Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
editorial
. 2020 May 8;153(5):289–293. doi: 10.1007/s00418-020-01879-5

Inline graphicIn focus in HCB

Douglas J Taatjes 1,✉, Jürgen Roth 2
PMCID: PMC7205545  PMID: 32382788

As we provide this monthly Editorial for May, we would like to begin by wishing all of our readers good health and well-being during this most unsettling time. The global reach of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is staggering, with positive tests found on all continents except Antarctica. Our fervent hope is that science will unlock the key to combatting this virus through the development of efficient pharmaceutical treatments and vaccines. In the past, microscopy certainly has provided much needed morphological and ultrastructural correlates of potential disease-causing organisms (see Rand and Taatjes 2018 for a couple of brief historical examples). Perhaps today’s high resolution microscopy techniques, such as cryoelectron microscopy together with sophisticated image analysis algorithms, will play a role through providing clues towards understanding the virus structure at the molecular level, and its interaction with cell membranes.

As always, we hope that you enjoy this issue of Histochemistry and Cell Biology, and that reading through the articles may help provide a sense of normalcy to your day.

SAF(B) interactions with a hormone receptor

Steroid hormones play many roles in brain function, including influencing health along a brain–body axis (McEwen 2020). The estrogen receptor α (ER α), with a particularly strong presence in the hypothalamic area, is a nuclear transcription factor involved in regulating genomic functions. Scaffold attachment factor B (SAFB) serves as a corepressor for Erα, inhibiting its transcriptional activity. Since little is currently known concerning the functional significance of corepressors in the brain, Hashimoto and colleagues (2020) have now provided a detailed description of the immunolocalization of SAFB1 and its paralog SAFB2 in rat brain, as well as its interaction with ERα. Their results showed (1) SAFB1 and SAFB2 were widely distributed throughout the brain regions in a very similar pattern; (2) both were also expressed in the nucleus by a variety of brain cell types including neurons, glial cells, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes; (3) immunostaining on primary cultures of a variety of brain cell types confirmed the results obtained from rat brain with the exception that SAFB2 immunoreactivity was detected in both the nucleus and cytoplasm of the cultured cells; (4) double immunofluorescence staining demonstrated that both SAFB1 and SAFB2 were co-expressed with ERα in the nucleus of cells throughout the hypothalamus; and (5) co-precipitation experiments revealed that both SAFB1 and SAFB2 interact with ERα in the medial preoptic area of the hypothalamus. Taken together, their results provide new information regarding the distribution and function of the SAFB corepressors in regions of the brain containing steroid receptors.

Keratin phosphorylation keeps mother and daughter centrioles together

Keratins represent a large and diverse family of intermediate filaments that are expressed in epithelia in a cell- and tissue-specific manner (Moll et al. 2008). Like other cytosolic proteins, they receive different post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation and O-GlcNAcylation at serine which are of functional importance (Hart et al. 2011; Yi et al. 2018). Previous studies on the functional implications of serine-52 and serine-33 phosphorylation of keratin 18 have demonstrated a role in cell cycle regulation and cell proliferation (Ku and Omary 1994; Ku et al. 2014; Schatten and Sun 2018). Now, Yu et al. (2020) have analyzed the subcellular distribution of phospho-Ser52 keratin 18 through the cell cycle of multiple cell types by applying various combinations of double immunofluorescence, Western blotting and co-immunoprecipitation combined with Western blotting, and site directed mutagenesis of keratin 18 serine-52 by alanine. They found that phospho-Ser52 keratin 18 accumulated at mitosis and was associated with the spindle poles of centrosomes during metaphase. Replacing serine-52 by alanine prevented this interaction. Their additional detailed analyses demonstrated that phospho-Ser52 keratin 18 was located at the proximal end of mother centrioles and that it was involved in the regulation of the engagement of mother and daughter centrioles. In addition, evidence was presented that phospho-Ser52 keratin 18 is involved in microtubule nucleation.

Illuminating peroxisomes in health and disease

Peroxisomes are ubiquitous and key metabolic organelles, and their biogenesis is complex (Islinger et al. 2018). Peroxisomal matrix proteins synthesized on cytosolic polysomes contain peroxisomal targeting signals (PTS) which are recognized by peroxins (PEX) that target them to the peroxisomal matrix. PTS1 consists of a conserved three amino acid sequence (ser-lys-leu) at the extreme C-terminus of most peroxisomal matrix proteins and is the target of PEX5. Mutations in the PEX genes result in peroxisome biogenesis disorders collectively named Zellweger spectrum disorders (Argyriou et al. 2016; Pavelka and Roth 2015). To evaluate peroxisome biogenesis in vitro, immunofluorescence for the detection of peroxisomal membrane and matrix proteins and transient peroxisomal fluorescent reporter transfections are used. To overcome various drawbacks inherent to these approaches, Demaret et al. (2020) have developed a third-generation lentiviral transfer plasmid expressing a fusion protein consisting of PTS1 and enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP-PTS1). This vector permitted the stable expression of the eGFP-PTS1 fusion protein in normal and Zellweger spectrum disorder mouse and human fibroblasts. By evaluating the eGFP-PTS1 signal alone, the authors demonstrated that the number of eGFP-positive particles and their average size was significantly lower in Zellweger spectrum disorder human fibroblasts as compared with normal fibroblasts. Through time-lapse live cell imaging analyzed and quantified by an automated tracking tool, the motility of peroxisomes in Zellweger spectrum disorder human fibroblasts was shown to be significantly slower than in normal fibroblasts. The authors also performed immunofluorescence for the peroxisomal membrane protein PMP70 in formaldehyde-fixed eGFP-PTS1 transduced cells (Fig. 1). The low degree of colocalization between the eGFP-PTS1 fluorescence and the PMP70 immunofluorescence confirmed the peroxisomal biogenesis disorder in the Zellweger spectrum disorder fibroblasts. By calculating Manders’ overlap coefficient and Pearson’s correlation coefficient, the authors demonstrated that this approach was as sensitive as the conventional double immunofluorescence detection of PMP70 and the matrix protein catalase. It was concluded that the developed plasmid represents a useful tool for the in vitro evaluation of peroxisome biogenesis and for drug screening for Zellweger spectrum disorders.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Immunofluorescence for PMP70 (red) in Zellweger spectrum disorder human fibroblasts stably expressing the eGFP-PST1 fusion protein (green). As compared to normal human fibroblasts, the degree of colocalization is much lower. Nuclei stained with DAPI (blue). From Demaret et al. (2020)

Method to detect anti-tumor agents in paraffin-embedded cells and tissues

To assess the potential chemotherapeutic effect of anti-cancer treatments, it is important to determine with what efficiency the targeting agent reaches the intended tumor cells, since it is well known that the tumor microenvironment restricts access of many agents to the solid tumor (Nandigama et al. 2018). Traditionally, this assessment has been performed on fresh-frozen tissue samples, or on methanol-fixed cultured tumor cell lines. It would be most useful, however, if such evaluations could be made on the enormous cache of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks archived in hospitals and laboratories the world over. Böcklemann and colleagues (2020) now describe the detection of the chemotherapeutics cisplatin, doxorubicin, and therapeutic antibodies in sections from FFPE blocks of multiple human tumor cell lines and tumor xenografts from drug-treated mice. Cell lines were treated either with cisplatin, doxorubicin, or therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, followed by standard FFPE. Human tumors grown in mice were likewise treated with chemotherapeutic agents and then subjected to FFPE. Immunohistochemistry was performed to evaluate the localization of cisplatin (with anti-Pt-[GpG] monoclonal antibody) and the therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, while the anthracycline doxorubicin was detected via its natural autofluorescence emission in the red wavelength range. The results on the cell lines demonstrated that the tested agents could be imaged by either conventional wide-field light or fluorescence (doxorubicin) microscopy in routine FFPE-processed samples. These results were validated by positive immunostaining observed in sections from the archival drug-treated tumor-bearing mice. The ability to detect chemotherapeutic agents in sections from FFPE tissues in addition to frozen sections, provides a whole new range of possibilities for re-examining and analyzing archived tumor blocks.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Argyriou C, D’Agostino MD, Braverman N. Peroxisome biogenesis disorders. Transl Sci Rare Dis. 2016;1:111–144. doi: 10.3233/trd-160003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Böcklemann L, Starzonek C, Niehoff A-C, Karst U, Thomale J, Schlüter H, Bokemeyer C, Aigner A, Schumacher U. Detection of doxorubicin, cisplatin and therapeutic antibodies in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human cancer cells. Histochem Cell Biol. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00418-020-01857-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Demaret T, Courtoy GE, Ravau J, et al. Accurate and live peroxisome biogenesis evaluation achieved by lentiviral expression of a green fluorescent protein fused to a peroxisome targeting signal 1. Histochem Cell Biol. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00418-020-01855-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hart GW, Slawson C, Ramirez-Correa G, Lagerlof O. Cross talk between O-GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation: roles in signaling, transcription, and chronic disease. Annu Rev Biochem. 2011;80:825–858. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060608-102511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hashimoto T, Kawata M, Hirahara Y, Nishi M, Satoshi I, Matsuda K-I. Scaffold attachment factor B: distribution and interaction with Erα in the rat brain. Histochem Cell Biol. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00418-020-01853-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Islinger M, Voelkl A, Fahimi HD, Schrader M. The peroxisome: an update on mysteries 2.0. Histochem Cell Biol. 2018;150:443–471. doi: 10.1007/s00418-018-1722-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ku NO, Omary MB. Identification of the major physiologic phosphorylation site of human keratin 18: potential kinases and a role in filament reorganization. J Cell Biol. 1994;127(1):161–171. doi: 10.1083/jcb.127.1.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ku NO, Liao J, Omary MB. Phosphorylation of human keratin 18 serine 33 regulates binding to 14-3-3 proteins. EMBO J. 2014;17(7):1892–1906. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.7.1892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McEwen BS. Hormones and behavior and the integration of brain-body science. Horm Behav. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.104619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moll R, Divo M, Langbein L. The human keratins: biology and pathology. Histochem Cell Biol. 2008;129(6):705–733. doi: 10.1007/s00418-008-0435-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nandigama R, Upcin B, Aktas BH, Ergün S, Henke E. Restriction of drug transport by the tumor environment. Histochem Cell Biol. 2018;150:631–648. doi: 10.1007/s00418-018-1744-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pavelka M, Roth J. Functional ultrastructure. Atlas of tissue biology and pathology. 3. Vienna: Springer; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rand JH, Taatjes DJ. Reimagining the antiphospholipid syndrome, an enigmatic thrombophilic disorder, through the looking glass of microscopic imaging. Histochem Cell Biol. 2018;150:529–543. doi: 10.1007/s00418-018-1709-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schatten H, Sun QY. Functions and dysfunctions of the mammalian centrosome in health, disorders, disease, and aging. Histochem Cell Biol. 2018;150:303–325. doi: 10.1007/s00418-018-1698-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yi H, Yoon H, Kim S. Ku N-O (2018) The role of keratins in the digestive system: lessons from transgenic mouse models. Histochem Cell Biol. 2018;150:351–359. doi: 10.1007/s00418-018-1695-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yu H, Yang X, Wu H, et al. Phosphorylation of keratin 18 serine 52 regulates mother–daughter centriole engagement and microtubule nucleation by cell cycle-dependent accumulation at the centriole. Histochem Cell Biol. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00418-020-01849-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

News from the Society for Histochemistry

  1. Inline graphic
  2. Inline graphic

Articles from Histochemistry and Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES