based on weighted UniFrac distances, revealed a clear separation between soil bacterial communities and hyphosphere communities (permutational multivariate analysis of variance [PERMANOVA], F = 24.338, R = 0.6, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, long-term soil fertilization had strong and significant effects on the structures of both soil (PERMANOVA, F = 10,844, R = 0.8, P < 0.005) and hyphosphere (PERMANOVA, F = 47,629, R = 0.9, P < 0.005) bacterial communities, in particular for communities from M1P1-F and PeM1P1-F, which clustered separately from the other communities (Fig. 2C and S2).

Composition of soil and hyphosphere bacterial communities.

Consistent with the diversity and NMDS analyses, hierarchical clustering analysis highlighted the dissimilarity between soil and hyphosphere communities at both the phylum and class levels (Fig. 2D and E). Within the soil community cluster, the M1P1-F community was separated from the other soil communities and was characterized by a dominance of Verrucomicrobia (31%), while the most-abundant phylum in the other two soil communities was Proteobacteria, with a relative abundance ranging from 30% to 35%. Moreover, the relative abundances of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria were significantly lower in M1P1-F (P < 0.05).

Compared with the corresponding soil communities, hyphosphere communities presented significantly higher relative abundances of Proteobacteria (P < 0.01) and lower abundances of Firmicutes (P < 0.05, with the exception of PeN1K1-F) (Table S1). Furthermore, PeM1P1-F had a significantly higher abundance of the phylum Bacteroidetes than did M1P1-F (P < 0.01) (Table S1). For Proteobacteria, the class Gammaproteobacteria had a relative abundance above 45% in all hyphosphere communities (Fig. 2E). The relative abundance of the class Betaproteobacteria varied from over 20% in hyphosphere communities retrieved from field soil with NPK and NK fertilizer amendments (PeN1P2K2-F and PeN1K1-F, respectively) to 8% in hyphosphere samples from field soil receiving manure plus P fertilizer (PeM1P1-F).

The effects of soil factors on the relative abundances of phyla in the soil samples were determined by redundancy analysis (RDA), where the first two axes of the RDA explained 85% and 9% of the total variation, respectively (Fig. 3A). The first axis separated soil with mineral fertilizer amendments (N1K1-F and N1P2K2-F) from soil with the organic fertilizer amendment (M1P1-F), while the second axis separated the N1P2K2-F soil from the other soils. Olsen P, exchangeable K, and exchangeable Mg were significant factors affecting the relative abundances of phyla in these soils (P < 0.05). A significantly positive correlation was observed between Olsen P and the relative abundances of Gemmatimonadetes and Planctomycetes (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.84 and 0.75, respectively, P < 0.05). Bacteroidetes showed a significantly negative correlation with exchangeable K (r = −0.86, P < 0.05). Exchangeable Mg was significantly and positively correlated with the relative abundances of Verrucomicrobia (r = 0.89), Bacteroidetes (r = 0.89), Planctomycetes (r = 0.69), and Acidobacteria (r = 0.88) (P < 0.05) but was negatively correlated with Proteobacteria (r = −0.93), Actinobacteria (r = −0.74), and Firmicutes (r = −0.84) (P < 0.05).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

(A and B) Redundancy analysis (RDA) of soil properties and the relative abundance of bacterial taxa (phylum level) in soil communities (A) and in hyphosphere bacterial communities (B). The soil communities came from soils that had been amended in the field over a long period with N and K (N1K1-F), with N, P, and K (N1P2K2-F), or with manure plus P (M1P1-F). Hyphosphere communities recruited from these soils are referred to as PeN1K1-F, PeN1P2K2-F, and PeM1P1-F, respectively. The significance of factors was determined by the Monte Carlo permutation test (999 permutations). Asterisks indicate the level of significance at P values of <0.05 (*) and <0.01 (**). The soil factors analyzed were as follows: C/N, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio; Kexch, exchangeable potassium; Mgexch, exchangeable magnesium; TK, total potassium; and TP, total phosphorus. Phyla with relative abundances of >2% are shown as vectors in the RDA representations. Others include bacterial phyla with a mean relative abundance of <2% and unassigned bacterial taxa.

An RDA was conducted for hyphosphere samples, with the analysis relating bulk soil factors to the recruitment of bacterial taxa to the hyphae (Fig. 3B). For the hyphosphere samples, the first two axes of the RDA explained 58% and 35% of the total variation, respectively. Here, the first axis seemed to separate the N1P2K2-F soil from the other soils. Soil pH, Olsen P, exchangeable K, and exchangeable Mg were significant factors affecting the relative abundances of phyla associated with the hyphae (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3B). Across hyphosphere samples, the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes was significantly and positively correlated with pH (r = 0.87, P < 0.05) and exchangeable Mg (r = 0.82, P < 0.05) and negatively correlated with exchangeable K (r = −0.68, P < 0.05). In contrast, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria was negatively correlated with pH (r = −0.70, P < 0.05) and exchangeable Mg (r = −0.71, P < 0.05) but positively correlated with exchangeable K (r = 0.84, P < 0.05). The relative abundance of Firmicutes showed a significantly negative relationship with Olsen P (r = −0.96, P < 0.05).

This study then investigated whether the changes in soil and hyphosphere communities caused by fertilizer amendments were correlated, and a Mantel test was conducted to test the hypothesis that distance matrices for soil communities are not linearly related to the distance matrices for hyphosphere communities. When the fertilizer amendments were taken into account, they were found to be good predictors of the degree of similarity between soil and hyphosphere communities (rMantel = 0.84; P < 0.001, weighted UniFrac).

A linear discriminant analysis (LEfSe) of hyphosphere samples identified distinctive bacterial taxa at different levels depending on different soil fertilizer treatments (P < 0.05; Fig. S3 and Table S2). Hence, Firmicutes were distinctive in PeN1K1-F, Proteobacteria were distinctive in PeN1P2K2-F, and Bacteroidetes were distinctive in PeM1P1-F. To identify the core hyphosphere microbiome, the relative abundances of the 11 most-abundant bacterial genera were compared across all hyphosphere samples (Fig. 4). According to this analysis, the genera Delftia and Pseudomonas were core bacterial taxa of the P. canescens hyphosphere bacterial communities, as they were present at relative abundances of >2% in all hyphosphere samples irrespective of soil fertilization (Fig. 4).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Mean relative abundances of the 11 most-abundant bacterial genera in hyphosphere communities of P. canescens across the microcosms. The hyphosphere communities were recruited from soils that had been amended in the field over a long time with N and K (PeN1K1-F), N, P, and K (PeN1P2K2-F), or with manure plus P (PeM1P1-F). The core genera were defined as the bacterial genera with a mean relative abundance above 2% in all hyphosphere communities, irrespective of soil background.

A comparison of the communities in N1K1-F, N1P2K2-F, and M1P1-F soils by ternary plot analysis showed that each soil enriched specific OTUs. In particular, the M1P1-F soil community contained a large number of specifically enriched OTUs (183 blue circles, Fig. 5A and S6). Fewer OTUs were specifically enriched in N1K1-F (64 red circles) and N1P2K2-F (48 green circles) (Fig. 5A, S4, and S5). The comparison of the corresponding hyphosphere communities identified 201, 28, and 29 enriched OTUs in PeM1P1-F (blue circles), PeN1K1-F (red circles), and PeN1P2K2-F (green circles, Fig. 5B and S7 to S9), respectively. Notably, these enriched OTUs were hardly shared between the different hyphosphere communities.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Distinct distributions of enriched OTUs in soil and hyphosphere samples. Soil communities came from soils that had been amended for a long time in the field with N and K (N1K1-F), with N, P, and K (N1P2K2-F), or with manure plus P (M1P1-F). Hyphosphere communities recruited from these soils are referred to as PeN1K1-F, PeN1P2K2-F, and PeM1P1-F, respectively. (A) OTUs specifically enriched in N1K1-F, N1P2K2-F, and M1P1-F. (B) OTUs specifically enriched in PeN1K1-F, PeN1P2K2-F, and PeM1P1-F. Ternary plots depict OTUs (>0.5‰) with respect to each compartment, where each circle corresponds to an enriched OTU. The size of each circle represents its average relative abundance across three compartments, and its position is determined by the relative abundances regarding each indicated compartment. The colored circles mark OTUs that are enriched in one compartment compared with the other compartments. OTUs that are not significantly enriched in a specific compartment are indicated by gray circles.

Distribution and abundance of functional genes related to P and N cycling in soil and hyphosphere communities.

Relative abundances were investigated for functional genes related to P and N cycling for soil and hyphosphere samples (Fig. 6). The P cycling genes included phoD, encoding alkaline phosphatase; phnK, which is involved in phosphonate utilization; and pqqC, which is involved in pyrroloquinoline quinone biosynthesis required for inorganic P solubilization. No significant differences were observed in the relative abundances of phoD and phnK between the three soil communities. Compared to the soil communities, a significantly higher abundance (P < 0.05) of phoD was found in the PeN1K1-F hyphosphere community (Fig. 6A), while no enrichment of the phoD gene was found for the hyphosphere communities in the PeN1P2K2-F and PeM1P1-F soils. The phnK gene was significantly (P < 0.05) enriched in the PeN1K1-F and PeM1P1-F communities compared to the soil communities (Fig. 6B). For pqqC, the relative abundance in hyphosphere communities was generally lower than in the corresponding soil communities. This difference was significant (P < 0.05) for the hyphosphere communities from soils receiving inorganic fertilizers, i.e., PeN1K1-F and PeN1P2K2-F (Fig. 6C).

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Distribution and relative abundances of functional genes involved in phosphorus and nitrogen cycling in soil and hyphosphere communities. The soil communities came from soils that had been amended in the field over a long period with N and K (N1K1-F), with N, P, and K (N1P2K2-F), or with manure plus P (M1P1-F). Hyphosphere communities recruited from these soils are referred to as PeN1K1-F, PeN1P2K2-F, and PeM1P1-F, respectively. The relative abundances of genes were calculated by the ratio of the absolute copy numbers of genes of interest to the 16S rRNA gene. The average relative abundances of the target genes in each sample are presented, and error bars represent the standard error of the results from three replicates. Significant differences were analyzed for soil samples and hyphosphere samples using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD test (P < 0.05) and are indicated by lowercase letters; different letters indicate significant differences.

The analysis of functional genes involved in N cycling included nifH (nitrogenase iron protein), nirS (nitrite reductase), nirK (nitrite reductase), nosZ (nitrous oxide reductase), and amoA (ammonia monooxygenase). The relative abundances of these genes varied little between the soil communities. nifH had higher relative abundance in hyphosphere communities from the N1K1 and M1P1 soils than in the corresponding soil samples, although the difference was only significant (P < 0.05) for the comparison of N1K1-F to PeN1K1 (Fig. 6D). For hyphosphere communities recruited from the N1K1-F soil, the relative abundances of nirS and nosZ were significantly higher than those in the corresponding soil communities (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6E and G). Interestingly, nirK was significantly enriched in hyphosphere communities from the M1P1-F soil and hence showed a different pattern from that observed for nirS (Fig. 6F). For the amoA gene, the relative abundance in hyphosphere communities was lower than that in the corresponding soil communities, although these differences were not significant (Fig. 6H).

Hence, most P and N cycling genes were enriched in one or several hyphosphere communities compared to the corresponding soil communities. Furthermore, the soil fertilization regime had a stronger effect on the metabolic potential for P and N cycling in hyphosphere communities than in soil communities.

DISCUSSION

Colonization of hyphae in soil.

