Abstract
Retinopathy, owing to damage to the retina, often causes vision impairment, and the underlying molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. Using a gene targeting strategy, we generated mice with the essential gene Tubgcp4 knocked out. Homozygous mutation of Tubgcp4 resulted in early embryonic lethality due to abnormal spindle assembly caused by GCP4 (gamma-tubulin complex protein 4, encoded by Tubgcp4) depletion. Heterozygotes were viable through dosage compensation of one wild-type allele. However, haploinsufficiency of GCP4 affected the assembly of γ-TuRCs (γ-tubulin ring complexes) and disrupted autophagy homeostasis in retina, thus leading to photoreceptor degeneration and retinopathy. Notably, GCP4 exerted autophagy inhibition by competing with ATG3 for interaction with ATG7, thus interfering with lipidation of LC3B. Our findings justify dosage effects of essential genes that compensate for null alleles in viability of mutant mice and uncover dosage-dependent roles of GCP4 in embryo development and retinal homeostasis. These data have also clinical implications in genetic counseling on embryonic lethality and in development of potential therapeutic targets associated with retinopathy.
Subject terms: Macroautophagy, Gene expression
Introduction
In mammals, loss-of-function mutations often lead to early embryonic lethality, also a major cause of infertility. More than 50 million people globally have infertility and cannot access the essential interventions [1]. Despite viable pregnancies with embryos carrying gene mutations, a considerable number of newborns (~303,000) die within 4 weeks of birth each year worldwide, owing to congenital anomalies [2].
Considerable efforts have been made in screening for genes essential for cell survival in genomes. In mice, 489 genes have been knocked out by gene targeting in ES cells; 29% are lethal at postnatal day 14 and 13% are survivable (less homozygotes than predicted), whereas 58% are viable [3]. Multiplex RNAi screening has generated 166 important genes for growth in two human mammary cell lines [4]. Systematic pooled shRNA screening efforts have expanded to cancer cell lines [5–7]. A number of commonly essential genes and cell lineage-specific essential genes have been identified, thus facilitating identification of drivers of cancer cell growth and development of anti-cancer strategies. Through a CRISPR/Cas9 approach, screens have revealed differences in gene essentiality specific to cell lines and cancer types in addition to overlapping essential genes in leukemia cell lines [8]. Further functional identification has determined essential gene networks and synthetic lethal interactions in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines [9]. Gene essentiality appears to be conditional, and it may depend on mutation strategies, growth conditions, cell lineages, and the compensation of paralogous genes or parallel pathways. Studies in yeast have shown that gene essentiality can be adaptive to various environments and evolvable, probably through whole-chromosome and segmental aneuploidy [10, 11]. The distinction between essential genes and non-essential genes does not appear to be very strict. A quantitative assessment has been proposed to determine gene essentiality [12]. However, in vivo functional insights into gene essentiality remain to be explored in animal models.
Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved catabolic process, which degrades toxic aggregates and damaged organelles and recycles them as basic building blocks in order to maintain cellular homeostasis [13–15]. Dysregulations of autophagy were associated with neurodegenerative diseases, including retinopathy [16]. Under most pathological conditions affecting the optic nerve, including optic nerve transection, glaucoma, and retinal ischemia, a marked increase in autophagic markers in the RGC has been described [17–21]. However, it remains unclear whether this increase plays a protective or detrimental role under these conditions and whether therapeutic approaches should foster or inhibit autophagy. It seems that maintenance of autophagy homeostasis is important for normal physiological functions of retina.
GCP4 (gamma-tubulin complex protein 4, encoded by TUBGCP4) belongs to γ-tubulin ring complexes (γ-TuRCs) [22], which includes GCP4, 5 and 6, and γ-tubulin small complexes (γ-TuSCs: GCP2, GCP3, and γ-Tubulin). Gfh1 (homolog of human TUBGCP4) mutants are viable in fission yeast [23, 24]. Many individuals with the Dgrip75 (homolog of TUBGCP4) mutation are viable; some larvae die after hatching, but both sexes are sterile and have defects in abdominal morphology and the thoracic bristle pattern in Drosophila [25, 26]. In an assessment of essentiality for cell survival in the Burkitt’s lymphoma cell line, the CRISPR score has been defined as the average log2-fold-change in the abundance of all sgRNAs targeting a given gene, and genes with a CS < −0.1 and a corrected p < 0.05 have been defined as cell essential. On the basis of the cutoff values, 1878 genes have been identified as candidate essential genes, including TUBGCP4 [8].
In humans, TUBGCP4 mutations have been identified in patients with autosomal-recessive microcephaly and chorioretinopathy [27]. However, GCP4’s essentiality for embryo survival is unknown. Using knockout mouse models, we determined the gene essentiality of Tubgcp4 for embryo survival. Haploinsufficiency and dosage compensation of Tubgcp4 was determined in heterozygous mice. The dosage effect of GCP4 was then assessed in both cell lines and mice. The functions of GCP4 in maintenance of retina homeostasis were determined. We additionally demonstrated GCP4 pathways in regulation of autophagy in the retina.
Results
Tubgcp4 knockout results in early embryonic lethality
To explore the physiological functions of Tubgcp4 in embryo development, we first generated Tubgcp4 knockout mice. Gene targeting in ES cells was performed, which generated exon 2–6 deletion and a frameshift after exon 1 (Supplementary Fig. S1a). Two lines of heterozygous mutant mice (Tubgcp4+/−) were generated separately. These Tubgcp4+/− mice were viable and fertile. There were no differences in growth rate, body fat or lean mass between heterozygous mice and their wild-type littermates (Supplementary Fig. S2), whereas protein levels of GCP4 were not markedly lower in Tubgcp4+/− mice than wild type (Supplementary Fig. S3a). Genotype analysis of progeny from heterozygote intercrosses revealed that 36.1% were wild type, 63.9% were heterozygous, and none were homozygous (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. S1b). This abnormal ratio phenomenon was identical to that in mutant lines derived from two independent ES clones. These results indicated that the Tubgcp4 homozygous mutation resulted in embryonic lethality.
Table 1.
Embryo Stage | Total Number | Genotype (Ratio) | N.D. | Resorption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+ / + | + /− | −/− | ||||
E3.5 | 63 | 16 (1) | 34 (2.1) | 11 (0.89) | 2 | 0 |
E4.5 | 35 | 9 (1) | 17 (1.9) | 7 (0.78) | 2 | 0 |
E5.5 | 31 | 8 (1) | 18 (2.3) | 4 (0.5) | 1 | 0 |
E6.5 | 51 | 14 (1) | 26 (1.9) | 6 (0.4) | 0 | 5 |
E7.5 | 41 | 10 (1) | 24 (2.4) | 0 (0) | 0 | 7 |
Adult | 191 | 69 (1) | 122 (1.8) | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 |
To assess the specific period of Tubgcp4 knockout-induced developmental failure, embryos from heterozygous mating were collected at various periods of gestation, and their genotypes were determined by PCR (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. S1b). The number of homozygous mutant embryos decreased at E5.5, and no homozygous mutant embryos were detected after E7.5, thus indicating an embryonic death in peri-implantation of Tubgcp4-deficient embryos.
To characterize the structural abnormality of Tubgcp4−/− embryos, we sectioned intact deciduas of E5.5 and E6.5 from heterozygous intercrosses. Sectioned embryonic tissues were collected by microdissection for PCR genotyping. All embryos appeared morphologically normal at E5.5, although the proportion of Tubgcp4−/− embryos was lower than that in wild type. However, Tubgcp4−/− embryos at E6.5 displayed a developmental retardation with a short embryonic region (Fig. 1a, b). To further determine the developmental defects of Tubgcp4-deficient embryos, blastocysts were recovered at E3.5 and cultured in vitro for 1–3 days. After culturing for 2 days, abnormal development was observed in Tubgcp4-deficient embryos. After day 3, the number of Tubgcp4−/− outgrowths decreased, thus indicating that the proliferation of embryonic cells was arrested at E6.5 (Fig. 1c). These results were consistent with the high expression level of GCP4 at E6.5 (Supplementary Fig. S3b).
GCP4 affects mitotic spindle formation in a dose-dependent manner
The developmental retardation of Tubgcp4-deficient early embryos suggested a cell division defect. We thus investigated the potential role of GCP4 during mitosis. We attempted to construct a Tubgcp4 knockout cell line by using CRISP/Cas9 technology but obtained only non-functional mutations (deletions of multiple 3 bases) (Supplementary Fig. S4), thus suggesting an essential role of GCP4 in mitosis. To confirm this possibility, we further constructed Tubgcp4 knockdown cell lines (Fig. 2a). Immunofluorescence analysis of GCP4 and β-tubulin showed abnormal spindle assembly in these knockdown cell lines, including monopolar spindles, unbalanced bipolar spindles and multipolar spindles (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. S5a). The proportion of normal bipolar balanced spindles was significantly lower in Tubgcp4 knockdown cell lines than in controls, and the proportion of abnormal spindle types was significantly higher (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. S5b). In particular, the monopolar spindle type increased to 20% (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. S5b). Together, these results suggested a dose-dependent role of GCP4 during mitosis. RNA interference decreased the protein level of GCP4 and affected mitotic spindle formation, whereas complete knockout of GCP4 prevented cell survival and led to embryonic lethality.
Retinopathy in Tubgcp4+/− mice
Because GCP4 has a dosage effect on exerting its roles in development, we explored the pathological phenotypes of Tubgcp4+/− mice in detail. The head size of heterozygous mice, measured by X-ray imaging of bones, was smaller than that of their wild-type littermates (Fig. 3a–c), an effect mimicking TUBGCP4 mutant autosomal-recessive microcephaly in humans [27]. We further detected pathological lesions of sensitive tissue retina by using electroretinography (ERG). Under scotopic conditions, standard responses showed that the average saturated a-wave and b-wave decreased ~40% in the heterozygous mice compared with wild-type mice (Fig. 3d, e). These results indicated that the rod- and cone-driven circuits were significantly affected in the retinas of Tubgcp4+/− mice (Fig. 3d, e). The rod responses confirmed this result (Fig. 3f, g). Similarly to the scotopic ERG responses, photopic ERG responses were weakened in the b-wave in Tubgcp4+/− mice, decreasing approximately 50% compared with that in wild-type mice (Fig. 3h, i). To exclude the possibility that the overserved phenotypes were due to rd8-associated retinal degeneration [28], we conducted a PCR screening for rd8 and found that the mice were free of background mutation of rd8 (Supplementary Fig. S6). These results indicated that haploinsufficiency of Tubgcp4 led to retinopathy.
Haploinsufficiency of GCP4 leads to structure disorganization of retina
We then assessed retina morphology in Tubgcp4+/− and age-matched Tubgcp4+/+ mice. Histologic analysis of heterozygous retinas at the age of 6 months revealed a decrease (10–20%) in the thickness of the outer nuclear layer (ONL) in heterozygous mice compared with wild-type littermates (Fig. 4a, b). Ultrastructural analysis of photoreceptors in mutant retinas showed a disorganized outer segment morphology and disrupted lamellar structure of the outer segment (OS) (Fig. 4c).
Because GCP4 localizes with γ-tubulin as γ-TuRC in centrosomes [22], we examined whether GCP4 depletion might affect γ-TuRC formation in Tubgcp4+/− retinas. Extracts from wild-type and heterozygous retinas were subjected to sucrose gradient sedimentation and subsequent western blot analysis to detect different γ-TuRC components. In wild-type, GCP4 was detected mainly in higher molecular weight fractions, together with GCP2 and γ-tubulin (Fig. 4d, top). However, in Tubgcp4+/− retinas, GCP4 protein shifted to lower molecular weight fractions, thus indicating the disassembly of γ-TuRC (Fig. 4d, bottom). Further co-immunoprecipitation analysis confirmed the disassembly of γ-TuRC in retinas of Tubgcp4+/− mice (Fig. 4e). These results suggested that the haploinsufficiency of GCP4 affected the assembly of γ-TuRC and led to photoreceptor degeneration in retina.
Upregulation of autophagy in Tubgcp4+/− retinas
To further investigate molecular mechanisms of photoreceptor degeneration in the retina, we detected autophagy in retinas of mice at different ages. The GCP4 protein level was slightly lower in heterozygous retinas than wild-type retinas, particularly at 4 months (Fig. 5a–e). Western blot analysis showed that LC3B-II, a key autophagy protein, was upregulated and its downstream substrate SQSTM1 was downregulated in the heterozygous retinas in comparison with the wild-type retinas (Fig. 5a–c). Given that Sqstm1 expression is regulated at transcriptional level when prolong starvation treatment [29], we performed qPCR assay to assess Sqstm1 transcription and found that there was no significant change between these groups (Fig. 5d). Further, the retinal cells were used to assess GCP4-involved autophagic flux. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ, an autophagy flux inhibitor in vivo [30]) treatment resulted in accumulation of both LC3-II and SQSTM1 proteins in both wild-type and heterozygous retinas (Fig. 5f–i). In addition, over-expression of GCP4 inhibited autophagy in the 293T cell line (Supplementary Fig. S7). Thus, the decrease in GCP4 protein levels was associated with the upregulation of autophagy in the heterozygous retinas. Furthermore, in Tubgcp4+/− retinas, LC3B puncta were detected at photoreceptor inner segments and near the nuclei, thus indicating autophagosome formation in the segment (Fig. 5j). The numbers of LC3B puncta were significantly higher in Tubgcp4+/− retinas than wild-type retinas (Fig. 5k). Transmission electron microscopy of Tubgcp4+/− retinas confirmed the formation of autophagosomes in the photoreceptor inner segment (Fig. 5l). In addition, nuclear autophagy could probably occur in photoreceptor cell segments (Supplementary Fig. S8). To address whether depletion of GCP4 affects phagocytic ability in heterozygous retinas [31], we performed an immunofluorescent examination on both retinal sections and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) flat mounts, and observed no significant change in the phagocytic ability of RPE between heterozygous and wild-type retinas (Supplementary Fig. S9). These results suggested that autophagy was upregulated in the Tubgcp4+/− mouse retinas and GCP4 was involved in autophagy regulation in retina.
Autophagy inhibition reduces retinal degeneration in Tubgcp4+/− retina
Given the photoreceptor degeneration when autophagy was increased, we test whether autophagy inhibition can rescue the retinopathy phenotypes in heterozygous mice. To decrease autophagy activity in the retinas of Tubgcp4+/− mice, we administered mice with HCQ via the drinking water for 2 months. HCQ was effective in reducing the flux as evidenced by accumulation of LC3-II and SQSTM1, but there was no significant change at transcription levels of Sqstm1 (Fig. 6a–c). HCQ treatment resulted in an obvious increase of ONL thickness in both the superior and inferior retina (approximately 40% after 2 months of HCQ-treatment in comparison with controls) (Fig. 6d, e). Moreover, ERG showed a significant increase in retinal function in HCQ-treatment mice (Fig. 6f–k). These findings suggested that decrease of autophagy activity in the heterozygous retinas increased photoreceptor survival and rescued retinal function.
GCP4 inhibits autophagy by competing with ATG3 for interaction with ATG7
To explore the molecular mechanisms of GCP4 in the regulation of autophagy, we analyzed autophagy flux through a tandem fluorescent indicator, mCherry-GFP-LC3. Because green fluorescence of the fusion protein is very sensitive to the acidic environment of lysosomes and is quickly quenched in autolysosomes, only red fluorescence could be detected in the autolysosomes [32, 33]. Confocal microscopy analysis using the indicator system in COS-7 cells showed that GCP4 knockdown promoted the formation of autophagosomes after starvation induction. With BAF treatment, autophagosomes clearly accumulated, and the number of autolysosomes decreased (Fig. 7a, b and Supplementary Fig. S10). These results suggested that GCP4 inhibits autophagosome formation.
To further investigate how GCP4 regulates autophagy, GCP4 interacting proteins involved in autophagy initiation were identified through co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization analysis. We determined that ATG7, a key protein for autophagy initiation, can interact with GCP4 in 293T cells (Fig. 8a, b). Truncation mutation analysis showed that GCP4 bound to the N-terminal domain of ATG7 but not to the C-terminal region (Fig. 8c, d).
We further confirmed the interaction in vivo. Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that GCP4 interacted with ATG7 in mouse retinas (Fig. 8e). GST-pulldown assays were used to test whether the interaction was direct or indirect. The direct association was observed between GCP4 and ATG7, particularly its N-terminal (Fig. 8f, g). Immunofluorescence analysis of the retinal sections showed that both GCP4 and ATG7 proteins co-localized in the outer segment, inner segment, outer plexiform layer, inner plexiform layer and ganglion cell layer of retina (Fig. 8h). Because ATG3 interacts with the N-terminal domain of ATG7 and consequently promotes autophagy, we further determined the interaction modes of GCP4, ATG3, and ATG7. Co-immunoprecipitation analysis showed that GCP4 competed with ATG3 for interaction with ATG7 (Fig. 8i, j). Together, these results suggested that GCP4 inhibits autophagy by competing with ATG3 to interact with ATG7.
Discussion
The retina consists of highly specialized and multilayered neural tissue for initial capture and processing of visual signals. Maintenance of retinal homeostasis is critical for normal physiological function of retina, which is often affected by a variety of both physiological and pathological conditions, including genotoxicity, age-associated alterations, light damage, abnormal apoptosis and autophagy [16, 34]. Using knockout mouse models, we have found that GCP4 depletion affected the assembly of γ-TuRC, which led to abnormal spindle formation, thus structure disorganization of the retina. On the other hand, GCP4 can down-regulate autophagy by competing with ATG3 for interaction with ATG7 and interferes with the lipidation of LC3B. In Tubgcp4 heterozygous retina, haploinsufficiency of GCP4 releases more ATG7 proteins for interaction with ATG3 to up-regulate autophagy. HCQ treatment in vivo to decrease autophagy activity in the heterozygous retinas can increase photoreceptor survival and rescue retinal function. Thus, GCP4 may play bi-functional roles in maintenance of retinal homeostasis, through participating in assembly of γ-TuRC, on the other side, in regulating autophagy in retina. In line with these results, inhibition of autophagy reduced retinal degeneration by pharmacological treatment and Atg5 knockout in mice [30].
Assessment of gene essentiality in vivo has posed technical and conceptual challenges in mammals. Here, we demonstrated that Tubgcp4 is an essential gene for early embryo survival in mice. Gene essentiality was assessed in terms of the dosage effect of Tubgcp4 on mitosis and retina homeostasis. GCP4 regulates autophagy through the ATG3/GCP4-ATG7-LC3B pathway, which plays key roles in the maintenance of retina architecture in a dose-dependent manner. Accordingly, we propose that the essential gene Tubgcp4 has dose-dependent effects from tissue homeostasis to early embryo survival.
An intriguing finding in this study is the dosage effect of essential genes. In mammals, two copies of gene products are essential for embryo survival. In heterozygotes, embryo survival can be rescued by the wild-type allele through dosage compensation. When an essential gene is lacking, the early embryo can still survive until implantation because of the compensation by maternally inherited gene products. In addition, a mammalian pre-implantation embryo has a certain degree of plasticity and an ability to efficiently adapt to its development before implantation [35]. However, haploid dosage is insufficient for the functions of sensitive tissues, such as in the maintenance of retinal homeostasis. The viability of yeast cells with disruptions in components of essential pathways was rescued by aneuploidy of specific chromosomes [11], thereby supporting the dosage compensation effect of essential genes observed in mammals. Thus, gene essentiality should be assessed as a dosage effect.
Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying embryo lethality are not well understood, although several scenarios have been proposed, such as impaired expansion of the primitive streak with Oct4 depletion [36], impaired placental development caused by insufficient oxygen and nutrient transfer in Pdcd5-deficient embryos [37], and lesions in inner cell mass proliferation in mTOR knockout embryos [38]. Here, we propose that GCP4 is essential for mitotic spindle assembly in a dose-dependent manner and that depletion of GCP4 leads to abnormal spindle assembly and thus embryonic lethality. GCP4, together with other subunits of γ-TuRC, participate in the nucleation of spindle microtubules [39, 40]. In fission yeast cells, Gfh1 (homolog of TUBGCP4) mutants are viable, but with quantitatively less nucleation [23, 24]. In Drosophila, most of Dgrip75 (homolog of TUBGCP4) mutants are viable, but both males and females are sterile [25, 41]. TUBGCP4 siRNA affects spindle orientation in HeLa cells [42, 43]. Our study demonstrated that Tubgcp4 knockout in mice resulted in embryonic lethality; concordantly, no homozygous mutants have been observed in human families with autosomal-recessive microcephaly and chorioretinopathy [27]. These data suggest that the gene essentiality of Tubgcp4 in embryonic survival is specific to mammals. However, in fission yeast and Drosophila, Gfh1/Dgrip75 mutants can survive even though microtubule nucleation is impaired in culture cells, thus suggesting that its function can be compensated by other microtubule-associated pathways. Thus, our study reveals a novel genetic cause of embryonic lethality, partially explains the etiology of infertility, and suggests that essential genes can be used as candidate markers in genetic counseling.
The light-sensitive tissue, retina, links the optic nerve to the brain. Various environmental insults often impair retinal function and lead to retinal diseases. Autophagy is an essential mechanism for cellular renovation in maintaining retinal homeostasis [16, 44]. Under most pathological conditions affecting the optic nerves, including optic nerve transection, glaucoma, and retinal ischemia, an upregulation of autophagy in the retina has been detected [17–21]. Autophagy deficiency due to depletion of Beclin1 or Atg7 results in light-induced retinal degeneration [45]. Thus, homeostasis of autophagic activity is essential to supporting retinal function. Nevertheless, regulation mechanisms of autophagy in maintaining retinal homeostasis remain elusive. Here, we have identified a pathway of ATG3/GCP4-ATG7-LC3B in the regulation of autophagy in retina, which is schematically shown in Fig. 8j. GCP4 inhibits autophagy by competing with ATG3 for interaction with ATG7 and interferes with the lipidation of LC3B. The autophagic regulation pathway has both physiological and pathologic implications in understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying retina degeneration. Our results also have clinical significance in the potential treatment of retinopathy through the dosage effect of essential gene GCP4.
Materials and methods
Animals
Wild-type C57BL/6J and CD-1 mice were purchased from Shanghai Biomodel Organism Science & Technology Development (Shanghai, China). All animal experiments and methods were performed in accordance with the relevant approved guidelines and regulations, as well as under the approval of the Ethics Committee of Wuhan University.
Generation of Tubgcp4 knockout mice and genotyping
A 5.2-kb DNA fragment containing a region of exon 2 to exon 6 of Tubgcp4 was replaced with a 1.9-kb Kanamycin-Neomycin cassette and was used as a dominant selection marker (Supplementary Fig. S1a). The herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase (HSV-tk) was used as a negative selection marker. Gene targeting was performed in SCR012 ES cells (129/S6/SvEv). ES cell culture and electroporation were performed as previously described [46]. The targeted ES clones were verified by PCR (Table S1). Two independent targeted ES clones were injected into C57BL/6 J blastocysts, which were transferred into a CD-1 foster mother. The resulting male chimeras were mated with C57BL/6J females to establish knockout mouse lines. Both lines exhibited identical phenotypes.
Genotyping was carried out with the nested PCR method. Genotyping of adult and post-implantation embryos was performed by multiplex PCR using a mixture of three primers: GT-f1 + GT-r and GT-f2 + GT-r (Table S1), whereby the wild-type alleles yielded a band of 421 bp and the knockout allele produced a band of 585 bp. Genotyping of pre-implantation embryos was performed using a nested PCR strategy, whereby 1 µl from the first round of PCR amplification was used as a template for the second round of PCR amplification using primers GT-nest-f1 + GT-nest-r and GT-nest-f2 + GT-nest-r (Table S1). The wild-type Tubgcp4 allele yielded a 360-bp product and the knockout alleles yielded a 485-bp product (Supplementary Fig. S1b).
For genotyping of in situ embryos in utero, embryo tissues were cryosectioned (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Some sections were used for H.E. staining, and others were dissected by laser captured microdissector (LMD6500, Leica). Then, embryo samples were collected in PCR tubes and were lysed in 10 μL lysis buffer (0.005% SDS + 1 mg/mL protein kinase K) for 1 h at 55 °C and then 10 min at 98 °C. Approximately 1 μL lysate was used as a template for genotyping as described above for pre-implantation embryos.
Antibodies
The primary antibodies were as follows: anti-GCP4 (D-5) (sc-271876, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, USA) for western blotting, immunofluorescence and co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) analysis; Alexa Fluor488-ATG7 (ab214867, Abcam) and anti-GCP4 (GTX115949, Gene Tex, Irvine, USA) for immunofluorescence analysis of histological section of the retina; and anti-GCP5 (14620-1-AP, Proteintech Group, Rosemont, USA), anti-γ-tubulin (15176-1-AP, Proteintech Group), anti-GCP2 (AP12746C, Abgent, San Diego, USA), anti-ATG7 (ab133528, Abcam, Cambridge, USA) for western blotting and co-IP; anti-LC3B (3868 s, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA) and anti-TUBB3 (AC008, ABclonal Biotechnology, Wuhan, China) for immunofluorescence and Western blotting; anti-p62 (SQSTM1) (18420-1-AP, Proteintech Group), anti-GAPDH (CW0100, CWBIO, Beijing, China), anti-FLAG (F3165, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, USA), and anti-MYC/c-MYC (11667149001, Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, USA) for Western blotting and co-immunoprecipitation.
The following secondary antibodies were used: peroxidase-conjugated AffiniPure goat anti-mouse IgG, light chain specific (115-035-174, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, USA), horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated-goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (31430, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA), and HRP conjugated-goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (31460, Invitrogen).
The following fluorescent antibodies were used: Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated-goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (R37117, Invitrogen), Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated-goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (R37116, Invitrogen), and TRITC conjugated-goat anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (A16071, Invitrogen).
Plasmid constructs
Mouse Tubgcp4 CDS (NM_153387.3) was cloned into pCMV-3xFlag using EcoRI and XhoI to generate FLAG-Tubgcp4. Human ATG7 CDS (NM_006395.2) was cloned into pEGFP-N1 (GM-1013P031, Clontech, Mountain View, USA) and pcDNA3.0-myc using EcoRI and SalI to generate pMyc-ATG7. ATG7 fragments consisting of MYC-ATG7 residues 1 to 359 or 360 to 741 were amplified using the PCR primers described in Table S1. These fragments were digested with EcoRI and SalI and ligated into pcDNA3.0-myc to generate pMyc-ATG7-NTD and pMyc-ATG7-CTD, respectively. Human ATG3 CDS (NM_022488.4) was cloned into pCMV-3xFlag using EcoRI and XhoI to generate FLAG-ATG3. LentiCRISPRv2-GCP4-gRNA was constructed as described previously [47]. Briefly, GCP4-gRNAs were designed according to the CRISPR Design Tool (http://crispr.mit.edu/) and synthesized with a BsmB I sticky end, then annealed and inserted into the lentiCRISPRv2 plasmid (52961, Addgene, Cambridge, USA), which had been digested with Bsmb I (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania). The target sequences are described in Table S1. pcDNA6.2-GW/EmGFP-miR (Invitrogen) was digested by DraI (Fermentas) to remove GFP to generate pcDNA6.2-GW-miR plasmid. To generate the miR-Tubgcp4 plasmid, Tubgcp4 specific miRNA and control miRNA target sequences were synthesized and cloned into pcDNA6.2-GW-miR. The target sequences for Tubgcp4 and LacZ are described in Table S1. The plasmid mCherry-GFP-LC3 was a kind gift from Dr. Mingzhou Chen.
Cell culture, treatment, and transfection
HEK293T, COS-7, and MEF cells were cultured in DMEM (SH30022.01B, HyClone, Logan, USA) with 10% FBS (P30-330250, PAN-Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany). Cells were transfected in 12/24-well plates by using Lipofectamine 2000 (11668027, Invitrogen) according to the routine protocol. To establish stable Tubgcp4 knockdown cell lines, COS-7 cells were transfected with miR-Tubgcp4 1#, miR- Tubgcp4 2# and miR- Tubgcp4 3# plasmids by using Lipofectamine 2000. Stably expressing cells were screened with blasticidin (15205, Sigma-Aldrich) at a final concentration of 20 µg/mL for 2 weeks. For starvation treatment, the cells were cultured in EBSS medium (SH30029.02, HyClone). For BAF treatment, Bafilomycin A1 (B1793, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the culture for 4 h before harvesting.
Western blot analysis and co-immunoprecipitation assays
Western blot analysis was performed as described previously [48]. Briefly, protein extracts (50 μg) from tissues and cell lines were separated in 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and then transferred onto 0.45-µm membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Hybond-P). Primary antibodies were incubated with the membranes overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were washed in TBST (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) 3–5 times, incubated with the indicated HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature and then washed in TBST 3–5 times. A Super Signal Chemiluminescent Substrate system (K-12045-D50, Advansta, Menlo Park, USA) was used to detect the signals.
Co-immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously [49]. Briefly, 293T cells were co-transfected with related plasmids by using Lipofectamine 2000. The cells or tissues were lysed in HEPES buffer (50 mM HEPES at pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, and 0.5% NP-40 with protease inhibitor cocktail (04693159001, Roche Applied Science)). Cell lysates were incubated with the specified antibodies and Protein G agarose (Roche) overnight at 4 °C. The resins were collected by centrifugation and then washed four times with HEPES buffer. Bound proteins were eluted with loading buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 2% SDS, 1% mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, 0.1% bromophenol blue, pH 6.8), separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with appropriate antibodies.
GST pull-down assays
GST pull-down experiments were performed as described previously [50]. Briefly, GST, GST-ATG7, GST-ATG7-N, GST-ATG7-C or His-GCP4 were introduced into E.coli BL21 (DE3) pLyS, and the fusion proteins were induced with 0.1 mM IPTG at 16 °C for 24 h. 10 μg supernatants of GST-fusion proteins were mixed with glutathione-agarose beads (Cat# P2020, Solarbio, Beijing, China) for 4 h at 4 °C. The beads were washed three times with HEPES buffer. Then the beads were incubated with 10 μg supernatants of His-GCP4 and rotated at 4 °C overnight respectively. Finally, the glutathione-agarose beads were washed four times with HEPES buffer, and then subjected to Western blot analysis.
Immunofluorescence analysis
Immunofluorescence analysis was performed as described previously [51]. Briefly, retina tissues were embedded in OCT medium (4583, Tissue-Tek, Miles, USA) and cut into a series of 8-µm sections using a cryostat (Leica). The sections were fixed with pre-cooled methanol for 20 min at −20 °C and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 (9002–93–1, Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 10 min. Alternatively, COS-7 cells on coverslips were extracted with microtubule stabilization buffer (80 mM Pipes, pH 6.8, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA and 0.5% Triton X-100) and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature. Both tissue sections and cells on coverslips were treated with 2% BSA for 20 min at room temperature and incubated with indicated primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. After being washed 3 times with PBS, the samples were subjected to appropriate fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibody at 37 °C for 1 h. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst33258. Images were taken by confocal fluorescence microscopy (SP8, Leica). Optical z-sections were acquired in 0.4 μm steps. Z-stacks were deconvolved in LAS X software (Leica) using default parameters. All presented maximum intensity projections of deconvolved z-stacks were prepared in ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, USA).
In vitro culture of blastocysts
All blastocysts were generated by natural mating of Tubgcp4 heterozygous mice. The morning of the day on which a vaginal plug was detected was designated day 0.5. Blastocysts were collected on E3.5 by flushing the uterus with M2 medium (Sigma-Aldrich) and cultured in ES medium (DMEM, 15% FBS (SH30070.02E, HyClone), 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 units/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, 55 µM 2-mercaptoethanol (Invitrogen), and 103 units/ml leukemia inhibitory factor (ESG1106, Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany)). Outgrowths were photographed under an inverted microscope (DM IRB, Leica) each day and harvested for genotyping.
X-ray imaging
Adult mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (85 mg/kg body weight). X-ray imaging was performed using a Bruker In-Vivo Xtreme imaging system (Bruker Xtreme BI, Bruker, Madison, USA). The images were captured by a 4 MP back-illuminated cooled CCD and a f-stop 1.1–16 lens (Bruker Molecular Imaging, Billerica, USA) with the following parameters: 1.2 sec exposure time, f-stop 2.0, binning 1 × 1, X-ray filter: 0.4 mm, X-ray energy: 45kVp. Body indexes were measured by Image-pro plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, USA).
Mouse electroretinography
Mouse ERG measurement was performed according to previously described procedures with modifications [52]. Mice were dark adapted overnight and anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine (75 mg/kg body weight) and xylazine (5 mg/kg body weight) under dim red light. The pupils were dilated with a single drop of 1% atropine sulfate. A drop of 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride was applied for corneal anesthesia. A small amount of 2.5% methylcellulose gel was applied to the eye. Mice were placed on the heating pad (37 °C) of a Ganzfeld dome (Roland Q400, Wiesbaden, Germany). A silver loop electrode was placed over the cornea to record the ERGs. Needle reference and ground electrodes were placed in the cheek and tail, respectively. All stimuli were presented in the Ganzfeld dome. Light was spectrally filtered with a 500-nm interference filter. The intensities of flashes were −5, −15, −25, and −35 log scotopic candela-sec/m2 (cd. s/m2). For photopic ERG, mice were recovered at intensities of 30 cd. s/m2 for 10 min, and then tested at the intensity of 3.0 cd. s/m2. Data were collected and analyzed with Port32.exe.
HCQ treatment in Tubgcp4+/− mice
Mice were given treatment at the age of 6 months. For hydroxychloroquine (HCQ; H1306, Tokyo Chemical Industry, Japan) treatment [30], HCQ was administered in the drinking water at a concentration of 1.2 mg/ml. In the control group, mice were raised at the same condition except no HCQ administered.
Electron microscopy
Electron microscopy analysis was performed as described previously [53]. Briefly, eye samples were enucleated, and the anterior segment and the lens were removed. Eye cups were fixed in fixative buffer (4% paraformaldehyde and 3% glutaraldehyde for 4 h in 0.1 M sodium-phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) at 4 °C for at least 24 h, and post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h at 4 °C. After a stepwise ethanol and acetone dehydration and infiltration with Spurr’s epoxy resin, the samples were embedded and polymerized in Spurr’s epoxy resin at 60 °C for 48 h. Then, the samples were sectioned at a thickness of 70 nm using an ultramicrotome (EM UC7, Leica). The sections were contrasted with 5% uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined under a transmission electron microscope (Tecnai G2 20, FEI, Oregon, USA).
Sucrose density gradient centrifugation analysis
Eye samples were enucleated, and retinas were dissected and homogenized at 4 °C in 0.2 ml of HEPES buffer (50 mM HEPES at pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, and 0.5% NP-40 with protease inhibitor cocktail (04693159001, Roche Applied Science)). After centrifugation for 10 min at 12,000 × g at 4 °C, the supernatant was loaded onto a 3.3 mL 5–40% continuous sucrose gradient in HEPES buffer without 0.5% NP-40. The gradient was then centrifuged in a RPS56T-swing rotor (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) for 4 h at 314,000 × g at 4 °C. Fractions were collected from top to bottom (14 fractions) and analyzed by western blotting.
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as the means ± standard deviation. Statistical comparisons were made using Student’s t-test when comparing two groups. One-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni posttest was performed for comparisons among more than two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using the GraphPad Prism 5 software package (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, USA). For all analysis, a p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Ethics statement
All animal experiments and methods were performed in accordance with the relevant approved guidelines and regulations, as well as under the approval of the Ethics Committee of Wuhan University.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgments
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and National Key Technologies R&D Program.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, HC and RZ; Methodology, ZL; Formal Analysis, ZL, HRL, and RZ; Investigation, ZL, XX, LW, HRL, WZ, YS, XZX, BL, LL, and HL; Writing—Original Draft, ZL; Writing-—Review & Editing, ZL and RZ; Supervision, HC and RZ; Project Administration, HC and RZ.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by D. Rubinsztein
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Hanhua Cheng, Email: hhcheng@whu.edu.cn.
Rongjia Zhou, Email: rjzhou@whu.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version of this article (10.1038/s41418-019-0371-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
- 1.WHO. HRP annual report 2016. 2017.
- 2.WHO. 2000-2015 child causes of death. 2016.
- 3.White JK, Gerdin AK, Karp NA, Ryder E, Buljan M, Bussell JN, et al. Genome-wide generation and systematic phenotyping of knockout mice reveals new roles for many genes. Cell. 2013;154:452–64. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Silva JM, Marran K, Parker JS, Silva J, Golding M, Schlabach MR, et al. Profiling essential genes in human mammary cells by multiplex RNAi screening. Science. 2008;319:617–20. doi: 10.1126/science.1149185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Luo B, Cheung HW, Subramanian A, Sharifnia T, Okamoto M, Yang X, et al. Highly parallel identification of essential genes in cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:20380–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810485105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cheung HW, Cowley GS, Weir BA, Boehm JS, Rusin S, Scott JA, et al. Systematic investigation of genetic vulnerabilities across cancer cell lines reveals lineage-specific dependencies in ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:12372–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109363108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marcotte R, Brown KR, Suarez F, Sayad A, Karamboulas K, Krzyzanowski PM, et al. Essential gene profiles in breast, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:172–89. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang T, Birsoy K, Hughes NW, Krupczak KM, Post Y, Wei JJ, et al. Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome. Science. 2015;350:1096–101. doi: 10.1126/science.aac7041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang T, Yu H, Hughes NW, Liu B, Kendirli A, Klein K, et al. Gene essentiality profiling reveals gene networks and synthetic lethal interactions with oncogenic ras. Cell. 2017;168:890–903 e15.. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lieben L. Evolution: Redefining gene essentiality. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17:66. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2015.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu G, Yong MY, Yurieva M, Srinivasan KG, Liu J, Lim JS, et al. Gene essentiality is a quantitative property linked to cellular evolvability. Cell. 2015;163:1388–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gerdes S, Edwards R, Kubal M, Fonstein M, Stevens R, Osterman A. Essential genes on metabolic maps. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006;17:448–56. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yang Z, Klionsky DJ. Eaten alive: a history of macroautophagy. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:814–22. doi: 10.1038/ncb0910-814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Luo M, Zhao X, Song Y, Cheng H, Zhou R. Nuclear autophagy: an evolutionarily conserved mechanism of nuclear degradation in the cytoplasm. Autophagy. 2016;12:1973–83. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1217381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Klionsky DJ, Abdelmohsen K, Abe A, Abedin MJ, Abeliovich H, Acevedo Arozena A, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) Autophagy. 2016;12:1–222. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Boya P, Esteban-Martinez L, Serrano-Puebla A, Gomez-Sintes R, Villarejo-Zori B. Autophagy in the eye: development, degeneration, and aging. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016;55:206–45. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Deng S, Wang M, Yan Z, Tian Z, Chen H, Yang X, et al. Autophagy in retinal ganglion cells in a rhesus monkey chronic hypertensive glaucoma model. PLoS One. 2013;8:e77100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim SH, Munemasa Y, Kwong JM, Ahn JH, Mareninov S, Gordon LK, et al. Activation of autophagy in retinal ganglion cells. J Neurosci Res. 2008;86:2943–51. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Knoferle J, Koch JC, Ostendorf T, Michel U, Planchamp V, Vutova P, et al. Mechanisms of acute axonal degeneration in the optic nerve in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:6064–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909794107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Piras A, Gianetto D, Conte D, Bosone A, Vercelli A. Activation of autophagy in a rat model of retinal ischemia following high intraocular pressure. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rodriguez-Muela N, Germain F, Marino G, Fitze PS, Boya P. Autophagy promotes survival of retinal ganglion cells after optic nerve axotomy in mice. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19:162–9. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fava F, Raynaud-Messina B, Leung-Tack J, Mazzolini L, Li M, Guillemot JC, et al. Human 76p: A new member of the gamma-tubulin-associated protein family. J Cell Biol. 1999;147:857–68. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.4.857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Anders A, Lourenco PC, Sawin KE. Noncore components of the fission yeast gamma-tubulin complex. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17:5075–93. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-11-1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Venkatram S, Tasto JJ, Feoktistova A, Jennings JL, Link AJ, Gould KL. Identification and characterization of two novel proteins affecting fission yeast gamma-tubulin complex function. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:2287–301. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E03-10-0728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vogt N, Koch I, Schwarz H, Schnorrer F, Nusslein-Volhard C. The gammaTuRC components Grip75 and Grip128 have an essential microtubule-anchoring function in the Drosophila germline. Development. 2006;133:3963–72. doi: 10.1242/dev.02570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Verollet C, Colombie N, Daubon T, Bourbon HM, Wright M, Raynaud-Messina B. Drosophila melanogaster gamma-TuRC is dispensable for targeting gamma-tubulin to the centrosome and microtubule nucleation. J Cell Biol. 2006;172:517–28. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200511071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Scheidecker S, Etard C, Haren L, Stoetzel C, Hull S, Arno G, et al. Mutations in TUBGCP4 alter microtubule organization via the gamma-tubulin ring complex in autosomal-recessive microcephaly with chorioretinopathy. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;96:666–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mattapallil MJ, Wawrousek EF, Chan CC, Zhao H, Roychoudhury J, Ferguson TA, et al. The Rd8 mutation of the Crb1 gene is present in vendor lines of C57BL/6N mice and embryonic stem cells, and confounds ocular induced mutant phenotypes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:2921–7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sahani MH, Itakura E, Mizushima N. Expression of the autophagy substrate SQSTM1/p62 is restored during prolonged starvation depending on transcriptional upregulation and autophagy-derived amino acids. Autophagy. 2014;10:431–41. doi: 10.4161/auto.27344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yao Jingyu, Qiu Yaoyan, Frontera Eric, Jia Lin, Khan Naheed W., Klionsky Daniel J., Ferguson Thomas A., Thompson Debra A., Zacks David N. Inhibiting autophagy reduces retinal degeneration caused by protein misfolding. Autophagy. 2018;14(7):1226–1238. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1463121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim JY, Zhao H, Martinez J, Doggett TA, Kolesnikov AV, Tang PH, et al. Noncanonical autophagy promotes the visual cycle. Cell. 2013;154:365–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kimura S, Noda T, Yoshimori T. Dissection of the autophagosome maturation process by a novel reporter protein, tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3. Autophagy. 2007;3:452–60. doi: 10.4161/auto.4451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ding B, Zhang G, Yang X, Zhang S, Chen L, Yan Q, et al. Phosphoprotein of human parainfluenza virus type 3 blocks autophagosome-lysosome fusion to increase virus production. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15:564–77. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wright AF, Chakarova CF, Abd El-Aziz MM, Bhattacharya SS. Photoreceptor degeneration: genetic and mechanistic dissection of a complex trait. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:273–84. doi: 10.1038/nrg2717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Artus J, Cohen-Tannoudji M. Cell cycle regulation during early mouse embryogenesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008;282:78–86. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2007.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.DeVeale B, Brokhman I, Mohseni P, Babak T, Yoon C, Lin A, et al. Oct4 is required ∼E7.5 for proliferation in the primitive streak. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li G, Xu C, Lin X, Qu L, Xia D, Hongdu B, et al. Deletion of Pdcd5 in mice led to the deficiency of placenta development and embryonic lethality. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2811. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gangloff YG, Mueller M, Dann SG, Svoboda P, Sticker M, Spetz JF, et al. Disruption of the mouse mTOR gene leads to early postimplantation lethality and prohibits embryonic stem cell development. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:9508–16. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.21.9508-9516.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Petry S, Vale RD. Microtubule nucleation at the centrosome and beyond. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17:1089–93. doi: 10.1038/ncb3220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zheng Y, Iglesias PA. Nucleating new branches from old. Cell. 2013;152:669–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schnorrer F, Luschnig S, Koch I, Nusslein-Volhard C. Gamma-tubulin37C and gamma-tubulin ring complex protein 75 are essential for bicoid RNA localization during drosophila oogenesis. Dev Cell. 2002;3:685–96. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00301-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bouissou A, Verollet C, de Forges H, Haren L, Bellaiche Y, Perez F, et al. gamma-Tubulin Ring Complexes and EB1 play antagonistic roles in microtubule dynamics and spindle positioning. EMBO J. 2014;33:114–28. doi: 10.1002/embj.201385967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bahtz R, Seidler J, Arnold M, Haselmann-Weiss U, Antony C, Lehmann WD, et al. GCP6 is a substrate of Plk4 and required for centriole duplication. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:486–96. doi: 10.1242/jcs.093930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kaarniranta K, Sinha D, Blasiak J, Kauppinen A, Vereb Z, Salminen A, et al. Autophagy and heterophagy dysregulation leads to retinal pigment epithelium dysfunction and development of age-related macular degeneration. Autophagy. 2013;9:973–84. doi: 10.4161/auto.24546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chen Y, Sawada O, Kohno H, Le YZ, Subauste C, Maeda T, et al. Autophagy protects the retina from light-induced degeneration. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:7506–18. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.439935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Joyner AL, Gene targeting: a practical approach. 2nd ed. Practical approach series. 2000, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. xviii, 293 p.
- 47.Sanjana NE, Shalem O, Zhang F. Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening. Nat Methods. 2014;11:783–4. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yuan J, Zhang Y, Sheng Y, Fu X, Cheng H, Zhou R. MYBL2 guides autophagy suppressor VDAC2 in the developing ovary to inhibit autophagy through a complex of VDAC2-BECN1-BCL2L1 in mammals. Autophagy. 2015;11:1081–98. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1040970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chen K, Huang C, Yuan J, Cheng H, Zhou R. Long-term artificial selection reveals a role of TCTP in autophagy in mammalian cells. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31:2194–211. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sheng Y, Song Y, Li Z, Wang Y, Lin H, Cheng H, et al. RAB37 interacts directly with ATG5 and promotes autophagosome formation via regulating ATG5-12-16 complex assembly. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:918–34. doi: 10.1038/s41418-017-0023-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hou Y, Yuan J, Zhou X, Fu X, Cheng H, Zhou R. DNA demethylation and USF regulate the meiosis-specific expression of the mouse Miwi. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pennesi ME, Cho JH, Yang Z, Wu SH, Zhang J, Wu SM, et al. BETA2/NeuroD1 null mice: a new model for transcription factor-dependent photoreceptor degeneration. J Neurosci. 2003;23:453–61. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-02-00453.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Datta P, Allamargot C, Hudson JS, Andersen EK, Bhattarai S, Drack AV, et al. Accumulation of non-outer segment proteins in the outer segment underlies photoreceptor degeneration in Bardet-Biedl syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:E4400–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510111112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.