Over 3000 healthcare workers (HCW) in China are suspected of having coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and over 1700 tested positive.1 These statistics underline the need for robust preventative measures against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Endoscopy departments are fertile grounds for viral spread because aerosolisation of bodily secretions occurs during procedures. A single viral-shedding patient with a high viral load can contaminate an entire endoscopy room with the virus that remains viable for up to 3 days, putting uninfected patients and HCWs at risk.2 3
Singapore previously had the largest cohort of COVID-19 patients outside China in the early phases of the outbreak. Given its novelty, the effectiveness of new preventative measures implemented within our endoscopy services was unknown. To determine best practice, we conducted systematic searches of literature and official websites for gastroenterology and endoscopy societies (n=28) in the 15 most-affected countries to scrutinise recommendations and associated evidence. Methodology is available on request.
In summary, we found careful patient selection was commonly advised but protocols for screening and triaging differed (table 1). The two most important differences observed were: (1) type of personal protective equipment (PPE) recommended and (2) postprocedure risk management (table 2). Only 32% (9/28) of all gastrointestinal (GI) related societies reviewed had provided guidance as of 16 March 2020. A universal gold standard was lacking. One article reported the effect of preventative measures on the incidence of new COVID-19 cases but the sample size was small and period of observation abrupt.4
Table 1.
Summary of recommendations for patient selection in GI endoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic
Articles grouped by country: | China*†‡ | USA§¶ | UK**†† | Spain‡‡ | Singapore |
Patient selection in endoscopy | Triaging:
Screening protocol:
PPE recommendation (general staff):
Contingency plan for high-risk patients detected in endoscopy:
|
Triaging:
Screening protocol for6:
Classify risk:
PPE recommendation (general staff):
Contingency plan for high-risk patients detected in endoscopy:
|
Triaging:
Need to continue procedures: acute upper GI bleeding, oesophageal obstruction (foreign bodies, food bolus, pinhole stricture or cancer requiring urgent stenting), endoscopic vacuum therapy for perorations/leaks, acute cholangitis or jaundice secondary to biliary obstruction, acute biliary pancreatitis, cholangitis with stone and jaundice, infected pancreatic collections, walled-off pancreatic necrosis, urgent inpatient nutrition support (enteral feeding tubes), gastrointestinal obstruction needing urgent decompression or stenting. Defer until further notice procedures: All routine symptomatic referrals, planned POEM, pneumatic dilatation for achalasia, elective PEG, stricture dilatation, APC for GAVE, RFA, pneumatic dilatation, ampullectomy, bariatric endoscopy Low-risk follow-up and repeat scopes—oesophagitis healing, gastric ulcer healing, ‘poor views’, check post-therapy, for example, EMR, RFA, polypectomy (unless high-risk neoplasia present), and so on. Surveillance polyp check, IBD, Barrett’s (unless high-risk neoplasia present), non-urgent enteroscopy, EUS for ‘benign’ indications—biliary dilatation, possible stones, submucosal lesions, pancreatic cysts without high-risk features. Other ERCP cases—stones where there has been no recent cholangitis and a stent is in place; therapy for chronic pancreatitis; metal stent removal or change; ampullectomy follow-up. Flexible sigmoidoscopy should stop unless discussed with local commissioners. Patients undergoing endoscopy/biopsy as part of clinical trials. Case-by-case decision: 2-week wait cancer referrals, FIT positive bowel screening colonoscopy, planned EMR/ESD for complex polyps or high-risk lesions, new suspected IBD, cancer staging EUS, small bowel endoscopy. (General guidance, non-exhaustive list). Screening protocol:
PPE recommendation (general staff):
Contingency plan for high-risk patients detected in endoscopy:
|
Triaging:
Screening protocol:
Contingency plan for high-risk patients detected in endoscopy:
PPE recommendation (general staff):
Contingency plan for high-risk patients detected in endoscopy:
|
Triaging
Screening protocol:
All suspected and confirmed COVID-19 patients to be managed in designated isolation areas. PPE recommendation (general staff):
Contingency plan for high-risk patients detected in endoscopy:
|
Articles grouped by the country of publication; recommendations may not necessarily reflect national guidance if any.
*Subspecialty group of Gastroenterology, the Society of Paediatrics, Chinese Medical Association. (Prevention and control program on 2019 novel coronavirus infection in children’s digestive endoscopy centre). Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 2020;58, 175–178.
†Luo et al (Standardised diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer during the outbreak of novel coronavirus pneumonia in Renji hospital). Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 23, 2020; E003.
‡Gou et al (Treatment of pancreatic diseases and prevention of infection during outbreak of 2019 coronavirus disease). Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2020;58, E006.
§Pochapin et al American College of Gastroenterology COVID-19 and recommendations for gastroenterologists. 2020.
¶Repici et al Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak: what the department of endoscopy should know. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2020.
**British Society of Gastroenterology and British Association for the Study of the Liver. COVID-19: Advice for healthcare professionals in Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2020.
††Public Health England. COVID-19: Guidance for infection prevention and control in healthcare settings (Version 1.0). 2020.
‡‡Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD) (Updated SEPD recommendations on infection by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus.)
APC, argon plasma coagulation; EMR, endoscopic mucosal resection; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection; EUS, endoscopic ultrasonography; FIT, faecal immunochemical test; GAVE, gastric antral vascular ectasia; GI, gastrointestinal; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; PEG, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; POEM, peroral endoscopic myotomy; PPE, personal protective equipment; RFA, radio frequency ablation.
Table 2.
Summary of recommendations for periprocedural, intraprocedural and postprocedural recommendations including general advice
Articles grouped by country: | China*†‡ | USA§¶ | UK**†† | Spain‡‡ | Singapore |
Periprocedural and intraprocedural practices | PPE recommendations: For all patients: Mask: N95 or PAPR Clothing: Impermeable clothing wear, shoe covers, work caps, goggles and latex gloves for all procedures.
Infection control measures:
|
PPE recommendations: Low-risk patients: Mask: Surgical masks. Clothing: Work cap, goggles, glove, disposable gowns and gloves *Lower endoscopy in patients with intermediate-risk is downgraded to low risk High-risk patients: Mask: FFP2 or FFP3 Clothing: Impermeable clothing, work cap, goggles and/or face shield, double glove, impermeable clothing *Upper endoscopy=high risk. Infection control measures:
|
PPE recommendations: Low-risk patients: Mask: Recommendation unclear Clothing: Standard infection control procedures with PPE; disposable gloves and gowns. *Lower endoscopy in COVID-19 patients considered low risk, surgical face mask recommended. High-risk patients: Masks: FFP3 Clothing: PPE with face shield or goggles if upper endoscopy. Consider advanced PPE if out-of-hours or emergency cases. Infection control measures:
|
PPE recommendations: For all patients: Mask: Unspecified mask Clothing: Gowns, gloves and protective goggles. Infection control measures:
|
PPE recommendations: Low-risk patients: Mask: N95 Clothing: Face shield and standard PPE High-risk patients: Mask: PAPR Clothing: Advanced PPE including goggles, work caps, shoe covers, with required for all staff. Infection control measures:
|
Postprocedural practices | Decontamination practices:
PPE for transfer:
Post-sedation management:
|
Decontamination practices:
PPE for transfer:
Post-sedation management:
|
Decontamination practices:
PPE for transfer:
Postsedation management:
|
– | Decontamination practices:
PPE for transfer staff:
Postsedation management:
|
General advice |
|
|
|
|
|
Articles grouped by the country of publication; recommendations may not necessarily reflect national guidance if any.
*Subspecialty group of Gastroenterology, the Society of Paediatrics, Chinese Medical Association. (Prevention and control program on 2019 novel coronavirus infection in children’s digestive endoscopy centre). Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 2020;58, 175–178.
†Luo et al (Standardised diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer during the outbreak of novel coronavirus pneumonia in Renji hospital). Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 23, 2020; E003.
‡Gou et al (Treatment of pancreatic diseases and prevention of infection during outbreak of 2019 coronavirus disease). Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2020;58, E006.
§Pochapin et al American College of Gastroenterology COVID-19 and recommendations for gastroenterologists. 2020.
¶Repici et al Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak: what the department of endoscopy should know. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2020.
**British Society of Gastroenterology and British Association for the Study of the Liver. COVID-19: Advice for healthcare professionals in Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2020.
††Public Health England. COVID-19: Guidance for infection prevention and control in healthcare settings (V.1.0). 2020.
‡‡Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD) (Updated SEPD recommendations on infection by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus).
FFP2, filtering facepiece rating 2; FFP3, filtering facepiece rating 3; PAPR, powered air-purifying respirator; PPE, personal protective equipment.
Patient screening undoubtedly is the foremost step at preventing nosocomial transmission; timely detection allows postponement of non-urgent procedures until the infection has resolved, significantly reducing transmission risk to patients and staff. However, the median incubation time of the virus is 5.1 days but can extend to 14 days (99th percentile), meanwhile patients remain asymptomatic or have subclinical symptoms and may be infectious.5 6 This limits screening protocols reliant on symptomatology. GI symptoms of COVID-19 are also non-specific. Travel history becomes limited when COVID-19 becomes more rampant in local communities so contact screening for exposure to individuals who have symptoms of COVID-19 may be more useful. Nonetheless, data on the accuracy of question-based screening tools were not identified.
Current limitations of screening place greater importance on risk management strategies postprocedure. Detecting ‘false negatives’ that slip through processes allows for the identification of HCWs and patients with infection risk after exposure to asymptomatic or subclinical carriers in the viral incubation period at the time of endoscopy. A robust contact screening programme is then necessary to contain the spread of COVID-19 among exposed staff and patient contacts. Only one guideline identified in our review has advised on postprocedure patient follow-up on day 7 and day 14 by telephone.7
No evidence of SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2 transmission through endoscopy was identified. SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated in gastric, duodenal and rectal biopsies, and faecal viral RNA is detectable in half of all COVID-19 patients although there is a poor correlation to GI symptoms.8 9 Nonetheless, reports may surface in the future and suspicion for faecal-oral transmission should remain high. US and UK guidelines regarded lower endoscopy as low risk and therefore were less stringent with PPEs compared with China or Singapore (table 2). We have erred on the side of caution because the microbial contamination of surroundings after lower endoscopy has been reported.10 11 Differences in recommendations may also have been influenced by resource availability and health policies.
In our experience, resource allocation for staff education, decontamination and management of the physical and mental well-being of HCWs were also crucial. In conclusion, better evidence is needed to inform current practice. A postprocedure risk management programme can help prevent the nosocomial and community spread of SARS-CoV-2 and should not be neglected.
Acknowledgments
JO is supported by the W.D. Armstrong Doctoral Fellowship from Cambridge University and a development grant from the National University of Singapore.
Footnotes
Contributors: Concept: JO, data curation and intepretation: JO, YYD and GBC, writing: JO and YYD, critical revisions: YYD.
Funding: JO is supported by a development grant (AY2019/2020) from the National University of Singapore which made this work possible.
Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS or the Department of Health.
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Patient consent for publication: Not required.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
References
- 1. Zhou P, Huang Z, Xiao Y, et al. Protecting Chinese healthcare workers while combating the 2019 novel coronavirus. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2020:1–4. 10.1017/ice.2020.60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. SWX O, TanYK CPY, et al. Air, surface environmental, and personal protective equipment contamination by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from a symptomatic patient. JAMA 2020. [Epub ahead of print: 4 Mar 2020]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med 2020. 10.1056/NEJMc2004973. [Epub ahead of print: 17 Mar 2020]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Gou SM, Yin T, Xiong JX, et al. [Treatment of pancreatic diseases and prevention of infection during outbreak of 2019 coronavirus disease]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2020;58:E006. 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20200224-00123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lauer SA, Grantz KH, Bi Q, et al. The incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: estimation and application. Ann Intern Med 2020. 10.7326/M20-0504. [Epub ahead of print: 10 Mar 2020]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Li R, Pei S, Chen B, et al. Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV2). Science 2020;6:eabb3221 10.1126/science.abb3221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Repici A, Maselli R, Colombo M, et al. Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak: what the department of endoscopy should know. Gastrointest Endosc 2020. 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Xiao F, Tang M, Zheng X, et al. Evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS-CoV-2. Gastroenterology 2020. 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ong J, Young BE, Ong S. COVID-19 in gastroenterology: a clinical perspective. Gut 2020;69:1144–5. 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Vavricka SR, Tutuian R, Imhof A, et al. Air suctioning during colon biopsy forceps removal reduces bacterial air contamination in the endoscopy suite. Endoscopy 2010;42:736–41. 10.1055/s-0030-1255615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Johnston ER, Habib-Bein N, Dueker JM, et al. Risk of bacterial exposure to the endoscopist’s face during endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2019;89:818–24. 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]