Graphical abstract
Keywords: Lipid droplets, Obesity, Lymphatic system, Microarray
Abstract
In obesity, increased dietary lipids are taken up and transported by the lymphatic systems into the circulatory system. Increased fat accumulation results in impairments in the lymph fluid and lymph node (LN) atrophy. LNs filter the lymph fluid for foreign antigens to induce and control immune responses, and the alteration of this function during obesity remains underexplored. Here, the changes within the microarchitecture of mesenteric LNs (mLNs) during high levels of lipid transport were investigated, and the role of stromal cells in mice fed a high-fat diet for 10 weeks was assessed. Microarray experiments revealed that gene probes involved in lipid metabolism are expressed by mLN stromal cells. Transmission electron microscopy enabled the identification of lipid droplets in lymphatic endothelial cells, different reticulum cells, and macrophages, and the lipid droplet sizes as well as their numbers and intercellular distances increased after 10 weeks of high-fat diet feeding. The results indicate that changes in the microarchitecture and increased accumulation of lipid droplets in stromal cells and macrophages influence the immunological function of mLNs.
Introduction
Obesity is a worldwide health issue among children and adults [1]. Nutrients, including lipids, are absorbed in the intestine, particularly the jejunum, by enterocytes [2], [3], [4]. Short- and medium-chain fatty acids taken up from the diet are directly transported to the liver via the portal vein, whereas long-chain fatty acids are transformed into chylomicrons within enterocytes [5]. Chylomicrons enter the lymphatics and are transported into the blood [2], [4]. In diet-induced obesity, lymphatic vessels and lymph fluid transport are impaired, which results in smaller draining lymph nodes (LNs) [6], [7].
Mesenteric LNs (mLNs) drain the intestinal tract and form part of the immune system by activating and regulating immune cells during infection or inducing tolerance [8], [9], [10]. LNs are divided into different regions, such as the cortex, paracortex and medulla, and are surrounded and penetrated by lymph-filled sinuses [11]. These compartments are organized to manage a large number of motile lymphocytes (Ly) and antigen-presenting cells by resident stromal cells, including major types such as T-zone reticular cells (TRCs), follicular dendritic cells (FDCs), lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) and blood endothelial cells (BECs) [12]. The afferent lymphatic vessels are connected to LNs and transport lymphoid fluid through the sinuses to the medulla, and the fluid exits through the efferent lymphatic vessels [13]. LECs express cytokines and chemokines, such as chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 21 (CCL21) and CCL19, to attract T cells, DCs, and adhesion molecules, such as platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1) [14], [15]. Therefore, LECs play a pivotal role in controlling transport and communication with immune cells [14]. However, particles smaller than 70 kDa or virions pass a filter built by LECs to enter the conduit system [16], [17], [18]. Conduits transport the filtered lymph through the paracortex to high endothelial venules (HEVs), where immune cells enter the LNs [19]. Although sheathed by TRCs, DCs can access the lumens of HEVs [20]. Thus, TRCs form a three‐dimensional scaffold and influence the migration, survival, activation and function of lymphocytes [21], [22], [23], [24]. TRCs express podoplanin (gp38) and extracellular matrix proteins such as ER‐TR7. Single‐cell RNA sequencing has revealed four distinct subtypes of TRCs, which are characterized by Cxcl9+, Ccl19high, Ccl19+ and Ccl19+Il7high expression [25], [26]. HEVs, which are found in the paracortex within the TRC network and the medulla [27], are specialized cuboidal endothelial cells that recruit Ly [28]. HEVs are impermeable to high-molecular-weight particles, but smaller particles reach paracortical and medullary HEVs through the conduit system [27]. Furthermore, capillary BECs are also detectable and provide nutrients and oxygen to the surrounding cells [28], [29]. FDCs are located in the cortex, express CXCL13 for B cell migration and can function as antigen-presenting cells [30]. During immune reactions, FDCs remodel follicles into germinal centers, where B cells proliferate and undergo somatic hypermutations [30]. Because lipids are transported via lymph fluid through the mLNs, various cells are thought to come in contact with each other. Through high-resolution three-dimensional imaging, the transport route of lymph fluid, including a small tracer molecule, has been well illustrated, and the results have shown that all compartments come into contact with lymph-borne antigens [19]. The LN structure after high-fat diet (HFD) feeding has been analyzed, and this analysis revealed alterations and an abnormal organization [7], [31] as well as decreased T cell numbers and increased cell death [7], [32].
Thus, despite the occurrence of lipid transport and the induction of the immune response in mLNs, the microarchitecture of mLNs during obesity has not been widely explored. In the present study, animals were fed a HFD for 10 weeks, and transmission electron microscopy observations of these animals revealed various stromal cell subsets in most LN compartments and macrophages in contact with lipids. Furthermore, this study showed that stromal cells express high amounts of lipid metabolism-related genes, which indicated that mLNs participate in lipid metabolism.
Materials and methods
Mice and feeding
Five male mice per group (body weight, 18–25 g) were used in this study. C57BL/6NCrl (B6NCrl) mice were purchased from Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany) and fed a HFD (D12492, Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ, USA) containing 20% protein, 20% carbohydrate and 60% kcal fat or a low-fat diet (LFD; D12450J, Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ, USA) containing 20% protein, 70% carbohydrate and 10% kcal fat ad libitum for 10–14 weeks. During the feeding period, the body weight was measured twice per week.
Ethical statement
This study was conducted in accordance with German animal protection laws and the European Directive 2010/63/EU. All the experiments were approved by the Local Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee and permitted by the Lower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety (LAVES; file number: 13/1174).
Stromal cell (SC) isolation
For CD45- SC isolation, mLNs or peripheral lymph nodes (pLNs) were obtained from the wild-type mice, and the LNs were digested at 37 °C for 30 min with 1 mg/ml collagenase 8 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in RPMI 1640/10% FCS. The CD45- cells were isolated using the MACS technique in accordance with the instructions provided by Miltenyi (Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany). The mean purity of the CD45- cells from the mLN and pLN cells was 97.4% ± 2.0 and 97.5% ± 2.2, respectively, and that of the stromal cell subsets was 88% ± 1.5. The SCs were used for mRNA isolation.
Microarray analysis
The data discussed in this article have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus [33] and are accessible under GEO SuperSeries accession number GSE138595 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE138595). All relevant laboratory processes and raw data processing steps are described in the database. For analysis and visualization, the normalized Processed Signals of the green channel (gPSs) were imported into GeneSpring GX software (version 13.1.1, Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The normalized values were imported as single-color data and log2-transformed according to the default import procedure. No additional data transformation or normalization was applied during the data import process.
Filter criteria for experiment #1 (pLNs versus mLNs): All the data were filtered to identify transcripts that fulfilled the following criteria: 1) fold difference in normalized gPSs calculated from both pairs of mLN vs pLN samples > 2-fold (consistent and unidirectional) and 2) an arithmetic mean of processed signal intensities calculated from both pairs of mLN vs pLN samples > 50.
Filter criteria for experiment #2 (mLN FRCs versus mLN LECs versus mLN BECs): All the data were filtered to identify transcripts that fulfilled the following criteria, which were applied separately for all possible pairwise comparisons (contrasts) among the three samples: 1) fold difference > 2-fold; 2) arithmetic mean of processed signal intensities calculated from both samples > 50; 3) absence (=0) of technical impairment, as defined by all four types of technical outliers (feature extraction software) in each of the samples analyzed.
Immunohistochemistry
Cryostat sections of mLNs were fixed in acetone/methanol solution (1:1, 10 min, −20 °C) and subjected to immunofluorescence histochemical analysis according to standard protocols. Briefly, the sections were rehydrated in TBST (0.1 M Tris pH 7.5, 0.15 M NaCl, and 0.1% Tween-20), preincubated with TBST containing 5% swine serum (Dako, Hamburg, Germany) and stained with antibodies against B220 and CD11b (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), CXCL13 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), ERTR-7 (BMA, Augst, Switzerland), FDC-M1 (ImmunoKontact, Frankfurt, Germany), CD31-APC (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and Lyve-1 (kindly provided by R. Förster) in 2.5% serum/TBST. The unconjugated antibodies were then visualized using goat anti-rat Cy5 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) or anti-rabbit Cy3 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA). The nuclei were visualized by DAPI staining (1 μg/ml DAPI/TBST), and the sections were mounted with Fluorescent Mounting Medium (Dako, Hamburg, Germany). Images were acquired using a Zeiss Axioskop 40 microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) connected to an AxioCam MRm (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany).
Transmission electron microscopy
The mLNs were fixed by immersion in 150 mM HEPES, pH 7.35, containing 1.5% formaldehyde and 1.5% glutaraldehyde. After overnight incubation at 4 °C with 1% OsO4 (2 h at RT) and 4% uranyl acetate, the mLNs were dehydrated in acetone and embedded in Epon. Subsequently, 50-nm sections were poststained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate (48) and observed with a Morgagni TEM (FEI, Eindhoven, Netherland). Images were captured with a side-mounted Veleta CCD camera (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions, Münster, Deutschland).
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism® 6 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The data were tested for normality using the D'Agostino-Pearson (n ≥ 8) normality test. For smaller sample sizes, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test (n ≥ 7) or Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (n ≥ 5) was used. The quantitative parametric data from two groups were compared using a t test. The significance level was set to 5%.
Results
Stromal cells express enzymes involved in lipid metabolism
Microarray analyses revealed significant differences in the expression patterns of several genes involved in lipid metabolism between pLN and mLN stromal cells. Genes such as Clps (colipase), Pnlip (pancreatic lipase), Cpa1 (carboxypeptidase A1) and Cel (carboxyl ester lipase), which encode products involved in lipid metabolism, were more highly expressed in the stromal cells of mLNs than in those of pLNs (Fig. 1A, Suppl. Table 1). The analysis of different stromal cell subpopulations (FRC: gp38+CD31-; LEC: gp38+CD31+; BEC: gp38-CD31+; Suppl. Table 2) in a second microarray experiment showed high numbers of differentially expressed genes between FRCs and BECs (6886 gene probes), FRCs and LECs (5365 gene probes) and BECs and LECs (4269 gene probes). Fifty-one lipid metabolism-related gene probes representing 37 genes showed differential expression between FRCs and BECs, and 35 gene probes (27 genes) and 32 gene probes (27 genes) exhibited differential expression between FRCs and LECs and between BECs and LECs, respectively (Fig. 1B). The visualization of these genes in a scatter plot showed that BECs expressed a lower number of upregulated lipid metabolism-related genes compared with FRCs and LECs.
Increased sizes and numbers of lipid droplets in LECs and MRCs following HFD feeding
To determine whether stromal cells are in contact with dietary lipids, animals were fed a HFD (60%) or LFD (10%). After 10 weeks of feeding, the weight of the HFD-fed mice was 76% higher compared with that of the LFD-fed animals (Fig. 2). mLNs were isolated from these mice and analyzed by transmission electron microscopy to identify dietary lipids and determine the localization of lipid droplets (LDs). First, the analysis of the HFD group revealed increased LD numbers and sizes in various regions and cells of the mLNs (Fig. 2). A more detailed analysis provided insights into specific cell populations that are in contact with dietary lipids and into the localization of lipid vesicles within the different compartments of LNs.
The first region investigated in this study was the subcapsular sinus (SCS; Fig. 3A), where immune cells enter the lymph node from the draining area. LDs, Ly, dendritic cells (DCs) and mast cells (MCs) or macrophages (M) were detected within the SCS as well as in all other sinuses (intermediary and medullary) (Fig. 3B and 3C). Lymphocytes were identified by their round nucleus with dense chromatin and their small cytoplasm. DCs exhibited an irregular nucleus and several cytoplasmic protrusions but fewer lysosomes compared with macrophages. Macrophages were identified as large cells containing a nucleus with a peripheral rim of heterochromatin/condensed chromatin and a distinct nucleolus, and high numbers of granules and lysosomes were found within their cytoplasm. Furthermore, mast cells exhibited irregular nuclei and dark granules in the sinuses and particularly in the SCS of the LNs of LFD-fed mice, and reduced levels of these cells were found in the HFD-fed animals. In the LFD- and HFD-fed mice, macrophages were found loaded with lipids.
The SCS is lined by sessile nonhematopoietic stromal cells, namely, LECs and marginal reticulum cells (MRCs, Fig. 3D and E). LECs, which are flattened cells with an elongated nucleus, cover the SCS on two sites: the inner site flanking the cortex and the outer site next to the capsular region. The LECs facing the cortex were connected to collagen fibers and amorphous moderately electron-dense material. No or only some intracellular LDs and lysosome structures were found in the LECs of LFD-fed mice (Fig. 3D) and in the LECs on the capsular site of HFD-fed mice. In contrast, an increasing number of LDs were detected intracellularly in LECs on the inner site of the SCS after HFD feeding (Fig. 3E). LECs were found to be in direct contact with some type of sinusoidal reticular cell (SRC) in the sinuses and with MRCs at the outer layer of the cortex (Fig. 3D and E). These SRCs exhibited a light-colored nucleus/cytoplasm and numerous cell protrusions and cell organelles (Fig. 3E). However, MRCs showed a heterogeneous phenotype, as demonstrated by variations in both the shape and color of the cytoplasm. In addition, regardless of the diet, these cells exhibited an elongated, round or irregularly shaped pale nucleus, scattered Golgi complexes, and numerous mitochondria but only a few lysosomes. A normal morphology, including small LDs, was found in the MRCs of LFD-fed mice, whereas the LDs in the MRCs of the HFD-fed animals showed increases in both size and number (Suppl. Fig. 1).
Morphological changes in the interfollicular region following HFD feeding
The cortical area is divided into a follicular region (FR) and an interfollicular region (IFR) (Fig. 4A). Lymphoid follicles consist mostly of lymphocytes, but FDCs and macrophages could also be detected (Fig. 4B and C). FDCs were identified as large reticular cells with one or more light irregular nuclear profiles of finely dispersed chromatin. FDCs mainly occur in germinal centers of secondary follicles and exhibit numerous cytoplasmic protrusions. Within these germinal centers, tingible body macrophages with large phagolysosomes containing dead cells could also be identified. Lymphocytes and FDCs showed no morphological changes or intracellular LDs, regardless of the diet (Fig. 4B and 4C). In the IFR, some types of reticulum cells (now called interfollicular reticulum cells, IRCs) were observed in close proximity to the intermediary/cortical sinuses (Fig. 4D and 4E). These cells exhibited a fusiform structure and an irregularly shaped nucleus with a peripheral rim of dense chromatin and were in direct contact with lymphocytes, macrophages and DCs. LDs in the cytoplasm of these IRCs were observed only in the HFD-fed mice (Fig. 4E). Furthermore, in this region, some free LDs in the interstitium and larger intercellular spaces were observed in the HFD-fed mice compared with the LFD-fed mice (Fig. 4F).
Lipid droplets do not enter the paracortex
The paracortex was characterized by the presence of HEVs, lymphocytes, DCs and FRCs (Fig. 5A-5E). The HEVs were constructed by BECs and were surrounded by reticular fibers and pericytes (Fig. 5B-5E). These specialized postcapillary venules represent the portals for the entry of lymphocytes migrating from the bloodstream into the LNs. Subsequently, the HEV FRCs formed a three-dimensional network (conduit) in which various FRCs were connected via their cytoplasmic extensions (Fig. 5B and 5C). These reticular cells showed a fusiform or stellate-shaped structure, a dark cytoplasm due to irregularly distributed strands of the endoplasmic reticulum, and a long ovoid nucleus. In addition, these cells were highly connected to collagen fibers, and DCs and lymphocytes were found to be in close contact with FRCs. Morphological changes or LDs were not observed in this region of the paracortex. However, in the paracorticomedullary transition area, the FRCs of the LFD-fed mice exhibited small intracellular LDs (Fig. 5F, Suppl. Fig. 2), and highest numbers of and larger LDs were found in the HFD-fed mice (Fig. 5G).
Stromal cells but not leucocytes integrate lipid droplets in the medulla
The last compartment of the LN is the medulla (Fig. 6A). This region consists of medullary sinuses and cords, and blood vessels could also be detected. The medullary sinuses are lined with SRCs and LECs (Fig. 6B and 6C). The cords contain plasma cells, lymphocytes and macrophages between some RCs and FRCs (Fig. 6D and 6E). Plasma cells possess a pronounced, occasionally dilated rough endoplasmic reticulum and a round nucleus. Neither these antibody-producing cells nor the other leucocytes showed morphological changes between the different groups. Furthermore, independent of the diet, apoptotic cells were observed mostly near blood vessels in the interstitium of this region. These cells were characterized by condensation of chromatin and fragmentation of the nucleus and many autolysosomes, including cell debris. Similar to the results obtained in the paracorticomedullary area, small LDs were noted in FRCs surrounding the blood vessels in the LFD-fed mice and were increased in the HFD-fed mice at the end of the 10-week feeding period (Fig. 6B and C). Moreover, intracellular LDs were observed in SRCs of HFD-fed mice (Fig. 6C).
Lipophages and foam cells are detected in the sinuses after HFD feeding
Additionally, macrophages representing only a small cell population in the LNs were detected in all sinuses of the LFD-fed mice and in the mLNs of HFD-fed mice, starting from the SCS to the cortical sinus and converging in the medulla (Figs. 3B, C, and 7A-C). Typical sinus macrophages contain many different types of lysosomes. In the medullary sinuses, macrophages showed an increased number of bright heterolysosomes (HLs) containing lipids or chylomicrons and were therefore called lipophages (Figs. 6B, 7C and D). However, following HFD feeding, enlarged numbers of these lipophages were identified within the intermediary/cortical and medullary sinuses (Fig. 7C). Furthermore, macrophages that transformed into foam cells could be detected, and these showed increased intracytoplasmic LDs in addition to HLs (Fig. 7E).
Discussion
Increased dietary fat intake leads to the accumulation of dietary lipids, and the dysregulation of lipid metabolism during obesity exerts several effects on different organs [34], [35], [36]. Dietary lipids pass the mLNs during their transport by afferent lymphatics from the small intestine to the thoracic duct. The direct contact between mLN cells and dietary lipids suggests the involvement of mLNs in lipid metabolism. Furthermore, mLNs form part of the intestinal immune system and maintain inner homeostasis by generating immune responses against potential pathogens or pathologically altered cells and inducing tolerance against harmless antigens [12]. This study showed that the mLN is affected during obesity and that most stromal cells and macrophages store high amounts of LDs.
In recent years, scientists have focused on the stromal cells of LNs because these cells are involved in immunological functions, such as the immune response and tolerance induction [12]. Different types of stromal cells, such as FDCs and FRCs, were detected in the follicles or T cell zone of the LNs, respectively. Together with LECs and BECs, these stromal cell subpopulations were sorted and analyzed based on their gene expression profiles [22], [24]. mLNs and pLNs share similar gene expression profiles within these clusters, such as genes belonging to the interferon family, Ccl19 and Ccl21, but also show differences, such as in the expression of Il6 or Cxcl14 [22], [24]. However, differences between the LNs and stromal cell subpopulations were detected. Il7, as a lymphocyte survival-related cytokine, exhibits markedly higher expression in FRCs than in BECs [24]. Many more stromal cell subsets were recently identified by single-cell sequencing, and these findings resulted in the identification of four FRC subtypes (Cxcl9+, Ccl19high, Ccl19+ and Ccl19+Il7high TRCs) or the identification of new stromal cell populations, such as CD34+ cells. These cells could be subdivided into CD34+(Aldh1a2+), CD34+(Ackr3+), CD34+(Gdf10+) and CD34+(Cd248+) SCs [25], [26], and all these stromal cell populations exhibited a distinct gene expression profile. This study revealed that a substantial number of genes involved in lipid metabolism exhibited increased expression in mLN stromal cells compared with pLN stromal cells. Dietary lipids are absorbed in the intestine and transported via afferent lymphatics to the mLNs and then to the thoracic duct [2]. Therefore, mLNs but not pLNs are in contact with these lipids. These results suggest that mLNs play a role in lipid metabolism. The gene expression of these enzymes in the stromal cell subpopulation of the mLNs was examined, and genes involved in lipid metabolism were detected in all analyzed subpopulations (FRCs, BECs and LECs). In addition, the highest number of upregulated genes were found in FRCs. Prior to this study, scarce information on lipid metabolism or lipid accumulation in mLNs is available. Therefore, mice were fed an LFD or HFD, and the morphological differences and lipid-cell interactions in their mLNs were analyzed. LDs were identified predominantly in or near the sinuses, the paracorticomedullary transition area and the medulla after 10 weeks of HFD feeding.
The lymphoid fluid is transported through afferent lymphatic vessels to the mLNs and SCS, which is lined with LECs. LECs, which are characterized by LYVE1 expression, control the entrance of lymphocytes [37]. Furthermore, LECs transport extracellular proteins and soluble substances [38] and filter particles smaller than 70 kDa or virions [16], [17], [18]. Two other stromal cell populations (MRCs and CD34+ SCs) are located below the SCS [26], [39], [40], and both of these cell types are thought to play a role in capsule integrity and are in direct contact with LECs [26]. This study identified two different stromal cell populations attached to LECs: one cell population was identified as MRCs, and the other cell population was termed SRCs. These cells, which might be CD34+ SCs, are direct contact with the lymph fluid, whereas the cells in the cortex and paracortex are connected to filtered lymph fluid via the conduit system [17], [19], [20]. Increased numbers of LDs of increased sizes were detected in LECs, MRCs and SRCs in all sinuses (the SCS, intermediary and medullary sinuses) after 10 weeks of HFD feeding, whereas the FDCs in the follicular region and TRCs in the paracortical area did not contain LDs in their cytoplasm. FDCs are known to capture and present antigens [41], and Ccl19high TRCs build and envelope the conduit system [20]. These cells express high levels of Ccl21 in addition to Ccl19 [42], cytokines needed for T and B cell survival, such as Il7 and Baff, [42], [43], and pattern recognition receptors to control innate immune responses [44], [45] and present self-antigens via peptide-MHCII complexes to tolerize T cells [46], [47]. In addition, reticulum cells surrounding HEVs and HEV endothelial cells were also found to lack LDs. HEVs are considered the entrance points for lymphocytes from the circulation to the paracortical regions of the LNs [12]. Thus, the dietary lipids obtained from HFD consumption appear to be mostly filtered by LECs and are not transported via the conduit system to the paracortical area. However, in the interfollicular zone, LDs were observed in the cytoplasm of IRCs in the HFD-fed mice, and some free LDs were detected in the interstitium. These cells are in direct contact with lymphocytes, macrophages and DCs. This region has been described as the primary site for stromal cell-DC-T cell interactions [48] and the activation of antigen-specific T cells [18]. Therefore, the larger intercellular spaces observed in the HFD-fed mice compared with those observed in the LFD-fed mice might be important for induction of the immune response in this region. A topological analysis of the T cell zone (TCZ) showed that lymphocytes in the superficial TCZ are in continuous contact with the conduit network and therefore with FRCs [19]. The altered microarchitecture due to an increased collagen content or increased cell debris within the paracortex [31] and the increased apoptosis of activated T cells [32] support the hypothesis that obesity results in mLNs that show an impaired immune function. Furthermore, the mice showed smaller mLNs and reduced lymph vessels after consumption of the HFD [7], which mimics the clinical symptoms observed in obese patients developing lymphedema [49].
The medulla, where lymphocytes exit via efferent lymphatics, consists of medullary cords and lymph sinuses [50]. In addition to all lymphocyte subtypes, such as B and T cells or plasma cells, which leave the LNs, various types of stromal cells, such as nondifferentiated reticular cells, medullary zone FRCs, phagocytic reticular cells, CD34+ stromal cells and LECs, were detected in this region [23], [26], [51], [52], [53]. In this study, stromal cells but not leucocytes were found to contain LDs. Additionally, macrophages were located in both the medulla and the SCS. Although all of these cells phagocytose antigens and present them to lymphocytes for immune response induction, SCS macrophages exhibit less efficient phagocytosis but more efficient virus capture [54]. Independent of the diet, macrophages can be distinguished from lipophages in the sinuses of the mLNs by the presence of increased lipids or chylomicrons in heterolysosomes. However, foam cells containing LDs within their cytoplasm were detected only in the mLNs of the HFD-fed mice. Lipophages express the enzyme lipoprotein lipase, which catalyzes the hydrolysis of chylomicrons [55], [56], whereas foam cells are formed by high-lipid material exposure and are characteristic of lipid lymphadenopathy [57].
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study provides the first demonstration that stromal cells and macrophages are almost exclusively involved in lipid uptake in the mLNs. Because all of these cells are involved in immune response induction or homeostasis maintenance, it is possible that a high lipid intake, lipid transport through the sinuses of the LNs and lipid absorption by the cells impair their immunological function.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
We thank Anna Smoczek and Andrea Liese for their excellent technical assistance. We would also like to acknowledge the assistance of the Cell Sorting Core Facility of the Hannover Medical School funded in part by the Braukmann-Wittenberg-Herz-Stiftung and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. The work was supported by the German Research Foundation (BO 1866/3-1).
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of Cairo University.
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.04.020.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
The following are the Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Goossens G.H. The metabolic phenotype in obesity: fat mass, body fat distribution, and adipose tissue function. Obes Facts. 2017;10(3):207–215. doi: 10.1159/000471488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Klop B., Elte J.W., Cabezas M.C. Dyslipidemia in obesity: mechanisms and potential targets. Nutrients. 2013;5(4):1218–1240. doi: 10.3390/nu5041218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang T.Y., Liu M., Portincasa P., Wang D.Q. New insights into the molecular mechanism of intestinal fatty acid absorption. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013;43(11):1203–1223. doi: 10.1111/eci.12161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Beilstein F., Carriere V., Leturque A., Demignot S. Characteristics and functions of lipid droplets and associated proteins in enterocytes. Exp Cell Res. 2016;340(2):172–179. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schonfeld P., Wojtczak L. Short- and medium-chain fatty acids in energy metabolism: the cellular perspective. J Lipid Res. 2016;57(6):943–954. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R067629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Blum K.S., Karaman S., Proulx S.T., Ochsenbein A.M., Luciani P., Leroux J.C. Chronic high-fat diet impairs collecting lymphatic vessel function in mice. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weitman E.S., Aschen S.Z., Farias-Eisner G., Albano N., Cuzzone D.A., Ghanta S. Obesity impairs lymphatic fluid transport and dendritic cell migration to lymph nodes. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Worbs T., Bode U., Yan S., Hoffmann M.W., Hintzen G., Bernhardt G. Oral tolerance originates in the intestinal immune system and relies on antigen carriage by dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2006;203(3):519–527. doi: 10.1084/jem.20052016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yero A., Farnos O., Rabezanahary H., Racine G., Estaquier J., Jenabian M.A. Differential dynamics of regulatory T-cell (Treg) and Th17 cell balance in mesenteric lymph nodes and blood following early anti-retroviral initiation during acute SIV infection. J Virol. 2019;93(19):e00371–e419. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00371-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hahn A., Thiessen N., Pabst R., Buettner M., Bode U. Mesenteric lymph nodes are not required for an intestinal immunoglobulin A response to oral cholera toxin. Immunology. 2010;129(3):427–436. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03197.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Van den Broeck W., Derore A., Simoens P. Anatomy and nomenclature of murine lymph nodes: Descriptive study and nomenclatory standardization in BALB/cAnNCrl mice. J Immunol Methods. 2006;312(1–2):12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2006.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chang J.E., Turley S.J. Stromal infrastructure of the lymph node and coordination of immunity. Trends Immunol. 2015;36(1):30–39. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2014.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mueller S.N., Germain R.N. Stromal cell contributions to the homeostasis and functionality of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(9):618–629. doi: 10.1038/nri2588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Farnsworth R.H., Karnezis T., Maciburko S.J., Mueller S.N., Stacker S.A. The Interplay Between Lymphatic Vessels and Chemokines. Front Immunol. 2019;10:518. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sawa Y., Yoshida S., Ashikaga Y., Kim T., Yamaoka Y., Shiroto H. Lymphatic endothelium expresses PECAM-1. Tissue Cell. 1998;30(3):377–382. doi: 10.1016/s0040-8166(98)80051-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rantakari P., Auvinen K., Jappinen N., Kapraali M., Valtonen J., Karikoski M. The endothelial protein PLVAP in lymphatics controls the entry of lymphocytes and antigens into lymph nodes. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(4):386–396. doi: 10.1038/ni.3101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Roozendaal R., Mebius R.E., Kraal G. The conduit system of the lymph node. Int Immunol. 2008;20(12):1483–1487. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxn110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reynoso G.V., Weisberg A.S., Shannon J.P., McManus D.T., Shores L., Americo J.L. Lymph node conduits transport virions for rapid T cell activation. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(5):602–612. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0342-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kelch I.D., Bogle G., Sands G.B., Phillips A.R.J., LeGrice I.J., Dunbar P.R. High-resolution 3D imaging and topological mapping of the lymph node conduit system. PLoS Biol. 2019;17(12) doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sixt M., Kanazawa N., Selg M., Samson T., Roos G., Reinhardt D.P. The conduit system transports soluble antigens from the afferent lymph to resident dendritic cells in the T cell area of the lymph node. Immunity. 2005;22(1):19–29. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Buettner M., Pabst R., Bode U. Lymph node stromal cells strongly influence immune response suppression. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41(3):624–633. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Buettner M., Dittrich-Breiholz O., Falk C.S., Lochner M., Smoczek A., Menzel F. Stromal cells as trend-setters for cells migrating into the lymph node. Mucosal Immunol. 2015;8(3):640–649. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huang H.Y., Rivas-Caicedo A., Renevey F., Cannelle H., Peranzoni E., Scarpellino L. Identification of a new subset of lymph node stromal cells involved in regulating plasma cell homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(29):E6826–E6835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712628115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Malhotra D., Fletcher A.L., Astarita J., Lukacs-Kornek V., Tayalia P., Gonzalez S.F. Transcriptional profiling of stroma from inflamed and resting lymph nodes defines immunological hallmarks. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(5):499–510. doi: 10.1038/ni.2262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pezoldt J., Pasztoi M., Zou M., Wiechers C., Beckstette M., Thierry G.R. Neonatally imprinted stromal cell subsets induce tolerogenic dendritic cells in mesenteric lymph nodes. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):3903. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06423-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rodda L.B., Lu E., Bennett M.L., Sokol C.L., Wang X., Luther S.A. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Lymph Node Stromal Cells Reveals Niche-Associated Heterogeneity. Immunity. 2018;48(5) doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.006. pp. 1014–28 e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pfeiffer F., Kumar V., Butz S., Vestweber D., Imhof B.A., Stein J.V. Distinct molecular composition of blood and lymphatic vascular endothelial cell junctions establishes specific functional barriers within the peripheral lymph node. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38(8):2142–2155. doi: 10.1002/eji.200838140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Girard J.P., Springer T.A. High endothelial venules (HEVs): specialized endothelium for lymphocyte migration. Immunol Today. 1995;16(9):449–457. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(95)80023-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Anderson N.D., Anderson A.O., Wyllie R.G. Specialized structure and metabolic activities of high endothelial venules in rat lymphatic tissues. Immunology. 1976;31(3):455–473. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gentek R., Bajenoff M. Lymph Node Stroma Dynamics and Approaches for Their Visualization. Trends Immunol. 2017;38(4):236–247. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Solt C.M., Hill J.L., Vanderpool K., Foster M.T. Obesity-induced immune dysfunction and immunosuppression: TEM observation of visceral and subcutaneous lymph node microarchitecture and immune cell interactions. Horm Mol Biol. Clin Investig. 2019;39(2) doi: 10.1515/hmbci-2018-0083. /j/hmbci.2019.39.issue-2/hmbci-2018-0083/hmbci-2018-0083.xml. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kim C.S., Lee S.C., Kim Y.M., Kim B.S., Choi H.S., Kawada T. Visceral fat accumulation induced by a high-fat diet causes the atrophy of mesenteric lymph nodes in obese mice. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(6):1261–1269. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Edgar R., Domrachev M., Lash A.E. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(1):207–210. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Auclair N., Melbouci L., St-Pierre D., Levy E. Gastrointestinal factors regulating lipid droplet formation in the intestine. Exp Cell Res. 2018;363(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Magnuson A.M., Regan D.P., Booth A.D., Fouts J.K., Solt C.M., Hill J.L. High-fat diet induced central adiposity (visceral fat) is associated with increased fibrosis and decreased immune cellularity of the mesenteric lymph node in mice. Eur J Nutr. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s00394-019-02019-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Olzmann J.A., Carvalho P. Dynamics and functions of lipid droplets. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(3):137–155. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0085-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ulvmar M.H., Werth K., Braun A., Kelay P., Hub E., Eller K. The atypical chemokine receptor CCRL1 shapes functional CCL21 gradients in lymph nodes. Nat Immunol. 2014;15(7):623–630. doi: 10.1038/ni.2889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Triacca V., Guc E., Kilarski W.W., Pisano M., Swartz M.A. Transcellular Pathways in Lymphatic Endothelial Cells Regulate Changes in Solute Transport by Fluid Stress. Circ Res. 2017;120(9):1440–1452. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Katakai T., Suto H., Sugai M., Gonda H., Togawa A., Suematsu S. Organizer-like reticular stromal cell layer common to adult secondary lymphoid organs. J Immunol. 2008;181(9):6189–6200. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.9.6189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sitnik K.M., Wendland K., Weishaupt H., Uronen-Hansson H., White A.J., Anderson G. Context-Dependent Development of Lymphoid Stroma from Adult CD34(+) Adventitial Progenitors. Cell Rep. 2016;14(10):2375–2388. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Suzuki K., Grigorova I., Phan T.G., Kelly L.M., Cyster J.G. Visualizing B cell capture of cognate antigen from follicular dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2009;206(7):1485–1493. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Link A., Vogt T.K., Favre S., Britschgi M.R., Acha-Orbea H., Hinz B. Fibroblastic reticular cells in lymph nodes regulate the homeostasis of naive T cells. Nat Immunol. 2007;8(11):1255–1265. doi: 10.1038/ni1513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cremasco V., Woodruff M.C., Onder L., Cupovic J., Nieves-Bonilla J.M., Schildberg F.A. B cell homeostasis and follicle confines are governed by fibroblastic reticular cells. Nat Immunol. 2014;15(10):973–981. doi: 10.1038/ni.2965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gil-Cruz C., Perez-Shibayama C., Onder L., Chai Q., Cupovic J., Cheng H.W. Fibroblastic reticular cells regulate intestinal inflammation via IL-15-mediated control of group 1 ILCs. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(12):1388–1396. doi: 10.1038/ni.3566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gregory J.L., Walter A., Alexandre Y.O., Hor J.L., Liu R., Ma J.Z. Infection Programs Sustained Lymphoid Stromal Cell Responses and Shapes Lymph Node Remodeling upon Secondary Challenge. Cell Rep. 2017;18(2):406–418. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Baptista A.P., Roozendaal R., Reijmers R.M., Koning J.J., Unger W.W., Greuter M. Lymph node stromal cells constrain immunity via MHC class II self-antigen presentation. Elife. 2014;3 doi: 10.7554/eLife.04433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dubrot J., Duraes F.V., Potin L., Capotosti F., Brighouse D., Suter T. Lymph node stromal cells acquire peptide-MHCII complexes from dendritic cells and induce antigen-specific CD4(+) T cell tolerance. J Exp Med. 2014;211(6):1153–1166. doi: 10.1084/jem.20132000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Katakai T., Hara T., Lee J.H., Gonda H., Sugai M., Shimizu A. A novel reticular stromal structure in lymph node cortex: an immuno-platform for interactions among dendritic cells, T cells and B cells. Int Immunol. 2004;16(8):1133–1142. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Arngrim N., Simonsen L., Holst J.J., Bulow J. Reduced adipose tissue lymphatic drainage of macromolecules in obese subjects: a possible link between obesity and local tissue inflammation? Int J Obes (Lond) 2013;37(5):748–750. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Movat H.Z., Fernando N.V. The Fine Structure of Lymphoid Tissue. Exp Mol Pathol. 1964;3:546–568. doi: 10.1016/0014-4800(64)90034-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Crivellato E., Mallardi F. Stromal cell organisation in the mouse lymph node. A light and electron microscopic investigation using the zinc iodide-osmium technique. J Anat. 1997;190(Pt 1):85–92. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1997.19010085.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Han S.S. The ultrastructure of the mesenteric lymph node of the rat. Am J Anat. 1961;109:183–225. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001090208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Takeuchi A., Ozawa M., Kanda Y., Kozai M., Ohigashi I., Kurosawa Y. A Distinct Subset of Fibroblastic Stromal Cells Constitutes the Cortex-Medulla Boundary Subcompartment of the Lymph Node. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2196. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kuka M., Iannacone M. The role of lymph node sinus macrophages in host defense. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014;1319:38–46. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Merkel M., Eckel R.H., Goldberg I.J. Lipoprotein lipase: genetics, lipid uptake, and regulation. J Lipid Res. 2002;43(12):1997–2006. doi: 10.1194/jlr.r200015-jlr200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lichtenstein L., Mattijssen F., de Wit N.J., Georgiadi A., Hooiveld G.J., van der Meer R. Angptl4 protects against severe proinflammatory effects of saturated fat by inhibiting fatty acid uptake into mesenteric lymph node macrophages. Cell Metab. 2010;12(6):580–592. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Aterman K., Remmele W., Karl Smith M. Touton and his “xanthelasmatic giant cell.” A selective review of multinucleated giant cells. Am J Dermatopathol. 1988;10(3):257–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.