ANESTHESIOLOGISTS across the United States have a rich history in critical care that spans more than 60 years. The American Board of Anesthesiology first offered certification in critical care in 1986.1 This development followed an unsuccessful attempt to create a unified board certification process for all critical care physicians from various backgrounds, including anesthesiology, internal medicine, pediatrics, and surgery.1 , 2 Since the introduction of board certification, the participation of anesthesiologists in critical care has not kept pace with that by other specialists from emergency medicine, internal medicine, and surgery who have expanded their role in adult critical care, including cardiothoracic critical care.1, 2, 3 This lack of growth prompted concerns about the future of anesthesiologists in critical care both in the 1990s and early in the new millenium.1 , 3 It is likely that the participation of anesthesiologists in critical care throughout the United States continues to be highly variable depending on multiple factors, including sex, opportunities, and location.4, 5, 6
The current coronavirus pandemic and its catastrophic consequences have highlighted the imperative for anesthesiologists to be key stakeholders in critical care.7 In areas hit by the full intensity of the pandemic, anesthesiologists have converted postanesthesiology care units into intensive care units; deployed anesthesia machines as ventilators; and created acute- care teams to address the unique challenges of clinical care in this setting, including airway management.7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Beyond direct clinical care in the frontlines of the pandemic, anesthesiologists also are leading operations for surge planning, educating physicians about ventilator management, and designing guidelines for sedation and analgesia in patients with coronavirus 2019.10, 11, 12
As of 2018, fewer than 4% of anesthesiologists in the United States had board certification in critical care (data provided by the American Board of Anesthesiology upon the authors’ request; data received June 17, 2019). As a comparison, more than 10% were board certified in pain medicine, and 6% were board certified in pediatric anesthesiology, and although low, there has been some growth in in the prevalence of anesthesiologists who are board certified in critical care in the past 25 years, given that in 1986 fewer than 2% of anesthesiologists had subspecialty certification in critical care, according to the data from the American Board of Anesthesiology. The focus on critical care due to the coronavirus pandemic might further stimulate an interest in board certification in this specialty, given the inspiring roles of anesthesiologists in leading and providing care on the frontlines.13, 14, 15, 16 This possible surge in demand for fellowship training in adult critical care could be met by the steady growth in fellowship opportunities across the United Stattes.17
According to statistics from San Francisco Match, the number of critical care fellowships in the United States has grown by 21.3% from 47 programs in 2014 to 57 programs in 2018.17 The number of fellowship positions offered also has grown accordingly, by 39.3% from 150 positions in 2014 to 209 positions in 2018.17 This growth also has occurred in adult cardiothoracic anesthesiology, with a 22.2% increase in programs from 54 in 2014 to 66 in 2018.18 The number of fellowship positions in adult cardiothoracic anesthesiology also has increased by 33.3% from 168 positions in 2014 to 224 positions in 2018.18 The growing interest in cardiothoracic critical care also may be boosted by the pandemic, thereby encouraging aspiring fellows to train both in critical care and cardiothoracic anesthesiology at a time when capacity is higher than ever before.19
Recently, we performed an electronic survey of leaders in academic anesthesiology departments in conjunction with the Society of Academic Associations of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine. In this survey, more than 75% (23/30) of respondents noted that a critical care anesthesiologist held a system-wide leadership position at his or her respective institution. These positions included chief operating officer, senior vice president, and chair for critical care medicine in their respective hospitals. Furthermore, all respondents viewed having an anesthesiology presence within adult critical care medicine as positive. Respondents were mixed about the financial implications of anesthesiologists practicing critical care, with 23.3% (7/30) stating that it required additional financial support, 30% (9/30) stating that it garnered additional revenue, and 46.7% (14/30) having a neutral position. Upon completion of the survey, respondents also described their vision for critical care within anesthesiology. From a total of 23 free text responses, 5 major themes could be defined as follows: further encouragement of resident interest; greater expansion into cardiothoracic critical care; the importance of critical care to the future of anesthesiology; the priority for greater support and recognition; and boosted ownership in critical care medicine by anesthesiologists (Table 1 ). Notably, a major theme is the ongoing expansion of critical care anesthesiologists into cardiothoracic critical care with concomitant integration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation into the practice of perioperative medicine.13 , 14
Table 1.
Major Themes in the Future of Critical Care
| Theme | Typical Examples |
|---|---|
| Foster trainee interest |
|
| Expansion into cardiothoracic critical care |
|
| Future practice of anesthesiology |
|
| Priority for support |
|
| Bigger footprint in critical care landscape |
|
Abbreviation: ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
As the coronavirus crisis continues, the roles of anesthesiologists outside the operating room environment will expand and add value across their health systems. The response to the crisis likely will grow the roles of anesthesiologists in critical care, including the cardiothoracic arena. It will remain important to harmonize this growth with developments in the critical care landscape, including calls for refined training certification requirements.20 Furthermore, there also are opportunities for adult cardiothoracic anesthesiology to learn from the European experience in fellowship development as the evolution in this subspecialty continues.21 The challenges ahead for fellowships in adult cardiothoracic anesthesiology include board certification and better integration with cardiothoracic critical care.22 , 23 This dynamic interface between cardiothoracic anesthesiology and critical care offers multiple opportunities for both subspecialties to harmonize, thrive, and strengthen their clinical impact and delivered value.
Conflict of Interest
None.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the Society of Academic Associations of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine for survey distribution.
References
- 1.Hanson CW, 3rd, Durbin CG, Maccioli GA. The anesthesiologist in critical care medicine: Past, present, and future. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:781–788. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200109000-00034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Napolitano LM, Rajajee V, Gunnerson KJ. Physician training in critical care in the United States: Update 2018. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84:963–971. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stoltzfus DP, Watson CB, Ries MC. Anesthesiology critical care medicine fellowship training. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:441–445. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199509000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nwozuzu A, Fontes ML, Schonberger R. Mobile extracorporeal membrane oxygenation teams: The North American versus the European experience. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:1441–1448. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lane-Fall M, Miamo TA, Aysola J. Diversity in the emerging critical care workforce: Analysis of demographic trends in critical care fellows from 2004 to 2014. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:822–827. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Capdeville M, Ural KG, Patel PA. The educational evolution of fellowship training in cardiothoracic anesthesiology: Perspectives from program directors around the United States. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018;32:607–620. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Augoustides JG. Critical care during the coronavirus crisis – challenges and considerations for the cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia community [E-pub ahead of print] J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sommer P, Lukovic E, Fagley E. Initial clinical impressions of the critical care of COVID-19 patients in Seattle, New York City, and Chicago [E-pub ahead of print] Anesth Analg. 2020 doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chopra V, Toner E, Waldhorn R. How should US hospitals prepare for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [E-pub ahead of print] Ann Int Med. 2020 doi: 10.7326/M20-0907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Christian MD, Sprung CL, King MA. Triage care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters. Chest. 2014;146:e615–e745. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dries D, Reed MJ, Kissoon N. Special populations: Care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: Chest consensus statement. Chest. 2014;146:e755–e865. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Phua J, Weng L, Ling L. Intensive care management of coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Challenges and recommendations. Lancet Resp Med. 2020;8:506–517. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30161-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Augoustides JG. Cardiovascular consequences and considerations of coronavirus infection – perspectives for the cardiothoracic anesthesiologist and intensivist during the coronavirus crisis [E-pub ahead of print] J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Augoustides JG. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation – crucial considerations during the coronavirus crisis [E-pub ahead of print] J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.03.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhao S, Ling K, Yan H. Anesthetic management of patients with suspected or confirmed 2019 novel coronavirus infection during emergency procedures [E-pub ahead of print] J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.02.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.He Y, Wei J, Bian J. Chinese Society of Anesthesiology expert consensus on anesthetic management of cardiac surgical patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;24:1397–1401. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.03.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.San Francisco Match. Critical care anesthesiology fellowship. Available at: https://www.sfmatch.org/SpecialtyInsideAll.aspx?id=25&typ=1&name=CriticalCareAnesthesiology#. Accessed April 25, 2020.
- 18.San Francisco Match. Adult cardiothoracic anesthesiology fellowship. Available at: https://www.sfmatch.org/SpecialtyInsideAll.aspx?id=24&typ=1&name=Adult%20Cardiothoracic%20Anesthesiology#. Accessed April 25, 2020.
- 19.Neelankavil J, Goeddel LA, Dwarakanath S. Mentoring fellows in adult cardiothoracic anesthesiology for academic practice in the contemporary era – perpsectives from mentors around the United States. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;34:521–529. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tisherman SA, Spevetz A, Blosser SA. A case for change in adult critical care training for physicians in the United States: A white paper developed by the Critical Care as a Specialty Task Force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:1577–1584. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.El Tahan MR, Mendoza Vasquez LE, Alston RP. Perspectives on the fellowship training in cardiac, thoracic, and vascular anesthesia and critical care in Europe from program directors and educational leads around Europe. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;34:512–520. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Capdeville M, Hargrave J, Patel PA. Contemporary challenges for fellowship training in adult cardiothoracic anesthesiology: Perspectives from program directors around the United States. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Feb 11 doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.02.011. [E-pub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Troianos CA. The time is now for board certification in cardiac anesthesia. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;34:5734. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
