Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 11.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2020 Mar 11;579(7798):240–244. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2069-3

Extended data Figure 4. Ruthenium isotope plots illustrating systematic compositional differences between enstatite (EC), ordinary (OC) and CI carbonaceous chondrites (CI), modern mantle and pre-late veneer mantle in comparison to mixing lines calculated between the modern mantle composition and isotopic variations caused by variable contributions of s-process Ru nuclides, a fissiogenic Ru component, and variations of nuclear field-shift induced isotope fractionations.

Extended data Figure 4

(a) Ruthenium isotope data for the Eoarchean mantle of SW Greenland, the modern mantle, and ordinary, enstatite and CI carbonaceous chondrites in comparison to a mixing line calculated between the composition of the modern mantle (ε102Ru = ε100Ru = 0) and an s-process component34 (dashed line), and the slope calculated for a nuclear field shift-induced (NSF) fractionation51 (black solid line). (b) Ruthenium isotope composition of the Eoarchean mantle in comparison to mixing lines calculated between the composition of the modern mantle (ε96Ru = ε100Ru = 0) and a fissiogenic Ru component53 (dotted line), an s-process component34 (dashed line), and the slope calculated for nuclear field shift-induced (NSF) isotope fraction51 (solid black line).