A recently developed baiting microcosm approach (15) provided an opportunity to investigate how different soil fertilizer amendments impact bacterial communities recruited by the hyphae of P. canescens under close-to-natural soil conditions. Bacterial colonization was observed both for old hyphae and for young hyphae developing during the incubation period from germinating spores in the soil. It could be ascertained that the bacteria recovered for molecular analysis were associated with hyphae, as very few bacteria colonized the glass coverslips that had not been inoculated with P. canescens, which is in agreement with previous findings for P. bilaiae (15).

Effects of fertilizer regimes on bacterial community composition.

The alpha diversity of hyphosphere bacterial communities was significantly lower than that of the bacterial communities from bulk soil. This finding is consistent with previous findings for bacterial communities from mycosphere, mycelial cords (21, 22), and Penicillium hyphae recovered by the same baiting approach (15, 16). For soil bacterial microbiomes, the current results highlighted the influence of fertilizer type (mineral versus manures) on the structure of these communities. The bacterial community from soil with long-term manure amendment (M1P1-F) showed the highest alpha diversity and a distinct community structure, probably caused by the introduction of complex organic matter through the manure, as has been suggested by previous studies (17, 19, 20, 23).

Proteobacteria was the dominant phylum in all hyphosphere bacterial communities, which showed less variation in taxonomic structure than soil bacterial communities. Within the Proteobacteria, Delftia (order Burkholderiales) and Pseudomonas (order Pseudomonadales) were identified as core genera. These genera might play crucial roles in the provision of nutrients for the fungus, as they contain species with N-fixing and P-solubilizing activities (2428) and are often found in association with fungi (12, 29).

The different soil fertilizer amendments had a strong and significant impact on the composition of the soil and hyphosphere bacterial communities, and RDA together with a Monte Carlo permutation test revealed that bacterial communities were influenced by the soil factors Olsen P, exchangeable K, exchangeable Mg, and pH (pH only for hyphosphere communities). For bulk-soil communities, a previous study using a wider range of soils from the long-term nutrient depletion trial showed that N inputs to soil influenced bacterial community structures more than did P or K inputs (17). The significant impact seen here for available K and Mg differed from the results from a recent microcosm study. That study showed an impact on the distribution of bacteria from mineral-weathering taxa, such as Burkholderia and Collimonas, but little effect on the overall taxonomic community structure of bacteria in forest soil (30). This discrepancy might point to a legacy effect of the repeated annual fertilizer amendments in the present study. Finally, pH has often been reported to be an important driver of soil bacterial community composition (17, 31, 32).

For hyphosphere communities, a previous study including a total of five very different topsoils and subsoils indicated that soil pH, Mg2+, Olsen P, and total carbon influenced bacterial communities associated with P. canescens hyphae (16). Hence, the current results consolidate these previous observations using a targeted fertilizer amendment approach. It is important to note that soil factors are related here to the recruitment of bacterial taxa to the hyphae, where the physical/chemical factors probably differ from those in the soil. Finally, the present study was interested in determining whether the factors affecting soil and hyphosphere bacterial communities were similar. The Mantel test was applied to look for correlations between distance matrices for the soil versus hyphosphere communities as affected by the different fertilizer amendments. These distances were found to be linearly related for the two communities. Hence, the above-mentioned soil factors seemed to be of major importance in influencing the composition of both soil and hyphosphere communities, indicating that changes in fungal physiology between fertilizer treatments played a very minor role in influencing the hyphosphere communities. In the current soil microcosm, a mix of viable and nonviable hyphae of P. canescens was found, which complicates any comparison with previous studies showing a differential attachment of selected bacteria to AMF hyphae under pure-culture conditions (33).

Long-term fertilizer treatment with manure and P led to a high relative abundance of hyphosphere Bacteroidetes, and the phylum was even distinctive for this treatment. Bacteroidetes is a dominant phylum in manure (34) and is regarded as a copiotroph group that is commonly detected in C-enriched environments such as the rhizosphere (35, 36). The observed positive correlation of Bacteroidetes with pH was even in accordance with previous reports (31). For this PeM1P1-F community, the presence of both aerobic (Cytophagia and Flavobacteriia) and anaerobic taxa within the Bacteroidetes (Saprospirae and faculative anaerobic Sphingobacteriia) might indicate varied oxygen availability close to the hyphae.

Both Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria, which were enriched in hyphosphere communities, respond to hyphal exudates (37) and are commonly associated with fungal hyphae (15, 16, 29). Furthermore, both taxa contain species that are rapid colonizers and can grow at interphases between aerobic and anaerobic areas (38, 39).

Effects of fertilizer regime on bacteria community potential for phosphorus and nitrogen cycling.

Significantly increased relative abundances of several P and N cycling genes were observed in bacterial communities associated with Penicillium hyphae compared to those in soil communities. Additionally, fertilization treatments showed a strong impact on these gene abundances in hyphosphere communities.

Penicillium hyphae recruited bacteria harboring the phoD gene. A comparable recruitment of phosphatase-producing bacteria by hyphae of AMF has previously been reported (6). The relative abundance of phoD is reported to be inversely related to the level of available P in the soil and rhizosphere (40, 41). Hence, the current higher relative abundance of phoD in hyphosphere communities from the N1K1-F soil than in those recruited from the long-term P fertilizer-amended soils indicated that P limitation around the fungal hyphae can be relieved by long-term P application.

The high relative abundance of phnK in hyphosphere communities suggests that the hyphosphere bacteria utilize phosphonate. This result supports the findings for bacteria associated with P. canescens hyphae in a collection of very different soils (16). The phosphonates might originate from the fungal hyphae since phosphonates are reported to be components of fungal exopolysaccharides, glycoproteins, and membrane phosphonolipids (42). Phosphonates are very stable organic compounds, and bacterial phosphonate utilization has been reported in particular in phosphate-limited marine waters where the carbon-phosphorus lyase pathway for phosphonate degradation is enriched (43). It can therefore be speculated that the high relative abundance of phnK in most hyphosphere communities may reflect a limitation of easily available P.

The N-cycling potential of hyphosphere bacterial communities was assessed through the relative abundances of genes involved in N fixation, denitrification, and nitrification. Associations between N-fixing bacteria and fungi have previously been found and are thought to be beneficial for meeting the N requirements of fungi (1, 5). A significantly increased abundance of nifH in PeN1K1-F hyphosphere communities was observed, indicating recruitment of the N-fixing bacteria. This may be due to a high C/N ratio caused by fungal exudates, as seen for N fixers in the plant rhizosphere (44). The high nifH gene abundance might even be related to P limitation around the fungal hyphae, as N fixers have advantages in P acquisition compared to that with non-N fixers when N availability is limited (45, 46).

Higher abundances of the nirS, nirK, and nosZ genes, involved in denitrification, were generally observed for hyphosphere bacterial communities than for soil communities but with differences between fertilizer treatments. Interestingly, both nirS and nosZ were significantly increased in the PeN1K1-F community, whereas nirK was enriched in the PeM1P1-F community. For the dominating taxa in these communities, Gammaproteobacteria mainly harbor nirS nosZ genotypes, whereas Betaproteobacteria harbor both the nirS nosZ and the nirK nosZ genotypes (47), but the majority of nirK-harboring organisms do not have the nosZ gene (47). Overall, the distinct distributions of nirS and nirK genes across hyphosphere communities could be explained by different ecological niches of nirS- and nirK-harboring denitrifiers (48, 49).

According to previous studies, the C/N ratio is an important factor influencing denitrification, as denitrifier abundance responds positively to increased C availability in the environment (5052). A C-rich environment around fungal hyphae due to the release of fungal exudates (37, 53, 54) might lead to the increased abundance of denitrification-related genes in this environment. Furthermore, the higher potential for denitrification could be explained partly by an anoxic microenvironment near fungal hyphae caused by the oxygen consumption of metabolically active microorganisms.

The amoA gene, involved in nitrification, was not enriched in hyphosphere bacterial communities. This is compatible with the evidence of a partly anoxic microenvironment near fungal hyphae discussed above, although the cooccurrence of genes for nitrification and denitrification suggests spatial or temporal heterogeneity of oxygen availability. Additionally, fungi preferentially utilize easily assimilated N sources, such as ammonium, rather than other N sources, such as nitrate, urea, and purines (5557). Competition between fungi and bacteria could lead to a lack of ammonium around hyphae and thereby further limit nitrification.

Conclusions.

P. canescens hyphae in soil recruited distinct bacterial communities dominated by Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria, as well as by Bacteroidetes in soils that had been amended with manure over a long period. There were clear indications that field amendment with organic fertilizers exerted larger effects on soil and hyphosphere communities than those with amendments with mineral fertilizers. Furthermore, the potential of the hyphosphere communities for P and N cycling was generally higher than that of soil communities and was even affected by soil fertilization. The recruitment of bacteria with a potential to mobilize organic P and to fix N to the P. canescens hyphosphere in soils that had not received P fertilizer may be relevant for future optimization of next-generation biofertilizer consortia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fungal strain and soil samples.

The fungus used in this study was the P-solubilizing soil isolate Penicillium canescens strain ATCC 10419. Three soils subjected to different fertilizer treatments were used to establish baiting soil microcosms. Soil samples were collected from the long-term nutrient depletion trial (LTNDT) established in 1964 at the experimental farm of the University of Copenhagen in Taastrup, Denmark (55°40′N, 12°17′E). Permanent mineral fertilizer (combinations of N, P, and K) and organic slurry treatments were introduced in 1995 and 1996 (17). The N1K1-F, N1P2K2-F, and M1P1-F soils used in this study originate from the long-term field trial. N1K1-F and N1P2K2-F soils received mineral fertilizers, while the M1P1-F soil received mineral P plus cattle or pig slurry, depending on the year.

Soil microcosm setup and sample collection.

Before setting up the soil microcosms, the water content of all soil samples was adjusted to 14.3%, corresponding to ca. 50% of their water-holding capacities. These rather dry conditions were selected to avoid passive transport of bacteria from the soil to the hyphae by flowing water. All soil samples were incubated at 26°C for 8 days to activate the soil microbiota. The baiting soil microcosms were set up as in reference 15 and incubated at 26°C, the optimal growth temperature for P. canescens. Briefly, P. canescens hyphae growing on glass coverslips were placed inside polyamide mesh bags (mesh diameter, 50 μm; Sintab Produkt AB, Oxie, Sweden) and buried in the soil. There were three treatments corresponding to the three soil types, N1K1-F, N1P2K2-F, and M1P1-F, and each treatment included three replicates. Glass coverslips were recovered from the microcosms after incubation for up to 8 days. The coverslips were washed with sterile water to remove nonattached bacteria. From each treatment, 30 coverslips (three replicates with 10 slides per replicate) were used for DNA extractions. The hyphae and their associated bacteria were harvested by scraping off the hyphae with a sterile scalpel. For microscopic assessments, two coverslips were used for the determination of bacterial colonization. Sterile glass coverslips without fungal hyphae served as negative controls for both DNA extraction and microscopy. Triplicate soil microcosms without introduced mesh bags were used for soil DNA extraction. Detailed descriptions of the microcosm setup are presented in the supplemental material.

Hypha viability check and bacterial colonization.

Calcofluor white M2R (CFW) and FUN1 from the LIVE/DEAD yeast viability kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, CA, USA) were used for staining to check the structure and viability, respectively, of hyphae on the glass coverslips at days 0, 1, 4, and 8 during incubation in the soil. SYBR green (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) staining was applied to check bacterial colonization of P. canescens hyphae after 8 days of incubation. The staining procedures are described in the supplemental material.

Microscopic observations of hyphae or bacteria stained with CFW, FUN1, or SYBR green were carried out using an Axioskop 2 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). A fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) filter (exciter filter band pass [BP], 450 to 490 nm; emission long pass [LP], 420 nm) was used to visualize fungi or bacteria stained by FUN1 and SYBR green, while a 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) filter (exciter filter G, 365 nm; emission LP, 420 nm) was used to visualize CFW-stained hyphae or spores. All of the observations were performed using a 63× oil lens objective (total magnification, ×630; Zeiss). Images were captured using a Zeiss AxioCam digital camera and the AxioVision software.

DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

DNA was extracted from 0.25-g soil samples obtained from microcosms without the fungal inoculant using the DNeasy PowerSoil kit (Qiagen, Santa Clarita, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To avoid DNA loss associated with procedures for humic acid removal inherent in the PowerSoil kit procedure, bacterial DNA was extracted from the low-biomass suspensions of hyphal and hyphosphere bacteria using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen). Extractions were made according to the bacterial DNA extraction protocol, including a lysozyme pretreatment, to enable DNA recovery from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. The V3-V4 variable region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified from DNA samples by PCR using the primer pair Bakt_341F (CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG) and Bakt_805R (GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC) (58) and sequenced by the Illumina MiSeq platform (paired-end, 2 × 301 bp; Macrogen, Seoul, South Korea).

Quantification of functional genes involved in P and N cycling.

Genes involved in P cycling (phoD, phnK, and pqqC) and N cycling (nifH, nosZ, nirS, nirK, and amoA), as well as the 16S rRNA gene, were quantified by qPCR using the Mx3000P qPCR system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The primers used and annealing temperatures are presented in Table 2. Twenty-microliter reaction mixtures were prepared with 10 μl of the Brilliant III Ultra-Fast SYBR green low ROX qPCR master mix (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), 0.4 μM each primer, and 2 μl of template DNA (1 to 10 ng/μl). Thermal cycling conditions were as follows: an initial cycle of 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 20 s, and then the annealing temperature for 30 s. A dissociation curve was generated at the end of the qPCR program to verify a specific melting temperature of the amplified product. Absolute abundance was calculated based on an external standard curve for each target gene. The relative abundances of P and N cycling genes were calculated after normalization by 16S rRNA gene copy numbers, i.e., functional gene copy number/16S rRNA gene copy number. A detailed description of the cloning and validation of the standards, as well as calculation of the relative abundances of the target genes, can be found in the supplemental material.

TABLE 2.

Primers used in this study

Target gene Primer Sequence Annealing temp (°C) Reference
16S rRNA gene 341F CCTAYGGGRBGCASCAG 58 67
806R GGACTACNNGGGTATCTAAT
phoD ALPS-F730 CAGTGGGACGACCACGAGGT 58 68
ALPS-R1101 GAGGCCGATCGGCATGTCG
pqqC pqqC2-F AACCGCTTCTACTACCAG 58 69
pqqC2-R GCGAACAGCTCGGTCAG
phnK PhnK-F CATCGTCGGCGAATCCGG 58 70
PhnK-R TGCTGCATGCCGCCGGAAAA
nifH nifHF AAAGGYGGWATCGGYAARTCCACCAC 56 70
nifHRb TGSGCYTTGTCYTCRCGGATBGGCAT
nirS-1 nirS cd3AF GTSAACGTSAAGGARACSGG 56 70
nirS R3cd GASTTCGGRTGSGTCTTGA
nirK nirK-F1aCu ATCATGGTSCTGCCGCG 58 70
nirK-R3Cu GCCTCGATCAGRTTGTGGTT
nosZ nosZ-F CGYTGTTCMTCGACAGCCAG 63 71
nosZ-1622R CGSACCTTSTTGCCSTYGCG 72
amoA amoA-1Fmod CTGGGGTTTCTACTGGTGGTC 58 73
GenAOBR-1 GCAGTGATCATCCAGTTGCG

Bioinformatics and statistical analysis.

The paired-end Illumina MiSeq reads were joined using quality score 0.9 in PANDAseq (59), generating 1,560,801 merged sequences with 464 ± 2 bp. The merged reads were further analyzed using the QIIME data analysis package (60). The QIIME pipeline included de novo operational taxonomic unit (OTU) picking based on 97% sequence similarity by UCLUST, representative sequence picking, representative sequence alignment, taxonomic assignment against Greengenes 13_8 (UCLUST), and tree-building steps. The resulting OTU table was filtered to remove taxa identified as chloroplasts and mitochondria. A total of 78,478 OTUs were obtained for 18 communities (nine soil samples and nine hyphosphere samples) and used in all subsequent analyses.

The alpha-diversity analyses of richness and diversity were based on data rarefied to an even depth of 34,410 reads. The richness and Shannon diversity indices were calculated via PAST 3.20 and the phyloseq package in R, respectively (61, 62). Beta diversity was analyzed by nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS), and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) ordinations (10,000 permutations) was performed based on a weighted UniFrac distance matrix calculated from OTU tables using the vegan package in R (63) (https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan).

Redundancy analysis (RDA) was conducted using the vegan package in R to explain the contribution of soil factors to changes in soil and hyphosphere bacterial communities analyzed at the phylum level. The soil factors tested were total K, exchangeable K, exchangeable Mg, total P, Olsen P, pH, and the C/N ratio. The significance of these factors was determined by the Monte Carlo permutation test (999 permutations) in the vegan package. The Mantel test was used to determine the correlation between soil and hyphosphere bacterial communities. This analysis was carried out for soil and hyphosphere bacterial community distance matrices (unweighted UniFrac and weighted UniFrac) in QIIME (http://qiime.org/scripts/compare_distance_matrices.html). The results contain the Mantel r statistic and P value; r refers to the correlation which falls in the range of −1 (negative correlation) to +1 (positive correlation). A two-tailed test was performed to calculate the P value (999 permutations).

Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrices of relative abundances of bacterial OTUs at the phylum and class levels. The linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) algorithm was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and pairwise Wilcoxon test (64) (https://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy). Linear discriminant analysis was used to estimate the effect size of each differentially abundant taxon. An alpha significance level of 0.5 and an effect size threshold of 2.0 were used for all distinctive taxa. Statistical analyses of enriched OTUs and ternary plots were performed using the R package edgeR (65) with scripts from https://www.mpipz.mpg.de/R_scripts (66). Analyses included OTUs with relative abundances above 0.05%. Briefly, a negative binomial generalized linear model (GLM) was fitted to the OTUs with relative abundances above 0.05% for selecting OTUs with differential abundances among the compared samples. Phylum-level classification of each enriched OTU was obtained, and the relative abundances of enriched OTUs were visualized with heat maps after centering and scaling by the pheatmap package in R.

The significance of differences in alpha-diversity indices and relative abundances of functional genes were determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the post hoc Duncan test and by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test using the SPSS software version 19 (Armonk, NY, USA).

Data availability.

Raw sequence data were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive and assigned accession number SRP179700.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file 1
AEM.02969-19-s0001.pdf (2.3MB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Innovation Fund Denmark (grant 5107-00002B) to the Future Cropping project and by the Danish Council for Strategic Research (grant 1308-00016B) to the MiCroP project. Further support from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (grant 2662018QD065), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grants XDB15020402 and XDB15020302), and the International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program, China (grant 20150079) are acknowledged.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Frey-Klett P, Burlinson P, Deveau A, Barret M, Tarkka M, Sarniguet A. 2011. Bacterial-fungal interactions: hyphens between agricultural, clinical, environmental, and food microbiologists. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 75:583–609. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00020-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang L, Shi N, Fan J, Wang F, George TS, Feng G. 2018. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi stimulate organic phosphate mobilization associated with changing bacterial community structure under field conditions. Environ Microbiol 20:2639–2651. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jansa J, Bukovská P, Gryndler M. 2013. Mycorrhizal hyphae as ecological niche for highly specialized hypersymbionts–or just soil free-riders? Front Plant Sci 4:134. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zagryadskaya YA. 2017. Comparative characteristics of the bacterial complex in the hyphosphere of basidial macromycetes. Biol Bull Russ Acad Sci 44:251–260. doi: 10.1134/S1062359017030116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hoppe B, Kahl T, Karasch P, Wubet T, Bauhus J, Buscot F, Krüger D. 2014. Network analysis reveals ecological links between N-fixing bacteria and wood-decaying fungi. PLoS One 9:e88141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang L, Fan J, Ding X, He X, Zhang F, Feng G. 2014. Hyphosphere interactions between an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and a phosphate solubilizing bacterium promote phytate mineralization in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 74:177–183. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Raymond NS, Stöver DM, Peltre C, Nielsen HH, Jensen LS. 2018. Use of Penicillium bilaiae to improve phosphorus bioavailability of thermally treated sewage sludge–a potential novel type biofertiliser. Process Biochem 69:169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2018.03.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yadav AN, Verma P, Kumar V, Sangwan P, Mishra S, Panjiar N, Gupta VK, Saxena AK. 2018. Biodiversity of the genus Penicillium in different habitats, p 3–18. In Gupta VK, Rodriguez-Couto S (ed), New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering, Penicillium system properties and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Leggett M, Cross J, Hnatowich G, Holloway G. 2007. Challenges in commercializing a phosphate-solubilizing microorganism: Penicillium bilaiae, a case history, p 215–222. In Velázquez E, Rodríguez-Barrueco C (ed), First international meeting on microbial phosphate solubilization. Developments in plant and soil sciences, vol 102 Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Leggett M, Newlands N, Greenshields D, West L, Inman S, Koivunen M. 2015. Maize yield response to a phosphorus-solubilizing microbial inoculant in field trials. J Agric Sci 153:1464–1478. doi: 10.1017/S0021859614001166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cuong ND, Nicolaisen MH, Sørensen J, Olsson S. 2011. Hyphae-colonizing Burkholderia sp.—a new source of biological control agents against sheath blight disease (Rhizoctonia solani AG1-IA) in rice. Microb Ecol 62:425–434. doi: 10.1007/s00248-011-9823-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Scheublin TR, Sanders IR, Keel C, Van Der Meer JR. 2010. Characterisation of microbial communities colonising the hyphal surfaces of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. ISME J 4:752–763. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ballhausen MB, van Veen JA, Hundscheid MP, De Boer W. 2015. Methods for baiting and enriching fungus-feeding (Mycophagous) rhizosphere bacteria. Front Microbiol 6:1416. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rudnick M, Van Veen JA, De Boer W. 2015. Baiting of rhizosphere bacteria with hyphae of common soil fungi reveals a diverse group of potentially mycophagous secondary consumers. Soil Biol Biochem 88:73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.04.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ghodsalavi B, Svenningsen NB, Hao X, Olsson S, Nicolaisen MH, Al-Soud WA, Sørensen SJ, Nybroe O. 2017. A novel baiting microcosm approach used to identify the bacterial community associated with Penicillium bilaii hyphae in soil. PLoS One 12:e0187116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hao X, Zhu Y-G, Nybroe O, Nicolaisen MH. 2019. The composition and phosphorus cycling potential of bacterial communities associated with hyphae of Penicillium in soil are strongly affected by soil origin. Front Microbiol 10:2951. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.van der Bom F, Nunes I, Raymond NS, Hansen V, Bonnichsen L, Magid J, Nybroe O, Jensen LS. 2018. Long-term fertilization form, level and duration affect the diversity, structure and functioning of soil microbial communities in the field. Soil Biol Biochem 122:91–103. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang Y, Hao X, Alexander TW, Thomas BW, Shi X, Lupwayi NZ. 2018. Long-term and legacy effects of manure application on soil microbial community composition. Biol Fertil Soils 54:269–283. doi: 10.1007/s00374-017-1257-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li J, Cooper JM, Lin ZA, Li Y, Yang X, Zhao B. 2015. Soil microbial community structure and function are significantly affected by long-term organic and mineral fertilization regimes in the North China Plain. Appl Soil Ecol 96:75–87. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Francioli D, Schulz E, Lentendu G, Wubet T, Buscot F, Reitz T. 2016. Mineral vs. organic amendments: microbial community structure, activity and abundance of agriculturally relevant microbes are driven by long-term fertilization strategies. Front Microbiol 7:1446. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Boersma FGH, Otten R, Warmink JA, Nazir R, van Elsas JD. 2010. Selection of Variovorax paradoxus-like bacteria in the mycosphere and the role of fungal-released compounds. Soil Biol Biochem 42:2137–2145. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Halsey JA, de Cássia Pereira E Silva M, Andreote FD. 2016. Bacterial selection by mycospheres of Atlantic rainforest mushrooms. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 109:1353–1365. doi: 10.1007/s10482-016-0734-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hartmann M, Frey B, Mayer J, Mäder P, Widmer F. 2015. Distinct soil microbial diversity under long-term organic and conventional farming. ISME J 9:1177–1194. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Han J, Lei S, Dong X, Cai Z, Sun X, Yang H, Wang Y, Wei S. 2005. Characterization of a novel plant growth-promoting bacteria strain Delftia tsuruhatensis HR4 both as a diazotroph and a potential biocontrol agent against various plant pathogens. Syst Appl Microbiol 28:66–76. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2004.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mirza MS, Mehnaz S, Normand P, Prigent-Combaret C, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Bally R, Malik KA. 2006. Molecular characterization and PCR detection of a nitrogen-fixing Pseudomonas strain promoting rice growth. Biol Fertil Soils 43:163–170. doi: 10.1007/s00374-006-0074-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yan Y, Yang J, Dou Y, Chen M, Ping S, Peng J, Lu W, Zhang W, Yao Z, Li H, Liu W, He S, Geng L, Zhang X, Yang F, Yu H, Zhan Y, Li D, Lin Z, Wang Y, Elmerich C, Lin M, Jin Q. 2008. Nitrogen fixation island and rhizosphere competence traits in the genome of root-associated Pseudomonas stutzeri A1501. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:7564–7569. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801093105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zaidi A, Khan MS, Ahemad M, Oves M. 2009. Plant growth promotion by phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 56:263–284. doi: 10.1556/AMicr.56.2009.3.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zheng BX, Ibrahim M, Zhang DP, Bi QF, Li HZ, Zhou GW, Ding K, Peñuelas J, Zhu YG, Yang XR. 2018. Identification and characterization of inorganic-phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from agricultural fields with a rapid isolation method. AMB Express 8:47. doi: 10.1186/s13568-018-0575-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nazir R, Semenov AV, Sarigul N, van Elsas JD. 2013. Bacterial community establishment in native and non-native soils and the effect of fungal colonization. Microbiol Discov 1:1–10. doi: 10.7243/2052-6180-1-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nicolitch O, Feucherolles M, Churin J-L, Fauchery L, Turpault M-P, Uroz S. 2019. A microcosm approach highlights the response of soil mineral weathering bacterial communities to an increase of K and Mg availability. Sci Rep 9:14403. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50730-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N. 2009. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:5111–5120. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00335-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rousk J, Baath E, Brookes PC, Lauber CL, Lozupone C, Caporaso JG, Knight R, Fierer N. 2010. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J 4:1340–1351. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Toljander JF, Artursson V, Paul LR, Jansson JK, Finlay RD. 2006. Attachment of different soil bacteria to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal extra radical hyphae are determined by hyphal vitality and fungal species. FEMS Microbiol Lett 254:34–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2005.00003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sun R, Guo X, Wang D, Chu H. 2015. Effects of long-term application of chemical and organic fertilizers on the abundance of microbial communities involved in the nitrogen cycle. Appl Soil Ecol 95:171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.06.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson BB. 2007. Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88:1354–1364. doi: 10.1890/05-1839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Aislabie J, Deslippe JR, Dymond JR. 2013. Soil microbes and their contribution to soil services, p 143–161. In Dymond JR. (ed), Ecosystem services in New Zealand–conditions and trends. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, New Zealand. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Toljander JF, Lindahl BD, Paul LR, Elfstrand M, Finlay RD. 2007. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelial exudates on soil bacterial growth and community structure. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 61:295–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00337.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pohlon E, Marxsen J, Küsel K. 2010. Pioneering bacterial and algal communities and potential extracellular enzyme activities of stream biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 71:364–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00817.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kamika I, Coetzee M, Mamba BB, Msagati T, Momba MN. 2014. The impact of microbial ecology and chemical profile on the enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) process: a case study of Northern Wastewater Treatment Works, Johannesburg. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11:2876–2898. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110302876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tan H, Barret M, Mooij MJ, Rice O, Morrissey JP, Dobson A, Griffiths B, O’Gara F. 2013. Long-term phosphorus fertilisation increased the diversity of the total bacterial community and the phoD phosphorus mineraliser group in pasture soils. Biol Fertil Soils 49:661–672. doi: 10.1007/s00374-012-0755-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chen X, Jiang N, Chen Z, Tian J, Sun N, Xu M, Chen L. 2017. Response of soil phoD phosphatase gene to long-term combined applications of chemical fertilizers and organic materials. Appl Soil Ecol 119:197–204. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.06.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.McGrath JW, Chin JP, Quinn JP. 2013. Organophosphonates revealed: new insights into the microbial metabolism of ancient molecules. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:412–419. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sosa OA, Repeta DJ, DeLong EF, Ashkezari MD, Karl DM. 2019. Phosphate-limited ocean regions select for bacterial populations enriched in the carbon-phosphorus lyase pathway for phosphonate degradation. Environ Microbiol 21:2402–2414. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bürgmann H, Meier S, Bunge M, Widmer F, Zeyer J. 2005. Effects of model root exudates on structure and activity of a soil diazotrof community. Environ Microbiol 7:1711–1724. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00818.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Houlton BZ, Wang Y-P, Vitousek PM, Field CB. 2008. A unifying framework for dinitrogen fixation in the terrestrial biosphere. Nature 454:327–330. doi: 10.1038/nature07028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nasto MK, Alvarez-Clare S, Lekberg Y, Sullivan BW, Townsend AR, Cleveland CC. 2014. Interactions among nitrogen fixation and soil phosphorus acquisition strategies in lowland tropical rain forests. Ecol Lett 17:1282–1289. doi: 10.1111/ele.12335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Graf DR, Jones CM, Hallin S. 2014. Intergenomic comparisons highlight modularity of the denitrification pathway and underpin the importance of community structure for N2O emissions. PLoS One 9:e114118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yang Y, Zhao J, Jiang Y, Hu Y, Zhang M, Zeng Z. 2017. Response of bacteria harboring nirS and nirK genes to different N fertilization rates in an alkaline northern Chinese soil. Eur J Soil Biol 82:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2017.05.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hou S, Ai C, Zhou W, Liang G, He P. 2018. Structure and assembly cues for rhizospheric nirK-and nirS-type denitrifier communities in long-term fertilized soils. Soil Biol Biochem 119:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Miller M, Zebarth B, Dandie C, Burton D, Goyer C, Trevors J. 2008. Crop residue influence on denitrification, N2O emissions and denitrifier community abundance in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2553–2562. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.06.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Miller M, Zebarth B, Dandie C, Burton D, Goyer C, Trevors J. 2009. Influence of liquid manure on soil denitrifier abundance, denitrification, and nitrous oxide emissions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:760–768. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Henderson SL, Dandie CE, Patten CL, Zebarth BJ, Burton DL, Trevors JT, Goyer C. 2010. Changes in denitrifier abundance, denitrification gene mRNA levels, nitrous oxide emissions, and denitrification in anoxic soil microcosms amended with glucose and plant residues. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:2155–2164. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02993-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nazir R, Warmink JA, Boersma H, van Elsas JD. 2010. Mechanisms that promote bacterial fitness in fungal-affected soil microhabitats. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 71:169–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00807.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wang F, Shi N, Jiang R, Zhang F, Feng G. 2016. In situ stable isotope probing of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in the hyphosphere. J Exp Bot 67:1689–1701. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Marzluf GA. 1997. Genetic regulation of nitrogen metabolism in the fungi. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:17–32. doi: 10.1128/.61.1.17-32.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wong KH, Hynes MJ, Davis MA. 2008. Recent advances in nitrogen regulation: a comparison between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and filamentous fungi. Eukaryot Cell 7:917–925. doi: 10.1128/EC.00076-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tudzynski B. 2014. Nitrogen regulation of fungal secondary metabolism in fungi. Front Microbiol 5:656. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Roos S, Dicksved J, Tarasco V, Locatelli E, Ricceri F, Grandin U, Savino F. 2013. 454 pyrosequencing analysis on faecal samples from a randomized DBPC trial of colicky infants treated with Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938. PLoS One 8:e56710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Masella AP, Bartram AK, Truszkowski JM, Brown DG, Neufeld JD. 2012. PANDAseq: paired-eND assembler for Illumina sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 13:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hammer Ø, Harper D, Ryan P. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electronica 4:article 4. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. 2013. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Oksanen J, Guillaume Blanchet F, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H. 2019. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5–5 R Foundation For Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C. 2011. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol 12:R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. 2010. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26:139–140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zgadzaj R, Garrido-Oter R, Jensen DB, Koprivova A, Schulze-Lefert P, Radutoiu S. 2016. Root nodule symbiosis in Lotus japonicus drives the establishment of distinctive rhizosphere, root, and nodule bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E7996–E8005. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616564113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Yu Y, Lee C, Kim J, Hwang S. 2005. Group-specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnol Bioeng 89:670–679. doi: 10.1002/bit.20347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sakurai M, Wasaki J, Tomizawa Y, Shinano T, Osaki M. 2008. Analysis of bacterial communities on alkaline phosphatase genes in soil supplied with organic matter. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 54:62–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2007.00210.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zheng BX, Hao XL, Ding K, Zhou GW, Chen QL, Zhang JB, Zhu YG. 2017. Long-term nitrogen fertilization decreased the abundance of inorganic phosphate solubilizing bacteria in an alkaline soil. Sci Rep 7:42284. doi: 10.1038/srep42284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zheng BX, Zhu Y, Sardans J, Peñuelas J, Su J. 2018. QMEC: a tool for high-throughput quantitative assessment of microbial functional potential in C, N, P, and S biogeochemical cycling. Sci China Life Sci 61:1451–1462. doi: 10.1007/s11427-018-9364-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kloos K, Mergel A, Rösch C, Bothe H. 2001. Denitrification within the genus Azospirillum and other associative bacteria. Aust J Plant Physiol 28:991–998. doi: 10.1071/PP01071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Throbäck IN, Enwall K, Jarvis Å, Hallin S. 2004. Reassessing PCR primers targeting nirS, nirK and nosZ genes for community surveys of denitrifying bacteria with DGGE. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 49:401–417. doi: 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Meinhardt KA, Bertagnolli A, Pannu MW, Strand SE, Brown SL, Stahl DA. 2015. Evaluation of revised polymerase chain reaction primers for more inclusive quantification of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria. Environ Microbiol Rep 7:354–363. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1
AEM.02969-19-s0001.pdf (2.3MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Raw sequence data were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive and assigned accession number SRP179700.


Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES