Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 3.
Published in final edited form as: Nanoscale. 2019 Oct 3;11(38):17664–17681. doi: 10.1039/c9nr05783h

Identification of peptide coatings that enhance diffusive transport of nanoparticles through the tumor microenvironment

Rashmi P Mohanty 1, Xinquan Liu 1, Jae Y Kim 2, Xiujuan Peng 1, Sahil Bhandari 3, Jasmim Leal 1, Dhivya Arasappan 4, Dennis Wylie 4, Tony Dong 1, Debadyuti Ghosh 1,*
PMCID: PMC7209769  NIHMSID: NIHMS1052130  PMID: 31536061

Abstract

In solid tumors, increasing drug penetration promotes their regression and improves the therapeutic index of compounds. However, the heterogeneous extracellular matrix (ECM) acts as a steric and interaction barrier that hinders effective transport of therapeutics, including nanomedicines. Specifically, the interactions between the ECM and surface physicochemical properties of nanomedicines (e.g. charge, hydrophobicity) impede their diffusion and penetration. To address the challenges using existing surface chemistries, we used peptide-presenting phage libraries as a high-throughput approach to screen and identify peptides as coatings with desired physicochemical properties that improve diffusive transport through the tumor microenvironment. Through iterative screening against the ECM and identification by next-generation DNA sequencing and analysis, we selected individual clones and measured their transport by diffusion assays. Here, we identified a net-neutral charge, hydrophilic peptide P4 that facilitates significantly higher diffusive transport of phage than negative control through in vitro tumor ECM. Through alanine mutagenesis, we confirmed that the hydrophilicity, charge, and their spatial ordering impact diffusive transport. The P4 phage clone exhibited almost 200-fold improved uptake in ex vivo pancreatic tumor xenografts compared to the negative control. Nanoparticles coated with P4 exhibited ~40-fold improvement in diffusivity in pancreatic tumor tissues, and P4-coated particles demonstrated less hindered diffusivity through the ECM compared to functionalized control particles. By leveraging the power of molecular diversity using phage display, we can greatly expand the chemical space of surface chemistries that can improve the transport of nanomedicines through the complex tumor microenvironment to ultimately improve their efficacy.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1052130-f0007.jpg

High throughput phage display screening to identify peptides that enhances diffusive transport of nanoparticles through tumor microenvironment

Introduction

For successful delivery and efficacy of therapeutics in solid tumors, it is critical for drugs to reach as many target cells as possible to improve their therapeutic index and minimize drug resistance(1). Increasing penetration of antibodies(24), small molecule drugs(58), and nanoparticles(912) through the tumor microenvironment improves drug distribution, achieves tumor regression and significantly improves the therapeutic index of these compounds. The transport of these molecules through the heterogeneous tumor microenvironment significantly depends on their physicochemical properties and their interactions with the tumor extracellular matrix (ECM)(13). The tumor ECM primarily composes of abnormal, overexpressed amounts of collagen, fibronectin, and glycosaminoglycans, which collectively form a net negative charged network that interacts with and impacts transport of molecules through size-based, hydrodynamic, and/or electrostatic interactions(14, 15).

Nanoparticles are promising systems to deliver large quantities of therapeutic cargo while minimizing off-target toxicity in non-tumor tissues (reviewed in (16)), and engineering these particles for effective transport through the tumor microenvironment is critical towards successful drug delivery. The physicochemical properties of nanoparticles, such as shape, size, and surface chemistry, govern their penetration into tumors, and optimization of these properties can enhance their transport for improved accumulation and retention. The tumor ECM acts as a steric barrier that can filter away particles based on size(17, 18). To address this problem, extensive efforts have been made to synthesize nanoparticles with smaller diameters(10, 1927) or different non-spherical shapes(19, 2832) to diffuse through the ECM mesh and improve penetration in select tumor types.

While the size and shape of nanoparticles have been engineered to circumvent the steric barrier of the ECM, molecules smaller than the pore size of the tumor ECM remain unable to traverse the barrier; here the ECM also acts as an interaction barrier that prevents particle transport due to intermolecular interactions(33). There has been less work to engineer and optimize the surface chemistries of particles to interact (or not) with the ECM for improved tumor penetration. Studies indicated that positively charged liposomes(34) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic) (PLGA) nanoparticles(35) improved penetration in tumors, whereas in other studies, negatively charged liposomes(36) and gold nanoparticles(37) exhibited improved penetration in spheroids and tumors. Typically, the surfaces of most nanoparticles are functionalized with poly(ethylene) glycol (PEG) to improve the systemic circulation half-life, but the PEG coating additionally provides a net neutral, hydrophilic surface that facilitates penetration through the tumor ECM due to its inertness. PEG-coated PLGA and polystyrene nanoparticles exhibited enhanced diffusive transport and penetration through ECM gels(33, 38) and tumor tissues(3942) than uncoated positive and/or negative charged particles. While PEGylation has been an attractive strategy for tumor penetration, there are some challenges that limit its feasibility. PEGylation has been shown to hinder cell internalization(4345) and endosomal escape(46) needed for drug and gene delivery. Numerous studies have also shown that people possess pre-existing anti-PEG antibodies, which reduces the efficacy and clinical feasibility of PEG-conjugated therapeutics(4750). In addition, repeated systemic dosing of PEGylated formulations can result in the development of anti-PEG antibodies in living subjects(5153). These findings suggest while PEGylation can improve tumor penetration, there are challenges that motivate the need to find alternative surface chemistries.

Peptides are attractive biological materials for surface modification of nanomedicines. Their length and sequence can be controlled(54), and they are chemically complex molecules that impart diverse functionality due to the amino acid sequence and their functional side chain groups(55). In nanomedicine, peptides have been traditionally thought of and used as ligands that are conjugated to improve cell targeting and internalization of small molecules, macromolecules, and nanoparticles(56, 57). For example, peptides such as iRGD have been discovered through phage display as ligands that bind tumor vasculature and target tumor cells(58, 59). However, there has also been an increasing emphasis to exploit the chemistry of the amino acids and their physicochemical properties to develop peptides as surface coatings tuned for desired functionalities. For example, there has been extensive work to develop zwitterionic peptides with positive and negative charged amino acids as nonfouling coatings on surfaces(54, 6062). Additional work has showed that peptides with block configuration of charged amino acids (e.g. KKKKEEEE) can facilitate penetration through mucus hydrogels due to partitioning effects(63).

In this work we use phage display technology as a combinatorial approach to generate and identify peptides as surface coatings to achieve improved diffusive transport through the tumor microenvironment. Phage, or bacterial viruses, can be genetically engineered to display peptides on their protein coat and can be pooled together to generate a collection of peptide-presenting phage libraries with excellent molecular diversity (i.e. 105 – 109 different peptide sequences)(64). Specifically, we used T7 phage as the scaffold to display and identify peptide coatings. T7 is an icosahedral virus that can be engineered to display 415 copies of a peptide on its gp10 protein coat and has size features (~70 nm diameter) on the scale of conventional synthetic nanoparticles. T7 phage are biological nanoparticles that can multivalently display different “peptide-based” surface chemistries that can be combinatorially screened to identify peptide coatings. Here, we engineered random peptides to be displayed on T7 phage and screened the library against the selective pressure of ECM components found in solid tumors to collect peptide-presenting phage that permeated through the ECM. After successive rounds of selection, permeating phage were harvested, and using next generation sequencing and analysis, the most frequent peptides and motif sequences were identified and subsequently validated in transport studies. Diffusion assays were done to measure and identify peptide-presenting phage that exhibited most unhindered diffusivity through the ECM. Using one of the selected peptides, P4, as a model, we performed site-directed alanine mutagenesis to study the role of hydrophilicity, charge, and the order of the amino acid sequence on diffusive transport through the ECM. We next measured the ability of select peptide-presenting phage to achieve uptake in ex vivo ECM-rich pancreatic cancer xenografts. To demonstrate its feasibility as a surface coating for synthetic nanoparticles, the tumor penetrating peptide was conjugated onto polystyrene nanoparticles, and their diffusive transport in pancreatic tumor tissue was measured using multiple particle tracking and compared to gold standard functionalized and uncoated control nanoparticles. Phage display provides the molecular diversity that can be leveraged to screen and select peptides as surface coatings that facilitate diffusive transport and establish that charge, hydrophilicity, and their orientation govern transport through the tumor ECM. This work highlights the promise of peptides as alternative surface chemistries to improve transport and delivery of nanomedicines for solid tumors and potentially other disease microenvironments.

Experimental

Preparation of in vitro tumor ECM model

An in vitro tumor ECM was prepared following a method from Chauhan et al.(65). Rat tail collagen type I at an initial concentration 8–10 mg/ml was purchased from Corning, and hyaluronic acid (HA) sodium salt isolated from rooster comb was purchased from Sigma. All subsequent steps were performed at 4 °C. HA solution was prepared by dissolving HA in 1 × PBS at 5–7 mg/ml following Ramanujan et al.(66). The solution was stirred at 350 rpm for 10 hours at 4 °C and left overnight at 4 °C. The pH and ionic strength of collagen solution were adjusted by adding 1 N NaOH and 10× PBS as recommended by the manufacturer. The HA solution was spiked into the collagen solution while stirring at 125 rpm for 10 minutes. The final concentration of HA and collagen was maintained at 0.84 mg/ml and 7.8 mg/ml, respectively, to mimic tumor ECM as reported by others(6668). The ECM was incubated at 37 °C for 1 hour for gelation and subsequently used for transwell or microchannel diffusion assays.

Peptide-presenting T7 phage library screening through the in vitro tumor ECM

A peptide-presenting T7 phage library, which was previously developed in our lab, was used to screen and select peptide-presenting phage that permeate through the ECM. The library is a collection of phage presenting cysteine-constrained random 7-mer peptides (denoted as CX7C) on the surface of the T7 gp10 capsid. We screened the phage library against the in vitro tumor ECM using a transwell assay. Tumor-like ECM (thickness ~1 mm) was prepared in the insert of a 3.0 μm pore size polyester membrane 24-well transwell (Corning). Approximately 3.2×108 plaque forming units (i.e. amount of phage) of the phage library was added at the top of the tumor ECM in the donor chamber. To allow sufficient time for phage to enter ECM prior to measuring diffusivity, a time lag of 15 minutes was allotted based on theoretical calculations for phage to achieve unhindered diffusion through saline. After, the insert was transferred to a new receiving chamber filled with 600 μL of 1× PBS to maintain the hydrostatic pressure needed for diffusivity. We then performed the diffusion assay at 37 °C and collected the entire eluate from the receiving chamber after 1 hour. Part of the output was quantified, or titered, by standard double-layer plaque assay. A fraction of the eluate was used for next-generation sequencing (discussed in the next section), and the remaining fraction was amplified to make more copies that would be used for subsequent rounds of screening. The phage were amplified in BL21 E. Coli. (Novagen) for 3 hours as followed by the manufacturer’s recommendation and were quantified by titering. The selection was repeated for another three rounds using the same amount of input phage. With each iterative round of selection, the ECM acts a selection pressure to filter out phage clones that are not fit and cannot permeate; only clones that achieve penetrating transport through the barrier are enriched. Phage library screening were performed in replicate.

Identification and selection of peptides using next-generation DNA sequencing

Sample preparation for next-generation sequencing

From each round of screening from each replicate, a fraction of the phage eluate was prepared for next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) to identify DNA sequences that encode for the peptide-presenting phage that permeate through the ECM. Prior to NGS preparation, ten microliters of each library sample (~108 pfu/μL) was denatured at 100 °C for 15 minutes to lyse the phage and release the encapsulated DNA. The workflow for NGS sample preparation was based on manufacturers recommendation (Illumina 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Protocol). Briefly, the random insert region of the T7 library DNA was amplified from the denatured phage sample by PCR using 2× KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix (KAPA Biosystems). Forward and reverse primers used for the PCR reaction were: 5’-TCG TCG GCA GCG TCA GAT GTG TAT AAG AGA CAG GTC GTA TTC CAG TCA GGT GTG- 3’, and 5’-GTC TCG TGG GCT CGG AGA TGT GTA TAA GAG ACA GGA GCG CAT ATA GTT CCT CCT TTC- 3’, respectively. An additional PCR was performed to attach dual indices and overhanging adapters that would be used to recognize individual samples from the final pooled library of all samples (i.e. each round from each replicate pooled together). The primers for the barcoding were provided from the Nextra XT Index kit (FC-131–1001, Illumina). The PCR amplicon was purified from the free primers using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter) after each PCR amplification step. The size of the purified PCR product was verified by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the DNA concentration was quantified using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) after each PCR step. After purification, each sample was diluted to 40 nM with 10 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.5. One microliter of each sample was pooled together, and the library was run on Illumina MiSeq (The University of Texas at Austin (UT-Austin) Genomic Sequencing and Analysis Facility).

Data analysis of next-generation sequencing to identify peptides

The MiSeq sequencing data was analyzed using Stampede supercomputer at the Texas Advanced Computing Center in collaboration with the Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics at UT-Austin. The fastq file was first demultiplexed based on the cluster’s index sequence using MiSeq Reporter, and the quality of the fastq files was checked with FastQC version 0.11.5. The fastq files were converted to fasta format using fastx-toolkit to filter out the low-quality sequence reads. The variable region encoding for the CX7C sequence was isolated using a customized Bash script. Another customized Python script was used to translate the coding DNA sequences of the randomized region to the phage-displayed peptide sequences. Here, sequences without insert, with stop codons, and/or truncations were excluded from further analysis. The total number of peptide sequences in each sample was also determined from the Python script, and the peptide sequences were sorted based on their frequency. The thirty most abundant sequences from all the samples were used for further experiments and analyses.

In silico physicochemical properties of the thirty most frequent peptides

Physicochemical properties such as net charge and hydropathy (i.e. hydrophobicity) of the top thirty sequences in each sample were calculated. The net charge at neutral pH of the sequences was obtained from the peptide property calculator (https://pepcalc.com/; Innovagen AB). The hydropathy, or conversely, the hydrophilicity of the peptide sequences was calculated from the grand average of hydropathy (GRAVY) score (http://www.gravy-calculator.de/)(69). Motif analysis of the top thirty sequences in the fourth round of library screening from both replicates was done using multiple sequence alignment and visualized by Seq2logo(70). Based on the frequency, reproducibility, and motif analysis, five sequences were selected for further validation.

Cloning and characterization of selected peptides on T7 bacteriophage

Cloning to express selected peptides on the bacteriophage

Five peptide sequences were selected from the NGS analysis and sequence alignment to be validated for transport through tumor ECM. In addition, a negative control clone was chosen from the original library, which was not enriched with increased rounds of selection; instead, its frequency decreased with successive rounds. The peptides were each genetically engineered to be displayed on T7 based on the manufacturer’s protocol (MilliporeSigma). Briefly, the reverse complement oligonucleotides encoding each peptide sequences (Table S1) and the biotinylated forward oligo (Biotin-5’-ATG CTC GGG GAT CCG AAT TCT TGC- 3’) were synthesized by IDT. All the oligos were dissolved in DNase free, RNase free water to a stock concentration of 100 μM and diluted to 50 μM before use. The forward and reverse oligos were annealed at 95 °C in a BioRad C1000 thermocycler (BioRad) for 3 minutes and cooled down to 25 °C at a rate of 0.1 °C/sec. The forward strand was extended from 5’ to 3’ using Klenow fragment DNA polymerase (NEB), and the extension reaction was confirmed using 10% TBE polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The double stranded oligonucleotide insert was double digested with HindIII and EcoRI high fidelity restriction enzymes (NEB) and ligated to the T7Select415–1b vector with precut HindIII/EcoRI overhangs (MilliporeSigma). The ligation product was packaged with the T7 packaging extracts provided by the T7Select kit (MilliporeSigma). The packaged clones were incubated with BL21 E. coli for infection, overlaid with liquid agar, and plated on a solid agar plate to produce plaques. Following standard techniques, individual plaques were isolated, grown in M9 liquid culture, and their DNA was purified and sequenced via Sanger DNA sequencing (UT GSAF) to validate correct insertion of the DNA sequence in the phage vector. After, the peptide-presenting phage were then amplified in liquid culture with BL21 E. Coli. to obtain sufficient quantities of phage needed for subsequent studies.

Characterization of the clones

Unhindered diffusivity of phage clones was calculated from dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurement in 1× PBS at 25 °C (Zetasizer Nano, Malvern Instruments). Clones of 107–108 pfu/μL titer were suspended in 1× PBS and syringe filtered with a 0.2 μm PES membrane (VWR) to remove any remaining bacteria debris before the measurement.

Diffusion of clones through in vitro tumor ECM using a μ-slide assay

SYBR Gold labeling of phage DNA for fluorescent imaging

We wanted to fluorescently label the phage to image and determine the diffusivity through the tumor ECM. However, it was important to label the phage without affecting the coat protein, thus conserving the surface physicochemical properties of the phage clones. As a result, the encapsulated DNA of the selected peptide-presenting T7 phage was labeled with SYBR Gold dye. While the phage DNA is highly packed and protected by capsid proteins, the capsid is permeable to water, salt, and other molecules because of the dynamic pores (~1.2 in diameter) that form in between the assembled proteins of the capsid (71, 72). This allows a permeable cyanine dye like SYBR Gold to enter the capsid and bind to the phage DNA, as has previously shown by others (7376). Since the T7 genome only takes up ~49% of the head volume, there is sufficient space for the dye to penetrate the capsid and intercalate with DNA via electrostatic interactions (73). We labeled the T7 phage DNA with SYBR Gold dye with a slight modification of the protocol described by Mosier-Boss et al. (2003)(75). Briefly, the SYBR Gold dye (ThermoFisher Scientific) was diluted to 100× from the 10,000× stock concentration using 1× PBS. Sixty microliters of each clone (108 pfu/μL) was incubated with 500 μL of diluted dye for 20 minutes on a rocker (ThermoFisher Scientific) at room temperature. One hundred microliters of sterile 50% PEG 8000 was added to the labeled clone, incubated overnight at 4 °C, and centrifuged at 17000g for 30 minutes. The supernatant containing unlabeled free dye was decanted away from the labeled phage pellet, which was subsequently resuspended with 1× PBS. The suspension was filtered using a syringe filter 0.2 μm PES membrane (VWR). To ensure complete removal of any trace amounts of free dye, the phage suspension underwent a second round of purification using ultrafiltration with Amicon Ultra 3 kDa molecular weight cutoff of 0.5mL centrifugal filters (MilliporeSigma) and five 1× PBS washes. After centrifugation, the resulting phage pellet was resuspended with 150 μL of 1× PBS and transferred to a fresh tube.

Time-lapse fluorescent image acquisition in μ-slide

We visualized the transport of the fluorescently labeled phage clones along the length of a microfluidic chip over time to calculate the diffusivity of each clone, adapting from a method by Raeesi and Chan(77). The microchannels of μ-slide (Ibidi) were loaded with 30 μL of the in vitro tumor ECM and incubated at 37°C for 1 hour to allow sufficient time for gelation. The channel length is 17 mm, with 3.8 mm width and 0.4 mm height. Therefore, it acts as a one-dimensional semi-infinite diffusion barrier for the labeled clones. Fifty microliters of the labeled clone were loaded into the inlet, and an equal volume of 1×PBS was loaded in the outlet reservoir to maintain the hydrostatic pressure. An Olympus IX-83 inverted fluorescence microscope with 4×/0.16NA objective, 1.63 micron/pixel image resolution and Hamamatsu ORCA-flash 4.0 camera, was used to track the fluorescent signal from the clones through the ECM. Images showing the migration of clones were acquired along the entire length and width of the channel for 15 hours with a time lapse of 30 minutes, while keeping the z-focus constant.

Fluorescent image analysis to determine the diffusion coefficient

The diffusion coefficient of the clones was calculated by analyzing the sequential fluorescent images using a customized Matlab script based on the procedure described elsewhere(77). Briefly, the spatial fluorescence intensity was recorded from the average intensity over each 5-pixel penetration length of the channel (up to 1.1 mm from the input reservoir) and the entire width of the channel for all the time-lapse images. The background intensity for each channel was subtracted from the spatiotemporal intensity profile and was then normalized based on the maximum fluorescence intensity. The intensity decay was plotted along with the penetration length after 6 hours of diffusion. The average diffusion coefficient of the clones was calculated from the non-linear curve fitting of each experimental normalized intensity decay values with the one-dimensional analytical Fick’s second law of diffusion (1). The diffusion coefficient was assumed to be independent of the concentration of the clone and the penetration depth.

C(x,t)C0=I(x,t)I0=erfc(x2Defft) (1)

Where,

C(x,t)C0 : Normalized concentration profile of clone as a function of distance and time

I(x,t)I0 : Spatio-temporal intensity profile normalized based on maximum intensity, I0

x : Penetration distance from the inlet along the mid-line of the channel in meters

t : Time of diffusion in seconds

Deff : Effective diffusivity of the labeled clone through tumor ECM

Alanine mutagenesis to investigate the effect of surface physicochemical properties

Alanine mutagenesis was done on model P4 clone to understand how specific surface physicochemical properties impact diffusivity of peptide-presenting phage through tumor ECM. Specific amino acids of the peptide sequence were mutated to alanine to alter the net charge and hydropathy. We also investigated how altering the spatial distribution of physicochemical properties impacts transport by changing the amino acid position of the selected peptide sequence. Complementary oligonucleotides encoding the mutant phages were designed (Table S2) and synthesized by IDT. The oligonucleotides were annealed at 95 °C for 3 minutes and were cooled down to 25°C at 0.1 °C/sec using BioRad C1000 thermocycler. The annealed oligonucleotides were phosphorylated using T4 ligase buffer (NEB), and the T7Select415–1b vector arm (MilliporeSigma) was dephosphorylated following the manufacturer’s protocols. Dephosphorylation is needed to remove the phosphate groups from the T7Select415–1b vector arms to prevent potential self-ligation of the parent vector during ligation of the oligonucleotide insert. The phosphorylated insert was ligated into the dephosphorylated vector at 16°C for 16 hours. The ligated product was then packaged, grown, and plated as described earlier. To confirm that the sequences were correctly cloned into the T7 vector, individual plaques were grown, their DNA was purified and confirmed by Sanger DNA sequencing (UT GSAF). The diffusivity of the mutants was performed and calculated using previously described microfluidic channel diffusion assays.

Live subject statement

All experiments that involved animals were in strict accordance with the United States Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at The University of Texas at ustin (Austin, Texas, USA).

Tumor tissue harvest and slice preparation for ex vivo study

All animal protocols were approved by the UT-Austin Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Six to eight weeks old female athymic nude mice were purchased from Taconic Biosciences. Approximately 4×106 cells BxPC3 cells (ATCC) in 100 μL of RPMI were mixed with 100 μL of Matrigel and subcutaneously inoculated in both flanks of mice under 2–3% isoflurane anesthesia. Tumors were palpable after three to four weeks, and mice were humanely euthanized to harvest the tumors. Tumors were removed, and tumor slices of 3 mm diameter were prepared using a reusable biopsy punch (World Precision Instruments).

Ex vivo clone uptake study

The uptake of the hydrophilic, net neutral C5 clone was compared to the negative control clone following the protocol as described by Bajpayee et al.(78). Briefly, the tumor slices were pre-equilibrated with 1× PBS supplemented with protease inhibitors (Complete ULTRA Tablets, Roche Applied Science) for 24 – 48 hours in a 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator to maintain the high interstitial fluid pressure found in the tumor microenvironment. Tumor slices were then incubated with 300 μL of 106 pfu/μL P4 or control-phage supplemented with protease inhibitors in a 96-well plate. The 96-well plate was incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for five days. Ten microliter samples from the bath were collected every day, and the bath titer of the clones were calculated using standard double-layer plaque assay. The number of phage were in the tumor slice was calculated based on the difference between the initial and final bath titer. At the end of 5 days, the tumor slice surfaces were blotted with Kimwipes, and wet weight of the tissue was measured. The slices were then lyophilized for 24 hours, and dry weight was measured; the water weight inside the tissue was calculated by subtracting the dry tissue weight from the wet tissue weight. The clone uptake ratio was calculated based on the clone titer inside the tissue to that of the clone titer in the bath at that given time point.

Diffusion of surface functionalized nanoparticles in pancreatic tumor tissues

Surface functionalization of nanoparticles

One hundred nanometer diameter yellow-green carboxylate polystyrene nanoparticles (ThermoFisher Scientific) were surface modified with either peptide or poly(ethylene) glycol (PEG) coating. C-terminal amidated P4 and iRGD peptides (LifeTein) and methoxy-PEG 1k-amine (Alfa Aesar) were covalently conjugated to the COOH functional group of the nanoparticle at a molar ratio of 5:1 using standard carbodiimide chemistry with (1-ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropyl]carbodiimide hydrochloride) (EDC) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Sulfo- (N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide) (Sulfo-NHS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific), following manufacturer’s protocol. After conjugation, we performed dialysis for 24 hours against 1× PBS using 100 kDa molecular weight cut-off dialysis membrane (Spectrum Labs) for buffer exchange and to remove unconjugated PEG/peptide. Size and the zeta potential of the uncoated and peptide/PEG conjugated nanoparticles were measured by suspending the particles in 10 mM NaCl at 25 °C. The nanoparticle formulations were stored at 4 °C for particle tracking experiments.

To quantify the number of peptides conjugated per polystyrene nanoparticle, we used Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS). The unconjugated peptides were removed from the conjugated particles using ultrafiltration with Amicon Ultra 100 kDa molecular weight cutoff of 0.5mL centrifugal filters (MilliporeSigma). The nanoparticles were washed three times with ultrapure water to avoid the presence of salt from PBS buffer. The washes were collected and were then diluted in acetonitrile up to a concentration which was within the range of detection of the LC-MS. The concentration of the unconjugated peptides of each wash was analyzed based on the molecular weight determination of the peptides using Agilent Technologies 6120 Single Quadrupole LC-MS (The University of Texas Austin Mass Spectrometry Facility). The number of the peptides conjugated to the nanoparticles was calculated by subtracting the unconjugated amount from the amount of peptide added initially to the nanoparticles. The number of polystyrene nanoparticles in the formulation were quantified by measuring the fluorescence using a Tecan 200 plate reader (Tecan).

Nanoparticle diffusion in pancreatic tumor slices using multiple particle tracking

Diffusion of the surface functionalized nanoparticles in BxPC3 tumor tissue slices was measured by multiple particle tracking following method described in Dancy et al.(39). Briefly, the tumor tissue slices were placed on custom microscope slide chambers, and 0.5 μL of 50 μg/mL of yellow-green fluorescent nanoparticles were injected to the ex vivo tumor tissue using a Hamilton syringe. The slide chambers were sealed using a coverslip, and the particles were allowed to equilibrate with the tumor tissue at 37°C for 15 minutes. The fluorescence intensity of the individual particles was then tracked at a frame rate of 15 frames/sec for 20 sec using an inverted fluorescence IX-83 Olympus microscope with 100X/1.3 NA oil-immersion objective with 65 nm/pixel image resolution. Five movies were recorded for each tissue slice, and three independent experiments were performed for each nanoparticle formulation.

Time-lapse images were analyzed using a customized Matlab script (Script S1) developed in our lab based on the Crocker and Grier algorithm and the Matlab version of particle tracking code repository developed by Blair & Dufresne(79, 80). Based on the size and the threshold intensity value of the fluorescence, the centroid of the nanoparticles were determined in each image. The particle trajectory was estimated by linking the particle locations between frames, and based on a simple random-walk trajectory, the mean square displacement of the particles within a time scale was estimated. The mean square displacement (MSD) was calculated as Δr2τ=rt+τ-rt2, where r is the position vector of the particle, and τ is the lag time. The ensemble average of MSDs (Δr2τ) of collected individual particles was calculated to average the MSD’s over a time lag of 1 sec over multiple particles(81).

Results and Discussion:

The tumor ECM is a barrier that restricts diffusive transport of therapeutics. The interaction between the ECM with the surface physicochemical properties of nanomedicines dictate their transport through this barrier. Here, the objective was to identify peptides as surface coatings using combinatorial selection against the tumor ECM and validate that they improve diffusive transport through the ECM. A second objective was to understand how physicochemical properties of peptides, including charge and hydrophobicity, can affect transport through the ECM barrier.

Screening of peptide-presenting phage libraries against tumor ECM model

We used combinatorial screening (Figure 1a) with next-generation sequencing and analysis to identify peptides that can achieve diffusive transport through the ECM network present in tumors. A cysteine constrained 7-mer random peptide-presenting T7 phage library was engineered to effectively serve as a collection of peptide-based surface chemistries with a combination of amino acids possessing varying physicochemical properties. Cysteine-constrained peptides have less conformational freedom than linear peptides which result in higher receptor binding affinities (82, 83). In addition, the structurally constrained peptides are conformationally and proteolytically more stable (83). As a result, the cysteines ensure that the displayed peptides will have a more ‘fixed’ orientation when interacting with the ECM compared to linear peptides. The short length of a 7-mer peptide do not possess secondary structures, as opposed to a longer length library that could have variable interactions with the ECM. While the 7-mer has a small number of amino acids, it is sufficient to interact with the tumor ECM, as has been shown by Cao et al. demonstrating the interaction of a 6-mer peptide with extracellular matrix protein fibronectin (84). Also, the 7-mer peptide does not dramatically alter the size of the phage or nanoparticles, so we can study transport without having to be concerned about altering the size (which does affect transport); any differences in transport would be due to the surface property of the nanoparticle. The phage library was incubated with a transwell coated with ECM components collagen I (7.8 mg/ml) and hyaluronic acid (HA) (0.84 mg/ml), which are predominant in the tumor microenvironment of pancreatic cancers(66, 67, 77). The charged ECM components serve as an electrostatic interaction filter that has been shown to hinder diffusion of charged molecules(15, 66). A 1 mm thickness of tumor ECM was prepared in the insert of a 24-well transwell. The phage library was added at the top of the ECM to allow it to diffuse through the tumor ECM model at 37 °C. After 1 hour of incubation, phage that permeated through the ECM was collected, and a fraction of the output was quantified by standard double-layer plaque assay. The remaining fraction was amplified in E. coli to make more copies needed for the subsequent round of screening. This screening was iterated for three additional rounds and the overall selection was performed in replicate. Selection of peptides using phage libraries is typically reported from one or two screenings(85, 86).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(a) Schematic of peptide-presenting phage library screening through a tumor ECM model. Phage library was allowed to diffuse through the tumor ECM model prepared in the insert of a transwell. After one hour, phage was collected from the receiving chamber and part of the eluate was used for quantification using double-layer plaque assay. The remaining fraction was amplified for use in subsequent screening, which was performed for a total of four rounds. (b) Enrichment of phage library diffusing through tumor-like ECM. Cout represents the output titer of the phage library after 1 hour of permeation through the tumor ECM, and Cin represents the input titer. Round1, Round2, Round3 and Round4 signify the iterative rounds of phage library screening. Replicate 1 and Replicate 2 are the two replicates of the screening.

Iterative screening allows the tumor-like ECM to serve as a selection pressure to filter away phage unable to consistently penetrate through the ECM, irrespective of the heterogeneity of its mesh network. In each replicate, we observed an increased amount of phage that permeated through the tumor-like ECM after four rounds (Figure 1b). The average library titer (i.e. amount of phage) of both replicates increased 200-fold and 400-fold in the third and fourth round compared to the second round. In the third and fourth rounds, the increase of permeating phage suggests there is enrichment of the library for phage that may possess desired functionalities (i.e. unhindered transport) through the tumor-like ECM. There was no increase in the second round, but the lack of initial enrichment is typically observed in phage selections(87). The enrichment of phage during selection is expected, as observed with affinity-based panning against specific targets(8789).

Identification and selection of peptides using next generation sequencing (NGS)

From each round of panning, a fraction of the permeated phage was subsequently used to identify the peptide sequences. Since the DNA sequence of the individual phage encodes for the peptide displayed on the phage surface, we used NGS to obtain a high number of DNA reads not feasible with Sanger sequencing, and the sequences were translated and sorted to identify abundant peptides present during our selection. DNA from the eluted phage was isolated and PCR amplified for the region encoding the random peptides, and the DNA were individually barcoded to identify selection round and replicate. The pooled, barcoded DNA sequences were run on Illumina MiSeq to obtain up to 105-106 reads per sample. Using customized Python and bash scripts, the DNA reads were trimmed to the DNA sequences that encode for the displayed peptide and translated, and the peptides were counted and sorted by their frequency relative to the total number of reads. Sequences that contained truncations, premature stop codons, and/or did not contain the full amino acid sequence were excluded in subsequent analysis and experiments. We then determined the overall physicochemical properties of the thirty most frequent peptide sequences by in silico analysis (Figures S1a and S1b).

From the thirty most frequent peptides after four rounds of selection (Table S3), we selected five peptide-presenting phage to subsequently be validated in transport studies. Three peptides known as P1, P2 and P3-peptides were selected based on their frequency and reproducibility, i.e. if they are present within the thirty most frequent sequences of both replicates. The frequency of each individual peptide as a percentage of total number of reads from each round of panning was quantified (Figure 2a) to determine if phage-displayed peptides were enriched during selection against the tumor-like ECM. In general, the number of the selected peptides were enriched over the four rounds of screening. The relative abundance of the individual peptides did not increase from original library (R0) to first round of screening (R1), but they are enriched 10 to 40-fold from Round 1 to Round 2 and had moderate increase in Rounds 3 and 4; these results have been observed by others and is indicative of their enrichment(8688, 90). From NGS data, we selected one peptide sequence from the original, naïve library as a negative control for our subsequent experiments. This control peptide sequence is present in the original library, but its frequency decreased with successive rounds of selection, which suggests it was unable to withstand the selection pressure of the tumor-like ECM and cannot permeate through the barrier. Two additional sequences, P4 and P5-peptides, were selected from multiple sequence alignment using Seq2Logo as described elsewhere(86, 91). Here, multiple sequence alignment of the thirty most frequent peptides from the fourth round of both replicates (Table S1) was done to identify the most abundant amino acid at each position of the 7-mer(70). From this analysis, we generated and selected synthetic motifs P4-peptide from replicate 1 (Figure 2b) and P5-peptide from replicate 2 (Figure 2c) for subsequent studies.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) Sequences selected based on their frequency and reproducibility (P1, P2, and P3-peptides) were enriched over the rounds of screening. The negative control selected from the naïve library did not withstand the selection pressure and decreased in relative frequency with successive rounds of selection. R0: Original naïve library, P: Peptides selected from phage display. Data represents mean ± SD of two replicates of library screening. Multiple sequence alignment of the thirty most frequent sequences from (b) replicate 1 and (c) replicate 2 of the fourth round of phage screening visualized using Seq2Logo generator to select synthetic motifs P4-peptide and P5-peptide, respectively.

The selected peptides along with their physicochemical properties (net charge at pH 7.0 and hydropathy/hydrophobicity) are listed in Table 1. Three of the five sequences selected are hydrophilic, one is hydrophobic, and one of the sequences is neither hydrophilic nor hydrophobic, which we term as hydro-neutral. The net charge of two of the selected sequences is negative, two are positive, and one of them has a net neutral surface charge at pH 7.0. The net charge of all the selected peptides are near neutral, ranging from −1.0 to +1.1.

Table 1.

Peptides selected for validation based on frequency, reproducibility and multiple sequence alignment of the thirty most frequent sequences from both replicates of phage library screening, along with their physicochemical properties.

Peptide Name Peptide Sequence Hydropathy Net charge at pH 7
P1-peptide CHPRSTPNC −1.2 +1.1
P2-peptide CVLADGNAC +1.0 −1.0
P3-peptide CRLEDGTLC 0 −1.0
P4-peptide CKPGDGGPC −0.7 0
P5-peptide CRPGSGGAC −0.1 +1.0
Control-peptide CDIEAEEEC −0.7 −5.0

The selected and control sequences were each genetically engineered into the T7 vector to display the peptides on the surface of the T7 phage (denoted as P1 to P5-phage, insertless (WT), and control-phage). The T7 phage are biological nanoparticles; the peptide-presenting phage clones have nanoscale dimensions, and in addition, phage have served as a template for molecular assembly of nanoscale materials and have been used in various applications in nanomedicine(92). The diffusion coefficient of clones is representative of the unhindered diffusivity of individual clones in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) using dynamic light scattering (Table S4). The measured diffusion coefficient of the insertless, WT phage (hydrodynamic diameter ~70 nm) correlates with its theoretical calculation following the Stokes-Einstein equation.

Improved diffusion of selected peptide-presenting phage through in vitro ECM.

Next, we confirmed that selected and motif peptide-presenting phage exhibited improved diffusion through the tumor-mimetic ECM compared to control phage. Here, we measured the diffusion of the peptide-presenting phage through tumor-like ECM using a fluorescence-based microfluidic channel diffusion assay, as described elsewhere (77). We prepared the ECM within the channel of a microfluidic chamber μ-slide (Figure 3a). The tumor ECM in the channel provides a semi-infinite barrier to test the diffusivity of the phage clones. The encapsulated DNA of the phage was fluorescently labeled to avoid surface labeling of phage, which could change the surface properties of the phage and affect interaction and transport through the ECM. Phage were added to the input reservoir, and an equal volume of PBS is added to the output reservoir to maintain the hydrostatic pressure and to achieve a concentration gradient through the channels. Fluorescent images of the channel were acquired at different time points and processed to identify the fluorescence intensity at each time point over the distance of the entire channel (Figure 3b). The normalized intensity value over the channel length and the entire diffusion time was used for non-linear curve fitting with the Fick’s second law of diffusion to calculate the diffusion coefficient of each clone using a customized MATLAB script (Figure S2).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(a) Tumor ECM-loaded μ-slide (b) Schematic representation of the diffusion of fluorescently-labeled phage clones through the tumor ECM along the length of the channel and with time (c) The diffusion coefficient of selected clones and the negative control-phage through the tumor ECM is calculated from the microchannel diffusion assay. The diffusion coefficient through the ECM (DECM) is normalized to the theoretical unhindered diffusivity of WT in PBS (DPBS). Data represents mean ± SD (n=3), unpaired, two-tailed Welch’s t-test (p<0.05).

The diffusivity of the clones through the ECM varied from 6.40×10−14±2.17×10−14 m2/sec for the negative control-phage to 1.05×10−13±1.27×10−14 m2/sec for P4-phage, which was in the same order of magnitude as the diffusivity of similar sized T4 phage through gels and artificial biofilm models(93, 94). Comparable values of 1.62×10−12 m2/sec and 3.39×10−13 m2/sec were reported for diffusion of 50 and 120 nm gold nanoparticles through a similar microchannel with collagen I(77). To determine how the ECM affects diffusion, we calculated the effective diffusivity of the clones through the tumor-like ECM with respect to the theoretical diffusivity of the WT in PBS (Figure 3c).

Diffusion of the negative control was hindered 80-fold through the dense tumor ECM. However, all the selected clones exhibited improved diffusivity through the tumor-like ECM compared to the control (Figure 3c). Since the only difference between the selected clones and the control was the sequence of the displayed peptides, this finding suggests that the physicochemical properties of the displayed peptide likely impacted binding to the ECM and subsequent diffusion. In particular, the P4-phage demonstrated significantly higher diffusivity through the ECM compared to the control-phage. The hydrophilic and net neutral charged peptide sequence P4 was selected for subsequent studies since it demonstrated highest average diffusivity through the in vitro tumor ECM in the microfluidic and transwell diffusion studies (Figure 3c and Figure S3).

Effect of specific physicochemical properties on the diffusivity is investigated by site-directed alanine mutagenesis.

While net-neutral charge, hydrophilic polymer coatings have improved transport of nanocarriers through ECM(33, 39, 41), the polymer coating consists of a single repeating unit (e.g. H-[O-CH2-CH2]n-OH for PEG). Alternatively, the molecular diversity of amino acids and their ordering in the peptide sequence allows us to systematically manipulate select amino acids and determine their contribution to peptide-mediated transport through the ECM. Using one of the selected peptides, P4, as a model, we performed site-directed alanine mutagenesis to study the role of hydrophilicity, charge, and the order of the amino acid sequence on diffusive transport through the ECM. We substituted specific amino acids with alanine, which has an inert methyl functional side chain group that does not change the main conformation of the peptide, and thereby we removed the functional groups to create mutants with different surface physicochemical characteristics. We tested the diffusivity of these mutants through the tumor ECM using the aforementioned microchannel diffusion assay.

The P4 sequence has one basic amino acid, and the remaining residues are polar amino acids. To alter the net charge, we mutated the basic and acidic positions to alanine to create negative (–1) and positive (+1) charge modifications, respectively (Table 2a). The diffusivity of the original and charge modified clones through tumor-like ECM was measured, and their diffusivity was compared to the theoretical diffusivity of WT in PBS. The original neutral clone exhibits approximately 1.5-fold higher effective diffusivity compared to the positive and negative modifications (Figure 4a). As a result of the alanine mutations, the hydrophobicity of the sequences has also been changed due to the removal of the polar acidic and basic amino acid residues. A similar decrease in hydrophilicity was also observed during library screening, where highly positive and negative charged peptides (with polar basic and acidic residues) were filtered out with increased rounds (Figures S1a and S1b).

Table 2a.

Alanine mutagenesis to study the effect of net surface charge

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Charge Hydropathicity
P4-phage K P G D G G P 0 −0.756
Negative A P G D G G P −1 −0.122
Positive K P G A G G P +1 −0.167

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

A la nine mutagenesis. Native an d mutant P4-phage were used in microfluidic diffusion assays to understand the effect of (a) surface charge, (b) hydrophobicity, and (c) spatial order of the amino acids on diffusion through ECM (DECM) relative to their unhindered diffusion through PBS (DPBS). Hydro-neutral signifies neither hydrophilic nor hydrophobic. Data represents mean ± SD (n=3), One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparison (p<0.05).

Next, we determined the role of hydrophobicity on transport of our selected peptide through the ECM. We modified the hydrophobicity of the original sequence through alanine mutagenesis of some or all of the polar amino acids, as indicated in Table 2b. In one of the modifications, we designed a peptide that is neither hydrophilic nor hydrophobic, which we termed hydro-neutral. We also generated a hydrophobic sequence where all of the polar amino acids were substituted with alanine. These modifications retained the same net charge of the original sequence while altering the hydrophobicity (Table 2b). The original hydrophilic clone demonstrated 2-fold and 1.5-fold higher diffusivity than the hydro-neutral and hydrophobic clones, respectively (Figure 4b). This result is similar to reports where hydrophilic PEG coatings on hydrophobic polystyrene and poly(lactic-co-glycolic) nanoparticles improved their diffusivity through brain(41) and breast(39) tumor microenvironments. Hydrophobic surfaces of particles can strongly bind to the ECM(41), and hydrophilic coatings minimize adhesion.

Table 2b.

Alanine mutagenesis to study the effect of hydropathy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Charge Hydropathy
P4-phage K P G D G G P 0 −0.756
Hydro-Neutral K A G D G G A 0 0
Hydrophobic K A A D A A A 0 0.733

Next, we made alterations to the order of the amino acid sequence to understand how changing the spatial order of the physicochemical properties affects diffusive transport through the tumor ECM. We made two modifications—(1) interchange the position of the basic and the acidic amino acid residue of the P4 sequence and (2) place the acidic and basic residues adjacent to each other (Table 2c). The net charge and hydrophobicity of the mutant sequences remain the same as the original sequence. From diffusion assays, the original selected sequence exhibits three-fold and two-fold higher effective diffusivity compared to the interchanged and adjacent mutants, respectively (Figure 4c). This result suggests that the order of the amino acid sequence significantly impacts the diffusivity through the tumor-like ECM. Others have previously shown that modifying the spatial configuration of charge modulates the transport of peptides through a mucin hydrogel(63). There, two peptides with the same net charge but different amino acid configuration had different transport behavior through mucin; a peptide possessing block charge (e.g. KKKKEEEE) demonstrated partitioning and a sharper diffusion gradient than alternating amino acids with same composition and net charge (e.g. KEKEKEKE)(63). Placing the basic and acidic amino acids adjacent to each other neutralizes the effect of the charged amino acids, thereby altering the interaction with the surrounding environment(63). However, it is unknown why there is a decrease in the diffusivity through the tumor ECM by interchanging the position of the charged amino acids, and further studies are needed to understand their interaction with the ECM and correlate to transport.

Table 2c.

Alanine mutagenesis to study the effect of spatial order of the amino acids

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Charge Hydropathy
P4-phage K P G D G G P 0 −0.756
Interchange D P G K G G P 0 −0.756
Adjacent G K D P G P G 0 −0.756

Higher equilibrium uptake of selected peptide in ex vivo pancreatic tumor tissues.

Building on our in vitro studies, we next validated that our selected clone P4-phage improved transport and uptake in tumors compared to the negative control-phage. We measured and quantified ex vivo uptake of our peptide-presenting phage in ECM-rich BxPC3 pancreatic tumor xenografts(95) as described by Bajpayee et al.(78). Briefly, the BxPC3 tumor tissue slices were preequilibrated in PBS with protease inhibitor and incubated with in a bath of sample, P4 or control-phage. We calculated the clone uptake ratio in the tissue by quantifying the amount of phage in the tissue to the amount in the incubation bath over several days. The average uptake of selected clone P4-phage dramatically increased from 1.67×102.08×103 after 1 day to 1.34×102.31×108 after 5 days of the incubation, whereas the tumor uptake of the negative control-phage only increased from 1.12×104.94×102 in 1 day to 7.27×101.32×105 in 5 days (Figure 5). Consequently, the uptake ratio of P4-phage is 200 times higher than that of the negative control-phage after five days of incubation with the ex vivo tumor tissue. At initial timepoints, the rate of uptake is similar for both clones, but at later timepoints, there is a larger concentration gradient for our selected clone. This gradient allows continued diffusion and further transport of the P4-phage into the tumor tissue than observed with the control-phage. The difference in concentration gradients resulting in improved tissue uptake has been observed in cartilage explants(78, 96, 97) and mucus hydrogels(63).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Uptake ratio of clones in ex vivo tumor tissue. Uptake ratio of the selected clone P4-phage compared to the negative control-phage in ex vivo tumor tissue over five days of incubation. Data represents mean ± SD (n=3).

Improved transport of nanoparticles in tumor tissue with peptide coatings.

While we have demonstrated that P4 peptide facilitates and improves transport of phage (P4-phage) through the tumors, we wanted to translate peptides from the structural context of phage and demonstrate their ability as surface coatings to improve diffusive transport of synthetic nanoparticles through the tumor microenvironment towards improving drug delivery. Here, fluorescent nanoparticles were conjugated with our selected peptide or gold standard controls from literature, and their displacement in tumors was tracked and measured using particle tracking microscopy.

We compared the penetration of P4-coated nanoparticle through the tumor ECM with two functionalized controls that have been previously used to improve the penetration and/or uptake of nanoparticles. iRGD peptide (CRGDKGPDC), which is a cysteine constrained 9-mer peptide sequence identified by phage display, has been extensively demonstrated to improve solid tumor penetration(59). This CendR motif peptide rapidly penetrates across tumor tissue via Neuropilin 1-mediated endocytosis and subsequent intercellular transport(98). On the other hand, the peptides identified in this work are expected to be used as coatings that have favorable interactions with the tumor microenvironment to improve the diffusive transport and the distribution of the nanoparticle drug carriers within the microenvironment. In addition, low molecular weight PEG surface modification of nanoparticles has been shown to improve their diffusivity through various biological barriers including mucus(99, 100), brain extracellular space(41) and solid tumor ECM(39). We conjugated the peptides and PEG coatings to fluorescent carboxylate nanoparticles via standard EDC bioconjugation chemistry. On average approximately 106 peptides were conjugated to each polystyrene nanoparticle. We selected PEG 1 kDa to match with the size of the peptide used in this work. As a result, the size and surface properties of all the particles are similar (Table 3), and therefore any change in the diffusivity of the particles is due to their interactions with the tumor tissue.

Table 3.

Characterization of the PEG/peptide coated nanoparticle formulations.

Sample Size (nm) PDI Zeta potential (mV) <MSD>PBS/<MSD>tumor(1 sec time lag)
Uncoated 145.9±0.9 0.09 −71.4±2.6 2373.63
P4-coated 152.5±2.9 0.08 −59.9±3.9 57.24
iRGD-coated 153.1±3.0 0.08 −62.9±3.3 137.66
PEGylated 150.1±0.2 0.09 −52.3±3.4 238.64

We performed multiple particle tracking to measure the displacement of the surface modified nanoparticles through ex vivo BxPC3 tumor tissue xenografts (Script S1). The collective movement of uncoated nanoparticles was strongly hindered in the tumor tissue (Figure 6 and Table 3). The average MSD of the uncoated particles was 10−4 to 10−3 μm2, which is nearly ten-fold less compared to the value reported by Dancy et al. using 100 nm beads (measured size of 96 nm) through ex vivo breast tumor slices(39). The discrepancy can be attributed to the difference in the actual hydrodynamic size of the nanoparticles used in both studies and/or the heterogeneous composition and pore size distribution between the breast tumor versus pancreatic tumor microenvironments. The PEG and peptide coatings improved diffusion of the nanoparticles, as indicated by the upward shift in the ensemble-averaged MSD at a time scale of 1 sec (Figure 6a). Both PEGylation and iRGD-coating improved the MSD of the nanoparticle 10- and 15-fold, respectively (Figure 6b). This improvement is most likely due to their hydrophilic and less negative surface charge properties. Interestingly, the P4-peptide coating improved the MSD of the nanoparticle 40-fold, exhibiting greater improvement than the other coatings. Examining the individual particle diffusivity binned together as ensemble measurements through the tumor ECM, there is a shift in particle distribution towards higher MSD upon PEG or P4-peptide coating (Figures 6c and 6d). In particular, there is a larger fraction of P4 peptide-coated nanoparticles that are mobile and demonstrate rapid diffusivity (log MSD is greater than −0.5) compared to PEG-coated nanoparticles (5% to 1%, respectively). Given that the same molar ratio was used to conjugate peptide/PEG onto nanoparticles, this result suggests that the optimal peptide coating improves unhindered particle transport through the tumor ECM.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Diffusion of different surface functionalized nanoparticles through ex vivo tumor tissue. Ensemble-averaged MSD of peptide or PEG coated nanoparticles were compared (a) as a function of time scale and (b) at a time scale of 1 sec with the uncoated polystyrene nanoparticles using multiple particle tracking. The distribution of the logarithms of individual MSDs at a time scale of 1s of (c) uncoated versus P4-coated, and (d) uncoated vs PEGylated nanoparticles. Data represents mean ± SD for three experiments, with n ≥ 100 nanoparticles for each experiment.

Next, we quantified the MSD of the uncoated particle through PBS using particle tracking (Script S1 and Figure S4) and used these measurements to understand how the tumor ECM hinders nanoparticle transport (Table 3). The ensemble-averaged MSD of the particles in tumor ECM was compared to the unhindered MSD of the uncoated bead through PBS after 1 sec time lag (Table 3). There was a ~2000-fold decrease in the MSD of the uncoated nanoparticle through the tumor, whereas peptide and PEG-coatings reduced the hindrance of nanoparticle transport through the tumor tissue. P4 surface-coating most effectively reduced hindered transport, with only a ~57-fold decrease in transport in tumor relative to unhindered transport in PBS. The presence of both cationic and anionic amino acid residues in the net neutral P4 peptide CKPGDGGPC might lead to electrostatic-driven binding with the tumor ECM. Our observations support findings reported by Li et al., who studied diffusive transport of peptides through charged network of mucus (63). They observed that net neutral peptides with positive and negative amino acids can improve diffusion through mucus via weak, reversible electrostatic interactions. They also observed enhanced transport of a net neutral peptide with a block combination of negative and positive surface charge through a mucus barrier compared to a peptide with same net charge but different charge configuration because of Donnan partitioning. While our observations may suggest that amino acid charge and order impact the diffusivity of peptides, and this may be due to binding interactions with the tumor ECM, a detailed future study linking the mechanism of binding with transport of the P4 peptide is required.

Conclusion:

From combinatorial screening of a peptide-presenting phage “nanoparticle” library, we identified peptides as surface chemistries that facilitate diffusive transport through the ECM in tumor microenvironments, which can be used to ultimately improve transport of nanomedicines. Taking advantage of the molecular diversity of peptide-presenting phage libraries and their physicochemical properties, we are able to screen, iterate, and select peptides that can overcome the selection barrier of the tumor ECM to achieve permeating transport. The use of next-generation DNA sequencing allows us to expand the sequence sample space of peptides that can be analyzed and tested for improved transport. From next-generation sequencing data and in silico analysis, we identified specific peptides and motif sequences that enhanced transport through the ECM barrier. Select peptide-presenting clones exhibit rapid transport, as evidenced by an significant increase in their tumor transport compared to the negative control. Through systematic mutagenesis of the model P4 peptide-presenting phage, we demonstrate that alterations of the physicochemical properties and the configuration of the peptide impacts transport. We hypothesize that the mutations change the binding affinity of the peptide to the ECM, thereby hindering their diffusion. The role of binding interactions and its impact on diffusion has been observed in peptide transport through mucus and cartilage; however, further studies are needed to elucidate this mechanism in the tumor microenvironment. The model peptide-presenting phage exhibited increased uptake in tumor tissue compared to the negative control. Importantly, peptides are promising as surface coatings to improve nanoparticle transport through the tumor microenvironment. Peptide coatings reduce the hindered transport of uncoated nanoparticles through the tumor ECM and demonstrate improved transport compared to gold standard polymeric coatings. Importantly, there is a greater fraction of nanoparticles that achieve rapid transport in tumor tissues with our peptide coating compared with PEG and other controls. Additional studies are needed to study how molecular weight and density of peptide and PEG coatings affect diffusion through tumors and tumor-like environments(38). Collectively, these findings highlight that peptides are promising as alternative coatings to improve diffusion and distribution of nanomedicines across biological barriers of solid tumors and possibly of other diseases. Due to the zwitterionic character of these peptides, it would be of interest to study the antifouling properties of these peptides, as reported by others(61); this would increase the attractiveness of our peptide-modified surfaces. While these studies were done in the ex vivo environment, we can translate these findings to investigate the antitumor efficacy of the peptide-coated therapeutics after local delivery in vivo. We acknowledge that it in the future, it would be useful to study the anti-fouling properties, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of these peptides to expand their potential use in systemic delivery.

Supplementary Material

ESI

Acknowledgements

Work was supported by NIH National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01HL138251 and startup funds from the College of Pharmacy at University of Texas at Austin. We acknowledge The University of Texas at Austin Genome Sequencing and Analysis Facility with assistance with Sanger DNA sequencing and next-generation DNA sequencing.

Footnotes

Ethical Statement

All procedures involving animals were in strict compliance with the NIH guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals (United States Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals) and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at The University of Texas at Austin (Austin, Texas, USA).

Conflicts of interests

There are no conflicts to declare.

References

  • 1.Minchinton AI, Tannock IF. Drug penetration in solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(8):583–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cilliers C, Menezes B, Nessler I, Linderman J, Thurber GM. Improved Tumor Penetration and Single-Cell Targeting of Antibody-Drug Conjugates Increases Anticancer Efficacy and Host Survival. Cancer research. 2018;78(3):758–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tong RT, Boucher Y, Kozin SV, Winkler F, Hicklin DJ, Jain RK. Vascular normalization by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 blockade induces a pressure gradient across the vasculature and improves drug penetration in tumors. Cancer research. 2004;64(11):3731–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Koch M, de Jong JS, Glatz J, Symvoulidis P, Lamberts LE, Adams AL, et al. Threshold Analysis and Biodistribution of Fluorescently Labeled Bevacizumab in Human Breast Cancer. Cancer research. 2017;77(3):623–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chauhan VP, Martin JD, Liu H, Lacorre DA, Jain SR, Kozin SV, et al. Angiotensin inhibition enhances drug delivery and potentiates chemotherapy by decompressing tumour blood vessels. Nature communications. 2013;4:2516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Primeau AJ, Rendon A, Hedley D, Lilge L, Tannock IF. The distribution of the anticancer drug Doxorubicin in relation to blood vessels in solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(24 Pt 1):8782–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tannock IF, Lee CM, Tunggal JK, Cowan DS, Egorin MJ. Limited penetration of anticancer drugs through tumor tissue: a potential cause of resistance of solid tumors to chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8(3):878–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tunggal JK, Cowan DS, Shaikh H, Tannock IF. Penetration of anticancer drugs through solid tissue: a factor that limits the effectiveness of chemotherapy for solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5(6):1583–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Diop-Frimpong B, Chauhan VP, Krane S, Boucher Y, Jain RK. Losartan inhibits collagen I synthesis and improves the distribution and efficacy of nanotherapeutics in tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(7):2909–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cabral H, Matsumoto Y, Mizuno K, Chen Q, Murakami M, Kimura M, et al. Accumulation of sub-100 nm polymeric micelles in poorly permeable tumours depends on size. Nature nanotechnology. 2011;6(12):815–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sykes EA, Dai Q, Sarsons CD, Chen J, Rocheleau JV, Hwang DM, et al. Tailoring nanoparticle designs to target cancer based on tumor pathophysiology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(9):E1142–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee J, Kim J, Jeong M, Lee H, Goh U, Kim H, et al. Liposome-based engineering of cells to package hydrophobic compounds in membrane vesicles for tumor penetration. Nano Lett. 2015;15(5):2938–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chauhan VP, Stylianopoulos T, Boucher Y, Jain RK. Delivery of molecular and nanoscale medicine to tumors: transport barriers and strategies. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2011;2:281–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stylianopoulos T, Jain RK. Design considerations for nanotherapeutics in oncology. Nanomedicine. 2015;11(8):1893–907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stylianopoulos T, Poh MZ, Insin N, Bawendi MG, Fukumura D, Munn LL, et al. Diffusion of particles in the extracellular matrix: the effect of repulsive electrostatic interactions. Biophysical journal. 2010;99(5):1342–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Blanco E, Shen H, Ferrari M. Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(9):941–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yuan F, Dellian M, Fukumura D, Leunig M, Berk DA, Torchilin VP, et al. Vascular permeability in a human tumor xenograft: molecular size dependence and cutoff size. Cancer research. 1995;55(17):3752–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hobbs SK, Monsky WL, Yuan F, Roberts WG, Griffith L, Torchilin VP, et al. Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95(8):4607–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Perrault SD, Walkey C, Jennings T, Fischer HC, Chan WC. Mediating tumor targeting efficiency of nanoparticles through design. Nano letters. 2009;9(5):1909–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Popovic Z, Liu W, Chauhan VP, Lee J, Wong C, Greytak AB, et al. A nanoparticle size series for in vivo fluorescence imaging. Angewandte Chemie (International ed in English). 2010;49(46):8649–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Huang K, Ma H, Liu J, Huo S, Kumar A, Wei T, et al. Size-dependent localization and penetration of ultrasmall gold nanoparticles in cancer cells, multicellular spheroids, and tumors in vivo. ACS nano. 2012;6(5):4483–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li HJ, Du JZ, Du XJ, Xu CF, Sun CY, Wang HX, et al. Stimuli-responsive clustered nanoparticles for improved tumor penetration and therapeutic efficacy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2016;113(15):4164–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen Q, Wang X, Wang C, Feng L, Li Y, Liu Z. Drug-Induced Self-Assembly of Modified Albumins as Nano-theranostics for Tumor-Targeted Combination Therapy. ACS nano. 2015;9(5):5223–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ruan S, Cao X, Cun X, Hu G, Zhou Y, Zhang Y, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive size-shrinkable nanoparticles for deep tumor penetration and pH triggered doxorubicin release. Biomaterials. 2015;60:100–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tong R, Chiang HH, Kohane DS. Photoswitchable nanoparticles for in vivo cancer chemotherapy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110(47):19048–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tong R, Hemmati HD, Langer R, Kohane DS. Photoswitchable nanoparticles for triggered tissue penetration and drug delivery. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2012;134(21):8848–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wong C, Stylianopoulos T, Cui J, Martin J, Chauhan VP, Jiang W, et al. Multistage nanoparticle delivery system for deep penetration into tumor tissue. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108(6):2426–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang Y, Black KC, Luehmann H, Li W, Zhang Y, Cai X, et al. Comparison study of gold nanohexapods, nanorods, and nanocages for photothermal cancer treatment. ACS nano. 2013;7(3):2068–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chauhan VP, Popovic Z, Chen O, Cui J, Fukumura D, Bawendi MG, et al. Fluorescent nanorods and nanospheres for real-time in vivo probing of nanoparticle shape-dependent tumor penetration. Angewandte Chemie (International ed in English). 2011;50(48):11417–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shukla S, DiFranco NA, Wen AM, Commandeur U, Steinmetz NF. To Target or Not to Target: Active vs. Passive Tumor Homing of Filamentous Nanoparticles Based on Potato virus X. Cellular and molecular bioengineering. 2015;8(3):433–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shukla S, Eber FJ, Nagarajan AS, DiFranco NA, Schmidt N, Wen AM, et al. The Impact of Aspect Ratio on the Biodistribution and Tumor Homing of Rigid Soft-Matter Nanorods. Advanced healthcare materials. 2015;4(6):874–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Smith BR, Kempen P, Bouley D, Xu A, Liu Z, Melosh N, et al. Shape matters: intravital microscopy reveals surprising geometrical dependence for nanoparticles in tumor models of extravasation. Nano letters. 2012;12(7):3369–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lieleg O, Baumgartel RM, Bausch AR. Selective filtering of particles by the extracellular matrix: an electrostatic bandpass. Biophysical journal. 2009;97(6):1569–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang HX, Zuo ZQ, Du JZ, Wang YC, Sun R, Cao ZT, Ye XD, Wang JL, Leong KW, Wang J. Surface charge critically affects tumor penetration and therapeutic efficacy of cancer nanomedicines. Nano Today. 2016;11(2):133–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang G, Chen Y, Wang P, Wang Y, Hong H, Li Y, et al. Preferential tumor accumulation and desirable interstitial penetration of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles with dual coating of chitosan oligosaccharide and polyethylene glycol-poly(D,L-lactic acid). Acta biomaterialia. 2016;29:248–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Campbell RB, Fukumura D, Brown EB, Mazzola LM, Izumi Y, Jain RK, et al. Cationic charge determines the distribution of liposomes between the vascular and extravascular compartments of tumors. Cancer research. 2002;62(23):6831–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jin S, Ma X, Ma H, Zheng K, Liu J, Hou S, et al. Surface chemistry-mediated penetration and gold nanorod thermotherapy in multicellular tumor spheroids. Nanoscale. 2013;5(1):143–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tomasetti L, Liebl R, Wastl DS, Breunig M. Influence of PEGylation on nanoparticle mobility in different models of the extracellular matrix. European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik eV. 2016;108:145–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dancy JG, Wadajkar AS, Schneider CS, Mauban JRH, Goloubeva OG, Woodworth GF, et al. Non-specific binding and steric hindrance thresholds for penetration of particulate drug carriers within tumor tissue. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2016;238:139–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nance E, Zhang C, Shih TY, Xu Q, Schuster BS, Hanes J. Brain-penetrating nanoparticles improve paclitaxel efficacy in malignant glioma following local administration. ACS Nano. 2014;8(10):10655–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nance EA, Woodworth GF, Sailor KA, Shih TY, Xu Q, Swaminathan G, et al. A dense poly(ethylene glycol) coating improves penetration of large polymeric nanoparticles within brain tissue. Science translational medicine. 2012;4(149):149ra19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nance E, Timbie K, Miller GW, Song J, Louttit C, Klibanov AL, et al. Non-invasive delivery of stealth, brain-penetrating nanoparticles across the blood-brain barrier using MRI-guided focused ultrasound. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2014;189:123–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mishra S, Webster P, Davis ME. PEGylation significantly affects cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking of non-viral gene delivery particles. Eur J Cell Biol. 2004;83(3):97–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Klibanov AL, Maruyama K, Beckerleg AM, Torchilin VP, Huang L. Activity of amphipathic poly(ethylene glycol) 5000 to prolong the circulation time of liposomes depends on the liposome size and is unfavorable for immunoliposome binding to target. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991;1062(2):142–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Betker JL, Gomez J, Anchordoquy TJ. The effects of lipoplex formulation variables on the protein corona and comparisons with in vitro transfection efficiency. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2013;171(3):261–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Remaut K, Lucas B, Braeckmans K, Demeester J, De Smedt SC. Pegylation of liposomes favours the endosomal degradation of the delivered phosphodiester oligonucleotides. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2007;117(2):256–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ganson NJ, Povsic TJ, Sullenger BA, Alexander JH, Zelenkofske SL, Sailstad JM, et al. Pre-existing anti-polyethylene glycol antibody linked to first-exposure allergic reactions to pegnivacogin, a PEGylated RNA aptamer. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137(5):1610–3 e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Garay RP, El-Gewely R, Armstrong JK, Garratty G, Richette P. Antibodies against polyethylene glycol in healthy subjects and in patients treated with PEG-conjugated agents. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012;9(11):1319–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hershfield MS, Ganson NJ, Kelly SJ, Scarlett EL, Jaggers DA, Sundy JS. Induced and pre-existing anti-polyethylene glycol antibody in a trial of every 3-week dosing of pegloticase for refractory gout, including in organ transplant recipients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16(2):R63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Armstrong JK, Hempel G, Koling S, Chan LS, Fisher T, Meiselman HJ, et al. Antibody against poly(ethylene glycol) adversely affects PEG-asparaginase therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Cancer. 2007;110(1):103–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Verhoef JJ, Carpenter JF, Anchordoquy TJ, Schellekens H. Potential induction of anti-PEG antibodies and complement activation toward PEGylated therapeutics. Drug Discov Today. 2014;19(12):1945–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mima Y, Hashimoto Y, Shimizu T, Kiwada H, Ishida T. Anti-PEG IgM Is a Major Contributor to the Accelerated Blood Clearance of Polyethylene Glycol-Conjugated Protein. Molecular pharmaceutics. 2015;12(7):2429–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ishida T, Kiwada H. Accelerated blood clearance (ABC) phenomenon upon repeated injection of PEGylated liposomes. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2008;354(1–2):56–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Keefe AJ, Caldwell KB, Nowinski AK, White AD, Thakkar A, Jiang S. Screening nonspecific interactions of peptides without background interference. Biomaterials. 2013;34(8):1871–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ghosh D, Peng X, Leal J, Mohanty R. Peptides as drug delivery vehicles across biological barriers. J Pharm Investig. 2018;48(1):89–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Komin A, Russell LM, Hristova KA, Searson PC. Peptide-based strategies for enhanced cell uptake, transcellular transport, and circulation: Mechanisms and challenges. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;110–111:52–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ruoslahti E. Tumor penetrating peptides for improved drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;110–111:3–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pasqualini R. Vascular targeting with phage peptide libraries. The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR). 1999;43(2):159–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sugahara KN, Teesalu T, Karmali PP, Kotamraju VR, Agemy L, Girard OM, et al. Tissue-penetrating delivery of compounds and nanoparticles into tumors. Cancer cell. 2009;16(6):510–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shao Q, Jiang S. Molecular understanding and design of zwitterionic materials. Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla). 2015;27(1):15–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chen S, Cao Z, Jiang S. Ultra-low fouling peptide surfaces derived from natural amino acids. Biomaterials. 2009;30(29):5892–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Liu EJ, Sinclair A, Keefe AJ, Nannenga BL, Coyle BL, Baneyx F, et al. EKylation: Addition of an Alternating-Charge Peptide Stabilizes Proteins. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16(10):3357–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Li LD, Crouzier T, Sarkar A, Dunphy L, Han J, Ribbeck K. Spatial configuration and composition of charge modulates transport into a mucin hydrogel barrier. Biophysical journal. 2013;105(6):1357–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Weiss GA. Editorial overview: How to generate molecular diversity, the most important process in biology. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2017;41:A3–A5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chauhan VP, Lanning RM, Diop-Frimpong B, Mok W, Brown EB, Padera TP, et al. Multiscale measurements distinguish cellular and interstitial hindrances to diffusion in vivo. Biophysical journal. 2009;97(1):330–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ramanujan S, Pluen A, McKee TD, Brown EB, Boucher Y, Jain RK. Diffusion and convection in collagen gels: implications for transport in the tumor interstitium. Biophysical journal. 2002;83(3):1650–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.DuFort CC, DelGiorno KE, Carlson MA, Osgood RJ, Zhao C, Huang Z, et al. Interstitial Pressure in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Is Dominated by a Gel-Fluid Phase. Biophysical journal. 2016;110(9):2106–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Netti PA, Berk DA, Swartz MA, Grodzinsky AJ, Jain RK. Role of extracellular matrix assembly in interstitial transport in solid tumors. Cancer research. 2000;60(9):2497–503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. Journal of molecular biology. 1982;157(1):105–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Thomsen MC, Nielsen M. Seq2Logo: a method for construction and visualization of amino acid binding motifs and sequence profiles including sequence weighting, pseudo counts and two-sided representation of amino acid enrichment and depletion. Nucleic acids research. 2012;40(Web Server issue):W281–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Cordova A, Deserno M, Gelbart WM, Ben-Shaul A. Osmotic shock and the strength of viral capsids. Biophysical journal. 2003;85(1):70–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Serwer P, Wright ET, Chang JT, Liu X. Enhancing and initiating phage-based therapies. Bacteriophage. 2014;4(4):e961869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Eriksson M, Hardelin M, Larsson A, Bergenholtz J, Akerman B. Binding of intercalating and groove-binding cyanine dyes to bacteriophage t5. The journal of physical chemistry B. 2007;111(5):1139–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Han JH, Wang MS, Das J, Sudheendra L, Vonasek E, Nitin N, et al. Capture and detection of T7 bacteriophages on a nanostructured interface. ACS applied materials & interfaces. 2014;6(7):4758–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Mosier-Boss PA, Lieberman SH, Andrews JM, Rohwer FL, Wegley LE, Breitbart M. Use of fluorescently labeled phage in the detection and identification of bacterial species. Applied spectroscopy. 2003;57(9):1138–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Nguyen S, Baker K, Padman BS, Patwa R, Dunstan RA, Weston TA, et al. Bacteriophage Transcytosis Provides a Mechanism To Cross Epithelial Cell Layers. mBio. 2017;8(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Raeesi V, Chan WC. Improving nanoparticle diffusion through tumor collagen matrix by photo-thermal gold nanorods. Nanoscale. 2016;8(25):12524–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bajpayee AG, Wong CR, Bawendi MG, Frank EH, Grodzinsky AJ. Avidin as a model for charge driven transport into cartilage and drug delivery for treating early stage post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Biomaterials. 2014;35(1):538–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Crocker JC, Grier DG. Methods of Digital Video Microscopy for Colloidal Studies. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1996;179(1):298–310. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Dufresne DBaE. The Matlab Particle Tracking Code Repository 2007. [Available from: http://site.physics.georgetown.edu/matlab/index.html.
  • 81.Schuster BS, Ensign LM, Allan DB, Suk JS, Hanes J. Particle tracking in drug and gene delivery research: State-of-the-art applications and methods. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2015;91:70–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Li P, Roller PP. Cyclization strategies in peptide derived drug design. Current topics in medicinal chemistry. 2002;2(3):325–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Fairlie DP, Dantas de Araujo A. Review stapling peptides using cysteine crosslinking. Biopolymers. 2016;106(6):843–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Cao L, Zeller MK, Fiore VF, Strane P, Bermudez H, Barker TH. Phage-based molecular probes that discriminate force-induced structural states of fibronectin in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109(19):7251–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Aoki S, Morohashi K, Sunoki T, Kuramochi K, Kobayashi S, Sugawara F. Screening of paclitaxel-binding molecules from a library of random peptides displayed on T7 phage particles using paclitaxel-photoimmobilized resin. Bioconjugate chemistry. 2007;18(6):1981–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Liu GW, Livesay BR, Kacherovsky NA, Cieslewicz M, Lutz E, Waalkes A, et al. Efficient Identification of Murine M2 Macrophage Peptide Targeting Ligands by Phage Display and Next-Generation Sequencing. Bioconjugate chemistry. 2015;26(8):1811–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Dennis MS. Selection and Screening Strategies. In: Sachdev S. Sidhu CRG, editor. Phage Display in Biotechnology and Drug Delivery. Second Edition ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015. p. 97–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Scott JK, Smith GP. Searching for peptide ligands with an epitope library. Science. 1990;249(4967):386–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Barry MA, Dower WJ, Johnston SA. Toward cell-targeting gene therapy vectors: selection of cell-binding peptides from random peptide-presenting phage libraries. Nature medicine. 1996;2(3):299–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Matochko WL, Cory Li S, Tang SK, Derda R. Prospective identification of parasitic sequences in phage display screens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(3):1784–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ravn U, Didelot G, Venet S, Ng KT, Gueneau F, Rousseau F, et al. Deep sequencing of phage display libraries to support antibody discovery. Methods (San Diego, Calif). 2013;60(1):99–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Sunderland KS, Yang M, Mao C. Phage-Enabled Nanomedicine: From Probes to Therapeutics in Precision Medicine. Angewandte Chemie (International ed in English). 2017;56(8):1964–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Hu J, Miyanaga K, Tanji Y. Diffusion of bacteriophages through artificial biofilm models. Biotechnology progress. 2012;28(2):319–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Hu J, Miyanaga K, Tanji Y. Diffusion properties of bacteriophages through agarose gel membrane. Biotechnol Prog. 2010;26(5):1213–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Lohr M, Trautmann B, Gottler M, Peters S, Zauner I, Maillet B, et al. Human ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas express extracellular matrix proteins. Br J Cancer. 1994;69(1):144–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Bajpayee AG, De la Vega RE, Scheu M, Varady NH, Yannatos IA, Brown LA, et al. Sustained intra-cartilage delivery of low dose dexamethasone using a cationic carrier for treatment of post traumatic osteoarthritis. Eur Cell Mater. 2017;34:341–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Bajpayee AG, Scheu M, Grodzinsky AJ, Porter RM. Electrostatic interactions enable rapid penetration, enhanced uptake and retention of intra-articular injected avidin in rat knee joints. J Orthop Res. 2014;32(8):1044–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Pang HB, Braun GB, Friman T, Aza-Blanc P, Ruidiaz ME, Sugahara KN, et al. An endocytosis pathway initiated through neuropilin-1 and regulated by nutrient availability. Nature communications. 2014;5:4904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Lai SK, O’Hanlon DE, Harrold S, Man ST, Wang YY, Cone R, et al. Rapid transport of large polymeric nanoparticles in fresh undiluted human mucus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104(5):1482–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Xu Q, Ensign LM, Boylan NJ, Schon A, Gong X, Yang JC, et al. Impact of Surface Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Density on Biodegradable Nanoparticle Transport in Mucus ex Vivo and Distribution in Vivo. ACS nano. 2015;9(9):9217–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESI

RESOURCES