Enterococcus faecium is a multifaceted bacterial species. It is part of the natural human microbiota, it grows in a variety of traditional foods, and emerging multiresistant clones are a leading cause of nosocomial infections. Here, we present draft genomes of five E. faecium isolates originating from traditional Montenegrin brine cheeses.
ABSTRACT
Enterococcus faecium is a multifaceted bacterial species. It is part of the natural human microbiota, it grows in a variety of traditional foods, and emerging multiresistant clones are a leading cause of nosocomial infections. Here, we present draft genomes of five E. faecium isolates originating from traditional Montenegrin brine cheeses.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Enterococci, belonging to the group of lactic acid bacteria, are often present in traditional food products (1). Due to the emergence of multidrug-resistant enterococci as a leading cause of nosocomial infections (2), only specific strains of Enterococcus faecium can be used as probiotics or feed additives (3). The genus Enterococcus has not obtained the status generally recognized as safe (GRAS) (4). E. faecium strains exhibiting probiotic and other beneficial potentials must be differentiated from pathogenic strains, as determined by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (5, 6). Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis of E. faecium strains has the potential to distinguish between safe and potentially harmful strains, thereby minimizing possible risks for consumers (7, 8).
Bacteria were isolated from white brine-ripened traditional cheese from Montenegro, as described previously (9, 10). Colonies morphologically suspected to be enterococci were subcultured for species identification by WGS.
The GeneMatrix bacterial and yeast genomic DNA purification kit (EURx, Gdańsk, Poland) was used for the isolation of genomic DNA from overnight cultures grown in M17 or MRS broth (HiMedia, India). The Nextera XT kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used for WGS library preparation, and paired-end sequencing (2 × 300 bp) was performed on a MiSeq system (Illumina) as described previously (11). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. Raw reads were quality controlled using FastQC v0.11.9. Trimmomatic v0.36 (12) was used to remove adapter sequences and to trim the last 10 bp of each sequence, as well as sequences with a quality score of <20. Reads were assembled using SPAdes v3.11.1 (13). Contigs were filtered for a minimum coverage of 5× and a minimum length of 200 bp using SeqSphere+ software v6.0.0 (Ridom GmbH, Würzburg, Germany).
WGS of five E. faecium isolates generated 1,053,512 to 1,933,204 reads, with a mean coverage of 39× to 48×. The NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline identified 2,721 to 2,840 genes, 2,639 to 2,690 coding sequences, 168 to 192 pseudogenes, 14 to 19 rRNA genes, and 61 to 68 tRNA genes (Table 1). Species identification was done with a BLAST search against the NCBI 16S rRNA database (14), Mash distance analysis (15), and ribosomal multilocus sequence typing (rMLST) (16). All methods identified all isolates as E. faecium. Strains were characterized by MLST (17) and core genome MLST (cgMLST) using SeqSphere+ with default settings, as described (18). All isolates had >97% good cgMLST targets and were sequence type 1453 (ST1453) and the new cgMLST complex type 2909 (CT2909) (CT founder strain INF40 [sample no. 511450]) (https://www.cgmlst.org/ncs/schema/991893/searchstrain/?f=sampleid&v=511450). cgMLST-based comparisons with genomes available in GenBank revealed that Montenegrin isolates differed by a maximum of 4 alleles from each other and by 63 alleles from the closest relative in GenBank, strain UC7267 (ST1453) (BioProject accession no. PRJNA200656), which was isolated from Italian cheese in 2002. BAGEL4 (19) and antiSMASH 5.0 (20) revealed that all isolates carried genes of the bacteriocin biosynthetic gene clusters (i.e., type III polyketide synthase, the RiPP cluster, and enterolysin A). Analysis of genomes with ResFinder (21), PlasmidFinder (22), and VirulenceFinder (23) from the Center of Genomic Epidemiology revealed that all isolates carried the intrinsic resistance genes msrC and aac(6′)-li and had mutations in pbp5 conferring resistance to ampicillin C, carried the plasmids rep1 and repUS15, and carried virulence factors acm and efaAfm.
TABLE 1.
Strain | Genome size (bp) | No. of reads | Total no. of genes | No. of RNAs | Avg coverage (×) | No. of contigs | Contig N50 (bp) | G+C content (%) | GenBank accession no. | SRA accession no. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INF9 | 2,667,018 | 1,133,000 | 2,728 | 89 | 41 | 282 | 29,445 | 38.2 | JAAHCC000000000 | SRR11111645 |
INF12 | 2,656,101 | 1,628,168 | 2,721 | 81 | 41 | 417 | 15,070 | 38.3 | JAAHCE000000000 | SRR11111643 |
INF29 | 2,772,412 | 1,748,532 | 2,778 | 88 | 47 | 621 | 14,675 | 38.7 | JAAHCB000000000 | SRR11111646 |
INF39 | 2,641,555 | 1,933,204 | 2,756 | 82 | 48 | 625 | 9,506 | 38.6 | JAAHCD000000000 | SRR11111644 |
INF40 | 2,727,633 | 1,053,512 | 2,840 | 88 | 39 | 287 | 43,961 | 38.3 | JAAHCA000000000 | SRR11111647 |
Data availability.
The Enterococcus faecium whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession no. JAAHCA000000000 (INF40), JAAHCB000000000 (INF29), JAAHCC000000000 (INF9), JAAHCD000000000 (INF39), and JAAHCE000000000 (INF12). The versions described in this paper are the first versions (accession no. JAAHCA010000000 to JAAHCE010000000). The raw sequence reads have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession no. SRR11111643 (INF12), SRR11111644 (INF39), SRR11111645 (INF9), SRR11111646 (INF29), and SRR11111647 (INF40).
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This research was funded through a grant from the Ministry of Science of Montenegro (grant MNE-INNO-2018-24).
REFERENCES
- 1.Foulquié Moreno M, Sarantinopoulos P, Tsakalidou E, De Vuyst L. 2006. The role and application of enterococci in food and health. Int J Food Microbiol 106:1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hanchi H, Mottawea W, Sebei K, Hammami R. 2018. The genus Enterococcus: between probiotic potential and safety concerns—an update. Front Microbiol 9:1791. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Franz C, Huch M, Abriouel H, Holzapfel W, Gálvez A. 2011. Enterococci as probiotics and their implications in food safety. Int J Food Microbiol 151:125–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Huys G, Botteldoorn N, Delvigne F, De Vuyst L, Heyndrickx M, Pot B, Dubois J-J, Daube G. 2013. Microbial characterization of probiotics: advisory report of the Working Group “8651 Probiotics” of the Belgian Superior Health Council (SHC). Mol Nutr Food Res 57:1479–1504. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201300065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.European Food Safety Authority. 2012. Guidance for assessing safety of Enterococcus faecium in animal feed. EFSA J 10:2682. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2682. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Laulund S, Wind A, Derkx P, Zuliani V. 2017. Regulatory and safety requirements for food cultures. Microorganisms 5:28. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms5020028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bonacina J, Suárez N, Hormigo R, Fadda S, Lechner M, Saavedra L. 2017. A genomic view of food-related and probiotic Enterococcus strains. DNA Res 24:11–24. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsw043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim EB, Marco ML. 2014. Nonclinical and clinical Enterococcus faecium strains, but not Enterococcus faecalis strains, have distinct structural and functional genomic features. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:154–165. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03108-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.International Dairy Federation. 1995. Milk and milk products: guidance on sampling. IDF standard 50c International Dairy Federation, Brussels, Belgium. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Martinovic A, Radulovic Z, Wind A, Janzen T, Obradovic D. 2005. Isolation and characterization of bacterial flora from farmhouse fermented milk products of Serbia and Montenegro. Acta Vet 55:307–318. doi: 10.2298/AVB0504307M. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chakeri A, Allerberger F, Kundi M, Stöger A, Rehak S, Ruppitsch W, Schmid D. 2019. Draft genome sequences of Legionella taurinensis recovered from a hot water system in Austria, 2018. Microbiol Resour Announc 8:e01478-18. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01478-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W. 2000. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol 7:203–214. doi: 10.1089/10665270050081478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ondov BD, Treangen TJ, Mallonee AB, Bergman NH, Koren S, Phillippy AM. 2015. Fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/029827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Jolley KA1, Bliss CM, Bennett JS, Bratcher HB, Brehony C, Colles FM, Wimalarathna H, Harrison OB, Sheppard SK, Cody AJ, Maiden MC. 2012. Ribosomal multilocus sequence typing: universal characterization of bacteria from domain to strain. Microbiology 158:1005–1015. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.055459-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Homan WL, Tribe D, Poznanski S, Li M, Hogg G, Spalburg E, Van Embden JD, Willems RJ. 2002. Multilocus sequence typing scheme for Enterococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol 40:1963–1971. doi: 10.1128/jcm.40.6.1963-1971.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.de Been M, Pinholt M, Top J, Bletz S, Mellmann A, van Schaik W, Brouwer E, Rogers M, Kraat Y, Bonten M, Corander J, Westh H, Harmsen D, Willems RJ. 2015. Core genome multilocus sequence typing scheme for high- resolution typing of Enterococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol 53:3788–3797. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01946-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.van Heel AJ, de Jong A, Song C, Viel JH, Kok J, Kuipers OP. 2018. BAGEL4: a user-friendly Web server to thoroughly mine RiPPs and bacteriocins. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W278–W281. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N, Lee SY, Medema MH, Weber T. 2019. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W81–W87. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. 2012. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Joensen KG, Scheutz F, Lund O, Hasman H, Kaas RS, Nielsen EM, Aarestrup FM. 2014. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 52:1501–1510. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03617-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Møller Aarestrup F, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The Enterococcus faecium whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession no. JAAHCA000000000 (INF40), JAAHCB000000000 (INF29), JAAHCC000000000 (INF9), JAAHCD000000000 (INF39), and JAAHCE000000000 (INF12). The versions described in this paper are the first versions (accession no. JAAHCA010000000 to JAAHCE010000000). The raw sequence reads have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession no. SRR11111643 (INF12), SRR11111644 (INF39), SRR11111645 (INF9), SRR11111646 (INF29), and SRR11111647 (INF40).