Abstract
Improper activity of bone-resorbing osteoclasts results in low bone density and deterioration of bone structure, which increase the risk of fractures. Anti-resorptive therapies targeting osteoclasts have proven effective in preserving bone mass, but these therapeutic agents lead to defective new bone formation and numerous potential side effects. In this study, we demonstrate that recombinant adeno-associated virus, serotype 9 (rAAV9) can deliver to osteoclasts an artificial microRNA (amiR) that silences expression of key osteoclast regulators, RANK (receptor activator for nuclear factor κB) and cathepsin K (rAAV9.amiR-rank, rAAV9.amiR-ctsk), to prevent bone loss in osteoporosis. As rAAV9 is highly effective for the transduction of osteoclasts, systemic administration of rAAV9 carrying amiR-rank or amiR-ctsk results in a significant increase of bone mass in mice. Furthermore, the bone-targeting peptide motif (Asp)14 or (AspSerSer)6 was grafted onto the AAV9-VP2 capsid protein, resulting in significant reduction of transgene expression in non-bone peripheral organs. Finally, systemic delivery of bone-targeting rAAV9.amiR-ctsk counteracts bone loss and improves bone mechanical properties in mouse models of postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis. Collectively, inhibition of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption via bone-targeting rAAV9-mediated silencing of ctsk is a promising gene therapy that can preserve bone formation and mitigate osteoporosis, while limiting adverse off-target effects.
Keywords: osteoporosis, osteoclast, osteoblast, rAAV, artificial miRNA, cathepsin k, rank, bone resorption, bone formation, osteoclastogenesis
Graphical Abstract
Anti-resorptive therapies targeting osteoclasts have proven effective in preserving bone mass, but these therapeutic agents lead to numerous side effects. The authors show that silencing cathepsin K in osteoclasts by delivering an artificial miRNA via bone-homing AAV9 can counteract bone loss in mouse models of postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis.
Introduction
Osteoporosis is an aging-associated disease marked by bone loss and deterioration of the bone microstructure.1 Collectively, these factors significantly increase the risk of fractures. Most existing therapeutic agents for osteoporosis are anti-resorptive agents, such as bisphosphonates and anti-RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand) antibody, inhibitors of osteoclast (OC) differentiation and bone resorption. Unfortunately, their effectiveness is limited by an inability to promote new bone formation, as OC-mediated bone resorption is coupled with osteoblast-mediated bone formation during remodeling.2,3 Moreover, these agents are accompanied by potential adverse effects, including atypical fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw.4,5 Thus, the development of anti-resorptive therapies that can preserve osteoblast function while limiting off-target side effects is still an unmet need.
OCs originate from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in the bone marrow and require macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) and RANKL for the differentiation of monocytes to multinucleated OCs. The loss of M-CSF and its receptor c-Fms,6 or RANKL and its receptor RANK,7,8 results in severe osteopetrosis and abnormal tooth eruption in mice because of a complete absence of mature OCs. Osteoprotegerin (OPG), a soluble decoy receptor for RANKL, acts as a natural suppressor of RANKL-RANK signaling by obstructing RANKL binding to RANK on the surface of OC precursor cells.9 Similarly, the human monoclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG)2 antibody against RANKL (denosumab) prevents RANKL from activating RANK, thereby inhibiting OC survival and differentiation.10 Despite its favorable therapeutic efficacy and safety profile, continuous treatment with denosumab reduces physiologic bone remodeling and causes potential adverse effects.3
Cathepsin K (CTSK), a cysteine protease member of the cathepsin lysosomal protease family, is highly expressed in OCs and efficiently degrades type 1 collagen, the major component of organic bone matrix.11 Mice lacking CTSK display osteopetrosis as a consequence of impaired bone resorption, while bone formation is normal or increased.12,13 In human clinical trials, the pharmacologic CTSK inhibitor odanacatib showed a continuous increase in bone mineral density and enhanced bone strength at the hip and spine. However, as CTSK is expressed in various nonskeletal tissues, including skin, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular sites, its pharmacological inhibition causes an increased risk of off-target cerebrovascular accidents.14, 15, 16
Adeno-associated virus (AAV), a small non-enveloped parvovirus with a single-stranded genome, has been used for gene therapy in more 140 clinical trials, involving more than 2,000 patients worldwide. Recombinant AAVs (rAAVs) show high transduction efficiency, persistent transgene expression, and generally lack post-infection immunogenicity and pathogenicity.17, 18, 19 The AAV vector genome contains two inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) and regulatory (rep) and structural capsid (cap) open reading frames (ORFs). A transgene of interest can replace the rep and cap ORFs, producing a replication-defective rAAV genome.20,21 Additionally, self-complementary AAV (scAAV) vectors were developed to enhance in vitro and in vivo transduction efficacies.22, 23, 24, 25 Using a bone-targeting AAV9 capsid, this study aimed to develop an osteoporosis therapy that simultaneously suppresses OC-mediated bone resorption and promotes osteoblast-mediated bone formation, while limiting off-target side effects. We provide a proof-of-concept demonstration that a rationally designed AAV9 capsid can deliver an artificial microRNA (amiR) that silences the expression of RANK (OC survival/differentiation) or CTSK (OC resorption activity) in OCs to reverse bone loss and improve bone mechanical properties in mouse models of postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis, while detargeting transduction to non-relevant tissues.
Results
rAAV9 Can Effectively Transduce OCs
Our previous study demonstrated that systemic delivery of rAAV9 in mice can transduce osteoblast-lineage cells and OCs residing on the bone surface (BS).26 Since OCs originate from HSCs in the bone marrow, we explored the ability of rAAV9 to transduce other HSC-lineage cells. rAAV9.EGFP was intravenously (i.v.) injected into 2-month-old mice and the tissue distribution of rAAV9 was assessed by EGFP expression using IVIS (in vivo imaging system) optical imaging (Figure S1). Individual organ imaging of treated mice showed EGFP expression in the heart, liver, and hindlimbs. In the femur, most EGFP-expressing cells, including osteoblasts and CTSK-expressing OCs, were located in the trabecular bone of the metaphysis, while only a few round-shaped bone marrow cells exhibited EGFP expression (Figures 1A and 1B). Flow cytometry analysis of bone marrow cells confirms EGFP expression in a small subset of CD11b+ monocytes, OC progenitors (OCPs; CD3ε−, B220−, TER119−, CD11b−/lo, Ly6c+), and B220+ B lymphocytes (Figures 1C and 1D; Figures S2B and S2C). Of note, megakaryocytes residing in the bone marrow display autofluorescence (Figure 1A, right; Figure S2A). An in vitro differentiation assay of bone marrow-derived monocytes (BMMs) revealed that rAAV9 is highly effective for transducing RANKL-treated pre-OCs and mature OCs, but not BMMs, bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs), and bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) (Figure 1E). Thus, these results demonstrate that rAAV9 is more effective in transducing pre-OCs and mature OCs than other HSC-lineage cells in the bone marrow.
RANK is a member of tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) family essential for the differentiation of monocytes to mature OCs.27 Accordingly, conditional deletion of a floxed rank allele with Cre deleter mice targeting OCs (Rankfl/fl;Ctsk) results in osteopetrosis, because of a lack of OC-mediated bone resorption (Figures S3A and S3B). To provide a proof-of-concept demonstration that systemically delivered rAAV9 can target Rank in OCs to inhibit bone resorption, we generated an rAAV9 vector expressing Cre recombinase (rAAV9.Cre, Figure S3C), which mediates the deletion of Rank in OC lineage cells. rAAV9-mediated Cre expression in cultured Rankfl/fl pre-OCs was effective in deleting Rank and ablating OC differentiation (Figures 1E and 1F). To visualize rAAV9-mediated Cre expression in OCs in vivo, the Cre-reporter RosamT/mG mice were crossed with Rankfl/fl mice (Rankfl/fl;RosamT/mG). rAAV9.Cre was i.v. injected into 2-month-old Rankfl/fl;RosamT/mG mice, and Cre-mediated GFP expression in the femur was validated by fluorescence microscopy 2 weeks post-injection (Figure 1G). Two months after the injection, rAAV9.Cre-treated femurs showed a significant increase in trabecular bone mass and cortical thickness relative to rAAV9.EGFP-treated femurs (Figures 1H and 1I). These results demonstrate that systemically delivered rAAV9.Cre in Rankfl/fl;RosamT/mG mice targets OCs and directs the deletion of Rank to increase bone mass.
rAAV9-Mediated Gene Silencing in OCs Increases Bone Mass in Mice
To inhibit OC-mediated bone resorption, we aimed to silence key OC regulators, RANK (tnfrsf11a) and CTSK (ctsk), using rAAV9-mediated gene transfer. Embedding the guide strand of a small silencing RNA into the miR-33-derived miRNA scaffold (amiR) limits short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-related toxicity, enables efficient gene knockdown, and reduces off-target silencing by 10-fold compared to conventional shRNA constructs.28 We therefore generated amiR cassettes targeting two different positions of rank (amiR-rank) or ctsk (amiR-ctsk) mRNA and then packaged them with AAV9 capsids (Figure 2A). Of note, the amiR cassette is embedded within the EGFP intronic region of the transgene cassette to track transduced cells or tissues. The knockdown efficiency of these vectors in cultured wild-type pre-OCs was examined using RT-PCR (Figure 2B; Figures S4A–S4D). We found that the levels of rank or ctsk mRNA were more efficiently reduced in the cells when treated with rAAV9.amiR-rank-2 or amiR-ctsk-1 than rAAV9.amiR-rank-1 or amiR-ctsk-2 (Figures S4B and 4SD). Hereafter and in Figure 2, amiR-rank-2 and amiR-ctsk-1 are referred to as amiR-rank and amiR-ctsk, respectively.
Genetic deletion of rank in mice results in a complete absence of OCs due to defective OC survival and differentiation.7,8 In contrast, loss of CTSK impairs OC resorption activity while preserving OC survival and differentiation.12,13 Similar to the genetic deletion of rank or ctsk, rAAV9-mediated silencing of rank impairs both OC differentiation and resorption activity, whereas only bone resorption activity was markedly reduced in rAAV9.amiR-ctsk-treated cells (Figure 2C). To examine the ability of amiR-rank or amiR-ctsk to inhibit bone resorption in vivo, rAAV9 vectors carrying either transgenes were i.v. injected into 2-month-old mice, and two months later, whole-body and femur EGFP expression was visualized by IVIS imaging (Figure S4E) and fluorescence microscopy (Figure 2D), respectively. Compared to rAAV9.amiR-ctrl-treated femurs, rAAV9.amiR-rank- or amiR-ctsk-treated femurs displayed ~60% reduction of rank or ctsk mRNA levels and a relative increase in trabecular bone mass (Figures 2F and 2G). Intriguingly, rAAV9.amiR-ctsk demonstrates a higher potency of bone accrual than does rAAV9.amiR-rank, as shown by the greater trabecular bone volume (BV), number, and thickness in rAAV9.amiR-ctsk-treated femurs relative to rAAV9.amiR-rank-treated femurs. To gain insight into the mechanism of these findings, histomorphometry was performed in the metaphysis of treated femurs to assess in vivo OC and osteoblast activities. In rAAV9.amiR-rank-treated femurs, the numbers of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive OCs and bone erosion surfaces were markedly reduced, compared to rAAV9.amiR-ctrl-treated femurs (Figures 3A and 3C). However, treatment with rAAV9.amiR-ctsk results in a significant reduction in bone erosion surfaces where flat-shaped OCs reside, while OC numbers were not significantly altered (Figures 3B and 3D). Unlike rAAV9.amiR-rank-treated femurs, bone formation rate (BFR), mineral apposition rate (MAR), and osteoblast surface per BS (Ob.S/BS) were markedly increased in rAAV9.amiR-ctsk-treated femurs (Figures 3F–3H). These findings demonstrate that treatment with rAAV9.amiR-rank results in a significant decrease in OC differentiation and resorption activity without any alteration in osteoblast activity. Alternatively, treatment with rAAV9.amiR-ctsk simultaneously impairs OC-mediated bone resorption and promotes osteoblast-mediated bone formation, without affecting OC differentiation. Notably, treatment of cultured osteoblasts with rAAV9.amiR-ctsk did not affect osteoblast proliferation and differentiation (Figure S5), demonstrating that increased osteoblast activity seen in rAAV9.amiR-ctsk-treated femurs is an indirect effect of rAAV9-mediated silencing of ctsk. Instead, similar to mice a with genetic deletion of ctsk in OCs,29 rAAV9.amiR-ctsk-treated femurs display elevated levels of sphingosine kinase 1 (sphk1) and runt related transcription factor 2 (runx2) mRNA (Figure 3I). Given that SPHK1 promotes osteogenesis by phosphorylating sphingosine to generate sphingosine 1 phosphate (S1P),30 rAAV9-mediated silencing of ctsk in OCs likely enhances osteoblast-mediated bone formation via increased production of S1P. Taken together, the rAAV9-amiR-ctsk vector is a more potent agent for osteoporosis therapy than the rAAV9-amiR-rank vector, since amiR-ctsk can suppress OC-mediated bone resorption and promote osteoblast-mediated bone formation, simultaneously.
Development of a rAAV9 Capsid Targeting OCs in the Bone Tissue
Expression of CTSK is also seen in various non-skeletal tissues, including epidermal, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular sites. Therefore, pharmacologic inhibition of CTSK causes an increased risk of off-target cerebrovascular accidents in clinical trials.14, 15, 16 Thus, we aimed to detarget the transduction of rAAV9 to non-skeletal tissues by utilizing a bone-homing capsid. Previously reported peptide motifs that can direct a liposome to osteoblast-enriched bone-forming surfaces, (Asp-Ser-Ser)6,31 or OC-enriched bone-resorbing surfaces, (Asp)14,32 were grafted onto the N terminus of the VP2 subunit of the AAV9 capsid protein26 (Figure 4A). Since hydroxyapatite (HA) is a major inorganic component in the bone tissue,33 we tested the capsid for HA-binding affinity in vitro. Genome copies (GC) of AAV9.DSS-Nter (rAAV9.DSS) and AAV9.D14-Nter (rAAV9.D14) in the HA pellet were markedly increased relative to those of rAAV9 (Figure 4B, left), while GC of these vectors in the supernatant were decreased (Figure 4B, right), demonstrating that both of the AAV9.DSS-Nter and AAV9.D14-Nter capsids can enhance HA-binding affinity. Of note, capsid grafting of these motifs did not affect rAAV9’s transduction efficiency in OCs (Figure 4C). To test the capsid for bone-targeting activity in vivo, vectors were i.v. injected into 2-month-old mice and vector biodistributions were assessed by EGFP expression using IVIS optical imaging 2 weeks post-injection (Figures 4D and 4E; Figure S6A). rAAV9.DSS-Nter-treated mice exhibited less EGFP expression than that achieved by rAAV9 in the liver (~50% less) and muscle (~30% less), and little to no expression in the heart. However, the biodistributions of rAAV9.D14-Nter were comparable to those of rAAV9, suggesting that the AAV9.D14-Nter capsid is unable to confer bone-homing specificity of rAAV9 in vivo. These results are consistent with fluorescence microscopy data showing a nearly complete lack of EGFP expression in the heart and a significant reduction in the liver and muscle of rAAV9.DSS-Nter-treated mice when compared with mice treated with rAAV9 or rAAV9.D14-Nter (Figure 4F; Figure S6B). Importantly, expression in femurs was relatively comparable between treatment groups (Figures 4D and 4F), demonstrating that the AAV9.DSS-Nter capsid, not the AAV9.D14-Nter capsid, reduces transduction from non-skeletal tissues. Likewise, GC of AAV9.DSS-Nter in the liver were markedly decreased relative to those of rAAV9, whereas GC of these vectors in the bone were relatively comparable (Figure S6C). We note that with the doses of vector used in these experiments (8 × 1011 GC/mouse), we did not anticipate strong transduction of brain tissues following i.v. administration (Figure 4F). Taken together, the DSS-VP2 capsid protein, not the D14-VP2 capsid protein, improves bone-homing specificity of rAAV9 by detargeting its transduction to non-relevant tissues.
Bone-targeting rAAV9-Mediated Silencing of ctsk Counteracts Bone Loss in Mouse Models of Osteoporosis
Postmenopausal (type 1) and senile (type 2) osteoporosis results in severe bone loss and deterioration of bone structure, increasing the risk of fractures. Bone loss in postmenopausal women is caused by enhanced OC activity as a result of estrogen withdrawal. Estrogen, which is normally produced as a part of the menstrual cycle, mainly acts on OCs as a negative regulator, preventing OC-mediated bone resorption.34 Senile osteoporosis typically develops after the age of 70 for both men and women, and is a consequence of bone senescence and calcium deficiency. To test therapeutic effects of our bone-targeting rAAV9-mediated gene silencing in osteoporosis, we packaged amiR-ctsk with AAV9.DSS-Nter capsid. Compared to rAAV9.amiR-ctsk, the rAAV9.DSS-amiR-ctsk showed a modest reduction in infectivity at lower doses (5 × 1010 GC/kg) (Figure S7A), but effectively silenced expression of ctsk (Figure S7B) and inhibited OC resorption activity (Figure S7C) without any alteration in TRAP activity at a dose of 5 × 1012 GC/kg. These results demonstrate that there are no adverse effects of the AAV9.DSS-Nter capsid on the therapeutic potential of amiR-ctsk.
Ovariectomized (OVX) mice are an established model for postmenopausal osteoporosis induced by estrogen deficiency.35 Sham or OVX surgery was conducted on 3-month-old female mice and rAAV9.DSS-amiR-ctsk was i.v. injected 6 weeks post-surgery (Figure 5A). Seven weeks after injection, reduced levels of ctsk mRNAs were validated in amiR-ctsk-expressing OVX femurs (Figure 5B). While amiR-ctrl-expressing OVX mice showed a significant reduction in trabecular bone mass relative to sham mice, bone loss was completely reversed in the femurs of amiR-ctsk-expressing OVX mice, as demonstrated by the greater trabecular BV/total volume (TV), thickness, number, and connectivity density (Figures 5C and 5D). These femurs displayed a decrease in bone erosion surfaces (Figure 5E, left), while the number of OCs in the total bone area is relatively comparable to that of amiR-ctrl-expressing OVX femurs (Figure 5E, right). Additionally, treatment with rAAV9.DSS-amiR-ctsk in OVX mice enhances BFR, MAR, and Ob.S/BS (Figures 5F–5H), which is accompanied with elevated levels of sphk1 mRNA (Figure 5I). This effect is specific to the bone tissue, as no mineralization was detected in non-skeletal tissues, including brain, heart, liver, and skeletal muscle (Figure S8). Finally, biomechanical testing analysis showed that the strength and stiffness of femurs were considerably protected from OVX-induced bone loss when treated with rAAV9.DSS-amiR-ctsk (Figure 5J), suggesting that bone-targeting rAAV9-mediated silencing of ctsk improves clinically meaningful endpoints in osteoporotic mice. Taken together, these results demonstrate that systemic delivery of amiR-ctsk by the bone-tropic capsid can counteract bone loss and enhance clinically relevant mechanical properties of bone after the onset of estrogen deficiency-induced osteoporosis by simultaneously suppressing OC-mediated bone resorption and promoting osteoblast-mediated bone formation.
Next, we tested therapeutic effects of rAAV9.DSS-amiR-ctsk in a mouse model of senile osteoporosis. Vector was i.v. injected into 18-month-old male mice and 2 months later, EGFP expression in femurs and lumbar vertebrae was assessed by fluorescence microscopy (Figure 6A). EGFP-expressing cells are mainly located on the surface of trabecular bones in femurs and vertebrae. Compared to amiR-ctrl-treated animals, mice injected with amiR-ctsk showed reduced levels of ctsk mRNA (Figure 6B) and a relative increase in trabecular bone mass within the femur and lumbar vertebrae, as indicated by greater trabecular BV/TV, thickness, and number (Figures 6C–6F). As higher expression of EGFP is detected in femurs relative to vertebrae, bone accrual in femurs was greater than in vertebrae of mice treated with rAA9.DSS.amiR-ctsk. Thus, these results demonstrate that bone-targeted delivery of amiR-ctsk is also effective at reversing bone loss in senile osteoporosis. Collectively, rAAV9.DSS-amiR-ctsk is a promising therapeutic agent for both postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis.
Discussion
Our previous study demonstrated that bone-targeting rAAV9-mediated silencing of Schnurri-3 in osteoblasts is a bone-anabolic therapy for osteoporosis that does not alter OC development. This study establishes a promising osteoporosis therapy that simultaneously suppresses OC-mediated bone resorption and promotes osteoblast-mediated bone formation, while limiting adverse off-target effects. In addition to osteoblasts, AAV9 targets OCs to drive RNAi-mediated silencing of the key OC regulators RANK and CTSK, which we show have clinical relevance as genetic targets to prevent osteoporosis. Since rAAV9 can transduce both osteoblasts and OCs in vivo,26 our OC-targeting rAAV9-based gene therapy can complement our previous approach, which only targeted osteoblasts for the treatment of osteoporosis.
Unlike other RNAi-based strategies using liposomes31 or lipid-based nanoparticles,36 a single systemic injection of rAAV9.DSS.amiR-ctsk is sufficient to increase bone accrual in mice. Due to their high-transduction efficiency, ability to confer persistent transgene expression, and lack of post-infection immunogenicity and pathogenicity, AAV vectors have a long track record for safety and efficacy in relevant preclinical and clinical studies.37 In particular, rAAV9-mediated gene therapy is currently the leading platform for the treatment of neurological disorders,38 as systemically delivered rAAV9 can traverse the blood-brain barrier to target the central nervous system (CNS).39 Additionally, our previous study and others have demonstrated its ability to transduce various peripheral tissues, such as liver, retina, striated muscles, and bone in adult mice.26,40,41 rAAV9 is likely to be effective for the transduction of osteoblasts and OCs that reside in the trabecular bone of femur with high bone remodeling activity relative to lumbar vertebrae. This is accompanied with greater bone accrual in femurs relative to vertebrae when treated with rAAV9.amiR-ctsk. Notably, treatment with rAAV9.amiR-ctsk results in impaired bone resorption activity and elevated expression of sphk1, which produces S1P to promote differentiation of neighboring RUNX2+ osteoblasts. Therefore, bone-targeting rAAV9-mediated silencing of ctsk in OCs is a potent gene therapy to treat osteoporosis, while limiting adverse off-target effects.
RANK and CTSK are promising therapeutic targets for osteoporosis. Denosumab, the human monoclonal IgG2 antibody against RANKL,10 and odanacatib, the pharmacologic CTSK inhibitor,14 are both effective in preventing bone loss in human patients with osteoporosis. However, continuous treatment with denosumab reduces physiologic bone remodeling and can potentially be accompanied by adverse effects.3 Furthermore, pharmacological inhibition of CTSK causes off-target cerebrovascular accidents.16 It was therefore apparent that the safety of rAAV9 in the brain be considered. Two bone-homing peptide motifs, (Asp-Ser-Ser)631 and (Asp)14,32 have been developed to direct liposomes to osteoblast-enriched bone-forming and OC-enriched bone-resorbing surfaces, respectively. Therefore, display of the (Asp)14 peptide on the capsid protein may enhance rAAV9’s ability to transduce OCs in vivo. To address this, we rationally designed an AAV9 capsid by grafting the peptide motif (Asp)14 or (Asp-Ser-Ser)6 onto AA9-VP2. Although both AAV9.D14-Nter and AAV9.DSS-Nter capsids enhance in vitro HA-binding affinity, only the AAV9.DSS-Nter capsid can detarget transduction from non-skeletal tissues in mice, while retaining transduction in OCs and osteoblast-lineage cells26 that reside on the BS. This capability demonstrates its ability to specifically target both OC-enriched bone-resorbing areas and osteoblast-enriched bone-forming areas. We note that the transduction efficiencies of rAAVs in vitro are scarcely predictive of their in vivo performance. This phenomenon may be due to the presence of multiple physiological barriers related to the route of administration, serum factors, circulating neutralizing antibodies, and extracellular barriers.42 Future vector improvements to transduce exclusively OC lineage cells, such as using OC-specific promoters in the vector genome design or further engineering of capsids, will allow for even more precise bone-targeting rAAV vectors to be developed. Finally, the bone-targeted, rAAV9-mediated silencing of ctsk in OCs may have clinical utility for counteracting bone loss in other skeletal diseases, such as inflammatory arthritis-induced bone loss.
Materials and Methods
rAAV Vector Design and Production
The amiR against the mouse ctsk transcript was designed by using a custom Excel macro, which considers miR-33 scaffold design rules to generate optimized amiR cassettes.28 DNA sequences for amiR-33-ctrl, amiR-33-rank-1 and -2, and amiR-33-ctsk-1 and -2 were synthesized as gBlocks and cloned into the intronic region of the pAAVsc-CB6-EGFP plasmid at PstI and BglII restriction enzyme sites.43 Constructs were verified by Sanger sequencing. Plasmids of the pAAV-amiR-ctrl, pAAV-amiR-rank-1 and -2, and pAAV-amiR-ctsk-1 and -2 were packaged with AAV9 capsids. rAAV production was performed by transient transfection of HEK293 cells, purified by CsCl sedimentation, and titered by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) on a QX200 ddPCR system (Bio-Rad) using the EGFP primer/probe set as previously described.44 The sequences of gBlocks and oligonucleotides for ddPCR and are listed in Table S1. The bone-targeting rAAV9 vectors (AAV9.D14-Nter and AAV9.DSS-Nter) were generated by inserting the codon-optimized DNA sequence encoding the bone-targeting peptide motif, D14 (Asp)14 or DSS (AspSerSer)6, into the AAV9 capsid protein VP2, as previously described.45
Animals
C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory. For systemic delivery, 200 μL of rAAV9 carrying amiR-ctrl, amiR-rank-1 and -2, or amiR-ctsk-1 and -2 (8 × 1011 GC/mouse) was i.v. injected into mice. Mouse models of postmenopausal osteoporosis were generated by anesthetizing and bilaterally ovariectomizing 3-month-old female mice (C57BL/6J). Six weeks after the surgery, sham or OVX mice were i.v. injected with 200 μL of rAAV9.DSS-Nter carrying amiR-ctrl or amiR-ctsk (8 × 1011 GC/mouse). Mice were randomly divided into three groups with sham + rAAV9.DSS-Nter-amiR-ctrl, OVX + rAAV9.DSS-Nter-amiR-ctrl, and OVX + rAAV9.DSS-Nter-amiR-ctsk. As a mouse model of senile osteoporosis, 18-month-old male mice were i.v. injected with 200 μL of rAAV9.DSS-Nter carrying amiR-ctrl or amiR-ctsk (8 × 1011 GC/mouse). All animals were used in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were handled according to protocols approved by the University of Massachusetts Medical School Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) on animal care.
MicroCT Analysis
Micro-computed tomography (microCT) was used for qualitative and quantitative assessment of trabecular and cortical bone microarchitecture. Analysis was carried out by an investigator blinded to the genotypes of the animals. Femurs excised from the indicated mice were fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin and scanned using a microCT 35 (Scanco Medical) with a spatial resolution of 7 μm. For trabecular bone analysis of the distal femur, an upper 2.1-mm region beginning 280 μm proximal to the growth plate was contoured. Connectivity density (Conn.D) was calculated with the Conn-Euler method of Odgaard and Gundersen46 using the Scanco microCT 35 software. Based on a 3D node-and-branch network of a cancellous bone structure (connectivity), its connectivity density was calculated by dividing the connectivity estimate by the volume of the sample. For cortical bone analyses of femurs, midshaft regions of 0.6 mm in length were used. 3D reconstruction images were obtained from contoured 2D images by methods based on distance transformation of the binarized images. Alternatively, the Inveon multimodality 3D visualization program was used to generate fused 3D viewing of multiple static or dynamic volumes of microCT modalities (Siemens Medical Solutions USA). All images presented are representative of the respective genotypes (n > 6).
Histology, Histomorphometry, and Immunofluorescence
For histological analyses, femurs and tibias were dissected from rAAV-treated mice, fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 2 days, and decalcified by 5% tetrasodium EDTA for 2–4 weeks. Tissues were dehydrated by passage through an ethanol series, cleared twice in xylene, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at a thickness of 6 μm along the coronal plate from anterior to posterior. Decalcified femoral sections were stained with TRAP.
For dynamic histomorphometric analysis, 25 mg/kg calcein (Sigma, C0875) and 50 mg/kg alizarin-3-methyliminodiacetic acid (Sigma, A3882) dissolved in 2% sodium bicarbonate solution were subcutaneously injected into mice in 6-day intervals. MARs and mineralized surface/BS to calculate BFRs were assessed by measuring the distances between BSs labeled by calcein (existing bone) and alizarin-3-methyliminodiacetic acid (newly formed bone). After fixation in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 2 days, undecalcified femur samples were embedded in methyl methacrylate, and the proximal metaphyses of femurs were sectioned longitudinally (5 μm) and stained with McNeal’s trichrome for osteoid assessment, toluidine blue for osteoblasts, and TRAP for OCs.47 A region of interest was defined in the trabecular bone of the metaphysis, and BFR/BS, MAR, BS, Ob.S/BS, and OC surface (Oc.S/BS) were measured using a Nikon Optiphot 2 microscope interfaced with a semiautomatic analysis system (OsteoMetrics). Measurements were taken on two sections/sample (separated by ~25 μm) and summed prior to normalization to obtain a single measure/sample in accordance with the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee.48 This methodology has undergone extensive quality control and validation, and the results were assessed by two different researchers in a blinded fashion.
For immunofluorescence imaging, fresh femurs dissected from rAAV-treated mice were collected and immediately fixed in ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 2 days. Semi-decalcification was carried out for 5 days in 0.5 M EDTA (pH 7.4) at 4°C with constant shaking, and infiltration was followed with a mixture of 20% sucrose in phosphate buffer for 1 day and 25% sucrose in phosphate buffer the next day. All samples were embedded in a 50/50 mixture of 25% sucrose solution and OCT compound (Sakura) and cut into 12-μm-thick sagittal sections using a cryostat (Leica). Immunofluorescence staining and analysis were performed as described previously.47,49 Briefly, after treatment with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 10 min, sections were blocked with 5% donkey serum at room temperature for 30 min and incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-CTSK antibody (A1782, ABclonal, 1:150). Primary antibodies were visualized with donkey anti-rat IgG Alexa Fluor 594 (1:500, Molecular Probes). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. An Olympus IX81 confocal microscope or Leica TCS SP5 II Zeiss LSM-880 confocal microscope was used to image samples.
OC and Osteoblast Differentiation Analysis
For OC differentiation, bone marrow cells were flushed from the femurs and tibias of 2-month-old mice (C57BL/6J) and cultured in Petri dishes in α-minimal essential medium (α-MEM) medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 20 ng/mL M-CSF (R&D Systems) to obtain BMMs. 12 h later, nonadherent cells were re-plated into tissue culture dishes and cultured in the same medium for 2 days. BMMs were then differentiated into OCs in the presence of RANKL (20 ng/mL; R&D Systems) and M-CSF (20 ng/mL; R&D Systems) for 6 days. Alternatively, cells were plated into Osteo Assay surface plates (3987, Corning Life Sciences), and OC resorption activity was measured according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
For osteoblast differentiation, calvarial osteoblasts (COBs) were isolated from 4-day-old mice by enzymatic digestion in α-MEM containing 0.5 mg/mL collagenase-P (Roche) and 0.05% trypsin and cultured in osteogenic medium (0.1 mg/mL ascorbic acid, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate). COBs were incubated with 10-fold diluted Alamar Blue solution (Invitrogen, DAL1100) for cell proliferation. Subsequently, cells were washed and incubated with a solution containing 6.5 mM Na2CO3, 18.5 mM NaHCO3, 2 mM MgCl2, and phosphatase substrate (Sigma, S0942), and alkaline phosphatase activity was measured by an iMark microplate absorbance reader (Bio-Rad). To assess extracellular matrix mineralization in mature osteoblasts, cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed in 70% EtOH for 15 min at room temperature. Fixed cells were washed twice with distilled water and then stained with a 2% alizarin red solution (Sigma, A5533) for 5 min. Cells were then washed three times with distilled water and examined for the presence of calcium deposits.
Flow Cytometry
Bone marrow cells were flushed from the femurs and tibias of 2-month-old mice (C57BL/6J) and incubated for 2 min at room temperature with BD Pharm Lyse hypotonic lysis buffer (BioLegend, 420301) for red blood cell (RBC) lysis. Cells were washed twice with cold fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer, incubated with Fc blocking buffer (BD Biosciences, 564765) for 15 min at 4°C, and treated with antibody cocktail including CD11b (Tonbo Biosciences, 20-0112), CD45R/B220 (Tonbo Biosciences, 65-0452), CD117 (Tonbo Biosciences, 60-1172), CD3 (Tonbo Biosciences, 50-0031), Ter119 (BioLegend, 116233), and Ly6C (BioLegend, 128017) in cold FACS buffer. After treatment with DAPI, cells were subjected to FACS analysis using a BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The data were analyzed using FlowJo (v.10.1).
HA-Binding Assay
HA beads (1 mg/mL) were suspended in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4). Three different GC (108, 109, 1010) of rAAV9, rAAV9.D14-Nter, and rAAV9.DSS-Nter were incubated with HA in a 100-μL vol for 1 h at 37°C and 300 rpm, and then vector titers in the HA pellet and the supernatant were measured by ddPCR.44
ELISA Analysis
CTX1 ELISA (EM0960, FineTest) analysis was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis
Total RNA was purified from cells using QIAzol (QIAGEN), and cDNA was synthesized using a high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit from Applied Biosystems. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using SYBR Green PCR master mix (Bio-Rad) with a CFX Connect RT-PCR detection system (Bio-Rad). To measure mRNA levels in bone tissues, tibias were removed of their bone marrow and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen for 30 s and homogenized in 1 mL of QIAzol for 1 min. Primers used for PCR are described in Table S1.
Statistical Analysis
Except where indicated, all data are graphically represented as the mean ± SD. For experiments with three or more samples, statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni-corrected Student’s t test. For two-sample comparisons, a two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t test was applied. Values were considered statistically significant at p <0.05. Results shown are representative of three or more individual experiments.
Author Contributions
Y.-S.Y. designed, executed, and interpreted the experiments. J.X. designed and generated all of the AAVs used in this work. D.W. developed the AAV9.DSS-Nter and AAV9.D14-Nter capsids. J.-M.K. performed ovariectomy. S.C., J.-H.K., and S.-K.S. performed flow cytometry, OC culture, histology, and histomorphometry. E.G. and P.W.L.T interpreted the experiments and helped draft the manuscript. G.G. and J.-H.S. supervised the research and prepared the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
G.G. and J.-H.S. have submitted a patent application concerning the methodology described in this study. G.G. and J.H.-S. are scientific co-founders of AAVAA Therapeutics and hold equity in this company. G.G. is also a scientific co-founder of Voyager Therapeutics and Aspa Therapeutics and holds equity in these companies. G.G. is an inventor on patents with potential royalties licensed to Voyager Therapeutics, Aspa Therapeutics, and other biopharmaceutical companies.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Center for Skeletal Research Imaging and Biomechanical Testing Core for biomechanical testing (NIH P30AR066261), Jihye Ko and Oksun Lee for technical support, and the many individuals who provided valuable reagents. G.G. received support from NIH grants (P01AI100263, R01NS076991, P01HD080642, and R01AI12135). J.H.S. received support from NIAMS/NIH grants (R01AR068983, R21AR072836, and R21AR073331), the Glory Harvest Group, and AAVAA Therapeutics.
Footnotes
Supplemental Information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2020.04.010.
Contributor Information
Guangping Gao, Email: guangping.gao@umassmed.edu.
Jae-Hyuck Shim, Email: jaehyuck.shim@umassmed.edu.
Supplemental Information
References
- 1.Harada S., Rodan G.A. Control of osteoblast function and regulation of bone mass. Nature. 2003;423:349–355. doi: 10.1038/nature01660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mashiba T., Hirano T., Turner C.H., Forwood M.R., Johnston C.C., Burr D.B. Suppressed bone turnover by bisphosphonates increases microdamage accumulation and reduces some biomechanical properties in dog rib. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2000;15:613–620. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.4.613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Eastell R., Christiansen C., Grauer A., Kutilek S., Libanati C., McClung M.R., Reid I.R., Resch H., Siris E., Uebelhart D. Effects of denosumab on bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2011;26:530–537. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rasmusson L., Abtahi J. Bisphosphonate associated osteonecrosis of the jaw: an update on pathophysiology, risk factors, and treatment. Int. J. Dent. 2014;2014:471035. doi: 10.1155/2014/471035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Im G.I., Jeong S.H. Pathogenesis, management and prevention of atypical femoral fractures. J. Bone Metab. 2015;22:1–8. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2015.22.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W., Bartocci A., Ferrante A.W., Jr., Ahmed-Ansari A., Sell K.W., Pollard J.W., Stanley E.R. Total absence of colony-stimulating factor 1 in the macrophage-deficient osteopetrotic (op/op) mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1990;87:4828–4832. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dougall W.C., Glaccum M., Charrier K., Rohrbach K., Brasel K., De Smedt T., Daro E., Smith J., Tometsko M.E., Maliszewski C.R. RANK is essential for osteoclast and lymph node development. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2412–2424. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.18.2412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kong Y.Y., Yoshida H., Sarosi I., Tan H.L., Timms E., Capparelli C., Morony S., Oliveira-dos-Santos A.J., Van G., Itie A. OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature. 1999;397:315–323. doi: 10.1038/16852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Simonet W.S., Lacey D.L., Dunstan C.R., Kelley M., Chang M.S., Lüthy R., Nguyen H.Q., Wooden S., Bennett L., Boone T. Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell. 1997;89:309–319. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80209-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bekker P.J., Holloway D.L., Rasmussen A.S., Murphy R., Martin S.W., Leese P.T., Holmes G.B., Dunstan C.R., DePaoli A.M. A single-dose placebo-controlled study of AMG 162, a fully human monoclonal antibody to RANKL, in postmenopausal women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2004;19:1059–1066. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li Y.P., Alexander M., Wucherpfennig A.L., Yelick P., Chen W., Stashenko P. Cloning and complete coding sequence of a novel human cathepsin expressed in giant cells of osteoclastomas. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1995;10:1197–1202. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650100809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Saftig P., Hunziker E., Wehmeyer O., Jones S., Boyde A., Rommerskirch W., Moritz J.D., Schu P., von Figura K. Impaired osteoclastic bone resorption leads to osteopetrosis in cathepsin-K-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:13453–13458. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gowen M., Lazner F., Dodds R., Kapadia R., Feild J., Tavaria M., Bertoncello I., Drake F., Zavarselk S., Tellis I. Cathepsin K knockout mice develop osteopetrosis due to a deficit in matrix degradation but not demineralization. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1999;14:1654–1663. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.10.1654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bone H.G., McClung M.R., Roux C., Recker R.R., Eisman J.A., Verbruggen N., Hustad C.M., DaSilva C., Santora A.C., Ince B.A. Odanacatib, a cathepsin-K inhibitor for osteoporosis: a two-year study in postmenopausal women with low bone density. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2010;25:937–947. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.091035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gauthier J.Y., Chauret N., Cromlish W., Desmarais S., Duong L.T., Falgueyret J.P., Kimmel D.B., Lamontagne S., Léger S., LeRiche T. The discovery of odanacatib (MK-0822), a selective inhibitor of cathepsin K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008;18:923–928. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.12.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mullard A. Merck &Co. drops osteoporosis drug odanacatib. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016;15:669. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vandenberghe L.H., Wilson J.M., Gao G. Tailoring the AAV vector capsid for gene therapy. Gene Ther. 2009;16:311–319. doi: 10.1038/gt.2008.170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Asokan A., Schaffer D.V., Samulski R.J. The AAV vector toolkit: poised at the clinical crossroads. Mol. Ther. 2012;20:699–708. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang D., Tai P.W.L., Gao G. Adeno-associated virus vector as a platform for gene therapy delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019;18:358–378. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0012-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Snyder R.O., Im D.S., Ni T., Xiao X., Samulski R.J., Muzyczka N. Features of the adeno-associated virus origin involved in substrate recognition by the viral Rep protein. J. Virol. 1993;67:6096–6104. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.10.6096-6104.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McCarty D.M., Ryan J.H., Zolotukhin S., Zhou X., Muzyczka N. Interaction of the adeno-associated virus Rep protein with a sequence within the A palindrome of the viral terminal repeat. J. Virol. 1994;68:4998–5006. doi: 10.1128/jvi.68.8.4998-5006.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McCarty D.M., Fu H., Monahan P.E., Toulson C.E., Naik P., Samulski R.J. Adeno-associated virus terminal repeat (TR) mutant generates self-complementary vectors to overcome the rate-limiting step to transduction in vivo. Gene Ther. 2003;10:2112–2118. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang Z., Ma H.I., Li J., Sun L., Zhang J., Xiao X. Rapid and highly efficient transduction by double-stranded adeno-associated virus vectors in vitro and in vivo. Gene Ther. 2003;10:2105–2111. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kyöstiö S.R., Owens R.A., Weitzman M.D., Antoni B.A., Chejanovsky N., Carter B.J. Analysis of adeno-associated virus (AAV) wild-type and mutant Rep proteins for their abilities to negatively regulate AAV p5 and p19 mRNA levels. J. Virol. 1994;68:2947–2957. doi: 10.1128/jvi.68.5.2947-2957.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dubielzig R., King J.A., Weger S., Kern A., Kleinschmidt J.A. Adeno-associated virus type 2 protein interactions: formation of pre-encapsidation complexes. J. Virol. 1999;73:8989–8998. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.11.8989-8998.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yang Y.S., Xie J., Wang D., Kim J.M., Tai P.W.L., Gravallese E., Gao G., Shim J.H. Bone-targeting AAV-mediated silencing of Schnurri-3 prevents bone loss in osteoporosis. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2958. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10809-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Park J.H., Lee N.K., Lee S.Y. Current Understanding of RANK Signaling in Osteoclast Differentiation and Maturation. Mol. Cells. 2017;40:706–713. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2017.0225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Xie J., Tai P.W.L., Brown A., Gong S., Zhu S., Wang Y. Effective and Accurate Gene Silencing by a Recombinant AAV-Compatible MicroRNA Scaffold. Mol. Ther. 2020;28:422–430. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lotinun S., Kiviranta R., Matsubara T., Alzate J.A., Neff L., Lüth A., Koskivirta I., Kleuser B., Vacher J., Vuorio E. Osteoclast-specific cathepsin K deletion stimulates S1P-dependent bone formation. J. Clin. Invest. 2013;123:666–681. doi: 10.1172/JCI64840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ryu J., Kim H.J., Chang E.J., Huang H., Banno Y., Kim H.H. Sphingosine 1-phosphate as a regulator of osteoclast differentiation and osteoclast-osteoblast coupling. EMBO J. 2006;25:5840–5851. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang G., Guo B., Wu H., Tang T., Zhang B.T., Zheng L., He Y., Yang Z., Pan X., Chow H. A delivery system targeting bone formation surfaces to facilitate RNAi-based anabolic therapy. Nat. Med. 2012;18:307–314. doi: 10.1038/nm.2617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ogawa K., Ishizaki A., Takai K., Kitamura Y., Makino A., Kozaka T., Kiyono Y., Shiba K., Odani A. Evaluation of Ga-DOTA-(D-Asp)n as bone imaging agents: D-aspartic acid peptides as carriers to bone. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:13971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14149-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Posner A.S., Beebe R.A. The surface chemistry of bone mineral and related calcium phosphates. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 1975;4:267–291. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(75)90013-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nakamura T., Imai Y., Matsumoto T., Sato S., Takeuchi K., Igarashi K., Harada Y., Azuma Y., Krust A., Yamamoto Y. Estrogen prevents bone loss via estrogen receptor alpha and induction of Fas ligand in osteoclasts. Cell. 2007;130:811–823. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bouxsein M.L., Myers K.S., Shultz K.L., Donahue L.R., Rosen C.J., Beamer W.G. Ovariectomy-induced bone loss varies among inbred strains of mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2005;20:1085–1092. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liang C., Guo B., Wu H., Shao N., Li D., Liu J., Dang L., Wang C., Li H., Li S. Aptamer-functionalized lipid nanoparticles targeting osteoblasts as a novel RNA interference-based bone anabolic strategy. Nat. Med. 2015;21:288–294. doi: 10.1038/nm.3791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Basner-Tschakarjan E., Mingozzi F. Cell-mediated immunity to AAV vectors, evolving concepts and potential solutions. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:350. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dayton R.D., Wang D.B., Klein R.L. The advent of AAV9 expands applications for brain and spinal cord gene delivery. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2012;12:757–766. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2012.681463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Foust K.D., Nurre E., Montgomery C.L., Hernandez A., Chan C.M., Kaspar B.K. Intravascular AAV9 preferentially targets neonatal neurons and adult astrocytes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009;27:59–65. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mattar C.N., Wong A.M., Hoefer K., Alonso-Ferrero M.E., Buckley S.M., Howe S.J., Cooper J.D., Waddington S.N., Chan J.K., Rahim A.A. Systemic gene delivery following intravenous administration of AAV9 to fetal and neonatal mice and late-gestation nonhuman primates. FASEB J. 2015;29:3876–3888. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-269092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bish L.T., Morine K., Sleeper M.M., Sanmiguel J., Wu D., Gao G., Wilson J.M., Sweeney H.L. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotype 9 provides global cardiac gene transfer superior to AAV1, AAV6, AAV7, and AAV8 in the mouse and rat. Hum. Gene Ther. 2008;19:1359–1368. doi: 10.1089/hum.2008.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Balakrishnan B., Jayandharan G.R. Basic biology of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors used in gene therapy. Curr. Gene Ther. 2014;14:86–100. doi: 10.2174/1566523214666140302193709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Xie J., Mao Q., Tai P.W.L., He R., Ai J., Su Q., Zhu Y., Ma H., Li J., Gong S. Short DNA hairpins compromise recombinant adeno-associated virus genome homogeneity. Mol. Ther. 2017;25:1363–1374. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gao G., Sena-Esteves M. Introducing genes into mammalian cells: viral vectors. In: Green M.R., Sambrook J., editors. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Vol. 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2012. pp. 1209–1313. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yang Y.S., Wang D., Kim J.M., Tai P.W., Gravallese E., Gao G., Shim J.-H. Bone-targeting AAV-mediated RNAi delivery as a novel gene therapy for osteoporosis. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2958. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10809-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Odgaard A., Gundersen H.J. Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. Bone. 1993;14:173–182. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(93)90245-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fukuda T., Takeda S., Xu R., Ochi H., Sunamura S., Sato T., Shibata S., Yoshida Y., Gu Z., Kimura A. Sema3A regulates bone-mass accrual through sensory innervations. Nature. 2013;497:490–493. doi: 10.1038/nature12115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Parfitt A.M., Drezner M.K., Glorieux F.H., Kanis J.A., Malluche H., Meunier P.J., Ott S.M., Recker R.R. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1987;2:595–610. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650020617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Xu R., Zhang C., Shin D.Y., Kim J.M., Lalani S., Li N., Yang Y.S., Liu Y., Eiseman M., Davis R.J. c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs) are critical mediators of osteoblast activity in vivo. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2017;32:1811–1815. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.