Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2020 May 8;30:105682. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105682

Dataset of Vietnamese student's learning habits during COVID-19

Tran Trung a, Anh-Duc Hoang b,, Trung Tien Nguyen c, Viet-Hung Dinh d, Yen-Chi Nguyen b, Hiep-Hung Pham b,e
PMCID: PMC7207136  PMID: 32395572

Abstract

A dataset was constructed to examine Vietnamese student's learning habits during the time schools were suspended due to the novel coronavirus - SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), in response to a call for interdisciplinary research on the potential effects of the coronavirus pandemic (Elsevier, 2020). The questionnaires were spread over a network of educational communities on Facebook from February 7 to February 28, 2020. Using the snowball sampling method, researchers delivered the survey to teachers and parents to provide formal consent before they forwarded it to their students and children. In order to measure the influence of students’ socioeconomic status and occupational aspirations on their learning habits during school closures, the survey included three major groups of questions: (1) Individual demographics, including family socioeconomic status, school type, and occupational aspirations; (2) Student's learning habits, including hours of learning before and during the period of school suspension, with and without other people's support; and (3) Students’ perceptions of their self-learning during the school closures. There was a total of 920 clicks on the survey link, but only 460 responses accompanied by consent forms were received. Non-credible answers (e.g., year of birth after 2009, more than 20 hours of learning per day) were eliminated. The final dataset included 420 valid observations.

Keywords: Learning habits, School closure, Socioeconomic, Occupational Aspiration, COVID-19, Vietnam, Secondary school


Specifications Table

Subject Education, Secondary Education
Specific subject area Learning analytics, Socioeconomic, Occupational orientation
Type of data Table
Figure
Excel file
Sav file
How data were acquired Data was gathered using an online survey and converted into .xlsx format for formal analysis in SPSS v.20
Data format Raw
Analyzed
Parameters for data collection The target population of the survey was students in Hanoi who are learning online due to the effect of COVID-19. Only Grade 6-12 students were selected as they can evaluate their learning activities, and have more explicit occupational aspirations. Only students who had parental approval could access the survey.
Description of data collection The data was conducted through an online questionnaire, which was delivered to Grade 6-12 students in Hanoi using the snowball sampling method.
Data source location Information was collected from secondary schools in Hanoi (Latitude 21°1′28.2"N, Longitude 105°50′28.21"E), Vietnam
Data accessibility Repository name: Mendeley repository
Data identification number:
Direct URL to data: http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/2pzvmnb2km.3

Value of the data

  • The dataset will be useful for researchers who want to compare students’ habits in a normal situation and unusual situations such as a pandemic.

  • The dataset will be valuable to researchers who want to examine relationships between socioeconomic status, occupational aspirations, and students’ learning habits.

  • The dataset will be useful for researchers who want to conduct comparative studies on students’ learning habits in different countries.

  • The results of this dataset also contribute to enhancing educational leaders’ and policymakers’ awareness of the effects of sudden changes in educational scenarios, so education systems may be better prepared for similar situations in the future.

1. Data Description

Students’ learning habits are not the same during the school year and holidays. While a decrease in students’ formal learning habits during holidays is seasonal and predictable [1], the adjustments in their learning habits during a sudden pandemic are still unresearched. The preparation of this dataset is a response to the call for inter-disciplinary research about the effects of the novel coronavirus pandemic [2]. As a country that dealt with the COVID-19 outbreak very early and productively, Vietnam is a notable case study of instantaneous and conspicuous collaboration between the government and society [3]. However, the shift in the educational system was unforeseen and caused significant side effects [4]. This dataset [5] focused on the learning habits of 420 secondary students (Grade 6-12) in Hanoi during the first two weeks of school closures due to COVID-19. The dataset includes three major groups of variables: (A) Individual demographics, including family socioeconomic status (SES), school type, and occupational aspirations; (B) Students’ learning habits, including hours of learning before and during the period of school suspension, with and without other people's support; and (C) Students’ perceptions of their self-learning during the school closures. In addition, we added a question to measure the integration of online lessons during this time with sustainability topics. Detailed descriptions of all variables, together with the questions for each variable, and descriptive tables and figures can be found in the Mendeley data repository [5].

Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of demographics and students’ learning habits

Learning hours N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Max 95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Min
Lower Bound Upper Bound
A. Students’ demographic
Gender Male 166 1.57 .699 .054 3 1.47 1.68 1
Female 239 1.59 .704 .046 3 1.50 1.68 1
Not public 15 1.47 .640 .165 3 1.11 1.82 1
Total 420 1.58 .699 .034 3 1.51 1.64 1
Grade level Secondary school 234 1.61 .687 .045 3 1.52 1.70 1
High school 186 1.54 .714 .052 3 1.43 1.64 1
Total 420 1.58 .699 .034 3 1.51 1.64 1
School type Public school (normal) 186 1.50 .668 .049 3 1.40 1.60 1
Public school (Gifted) 132 1.65 .741 .065 3 1.52 1.78 1
Private school (normal) 94 1.63 .672 .069 3 1.49 1.77 1
International school 8 1.50 .926 .327 3 .73 2.27 1
Total 420 1.58 .699 .034 3 1.51 1.64 1
Siblings One 38 1.53 .797 .129 3 1.26 1.79 1
Two 247 1.60 .684 .044 3 1.52 1.69 1
Three 57 1.51 .685 .091 3 1.33 1.69 1
Four or more 78 1.56 .713 .081 3 1.40 1.72 1
Total 420 1.58 .699 .034 3 1.51 1.64 1
Father's job STEM-related 141 1.59 .687 .058 3 1.47 1.70 1
Social Science 172 1.64 .724 .055 3 1.53 1.75 1
Free 73 1.51 .710 .083 3 1.34 1.67 1
Others 34 1.35 .544 .093 3 1.16 1.54 1
Total 420 1.58 .699 .034 3 1.51 1.64 1
Mother's job STEM-related 32 1.59 .712 .126 3 1.34 1.85 1
Social Science 270 1.62 .715 .044 3 1.53 1.70 1
Free 63 1.43 .665 .084 3 1.26 1.60 1
Others 55 1.53 .634 .085 3 1.36 1.70 1
Total 420 1.58 .699 .034 3 1.51 1.64 1
Family income Less than 430 USD 62 1.52 .671 .085 3 1.35 1.69 1
From 430 to under 860 USD 141 1.48 .628 .053 3 1.37 1.58 1
From 860 to under 1,290 USD 97 1.60 .745 .076 3 1.45 1.75 1
From 1,290 to under 1,720 USD 50 1.80 .700 .099 3 1.60 2.00 1
From 1,720 to under 2,150 USD 30 1.70 .794 .145 3 1.40 2.00 1
More than 2,150 USD 40 1.60 .744 .118 3 1.36 1.84 1
Total 420 1.58 .699 .034 3 1.51 1.64 1
University Entrance Exam subject group A (Math, Physics, Chemistry) 52 1.48 .641 .089 3 1.30 1.66 1
A1 (Math, Physics, English) 64 1.84 .672 .084 3 1.68 2.01 1
B (Math, Biology, Chemistry) 23 1.70 .559 .117 3 1.45 1.94 1
C (Literature, History, Geography) 22 1.41 .734 .157 3 1.08 1.73 1
D (Literature, Foreign Language, Mathematics) 187 1.55 .727 .053 3 1.44 1.65 1
Other 72 1.50 .671 .079 3 1.34 1.66 1
Total 420 1.58 .699 .034 3 1.51 1.64 1
Self-evaluation of Academic performance Below Average 7 1.14 .378 .143 2 .79 1.49 1
Average 109 1.41 .596 .057 3 1.30 1.53 1
Good 251 1.62 .702 .044 3 1.53 1.70 1
Excellent 53 1.77 .824 .113 3 1.55 2.00 1
Total 420 1.58 .699 .034 3 1.51 1.64 1
English language proficiency Below Average 35 1.43 .655 .111 3 1.20 1.65 1
Average 135 1.46 .620 .053 3 1.35 1.56 1
Good 191 1.62 .721 .052 3 1.52 1.73 1
Excellent 59 1.78 .767 .100 3 1.58 1.98 1
Total 420 1.58 .699 .034 3 1.51 1.64 1
B. Students’ learning habits
Learning time before COVID-19 under 4h 312 1.38 .560 .032 3 1.32 1.44 1
from 4 to 7h 93 2.09 .732 .076 3 1.94 2.24 1
over 7h 15 2.53 .743 .192 3 2.12 2.94 1
Total 420 1.58 .699 .034 3 1.51 1.64 1
Learning time during COVID-19 under 4h 229 1.08 .292 .019 3 1.04 1.12 1
from 4 to 7h 140 1.12 .388 .033 3 1.06 1.19 1
over 7h 51 1.39 .666 .093 3 1.20 1.58 1
Total 420 1.13 .398 .019 3 1.10 1.17 1
Online learning time during COVID-19 under 4h 304 1.37 .593 .034 3 1.30 1.43 1
from 4 to 7h 88 1.97 .535 .057 3 1.85 2.08 1
over 7h 28 2.64 .731 .138 3 2.36 2.93 1
Total 420 1.58 .699 .034 3 1.51 1.64 1
Learning time with instruction under 4h 373 1.53 .666 .034 3 1.46 1.60 1
from 4 to 7h 38 1.82 .834 .135 3 1.54 2.09 1
over 7h 9 2.44 .726 .242 3 1.89 3.00 1
Total 420 1.58 .699 .034 3 1.51 1.64 1

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of students’ perceptions of their self-learning during school closures

C. Students’ perception of self-learning during COVID-19 N Range Min Max Mean
Std. Deviation
Statistic Std. Error
Self-learning during school closure due to COVID-19 is necessary because…
I can ensure my learning progress 420 4 1 5 3.90 .047 .965
I can maintain my learning habits 420 4 1 5 3.88 .045 .926
My teachers show me it is necessary 420 4 1 5 3.66 .050 1.031
My parents show me it is necessary 420 4 1 5 3.73 .050 1.019
My siblings show me it is necessary 420 4 1 5 3.27 .055 1.125
My friends show me it is necessary 420 4 1 5 3.25 .054 1.113
I consider my self-learning activities are effective because…
I have motivation for self-learning 420 4 1 5 3.44 .049 .998
I have good concentration skills 420 4 1 5 3.36 .047 .970
I have support from my family 420 4 1 5 3.35 .053 1.090
I have an effective learning environment 420 4 1 5 3.55 .050 1.034
I can define my daily learning objectives 420 4 1 5 3.44 .050 1.017
I have various learning resources 420 4 1 5 3.66 .048 .983
I communicate and collaborate with my friends about learning 420 4 1 5 3.21 .055 1.129

Table 3.

Correlations among variables and students’ total learning hours during COVID-19

Variables Total Learning hours during COVID-19
P-valure
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F
Students’ demographics
Gender .204 2 .102 .209 .812
Grade level .496 1 .496 1.017 .314
School type 2.124 3 .708 1.455 .226
Siblings .546 3 .182 .371 .774
Father's job 2.758 3 .919 1.895 .061**
Mother's job 1.998 3 .666 1.368 .252
Family income 4.695 5 .939 1.945 .086
University Entrance Exam subject group 24.148 2 12.074 4.208 .018***
Self-evaluation of Academic performance 6.717 3 2.239 4.708 .002***
English language proficiency 5.470 3 1.823 3.810 .014***
Learning hour before COVID-19 50.145 2 25.072 67.708 .000***
Students’ perceptions about the necessity of learning during COVID-19
I can ensure my learning progress 3.360 4 .840 1.733 .061**
I can maintain my learning habits 11.884 4 2.971 6.399 .001***
My teachers show me it is necessary 2.879 4 .720 1.481 .207
My parents show me it is necessary 5.135 4 1.284 2.672 .032***
My siblings show me it is necessary 3.865 4 .966 1.998 .094
My friends show me it is necessary 3.121 4 .780 1.607 .171
Students’ perception about factors that support learning during COVID-19
I have motivation for self-learning 20.711 4 5.178 11.687 .000***
I have good concentration skills 13.668 4 3.417 7.428 .000***
I have support from my family 6.083 4 1.521 3.180 .014***
I have an effective learning environment 12.054 4 3.013 6.496 .000***
I can define my daily learning objectives 21.514 4 5.378 12.194 .000***
I have various learning resources 12.963 4 3.241 7.019 .000***
I communicate and collaborate with my friends about learning 6.035 4 1.509 3.154 .014***

Table 4.

Integration of online sessions with sustainability topics

N Range Min Max Mean
Std. Deviation
Statistic Std. Error
General Preventive Health care 420 4 1 5 3.85 .048 .985
Coronaviruses 420 4 1 5 3.93 .047 .959
Sustainable Environment Development 420 4 1 5 3.58 .049 0.995
Sustainable Society Development 420 4 1 5 3.49 .050 1.033
E-learning tools and techniques 420 4 1 5 3.35 .053 1.081

2. Experimental Design, Materials, and Methods

The survey was conducted between February 7 and February 28, 2020, the first three weeks of nationwide school closures due to COVID-19. Initially, online questionnaires were delivered to parents and teachers who were active in various educational forums on Facebook. Thereafter, it was spread by parents’ and teachers’ referrals. Parents or teachers were required to complete the consent form before forwarding the URL to the student. A total of 460 responses were received, but only 420 valid observations were accepted for further analysis, due to the elimination of obviously invalid answers (e.g. more than 20 hours of learning per day).

Overall, the influence of SES and students’ occupational aspirations on their learning habits during COVID-19 was examined using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression:

Bβ0+β1*A+β2*C+u

Theoretically, the survey was designed based on prior literature on transformative learning, with the focus on socioeconomic differences. Variables in group A related to students’ demographics, including SES factors and students’ self-evaluated competencies. Scholars have pointed out that SES factors such as monthly family income, parents’ occupations, number of siblings, school type, and grade level have significant influences on students’ learning habits [6,7]. This study complements the conventional notion of SES with additional variables about students’ competencies. Specifically in the case of Vietnam, we added subjects for university entrance, which demonstrate students’ occupational aspirations, and English, which is a crucial competency in today's world.

Variables in group B measured students’ learning habits by their learning hours per day [8]. In particular, students were asked their total hours of self-learning before and during COVID-19. With regard to the total number of learning hours during COVID-19, there were sub-questions about the total hours of off-line and online study modes, as well as the total hours of learning with instruction or without instruction from other people.

Variables in group C were mainly designed for this specific data collection. All items in this section were measured using a five-point Likert scale (1: Totally Disagree, 5: Totally Agree). First, we examined students’ perceptions on the necessity for self-learning during COVID-19. According to the literature on transformative learning, students’ learning practices are influenced by their beliefs about learning and influences from teachers, parents, and peers [9]. Thus, we constructed the variable of “students’ necessity for self-learning” using the following items: (i) to ensure my learning progress; (ii) to maintain my learning habits; (iii) influenced by teachers; (iv) influenced by parents; (v) influenced by siblings; (vi) influenced by friends. Second, we measured students’ self-reports on factors that influence self-learning effectiveness. This variable consisted of different physical factors (the availability of learning resources [10], learning space [11]), psychological factors (self-motivation [12], family support [13]), and behavioural factors (concentration, goal setting [14], communication and peer collaboration [15]).

In addition, with regard to the unique context of school closures due to COVID-19, we measured the integration of students’ online lessons with sustainability topics. Students were asked whether they were taught any of those topics or not: (i) General Preventive Health care; (ii) Coronaviruses; (iii) Sustainable Environment Development; (iv) Sustainable Society Development; (v) E-learning tools and techniques.

Acknowledgments

We are deeply grateful to all the students who participated in this study, as well as the teachers, parents and institutions who supported the distribution of the questionnaires.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105682.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.xml (1.3KB, xml)

References

  • 1.Wagner P., Schober B., Spiel C. Time students spend working at home for school. Learning and Instruction. 2008;18(4):309–320. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Elsevier . Elsevier; 2020. Novel Coronavirus Information Center.https://www.elsevier.com/connect/coronavirus-information-center [Google Scholar]
  • 3.La V., Pham T., Ho T.M., Hoàng N.M., Linh N.P.K., Vuong T.…Vuong Q. Policy response, social media and science journalism for the sustainability of the public health system amid COVID-19 outbreak: The Vietnam lessons. Sustainability. 2020;12:2931. doi: 10.3390/su12072931. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training (2020). Official Letter No. 793 / BGDĐT-GDTrH dated 12/3/2020 about enhancing teaching via internet and on television during the time of absence from school to prevent and control Covid-19. https://e-ict.gov.vn/laws/detail/CV-so-793-BGDDT-GDTrH-ngay-12-3-2020-ve-viec-tang-cuong-day-hoc-qua-internet-tren-truyen-hinh-trong-thoi-gian-nghi-hoc-de-phong-chong-COVID-19-740/.
  • 5.Hoang Anh-Duc, Nguyen Yen-Chi, Dinh Viet-Hung, Pham Hiep-Hung. Dataset of Vietnamese Student's Learning Habit during School Closure due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Mendeley Data. 2020 doi: 10.17632/2pzvmnb2km.3. v3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mueller C.W., Parcel T.L. Measures of socioeconomic status: Alternatives and recommendations. Child Development. 1981;52(1):13‐30. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hauser R.M. Measuring socioeconomic status in studies of child development. Child Development. 1994;65(6):1541–1545. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00834.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Siahi E.A., Maiyo J.K. Study of the relationship between study habits and academic achievement of students: A case of Spicer Higher Secondary School, India. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies. 2015;7(7):134–141. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McNeal R.B., Jr Differential effects of parental involvement on cognitive and behavioral outcomes by socioeconomic status. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2001;30(2):171–179. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coleman J.S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology. 1988;94:S95–S120. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Henderson, A. T. (1987). The Evidence Continues to Grow: Parent Involvement Improves Student Achievement. An Annotated Bibliography. National Committee for Citizens in Education Special Report. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED315199.
  • 12.Schunk D.H. Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist. 1990;25(1):71–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Grolnick W.S., Slowiaczek M.L. Parents' involvement in children's schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development. 1994;65(1):237–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shernoff D.J., Csikszentmihalyi M., Schneider B., Shernoff E.S. Applications of flow in human development and education. Springer; Dordrecht: 2014. Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory; pp. 475–494. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Poellhuber B., Chomienne M., Karsenti T. The effect of peer collaboration and collaborative learning on self-efficacy and persistence in a learner-paced continuous intake model. Journal of Distance Education. 2008;22(3):41–62. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.xml (1.3KB, xml)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES