Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
editorial
. 2020 May 8;149:73–77. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.040

Practical indications for management of patients candidate to Interventional and Intraoperative Radiotherapy (Brachytherapy, IORT) during COVID-19 pandemic – A document endorsed by AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) Interventional Radiotherapy Working Group

Andrea Vavassori a, Luca Tagliaferri b,⁎,1, Lisa Vicenzi c, Andrea D'Aviero d, Antonella Ciabattoni e, Sergio Gribaudo f, Loredana Lapadula g, Gian Carlo Mattiucci b,d, Lorenzo Vinante h, Vitaliana De Sanctis i, Cristiana Vidali j, Rita Murri d,k, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta b,d, Marcello Mignogna l, Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa a,m, Vittorio Donato n
PMCID: PMC7205646  PMID: 32389752

In the contest of COVID-19 rapid spread in Italy, the Italian Government in March 2020 released an official recommendation statement indicating [1].

Regarding oncological patients, the statement indicates to regional health authorities to identify and implement as quickly as possible the arrangements necessary to ensure oncological treatments, in order not to influence disease prognosis.

The Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) released an orientation paper in order to assure homogeneous working procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic emergency [2].

Interventional Radiation Therapy (IRT, Brachytherapy, BT) and IntraOperative Radiotherapy (IORT) represent potentially life-saving treatment options in different oncological clinical settings with indications shared in multidisciplinary contexts following international guidelines or trial protocols [3]. Delaying radiation treatments could worsen the overall prognosis of the disease, so that it seems to be essential to ensure radiation treatments delivery even at the time of COVID-19 emergency, fully guaranteeing health professionals, patients, and caregivers safety [4], [5].

Current evidences review on “COVID-19 disease” and “Radiation Oncology” was performed, then a multicenter team composed by all members of current AIRO-IRT/IORT-Working Group (WG), an infectious disease expert working in a COVID-19 Hospital, the past chair and deputy chair of AIRO-IRT/IORT-WG, members of AIRO committee, the chair of the Scientific Committee and the president of AIRO wrote this document.

To enable the regular conduct of clinical activity and the reduction of the risk of COVID-19 diffusion in the radiation oncology departments, it is essential to identify patients and operators with suspected or proven infection performing triage at the hospital and/or departments entrance (Table 1 ).

Table 1.

Suspected or positive COVID-19 patient management in Radiation Oncology Departments.

Triage General recommendations Radiation treatment recommendations
Patient at home Physiological anamnesis through telephone or videoconference contact in order to limit suspicious patient access to Radiation Oncology Departments
Consider link suspicious patients to Local Public Health Institution Agency or General practitioner for domiciliary COVID-19 screening
Postpone and/or convert follow-up evaluations to telephone/videoconference contact in case of negative COVID-19 patients without referred post-treatment symptoms
Plan follow-up evaluations in COVID-19 negative patients but with referred symptoms related to radiation treatments according to the clinical case presentation verified telephone/videoconference contact
Asymptomatic patient Imperative wearing of mask (according to internal recommendation).
Assure recommended inter-personal distance
Body temperature check at Department main entrance
Physiological anamnesis and patient self-declaration of health.
Consider COVID-19 testing for inpatient treatments (according to internal recommendation)
Follow treatment program
Healthcare workers wear surgical mask and follow hands hygiene protocols
Suspicious patient with typical symptoms (cough and/or fever and/or dyspnea and/or conjunctivitis unrelated to oncological disease) Imperative wearing of mask (according to internal recommendation).
Assure recommended inter-personal distance
Address patient the hospital dedicated COVID-19 way
Official notification to Institutional Direction
Consider COVID-19 testing
Investigate contact with COVID-19 positive or suspected people
Postpone the start or interrupt ongoing treatments according to personalized clinical judgment
If treatment cannot be postponed, assure the respect of local protocols for the Infection Control in patients with COVID-19 or suspected COVID-19
Healthcare workers wear surgical mask and follow hands hygiene protocols
COVID-19 + patient (symptomatic or asymptomatic) Imperative wearing of mask (according to internal recommendation).
Assure recommended inter-personal distance
Address patient the hospital dedicated COVID-19 way
Official notification to Institutional Direction
Consider COVID-19 testing
Investigate contact with COVID-19 positive or suspected people
Consider symptoms-based hospitalization
Postpone the start or interrupt ongoing treatments according to personalized clinical judgment
Healthcare workers wear surgical mask (consider FFP2/FFP3 in case of aereosol-generating procedures) and follow hands hygiene protocols
Previous COVID19+ patient confirmed healed Imperative wearing of mask (according to internal recommendation).
Assure recommended inter-personal distance
Consider quarantine with ward and referent clinicians
Start or continue ongoing treatment
Healthcare workers wear surgical mask and follow hands hygiene protocols

It is strongly recommended the identification of dedicated team members to manage COVID-19 cases. As a general rule, the RADS (Remote visits, Avoidance of treatment if little to no benefit or if an alternative treatment is available, Deferment of treatment if clinically appropriate, and Shortening of radiotherapy if treatment is unavoidable) principle is recommended to plan each individual patient treatment [6].

For new outpatients’ appointments it is recommended, if possible, to contact patients the day before the start of treatment (or any fraction if once weekly) whereas any new patient who has to undergo inpatient therapy should be contacted the day before hospitalization or any preoperative anesthesiologic assessment. According to national, regional or institutional recommendation, consider nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 in people who has to undergo inpatient therapy.

In case of suspected or positive patients, starting or continuing treatments should be allowed by local health authorities and carried out under condition of maximum safety for health professionals, with dedicated routes and facilities, dedicated treatment schedules and appropriate sanitization of treatment areas and equipment [7].

It is also recommended to limit access to patients and their relatives or accompanying persons:

  • offering IRT or IORT, if available and whenever possible,

  • encouraging high hypofractionation, where indicated,

  • postponing treatments of certain oncological diseases according to clinical judgement,

  • in palliative setting it might be useful to optimize medical symptomatic treatments, if judged to be of similar efficacy,

  • postponing treatment for benign diseases,

  • considering hormonal or cytotoxic therapy in selected cases for further deferral of radiotherapy,

  • allowing only one accompanying person per patient, whenever possible,

  • considering dedicated “COVID+ interventional radiotherapy pathway”.

Follow-up evaluations should be:

  • postponed until proven healing in COVID-19 positive patients,

  • postponed and/or converted to telephone contact in case of negative COVID-19 patients without referred post-treatment symptoms,

  • planned according to the clinical case presentation verified by telephone contact, in COVID-19 negative patients but with referred symptoms related to radiation treatments.

According to institutional recommendations, the use of specific Personal Protective Equipment is indicated during treatments with an aerosol generating procedure such as intubation, open suctioning of the respiratory tract, endoluminal IRT with bronchoscopy or upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and IRT for some intrabuccal lesions [1], [8].

In these cases, it is suggested to wear disposable gloves, FFP2/FFP3 mask and fluid resistant surgical mask, eye/face protection, disposable fluid repellent gown, disposable caps and shoe covers.

The surgical room for IORT and the IRT dedicated room should have an area for donning and doffing of personal protective equipment and exchange of material and medications for the procedure.

In case of endocavitary and/or interstitial IRT requiring major anesthesia the definitive indication should be made considering the expected need for intensive therapy unit and its availability.

As long as IORT is concerned, cases should be prioritized by the Operating team and coordinated centrally [9].

We suggest to shortening the case duration of surgery, discussing in advance every potential scenarios with the referring surgeons (e.g. treatment volume and doses according to site, histology and resection margins) and assigning the docking procedure to an expert team.

Optionally discuss treatment options in multidisciplinary boards with consultants from Anesthesia and Intensive Care and Infectious Diseases.

Patients should be adequately informed.

There are few evidences on the management of radiation treatments’ long-term interruptions, due to large-scale emergencies [10], [11]. It is indicated to avoid or in any case limit delaying treatments that could negatively affect the disease control and/or the related symptoms, evaluating comorbidities and balancing the cost/benefit ratio related to infection or contamination risk and the risk of cancer not being treated optimally [3], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20].

Whenever possible and clinically indicated, providing radiotherapy and/or systemic therapy and/or targeted treatments would potentially reduce the impact on need for level 2/3 hospital beds for elective surgery. Patients over 70, especially with co-morbidities, are at highest risk of death from coronavirus and ideally, they should be seen once the pandemic is over, unless clinically urgent [9].

Table 2 summarizes relevant clinical suggestions for COVID-19 negative or positive patients eligible for IRT treatments in relation to oncological disease.

Table 2.

Relevant clinical indications for COVID-19 negative or positive patients eligible for IRT or IORT treatments. The indications should be decided on an individual basis.

Site Patient setting Interruption impact COVID− patients COVID+ patients Notes
Breast [21], [22], [23] Low-risk Adjuvant Medium-low Consider treatment omission in selected cases (age ≥ 70 years, invasive Luminal A, ≤2 cm, cN0, planned for endocrine therapy)
Postpone
Postpone after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider exclusive IORT (if available)
High-risk Adjuvant Medium-high Postpone limiting the time gap Start after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider IORT or perioperative IRT anticipated boost (if available) in particular for young patients (age ≤ 40 years as per EORTC trial).
Evaluate concomitant boost if indicated (e.g. age ≤ 40 years, as per EORTC trial, or positive margins)
Adjuvant salvage treatment for relapse High Start ASAP Postpone after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider exclusive IORT or perioperative IRT (if available)
Alternative EBRT or IRT (local anesthesia) with consequent no start-time limitation
Vulva-vagina [24] Adjuvant Low Postpone if negative resection margins and cN0
Consider omitting CT on case by case and resources
Postpone after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
-
Curative High Start ASAP
Consider omitting CT on case by case and resources
Start after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider EBRT if IRT requires major anesthesia
Uterine cervix [24] Adjuvant Low Postpone Postpone
Curative Very high Start ASAP
Consider selected early stages that would normally undergo radical hysterectomy
Consider omitting CT on case by case and resources
Start ASAP if safety – guaranteed
Start after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider PDR or HDR IRT with bifractionated schemes to reduce hospitalization
Consider to treat IR-CTV using EBRT in order to reduce the PDR time or the HDR fractions
Consider smaller diameter applicators for better patient compliance and avoidance of anesthesia
In experienced centres consider SBRT boost or SIB if IRT requires major anesthesia.
Referral to another centre for IRT is generally preferred to using EBRT
Endometrium [24] Adjuvant Intermediate-low Observation alone
Postpone if high-risk up to 3 months from surgery unless residual disease, positive resection margins or aggressive histological subtype
Observation alone
Postpone after confirmed healing if high-risk
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider strong hypofractionation
Consider IRT only also in high-risk group on case by case
Exclusive Intermediate-high Start ASAP
If surgery is not possible consider HT or CT (if locally advanced) on individualised situation.
Consider EBRT and/or IRT in selected cases that would normally undergo radical hysterectomy
Postpone after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider strong hypofractionation
Prostate [6] Low risk Very low Consider Surveillance or postponed treatment Consider Surveillance or postponed treatment Consider ultra-hypofractionated EBRT
Intermediate/High risk High Consider hypo fractionated EBRT Postpone decision after confirmed healing considering HT Consider EBRT boost instead of IRT boost
Consider IRT only if resources are available
Penis Curative Medium-high Start ASAP Start ASAP if safety – guaranteed
Start after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider contact IRT
Urethra Palliative Medium-high Start ASAP Start ASAP if safety – guaranteed
Start after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider endoscopic desobstruction
Consider single fraction HDR IRT
Trachea and main bronchus [25] Palliative High Start ASAP Start ASAP if safety – guaranteed
Start after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider endoscopic desobstruction
Consider single fraction HDR IRT or hypofractionated EBRT
Esophagus [26] Curative High Start ASAP Start ASAP after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider EBRT without IRT boost+/− CT
If not suitable for concomitant CT, consider hypofractionated EBRT alone
Palliative High Start ASAP Start ASAP only if safety-guaranteed
Start after confirmed healing
Consider stenting desobstruction
Consider IRT or EBRT with single fraction or hypofractionated approaches
Biliary duct Palliative High Start ASAP Start after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider stenting or external-drainage desobstruction
Anal canal – Lower Rectum [27] Curative Medium-high Start ASAP
CT according to age, comorbidities and tumor biology
Start after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider EBRT if IRT requires major anesthesia
Consider IORT anticipated boost (if available)
If surgery not available, consider Short/Long course EBRT, on case by case
Palliative High Start ASAP Start ASAP only if safety-guaranteed
Start after confirmed healing
Consider strong hypofractionation
Consider IORT anticipated boost (if available)
Skin [28] Adjuvant Low/medium Choice based on patient’s prognosis, age, comorbidities and the location
Consider postpone in case of basal cell carcinoma (outside face) even with closely excised margins
Priority in case of squamous cell carcinoma and/or face location
Postpone after confirmed healing Consider hypofractionated regimens
Curative High/Medium SCC: No postponed, especially for large lesion or/and face lesion
BCC: discuss in multidisciplinary board to postpone or contact ipofractionated radiotherapy based on lesion size and location (priority for face lesion)
Discuss in multidisciplinary board if postpone or Contact ipofractionated radiotherapy
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider hypofractionated regimens
Consider no biopsy but only clinical diagnosis)
Consider in selected cases systemic therapy
Priority in case of squamous cell carcinoma and/or palliative setting and/or face location
Soft tissues – Sarcomas [29] Adjuvant Intermediate -High Postpone on an individual patient basis Postpone after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider IORT or perioperative IRT (if available)
In selected cases, consider preoperative hypofractionated EBRT
Consider hypofractionated IRT or EBRT with no start-time limitation
Lips – Oral mucosa Curative Medium-high Start ASAP Start ASAP only if safety – guaranteed.
Start after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
IRT (local-anesthesia)
Tongue [30] Curative High Start ASAP Start ASAP only if safety – guaranteed.
Start after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider switch to hypofractionated EBRT in order to avoid IRT with anesthesiologic involvement for bleeding risk
Nasopharynx Curative High Start ASAP Start ASAP only if safety – guaranteed.
Start after confirmed healing
Consider dedicated COVID19+ Interventional Radiotherapy Pathway
Consider hypo fractionated HDR IRT or EBRT
Keloids Adjuvant Very Low Observation alone
Postpone
Consider no surgery for benign disease
Observation alone
Postpone
Consider no surgery for benign disease

By adopting these practical suggestions we will protect ourselves and the patients from the risk of infection, respecting oncological outcomes and reducing the workload in any Radiotherapy Service.

The indications reported in this orientation paper cannot leave aside the careful evaluation of the proposed treatment setting, the clinical case and the life expectancy of each patient also taking into account any concomitant or alternative valid therapy.

Conflicts of interest

All the authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the Scientific Committee of the AIRO for the critical revision of the paper.

Authors’ contributions

Conception and design: AV, LT, LiV, BF, BJ, VD.

Data Collection: AC, SG, CV, LoV.

Analysis and Interpretation of Data: AV, LT, LL, GCM, VDS, LoV, MAG, MM, AC, LiV, SG, RM.

Manuscript Writing: ADA, AV, LT, LiV.

The Final Manuscript Approval: all authors.

Footnotes

The Editors of the Journal, the Publisher and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) cannot take responsibility for the statements or opinions expressed by the authors of these articles. Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds or experiments described herein. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, in particular, independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be made. For more information see the editorial “Radiotherapy & Oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic”, Vol. 146, 2020.

References

  • 1.COVID-19, raccomandazioni per i pazienti oncologici. http://www.salute.gov.it/portale/nuovocoronavirus/dettaglioNotizieNuovoCoronavirus.jsp?lingua=italiano&menu=notizie&p=dalministero&id=4200 (accessed April 1, 2020).
  • 2.Emergenza COVID-19 » Associazione Italiana di Radioterapia ed Oncologia Clinica. https://www.radioterapiaitalia.it/soci/sportello-covid-19/ (accessed April 1, 2020).
  • 3.Tagliaferri L., Vavassori A., Lancellotta V. Can brachytherapy be properly considered in the clinical practice? Trilogy project: the vision of the AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) Interventional Radiotherapy study group. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2020;12:84–89. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2020.92765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Simcock R, Vengaloor Thomas T, Estes Mercy C, et al. Journal Pre-proofs COVID-19: Global Radiation Oncology’s Targeted Response for Pandemic Preparedness COVID-19: Global Radiation Oncology’s Targeted Response for Pandemic Preparedness. 2020. DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2020.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.ESTRO - ESTRO News. https://www.estro.org/About/Newsroom/News/Radiotherapy-in-a-time-of-crisis (accessed April 7, 2020).
  • 6.Zaorsky N.G., Yu J.B., McBride S.M. Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy Recommendations in Response to COVID-19. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.03.010. published online April 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kampf G, Todt D, Pfaender S, Steinmann E. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2020.01.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.World Health Organization (WHO) Advice on the use of masks in the community, during home care and in healthcare settings in the context of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak. Who. 2020;2020:1–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.ESSO. Statement on COVID-1 advice for surgical oncologists on cancer service.
  • 10.Gay Md H.A., Santiago R., Gil B. Lessons learned from Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico: practical measures to mitigate the impact of a Catastrophic Natural Disaster on Radiation Oncology Patients. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019;9:305–321. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.The timely delivery of radical radiotherapy: guidelines for the management of unscheduled treatment interruptions Fourth edition. 2019 www.rcr.ac.uk (accessed April 1, 2020).
  • 12.Andrea Riccardo Filippi, Elvio Russi, Stefano Maria Magrini, Renzo Corvò Letter from Italy: First practical indications for radiation therapy departments during COVID-19 outbreak Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Publication stage: In Press Corrected Proof doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.007 Published online: March 19, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Krengli M., Ferrara E., Mastroleo F., Brambilla M., Ricardi U. Journal Pre-proof Running a Radiation Oncology Department at the time of coronavirus: an Italian experience. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wei W., Jiang H., Chen W. How should we implement radiotherapy for cancer patients in China during the endemic period of COVID-19? Radiother Oncol. 2020;147:100–102. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.016. published online March. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wu S, Zheng D, Liu Y, Hu D, Wei W, Han G. Journal Pre-proof Radiotherapy care during a major outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.adro.2020.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Cortiula F, Pettke A, Bartoletti M, Puglisi F, Helleday T. Journal Pre-proof Managing COVID-19 in the oncology clinic and avoiding the distraction effect. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Overview | COVID-19 rapid guideline: delivery of systemic anticancer treatments | Guidance | NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng161 (accessed April 1, 2020). [PubMed]
  • 18.Overview | COVID-19 rapid guideline: delivery of radiotherapy | Guidance | NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG162 (accessed April 1, 2020).
  • 19.Overview | COVID-rapid guideline: critical care in adults | Guidance | NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng159 (accessed April 1, 2020).
  • 20.Coronavirus (COVID-19): cancer treatment documents | The Royal College of Radiologists. https://www.rcr.ac.uk/college/coronavirus-covid-19-what-rcr-doing/coronavirus-covid-19-resources/coronavirus-covid-19-1 (accessed April 1, 2020).
  • 21.Coles C.E., Aristei C., Bliss J. International guidelines on radiation therapy for breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Oncol. 2020;32:279–281. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.https://www.radioterapiaitalia.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Best-Clinical-Practice-nella-radioterapia-dei-tumori-della-mammella-2019.pdf (accessed April 7, 2020).
  • 23.Smith B.D., Bellon J.R., Blitzblau R. Radiation therapy for the whole breast: executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018;8:145–152. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cooper R, Taylor A. Proposed guidance for radiotherapy for gynaecological cancer and COVID-19. www.rcr.ac.uk/cancer-treatment-documents (accessed April 7, 2020).
  • 25.Faivre-Finn C, Fenwick JD, Franks KN, et al., Reduced fractionation in lung cancer patients treated with curative-intent radiotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic The Christie NHS Foundation Trust. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng162/resources/covid19-rapid-guideline-delivery-of- (accessed April 7, 2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Considerations for treatment of oesophagogastric cancers within the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic. www.uppergisurgery.com. (accessed April 7, 2020).
  • 27.Lower GI response to Covid-19 outbreak. www.rcr.ac.uk/cancer-treatment-documents (accessed April 7, 2020).
  • 28.Rembielak A, Sykes A, Fife K, Challapalli A, Nobes J. Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and COVID-19. http://www.bapras.org.uk/media-government/news-and-views/view/covd-19- (accessed April 7, 2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.https://www.rcr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/sarcoma-treatment-covid19.pdf (accessed April 7, 2020).
  • 30.https://www.rcr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/head-and-neck-cancer-treatment-covid19.pdf (accessed April 7, 2020).

Articles from Radiotherapy and Oncology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES