Skip to main content
Transplantation Direct logoLink to Transplantation Direct
letter
. 2020 Apr 9;6(5):e546. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000992

Peripheral Endothelial Function as a Marker of Systemic Vasodilation in End-stage Liver Disease: Results of a Pilot Study

Navine Nasser-Ghodsi 1, Matthew F Plevak 2, Ross A Dierkhising 2, Mounika Angirekula 1, Manhal Izzy 1, Amir Lerman 3, Kymberly D Watt 1,
PMCID: PMC7213609  PMID: 32548240

Patients waitlisted for liver transplant with refractory complications of portal hypertension may not be well served by model of end-stage liver disease sodium score (MELD-Na) scores. Portal hypertension is the result of increased hepatic vascular resistance aggravated by the interplay between vasoactive mediators.1 Bedsides, measurement reflecting peripheral vasodilation may help to identify these cirrhotic patients at higher risk for worse outcomes.

The EndoPAT test is a noninvasive device that captures endothelial function using peripheral arterial tonometry in response to reactive hyperemia and correlates this to an index, the reactive hyperemia index (RHI).2 Low RHI measure represents vasoconstriction associated with atherosclerotic disease. A higher than normal RHI may suggest a vasodilatory state. We conducted a pilot study to compare RHI in patients with end-stage liver disease to normal control population to determine if a vasodilatory state can be measured in cirrhosis. In addition, the RHI was assessed in relation to complications of portal hypertension.

This was a prospective study, approved by the Institutional Review Board, of patients with chronic end-stage liver disease listed for primary, single organ, liver transplantation. Controls from a general population dataset were retrospectively identified and matched 2:1 for age (±5 y) and gender.3 Complications of portal hypertension were included if documented in the patient history or by physical or imaging examination findings at the time of the EndoPAT testing. A history of a >3 therapeutic paracentesis or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for an indication of refractory ascites or bleeding was also determined. In a fasting state using EndoPAT 2000 (Itamar Medical Inc., Israel), a finger probe placed on the middle finger with a blood pressure cuff on the proximal arm inflated to 60 mm Hg above baseline systolic pressure for 5 minutes. On cuff deflation, reactive hyperemia occurs resulting in vasodilatation. The RHI, a ratio of signal after cuff deflation with baseline was calculated through computer algorithms. Associations of variables with RHI in its continuous form were done using univariate linear regression models using a 2-tailed t-test. Comparison of the sample with matched controls was done using univariate conditional logistic regression models.

One hundred fifteen patients with mean age 54.8 (±10.4) and 59.1% male gender were matched 2:1 to general population patients. In cirrhotic patients, ascites was noted in 91 (79%) and varices in 93 (81%, 33 with bleeding history). Of 91, 15 patients with ascites had a history of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Mean RHI is demonstrated in Figure 1. RHI correlated with ascites (mean RHI 0.36 higher for those with ascites, 95% CI 0.07-0.64, P = 0.014). RHI >2 was associated with SBP (odds ratio, 3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-16.13; P = 0.041). There was no association with varices or variceal bleeding (P = 0.633 and P = 0.446, respectively). Sixty-seven patients underwent successful liver transplantation, and 20 patients died without transplant. Ascites complicated 19/20 (95%) patients who died, with 2/20 (10%) experiencing significant worsening of their ascites within 30 days of death. Three of the patients who died had a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for refractory ascites before the death with varying control of ascites. Univariate Cox regression model did not show a statistically increased risk of death related to ascites (hazard ratio, 2.66; 95% CI, 0.61-11.54; P = 0.190) nor RHI (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.60-2.16; P = 0.692). The cause of death for patients who died on the waiting list was varied and included sepsis and/or end-stage liver disease (9), cardiopulmonary (3), trauma/bleeding (1), hypoglycemia (1), and complications of malignancy (2). The cause of death was unknown for 4 patients.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Median RHI for the general population compared to patients with or without ascites and with or without SBP. RHI, reactive hyperemia index; SBP, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

This pilot study demonstrated a potential relationship between higher RHI values and ascites/SBP. Patients with refractory ascites are often more ill than the MELD-Na score reflects. This data opens the door to further studies evaluating RHI as an additional bedside measure possibly reflecting portal hypertension complications beyond the MELD-Na score. Further larger studies into combinations of MELD–Na with RHI to reflect mortality risk are warranted.

Footnotes

Published online 9 April, 2020.

N.N.-G participated in data collection, analysis, and writing of the paper. M.F.P. participated in research design, data analysis, and writing of the paper. R.A.D. participated in research design, data analysis, and writing of the paper. M.A. participated in data collection. M.I. participated in data collection and writing of the paper. A.L. participated in research design and performance of the research. K.D.W. participated in research design, performance of the research, data analysis, and writing of the paper.

The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Iwakiri Y, Groszmann RJ. The hyperdynamic circulation of chronic liver diseases: from the patient to the molecule. Hepatology. 2006; 43(2 Suppl 1):S121–S131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bonetti PO, Pumper GM, Higano ST, et al. Noninvasive identification of patients with early coronary atherosclerosis by assessment of digital reactive hyperemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44:2137–2141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li J, Flammer AJ, Lennon RJ, et al. Comparison of the effect of the metabolic syndrome and multiple traditional cardiovascular risk factors on vascular function. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012; 87:968–975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Transplantation Direct are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES